<<

University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana

Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School

1992

Influence of vo arian on the central induce of luteinizing in ovariectomized rats

Qing Lin. Yang The University of Montana

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y

Recommended Citation Yang, Qing Lin., "Influence of vo arian hormones on the central oxytocin induce stimulation of in ovariectomized rats" (1992). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7019. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7019

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be under^en only with the author’s written consent. MontanaUniversity of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFLUENCE OF OVARIAN HORMONES ON THE CENTRAL OXYTOCIN

INDUCE STIMULATION OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE IN

OVARIECTOMIZED RATS

by

Qing Lin Yang

Bachelor of Medicine, Guang Zhou College of TOM,

Guang Zhou, P. R. China, 1984

Master of Medicine, Guang Zhou College of TCM,

Guang Zhou, P. R. China, 1989

Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degree of

Master of Science

University of Montana

1992

Approved by:

Chairman, E(

Dean, Graduate School /

Date

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP37820

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT

UMI EP37820 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code

uest*

ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 -1346

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Qing-Lin Yang M.S., December 14, 1992 Pharmacy Influence of ovarian hormones on the central oxytocin induced stimulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) in ovariectomized rats Director: Craig A. Johnston, Ph.D Central oxytocin (oxy) can stimulate LH in cycling female proestrous rats, but not in metestrous or diestrous rats. Gonadal steroids play a critical role in regulating the influence of oxy on LH secretion. To examine the influence of (E2) and/or (P4) directly, the effects of dose and duration of E2 and P4 exposure on the oxy stimulation of LH release was examined in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. For chronic exposure, subcutaneous time-release pellets containing vehicle, E2, P4 or both hormones were implanted in OVX rats. For short term exposure, various doses of P4 were administered, s.c. , at 900 hr in OVX, E2-primed or OVX animals. Central injections of oxy were given through stereotaxically-placed, intracerebroventricular ( icv) cannulae. Plasma samples were obtained via jugular cannulae from the unanesthetized, freely moving rats at 10 min before (Pre) and at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min following icv injection. Basal LH levels were highest in OVX animals, and responded to icv oxy with a modest decrease at 30 and 60 min. E2 or P4 replacement lowered basal LH levels, and the combination of E2 and P4 lowered basal LH even more. The results of oxy injection in E2-treated animals were variable, but in most cases caused a small increase in plasma LH. In animals treated with P4, alone, oxy injection did not alter plasma LH. In E2- primed animals, the acute injection of P4 caused a bell-shaped dose-response curve with low doses allowing some stimulation of LH release in response to central oxy injection, 2.5 mg P4 causing a dramatic synergism with E2 on the LH response, and higher doses causing a diminished response. The results prove the stimulatory effect of centrally administered oxy can be seen in a pharmacological model of the proestrous female rat. In the absence of E2 or P4, oxy exerts an inhibitory influence on plasma LH. The level of stimulation by oxy on plasma LH was critically dependent on the optimal dose and time of P4 as well as E2 priming.

11

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author wishes to express his deep appreciation to his advisor Dr. Craig A. Johnston for his guidance, concern, support and patience throughout the course of this research. He deeply thanks the advice and time offered by the other members of his thesis committee. Dr. Charles L. Eyer and Dr. Kerry R. Foresman. He also deeply appreciates the excellent technical assistance and friendships of Ms. Janee Gelineau-van Waes, Ms. Nancy Irons-Diemert, Ms. Shannon Pinkston, Ms. Tammy Stenson, Mr. Brian K. Clifton, Mr. Ernie Flynn, Mr. Erik Chosa, Mr. Lauren Bell and Ms. Kris Ross.

iii

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract...... ii Acknowledgements...... iii Table of Contents...... iv List of Figures...... v Chapter I. INTRODUCTION...... 1 Chapter II. OBJECTIVES...... 16 Chapter III. MATERIAL AND MATHODS...... 18 Animals...... 18 Surgery...... 18 Radioimmunoassays...... 19 Statistical analysis...... 20 Drugs and chemicals...... 20 Experimental procedure...... 21 Chapter IV. RESULTS...... 24 Chapter V. DISCUSSION...... 4 0 Chapter VI. SUMMARY...... 49 REFERENCES...... 52

IV

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES

Effect of OVX & Replacement therapy on basal LH...... 2 6 E2 on OXY LH release in OVX rats...... 2 8 ICV OXY on LH in OVX & hormone replaced rats...... 31 E2 or P4 on OXY LH release in OVX rats...... 3 3 E2/P4 on OXY LH release in OVX rats...... 3 5 P4 on OXY stimulation of LH in E2-primed rats...... 3 9

V

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

I. Neurotransmitt«rs/ and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion

The primary neuroendocrine factor responsible for triggering the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) in mammals is the hypothalamic factor, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH), which directly stimulates LH release from gonadotrophs located in the adenohypophysis (1-3). It is also accepted that many other factors modulate this regulation. The important role which LH exerts in stimulating ovulation is universally recognized (3). Several and substances contained within the central nervous system have been reported to play a significant physiological role in the regulation of LHRH and LH release. (NE) is a monoamine neurotransmitter which has been shown to consistently stimulate LH release in a dose-related fashion in and progesterone treated ovariectomized rats or in intact, cycling female proestrous rats (4-7). Other numerous neuropeptides may play a role in the neuroendocrine regulation of LH secretion which depends upon the presence of gonadal steroids. (NPY) and the related human

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 stimulate LH secretion, but the response depends upon the presence of gonadal steroids (8-10). Steele et al (11) demonstrated that II can stimulate LH secretion by working at central sites, glutamate has also been found to stimulate LH, but not follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), secretion in estrogen-treated, ovariectomized immature rats (12). Endogenous are recognized as a hypothalamic network which exerts a powerful inhibitory influence on secretion. It is obvious that each of the subtypes in the can suppress LH release when activated by an appropriate opiate receptor agonist (13-14). Another inhibitory factor on LH secretion is GABA (15). This inhibitory system inhibits LH secretion via GABA receptors and it operates without mediation by the NE system (15). Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) can also suppress LH secretion, and this action is through its stimulating the release of hypothalamic opioid (16).

II. Central role of oxytocin in LH secretion Hormonal functions for oxytocin on the female reproductive system are well established. During parturition, oxytocin regulates the contraction of the uterine wall and, during , oxytocin triggers milk-ejection from the (17). Several studies on the maternal behavior (17-18) and female sexual behavior (19-21) of the rat indicate

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 that oxytocin also plays a role in these behaviors in the central nervous system. Other studies indicate a possible role for oxytocin in the neuroendocrine regulation of hormone secretion. Synthetic oxytocin stimulates secretion from the anterior pituitary both in vivo and in vitro (21-22). Oxytocin can influence the secretion of ACTH from the (23-26). Oxytocin has also been reported to stimulate gonadotropin-releasing activity in vivo. For example, oxytocin induced an increase in number and size of gonadotrophs in rats and dogs, increased testicular weight, enhanced urinary of 17-keto steroids in rabbits (27) , and increased urinary gonadotropin excretion (28-29). Recent reports indicate a physiological role for oxytocin in the neuroendocrine regulation of LH secretion (30-35). The first evidence that oxytocin might stimulate gonadotropin secretion was proposed in 1988 (30). It was later demonstrated that oxytocin can stimulate gonadotropin secretion from rat anterior pituitary cells in static culture (3 6). These findings suggest that the observed accelerated follicular maturation and ovulation in mice given oxytocin might have been a result of oxytocin-induced release of pituitary , although the endocrine events were not elucidated (37). Oxytocin is released directly into the hypophyseal portal blood system and could, therefore, affect LH secretion directly from the anterior pituitary (35-36). Furthermore, oxytocin neurons send projections which terminate

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 in many areas of the containing cell bodies or terminals of LHRH neurons or other LHRH secretagogues (38-42). However, there is a controversy concerning how oxytocin influences LH secretion. Some reports have indicated that the actions of oxytocin on LH release are primarily inhibitory in nature and are mediated through actions on central LHRH neurons (36) . other reports suggest the action of oxytocin on LH release is minor at best (43) . On the other hand, there is evidence supporting a physiologically relevant stimulatory influence of oxytocin on the secretion of LH from the anterior pituitary mediated primarily at a central site (30). These actions result in the preovulatory release of LH (32) . The latter studies utilized a physiological animal model of the female cycling rat on proestrus (when plasma levels of estradiol are physiologically high). The earlier studies showing inhibitory or little action of oxytocin on LH release used male or ovariectomized female rats (both of which have low plasma estradiol levels). The results indicate that in order for oxytocin to stimulate LH secretion, physiologically high levels of estradiol must be present (32). Much evidence suggests estradiol plays a predominant role in the excitation of preovulatory LH release. From a variety of experiments, it is apparent that estradiol is required for the stimulation of LH release in ovariectomized rats (6, 8, 9, 11). and progesterone have also been shown to increase the number of oxytocin receptors in some

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 areas of the brain (44-45). Additionally, gonadal steroids, in particular estradiol, are known to have multiple effects upon central oxytocin neurons. Administration of estradiol enhances the electrical activity of magnocellular oxytocin neurons (44- 45), stimulates oxytocin secretion into the pituitary portal circulation (46) , and releases oxytocin associated neurophysin into the peripheral circulation (47-49). Finally, receptors for estradiol are found on central oxytocin neurons (3) but not on central LHRH neurons.

1) Distribution of oxytocinergic neurons in the central nervous system Oxytocin, synthesized in the hypothalamus and released from the , has been associated with immunoreactive neurons not only in the classical magnocellular groups (the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei), but also in the anterior commissural nucleus, medial , periventricular stratum, intersupraopticoparaventricular (internuclear) group, perifornical nucleus, nucleus circularis, and the ventral nucleus of (50-51). Besides the well-known projections to the posterior pituitary, oxytocinergic neurons project to the external zone of the (52), to the brain stem and spinal cord (53), and to olfactory and limbic targets (54- 56) .

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 2) Estradiol interactions with central oxytocin neurons Oxytocin's involvement with reproductive functions centering on parturition and maternal and receptive behavior may be, in part, influenced by estrogen. Concentrations of oxytocin in the pituitary have been found to fluctuate with the (57), Oxytocin levels in the portal blood increase on the afternoon of proestrus, correlating with the onset of sexual receptivity as well as the preovulatory LH surge (47). Estrogen treatment can increase oxytocin release from the pituitary (58). Correspondingly, oxytocin content of anterior commissural neurons decreases with estrogen treatment, perhaps associated with increased oxytocin release from these neurons (59). Some oxytocin immunoreactive neurons in portions of the paraventricular nucleus and a few cells in the anterior commissural nucleus accumulate estrogen in the cell nucleus (60-62). These immunocytochemical studies show both increased oxytocin immunoreactivity and increased distribution of oxytocin immunoreactive neurons following estrogen treatment in the anterior commissural nucleus, anterior hypothalamic area, septohypothalaroic nucleus, medial preoptic area, perifornical nucleus, and zona incerta (50-51, 61) . Recent experiments have utilized in situ hybridization to study possible estrogen influences on oxytocin messenger RNA levels. These studies concentrated on preoptic and anterior hypothalamic levels because of the possible

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 7 involvement of oxytocin in LHRH function influencing LH release (30) and because of demonstrated preoptic sites of action of oxytocin in female sexual behaviors (63). Analysis of oxytocin-expressing neurons included the numbers of cells labeled with in situ hybridization procedures as well as the numbers of grains per labeled cell because these two parameters can change independently. The possibility of direct involvement of estradiol with oxytocin or -producing neurons was suggested by observations of tritiated estradiol binding in the cell nuclei of neurophysin-immunoreactive neurons (61-62). Using northern blot and dot blot analysis» Van Toi et al (64) demonstrated a significant increase in oxytocin mRNA levels during the estrous phase of the female rat's cycle to almost twice the levels seen on diestrus. Oxytocin mRNA in the brain of the female rat is increased concomitant with puberty, and ovariectomy of adult females decreased oxytocin mRNA values (65); both observations consistent with estrogen stimulation of oxytocin. Significant elevations of oxytocin mRNA during the late stages of also suggest increased transcription under the influence of ovarian hormones (66). Radioimmunoassay of oxytocin in micropunches from the medial preoptic area revealed significantly increased levels in estrogen-progesterone-treated animals which were behaviorally receptive (59), while the number of immunocytochemically detectable oxytocin cell bodies actually decreased. This

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8 configuration of results suggested a greater amount of expression per oxytocin-producing . Jirikowski et al (51) reported a stimulatory effect of short-term estradiol treatment on the distribution of immunoreactive cell bodies. Greater numbers of oxytocin immunoreactive neurons were seen in the septohypothalamic nucleus, the lateral subcommissural area, the medial preoptic area, the perifornical region, the zona incerta, and the ansa lenticularis. Finally, a number of experimental approaches in different species have suggested strongly that estrogen treatment facilitates oxytocin release (48, 58). Under these circumstances, where release is increased by estrogen and immunoreactive content is either not changed or is increased, elevated transcription and/or mRNA stability is to be expected. The mechanisms of estrogen effects on oxytocin mRNA levels are unclear. The possibility of a direct effect of the estrogen receptor on transcription is indicated by the presence of these partial estrogen-response-elements upstream to the oxytocin transcription start site (67-69) . On the other hand, significant numbers of supraoptic neurons with nuclear estrogen receptors have not been identified (70). There may be an analogy to control of the LHRH gene, where a long estrogen treatment can lead to increased mRNA levels (71-72) and where the stimulatory effects of estrogen can be interpreted as consequent to the release of the neuroendocrine peptide (73). Co-existence of oxytocin and of estrogen receptor in the same

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 neurons raises questions regarding their possible functional significance. Changes in the oxytocin levels in circulation after estrogen treatment (58) and during the estrous cycle in the PVN (74) and in the pituitary (57) have been reported. Results of these studies suggest that physiological fluctuation in ovarian steroid levels affect the release of neurohypophyseal hormones. Although the intensity of oxytocin immunostaining of perikarya and processes in several brain sites vary after estrogen treatment, it is impossible to explain whether the increased immunostaining after estradiol treatment is due to an increased synthesis of peptide or to an inhibition of its secretion. Existence of estrogen receptor in an identical population of neurons does not represent complete proof that estrogen regulates the synthesis of that peptide. However, recent studies using a hybridization assay on the levels of rat hypothalamic oxytocin mRNA during gestation, lactation and the estrous cycle (64,75-76) have shown that the expression of oxytocin gene was stimulated concomitantly with an increase in serum estrogen levels during the estrous cycle and pregnancy (77). These observations suggest that estrogens may be involved in regulating oxytocin . Recent studies by Richard and Zingg (78) , demonstrate that beta-estradiol administration stimulates the transcriptional activity of the human oxytocin gene promoter by a direct estrogen receptor dependent mechanism. Anatomical evidence that an estrogen-stimu1ated release of oxytocin from

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 10 the posterior pituitary is mediated by a direct effect of estrogen on magnocellular hypothalamic neurons has also recently been published (79),

3) Gonadal hormones and LH secretion Although a lot of evidence gathered over the years has documented the feedback action of gonadal steroids in the hypothalamus and pituitary in the neuroendocrine regulation of LHRH and LH secretion, the mechanisms involved in these actions have not yet been precisely delineated. Several lines of evidence indicate that estradiol is the critical stimulus for the preovulatory surge of gonadotropins. In intact cycling female rats, the serum levels of LH are low from early on the morning of estrus, shortly after ovulation, through metestrus, diestrus, and midday on proestrus (80) . Though most studies have reported basal unchanging levels of LH over this time (80-84), one study reported a significant diurnal variation throughout the cycle (85). This circadian pattern from estrus through diestrus consisted of a small elevation of LH each day at the midpoint of the light period, and the lowest levels by midnight of each day. On the late afternoon of proestrus (actual time of initiation depending on the light cycle) the circulating levels of LH begin to increase rapidly and ultimately reach peak levels by 1700-1900 hr on that same evening. This rapid surge of LH induces follicular rupture and ovulation. Thereafter, the blood levels

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 11 of LH begin to decline and reach basal levels by early on the morning of estrus. There is a voluminous literature indicating that ovarian estradiol, secreted on diestrus, is a critical positive- feedback stimulus for the ovulation-inducing surge Of LH. Several experimental approaches have attested to this fact. Specifically, under either a 14:10 or 12:12 light-dark cycle, with noon as the midpoint of the light interval (86) , ovariectomized rats will respond to a dose of exogenous estradiol by presenting a proestrous-like LH surge the following day with the same timing and duration as the intact female rat on proestrus (86-88), However, the magnitude of this induced surge differs from that of the spontaneous surge on proestrus. That is, base-line values are not as low and peak values are not as high as those obtained during the endogenous surge on proestrus. In addition, rather than stimulating a surge of LH on a single day, estradiol administration to ovariectomized animals results in an LH surge of equivalent timing on each of at least the following 3 days. Thus, a daily neural event must be coupled with the presence of estrogen to eventuate in a daily LH surge in the ovariectomized rat. This confirms Everett and Sawyer's original proposal (89) of a 24 hr. periodicity in the LH release apparatus. Other approaches have demonstrated that ovarian estradiol secreted on diestrus is required to activate the LH surge response on proestrus. Specifically,

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 12 administration of estrogen inhibitors (90) or estradiol antiserum (90-92) or ovariectomy (93) on diestrus bloc)cs the proestrous surge of LH. On the other hand, administration of these agents or removal of the early on proestrus is ineffective in preventing this response later that same day. These data, taken together, suggest that the rising titer of estradiol secreted on diestrus represents a major stimulus for the increased secretion of LH on proestrus. The tonic levels of LH secreted on diestrus contribute to the stimulation of estradiol secretion by the ovarian follicle which, in turn, stimulates LH secretion (94). The long-term ovariectomized rat responds to a brief exposure (only 4 to 5 days) to estradiol with daily LH surges, whereas the acutely ovariectomized rat requires chronic exposure to estradiol to secrete daily LH surges (88). Also, it has been shown that expression of the daily LH surge mechanism is limited to proestrus by the heightened secretion of progesterone on proestrus (87). Thus, there is every indication from the present data as well as previous reports that progesterone contributes in a positive way to the secretion of the surge of LH on proestrus. In fact, progesterone administered early on the morning of proestrus will advance LH release by several hours (95). Similarly, progesterone administrated to ovariectomized, estradiol- benzoate-pretreated rats will induce an LH surge during the afternoon of that same day (106) . In addition, progesterone

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 13 will enhance the magnitude of the estrogen-induced LH surge (96). The effect of estrogen to increase LHRH release may not be exerted directly on LHRH-containing neurons since only 1 in 435 LHRH neurons reportedly have estrogen receptors (97) . The effect of progesterone appears not to be mediated through the since studies in the rat have shown progesterone stimulates gonadotropin secretion in bilaterally ovariectomized rats primed with estradiol (98-100). The stimulatory effect of progesterone does, however, require the presence of estradiol, as evidenced by the lack of effect of progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomized rats not given estrogen replacement (101-102). The critical dependence of progesterone on estradiol for the induction of progesterone receptors is important (103-104); however, estradiol may also exert other important priming effects, such as setting the neural trigger for progesterone activation. On the other hand, the data also suggest that the proestrous surge of LH may be terminated, in part, by the secretion of progesterone. Progesterone's effect upon gonadotropin secretion is dependent not only upon time of administration but also upon the dose of administration. Freeman et al (105) found that the injection of progesterone to estradiol benzoate-treated, long­ term ovariectomized rats resulted in an enhancement of the LH surge on the first day, and elimination of the surge on following days (105). The role of endogenous progesterone to

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 14 limit the expression of the gonadotropin surge to a single day was further confirmed by the study of Smith et al (106), who demonstrated that blockade of progesterone's effects on the afternoon of proestrus with either progesterone antibody administration or the antiprogestin, RU486, caused a return of pulsatile LH secretion on estrus. In addition to direct effects at the anterior pituitary, progesterone may regulate hypothalamic release and degradation of LHRH as a mechanism in its effect on gonadotropin secretion; however, it appears unlikely that this action of progesterone is exerted directly on LHRH-containing neurons since progesterone receptors are not reported to be present on hypothalamic LHRH neurons (107), It appears more likely that progesterone's effect on LHRH is exerted through neurotransmitter/neuropeptide-containing neurons in the hypothalamus which interact with LHRH neurons. Numerous studies have demonstrated that progesterone enhances the pituitary response to LHRH (108-113). Acute progesterone treatment enhances, while chronic treatment suppresses, the pituitary response to LHRH. The cellular mechanism involved in the acute progesterone enhancement of LHRH response is unclear. One possible mechanism could be the modulation of LHRH receptors. However, a recent study by Attardi and Happe (110) failed to show any effect of progesterone on LHRH receptor number in the pituitary, suggesting the site of progesterone action could be

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 15 independent of effects on the LHRH receptor. Krey and Kamel (111) recently reported that progesterone enhances the pituitary LH response to secretagogues which act separate from the LHRH receptor. Progesterone can modify the action of estradiol by decreasing nuclear estradiol receptor retention (114-115) . The reduction of occupied nuclear estradiol receptors is equivalent to causing a fall in serum estradiol levels, because estradiol * s action is exerted through its occupied nuclear receptors. These reports demonstrate the crucial role played by progesterone in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion. The regulatory role of progesterone on gonadotropin secretion depends on the time and dose of its administration in relationship to the adequacy of estrogen priming.

All this information suggests to us that the effects of estradiol and progesterone are partly exerted through other neurotransmitter(s)/neuropeptide(s), and the central role of those factors. Verification of this hypothesis requires more research. The review summarized here suggests that oxytocin neurosecretion, itself, as well as its central influence on LH secretion, is subject to modulation by gonadal steroids and may represent a significant portion of this neuroendocrine control.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER II OBJECTIVES:

The major objectives of this research are to 1) demonstrate the important role of central oxytocin in the regulation of LH secretion in the pharmacological model of the proestrous LH surge, 2) to determine and characterize if that stimulatory role is influenced by gonadal hormone levels in vivo and 3) to study the interaction of different gonadal hormones on the oxytoe in-induced stimulation of LH secretion. Previous experiments in our laboratory suggest that central oxytocin neurons may exert a physiologically important stimulatory influence on the release of LHRH and LH occurring just prior to ovulation on the afternoon of proestrus in the cycling female rat (when estradiol levels are physiologically high)(32). Another recent report showed that the in vitro LH response to oxytocin at the anterior pituitary level is steroid-dependent(106). This research tested the hypothesis that the central stimulatory role of oxytocin on LH secretion is subject to modulation by the levels, concentration ratios and time of exposure of gonadal hormones. To investigate these possibilities, we utilized ovariectomized, estrogen, or both estrogen and progesterone- primed female rats as an in vivo pharmacological model for the proestrous female rat. The results were planned to further

16

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 17 confirm the central effect of oxytocin on LH release and the dependence of its action on plasma estradiol and progesterone levels in a pharmacological model for the preovulatory surge. The knowledge gained from this research might advance our basic understanding of the nature, site, mechanism and physiological significance of oxytocin in regulating the preovulatory surge of LH and the influence of gonadal hormones on that neuroendocrine regulation. It might also offer an ideal experimental model for the study of the interaction between oxytocin and other physiologically relevant LHRH secretagogues.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER III

MATERIALS AMD METHODS

1) Animals: Young adult female, ovariectomized, Sprague Dawley rats (200-300 g, BW) were housed in a temperature (22±l*C) and light ( light on 700-1900 h) controlled room. Ovariectomies were done at least 4 weeks prior to further experiments. The rats were supplied food and water ad libitum.

2)Surgery: a. Third ventricular cannulae placement (icv): Stainless-steel 23 gauge cannulae were stereotaxically placed into the third cerebral ventricle of the ovariectomized rats using the atlas of Kdnig and Klippel (107) as a guide under tribromoethanol (1 ml/100 g B.W. of a 2.5% solution in saline) anesthesia. Coordinates utilized for placement of the icv cannulae were lateral 0.0 mm from midline, 2.5 mm posterior to bregma, and approximately -8.5 mm ventral to the surface of the brain. Each cannula was secured with dental cement and fine microscrews, and was provided with a screw-in mandril to prevent its obstruction. Location of the cannulae were confirmed by the flow of through the cannulae after removal of the mandril and by a positive

18

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 19 drinking response to the icv injection of 10 ng angiotensin II (a positive drinking response started not more than one minute after icv injection of angiotensin II with a total consumption of water of greater than 3 ml within 3 0 minutes). At the time of the experiment, the mandril of the cannulae were removed and injections were made using a 10 microliter Hamilton (Hamilton Industries, Two Rivers, WI) microsyringe connected by polyethylene tubing (PE 10) to a 3 0 gauge stainless steel infusion needle which fits within and extends to the lower lip of the chronic third ventricular cannula. The tubing and needle were filled with freshly made solution to be injected just prior to the injection.

b. Jugular cannulae: Silastic cannulae were placed in the right atrium via the external jugular vein under tribromoethanol (TBE) anesthesia (1 ml of 2.5% solution/100 gm BW), secured to the pectoral muscle, threaded subcutaneously and externalized at the base of the neck on the rat’s back (108) . The cannulae were connected to extensions running outside the cages 2-3 h before further experimentation.

3) Estradiol, progesterone and LH radioimmunoassays: Plasma samples were assayed for estradiol and progesterone levels using a double antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA, Diagnostic Assay Services, Gaithersburg, ML). The

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20 sensitivities of the RlAs for estradiol and progesterone were 1.0 ng/liter and 1.0 ng/ml, respectively, with intraassay coefficient of variation of 8 and 11%, respectively. Serum LH levels were measured by double antibody radioimmunoassay. The sensitivity of this assay was 0.5 ng/tube, with an intraassay coefficient of variation of 7-8%. All samples from the same experiment were assayed in the same RIA. 4) Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with the student-Newman Keuls post-hoc test or the Student's t- test. The 0.05 level of probability was used as the minimum level of significance for differences between the means for all experiments.

5) Drugs and chemicals: All the drugs to be employed in the proposed experiments were available from commercial sources. Purified preparations of angiotensin II and oxytocin were available from Peninsula Laboratories (San Carlos, CA). HPLC-purified 125-1 rat LH was obtained from Hazleton Laboratories (Vienna, Virginia). Other chemicals and reagents including progesterone were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (ST. Louis, MO). The pellets for 17-beta estradiol, progesterone and their placebo carrier- binder were purchased from Innovative Research of America (Toledo, OH) . Chemicals for intravenous injections were

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 21 diluted in saline.

6) Experimental procedure Effect of gonadal hormones on the stimulatory effect of oxytocin on LH secretion.

1)Long term exposure to high doses of estradiol and/or progesterone: Ovariectomized female rats were separated into 4 groups (7-8 rats/group). Pellets containing placebo carrier-hinder (control group), 17-beta estradiol (1 mg, E2 group), progesterone (35 mg, P4 group) or both estradiol and progesterone (1 mg 17-beta estradiol and 3 5 mg progesterone, E2/P4 group) were placed subcutaneously 4 days prior to further experimentation.

2) Short term exposure of varying progesterone doses in ovariectomized rats with or without estradiol-priming: Ovariectomized female rats were separated into 6 groups (7-8 rats/group) . Rats received subcutaneous 17-beta estradiol pellets (1 mg) 2 days prior to further experimentation. On the day of the experiment, various doses of progesterone (15 mg, 5 mg, 2.5 mg, 1.5 mg, 0.5 mg or 0.0 mg/rat in vegetable oil vehicle) were administered, subcutaneously [P4(2.5), P4(1.5), P4(0.5), control, E-P4(15), E-P4(5) groups] in the

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 22 ovariectomized rats primed with estradiol. Four other groups of ovariectomized rats (7-8 rats/group) received various doses of progesterone [25 mg, 15 mg, 5 mg/rat or 0 mg/rat in vegetable oil vehicle; P4(25), P4(15), P4(5) and control groups, respectively]. Rats were housed and maintained according to guidelines published in "NIH Principles for Use of Animals, Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals". All surgical procedures were classified as USDA type D procedures. The surgery for jugular cannulae placement takes approximately 5-10 min and the stereotaxic ICV cannulae placement surgery takes 20-30 min. Sterilized materials and prophylactic antibiotics (intramuscular injection and local ointment) were administered to prevent infections for all recoverable surgeries. Any rats displaying signs of illness were euthanized so they did not suffer, consistent with the recommendations of the panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Approximately 145 female rats were used for these experiments. All precautions were taken to avoid any stress in handling the rats, which could affect the release of LH. Plasma samples were obtained via jugular cannulae (placed 2 days earlier) from the unanesthetized, freely moving rats at 10 min before (PRE) and at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min following oxytocin (10 ng) icv injection. Blood obtained from samples were transferred to heparinized tubes and separated immediately at 4*C. Plasma samples were stored at -80®C until

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 23 analyzed by RIA. lev experiments started at 1300 hr (4 hours after progesterone injection).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER IV RESULTS : 1. Long term exposure of high doses of estradiol and/or progesterone on oxytocin induced LH release The results indicate that basal LH was higher in control, ovariectomized rats treated with subcutaneous pellets containing placebo carrier-binder than in groups treated with subcutaneous pellets containing estradiol, progesterone or both hormones (Fig 1) . Furthermore, ovariectomized animals (control group) responded to icv oxytocin with a modest decrease in plasma LH at 30 and 60 min after icv injection (Fig 2). Estradiol or progesterone treatments, alone, decreased basal LH levels compared to control ovariectomized animals (Fig 2; Pre time point). ICV oxytocin caused a modest increase in plasma LH at 5, 15, and 30 min in estradiol- treated animals compared with the proestrous LH surge in the intact, cycling female rats (Fig 2) . ICV oxytocin administration to progesterone-treated animals caused little change in plasma LH. In animals treated with both estradiol and progesterone, basal LH levels were significantly lower than in any other treatment groups (Fig 1 and Fig 2; Pre time point). The icv injection of oxytocin to chronic estradiol and progesterone treated animals resulted in no change in plasma LH (Fig 2; E2/P4 group).

24

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 25

Figure l. Effect of chronic replacement therapy with subcutaneous pellets containing placebo carrier-binder (CNTRL

group)t 17 8-Estradiol (1 mg, E2 group), progesterone (35 mg, P4 group), or both E2 and P4 (E2/P4 group) 2-4 days prior to further experimentation on basal plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone. Column height represents mean and vertical bars represent SEM as determined from N = 7-8 rats. A, significantly different from all other mean values (P<0.01). *, significantly different from CNTRL mean value (P

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. EFFECT OF OVX & REPLACEMENT THERAPY ON BASAL LH

i I<

CNfTRL E2 P4 E2/P4 TREATMENT

F ig u re I

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 27

Figure 2. Effect of a central injection of oxytocin (10 ug/ 5ul) on plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized rats which have received subcutaneous pellets containing placebo carrier- binder ( CNTRL group), 17 6-Estradiol (1 mg, E2 group), progesterone (35 mg, P4 group) , or both E2 and P4 (E2/P4 group) 2-4 days prior to further experimentation. At 13 00 hr of the experimental day animals received an icv injection of oxytocin and plasma samples were collected 10 min prior to icv injection (Pre) , or 5, 15, 30 or 60 min after the icv injection for plasma LH determination. Values represent mean plasma LH concentration as determined from N = 7-8 rats.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ICV OXYTOCIN ON LH IN OVX & HORMONE REPLACED RATS

30

CNTRL

E2/P4

20 §

S < 10

—,------1------1----- I------1---- PPE 5M IN 15 MIN 30 MIN 60 MIN

TIME POST ICV INJECTION

F ig u re 2

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 29

2. Short term exposure to various progesterone doses in ovariectomized rats with or without estradiol priming on oxytocin-induced LH release

The effect of short term exposure to various progesterone doses in estradiol-primed, ovariectomized rats on the oxytocin-induced stimulation of LH release were investigated. Once again, the results indicate that basal LH is highest in ovariectomized rats, next highest in animals treated with estradiol alone (Fig 3; Pre time values), and lowest (in a dose-related manner) in those treated with high doses of progesterone, alone [25 mg, P4(25) group; 15 mg, P4(15) group or 5 mg, P4(5) group; Pre time values in Fig 4]. Oxytocin injection did not alter plasma LH in animals treated with any of the progesterone doses, alone (Fig 4) . Following estradiol treatment, alone, a very small decrease was seen at 5 min and a small increase in plasma LH was seen at 15 and 30 min after oxytocin injection (Fig 4, E group). In estradiol-primed, ovariectomized rats treated acutely with 15 mg [E-P4(15) group] or 5 mg [E-P4 (5) group] progesterone at 900 hr, icv administration of oxytocin 4 hr later caused an increase in plasma LH (Fig 5) . This increase was significantly higher than that seen in animals treated with estradiol, alone (E group. Fig 5) , in animals receiving the lower dose of progesterone [E-P4(5) group. Fig 5] at 5 min-30 min. In animals receiving

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 30

Figure 3. Effect of a central injection of oxytocin (10 ug/5 ul) on plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized rats which have received subcutaneous pellets containing placebo carrier- binder (CNTL group) or 17 6-Estradiol (1 mg, E group) 2 days prior to further experimentation. At 13 00 hr of the experimental day, animals received an icv injection of oxytocin and plasma samples were collected 10 min prior to icv injection (Pre), or 5, 15, 30 or 60 min after the icv injection for plasma LH determination. Values represent mean plasma LH concentration as determined from N = 7-8 rats.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. E2 ON OXY LH RELEASE IN OVX RATS

25

20 -

I 15 -

I 10 -

PRE 1 5 30 60

TIME (MIN) POST ICV INJECTION

F ig u re 3

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 32

Figure 4 . Effect of a central injection of oxytocin (10 ug/5 ul) on plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized rats which have received subcutaneous pellets containing 17 6-Estradiol (1 mg, E group) 2 days prior to further experimentation, or an acute subcutaneous injection of progesterone at 25 mg/0.6 ml oil [P4(25) group], 15 mg/0.3 ml oil [P4(15) group], or 5 mg/0.3 ml oil [P4 (5) group ] at 900 hr of the experimental day. At 13 00 hr an icv injection of oxytocin was administered and plasma samples were collected 10 min prior to icv injection (Pre) , or 5, 15, 30 or 60 min after the icv injection for plasma LH determination. Values represent mean plasma LH concentration as determined from N = 7-8 rats.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. E2 OR P4 ON OXY LH RELEASE IN OVX RATS

25

20 - P4 (25) P4 (15) P4(5)

S 15 - d

I 1 0 -

PFE 5 1 5 30 60

TIME (MIN) POST ICV INJECTION

F ig u re 4

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 34

Figure 5. Comparison of the effect of a central injection of oxytocin (10 ug/5ul) on plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized rats which have received subcutaneous pellets containing 17 6-Estradiol (1 mg) 2 days prior to further experimentation either without (E group) or with an acute subcutaneous injection of progesterone at 15 mg/0.3 ml oil [E- P4(15) group) or 5 mg/0.3 ml oil [E-P4(5) group] at 900 hr of the experimental day. At 1300 hr an icv injection of oxytocin was administered and plasma samples were collected 10 min prior to icv injection (Pre), or 5, 15, 30 or 60 min after the icv injection for plasma LH determination. Values represent mean plasma LH concentration as determined from N = 7-8 rats.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. E2/P4 ON OXY LH RELEASE IN OVX RATS

3 0 - □ + E-P4 (15) ■ E-P4 (S)

20

S

5 Q.

10

— I— "T —T— — r - — r~ PRE 5 1 5 30 60

TIME (MIN) POST ICV INJECTION

F ig u re 5

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 36 the higher dose of progesterone [E-P4 (15) group. Fig 5] the LH stimulation resulting from icv oxytocin administration was smaller and of shorter duration than even in the estradiol, alone, treatment group; suggesting that higher doses of progesterone may inhibit the oxytocin-induced release of LH. To test this directly, ovariectomized, estradiol primed rats were give acute injections of 2.5 mg [P4(2.5) group], 1.5 mg [P4(1.5) group] or 0.5 mg [P4(0.5) group] progesterone or 0.3 ml oil vehicle at 9:00 hr and then given an icv injection of oxytocin at 1300 hr in order to evaluate the effect of the dose of progesterone on the oxytocin-induced increase in plasma LH in estradiol-primed rats. Oxytocin elicited a maximum response in plasma LH in animals given an acute injection of 2.5 mg progesterone, with a surge which increased 5 min after icv injection, peaked at greater than 60 ng/ml at 3 0 min and was still significantly elevated over control animals at 60 min [P4(2.5) group. Fig 6]. Oxytocin induced a much smaller, but significant, increase in plasma LH in ovariectomized, estradiol-primed animals treated acutely with 1.5 mg progesterone [P4(1.5) group. Fig 6] with increased plasma LH levels at 5-30 min after icv injection, peaking with a value of about 25 ng/ml at 5 min after icv injection. The effect of icv oxytocin in animals receiving the lowest dose of progesterone [0.5 mg, P4 (0.5) group. Fig 6] showed a much smaller stimulation with small increases in plasma LH being observed at 5 min and at 60 min after icv injection of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 37 oxytocin. Interestingly, in the animals receiving estradiol priming, alone, no significant effect of icv oxytocin on plasma LH was observed.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 38

Figure 6; Comparison of the effect of a central injection of oxytocin (10 ug/5 ul) on plasma concentrations in ovariectomized rats which have received subcutaneous pellets containing 17 6-estradiol (1 mg) 2 days prior to further experimentation and an acute subcutaneous injection of progesterone at 2.5 mg/0.3 ml oil [P4(2.5)group]; 1.5 mg/0.3 ml oil [P4(1.5) group] or 0.5 mg/0.3 ml oil [P4(0.5) group]; or received 0.3 ml oil vehicle (CNTRL group) at 900 hr of the experimental day. At 1300 hr an icv injection of oxytocin was administered and plasma samples were collected 10 min prior to icv injection (Pre), or 5, 15, 30 or 60 min after the icv injection for plasma LH determination. Values represent mean plasma LH concentration ±sem as determined from N=7-8 rats.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. P4 ON OXY STIMULATION OF LH IN E2-PRIMED RATS

80

70 - ■ CNTRL O P4 (2.5) A P4 (1.5) 60 ■ A P4 (0.5)

50

< 40 ■

IQ. - 30

20 -

10 -

PFE 5 MIN 15 MIN 30 MIN 60 MIN

TIME (MIN) POST ICV INJECTION

F ig u re 6

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER V

DISCUSSION:

The data demonstrate that for the expression of the stimulatory role of oxytocin on plasma LH to be seen, serum levels, concentration ratios and exposure time of gonadal hormones are critical. This stimulatory action of oxytocin disappears when estradiol is removed. Furthermore, although a small dose of progesterone synergizes with estradiol to cause a greater release of LH by oxytocin, the action is reduced as the dose of acutely administered progesterone increases in the ovariectomized, estrogen-primed rats (Fig 6). The data from the present study agree with previous reports (30, 32) that oxytocin exerts a physiologically relevant, stimulatory influence on the preovulatory release of LH on the afternoon of proestrus in cycling female rats (when the concentration of plasma estradiol level is high and progesterone is low, but increasing). Pharmacological manipulation of endogenous oxytocin with selective oxytocin antagonists and passive immunoneutralization with specific oxytocin antisera result in significant deficiencies in stimulated LH release in animal models with similar estradiol and progesterone concentrations (30, 32) . Recently, Samson et

40

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 41 al (119) developed a novel method to selectively lesion central oxytocin neurons with a ricin-cytotoxin conjugate to reveal a physiologically relevant role for oxytocin within the hypothalamus to control LHRH release on the afternoon of proestrus in the steroid-primed LH surge model (119). Our results provide a possible explanation for data from several laboratories describing both inhibitory and stimulatory effects of oxytocin on LH. Changes in the concentration of plasma gonadal hormones are critical to the action and effect of central oxytocin on LH secretion. Two studies demonstrating inhibitory effects of oxytocin on LH release were carried out in animal models associated with low levels of ovarian hormones (34, 43) . On the other hand, another group has provided evidence for a direct, stimulatory action of oxytocin on LH release from rat anterior pituitary cells in static culture (31, 35), which is steroid-dependent (106). We have shown pretreatment with either an oxytocin antagonist or an LHRH antagonist blocked the increase in plasma LH resulting from a central injection of oxytocin on proestrus (when plasma concentrations of gonadal steroids are high) (12 0). These results demonstrate that the oxytocin-induced increase in plasma LH is an -mediated event and is apparently mediated by influencing the release of LHRH. Additionally, using oxytocin-ricin A chain conjugates to selectively target and destroy cells in vivo and in vitro that possess oxytocin receptors, Samson and co-workers failed to

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 42 demonstrate that oxytocin acts directly on the anterior pituitary, and provided evidence that oxytocin acts through LHRH neurons centrally to affect LH release. Evidence supporting the influence of plasma estradiol and progesterone on distribution, content, synthesis, and release of oxytocin in the CNS has been provided. Treatment with estradiol has been shown not only to enhance the oxytocin-like immunoreactivity contained in discrete regions of the rat brain (20), but also allows additional immunoreactive oxytocin perikarya and processes to be observed in areas which demonstrate no oxytocin-like immunoreactivity prior to estradiol treatment (50, 51, 58) . The concentrations of oxytocin found in CNS nuclei fluctuate within the estrous cycle (57). Oxytocin levels in the portal blood increase on the afternoon of proestrus, correlating with the onset of the preovulatory LH surge (47). Studies examining the possible influence of estrogen on oxytocin messenger RNA levels using Northern blot and dot blot analysis provide evidence for a role at the molecular level (64-66). The possibility of a direct effect of estrogen on transcription is indicated by the presence of partial estrogen-responsive-elements located upstream to the oxytocin transcription start site (67-69), However, autoradiographic studies of estrogen binding have not revealed significant numbers of supraoptic neurons with nuclear estrogen receptors (70) . This is unlikely to represent the only route of gonadal hormone action on the oxytocin

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 43 system. Other possibilities include the modification of hormone responsiveness by increasing the sensitivity of putative second messenger systems or membrane potential to oxytocin. For LHRH gene expression, a long estrogen treatment can induce increased roRNA levels and the stimulatory effects of estrogen can be consequent to the release of the neuroendocrine peptide (71-73) . All these results suggest that the increasing activity of oxytocin neurons during proestrus (when plasma estradiol levels are high) is probably physiologically responsible for inducing the LH surge. The results from the present study support the fact that the stimulatory effect of centrally administered oxytocin can be seen in a pharmacological model of the proestrous female rat, and that the presence of physiologically high levels of estradiol are critical for the stimulatory effect of oxytocin to be seen. Our results demonstrate that progesterone also plays an important role in this mechanism. In our study, both estradiol and progesterone chronically exerted additive negative feedback effects on basal LH levels. ICV oxytocin inhibited LH levels in ovariectomized rats, and modestly stimulate LH levels (in most cases) in estradiol treated rats compared with the proestrous LH surge in cycling female rats, but not in rats treated with the highest dose of progesterone. This suppressive action of progesterone is reduced and even begins to synergize with estradiol when the acute dose of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 44 administered progesterone is reduced to 0.5-5 mg/rat (Fig 5, Fig 6) . This result is consistent with the fact that progesterone administered early on the morning of proestrus advanced LH release by several hours and enhanced the magnitude of the estrogen-induced LH surge (96). The effect of progesterone appears not to be mediated through the ovary since studies in the rat have shown progesterone to stimulate LH release in ovariectomized rats primed with estradiol (98- 100) . However, our studies show that the stimulatory effect of progesterone required the presence of estradiol. These facts are consistent with the negative feedback of the gonadal hormones on the basal release of LH. The results also relate to the general mechanisms by which gonadal hormones exert their effects on different locations in the CNS to control LH secretion; including effects on neurotransmitter synthesis and release dynamics, to receptor number and affinity. The requirement of estradiol priming for progesterone * s stimulatory effect to be exhibited is obvious and may be due to a critical dependence of progesterone on estradiol for the induction of its receptors (103-104). on the other hand, progesterone's action might be due to neurotransmitter release mechanisms while that of estradiol might be on synthesis of . This possibility is supported by the fact that progesterone receptors are not found directly on hypothalamic LHRH neurons (107). Therefore, central oxytocin may represent one of the mediating factors in the action of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 45 gonadal steroids on LHRH neurons. The effects of estrogen on hypothalamic LHRH release might be mediated, in part, through effects on oxytocin neurons surrounding LHRH neurons in the hypothalamus and median eminence. Indeed, estradiol and progesterone receptors have been identified on central oxytocin neurons (121). Estrogen also exerts important effects which sensitize the anterior pituitary to LHRH stimulation. Drouva et al (122) provided evidence that estradiol increases anterior pituitary protein kinase C activity both in vivo as well as in vitro. Direct effects of estradiol on the pituitary have been demonstrated in ovariectomized female rats in which the vascular connections between the hypothalamus and the pituitary were interrupted surgically, and regrowth was prevented by insertion of a piece of aluminum foil; as well as in experiments using dispersed pituitary cells in culture (123-124). On the other hand, at the very least, gonadal hormones modulate the oxytocin receptors and interactions involved in the stimulation of LH release in terms of its qualitative nature, quantity, affinity and distribution. The central influence of gonadal steroids was also proven in experiments showing pretreatment with an oxytocin antagonist, central administration of an oxytocin antisera or an LHRH antagonist blocked the increase in plasma LH resulting from a central injection of oxytocin. Several other neuropeptides and monoaminergic neurotransmitters have been implicated in the neuroendocrine regulation of LH secretion. They primarily

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 46 appear to work by altering the net release of LHRH from the median eminence into the hypophyseal portal blood. Surprisingly, most of the LHRH secretagogues or inhibitors more or less appear to be dependent on the levels of plasma gonadal hormones, especially physiologically high levels of plasma estradiol. These include NE, epinephrine, angiotensin II, glutamate, GAB A, CRF, NPY, and the (5-16). However, direct evidence for these interactions and their significance in the neuroendocrine regulation of LHRH and LH secretion, as well as the modulatory influence of plasma estradiol/progesterone levels on those possible interactions is controversial and largely unknown. Further work is needed to clarify these issues. Besides the modulation by estradiol of the oxytocin stimulation of LH release, the acute administration of progesterone also acted synergistically to enhance LH release in estradiol-primed, ovariectomized rats in dose-related manner (Fig 5; Fig 6). How progesterone acts centrally to exert this action on LH release remains unresolved. The regulatory role of progesterone on the neuroendocrine regulation of LH secretion depends on the time and dose of its administration in relationship to the plasma level of estradiol. Long term administration of high doses of progesterone failed to show the synergistic effect when serum estradiol levels were similar to those attained in the most recent experiments demonstrating synergism (Fig 2, Fig 5, Fig

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 47 6). Such synergism was evident when progesterone levels were probably closer to the expected physiological progesterone level seen during proestrus. When progesterone was administered acutely (s.c.) to estradiol-primed rats, the resulting stimulation of LH release in response to centrally administered oxytocin demonstrated a bell-shaped dose response (Fig 5, Fig 6). The results indicate that the lower doses of progesterone synergistically enhance the ability of oxytocin to stimulate LH release in animals having physiologically high levels of serum estradiol. The enhancement was maximum after administration of 2.5 mg progesterone, but was also seen to a lesser degree in animals treated with 1.5 and 0.5 mg progesterone. As the dose of progesterone increased further, the synergism decreased. At the optimum progesterone dose , the level of LH stimulation was similar to that observed in intact proestrous rats during the spontaneous LH surge, and is higher than that observed in intact rats early on proestrus 30 min after oxytocin injection. These differences are most likely due to differences in the progesterone levels and duration in the current experiments compared to intact cycling rats. In particular, lower doses of progesterone may be important to stimulate the start of the oxytocin-induced LH release in estradiol-primed ovariectomized rats, whereas larger doses may help bring the LH surge back down to normal. Interestingly, the lowest dose of progesterone in our study (0.5 mg) stimulated oxytocin-induced LH release in a modest

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 48 biphasic manner (Fig 6). These data suggest low doses of progesterone might start the oxytocin-induced LH release in estradiol-primed ovariectomized rats, and that this stimulation of LH secretion could be brought back to normal as progesterone levels continue to rise. The cellular mechanisms involved in the acute progesterone enhancement of oxytocin's stimulatory effect on LH release in estradiol primed, ovariectomized rats is unclear. No effect of progesterone on LHRH receptor number in the pituitary has been reported, suggesting the site of progesterone action must be at a level higher than the LHRH receptor (110). Other reports show that progesterone enhances the pituitary LH response to other secretagogues which act prior to the LHRH receptor (111) . The results from our present study suggest that the action of progesterone may be required for a functional interaction between oxytocin, other neuropeptides and their receptors. Alternatively, progesterone may activate additional mechanisms which estradiol does not affect, which are then required for the facilitation of LH secretion by oxytocin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 49

CHAPTER VI SUMMARY In summary, both estradiol and progesterone exert negative feedback effects on basal LH secretion, and their combined effect was additive. Centrally administered oxytocin inhibited the high plasma LH levels seen in ovariectomized rats. In contrast, in most cases, oxytocin caused LH levels to increase in estradiol-treated rats following its icv injection, although the magnitude of that increase is very small compared to the proestrous surge or the estradiol-primed rat given 2.5 mg progesterone. In animals treated with progesterone, alone, there was little effect of centrally administered oxytocin on plasma LH. Oxytocin did not alter plasma LH concentrations in animals treated with long term progesterone and/or estradiol. The results support the fact that the stimulatory effect of centrally administered oxytocin can be seen in a pharmacological model of the proestrous female rat, and that the presence of physiologically high levels of estradiol are critical for the stimulatory effect of oxytocin to be seen. In the absence of estradiol or progesterone, oxytocin exerts an inhibitory influence on plasma LH. The level of stimulation by oxytocin on plasma LH was critically dependent on the optimal dose of progesterone. Progesterone's influence on the oxytocin-induced change in LH release was both dose and time dependent. Low doses of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 50 progesterone synergistically enhance» while high doses inhibit» the ability of oxytocin administered centrally to stimulate LH secretion. The fact that the optimal dose of progesterone can influence oxytocin-induced LH release in a manner similar to that seen in cycling female rats on the afternoon of proestrus» and even stimulate LH release at 30 min after icv oxytocin suggests that the duration and/or dose of estradiol and progesterone exposure are critical for the expression of the stimulatory oxytocin effect. On the other hand» the progesterone levels seen in intact female rats on proestrus are dynamic » and are probably lower than that seen in most of the acutely progesterone-treated » ovariectomized groups. The dynamic changes occuring in plasma estradiol and progesterone in relation to each other throughout proestrus are probably critically important to the expression of the oxytocin stimulation of LH secretion. Alternatively, it is possible that if other critically important key elements/inputs were also stimulated in the present experiments» or if the oxytocin challenge could be given at the time of the endogenous surge » the resulting surge of LH might resemble even more closely that seen on the afternoon of proestrus prior to ovulation in intact» cycling rats. When ovariectomized rats are estradiol-primed» and the progesterone level is carefully controlled» oxytocin given centrally induces an increase in plasma LH which resembles the endogenous LH surge seen on the afternoon of proestrus

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 51 in the cycling, intact female rat. The pharmacological model of the proestrous surge can be used to evaluate the influence of oxytocin on LH secretion, as well as the important interaction, occurring between oxytocin and other central neurotransmitters to provide that regulation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. REFERENCES 1. Schlally, A. V., Kastin, A. J. and Arimura, A. (1972): FSH-releasing hormone and LH-releasing hormone. and Hormones 30, 83-164. 2. Blackwell, R. W. & Guillemin, R. (1973): Hypothalamic control of adenohypophyses1 . Annual Review of 35, 357-390. 3. Antoni, F. A. (1986): Oxytocin receptors in rat adenohypophysis: evidence from radioligand binding studies. Endocrinology 119, 2393-2395. 4. Gallo, R. V. and Drouva, S. V. (1979): Effect of intraventricular infusion of catecholamines on luteinizing hormone release in ovariectomized and ovariectomized steroid-primed rats. 29, 149-162. 5. Kalra, S. P. and Gallo, R.V. (1983): Effects of intraventricular catecholamines on luteinizing hormone release in morphine-treated rats. Neuroendocrinology 113, 23-28, 6. Krieg, R. J. and Sawyer, C. H. (1976): Effects of intraventricular catecholamines on luteinizing hormone release in ovariectomized-steroid primed rats. Endocrinology 99, 411-419. 7. Vijaiyan, E. and McCann, S. M. (1978): Re-evaluation of the role of catecholamines in control of gonadotropin and prolactin release. Neuroendocrinology 25, 150-165. 8. Kalra, S. P. and Crowley, W. R. (1984): Norepinephrine-like effects of neuropeptide Y on LH release in the rat. Life Science 35, 1173-1176. 9. Kalra, S. P. and Crowley, W. R. (1984): Differential effects of pancreatic polypeptide Y on luteinizing hormone release in female rats. Neuroendocrinology 38, 522-513. 10. McDonald, J, K, (1989): Reproductive neuroendocrine effects of neuropeptide Y and related peptides. In: Brain-Gut peptides and reproductive function, Johnston C, A., Charles D, B, editors, P.105 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 1991).

52

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 53 11. Steele, M. K., Gallo R. V. and Ganong W. F. (1985): Stimulatory or inhibitory effects of angiotensin II upon ^ secretion in ovariectomized rats: A function of gonadal steroids. Neuroendocrinology 40, 210-216, 12. Brann D. W. and Mahesh V. B. (1992): Excitatory regulation of gonadotropin secretion: modulation by steroid hormones. J. steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41(3-8), 847-850. 13. Wood, P. L. (1982): Multiple opiate receptors: support for unique mu, delta and Kappa sites. Neuropharmacology, 21: 487-497. 14. Leadem, C. A., Drowley, w. R . , simJcins, J. W. and Kalra, S. P. (1985): Effects of naloxone on catecholamine and LHRH release from the perfused hypothalamus of the steroid-primed rat Neuroendocrinology 40, 497-500. 15. Akema, T., Chiba, T. and Kimura, F. (1990): On the relationship between noradrenergic stimulatory and GABAergic inhibitory systems in the control of luteinizing hormone secretion in female rats. Neuroendocrinology. 52(6), 566-572. 16. Almeida, O. F., Nikolarakis, K. E, and Herz, A. (1988): Evidence for the involvement of endogenous in the inhibition of luteinizing hormone by corticotropin-releasing factor. Endocrinology. 122(3), 1034-1041. 17. Pederson, C. A., Asher, J. A., Monroe, Y. L. and Prange A. J. Jr. (1985): Oxytocin induces maternal behavior in virgin female rats. Science 216, 648- 649. 18. Van Leengoed E., Kerker, E. and Swanson, H.H. (1987): Inhibition of postpartum maternal behavior in the rat by injecting an oxytocin antagonist into the cerebral ventricles. Journal of Endocrinology 112, 275-282. 19. Arletti, R. and Bertolini, A. (1985): Oxytocin stimulates lordosis behavior in female rats. Neuropeptides 6, 247-253. 20. Caldwell, J. D,, Prange, A. J. Jr and Pederson, C. A. (1986): Oxytocin facilitates the sexual receptivity of estrogen-treated female rats. Neuropeptides 7, 175-189.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. S4 21. Samson, w. K., Lumpkin, M. S., Kozloski, G. p., McCann, S. M. (1982): A possible role for oxytocin in the control of prolactin release. 12th. Ann. Sic. of Neuroscience, Abstract 18, 22. 22. Samson, w. K., Lumpkin, M. D. and McCann, S. M. (1983); Further correlation of oxytocin and prolactin release: lactation. 13th. Ann. Meet Soc. of Neuroscience abstract 13 6, 12. 23. Antoni, F. A., Holmes, M. C., Jones, M. T.(1983): Oxytocin as well as vasopressin potentiate ovine CRF in vitro. Peptides 4, 411-415. 24. Beny, J. L, and Baertschi, A. J. (1980): Oxytocin : major corticotropin-releasing factor secreted from diabetes insipidus rat posterior pituitary in vitro. Neuroendocrinology 31, 261-264. 25. Gibbs, D. M., Vale, M., River, J. and Yen, S. S. C. (1984): Oxytocin potentiates the ACTH-releasing activity of CRF (41) but not vasopressin. Life Science 34, 2245-2249. 26. Kartezi, M., Koch, B. and Makara, G. B. (1982): Comparative study of the CRF-like activities of vasopressin and oxytocin in the Brattle-boro rat. In: Neuroendocrinology of Vasopressin, Corticoliberin, and Opiomelanocortins, Baertschi, A. J., Dreifuss, J. J. editors, P.273 (Academic Press, New York 1982). 27. Shibusawa, K., Saito, S. Fukuda, M., Kawai, T., Yamada, J. and Tomozawa, K. (1985): Neurosecretion of oxytocin stimulates the release of pituitary gonadotrophin. Endocrinologie Japonica 2, 183-187. 28. Martini, L., Mira, L., Pecile, A. and Saito, S. (1959): Neurohypophysial hormones and release of gonadotrophin. Journal of Endocrinology 18, 245- 250. 29. Melin, P. (1971): Gonadotrophic activity of the pituitary and of the male rabbit after oxytocin treatment. Acta Endocrinologica 66, 529- 530. 30. Johnston, C. A. and A. Negro-Villar (1988): Role of oxytocin on prolactin secretion during proestrus and in different physiological of pharmacological paradigms. Endocrinology 122, 341-350.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 55 31. Robinson, G. and Evans, J.J. (1990): Oxytocin has a role in gonadotropin regulation in rats. Journal of Endocrinology 125,425-432. 32. Johnston, c. A., Lopez, P., Samson, W. K. and Negro-Vilar, A. (1990): Physiologically important role for central oxytocin in the preovulatory release of luteinizing hormone. Neuroscience Letters 120, 256-258. 3 3. O'Bryne, K .T ., Lunnand S. F. and Coen, C . W. (1990): Central oxytocin stimulute luteinizing hormone release in the marmoset, a which fails to show lactationslly-induced infertility. Neuroendocrinology 2,1-3. 34. Gambacciani, M., Yen, S. S. C. and Rasmussen, D. D. (1986): GnRH release from the mediobasal hypothalamus , In vitro regulation by oxytocin. Neuroendocrinology 42, 181-183. 35. Evans, J. J., Robinson, G. and Catt, K. J. (1989): Gonadotrophin releasing activity of neurohypophysial hormones I, Potential for modulation of pituitary hormone secretion in rats. Endocrinology 122.99-106. 36. Evans, J. J. and Catt, K. J. (1989): Gonadotrophin releasing activity of neurohypophyseal hormones: II, The pituitary oxytocin release differs from that of corticotrophin. Endocrinology. 122, 107- 116. 37. Robinson, G., Evans, J. J. and Forster, M. E. (1985); Oxytocin can affect follicular development in the adult mouse. Acta Endocrinologica. 108, 273-276. 38. Leng, G., Way, S. and Dyball, R.E. J. (1991): Identification of oxytocin cells in the rat by their response to injection. Neuroscience Letter 122, 158-162. 39. Buijs, R. M. (1990): Vasopressin and oj^tocin neutralization and putative functions in the brain. Acta Neurochirurgie, Suppl. 47, 86-89. 40. Zimmerman, E. A., Nilaver. G., Itou-Yi, A. and Silverman, A. J. (1984): Vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic pathways in the central nervous system. Fed. Proc. 43, 91-96.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 56 41. Yu, H., Lamme, A. T., Zimmerman, E. A. and Silverman, A. J. (1986): Comparative distribution of vasopressin and oxytocin neurons in the rat brain using a double—label procedure. Neuroendocrinology 44, 235-246. 42. Sawchenko, P.E. and Swanson, L. W. (1982): Immunohistochemical identification of neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that project to the medulla or to the spinal cord in that rat. Journal of comp. Neurol. 205, 260-272. 43. Franci, C. F., Anselmo-Frani, J. , Kozlowski, G. P. and McCann, S. M. (1988): Effects of vasopressin or oxytocin antiserum on anterior pituitary secretion in the rat. Soc. Neuroscience Abstract 14, 629. 44. Akaishi, T. and Sakuma, Y. (1985): Estrogen excites oxytocinergic but not vasopressinergic cells in the paraventricular nucleus of female rat hypothalamus. Brain Research. 335, 302-305. 45. Negoro, H., Visessawan, S. and Holland R. C. (1973) : Unit activity in the paraventricular nucleus of female rats at different stages of the reproductive cycle and after ovariectomy, with or without estrogen or progesterone treatment. Endocrinology 59, 543-558. 46. Lumpkin, M. D . , Samson, W. K. and McCann, S. M. (1983): Hypothalamic and pituitary sites of action of oxytocin to alter prolactin secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 112, 1711-1717. 47. Sarkar, D. k. and Gibbs D. M. (1984): Cyclic variation of oxytocin in the blood of pituitary portal vessels of rats. Neuroendocrinology 39, 481-483. 48. Robinson, A. G. (1974): Elevation of plasma neurophysin in women on oral contraceptive. J. Clin. Invest 54, 209-212.

49. Amico, J. A., Finn, F. M. and Robinson, A. G. (1986): Amphikyte displacement and high pressure liquid chromatographic separation of the estrogen responsive neurophysin from human plasma. J. din Endocrinology metab. 63, 835-840.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 57 50. Rhodes, c. H., Morrell, J. I. and Pfaff D. W. (1981C): Immunohistochemical analysis of magnocellular elements in rat hypothalamus: Distribution and numbers of cell containing neurophysin, oxytocin and vasopressin. J. Comp. Neurol, 198, 45-46. 51. Jirikowski, G. F., Caldwell, J. D., Pederson, c. A. and Stumpf, W. E. (1988): Estradiol influences oxytoe in-immunoreactive brain systems. Neuroscience 25, 237-248. 52. DeMay, J, K., Dieridkx, K. and Vandesande, F. (1975): Immunohistochemical demonstration of neurophysin-1 and neurophys in-II-conta in ing nerve fibers in the external region of the bovine median eminence. Cell research 157, 517-519. 53. Sawchenko, P. E. and Swanson, L. E. (1985): Relationship of oxytocin pathways to the control of neuroendocrine and autonomic function. In Amico, J. A. and Robinson, A. G. (eds): Oxytocin: clinical and Laboratory Studies. Elsevier, PP. 87-103. 54. Buijs, R. M., and Swaab, D. F. (1979): Immunoelectron microscopical demonstration of vasopressin and oxytocin synapses in the limbic system of the rat. Cell Tissue Research 204, 355- 365. 55. Sofroniew, M, V. and Schrell, U. (1985): Evidence for a direct projection from oxytocin and vasopressin neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus to the medulla oblongata: Immunohistochemical visualization of both the horseradish peroxidase transported and the peptide produced in the same neuron. Neuroscience Letter 22, 211-217. 56. Hermes, M. L. H. J., Buijs, R. M., Masson-Pevet, M. and Pevet, P. (1988): Oxytocinergic innervation of the brain of the Garden Dormouse (Eliomys quercinus L.). J. Domp. Neurol. 273, 252-262. 57. Crowley, W. R., O'Donahue, T. L., George, T. L. and Jacobowitz, D. W. (1978): Changes in pituitary oxytocin and vasopressin during the estrous cycle and after ovarial hormones: Evidence for mediation by norepinephrine. Life Science 23, 2579-2586.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 58 58. Yamaguchi, K., Akaishi^ T. and Nigoro, H. (1979): Effect of estrogen treatment on plasma oxytocin and vasopressin in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 526, 197-205. 59. Caldwell, J. D., Jirikowski, G. F., Rosalie Greer, E., Stumpf, W. E. and Pederson, C. A. (1988): Ovarian steroids and sexual interaction alter oxytocinergic content and distribution in the basal . Brain Research 446, 236-244. 60. Sar, M. and Stumpf, W. E. (1980): Simultaneous localization of estradiol and or vasopressin in hypothalamic neurons demonstrated by a combined technique of dry-mount autoradiography and immunocytochemistry Neuroscience Letter 17, 179-184. 61. Rhodes, C. H. , Morrell, J. I. and Pfaff, D. W. (1981b): Distribution of estrogen-concentrating, neurophysin-containing magnocellular neurons in the rat hypothalamus as demonstrated by a technique combining steroid autoradiography and immunohistology in the same tissue. Neuroendocrinology 33, 18-23. 62. Rhodes, C. H., Morrell, J. I. and Pfaff, S, W. (1982): Estrogen concentrating neurophysin containing hypothalamic magnocellular neurons in the vasopressin deficient (Brattleboro) rat: A study combining steroid autoradiography and immunohistochemistry. Journal of Neuroscience 2, 1718-1724. 63. Caldwell, J. D., Brooks, P. J., Jirikowski, G. F., Barakat, A. S., Lund, P. K. and Pederson, C. A. (1989): Estrogen alters oxytocin mRNA levels in the preoptic area. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 1(4), 273-278. 64. Van Toi, H. H. M., Bolwerk, E. L. M., Liu, B. and Burbach, J. P. H. (1988): Oxytocin and vasopressin gene expression in the hypotha1amo-neurohypophyseal system of the rat during the estrous cycle, pregnancy and lactation. Endocrinology 122, 945- 951. 65. Miller, F. R., Ozimek, G., Milner, R. J . and Bloom, F. E. (1989): Regulation of neuronal oxytocin mRNA by ovarian steroids in the mature and developing hypothalamus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 2468-2472.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 59 66. Zingg, H. H. and Lefebvre, D. L. (1988): Oxytocin and vasopressin gene expression during gestation and lactation. Molecular Brain Research 4, 1-6. 67. Mohr, E., Bahnsen, U., Kiessling, C. and Richter, D. (1988): Expression of the vasopressin and oxytocin in rats occurs in mutually exclusive sets of hypothalamic neurons. FEBS Letter 242(1), 144-148. 68. Richard, S. and Zingg, H.H. (1989): Identification and localization of an estrogen responsive element in the human oxytocin gene. Endocr. Soc. 199. 69. Richard, S. and Zingg, H. (1990): The human oxytocin gene promoter in regulated by estrogens. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6098-6103. 70. Pfaff, D. W.and Keiner, M. (1973): Atlas of estradiol-concentrating cells in the central nervous system of the female rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 151, 121-158. 71. Roberts, J. L., Dutlow, C. M. , Jakubowski, M. and Millar, R. P. (1989): Estradiol stimulates preoptic area-anterior hypothalamic proGnRH-GAP gene expression in ovariectomized rats. Molecular Brain Research 6, 127-134. 72. Rothfeld, J. M., Hejtmancik, J. P., Conn, P. M. and Pfaff, D. W. (1989): Effects of estrogen on LHRH mRNA content in preoptic neurons of female rats. Molecular Brain Research 6, 121-125. 73. Rosie, R., Thomson, E. and Fink, G. (1990): Oestrogen positive feedback stimulates the synthesis if LHRH mRNA in neurons of the rostral of the rat. Journal of Endocrinology 124(2), 285-289. 74. Greer, E. R., Caldwell, J. D., Johnson, M. F., Prange, A. J. Jr and Pederson, C. A. (1986): Variations in concentration of oxytocin and vasopressin in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus during the estrous cycle in rats. Life Science 38, 2311-2318. 75. Romano, G. J., Krust, A. and Pfaff, D. W. (1989): Expression and estrogen regulation of progesterone receptor mRNA in neurons of the mediobasal hypothalamus : An in situ hybridization study. Molecular Endocrinology 3(8), 1295-1300.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 60 76. Romano, G. J., Harlan, R. E., Shivers, B. D., Howells, R. D. and Pfaff, D. W. (1988): Estrogen increases mRNA levels in the ventromedial hypothalamus of the rat. Molecular Endocrinology. 2, 1320-1328.

77. Yoshinaga, K., Hawkins, R. A.and Stocker, J. F. (1969): Estrogen secretion by the rat ovary in vivo during the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Endocrinology 85, 103-112. 78. Richard, S. and Zingg, H. H. (1989): Positive regulation of the human oxytocin gene promoter by estrogens: identification of a functional estrogen- responsive element. Annls. Endocr. 50, 49N. 79. Waremourg, M. and Poulain, P. (1991): Presence of estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in the oxytocin- containing Magnocellular neurons projecting to the neurohypophysis in the Guinea-Pig. Neuroscience 40(1), 41-53. 80. Butcher, R. L., Collins, W. E. and Fugo, N. W.(1974): Plasma concentration of LH, FSH, prolactin, progesterone and estradiol-l7-B throughout the 4-day estrous cycle of the rat. Endocrinology 94, 1704-1708. 81. Barraclough, C. A., Collu, R., Massa, R. and Martini, L. (1971): Temporal interrelationships between plasma LH, ovarian secretion rates and peripheral plasma progestin concentrations in the rat: effects of nembutal and exogenous gonadotropins. Endocrinology 88, 1437-1447.

82. Goldman, B. D. , Kamberi, I. A., Sitteri, P. K., and Porter, J. C. (1969): Temporal relationship of progestin secretion, LH release and ovulation in rats. Endocrinology 85,1137-1143. 83. Nequin, L. G., Alvarez, J., and Schwartz, N. B. (1979): Measurement of serum steroid and gonadotropin levels and uterine and ovarian variables throughout 4-day and 5-day estrous cycles in the rat. Biol. Reprod. 20, 659-670. 84. Smith, M. S., Freeman, M. E. and Neill, J.D. (1975): The control of progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle and early pseudopregnancy in the rat: prolactin, gonadotropin and steroid levels associated with rescue of the of pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology 96,219-226.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 61 85. Gay, V. L., Midgley, A. R., Jr. and Niswender, G. D. (1970): Patterns of gonadotrophin secretion associated with ovulation. Fed.Proc. 29, 1880- 1887. 86. Hoffman, J. C.(1968): Effect of photoperiod on estrous cycle length in the rat. Endocrinology 83, 1355-1358. 87. Ban)cs, J. A., Midk, C. , and Freeman, M. E. (1980): A possible cause for the differing responses of the luteinizing hormone surge mechanism of ovariectomized rats to short term exposure to estradiol. Endocrinology 106, 1677-1681. 88. Banlcs, J. A. and Freeman, M. E. (1980): Inhibition of the daily LH release mechanism by progesterone acting at the hypothalamus. Biol. Reprod. 22, 217- 2 2 2 . 89. Everett, J. W. and Sawyer, C. H. (1950) : A 24-hour periodicity in the "LH-release apparatus” of female rats, disclosed by barbiturate sedation. Endocrinology 47, 198-298. 90. Shirley, B., Wo1insky, J. and Schwartz, N. B. (1968): Effect of a single injection of an estrogen antagonist on the estrous cycle of the rat. 82, 959-968. 91. Ferin, M., Tempone, A., Zimmer ing, P. E. and Vande Wiele, R. L. (1969); Effects of antibodies to 17 B- estradiol and progesterone on the estrous cycle of the rat. Endocrinology 85, 1070-1083.

92. Neill, J. D. Freeman, M. E. and Tillson, S. A. (1971): Control of the proestrus surge of prolacti and luteinizing hormone secretion by estrogens in the rat. Endocrinology 89, 1448-1453.

93. Schwartz, N. B. (1964): Acute effects of ovariectomy on pituitary LH, uterine weight, and vaginal cornification. Am. J. Physiol. 207, 1251- 1259.

94. Ely, c. A. and Schwartz, N. B. (1971): Elucidation of the role of luteinizing hormone in estrogen secretion and ovulation by use of antigonadotropic sera. Endocrinology 59, 1103-1108.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 62 95. Brown-Grant, K. and Naftolin, F. (1972): Facilitation of luteinizing hormone secretion in the female rat by progesterone. Journal of Endocrinology 53, 37-46. 96. Caligaris, L., Astrada, J. j. and Taleisnik, S. (1971): Biphasic effect of progesterone on the release of gonadotropin in rats. Endocrinology 89, 331-337.

97. Shivers, B. D., Harlan, R. E., Morel1, J. I. and Pfaff, D, W.(1983): absence of oestradiol concentration in cell nuclei of LHRH-immunoreactive neurones. Nature 304, 345-347. 98. McPherson, J., Costoff, A., Eldridge, J. and Mahesh, V. (1974): Effects of various progestational preparations on gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomized immature female rats. Fertil Steril 25, 1063-1070. 99. McPherson, J., C., Costoff, A. and Mahesh, V. B. (1975): Influence of estrogen-progesterone combinations on gonadotropin secretion in castrate female rats. Endocrinology 91, 771-779. 100. Kato, J. (1975): The role of hypothalamic and hypophyseal 5a-dihydrotestosterone, estradiol and progesterone receptors in the mechanism of feedbaclc action. J. Steroid Biochem 6, 979-988. 101. Kato, J., Onouchi and T., Okinaga, S. (1988): Hypothalamic and hypophysial progesterone receptors: estrogen-priming effect, differential localization, 5a-dihydroprogesterone binding, and nuclear receptors. J. Steroid Biochem 9, 419-427. 102. Burgus, R., Butcher, M., Amoss, M., Ling, N., Monahan, M., Rivier, J., Fellows, R., Blackwell, R., Vale, W. and Guillemin, R. (1972): Primary structure of the ovine hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing factor(LRF). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 278-282. 103. Fox, S. R,, Harlan, R., Shivers, B. and Pfaff, D. W. (1990): Chemical characterization of neuroendocrine targets for progesterone in the female rat brain and pituitary. Neuroendocrinology 51,276-283.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 63 104. Aiyer M. s. and Fink, G. (1974): The role of sex steroid hormones in modulating the responsiveness of the anterior pituitary gland to luteinizing hormone releasing factor in the female rat. Journal of Endocrinology 62, 553-572. 105. Fink, G. (1988): Gonadotropin secretion and its control. In: Knobil, E., Neill, J. eds. The physiology of reproduction. New York: Raven Press. 1349-1377. 106. Fink, G. and Henderson, S. R. (1977): Steroids and pituitary responsiveness in female, androgenized female and male rats. Journal of Endocrinology 73, 157-164. 107. Ortmann, O., Bmons, G., Knuppen, R. and Catt, K.J. (1978): Inhibitory effects of the antiprogestin, RU486, on progesterone actions and luteinizing hormone secretion in pituitary gonadotrophs. J. Steroid Biochem 32, 291-297. 108. Ortmann, O., Wiese, H., Knuppen, R. and Emons, G. (1989) : Acute facilitory action of progesterone on gonadotropin secretion of perfused rat pituitary cells. Acta Endocrinology 121, 426-434. 109. Calderon, J. J., Muldoon, T. G. and Mahesh, V. B.(1987): Receptor-mediated interrelationships between progesterone and estradiol action on the anterior pituitary-hypothalamic axis of the ovariectomized immature rat. Endocrinology 120, 2428-2435. 110. Attardi, B. and Happe, H. K. (1986): Modulation of the estradiol-induced LH surge by progesterone or antiestrogens: effects on pituitary gonadotropin- releasing hormone receptors. Endocrinology 119, 274-283. 111. Krey, L. and Kamel, F. (1990): Progesterone modulation of gonadotropin secretion by dispersed rat pituitary cells in culture. III. A23187, cAMP, phorbol ester and DiC8-stimulated luteinizing hormone release. Mol. Cell Endocrinology 70, 21- 29. 112. Mauvais-Jarvis, P., Kittenn, F. and Gompel, A. (1987): Antiestrogen action of progesterone in tissue. Hormone Research 28, 212-218.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 64 113. Evans, R, w. and Leavitt, W. W. (1980): Progesterone action in hamster uterus: rapid inhibition of ^H-estradiol retention by the nuclear fraction. Endocrinology 107, 1261-1263. 114. Mauvis-Jarvis, P. (1983): Progesterone and progestins: A general overview. In: Bardin, W., Milgrom, E. and Mauvais-Jarvis, P. eds. Progesterone and progestins. New York: Raven Press, 1983: 1-16. 115. Okulicz, W . , Evans, R. and Leavitt, W. (1981): Progesterone regulation of the occupied form of nuclear estrogen receptor. Science 213, 1503- 1505. 116. Evans, J. J . , Robinson G. and Catt, K. J. (1992): Luteinizing hormone response to oxytocin is steroid-dependent. Neuroendocrinology. 55, 538- 543. 117. Kônig, J. F. R. and Klippel, R. A., The Rat Brain: A Stereotaxic Atlas, Krieger, Huntington, New York, 1967. 118. Harms, P. G. and Ojeda, S. R. (1974): A rapid and simple procedure for chronic cannulation of the rat jugular vein. J. Appl. Physiol. 36, 391-392.

119. Samson, W. K. , Alexander, B. D., Skala, K. D., Huang, F-L. S. and Fulton, R. J. (1992): Ricin- Cytotoxin conjugate administration reveals a physiologically relevant role for oxytocin in the control of gonadotropin secretion. Ann-N-Y- Acad-Sci. 652, 422-422. 120. Johnston, C. A. and Van Waes, J. (1990): Neurohypophyseal hormones and reproductive hormone secretion. In: Johnston, C. A. and Barnes, C. D. eds. Brain-gut peptides and reproductive function. Florida CRC Press. 1990: 61-82. 121. Fink, G. (1988): Gonadotropin secretion and its control. In:Knobil, E. and Neil, J eds. The physiology of reproduction. New York, Raven Press. 1349-1377.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 65 122. Drouva, S. V., Gorenne, I., Loplae, E., Rerat, E., Enjalbert, A. and Kordon, c. (1990): Estradiol modulates protein kinase C activity in the rat pituitary in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology 126, 536-544. 123. Emons, G., Knuppen, R., Ball P. and Catt, K. J. (1984): Biphasic modulation of pituitary sensitivity to GnRH by estrogen: the effect of A- and D-ring substitution on LH release in cultured pituitary cells. Acta Endocrinol 107, 317-3 27. 124. Frawley, L. S. and Neil, J. D. (1984): Biphasic effects of estrogen on gonadotropin-releasing hormone induced luteinizing hormone release in monolayer cultures of rat and monkey pituitary cells. Endocrinology 114, 659-663.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.