Germination of Phyllospora Comosa, Hormosira Banksii and Ma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Germination of Phyllospora Comosa, Hormosira Banksii and Ma The effects of treated sewage effluent on three species of marine macroalgae A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Mary-Anne Shir B. Sc. (Hons) Sustainability Group Victoria University June 2004 STA THESIS 571.95298 SHI 30001007911011 Shir, Mary-Anne The effects of treated sewage effluent on three species of marine macroalgae Declaration This thesis is submitted in accordance with the regulations of Victoria University in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university and no material previously published or written by another person except where duly acknowledged or referenced. Mary-Aime Shir June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration i Acknowledgements ii Index of figures Hi Index of tables xvii Index of appendices xxiii List of abbreviations and definitions xxvii List of publications and conference presentations xxix Abstract xxx Chapter 1 - General Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Effluent discharge 1 1.1.2 Toxicity testing 2 1.1.3 Algal toxicity testing 4 1.2 Aims of this study 7 Chapter 2 - Materials and Methods 8 2.1 Collection 8 2.2 Test species and toxicity test endpoints 8 2.2.1 Phyllospora comosa 8 2.2.2 Hormosira banksii 10 2.2.3 Macrocystis angustifolia 11 2.2.4 Vibriofischeri 12 2.3 Dilution water 13 2.4 Test solutions 13 2.5 Data analysis 15 2.6 Specimen preparation for light and electron microscopy 16 2.6.1 Preparation of cultures 16 2.6.2 Fixative 16 2.6.3 Tissue preparation for light microscopy 16 2.6.4 Sample preparation for scarming electron microscopy 17 2.6.5 Sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy 18 2.7 Sectioning 18 2.7.1 Light microscopy 18 2.7.2 Transmission electron microscopy 19 2.8 Microscopy 19 2.8.1 Light microscopy 19 2.8.2 Scanning electron microscopy 19 2.8.3 Transmission electron microscopy .19 Chapter 3 - The effects of sewage effluent on germination of Phyllospora comosa, Hormosira banksii and Macrocystis angustifolia 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.1.1 Aims of this chapter 22 3.2 Results 23 3.2.1 Phyllospora comosa 23 3.2.2 Hormosira banksii 36 3.2.3 Macrocystis angustifolia 48 3.2.4 Sewage effluent and EC50 correlations 68 3.2.5 Test species sensitivity 69 3.3 Discussion 70 3.3.1 Relative sensitivity of test species 70 3.3.2 Temporal variability 73 3.3.3 Toxicity test endpoint comparisons 74 3.3.4 Treatment toxicity 75 3.3.5 Conclusion 76 Chapter 4 - The effects of sewage effluent on mortality of Phyllospora comosa and Hormosira banksii 77 4.1 Introduction 77 4.1.1 Aims of this chapter 79 4.2 Results 80 4.2.1 Phyllospora comosa 80 4.2.2 Hormosira banksii 93 4.2.3 Sewage effluent and EC50 correlations 105 4.2.4 Test species sensitivity 105 4.3 Discussion 106 4.3.1 Relative sensitivity of test species 106 4.3.2 Treatment toxicity 108 4.3.3 Conclusion 108 Chapter 5 - The effects of sewage effluent on growth of Phyllospora comosa and Hormosira banksii, and growth and reproduction of Macrocystis angustifolia 109 5.1 Introduction 109 5.1.1 Aims of this chapter 110 5.2 Results Ill 5.2.1 Phyllospora comosa Ill 5.2.2 Hormosira banksii 120 5.2.3 Macrocystis angustifolia 128 5.2.4 Sewage effluent and EC50 correlations 138 5.2.5 Test species sensitivity 138 5.3 Discussion 139 5.3.1 Relative sensitivity of test species 139 5.3.2 Temporal variability 141 5.3.3 Toxicity test endpoint comparisons 141 5.3.4 Treatment toxicity 142 5.3.5 Conclusion 143 Chapter 6 - The effects of sewage effluent on bioluminescence of Vibrio fischeri 144 6.1 Introduction 144 6.1.1 Aims of this chapter 145 6.2 Results 146 6.3 Discussion 150 6.3.1 Conclusion 151 Chapter 7 - The effects of sewage effluent on the morphology of Phyllospora comosa, Hormosira banksii and Macrocystis angustifolia 152 7.7 Introduction 152 7.1.1 Aims of this chapter 153 7.2 Results 154 7.2.1 Phyllospora comosa 154 7.2.2 Hormosira banksii 162 7.2.3 Macrocystis angustifolia 168 7.3 Discussion 171 7.3.1 Conclusion 173 Chapter 8-General Discussion 174 8.1 Conclusions 181 References 182 Appendix 1 200 Appendix 2: Tables of test NOEC, LOEC and EC50 values for Phyllospora comosa, Hormosira banksii and Macrocystic angustifolia germination bioassays and Macrocystis angustifolia germination and germination tube growth bioassays 201 Appendix 2.1 201 Appendix 2.2 202 Appendix 2.3 203 Appendix 2.4 204 Appendix 2.5 205 Appendix 2.6 206 Appendix 2.7 207 Appendix 2.8 208 Appendix 2.9 209 Appendix 2.10 210 Appendix 2.11 211 Appendix 2.12 212 Appendix 2.13 213 Appendix 2.14 214 Appendix 2.15 215 Appendix 2.16 216 Appendix 2.17 217 Appendix 2.18 218 Appendix 2.19 219 Appendix 2.20 220 Appendix 3: Tables of test NOEC, LOEC and LC50 values for Phyllospora comosa and Hormosira banksii mortality bioassays 221 Appendix 3.1 221 Appendix 3.2 222 Appendix 3.3 223 Appendix 3.4 224 Appendix 3.5 225 Appendix 3.6 226 Appendix 3.7 227 Appendix 3.8 228 Appendix 3.9 229 Appendix 3.10 230 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the encouragement and assistance of many people. I am sincerely grateful to the following: Dr Trevor Burridge for instigating my interest in marine ecotoxicology and motivating me throughout my candidature. My fellow research students who included Stuart Campbell, Juanita Bite and Sue Pascoe for their support and encouragement. Thanks also to all the laboratory technicians over the years who offered constant assistance. Jermy Stauber and fellow staff of CSIRO who provided fiinding for part of my research and gave invaluable feedback on manuscripts. Victoria University for financial support through an Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship. Timothy Lavery for all his patience, love and support. My family for all their understanding. List of Figures page Figure 2.1 Collection site of macroalgal species. 9 Figure 3.1 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to copper (a) and chromium (b) for 48 hours. 23 Figure 3.2 Response over time of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to copper (a) and chromium (b) for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 24 Figure 3.3 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified primary treated effluent. 26 Figure 3.4 Response over time of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) primary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 + 95% confidence intervals. 27 Figure 3.5 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified secondary treated effluent. 29 Figure 3.6 Response over time of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) secondary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 30 Figure 3.7 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified chlorinated secondary treated effluent. 32 Figure 3.8 Response over time of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) chlorinated secondary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 33 Figure 3.9 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to varying salinity. 34 Figure 3.10 Response over time of Phyllospora comosa zygotes exposed to treatments of reduced salinity for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 35 Figure 3.11 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to copper (a) and chromium (b) for 48 hours. 36 Figure 3.12 Response over time of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to copper (a) and chromium (b) for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 37 Figure 3.13 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified primary treated effluent. 39 Figure 3.14 Response over time of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) primary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95%) confidence intervals. 40 Figure 3.15 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified secondary treated effluent. 41 Figure 3.16 Response over time of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) secondary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 42 Figure 3.17 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to modified and unmodified chlorinated secondary treated effluent. 44 Figure 3.18 Response over time of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to unmodified (a) and modified (b) chlorinated secondary treated effluent for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95%) confidence intervals. 45 IV Figure 3.19 Germination (Mean ± Standard Error) of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to varying salinity. 46 Figure 3.20 Response over time of Hormosira banksii zygotes exposed to treatments of reduced salinity for 48 hours. EC50 + 95% confidence intervals. 47 Figure 3.21 Germination (± 95% confidence interval) of Macrocystis angustifolia spores exposed to copper (a) and chromium (b) for 48 hours. 49 Figure 3.22 Germination (a) and growth (b) response over time of Macrocystis angustifolia spores exposed to copper for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 50 Figure 3.23 Germination (a) and growth (b) response over time of Macrocystis angustifolia spores exposed to chromium for 48 hours. EC50 ± 95% confidence intervals. 51 Figure 3.24 Germination (± 95%) confidence interval) of Macrocystis angustifolia spores exposed to modified and unmodified primary treated effluent.
Recommended publications
  • Rock Lobster Hab Itat Assessment Figure 20. Nine Mile Reef Video
    36 Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment Figure 20. Nine Mile Reef video survey sites (see Table 4 for biota codes). a. NMR01a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. d. NMR03a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. b. NMR02a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. e. NMR05a high profile reef, sessile invertebrates. c. NMR03a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. f. NMR06a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment 37 g. NMR06a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. i. NMR09a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. h. NMR08a High profile reef, sessile j. NMR09a low profile reef. invertebrates. Figure 21. Nine Mile Reef video still images. Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment 38 Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment Figure 22. Torquay and Ocean Grove (western area) video survey sites (see Table 4 for biota codes). 39 40 Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment Figure 23. Torquay and Ocean Grove (eastern area) video survey sites (see Table 4 for biota codes). a. OGT05a low profile reef, sessile invertebrates. d. OGT12a patchy low profile reef, sessile invertebrates / E. radiata b. OGT06a patchy low profile reef. e. OGT16a low profile reef, E. radiata / Cystophora spp. c. OGT11a high profile reef, E. radiata. F. OGT17a sediment, A. antarctica. Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment 41 g. OGT18a patchy low profile reef, Cystophora j. OGT24a patchy low profile reef, sessile spp. invertebrates (Butterfly perch). h. OGT22a low profile reef, E. radiata / Cystophora k. OGT27a patchy low profile reef ‐ cobble. spp. i. OGT23a low profile reef, E. radiata. l. OGT30a patchy low profile reef, E. radiata. Rock Lobster Habitat Assessment 42 m. OGT32a low profile reef, Cystophora spp. p.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Products of Marine Macroalgae from South Eastern Australia, with Emphasis on the Port Phillip Bay and Heads Regions of Victoria
    marine drugs Review Natural Products of Marine Macroalgae from South Eastern Australia, with Emphasis on the Port Phillip Bay and Heads Regions of Victoria James Lever 1 , Robert Brkljaˇca 1,2 , Gerald Kraft 3,4 and Sylvia Urban 1,* 1 School of Science (Applied Chemistry and Environmental Science), RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (R.B.) 2 Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia 3 School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; [email protected] 4 Tasmanian Herbarium, College Road, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7015, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 January 2020; Accepted: 26 February 2020; Published: 28 February 2020 Abstract: Marine macroalgae occurring in the south eastern region of Victoria, Australia, consisting of Port Phillip Bay and the heads entering the bay, is the focus of this review. This area is home to approximately 200 different species of macroalgae, representing the three major phyla of the green algae (Chlorophyta), brown algae (Ochrophyta) and the red algae (Rhodophyta), respectively. Over almost 50 years, the species of macroalgae associated and occurring within this area have resulted in the identification of a number of different types of secondary metabolites including terpenoids, sterols/steroids, phenolic acids, phenols, lipids/polyenes, pheromones, xanthophylls and phloroglucinols. Many of these compounds have subsequently displayed a variety of bioactivities. A systematic description of the compound classes and their associated bioactivities from marine macroalgae found within this region is presented. Keywords: marine macroalgae; bioactivity; secondary metabolites 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Restricted Dispersal in Habitat-Forming Seaweed
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Highly restricted dispersal in habitat‑forming seaweed may impede natural recovery of disturbed populations Florentine Riquet1,2*, Christiane‑Arnilda De Kuyper3, Cécile Fauvelot1,2, Laura Airoldi4,5, Serge Planes6, Simonetta Fraschetti7,8,9, Vesna Mačić10, Nataliya Milchakova11, Luisa Mangialajo3,12 & Lorraine Bottin3,12 Cystoseira sensu lato (Class Phaeophyceae, Order Fucales, Family Sargassaceae) forests play a central role in marine Mediterranean ecosystems. Over the last decades, Cystoseira s.l. sufered from a severe loss as a result of multiple anthropogenic stressors. In particular, Gongolaria barbata has faced multiple human‑induced threats, and, despite its ecological importance in structuring rocky communities and hosting a large number of species, the natural recovery of G. barbata depleted populations is uncertain. Here, we used nine microsatellite loci specifcally developed for G. barbata to assess the genetic diversity of this species and its genetic connectivity among ffteen sites located in the Ionian, the Adriatic and the Black Seas. In line with strong and signifcant heterozygosity defciencies across loci, likely explained by Wahlund efect, high genetic structure was observed among the three seas (ENA corrected FST = 0.355, IC = [0.283, 0.440]), with an estimated dispersal distance per generation smaller than 600 m, both in the Adriatic and Black Sea. This strong genetic structure likely results from restricted gene fow driven by geographic distances and limited dispersal abilities, along with genetic drift within isolated populations. The presence of genetically disconnected populations at small spatial scales (< 10 km) has important implications for the identifcation of relevant conservation and management measures for G.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Sewage Effluents on Germination of Three Marine Brown Algal Macrophytes
    Mar: Freshwater Rex, 1996, 47, 1009-14 Effect of Sewage Effluents on Germination of Three Marine Brown Algal Macrophytes T. R. ~urrid~e*,T. portelliA and P. ~shton~ *~epartmentof Environmental Management, Kctoria University of Technology, PO Box 14428, MCMC, Vic. 3001, Australia. B~nvironmentaland Scient@c Consulting Services, Suite 1/10 Moorabool St, Geelong, Kc. 3220, Australia. Abstract. Inhibition of germination of zygotes of the fucoid macroalgae Hormosira banksii and Phyllospora comosa and zoospores of the laminarian Macrocystis angustifolia was used as an end-point to assess the toxicity of three sewage effluents of differing quality. For each species, between-assay variation was low and results of tests with the reference toxicant 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid suggested that results are reproducible, especially in R comosa. Each species showed a greater sensitivity to primary-treated effluent than to secondary-treated effluent, and higher variability in response to the primary effluent. High variation in response for each species when exposed to the primary effluent (compared with that for the secondary effluent) is presumably indicative of variation in quality of the primary effluent. The capacity to reproduce these assays, the sensitivity of species employed, and the ecological relevance of germination as a toxicological end-point suggest that germination tests of this nature may be useful in biological testing of effluent quality at discharge sites in south-eastem Australia. Introduction This laboratory study assesses the
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Antioxidant Activity in Victorian Marine Algal Extracts Using High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography and Multivariate Analysis
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Cherry - Repository of the Faculty of Chemistry; University of Belgrade Accepted Manuscript Title: Assessment of antioxidant activity in Victorian marine algal extracts using high performance thin-layer chromatography and multivariate analysis Author: Snezana Agatonovic-Kustrin David W. Morton Petar Ristivojevic´ PII: S0021-9673(16)31257-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2016.09.041 Reference: CHROMA 357913 To appear in: Journal of Chromatography A Received date: 6-8-2016 Revised date: 17-9-2016 Accepted date: 20-9-2016 Please cite this article as: Snezana Agatonovic-Kustrin, David W.Morton, Petar Ristivojevic,´ Assessment of antioxidant activity in Victorian marine algal extracts using high performance thin-layer chromatography and multivariate analysis, Journal of Chromatography A http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.09.041 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Assessment of antioxidant activity in Victorian marine algal extracts using high performance thin-layer chromatography and multivariate analysis Snezana Agatonovic-Kustrina, David W. Mortonb*, Petar Ristivojevićc aFaculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, 42300, Malaysia bSchool of Pharmacy and Applied Science, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Edwards Rd, Bendigo, 3550, Australia cInnovation Center of the Faculty of Chemistry Ltd, Studentski trg 12-16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia *Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History of Undaria Pinnatifida and Sargassum Filicinum at the California Channel Islands: Non-Native Seaweeds with Different Invasion Styles
    Pages 131–140 in Damiani, C.C. and D.K. Garcelon (eds.). 2009. Proceedings of 131 the 7th California Islands Symposium. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, CA. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF UNDARIA PINNATIFIDA AND SARGASSUM FILICINUM AT THE CALIFORNIA CHANNEL ISLANDS: NON-NATIVE SEAWEEDS WITH DIFFERENT INVASION STYLES KATHY ANN MILLER1 AND JOHN M. ENGLE2 1University Herbarium, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; [email protected] 2Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Abstract—The new millennium ushered in two prominent non-native subtidal seaweeds to southern California: Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales) and Sargassum filicinum Harvey (Fucales), both originally from Asia. Our long-term and widespread survey program provided the opportunity to document their establishment and dispersal at the Channel Islands. The two species exhibit very different invasion patterns. Undaria is well known for invading a broad spectrum of habitats throughout the world; however, California is the first region outside of Asia at which little-known S. filicinum has been reported. In 2001, Undaria was discovered at a single sheltered cove on the lee side of Santa Catalina Island, on a deep (24 m) soft sediment substrate. In subsequent years, it moved onto shallow subtidal rocky habitat, mixing with the Macrocystis kelp forest community. By 2004, it was well established at the primary site and was found at a second adjacent site. Surprisingly, our subsequent surveys at Santa Catalina Island and the other Channel Islands, as well as alerts to the diving community, have not yielded new populations, despite this species’ aggressive spread in harbors on the mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Ecology of the Globally Significant Kelp Ecklonia Radiata
    Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 2019, 57, 265–324 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF THE GLOBALLY SIGNIFICANT KELP ECKLONIA RADIATA THOMAS WERNBERG1*, MELINDA A. COLEMAN2*, RUSSELL C. BABCOCK3, SAHIRA Y. BELL1, JOHN J. BOLTON4, SEAN D. CONNELL5, CATRIONA L. HURD6, CRAIG R. JOHNSON6, EZEQUIEL M. MARZINELLI7,8,9, NICK T. SHEARS10, PETER D. STEINBERG8,9,11, MADS S. THOMSEN12, MAT A. VANDERKLIFT13, ADRIANA VERGÉS9,14, JEFFREY T. WRIGHT6 1UWA Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia 2Department of Primary Industries, NSW Fisheries, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia 3CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland BioSciences Precinct, St Lucia, Australia 4Biological Sciences Department and Marine Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa 5Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories, The Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 6Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia 7School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia 8 Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 9Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia 10Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 11Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia 12Centre
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Abundance of Rafting Algae and Its Associated Fauna Now and in a Future Ocean
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2017 Cut adrift: the distribution and abundance of rafting algae and its associated fauna now and in a future ocean Lauren Jean Cole University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Cole, Lauren Jean, Cut adrift: the distribution and abundance of rafting algae and its associated fauna now and in a future ocean, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Variation in the Phenotypically-Diverse Brown Alga Saccharina Japonica
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title DNA variation in the phenotypically-diverse brown alga Saccharina japonica Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5zg0s4gx Journal BMC Plant Biology, 12 Authors Balakirev, ES Krupnova, TN Ayala, FJ Publication Date 2012-07-11 DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-108 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Balakirev et al. BMC Plant Biology 2012, 12:108 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/12/108 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access DNA variation in the phenotypically-diverse brown alga Saccharina japonica Evgeniy S Balakirev1,2*, Tatiana N Krupnova3 and Francisco J Ayala1 Abstract Background: Saccharina japonica (Areschoug) Lane, Mayes, Druehl et Saunders is an economically important and highly morphologically variable brown alga inhabiting the northwest Pacific marine waters. On the basis of nuclear (ITS), plastid (rbcLS) and mitochondrial (COI) DNA sequence data, we have analyzed the genetic composition of typical Saccharina japonica (TYP) and its two common morphological varieties, known as the “longipes” (LON) and “shallow-water” (SHA) forms seeking to clarify their taxonomical status and to evaluate the possibility of cryptic species within S. japonica. Results: The data show that the TYP and LON forms are very similar genetically in spite of drastic differences in morphology, life history traits, and ecological preferences. Both, however, are genetically quite different from the SHA form. The two Saccharina lineages are distinguished by 109 fixed single nucleotide differences as well as by seven fixed length polymorphisms (based on a 4,286 bp concatenated dataset that includes three gene regions). The GenBank database reveals a close affinity of the TYP and LON forms to S.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Connectivity in Marine Macroalgae
    Population connectivity in marine macroalgae Halley Mary Stirling Durrant BSc (Hons), GradCertRes Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences University of Tasmania November 2015 Statements by the author Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Statement regarding published work contained in thesis The publishers of the papers comprising Chapters 2, 3 and 5 hold the copyright for that content, and access to the material should be sought from the respective journals. The remaining non-published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed Halley M.S. Durrant Date: 30th November 2015 i Statement of co-authorship The following people contributed to the publication of work undertaken as part of this thesis: Halley Durrant (Candidate), School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia Christopher
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Among Fragmented Populations of a Habitat-Forming Alga, Phyllospora Comosa (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) on an Urbanised Coast
    Vol. 381: 63–70, 2009 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 17 doi: 10.3354/meps07977 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Connectivity among fragmented populations of a habitat-forming alga, Phyllospora comosa (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) on an urbanised coast Melinda A. Coleman1, 2,*, Brendan P. Kelaher2, 3 1Center for Marine Bioinnovation, University of New South Wales, New South Wales 2052, Australia 2Batemans Marine Park, Department of Environment and Climate Change, Burrawang St., Narooma, New South Wales 2546, Australia 3Department of Environmental Sciences and Institute for Water and Environmental Resource Management, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia ABSTRACT: Despite a growing body of knowledge on the ecological consequences of loss and frag- mentation of habitat-forming macroalgae, little is known about the genetic implications of such losses. Here, we investigate the genetic consequences of fragmentation caused by the loss of the habitat-forming macroalga Phyllospora comosa from 70 km of urbanised coastline in Sydney, Aus- tralia. Contrary to predictions, there appeared to be substantial connectivity among fragmented pop- ulations, although spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that this may be an artifact of allele size homoplasy beyond scales of ~80 km. Genetic differentiation was not related to geographic separation of populations. This may be explained by the nature of prevailing currents (East Australian Current) that promote nonlinear dispersal in ‘leaps’, sourcing propagules from one area and depositing them via eddies that either come ashore or disperse. Populations that were tens of kilometers apart were often genetically different, which was likely due to barriers to dispersal, such as sandy beaches and mouths of estuaries, or rapid fertilization and recruitment of zygotes on small spatial scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Seaweeds to Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture in Southern Australia: Identifying and Investigating Suitable Native Species
    Application of seaweeds to integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in southern Australia: identifying and investigating suitable native species Kathryn. H. Wiltshire Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide June 2020 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................. II THESIS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... VIII DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................ X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. XI CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture and the South Australian context ............... 2 1.2 Potentially suitable native seaweeds ...................................................................... 7 1.3 Selection of candidate species for research .......................................................... 11 1.4 Assessing suitability for IMTA ................................................................................ 14 1.4.1 Feasibility of propagation and
    [Show full text]