DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Commons and the Law of the Sea an Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Commons and the Law of the Sea an Introduction Chapter 1 Global Commons and the Law of the Sea An Introduction Keyuan Zou Introduction According to the United Nations Environment Programme (unep), “the ‘Global Commons’ refers to resource domains or areas that lie outside of the political reach of any one nation State. Thus international law identifies four global commons namely: the High Seas; the Atmosphere; Antarctica; and, Outer Space.”1 This traditional definition has been used both in academia and state practice. For example, the book on global commons written by Susan Buck uses this definition and includes Antarctica, oceans, atmosphere and outer space for her discussion.2 The term global commons has a close relation- ship with the term ‘public goods’. It is also related to the corresponding terms in international law/relations such as ‘common interest’, ‘common concern’, and ‘common heritage’. Recently, China has advocated to establish a ‘Community of Common Destiny’ at the international level,3 and it may provide some useful reference to the global commons and their governance. It is admitted that the concept of ‘global commons’ is a living concept and can accommodate, over time, other commons at the international level, such as biodiversity and generic resources. It is argued that the ecosystems, biomes and processes that regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth system (e.g. carbon cycle) are also global commons.4 In the maritime domain, it is generally 1 unep, ‘IEG of the Global Commons’, available at http://staging.unep.org/ delc/ GlobalCommons/ tabid/ 54404/ Default.aspx. 2 For details, see Susan J. Buck, The Global Commons: An Introduction, Washington dc: Island Press, 1998. 3 See ‘Li Keqiang: To Construct a Community of Common Destiny Featuring Common Ideals, Common Prosperity, and Common Responsibility’, 14 November 2017, available at http:// www.fmprc.gov.cn/ mfa_ eng/ zxxx_ 662805/ t1510689.shtml. 4 See N. Nakicenovic, J. Rockstrom, O. Gaffney and C. Zimm, Global Commons in the Anthropocene: World Development on a Stable and Resilient Planet, iiasa Working Paper, October 2016. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2018 | DOI:10.1163/ 9789004373334_ 002 2 Zou recognized that in addition to high seas and Antarctica, the international sea- bed is also a visible global commons. The situation of global marine commons is not that optimistic in that fishery resources continue to deplete, marine biodiversity continue to reduce, and plastic wastes in the oceans continue to increase. Based on the above, global commons in this book refer to global marine commons including high seas, international seabed area, polar regions, and marine generic resources. Moreover, the book also discusses some related themes including, inter alia, the principle of common heritage of mankind, climate change, fisheries conservation, and marine environmental protection. In international law, there are legal regimes governing global marine com- mons. A most important global treaty is the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (losc), which came into effect in 1994.5 It governs the high seas, international seabed and its resources, marine environmental protection, and fisheries. According to the losc, the high seas are open to all States, whether coastal or land- locked. Freedom of the high seas is exercised under the conditions laid down by the Convention and by other rules of inter- national law and comprises, inter alia, freedom of navigation, freedom of over- flight, freedom to lay submarine cables and pipelines, freedom to construct artificial islands and other installations permitted under international law, freedom of fishing, and freedom of scientific research.6 The high seas should be reserved for peaceful purposes, and no State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty.7 States are encouraged to cooper- ate with each other in the conservation and management of living resources in the areas of the high seas. States whose nationals exploit identical living resources, or different living resources in the same area, shall enter into negoti- ations with a view to taking the measures necessary for the conservation of the living resources concerned. They shall, as appropriate, cooperate to establish subregional or regional fisheries organizations to this end.8 As to the international seabed area (the Area), the losc defines it and its resources as the common heritage of mankind.9 No State shall claim or exer- cise sovereignty or sovereign rights over any part of the Area or its resources, nor shall any State or natural or juridical person appropriate any part thereof. All rights in the resources of the Area are vested in mankind as a whole, on 5 Text is available at http:// www.un.org/ depts/ los/ convention_ agreements/ texts/ unclos/ closindx.htm. As of December 2017, there were 168 signatories to the Convention. 6 Article 87 of the losc. 7 Articles 88– 89 of the losc. 8 Articles 117– 119 of the losc. 9 Article 136 of the losc..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Realized Benefits from Bioprospecting in the Wake of the Convention on Biological Diversity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 47 Intellectual Property: From Biodiversity to Technical Standards 2015 The Realized Benefits from Bioprospecting in the Wake of the Convention on Biological Diversity James S. Miller Missouri Botanical Garden Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Environmental Law Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation James S. Miller, The Realized Benefits from Bioprospecting in the Wake of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 47 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 051 (2015), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol47/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Realized Benefits from Bioprospecting in the Wake of the Convention on Biological Diversity James S. Miller MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN In the mid-1980s, the convergence of several technological advances led to a serious resurgence of interest in surveying plant species for drug development. The emergence of methods to miniaturize in-vitro bioassays (a test used to quantify the biological effect of a chemical compound or extract against a specific disease target) run the bioassays with robotic equipment, and isolate and identify active compounds with a speed and precision never before possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas
    LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas LAND-USE, LAND-COVER CHANGES AND BIODIVERSITY LOSS Helena Freitas University of Coimbra, Portugal Keywords: land use; habitat fragmentation; biodiversity loss Contents 1. Introduction 2. Primary Causes of Biodiversity Loss 2.1. Habitat Degradation and Destruction 2.2. Habitat Fragmentation 2.3. Global Climate Change 3. Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation 3.1. General 3.2. The European Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 4. Conclusions Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary During Earth's history, species extinction has probably been caused by modifications of the physical environment after impacts such as meteorites or volcanic activity. On the contrary, the actual extinction of species is mainly a result of human activities, namely any form of land use that causes the conversion of vast areas to settlement, agriculture, and forestry, resulting in habitat destruction, degradation, and fragmentation, which are among the most important causes of species decline and extinction. The loss of biodiversity is unique among the major anthropogenic changes because it is irreversible. The importance of preserving biodiversity has increased in recent times. The global recognition of the alarming loss of biodiversity and the acceptance of its value resultedUNESCO in the Convention on Biologi – calEOLSS Diversity. In addition, in Europe, the challenge is also the implementation of the European strategy for biodiversity conservation and agricultural policies, though it is increasingly recognized that the strategy is limitedSAMPLE by a lack of basic ecological CHAPTERS information and indicators available to decision makers and end users. We have reached a point where we can save biodiversity only by saving the biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bioprospecting: Can Indigenous Populations Benefit from the Search for Pharmaceuticals in Areas of High Biodiversity
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses Environmental Studies Program Spring 5-2011 Understanding Bioprospecting: Can Indigenous Populations Benefit from the Search for Pharmaceuticals in Areas of High Biodiversity Emily Schwindt University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Place and Environment Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Disclaimer: The following thesis was produced in the Environmental Studies Program as a student senior capstone project. Schwindt, Emily, "Understanding Bioprospecting: Can Indigenous Populations Benefit from the Search for Pharmaceuticals in Areas of High Biodiversity" (2011). Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses. 46. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. UNDERSTANDING BIOPROSPECTING:
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Among Biodiversity Dimensions of Birds in Nebraska Nadejda Mirochnitchenko University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of Fall 12-2018 Relationships Among Biodiversity Dimensions of Birds in Nebraska Nadejda Mirochnitchenko University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Ornithology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Mirochnitchenko, Nadejda, "Relationships Among Biodiversity Dimensions of Birds in Nebraska" (2018). Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources. 275. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss/275 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BIODIVERSITY DIMENSIONS OF BIRDS IN NEBRASKA by Nadejda Anatolievna Mirochnitchenko A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Natural Resource Sciences Under the Supervision of Professors Erica F. Stuber and Joseph J. Fontaine Lincoln, Nebraska December 2018 RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BIODIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Genetic Resources As Commons: the Model of Fao’S International Treaty
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES AS COMMONS: THE MODEL OF FAO’S INTERNATIONAL TREATY Dr. María Iglesias Introduction After almost 7 years of negotiations, the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (hereinafter ITPGRFA) was adopted in November 20011. The Treaty already recognises in its Preamble that plant genetic resources for food and agriculture are a common concern of all countries, in that all countries depend very largely on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture that originated elsewhere. Thus, the main objectives of the ITPGRFA are the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (hereinafter PGRFAs) and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use, in harmony with the Convention on Biological Diversity, for sustainable agriculture and food security2. Although the Treaty covers all PGRs3, it establishes an international commons pool, the so called multilateral system, only for certain kinds of resources that will guarantee the access to these resources and the sharing of benefits 1 The ITPGRFA entered in to force in June 2004. In December 2008, 119 states had ratified it. 2 Art. 1. The ITPGRFA may be considered in fact as a special application of art. 15 (Access to Genetic Resources) of the Convention on Biological Diversity: “1. Recognizing the sovereign rights of States over their natural resources, the authority to determine access to genetic resources rests with the national governments and is subject to national legislation. 2. Each Contracting Party shall endeavour to create conditions to facilitate access to genetic resources for environmentally sound uses by other Contracting Parties and not to impose restrictions that run counter to the objectives of this Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Commons: Between Cooperation and Competition by Gerald Stang
    17 2013 Photo by NASA / Rex Features (1568628a) Features / Rex NASA by Photo Global commons: Between cooperation and competition by Gerald Stang Rapid economic development and increasing inter- What exactly are the global commons? national trade are leading to a more crowded interna- tional stage and raising new challenges in the ‘global Security analysts generally identify four domains as commons’ – those domains that are not under the global commons: high seas, airspace, outer space control or jurisdiction of any state but are open for use and, now, cyberspace. From a security perspective, by countries, companies and individuals from around the primary concern is safeguarding ‘access’ to these the world. Their management involves increasingly domains for commercial and military reasons. complex processes to accommodate and integrate the interests and responsibilities of states, international It is important to highlight that this language differs organisations and a host of non-state actors. from the discourse on commons developed by envi- ronmental analysts: their arguments focus on dam- Shared rules regarding the usage of - and access to age to the ‘condition’ of the commons from overuse - the global commons encourage their peaceful and by actors who do not have to pay direct costs. They cooperative use. Over the last seven decades, the US worry about the depletion of shared resources such as has led in the creation of a liberal international order ocean fish stocks, or the damage to shared domains which has attempted to define these rules in such a such as Antarctica or the atmosphere. way as to make it easier and more beneficial to join the order and follow the rules than it does to operate A third strand of analysis looks not at the need for outside of (or undermine) it.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: the Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office
    Gulati: The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: The Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office Note The "Tragedy of the Commons" in Plant Genetic Resources: The Need for a New International Regime Centered Around an International Biotechnology Patent Office Chetan Gulati- The last several centuries have seen a transformation in the ways in which wealth is generated. As society has transformed itself in the post- industrial era, "knowledge" and "information," as opposed to land and physical property, have increasingly become the primary sources of wealth generation.1 For example, historically, it was ownership of the forest that was the principal channel for the derivation of riches. Today it is the possession of the patent in the pharmaceutical product derived from the leaves of the trees of the very same forest that is the fountain from which the greatest wealth springs. It is not surprising, therefore, that the strategy of wealth maximization has shifted from the desire to accumulate physical property to one in which the domination2 of intellectual property rights ("IPRs") has become preeminent. As already alluded to, the products derived from plant genetic resources ("PGRs")3 are major sources of wealth generation for developed t J.D., Yale Law School, expected 2002. I am grateful to Professor Gideon Parchomovsky for his guidance and valuable commentary. I should also thank my colleagues at the Yale Law School, especially Saema Somalya, Jean Tom and the other editors of the Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, without whose constant challenge to my ideas, this project would never have come to fruition.
    [Show full text]
  • Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings
    Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings OSHA 3430-04 2011 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards-related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibili- ties which are set forth in OSHA standards, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. More- over, because interpretations and enforcement poli- cy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements, the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory- impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877- 889-5627. Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings Occupational Safety and Health Administration U.S. Department of Labor OSHA 3430-04 2011 The guidance is advisory in nature and informational in content. It is not a standard or regulation, and it neither creates new legal obligations nor alters existing obligations created by OSHA standards or the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Digital Commons: from Common-Pool Resources to Community Governance Melanie Dulong De Rosnay, Hervé Le Crosnier
    An Introduction to the Digital Commons: From Common-Pool Resources to Community Governance Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Hervé Le Crosnier To cite this version: Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Hervé Le Crosnier. An Introduction to the Digital Commons: From Common-Pool Resources to Community Governance. Building Institutions for Sustain- able Scientific, Cultural and genetic Resources Commons, Sep 2012, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. http://biogov.uclouvain.be/iasc/index.php?page=fullpapers. halshs-00736920 HAL Id: halshs-00736920 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00736920 Submitted on 30 Sep 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. An Introduction to the Digital Commons: From Common-Pool Resources to Community Governance Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, Institute for Communication Sciences of CNRS, Paris Hervé Le Crosnier, University of Caen and Institute for Communication Sciences of CNRS, Paris Abstract This article proposes an introductory analysis of digital resources and commons-based peer production online communities with the framework of the common pool-resources. Trying to go beyond the classic economy dichotomy between physical resources scarcity and informational resources reproducibility, the approach allows to focus not only on the nature of the resources, but mostly on the governance by the communities to produce resources which remain available for all to share and build upon, while avoiding risks of pollution, degradation, underuse or enclosure by the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Brochure
    THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Water What Can You Do? AND PLANNING AGENCY Jamaica, as a small mountainous island, is particu- • Dispose of and store chemicals properly larly vulnerable to the effects of water pollution. Pol- • Learn more about the proper disposal of waste Pollution luted water adversely affects coastal and marine en- • Get involved in environmental action groups vironments. Some sources of water pollution include: • Reduce noise Is Our Concern • Report offensive odours and emissions from • Sewage effluent (treated and untreated) factories and commercial sites Surface run off from agricultural sources which • • Do not burn your garbage may carry solid waste and dissolved chemicals • Do not throw garbage into gullies, drains and such as pesticides rivers • Oil pollution from off shore oil spills, drilling, • Reduce, reuse and recycle tanker washing and industrial effluent Air Pollution Noise Frequent exposure to high levels of noise can cause Land pollution headaches, high level of stress and temporary or Managing & protecting Jamaica’s permanent deafness. Sleep as well as concentration land, wood & water can be affected by noise. Some sources of noise pollution include: For further information contact The Public Education and Corporate • Loud music and talking Communication Branch of National Environment and Planning Agency • Honking horns (NEPA) • Industrial activity (factory noise) 10 & 11 Caledonia Avenue, Kingston 5 Water pollution • Low flying aeroplanes and motor vehicles Tel: 754-7540, Fax: 754-7595/6 What is Environmental Pollution ? Toll free: 1-888-991-5005 Environmental pollution may be defined as; the contamination Email: [email protected] of the environment by man through substances or energy Website: www.nepa.gov.jm which may cause harm or discomfort to humans, other living organisms and ecological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions of Land and Water in Europe
    Name Date Interactions of Land and Water in Europe Read the following passage two times. Read once for understanding. As you read the second time, underline or highlight each proper name of a physical feature of Europe. The interactions of land and water in Europe have shaped the geography of Europe. These interactions have also shaped the lives of the people who live there. The continent of Europe is nearly 10,359,952 square kilometers (4,000,000 square miles). Its finger-like peninsulas extend into the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans and the Baltic and Mediterranean Seas. The oceans and seas lie to the north, south, and west of the continent. Only the eastern edge of the continent is landlocked. It is firmly attached to its larger neighbor, Asia, along Russia and Kazakhstan’s low Ural Mountain range. Mountains, rivers, and seacoasts dominate the landscape from north to south and east to west. Europe is the only continent with no large deserts. The Scandinavian Peninsula and islands of Great Britain are partially covered with eroded mountains laced with fjords and lakes carved out by ancient glaciers. The northern edge of Europe lies in the frozen, treeless tundra biome. But forests once covered more than 80 percent of the continent. Thousands of years of clearing the land for farming and building towns and cities has left only a few large forest areas remaining in Scandinavia, Germany, France, Spain, and Russia. Warm, wet air from the Atlantic Ocean allowed agriculture, or farming, to thrive in chilly northern Europe. This is especially true on the North European Plain, which stretches all the way from France and southern England to Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaseplan Partners with Land Life Company to Help Make Every Trip Carbon Neutral
    LeasePlan partners with Land Life Company to help make every trip carbon neutral Geneva and Amsterdam, 13 September 2018: LeasePlan Corporation N.V., a global leader in Car-as-a-Service, has signed an agreement at the Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco with Land Life Company, a leading nature restoration venture, to help LeasePlan customers make their trips carbon neutral. Under the partnership, LeasePlan customers will be able to offset their fleet emissions through Land Life Company’s innovative reforestation programme. Land Life Company is a leader in the sustainable and technology-driven reforestation of degraded land in the EU and US. LeasePlan has committed to offsetting carbon emissions from its employee fleet until 2021, when the company’s employee fleet is scheduled to be completely electric. LeasePlan is also targeting net zero emissions from its serviced fleet by 2030. The announcement comes as business leaders meet in San Francisco to discuss the next steps in the global fight against climate change. Tex Gunning, CEO of LeasePlan, said: “Cutting emissions will not be enough to keep global warming in check. Greenhouse gases must also be scrubbed from the air. By partnering with Land Life Company, we can offer our customers the opportunity to make every one of their trips carbon neutral. Collectively, we have a carbon debt that needs to be repaid and, with 1.8 million vehicles on the road, we can make a big and positive impact to the climate change challenge.” Land Life Company’s CEO, Jurriaan Ruys, said: “Through reforestation, we have an opportunity to take CO2 out of the air and rebuild the planet, addressing two of the world’s most significant challenges – climate change and land degradation – at the same time.
    [Show full text]