Download PDF File Campsite Report 20-26
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Urban Dwellers and Neighborhood Nature: Exploring Urban Residents' Connection to Place, Community, and Environment
URBAN DWELLERS AND NEIGHBORHOOD NATURE: EXPLORING URBAN RESIDENTS' CONNECTION TO PLACE, COMMUNITY, AND ENVIRONMENT by SARAH P. CHURCH BMUS, The University of Idaho, 1996 MUP, The University of Utah, 2007 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Planning) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2013 © Sarah P. Church, 2013 Abstract Urban residents, in part due to issues of urban form and lifestyle choice, have become both physically and cognitively disconnected from the environment and natural processes – a disconnection that has contributed to decisions that have led to over consumption of natural resources and degradation of Earth. The form of the built environment has contributed to this separation, with city development embedded within infrastructures of concrete and pavement. Further, there is little attention paid to smaller scale integration of nature at the neighborhood level that might allow for frequent resident contact and activity. Today, whether in growth or decline, cities are faced with regulatory obligations and crumbling infrastructure. These issues are compounded by the pressing need to address sustainable development and resilience in the face of uncertainty around climate change and the need for reduced oil use. Incremental urban restructuring of neighborhoods through planning and designing to the specifics of local ecology (place-based design) has the potential to restore a balance between urban areas and natural systems. I therefore studied how urban residents perceive and interact with these systems in order to answer the question: How does active involvement in Portland’s Tabor to the River watershed health program foster place-based awareness and environmental learning? This dissertation is an exploratory qualitative case study undertaken in Portland, Oregon in which I conducted 42 semi-structured interviews of community members and 14 experts. -
District Background
DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%). -
Download the PDX Celebrate It’S Two Year Anniversary on June 7 at 6:30 Pm
Our Where’s Growing Early 28th Ave. Q Revolution Newspaper Year Page 14 Page 8 Page 3 JUNE SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2017 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 28 No 6 Portland, OR Infill on Steroids Gains State Traction: Riles Residents BY MIDGE PIERCE and old. But opponents say the Oregon A bill known as a “Build Baby Build” Home Builders Association (OHBA) legislative bill under the idea of addressing and others twisted it into a bill that over- emergency housing statewide is fueling rides local zoning and undermines city what critics call a widespread assault controls. The bill would allow building to on Oregon cities’ self-determination maximum density and heights potentially and livability. Adding insult, the bill is disregarding critical local planning tools barreling through the state legislature like discretionary design reviews. without adequate public hearing. As outrage mounted last month at House Bill 2007 would essentially an informational meeting in Salem, House Overview of the proposed cascading soaking pools between reservoirs 5 and 6. eliminate single family residential Speaker Tina Kotek slammed opponents as Designed by Jennifer Moran neighborhoods by making multi-plex infill racist NIMBYS. Arriving late to advocate housing mandatory across the state. The for the “high-yield” housing bill she Mt. Tabor Park Thermal Baths bill would permit duplexes and ADUs sponsored, she condemned “race-based everywhere in cities and towns of at least housing policies” and said opposition is An Idea for Preserving the Reservoirs, Creating 2500 residents. “grounded in Nimbyism” by well-heeled Energy, and Raising Revenue Critics call it a stealth bill that is residents using discriminatory practices Infill inflation modeled after Portland’s that restrict others from building wealth BY AMY PETERSON PSU SCHOOL OF ARCHI- in 2006, the city cannot use the open controversial Residential Infill Project and power. -
Sub-Area: Southeast
PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources. -
MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36 -
Histortrees! Trees Are
activities. Ask them how old they think those Histortrees! trees are. When do they think they were Grade Level planted? Who do they think planted them? 1st - 5th grade What do they think the neighborhood looked Time Frame like when they were planted? Were there cars 1 - 2 hours or did people ride around on horses? Were the Curriculum Areas roads paved yet? Can they imagine what Social studies, history, art, language arts, Portland looked like 100 years ago? 200 years reading comprehension ago? Tell the students that they are going to be learning about heritage trees. Ask them if The Project anyone knows what a Heritage Tree is. Ask Think about the trees we saw in the first activity. them if they know what heritage is. Some Who planted those trees? What did the words related to heritage are: tradition, history, neighborhood look like when those trees were historic meaning, or ‘handed down from the planted? How has it changed? The City of past.’ These words and phrases may help the Portland’s Parks and Recreation Heritage Tree students understand that heritage is something Program protects trees that are special for their with historical value or historical meaning. “age size, type, historical associations and Inform the students that there are hundreds of horticultural value.” Do you know any trees heritage trees in Portland. Can they think of that fit this description? This project will any reason why a tree would become a introduce historical knowledge and the heritage tree? Hint: A heritage tree is a tree concept of heritage trees. -
Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossings: Lessons Learned
Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossings: Lessons Learned Prepared by: Rory Renfro Portland State University Masters of Urban and Regional Planning Field Area Paper June 2007 Acknowledgements Todd Boulanger, City of Vancouver, Washington Basil Christopher, Oregon Department of Transportation Jennifer Dill, Portland State University (first FAP reader) Carley Francis, Washington State Department of Transportation Young Park, TriMet David Roth, City of Eugene, Oregon Jim Strathman, Portland State University (second FAP reader) Steve Yates, City of Portland, Oregon ii Table of Contents Introduction: Why are pedestrian/bicycle overcrossings important?.......... 1 Purpose of this Study……………………………………………………………………. 2 Background Literature................................................................................. 2 Federal Publications……………………………………………………………………... 2 State Publications………………………………………………………………………... 2 Other Publications……………………………………………………………................ 3 Overcrossings Evaluated for this Study……………………………………………. 3 Overcrossing Inventory Process…………………………………………………………. 3 Data Collection Challenges……………………………………………………………... 3 Location Elements……………………………………………………………………….. 4 Pedestrian/Bicycle Destinations and Desired Routes…………………………………... 4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Destinations………………………………………………... 4 Walking and Bicycling Routes………………………………………………………. 7 Using an Overcrossing versus Crossing At-Grade……………………………………... 8 Overcrossings within the Overall Pedestrian/Bicycle Network………………………... 9 Shared Use Paths……………………………………………………………………. -
Park Tree Inventory Findings
Tree Summit 2019 PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Agenda 9:00am – 9:10am Welcome Jeff Ramsey, Science and Policy Specialist, PP&R Urban Forestry 9:15 am – 10:00 am Results from Portland’s First Inventory of Neighborhood Park Trees Bryn Davis and Bianca Dolan, PP&R Urban Forestry 10:05 am – 10:20 am Canaries in the Coal Mine: Studying urban trees reveals climate impacts on native forests Aaron Ramirez, Professor of Biology, Reed College 10:25 am – 10:40 am Thuja plicata, Hakuna Matata? The Mystery of Western Redcedar Decline in the Pacific Northwest Christine Buhl, Forest Entomologist, Oregon Department of Forestry 10:45 am – 11:00 am Break 11:00 am – 11:15 am Art and Activism in the Urban Forest: The Tree Emergency Response Team Ashley Meyer, Elisabeth Art Center 11:15 am – 11:30 am Film Screening: 82nd and Verdant Filmmaker James Krzmarzick and Dave Hedberg of the Canopy Stories Film Project 11:35 am – 11:45 am Bill Naito Community Trees Award Ceremony Jenn Cairo, City Forester, PP&R Urban Forestry 11:50 am – Noon Growing Portland’s Future Forest Together Angie DiSalvo, Science and Outreach Supervisor, PP&R Urban Forestry Noon – 1:00pm LunchPORTLANDPARKS.ORG and Breakout | Commissioner Session Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Hamilton Park PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Alberta Park PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena -
Reserve a Park for Your Picnic
Reserve a Park for Your Picnic Making reservations, policies, insurance, and more Prices and policies within are valid for permits booked from February 18 - June 30, 2020. GENERAL INFORMATION Picnic permits allow you to bring in the following items Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) has 200+ parks and for your event - gardens, and many of these locations have individual • 1-2 tables and/or 1-2 pop-up canopies (no larger picnic tables available for use on a first-come, first-served than 10’x10’, no stakes are allowed in a park) basis. When there is a grouping of three or more tables, • a residential-style barbecue grill they are often reservable. To guarantee your picnic • small speakers heard only within immediate date and location, it is recommended that you make a picnic area picnic reservation in advance. For your convenience, this Special Use Permits are required when - brochure lists picnic sites and fees. Parks not included in • there is BYOB beer and wine present and more than 49 this brochure may be reserved under a Special Use Permit. people of any age • you’d like to provide alcohol (hosted, catered, kegs, etc.) Picnic permits cover the following type of events - • you’d like to bring items not included above (i.e. • A gathering of family/friends or company/ volleyball nets, inflatables/bounce house, additional organization tables or canopies) • A single reserved picnic facility without exceeding • you’d like to drive a vehicle on the sidewalk to pick up or the stated site capacity drop off items for your event • When event attendance is free. -
9 Pm 501 SE Hawthorne Blvd. Buckman
Our Ramen Vision Gill Landry Rides 29th Time Zero a Dark Horse Year Page 12 Page 2 Page 18 APRIL SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2018 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 29 No 4 Portland, OR Council Ponders URM Retrofits BY GABRIEL FRAYNE JR. public information officer for BEM. That standard is known as “collapse The city-wide dilemma concerning risk reduction,” which would require the how to mandate seismic retrofits for Port- majority of URM owners to brace parapets land’s nearly two thousand unreinforced (sections of exterior wall that rise above masonry buildings (URMs) without forc- the roof line), cornices and chimneys, and ing their demise will take a step towards attach roofs and floors to the walls within a policy resolution when the issue comes a fifteen-year time line. A higher standard before the city council later this month. of retrofit would be required for “essential” This phase of a nearly three-year buildings such as utilities, schools and hos- long process follows the release of a final pitals. report by the URM Policy Committee who Although the standard falls short of makes a series of recommendations for ret- the “life safety” standard for all URMs the rofitting different categories of buildings BEM had advocated for previously, the depending on their use. recommendations remain problematic for The council will be hearing from a many URM owners. variety of community stakeholders, which According to Kathy Rogers, co-chair includes URM building owners. Whatever of Save Portland Buildings (and, with her mandate eventually results from the coun- husband Marc, the owner of the Morlee Larry Kirby on his elliptical bike cil’s action will only relate to commercial Court apartments on Hawthorne Blvd.), buildings, churches, schools and other “Our stance is that we want to have the saf- public buildings and multi-family apart- est buildings possible, but we have to be Around the World on the ment buildings. -
Ten Steps to Pesticide-Free Parks: How to Create Healthy Public Spaces in Your Community
Ten Steps to Pesticide-free Parks: How to Create Healthy Public Spaces in Your Community Arbor Lodge is one of Portland, Oregon’s first pesticide-free parks. www.pesticide.org 0 Table of Contents Introduction: Ten Steps To Pesticide-free Parks…2 1. Connect With Others Who Share Your Interest In Pesticide-free Parks…3 2. Set Goals And Clarify What The Group Wants…4 3. Identify And Meet With Parks Staff To Measure Support For Your Goals…5 4. Gather More Support From The Community To Gain Visibility…6 5. Launch A Campaign To Influence The Decision Makers …7 6. Once The Program Concept Is Approved, Work With Parks Staff To Design A Program That Has Community And Agency Support…9 7. Put The Program In Writing…10 8. Train and Support Your Program Volunteers…11 9. Plan A Community Event With Parks Staff To Kick Off The Program And Celebrate!...12 10. Moving Forward With Your Program…13 Appendix A-J …15 1 Introduction: Ten Steps to Pesticide-free Parks The pesticide-free parks movement is growing! People want places they can go with their children and pets where they won’t be exposed to pesticides. There are new pesticide-free parks programs sprouting up all over the northwest! Just five years ago, only a few cities in the northwest had established pesticide-free parks programs. Now at least 17 cities in the northwest have parks that are managed without the use of any pesticides — including insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. As more and more community members become interested in pesticide-free public spaces, parks departments are responding by designating parks where vegetation is managed without herbicides. -
The Oregonian Portland Agrees to Sell Hydroelectric Power to PGE For
The Oregonian Portland Agrees to Sell Hydroelectric Power to PGE for undisclosed Amount By Jessica Floum August 30, 2017 Portland will sell hydroelectric power from a city-owned plant at the Bull Run watershed to Portland General Electric in an opaque deal that could lose taxpayers money over the next three years in an effort to make money later. In the past, the city paid PGE to maintain and operate its hydroelectric facility then sold the power to the utility. The deal netted the city an average profit of $300,000 a year over the last four years. PGE's contract ends Thursday, however, and the utility told Portland months ago that it no longer wishes to operate the plant. On Wednesday, the Portland City Council unanimously approved three contracts needed to operate the plant and transmit power to the grid, including a deal to sell power to PGE so long as the city does not tell the public how much PGE will pay. A city risk analysis said the deal could yield the city $3 million to $8.5 million over the next 15 years. But it could also lose the city as much as $2 million over the next three years if the city has extremely dry weather. Portland is considering putting taxpayer dollars at risk to sell hydroelectric power, and it won't tell the public exactly how much it stands to make -- or lose -- from the arrangement. Water Bureau officials insisted that agreeing to keep how much PGE will pay quiet was necessary to get the utility to agree to a deal that was in the best interest of the city.