DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachments Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATTACHMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FORESHORE LICENCE APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry ATTACHMENT CONTENTS Attachment A Figure 1 proximity to sensitive shellfish areas Attachment B B.1 Sediment Chemistry Results Attachment B.1(I) Dumping at Sea Material Analysis Reporting Form Attachment B.1(II) Copies of the laboratory reports Attachment B.1(III) Comparison to Irish Action Level B.2 Characteristics /Composition of the Substance or Material for Disposal Attachment B.2 Sediment Characterisation Report (AQUAFACT, 2018) Attachment C Assessment of Alternatives Attachment D D.1 Purpose Of The Operation D.2 Loading Areas D.3 Details Of The Loading Operations Attachment E E.1 DUMPING SITE SELECTION E.2 GENERAL INFORMATION E.3 DETAILS OF THE DUMPING OPERATION Attachment E.1(I) Attachment E.2(I) Marine Benthic Study Fenit Harbour Dredging and Disposal Operations (Aquafact 2018) Attachment F F.1 Assessment of Impact on the Environment Appendix 1 Assessment of Risk to Marine Mammals from Proposed Dredging and Dumping at Sea Activity, Fenit Harbour, Co. Kerry. Appendix 2 Underwater Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Fenit Harbour and Tralee Bay, Co. Kerry. Appendix 3: Nature Impact Statement Attachment G G.1 Monitoring Programme Attachment-A FIGURE 1 SHELLFISH WATERS FORESHORE LICENCE APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry Legend Foreshore Licence Area Shellfish Area 5091m Proposed Dump Site 4 89m Fenit Harbour Map Reproduced From Ordnance Survey Ireland By Permission Of The Government. Licence Number EN 0015719. 0 1.5 3 km Ü Project Title: Fenit Harbour Client: Kerry County Council Drawing Title: Foreshore Licence and Shellfish Areas Drawn: JK Checked: CF Date: 15-10-2019 Scale (A4): 1:85,000 Attachment-B MATERIAL ANALYSIS DUMPING AT SEA PERMIT APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry Attachment B MATERIAL ANAYSIS CONTENTS B.1 SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS Attachment B.1(I) Dumping at Sea Material Analysis Reporting Form Attachment B.1(II) Copies of the laboratory reports Attachment B.1(III) Comparison to Irish Action Levels B.2 Characteristics and Composition of the Substance or Material for Disposal Attachment B.2 Sediment Characterisation Report (AQUAFACT, 2018) Attachment B MATERIAL ANAYSIS B.1 SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS B.1.1 Sampling Locations Consultation was undertaken with the Marine Institute of Ireland to determine the optimum locations and number of samples to be attained to ensure the proposed loading locations were adequately tested. A total of 12 sediment stations were sampled for physical and chemical analysis as per a request from the Marine Institute. Figure 1 shows the sampling station locations and Table 1 shows the sampling station coordinates. Full details of the sampling undertaken and methodology, including the correspondence from the Marine Institute on the sampling schedule, is provided in Attachment B.2 Sediment Characterisation Report (AQUAFACT, 2018). Figure 1 Location of chemistry sampling sites Table 1: Coordinates of stations sampled for physical and chemical analysis. Station Latitude Longitude Depth (m) 1 52.2702 -9.86316 2.7 2 52.2713 -9.86313 3.3 3 52.27 -9.86274 4.8 4a 52.2701 -9.85977 7.4 5 52.2713 -9.86214 4.4 6 52.2703 -9.86194 4.0 7 52.2699 -9.8618 3.1 8 52.2716 -9.86177 1.4 9 52.272 -9.86104 3.4 10 52.2711 -9.86087 2.7 11 52.2704 -9.86028 8.5 12 52.2722 -9.8602 3.3 Attachment B MATERIAL ANAYSIS Attachment B.1(I) Dumping at Sea Material Analysis Reporting Form EPA Dumping at Sea Permit Application - Material Analysis Reporting Form (Version 1.0) Sheet 1. Instructions Instructions As part of an application for a Dumping at Sea (DAS) Permit, sediment chemistry results must be submitted using this form. When completing this form, please ensure that you: * Complete all worksheets in full - i.e. sheets "2. Project Info", "3. Results" and "4. QA". * Report all results in the units specified (e.g. mg kg-1 versus mg kg-1). * Do not alter the format of this spreadsheet by changing units, by moving columns or by inserting new columns amongst the existing used columns. * Insert additional rows as necessary at the end of the existing rows in sheet. "3 Results" * Insert other determinants as necessary in the empty columns to the right in sheet. "3 Results". * Any additional information should be included as inserted comments or in the Notes column in sheet. "3 Results". * Provide a brief description of methodology used in sheet "2. Project Info". * Enter the measured value (as well as the certified value) for Certified Reference material in sheet "4. * If in-house reference material is used, insert the measured value and the range normally achieved. * Refer to the Dumping at Sea Application Form Guidance Note for further relevant information: http://www.epa.ie/downloads/forms/lic/das/name,30267,en.html Key Location Name of area e.g. Cork Harbour, Dublin Bay CRMs Certified reference materials used in analyses for metals, organics & TBT Specify which fraction of sediment was analysed. < 2mm is requested, but Fraction analysed some labs use < 63um Analysing laboratory Main laboratory where samples were sent to for analysis Sub-contract lab Sub-contracted laboratory where samples were sent by main laboratory Sample ID code Sample number assigned by sampler Lab Report ID Code assigned by analysing laboratory Give lat/long coordinates in degrees & decimal minutes (dd mm.mmm) of the Position (dd/mm.mmm) position where the sample was taken. List also the datum & projection. Sampling depth (m) The depth below the seabed surface at which the sample was collected. <2mm Grain size % < 2mm <63um Grain size % < 63mm OC Organic carbon (NOT organic matter) TEH Total extractable hydrocarbons Cu Copper Zn Zinc Cd Cadmium Hg Mercury Pb Lead As Arsenic Cr Chromium Mn Manganese Ni Nickel Li Lithium Al Aluminium DBT Dibutyl tin TBT Tributyl tin S TBT + DBT Sum of di-butyl tin & tri-butyl tin Sum of the seven ICES polychlorinated biphenyls: PCB 028, PCB 052, PCB S 7 PCB 101, PCB 138, BCB 153, PCB 180, PCB 118. Sum of US EPA 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Naphthalene, Acenaphthylene, Acenaphthene, Fluorene,Phenanthrene, Anthracene, S 16 PAH Fluoranthene, Pyrene, Benzo(a)anthracene, Chrysene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Dibenzo(ah)anthracene, Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(123-cd)pyrene. g-HCH 1α,2α,3β,4α,5α,6β-hexachlorocyclohexane (Lindane) HCB Hexachlorobenzene Sheet 1. Instructions (Page 1 of 1) EPA Dumping at Sea Permit Application - Material Analysis Reporting Form (Version 1.0) Sheet 2. Project Info 1. General Information Applicant (company name) Kerry County Council Location (port/harbour) Fenit Harbour Dredge Quantity (tonnes) Permit Application Reg. No. (to be assigned by EPA) 2. Survey Information Survey Company Sampling Date 23/11/2017 Analysing Laboratory ESG Sub Contract Lab Analysis Date 28/11/2017 3. Methods Information Fraction analysed <2mm Water content of sample (reported as %) Air dried 105°C Are results reported as wet weight or dry weight? Dry Weight Granulometry method Particle Size by Laser Diffraction · Total Hydrocarbons: (GCFID) TNRCC method using gas TEH method chromatography with flame ionisation detection. carbonate removal and sulphurous acid/combustion at Organic carbon (OC) method 800°C/NDIR. Metals (incl. mercury & arsenic) extraction type using HF boric extraction followed by ICPMS (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Methods of detection (metals, incl. mercury & arsenic) Pb, Hg, Ni and Zn) and by ICPOES (Al and Li). Organics extraction types • Organotins: Documented in-house method OGSNSED • OCP & PCB analysis: Documented in-house method using Methods of detection (PCBs / PAHs / TBT / DBT) GCQQQ. • PAH analysis: Documented in-house method using DTI specification by GC-MS. Sheet 2. Project Info (Page 1 of 1) EPA Dumping at Sea Permit Application - Material Analysis Reporting Form (Version 1.0) Sheet 3. Results Sampling Sampling Sample appearance Sample ID Sampling Position Latitude Position Longitude Company Name Location date depth Lab Report ID (e.g. colour, texture, signs of code Location ID (dd mm.mmm) (dd mm.mmm) (dd/mm/yyyy) m life) Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7896 Light brown surface/ anoxic Council 1 1 52˚ 16.2120000000002 2.7 S18_1025 black below , Mud/fine sand Kerry County Light brown surface/ anoxic Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7878 2 Council 2 52˚ 16.2779999999998 3.3 S18_1025 black below, Mud/fine sand Kerry County Light brown surface/ anoxic Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7644 3 Council 3 52˚ 16.2000000000002 4.8 S18_1025 black below, Mud/fine sand Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.5862 7.4 black below, Mud/medium 4 Council 4 52˚ 16.206 S18_1025 sand Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7284 4.4 black below, Mud/fine sand, Council 5 5 52˚ 16.2779999999998 S18_1025 Sabella sp. tubes Kerry County Light brown surface/ anoxic Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7164 4 6 Council 6 52˚ 16.2179999999999 S18_1025 black below, Mud/fine sand Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.708 3.1 black below, Mud/fine sand, Council 7 7 52˚ 16.194 S18_1025 Sabella sp. tubes Kerry County Light brown surface/ anoxic Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.7062 1.4 8 Council 8 52˚ 16.296 S18_1025 black below, Mud/fine sand Kerry County Light brown surface/ anoxic Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.6623999999999 3.4 9 Council 9 52˚ 16.3199999999999 S18_1025 black below, Fine sand/mud Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.6522 2.7 black below, Mud/fine sand, Council 10 10 52˚ 16.2659999999998 S18_1025 Rag worms Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.6168 8.5 black below, Mud/medium 11 Council 11 52˚ 16.2240000000001 S18_1025 sand Light brown surface/ anoxic Kerry County Fenit Harbour 22/11/2017 9˚ 51.612 3.3 black below, Mud/medium 12 Council 12 52˚ 16.3319999999999 S18_1025 sand <insert more rows as necessary> Sheet 3.
Recommended publications
  • Benthos Supported by the Tunnel-Valleys of the Southern North Sea

    Benthos Supported by the Tunnel-Valleys of the Southern North Sea

    Benthos supported by the tunnel-valleys of the southern North Sea Bryony Pearce1*, David, R.Tappin2, Dayton Dove3 & Jennifer Pinnion1 1. Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 3 Palace Yard Mews, Bath BA1 2NH 2. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham 3. British Geological Survey, Edinburgh * Corresponding Author; Email: [email protected], Telephone: +44(0) 1225 442211, Fax: +44 (0) 1225 444411 Abstract The tunnel-valleys of the southern North Sea are arcuate sub-linear seabed depressions. The origin of these features has been the subject of much discussion, but they are generally considered to have been formed by subglacial erosion and sediment backfill beneath the outer margins of a receding ice sheet. We present here a study of two southern North Sea tunnel-valleys, the Silver and Sole Pits. Extensive areas of Sabellaria spinulosa reefs have been identified on the western flanks of the Silver Pit which extend down to the valley floor. It is likely that this reef complex would qualify as an Annex I habitat. The seabed of the Sole Pit is characterised by much sandier deposits than that of the Silver Pit, and supports an abundant bivalve community, dominated by Abra alba. This bivalve assemblage also contained Coarcuta obliquata which has only been recorded once before in the UK. Key Words Tunnel Valley, Benthos, Habitat, Seabed Mapping, Sabellaria spinulosa, Annex I Habitat, North Sea, Mulitbeam Introduction Tunnel-valleys are prominent features of the southern North Sea, where they form arcuate sub-linear seabed depressions with a limited sediment infill (Fig. 1). In the outer Humber area the valleys attain water depths up to 100 m and radiate outward from the mapped palaeo-ice margin of the Devensian (Weischelian) glaciations.
  • Response to Oxygen Deficiency (Depletion): Bivalve Assemblages As an Indicator of Ecosystem Instability in the Northern Adriatic Sea

    Response to Oxygen Deficiency (Depletion): Bivalve Assemblages As an Indicator of Ecosystem Instability in the Northern Adriatic Sea

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Response to oxygen deficiency (depletion): Bivalve assemblages as an indicator of ecosystem instability in the northern Adriatic Sea Vedrana NERLOVIĆ1, Alper DOĞAN2 & Mirjana HRS-BRENKO1 1Ruđer Bošković Institute, Centre for Marine Research, Giordano Paliaga 5, HR-52210 Rovinj, Croatia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Benthic communities represent a powerful tool for the detection of natural and anthropogenic disturbances, as well as for the assessment of marine ecosystem stability. This paper shows that Bivalve assemblages could serve as excellent indicators of disturbance and ecosystem instability. The goal of this study was to compare two sets of data in order to determine the differences between two different periods belonging to Bivalve assemblage in the muddy detritic bottom of the northern Adriatic Sea in the post-anoxic period during December 1989, 1990, 1991 and quite a while later, during 2003, 2004 and 2005. Abundances of some indicator species such as Corbula gibba, Modiolarca subpicta, and Timoclea ovata were detected during the post-anoxic period. Recruitment in the quality of Bivalve assemblages was proved by the ecologic and biotic indexes during 2003, 2004 and 2005, during a period of relatively stable ecological conditions. Fluctuation in Bivalve diversity due to the ecological quality of the marine ecosystem in the eastern part of the northern Adriatic Sea is also discussed. Key words: hypoxia; Bivalve assemblages; indicator species; soft bottoms; northern Adriatic Sea Introduction Recent reviews and summaries have provided good introductions on how hypoxia and anoxia came to be such a large and serious problem in the aquatic ecosystem (Gray et al.
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project

    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project

    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
  • Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52

    Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52

    www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52 Tim Worsfold David Hall Søren Pears (Images) APEM Ltd. March 2017 E-mail: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test #52 Type/Contents – Targeted - Bivalvia Circulated – 12/11/16 Results deadline – 16/12/16 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 24 Number of Participating Laboratories – 21 Number of Results Received – 21* *multiple data entries per laboratory permitted Summary of differences Total differences for 21 Specimen Genus Species Size returns Genus Species RT5201 Thyasira flexuosa 2-3mm 0 1 RT5202 Abra alba 10mm 0 1 RT5203 Cochlodesma praetenue 3-5mm 5 5 RT5204 Thyasira equalis 2-4mm 3 9 RT5205 Abra nitida 4-6mm 0 1 RT5206 Fabulina fabula 3-5mm 1 1 RT5207 Cerastoderma edule 1mm 6 13 RT5208 Tellimya ferruginosa 3-4mm 0 0 RT5209 Nucula nucleus 8-9mm 0 3 RT5210 Nucula nitidosa 2-3mm 1 3 RT5211 Asbjornsenia pygmaea 2-3mm 1 1 RT5212 Abra prismatica 3-5mm 1 1 RT5213 Chamelea striatula 3-4mm 7 9 RT5214 Montacuta substriata 1-2mm 5 5 RT5215 Spisula subtruncata 1mm 4 6 RT5216 Adontorhina similis 1-2mm 4 4 RT5217 Goodallia triangularis 1-2mm 0 0 RT5218 Scrobicularia plana 1mm 20 20 RT5219 Cerastoderma edule 2-3mm 9 13 RT5220 Arctica islandica 1mm 4 4 RT5221 Kurtiella bidentata 2-3mm 2 2 RT5222 Venerupis corrugata 2-3mm 9 9 RT5223 Barnea parva 10-20mm 0 0 RT5224 Abra alba 4-5mm 1 2 RT5225 Nucula nucleus 2mm 0 11 Total differences 83 124 Average 4.0 5.9 differences /lab. NMBAQC RT#52 bulletin Differences 10 15 20 25 0 5 Arranged in order of increasing number of differences (by specific followed by generic errors).
  • Cork City Licence Register No

    Cork City Licence Register No

    Annual Environmental Report 2015 Agglomeration Name: Cork City Licence Register No. D0033-01 Table of Contents Section 1. Executive Summary and Introduction to the 2015 AER 1 1.1 Summary report on 2015 1 Section 2. Monitoring Reports Summary 3 2.1 Summary report on monthly influent monitoring 3 2.2 Discharges from the agglomeration 4 2.3 Ambient monitoring summary 5 2.4 Data collection and reporting requirements under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 7 2.5 Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) - report for previous year 7 Section 3 Operational Reports Summary 9 3.1 Treatment Efficiency Report 9 3.2 Treatment Capacity Report 10 3.3 Extent of Agglomeration Summary Report 11 3.4 Complaints Summary 12 3.5 Reported Incidents Summary 13 3.6 Sludge / Other inputs to the WWTP 14 Section 4. Infrastructural Assessments and Programme of Improvements 15 4.1 Storm water overflow identification and inspection report 15 4.2 Report on progress made and proposals being developed to meet the improvement programme requirements. 22 Section 5. Licence Specific Reports 26 5.1 Priority Substances Assessment 27 5.2 Drinking Water Abstraction Point Risk Assessment. 28 5.3 Shellfish Impact Assessment Report. 28 5.4 Toxicity / Leachate Management 28 5.5 Toxicity of the Final Effluent Report 28 5.6 Pearl Mussel Measures Report 28 5.7 Habitats Impact Assessment Report 28 Section 6. Certification and Sign Off 29 Section 7. Appendices 30 Appendix 7.1 - Annual Statement of Measures 31 Appendix 7.1A – Influent & Effluent Monitoring Incl. UWWT Compliances 32 Appendix 7.2 – Ambient River Monitoring Summary 33 Appendix 7.2A – Ambient Transitional & Coastal Monitoring Summary 34 Appendix 7.3 – Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) Summary Sheets 35 Appendix 7.4 – Sewer Integrity Tool Output 36 WasteWater Treatment Plant Upgrade.
  • 50Secretos De La Ruta Costera Del Atlántico

    50Secretos De La Ruta Costera Del Atlántico

    Secretos de la Ruta Costera del Atlántico 50 ...la Irlanda más auténtica ÍNDICE 1 Introducción 1 2 Mapa de la Ruta Costera del Atlántico Puntos emblemáticos 3 3 Puntos emblemáticos 4 4 Mapa de la región noroeste 15 5 Secretos de la región noroeste 16 6 Mapa de la región oeste 23 7 Secretos de la región oeste 24 8 Mapa de la región medio oeste 27 9 Secretos de la región medio oeste 28 10 Mapa de la región suroeste 31 11 Secretos de la región suroeste 32 12 Información de contacto (Contraportada) CARRETERA DEL ATLANTIC DRIVE, ISLA DE ACHILL, CONDADO DE MAYO INTRODUCCIÓN ¿ Alguna vez has soñado en realizar un fantástico viaje y descubrir lugares ocultos y mundos secretos en los que te espera toda suerte de maravillas? Pues ahora puedes hacerlo por la ruta costera más salvaje y cautivadora del mundo, la ruta costera del Atlántico de Irlanda. Escondidos en pequeños pueblos y ciudades que bordean la línea costera encontrarás acogedoras cafeterías y restaurantes donde podrás disfrutar de una buena comida y un vino excelente. Quizás escuches algunas palabras del gaélico que se habla en las Gaeltachtai (regiones de habla gaélica) o recuperes la pasión por la vida mientras cabalgas las espectaculares olas de la costa de Donegal o Sligo. O quizá prefieras detenerte a reflexionar sobre el pasado con una visita a las ruinas de un asentamiento monástico del siglo VI situado en la impresionante Skellig Michael de Kerry. Puedes vagar entre la romántica belleza del pintoresco Parque Forestal Ards de Donegal. O puedes experimentar la rapidez con la que cambia el clima desde el histórico Faro de la Isla de Clare en el condado de Mayo.
  • Natura Impact Statement

    Natura Impact Statement

    NATURA IMPACT STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT FOR THE DRAFT DINGLE PENINSULA VISITOR EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for: Fáilte Ireland 88-95 Amiens Street Dublin 1 by: CAAS Ltd. 1st Floor 24-26 Ormond Quay Dublin 7 DECEMBER 2019 Appropriate Assessment Natura Impact Statement for the Dingle Peninsula Visitor Experience Development Plan Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Legislative Context ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Approach ...........................................................................................................................1 Section 2 Description of the VEDP .................................................................................. 3 Section 3 Screening for Appropriate Assessment ........................................................... 6 3.1 Introduction to Screening ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Identification of Relevant European sites .............................................................................. 6 3.3 Assessment Criteria and Screening ...................................................................................... 9 3.4 Other Plans and Programmes ...........................................................................................
  • Location: Fenit, Co. Kerry Unique ID: 230352 Stage 1: Desktop Review

    Location: Fenit, Co. Kerry Unique ID: 230352 Stage 1: Desktop Review

    Location: Fenit, Co. Kerry Unique ID: 230352 (from PFRA database) Initial OPW Designation APSR AFRR IRR Co-ordinates Easting: 73049 Northing: 115876 River / Catchment / Sub-catchment North Kerry Tralee Bay Type of Flooding / Flood Risk Fluvial non-tidal Fluvial tidal Coastal (identify all that apply) Stage 1: Desktop Review 1.1 Flood History General Area (include review of Fenit is a small port town situated on Tralee Bay 10 km west of Tralee. Floodmaps.ie) Flood event records There are no OPW flood records for the Fenit area. 1.2 Relevant PFRA database comments (in italics): information on flooding issues from OPW comments OPW and LA staff Coastal risk to port? Wait for ICPSS results and review LA comments None Meeting / discussion summary comments: OPW comments • Not aware of any significant issues in this area. • OPW constructed a wall of rock armour on the main road to the port (R558). LA comments • Not aware on any fluvial issue. Possible coastal erosion issue. 1.4 PFRA Data 1.4.1 PFRA hazard PFRA mapping available in GIS layer: Yes No mapping PFRA mapping included on FRR map: Yes No 1.4.2 Summary of Type FRI score Principal Receptors (if available) UWWTPLoc_Weighted_T_C 3.43 Port_Harbour_Weighted_T_C 342.5 Total 374.7 1 Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 23 Fenit V0_A 1.7 Stage 1 Aspect Clearly APSR Uncertain Evaluation Flood History (1.1) X OPW / LA Information (1.2) X PFRA Evaluation (1.4) X Overall Desktop Evaluation (if any above aspect is uncertain X then overall designation is uncertain) 1.8 Proposed level of Level A Site Visit X assessment for Stage 2 site visits Level B Site Visit 2 Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 23 Fenit V0_A Stage 2: Site Inspection Level A Assessment Date and Time of Inspection Date: 24/05/11 Time: 14:30 Names of inspection team Iain Blackwell (including OPW/LA staff if present) Kelly Kasperczyk 2.1 Ground-truthing Fluvial non-tidal Fluvial tidal Coastal Not available of Hazard Mapping No PFRA mapping, but FRI score of 374 primarily associated with the Port.
  • Audit Maritime Collections 2006 709Kb

    Audit Maritime Collections 2006 709Kb

    AN THE CHOMHAIRLE HERITAGE OIDHREACHTA COUNCIL A UDIT OF M ARITIME C OLLECTIONS A Report for the Heritage Council By Darina Tully All rights reserved. Published by the Heritage Council October 2006 Photographs courtesy of The National Maritime Museum, Dunlaoghaire Darina Tully ISSN 1393 – 6808 The Heritage Council of Ireland Series ISBN: 1 901137 89 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Objective 4 1.2 Scope 4 1.3 Extent 4 1.4 Methodology 4 1.5 Area covered by the audit 5 2. COLLECTIONS 6 Table 1: Breakdown of collections by county 6 Table 2: Type of repository 6 Table 3: Breakdown of collections by repository type 7 Table 4: Categories of interest / activity 7 Table 5: Breakdown of collections by category 8 Table 6: Types of artefact 9 Table 7: Breakdown of collections by type of artefact 9 3. LEGISLATION ISSUES 10 4. RECOMMENDATIONS 10 4.1 A maritime museum 10 4.2 Storage for historical boats and traditional craft 11 4.3 A register of traditional boat builders 11 4.4 A shipwreck interpretative centre 11 4.5 Record of vernacular craft 11 4.6 Historic boat register 12 4.7 Floating exhibitions 12 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 12 5.1 Sources for further consultation 12 6. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF RECORDED COLLECTIONS 13 7. MARITIME AUDIT – ALL ENTRIES 18 1. INTRODUCTION This Audit of Maritime Collections was commissioned by The Heritage Council in July 2005 with the aim of assisting the conservation of Ireland’s boating heritage in both the maritime and inland waterway communities. 1.1 Objective The objective of the audit was to ascertain the following:
  • T.C. Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Orta

    T.C. Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Orta

    T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ORTA KARADENİZ’DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI MUSTAFA BİÇER Bu tez, Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalında Yüksek Lisans derecesi için hazırlanmıştır. ORDU 2014 TEZ BİLDİRİMİ Tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu tezin yazılmasında bilimsel ahlak kurallarına uyulduğunu, başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel normlara uygun olarak atıfta bulunulduğunu, tezin içerdiği yenilik ve sonuçların başka bir yerden alınmadığını, kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmadığını, tezin herhangi bir kısmının bu üniversite veya başka bir üniversitedeki başka bir tez çalışması olarak sunulmadığını beyan ederim. İmza Mustafa BİÇER Not: Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaktan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. I ÖZET ORTA KARADENİZ’ DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI Mustafa BİÇER Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, 2014 Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 60s Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet AYDIN Bu çalışma ile Orta Karadeniz’de birçok sayıda familya ve cins ile temsil edilen mollusca sınıfına ait türlerin Ordu İlindeki dağılımının belirlenmesi ve araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Mollusca türlerini tespit etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada, derinlikleri 0-25 m arasında değişen 14 istasyondan örneklemeler yapılmıştır. Araştırma mediolittoral bölgeden elle, dalarak ve el direcleri
  • Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry, by 1

    Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry, by 1

    Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry, by 1 Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry, by William Butler Yeats This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry Author: William Butler Yeats Editor: William Butler Yeats Release Date: October 28, 2010 [EBook #33887] Language: English Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry, by 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAIRY AND FOLK TALES *** Produced by Larry B. Harrison, Brian Foley and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) FAIRY AND FOLK TALES OF THE IRISH PEASANTRY. EDITED AND SELECTED BY W. B. YEATS. THE WALTER SCOTT PUBLISHING CO., LTD. LONDON AND FELLING-ON-TYNE. NEW YORK: 3 EAST 14TH STREET. INSCRIBED TO MY MYSTICAL FRIEND, G. R. CONTENTS. THE TROOPING FAIRIES-- PAGE The Fairies 3 Frank Martin and the Fairies 5 The Priest's Supper 9 The Fairy Well of Lagnanay 13 Teig O'Kane and the Corpse 16 Paddy Corcoran's Wife 31 Cusheen Loo 33 The White Trout; A Legend of Cong 35 The Fairy Thorn 38 The Legend of Knockgrafton 40 A Donegal Fairy 46 CHANGELINGS-- The Brewery of Egg-shells 48 The Fairy Nurse 51 Jamie Freel and the Young Lady 52 The Stolen Child 59 THE MERROW--
  • Behind the Scenes

    Behind the Scenes

    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 689 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Anthony Sheehy, Mike at the Hunt Museum, OUR READERS Steve Whitfield, Stevie Winder, Ann in Galway, Many thanks to the travellers who used the anonymous farmer who pointed the way to the last edition and wrote to us with help- Knockgraffon Motte and all the truly delightful ful hints, useful advice and interesting people I met on the road who brought sunshine anecdotes: to the wettest of Irish days. Thanks also, as A Andrzej Januszewski, Annelise Bak C Chris always, to Daisy, Tim and Emma. Keegan, Colin Saunderson, Courtney Shucker D Denis O’Sullivan J Jack Clancy, Jacob Catherine Le Nevez Harris, Jane Barrett, Joe O’Brien, John Devitt, Sláinte first and foremost to Julian, and to Joyce Taylor, Juliette Tirard-Collet K Karen all of the locals, fellow travellers and tourism Boss, Katrin Riegelnegg L Laura Teece, Lavin professionals en route for insights, information Graviss, Luc Tétreault M Marguerite Harber, and great craic.