DOCSLIB.ORG

But I Still Can't Get Rid of a Sense of Artificiality': the Reichenbach-Einstein Debate on the Geometrization of the Electromagnetic Field

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
But I Still Can't Get Rid of a Sense of Artificiality': the Reichenbach-Einstein Debate on the Geometrization of the Electromagnetic Field AperTO - Archivio Istituzionale Open Access dell'Università di Torino '..But I still can't get rid of a sense of artificiality': The Reichenbach-Einstein debate on the geometrization of the electromagnetic field This is the author's manuscript Original Citation: Availability: This version is available http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1737429 since 2020-04-27T13:54:57Z Published version: DOI:10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.04.001 Terms of use: Open Access Anyone can freely access the full text of works made available as "Open Access". Works made available under a Creative Commons license can be used according to the terms and conditions of said license. Use of all other works requires consent of the right holder (author or publisher) if not exempted from copyright protection by the applicable law. (Article begins on next page) 26 September 2021 Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 54 (2016) 35–51 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsb ‘…But I still can't get rid of a sense of artificiality’: The Reichenbach–Einstein debate on the geometrization of the electromagnetic field Marco Giovanelli a,b,n a Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstrae 33, 72074 Tübingen, Germany b Einstein Papers Project, Caltech M/C 20-7, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA article info abstract Article history: This paper analyzes correspondence between Reichenbach and Einstein from the spring of 1926, Received 6 December 2015 concerning what it means to ‘geometrize’ aphysicalfield. The content of a typewritten note that Accepted 10 April 2016 Reichenbach sent to Einstein on that occasion is reconstructed, showing that it was an early version of Section 49 of the untranslated Appendix to his Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, on which Reichenbach Keywords: was working at the time. This paper claims that the toy-geometrization of the electromagnetic field Hans Reichenbach that Reichenbach presented in his note should not be regarded as merely a virtuoso mathematical Albert Einstein exercise, but as an additional argument supporting the core philosophical message of his 1928 fi fi Uni ed eld theories monograph. This paper concludes by suggesting that Reichenbach's infamous ‘relativization of geo- General relativity metry’ was only a stepping stone on the way to his main concern—the question of the ‘geometrization Geometrization of gravitation’. & 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. When citing this paper, please use the full journal title Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Aber ich kann auch da das Gefühl des Künstlichen nicht form (including a transcription of the quite heavy mathematical los werden—Reichenbach to Einstein, March 16, 1926 apparatus), and the typescript is preserved in the Reichenbach Archives in Pittsburgh (HR, 041-2101). However, the publication must have been withdrawn subsequently. Except for a ‘dead link’ to a no-longer-existing Section 46 on page 17, even today many 1. Introduction readers of The Philosophy of Space and Time might be unaware that such an Appendix ever existed. In the late 1950s, Hans Reichenbach's second wife Maria The decision not to publish the Appendix is understandable. Reichenbach edited an English translation (Reichenbach, 1958)of The text is quite demanding for readers unaccustomed to the his Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre (Reichenbach, 1928). This edi- formalism, and struggling through it may not have been worth tion was missing a long Appendix entitled ‘Die Weylsche Erwei- terung des Riemannschen Raumbegriffs und die geometrische the effort. After Einstein's death in 1955, the very project of a fi Deutung der Elektrizität’ (‘Weyl's Extension of Riemann's Concept uni ed theory of gravitation and electromagnetism, which of Space and the Geometrical Interpretation of Electromagnetism’). Reichenbach discusses with a plethora of technical details, was A translation of the Appendix was prepared in a nearly publishable nearly unanimously regarded as a relic of the past (but see Tonnelat, 1955)—not least of which by Hermann Weyl, one of the project's initiators (Weyl, 1956). In the same spirit, in an English Abbreviation: AEA, The Albert Einstein Archives at The Hebrew University of translation of a selection of Reichenbach's writings from the late – – Jerusalem (1879 1955); CPAE, Albert Einstein (1987 ). The Collected Papers of “ Albert Einstein. Ed. by John Stachel et al. 14 vols. Princeton: Princeton University 1970s (Reichenbach, 1978), the pages dealing with Weyl's gen- Press; HR, Archives of Scientific Philosophy: The Hans Reichenbach Papers eralization of Riemannian space” were omitted because, as the (18911953); SN, Vienna Circle Foundation—Wiener Kreis Stichting: Schlick Nachlass editors write, they had “no historical significance” (Reichenbach, (1882–1936) n 1978,2:3). Correspondence address: Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstrae 33, 72074 Tübingen, Germany Only a year later, however, a pathbreaking paper by Coffa E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (1979) proved that this judgment was hasty. Rediscovering Weyl http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.04.001 1355-2198/& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 36 M. Giovanelli / Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 54 (2016) 35–51 and Reichenbach's ‘elective affinities’, Coffa began (with a nice then approving, reaction to the note. Section 5 shows what pun) a fertile line of research which, much later, would bear fruit Reichenbach's Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre looks like if read in the work of Ryckman (1995, 1996, 2005), Rynasiewicz (2005) from the perspective of the Appendix. Finally, analyzing Reich- and others (see also Giovanelli, 2013b). It was in this context that enbach's attitude towards Einstein's distant parallelism field the- Coffa provided perhaps the first and only detailed analysis of the ory, Section 6 emphasizes the differences that existed behind untranslated Appendix to the Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre.In Reichenbach and Einstein's apparent agreement on the issue of fact, Coffa read the Appendix as single-mindedly trying to “exhibit geometrization. This paper concludes by suggesting that Reich- the vacuity of Weyl's enterprise” (Coffa, 1979, 295). Here, however, enbach's well-known ‘relativization of geometry’ was only a Coffa's major achievement becomes a hindrance. Despite the stepping stone on the way to his main concern—the question of Appendix's somewhat misleading title, by interpreting it exclu- the ‘geometrization of gravitation’. sively in terms of the Weyl–Reichenbach debate, we do not fully grasp its meaning. Letters between Reichenbach and Einstein, preserved in the 2. Reichenbach's Γ-critique and his note on the unified field 1 Einstein Archives in Jerusalem (AEA), suggest that the Appendix theories should be read more broadly. In the spring of 1926, Reichenbach, after making some remarks on Einstein's newly published metric- On June 5, 1925 Einstein, who had just returned from a long affine theory (Einstein, 1925b), sent him a note offering what looks trip to South America (see his travel diary, CPAE, Vol. 14, Doc. 455, like his own attempt at a unified field theory. Reichenbach's note March 5–May 11, 1925), wrote to Michele Besso about the state of turns out to have been an early draft of Section 49 of the Appendix, his research on a unified theory of the gravitational and elec- on which he was working at the time. Einstein's objections and tromagnetic fields (Goenner, 2004; Sauer, 2014; Vizgin, 1994). He Reichenbach's replies reveal that criticism of Weyl's theory was revealed to Besso that he had become disillusioned with the only part of the story. Reichenbach was mainly interested in the whole “Weyl–Eddington–Schouten line of thinking,” the frame- very idea of the ‘geometrization’ of a physical field. At the time, work in which he had been working in the previous years,2 and many believed that if general relativity geometrized the gravita- that he was already “on another track, that is physically more tional field, then it was also plausible to geometrize the other grounded” (Einstein to Besso, June 5, 1925; Speziali, 1972,240). known field—the electromagnetic field. To challenge this view, The paper Einstein was referring to—the first in which the term Reichenbach conducted what might be called an ‘epistemological ‘unified field theory’ appears in the title—was presented at the experiment’. Prussian Academy during its July 9, 1925 session (Einstein, Reichenbach constructed a toy-theory establishing a connection 1925b). between electricity and geometry which, he argued, was just as Einstein described “the egg” he “recently laid” to Besso some good as the one general relativity established between gravitation weeks later (Einstein to Besso, July 28, 1925; Speziali, 1972, 209– τ and geometry. Reichenbach's theory, however, was clearly not as 210). The theory introduced an affine connection (Γμν) (from successful as general relativity. Thus, Reichenbach could provide which the Riemann and Ricci tensor Rμν are derived), and inde- ‘ ’ fi experimental evidence that the geometrization of a physical eld pendently the metric tensor gμν (and its correspondent contra- μν μν cannot be regarded in itself as a physical achievement. As soon as variant tensor g and tensor density g ). Einstein then built the ‘ ’ μν Einstein understood the ironical nature of Reichenbach's enter- scalar densityR H ¼ g Rμν and postulated the independent varia- μν τ prise, he immediately agreed with him. As Lehmkuhl (2014) has tion δ H dt ¼ 0, with respect to the g and Γμν (Ferraris, recently shown, it was in his correspondence with Reichenbach that Francaviglia, & Reina, 1982). After some manipulation he obtained, Einstein pointed out, for the first time, that general relativity had at first approximation, the already-known laws of gravitation and μν not geometrized the gravitational field. electromagnetism. The symmetric part of the g represents the As we shall see, Einstein and Reichenbach's opinions about the ‘gravitational potentials’, and the antisymmetric part the ‘electro- geometrization issue were only superficially similar.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Collaboration of Mileva Marić and Albert Einstein
    Asian Journal of Physics Vol 24, No 4 (2015) March The collaboration of Mileva Marić and Albert Einstein Estelle Asmodelle University of Central Lancashire School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, Preston, Lancashire, UK PR1 2HE. e-mail: [email protected]; Phone: +61 418 676 586. _____________________________________________________________________________________ This is a contemporary review of the involvement of Mileva Marić, Albert Einstein’s first wife, in his theoretical work between the period of 1900 to 1905. Separate biographies are outlined for both Mileva and Einstein, prior to their attendance at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zürich in 1896. Then, a combined journal is described, detailing significant events. In additional to a biographical sketch, comments by various authors are compared and contrasted concerning two narratives: firstly, the sequence of events that happened and the couple’s relationship at particular times. Secondly, the contents of letters from both Einstein and Mileva. Some interpretations of the usage of pronouns in those letters during 1899 and 1905 are re-examined, and a different hypothesis regarding the usage of those pronouns is introduced. Various papers are examined and the content of each subsequent paper is compared to the work that Mileva was performing. With a different take, this treatment further suggests that the couple continued to work together much longer than other authors have indicated. We also evaluate critics and supporters of the hypothesis that Mileva was involved in Einstein’s work, and refocus this within a historical context, in terms of women in science in the late 19th century. Finally, the definition of, collaboration (co-authorship, specifically) is outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Equations for Spin 2 Mass 0 from Noether's Converse Hilbertian
    Einstein’s Equations for Spin 2 Mass 0 from Noether’s Converse Hilbertian Assertion October 4, 2016 J. Brian Pitts Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge [email protected] forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Abstract An overlap between the general relativist and particle physicist views of Einstein gravity is uncovered. Noether’s 1918 paper developed Hilbert’s and Klein’s reflections on the conservation laws. Energy-momentum is just a term proportional to the field equations and a “curl” term with identically zero divergence. Noether proved a converse “Hilbertian assertion”: such “improper” conservation laws imply a generally covariant action. Later and independently, particle physicists derived the nonlinear Einstein equations as- suming the absence of negative-energy degrees of freedom (“ghosts”) for stability, along with universal coupling: all energy-momentum including gravity’s serves as a source for gravity. Those assumptions (all but) imply (for 0 graviton mass) that the energy-momentum is only a term proportional to the field equations and a symmetric curl, which implies the coalescence of the flat background geometry and the gravitational potential into an effective curved geometry. The flat metric, though useful in Rosenfeld’s stress-energy definition, disappears from the field equations. Thus the particle physics derivation uses a reinvented Noetherian converse Hilbertian assertion in Rosenfeld-tinged form. The Rosenfeld stress-energy is identically the canonical stress-energy plus a Belinfante curl and terms proportional to the field equations, so the flat metric is only a convenient mathematical trick without ontological commitment. Neither generalized relativity of motion, nor the identity of gravity and inertia, nor substantive general covariance is assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reichenbach-Einstein Debate on the Geometrization of the Electromagnetic Field
    ‘. But I Still Can’t Get Rid of a Sense of Artificiality’: The Reichenbach-Einstein Debate on the Geometrization of the Electromagnetic Field Marco Giovanelli Contributing editor at the Einstein Paper Project at Caltech: Einstein Papers Project Caltech M/C 20-7 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstraße 33 72074 Tübingen, Germany Abstract This paper analyzes correspondence between Reichenbach and Einstein from the spring of 1926, concerning what it means to ‘geometrize’ a physical field. The content of a typewritten note that Reichenbach sent to Einstein on that occasion is reconstructed, showing that it was an early version of §49 of the untranslated Appendix to his Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, on which Reichenbach was working at the time. This paper claims that the toy-geometrization of the electromagnetic field that Reichenbach presented in his note should not be regarded as merely a virtuoso mathematical exercise, but as an additional argument supporting the core philosophical message of his 1928 monograph. This paper concludes by suggesting that Reichenbach’s infamous ‘relativization of geometry’ was only a stepping stone on the way to his main concern—the question of the ‘geometrization of gravitation’. Aber ich kann auch da das Gefühl des Künstlichen nicht los werden Reichenbach to Einstein, March 16, 1926 Introduction In the late 1950s, Hans Reichenbach’s second wife Maria Reichenbach edited an English translation (Reichenbach, 1958) of his Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre (Reichenbach, 1928). This edition was missing a long Appendix entitled ‘Die Weylsche Erweiterung des Riemannschen Raumbegriffs und die geometrische Deutung der Elektrizität’ (‘Weyl’s Extension of Riemann’s Concept of Space and the Geometrical Interpretation of Electromagnetism’).
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Einstein - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 27
    Albert Einstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 27 Albert Einstein From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Albert Einstein ( /ælbərt a nsta n/; Albert Einstein German: [albt a nʃta n] ( listen); 14 March 1879 – 18 April 1955) was a German-born theoretical physicist who developed the theory of general relativity, effecting a revolution in physics. For this achievement, Einstein is often regarded as the father of modern physics.[2] He received the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics "for his services to theoretical physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect". [3] The latter was pivotal in establishing quantum theory within physics. Near the beginning of his career, Einstein thought that Newtonian mechanics was no longer enough to reconcile the laws of classical mechanics with the laws of the electromagnetic field. This led to the development of his special theory of relativity. He Albert Einstein in 1921 realized, however, that the principle of relativity could also be extended to gravitational fields, and with his Born 14 March 1879 subsequent theory of gravitation in 1916, he published Ulm, Kingdom of Württemberg, a paper on the general theory of relativity. He German Empire continued to deal with problems of statistical Died mechanics and quantum theory, which led to his 18 April 1955 (aged 76) explanations of particle theory and the motion of Princeton, New Jersey, United States molecules. He also investigated the thermal properties Residence Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United of light which laid the foundation of the photon theory States of light. In 1917, Einstein applied the general theory of relativity to model the structure of the universe as a Ethnicity Jewish [4] whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Opened Correspondence Illuminates Einstein's Personal Life
    CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS NEWSLETTER Vol. XXXVIII, Number 2 Fall 2006 One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843, Tel. 301-209-3165 Newly Opened Correspondence Illuminates Einstein’s Personal Life By David C. Cassidy, Hofstra University, with special thanks to Diana Kormos Buchwald, Einstein Papers Project he Albert Einstein Archives at the Hebrew University of T Jerusalem recently opened a large collection of Einstein’s personal correspondence from the period 1912 until his death in 1955. The collection consists of nearly 1,400 items. Among them are about 300 letters and cards written by Einstein, pri- marily to his second wife Elsa Einstein, and some 130 letters Einstein received from his closest family members. The col- lection had been in the possession of Einstein’s step-daughter, Margot Einstein, who deposited it with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem with the stipulation that it remain closed for twen- ty years following her death, which occurred on July 8, 1986. The Archives released the materials to public viewing on July 10, 2006. On the same day Princeton University Press released volume 10 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, con- taining 148 items from the collection through December 1920, along with other newly available correspondence. Later items will appear in future volumes. “These letters”, write the Ein- stein editors, “provide the reader with substantial new source material for the study of Einstein’s personal life and the rela- tionships with his closest family members and friends.” H. Richard Gustafson playing with a guitar to pass the time while monitoring the control room at a Fermilab experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Einstein
    WIKIPEDIA - La mejor página de Internet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Albert Einstein «Einstein» redirige aquí. Para otras acepciones, véase Einstein (desambiguación). Albert Einstein Información personal 14 de marzo de 1879 Nacimiento Ulm, Alemania 18 de abril de 1955 (76 años) Fallecimiento Princeton, Estados Unidos Residencia Einsteinhaus Caputh y Einsteinhaus Reino de Wurtemberg (1879–1896), apátrida (1896–1901), suiza (1901– Nacionalidad 1955), Imperio austrohúngaro (1911), República de Weimar (1920–1933) y estadounidense (1940–1955) Lengua materna Alemán Religión Panteísmo Familia Hermann Einstein Padres Pauline Koch Cónyuge Mileva Marić (1903–1919) Elsa Einstein (1919–1936) Hans Albert Einstein Eduard Einstein Hijos Lieserl Einstein Educación Escuela Politécnica Federal de Zúrich (Bachelor of Science) Luitpold-Gymnasium Alte Kantonsschule Alma máter Aarau (Matura) Universidad de Zúrich (Ph.D.) Supervisor Alfred Kleiner doctoral Información profesional Físico teórico, filósofo de la ciencia, inventor, escritor de ciencia, Ocupación astrónomo, pedagogo, profesor universitario (desde 1909), profesor, físico y escritor de no ficción Área Física teórica Universidad Carolina Karl-Ferdinands-Universität Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Escuela Politécnica Federal de Zúrich Sociedad Kaiser Wilhelm Empleador Universidad de Leiden Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (1902– 1909) Universidad de Zúrich (desde 1909) Universidad de Princeton (1933–1955) relatividad especial relatividad general Obras notables Movimiento
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativity As a Hybrid Theory: the Genesis of Einstein's Work on the Problem of Motion
    General Relativity as a Hybrid theory: The Genesis of Einstein’s work on the problem of motion Dennis Lehmkuhl, Einstein Papers Project, California Institute of Technology Email: [email protected] Forthcoming in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Special Issue: Physical Relativity, 10 years on Abstract In this paper I describe the genesis of Einstein’s early work on the problem of motion in general relativity (GR): the question of whether the motion of matter subject to gravity can be derived directly from the Einstein field equations. In addressing this question, Ein- stein himself always preferred the vacuum approach to the problem: the attempt to derive geodesic motion of matter from the vacuum Einstein equations. The paper first investigates why Einstein was so skeptical of the energy-momentum tensor and its role in GR. Drawing on hitherto unknown correspondence between Einstein and George Yuri Rainich, I then show step by step how his work on the vacuum approach came about, and how his quest for a unified field theory informed his interpretation of GR. I show that Einstein saw GR as a hybrid theory from very early on: fundamental and correct as far as gravity was concerned but phenomenological and effective in how it accounted for matter. As a result, Einstein saw energy-momentum tensors and singularities in GR as placeholders for a theory of matter not yet delivered. The reason he preferred singularities was that he hoped that their mathemat- ical treatment would give a hint as to the sought after theory of matter, a theory that would do justice to quantum features of matter.
    [Show full text]
  • EINSTEIN PAPERS PROJECT Ripples in Spacetime One Hundred
    EINSTEIN PAPERS PROJECT California Institute of Technology 1200 E. California Blvd. MC 20-7 Pasadena, Ca 91125 Telephone: (626) 395-8028 Fax: (626) 449-0814 E-mail: [email protected] Ripples in Spacetime One Hundred Years after Einstein: LIGO, Gravitational Waves, and the Long Road from Prediction to Observation By Diana K. Buchwald (Caltech), Hanoch Gutfreund (Hebrew University), and Jürgen Renn, Alex Blum & Roberto Lalli (MPIWG) Gravitational waves do exist, as announced with great joy by the scientists of the LIGO collaboration on February 11, 2016, after more than two decades of intensive work. The first publication on gravitational waves in the general theory of relativity, entitled “Approximative Integration of the Field Equations of Gravitation,” was written by Albert Einstein and submitted on June 22, 1916, to the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin. Yet for many decades afterward, Einstein himself, and many others, remained uncertain about the actual, physical existence of these waves. Collaborative work on the historiography of 20th-century physics by the Einstein Papers Project at Caltech, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science carried out over many years has recently shown that the prediction of gravitational waves emerged as early as mid-February 1916 from an exchange of letters between Albert Einstein and the astronomer Karl Schwarzschild. In these letters, Einstein expressed skepticism about the existence of gravitational waves. It is remarkable that these scientists’ significant physical and mathematical work was carried out in the midst of a devastating war, while Schwarzschild served on the Eastern Front.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reichenbach–Einstein Debate on the Geometrization of the Electromagnetic field
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 54 (2016) 35–51 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsb ‘…But I still can't get rid of a sense of artificiality’: The Reichenbach–Einstein debate on the geometrization of the electromagnetic field Marco Giovanelli a,b,n a Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstrae 33, 72074 Tübingen, Germany b Einstein Papers Project, Caltech M/C 20-7, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA article info abstract Article history: This paper analyzes correspondence between Reichenbach and Einstein from the spring of 1926, Received 6 December 2015 concerning what it means to ‘geometrize’ aphysicalfield. The content of a typewritten note that Accepted 10 April 2016 Reichenbach sent to Einstein on that occasion is reconstructed, showing that it was an early version of Section 49 of the untranslated Appendix to his Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, on which Reichenbach Keywords: was working at the time. This paper claims that the toy-geometrization of the electromagnetic field Hans Reichenbach that Reichenbach presented in his note should not be regarded as merely a virtuoso mathematical Albert Einstein exercise, but as an additional argument supporting the core philosophical message of his 1928 fi fi Uni ed eld theories monograph. This paper concludes by suggesting that Reichenbach's infamous ‘relativization of geo- General relativity metry’ was only a stepping stone on the way to his main concern—the question of the ‘geometrization Geometrization of gravitation’.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Einstein Did Not Believe That General Relativity Geometrizes Gravity
    Why Einstein did not believe that general relativity geometrizes gravity Dennis Lehmkuhl, IZWT Wuppertal and Einstein Papers Project, Caltech Email: [email protected] Address: IZWT, University of Wuppertal, Gausstrasse 20, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany Telephone: +49 202 439 3605 Abstract I argue that, contrary to folklore, Einstein never really cared for geometrizing the gravitational or (subsequently) the electromagnetic field; indeed, he thought that the very statement that General Rela- tivity geometrizes gravity \is not saying anything at all". Instead, I shall show that Einstein saw the “unification” of inertia and gravity as one of the major achievements of General Relativity. Interestingly, Einstein did not locate this unification in the field equations but in his interpretation of the geodesic equation, the law of motion of test particles. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 What Einstein did not believe 4 2.1 The Einstein-Meyerson debate: against the reduction of grav- ity to geometry . 4 2.2 Analysis of the debate . 11 3 What Einstein could have believed 13 3.1 The geodesic equation as the equation of motion of test par- ticles subject to gravity . 14 3.2 Kottler and the generalised law of inertia . 18 4 What Einstein did believe 20 5 Conclusion 27 6 Acknowledgements 28 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1 Introduction What could be more beautiful than the idea that all there is to the world is geometry? What could cause a bigger sense of wonder than finding out that something we do not normally conceive as geometrical is exactly that at its core: a feature of the geometry of space or spacetime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Editing Einstein's Scientific Manuscripts
    The Challenge of Editing Einstein’s Scientific Manuscripts Tilman Sauer∗ February 2, 2008 Abstract Einstein’s research manuscripts provide important insights into his ex- ceptional creativity. At the same time, they can present difficulties for a publication in the documentary edition of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (CPAE). The problems are illustrated by discussing how some important examples of Einstein’s research manuscripts have been included in previous volumes of the CPAE series: his Scratch Notebook from the years 1910–1914, his so-called Zurich Notebook from 1912, document- ing his early search for a generally covariant theory of gravitation, and the Einstein-Besso manuscript from 1913, containing calculations of Mer- cury’s perihelion advance on the basis of the Einstein-Grossmann equa- tions. Another category of research notes are small and disconnected “back-of-an-envelope” calculations. A major challenge for future vol- umes of the CPAE series are Einstein’s Berlin and Princeton research manuscripts on a unified field theory. This batch of some 1700 undated manuscript pages presents a formidable challenge also for historians of sci- ence. Although the web provides new possibilities for the editorial task, such as the publication of facsimiles on the Einstein Archives Online web- site, it is argued that a satisfactory solution of the editorial problems posed by these manuscripts depends on scholarly efforts to reconstruct and understand the content of Einstein’s manuscripts. 1 The Einstein Papers Project The Einstein Papers Project is a long-term editorial project devoted to pub- lishing the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (CPAE).1 The first volume was published by Princeton University Press in 1987 [CPAE1], followed by eight arXiv:physics/0412142v1 [physics.hist-ph] 22 Dec 2004 ∗Paper presented at the 25th Anniversary Annual Meeting of the Association for Documen- tary Editing, Chicago, November 14–16, 2003; to appear in Documentary Editing.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBERT EINSTEIN March 14, 1879—April 18, 1955
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES A L B E R T E INSTEIN 1879—1955 A Biographical Memoir by J O H N A R C H I B A L D W HEELER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1980 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. ALBERT EINSTEIN March 14, 1879—April 18, 1955 BY JOHN ARCHIBALD WHEELER* ALBERT EINSTEIN was born in Ulm, Germany on March -**- 14, 1879. After education in Germany, Italy, and Swit- zerland, and professorships in Bern, Zurich, and Prague, he was appointed Director of Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Phy- sics in Berlin in 1914. He became a professor in the School of Mathematics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton beginning the fall of 1933, became an American citizen in the summer of 1936, and died in Princeton, New Jersey on April 18, 1955. In the Berlin where in 1900 Max Planck discovered the quantum, Einstein fifteen years later explained to us that gravitation is not something foreign and mysterious acting through space, but a manifestation of space geometry itself. He came to understand that the universe does not go on from everlasting to everlasting, but begins with a big bang. Of all the questions with which the great thinkers have occupied themselves in all lands and all centuries, none has ever claimed greater primacy than the origin of the universe, and no contributions to this issue ever made by any man anytime have proved themselves richer in illuminating power than those that Einstein made.
    [Show full text]