A Cree Community in Northeastern Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cree Community in Northeastern Ontario Apportioning Responsibility for Cumulative Changes: a Cree Community in Northeastern Ontario RICHARD J. PRESTON and JOHN S. LONG McMaster University Kashachewan, Ont. In memory of Peter Sutherland, Sr., 1915-1998. In the aftermath of failed negotiations with Ontario Hydro,1 we are continuing to collaborate in specifying the processes of change that have been affecting the environment, economy and culture of the Cree commu­ nity known as New Post over the past 130 years. We use the metaphor of a "conduit" for the transmission of cultural and environmental change, and are selectively defining the contents of the conduit in terms of a series of major modernizing processes. Our account of modernization is organized around: (1) travel; (2) larger scale (late fur- trade) transport; (3) industrial-scale (railroad) transport; (4) industrial- scale natural resource development; and (5) the implementation of govern­ ment programs and supervision. Apportioning responsibility for the modernization conduit is a difficult challenge. It requires that we identify specific externally caused changes, assess whether they were, on balance, damaging or helpful to the regional environment and indigenous culture, and then assess the approximate dollar value of the net negative effects ("impacts"). Our theoretical context for assessing cumulative cultural change was conceptualized along lines parallel to those currently being developed for 1 The immediate cause of this paper: we both worked as members of a negotia­ tion team, Richard Preston as a consultant to the New Post First Nation, and John Long as the "neutral facilitator" of the group. Long also provided a great deal of detailed information on the history of the region. Both the First Nation and Hydro members of the team were working toward the goal of assessing Ontario Hydro's degree of responsibility for impacts which were being grieved by the contemporary New Post First Nation, until (in our opinion) a change within Hydro's senior adminis­ tration ended the process. Both the Ontario Hydro and New Post members of this team prepared documents and tabled them, criticized each other's documents in writing, provided alternative calculations and interpretations of cumulative impacts, and met in person to discuss these issues, in hopes for a mutually satisfactory resolution of the grievances. APPORTIONING RESPONSIBILITY FOR CUMULATIVE CHANGES 265 cumulative environmental impact assessment (Lees and Bates 1990). Lees and Bates theorize about the assessment of cumulative change within the complexity of ecosystems, where cumulative change is seen as either the consequence of a single type of change of long duration, or of changes of several types which have mutually strengthening effects. To make the shift from nature to culture, we draw on previous theore­ tical studies of cultural change, especially on the theory of multilinear cultural evolution (Steward 1955, Murphy and Steward 1956). While not currently in fashion in anthropology, this focus on the technology-ecology nexus leads us to examine the way that changes in technology and environment limit people's options, and also transform their ability to draw adaptively on their traditional knowledge and skills. Given the scenario that we describe below, the evolutionary perspective seems to us quite compelling. It allows us to incorporate the theory of political economy, focussing on the conflict of cultures in terms of a marked disparity in structural power (Wolf 1980). We also have used acculturation theory, focussing on the adaptation and adoption of new cultural ideas, attitudes and behaviour (Sapir 1930, Hallowell 1950, Preston 1986), to account for the survival of families that had close experience with the "company family" culture of the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC). We believe that the three surviving (in fact, flourish­ ing) families were able to rely on their previous experience in relocating to find a more secure means of living. But this was more than taking the risk of moving to a new place and fluency in the dominant language. Most importantly, it was their bicultural technical and social competence in making periodic shifts to settlements for wage work. To account for the stark contrast with the other, more exclusively traditional "bush" families (Schuurman et al. 1992) which have (literally) died out, we follow the perspectives of cultural disintegration theory. Here we are focussing on the dysfunction or maladaptation of some trusted traditional cultural ideas, attitudes, and behaviour in the context of radically transformed ecological and social settings (Honigmann 1966, Shkilnyk 1985). To account for the recent development of a reserve-based culture, we use loss of freedom theory, focussing on the frustration of cultural integrity and continuity (Manuel and Posluns 1974, Driben and Trudeau 1983), and resistance theory. 266 PRESTON AND LONG Our understanding of the cultural history of the New Post people was gained through successive attempts by several persons (Richard Neff, Linda Archibald, Lisa Schuurman, and the present authors) to distil this history, recording oral history and reading historical documents, making cultural-historical interpretations, and most recently by a "joint problem- solving" negotiation process. We both spent time with elders and others at New Post and especially with Peter Sutherland at Moosonee, people who generously shared their individual experiences with us. At the joint problem-solving stage of our analysis, we chose to use a time chart and "hang text on it" according to the major factors in develop­ ments, bringing in other impacting factors as they relate to the five major factors listed above and now described in detail. TRAVEL The earliest conduit is organized around travel for subsistence and trade in recorded history: Ojibwe or Algonquin people2 in the New Post region would have been trading into Lake Abitibi, Moose Factory, Frederick House, Flying Post, Kenogamisee, Mattagami, and Kesagami. Travel by white men through the New Post region goes back to the early days of the fur trade: de Troyes travelled through from Montreal in 1686 on his way to capturing the HBC posts on James Bay. Annual visits by Catholic missionaries of the Oblate order begin in the 1840s, and a Methodist missionary was settled briefly at Moose Factory in the 1840s, followed by Anglicans of the Church Missionary Society from the 1850s to the present. The HBC established New Post in 1867, at the site of a convenient way-station on the Montreal-Ottawa-Temiskaming-Abitibi- Moose Factory river route. The "Cree-ification" of New Post (which previously had been populated by non-Cree from the Lake Abitibi region) began around 1900. Two families who had already moved south to Moose Factory from the west side of James Bay moved again, to the New Post region. We know that many "company family" people were sent south about 1902 in a Company downsizing (Long 1985). We suspect that the David Wynne family, from Fort Albany, who appear on the first New Post treaty list 2 The nomenclature is uncertain. These people include the Esau Omakees family; William Gull; John Luke; Daniel, Donald, Harriet and William Squirrel; Angus and Louisa Weenusk, Cecile Weenusk; and others. APPORTIONING RESPONSIBILITY FOR CUMULATIVE CHANGES 267 (1905), was one of these families sent by the Moose Factory manager. Perhaps this was also the case for Thomas and Annie Sutherland, from Cape Henrietta Maria, who were also on the 1905 treaty list.3 Sidney Archibald, the son of David Wynne's half-brother William Archibald, was adopted by the Wynnes and later married into the New Post band. TRANSPORTATION Gradually, travel became involved with more than the local people's subsistence and the fur trade, and included Cree experiments with living "outside". By 1915-30 Cree people were travelling or sometimes sojourn­ ing outside of the New Post region as squatters around railway towns, or as students at residential schools. Some years before the railroad arrived at Island Falls in 1923, New Post people could take a cart ride to Cochrane for excitement and trading. One person adventured much further: Thomas Archibald, Sr., went off to World War I, and stayed out for some years, marrying a Scots woman and having three children. Kinship ties led to visits, and sometimes marriages, to Moose Factory people, Kesagami Lake people, and Rupert's House people.4 The kind of conduit had also changed to a larger geographical scale of transportation of goods and people originating from outside the region: HBC personnel and missionaries and their goods travelled through, and Cree people worked at freighting Company supplies on the river. The river road became increasingly a conduit of people, goods, disease, and knowledge of the outside. Disease (notably tuberculosis5) may have caused the deaths of 5 of the 20 New Post hunters in the winter of 1880-81, including the best 3 The Sutherland family moved south from the area between Severn and Winisk to Moose Factory, where the father, Peter James Sutherland, died. Some of his sons, including Thomas, then moved further south. David and Elizabeth Wynne, and David's half-brothers William Archibald and Thomas Taylor, moved south from Fort Albany to Moose Factory. William and Laura Archibald moved south from Fort Albany, and their son Sidney attended the Anglican boarding school at Moose Factory, subsequently working for both the church and the HBC, as well as trapping, wherever he could make a living. 4 For example, Sidney Archibald went to Rupert's House, and, after *e birth of his first son (Peter Sutherland) and the death of his wife (Bella Omakees Archibald), probably married Nancy Moses there. Later, Helen (Moses) Morrison and her uncle wintered with Peter Sutherland. 5 For a general discussion of tuberculosis in this region see Herring and Hoppa (1998). 268 PRESTON AND LONG hunter, and "before they had given in a skin" (HBCA D. 14/27). RAILWAY TRANSPORT In 1900, the Government of Ontario created the Temiskaming and Northern Ontario Railway (T&NO, now the Ontario Northland) to enable the development of natural resources and other commercial activities in the Moose River basin (Long 1997).
Recommended publications
  • Growth Responses of Riparian Thuja Occidentalis to the Damming of a Large Boreal Lake
    53 Growth responses of riparian Thuja occidentalis to the damming of a large boreal lake Bernhard Denneler, Yves Bergeron, Yves Be´ gin, and Hugo Asselin Abstract: Growth responses of riparian eastern white cedar trees (Thuja occidentalis L.) to the double damming of a large lake in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest was analyzed to determine whether the shoreline tree limit is the result of physiological flood stress or mechanical disturbances. The first damming, in 1915, caused a rise in water level of ca. 1.2 m and resulted in the death of the trees that formed the ancient shoreline forest, as well as the wounding and tilting of the surviving trees (by wave action and ice push) that constitute the present forest margin. The second damming, in 1922, did not further affect the water level, but did retard the occurrence of spring high water levels, as well as reduce their magnitude. However, this did not injure or affect the mortality of riparian eastern white cedars. Radial growth was not affected by flooding stress, probably because inundation occurred prior to the start of the growing season (1915–1921) or was of too short duration to adversely affect tree metabolism (after 1921). It follows that (i) the shoreline limit of east- ern white cedar is a mechanical rather than a physiological limit, and (ii) disturbance-related growth responses (e.g., ice scars, partial cambium dieback, and compression wood) are better parameters than ring width for the reconstruction of long-term water level increases of natural, unregulated lakes. Key words: compression wood, eastern white cedar, flooding, ice scars, mortality, partial cambium dieback.
    [Show full text]
  • POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit
    POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit Kapuskasing Iroquois Falls Hearst Timmins Porcupine Cochrane Moosonee Hornepayne Matheson Smooth Rock Falls Population Profile Foyez Haque, MBBS, MHSc Public Health Epidemiologist published by: Th e Porcupine Health Unit Timmins, Ontario October 2009 ©2009 Population Profile - 2006 Census Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to those without whose support this Population Profile would not be published. First of all, I would like to thank the management committee of the Porcupine Health Unit for their continuous support of and enthusiasm for this publication. Dr. Dennis Hong deserves a special thank you for his thorough revision. Thanks go to Amanda Belisle for her support with editing, creating such a wonderful cover page, layout and promotion of the findings of this publication. I acknowledge the support of the Statistics Canada for history and description of the 2006 Census and also the definitions of the variables. Porcupine Health Unit – 1 Population Profile - 2006 Census 2 – Porcupine Health Unit Population Profile - 2006 Census Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Preface . 5 Executive Summary . 7 A Brief History of the Census in Canada . 9 A Brief Description of the 2006 Census . 11 Population Pyramid. 15 Appendix . 31 Definitions . 35 Table of Charts Table 1: Population distribution . 12 Table 2: Age and gender characteristics. 14 Figure 3: Aboriginal status population . 16 Figure 4: Visible minority . 17 Figure 5: Legal married status. 18 Figure 6: Family characteristics in Ontario . 19 Figure 7: Family characteristics in Porcupine Health Unit area . 19 Figure 8: Low income cut-offs . 20 Figure 11: Mother tongue .
    [Show full text]
  • (De Beers, Or the Proponent) Has Identified a Diamond
    VICTOR DIAMOND PROJECT Comprehensive Study Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview and Background De Beers Canada Inc. (De Beers, or the Proponent) has identified a diamond resource, approximately 90 km west of the First Nation community of Attawapiskat, within the James Bay Lowlands of Ontario, (Figure 1-1). The resource consists of two kimberlite (diamond bearing ore) pipes, referred to as Victor Main and Victor Southwest. The proposed development is called the Victor Diamond Project. Appendix A is a corporate profile of De Beers, provided by the Proponent. Advanced exploration activities were carried out at the Victor site during 2000 and 2001, during which time approximately 10,000 tonnes of kimberlite were recovered from surface trenching and large diameter drilling, for on-site testing. An 80-person camp was established, along with a sample processing plant, and a winter airstrip to support the program. Desktop (2001), Prefeasibility (2002) and Feasibility (2003) engineering studies have been carried out, indicating to De Beers that the Victor Diamond Project (VDP) is technically feasible and economically viable. The resource is valued at 28.5 Mt, containing an estimated 6.5 million carats of diamonds. De Beers’ current mineral claims in the vicinity of the Victor site are shown on Figure 1-2. The Proponent’s project plan provides for the development of an open pit mine with on-site ore processing. Mining and processing will be carried out at an approximate ore throughput of 2.5 million tonnes/year (2.5 Mt/a), or about 7,000 tonnes/day. Associated project infrastructure linking the Victor site to Attawapiskat include the existing south winter road and a proposed 115 kV transmission line, and possibly a small barge landing area to be constructed in Attawapiskat for use during the project construction phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Iroquois Falls Forest Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report
    349 Mooney Avenue Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada P7B 5L5 Bus: 807-345- 5445 www.kbm.on.ca © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2011 Iroquois Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... ii 2.0 Table of Recommendations and Best Practices ............................................................... 1 3.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................. ... 3 3.1 Audit Process ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Management Unit Description............................................................................................... 4 3.3 Current Issues ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit .......................................................................... 6 4.0 Audit Findings .................................................................................................................. 6 4.1 Commitment.................................................................................................................... ... 6 4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement ...................................................................... 7 4.3 Forest Management Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on Facilitated Community Sessions March 2020
    FINAL REPORT ON FACILITATED COMMUNITY SESSIONS MARCH 2020 MCLEOD WOOD ASSOCIATES INC. #201-160 St David St. S., Fergus, ON N1M 2L3 phone: 519 787 5119 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups Contents The New Community – a Five Step Process .................................................................................... 2 Background: ................................................................................................................................ 2 Steps Leading to Relocation: ................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Steps Two and Three .......................................................................................... 4 Summary of the Focus Group Discussions: ............................................................................. 5 Appendix One: Notes from Moose Factory Meeting held November 26 2019…………………………17 Appendix Two: Notes from Moosonee Meeting held November 28 2019………………………………23 1 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups The New Community – a Five Step Process Background: The MoCreebec Council of the Cree Nation was formed on February 6, 1980 to contend with economic and health concerns and the social housing conditions facing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) beneficiaries that lived in Moose Factory and Moosonee. The JBNQA beneficiaries were mainly registered with three principal bands
    [Show full text]
  • BY COURIER July 31, 2014 Ms. Kirsten Walli Secretary Ontario
    Hydro One Networks Inc. 7th Floor, South Tower Tel: (416) 345-5700 483 Bay Street Fax: (416) 345-5870 Toronto, Ontario M5G 2P5 Cell: (416) 258-9383 www.HydroOne.com [email protected] Susan Frank Vice President and Chief Regulatory Officer Regulatory Affairs BY COURIER July 31, 2014 Ms. Kirsten Walli Secretary Ontario Energy Board Suite 2700, 2300 Yonge Street P.O. Box 2319 Toronto, ON. M4P 1E4 Dear Ms. Walli: EB-2014-0244 – MAAD S86 Hydro One Networks Inc. Application to Purchase Haldimand County Utilities Inc. I am attaching two (2) paper copies of Hydro One Inc’s MAAD Application for the acquisition of Haldimand County Utilities Inc. Please note that information has been redacted in Exhibit A, Tab 3, Schedule 1, Attachment 6 pertaining to employee, property owner, and account information. An electronic copy of the complete application has been filed using the Board’s Regulatory Electronic Submission System. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY SUSAN FRANK Susan Frank attach. Filed: 2014-07-31 EB-2014-0244 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 6 1 ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD 2 3 IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (the “Act”). 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF an application made by Hydro One Inc. for leave for Hydro One Inc., 6 acting through its subsidiary 1908872 Inc.. (referred to collectively hereinafter as “Hydro One 7 Inc.”) to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Haldimand County Utilities Inc., 8 made pursuant to section 86(2)(b) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT Between COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY
    COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT between COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA LOCAL 6 and NORTHERNTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Effective August 22, 2011 to February 28, 2014 04016 (09) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION AND SCOPE........................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 2 - NO DISCRIMINATION ...................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 3 - DEDUCTION FOR UNION DUES & HUMANITY FUND .................................. 6 ARTICLE 4 - RESERVATION OF MANAGEMENT RIGHTS................................................. 8 ARTICLE 5 - UNION REPRESENTATION............................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 6 - DUTIES OF STEWARDS.................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 7 – COMPENSATION OF STEWARDS................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 8 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ............................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 9 - DISCIPLINE .................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 10 - STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS......................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 11 - SENIORITY..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bies-Parents.Pdf
    1 MY PARENTS’S JOURNEY TO BECOMING CANADIANS by Ernie Bies. June 12. 2019 Jan Bies, left the old country ninety-two years ago to seek a new life in Canada. He had completed the mandatory military service in the newly formed country of Czechoslovakia. Enticed by agents who promised work on Western Canadian farms, and with the financial support of his mother, he signed on. After boarding the Canadian Pacific Railway (C.P.R) ship S.S. Montnairn in Antwerp on May 4th 1927, and celebrating a lonely 23rd birthday during the crossing, he arrived in Quebec City on May 13, 1927. Of the 517 passengers on board, almost 200 were from Czechoslovakia and many, like my father, were bound to meet Mr. C.A. Van Scoy, Superintendent of Colonization, C.P.R. in Winnipeg Manitoba. His status was Landed Immigrant and he had $25 in his pocket. From Quebec City he went to Montreal where he boarded the C.P.R. train to Winnipeg ready to start his Canadian journey. Chester Allan Van Scoy, along with Dr. William John Black, his counterpart at the Canadian National Railway (C.N.R.) Department of Colonization, Agriculture and Natural Resources, were responsible for bringing hundreds of thousands of European immigrants to the Canadian west in the mid to late 1920s under terms of the Railway Agreement. 2 The Railway Agreement of 1925. Following the First World War, immigration policies in Canada were very restrictive. Landing in Canada of alien enemies was prohibited with some allowances made for those countries whose independence was recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Nations Energy Inc
    Five Nations Energy Inc. Presented by: Edward Chilton Secretary/Treasurer And Lucie Edwards Chief Executive Officer Where we are James Bay area of Ontario Some History • Treaty 9 signed in 1905 • Treaty Organization Nishnawbe Aski Nation formed early 1970’s • Mushkegowuk (Tribal) Council formed late 1980’s • 7 First Nations including Attawapiskat, Kashechewan, Fort Albany • Fort Albany very early trading post early 1800’s-Hudson Bay Co. • Attawapiskat historical summer gathering place-permanent community late 1950’s • Kashechewan-some Albany families moved late 1950’s History of Electricity Supply • First energization occurred in Fort Albany- late 1950’s Department of Defense Mid- Canada radar base as part of the Distant Early Warning system installed diesel generators. • Transferred to Catholic Mission mid 1960’s • Distribution system extended to community residents early 1970’s and operated by Ontario Hydro • Low Voltage (8132volts) line built to Kashechewan mid 1970’s, distribution system built and operated by Ontario Hydro • Early 1970’s diesel generation and distribution system built and operated by Ontario Hydro • All based on Electrification agreement between Federal Government and Ontario Provincial Crown Corporation Ontario Hydro Issues with Diesel-Fort Albany Issues with Diesel-Attawapiskat • Fuel Spill on River From Diesel To Grid Based Supply • Early 1970’s - Ontario Hydro Remote Community Systems operated diesel generators in the communities • Federal Government (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada-INAC) covered the cost for
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kapuskasing Area: Aeromagnetic-Geological Compilation
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL 2009 Annual Report
    NEOnet 2009 Annual Report Infrastructure Enhancement Application Education and Awareness 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Message from the Chair ..............................................................................................2 Corporate Profile........................................................................................................3 Mandate ....................................................................................................................3 Regional Profile ..........................................................................................................4 Catchment Area.......................................................................................................................................................5 NEOnet Team .............................................................................................................6 Organizational Chart..............................................................................................................................................6 Core Staff Members...............................................................................................................................................7 Leaving staff members..........................................................................................................................................8 Board of Directors ..................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]