EMPORIUM REDEVELOPMENT, LONSDALE and LITTLE BOURKE 12 April 2011 STREETS, MELBOURNE: TREE REMOVAL
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Page 1 of 7 FUTURE MELBOURNE (PLANNING) Agenda Item 5.1 COMMITTEE REPORT EMPORIUM REDEVELOPMENT, LONSDALE AND LITTLE BOURKE 12 April 2011 STREETS, MELBOURNE: TREE REMOVAL Presenter: Angela Meinke, Manager Planning and Building Purpose and background 1. This matter is presented to the Committee at the request of Councillor Clarke. 2. The purpose of this report is to advise the Committee of a request by Colonial First State (CFS) to allow the removal of two street trees located within the Lonsdale Street median strip. Key issues 3. The key issue for consideration is whether the existing street trees should be retained or permitted for removal. 4. The Minister for Planning issued a planning permit for the redevelopment of the Emporium site which included the requirement to retain the historic eight storey building façade. In investigating design options to enable this it was determined by the project engineers (on the basis of safety, practicality and certainty) that an external retention system was most appropriate. This option was presented by CFS to a stakeholder group facilitated by the Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development that included the Council officers, VicRoads and the Department of Transport. CFS also engaged at this time in detailed discussions with Council officers on the approach they proposed to adopt for the retention of the façade. 5. CFS’s representatives were advised by Council’s Urban Landscapes branch that Council would consider the removal of trees if there was no viable alternative. Council officers provided advice to CFS on the value to remove each tree and the need for CFS to pay all associated costs. Further meetings secured support for the structural design and Construction Management Plan (CMP) details were fully developed with on-going input from Council traffic engineers and Construction Management Group staff. 6. Once the design was finalised and certified, CFS chose to reduce potential lead time delays and commenced fabrication of the steelwork. Grocon, the contractors awarded the early works/façade retention contract, presented more details on the concept at additional stakeholders meetings. At this time, as all outstanding matters had been resolved, the CMP was issued conditional upon a number of requirements. 7. In early February 2011 Council officers advised CFS that the removal of trees was of concern for Council and CFS were requested to investigate whether the removal of the two mature trees in the Lonsdale Street median strip could be avoided through changes in the footing design and/or steel work in the area. CFS advised that the request to retain the trees will have a significant impact on the project, with a redesign of the external retention system adding approximately 13 weeks to the program and scrapping of steelwork design, some 20 per cent of which has already been prepared. The redesign will have an impact on the protection works process. 8. CFS has written to Council seeking approval for the removal of the street trees and have offered to contribute $250,000 to upgrade the landscaping in the vicinity of the Emporium development, including the planting of suitable mature trees, to the satisfaction of Council. Attachment 4 provides detail of the request and offer to Council. Page 2 of 7 Recommendation from management 9. That the Future Melbourne Committee determine the request from Colonial First State for the removal of the two trees in the Lonsdale Street median strip facing the Emporium redevelopment site. Attachments: 1. Supporting Attachment 2. Façade Retention Plan 3. Lonsdale Street Perspective 4. CFS Submission 2 Page 3 of 7 Attachment 1 Agenda Item 5.1 Future Melbourne Committee 12 April 2011 SUPPORTING ATTACHMENT Legal 1. No direct legal issues arise from the subject matter of the report. Finance 2. There are no direct financial issues arising from the recommendations contained in this report. Conflict of interest 3. No member of Council staff, or other person engaged under a contract, involved in advising on or preparing this report has declared a direct or indirect interest in relation to the matter of the report. Stakeholder consultation 4. Officers have consulted with the proponent and relevant departments of Council in relation to the options available to proponent. Environmental sustainability 5. It is considered that the recommendation addresses relevant environmental sustainability issues/opportunities by retaining existing well established vegetation. Page 4 of 7 1 N-1.0 2 A 11.46 N-2.0 6 S02-50 N-3.0 7 3 PF1 S02-50 11.53 N-F 11.6574 11.62 4 N-E SC k PF6 N-4.0 SC k 11.71 C k 11.52 S 4 EXISTING TREE 11. 5121.64 . 4x 11.5634 0 5 PB1 11.52 7 N-D C k 11.7 N-5.0 S C k 111..8833 S 11.73 A6 EXISTING TREE BRANCHES N 11.82 B I 11.84 650 5.28 11.85 MAY REQUIRE CUTTING M 1 11 .1181.58.856 SC k 1111..8855 WITH APPROVAL FROM 11.44 8x 3.07 11.87 PF1 6 NOTE: PB1 MELBOURNE CITY COUNCIL 4 4 . PB - INDICATED PRECAST . 0 0 N-6.0 9 N-C BLOCK, THAT SITS ON TOP OF 9 11.83 FOOTING. REFER DRG S02-01 1111..6872 1ROADSIDE1.86 KERB 11.99 SC q FOR DETAILS N-6.5 121.0952PF1 7 11.35 EXISTING PIT 12.01 12.09 SC k N-7.0 4 225 . 12.1 dia 6 C 11.59 4x 12.04 12.17 WW C q 3 SE PB1 S WER F MA 11.15 11.2 F IN 8 N-B 11.13 L PF14 12.14 1111..2256 ROADSIDE KERB 12.02 3.65 BLUESTONE 112.8061 C k SC a S F 5.85 PF7 F 1011 L 12.21 4x 4 L 4 11.3 3.65 N-A 1. SHEAR KEY PB1 C k . SIGN . S 12.27 6 11.55 O 6 12.39 N-8.0 C a 9 6 *MP S 6 C a 8500L x 600W x 800D C S PF5 NS EXISTING PIT P 11.79 IT SC k C k 29.16 TOP SC a 12x S P CRANE ACCESS VOID ABOVE PB1 IT 11.36 D TITLE BOUNDARY *MP 11.35 7 11.43 1 U C q S 8 4 1 P A C k S 12.79 S 25 S02-51 10 5 " .3 C a 1 1223.32 .24 N-9.0 4 0'0 4x S9 L 1.2.13245 ° PB2 1 11.15.252 12.232 90 11.52 *MP 75 dia CITI POWER CONDUIT x 7 E 5 C k TITLE BOUNDARY C a SIGN S S . 11.59 PF5 20 PF12 11.79 .09 5 4xPB2 C a 13 9 PAD TO BE LOCALLY STEPPED DO S 11 OR 18.61 BOTTOM SC k ROADSIDE KERB S02-51 N-10 TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE 12.8 ROADSIDE KERB 12.8914 13.18 RAMP GRADIENT. TYP 12.18 25 EXISTING TREE 2000 MIN . 23 SC k 1LP1.67 13.24 N-11 PF511.63 A6 M *MP*MP REIDBAR TYP 12.95 10 SC a REFER DWG S02-01 FOR DETAILS R25 REID BAR WITH FACADE RETENTION Nth GROUND LEVEL GENERAL ARRANGEMEN S02-52 12 F PF3 PF1 COUPLER INTO SCALE C a EXISTING CONCRETE 11 1 : 100 S 4x 4x 12.9 212.96 NOTE: PB2 11.93 12.09 PB1 11122 21...772978.192 S02-52 N-12 11.8 PF15 12.01 12.7993 C k 11 1333..32 .1324352.23 THE BUILDER IS CONFIRM THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING EXISTING NORTH FACADE KERB ROADSIDE KERB S 1 11 3 31 1311..33.333.5..53.25226325 D 11.86 11.98 12.82 13.64 FOOTING HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO 150kPa MAXIMUM BEARIN BASEMENT RETAINING WALLS TO BE RETAINED C a F12.02 LONSDALE STREET GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REFER TO S03 DRAWING SERIES FOR SUPPORT S P AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXTENT 12.01 12.88 SC k 13.2491 ROADSIDE KERB *MP DENOTES MONITORING POINTS ON THE HERITAGE FACAD C a 13.41 S 4x 18.61 BOTTOM 13.48 1 U PB2 4x 3 C a C b C b . P S PB1 S S EXISTING7 PIT 1 9 5 REFER TO MONITORING NOTES ON DRAWING S00-20 1. 5 13.02 13.64 3 UNDERGROUND SERVICES *MP*MP 13.4356 . EXTENT OF 12.84 13.45 ROADSIDE KERB 13.79 GROUND FLOOR SLAB C a 12.74 13.872 5 13.75 G PRESSURE AS PER S 1 31 .1343.44.43676 13.8F OVER EXISTING B1 RETAINING WALLS 13.3414 C b F 13.787 PF2 A 12.8 12.91 13 13.33 S 13 1.831.71L 13.88 SC a 12x EXISTING TREE BRANCHES 13.8721 13 4.7.960 T PLAN PB2 12 MAY REQUIRE CUTTING 1 31.378.7889 5 WITH APPROVAL FROM F S02-24 S02-52 12.96 F 7.11 12.67 12.77 MELBOURNE CITY COUNCIL L SC a C b MYER LONSDALE 12.16 4.90 S E 20. 12.17 21 SC b PF512.36 12.69 12.91 SERVICE C a C b 4 S 2 S S02-23 APARTMENTS 5.24 C a 12.45 AND REFER TO DEMOLITION DRAWINGS S 12.52 12.62 12.75 ENGINEERING S01 SERIES 12.63 1122..8844 S 2 SHEAR KEY 0 CABLE 12.83 13.91 .3 125500L.5 x 600W9 12.72 FOR EXTENT OF EXISTING FACADE 3 1122..6542 T 12.65 S-A .