Touch Down World-Renowned for Innovation in Sports Architecture, COX Is Changing the Rules of the Game Again with a Space-Age New Stadium in Melbourne
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Case Study Grocon Group
Case Study Grocon Group Case Study Grocon Group » Beyond the technology, Fujitsu has provided a real human touch. It’s not just about vision; it’s about ensuring total customer satisfaction. Fujitsu has given us the confidence to think big « Rebecca Brockett, CIO, Grocon Group The customer Grocon is the largest privately owned development, construction and investment management company in Australia. It specializes in large scale projects, be they commercial office spaces for premium clients such as ANZ and Freehills, or Public Private Partnerships such as the new Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre for the Federal and Victorian Governments. Grocon’s core values of safety, sustainability, community and innovation drive everything it does and are demonstrated through projects such as Pixel in Melbourne, currently considered the greenest building in Australia. The Challenge Grocon was looking for a cost effective and scalable solution for the agile management of IT services as part of a wider back office infrastructure renewal initiative. The existing infrastructure was THE CUSTOMER nearing the end of its lifecycle so the company was keen to look at new Country: Australia solutions that would be more flexible and cost-effective. Industry: Construction Founded: 1950s “We were looking for a partner to take us to the next level. We found Employees: 500 that partner in Fujitsu,” explains Rebecca Brockett, CIO, Grocon Group. Website: www.grocon.com “The company presented us with a radical vision and we jumped on board because innovation is part of our corporate DNA.” CHALLENGE Grocon wanted to replace its existing ageing legacy infrastructure Fujitsu suggested migrating to a cloud platform which would deliver with a more innovative approach to delivering applications in order to all the functionality Grocon needed without compromising security or reduce costs, improve productivity and increase performance. -
National Architecture Award Winners 1981 – 2019
NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS WINNERS 1981 - 2019 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARD WINNERS 1 of 81 2019 NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Yagan Square (WA) The COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Lyons in collaboration with Iredale Pedersen Hook and landscape architects ASPECT Studios COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE Dangrove (NSW) The Harry Seidler Award for Commercial Architecture Tzannes Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Commercial Architecture Breathe Architecture Private Women’s Club (VIC) National Award for Commercial Architecture Kerstin Thompson Architects EDUCATIONAL ARCHITECTURE Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Primary School (NSW) The Daryl Jackson Award for Educational Architecture BVN Braemar College Stage 1, Middle School National Award for Educational Architecture Hayball Adelaide Botanic High School (SA) National Commendation for Educational Architecture Cox Architecture and DesignInc QUT Creative Industries Precinct 2 (QLD) National Commendation for Educational Architecture KIRK and HASSELL (Architects in Association) ENDURING ARCHITECTURE Sails in the Desert (NT) National Award for Enduring Architecture Cox Architecture HERITAGE Premier Mill Hotel (WA) The Lachlan Macquarie Award for Heritage Spaceagency architects Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Heritage Breathe Architecture Flinders Street Station Façade Strengthening & Conservation National Commendation for Heritage (VIC) Lovell Chen Sacred Heart Building Abbotsford Convent Foundation -
EMPORIUM REDEVELOPMENT, LONSDALE and LITTLE BOURKE 12 April 2011 STREETS, MELBOURNE: TREE REMOVAL
Page 1 of 7 FUTURE MELBOURNE (PLANNING) Agenda Item 5.1 COMMITTEE REPORT EMPORIUM REDEVELOPMENT, LONSDALE AND LITTLE BOURKE 12 April 2011 STREETS, MELBOURNE: TREE REMOVAL Presenter: Angela Meinke, Manager Planning and Building Purpose and background 1. This matter is presented to the Committee at the request of Councillor Clarke. 2. The purpose of this report is to advise the Committee of a request by Colonial First State (CFS) to allow the removal of two street trees located within the Lonsdale Street median strip. Key issues 3. The key issue for consideration is whether the existing street trees should be retained or permitted for removal. 4. The Minister for Planning issued a planning permit for the redevelopment of the Emporium site which included the requirement to retain the historic eight storey building façade. In investigating design options to enable this it was determined by the project engineers (on the basis of safety, practicality and certainty) that an external retention system was most appropriate. This option was presented by CFS to a stakeholder group facilitated by the Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development that included the Council officers, VicRoads and the Department of Transport. CFS also engaged at this time in detailed discussions with Council officers on the approach they proposed to adopt for the retention of the façade. 5. CFS’s representatives were advised by Council’s Urban Landscapes branch that Council would consider the removal of trees if there was no viable alternative. Council officers provided advice to CFS on the value to remove each tree and the need for CFS to pay all associated costs. -
Commonwealth Property Office Fund
Commonwealth Property Office Fund Retail Entitlement Offer 18 November 2010 DETAILS OF A 1 FOR 15 NON-RENOUNCEABLE PRO-RATA ENTITLEMENT OFFER OF UNITS IN THE COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY OFFICE FUND AT AN OFFER PRICE OF $0.86 PER NEW UNIT THIS ENTITLEMENT OFFER CLOSES AT 5.00PM (AEDT) ON 8 DECEMBER 2010 This is an important document which is accompanied by an Entitlement and Acceptance Form and both documents should be read in their entirety. Please call your professional adviser or the CPA Entitlement Offer Information Line if you have any questions. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR RELEASE IN THE UNITED STATES For personal use only Responsible Entity: Commonwealth Managed Investments Limited ABN 33 084 098 180 AFSL 235384 Registered Address: Ground Floor, Tower 1, 201 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Contents 1 Chairman’s letter 1 2 Details of the Entitlement Offer 2 3 How to apply 4 4 Important information 7 5 ASX offer documents 12 – Equity raising launch announcement 12 – Investor presentation 16 – Placement and Institutional Entitlement Offer completion announcement 44 6 Glossary 46 7 Corporate directory 49 Important information This Retail Offer Booklet is not a product disclosure This Retail Offer Booklet, including the ASX statement, prospectus or other disclosure document announcements produced in it and the Entitlement and has not been lodged with ASIC. It does not and Acceptance Form do not constitute an offer contain all the information that an investor would to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any find in a product disclosure statement, prospectus or securities in the United States or in any other other disclosure document or on which an investor jurisdiction in which, or to any person to whom, would expect to make an informed decision as to such an offer or sale would not be lawful. -
Porcelanosa Lifestyle Magazine 26
lifestylePORCELANOSA ISSUE NO. 26 / 5 EUROS RAMÓN ESTEVE COOL MEDITERRANEAN CLEAR LINES LWA, NORDIC THOUGHT IN THE WORLD EIGHT BIG BRANDS THE 22ND INTERNACIONAL EXHIBITION BY PORCELANOSA GROUP KELLY HOPPEN DESIGN AS ONE OF THE FINE ARTS CARLOS JIMÉNEZ SENSIBLE ELEGANCE 8TH ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN PRIZES 2015 BY PORCELANOSA GROUP COVER PHOTO: Private swimming pool of one of the villas at the Maalifushi by COMO resort, Maldives. lifestylePORCELANOSA EDITORIAL BOARD Cristina Colonques Francisco Peris EDITORIAL Félix Balado PUBLISHER Ediciones Condé Nast S.A. MANAGING EDITOR Great expectations Sandra del Río ART & DESIGN DIRECTOR Vital R. García Tardn Porcelanosa Group closed its 8th Architecture and Interior TRANSLATORS Design Prizes as a benchmark company in the sector. On a Paloma Gil (English) Geneviève Naud (French) night lit up by the talent of architects and interior designers, Lionbridge (Russian / Polish) Asia Idiomas (Chinese) this project, showcasing eight iconic brands, was consolidated Pichamonch Pintola (Thai) as they managed to surpass their own quality and standards of COPY EDITOR Monique Fuller (English) technology for yet another year. The moving words of Belén COORDINATION Moneo – who was among the prize winners – called for Marta Sahelices (Project Coordinator) Andrea Morán (Print Edition) passion, creativity and the growing involvement of women in Marisa Santamaría and Gema Monroy (Features) the world of architecture. PHOTOGRAPHERS Eight brands showed their best new products at Porcelanosa Esmeralda Álvarez nd PRODUCTION Group’s 22 International Exhibition: an unmissable event Francisco Morote (Director) Rosana Vicente that has made Villarreal the sector’s operational hub, with Juan Ignacio Bocos professionals, artists, designers and businesspeople from all Fernando Bohúa RESEARCH over the world. -
AAMI PARK the Roof Structure Allows Internal Space to Be More Efficiently Used, with Unobstructed Sight Lines
AAMI PARK The roof structure allows internal space to be more efficiently used, with unobstructed sight lines. The roof geometry is also ARCHITECTURAL STEEL DESIGN AWARD 2010 driven by the requirement to maximise natural light and NATIONAL AND STATE WINNER (VIC + TAS) ventilation, both for spectator comfort and the health of the STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING STEEL DESIGN AWARD 2010 playing surface. NATIONAL AND STATE WINNER (VIC + TAS) The structural concept and geometry allows the roof to be ARUP, Cox Architects + Planners delivered with approximately 50% of the steel required, compared to similar stadium roofs. Further, the shell concept allows the roof to work with a single layer of structure, where the façade is fixed directly to the structural frame, eliminating secondary steelwork. Parametric modelling allowed variations in geometry to be tested quickly to provide the most structurally efficient form. The roof structure is formed from 273mm diameter tubes, rigidly connected to form shells. Each shell is bounded by a 508mm diameter edge and front edge members, and a 457mm diameter back edge member. The structure is clad in a combination of aluminium, glass and louvres. The roof structure also supports four light towers on the corners of the stadium, with additional lighting fixtures and services suspended below the main canopy. Architectural merit AAMI Park (The Melbourne Rectangular Stadium) is a purpose built rectangular pitch stadium designed to accommodate 31,000 fans, and will host soccer, rugby league and rugby union matches. The stadium is a world-class facility, featuring a sports campus, elite training centre and sports administration complex. The brief called for the stadium to achieve world standards, and Practicality in fabrication + erection be extraordinary in terms of structure, atmosphere and spectator experience. -
MSAA/LSAA Conf Proceedings
LSAA 2000 AUCKLAND STRUCTURAL EXPRESSION INARCHITECTURE Harry Street Design Director at Creative Spaces Ltd Abstract A personal view of how structure can be employed to create exciting and memorable buildings. Commencing with the English 'Hi Tech' architects, the influence of Philip Cox and work at Creative Spaces the address will illustrate with the aid of slides how structural concepts, their expression and how they are detailed can generate a vibrant interesting architecture. Introduction Expressing the structure in buildings, making it evident how they stand up, has been a legitimate, although perhaps not always intentional, form of architectural expression since time immemorial. There can be no doubt about how the roof of the Parthenon on the acropolis was held up. This was probably not the designer's main motivation when considering the buildings aesthetics, nor indeed the primary motivation of many others over the centuries. Nevertheless the structure is there for us to appreciate in this and in many other examples. The English Experience My own understanding of this was slow in dawning, but following my formal training and during my O.E. Iwas attracted to the exciting architecture of the English architects of the 70's where structural expression was a key ingredient of the so-called "Hi Tech" aesthetic. The most memorable buildings of this period included: The Centre Pompidou where everything is expressed, nothing hidden, all in its right place and very ordered through the use of strong colour The Willis Faber Dumas building in Ipswich is a far less exuberant example of the style. Nevertheless the relatively conventional concrete structure of round columns and waffle slab is plainly evident. -
Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square. -
1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2
1 Engineering Heritage Victoria Nomination for Recognition Engineering Heritage Australia Recognition Program 1956 Olympic Swimming & Diving Stadium July 2016 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2 CAPTION FOR COVER PHOTOGRAPH This shows the North West Elevation of the Stadium as completed in 1956 Photo: Wolfgang Sievers (State Library of Victoria picture collection) 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction………………………………………......................................................5-7 2.0 Heritage Assessment .....……… ………….....................................................................7 2.1 Basic Data............................................................................................................7 2.1.1Item Name.......……………………………………….............................................7 2.1.2 Other/Former Name………………………………………...................................7 2.1. 3 Location………………………………………………………………………..........7 2.1.4 Address……………………………………….......................................................7 2.1.5 Suburb/ Nearest Town.......………………………………………………………...7 2.1.6 State……………………………………………………………………………….7 2.1.7 Local Government Area………………………………………………………..7 2.1.8 Owner……………………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.9 Current Use……………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.10 Former Use……………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.11 Designer………………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.12 Maker/Builder…………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.13 Year Started…………………………………………………………………….7 -
Australian Cbd Office Supply & Development Maps December 2015
RESEARCH AUSTRALIAN CBD OFFICE SUPPLY & DEVELOPMENT MAPS DECEMBER 2015 After a hiatus in office completions in 2014, new supply Key Facts rebounded in 2015, with feasibility supported by the steady 560,500m² of new office decline in prime yields; albeit many schemes have and will supply will be completed in continue to divert to residential or alternate uses. 2015, up 75% on 2014. The 2015 calendar year will deliver completing in 2016. Melbourne is nearing Gross supply is anticipated approximately 560,500m² of new and the end of a long supply cycle, however new to rise by another 9% in refurbished stock to the major Australian supply will still total 108,000m² in 2016. 2016 to 610,800m², driven CBD markets, which is up 75% on the Perth, Adelaide and Canberra will all have predominantly by Sydney. 321,000m² recorded during 2014 and slightly benign supply over the next few years, higher than the 10 year average (538,000m²). which will assist in cushioning generally Pipeline for additional The CBDs with the greatest supply during weak demand conditions. The pipeline for supply in 2017 and 2018 is 2015 were Sydney (182,929m²), Perth supply additions in 2017 and 2018 is benign, with only Sydney (134.556m²) and Melbourne (130,214m²), currently very benign nationally. adding materially to stock. with the least amount of supply added in Feasibility for construction of new space has Canberra (11,945m²). Many office schemes are been supported by steady declines in prime being altered to residential Following the hiatus in office completions in yields, particularly for fund through use, but increasingly hotel and 2014, with many developers/owners actively developments with strong pre-commitment. -
JAMES L. Williamspty
James L. WIllIams PTY LTD From Gas Lights to Skyscrapers Australia’s Most Experienced and Respected Mechanical Services Contractor James L. Williams is Australia’s longest established Mechanical Services Contractor. Since 1875 James L. Williams has faithfully served the plumbing and engineering industry of Victoria and Australia. The success of the company is both a legacy of and a tribute to the energies and visions of its founder. His vision and his commitment have been continued, enlarged and reinvigorated by successive generations of Williams’ in an unbroken line of family management spanning over 130 years. With small beginnings at Errol Street, Melbourne, James L. Williams has developed to become an industry leader with offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. Each branch has its own unique style and personality, yet the companies core values of quality, a skilled and happy work force and high levels of customer satisfaction is preserved. Working in a tough and competitive environment, Williams continues to display the same characteristics of innovation and personal attention that so much marked the success of JL himself. Through its modern sheetmetal factory in Melbourne and with its association through G.J. Walker with Efatar Engineering in China, James L. Williams has manufactured, installed, commissioned and serviced many of Australia’s landmark buildings. Victorian Landmark Projects 737 AGSO BHP-Billiton Casey Bourke Street Canberra Q.V.3 Hospital Client: Equiset Client: Baulderstone Hornibrook Client: Grocon Client: Multiplex Building Value: $85 million Building Value: $160 million Building Value: $120 million (BHP-B) Building Value: $90 million Year: 2007-2008 Year: 1997 Building Value: $50 million (Q.V.3) Year: 2003-2004 737 Bourke St is an 11 level office The largest geothermal system Year: 2002-2004 The first public hospital built tower. -
Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.