DOCSLIB.ORG

Hate Speech, Racism and Other Discriminatory Behaviour in Sport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hate Speech, Racism and Other Discriminatory Behaviour in Sport STANDING COMMITTEE (T-RV) EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON SPECTATOR VIOLENCE AND MISBEHAVIOUR AT SPORT EVENTS AND IN PARTICULAR AT FOOTBALL MATCHES Strasbourg, 27 August 2020 T-RV(2020)6 Hate speech, racism and other discriminatory behaviour in sport Report of the topical tour de table of the 48th T-RV meeting (Strasbourg, 5-6 June 2019) Prepared by the Secretariat Adopted by written procedure T-RV(2020)6 Table of Contents 1. Background ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Work of the Council of Europe ............................................................................................ 6 i) PACE… ...........................................................................................................................................6 ii) European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ...............................................................................9 iii) European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) ............................................14 iv) «No Hate Speech Movement» Youth Campaign .......................................................................16 3. Update by States Parties, Observers and guests ............................................................... 21 i) Austria …………………………………………………………………………………………...22 ii) Azerbaijan .....................................................................................................................................23 iii) Belgium .........................................................................................................................................23 iv) Bulgaria .........................................................................................................................................24 v) Croatia ...........................................................................................................................................24 vi) Cyprus …………………………………………………………………………………………...24 vii) Czech Republic .............................................................................................................................24 viii) Estonia ...........................................................................................................................................24 ix) Finland ..........................................................................................................................................25 x) France. ...........................................................................................................................................25 xi) Germany .......................................................................................................................................28 xii) Greece. ...........................................................................................................................................29 xiii) Italy………………………………………………………………………………………………30 xiv) Lithuania .......................................................................................................................................30 xv) Monaco ..........................................................................................................................................31 xvi) Netherlands ...................................................................................................................................31 xvii) Norway ..........................................................................................................................................32 xviii) Portugal .........................................................................................................................................32 xix) Poland. ...........................................................................................................................................32 xx) Romania ........................................................................................................................................33 xxi) Russian Federation.......................................................................................................................33 xxii) Serbia.. ...........................................................................................................................................33 xxiii) Slovakia .........................................................................................................................................34 xxiv) Slovenia .........................................................................................................................................35 xxv) Spain……………………………………………………………………………………………...35 xxvi) Sweden...........................................................................................................................................35 2 T-RV(2020)6 xxvii) Switzerland .................................................................................................................................36 xxviii) Turkey ........................................................................................................................................36 xxix) United Kingdom ...........................................................................................................................36 4. Update by Observers ........................................................................................................... 37 i) Georgia ..........................................................................................................................................37 ii) Israel… ..........................................................................................................................................38 iii) Centre for Access to Football in Europe (CAFE) ......................................................................39 iv) Football Supporters Europe (FSE) .............................................................................................39 v) Supporters Direct Europe (SD Europe) .....................................................................................39 vi) UEFA… .........................................................................................................................................40 vii) FIFA……………………………………………………………………………………………...41 5. Update by Guests ................................................................................................................. 41 i) European Group of Safety and Security Experts (Think Tank)..............................................41 6. Future steps .......................................................................................................................... 42 7. Appendixes ........................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix 1 - Programme - Tour de table on racism and discrimination in sport…. .......... 43 Appendix 2 - Council of Europe - Inclusion and Anti-Discrimination programmes - Mission statement .............................................................................................................. 44 Appendix 3 - Council of Europe’s “No Hate Speech Movement” Youth Campaign ............ 46 Appendix 4 - Council of Europe - Conclusions of the Evaluation Conference of the No Hate Speech Movement Youth Campaign ................................................................. 54 Appendix 5 - Contribution from Belgium ................................................................................ 58 Appendix 6 - Contribution from France ................................................................................... 94 Appendix 7 - UEFA Safety and Security Regulations (edition 2019) ................................... 105 Appendix 8 - Contribution from FIFA .................................................................................... 109 Appendix 9 - Links to relevant sources ................................................................................... 111 3 T-RV(2020)6 1. Background Fighting all types of discrimination and hate speech has been and will continue to be one of the Council of Europe priorities and challenges, since it undermines the core values of democratic societies. The European Convention on Spectator Violence (ETS No. 120), or T-RV Convention, from 1985, in its Article 1 (Aim of the Convention), paragraph 1, establishes a positive obligation for the States Parties to prevent and fight against violence and misbehaviour: “The Parties, with a view to preventing and controlling violence and misbehaviour by spectators at football matches, undertake, within the limits of their respective constitutional provisions, to take the necessary steps to give effect to the provisions of this Convention”. Furthermore, Article 3 (Measures), paragraph 1, stresses the need to bring this positive obligation into practice: “The Parties undertake to ensure the formulation and implementation of measures designed to prevent and control violence and misbehaviour by spectators”. The topic of hate speech and discrimination was always a matter of concern both for the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, in particular, in the case of sports events, since the adoption of the T-RV Convention. The PACE, recalling the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the T-RV Convention, adopted in 1999 an innovative Recommendation on football hooliganism - Recommendation 1434 (1999). This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement by Alice Wairimu Nderitu, United Nations Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, on the Continued Deterioration of the Situation in Ethiopia
    UNITED NATIONS PRESS RELEASE For immediate release Statement by Alice Wairimu Nderitu, United Nations Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, on the continued deterioration of the situation in Ethiopia (New York, 30 July 2021) The Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide, Alice Wairimu Nderitu, expressed alarm at the continued deterioration of ethnic violence in Ethiopia and at the strong allegations of serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law in the Tigray region as well as in other parts of the country, including in Afar, Somali, Oromo and Amhara regions. The Special Adviser also reiterated concerns expressed in her 5 February 2021 statement on the situation in the country. Since the beginning of the conflict in the Tigray region, the Special Adviser has continued to receive reports of serious human rights violations and abuses, including alleged sexual violence, recruitment of child soldiers, arbitrary arrests and ethnic based targeted killings committed by all parties, which have now escalated to other parts of the country. She also deplored the erosion of rule of law and echoed the recent call by the Human Rights Council for an immediate end to the violence and human rights violations in Tigray. The Special Adviser also condemned inflammatory statements used by top political leaders and associated armed groups. The use of pejorative and dehumanizing language like “cancer”, “devil”, “weed” and “bud” to refer to the Tigray conflict is of utmost concern. Hate speech, together with its propagation through social media is part of a worrisome trend that contributes to further fuel ethnic tensions in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • An Agenda for Fairness and Unity
    An Agenda for Fairness and Unity A proactive plan for fairness and unity in our communities, politics, the economy and the law TK THE COMPACT FOR RACIAL JUSTICE T K TABLE OF CONTENTS T K T 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PREAMBLE 5 BUSH OVERVIEW Dominique Apollon: Director of Research, Applied Research Center 10 CIVIL RIGHTS Karin Wang, Esq.:Vice-President, Programs, Asian Pacific American Legal Center Vincent Eng: Deputy Director, Asian American Justice Center 14 BIOTECHNOLOGY Sujatha Jesudason, PhD: Executive Director of Generations Ahead 18 CRIMINAL JUSTICE Ashley Nellis: The Sentencing Project Judy Greene: Policy Analyst, Justice Strategies Patricia Allard: Justice Strategies Tanya Krupat: Program Director, N.Y. Initiative for Children of Incarcerated Parents, The Osborne Association Angelyn Frazer: Families Against Mandatory Minimums 23 GREEN ECONOMIES Van Jones: Founder and President of Green for All 27 HEALTHCARE LeeAnn Hall: Executive Director, Northwest Federation of Community Organizations 31 EDUCATION Tammy Johnson: Director of Strategic Partnerships, Applied Research Center 36 ECONOMY Amaad Rivera: Racial Wealth Divide Director, United for a Fair Economy 40 IMMIGRATION Rinku Sen: President & Executive Director, Applied Research Center Seth Wessler: Research Associate, Applied Research Center TK IN T THE COMPACT FOR RACIAL JUSTICE T RODU INTRODUCTION K T K T The Compact for Racial Justice is a proactive agenda for fairness and unity in our communities, politics, the CT economy and the law. It offers concrete strategies and proposals to reverse racial disparities and move our society towards full equity, inclusion and dignity for all people. The Compact transcends talk of personal prejudice ION with compelling evidence of institutional racism and realistic proactive solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech
    UNITED NATIONS STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION ON HATE SPEECH Foreword Around the world, we are seeing a disturbing groundswell of xenophobia, racism and intolerance – including rising anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim hatred and persecution of Christians. Social media and other forms of communication are being exploited as platforms for bigotry. Neo-Nazi and white supremacy movements are on the march. Public discourse is being weaponized for political gain with incendiary rhetoric that stigmatizes and dehumanizes minorities, migrants, refugees, women and any so-called “other”. This is not an isolated phenomenon or the loud voices of a few people on the fringe of society. Hate is moving into the mainstream – in liberal democracies and authoritarian systems alike. And with each broken norm, the pillars of our common humanity are weakened. Hate speech is a menace to democratic values, social stability and peace. As a matter of principle, the United Nations must confront hate speech at every turn. Silence can signal indifference to bigotry and intolerance, even as a situation escalates and the vulnerable become victims. Tackling hate speech is also crucial to deepen progress across the United Nations agenda by helping to prevent armed conflict, atrocity crimes and terrorism, end violence against women and other serious violations of human rights, and promote peaceful, inclusive and just societies. Addressing hate speech does not mean limiting or prohibiting freedom of speech. It means keeping hate speech from escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence, which is prohibited under international law. The United Nations has a long history of mobilizing the world against hatred of all kinds through wide-ranging action to defend human rights and advance the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar
    Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar October 2020 About Us This report was written based on the information and data collection, monitoring, analytical insights and experiences with hate speech by civil society organizations working to reduce and/or directly af- fected by hate speech. The research for the report was coordinated by Burma Monitor (Research and Monitoring) and Progressive Voice and written with the assistance of the International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School while it is co-authored by a total 19 organizations. Jointly published by: 1. Action Committee for Democracy Development 2. Athan (Freedom of Expression Activist Organization) 3. Burma Monitor (Research and Monitoring) 4. Generation Wave 5. International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School 6. Kachin Women’s Association Thailand 7. Karen Human Rights Group 8. Mandalay Community Center 9. Myanmar Cultural Research Society 10. Myanmar People Alliance (Shan State) 11. Nyan Lynn Thit Analytica 12. Olive Organization 13. Pace on Peaceful Pluralism 14. Pon Yate 15. Progressive Voice 16. Reliable Organization 17. Synergy - Social Harmony Organization 18. Ta’ang Women’s Organization 19. Thint Myat Lo Thu Myar (Peace Seekers and Multiculturalist Movement) Contact Information Progressive Voice [email protected] www.progressivevoicemyanmar.org Burma Monitor [email protected] International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School [email protected] https://hrp.law.harvard.edu Acknowledgments Firstly and most importantly, we would like to express our deepest appreciation to the activists, human rights defenders, civil society organizations, and commu- nity-based organizations that provided their valuable time, information, data, in- sights, and analysis for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinonline (PDF)
    Citation: 29 Const. Comment. 31 2013-2014 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Jul 31 13:36:18 2014 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0742-7115 Book Reviews RACE MATTERS SHOULD RACE MATTER?: UNUSUAL ANSWERS TO THE USUAL QUESTIONS. By David Boonin. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2011. Pp. vii + 441. $99.00 (cloth), $34.99 (paper). Larry Alexander & Maimon Schwarzschild One frequently hears that America has a race problem. We agree, but the race problem we identify is not what is usually meant by those who invoke it. It is not discrimination, intentional or otherwise, but rather obsession with race that is America's more consequential "race problem" today. America has vanquished slavery, segregation, and long-standing racial discrimination only to succumb to an almost equally destructive race obsession. Despite the biological arbitrariness of dividing a single, interbreeding biological species into "races," despite the sorry history legally and socially of the use of race, and despite the Civil Rights Movement's original ambition to substitute the content of character for the color of skin as the basis of decision making, America today is in many ways as race conscious as it was in the era of Jim Crow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Racist Hate Speech and Its Evolution Over Time
    The Concept of Racist Hate Speech and its Evolution over time Paper presented at the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination’s day of thematic discussion on Racist Hate Speech 81st session, 28 August 2012, Geneva Nazila Ghanea Racism has long-plagued human society and, left unheeded, it risks growing as a cancerous tumour through our societies blighting the lives of individuals and communities. The purpose of this short paper is to give attention to the concept of racist hate speech and particularly to the fact of its complexity and inseparability from a wider spectrum of hatred. Using the methodology of intersectionality, this paper encourages the CERD Committee’s continued but cautious engagement in this field. Section I: The backdrop of Freedom of Expression and Incitement Freedom of expression and incitement in human rights instruments Before turning our attention to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) and racist hate speech, it is worthwhile to situate hate speech more generally within other international instruments. We may rhetorically situate racist hate speech within ‘Article 19 ½’ of the ICCPR, between freedom of opinion and expression and incitement. We will give attention to this framework of freedom of expression and the prohibition of incitement within the ICCPR, before turning to the question of hate speech itself. The texts of Articles 191 and 202 of the ICCPR bear testament to the fact that although freedom of expression is “one of the most widely accepted rights”,3 it is not an absolute right and there are prohibitions and limitations attached to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crime and Hate Speech in Europe: Comprehensive Analysis of International Law Principles, EU-Wide Study and National Assessments
    Hate Crime and Hate Speech in Europe: Comprehensive Analysis of International Law Principles, EU-wide Study and National Assessments This report was produced within the framework of the project "PRISM - Preventing, Redressing and Inhibiting hate speech in new Media”, co-funded by the European Union and coordinated by Associazione Arci Disclaimer The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors. 2 Table of Contents Executive Overview…………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Repression of Hate Speech: Its Foundations in International and European law……….5 Comparative Analysis: Legislation and Existing Legal Procedures for addressing Hate Crime and Hate Speech across the European Union……………………………………….36 France: In-depth Country Study on Hate Crime and Hate Speech conducted within the Framework of the PRISM Project…………………………………………………………………….100 Italy: In-depth Country Study on Hate Crime and Hate Speech conducted within the Framework of the PRISM Project…………………………………………………………………….152 Romania: In-depth Country Study on Hate Crime and Hate Speech conducted within the Framework of the PRISM Project………………………………………………………….189 Spain: In-depth Country Study on Hate Crime and Hate Speech conducted within the Framework of the PRISM Project…………………………………………………………………….238 UK: In-depth Country Study on Hate Crime and Hate Speech conducted within the Framework of the PRISM Project…………………………………………………………………….284 3 Executive Overview This report serves as a component of the Preventing Redressing & Inhibiting hate Speech in new Media (PRISM) Project, incorporating seven different assessments into one comprehensive study. Part one concerns European and international law principles applicable for the prevention and repression of hate crime, particularly hate speech.
    [Show full text]
  • “I'm Not Sitting Next to You”: Education and Racism in Afro-Mexican Communities
    Diálogos sobre educación. Temas actuales en investigación educativa ISSN: 2007-2171 [email protected] Universidad de Guadalajara México “I’m Not Sitting Next To You”: Education and Racism in Afro-Mexican Communities Masferrer León, Cristina V. “I’m Not Sitting Next To You”: Education and Racism in Afro-Mexican Communities Diálogos sobre educación. Temas actuales en investigación educativa, vol. 7, no. 13, 2016 Universidad de Guadalajara, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553458105006 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Eje Temático “I’m Not Sitting Next To You”: Education and Racism in Afro-Mexican Communities Cristina V. Masferrer León [email protected] INAH, México Abstract: Today, the biggest concentration of Afro-Mexican communities is found in the Costa Chica region of Guerrero and Oaxaca, although their presence is also important in other areas and states of Mexico. e social, cultural, economic, and political contributions of Africans and their descendants were significant during the colonial period throughout the territory known today as Mexico. Still, historic processes of racism and discrimination have led to their invisibilization and exclusion. is paper is a reflection on racism in schools of Afro-Mexican communities in the Costa Chica region. It presents an analysis of interactions between students, showing how bullying Diálogos sobre educación. Temas actuales en investigación educativa, vol. 7, no. 13, reproduces racism in school, as well as the role of teachers in this process, with some 2016 confronting the problem and collaborating to eradicate it and others reproducing racist ideas and discriminatory practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Durban Diaries
    THE DURBAN DIARIES What really happened at the UN Conference against Racism in Durban (2001) JOËLLE FISS The mission of American Jewish Committee is: THE DURBAN DIARIES —To safeguard the welfare and security of Jews in the United States, in Israel, and throughout the world; What really happened at the UN Conference against Racism in Durban (2001) —To strengthen the basic principles of pluralism around the world as the best defense against anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry; —To enhance the quality of American Jewish life by helping to ensure Joëlle Fiss Jewish continuity, and; —To deepen ties between American and Israeli Jews. To learn more about our mission, programs, and publications, and to join and contribute to our efforts, please visit us at www.ajc.org or contact us by phone at 212-751-4000 or by e-mail at [email protected]. The European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS) is the umbrella organi- zation for thirty-four national Jewish student unions in Europe and the Former Soviet Union, representing over 200,000 Jewish students. Cog- nizant of the religious, linguistic, and cultural diversity that make up the European Jewish community, EUJS is a constituent member of the Euro- pean Youth Forum and is the only Jewish organization represented at that level. It is a member of the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS), is one of the largest international student organizations worldwide, and the first Jewish youth NGO to obtain consultative status to the Economic and So- cial Council of the United Nations. AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE EUROPEAN UNION OF JEWISH STUDENTS Contents Joëlle Fiss was born in Brighton, UK, and moved to The Durban Diaries 1 Geneva, Switzerland, where she studied at the Gradu- ate Institute of International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism and Its Impact on Young People Call for a Renewed Youth Commitment
    EUROPEAN YOUTH FORUM REPORT - 2008 Racism and its impact on young people call for a renewed youth commitment FOREWORD BY THOMAS HAMMARBERG ISBN: 978-92-990049-9-9 EDITORIAL TEAM: Luiza Bara Amanda Brunt Marco Perolini Diogo Pinto PROOFREADING: Amanda Brunt LAY OUT: Marta Gomez This publication has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Texts represent the opinions of the European Youth Forum and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EU FOREWORD Racism, xenophobia and discrimination continue to be serious problems in all parts of Europe today. They are often manifested through the discriminatory treatment of minorities and migrants in education, employment, housing and access to health care. Racism may also be compounded by multiple forms of discrimination when members of ethnic and religious minorities become victims of discrimination on additional grounds such as their gender, disability, age or sexual orientation. THomas Hammarberg Council of Europe Commissioner While patterns of discrimination and intolerance for Human Rights continue, there are also reports about violent hate crimes against minorities. Such incidents include crimes related to racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Gypsism, Islamophobia and homophobia. Black Africans have been stabbed or beaten to death; Roma groups targeted in mob violence; Jews physically attacked; synagogues and cemeteries vandalised; Muslims have been assaulted, and their mosques and Islamic schools damaged; gay and lesbian demonstrators and persons with disabilities have also been targets of hate crimes and violent attacks. Physical attacks on individuals from minority groups are often perpetrated in communities where extremists have spread hate propaganda. I have personally seen examples of how minor incidents under such conditions can ignite mob tendencies against, for instance, Roma communities.
    [Show full text]
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Hereinafter, the “Convention” Or “CERD”)
    United Nations CERD/C/ISR/17-19 International Convention on Distr.: General 14 March 2017 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English English, French and Spanish only Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Seventeenth to nineteenth periodic reports of States parties due in 2016 , Israel* ** [Date received: 2 March 2017] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. ** The annexes are file with the Secretariat and are available for consultation. GE.17-04122(E) CERD/C/ISR/17-19 Introduction 1. The Government of Israel (GOI) welcomes the opportunity to present its 17-19th Periodic Report to the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (Hereinafter the “Committee) in accordance with the requirements of Article 9, paragraph 1(b) of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (hereinafter, the “Convention” or “CERD”). 2. In accordance with the Committee’s Concluding Observation No. 38 of March 9, 2012, (CERD/C/ISR/CO/14-16), all GOI Ministries and institutions relevant to this Report were requested to supply data and information concerning their areas of operation. Additionally, in accordance with Concluding Observation No. 32 of March 9, 2012, Israeli Non-Governmental Organizations (“NGOs”) were also invited to submit information and comments prior to the compilation of this Report. 3. This Report was compiled by the Counseling and Legislation (International Law) Department at the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), in cooperation with other Governmental Ministries and agencies. 4. Racial discrimination is prohibited in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • ČASOPIS PARALYMPIONIK POZOR! UŽ DNES Futbalisti, Nenapodobnite
    Piatok 18. 6. 2021 75. ročník • číslo 139 cena 0,90 pre predplatiteľov 0,70 App Store pre iPad a iPhone / Google Play pre Android Výpravu našej futbalovej reprezentácie trápi Covidové starosti koronavírus, v karanténe sú Denis Vavro a člen realizačného tímu pred veľkým sviatkom Strany 2 – 10 a 19 – 20 FOTO TASR/ MARTIN BAUMANN Vavro: Keby zranenie, ale ozaj toto? 11 strán o Eure Tarkovič: Ťažko sa úplne odizolovať Aj napriek nepríjemným starostiam vládla na predzápasovom tréningu našej reprezentácie dobrá nálada. Futbalisti, nenapodobnite ich Takú nenávisť Bodaj by nie, vyzerá to tak, že už nikomu remíza so Švédmi nám s najväčšou Strana 24 pravdepodobnosťou bude stačiť Kým zverencov tréne- neželám na osemfinále. ra Štefana Tarkoviča FOTO TASR/MARTIN BAUMANN čaká na Eure zápas so Náš hokejový útočník Ma- Švédskom až dnes, xim Čajkovič sa v exkluzív- basketbalistky si zme- nom rozhovore pre denník rali sily s výberom Šport vracia k udalostiam, z tejto krajiny na ktoré smerovali k jeho vy- európskom šampionáte radeniu z kádra reprezentá- už včera. S prehrou cie do 20 rokov pred de- 57:74 nemohla byť cembrovými majstrovstvami spokojná ani Ivana sveta v Kanade. Jakubcová (s loptou). FOTO ŠPORT/MILAN ILLÍK FOTO TASR/FIBA Strana 23 ČASOPIS PARALYMPIONIK POZOR! UŽ DNES 2 NÁZORY piatok 18. 6. 2021 PRIAMA REČ VAHANA BIČACHČJANA Pozor na Isaka a Forsberga Slovensko bude dnes žiť druhým vy- práve fyzicky disponovaní futbalisti. „ Treba si dať pozor na štandardné posunie do osemfinále s najväčšou stúpením futbalovej reprezentácie na Hovorí sa, že Švédsko nemá individua- pravdepodobnosťou už remíza. Netre- Eure, ktorá si zmeria sily so Švédskom.
    [Show full text]