Managing Wyoming Ground Squirrels Fact Sheet No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing Wyoming Ground Squirrels Fact Sheet No Managing Wyoming Ground Squirrels Fact Sheet No. 6.505 Natural Resources Series|Wildlife by W.F. Andelt, S.N. Hopper* Revised 3/16** Quick Facts The Wyoming ground squirrel (Urocitellus the north central and northwestern sections • The Wyoming ground elegans formerly Spermophilus elegans) is of Colorado. It prefers open sagebrush, squirrel is one of six species one of six species of ground squirrels found grasslands and subalpine meadows. This in Colorado. Formerly called “Richardson’s has garnered them the nickname of “high of ground squirrels found in ground squirrel,” the Wyoming ground mountain prairie dogs,” because they can Colorado. squirrel averages 10 to 15 inches long and tolerate high elevations and will flourish if • Wyoming ground squirrels weighs 9 to 14 ounces as an adult. Its fur predators are absent. compete with livestock for is generally a brownish smoke-gray, with forage and can destroy food a dappled pattern of cinnamon-buff. The crops. underside of the tail is buff. Food Habits and Biology Wyoming ground squirrels prefer green • Wyoming ground squirrel The animals are not nearly as large as foliage, such as grasses, but also eat forbs burrowing can damage prairie dogs but are sometimes mistaken and shrubs. When green vegetation becomes hay fields, grasslands, golf as such. Wyoming ground squirrels have scarce, the squirrels eat dry grasses and seeds. courses, and lawns. an underground burrow without the larger They also eat insects, including grasshoppers, mounds, and most often what one sees is crickets and caterpillars, and eggs from • Wyoming ground squirrels the ground squirrel darting into the hole for ground-nesting birds. can be controlled by safety during the morning hours. shooting, trapping, poison Wyoming ground squirrels construct grain baits and fumigation. Wyoming ground squirrels are found and live in underground burrows. In brushy in Colorado, southern Wyoming, western country, Wyoming ground squirrel burrows Nebraska and Utah. The species occupies often are identified by a substantial pile of areas from 5,000 feet to above timberline in debris (sticks, rocks, sagebrush leaves) that covers the area downslope from the burrow entrance. Squirrels stay in their burrows at night and during the warmest part of summer days. The burrow is the center of a ground squirrel’s activity. The squirrels enter their burrows in late July or early August and hibernate until the following March or April. Males usually come above ground one to three weeks before the females. Breeding takes place one to four days after females emerge from hibernation. Figure 1: Wyoming ground squirrel distribu- The young are born after a three- to four- tion*** week gestation period with two to 10 young *W.F. Andelt, Colorado State University professor emeritus, per litter. Only one litter is produced each fish, wildlife and conservation biology; S.N. Hopper, year. The young are weaned at five weeks and consultant. *Marvin Reynolds, CSU Extension area are foraging above ground by June. Density © Colorado State University director, range & natural resources, SLV Area. 7/2014 of Wyoming ground squirrel populations Revised S. Bokan, Small Acreage Coordinator Boulder Extension. 8/98. Revised 3/16. can range from two squirrels per acre before County; K. Crumbaker, Ag and Natural Resources Agent www.ext.colostate.edu Larimer County; T. Hoelsi, Extension County Director young are born in the spring, to 20 or more Grand County; D. Lester, Extension County Director Park animals per acre in early June when juveniles County and I. Shonle, Extension County Director Gilpin and adults are active. County, 3/16 Management Methods Health Risks Economic Damage Ground squirrels are hosts for fleas Several alternatives are available for High concentrations of Wyoming and may act as carriers for bubonic Wyoming ground squirrel management. ground squirrels can pose a serious plague. Plague is transmitted to Landowners should use multiple methods pest problem. They compete with humans via flea bites. Early symptoms for squirrel management such as habitat livestock for forage and can destroy of plague include swollen and tender modification, predators, exclusion, food crops. The mounds of dirt that trapping and shooting. For the average lymph nodes, chills and fever. Early squirrels excavate to build burrows high mountain homeowner, unfortunately, diagnosis and treatment is imperative. in hay fields can damage haying the remedy is not a quick nor easy one. When walking through suspected The goal is not to eliminate the entire equipment and take fields out of plague areas, apply an insect repellent population, but to keep the population production. Burrowing activity also to socks and pant cuffs before tucking under control. A Wyoming ground can damage grasslands, golf courses pants inside boots. squirrel population of over 8-10 per acre and lawns. is a growing problem for any homeowner that won’t simply take care of itself. When when the food source is no longer plentiful. Ecological Value using rodenticides, always read and If badger encounters persist, contact your Predators of the Wyoming ground follow label instructions and other local local Colorado Parks & Wildlife officer and squirrels include bullsnakes, rattlesnakes, regulations for proper use to minimize or they may be able to help you relocate the coyotes, foxes, badgers, weasels, bobcats eliminate off target harm to children, pets badger. and raptors. and wildlife. Canine & Feline Predators Wildlife Predators Dogs and cats can in fact be very helpful Utilizing natural predators of Wyoming in reducing ground squirrel populations. ground squirrels is an easy management Dog breeds that are quick hunters such as method. Many of the high mountain the Terriers, especially Jack Russells, and areas are home to a variety of hawks, the Australian Shepards are the best breeds foxes, badgers, and coyotes that are natural for decreasing squirrel populations. Cats predators of the squirrels. can be effective if quick and agile enough to catch a scurrying Wyoming ground Unwanted Predators squirrel. In higher mountain areas, homeowners may find themselves with increasing Shooting Figure 2: Wyoming ground squirrel bur- Wyoming ground squirrel populations Small, isolated colonies of Wyoming row has a fanned out low mound. The hole with a “not so friendly” badger. Although ground squirrels can be effectively entrance is at an angle and remains open. badgers can help manage the ground controlled by shooting. Shooting lowers Usually ground squirrel burrows have squirrels, they can also create new the population by removing individuals several entrances. challenges. While most badgers prefer to and disrupting their life cycle. However, if remain out of sight and eat during the dark there are other colonies of ground squirrels night hours, badgers have been known to nearby, individuals from those populations attack people when threatened and with will migrate into the area where squirrels their medium size of 40-55 pounds (mature are being removed. For effective weight) should be considered dangerous management of problem ground squirrels, with their “bad tempers” and fierce claws. a population must be kept under constant If you encounter a badger, vacate the area as shooting pressure. quickly as possible. Unlike other burrowing animals, the Most badgers will burrow a large hole, Wyoming ground squirrel is considered a 8-10” in diameter or more. While they help small game species in Colorado, allowing with the ground squirrel problem, they licensed hunters to harvest them year- create a new problem to horse and large round without a limit. Figure 3: A newly formed Wyoming livestock owners, as these animals can fall ground squirrel mound. Note the fanning into these large holes and injure themselves. Always use good hunter safety practices similar to pocket gopher holes. Wyoming and follow local laws and regulations when ground squirrel holes remain open. Badgers will only be drawn to your using fire arms to depopulate. Don’t shoot property if Wyoming ground squirrels are within ¼ mile of any roadway. Always abundant. The badger will often move on, know your target and beyond. always read and follow the label and controlling large numbers of Wyoming Source of Supplies guidelines and be sure you understand ground squirrels. Baiting is most effective at Rodenticides for controlling them prior to use to minimize off target two points during their annual cycle: early Wyoming ground squirrels are (i.e. raptors, dogs, and cats) poisoning. spring, or late June to early July. available through commercial vendors Rodenticides are meant to kill rodent in Denver, a few farm supply stores species but will also kill other animals if In a year of average rainfall, begin outside Denver, and the Animal Health used improperly. poison grain control early in the spring, Division, Colorado Department of about one to two weeks after squirrels Steps for safe use of rodenticides* Agriculture, (303) 869-9130. Traps can emerge from their burrows. Continue for be purchased or ordered at hardware -Positively identify the pest and one month or until vegetation turns green. stores. determine all techniques that can be used to Early control is enhanced by cold weather deter the pest such as habitat modification and minimal vegetative growth that makes Trapping and exclusion. bait more desirable to ground squirrels. -Decide what your threshold limit For small populations, wire-mesh cage is. Set realistic goals such as minimizing As soon as green vegetation becomes traps can be set anywhere that squirrels rodent numbers. Do not expect to available, bait is less accepted. To achieve frequent. Place traps on level ground within eliminate them completely. successful control in early spring, apply bait a few feet of burrows or other high-activity -Choose the most effective, least toxic when the entire ground squirrel population areas. Bait for several days with the door rodenticide to minimize potential non- is active. If part of the population is still wired open to get squirrels accustomed to target poisoning.
Recommended publications
  • Time Budgets of Wyoming Ground Squirrels, Spermophilus Elegans
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 41 Number 2 Article 9 6-30-1981 Time budgets of Wyoming ground squirrels, Spermophilus elegans David A. Zegers University of Colorado, Boulder Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Zegers, David A. (1981) "Time budgets of Wyoming ground squirrels, Spermophilus elegans," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 41 : No. 2 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol41/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TIME BUDGETS OF WYOMING GROUND SQUIRRELS, SPERMOPHILUS ELEGANS David A. Zegers' .\bstract.— Time budget of free-living adult Spermophiltts elegans differed significantly from that of juveniles in the Front Range of the Rockies during 1974-1975. No differences were found between males and females. Hour of day. day since emergence, air temperature, cloud cover, and presence of predators all correlated with the frequency of various components of the time budget. Study of time budgets is important in com- binocular, and a 20X telescope to observe the prehending the roles of animals in ecosystems squirrels from a blind. The animals were as well as understanding their basic patterns marked for individual recognition from a dis- of behavior. Time budgets constructed for a tance using a unique combination of freeze few ground .squirrels [the Columbian ground brands (Hadow 1972) located at one or two squirrel, Spemiophihis columbianus (Betts of the spots on the animal's body.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 63(2) 1996
    July 1996 Number 2 Of of Washington A semiannual journal of research devoted to Helminthology and all branches of Parasitology Supported in part by the Brayton H. Ransom Memorial Trust Fund D. C. KRITSKY, W. A. :B6EC3ER, AND M, JEGU. NedtropicaliMonogehoidea/lS. An- — cyrocephalinae (Dactylogyridae) of Piranha and Their Relatives (Teleostei, JSer- rasalmidae) from Brazil and French Guiana: Species of Notozothecium Boeger and Kritsky, 1988, and Mymarotheciumgem. n. ..__ _______ __, ________ ..x,- ______ .s.... A. KOHN, C. P. SANTOS, AND-B. LEBEDEV. Metacdmpiella euzeti gen. n., sp, n., and I -Hargicola oligoplites~(Hargis, 1951) (Monogenea: Allodiscpcotylidae) from Bra- " zilian Fishes . ___________ ,:...L".. _______ j __ L'. _______l _; ________ 1 ________ _ __________ ______ _ .' _____ . __.. 176 C. P. SANTO?, T. SOUTO-PADRGN, AND R. M. LANFREDI. Atriasterheterodus (Levedev and Paruchin, 1969) and Polylabris tubicimts (Papema and Kohn, 1964) (Mono- ' genea) from Diplodus argenteus (Val., 1830) (Teleostei: Sparidae) from Brazil 181 . I...N- CAIRA AND T. BARDOS. Further Information on :.Gymnorhynchus isuri (Trypa- i/:norhyncha: Gymnorhynchidae) from the Shortfin Make Shark ...,.'. ..^_.-"_~ ____. ; 188 O. M. AMIN AND W. L.'MmcKLEY. Parasites of Some Fisji Introduced into an Arizona Reservoir, with Notes on Introductions — . ____ : ______ . ___.i;__ L____ _ . ______ :___ _ .193 O. M. AMIN AND O. SEY. Acanthocephala from Arabian Gulf Fishes off Kuwait, with 'Descriptions of Neoechinorhynchus dimorphospinus sp. n. XNeoechinorhyrichi- dae), Tegorhyrichus holospinosus sp. n. (l\lio&&ntid&e),:Micracanthorynchina-ku- waitensis sp. n. (Rhadinorhynchidae), and Sleriidrorhynchus breviclavipraboscis gen. n., sp. p. (Diplosentidae); and Key to Species of the Genus Micracanthor- .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management
    Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Use of Wildlife Damage Management Methods by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Chapter I Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management MAY 2017 Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services (WS) Program completed Risk Assessments for methods used in wildlife damage management in 1992 (USDA 1997). While those Risk Assessments are still valid, for the most part, the WS Program has expanded programs into different areas of wildlife management and wildlife damage management (WDM) such as work on airports, with feral swine and management of other invasive species, disease surveillance and control. Inherently, these programs have expanded the methods being used. Additionally, research has improved the effectiveness and selectiveness of methods being used and made new tools available. Thus, new methods and strategies will be analyzed in these risk assessments to cover the latest methods being used. The risk assements are being completed in Chapters and will be made available on a website, which can be regularly updated. Similar methods are combined into single risk assessments for efficiency; for example Chapter IV contains all foothold traps being used including standard foothold traps, pole traps, and foot cuffs. The Introduction to Risk Assessments is Chapter I and was completed to give an overall summary of the national WS Program. The methods being used and risks to target and nontarget species, people, pets, and the environment, and the issue of humanenss are discussed in this Chapter. From FY11 to FY15, WS had work tasks associated with 53 different methods being used.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-0000-1900) - Department of Fish and Game
    Dear Senators HEIDER, Brackett, Stennett, and Representatives GIBBS, Gestrin, Erpelding: The Legislative Services Office, Research and Legislation, has received the enclosed rules of the Department of Fish and Game: IDAPA 13.00.00 - Notice of Omnibus Rulemaking - Temporary and Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. 13-0000-1900) - Department of Fish and Game. Pursuant to Section 67-454, Idaho Code, a meeting on the enclosed rules may be called by the cochairmen or by two (2) or more members of the subcommittee giving oral or written notice to Research and Legislation no later than fourteen (14) days after receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to call a meeting on the enclosed rules is no later than 07/30/2019. If a meeting is called, the subcommittee must hold the meeting within forty-two (42) days of receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to hold a meeting on the enclosed rules is 08/27/2019. The germane joint subcommittee may request a statement of economic impact with respect to a proposed rule by notifying Research and Legislation. There is no time limit on requesting this statement, and it may be requested whether or not a meeting on the proposed rule is called or after a meeting has been held. To notify Research and Legislation, call 334-4854, or send a written request to the address on the memorandum attached below. Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Rules Review Subcommittee of the Senate Resources & Environment Committee and the House Resources & Conservation Committee FROM: Deputy Division Manager - Katharine Gerrity DATE: July 11, 2019 SUBJECT: Department of Fish and Game IDAPA 13.00.00 - Notice of Omnibus Rulemaking - Temporary and Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Squirrels of Colorado
    CIRCULAR 44 NoVEMBER, 1924 THE GROUND SQUIRRELS OF COLORADO BY w. L. BURNETT OFFICE OF STATE ENTOMOLOGIST COLORADO AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FORT COLLINS, COLORADO OFFICIAL STAFF C. P. GILLETTE. ............. ------------------------------·------·-·---------------------------------------State Entomologist GEORGE M. LIST ........................ __________________ ------------···············-----·-··-·--···---·······--···--·-··Chief Deputy R. G. RICHMOND ................................. __________ Deputy in Charge Apiary Inspection WILLIAM L. BuRNETT ..................................... Deputy in Charge Rodent Control J. H. NEWTON ................................. Deputy in Charge Alfalfa Weevil Control W. L. MAY • ............................................................... Deputy in Charge Weed Control WM. P. YETTER, JR ................................................................................................................ Deputy GEORGE ::;. LANGFORD ................................................................... ------··········--··········--············Deputy E. RoBERTS ········································--·········-·······················································-······························Clerk • Deceased THE GROUND SQUIRRELS OF COLORADO BY W. L. BuRNETT Ground squirrels belong to the rodent family Sciuridae. Other members of this family are tree squirrels, chipmunks, prairie dogs and woodchucks. Colorado ground squirrels are divided into four genera, Citellus, with five members; Callospermophilus, two;
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison' Prairie
    UTAH GUNNISON’S PRAIRIE DOG AND WHITE-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG CONSERVATION PLAN FINAL DRAFT SARAH G. LUPIS, KEVIN D. BUNNELL, TODD A. BLACK, TERRY A. MESSMER AND THE GUNNISON’S AND WHITE TAILED PRAIRIE DOG PLANNING TEAM UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH NOVEMBER 2007 RECOMMENDED CITATION Lupis, S. G., K. D. Bunnell, T. A. Black, and T. A. Messmer. 2007. Utah Gunnison’s prairie dog and white-tailed prairie dog conservation plan: Draft #5. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, Utah. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We received significant input from a number of sources or their publications. We especially wish to acknowledge the following people and organizations: Brian Maxfield, Anthony Wright, Mary Conner, and Adam Kozlowski, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Bart Zwetzig, Tammy Wallace, Steve Madsen, and Pam Riddle, U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Amy Seglund, Colorado Division of Wildlife; Bill Andelt, Colorado State University; Sarah Lindsey, Utah Natural Heritage Program; and Bill VanPelt, Arizona Fish and Game. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................iii Background..................................................................................................................................... 3 Life History................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White-Tailed Prairie Dog Conservation Assessment
    WHITE-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT Amy E. Seglund, Andrea E. Ernst, Martin Grenier, Bob Luce, Allison Puchniak, and Pam Schnurr White-tailed Prairie Dog photo by Ron Stewart Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies January 2006 RECOMMENDED CITATION Seglund, A.E., A.E. Ernst, M. Grenier, B. Luce, A. Puchniak, and P. Schnurr. 2006. White-tailed prairie dog conservation assessment. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Laramie, Wyoming. Unpublished Report. 137 pp. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We received significant input from a number of sources or their publications. We especially wish to acknowledge the following people and organizations: Dean Biggins, U.S. Geological Survey; Brent Bibles, Utah State University Extension in Vernal, Utah; Bart Zwetzig, Ed Hollowed, Steve Madsen, Robin Sell, Dave Roberts, Mike Albee, and Jay Parks, U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Erin Robertson, Center for Native Ecosystems; Lonnie Renner, contractor for the Colorado Division of Wildlife; Larry Nelson, Colorado Division of Wildlife; Heidi Youmans, Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks; Brian Maxfield and Craig McLaughlin, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Bob Oakleaf, Wyoming Game and Fish Department; Craig Knowles, Fauna West Consulting; Bob Leachman, Laura Romin, and Renee Chi, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Sterling Miller, National Wildlife Federation. Deb O’Neill, Shortgrass Prairie Interstate Coordinator, and Terry B. Johnson, Chair of WAFWA’s Nongame and Endangered Species Committee, helped edit the final drafts of this report. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies January 2006 White-tailed Prairie Dog Conservation Assessment – Final Page ii of 137 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On 11 July 2002, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Above-Ground Density and Distribution of Small Mammal Prey Species at Large Spatial Scales
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Predicting above-ground density and distribution of small mammal prey species at large spatial scales ☯ ☯ ☯ ☯¤ Lucretia E. Olson1 *, John R. Squires1 , Robert J. Oakleaf2 , Zachary P. Wallace3 , ☯ Patricia L. Kennedy3 1 Rocky Mountain Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Missoula, Montana, United States of America, 2 Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Lander, Wyoming, United States of America, 3 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife and Eastern Oregon Agriculture & Natural a1111111111 Resource Program, Oregon State University, Union, Oregon, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 ¤ Current address: Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, United a1111111111 States of America * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Olson LE, Squires JR, Oakleaf RJ, Wallace Grassland and shrub-steppe ecosystems are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic ZP, Kennedy PL (2017) Predicting above-ground activities. Loss of native habitats may negatively impact important small mammal prey spe- density and distribution of small mammal prey cies. Little information, however, is available on the impact of habitat variability on density of species at large spatial scales. PLoS ONE 12(5): small mammal prey species at broad spatial scales. We examined the relationship between e0177165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0177165 small mammal density and remotely-sensed environmental covariates in shrub-steppe and grassland ecosystems in Wyoming, USA. We sampled four sciurid and leporid species Editor: Aaron W. Reed, University of Missouri Kansas City, UNITED STATES groups using line transect methods, and used hierarchical distance-sampling to model den- sity in response to variation in vegetation, climate, topographic, and anthropogenic vari- Received: January 4, 2017 ables, while accounting for variation in detection probability.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the Phase I Eagle Conservation Plan, Chokecherry
    Appendix F This page intentionally left blank Eagle and Raptor Prey Base Assessment Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project October 2012 This page intentionally left blank Prey Base Assessment for the Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Project Background ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Physiographic Setting .......................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Draft Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance .................................................................. 11 1.3 Influence of Prey Base on Golden Eagles ................................................................. 12 1.4 Influence of Prey Base on Bald Eagles ..................................................................... 14 2.0 Species-Specific Prey Base Assessments........................................................................ 14 2.1 White-tailed prairie dogs ........................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 White-tailed Prairie Dog Occurrences
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Dwelling Squirrels of the Pacific Northwest
    GROUND-DWELLING SQUIRRELS O F T H E P A C I F I C N O R T H W E S T S. t. nancyae eric yensen & paul w. sherman GROUND-DWELLING SQUIRRELS O F T H E P A C I F I C N O R T H W E S T S. t. nancyae eric yensen paul w. sherman Illustrations Ward P. Hooper Funding and Production U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Snake River Fish and Wildlife Office Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Office Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office Title Page GROUND-DWELLING SQUIRRELS O F T H E P A C I F I C N O R T H W E S T INTRODUCTION GROUND-DWELLING SQUIRRELS........................................................ 1 THE ECOLOGICAL ROLE OF GROUND SQUIRRELS ............. 1 CONSERVATION ................................................................................................. 2 DID YOU KNOW? ............................................................................................... 3 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ANTELOPE GROUND SQUIRRELS White-tailed Antelope Squirrel (Ammospermophilus leucurus) .............................................................................. 4 MANTLED GROUND SQUIRRELS Golden-mantled Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus lateralis).............................................................................................. 5 Northern Cascades Mantled Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus saturatus) .......................................................................................... 6 ROCK SQUIRRELS Rock Squirrel (Spermophilus variegatus) ........................................................................................ 7
    [Show full text]