DOCSLIB.ORG

Utilizing Agricultural Waste to Meet Cleaner Energy Demand for Georgian Covenant Signatories“ George ABULASHVILI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Utilizing Agricultural Waste to Meet Cleaner Energy Demand for Georgian Covenant Signatories“ George ABULASHVILI “Energy Efficiency Centre Georgia” „Utilizing Agricultural Waste to Meet Cleaner Energy Demand for Georgian Covenant Signatories“ George ABULASHVILI 22 June, 2016 Budapest, Hungary ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Where most energy is consumed? Above 55% of world population is urban ‘An estimated 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions come from cities and more than 70 percent of energy is consumed in urban areas. Covenant of Mayors Since 2008, 6800 local governments and self-governments with more then 211 Mln inhabitants around the globe have made a voluntary commitment to strive for sustainable energy development at local level. ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Evolution of the initiative Setting new Launch of the commitments Covenant of Launch of Mayors Mayors Adapt Priority action in Launch of the EU Action CoMO East Plan for Energy Efficiency 2006 2008 2011 2014 2016 New Covenant of Mayors The new integrated Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy was launched by the European Commission on 15 October 2015 during a Ceremony in the European Parliament in Brussels. Three pillars of the strengthened Covenant - mitigation, adaptation, and secure, sustainable and affordable energy – were symbolically endorsed on this occasion 5 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA New! Signatories now pledge to a: Reduction of CO2 (and possibly other GHG) emissions by at least 40% by 2030 Enhanced resilience to the impacts of climate change Increased cooperation to improve access to secure, sustainable and affordable energy Offering citizens high quality of life in sustainable and climate-resilient cities ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA 2016 – 2020: General overview 5 strategic pillars: Reinforce decentralisation and local ownership of the Covenant Make the Covenant go more national Inscribe energy and climate in national policies and strategies Build capacity and mobilize funds Team work and international networking 5 main activities: Capacity building Helpdesk Networking and cooperation with key stakeholders Communication Coordination 3 main expected results: Design of local energy policies and SEAPs in the framework of the new Covenant of Mayors Implementation and monitoring of SEAPs Covenant has been embedded at the national level ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Covenant of Mayors Policy in Georgia CoM Georgian Signatories Cities – 13 Members 8 Sustainable Action Plans/SEAPs Signatories Population Adhesion Status Signatories CO2 target Analysis Status Tbilisi, GE 1.100.000 30-Mar-10 Tbilisi, GE Rustavi, GE 120.800 02-May-11 25% Kutaisi, GE 196.600 15-Jul-11 Rustavi, GE 24% Batumi, GE 170.000 15-Jul-11 Kutaisi, GE 23% Gori, GE 50.400 16-Jul-12 Batumi, GE Zugdidi,GE 76.600 01-Aug-13 22% Telavi City Hall, GE 21.800 24-Mar-14 Gori, GE 27% Akhlatsikhe,GE 19.200 31-Oct-14 Zugdidi,GE 24% Tianeti,GE 12.900 13-Jan-15 Telavi City Hal 20% Telavi Municipality, GE 70.900 30-Jan-15 Kazbegi, GE 4.900 27-Feb-15 Akhaltikhe City 21% Bolnisi, GE 76.600 16-Mar-15 Mtskheta, GE 7.800 11-May-15 Sustainable Energy Action Plans Accepted Sustainable Energy Action Plans Submitted - Step1: Signature - Step2: SEAP Submitted 8 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Main sectors identified in Georgian municipalities and Final Energy Consumption per sectors for 8 CoM Cities: Tbilisi, Rustavi, Batumi, Kutaisi, Gori, Zugdidi, Akahltiskhe, Telavi, 9 9 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA TPES 2014 TWh Electricity, 0.2, 1% Coal, 3.4, 7% Geothermal, Solar, 0.2, 0% Biofuel &Waste, 5.4, 10% Hydro, 8.3, 16% Oil products, 13.2, 25% Natural Gas, 21.3, 41% ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Energy dependency 2014 (TWh) Local Production, 14.52, 28% Import, 37.56, 72% ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Final Energy Consumpion (TWh) for Georgia (2014) Coal, 3.38, 7% Electricity, 9.79, 21% Biofule &Waste, 5.41, 12% Oil products, 13.18, 28% Geothermal, Solar, 0.17, 0% Natural Gas, 14.86, 32% 12 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Residues from Vineyards and its Energy Potential Vineyards have the biggest potential in agricultural residue of Kakheti, Imereti, Racha Lechkhumi, Kvemo Svaneti & Kvemo Kartli regions; 1 3 13 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Hazelnuts residues and its Energy Potential Main hazelnut producer regions are mainly Samegrelo & Zemo Svaneti, Guria and Imereti regions; 1 4 14 ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Autonomous Heating System on Agricultural Biomass Residues (nutshells) Zugdidi Kindergarten #15 Floor area- 1050 m2 Investment: 65413 GEL Boiler house-24,000 GEL; Primitive wood stoves Heating system- 41,413 GEL 50m3 wood; only common rooms Boiler capacity 151 kW heated; Whole building heated Heating cost- 5000 GEL 12 tons of nutshells Heating cost- 1800 GEL; Compared to NG ≈ 20000 m3; Heating cost-17,000 GEL; CO2 emissions- ≈ 38 tons 35600 95160 PROMOTION OF BIOMASS PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION IN GEORGIA Micro-Capital Grant Agreement for non-credit related activities Duration- December 25,2015- May 6,2016 1. Provision of capital costs grant and related support to “Greenergy” Ltd and “Nisoni” Ltd winners in business plan competition. - 145,000.00USD 2. Provision of technical support to winner organizations 3. Monitoring and control of implementation of business plans ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Equipment for vine tree briquetting ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTRE GEORGIA Thanks for your attention! Energy Efficiency Centre Georgia 19 D. Gamrekeli str, 6th Floor, Office # 611, Tbilisi Georgia Tel: + 995 32 2474247 E-mail: [email protected] www.eecgeo.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electricity: 8700
    Covenant of Mayors 4 Climate & Energy Workshop on Data Solutions for Evidence- Based Policy and Stakeholder UNECE Webinar George Abulashvili COM Statistics for Georgia Signatories Population Akhaltsikhe 17,903 Lanchkhuti 31,486 Akhmeta 41,641 Mtskheta 7,800 Batumi 152,839 Ozurgeti 62,500 Bolnisi 53,590 Poti 41,465 Chokhatauri 19,001 Rustavi 125,103 Dedoplistskaro 21,221 Sagarejo 51,761 Gori 77,549 Sighnagi 29,948 Gurjaani 54,337 Tbilisi 1,108,717 Kutaisi 147,635 Telavi 38,721 Kazbegi 3,795 Tianeti 9,468 Kvareli 29,827 Zugdidi 62,511 Lagodekhi 41,678 Bagdati 29,2235 2 CNC’s ; 3 CTC’s and 3 CS’s 10 SE(C)Aps developed Georgian MDCP - Mayors Club Georgia • Analysis of barriers and drivers, Development of a National Roadmap (task 3.1.2) • Development of a Benchmark Database (task 3.1.3) • Development of a Project Pipeline (task 3.1.4) Number of Projects by Sectors 80 75 N of 70 SECAP Sectors Projects 60 Adaptation CC 0 50 EE in Buildings 12 40 Renewable energy 21 30 21 Street Lighting 75 20 12 Other (transport, …) 4 10 4 TOTAL 108 0 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable Street Lighting Other energy Number of municipalities implementing the projects -15; total number of CoM signatories - 24. Project Investments by Sectors, 1000 EUR 50,000 45,000 43379 40,000 Investments SECAP Sectors 000 EUR 35,000 Adaptation CC 0 30,000 EE in Buildings 8,538 25,000 Renewable energy 225 20,000 Street Lighting 1,509 15,000 Other (transport, …) 43,379 10,000 8538 TOTAL 53,651 5,000 1509 0 225 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable energy Street Lighting Other (transport, …) The huge figure in the “Other” sector is mainly due to the EBRD and EU E5P financing of the Tbilisi CNG bus project for 34 million euros.
    [Show full text]
  • RBMP SEA Report ENG FINAL
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE DRAFTALAZANI-IORI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN SEA Report November 2020 2 This SEA report was prepared by the national SEA team established for the pilot project “The Application of a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Draft Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan” (hereinafter also the SEA pilot project): Ms. Elina Bakradze (water and soil quality aspects), Ms. Anna Rukhadze (biodiversity, habitats and protected areas), Ms. Lela Serebryakova (health related aspects), Mr. Giorgi Guliashvili (hydrology and natural hazards), Mr. Davit Darsavelidze (socio-economic aspects), Mr. Irakli Kobulia (cultural heritage aspects and GIS) and the UNECE national consultant Ms. Irma Melikishvili (the team leader also covering climate change aspects), under the guidance and supervision of the UNECE international consultant Mr. Martin Smutny. Maps: The thematic maps presented in the SEA Report are produced by Mr. Irakli Kobulia on the basis of the GIS database provided by the EUWI + programme. The SEA Report also includes maps developed in the framework of the EUWI + programme (under result 2) by the REC Caucasus, subcontractor of the EUWI+ programme. The SEA pilot project was carried out under the supervision of Mr. Alisher Mamadzhanov, the EUWI+ programme leader from UNECE with the support provided by Ms. Christine Kitzler and Mr. Alexander Belokurov, UNECE and Ms. Eliso Barnovi, the EUWI+ Country Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijani Settlements of the Gardabani Municipality
    Unknown Suburbs: Azerbaijani Settlements of the Gardabani Municipality 2020 POLICY STUDY Unknown Suburbs: Azerbaijani Settlements of the Gardabani Municipality Aleksandre Kvakhadze POLICY STUDY 2020 Introduction Since declaring its independence, the Georgian state has been struggling with the integration of its ethnic minorities. The regions densely populated by ethnic Azerbaijanis and Armenians have been passively involved in the social and political processes in Georgia. The combination of the legacy of Soviet ‘national policy,’ an ineffective educational system and socio-economic problems hinder the integration of these regions. This paper will be devoted to the Gardabani municipality, an administrative entity with a significant Azerbaijani population. Several factors have determined the choice of this region for this study. Firstly, geographically speaking, the region represents a suburban area of the cities of Tbilisi and Rustavi. It can be considered as a part of ‘greater Tbilisi/Rustavi’ or a ‘Tbilisi-Rustavi agglomeration.’ Secondly, despite its proximity to Georgia’s political and economic center, the Azerbaijani community in this region has been leading a parallel life and is disconnected from the country’s social and political dynamics. Simultaneously, very little is known about this region and very little research has been carried out on its multi-ethnic population. Unlike the neighboring Marneuli municipality, which has been receiving increasing attention from academia, the media and the non-governmental sector, the Azerbaijani population in Garbadani remains neglected by academic and non-governmental bodies. For instance, there is no comprehensive academic research on the linguistic, historical, ethnologic, social and religious parameters of Azerbaijanis in Gardabani. The absence of reliable works leads to myths and uncertainties regarding Georgia’s Azerbaijanis.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019
    Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019 1 Table of Contents List of maps and figures......................................................................................................................3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................3 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Introduction – background and justification. Geographical Coverage of the Programme .....6 1.1. General background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Selection of the regions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II. Socio-economic situation and development trends in the targeted regions .........................9 Chapter ...........................................................................................................................................24 III. Summary of territorial development needs and potentials to be addressed in targeted regions .... 24 Chapter IV. Objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................................... 27 4.1. Programming context for setting up PIRDP’s objectives and priorities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 Km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized
    Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Construction Works for the Gurjaani (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized October 2018 LIST OF ACRONIMS EA - Environmental Assessment EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ESIA - Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP - Environmental and Social Management Plan HSE - Health, Safety, Environment HS - Health and Safety GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia IPPC - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control KP - Kilometer Post MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MEPA - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia MLHSA - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia NGO - Non-Governmental Organization RD - Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia ToR - Terms of Reference WB - The World Bank Contents 2.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ...............................................................................................2 2.2 Laws and Regulations Related to Social Aspects and Land Ownership ......................................................5 2.3 Labor Legislation ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Kakheti Regional Development Strategy 2014-2021
    KAKHETI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2014-2021 TBILISI 2013 CONTENTS I. GENERAL OVERVIEW 5 II. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION 5 EMPLOYMENT AND INCOMES 5 HEALTHCARE 7 EDUCATION 9 III. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION 10 Economy (Excluding agriculturE) 10 agriculturE 12 IV. INFRASTRUCTURE 22 V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 24 VI. Factor analysIs oF the regIon (sWOT) 27 VII. PRIORITIES, VISION, STRATEGIC GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES OF THE REGION’S DEVELOPMENT 40 rEgional dEvElopmEnt prioritiEs 40 thE Eight-yEar rEgional dEvElopmEnt vision 40 stratEgic goals, objEctivEs and ExpEctEd outcomEs in 2014-2021 41 4 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY I. GENERAL OVERVIEW Kakheti is an eastern border region of georgia bounded by the russian Federation to the north and azerbaijan to the south. the total area of the region is 11,310 km2, or 17.5% of the entire territory of georgia. according to the geostat data of 1 january 2013, Kakheti has a population of 405,000, or 9% of the total population of the country. based on these data, Kakheti is the fourth largest area after imereti, Kvemo Kartli and samegrelo-Zemo svaneti. the region has 9 cities and 276 villages, and the administrative centre is telavi. Kakheti has a total of 8 administrative entities. the region has an agriculture-dominated mono-profile economy with a low level of urbanisation. 80% of the Kakheti population live in villages. t he region’s villages are remarkable for large population and dense settlements. the average number of population in villages is around 1,200, which is twice as large as an average village in georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • LTD, Telavi Municipality Sub-Project
    Public Disclosure Authorized Road Rehabilitation to “Gevelli” LTD, Telavi Municipality Public Disclosure Authorized Sub-Project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD BANK FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (SRMIDP) Public-Private Investment (PPI) Public Disclosure Authorized November 2018 The Sub-Project Description The Sub-Project (SP) site is located in village Kondoli, Telavi municipality, Kakheti region, Eastern Georgia. The SP envisages arrangement of an armored concrete cover for the access road to the wine cellar of “Gevelli” LTD, with the length of 200 m and width of 6 m roadway. The rehabilitation works include: - Arrangement of fractional crushed rocks of 1 204 sq. m, - Arrangement of sand-gravel mixes of 70.3 cu. m and - Arrangement of armored cement concrete of 1 204 sq. m. Due to the existing conditions, bulking sides with sand-gravel mixtures will be arranged on the both sides of the road. The road to be rehabilitated is registered as the property of Telavi municipality with the cadastral code 53.08.42.397. Extract from public registry and other cadastral information is attached to this ESMP (attachment 1). Moreover, as the road to be rehabilitated will be connected to the intrastate importance road of Vaziani-Gombori-Telavi. The Roads Department of Georgia has submitted a written consent upon connection works with the special conditions. The letter from RD is attached (attachment 4). The road bed does not overlap with the privately-owned agricultural land plots under vineyards and other crops located on the sides of the road, so works will be completed within the ROW.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Screening of Subprojects
    Public Disclosure Authorized External Power Supply to Tsinandali Estates Ltd-owned Site in Village Tsinandali, Telavi Municipality Public Disclosure Authorized Sub-Project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD BANK FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (SRMIDP) Public-Private Investment (PPI) Public Disclosure Authorized July 2018 The Sub-Project Description The Subproject (SP) site is located in Telavi municipality, Kakheti region, Eastern Georgia. The SP includes arrangement of power supply for the site (cadastral code 53.03.39.061) owned by Tsinandali Estates Ltd. The capacity of the power supply will be 3000 kW on 10 kW voltage with the total length of 2,164 km. The cables will be laid underground along Akhmeta-Telavi- Bakurtsikhe road. The Roads Department of Georgia has provided written consent on carrying out these works. Arrangement of a transformer or an electric sub-station is not required and not included in the SP. The SP is designed by ENERGO-PRO Georgia JSC and the constructing works will be carried out by the same company. (A) IMPACT IDENTIFICATION Does the sub-project have a tangible The SP has tangible positive social impact. impact on the environment? What are the significant beneficial The SP is expected to have neutral long-term impact and adverse environmental effects of on the environment, while its short-term impacts are the subproject? assessed as minimal and typical for small to medium scale rehabilitation works in urban landscape: noise, dust, vibration, and emissions from the operation of construction machinery; generation of construction waste; disruption of traffic and pedestrian access.
    [Show full text]
  • City Telavi (Kakheti Region) Sewage Collector Rehabilitation Sub-Project
    City Telavi (Kakheti Region) Sewage Collector rehabilitation Sub-Project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental Management Plan WORLD BANK FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Tbilisi, Georgia June 2015 Environmental Screening Sub-Project (SP) envisages rehabilitation of the existing central sewerage collectors in Telavi city. The SP site is located in Telavi, main city and administrative center of Kakheti Region, Georgia's eastern province. Its population approximately consists of 21,800 inhabitants. The city is located on foothills of Tsiv-Gombori Mountain Range at 500–800 meters above the sea level. Telavi sewer system was built mainly of d=200 mm pipes and represents a gravity network. The collectors of d=300 mm pipes, cross the main channel of the irrigation system flowing north, join beside of the Telavi-Kvareli highway adjacent to the airport, proceed along the right side of the highway, cross agricultural lands and deliver sewage to a biological treatment plant located on bank of Alazani river, on the upper slope of floodplain. Purified water discharge pipe flows into the river Alazani. Telavi sewerage system (main collectors) is virtually in ruins and needs to be totally rehabilitated. Since decades the sewer system does not include any waste water treatment and even proper sewage drainage is no longer given.Currently Telavi fecal sewage network is in a satisfactory condition but on the upper (right) side of the main channel of Alazani Irrigation Scheme, the collectors are broken at 3 locations and sewage discharges into irrigation canal. As the channel dries at a certain time of the year, the sewage flowing into the channel causes significant aggravation of sanitary conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Technologies in Regions, Georgia
    WASTE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN REGIONS, GEORGIA Quarterly Report PERIOD: April – June 2016 31 July 2016 Waste Management Technologies in Regions, Georgia Waste Management Technologies in Regions, Georgia USAID Cooperative Agreement AID-114-LA-14-00001 Prepared for: Mission Environmental Officer Economic Growth Office USAID | Caucasus Prepared by: International City/County Management Association 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20002-4201 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Quarterly Report April – June, 2016 ii Waste Management Technologies in Regions, Georgia CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ 4 Program Background ................................................................................................ 5 Assumptions, Problems and Barriers........................................................................ 6 Significant Events and Achievements during the Reporting Period ......................... 7 Status of Activities by Components .......................................................................... 8 Component 1: Waste Collection and Recycling Systems .................................. 8 Component 2: Private Sector-led Recycling .................................................... 18 Component 3: Waste Management Strategy and Tariff Policy .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
    Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand
    [Show full text]