Ten Steps to Pesticide-Free Parks: How to Create Healthy Public Spaces in Your Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ten Steps to Pesticide-Free Parks: How to Create Healthy Public Spaces in Your Community Ten Steps to Pesticide-free Parks: How to Create Healthy Public Spaces in Your Community Arbor Lodge is one of Portland, Oregon’s first pesticide-free parks. www.pesticide.org 0 Table of Contents Introduction: Ten Steps To Pesticide-free Parks…2 1. Connect With Others Who Share Your Interest In Pesticide-free Parks…3 2. Set Goals And Clarify What The Group Wants…4 3. Identify And Meet With Parks Staff To Measure Support For Your Goals…5 4. Gather More Support From The Community To Gain Visibility…6 5. Launch A Campaign To Influence The Decision Makers …7 6. Once The Program Concept Is Approved, Work With Parks Staff To Design A Program That Has Community And Agency Support…9 7. Put The Program In Writing…10 8. Train and Support Your Program Volunteers…11 9. Plan A Community Event With Parks Staff To Kick Off The Program And Celebrate!...12 10. Moving Forward With Your Program…13 Appendix A-J …15 1 Introduction: Ten Steps to Pesticide-free Parks The pesticide-free parks movement is growing! People want places they can go with their children and pets where they won’t be exposed to pesticides. There are new pesticide-free parks programs sprouting up all over the northwest! Just five years ago, only a few cities in the northwest had established pesticide-free parks programs. Now at least 17 cities in the northwest have parks that are managed without the use of any pesticides — including insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. As more and more community members become interested in pesticide-free public spaces, parks departments are responding by designating parks where vegetation is managed without herbicides. Weeds in these parks are managed with a variety of techniques including hand pulling, flame weeding, and mulching by parks staff or volunteers. In addition to reducing the pesticides used in public spaces, pesticide-free parks serve as an educational model of pesticide-free practices people can use in their own homes and gardens while still managing weeds. Are you ready for pesticide-free parks in your community? Are you ready to work with parks staff to establish places where you can go with your children and pets where you won’t be exposed to pesticides? The process takes a firm commitment from dedicated individuals but is well worth the effort. In this report, the Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides (NCAP) has outlined 10 steps you can take to create a pesticide-free parks program in your community. Kids and pets can enjoy pesticide-free parks without exposure to pesticides. 2 1. CONNECT WITH OTHERS WHO SHARE YOUR INTEREST IN PESTICIDE-FREE PARKS Identify people in your community who are ready to take a leadership role in creating a pesticide-free parks program by having a booth at community events, talking with people who use the park, thinking of your own friends, or connecting with a school or church near a park you have in mind. Create a committee or group of a few people who are ready to take leadership on the issue. These people might be willing to attend meetings with city staff, connect with neighborhood associations, coordinate a kickoff event, or do outreach at other local events. Find a leadership role that fits each person. Also, identify people who aren’t necessarily leaders, but who are willing to help with the effort. These people can help by working at outreach events, distributing petitions in support of pesticide-free parks, preparing mailings or distributing flyers. Once the parks are designated pesticide-free, they can also help by pulling weeds, if this is needed. This volunteer takes a break to appreciate her pesticide-free park. 3 2. SET GOALS AND CLARIFY WHAT THE GROUP WANTS Gather with your group of leaders to get clarity on what the group wants. Will you start with a few pesticide-free parks or have the city declare all parks as pesticide-free zones? NCAP recommends starting small for success and adding more parks in time. Do you have a particular park or parks in mind? Small neighborhood parks that are used by kids are a great starting point. Large parks with large natural areas and/or invasive species can be difficult to manage with volunteer efforts or by parks staff with limited resources. Parks with ball fields can also be difficult to manage because these large open areas will need to be weeded by hand. Volunteers using hand tools maintain this pesticide-free ball field. Will you offer to recruit and engage volunteers, or will you ask the parks staff to manage the parks without pesticides using their staff resources? There are pros and cons to both ways. When parks employees manage the parks, they take more ownership for the program. However, many parks departments don’t currently have the resources to have staff manage weeds without pesticides, so engaging volunteers can be a good solution. Engaging volunteers involves 4 people in their parks and encourages community service, but it also takes a lot of time to recruit and supervise people who are willing to pull weeds in the parks. NCAP recommends starting with a goal of having parks staff maintain the park(s), but if this isn’t feasible, you may want to offer to recruit and/or coordinate volunteers who will help with weeding. 3. IDENTIFY AND MEET WITH PARKS STAFF TO MEASURE SUPPORT FOR YOUR GOALS Find out who would be responsible for implementing a pesticide-free parks program within the parks department and contact them to set up a meeting. This will usually be the parks director in a smaller city or the parks maintenance manager in a larger city. It’s important to have more than one community member attend this meeting so the person you’re meeting with understands this is not a one-person effort, but that a large part of the community wants pesticide-free parks. Keep the group at this first meeting small so you don’t overwhelm the staff person you are meeting with, as s/he may be defensive. Approach this meeting with a friendly attitude to learn more about whom you will be working with. Remember, the term “pesticides” includes herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. Most parks departments in the northwest don’t use insecticides or fungicides, so the focus of this conversation will be focused on herbicides and controlling weeds. The primary goal of this first meeting is to determine the level of support you have from the parks department. Is the staff opposed or receptive to the idea of implementing a pesticide-free parks program? If staff members aren’t supportive, they will need some convincing, so providing information and examples will be helpful. Weeds in this shrub bed are controlled with mulch made of wood chips. 5 NCAP has created several reports that will be useful in educating and encouraging the parks department’s participation. For example, a report titled, “Pesticide-free Parks: It’s Time!” includes convincing and important reasons to establish a pesticide-free parks program. Providing examples will help parks staff to understand that the movement is growing and will encourage them to join. The second goal of this meeting is to learn who ultimately makes the decision about establishing pesticide-free parks. Is this the parks director, the parks maintenance manager, the parks board, or the city council? A third goal for the meeting is to determine what is needed to establish a program. Will you need to demonstrate that the community is supportive? If so, let the staff you are meeting with know you’ll be gathering petition signatures to provide to the person or elected body who will make the decision. Find out if they would like you to provide community input about which parks could be good starting points. 4. GATHER MORE SUPPORT FROM THE COMMUNITY TO GAIN VISIBILITY In order to demonstrate support for the program, gather names of people who are supportive of pesticide-free parks. You can use the sample petition in Appendix A. Petitions are a great way to demonstrate to decision-makers that the community wants pesticide-free parks. They are also a great way to get input about which parks people would most like to see designated pesticide- NCAP’s Pesticide-free Parks Program free. Another way to gather input Coordinator, Megan Kemple, talks with the public at an outreach event to gather support at community events is to set up an for Portland’s pesticide-free parks program. easel with a map of all of the city parks. Ask people to place a 6 colored pushpin on the park they would most like to see designated pesticide- free. This can give you a good visual idea of which parks are a priority. Gather names of people who want to help with this effort. You can recruit volunteers at local community events such as Earth Day celebrations or natural living festivals. Circulate volunteer sign-up sheets to neighbors or friends. Make an announcement or presentation at a neighborhood association meeting and/or write an article for the neighborhood newsletter. You can use the sign-up sheets in Appendix B to gather names and contact information for these new volunteers. These people can help by distributing petitions, distributing flyers, writing letters, sending emails or making phone calls to whoever will make the decision to establish a program, or in the case of some volunteer-run programs, they may help by pulling weeds in the parks. You might also want to gather the support and/or endorsement of influential individuals such as physicians, city councilors, or business owners.
Recommended publications
  • Urban Dwellers and Neighborhood Nature: Exploring Urban Residents' Connection to Place, Community, and Environment
    URBAN DWELLERS AND NEIGHBORHOOD NATURE: EXPLORING URBAN RESIDENTS' CONNECTION TO PLACE, COMMUNITY, AND ENVIRONMENT by SARAH P. CHURCH BMUS, The University of Idaho, 1996 MUP, The University of Utah, 2007 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Planning) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2013 © Sarah P. Church, 2013 Abstract Urban residents, in part due to issues of urban form and lifestyle choice, have become both physically and cognitively disconnected from the environment and natural processes – a disconnection that has contributed to decisions that have led to over consumption of natural resources and degradation of Earth. The form of the built environment has contributed to this separation, with city development embedded within infrastructures of concrete and pavement. Further, there is little attention paid to smaller scale integration of nature at the neighborhood level that might allow for frequent resident contact and activity. Today, whether in growth or decline, cities are faced with regulatory obligations and crumbling infrastructure. These issues are compounded by the pressing need to address sustainable development and resilience in the face of uncertainty around climate change and the need for reduced oil use. Incremental urban restructuring of neighborhoods through planning and designing to the specifics of local ecology (place-based design) has the potential to restore a balance between urban areas and natural systems. I therefore studied how urban residents perceive and interact with these systems in order to answer the question: How does active involvement in Portland’s Tabor to the River watershed health program foster place-based awareness and environmental learning? This dissertation is an exploratory qualitative case study undertaken in Portland, Oregon in which I conducted 42 semi-structured interviews of community members and 14 experts.
    [Show full text]
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • FRG17 Online-1.Pdf
    Tualatin Dance Center - 8487 SW Warm Krayon Kids Musical Theater Co. - 817 12th, ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT Springs, Tualatin; 503-691-2414; facebook.com. Oregon City; 503-656-6099; krayonkids.org. Musical theater featuring local children. ART GALLERIES in camps and classes, plus supplies for at-home projects. Ladybug Theater - 8210 SE 13th; 502-232- & EXHIBITS DRAMA / THEATER 2346; ladybugtheater.com. Wed. morning Vine Gogh Artist Bar & Studio - 11513 SW Pa- Northwest Children’s Theater performances for young children with audience Oregon Historical Society cific Hwy, Tigard; 971-266-8983; vinegogh.com. participation. and School Visit our new permanent exhibit History Public painting classes for all ages. Hub where families can explore the topic of NWCT produces award-winning children’s Lakewood Theatre Company - 368 S State, diversity through fun, hands-on interactives. Young Art Lessons - 7441 SW Bridgeport; 503- theater productions and is one of the largest Lake Oswego; 503-635-3901; lakewood-center. With puzzles, touch screen activities, and board 336-0611; 9585 SW Washington Sq; 503-352- theater schools on the West Coast. NWCT org. Live theater and classes for kids and adults. games, History Hub asks students to consider 5965; youngartusa.co. keeps the magic of live performance accessible questions like “Who is an Oregonian?,” and and affordable to over 65,000 families annually Portland Revels - 1515 SW Morrison Street; “How can you make Oregon a great place for with a mission to educate, entertain, and enrich 503-274-4654; portlandrevels.org. Seasonal everyone?” the lives of young audiences. performances feature song, dance, story and DANCE ritual of the past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
    View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff .
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDX Celebrate It’S Two Year Anniversary on June 7 at 6:30 Pm
    Our Where’s Growing Early 28th Ave. Q Revolution Newspaper Year Page 14 Page 8 Page 3 JUNE SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2017 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 28 No 6 Portland, OR Infill on Steroids Gains State Traction: Riles Residents BY MIDGE PIERCE and old. But opponents say the Oregon A bill known as a “Build Baby Build” Home Builders Association (OHBA) legislative bill under the idea of addressing and others twisted it into a bill that over- emergency housing statewide is fueling rides local zoning and undermines city what critics call a widespread assault controls. The bill would allow building to on Oregon cities’ self-determination maximum density and heights potentially and livability. Adding insult, the bill is disregarding critical local planning tools barreling through the state legislature like discretionary design reviews. without adequate public hearing. As outrage mounted last month at House Bill 2007 would essentially an informational meeting in Salem, House Overview of the proposed cascading soaking pools between reservoirs 5 and 6. eliminate single family residential Speaker Tina Kotek slammed opponents as Designed by Jennifer Moran neighborhoods by making multi-plex infill racist NIMBYS. Arriving late to advocate housing mandatory across the state. The for the “high-yield” housing bill she Mt. Tabor Park Thermal Baths bill would permit duplexes and ADUs sponsored, she condemned “race-based everywhere in cities and towns of at least housing policies” and said opposition is An Idea for Preserving the Reservoirs, Creating 2500 residents. “grounded in Nimbyism” by well-heeled Energy, and Raising Revenue Critics call it a stealth bill that is residents using discriminatory practices Infill inflation modeled after Portland’s that restrict others from building wealth BY AMY PETERSON PSU SCHOOL OF ARCHI- in 2006, the city cannot use the open controversial Residential Infill Project and power.
    [Show full text]
  • BROCH-Mailer-3 PANEL Bleed
    UPnalearshkedsdoOgsfarfe-nleevear asllohweAd inrneataurs al areas. However, Portland has areas in 31 parks where dogs and their owners can exercise and i’m for the play off-leash. Some sites are fenced, others are ! unfenced with markers designating the bound - environment aries. Off-leash hours are specific to each park. NORTH SOUTHEAST Arbor Lodge Park Brentwood Park N. Bryant and Delaware SE 60th and Duke Cathedral Park Cherry Park N. Edison and Pittsburg SE 110th and Stephens Chimney Park Creston Park 9360 N. Columbia Blvd SE 44th and Powell Blvd Delta Park Laurelhurst Park Take the pledge N. Denver and MLK, Jr Blvd SE 39th and Stark ! Overlook Park Lents Park for the environment N. Fremont and Interstate SE 92nd and Holgate Portland International Raceway Lynchwood Park N. Denver and Victory Blvd SE 170th and Haig Mt Tabor Park NORTHEAST SE Lincoln, east of SE 64th Alberta Park Sellwood Riverfront Park NE 22nd and Killingsworth SE Spokane and Oaks Pkwy Argay Park Sewallcrest Park NE 141st and Failing SE 31st and Market East Holladay Park Woodstock Park NE 130th and Wasco SE 47th and Steele Fernhill Park NE 37th and Ainsworth SOUTHWEST Frazer Park Council Crest Park NE 52nd and Hassalo SW Council Crest Dr Grant Park Gabriel Park NE 33rd and U.S. Grant Place SW 45th and Vermont Irving Park Hillsdale Park NE 7th and Fremont SW 27th and Hillsdale Hwy Normandale Park Willamette Park NE 57th and Halsey SW Macadam and Nebraska Sacajawea Park NE 75th and Alberta Wilshire Park NE 33rd and Skidmore Partners: Portland Parks & Recreation, NORTHWEST Bureau of Environmental Couch Park Services, Audubon Society, NW 19th and Glisan Multnomah County Animal Wallace Park Services, and the Oregon WS 0864 Revised July 2008 Printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Area: Southeast
    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • TRN 1.14 Downtown Kenton Denver Avenue Streetscape Plan Exhibit A
    DRAFT 01.24.08 DOWNTOWN KENTON DENVER AVENUE STREETSCAPE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) Amanda Berry Tim Batog Joni Hoffman Garland Horner Rick Jacobson Jerrie Johnson Donna Lambeth-Cage Echo Leighton Larry Mills Steve Rupert Kimberly Shults Janice Thompson Jean Von Bargen Kert Wright Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Scott Batson, Portland Office of Transportation April Bertelsen, Portland Office of Transportation Nelson Chi, Portland Office of Transportation Ramon Corona, Portland Office of Transportation Jillian Detweiler, TriMet Roger Geller, Portland Office of Transportation Joe Hintz, Urban Forestry Tom Liptan, Bureau of Environmental Services Nolan Mackrill, Portland Office of Transportation Brett Kesterson, Portland Office of Transportation Dave Nunamaker, Bureau of Environmental Services Neal Robinson, Portland Office of Transportation Tod Rosinbaum, Portland Office of Transportation Chad Talbot, Portland Water Bureau Nicholas Starin, Bureau of Planning Project Team Carol Herzberg, Portland Development Commission Kate Deane, Portland Development Commission Kathryn Levine, Portland Office of Transportation Kathy Mulder, Portland Office of Transportation Tim Smith, SERA Architects Matthew Arnold, SERA Architects Allison Wildman, SERA Architects Mike Faha, GreenWorks Robin Craig, GreenWorks Shawn Kummer, GreenWorks Carol Landsman, Landsman Transportation Planning Valerie Otani, Public Art Consultant TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary, 3 Introduction, 5 Planning Process, 6 Existing Conditions, 8 Historic Commercial District, 10 Goals & Evaluation Criteria, 11 Preferred Streetscape Concept and Schematic Design, 13 Gateway Enhancements, 21 Parking & Loading, 23 Streetscape Elements, 24 Implementation, 34 Appendix, 35 Concept Design Process, 36 Meeting Notes and Survey Results, 43 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North Denver Avenue, stretching from Watts Street north to Interstate Avenue, forms the heart of the downtown Kenton business district (within the Interstate Corridor Urban Renewal Area).
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Pm 501 SE Hawthorne Blvd. Buckman
    Our Ramen Vision Gill Landry Rides 29th Time Zero a Dark Horse Year Page 12 Page 2 Page 18 APRIL SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2018 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 29 No 4 Portland, OR Council Ponders URM Retrofits BY GABRIEL FRAYNE JR. public information officer for BEM. That standard is known as “collapse The city-wide dilemma concerning risk reduction,” which would require the how to mandate seismic retrofits for Port- majority of URM owners to brace parapets land’s nearly two thousand unreinforced (sections of exterior wall that rise above masonry buildings (URMs) without forc- the roof line), cornices and chimneys, and ing their demise will take a step towards attach roofs and floors to the walls within a policy resolution when the issue comes a fifteen-year time line. A higher standard before the city council later this month. of retrofit would be required for “essential” This phase of a nearly three-year buildings such as utilities, schools and hos- long process follows the release of a final pitals. report by the URM Policy Committee who Although the standard falls short of makes a series of recommendations for ret- the “life safety” standard for all URMs the rofitting different categories of buildings BEM had advocated for previously, the depending on their use. recommendations remain problematic for The council will be hearing from a many URM owners. variety of community stakeholders, which According to Kathy Rogers, co-chair includes URM building owners. Whatever of Save Portland Buildings (and, with her mandate eventually results from the coun- husband Marc, the owner of the Morlee Larry Kirby on his elliptical bike cil’s action will only relate to commercial Court apartments on Hawthorne Blvd.), buildings, churches, schools and other “Our stance is that we want to have the saf- public buildings and multi-family apart- est buildings possible, but we have to be Around the World on the ment buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
    APPENDIX B4.2 – LAND USE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Existing Land Uses Existing land uses are shown on Figures B4.2‐1 to B4.2‐3, which include the ½‐mile study areas surrounding the potential stations as well as the ¼‐mile study areas on each side of the alignment alternatives. Segment A begins in the southern end of downtown Portland, the central city of the region, includes the South Waterfront District and extends south to the Hillsdale neighborhood. Existing land use here has been historically influenced and constrained by the presence of SW Barbur Boulevard (formerly a rail line) and the Willamette River, and more recently by the development of Interstates 5 and 205 (I‐5 and I‐205) as well as SW Naito Parkway. The northern portion of this segment is an extension of the central city (downtown) in its more densely developed blocks, and is similar in feel to other neighborhoods in the southern downtown area. The southern section of Segment A is dominated by auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. Properties on SW Barbur Boulevard are predominantly zoned for general commercial uses, and are developed with many auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. The zoning along SW Barbur Boulevard includes a mixture of commercial, open space and residential uses on the northern edge, transitioning to primarily multifamily and single‐family housing through the steep and wooded area, and then mostly low‐density commercial for the remainder of the corridor heading south to Tigard. Along SW Barbur Boulevard, existing land uses include auto‐oriented low‐ density commercial uses involving offices, personal services, and retail, followed by restaurants, apartments, auto‐specific uses (mechanics, tire and oil centers, body shops) and hotels.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan Summaries
    Capital Improvement Plan Summaries Bureau of Environmental Services Capital Program Revised Adopted Capital Plan Project Prior Years FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 5-Year Total Combined Sewer Overflow Eastside Combined Sewer Overflow System Startup Total Project Cost: 2,650,000 Area: East Dollars for Art: 0 Original Cost: 3,309,854 Objective: Mandated Project Description Add automation to the Willamette River CSO tunnel system to better manage flows during storms. Funded by bond proceeds repaid by sanitary sewer and stormwater rates. Total Expenditures 0 3,002,000 1,093,000 495,000 0 0 0 1,588,000 Net Operations and Maintenance Costs 10,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Portland Opera Permanent Parking Lot Total Project Cost: 430,000 Area: Central City Dollars for Art: 0 Original Cost: 430,000 Objective: Mandated Project Description Replacing the existing parking lot to comply with the land use requirements of the field office lease in the Portland Opera building. Funded by bond proceeds repaid by sanitary sewer and stormwater rates. Total Expenditures 0 0 277,000 0 0 0 0 277,000 Net Operations and Maintenance Costs 0 0 0 0 0 Portsmouth Force Main Odor Control Total Project Cost: 3,755,000 Area: Undetermined Dollars for Art: 0 Original Cost: 3,265,002 Objective: Mandated Project Description Construct odor treatment facility at Columbia Court south of the entrance to CBWTP. Project is designed to blend with the landscaping. It also includes minor enhancements to the bike trail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregonian Portland Agrees to Sell Hydroelectric Power to PGE For
    The Oregonian Portland Agrees to Sell Hydroelectric Power to PGE for undisclosed Amount By Jessica Floum August 30, 2017 Portland will sell hydroelectric power from a city-owned plant at the Bull Run watershed to Portland General Electric in an opaque deal that could lose taxpayers money over the next three years in an effort to make money later. In the past, the city paid PGE to maintain and operate its hydroelectric facility then sold the power to the utility. The deal netted the city an average profit of $300,000 a year over the last four years. PGE's contract ends Thursday, however, and the utility told Portland months ago that it no longer wishes to operate the plant. On Wednesday, the Portland City Council unanimously approved three contracts needed to operate the plant and transmit power to the grid, including a deal to sell power to PGE so long as the city does not tell the public how much PGE will pay. A city risk analysis said the deal could yield the city $3 million to $8.5 million over the next 15 years. But it could also lose the city as much as $2 million over the next three years if the city has extremely dry weather. Portland is considering putting taxpayer dollars at risk to sell hydroelectric power, and it won't tell the public exactly how much it stands to make -- or lose -- from the arrangement. Water Bureau officials insisted that agreeing to keep how much PGE will pay quiet was necessary to get the utility to agree to a deal that was in the best interest of the city.
    [Show full text]