O Ntwo Species Ofmangrove Leucosiidae from Irian Jaya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

O Ntwo Species Ofmangrove Leucosiidae from Irian Jaya CRUSTACEAN RESEARCH,NO. 32: 1-1 2,2003 Ontwo species ofmangrove Leucosiidae from Irian Jaya,Indonesia , with notes onPhilyr αmalザαctrix (Kemp,1915) (Decapoda:Brachyura) Dwi Listyo Rahayu and PeterK. L. Ng Abstract. -Two species of leucosiid lems with the taxonomy of P. malefactrix crabs,Philyr αnishihirαiTakeda & were identified. As aresult ,the taxonomy of Nakasone,1991 ,and P. bicornis,new P. mal抑 ctrix is revised on the basis of the species,are reported from mangroves types and fresh specimens,and P. minuta near the mouth of Kamora River in the Chen & Turkay,2001 ,is synonymised with southeast coast of Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Philyrαnishihirαiis record- The genus Philyra Leach,1817 (type ed for the first time since its original species Leucosia globus Fabricius,1775 ,des- description. Philyrα, bicornis resembles ignation by H. Milne Edwards,1837) is one P.mαt ザαctrix (Kemp,1915) but dif- of the largest in the Leucosiidae,with 43 fers in that the posterolateral angle of recognised species (P. K. L. Ng,unpub- the carapace is strongly projected and li shed compiled data). 百le characters sepa- the male first pleopod is long,straight rating Philyra from the closely allied Ebalia and tapering at the tip. The taxonomy Leach,1817 ,are not always reliabl e,and the of Philyra malザαctrix (Kemp,1915) is generic status of many species in these also discussed,and Philyrαminutα genera are still unclear (see Takeda & Chen & Turkay,2001 ,is here syn・ Nakasone,1991; Tan,1995; Chen & Turkay, onymised with P. m αt ザαctrix. 2001; P. K. L. Ng,unpublished data). Nevertheless,species that have awell devel- oped subhepatic facet and the epistome visi- Introduction ble from the dorsal view are currently placed Despite the hi gh diversity of leucosiid in Philyra rather than Ebalia (see Chen & crabs in the Indo-West Pacific ,there are few Turkay,2001: 254) . records of them from mangroves. Thus far , The abbreviations G1 and G2 are used only the following species haveb een report- for the male first and second pleopods ed from mangroves or associated habitats: respectively. Measurements provided are of Philyra malefactrix (Kemp,1915) ,P. taekoae the carapace width and length respectively. Takeda,1972 ,P. iriomotensis Sakai,1983 ,P. Specimens examined are deposited in the nishihirai Takeda & Nakasone,1991 ,P. min- Research Center for Oceanography (RCO) , utαC, h e n & Turkay,2001 ,and Praosia punc- Indonesian In stit ute of Sciences,Jakarta , tata Tan & Ng,1993. In this paper,we Indonesia; Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense describe anew species,Phi かra bicornis , (MZB),Cibinong ,Indonesia ;The Natural from mangroves in the southwest coast of History Museum (ex British Museum of Iri an Jaya,Indonesia ,as well as substantially Natural History,BMNH) ,London; and extend the range of P.nishihirai. As Philyra Zoological Reference Collection (ZRC) of bicornis is close to P. malefactrix (Kemp, the Raffles Museum,National University of 1915) ,compariso ns were made with this Singapore. species,and in the process,severa lprob- 2 D. L. RAHAYU & P. K. L. Ng grove near river mouth,Ka mora,lrian Jaya, Taxonomy Indonesia,col l. A. Pratiwi ,29 June 2001; 2 ovigerous females (7 .4 by 6.5 mm,7.4 by 6.6 Philyrαnis hihirαiTakeda & Nakasone , mm) (RCO) ,1 ovigerous fema1e (7.0 by 6.5 1991 mm) (MZB),1 fema 1e (5 .5by 4.6 mm) (Figs. 1a,2, 3) (ZRC) ,sandy-mud substrate in mangrove PhilyrαnishihirαiTakeda & Nakasone , near river mouth,Kamora ,Irian Jaya, 1991: 21 ,Fig. 2. Indonesia,co11. A. Pratiwi ,10 July 2001; 1 male (5.5 by 5.1 mm) (RCO),sandy-mud Materia1examined. -1 ma1e(6.0 by 5.4 substrate in mangrove near river mouth, mm) (RCO) ,sandy-mud substrate in man- Kamora,Irian Jaya ,Indonesia ,col 1. A. Fig. 1. a,Philyra nishihirai Takeda & Nakasone,199 1. a. male (6.3 by 5.9 mm) (ZRC) ,b. Phi かra bicor- nis ,new species ,male holotype (7.1 by 6.5 mm) (MZB). MANGROVE LEUCOSIIDAE OF IRIAN JAYA 3 {i' 、子恐 ." 円「 ヨ グF q. "'Y 町1' , 、.ラ,. 噌ヘ. すミ; : ,: , L 〆 1貝 , モJ 、; 。心 、 、夕 、 正~弓: v 句、 J o ) Fig. 2.Philyra ・nishihiraiTakeda &Nakasone ,199 1. Male (6 .0by 5.4 mm) (MZB). Scale =1. 0mm . Pratiwi,13 July 2001; 1male (6.3 by 5.9mm) the present record being asubstantial range (ZRC) ,1 ovigerous female (7.6 by 7.0 mm) extension. Thetaxonomy of this species has (RCO) ,1 female (5.3 by 4.4 mm) (ZRC) ,1 been discussed in depth by Takeda & female (5.7 by 4.9 mm) (MZB) ,sandy-mud Nakasone (1991) ,who described it on the substrate in mangrove near river mouth, basis of one male and one female. 百le pre- Kamora,Irian Jaya ,lndonesia ,col l. I. sent series of specimens indicate that the Ermayanti,22 September 2001. form of the anterolateral margin does not va可 very much,with the lobes always den- Remarks. -The present specimens from tate (Fig .1a ,2). None of them havethe Irian Jaya (Figs. 1a,2 ,3) agree well with the anterolateral lobes as low as that of the figures and descriptions of this species by female paratype ぐrakeda & Nakasone,1991: Takeda & Nakasone (1991) from Okinawa, Fig. 2B). Overall figures (carapacewith even though they aresome distance away, legs) ,as well as figures of the female 4 D. L. RAHAYU & P. K L. Ng > (-ω , (r g (. r ¥J 0."i_,)_. b ι 、, c 、0 4・ d 一ー一一一 一一- a,c d-f d e Fig. 3. Philyra nishihiraiTakeda &Nakasone ,199 1. a,c-f ,mal e(6 .0 by 5.4 mm) (MZB); b,g ,h ,oviger- ous female (7.0 by6.5 mm) (MZB). a. maleleft cheliped,b .female third maxilliped,dor sa lview ,c . malea bdomen,d ,e. male Gl,f. ma leG2 ,i. male third maxilliped,dor sa lview ,g .female abdomen,h. ventral view of femaleposterior margin of carapace. Scales =1. 0mm . abdomen and G2 areprovid edfor the first October 2000. Paratypes: 1male (7 .7by 7.5 time. mm) (ZRC) ,1 male (7.1 by 6.5 mm) (RCO) , 1ov igerous female (7.2 by7.0 mm) (RCO),1 Philyrαbicornis,new species ovigerous female (7 .4 by 7.0 mm) (ZRC) , (Figs. 1b,4, 5) sam edata as holotype. Material examined. -Holotype: male (7.1 by 6.5mm) (MZB),mud substrate in man- Etymology. -Th ename alludes to the groves,n ear river mouth,Kamora ,lrian projecting comers of the posterior carapace Jaya,lndon esia ,co ll. D .L. Rahayu,16 margin of the species. Thename is used as a MANGROVE LEUCOSIIDAE OFIRIAN JAYA 5 noun in apposition. and exopod denticulated ,with tufts of setae. Chelipeds about 1. 5times length of cara- Description (males). -Carapace slightly pace width. Anterior and posterior margin of broader than long,dorsal surface strongly merus tuberculated,outer surface covered convex,anterolateral ,posterolateral and pos- with large and small tubercles on proximal terior margins rimmed by obtuse tubercles , half. Carpus about one-third length of lateral angle obtuse,posterolateral margin merus,outer surface with rows of tubercles sinuous; dorsal surface minutely granular, along upper and lower margins. Palm slight- with numerous large punctae which extend ly longer than dactylus ,outer surface to ventral surface ,regions indistinc t. smooth orwi出 scattered flattened tubercles, Cardiac,branchial and intestinal regions ele- upper and lower margins with dense tuber- vated,with large granules; large granules on cles. Cutting edges of 宣ngers with blunt den- cardiac region extend anteriorly to form 3 ticles ,tip of fixed fi. nger hooked. Outer sur- granular ridges on gastric region,median face of dactylus with 2longitudinal ridges, keel with small tubercles; intestinal elevation outer surface of fixed finger with shallow bearing large and small granules confluent longitudinal groove. with elevation on cardiac region; elevation Ambulatory legs subcylindrical; lengths on branchial region with large granules, decreasing gradually from fi. rst to last pair , joined by oblique ridge at distal quarter. glabrous,upper and lower margins of meri, Large,shallow concavity between hepatic carpi and propodi se 汀 ated. and anterolateral margins. Front nearly Male abdomen with 3articulating seg- straight or slightly concave medially; hepatic ments (including telson) ,narrow; segments region excavated to form broad,shallow 1and telson free ,segments 2to 6fused , depression; floor of sinus with median immovable,sutures indistinct. Segment 2 obtuse angle; upper margin of sinus not con- with scattered tubercles,suture between fluent with lower margin at outer portion; segment 5and 6visible as notch on either pterygostomial region with scattered tuber- side of abdomen; telson short,apex round- cles ,not swollen. Posterior margin concave ed,ending close to lower edge of buccal cav- with posterolateral angles produced. ern.τboracic stemum with large tubercles , Antennules fold transversely ,antennular sternites interrupted ,印刷re between stem- fossa rectangular,external angle rounded. ites 1and 2indistinct ,visible only laterally. Basal segment of antennae embedded,fla- G1 long ,slender ,straight along most of gellum excluded from orbi t. Eye and orbit length ,tapering at tip ,加 ft of setae at distal small,eye retracts along orbital groove. one-sixth. G2 0.2 length of Gl,straight ,with Merus of third maxilliped with pointed spear-shaped structure distally ,expanded apex,0.8 times length of ischium along inner proximally,tuft of setae on inner side. margin,outer margin scarcely setose ,outer surface with row of minute tubercles; ischi- Description (females). -Similar to males um2.5 times longer 出an wide,outer surface except: posterolateral margin of carapace with 3rows of tubercles,largest tubercles relatively less produced; outer surface of adjacent to outer edge. Exopod much longer merus and ischium of third maxilliped with than wide,about twice length of merus,long longitudinal row of dense setae medially, setae on outer edge,outer surface with scat- margins of ischium,merus and exopod with tered tubercles; basis expanded,more than tuft of setae ,row of large tubercles near half length of exopod; carpus,propodus and outer margin of ischium; abdomen strongly dactylus not visible in external view when domed,highly punctate,covering most of reposed,articulating on inner surface of thoracic sternites; segments 3-6 fused, merus at about one-fifth distance from apex.
Recommended publications
  • Notes on the Occurrence of Some Poorly Known Decapoda (Crustacea) in the Southern North Sea
    NOTES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME POORLY KNOWN DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA by J. P. H M ADEMA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands F CREUTZBERG & G J VAN NOORT Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands With 9 text-figures, 6 tables, 5 maps INTRODUCTION Since April 1972 an ecological trawl-survey programme has been undertaken by the Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, in the southern North Sea with the R. V. "Aurelia". The main object is to obtain information on distribution, density, biomass and fluctuations of crawling or swimming demersal (epibenthic) fauna such as small fishes, shrimps, prawns, crabs, asteroids, ophiuroids and some gastropods, for the evaluation of the role of these carnivores in the benthic ecosystem of the southern North Sea. Sedimentological aspects of the area are described by Creutzberg & Postma (1979). Within the context of the present paper the most important feature is the mesh of 5 x 5 mm2 of the cod end of the 5V2 m beam-trawl used and the extensive area of 5000-10,000 m2 covered during each haul. These exceptional circumstances resulted into faunistically interesting catches which gave rise to a cooperation with taxonomic specialists of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie (RMNH), Leiden. The present paper deals with decapod crustaceans, collected during "Aurelia"-cruises, which are considered to be scarce or rare in the southern North Sea, completed with data from bottom-samples and other sources The species in question are: Pandalina brevirostris, Spirontocans lilljeborgii, Alpheus macrocheles, Pontophilus spinosus, Pontophilus bi.spino.sus, Galathea dispersa, Ebalia tubero.sa, Ebalia tumefacta, Ebalia cranchii, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Monodaeus couchii, Callianassa subterranea, Callianas.sa tyrrhena, Upogebia stellata and Upogebia deltaura Of the genus Macropodia a number of specimens have been collected, which partly were identified as M.
    [Show full text]
  • Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia Tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J
    Mar. Behav. Physiol. 1981, Vol. 8, pp. 149-161 0091-181X/81/0802-0149 $06.50/0 © 1981 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Inc. Printed in Great Britain Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J. SCHEMBRI† University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland KA28 OEG (Received November 17, 1980; in final form March 7, 1981) When given a choice, Ebalia tuberosa prefers sediment to a smooth plastic surface. Gravel is preferred to either sand or mud but no preference is shown between coarse and fine gravel. When overturned, the crabs may take from 2 to 900 s to right again, but males right in a shorter time than females, probably because they are less massive. E. tuberosa burrows by digging backwards into the sediment till half-covered. A variety of different mechanisms are then used to cover the remainder of the body. The crabs take from 130 to 1000 s to burrow completely and larger crabs of both sexes take longer to burrow than do smaller individuals. INTRODUCTION Almost nothing is known of the behaviour of any species of leucosiid crab. Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) is a typical member of the family and is found in subtidal coarse sediments (Allen, 1967; Schembri, 1980). E. tuberosa buries itself in the substratum but does not construct a permanent burrow (Gosse, 1856) and shows numerous morphological and physiological adaptations for this mode of life (Balss, 1940; Glaessner, 1969; Schembri, 1979a,b, 1980, and papers in preparation). Apart from the semi-anecdotal descriptions of burrowinDownloaded by [University of Glasgow] at 12:15 29 September 2014 g in E.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of National Seminar on Biodiversity And
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION OF COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS OF INDIA (2012) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrons: 1. Hindi VidyaPracharSamiti, Ghatkopar, Mumbai 2. Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) 3. Association of Teachers in Biological Sciences (ATBS) 4. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) 5. Mangroves for the Future (MFF) Advisory Committee for the Conference 1. Dr. S. M. Karmarkar, President, ATBS and Hon. Dir., C B Patel Research Institute, Mumbai 2. Dr. Sharad Chaphekar, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Mumbai 3. Dr. Asad Rehmani, Director, BNHS, Mumbi 4. Dr. A. M. Bhagwat, Director, C B Patel Research Centre, Mumbai 5. Dr. Naresh Chandra, Pro-V. C., University of Mumbai 6. Dr. R. S. Hande. Director, BCUD, University of Mumbai 7. Dr. Madhuri Pejaver, Dean, Faculty of Science, University of Mumbai 8. Dr. Vinay Deshmukh, Sr. Scientist, CMFRI, Mumbai 9. Dr. Vinayak Dalvie, Chairman, BoS in Zoology, University of Mumbai 10. Dr. Sasikumar Menon, Dy. Dir., Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Centre, Mumbai 11. Dr, Sanjay Deshmukh, Head, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Mumbai 12. Dr. S. T. Ingale, Vice-Principal, R. J. College, Ghatkopar 13. Dr. Rekha Vartak, Head, Biology Cell, HBCSE, Mumbai 14. Dr. S. S. Barve, Head, Dept. of Botany, Vaze College, Mumbai 15. Dr. Satish Bhalerao, Head, Dept. of Botany, Wilson College Organizing Committee 1. Convenor- Dr. Usha Mukundan, Principal, R. J. College 2. Co-convenor- Deepak Apte, Dy. Director, BNHS 3. Organizing Secretary- Dr. Purushottam Kale, Head, Dept. of Zoology, R. J. College 4. Treasurer- Prof. Pravin Nayak 5. Members- Dr. S. T. Ingale Dr. Himanshu Dawda Dr. Mrinalini Date Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • (Marlin) Review of Biodiversity for Marine Spatial Planning Within
    The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Review of Biodiversity for Marine Spatial Planning within the Firth of Clyde Report to: The SSMEI Clyde Pilot from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Contract no. R70073PUR Olivia Langmead Emma Jackson Dan Lear Jayne Evans Becky Seeley Rob Ellis Nova Mieszkowska Harvey Tyler-Walters FINAL REPORT October 2008 Reference: Langmead, O., Jackson, E., Lear, D., Evans, J., Seeley, B. Ellis, R., Mieszkowska, N. and Tyler-Walters, H. (2008). The Review of Biodiversity for Marine Spatial Planning within the Firth of Clyde. Report to the SSMEI Clyde Pilot from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [Contract number R70073PUR] 1 Firth of Clyde Biodiversity Review 2 Firth of Clyde Biodiversity Review Contents Executive summary................................................................................11 1. Introduction...................................................................................15 1.1 Marine Spatial Planning................................................................15 1.1.1 Ecosystem Approach..............................................................15 1.1.2 Recording the Current Situation ................................................16 1.1.3 National and International obligations and policy drivers..................16 1.2 Scottish Sustainable Marine Environment Initiative...............................17 1.2.1 SSMEI Clyde Pilot ..................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) Patrick J
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Glasgow] On: 29 September 2014, At: 12:15 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Marine Behaviour and Physiology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gmfw19 Substratum preferences, burrowing and righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) Patrick J. Schembri a b a University Marine Biological Station , Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland , KA28 0EG b Portobello Marine Laboratory , P.O. Box 8, Portobello, New Zealand Published online: 22 Jan 2009. To cite this article: Patrick J. Schembri (1981) Substratum preferences, burrowing and righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae), Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 8:2, 149-161 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10236248109387011 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Human Activities on Benthic Biotopes and Species
    The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species Report to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Contract no. CDEP 84/5/244 Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters & Dr Keith Hiscock Contractor: Marine Life Information Network for Britain and Ireland, Marine Biological Association of the UK, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. FINAL REPORT June 2005 (Contract period November 2001 to October 2004) Reference: Tyler-Walters, H. & Hiscock, K., 2005. Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species. Report to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Contract no. CDEP 84/5/244] Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN 2 Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................9 1. Introduction to the report ......................................................................................11 2. Background to the project.....................................................................................11 3. Contract objectives ................................................................................................11 4. Tasks and Milestones.............................................................................................13 4.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Ebalia Nux A. Milne Edwards, 1883 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Leucosiidae) from the Late Pliocene (Gelasian) of S
    74 NOTE E COMUNICAZIONI Alessandro Garassino*, Antonio De Angeli** & Giovanni Pasini*** Ebalia nux A. Milne Edwards, 1883 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Leucosiidae) from the late Pliocene (Gelasian) of S. Polo d’Enza (Reggio Emilia, N Italy) Abstract – We report some fragmentary leucosiid crabs from the late Pliocene (Gelasian) of S. Polo d’Enza (Reggio Emilia, N Italy), assigned to Ebalia nux A. Milne Edwards, 1883 (Leucosiidae Samouelle, 1819). This report enlarges the fossil record of this species, known to date from the Pleisto- cene of S Italy. Ebalia nux is known to date only in the fossil record of Italy. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Pliocene, Italy. Riassunto – Ebalia nux A. Milne Edwards, 1883 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Leucosiidae) del Pliocene superiore (Gelasiano) di S. Polo d’Enza (Reggio Emilia, N Italia). Segnaliamo alcuni resti frammentari di leucosidi del Pliocene superiore (Gelasiano) di S. Polo d’Enza (Reggio Emilia, N Italia), attribuiti a Ebalia nux A. Milne Edwards, 1883 (Leucosiidae Samouelle, 1819). Questa segnalazione allarga il record fossile di questa specie, conosciuta finora nel Pleistocene dell’Italia meridionale. Ebalia nux é conosciuta finora solo nel record fossile d’Italia. Parole chiave: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Pliocene, Italia. Introduction and geological setting The Cavalmagro (S. Polo d’Enza, Reggio Emilia) blue clays crop out 1 km NW of the Cava Moja locality, previously studied by Marasti & Raffi (1977) for the rich malacological fauna. *Museo di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ** Piazzetta Nostro Tetto, 9, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; Museo Civico “G. Zannato”, Piazza Marconi 15, 36075 Montecchio Maggiore (Vicenza), Italy; e -mail: [email protected] *** Museo Civico dei Fossili di Besano, Via Prestini 5, 21050 Besano (Varese), Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ATTI SOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia Tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Mar. Behav. Physiol. 1981, Vol. 8, pp. 149-161 0091-181X/81/0802-0149 $06.50/0 provided by OAR@UM © 1981 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Inc. Printed in Great Britain Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J. SCHEMBRI† University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland KA28 OEG (Received November 17, 1980; in final form March 7, 1981) When given a choice, Ebalia tuberosa prefers sediment to a smooth plastic surface. Gravel is preferred to either sand or mud but no preference is shown between coarse and fine gravel. When overturned, the crabs may take from 2 to 900 s to right again, but males right in a shorter time than females, probably because they are less massive. E. tuberosa burrows by digging backwards into the sediment till half-covered. A variety of different mechanisms are then used to cover the remainder of the body. The crabs take from 130 to 1000 s to burrow completely and larger crabs of both sexes take longer to burrow than do smaller individuals. INTRODUCTION Almost nothing is known of the behaviour of any species of leucosiid crab. Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) is a typical member of the family and is found in subtidal coarse sediments (Allen, 1967; Schembri, 1980). E. tuberosa buries itself in the substratum but does not construct a permanent burrow (Gosse, 1856) and shows numerous morphological and physiological adaptations for this mode of life (Balss, 1940; Glaessner, 1969; Schembri, 1979a,b, 1980, and papers in preparation).
    [Show full text]
  • Behaviour and Mortality of Benthic Crustaceans in Response to Experimentally Induced Hypoxia and Anoxia in Situ
    Vol. 414: 195–208, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 13 doi: 10.3354/meps08657 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Behaviour and mortality of benthic crustaceans in response to experimentally induced hypoxia and anoxia in situ A. Haselmair1,*, M. Stachowitsch1, M. Zuschin2, B. Riedel1 1Department of Marine Biology and 2Department of Paleontology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT: Crustaceans are sensitive to hypoxia and are therefore useful indicator organisms for oxygen depletions. We used the experimental anoxia generating unit in the northern Adriatic Sea to artificially induce and document hypoxia and anoxia on a small scale (0.25 m2 per deployment). Behavioural responses and mortalities were documented for 9 crustacean species typical for the sub- littoral soft bottom of the Gulf of Trieste. All species showed a similar succession of atypical responses, albeit at different thresholds. The first reaction to declining dissolved oxygen (DO) was avoidance by climbing to more oxygenated (higher) positions. The animals left their shelters, altered their activity patterns, and exposed themselves to a higher risk of predation at mild hypoxia (2 to 1 ml l–1 DO). Moderate hypoxia (1 to 0.5 ml l–1 DO) triggered changes in inter- and intraspecific interac- tions, resulting in aggregations of up to 27 individuals at the highest elevations. At severe hypoxia (0.5 to 0.01 ml l–1 DO), sublethal responses such as discarding of camouflage (Ethusa mascarone) were recorded, and 54% of all crustaceans died. Anoxia left most remaining individuals immobile and moribund until death. Almost all responses were related to DO thresholds—hydrogen sulphide (H2S) had not yet evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapod Crustacean Fauna of the Aegean Sea: New Information, Check List, Affinities
    Senckenbergiana marit. | 22 | (3/6) | 217—244 | Frankfurt am.AfeiSrT5~5. 1992 Senckenberg am Meer 463. Decapod Crustacean Fauna of the Aegean Sea: New Information, Check List, Affinities. With 2 Text-Figures and 4 Tables. ATHANASIOS KOUKOURAS & COSTAS DOUNAS & MICHAEL TURKAY & ELENI VOULTSIADOU-KOUKOURA. Abstract. [KOUKOURAS, A. & DOUNAS, C. & TURKAY, M. & VOULTSIADOU-KOUKOURA, E. (1992): Decapod crustacean fauna of the Aegean Sea: New information, check list, affinities. — Senckenbergiana marit. 22 (3/6): 217-244, 2 figs, 4 tabs.; Frankfurt a. M.] The examination of certain decapod crustacean collections from the Aegean Sea and the review of the relevant literature showed that the number of the species known from this area is 231. Seven of these species are reported for the first time from the eastern Mediterranean and three from the Aegean Sea. For the 19 more interesting species found, information on their distribution and their habitat is given. The numbers of decapods known from the entire Mediterranean, the Adriatic Sea, the coast of Israel and the Black Sea, according to the existing literature, are estimated. The affinities among the decapod faunas of the above areas are estimated by the coefficient of CHEKANOWSKI together with the number of species common to each pair of areas. The most strongly related fauna to that of the Aegean Sea is the fauna of the Adriatic. The fauna of the coast of Israel is more related to that of the coast of Cyprus although their degree of affinity is lower than that between Adriatic and Aegean. The two pairs of areas have an affinity with each other of about 60 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Region Depth N Reference Holte, B.; Buhl-Mortensen, L
    Table S1. Grab Author(s) Year size (m2) Geographical region Depth N Reference Holte, B.; Buhl-Mortensen, L. Does grab size influence sampled macrofauna composition? A test conducted on deep-sea communities in the northeast Atlantic. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 154, Holte & Mortensen 2020 0.25 NE Atlantic Ocean (Barents and Norwegian Sea) 287-963 m 16 104867. Holte, B.; Buhl-Mortensen, L. Does grab size influence sampled macrofauna composition? A test conducted on deep-sea communities in the northeast Atlantic. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 154, Holte & Mortensen 2020 0.1 NE Atlantic Ocean (Barents and Norwegian Sea) 287-963 m 40 104867. Roditi-Elasar, M.; Karem, D.; Lazar, M.; Barneah, Orit; Almogi-La- bin, A.; Angel, D.L. Benthic macro-faunal abundance and diversity and sediment distribution in Akhziv submarine canyon and the ad- jacent slope (eastern Levant Basin, Mediterranean Sea). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2019, 20, 521-531. Roditi-Elasar et al. 2019 0.48 Mediterranean Sea (Israeli coastline) 46-450 m 8 Trannum, H.C.; Borgersen, G.; Oug, E.; Glette, T.; Brooks, L.; Ramirez-Llodra, E. Epifaunal and infaunal responses to submarine Trannum et al. 2019 0.1 NE Atlantic Ocean (Norwegian fjord) 20-70 m 50 mine tailings in a Norwegian fjord. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2019, 149, 110560. Henkel & Nelson 2018 0.1 E Pacific Ocean (US West coast) 28-138 m 255 Mariani, S.; Pinedo, S.; Terradas, M.; Cefali, M.E.; Chappuis, E.; Ballesteros, E. Habitat structure and zonation patterns of northwestern Mediterranean shoreline strands. Sci. Mar. 2017, 81, Mariani et al. 2017 0.06 Mediterranean Sea (Catalonian coast) Intertidal 29 269-282.
    [Show full text]