DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantization of the E-M Field 2.1 Lamb Shift Revisited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2.1. LAMB SHIFT REVISITED April 10, 2015 Lecture XXVIII Quantization of the E-M field 2.1 Lamb Shift revisited We discussed the shift in the energy levels of bound states due to the vacuum fluctuations of the E-M fields. Our picture was that the fluctuating vacuum fields pushed the electron back and forth over a region of space defined by the strength of the fields and the electron mass. We estimate the uncertainty in the electron position due to the fields. The strength of the Coulomb potential that binds the electron to the proton depends of course on the position of the electron. In order to account for fluctuating position we average the potential over the position uncertainty. Far from the proton the difference of the potential averaged over this finite range of electron positions is zero. But at the origin of the potential, there is a finite contribution that will tend to reduce the effective coupling. At any rate we estimate the effect and found that because the vacuum fluctuations occur at all wavelengths, the position fluctuations diverge. We used a cutoff, excluding photons with energy greater than the electron rest energy. Now we consider the effect in the language of transitions. Suppose that we have an electron in a bound state A. There is some amplitude for the electron to emit a photon with energy ¯hck and absorb it again. In the interim, energy is not necessarily conserved. There may be an intermediate bound state, but maybe not. The electron lives in a virtual state as does the photon. We write X X D y E A j HI j I; k hI; k j HI j Ai k I r r X X e ¯hc e ¯hc D E = A j a λ · peik·x j I; k I; k j ay λ · pe−ik·x j A mc 2V k k mc 2V k k k I X X e 2 ¯hc D E = A j a λ · peik·x j I; k I; k j ay λ · pe−ik·x j A mc 2V k k k k I As we see in the above, all photon energies and polarizations are included. We are expecting that this interaction with the photons in the vacuum will result in a shift in the energy of the state A. The amplitudes cI and cA for the intermediate and initial state respectively are related according to X i(EI −EA)t=h¯ i¯hc_I = HIAcAe photon X X i(EA−EI )t=h¯ i¯hc_A = HAI cI e (2.1) photon I Here HIA corresponds to emission and HAI to absorption. These are the usual equations for the amplitudes to be in state I where at t = 0, cA(0) = 1 and cI6=A(0) = 0. We sum over all photon energies including those where ¯h! 6= EI − EA. Since we are looking for the shift in the energy of −i∆EAt)=h¯ EA we try cA = e so that −i(EA+∆EA)t=h¯ A(t) = j uAie 1 2.1. LAMB SHIFT REVISITED The plan now is to substitute our guess for cA into the Equations 2.1, and solve for ∆E. Since we are looking for an energy shift and not necessarily a transition rate, we will want eventually to integrate to t ! 1. Z t 1 X 0 c = H ei(EI −EA−∆EA+¯h!)t =h¯ I i¯h IA photons 0 X ei(EI −EA−∆EA+¯h!)t=h¯ − 1 cI = HIA (2.2) (−EI + EA + ∆EA − ¯h!) photons Next substitute Equation 2.2 and our guess for cA into the second of 2.1 ei(−∆EA+¯h!)t=h¯ − ei(EA−EI )t=h¯ −i(∆EAt=h¯) X X X −i!t ∆EAe = HAI HIAe (−EI + EA + ∆EA − ¯h!) photon I photons X X X 1 − ei(EA−EI +∆EA−h!¯ )t=h¯ ∆EA = HAI HIA (−EI + EA + ∆EA − ¯h!) photon I photons To lowest order in ∆EA (drop the terms on the right). X X 1 − ei(EA−EI −h!¯ )t=h¯ ∆EA = HAI HIA (2.3) (−EI + EA − ¯h!) photon I We would like to evaluate that last equation for ∆EA as t ! 1 but it appears to oscillate. We note that ixt 1 1 − e Z 0 lim = − lim i ei(x+i)t dt0 t!1 x !0 0 1 = lim !0 x + i x i = lim − !0 x2 + 2 x2 + 2 1 = − iπδ(x) x Therefore, Equation 2.3 becomes X X 2 1 <∆EA = jHIAj (2.4) (−EI + EA − ¯h!) photon I X X 2 Im∆EA = −π jHIAj δ(EA − EI − ¯h!) (2.5) photon I The real part of the energy shift is just that, a shift in the energy of the bound state A. It has contributions from all photon energies and intermediate states. The intermediate states are unrestricted. That is, EI > EA is allowed. The electron is interacting with virtual photons in the vacuum. The imaginary part corresponds to the spontaneous decay rate from I to A. The delta 2 2.1. LAMB SHIFT REVISITED function enforces conservation of energy. Only photons with energy EI −EA will contribute. Indeed there is an imaginary part only if there is a lower energy state available. Therefore 2 1 ΓA − Im[∆EA] = = ¯h τA ¯h Then −i(EA+Re[∆EA])t=h¯ −ΓAt=2¯h (t) = j uAie e The probability of finding the state A j (t)j2 ∼ e−Γt=h¯ Now consider the real part of the energy shift. We integrate over all of the photon phase space to account for the sum over photons. X X 2 1 <∆EA = jHIAj (−EI + EA − ¯h!) photon I 2 2 2 Z 3 λ 2 c ¯h e X d kV 1 X j(p · )IAj = 3 V mc (2π) 2! EA − EI − ¯h! I λ The sum over polarizations and the angular integration is the same as for our calculation of Rayleigh R P λ 2 2 scattering, namely, dΩ λ j(p · )IAj = (8π=3)j(p)IAj : Then the real part 2 2 Z 2 2 e 1 X Eγ j(p)IAj dEγ ∆EA = 2 3π 4π¯hc (mc) EA − EI − ¯h! I 2 The integral diverges. If we choose a cutoff, Emax = mc , (certainly our non-relativstic wave functions) will not be valid for energies greater than the electron rest mass, then the energy shift is equivalent to our earlier calculation of the Lamb shift. This time we take it a step further and consider the energy shift of a free electron. After all, a free electron can similarly interact with virtual photons. The self-energy of the free electron manifests itself as a shift in the mass of the free electron. We are looking only for the change in the bound state energy due the real potential. So we may be double counting. For the free electron, the difference is simply that there are no bound states. We integrate over all photon energies. Returning to equation 2.4 for the real part of the energy shift D e E H = p0; k j p · A j p IA mc r Z −ip0·x=h¯ ip·x=h¯ ¯hc e e −ik·x λ e 3 HIA = − p e (p · ) p d x 2kV mc V V where the initial and final states of the electron are plane waves (momentum eigenstates) with p and p0 respectively. The photon has energy ¯hck. Note that here we do not make the dipole approximation. By including the spatial dependence e−ik·x· in the integration d3x we end up with the momentum conserving delta function. For the energy shift of the bound state we did assume the dipole approximation. Are these results compatible? Then r ¯h e 1 H = − p · λδ(p0 − p + ¯hk): IA 2! m V 1=2 3 2.1. LAMB SHIFT REVISITED 2 2 The denominator EA − EI − ¯h! ! p =2m − (p − ¯hk) =2m − ¯h! ∼ −¯h!. Then as before X X 2 1 <∆EA = jHIAj (−EI + EA − ¯h!) photon I 2 Z 3 ¯he λ 2 d kV 1 = 2 jp · j 3 2!V m (2π) ¯h! Ea − EI − ¯h! λ 2 8π 2 We average jp · j over initial state polarization and sum over final ! 3 p . ¯h e2 p2 V R k2dkdΩ ∆E = − A 2! m2 V (2π)3¯h! 8π ¯h e2 p2 Z d3kV = − 3 2! m2 V (2π)3¯h! 2 e2 1 Z = − p2 ¯hd! 3π 4π¯hc (mc)2 2 e2 p2 Z = − dE 3π 4π¯hc (mc)2 γ = Cp2 Insofar as 1 @E = 2m @p2 we find that the observed mass 1 1 = + C ! mobs = mbare(1 − 2mbareC) 2mobs 2mbare 2 assuming C is small which it will be if we choose Emax = mc . Our calculation of energy of state A assumed the observed rather than the bare mass. We need to correct. Let's subtract the contribution for the free particle with momentum A. Note that 2 P 2 (p )AA = I j(p)IAj 2 Z 2 ! observed 2 e 1 X Eγ j(p)IAj 2 ∆EA = 2 + (p )AA dEγ 3π 4π¯hc (mc) EA − EI − ¯h! I 2 Z 2 ! 2 e 1 X j(p)IAj (EA − EI ) = 2 dEγ 3π 4π¯hc (mc) EA − EI − ¯h! I 2 max ! 2 e 1 X 2 Eγ = 2 j(p)IAj (EI − EA) log 3π 4π¯hc (mc) EA − EI I The expression still diverges, but now logarithmically rather than linearly so much less sensitive to the cutoff.
Recommended publications
  • The Particle Zoo

    The Particle Zoo

    219 8 The Particle Zoo 8.1 Introduction Around 1960 the situation in particle physics was very confusing. Elementary particlesa such as the photon, electron, muon and neutrino were known, but in addition many more particles were being discovered and almost any experiment added more to the list. The main property that these new particles had in common was that they were strongly interacting, meaning that they would interact strongly with protons and neutrons. In this they were different from photons, electrons, muons and neutrinos. A muon may actually traverse a nucleus without disturbing it, and a neutrino, being electrically neutral, may go through huge amounts of matter without any interaction. In other words, in some vague way these new particles seemed to belong to the same group of by Dr. Horst Wahl on 08/28/12. For personal use only. particles as the proton and neutron. In those days proton and neutron were mysterious as well, they seemed to be complicated compound states. At some point a classification scheme for all these particles including proton and neutron was introduced, and once that was done the situation clarified considerably. In that Facts And Mysteries In Elementary Particle Physics Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com era theoretical particle physics was dominated by Gell-Mann, who contributed enormously to that process of systematization and clarification. The result of this massive amount of experimental and theoretical work was the introduction of quarks, and the understanding that all those ‘new’ particles as well as the proton aWe call a particle elementary if we do not know of a further substructure.
  • The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen

    The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen

    The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen Dissertation submitted to the Physics Faculty of the Ludwig{Maximilians{University Munich by Aldo Sady Antognini from Bellinzona, Switzerland Munich, November 2005 1st Referee : Prof. Dr. Theodor W. H¨ansch 2nd Referee : Prof. Dr. Dietrich Habs Date of the Oral Examination : December 21, 2005 Even if I don't think, I am. Itsuo Tsuda Je suis ou` je ne pense pas, je pense ou` je ne suis pas. Jacques Lacan A mia mamma e mio papa` con tanto amore Abstract The subject of this thesis is the muonic hydrogen (µ−p) Lamb shift experiment being performed at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Its goal is to measure the 2S 2P − energy difference in µp atoms by laser spectroscopy and to deduce the proton root{mean{ −3 square (rms) charge radius rp with 10 precision, an order of magnitude better than presently known. This would make it possible to test bound{state quantum electrody- namics (QED) in hydrogen at the relative accuracy level of 10−7, and will lead to an improvement in the determination of the Rydberg constant by more than a factor of seven. Moreover it will represent a benchmark for QCD theories. The experiment is based on the measurement of the energy difference between the F=1 F=2 2S1=2 and 2P3=2 levels in µp atoms to a precision of 30 ppm, using a pulsed laser tunable at wavelengths around 6 µm. Negative muons from a unique low{energy muon beam are −1 stopped at a rate of 70 s in 0.6 hPa of H2 gas.
  • Identical Particles

    Identical Particles

    8.06 Spring 2016 Lecture Notes 4. Identical particles Aram Harrow Last updated: May 19, 2016 Contents 1 Fermions and Bosons 1 1.1 Introduction and two-particle systems .......................... 1 1.2 N particles ......................................... 3 1.3 Non-interacting particles .................................. 5 1.4 Non-zero temperature ................................... 7 1.5 Composite particles .................................... 7 1.6 Emergence of distinguishability .............................. 9 2 Degenerate Fermi gas 10 2.1 Electrons in a box ..................................... 10 2.2 White dwarves ....................................... 12 2.3 Electrons in a periodic potential ............................. 16 3 Charged particles in a magnetic field 21 3.1 The Pauli Hamiltonian ................................... 21 3.2 Landau levels ........................................ 23 3.3 The de Haas-van Alphen effect .............................. 24 3.4 Integer Quantum Hall Effect ............................... 27 3.5 Aharonov-Bohm Effect ................................... 33 1 Fermions and Bosons 1.1 Introduction and two-particle systems Previously we have discussed multiple-particle systems using the tensor-product formalism (cf. Section 1.2 of Chapter 3 of these notes). But this applies only to distinguishable particles. In reality, all known particles are indistinguishable. In the coming lectures, we will explore the mathematical and physical consequences of this. First, consider classical many-particle systems. If a single particle has state described by position and momentum (~r; p~), then the state of N distinguishable particles can be written as (~r1; p~1; ~r2; p~2;:::; ~rN ; p~N ). The notation (·; ·;:::; ·) denotes an ordered list, in which different posi­ tions have different meanings; e.g. in general (~r1; p~1; ~r2; p~2)6 = (~r2; p~2; ~r1; p~1). 1 To describe indistinguishable particles, we can use set notation.
  • Casimir Effect Mechanism of Pairing Between Fermions in the Vicinity of A

    Casimir Effect Mechanism of Pairing Between Fermions in the Vicinity of A

    Casimir effect mechanism of pairing between fermions in the vicinity of a magnetic quantum critical point Yaroslav A. Kharkov1 and Oleg P. Sushkov1 1School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia We consider two immobile spin 1/2 fermions in a two-dimensional magnetic system that is close to the O(3) magnetic quantum critical point (QCP) which separates magnetically ordered and disordered phases. Focusing on the disordered phase in the vicinity of the QCP, we demonstrate that the criticality results in a strong long range attraction between the fermions, with potential V (r) 1/rν , ν 0.75, where r is separation between the fermions. The mechanism of the enhanced∝ − attraction≈ is similar to Casimir effect and corresponds to multi-magnon exchange processes between the fermions. While we consider a model system, the problem is originally motivated by recent establishment of magnetic QCP in hole doped cuprates under the superconducting dome at doping of about 10%. We suggest the mechanism of magnetic critical enhancement of pairing in cuprates. PACS numbers: 74.40.Kb, 75.50.Ee, 74.20.Mn I. INTRODUCTION in the frame of normal Fermi liquid picture (large Fermi surface). Within this approach electrons interact via ex- change of an antiferromagnetic (AF) fluctuation (param- In the present paper we study interaction between 11 fermions mediated by magnetic fluctuations in a vicin- agnon). The lightly doped AF Mott insulator approach, ity of magnetic quantum critical point. To address this instead, necessarily implies small Fermi surface. In this case holes interact/pair via exchange of the Goldstone generic problem we consider a specific model of two holes 12 injected into the bilayer antiferromagnet.
  • Quantum Mechanics

    Quantum Mechanics

    Quantum Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Intendedaudience................................ 5 1.2 MajorSources .................................. 5 1.3 AimofCourse .................................. 6 1.4 OutlineofCourse ................................ 6 2 Probability Theory 7 2.1 Introduction ................................... 7 2.2 WhatisProbability?.............................. 7 2.3 CombiningProbabilities. ... 7 2.4 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation . ..... 9 2.5 ContinuousProbabilityDistributions. ........ 11 3 Wave-Particle Duality 13 3.1 Introduction ................................... 13 3.2 Wavefunctions.................................. 13 3.3 PlaneWaves ................................... 14 3.4 RepresentationofWavesviaComplexFunctions . ....... 15 3.5 ClassicalLightWaves ............................. 18 3.6 PhotoelectricEffect ............................. 19 3.7 QuantumTheoryofLight. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 3.8 ClassicalInterferenceofLightWaves . ...... 21 3.9 QuantumInterferenceofLight . 22 3.10 ClassicalParticles . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 3.11 QuantumParticles............................... 25 3.12 WavePackets .................................. 26 2 QUANTUM MECHANICS 3.13 EvolutionofWavePackets . 29 3.14 Heisenberg’sUncertaintyPrinciple . ........ 32 3.15 Schr¨odinger’sEquation . 35 3.16 CollapseoftheWaveFunction . 36 4 Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics 39 4.1 Introduction ..................................
  • Proton Polarisability Contribution to the Lamb Shift in Muonic Hydrogen

    Proton Polarisability Contribution to the Lamb Shift in Muonic Hydrogen

    Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen Mike Birse University of Manchester Work done in collaboration with Judith McGovern Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (2012) 120 Mike Birse Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift Mainz, June 2014 The Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen Much larger than in electronic hydrogen: DEL = E(2p1) − E(2s1) ' +0:2 eV 2 2 Dominated by vacuum polarisation Much more sensitive to proton structure, in particular, its charge radius th 2 DEL = 206:0668(25) − 5:2275(10)hrEi meV Results of many years of effort by Borie, Pachucki, Indelicato, Jentschura and others; collated in Antognini et al, Ann Phys 331 (2013) 127 Mike Birse Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift Mainz, June 2014 The Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen Much larger than in electronic hydrogen: DEL = E(2p1) − E(2s1) ' +0:2 eV 2 2 Dominated by vacuum polarisation Much more sensitive to proton structure, in particular, its charge radius th 2 DEL = 206:0668(25) − 5:2275(10)hrEi meV Results of many years of effort by Borie, Pachucki, Indelicato, Jentschura and others; collated in Antognini et al, Ann Phys 331 (2013) 127 Includes contribution from two-photon exchange DE2g = 33:2 ± 2:0 µeV Sensitive to polarisabilities of proton by virtual photons Mike Birse Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift Mainz, June 2014 Two-photon exchange Integral over T µn(n;q2) – doubly-virtual Compton amplitude for proton Spin-averaged, forward scattering ! two independent tensor structures Common choice: qµqn 1 p · q p · q
  • On the Possibility of Generating a 4-Neutron Resonance with a {\Boldmath $ T= 3/2$} Isospin 3-Neutron Force

    On the Possibility of Generating a 4-Neutron Resonance with a {\Boldmath $ T= 3/2$} Isospin 3-Neutron Force

    On the possibility of generating a 4-neutron resonance with a T = 3/2 isospin 3-neutron force E. Hiyama Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN, Wako, 351-0198, Japan R. Lazauskas IPHC, IN2P3-CNRS/Universite Louis Pasteur BP 28, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France J. Carbonell Institut de Physique Nucl´eaire, Universit´eParis-Sud, IN2P3-CNRS, 91406 Orsay Cedex, France M. Kamimura Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan and Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan (Dated: September 26, 2018) We consider the theoretical possibility to generate a narrow resonance in the four neutron system as suggested by a recent experimental result. To that end, a phenomenological T = 3/2 three neutron force is introduced, in addition to a realistic NN interaction. We inquire what should be the strength of the 3n force in order to generate such a resonance. The reliability of the three-neutron force in the T = 3/2 channel is exmined, by analyzing its consistency with the low-lying T = 1 states of 4H, 4He and 4Li and the 3H+ n scattering. The ab initio solution of the 4n Schr¨odinger equation is obtained using the complex scaling method with boundary conditions appropiate to the four-body resonances. We find that in order to generate narrow 4n resonant states a remarkably attractive 3N force in the T = 3/2 channel is required. I. INTRODUCTION ergy axis (physical domain) it will have no significant impact on a physical process. The possibility of detecting a four-neutron (4n) structure of Following this line of reasoning, some calculations based any kind – bound or resonant state – has intrigued the nuclear on semi-realistic NN forces indicated null [13] or unlikely physics community for the last fifty years (see Refs.
  • TO the POSSIBILITY of BOUND STATES BETWEEN TWO ELECTRONS Alexander A

    TO the POSSIBILITY of BOUND STATES BETWEEN TWO ELECTRONS Alexander A

    WEPPP031 Proceedings of IPAC2012, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA TO THE POSSIBILITY OF BOUND STATES BETWEEN TWO ELECTRONS Alexander A. Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract spins for reduction of minimal emittance restriction arisen from Eq. 1. In some sense it is an attempt to prepare the We analyze the possibility to compress dynamically the pure quantum mechanical state between just two polarized electron bunch so that the distance between electrons. What is important here is that the distance some electrons in the bunch comes close to the Compton between two electrons should be of the order of the wavelength, arranging a bound state, as the attraction by Compton wavelength. We attracted attention in [2,3] that the magnetic momentum-induced force at this distance attraction between two electrons determined by the dominates repulsion by the electrostatic force for the magnetic force of oppositely oriented magnetic moments. appropriately prepared orientation of the magnetic In this case the resulting spin is zero. Another possibility moments of the electron-electron pair. This electron pair considered below. behaves like a boson now, so the restriction for the In [4], it was suggested a radical explanation of minimal emittance of the beam becomes eliminated. structure of all elementary particles caused by magnetic Some properties of such degenerated electron gas attraction at the distances of the order of Compton represented also. wavelength. In [5], motion of charged particle in a field OVERVIEW of magnetic dipole was considered. In [4] and [5] the term in Hamiltonian responsible for the interaction Generation of beams of particles (electrons, positrons, between magnetic moments is omitted, however as it protons, muons) with minimal emittance is a challenging looks like problem in contemporary beam physics.
  • The Concept of the Photon—Revisited

    The Concept of the Photon—Revisited

    The concept of the photon—revisited Ashok Muthukrishnan,1 Marlan O. Scully,1,2 and M. Suhail Zubairy1,3 1Institute for Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 2Departments of Chemistry and Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 3Department of Electronics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan The photon concept is one of the most debated issues in the history of physical science. Some thirty years ago, we published an article in Physics Today entitled “The Concept of the Photon,”1 in which we described the “photon” as a classical electromagnetic field plus the fluctuations associated with the vacuum. However, subsequent developments required us to envision the photon as an intrinsically quantum mechanical entity, whose basic physics is much deeper than can be explained by the simple ‘classical wave plus vacuum fluctuations’ picture. These ideas and the extensions of our conceptual understanding are discussed in detail in our recent quantum optics book.2 In this article we revisit the photon concept based on examples from these sources and more. © 2003 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 270.0270, 260.0260. he “photon” is a quintessentially twentieth-century con- on are vacuum fluctuations (as in our earlier article1), and as- Tcept, intimately tied to the birth of quantum mechanics pects of many-particle correlations (as in our recent book2). and quantum electrodynamics. However, the root of the idea Examples of the first are spontaneous emission, Lamb shift, may be said to be much older, as old as the historical debate and the scattering of atoms off the vacuum field at the en- on the nature of light itself – whether it is a wave or a particle trance to a micromaser.
  • Bound and Quasi Bound States in the Continuum

    Bound and Quasi Bound States in the Continuum

    Bound and Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum One-dimensional models of square-integrable states embedded in continua, first offered by von Neumann and Wigner, can stabilize ordinary resonance levels and have gained importance in connection with solid state heterostructure semi­ conductor devices. General continuum bound state theories for many-particle systems do not exist, but models for continuum crossings of bound states suggest possible long-lived states, including some double charged anions. Nonlinear varia­ tional calculations can provide estimates of resonance energies and of the rapid onset of instability in various atomic and molecular ionization phenomena, typifying results found in mathematical "catastrophe theory". One-Dimensional Models :Many years ago von Neumann and Wignerl pointed out that local potentials could have bound (i.e. square-integrable) eigenstates with positive energies. These states are embedded in the continuum of scattering states with the same symmetry, but nevertheless would fail to "ionize". Thus it would be proper to regard these continuum bound states as infinitely sharp resonances. The example offered by von Neumann and Wigner (subsequently corrected by Simon2) was one-dimensional, and involved an oscillatory potential V(x) which behaved essentially as (sin x)/x for large lxl. Likewise the square-integ­ rable wavefunction l/;(x) for the positive energy bound state was oscillatory but, owing to diffractive interference induced by V(x), the amplitude of l/1 was driven toward zero as lxl increased, so that particle binding resulted. The exist­ ence of this elementary example naturally raises questions about whether similar continuum bound states could exist in physically more realistic cases.
  • The Lamb Shift Effect (On Series Limits) Revisited

    The Lamb Shift Effect (On Series Limits) Revisited

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Chemical Science (IJARCS) Volume 4, Issue 11, 2017, PP 10-19 ISSN No. (Online) 2349-0403 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0403.0411002 www.arcjournals.org The Lamb Shift Effect (on Series Limits) Revisited Peter F. Lang Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK *Corresponding Author: Peter F. Lang, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK Abstract : This work briefly introduces the development of atomic spectra and the measurement of the Lamb shift. The importance of series limits/ionization energies is highlighted. The use of specialist computer programs to calculate the Lamb shift and ionization energies of one and two electron atoms are mentioned. Lamb shift values calculated by complex programs are compared with results from an alternative simple expression. The importance of experimental measurement is discussed. The conclusion is that there is a case to experimentally measure series limits and re-examine the interpretation and calculations of the Lamb shift. Keywords: Atomic spectra, series limit, Lamb shift, ionization energies, relativistic corrections. 1. INTRODUCTION The study of atomic spectra is an integral part of physical chemistry. Measurement and examination of spectra dates back to the nineteenth century. It began with the examination of spectra which stemmed from the observation that the spectra of hydrogen consist of a collection of lines and not a continuous emission or absorption. It was found by examination of various spectra that each chemical element produced light only at specific places in the spectrum. First attempts to discover laws governing the positions of spectral lines were influenced by the view that vibrations which give rise to spectral lines might be similar to those in sound and might correspond to harmonical overtones of a single fundamental vibration.
  • Two Dimensional Supersymmetric Models and Some of Their Thermodynamic Properties from the Context of Sdlcq

    Two Dimensional Supersymmetric Models and Some of Their Thermodynamic Properties from the Context of Sdlcq

    TWO DIMENSIONAL SUPERSYMMETRIC MODELS AND SOME OF THEIR THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES FROM THE CONTEXT OF SDLCQ DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yiannis Proestos, B.Sc., M.Sc. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Stephen S. Pinsky, Adviser Stanley L. Durkin Adviser Gregory Kilcup Graduate Program in Robert J. Perry Physics © Copyright by Yiannis Proestos 2007 ABSTRACT Supersymmetric Discrete Light Cone Quantization is utilized to derive the full mass spectrum of two dimensional supersymmetric theories. The thermal properties of such models are studied by constructing the density of states. We consider pure super Yang–Mills theory without and with fundamentals in large-Nc approximation. For the latter we include a Chern-Simons term to give mass to the adjoint partons. In both of the theories we find that the density of states grows exponentially and the theories have a Hagedorn temperature TH . For the pure SYM we find that TH at infi- 2 g Nc nite resolution is slightly less than one in units of π . In this temperature range, q we find that the thermodynamics is dominated by the massless states. For the system with fundamental matter we consider the thermal properties of the mesonic part of the spectrum. We find that the meson-like sector dominates the thermodynamics. We show that in this case TH grows with the gauge coupling. The temperature and coupling dependence of the free energy for temperatures below TH are calculated. As expected, the free energy for weak coupling and low temperature grows quadratically with the temperature.