DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Human Activities on Benthic Biotopes and Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of Human Activities on Benthic Biotopes and Species The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species Report to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Contract no. CDEP 84/5/244 Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters & Dr Keith Hiscock Contractor: Marine Life Information Network for Britain and Ireland, Marine Biological Association of the UK, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. FINAL REPORT June 2005 (Contract period November 2001 to October 2004) Reference: Tyler-Walters, H. & Hiscock, K., 2005. Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species. Report to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Contract no. CDEP 84/5/244] Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN 2 Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................9 1. Introduction to the report ......................................................................................11 2. Background to the project.....................................................................................11 3. Contract objectives ................................................................................................11 4. Tasks and Milestones.............................................................................................13 4.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................13 4.2 Task 1. Maintain the MarLIN database and Web site..........................................13 4.3 Task 2. Contribute to the application of sensitivity information to marine environmental protection especially by promoting approaches developed in the UK in Europe..............................................................................................................................13 4.4 Task 3. Undertake further research on species and habitats that are keystone, characterizing or indicator species including species and habitats found in UK waters that are selected under the OSPAR prioritization process. .............................................17 4.5 Task 4. Develop links between sensitivity and survey data ................................17 4.6 Task 5. Identify locations of nationally important benthic species and habitats, at particular risk from pollution from accidental oil spills, to contribute to 3-yearly reviews of MEHRA’s environmental sensitivity data. ........................................................................20 4.7 Task 6. Report on programme.............................................................................20 5. Maintain the MarLIN database and Web site. ......................................................20 5.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................20 5.2 The redesigned MarLIN Web site .........................................................................21 5.2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................21 5.2.2 Pull-down menus ...........................................................................................21 5.2.3 Search tools ...................................................................................................22 5.3 The Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Database........................................23 5.4 The SEArchable BEnthic Data (SEABED) Map....................................................23 5.4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................23 5.4.2 The Data Access Sub-programme ................................................................23 5.4.3 Mapping software ..........................................................................................24 5.4.4 The SEABED Map .........................................................................................24 5.5 Use of the MarLIN Web site..................................................................................26 6. Undertake further research on species and habitats that are keystone, characterizing or indicator species .................................................................................29 6.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................29 6.2 The Biology and Sensitivity Key Information database ........................................29 6.3 Revision of benchmarks........................................................................................29 3 Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN 6.3.1 Physical disturbance and abrasion ............................................................... 30 6.3.2 Changes in nutrient levels............................................................................. 30 6.4 Update of database and Key Information reviews ............................................... 30 6.5 Biology and Sensitivity Key Information research ................................................ 32 6.5.1 Priority species .............................................................................................. 32 6.5.2 Key information research completed............................................................. 33 6.5.3 OSPAR Annex V threatened and declining species ..................................... 35 6.5.4 OSPAR Annex V threatened and declining habitats..................................... 47 6.5.5 Indicator species............................................................................................ 47 7. Linking sensitivity information and marine benthic survey data ..................... 49 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 49 7.2 Sensitivity Mapping Advisory Group..................................................................... 50 7.3 A combined ‘sensitivity’ scale ............................................................................... 50 7.3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 50 7.3.2 Rationale and approach ................................................................................ 51 7.4 Updating existing scales and definitions .............................................................. 53 7.5 Review of sensitivity, intolerance and recoverability across species and biotopes . .............................................................................................................................. 54 7.6 Assessing sensitivities at the biotope complex, lifeform, and habitat complex levels .............................................................................................................................. 60 7.7 Sensitivity mapping in marine environmental management................................. 61 7.7.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 61 7.7.2 Irish Sea Pilot trial sensitivity maps............................................................... 61 7.7.3 CCW trial of sensitivity maps in oil spill response......................................... 68 7.7.4 CEFAS contract to identify offshore biotope complexes and their sensitivities. ....................................................................................................................... 73 7.8 Benefits and limitations of sensitivity mapping in environmental management... 76 8. Conclusions............................................................................................................ 79 9. Recommendations ................................................................................................. 83 10. References .............................................................................................................. 85 11. Publications ............................................................................................................ 88 4 Impact of human activities on benthic biotopes and species MarLIN List of Figures Figure 1. The MarLIN Data Access Sub-programme data structure.................................24 Figure 2. SEABED Map. Example search for survey data for Mytilus edulis, Modiolus modiolus and Atrina fragilis...........................................................................................25 Figure 3. SEABED Map. Comparative distribution of Sabellaria alveolata and Sabellaria spinulosa (left), with close-up of the north Irish Sea (right). .........................................25 Figure 4. SEABED Map. Species list for an individual survey point. ...............................26 Figure 5. SEABED Map. Histogram of relative species abundance within survey sample. ......................................................................................................................................27 Figure 6. The top twenty countries of origin of our users (excluding the USA).................28 Figure 7. The range of different organization types using the Web site............................28 Figure 8. Range of species information on the MarLIN Web site (October 2004). ...........34 Figure 9. Number of research biotopes representative of the interest features of the EC Habitats
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes on the Occurrence of Some Poorly Known Decapoda (Crustacea) in the Southern North Sea
    NOTES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME POORLY KNOWN DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA by J. P. H M ADEMA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands F CREUTZBERG & G J VAN NOORT Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands With 9 text-figures, 6 tables, 5 maps INTRODUCTION Since April 1972 an ecological trawl-survey programme has been undertaken by the Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, in the southern North Sea with the R. V. "Aurelia". The main object is to obtain information on distribution, density, biomass and fluctuations of crawling or swimming demersal (epibenthic) fauna such as small fishes, shrimps, prawns, crabs, asteroids, ophiuroids and some gastropods, for the evaluation of the role of these carnivores in the benthic ecosystem of the southern North Sea. Sedimentological aspects of the area are described by Creutzberg & Postma (1979). Within the context of the present paper the most important feature is the mesh of 5 x 5 mm2 of the cod end of the 5V2 m beam-trawl used and the extensive area of 5000-10,000 m2 covered during each haul. These exceptional circumstances resulted into faunistically interesting catches which gave rise to a cooperation with taxonomic specialists of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie (RMNH), Leiden. The present paper deals with decapod crustaceans, collected during "Aurelia"-cruises, which are considered to be scarce or rare in the southern North Sea, completed with data from bottom-samples and other sources The species in question are: Pandalina brevirostris, Spirontocans lilljeborgii, Alpheus macrocheles, Pontophilus spinosus, Pontophilus bi.spino.sus, Galathea dispersa, Ebalia tubero.sa, Ebalia tumefacta, Ebalia cranchii, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Monodaeus couchii, Callianassa subterranea, Callianas.sa tyrrhena, Upogebia stellata and Upogebia deltaura Of the genus Macropodia a number of specimens have been collected, which partly were identified as M.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Borders Newsletter Autumn 2017
    Borders Newsletter Issue 19 Autumn 2017 http://eastscotland-butterflies.org.uk/ https://www.facebook.com/EastScotlandButterflyConservation Welcome to the latest issue of our What's the Difference between a Butterfly and a Moth? newsletter for Butterfly Conservation members and many other people When Barbara and I ran a stand at the St Abbs Science Day in August every one of living in the Scottish Borders and the fifty or more people we talked to asked us this question - yes, they really all did! further afield. Please forward it to Fortunately we were armed with both a few technical answers as well as a nice little others who have an interest in quiz to see if people could tell the difference - this was a set of about 30 pictures of butterflies & moths and who might both butterflies and moths along with a few wild cards of other things that looked a like to read it and be kept in touch bit like a moth. The great thing about the quiz is that it suits all ages and all levels of with our activities. knowledge - only one person got them all right and it led on to many interesting Barry Prater discussions. [email protected] Tel 018907 52037 Contents Highlights from this year ........Barry Prater A White Letter Day ................... Iain Cowe The Comfrey Ermel, a Moth new to Scotland ................................... Nick Cook Large Red-belted Clearwings in Berwickshire .......................... David Long Another very popular way of engaging with youngsters is the reveal of moth trap Plant Communities for Butterflies & Moths: contents and Philip Hutton has been working with the SWT Wildlife Watch group in Part 7, Oakwoods contd.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
    Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Glycymeris Longior (Sowerby, 1832) Clam at the Southern Edge of Its Distribution (Argentine Sea) Lucas H
    Gimenez et al. Helgol Mar Res (2020) 74:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-020-0534-x Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Age and growth of Glycymeris longior (Sowerby, 1832) clam at the southern edge of its distribution (Argentine Sea) Lucas H. Gimenez1,2†, María del Socorro Doldan1,3,4*† , Paula C. Zaidman1,3,4 and Enrique M. Morsan1,3 Abstract Even though Glycymeris longior is a clam widely distributed in the SW Atlantic Ocean, little is known about its biology and life history. The present study assessed the periodicity of the internal growth increments of G. longior using thin shell sections. Each internal growth increment was composed of two alternating bands: a translucent band (light- coloured when viewed with transmitted light) and an opaque band (dark-coloured). Annual formation for each pair of bands was demonstrated. The formation of the annual growth increments was synchronous among individuals. Growth was determined from live clams collected at El Sótano, Argentine Sea (age range 29 to 69 years). Accord- ing to the growth model, G. longior grows fast during the frst 5 years of life and then growth= becomes slower in later years; individuals reached 50% and 90% of maximum size at 5 and 13 years of age, respectively. High variability was found in shell height for the frst 10 years: diferences up to 5–7 mm among individuals were registered for the frst 2 years of age, and up to 11 mm between the ages of 3 and 9 years. The growth performance index phi-prime (φ′) and the index of growth performance (P) of G.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.55
    CHAPTER VIII SPONGES, COELENTERATES, AND CTENOPHORES Blank page retained for pagination THE PORIFERA OF THE GULF OF MEXICO 1 By J. Q. TIERNEY. Marine Laboratory, University of Miami Sponges are one of the dominant sessile inverte­ groups. The. floor of the Gulf between the bars brate groups in the Gulf of Mexico: they extend is sparsely populated. The majority of the ani­ from the intertidal zone down to the deepest mals and plants are concentrated on the rocky Parts of the basin, and almost all of the firm or ledges and outcroppings. rocky sections of the bottom provide attachment The most abundant sponges on these reefs are for them. of several genera representing most of the orders Members of the class Hyalospongea. (Hexacti­ of the class Demospongea. Several species of nellidea) are, almost without exception, limited to Ircinia are quite common as are Verongia, Sphecio­ the deeper waters of the Gulf beyond the 100­ spongia, and several Axinellid and Ancorinid fathom curve. These sponges possess siliceous sponges; Cliona is very abundant, boring into spicules in which (typically) six rays radiate from molluscan shells, coral, and the rock itself. The II. central point; frequently, the spicules are fused sponge population is rich both in variety and in ~gether forming a basket-like skeleton. Spongin number of individuals; for this reason no attempt 18 never present in this group. is made to discuss it in taxonomic detail in this In contrast to the Hyalospongea, representa­ r~sum~. ti\Tes of the clasa Calcispongea are seldom, if Some of the sponges of the Gulf are of world­ ~\Ter, found in deep water.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52
    www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52 Tim Worsfold David Hall Søren Pears (Images) APEM Ltd. March 2017 E-mail: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test #52 Type/Contents – Targeted - Bivalvia Circulated – 12/11/16 Results deadline – 16/12/16 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 24 Number of Participating Laboratories – 21 Number of Results Received – 21* *multiple data entries per laboratory permitted Summary of differences Total differences for 21 Specimen Genus Species Size returns Genus Species RT5201 Thyasira flexuosa 2-3mm 0 1 RT5202 Abra alba 10mm 0 1 RT5203 Cochlodesma praetenue 3-5mm 5 5 RT5204 Thyasira equalis 2-4mm 3 9 RT5205 Abra nitida 4-6mm 0 1 RT5206 Fabulina fabula 3-5mm 1 1 RT5207 Cerastoderma edule 1mm 6 13 RT5208 Tellimya ferruginosa 3-4mm 0 0 RT5209 Nucula nucleus 8-9mm 0 3 RT5210 Nucula nitidosa 2-3mm 1 3 RT5211 Asbjornsenia pygmaea 2-3mm 1 1 RT5212 Abra prismatica 3-5mm 1 1 RT5213 Chamelea striatula 3-4mm 7 9 RT5214 Montacuta substriata 1-2mm 5 5 RT5215 Spisula subtruncata 1mm 4 6 RT5216 Adontorhina similis 1-2mm 4 4 RT5217 Goodallia triangularis 1-2mm 0 0 RT5218 Scrobicularia plana 1mm 20 20 RT5219 Cerastoderma edule 2-3mm 9 13 RT5220 Arctica islandica 1mm 4 4 RT5221 Kurtiella bidentata 2-3mm 2 2 RT5222 Venerupis corrugata 2-3mm 9 9 RT5223 Barnea parva 10-20mm 0 0 RT5224 Abra alba 4-5mm 1 2 RT5225 Nucula nucleus 2mm 0 11 Total differences 83 124 Average 4.0 5.9 differences /lab. NMBAQC RT#52 bulletin Differences 10 15 20 25 0 5 Arranged in order of increasing number of differences (by specific followed by generic errors).
    [Show full text]
  • Dunlaverock House Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, Berwickshire Dunlaverock House Corridor to the Kitchen
    Dunlaverock House Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, Berwickshire Dunlaverock House corridor to the kitchen. The formal dining room has ample space and can comfortably sit 20. Both Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, the drawing room and dining room are enhanced Berwickshire TD14 5PA by many original features, including decorative plasterwork cornicing and open fireplaces. The kitchen has a range of appliances including a A magnificent, coastal property double sink, hand wash sink, a gas cooker and with stunning views across hob, integrated electric ovens, space for a large fridge freezer. It opens into a breakfast room, Coldingham Bay currently used as an office, that could be used for dining or as an informal sitting room and has Coldingham 1 mile, Eyemouth 4 miles, Berwick- a multi-fuel stove. The service corridor gives upon-Tweed 12.7 miles, Edinburgh 47 miles access to the back door, boiler room, larder, utility room and to the owner’s accommodation. The Ground floor: Vestibule | Hall | Drawing room owner’s accommodation consists of a snug/office Dining room | Kitchen/Breakfast room with French windows, and a WC. There is also Boiler room | Larder | 2 WCs | Utility room a secondary set of stairs, affording the owners Double bedroom with en suite shower room privacy, leading to a double bedroom with an en First floor: 4 Double bedrooms with en suite suite shower room to the rear of the property. bathroom The first floor is approached by a beautiful, Second floor: Shower room | 2 Double bedrooms sweeping staircase lit by a part stained, glass window. From here the landing gives access to Owner’s accommodation: 1 Double bedrooms four double bedrooms with en suite bathrooms, with en suite shower room | Snug/office two of which benefit from stunning sea views.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Oxygen Limit Thermal Tolerance in Arthropods? a Critical Review of Current Evidence
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 192 (2016) 64–78 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cbpa Review Does oxygen limit thermal tolerance in arthropods? A critical review of current evidence Wilco C.E.P. Verberk a,⁎, Johannes Overgaard b,RasmusErnb,MarkBayleyb,TobiasWangb, Leigh Boardman c,JohnS.Terblanchec a Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands b Zoophysiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 3, Building 1131, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark c Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa article info abstract Article history: Over the last decade, numerous studies have investigated the role of oxygen in setting thermal tolerance in aquatic an- Received 17 August 2015 imals, and there has been particular focus on arthropods. Arthropods comprise one of the most species-rich taxonomic Received in revised form 14 October 2015 groups on Earth, and display great diversity in the modes of ventilation, circulation, blood oxygen transport, with rep- Accepted 20 October 2015 resentatives living both in water (mainly crustaceans) and on land (mainly insects). The oxygen and capacity limita- Available online 24 October 2015 tion of thermal tolerance (OCLTT) hypothesis proposes that the temperature dependent performance curve of animals Keywords: is shaped by the capacity for oxygen delivery in relation to oxygen demand. If correct, oxygen limitation could provide OCLTT a mechanistic framework to understand and predict both current and future impacts of rapidly changing climate. Respiration physiology In arthropods, most studies testing the OCLTT hypothesis have considered tolerance to thermal extremes.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 415 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 415 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia Tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J
    Mar. Behav. Physiol. 1981, Vol. 8, pp. 149-161 0091-181X/81/0802-0149 $06.50/0 © 1981 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Inc. Printed in Great Britain Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J. SCHEMBRI† University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland KA28 OEG (Received November 17, 1980; in final form March 7, 1981) When given a choice, Ebalia tuberosa prefers sediment to a smooth plastic surface. Gravel is preferred to either sand or mud but no preference is shown between coarse and fine gravel. When overturned, the crabs may take from 2 to 900 s to right again, but males right in a shorter time than females, probably because they are less massive. E. tuberosa burrows by digging backwards into the sediment till half-covered. A variety of different mechanisms are then used to cover the remainder of the body. The crabs take from 130 to 1000 s to burrow completely and larger crabs of both sexes take longer to burrow than do smaller individuals. INTRODUCTION Almost nothing is known of the behaviour of any species of leucosiid crab. Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) is a typical member of the family and is found in subtidal coarse sediments (Allen, 1967; Schembri, 1980). E. tuberosa buries itself in the substratum but does not construct a permanent burrow (Gosse, 1856) and shows numerous morphological and physiological adaptations for this mode of life (Balss, 1940; Glaessner, 1969; Schembri, 1979a,b, 1980, and papers in preparation). Apart from the semi-anecdotal descriptions of burrowinDownloaded by [University of Glasgow] at 12:15 29 September 2014 g in E.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]