Organically Templated Layered Uranyl Molybdate [C3H9NH+] 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organically Templated Layered Uranyl Molybdate [C3H9NH+] 4 minerals Article Organically Templated Layered Uranyl Molybdate + [C3H9NH ]4[(UO2)3(MoO4)5] Structurally Based on Mineral-Related Modular Units Evgeny Nazarchuk 1,*, Dmitri Charkin 2, Oleg Siidra 1,3 and Stepan Kalmykov 2 1 Department of Crystallography, Saint-Petersburg State University, University emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University, GSP-1, 119991 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (S.K.) 3 Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 184200 Apatity, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-921-156-14-79 Received: 5 July 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 25 July 2020 + Abstract: A new organically templated uranyl molybdate [C3H9NH ]4[(UO2)3(MoO4)5] was prepared by a hydrothermal method at 220 ◦C. The compound is monoclinic, Cс, a = 16.768(6), b = 20.553(8), 3 c = 11.897(4) Å, β = 108.195(7), V = 3895(2) Å , R1 = 0.05. The crystal structure is based upon 4 [(UO2)3(MoO4)5] − uranyl molybdate layers. The isopropylammonium cations are located in the + interlayer. The layers in the structure of [C3H9NH ]4[(UO2)3(MoO4)5] are considered as modular VI architectures. Topological analysis of layers with UO2:TO4 ratio of 3:5 (T = S, Cr, Se, Mo) was performed. Modular description is employed to elucidate the relationships between different structural 4 topologies of [(UO2)3(TO4)5] − layers and inorganic uranyl-based nanotubules. The possible existence of uranyl molybdate nanotubules is discussed. Keywords: uranyl molybdates; uranyl sulfates; uranyl selenates; crystal structure; layered structures; minerals; nanotubules 1. Introduction Investigations of natural and synthetic compounds of hexavalent uranium are important both for materials science and mineralogy. Uranium minerals are important constituents of oxidation zones of uranium deposits [1,2]. The development of the nuclear industry also requires further investigations in the area of safe nuclear waste management [3]. The latter requires proper understanding of phase formation processes, relationships between chemical compositions, crystal structures, and properties of the compounds formed. Of particular interest are both the chemical nature of the possible secondary phases and their interactions with the geological environment [4]. In the last two decades, particular attention has been paid to the hexavalent uranium (uranyl) compounds containing organic moieties, which are important for lanthanide/actinide separation. Common among these are the hybrid materials wherein the organic molecules are directly coordinated to the uranyl cation as ligands [5,6]. The templated structures based on weakly bonded organic and inorganic parts are less numerous [7] but exhibit essentially larger structural diversity of inorganic motifs. The uranium compounds are formed during various steps of the nuclear cycle and present in the nuclear waste [3]. They accumulate various nuclides, thus preventing their migration into the environment [4]. The composition of nuclear waste is extremely complex and can contain both newly formed phases, as well as products of interaction between the fuel and container material, as well as with geological environment. The molybdenum isotopes (95Mo, 97Mo, 98Mo and 100Mo), formed Minerals 2020, 10, 659; doi:10.3390/min10080659 www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Minerals 2020, 10, 659 2 of 12 Minerals 2020, 10, 659 2 of 12 95 97 98 100 duringwith geological the fission environment. process, are relativelyThe molybdenum stable and isotopes accumulate ( Mo, in Mo, the wasteMo and fuel. TopologicallyMo), formed during similar andthe even fission isostructural process, are compounds relatively stable are also and known accumulate in the in chemistry the waste of fuel. pentavalent Topologically neptunium similar [ 7and]. evenThough isostructural the natural compounds and synthetic are also known uranyl in compounds the chemistry are of generally pentavalent formed neptunium under [7]. essentially Though the natural and synthetic uranyl compounds are generally formed under essentially different conditions, their crystal structures demonstrate topological relationships [8]. Of more different conditions, their crystal structures demonstrate topological relationships [8]. Of more than than 300 primary and secondary uranium minerals known to date (http://rruff.info/ima), the latter 300 primary and secondary uranium minerals known to date (http://rruff.info/ima), the latter demonstrate the expected richer structural chemistry wherein uranium most commonly forms a demonstrate the expected richer structural chemistry wherein uranium most commonly forms a linear uranyl cation coordinated by four, five, or six ligands in the equatorial plane. The coordination linear uranyl cation coordinated by four, five, or six ligands in the equatorial plane. The coordination polyhedra can share only edges, only corners, or both edges and corners between each other or also polyhedra can share only edges, only corners, or both edges and corners between each other or also with tetrahedral polyhedra of oxyanions. The group of compounds structurally based on exclusively with tetrahedral polyhedra of oxyanions. The group ofVI compounds structurally based on exclusively corner sharing between UOn polyhedra and TO4 (T = S, Cr, Se, Mo) tetrahedra is represented in corner sharing between UOn polyhedra and TO4 (TVI = S, Cr, Se, Mo) tetrahedra is represented in the thesecondary secondary minerals. minerals. Their Their structures structures exhibit exhibit two types two typesof 0D, offour 0D 1,D four, and 1 fourD, and 2D fourcomplexes 2D complexes (Figure (Figure1). 1). Figure 1. Heteropolyhedral complexes with corner sharing only between UOn bipyramids and TO4 Figure 1. Heteropolyhedral complexes with corner sharing only between UOn bipyramids and TO4 tetrahedra in the mineral crystal structures: (a) belakovskiite, (b) bluelizardite, (c) bobcookite, (d) tetrahedra in the mineral crystal structures: (a) belakovskiite, (b) bluelizardite, (c) bobcookite, (d) meisserite, meisserite, (e) shumwayite, (f) walpurgite, (g) autunite, (h) straßmannite, (i) wetherillite and (j) (e) shumwayite, (f) walpurgite, (g) autunite, (h) straßmannite, (i) wetherillite and (j) beshtauite. beshtauite. The 0D complexes are observed in the sulfate minerals belakovskiite, Na7(UO2)(SO4)4(SO3OH) 3H2O[9] The 0D complexes are observed in the sulfate minerals belakovskiite,· and bluelizardite, Na7(UO2)(SO4)4Cl 2H2O[10], which are the secondary products of uraninite weathering; Na7(UO2)(SO4)4(SO3OH)∙3H2O [9]· and bluelizardite, Na7(UO2)(SO4)4Cl∙2H2O [10], which are the both species have been found in the Blue Lizard mine, San Juan, UT, USA. Though a large number of secondary products of uraninite weathering; both species have been found in the Blue Lizard mine, natural uranyl sulfates has been described [11], the complexes observed in belakovskiite (Figure1a) and San Juan, UT, USA. Though a large number of natural uranyl sulfates has been described [11], the bluelizardite (Figure1b) are yet unique. complexes observed in belakovskiite (Figure 1а) and bluelizardite (Figure 1b) are yet unique. The same locality also bears bobcookite, NaAl(UO2)2(SO4)4 18H2O[12], fermiite, Na4(UO2)(SO4)3 3H2O, The same locality also bears bobcookite, NaAl(UO· 2)2(SO4)4∙18H2O [12], fermiite,· 2 and oppenheimerite, Na2(UO2)(SO4)2 3H2O[13], whose structures are comprised of [(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)] − Na4(UO2)(SO4)3∙3H2O, and oppenheimerite,· Na2(UO2)(SO4)2∙3H2O [13], whose structures are chains (Figure1 с). This topology is common for synthetic uranyl sulfates, selenates, comprised of [(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)]2− chains (Figure 1с). This topology is common for synthetic uranyl and chromates [14]. They are also present in the structures of rietveldite, Fe(UO )(SO ) 5H O[15] sulfates, selenates, and chromates [14]. They are also present in the structures2 of4 rietveldite,2· 2 and svornostite, K Mg[(UO )(SO ) ] 8H O[16]. The chains observed in the structure of meisserite, Fe(UO2)(SO4)2∙5H22O [15] and2 svornostite,4 2 2 2 K2Mg[(UO2)(SO4)2]2∙8H2O [16]. The chains observed in the · 2 Na5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH) H2O[17] can be derived from [(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)] − chains [18] via the addition · Minerals 2020, 10, 659 3 of 12 of a protonated sulfate tetrahedron (Figure1d). The structure of shumwayite, ((UO )(SO )(H O) ) H O[19] 2 4 2 2 2· 2 is formed by association of [(UO2)(SO4)(H2O)2] chains (Figure1e) and water via hydrogen bonding. In the structures of deloryite, Cu (UO )(MoO ) (OH) [20], walpurgite, (BiO) (UO )(AsO ) 2H O[21], 4 2 4 2 6 4 2 4 2· 2 and orthowalpurgite, (BiO) (UO )(AsO ) 2H O[22], the [(UO )(TO ) ]2 chains are comprised of UO 4 2 4 2· 2 2 4 2 − 6 tetragonal bipyramids and TO4 tetrahedra sharing vertices (Figure1f). Their association leads to the formation of autunite-type layers (Figure1g) [23]. n+ A large number of uranium minerals with a common formula A [(UO2)(TO4)](H2O)mXk adopt the V structures based on autunite-related [(UO2)(T O4)]− layers. Therein, A may stand for a single, double, or even triple-charged cation while T is P or As, and X is generally F or OH. The layers observed in the structures of magnesioleydetite, Mg(UO )(SO ) 11H O, straßmannite, Al(UO )(SO ) F 16H O[24], 2 4 2· 2 2 4 2 · 2 geschieberite, K (UO )(SO ) 2H O[25], and leydetite, Fe(UO )(SO ) 11H O[26] are topologically 2 2 4 2· 2 2 4 2· 2 identical (Figure1h). Therein, four out of five equatorial vertices of uranium polyhedra are occupied by oxygen atoms of sulfate tetrahedra while the fifth is occupied by a water molecule; all such vertices are similarly oriented in the layer plane. The layers in the structure of wetherillite, Na Mg(UO ) (SO ) 18H O[12], differ in that the vertices occupied by water molecules exhibit two 2 2 2 4 4· 2 positions (Figure1i). Yet another layered arrangement is formed by vertex-sharing UO 6(H2O) and SO4 moieties (Figure1j) in the structure of beshtauite, (NH ) (UO )(SO ) 2H O[27].
Recommended publications
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 101, pages 2570–2573, 2016 New Mineral Names*,† DMITRIY I. BELAKOVSKIY1, OLIVIER C. GAGNE2, AND YULIA UVAROVA3 1Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada 3CSIRO Mineral Resources, CSIRO, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia IN THIS ISSUE This New Mineral Names has entries for 9 new mineral species, including dmisokolovite, geschieberite, imayoshiite, palladosilicide, plášilite, raisaite, shchurovskyite, svornostite, and vanackerite. GESCHIEBERITE* AND SVORNOSTITE* 3.681 (18; 311), 3.403 (12; 013), 3.304 (15; 401,113), 3.006 (17; 122). The unit-cell parameters refined from powder-diffraction data are: a = J. Plášil, J. Hloušek, A.V. Kasatkin, R. Škoda, M. Novàk and J. Čejka 13.786(5), b = 7.278(3), c = 11.536(4) Å, V = 1157.4 Å3. Single-crystal (2015) Geschieberite, K (UO )(SO ) (H O) , a new uranyl sulfate 2 2 4 2 2 2 X-ray diffraction data collected on a crystal of size 0.19 × 0.11 × 0.09 mm mineral from Jáchymov. Mineralogical Magazine, 79(1), 205–216. refined to R = 0.028 for 1882 unique reflections with I ≥ 3σ(I) shows J. Plášil, J. Hloušek, A.V. Kasatkin, M. Novák, J. Čejka and L. Lapčák 1 geschieberite is orthorhombic, Pna2 , with a = 13.7778(3), b = 7.2709(4), (2015) Svornostite, K Mg[(UO )(SO ) ] ∙8H O , a new uranyl sulfate 1 2 2 4 2 2 2 c = 11.5488(2) Å, V = 1156.92 Å3, Z = 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The New IMA List of Minerals – a Work in Progress – Updated: March 2020
    The New IMA List of Minerals – A Work in Progress – Updated: March 2020 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of all valid mineral species is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association, which is the organization in charge for approval of new minerals, and more in general for all issues related to the status of mineral species. The list, which will be updated on a regular basis, is intended as the primary and official source on minerals. Explanation of column headings: Name : it is the presently accepted mineral name (and in the table, minerals are sorted by name). CNMMN/CNMNC approved formula : it is the chemical formula of the mineral. IMA status : A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). IMA No. / Year : for approved minerals the IMA No. is given: it has the form XXXX-YYY, where XXXX is the year and YYY a sequential number; for grandfathered minerals the year of the original description is given. In some cases, typically for Rd and Rn minerals, the year may be followed by s.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Jiří Čejka – Devadesátiny V Plné Síle
    Journal of the National Museum (Prague), Natural History Series Vol. 188 (2019), ISSN 1802-6842 (print), 1802-6850 (electronic) DOI: 10.37520/jnmpnhs-2019-0014 Kronika/ Chronicle Jiří Čejka – devadesátiny v plné síle Jiří Sejkora & Jakub Plášil Národní muzeum, Mineralogicko-petrologické oddělení, Cirkusová 1740, 193 00 Praha 9; [email protected] Sejkora J. & Plášil J., 2019: Jiří Čejka – devadesátiny v plné síle. – Journal of the National Museum (Prague), Natural History Series 188: 193–218. - - Ačkoliv se to zdá neuvěřitelné, náš vzácný kolega a spolupracovník, ing. Jiří Čejka, DrSc., osla vil začátkem září roku 2019 v rodinném kruhu v Roudnici nad Labem a mezi skauty své de vadesáté narozeniny. Nuže popořádku, nejdříve něco- biografických dat. Jiří Čejka se narodil 2. září 1929 v Roudnici nad Labem ve středostavovské- rodině úředníka roudnické radnice a později správce roudnické městské galerie, a mat ky, která byla nejdříve v domácnosti a později praco vala v městské knihovně. Po maturitě na osmiletém gymnáziu v roce 1948 nastoupil ke studiu na Vysoké škole chemicko-technologického inženýrství, patřící tehdy ještě pod ČVUT v Praze. Od mládí se zajímal- o politické dění a již během studia na střední škole se jako člen mládeže Československé stranyModrý národ meč ně socialistické a zejména jako aktivní skaut podílel na vytvoření protikomunistické skupiny -. Ta se zaměřila na vydávání a šíření letáků ukazující pravdu o podstatě tehdy vzniklého nedemokratic- kého komunistického totalitního státního zřízení.- Činnost této skupiny spoluorganizoval i během své ho vysokoškolského studia v Praze; po jejím odhale ní byl v roce 1951 z politických důvodů vyloučen ze studia na všech vysokých škol v tehdejší ČSR.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 100, pages 1319–1332, 2015 New Mineral Names*,† FERNANDO CÁMARA1, OLIVIER C. GAGNÉ2, DMITRIY I. BELAKOVSKIY3 AND YULIA UVAROVA4 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terrá, Universitá di degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35-10125 Torino, Italy 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada 3Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 4Mineral Resources Flagship, CSIRO, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia IN THIS ISSUE This New Mineral Names has entries for 25 new minerals, including alcaparrosaite, bastnäsite-(Nd), calciolangbeinite, chovanite, chromio-pargasite (ehimeite), chukhrovite-(Ca), dzhuluite, eltyubyuite, ferrisepiolite, hereroite, hielscherite, iseite, itsiite, jakobssonite, kazanskiite, meisserite, nashite, omsite, schindlerite, tanohataite, tazzoliite, vapnikite, vladkrivovichevite, wernerbaurite, and wopmayite. ALCAPARROSAITE* r < v. The optical orientation is X = b; Y ^ c = 27° in the obtuse A.R. Kampf, S.J. Mills, R.M. Housley, P.A. Williams, and M. angle β. No pleochroism was observed. The average of 4 electron 4+ 3+ probe analyses gives [wt% (range)]: Na2O 0.32 (0.16–0.51), K2O Dini (2012) Alcaparrosaite, K3Ti Fe (SO4)4O(H2O)2, a new hydrophobic Ti4+ sulfate from Alcaparrosa, Chile. Mineralogi- 20.44 (20.30–20.67), Fe2O3 11.58 (11.41–11.71), TiO2 11.77 cal Magazine, 76(4), 851–861. (11.54–12.18), P2O5 0.55 (0.48–0.68), SO3 47.52 (46.57–48.06), H2O 5.79 (calculated from structure refinement); total 97.97 wt%. 4+ 3+ 4+ This gives the empirical formula (K2.89Na0.07)Σ2.96Ti0.98Fe0.97(S0.99 Alcaparrosaite (IMA 2011-024), ideally K3Ti 3+ P0.01O4)4O0.72(OH)0.28(H2O)2 based on 19 O pfu.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the International Symposium CEMC 2014
    I V E R SI TA N S U M S I A S S A N R E Y N K U IA B R Czech Geological Society PROCEEDINGS NA OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM CEMC 2014 Skalský Dvůr, Czech Republic 23–26 April, 2014 4th CENTRAL EUROPEAN MINERALOGICAL CONFERENCE (CEMC) Skalský Dvůr, Czech Republic, 23–26 April 2014 Proceedings of the international symposium CEMC 2014 Masaryk University Czech Geological Society Edited and revised by Ivo Macek Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Cover by Petr Gadas Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic The authors are fully responsible for scientific content, language and copyright of all chapters including published figures and data. Organizers Milan Novák Petr Gadas Zbyněk Buřival Radek Škoda Renata Čopjaková Zdeněk Losos Ivo Macek ------------------------------ Masaryk University Brno David Buriánek František Veselovský --------------------------- Czech Geological Survey Stanislav Houzar Vladimír Hrazdil ----------------------------- Moravian Museum Brno Jakub Plášil ----------------------------- Czech Academy of Science Czech Republic Table of contents Bačík P., Dikej J., Fridrichová J.: Disorder among octahedral sites in tourmalines of schorl-dravite series ................................. 10 Bartz W., Chorowska M., Gasior M., Kosciuk J.: Petrographic study of early medieval mortars from the castle in Ostrów Tumski (wroclaw, SW Poland) .............................................................................................................................. 12 Bolohuščin V., Uher P., Ružička P.: Vesuvianite from the Dubová
    [Show full text]
  • 2H O, a New Uranyl Sulfate Mineral from the Blue Lizard Mine, San
    Journal of Geosciences, 60 (2015), 1–10 DOI: 10.3190/jgeosci.184 Original paper Plášilite, Na(UO2)(SO4)(OH)·2H2O, a new uranyl sulfate mineral from the Blue Lizard mine, San Juan County, Utah, USA Anthony R. KAmpf1*, Anatoly V. KAsAtKIn2, Jiří ČeJKA3, Joe mARty4 1 Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA; [email protected] 2 V/O “Almazjuvelirexport”, Ostozhenka str., 22, block 1, 119034 Moscow, Russia 3 Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, 193 00 Prague 9, Czech Republic 4 5199 E. Silver Oak Rd., Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA * Corresponding author Plášilite (IMA 2014-021), Na(UO2)(SO4)(OH)·2H2O, is a new uranyl sulfate mineral from the Blue Lizard mine, San Juan County, Utah, USA. The new mineral occurs in and on sandstone matrix in close association with atacamite, blödite, brochantite, calcite, chalcanthite, dickite, gerhardtite, gypsum, hexahydrite, johannite, manganoblödite, natrozippeite and tamarugite. It is a low-temperature, secondary mineral formed by the post-mining weathering of uraninite. Plášilite is monoclinic, with the space group P21/c, and unit cell parameters a = 8.7122(6), b = 13.8368(4), c = 7.0465(2) Å, β = 112.126(8)°, V = 786.89(7) Å3 and Z = 4. Crystals are long, thin blades, elongated on [001] and flattened on {100}; rarely occur as prisms, also elongated on [001]. Crystals exhibit the forms {100}, {010} and {011}, and are commonly twinned on {100}. Plášilite is greenish yellow, has a white streak and fluoresces bluish white under both long-wave and short-wave UV.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA–CNMNC Approved Mineral Symbols
    Mineralogical Magazine (2021), 85, 291–320 doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43 Article IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols Laurence N. Warr* Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Abstract Several text symbol lists for common rock-forming minerals have been published over the last 40 years, but no internationally agreed standard has yet been established. This contribution presents the first International Mineralogical Association (IMA) Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) approved collection of 5744 mineral name abbreviations by combining four methods of nomenclature based on the Kretz symbol approach. The collection incorporates 991 previously defined abbreviations for mineral groups and species and presents a further 4753 new symbols that cover all currently listed IMA minerals. Adopting IMA– CNMNC approved symbols is considered a necessary step in standardising abbreviations by employing a system compatible with that used for symbolising the chemical elements. Keywords: nomenclature, mineral names, symbols, abbreviations, groups, species, elements, IMA, CNMNC (Received 28 November 2020; accepted 14 May 2021; Accepted Manuscript published online: 18 May 2021; Associate Editor: Anthony R Kampf) Introduction used collection proposed by Whitney and Evans (2010). Despite the availability of recommended abbreviations for the commonly Using text symbols for abbreviating the scientific names of the studied mineral species, to date < 18% of mineral names recog- chemical elements
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropocene Epoch”
    American Mineralogist, Volume 102, pages 595–611, 2017 OUTLOOKS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY MATERIALS On the mineralogy of the “Anthropocene Epoch” ROBERT M. HAZEN1,*, EDWARD S. GREW2, MARCUS J. ORIGLIERI3, AND ROBERT T. DOWNS3 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2School of Earth and Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The “Anthropocene Epoch” has been proposed as a new post-Holocene geological time interval—a period characterized by the pervasive impact of human activities on the geological record. Prior to the influence of human technologies, the diversity and distribution of minerals at or near Earth’s surface arose through physical, chemical, and/or biological processes. Since the advent of human mining and manufacturing, particularly since the industrial revolution of the mid-eighteenth century, mineral-like compounds have experienced a punctuation event in diversity and distribution owing to the pervasive impact of human activities. We catalog 208 mineral species approved by the International Mineralogi- cal Association that occur principally or exclusively as a consequence of human processes. At least three types of human activities have affected the diversity and distribution of minerals and mineral-like compounds in ways that might be reflected in the worldwide stratigraphic record. The most obvious influence is the widespread occurrence of synthetic mineral-like compounds, some of which are manufactured directly for applications (e.g., YAG crystals for lasers; Portland cement) and others that arise indirectly (e.g., alteration of mine tunnel walls; weathering products of mine dumps and slag).
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 99, pages 1806–1813, 2014 New Mineral Names*,† DMITRIY BELAKOVSKIY1, FERNANDO CÁMARA2, YULIA UVAROVA3 AND OLIVIER C. GAGNE4 1Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35-10125 Torino, Italy 3CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, MDU Flagship, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia, 6151, Australia 4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 3R1, Canada IN THIS ISSUE This New Mineral Names has entries for 13 new mineral species, including arsiccioite, bluelizard- ite, diegogattaite, disulfodadsonite, fabriesite, laachite, oskarssonite, philrothite, putnisite, therasiaite, trinepheline, tubulite, and whitecapsite. ARSICCIOITE* Cd 0.20±5, Tl 18.79±33, As 10.77±19, Sb 4.75±10, S 18.08±21, C. Biagioni, E. Bonaccorsi, Y. Moëlo, P. Orlandi, L. Bindi, M. Se 0.07±5, total 97.99±44 wt%. On the basis of 6 cations D’Orazio, and S. Vezzoni (2014) Mercury-arsenic sulfosalts pfu, the empirical chemical formula is (Ag0.87Cu0.13Fe0.01)S1.01 (Hg1.91Zn0.08Cd0.02)S2.01Tl1.00(As1.56Sb0.42)S1.98S6.12Se0.01. The stron- from the Apuan Alps (Tuscany, Italy). II. Arsiccioite, AgHg2 gest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [d Å (I %; TlAs2S6, a new mineral from the Monte Arsiccio mine: occur- rence, crystal structure and crystal chemistry of the routhierite hkl)] are: 4.195 (m; 211), 3.542 (m; 103), 3.025 (vs; 222), 2.636 isotypic series. Mineralogical Magazine, 78(1), 101–117.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA Master List
    The New IMA List of Minerals – A Work in Progress – Updated: November 2015 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of all valid mineral species is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association, which is the organization in charge for approval of new minerals, and more in general for all issues related to the status of mineral species. The list, which will be updated on a regular basis, is intended as the primary and official source on minerals. Explanation of column headings: Name : it is the presently accepted mineral name (and in the table, minerals are sorted by name). CNMMN/CNMNC approved formula : it is the chemical formula of the mineral. IMA status : A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). IMA No. / Year : for approved minerals the IMA No. is given: it has the form XXXX-YYY, where XXXX is the year and YYY a sequential number; for grandfathered minerals the year of the original description is given. In some cases, typically for Rd and Rn minerals, the year may be followed by s.p.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 100, pages 1319–1332, 2015 New Mineral Names*,† FERNANDO CÁMARA1, OLIVIER C. GAGNÉ2, DMITRIY I. BELAKOVSKIY3 AND YULIA UVAROVA4 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terrá, Universitá di degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35-10125 Torino, Italy 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada 3Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 4Mineral Resources Flagship, CSIRO, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia IN THIS ISSUE This New Mineral Names has entries for 25 new minerals, including alcaparrosaite, bastnäsite-(Nd), calciolangbeinite, chovanite, chromio-pargasite (ehimeite), chukhrovite-(Ca), dzhuluite, eltyubyuite, ferrisepiolite, hereroite, hielscherite, iseite, itsiite, jakobssonite, kazanskiite, meisserite, nashite, omsite, schindlerite, tanohataite, tazzoliite, vapnikite, vladkrivovichevite, wernerbaurite, and wopmayite. ALCAPARROSAITE* r < v. The optical orientation is X = b; Y ^ c = 27° in the obtuse A.R. Kampf, S.J. Mills, R.M. Housley, P.A. Williams, and M. angle β. No pleochroism was observed. The average of 4 electron 4+ 3+ probe analyses gives [wt% (range)]: Na2O 0.32 (0.16–0.51), K2O Dini (2012) Alcaparrosaite, K3Ti Fe (SO4)4O(H2O)2, a new hydrophobic Ti4+ sulfate from Alcaparrosa, Chile. Mineralogi- 20.44 (20.30–20.67), Fe2O3 11.58 (11.41–11.71), TiO2 11.77 cal Magazine, 76(4), 851–861. (11.54–12.18), P2O5 0.55 (0.48–0.68), SO3 47.52 (46.57–48.06), H2O 5.79 (calculated from structure refinement); total 97.97 wt%. 4+ 3+ 4+ This gives the empirical formula (K2.89Na0.07)Σ2.96Ti0.98Fe0.97(S0.99 Alcaparrosaite (IMA 2011-024), ideally K3Ti 3+ P0.01O4)4O0.72(OH)0.28(H2O)2 based on 19 O pfu.
    [Show full text]
  • Meisserite Na5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH)(H2O)
    Meisserite Na5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH)(H2O) - Crystal Data: Triclinic. Point Group: 1 . As prisms elongated on [100], to 0.3 mm, exhibiting {010} and {001}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Fair on {100} and {001}. Fracture: Uneven. Tenacity: Very brittle. Hardness = 2 D(meas.) = n.d. D(calc.) = 3.208 Optical Properties: Translucent to transparent. Color: Pale green to yellowish green. Streak: Very pale yellow. Luster: Vitreous. Bright yellow-green fluorescence under LW and SW UV. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). α = 1.514 β = 1.546 γ = 1.557 2V(meas.) = 60(2)° 2V(calc.) = 60° Orientation: X ≈ a, Z ≈ c*. Dispersion: Weak, r > ν. Pleochroism: X = colorless, Y = pale yellow, Z = pale greenish yellow. Absorption: X < Y ≈ Z. - Cell Data: Space Group: P1 . a = 5.32317(10) b = 11.5105(2) c = 13.5562(10) α = 102.964(7)° β = 97.414(7)° γ = 91.461(6)° Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Blue Lizard Mine, Red Canyon, San Juan Co., Utah, USA. 5.24 (100), 13.15 (81), 4.67 (68), 6.33 (62), 5.64 (52), 3.849 (48), 3.293 (43) Chemistry: (1) (2) Na2O 21.67 19.66 UO3 61.46 36.32 SO3 34.98 40.59 H2O 3.90 3.43 Total 101.16 100.00 (1) Blue Lizard Mine, Red Canyon, San Juan Co., Utah, USA.; average of 4 electron microprobe analyses, H2O calculated from stoichiometry, complex anions confirmed by Raman spectroscopy; corresponding to Na5.05(U0.94O2)(SO4)3[SO2.69(OH)1.31](H2O). (2) Na5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH)(H2O). Occurrence: As efflorescences on sandstone in the underground workings of a roll-front type uranium deposit, the product of weathering and oxidation of primary uraninite.
    [Show full text]