Towards establishing an abundant B and Bs spectrum up to the second orbital excitations Qi Li, Ru-Hui Ni, Xian-Hui Zhong ∗ 1) Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China 2) Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications (SICQEA), Changsha 410081,China and 3) Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China Stimulated by the exciting progress in experiments, we carry out a combined analysis of the masses, and strong and radiative decay properties of the B and Bs-meson states up to the second orbital excitations. Based on our good descriptions of the mass and decay properties for the low-lying well-established states B1(5721), B2∗(5747), Bs1(5830) and B∗s2(5840), we give a quark model classification for the high mass resonances observed in recent years. It is found that (i) the BJ(5840) resonance may be explained as the low mass mixed state 3 3 3 1 B( SD L) via 2 S 1-1 D1 mixing, or the pure B(2 S 1) state, or B(2 S 0). (ii) The BJ(5970) resonance may be | i 3 3 assigned as the 1 D3 state in the B meson family, although it as a pure 2 S 1 state cannot be excluded. (iii) The + narrow structure around 6064 MeV observed in the B K− mass spectrum at LHCb may be mainly caused by + the BsJ (6109) resonance decaying into B∗ K−, and favors the assignment of the high mass 1D-wave mixed state P 3 Bs(1D2′ ) with J = 2−, although it as the 1 D3 state cannot be excluded. (iv) The relatively broader BsJ(6114) 3 3 structure observed at LHCb may be explained with the mixed state Bs( SD H) via 2 S 1-1 D1 mixing, or a pure 3 | i 1 D1 state. Most of the missing 1P-, 1D-, and 2S -wave B- and Bs-meson states have a relatively narrow width, they are most likely to be observed in their dominant decay channels with a larger data sample at LHCb. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION ferent methods. For the well established states B1(5721), B2∗(5747), Bs1(5830) and B∗s2(5840), there are no puzzles to classify them as the first orbital excitations (i.e. the 1P-wave Since 2007, significant progress has been made in the states) of quark models. While for the newly observed res- observations of the bottom and bottom-strange mesons [1]. onances/structures B (5840)0,+, B(5970)0,+, B (6064), and In 2007, two low-lying orbitally excited narrow B mesons J sJ B (6114), although they are good candidates of the 2S B (5721)0,+ and B (5747)0,+ were observed by the D0 ex- sJ 1 2∗ and 1D-wave states according to the mass spectrum predic- periment [2], and were confirmed by the CDF experiment tions in various quark models, their quark model classifi- one year later [3]. Their strange analogues, B (5830) and s1 cation is not clear. There are some theoretical interpreta- B (5840), as the first orbitally excited B mesons, were also ∗s2 s tions of the newly observed B (5840) and B (5970) based reported by the CDF Collaboration in 2007 [4]. The B (5830) J J s1 on the predicted masses and strong decay properties, since and B (5840) were confirmed by the D0 and LHCb experi- ∗s2 they have been reported by the CDF and LHCb experiments. ments [5, 6]. In 2013, two higher resonances B(5970)0,+ were In the literature, the BJ(5840) resonance is explained with observed in the Bπ final states by the CDF Collaboration [7]. 1 3 3 0,+ 0,+ the B(2 S 0) [27, 28, 39], the B(2 S 1) [31], or the B(1 D1) In 2015, four higher resonances BJ(5840) and BJ(5960) state [40]. While for the resonance BJ(5970), there are inter- were observed in the Bπ final states by the LHCb Collabora- 3 pretations with the radially excited state B(2 S 1)[15, 25, 39], tion when they carried out precise measurements of the prop- or with the second orbitally excited B-meson states [29] either erties of the B (5721)0,+ and B (5747)0,+ states [8]. The prop- 1 2∗ B(13D ) [27, 31] or B(13D ) [28]. It should be mentioned 0,+ 3 1 erties of the BJ(5960) states are consistent with those of that in Ref. [47], our group assigned the B (5970) resonance 0,+ J B(5970) obtained by the CDF Collaboration. Recently, the 3 to be the B(1 D3) state by analyzing the strong decay prop- LHCb Collaboration observed two structures BsJ(6064) and erties within a chiral quark model. Based on this assignment, arXiv:2102.03694v2 [hep-ph] 12 May 2021 + BsJ(6114) in the B K− mass spectrum [9]. More experimen- the authors further predicted that as the partner of BJ(5970), tal information about the excited bottom and bottom-strange 3 the mass and width of the Bs(1 D3) state might be M 6.07 mesons is collected in Table I. More and more excited bot- GeV and Γ 30 MeV, respectively, which are also in≃ agree- tom and bottom-strange mesons are expected to be observed ment with those≃ predictions in Refs. [27, 28]. If assigning the in future LHCb experiments due to its huge production cross 3 BsJ(6064) to be the Bs(1 D3) state, both the measured mass sections of beauty, together with a good reconstruction effi- and width are consistent with quark model predictions. It ciency, versatile trigger scheme and an excellent momentum should be mentioned that there are no discussions about the and mass resolution [10]. recently observed structures BsJ(6064) and BsJ(6114) in the In theory, many theoretical studies of the masses [11–29], literature. More information about the status of the bottom strong decays [24–43], radiative decays [23, 26–29, 42–44], and bottom-strange meson study can be found in the recent and weak decays [23, 45, 46] for the excited bottom and review work [48]. bottom-strange meson states have been carried out with dif- The experimental progress provides us good opportunities to establish an abundant B and Bs-meson spectrum up to the second orbital (L = 2) excitations. In this work we deepen ∗mail: [email protected] our study by carrying out a combined analysis of the masses 2 +,0 +,0 TABLE I: Summary of the experimental information for the excited B- and Bs-meson states. The date for the B1(5721) , B2(5747) , 0 0 Bs1(5830) , and Bs2(5840) resonances are adopted the average values of the Review of Particle Physics (RPP) of Particle Data Group (PDG) [1]. The N and UN stand for the natural spin parity P = ( 1)J and unnatural spin parity P = ( 1)J . − − − Resonance JP Mass (MeV) Width (MeV) Observed channel Experiment 0 + + B1(5721) 1 5726.1 1.3 27.5 3.4 B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + + ±+2.5 ± 0 + B1(5721) 1 5725.9 2.7 31 6 B∗ π D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] 0 + − ± + + B2(5747) 2 5739.5 0.7 24.2 1.7 B π−,B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + + ± ± + + B2(5747) 2 5737.2 0.7 20 5 B π−,B∗ π− D0 [2],CDF [3],LHCb [8] + ± +30± 0 + 0 + BJ(5970) ? 5961 17 60 20 40 B π [or B∗ π ] CDF[7] 0 ± −+30 ± + + BJ(5970) ? 5978 17 70 20 30 B π− [or B∗ π−] CDF[7] + ± − ± 0 + Case A BJ(5960) UN 5964.9 6.8 63.0 31.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5960) UN 5969.2 8.2 82.3 17.1 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + BJ(5840) UN 5850.3 26.6 224.4 103.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5840) UN 5862.9 11.9 127.4 50.9 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + Case B BJ(5960) UN 6010.6 7.1 61.4 31.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5960) UN 6015.9 9.2 81.6 19.3 B∗ π− LHCb [8] + ± ± 0 + 0 + BJ(5840) N 5874.5 39.6 214.6 106.5 B∗ π , B π ? LHCb[8] 0 ± ± + + BJ(5840) N 5889.7 29.1 107.0 53.8 B∗ π−, B π−? LHCb[8] + ± ± 0 + 0 + Case C BJ(5960) N 5966.4 7.2 60.8 31.2 B∗ π , B π ? LHCb[8] 0 ± ± + + BJ(5960) N 5993.6 11.7 55.9 16.0 B∗ π−, B π−? LHCb[8] + ± ± 0 + BJ(5840) UN 5889.3 29.3 229.3 104.7 B∗ π LHCb [8] 0 ± ± + BJ(5840) UN 5907.8 13.0 119.4 51.4 B∗ π− LHCb [8] 0 + ± ± + 0 0 Bs1(5830) 1 5828.70 0.20 0.5 0.3 0.3 B∗ K−, B∗ K CDF [4],D0 [6], LHCb [5] 0 + ± ± ± Bs2(5840) 2 5839.86 0.12 1.49 0.27 B∗K, BK CDF [4], D0 [6],LHCb [5] 0 ± ± + BsJ(6064) ? 6063.5 2.0 26 4 4 B K− LHCb [9] 0 ± ± ± + [or BsJ (6109) ] ? [or 6108.8 1.8] [or 22 5 4] [or B∗ K−] LHCb[9] 0 ± ± ± + BsJ(6114) ? 6114 8 66 18 21 B K− LHCb [9] 0 ± ± ± + [or B (6158) ] ? [or 6158 9] [or 72 18 25] [or B∗ K−] LHCb[9] sJ ± ± ± and decay properties of the B and B -meson states up to the s TABLE II: The parameters of the nonrelativistic potential model.