DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Atlantic, Southwest C-41 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Atlantic, Southwest C-41 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques 460 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Southwest C-41 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, sud-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, sudoccidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Lefteye flounders nei Bothidae 31 1 - - - - - - Tonguefishes Cynoglossidae 31 - - - - 38 - - Bastard halibuts nei Paralichthys spp 31 4 697 6 083 6 537 7 263 8 081 7 764 8 290 Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 3 328 2 798 2 212 2 611 2 411 2 566 2 570 Blue antimora Antimora rostrata 32 - - 24 18 12 9 35 Tadpole codling Salilota australis 32 4 676 7 635 6 384 5 654 6 374 9 815 12 088 Brazilian codling Urophycis brasiliensis 32 8 976 6 847 4 752 5 360 5 260 7 716 7 036 Southern blue whiting Micromesistius australis 32 61 793 60 546 78 864 53 727 52 203 41 209 33 049 Southern hake Merluccius australis 32 5 301 6 693 5 924 3 869 3 425 2 871 3 172 Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi 32 412 068 380 283 480 588 422 715 406 876 346 832 315 770 Hakes nei Merluccius spp 32 186 - 1 434 1 661 1 297 1 047 845 Patagonian grenadier Macruronus magellanicus 32 127 234 123 457 145 697 136 182 145 773 116 738 128 446 Ridge scaled rattail Macrourus carinatus 32 5 329 8 196 5 067 1 826 2 356 2 201 12 542 Bigeye grenadier Macrourus holotrachys 32 - - - - 2 11 53 Grenadiers nei Macrourus spp 32 723 57 198 778 1 453 1 657 1 802 Gadiformes nei Gadiformes 32 159 24 192 249 1 2 1 Tarpon Megalops atlanticus 33 1 075 1 067 1 035 860 898 636 640 Sea catfishes nei Ariidae 33 36 724 29 647 33 434 29 638 30 569 28 966 28 977 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 11 433 13 460 14 349 16 920 14 419 22 141 22 233 Snooks(=Robalos) nei Centropomus spp 33 3 311 5 072 4 577 3 442 3 318 3 947 3 950 Brazilian groupers nei Mycteroperca spp 33 1 357 1 826 1 770 2 128 1 757 1 781 1 780 Red grouper Epinephelus morio 33 1 204 2 380 1 714 1 273 1 104 863 860 Groupers nei Epinephelus spp 33 2 110 938 659 1 855 735 833 830 Argentine seabass Acanthistius brasilianus 33 3 624 4 032 5 111 5 983 4 469 4 472 4 570 Groupers, seabasses nei Serranidae 33 10 - - - - - - Bigeyes nei Priacanthus spp 33 59 66 70 89 102 398 400 Southern red snapper Lutjanus purpureus 33 6 923 5 912 5 994 7 793 6 587 3 694 3 700 Lane snapper Lutjanus synagris 33 1 392 1 631 1 306 1 778 1 863 2 036 2 040 Yellowtail snapper Ocyurus chrysurus 33 2 106 2 656 2 667 5 376 5 371 3 717 3 720 Snappers, jobfishes nei Lutjanidae 33 3 531 5 340 5 303 5 339 6 539 7 875 7 880 Barred grunt Conodon nobilis 33 106 177 133 137 154 161 160 Grunts, sweetlips nei Haemulidae (=Pomadasyidae) 33 3 228 2 581 2 459 2 811 3 254 3 792 3 800 Striped weakfish Cynoscion striatus 33 20 370 13 719 26 583 18 692 25 266 24 579 26 311 Weakfishes nei Cynoscion spp 33 45 414 46 910 40 374 42 481 42 311 46 499 46 500 Whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri 33 75 164 81 949 77 301 80 322 101 263 97 698 94 842 Kingcroakers nei Menticirrhus spp 33 2 053 2 052 1 655 2 186 2 126 1 961 1 968 Argentine croaker Umbrina canosai 33 17 681 15 166 17 324 9 313 19 666 17 458 15 245 King weakfish Macrodon ancylodon 33 6 318 4 532 5 761 4 476 5 671 5 121 6 329 Black drum Pogonias cromis 33 537 853 634 703 561 702 504 Croakers, drums nei Sciaenidae 33 188 208 473 457 756 270 270 South American silver porgy Diplodus argenteus 33 4 8 10 19 32 26 82 Red porgy Pagrus pagrus 33 2 647 3 700 4 442 5 287 7 101 6 559 9 247 Porgies, seabreams nei Sparidae 33 - 0 9 - - 0 - Argentine goatfish Mullus argentinae 33 78 88 178 238 416 350 304 Goatfishes, red mullets nei Mullidae 33 2 218 1 981 2 102 1 442 1 394 1 388 1 390 Sea chubs nei Kyphosidae 33 37 - - - - - - Parrotfishes nei Scaridae 33 137 140 364 280 357 135 135 Channel bull blenny Cottoperca gobio 33 - - - - 5 30 25 Patagonian blennie Eleginops maclovinus 33 97 77 73 59 57 16 21 Antarctic rockcods, noties nei Nototheniidae 33 180 259 568 4 236 10 513 8 363 12 461 Percoids nei Percoidei 33 2 209 3 110 3 173 2 490 2 827 2 819 2 820 Brazilian flathead Percophis brasiliensis 33 6 180 6 982 6 797 8 479 9 139 8 577 9 016 Argentinian sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata 33 1 778 2 233 2 393 3 064 2 797 2 637 2 614 Brazilian sandperch Pinguipes brasilianus 33 - - - - - 1 2 Spadefishes nei Ephippidae 33 208 170 265 315 250 198 200 Puffers nei Tetraodontidae 33 201 143 297 682 724 409 410 Triggerfishes, durgons nei Balistidae 33 12 828 7 970 6 590 6 349 5 494 3 787 3 790 Argentine conger Conger orbignyanus 34 273 86 302 256 204 19 28 Conger eels, etc. nei Congridae 34 1 192 3 - - 27 5 5 Pink cusk-eel Genypterus blacodes 34 19 712 16 450 19 293 21 284 23 889 24 638 20 055 Cusk-eels, brotulas nei Ophidiidae 34 808 824 577 642 576 626 630 Alfonsinos nei Beryx spp 34 749 - - - - - - Wreckfish Polyprion americanus 34 69 61 47 39 116 191 146 Tilefishes nei Branchiostegidae 34 638 639 614 790 782 939 927 Castaneta Cheilodactylus bergi 34 498 530 1 183 4 014 4 497 2 273 5 817 Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides 34 12 488 8 871 6 671 4 917 5 899 7 571 5 460 Patagonian rockcod Patagonotothen brevicauda 34 9 56 126 - - - - Longtail Southern cod Patagonotothen ramsayi 34 10 191 1 088 8 981 23 029 30 977 60 818 Mackerel icefish Champsocephalus gunnari 34 192 7 75 - 5 17 5 Pike icefish Champsocephalus esox 34 - - - 0 22 2 90 Snoek Thyrsites atun 34 - - - - 2 - - Escolar Lepidocybium flavobrunneum 34 21 28 30 40 21 8 39 Oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus 34 - - - 17 32 72 103 Snake mackerels, escolars nei Gempylidae 34 - - 74 - - 29 - Largehead hairtail Trichiurus lepturus 34 2 938 1 702 2 336 2 336 2 293 3 853 3 739 Hairtails, scabbardfishes nei Trichiuridae 34 - - 43 21 14 - - Choicy ruff Seriolella porosa 34 5 360 5 917 5 971 3 785 6 160 4 691 6 241 Ruffs, barrelfishes nei Centrolophidae 34 - - 1 53 41 - - Patagonian redfish Sebastes oculatus 34 ... ... ... ... ... ... 32 Blackbelly rosefish Helicolenus dactylopterus 34 2 038 1 405 2 149 2 809 2 544 2 307 2 247 Scorpionfishes nei Scorpaenidae 34 2 8 1 - - - 4 Atlantic searobins Prionotus spp 34 6 057 3 189 4 419 7 637 5 660 5 251 5 252 Blackfin goosefish Lophius gastrophysus 34 6 342 2 665 2 434 2 550 2 517 2 508 2 510 Demersal percomorphs nei Perciformes 34 110 1 656 559 304 340 311 310 Brazilian sardinella Sardinella brasiliensis 35 22 054 25 266 53 421 42 657 54 201 55 940 55 940 Brazilian menhaden Brevoortia aurea 35 828 1 030 1 151 1 036 986 1 558 1 303 461 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Southwest C-41 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, sud-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, sudoccidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Argentine menhaden Brevoortia pectinata 35 47 76 116 110 9 31 61 Scaled sardines Harengula spp 35 326 358 335 296 298 226 226 Atlantic thread herring Opisthonema oglinum 35 4 581 7 752 5 754 4 853 7 673 13 252 13 250 Falkland sprat Sprattus fuegensis 35 1 - - - 9 11 - Argentine anchovy Engraulis anchoita 35 21 335 28 570 39 367 44 034 44 275 27 824 22 887 Marini's anchovy Anchoa marinii 35 ... ... ... ... ... 18 36 Anchovies, etc. nei Engraulidae 35 3 766 4 398 4 676 3 353 5 181 4 374 4 370 Clupeoids nei Clupeoidei 35 25 930 18 357 19 797 15 923 17 350 18 190 18 190 Atlantic bonito Sarda sarda 36 16 129 269 200 533 405 28 Wahoo Acanthocybium solandri 36 0 403 519 449 113 76 77 King mackerel Scomberomorus cavalla 36 2 316 3 311 247 202 316 33 0 Serra Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus brasiliensis 36 3 071 2 881 814 471 1 432 563 1 521 Frigate and bullet tunas Auxis thazard, A. rochei 36 1 117 860 413 532 604 203 149 Little tunny(=Atl.black skipj) Euthynnus alletteratus 36 615 ... 324 280 454 399 ... Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis 36 18 345 20 428 23 078 26 405 23 318 24 205 20 866 Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus 36 - - - - 12 0 - Blackfin tuna Thunnus atlanticus 36 1 669 1 118 90 243 233 267 Albacore Thunnus alalunga 36 11 509 13 202 10 664 8 004 7 826 5 665 5 713 Southern bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii 36 1 7 - - - 8 - Yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares 36 7 504 5 717 8 420 8 935 4 933 6 687 4 928 Bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus 36 10 171 8 163 7 336 5 357 5 579 6 091 6 827 Slender tuna Allothunnus fallai 36 0 - - - - - 0 Atlantic sailfish Istiophorus albicans 36 925 794 665 520 293 343 737 Blue marlin Makaira nigricans 36 535 679 288 696 398 410 367 Atlantic white marlin Tetrapturus albidus 36 416 316 174 265 146 107 121 Longbill spearfish Tetrapturus pfluegeri 36 43 23 ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fishing and Illegal Trade of the Angelshark DNA Barcoding
    Fisheries Research 206 (2018) 193–197 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres The fishing and illegal trade of the angelshark: DNA barcoding against T misleading identifications ⁎ Ingrid Vasconcellos Bunholia, Bruno Lopes da Silva Ferrettea,b, , Juliana Beltramin De Biasia,b, Carolina de Oliveira Magalhãesa,b, Matheus Marcos Rotundoc, Claudio Oliveirab, Fausto Forestib, Fernando Fernandes Mendonçaa a Laboratório de Genética Pesqueira e Conservação (GenPesC), Instituto do Mar (IMar), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, 11070-102, Brazil b Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes (LBGP), Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu (IBB), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, 18618-689, Brazil c Acervo Zoológico da Universidade Santa Cecília (AZUSC), Universidade Santa Cecília (Unisanta), Santos, SP, 11045-907, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handled by J Viñas Morphological identification in the field can be extremely difficult considering fragmentation of species for trade Keywords: or high similarity between congeneric species. In this context, the shark group belonging to the genus Squatina is Conservation composed of three species distributed in the southern part of the western Atlantic. These three species are Endangered species classified in the IUCN Red List as endangered, and they are currently protected under Brazilian law, which Fishing monitoring prohibits fishing and trade. Molecular genetic tools are now used for practical taxonomic identification, parti- Forensic genetics cularly in cases where morphological observation is prevented, e.g., during fish processing. Consequently, DNA fi Mislabeling identi cation barcoding was used in the present study to track potential crimes against the landing and trade of endangered species along the São Paulo coastline, in particular Squatina guggenheim (n = 75) and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report No. 447 1974 •
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 447 1974 • ... FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Technical Reports FRB Technical Reports are research documents that are of sufficient importance to be preserved, but which ·for some reason are not appropriate for primary scientific publication. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series should reflect the broad research interests of FRB. These Reports can be cited in publications, but care should be taken to indicate their manuscript status. Some of the material in these Reports will eventually appear in the primary scientific literature. Inquiries concerning any particular Report should be directed to the issuing FRB establishment which is indicated on the title page. FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 44 7 THE SQUID OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AS A POTENTIAL FISHERY RESOURCE - A PRELIMINARY REPORT by S.A. Macfarlane and M. Yamamoto Fisheries and Marine Service Vancouver Laboratory Vancouver, B.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS 3 III. COMMERCIAL ASPECTS 8 A. Fishing Methods 8 B. International Squid Fisher,y 15 c. Status of Squid in British Co1uabia 19 IV. NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS 27 v. PROCESSING 28 VI. DISCUSSION 30 VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 32 VIII. REFERENCES 33 1. I. INTRODUCTION Available catch statistics from 1965 through 1971 indicate • that world-wide landings of squid totalled roughly 700,000 metric tons annually. An additional 100,000 metric tons of cuttlefish and about 160,000 metric tons of octopus were also landed annually. Apart from the well-established squid fishery in the Monterey area of California and the relatively minor inshore squid fishery off Newfoundland, the North American fishing industry has tended to ignore the possibility of further exploitation and utilization of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Bouguerche Et Al
    Redescription and molecular characterisation of Allogastrocotyle bivaginalis Nasir & Fuentes Zambrano, 1983 (Monogenea: Gastrocotylidae) from Trachurus picturatus (Bowdich) (Perciformes: Carangidae) off the Algerian coast, Mediterranean Sea Chahinez Bouguerche, Fadila Tazerouti, Delphine Gey, Jean-Lou Justine To cite this version: Chahinez Bouguerche, Fadila Tazerouti, Delphine Gey, Jean-Lou Justine. Redescription and molecular characterisation of Allogastrocotyle bivaginalis Nasir & Fuentes Zambrano, 1983 (Monogenea: Gas- trocotylidae) from Trachurus picturatus (Bowdich) (Perciformes: Carangidae) off the Algerian coast, Mediterranean Sea. Systematic Parasitology, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2019, 96 (8), pp.681-694. 10.1007/s11230-019-09883-7. hal-02557974 HAL Id: hal-02557974 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02557974 Submitted on 29 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Bouguerche et al. Allogastrocotyle bivaginalis 1 Systematic Parasitology (2019) 96:681–694 DOI: 10.1007/s11230-019-09883-7 Redescription and molecular characterisation
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Distribution of Pelagic Cephalopods *
    * Vertical Distribution of Pelagic Cephalopods CLYDE F. E. ROPER and RICHARD E. YOUNG SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 209 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti- tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These pub- lications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, and other interested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available. S. DILLON RIPLEY Secretary Smithsonian Institution SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 209 Vertical Distribution of Pelagic Cephalopds Clyde F.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Sardinella Brazil, Southwest Atlantic Purse Seines
    Brazilian sardinella Sardinella brasiliensis © Brazil, Southwest Atlantic Purse seines June 14, 2018 Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF3 Table of Contents About. Seafood. .Watch . 3. Guiding. .Principles . 4. Summary. 5. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 6. Introduction. 7. Assessment. 10. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. Species. Under. Assessment. .10 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. Other. Species. .12 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .20 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. Habitat. .and . Ecosystem. .23 . Acknowledgements. 26. References. 27. Appendix. A:. Extra. .By . Catch. .Species . 31. 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Employing DNA Barcoding As Taxonomy and Conservation Tools For
    Journal for Nature Conservation 36 (2017) 1–9 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal for Nature Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/jnc Employing DNA barcoding as taxonomy and conservation tools for fish species censuses at the southeastern Mediterranean, a hot-spot area for biological invasion a,b,∗ b b b a b Arzu Karahan , Jacob Douek , Guy Paz , Nir Stern , Ahmet Erkan Kideys , Lee Shaish c b , Menachem Goren , Baruch Rinkevich a Middle East Technical University, Institute of Marine Science, Department of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Mersin, Turkey b National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanography and Limnological Research, Department of Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Tel Shikmona, PO Box 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel c Tel Aviv University, Department of Zoology and the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: This study evaluates the utility of DNA barcoding (mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I; COI) as a Received 2 November 2015 biodiversity and conservation applied tool for identifying fish fauna from the southeastern Mediterranean Received in revised form 27 October 2016 (the continental coast of Israel), a hot-spot area for biological invasion, also with an eye to establish the Accepted 18 January 2017 foundation for follow-up studies that will use environmental DNA (eDNA) tracks of native and invasive species, and for the application of eDNA concepts and methodologies in nature conservation. We estab- Keywords: lished a dataset of 280 DNA barcodes, representing 110 marine fish species (all identified by a taxonomist), Mediterranean fish belonging to 75 native and 35 Lessepsian migratory species that were tested within and against the BOLD DNA barcode Taxonomy system database.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalopod Beak Sections Used to Trace
    Cephalopod beak sections used to trace mercury levels throughout the life of cephalopods: the Giant Warty squid Moroteuthopsis longimana as a case study José Queirós, Paco Bustamante, Yves Cherel, Joao Coelho, José Seco, Jim Roberts, Eduarda Pereira, José Xavier To cite this version: José Queirós, Paco Bustamante, Yves Cherel, Joao Coelho, José Seco, et al.. Cephalopod beak sections used to trace mercury levels throughout the life of cephalopods: the Giant Warty squid Moroteuthopsis longimana as a case study. Marine Environmental Research, Elsevier, 2020, 161, pp.105049. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105049. hal-02904190 HAL Id: hal-02904190 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02904190 Submitted on 21 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Cephalopod beak sections used to trace mercury levels throughout the life of cephalopods: the Giant Warty squid Moroteuthopsis longimana as a case study José P. Queirós*a, Paco Bustamanteb,c, Yves Chereld, João P. Coelhoe, José Secof,g, Jim Robertsh, Eduarda Pereiraf & José C. Xaviera,i a – University of Coimbra, MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal b - Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000 La Rochelle, France c - Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 rue Descartes 75005 Paris, France d - Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 du CNRS–La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers–en–Bois, France.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Sperm Storage and Mating in the Deep-Sea
    University of Groningen Sperm storage and mating in the deep-sea squid Taningia danae Joubin, 1931 (Oegopsida Hoving, Hendrik Jan T.; Lipinski, Marek R.; Videler, John J.; Bolstad, Kat S. R. Published in: Marine Biology DOI: 10.1007/s00227-009-1326-7 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Hoving, H. J. T., Lipinski, M. R., Videler, J. J., & Bolstad, K. S. R. (2010). Sperm storage and mating in the deep-sea squid Taningia danae Joubin, 1931 (Oegopsida: Octopoteuthidae). Marine Biology, 157(2), 393- 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1326-7 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Draft Report November 1999 the Marine Resources Assessment Group
    Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Draft Report November 1999 The Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) Report, 1999 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 6 General Background ....................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 8 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 9 Study Scope and Objectives............................................................................................ 9 Background To This Study ......................................................................................... 9 Overall Objective of the Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Study .......................... 9 Overall Study Activities.............................................................................................. 9 The Economic Evaluation Focuses on the Following Activities.............................. 10 Defining Biological Diversity................................................................................... 10 1.1. Prioritized Threats to Biodiversity........................................................................ 11 1.1.1. Overexploitation ............................................................................................ 12 1.1.2. Physical
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Loopholes on Shark Finning
    Threatened European sharks Like many animals before them, sharks have become prey to human indulgence. Today, sharks are among the ocean’s most threatened species. PORBEAGLE SHARK (Lamna nasus) BASKING SHARK (Cetorhinus maximus) COMMON THRESHER SHARK Similar to killing elephants for their valuable tusks, Critically Endangered off Europe Vulnerable globally (Alopias vulpinus) sharks are now often hunted for a very specific part of Closing Vulnerable globally their bodies – their fins. Fetching up to 500 Euros a kilo when dried, shark fins the SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD (Sphyrna zygaena) SPINY DOGFISH (Squalus acanthias) TOPE SHARK (Galeorhinus galeus) are rich pickings for fishermen. Most shark fins end up Endangered globally Critically Endangered off Europe Vulnerable globally in Asia where shark fin soup is a traditional delicacy and status symbol. loopholes With shark fins fetching such a high price, and with the rest of the shark being so much less valuable, many fishermen have taken to ‘finning’ the sharks they catch SHORTFIN MAKO (Isurus oxyrinchus) COMMON GUITARFISH (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) BLUE SHARK (Prionace glauca) Vulnerable globally Proposed endangered in Mediterranean Near Threatened globally to save room on their boats for the bodies of more on commercially important fish. shark GREAT WHITE SHARK (Carcharadon carcharias) COMMON SAWFISH (Pristis pristis) ANGEL SHARK (Squatina squatina) Vulnerable globally Assumed Extinct off Europe Critically Endangered off Europe finning Globally Threatened sharks on the IUCN (International Union
    [Show full text]
  • Why Have Global Shark and Ray Landings Declined: Improvement Management Or Overfishing?1
    Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improvement management or overfishing?1 Full names of all authors: Lindsay N.K. Davidson1 Meg A. Krawchuk2 Nicholas K. Dulvy1 Affiliations: 1 Earth to Ocean Research Group, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada 2 Landscape fire and conservation science, Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry, Oregon State University. Author to whom all correspondence and proofs should be sent: Lindsay N.K. Davidson, Biological Sciences, 8888 University Drive, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5A 1S6, [email protected] 1 A version of this chapter is published as: Davidson, LNK., Krawchuk, MA., Dulvy, NK. (2016) Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing? Fish and Fisheries. 17:438-458. doi:10.1111/faf.12119 1.1. Abstract Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate, and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO’s 2012 “State of the World’s Fisheries and Aquaculture” report, the authors “hoped” the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post-peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures.
    [Show full text]