DOCSLIB.ORG

Decentralized Evaluation for Evaluation Evidence Decentralized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decentralized Evaluation for Evaluation Evidence Decentralized based based decision making - Decentralized evaluation for evaluation evidence Decentralized Decentralized Evaluation USDA McGovern Dole Food for Education Program in Nepal 2014-2017 End-line Evaluation Report April 2019 Nepal Country Office Evaluation Manager- Kanta Khanal Prepared by Sambodhi Research and Communications Pvt. Ltd Narma Consulting Pvt. Ltd Acknowledgements The “Endline Evaluation for USDA Supported McGovern Dole Food for Education Programme 2014-2017” has been conducted by Sambodhi Research & Communications Pvt. Ltd in partnership with NARMA consulting Pvt. Ltd. We are grateful to World Food Programme Country Office, Nepal who provided us with the necessary funds and technical support to carry out the study successfully. This report has also been greatly benefited by the guidance provided by WFP’s Monitoring and Evaluation and programme team. Their dedication and valuable guidance is highly appreciated. Special thanks to the implementing partners, government partners and development partners of WFP who took time to meet with us and contributed with valuable insights into Nepal development context, especially education. The evaluation would not be possible without the tremendous effort of our research team who did an excellent job in interviewing all key officials and collecting the required information and meeting our deadlines. We are grateful to the students, school staff and parents who spoke with us despite their busy schedule. FY14 Endline Evaluation Report i | P a g e Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in maps do no imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers. FY14 Endline Evaluation Report ii | P a g e Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. i Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................. ii Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Key Findings ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview of the Evaluation Subject ............................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Context .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Evaluation Methodology and Limitations ................................................................................................. 9 2. Evaluation Findings........................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Relevance: How appropriate is the operation? ........................................................................................ 12 2.2 Effectiveness and Impact: What are the Output Outcome and Impact of the intervention? ................ 15 2.3 Efficiency: What is the cost benefit of the programmes implemented? ................................................. 31 2.4 Sustainability: To what extent does the intervention’s implementation strategy include considerations for sustainability? .................................................................................................................. 35 3. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 37 3.1 Conclusions................................................................................................................................................. 37 3.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 39 Annexures ............................................................................................................................ 42 Annex 1: Terms of Reference ................................................................................................ 43 Annex 2 : Stakeholder Mapping ........................................................................................... 64 Annex 3: Map of Project Districts ......................................................................................... 68 Annex 4: Results framework ................................................................................................. 71 Annex 5: Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................................... 74 Annex 6: Evaluation Criteria and Areas of Enquiry............................................................... 78 Annex 7: Data Collection Tools and Methods ....................................................................... 80 Annex 8: Sampling Strategy .................................................................................................. 81 Annex 9: EGRA Methodology ............................................................................................... 83 Annex 10: Performance Indicators for Evaluation of FY14- Comparative estimates for baseline 2015 and endline 2018 ............................................................................................ 86 Annex 12: Documents Gathered and Reviewed .................................................................... 88 Annex 13: List of Sampled Schools, VDC and Districts ......................................................... 89 Annex 14: Data Collection Tools ........................................................................................... 98 Annex 15: Bibliography ........................................................................................................ 98 List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................. 100 FY14 Endline Evaluation Report iii | P a g e Table of Figures Figure 1: Caste Category of Respondents ........................................................................................................... 13 Figure 2: Sources of Information on SMP .......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3: Availability of resources for cooking School Meals ............................................................................ 17 Figure 4: Sub-task Mean Score by programme combination ........................................................................... 22 Figure 5: Overall EGRA Score ............................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 6:Teaching aids used by teachers during classroom session ................................................................ 23 Figure 7: Type of lesson taught .......................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 8: Teachers interaction with the student ............................................................................................... 25 Figure 9:Students identified as inattentive by teachers.................................................................................... 25 Figure 10: Student Attentiveness ....................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 11: Dietary Diversity Status of Students .................................................................................................. 27 Figure 12: Dietary Practices of Students ............................................................................................................. 27 Figure 13: Exploring Gender Perspective ........................................................................................................... 31 List of Tables Table 1: SMP Beneficiaries as planned ................................................................................................................ 6 Table 2: Number of Project Schools by District .................................................................................................. 6 Table 3: Knowledge on Food preparation and Safety Practices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin 29
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 29, October 2010 The focus of this edition is on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain region Situation summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure* 26% This Food Security Bulletin covers the period July-September and is focused on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain (MFWHM) 24% region (typically the most food insecure region of the country). 22% July – August is an agricultural lean period in Nepal and typically a season of increased food insecurity. In addition, flooding and 20% landslides caused by monsoon regularly block transportation routes and result in localised crop losses. 18 % During the 2010 monsoon 1,600 families were reportedly 16 % displaced due to flooding, the Karnali Highway and other trade 14 % routes were blocked by landslides and significant crop losses were Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep reported in Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, western Surkhet and south- 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 eastern Udayapur. NeKSAP District Food Security Networks in MFWHM districts Rural Nepal Mid-Far-Western Hills&Mountains identified 163 VDCs in 12 districts that are highly food insecure. Forty-four percent of the population in Humla and Bajura are reportedly facing a high level of food insecurity. Other districts with households that are facing a high level of food insecurity are Mugu, Kalikot, Rukum, Surkhet, Achham, Doti, Bajhang, Baitadi, Dadeldhura and Darchula. These households have both very limited food stocks and limited financial resources to purchase food. Most households are coping by reducing consumption, borrowing money or food and selling assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001
    P|D|LL|S G8 G10 Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001 Maiwakhola Gaunpalika Patidanda Ma Vi 15 22 37 25 17 42 010360002 Meringden Gaunpalika Singha Devi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 8 2 10 0 0 0 010370001 Mikwakhola Gaunpalika Sanwa Ma V 27 26 53 50 19 69 010160009 Phaktanglung Rural Municipality Saraswati Chyaribook Ma V 28 10 38 33 22 55 010060001 Phungling Nagarpalika Siddhakali Ma V 11 14 25 23 8 31 010320004 Phungling Nagarpalika Bhanu Jana Ma V 88 77 165 120 130 250 010320012 Phungling Nagarpalika Birendra Ma V 19 18 37 18 30 48 010020003 Sidingba Gaunpalika Angepa Adharbhut Vidyalaya 5 6 11 0 0 0 030410009 Deumai Nagarpalika Janta Adharbhut Vidyalaya 19 13 32 0 0 0 030100003 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Janaki Ma V 13 5 18 23 9 32 030230002 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Singhadevi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 7 7 14 0 0 0 030230004 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Jalpa Ma V 17 25 42 25 23 48 030330008 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Khambang Ma V 5 4 9 1 2 3 030030001 Ilam Municipality Amar Secondary School 26 14 40 62 48 110 030030005 Ilam Municipality Barbote Basic School 9 9 18 0 0 0 030030011 Ilam Municipality Shree Saptamai Gurukul Sanskrit Vidyashram Secondary School 0 17 17 1 12 13 030130001 Ilam Municipality Purna Smarak Secondary School 16 15 31 22 20 42 030150001 Ilam Municipality Adarsha Secondary School 50 60 110 57 41 98 030460003 Ilam Municipality Bal Kanya Ma V 30 20 50 23 17 40 030460006 Ilam Municipality Maheshwor Adharbhut Vidyalaya 12 15 27 0 0 0 030070014 Mai Nagarpalika Kankai Ma V 50 44 94 99 67 166 030190004 Maijogmai Gaunpalika
    [Show full text]
  • Download 4.06 MB
    Environmental Compliance Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report Project Number: 44214-024 Grant Number: 0357-NEP July 2020 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Project Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental Compliance Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Department of Forests and Soil Conservation Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (BCRWME) Project (ADB Loan/Grant No.: GO357/0358-NEP) Semiannual Environemntal Monitoring Report of BCRWME Sub-projects (January to June 2020) Preparaed By BCRWME Project Project Management Unit Dadeldhura July, 2020 ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank BCRWME : Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions BOQ : Bills of Quantity CDG : Community Development Group CFUG : Community Forest User Group CO : Community Organizer CPC : Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) CS : Construction Supervisor DDR : Due Diligence
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Energy Promotion Centre
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Science, Technology & Environment Alternative Energy Promotion Centre Table of Content Executive Summary 2 1. Energy Situation in Nepal 4 1.1. Energy Data 5 1.2. Sources of Cooking Fuels 5 1.3. Sources of Lighting 6 1.4. RET Installation Data 6 2. AEPC at a Glance 7 2.1. Brief Introduction of AEPC 8 2.2. Our Approach and Modality 8 2.3. Our Partners 9 2.4. Our Staff 9 3. Introduction to AEPC’s Programmes 11 3.1. National Rural and Renewable Energy Program (NRREP) 12 3.2. Programmes/ Projects under NRREP Framework 15 3.3. Renewable Energy for Rural Livelihood (RERL) 16 3.4. Enhanced Rural Energy Service Programme-Kabeli Transmission Project 17 3.5. Wind Energy Development Activities 17 3.6. Regional Centre of Excellence in Micro Hydro (RCEMH) 17 4. Annual Performance of AEPC 18 4.1. Pico/Micro Hydropower Energy 19 4.2. Solar Energy 20 4.3. Biogas Energy 21 4.4. Biomass Energy 21 4.5. Productive Energy Use 22 4.6. Institutional Support Activities 23 4.7. Carbon Financing 23 4.8. Activities related to Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects: 23 4.9. Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) 23 4.10. Monitoring and Quality Assurance Activities 22 4.11. Wind Energy 24 4.12. Establishment of RCEMH Offi ce 24 AEPC - A Year in Review 5. Renewable Energy Initiatives 26 5.1. Renewable Energy Week 2013 27 5.2. Nepal Renewable Energy- Waste to Energy Bazaar 2013 27 5.3. Formation of Nepal Alliance for Clean Cook stove (NACC) 28 5.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020)
    Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020) Editor-In-Chief Shree Ram Bajagain Editor Aarya Adhikari Editorial Team Govinda Prasad Tripathee Ramesh Prasad Timalsina Data Analyst Anuj KC Cover/Graphic Designer Gita Mali For Human Rights and Social Justice Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) Nagarjun Municipality-10, Syuchatar, Kathmandu POBox : 2726, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5218770 Fax:+977-1-5218251 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.insec.org.np; www.inseconline.org All materials published in this book may be used with due acknowledgement. First Edition 1000 Copies February 19, 2021 © Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) ISBN: 978-9937-9239-5-8 Printed at Dream Graphic Press Kathmandu Contents Acknowledgement Acronyms and Abbreviations Foreword CHAPTERS Chapter 1 Situation of Human Rights in 2020: Overall Assessment Accountability Towards Commitment 1 Review of the Social and Political Issues Raised in the Last 29 Years of Nepal Human Rights Year Book 25 Chapter 2 State and Human Rights Chapter 2.1 Judiciary 37 Chapter 2.2 Executive 47 Chapter 2.3 Legislature 57 Chapter 3 Study Report 3.1 Status of Implementation of the Labor Act at Tea Gardens of Province 1 69 3.2 Witchcraft, an Evil Practice: Continuation of Violence against Women 73 3.3 Natural Disasters in Sindhupalchok and Their Effects on Economic and Social Rights 78 3.4 Problems and Challenges of Sugarcane Farmers 82 3.5 Child Marriage and Violations of Child Rights in Karnali Province 88 36 Socio-economic
    [Show full text]
  • Trimester Report
    Government of Nepal Trimester Report Rural Access Programme (RAP) Phase 3 November 2015 – March 2016 March 2016 Trimester Report November 2015 – March 2016 Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................. iii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Activities and progress ..................................................................................... 1 2.1 Local Road Component .................................................................................................... 1 2.1.1 Planning .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.2 Maintenance .................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.3 RAP3 TA to GoN road improvement projects ................................................................. 2 2.1.4 New construction ............................................................................................................. 2 2.1.5 Procurement .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Social and economic development ................................................................................... 4 2.3 Capacity development and institutional development .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Development Organizations in Agriculture Sector of Dadeldhura District: an Economic Analysis
    International Journal of Agricultural Science Research Vol. 2(5), pp. 163-176, May 2013 Available online at http://academeresearchjournals.org/journal/ijasr ISSN 2327-3321 ©2013 Academe Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Performance of development organizations in agriculture sector of Dadeldhura District: An economic analysis G. P. Bohara*, J. P. Dutta, D. Dhakal and J. L. Yadav Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal Accepted 17 May, 2013 Transformation of traditional and subsistence agriculture into commercial and market oriented production system needs efficient transfer of technology to the farmers. Efforts to bridge the gap between research and farmer’s field have been lacking in Nepal and performance of the organizations providing extension services to the farmers is below par, the reason behind this state of affairs is still to be studied. In order to assess the performance of development organizations, this study selected 105 farmers from Dadeldhura district using stratified random sampling technique and both primary and secondary data regarding the activities of those organizations were collected. The development organizations were found to be concentrated in urban areas with technician to population ratio and extension coverage of 1:2353 and 22.7%, respectively. Agriculture sector occupied only 4.01% of the district budget. Most of the organizations had similar type of activities mainly related to technology, extension and support. Regression analysis showed that organizations had significant contribution in annual income of farmers, hence it played a significant role in development of agriculture in the district and respondents were satisfied by their works in general with few disappointments at some instants.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal
    Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal Volumes: Volume I : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 1 Volume II : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 2 Volume III : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 3 Volume IV : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 4 Volume V : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 5 Volume VI : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 6 Volume VII : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 7 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Forest Research and Survey Kathmandu July 2017 © Department of Forest Research and Survey, 2017 Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part should mention the title and credit DFRS. Citation: DFRS, 2017. Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared by: Coordinator : Dr. Deepak Kumar Kharal, DG, DFRS Member : Dr. Prem Poudel, Under-secretary, DSCWM Member : Rabindra Maharjan, Under-secretary, DoF Member : Shiva Khanal, Under-secretary, DFRS Member : Raj Kumar Rimal, AFO, DoF Member Secretary : Amul Kumar Acharya, ARO, DFRS Published by: Department of Forest Research and Survey P. O. Box 3339, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4233510 Fax: 977-1-4220159 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dfrs.gov.np Cover map: Front cover: Map of Forest Cover of Nepal FOREWORD Forest of Nepal has been a long standing key natural resource supporting nation's economy in many ways. Forests resources have significant contribution to ecosystem balance and livelihood of large portion of population in Nepal. Sustainable management of forest resources is essential to support overall development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Adaptation Mechanisms to Address Climate Led Food Insecurity in Far-Western Nepal: the Case of Badimalika Municipality
    Journal of Food Science and Engineering 9 (2019) 1-5 doi: 10.17265/2159-5828/2019.01.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Local Adaptation Mechanisms to Address Climate Led Food Insecurity in Far-western Nepal: The Case of Badimalika Municipality Deepak Chaulagain1 and Parshu Ram Rimal2 College of Applied Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Environmental Science, Kathmandu, Nepal Abstract: The study was carried out to understand the food security situation and coping mechanisms due to an effect of climate change on food security of Badimalika Municipality of Bajura district in the far-western region; an acute food deficit district of Nepal. Literature review, household questionnaire survey to document primary data, stakeholders’ consultation with field observations were the principle methods applied to explore the possible adaptation measures for securing food and livelihood of people. The research revealed that the district is food insecure for at least six to nine months of a year which is worsened by climate induced natural disasters: flood, landslides and drought. Sudden and unpredictable precipitation both in winter and monsoon has distorted the productions over the years. Considerable proportions of grazing land and forested area have been converted into farmland especially in the highlands. Migrating working class manpower to India to seek livelihoods is a menace to development in the place while seasonal migration in and outside the country is an interesting adaptive mechanism in the district. Drought resistant crop varieties such as Finger Millet (Elusine coracana), Foxtail Millet (Setaria italic L.), Wheat (Triticum aestivum), and Amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) are highly potential cereal crops that need to be promoted. Some humanitarian agencies with the support of GoN have been playing an important role in reducing the impact of food deficiency in the region.
    [Show full text]