The Crystal Palace, Environmentally Considered

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Crystal Palace, Environmentally Considered Architectural Research Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/ARQ Additional services for Architectural Research Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Crystal Palace, environmentally considered Henrik Schoenefeldt Architectural Research Quarterly / Volume 12 / Issue 3-4 / December 2008, pp 283 - 294 DOI: 10.1017/S1359135508001218, Published online: 25 February 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1359135508001218 How to cite this article: Henrik Schoenefeldt (2008). The Crystal Palace, environmentally considered. Architectural Research Quarterly, 12, pp 283-294 doi:10.1017/S1359135508001218 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/ARQ, IP address: 128.103.149.52 on 25 Jul 2016 history Paxton’s early ambitions for a unified system of environmental control involving mechanical and passive technologies were partially realised in the Crystal Palace of 1851. The Crystal Palace, environmentally considered Henrik Schoenefeldt In the nineteenth century, horticulturists such as principles of horticulture were discussed extensively John Claudius Loudon and Joseph Paxton, aware of in nineteenth-century horticultural literature such the new environmental possibilities of glasshouses Loudon’s Remarks on the Construction of Hothouses that had been demonstrated in the context of (1817), Paxton’s Magazine of Botany (1834-49) and the horticulture, contemplated the use of fully-glazed Transactions of the Horticultural Society of London (1812- structures as a means to creating new types of 44). Since the purpose of glasshouses was to facilitate environments for human beings. While Loudon the cultivation of an increasing variety of foreign suggested the use of large glass structures to plants in the temperate climate of Northern Europe, immerse entire Russian villages in an artificial the creation of artificial climates tailored to the climate,1 Henry Cole and Paxton envisioned large- specific environmental needs of plants became the scale winter parks, to function as new types of public primary object of the design. The glasshouses not spaces. These indoor public spaces were intended to only provided a context for the application of grant the urban population of London access to contemporary mechanical and structural clean air, daylight and a comfortable climate.2 technology, but also rendered visible the ecological Although glasshouses had only been experienced in dimension of the built environment, as for example, the immediate context of horticulture, designed in the effect of temperature, humidity, solar radiation accordance with the specific environmental and air movement on the health of plants. A wide requirements of foreign plants, rather than the range of horticulturists, surgeons, social and health requirements of human comfort and health,3 they 1 Paxton’s proposal for were perceived as a precedent for a new approach to an urban Sanitarium, architectural design primarily driven by 1851. Illustrated London News, 5 July environmental criteria. The environmental design 1851, p. 11 1 history arq . vol 12 . no 3/4 . 2008 283 http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 25 Jul 2016 IP address: 128.103.149.52 284 arq . vol 12 . no 3/4 . 2008 history reformers contemplated applying the technical and mechanical equipment to regulate the internal environmental reasoning behind the horticultural climate could be adapted to create health enhancing glasshouse to the design of the built environment in environments for the population of large industrial general, with the intention of using glasshouses as a cities.7 These would comprise large spaces with an means of improving people’s health in major abundance of daylight, fresh air and a comfortable industrial cities.4 The horticulturist Joseph Paxton climate throughout the whole year. This pamphlet was a major proponent of this idea. outlined Paxton’s proposal for converting the Crystal Paxton articulated the larger social and Palace into a public winter garden and was part of a environmental aspirations behind his idea of public series of hypothetical projects in which he illustrated glasshouses in a number of hypothetical design his larger socio-environmental aspirations towards proposals and written accounts in pamphlets and the use of glasshouses for human functions. journal articles.5 When he received the commission Contemporary newspaper articles and pamphlets to design the Great Exhibition building, he was also indicate very clearly that the Crystal Palace from the able to put these ideas at least partially into practice. earliest stages in the design was conceived as a The Hyde Park Crystal Palace was a pioneering prototype of the kind of glass buildings that Paxton attempt to adapt the tradition of horticultural intended to promote as indoor public spaces. The glasshouses to human rather than plant habitation. first account of Paxton’s proposal for the Crystal Its history illustrates the difficulties of making fully- Palace in the Illustrated London News on 6 July 1850 glazed structures climatically suitable for human included a brief account of Paxton’s intention to beings. But as shown in a large number of convert the Crystal Palace into a public winter contemporary accounts detailing the extreme garden, which, by providing an expansive interior climatic conditions that periodically occurred inside space, would allow people to take extensive indoor the Crystal Palace during the Great Exhibition in promenades and coach rides whatever the season.8 In 1851, the ideal climate promised by the conceptual the summer, he proposed to remove the vertical glasshouses was not successfully delivered by the glazing to open the building up to its surrounding actual built form. landscape and to ‘give the appearance of a There are many publications which address the continuous park and garden’.9 In What is to be done history of the Crystal Palace in terms of its with the Crystal Palace and in a letter to the Times titled, construction and aesthetic, as for instance ‘Shall the Crystal Palace Stand or Not?’, Paxton gave a Hitchcock’s Early Victorian Architecture in Britain, more detailed description of his project and the Giedion’s Space Time and Architecture, McKean’s Crystal underlying environmental and social aspirations. Palace and Chadwick’s The Works of Sir Joseph Paxton.6 In Apart from providing a very large, well lit and contrast, the intention of this article is to discuss the sheltered space, the interior of the winter garden was environmental history of this building illustrating to comprise an autonomous artificial climate, how the environmental design aspirations insulated from the variable weather and the influenced its construction, form and spatial polluted atmosphere of nineteenth-century arrangement. It includes a discussion of Paxton’s London.10 The climate was to resemble the summer larger socio-environmental visions as a driving force climate of southern Italy during the winter, and behind the idea of glasshouses for human beings, a during the summer period the ‘winter temperature description of the environmental strategies and of that country […] would be about 10 degree colder technologies employed, and a study of the building’s than the ordinary heat of our dwelling houses’.11 In environmental performance. It compares the contrast to the Hyde Park building, with its climate that Paxton originally intended to achieve translucent roof which diffused the sunlight and the with the real climatic conditions which occurred opaque wooden infill panels on the ground floor, inside the building during the Great Exhibition. The both of which restricted the visual connection with latter is based on temperature measurements taken the outside, the envelope of the winter garden was during the period of the exhibition and written intended to be totally transparent. It was to facilitate accounts of people’s perception of the climate inside free admission of direct sunlight and to connect the the Crystal Palace. These measurements have interior visually with its surroundings, turning the hitherto not been discussed in print by architectural building into a display case through which the historians but are crucial if we are to appreciate the interior picturesque park and garden could be significance of the Crystal Palace. observed from the outside.12 Paxton’s proposal represented an attempt to utilise glasshouses as a Paxton’s broader environmental aspirations means of reinstating a healthy human habitat The idea of utilising all-glass structures and within the environment of the emerging industrial mechanical environmental systems as a means to cities which, as numerous articles in the Civil Engineer achieve healthy environments, not only for tender and Architect’s Journal and the Builderillustrated, were plants but also for the population of the nineteenth- confronted with poor hygienic conditions, century industrial city, was the locus of Paxton’s overcrowding, lack of daylight, air and water broader socio-environmental aspirations. Paxton pollution.13 The prospect of providing the general illustrated his ideas in a series of hypothetical design population of large cities, which suffered among projects, pamphlets, newspaper articles and lectures. other ailments from tuberculosis, various skin In What is to be done with the Crystal Palace?, Paxton diseases and bronchitis,with daylight and fresh air proposed that all-glass structures equipped with
Recommended publications
  • The Industrial Revolution: 18-19Th C
    The Industrial Revolution: 18-19th c. Displaced from their farms by technological developments, the industrial laborers - many of them women and children – suffered miserable living and working conditions. Romanticism: late 18th c. - mid. 19th c. During the Industrial Revolution an intellectual and artistic hostility towards the new industrialization developed. This was known as the Romantic movement. The movement stressed the importance of nature in art and language, in contrast to machines and factories. • Interest in folk culture, national and ethnic cultural origins, and the medieval era; and a predilection for the exotic, the remote and the mysterious. CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH Abbey in the Oak Forest, 1810. The English Landscape Garden Henry Flitcroft and Henry Hoare. The Park at Stourhead. 1743-1765. Wiltshire, England William Kent. Chiswick House Garden. 1724-9 The architectural set- pieces, each in a Picturesque location, include a Temple of Apollo, a Temple of Flora, a Pantheon, and a Palladian bridge. André Le Nôtre. The gardens of Versailles. 1661-1785 Henry Flitcroft and Henry Hoare. The Park at Stourhead. 1743-1765. Wiltshire, England CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH, Abbey in the Oak Forest, 1810. Gothic Revival Architectural movement most commonly associated with Romanticism. It drew its inspiration from medieval architecture and competed with the Neoclassical revival TURNER, The Chancel and Crossing of Tintern Abbey. 1794. Horace Walpole by Joshua Reynolds, 1756 Horace Walpole (1717-97), English politician, writer, architectural innovator and collector. In 1747 he bought a small villa that he transformed into a pseudo-Gothic showplace called Strawberry Hill; it was the inspiration for the Gothic Revival in English domestic architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crystal Palace
    The Crystal Palace The Crystal Palace was a cast-iron and plate-glass structure originally The Crystal Palace built in Hyde Park, London, to house the Great Exhibition of 1851. More than 14,000 exhibitors from around the world gathered in its 990,000-square-foot (92,000 m2) exhibition space to display examples of technology developed in the Industrial Revolution. Designed by Joseph Paxton, the Great Exhibition building was 1,851 feet (564 m) long, with an interior height of 128 feet (39 m).[1] The invention of the cast plate glass method in 1848 made possible the production of large sheets of cheap but strong glass, and its use in the Crystal Palace created a structure with the greatest area of glass ever seen in a building and astonished visitors with its clear walls and ceilings that did not require interior lights. It has been suggested that the name of the building resulted from a The Crystal Palace at Sydenham (1854) piece penned by the playwright Douglas Jerrold, who in July 1850 General information wrote in the satirical magazine Punch about the forthcoming Great Status Destroyed Exhibition, referring to a "palace of very crystal".[2] Type Exhibition palace After the exhibition, it was decided to relocate the Palace to an area of Architectural style Victorian South London known as Penge Common. It was rebuilt at the top of Town or city London Penge Peak next to Sydenham Hill, an affluent suburb of large villas. It stood there from 1854 until its destruction by fire in 1936. The nearby Country United Kingdom residential area was renamed Crystal Palace after the famous landmark Coordinates 51.4226°N 0.0756°W including the park that surrounds the site, home of the Crystal Palace Destroyed 30 November 1936 National Sports Centre, which had previously been a football stadium Cost £2 million that hosted the FA Cup Final between 1895 and 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crystal Palace and Great Exhibition of 1851
    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. The Crystal Palace and Great Exhibition of 1851 Ed King British Library Various source media, British Library Newpapers EMPOWER™ RESEARCH The Crystal Palace evokes a response from almost exhibition of 1849 was visited by 100,000 people.2 As the everyone that you meet. Its fame is part of our culture. introduction to the catalogue of the 1846 exhibition The origin of the Crystal Palace lay in a decision made explained: in 1849 by Albert, the Prince Consort, together with a small group of friends and advisers, to hold an international exhibition in 1851 of the industry of all 'We are persuaded that if artistic manufactures are not appreciated, it is because they are not widely enough known. We believe that when nations. This exhibition came to have the title of: 'Great works of high merit, of British origin, are brought forward, they will Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations', be fully appreciated and thoroughly enjoyed. ... this exhibition when normally shortened to 'Great Exhibition'. 3 thrown ... open to all will tend to improve the public taste.' There had been exhibitions prior to the Great Exhibition. This declaration of intent has a prophetic ring about it, These had occurred in Britain and also in France and when we consider what eventually happened in 1851. Germany.1 The spirit of competition fostered by the trade of mass-produced goods between nations created, to some extent, a need to exhibit goods. This, The Crystal Palace in Hyde Park in turn, promoted the sale of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Paxton's Approach to Historical City Park Design in the 21St Century
    TECHNICAL TRANSACTIONS CZASOPISMO TECHNICZNE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITEKTURA 1-A/2016 10.4467/2353737XCT.16.079.5443 ALBERT FEKETE, MÁTÉ SÁROSPATAKI, ZSÓFIA CSONKA, RITA ZSÓFIA JÁNOSKA* JOSEPH PAXTON’S APPROACH TO HISTORICAL CITY PARK DESIGN IN THE 21ST CENTURY KONCEPCJA PARKÓW HISTORYCZNYCH JOSEPHA PAXTONA W PROJEKTOWANIU ZIELENI W XXI WIEKU Abstract It is necessary today to completely re-examine the public parks use, development and design to meet the challenges and claims of the 21st century. With emphasis not just on their heritage and conservation but their potential as well, public parks could contribute not only to the social and recreational life of our urban areas, but also to the enhancement of environmental sustainability and the enrichment of the biodiversity of urban areas. A new design approach would be desirable for the management of our historical green spaces and to encourage a wider range of people to return to them. is paper comments on park use studies, contemporary park use investigations and student design works for parks in the future, using Paxton’s methods/approach/ideas for inspiration in the development of our historic city parks. And examines to what extent Paxton’s design ideas are applicable in the 21st century. Keywords: city park, public park, Joseph Paxton, landscape architecture, historic landscape, contemporary open space design Streszczenie Istnieje współcześnie potrzeba ponownego zbadania parków publicznych pod względem sposobu użytko- wania, rozwoju i projektowania, aby sprostać wyzwaniom i potrzebom XXI wieku. Podkreślając nie tylko ich dziedzictwo i wartość konserwatorską, ale także potencjał, parki publiczne mogłyby służyć nie tylko po- trzebom społecznym i rekreacji na obszarach zurbanizowanych, ale także poprawie równowagi ekologicznej i wzbogaceniu bioróżnorodności.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Jerrold, Dramatist And
    fl n yi^ » KTheirBooK UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES DOUGLAS JERROLD Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/douglasjerrolddr02jerr DoiTiLAS Jerroli), 1845 {Prom an etching bi/ Kainy Mea-loi's) Douglas Jerrold DRAMATIST AND WIT BY WALTER JERROLD WITH PORTRAITS AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS IN TWO VOLUMES VOL n. HODDER AND STOUGHTON LONDON NEW YORK TORONTO Printed in Great Britain bt Richard Clay & Sons, Limited, brunswick st., stamford st., s.e. 1, and bungay, suffolk. PR v.a. CONTENTS XII An " Annus Mirabilis " of Work — " Mrs. Caudle"—"Time Works Wonders"— Platform and Stage. 1845 . 381 XIII The Daily News—Douglas Jerrolds Weekly Newspaper — Letters — The Whitting- TON Club. 1846-1847 . .428 XIV Splendid Strolling — Mrs. Gamp and "that Dougladge"—Paris in Revo- lution. 1847-1848 468 XV " The Wittiest Man in London " — A Rolling Stone — Trip to Ireland— Difference with Dickens — Public Hanging — The Museum Club. 1849 . 497 XVI A Gold Pen—The " Catspaw "—Trip to the Lakes—Harriet Martineau—Leigh Hunt's Sneer—Eastbourne. 1850 . 528 XVII "Collected Works" — Sheridan Knowles: "Child of Nature"—"Re- tired FROM Business " — A Royal Per- —Lloyd's. formance 1851-1852 . 559 XVIII "St. Cupid" at Windsor—Gift to Kos- suth—A Swiss Holiday — "A Heart of Gold." 1853-1854 . .589 18ba?;i:6 vi CONTENTS CHAP. PAQI XIX Nathaniel Hawthorne and Douglas Jerrold—Boulogne—A Narrow Escape —Death OF A Beckett. 1855-1856 . 622 XX The Reform Club — Illness—The End. 1857 645 List of Douglas Jerrold's Plays . 660 Index 665 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS To face page Douglas Jerrold, 1845 .
    [Show full text]
  • New York's Crystal Palace
    Lesson Plan: New York’s Crystal Palace Architect: William R. Cobb for Lord and Burnham Site: Enid A. Haupt Conservatory 1896-1902 Location: Bronx River Parkway at Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458 Curriculum Link: High School Global History and Geography Unit Five: G:3: The British Industrial Revolution Or- 8th Grade Social Studies Unit Seven: An Industrial Society Project Aim: Students study the social, cultural, and political conditions within which the Enid A. Haupt Conservatory at the New York Botanical Gardens was built. They will look at its inspiration and precedents from England by studying the Crystal Palace—the first glass house of its kind, built by Joseph Paxton and Richard Turner, and Decimus Burton’s Palm house at Kew, in England. Vocabulary: Victorian: The Victorian era of Great Britain refers to the period of Queen Victoria’s rule between 1837 and 1901, and marked the height of the British Industrial Revolution and the apex of the British Empire. Cast-Iron Architecture: Buildings that incorporate iron for structural and/ or decorative purposes. After 1800 cast-iron supports were exploited as an alternative to masonry, and with the introduction of wrought-iron beams at mid-century, an efficient, prefabricated method of skeletal construction was possible, the most notable example was Joseph Paxton’s Crystal Palace. Cast- iron construction combined utility with the easy replication of attenuated classical orders in repeated bays. Description: The New York Botanical Gardens was founded by Columbia University botanist Nathaniel Lord Britton in 1891, after an inspiring trip to London’s Kew gardens in 1888. In Europe, leading botanical gardens grew out of royal properties or universities; but in New York City, the garden was established in Bronx Park, a 250-acre site of mostly untouched territory that included the former estate of Pierre Lorillard, a tobacco magnate.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Transformation and Architectural Development During the 19Th Century
    Technological Transformation and Architectural Development during the 19th Century In England, the development of constructional technology was depreciated b/c of the Palladian and Neo-Classical tradition, on the one hand, and, on the other, the trend of the gothic revival. Chiswick House, exterior view and plan axonometric (1725) Lord Burlington & William Kent Middlesex, England Understanding of Gothic architecture from ethical and moral standpoint in England August Welby Pugin (1812-1852) John Ruskin (1819-1900) A. W. N. Pugin frontispiece to An Apology for the Revival of Christian Architecture in England London, 1843 Houses of Parliament (1840-1865) Charles Barry (in collaboration with Pugin) London, England John Ruskin The Seven Lamps of Architecture 4th ed., London, 1894, pl. III Study of tracery Here Ruskin compares the tracery in the cathedrals of Caen, Bayeux, Rouen, and Beauvais. Technological Transformation in Civil Engineering in England -Yet, the tradition of Palldianism and Gothic Revivalism were less influential in the areas of bridges, aqueducts, railway stations, and large exhibition spaces -In these areas, technological progress was more crucial -Engineers were exempt from the stylistic concern of dressing the structure with a historic look. -Indeed, new types of space such as railway station were free from the concern of which stylistic dress to put on the inner structure -Honest expression of the function of the building and the determination of the shape based upon the structural rationality. -They may not be architecture, yet, opened the path to modern architecture. Isambard K. Brunel Clifton Suspension Bridge (designed 1836; completed 1864) River Avon, England -Designed by a famous railway engineer Isambard K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of the Green Infrastructure: the International Diffusion of New Concepts and Design Principles for Public Parks, 1840-1900
    The Genesis of the Green Infrastructure: the international diffusion of new concepts and design principles for public parks, 1840-1900. An international symposium, Tuesday 26th May 2020, at the historic Birkenhead Town Hall, Hamilton Square When Frederick Law Olmsted first visited Birkenhead Park on the 27th of May 1850, few people could have predicted the enormous impact it would have on the development of public parks in the USA. Birkenhead Park had only been opened three years earlier and was heralded by Olmsted as a ‘Democratic Institution’ where for the first time ‘the privileges of the garden’ could be ‘enjoyed about equally by all classes’. In many ways his design for Central Park, New York (1858) was ‘a facsimile of Birkenhead Park’ and similar design principles were incorporated in Prospect Park, Brooklyn (1867) and Delaware Park (1870). But his visit to Birkenhead Park was not part of a plan: it was the result of a casual recommendation by a local baker. In fact, little is known about how new concepts and design principles for public parks, now regarded as key heritage assets, were disseminated in the nineteenth century, or how the green infrastructure developed from a planning and aesthetic perspective. The symposium will therefore address the following issues. 1. What role did tours of gardens and parks play in diffusing new ideas? 2. How important was personal correspondence and professional networking among leading landscape gardeners? 3. What were the benefits of overseas employment in securing subsequent commissions? 4. Did European colonisation lead necessarily to the adoption of ‘national’ park designs? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis: Converting Radiant Energy Into Chemical Energy Pigments and Leaves
    Photosynthesis: Converting Radiant Energy into Chemical Energy Pigments and Leaves In a speech entitled, What is Science?, Richard Feynman (1969) said: “As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. When someone says, ‘Science teaches such and such,’ he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn't teach anything; experience teaches it. If they say to you, ‘Science has shown such and such,’ you might ask, ‘How does science show it? How did the scientists find out? How? What? Where?’ It should not be ‘science has shown’ but ‘this experiment, this effect, has shown.’ And you have as much right as anyone else, upon hearing about the experiments-- but be patient and listen to all the evidence--to judge whether a sensible conclusion has been arrived at.” You can find the whole speech, which includes thinking about photosynthesis http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html. Photosynthesis is the light (hν)-dependent chemical fixation of gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2) and liquid water (H2O) into solid carbohydrate (C(H2O)) with the evolution of gaseous oxygen (O2). hν CO2 + H2O → C(H2O) + O2 329 The “alchemical” production of sunlight resulted from the rearrangement of protons (atomic nuclei). The chemical fixation of carbon dioxide into carbohydrate by photosynthesis results from the sunlight-powered rearrangement of electrons. The alchemical production of sunlight involves the weak and strong forces. The weak force causes the transmutation of a proton into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. The strong force holds protons together in spite of their like charges.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Fixed' Superintendent of Birkenhead Park, 1843–91
    robert lee the challenge of managing the first publicly funded park: edward kemp as the ‘fixed’ superintendent of birkenhead park, 1843–91 Edward Kemp as the frst superintendent of Joseph Paxton’s contract for designing Birkenhead Park, the world’s frst publicly funded park, included provision for the appointment of ‘an effcient superintendent’ who would be ‘permanently on the ground’ directing ‘the whole details’. Kemp was appointed in August 1843 at a weekly salary of three guineas, or one hundred and seventy-six pounds and four shillings per annum. He remained in post, albeit for a considerable period as a ‘Consulting Superintendent’, until his death in 1891. This paper explores fve issues relating to Kemp’s long period of involvement with the management of Birkenhead Park. First, to what extent did his role as superintendent help to defne the way in which public parks were subsequently managed and the range of skills which such a role necessitated, particularly in the continued absence of a professional association for park managers until long after his death? Second, what were his terms of employment and how did these change over time? Why was it necessary from 1863 onwards to strengthen the managerial structure by appointing an assistant park superintendent? Third, how far did his private commissions and his role as a highly regarded writer on landscape design and horticulture affect his role as superintendent? Fourth, what was the relationship between Kemp and his employers, namely the members of the municipal committees to whom he was responsible, and to what extent did his national and international status affect the way he was treated by Birkenhead’s improvement commissioners, aldermen and councillors? Finally, in 1881, Kemp set out his views as to what the post of park superintendent required.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter and Proceedings of the LINNEAN SOCIETY of LONDON Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF
    THE LINNEAN Newsletter and Proceedings of THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF VOLUME 19 • NUMBER 4 • OCTOBER 2003 THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF Tel. (+44) (0)20 7434 4479; Fax: (+44) (0)20 7287 9364 e-mail: [email protected]; internet: www.linnean.org President Secretaries Council Professor G McG Reid BOTANICAL The Officers and Dr J R Edmondson Prof S Blackmore Vice-Presidents Dr J S Churchfield Professor D F Cutler ZOOLOGICAL Dr J C David Dr V R Southgate Dr V R Southgate Dr A Farjon Dr J M Edmonds Dr M F Fay Dr J R Edmondson EDITORIAL Mr M D Griffiths Professor D F Cutler Dr P Kenrick Dr S D Knapp Librarian & Archivist Dr A M Lister Miss Gina Douglas Dr E C Nelson Treasurer Dr A D Rogers Professor G Ll Lucas OBE Assistant Librarian Dr B R Rosen Ms Cathy Broad Dr D A Simpson Executive Secretary Dr R A Sweeting Dr John Marsden Catalogue Coordinator Ms Lynn Crothall Assistant Secretary Ms Janet Ashdown Membership & House Manager Mr David Pescod Finance Mr Priya Nithianandan Information Technology Mr David Fox THE LINNEAN Newsletter and Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London Edited by B. G. Gardiner Editorial .............................................................................................................. 1 Society News ............................................................................................................ 3 Linnean Society Library printed collections policy ................................................. 8 Library
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Fully Funded Public Parks
    Once Again, Why Public Parks? John W. Henneberger Origins of Fully Funded Public Parks t is commonly held that Birkenhead Park on the outskirts of Liverpool, Eng- land, was the first fully funded public park. The Birkenhead Park project began in 1841 as a venture initiated by municipal authorities with partici- pation by private developers, and differed from previous efforts to create Iparks for the English general public. Birkenhead embodied a vision of the future in which a large area of land within a town was to be set aside in perpetuity for the specific purpose of affording an amenity site for leisure and recreational activity for use by all the people of the community. Moreover, the people would tax themselves for that purpose. There had been previous “public” events are held today in any modern parks in all of the cultures of the landscaped urban central park. An ancient and medieval worlds, where ancient Babylonian text (ca. 2000 BCE) parks were part of the ambience and indicates the public nature of such public activity of the city.The concept open spaces. People ate splendid food, of the urban landscaped area emerged drank beverages, rejoiced in the court- some 6,000 years ago in the first cities yards, and thronged for celebration; of Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, monkeys, elephants, water buffalo, China, and a few other parts of the and other exotic animals jostled each world. Landscaped spaces were ini- other in the public squares (Cooper tially located within the inner religious 1983, 50). Cities in this period (4000- and political sanctuaries that were 1000 BCE) were centers for managing reserved for royalty, the priesthood, rural districts, for craft making and and privileged citizenry, though most trading, and for military, administra- had some public aspects.
    [Show full text]