DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2102.03694V2 [Hep-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2102.03694V2 [Hep-Ph] Towards establishing an abundant B and Bs spectrum up to the second orbital excitations Qi Li, Ru-Hui Ni, Xian-Hui Zhong ∗ 1) Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China 2) Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications (SICQEA), Changsha 410081,China and 3) Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China Stimulated by the exciting progress in experiments, we carry out a combined analysis of the masses, and strong and radiative decay properties of the B and Bs-meson states up to the second orbital excitations. Based on our good descriptions of the mass and decay properties for the low-lying well-established states B1(5721), B2∗(5747), Bs1(5830) and B∗s2(5840), we give a quark model classification for the high mass resonances observed in recent years. It is found that (i) the BJ(5840) resonance may be explained as the low mass mixed state 3 3 3 1 B( SD L) via 2 S 1-1 D1 mixing, or the pure B(2 S 1) state, or B(2 S 0). (ii) The BJ(5970) resonance may be | i 3 3 assigned as the 1 D3 state in the B meson family, although it as a pure 2 S 1 state cannot be excluded. (iii) The + narrow structure around 6064 MeV observed in the B K− mass spectrum at LHCb may be mainly caused by + the BsJ (6109) resonance decaying into B∗ K−, and favors the assignment of the high mass 1D-wave mixed state P 3 Bs(1D2′ ) with J = 2−, although it as the 1 D3 state cannot be excluded. (iv) The relatively broader BsJ(6114) 3 3 structure observed at LHCb may be explained with the mixed state Bs( SD H) via 2 S 1-1 D1 mixing, or a pure 3 | i 1 D1 state. Most of the missing 1P-, 1D-, and 2S -wave B- and Bs-meson states have a relatively narrow width, they are most likely to be observed in their dominant decay channels with a larger data sample at LHCb. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION ferent methods. For the well established states B1(5721), B2∗(5747), Bs1(5830) and B∗s2(5840), there are no puzzles to classify them as the first orbital excitations (i.e. the 1P-wave Since 2007, significant progress has been made in the states) of quark models. While for the newly observed res- observations of the bottom and bottom-strange mesons [1]. onances/structures B (5840)0,+, B(5970)0,+, B (6064), and In 2007, two low-lying orbitally excited narrow B mesons J sJ B (6114), although they are good candidates of the 2S B (5721)0,+ and B (5747)0,+ were observed by the D0 ex- sJ 1 2∗ and 1D-wave states according to the mass spectrum predic- periment [2], and were confirmed by the CDF experiment tions in various quark models, their quark model classifi- one year later [3]. Their strange analogues, B (5830) and s1 cation is not clear. There are some theoretical interpreta- B (5840), as the first orbitally excited B mesons, were also ∗s2 s tions of the newly observed B (5840) and B (5970) based reported by the CDF Collaboration in 2007 [4]. The B (5830) J J s1 on the predicted masses and strong decay properties, since and B (5840) were confirmed by the D0 and LHCb experi- ∗s2 they have been reported by the CDF and LHCb experiments. ments [5, 6]. In 2013, two higher resonances B(5970)0,+ were In the literature, the BJ(5840) resonance is explained with observed in the Bπ final states by the CDF Collaboration [7]. 1 3 3 0,+ 0,+ the B(2 S 0) [27, 28, 39], the B(2 S 1) [31], or the B(1 D1) In 2015, four higher resonances BJ(5840) and BJ(5960) state [40]. While for the resonance BJ(5970), there are inter- were observed in the Bπ final states by the LHCb Collabora- 3 pretations with the radially excited state B(2 S 1)[15, 25, 39], tion when they carried out precise measurements of the prop- or with the second orbitally excited B-meson states [29] either erties of the B (5721)0,+ and B (5747)0,+ states [8]. The prop- 1 2∗ B(13D ) [27, 31] or B(13D ) [28]. It should be mentioned 0,+ 3 1 erties of the BJ(5960) states are consistent with those of that in Ref. [47], our group assigned the B (5970) resonance 0,+ J B(5970) obtained by the CDF Collaboration. Recently, the 3 to be the B(1 D3) state by analyzing the strong decay prop- LHCb Collaboration observed two structures BsJ(6064) and erties within a chiral quark model. Based on this assignment, arXiv:2102.03694v2 [hep-ph] 12 May 2021 + BsJ(6114) in the B K− mass spectrum [9]. More experimen- the authors further predicted that as the partner of BJ(5970), tal information about the excited bottom and bottom-strange 3 the mass and width of the Bs(1 D3) state might be M 6.07 mesons is collected in Table I. More and more excited bot- GeV and Γ 30 MeV, respectively, which are also in≃ agree- tom and bottom-strange mesons are expected to be observed ment with those≃ predictions in Refs. [27, 28]. If assigning the in future LHCb experiments due to its huge production cross 3 BsJ(6064) to be the Bs(1 D3) state, both the measured mass sections of beauty, together with a good reconstruction effi- and width are consistent with quark model predictions. It ciency, versatile trigger scheme and an excellent momentum should be mentioned that there are no discussions about the and mass resolution [10]. recently observed structures BsJ(6064) and BsJ(6114) in the In theory, many theoretical studies of the masses [11–29], literature. More information about the status of the bottom strong decays [24–43], radiative decays [23, 26–29, 42–44], and bottom-strange meson study can be found in the recent and weak decays [23, 45, 46] for the excited bottom and review work [48]. bottom-strange meson states have been carried out with dif- The experimental progress provides us good opportunities to establish an abundant B and Bs-meson spectrum up to the second orbital (L = 2) excitations. In this work we deepen ∗mail: [email protected] our study by carrying out a combined analysis of the masses 2 +,0 +,0 TABLE I: Summary of the experimental information for the excited B- and Bs-meson states. The date for the B1(5721) , B2(5747) , 0 0 Bs1(5830) , and Bs2(5840) resonances are adopted the average values of the Review of Particle Physics (RPP) of Particle Data Group (PDG) [1]. The N and UN stand for the natural spin parity P = ( 1)J and unnatural spin parity P = ( 1)J . − − − Resonance JP Mass (MeV) Width (MeV) Observed channel Experiment 0 + + B1(5721) 1 5726.1 1.3 27.5 3.4 B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + + ±+2.5 ± 0 + B1(5721) 1 5725.9 2.7 31 6 B∗ π D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] 0 + − ± + + B2(5747) 2 5739.5 0.7 24.2 1.7 B π−,B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + + ± ± + + B2(5747) 2 5737.2 0.7 20 5 B π−,B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + ± +30± 0 + 0 + BJ(5970) ? 5961 17 60 20 40 B π [or B∗ π ] CDF[7] 0 ± −+30 ± + + BJ(5970) ? 5978 17 70 20 30 B π− [or B∗ π−] CDF[7] + ± − ± 0 + Case A BJ(5960) UN 5964.9 6.8 63.0 31.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5960) UN 5969.2 8.2 82.3 17.1 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + BJ(5840) UN 5850.3 26.6 224.4 103.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5840) UN 5862.9 11.9 127.4 50.9 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + Case B BJ(5960) UN 6010.6 7.1 61.4 31.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5960) UN 6015.9 9.2 81.6 19.3 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + 0 + BJ(5840) N 5874.5 39.6 214.6 106.5 B∗ π , B π ? LHCb[8] 0 ± ± + + BJ(5840) N 5889.7 29.1 107.0 53.8 B∗ π−, B π−? LHCb[8] + ± ± 0 + 0 + Case C BJ(5960) N 5966.4 7.2 60.8 31.2 B∗ π , B π ? LHCb[8] 0 ± ± + + BJ(5960) N 5993.6 11.7 55.9 16.0 B∗ π−, B π−? LHCb[8] + ± ± 0 + BJ(5840) UN 5889.3 29.3 229.3 104.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5840) UN 5907.8 13.0 119.4 51.4 B∗ π− LHCb [8] 0 + ± ± + 0 0 Bs1(5830) 1 5828.70 0.20 0.5 0.3 0.3 B∗ K−, B∗ K CDF [4],D0 [6], LHCb [5] 0 + ± ± ± Bs2(5840) 2 5839.86 0.12 1.49 0.27 B∗K, BK CDF [4], D0 [6],LHCb [5] 0 ± ± + BsJ(6064) ? 6063.5 2.0 26 4 4 B K− LHCb [9] 0 ± ± ± + [or BsJ (6109) ] ? [or 6108.8 1.8] [or 22 5 4] [or B∗ K−] LHCb[9] 0 ± ± ± + BsJ(6114) ? 6114 8 66 18 21 B K− LHCb [9] 0 ± ± ± + [or B (6158) ] ? [or 6158 9] [or 72 18 25] [or B∗ K−] LHCb[9] sJ ± ± ± and decay properties of the B and B -meson states up to the s TABLE II: The parameters of the nonrelativistic potential model.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Particle Zoo
    219 8 The Particle Zoo 8.1 Introduction Around 1960 the situation in particle physics was very confusing. Elementary particlesa such as the photon, electron, muon and neutrino were known, but in addition many more particles were being discovered and almost any experiment added more to the list. The main property that these new particles had in common was that they were strongly interacting, meaning that they would interact strongly with protons and neutrons. In this they were different from photons, electrons, muons and neutrinos. A muon may actually traverse a nucleus without disturbing it, and a neutrino, being electrically neutral, may go through huge amounts of matter without any interaction. In other words, in some vague way these new particles seemed to belong to the same group of by Dr. Horst Wahl on 08/28/12. For personal use only. particles as the proton and neutron. In those days proton and neutron were mysterious as well, they seemed to be complicated compound states. At some point a classification scheme for all these particles including proton and neutron was introduced, and once that was done the situation clarified considerably. In that Facts And Mysteries In Elementary Particle Physics Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com era theoretical particle physics was dominated by Gell-Mann, who contributed enormously to that process of systematization and clarification. The result of this massive amount of experimental and theoretical work was the introduction of quarks, and the understanding that all those ‘new’ particles as well as the proton aWe call a particle elementary if we do not know of a further substructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Identical Particles
    8.06 Spring 2016 Lecture Notes 4. Identical particles Aram Harrow Last updated: May 19, 2016 Contents 1 Fermions and Bosons 1 1.1 Introduction and two-particle systems .......................... 1 1.2 N particles ......................................... 3 1.3 Non-interacting particles .................................. 5 1.4 Non-zero temperature ................................... 7 1.5 Composite particles .................................... 7 1.6 Emergence of distinguishability .............................. 9 2 Degenerate Fermi gas 10 2.1 Electrons in a box ..................................... 10 2.2 White dwarves ....................................... 12 2.3 Electrons in a periodic potential ............................. 16 3 Charged particles in a magnetic field 21 3.1 The Pauli Hamiltonian ................................... 21 3.2 Landau levels ........................................ 23 3.3 The de Haas-van Alphen effect .............................. 24 3.4 Integer Quantum Hall Effect ............................... 27 3.5 Aharonov-Bohm Effect ................................... 33 1 Fermions and Bosons 1.1 Introduction and two-particle systems Previously we have discussed multiple-particle systems using the tensor-product formalism (cf. Section 1.2 of Chapter 3 of these notes). But this applies only to distinguishable particles. In reality, all known particles are indistinguishable. In the coming lectures, we will explore the mathematical and physical consequences of this. First, consider classical many-particle systems. If a single particle has state described by position and momentum (~r; p~), then the state of N distinguishable particles can be written as (~r1; p~1; ~r2; p~2;:::; ~rN ; p~N ). The notation (·; ·;:::; ·) denotes an ordered list, in which different posi­ tions have different meanings; e.g. in general (~r1; p~1; ~r2; p~2)6 = (~r2; p~2; ~r1; p~1). 1 To describe indistinguishable particles, we can use set notation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Field Theories for Quarkonium
    Effective Field Theories for Quarkonium recent progress Antonio Vairo Technische Universitat¨ Munchen¨ Outline 1. Scales and EFTs for quarkonium at zero and finite temperature 2.1 Static energy at zero temperature 2.2 Charmonium radiative transitions 2.3 Bottomoniun thermal width 3. Conclusions Scales and EFTs Scales Quarkonia, i.e. heavy quark-antiquark bound states, are systems characterized by hierarchies of energy scales. These hierarchies allow systematic studies. They follow from the quark mass M being the largest scale in the system: • M ≫ p • M ≫ ΛQCD • M ≫ T ≫ other thermal scales The non-relativistic expansion • M ≫ p implies that quarkonia are non-relativistic and characterized by the hierarchy of scales typical of a non-relativistic bound state: M ≫ p ∼ 1/r ∼ Mv ≫ E ∼ Mv2 The hierarchy of non-relativistic scales makes the very difference of quarkonia with heavy-light mesons, which are just characterized by the two scales M and ΛQCD. Systematic expansions in the small heavy-quark velocity v may be implemented at the Lagrangian level by constructing suitable effective field theories (EFTs). ◦ Brambilla Pineda Soto Vairo RMP 77 (2004) 1423 Non-relativistic Effective Field Theories LONG−RANGE SHORT−RANGE Caswell Lepage PLB 167(86)437 QUARKONIUM QUARKONIUM / QED ◦ ◦ Lepage Thacker NP PS 4(88)199 QCD/QED ◦ Bodwin et al PRD 51(95)1125, ... M perturbative matching perturbative matching ◦ Pineda Soto PLB 420(98)391 µ ◦ Pineda Soto NP PS 64(98)428 ◦ Brambilla et al PRD 60(99)091502 Mv NRQCD/NRQED ◦ Brambilla et al NPB 566(00)275 ◦ Kniehl et al NPB 563(99)200 µ ◦ Luke Manohar PRD 55(97)4129 ◦ Luke Savage PRD 57(98)413 2 non−perturbative perturbative matching Mv matching ◦ Grinstein Rothstein PRD 57(98)78 ◦ Labelle PRD 58(98)093013 ◦ Griesshammer NPB 579(00)313 pNRQCD/pNRQED ◦ Luke et al PRD 61(00)074025 ◦ Hoang Stewart PRD 67(03)114020, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Quarkonium Interactions in QCD1
    CERN-TH/95-342 BI-TP 95/41 Quarkonium Interactions in QCD1 D. KHARZEEV Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland and Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Bielefeld, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Preview 1.2 QCD atoms in external fields 2. Operator Product Expansion for Quarkonium Interactions 2.1 General idea 2.2 Wilson coefficients 2.3 Sum rules 2.4 Absorption cross sections 3. Scale Anomaly, Chiral Symmetry and Low-Energy Theorems 3.1 Scale anomaly and quarkonium interactions 3.2 Low energy theorem for quarkonium interactions with pions 3.3 The phase of the scattering amplitude 4. Quarkonium Interactions in Matter 4.1 Nuclear matter 4.2 Hadron gas 4.3 Deconfined matter 5. Conclusions and Outlook 1Presented at the Enrico Fermi International School of Physics on “Selected Topics in Non-Perturbative QCD”, Varenna, Italy, June 1995; to appear in the Proceedings. 1 Introduction 1.1 Preview Heavy quarkonia have proved to be extremely useful for understanding QCD. The large mass of heavy quarks allows a perturbation theory analysis of quarkonium decays [1] (see [2] for a recent review). Perturbation theory also provides a rea- sonable first approximation to the correlation functions of quarkonium currents; deviations from the predictions of perturbation theory can therefore be used to infer an information about the nature of non-perturbative effects. This program was first realized at the end of the seventies [3]; it turned out to be one of the first steps towards a quantitative understanding of the QCD vacuum. The natural next step is to use heavy quarkonia to probe the properties of excited QCD vacuum, which may be produced in relativistic heavy ion collisions; this was proposed a decade ago [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics
    Quantum Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Intendedaudience................................ 5 1.2 MajorSources .................................. 5 1.3 AimofCourse .................................. 6 1.4 OutlineofCourse ................................ 6 2 Probability Theory 7 2.1 Introduction ................................... 7 2.2 WhatisProbability?.............................. 7 2.3 CombiningProbabilities. ... 7 2.4 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation . ..... 9 2.5 ContinuousProbabilityDistributions. ........ 11 3 Wave-Particle Duality 13 3.1 Introduction ................................... 13 3.2 Wavefunctions.................................. 13 3.3 PlaneWaves ................................... 14 3.4 RepresentationofWavesviaComplexFunctions . ....... 15 3.5 ClassicalLightWaves ............................. 18 3.6 PhotoelectricEffect ............................. 19 3.7 QuantumTheoryofLight. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 3.8 ClassicalInterferenceofLightWaves . ...... 21 3.9 QuantumInterferenceofLight . 22 3.10 ClassicalParticles . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 3.11 QuantumParticles............................... 25 3.12 WavePackets .................................. 26 2 QUANTUM MECHANICS 3.13 EvolutionofWavePackets . 29 3.14 Heisenberg’sUncertaintyPrinciple . ........ 32 3.15 Schr¨odinger’sEquation . 35 3.16 CollapseoftheWaveFunction . 36 4 Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics 39 4.1 Introduction ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Possibility of Generating a 4-Neutron Resonance with a {\Boldmath $ T= 3/2$} Isospin 3-Neutron Force
    On the possibility of generating a 4-neutron resonance with a T = 3/2 isospin 3-neutron force E. Hiyama Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN, Wako, 351-0198, Japan R. Lazauskas IPHC, IN2P3-CNRS/Universite Louis Pasteur BP 28, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France J. Carbonell Institut de Physique Nucl´eaire, Universit´eParis-Sud, IN2P3-CNRS, 91406 Orsay Cedex, France M. Kamimura Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan and Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan (Dated: September 26, 2018) We consider the theoretical possibility to generate a narrow resonance in the four neutron system as suggested by a recent experimental result. To that end, a phenomenological T = 3/2 three neutron force is introduced, in addition to a realistic NN interaction. We inquire what should be the strength of the 3n force in order to generate such a resonance. The reliability of the three-neutron force in the T = 3/2 channel is exmined, by analyzing its consistency with the low-lying T = 1 states of 4H, 4He and 4Li and the 3H+ n scattering. The ab initio solution of the 4n Schr¨odinger equation is obtained using the complex scaling method with boundary conditions appropiate to the four-body resonances. We find that in order to generate narrow 4n resonant states a remarkably attractive 3N force in the T = 3/2 channel is required. I. INTRODUCTION ergy axis (physical domain) it will have no significant impact on a physical process. The possibility of detecting a four-neutron (4n) structure of Following this line of reasoning, some calculations based any kind – bound or resonant state – has intrigued the nuclear on semi-realistic NN forces indicated null [13] or unlikely physics community for the last fifty years (see Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • TO the POSSIBILITY of BOUND STATES BETWEEN TWO ELECTRONS Alexander A
    WEPPP031 Proceedings of IPAC2012, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA TO THE POSSIBILITY OF BOUND STATES BETWEEN TWO ELECTRONS Alexander A. Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract spins for reduction of minimal emittance restriction arisen from Eq. 1. In some sense it is an attempt to prepare the We analyze the possibility to compress dynamically the pure quantum mechanical state between just two polarized electron bunch so that the distance between electrons. What is important here is that the distance some electrons in the bunch comes close to the Compton between two electrons should be of the order of the wavelength, arranging a bound state, as the attraction by Compton wavelength. We attracted attention in [2,3] that the magnetic momentum-induced force at this distance attraction between two electrons determined by the dominates repulsion by the electrostatic force for the magnetic force of oppositely oriented magnetic moments. appropriately prepared orientation of the magnetic In this case the resulting spin is zero. Another possibility moments of the electron-electron pair. This electron pair considered below. behaves like a boson now, so the restriction for the In [4], it was suggested a radical explanation of minimal emittance of the beam becomes eliminated. structure of all elementary particles caused by magnetic Some properties of such degenerated electron gas attraction at the distances of the order of Compton represented also. wavelength. In [5], motion of charged particle in a field OVERVIEW of magnetic dipole was considered. In [4] and [5] the term in Hamiltonian responsible for the interaction Generation of beams of particles (electrons, positrons, between magnetic moments is omitted, however as it protons, muons) with minimal emittance is a challenging looks like problem in contemporary beam physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the J/Psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX Todd Kempel Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Understanding the J/psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX Todd Kempel Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Kempel, Todd, "Understanding the J/psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11649. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11649 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Understanding the J= Production Mechanism at PHENIX by Todd Kempel A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Nuclear Physics Program of Study Committee: John G. Lajoie, Major Professor Kevin L De Laplante S¨orenA. Prell J¨orgSchmalian Kirill Tuchin Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Todd Kempel, 2010. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . v LIST OF FIGURES . vii CHAPTER 1. Overview . 1 CHAPTER 2. Quantum Chromodynamics . 3 2.1 The Standard Model . 3 2.2 Quarks and Gluons . 5 2.3 Asymptotic Freedom and Confinement . 6 CHAPTER 3. The Proton . 8 3.1 Cross-Sections and Luminosities . 8 3.2 Deep-Inelastic Scattering . 10 3.3 Structure Functions and Bjorken Scaling . 12 3.4 Altarelli-Parisi Evolution .
    [Show full text]
  • Strange Hadrocharmonium ∗ M.B
    Physics Letters B 798 (2019) 135022 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Strange hadrocharmonium ∗ M.B. Voloshin a,b,c, a William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA b School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA c Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 117218, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: It has been recently suggested that the charged charmoniumlike resonances Zc (4100) and Zc (4200) Received 23 May 2019 are two states of hadrocharmonium, related by the charm quark spin symmetry in the same way Received in revised form 12 August 2019 as the lowest charmonium states ηc and J/ψ. It is pointed out here that in this picture one might Accepted 16 September 2019 expect existence of their somewhat heavier strange counterparts, Zcs, decaying to ηc K and J/ψ K . Some Available online 11 October 2019 expected properties of such charmoniumlike strange resonances are discussed that set benchmarks for Editor: B. Grinstein their search in the decays of the strange Bs mesons. © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license 3 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP . Numerous new resonances recently uncovered near the open down to about 4220 MeV), has been recently invoked [11]for de- charm and open bottom thresholds, the so-called XYZ states, ap- scription of the charged charmoniumlike resonances Zc(4100) and parently do not fit in the standard quark-antiquark template and Zc(4200) observed respectively in the decay channels ηcπ [12] 1 contain light constituents in addition to a heavy quark-antiquark and J/ψπ [13].
    [Show full text]
  • Bound and Quasi Bound States in the Continuum
    Bound and Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum One-dimensional models of square-integrable states embedded in continua, first offered by von Neumann and Wigner, can stabilize ordinary resonance levels and have gained importance in connection with solid state heterostructure semi­ conductor devices. General continuum bound state theories for many-particle systems do not exist, but models for continuum crossings of bound states suggest possible long-lived states, including some double charged anions. Nonlinear varia­ tional calculations can provide estimates of resonance energies and of the rapid onset of instability in various atomic and molecular ionization phenomena, typifying results found in mathematical "catastrophe theory". One-Dimensional Models :Many years ago von Neumann and Wignerl pointed out that local potentials could have bound (i.e. square-integrable) eigenstates with positive energies. These states are embedded in the continuum of scattering states with the same symmetry, but nevertheless would fail to "ionize". Thus it would be proper to regard these continuum bound states as infinitely sharp resonances. The example offered by von Neumann and Wigner (subsequently corrected by Simon2) was one-dimensional, and involved an oscillatory potential V(x) which behaved essentially as (sin x)/x for large lxl. Likewise the square-integ­ rable wavefunction l/;(x) for the positive energy bound state was oscillatory but, owing to diffractive interference induced by V(x), the amplitude of l/1 was driven toward zero as lxl increased, so that particle binding resulted. The exist­ ence of this elementary example naturally raises questions about whether similar continuum bound states could exist in physically more realistic cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Dimensional Supersymmetric Models and Some of Their Thermodynamic Properties from the Context of Sdlcq
    TWO DIMENSIONAL SUPERSYMMETRIC MODELS AND SOME OF THEIR THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES FROM THE CONTEXT OF SDLCQ DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yiannis Proestos, B.Sc., M.Sc. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Stephen S. Pinsky, Adviser Stanley L. Durkin Adviser Gregory Kilcup Graduate Program in Robert J. Perry Physics © Copyright by Yiannis Proestos 2007 ABSTRACT Supersymmetric Discrete Light Cone Quantization is utilized to derive the full mass spectrum of two dimensional supersymmetric theories. The thermal properties of such models are studied by constructing the density of states. We consider pure super Yang–Mills theory without and with fundamentals in large-Nc approximation. For the latter we include a Chern-Simons term to give mass to the adjoint partons. In both of the theories we find that the density of states grows exponentially and the theories have a Hagedorn temperature TH . For the pure SYM we find that TH at infi- 2 g Nc nite resolution is slightly less than one in units of π . In this temperature range, q we find that the thermodynamics is dominated by the massless states. For the system with fundamental matter we consider the thermal properties of the mesonic part of the spectrum. We find that the meson-like sector dominates the thermodynamics. We show that in this case TH grows with the gauge coupling. The temperature and coupling dependence of the free energy for temperatures below TH are calculated. As expected, the free energy for weak coupling and low temperature grows quadratically with the temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Field Theories of Heavy-Quark Mesons
    Effective Field Theories of Heavy-Quark Mesons A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences Mohammad Hasan M Alhakami School of Physics and Astronomy 2014 Contents Abstract 10 Declaration 12 Copyright 13 Acknowledgements 14 1 Introduction 16 1.1 Ordinary Mesons......................... 21 1.1.1 Light Mesons....................... 22 1.1.2 Heavy-light Mesons.................... 24 1.1.3 Heavy-Quark Mesons................... 28 1.2 Exotic cc¯ Mesons......................... 31 1.2.1 Experimental and theoretical studies of the X(3872). 34 2 From QCD to Effective Theories 41 2.1 Chiral Symmetry......................... 43 2.1.1 Chiral Symmetry Breaking................ 46 2.1.2 Effective Field Theory.................. 57 2.2 Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry.................. 65 2.2.1 Motivation......................... 65 2.2.2 Heavy Quark Effective Theory.............. 69 3 Heavy Hadron Chiral Perturbation Theory 72 3.1 Self-Energies of Charm Mesons................. 78 3.2 Mass formula for non-strange charm mesons.......... 89 3.2.1 Extracting the coupling constant of even and odd charm meson transitions..................... 92 2 4 HHChPT for Charm and Bottom Mesons 98 4.1 LECs from Charm Meson Spectrum............... 99 4.2 Masses of the charm mesons within HHChPT......... 101 4.3 Linear combinations of the low energy constants........ 106 4.4 Results and Discussion...................... 108 4.5 Prediction for the Spectrum of Odd- and Even-Parity Bottom Mesons............................... 115 5 Short-range interactions between heavy mesons in frame- work of EFT 126 5.1 Uncoupled Channel........................ 127 5.2 Two-body scattering with a narrow resonance........
    [Show full text]