DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Geological Survey Appalachian Region Integrated Science Workshop Proceedings, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, October 22-26, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Geological Survey Appalachian Region Integrated Science Workshop Proceedings, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, October 22-26, 2001 U.S. Geological Survey Appalachian Region Integrated Science Workshop Proceedings, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, October 22-26, 2001 D. Briane Adams, Katrina Burke, Bruce Hemingway, Jeff Keay, and Michael Yurewicz, compilers U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 01-406 Norcross, Georgia 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Abstracts and papers included in this proceedings are published as submitted by the authors. For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: D. Briane Adams U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3850 Holcomb Bridge Road Box 25286 Suite 160 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Norcross, Georgia 30092 PREFACE Why the Appalachians? A U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Science Planning Effort Some of nature's most magnificent creations beginning to work together to preserve the on Earth are the picturesque landscape and the landscape of the Appalachians for not only the terrestrial and aquatic inhabitants of the economic future of human residents and the Appalachian Mountains of the Eastern United natural environment for endemic species, but also States. Mother Nature has been kind to the region for the many millions of visitors who come to but man, often, has not. The Appalachian enjoy the majestic scenery. One such group is the mountains and valleys have been home to a Southern Appalachian Man and Biosphere variety of human cultures, dating back (SAMAB) program, founded in 1988 as a approximately 12,000 years. A series of Native cooperative of Federal agencies that collaborate to American peoples, including most recently the provide information necessary for solving issues Cherokee Nation, inhabited the region prior to related to their natural resource missions and European settlement which began in the 1600's. responsibilities in the Southern Appalachians. All of these peoples have had the desire to reap This cooperation has resulted in numerous efforts the benefits of the land. to identify and correct longstanding problems and Current and historic use of the land ranges to improve management practices in the region. from mineral extraction to agricultural The most comprehensive of these efforts was the development to timber production to industrial Southern Appalachian Assessment (SAA), which and residential development, all of which have was completed in 1996. The assessment provided now threatened the landscape. Many individuals feedback on the current status of the resources of and organizations desire to save the awe and the area and identified many issues that needed to beauty of the Appalachians for the generations to be addressed. To date, there has been no come, in a way that is environmentally and comprehensive effort to follow up and address the economically sustainable. They have tried for issues identified. About the same time that the years to raise alarms that this area is threatened SAA was being completed, the U.S. Geological and worth the attention of all who are interested in Survey (USGS) initiated an effort to develop the an effort of restitution and preservation. Southern Appalachian Critical Ecosystem Residents, environmental groups, land managers, Program (SACEP), a solicited proposal for scientists, business groups, and the multitude of funding under the then National Ecosystem visitors who pass through the national parks and Program, which had initiated work in other parts other public lands located within the Appalachians of the United States, most significantly in have raised these same alarms. There is a need to southern Florida. The SACEP continues to remain not only identify the issues resulting from unfunded. Since that time, the USGS has been anthropogenic pressures on the landscape, but also reorganizing both administratively and to collect the information and conduct the science programmatically. During this reorganization that will allow land managers and policy makers process, the USGS has concentrated on to become better informed and better able to conducting science in an integrated and execute their responsibilities. multidisciplinary manner. As a result, a number of The issues are many air quality, sustainable national issues of concern have been identified, development, threatened and endangered species, with several geographic areas and landscapes invasive species, landscape fragmentation, designated as specific focus areas for scientific watershed modification, ground-water study. Initially, the Appalachians were not contamination, mineral extraction, cultural and considered as one of these specific areas of focus. economic impacts to list just a few. An USGS managers now have become convinced that important awareness has developed in the past the region should be reconsidered as a focus area decade .... individuals, businesses, government for scientific study. Subsequently, USGS agencies, universities, and private groups are scientists and managers from all disciplines throughout the USGS gathered at a workshop in also house the draft science opportunities Gatlinburg, Tennessee, from October 22-26, 2001, document which will be available for review and to share data, scientific results, and ideas. An input. You can also find links to other supporting attempt was made to establish an understanding websites with information on Appalachian region about the current status of science efforts, to resources. We invite you to provide additional develop new collaborative opportunities, and to internet information links that can be added to the further scientific understanding of the issues and website. the impacts on the earth resources of the In summary, the workshop was organized to Appalachians. As a result of this workshop, a draft bring together USGS scientists of all disciplines to "science opportunities" document is currently not only identify their current areas of research in under development in an effort to help set USGS the Appalachian region but to allow them the priorities for investment of resources for the opportunity to become familiar with whom they foreseeable future. In developing this document, may collaborate in future work. We hope that the issues and gaps in scientific understanding are information presented at the workshop and in being identified. The plan will not be successful, these proceedings will not only benefit USGS however, if developed from within the USGS scientists, but will be of value to policy makers alone. It is critical that all USGS partners provide and resource managers in identifying additional their voice in identifying issues and needs for needs for USGS participation in supplying science science information in this region. A second information for the Appalachian region in the workshop scheduled for early 2002 will invite the future. Based upon this information and participation of USGS partners to not only subsequent discussions in the development of the critically review the draft integrated science draft science opportunities document, we hope to opportunities document, but to come with their provide some guidance for investment of USGS issues and needs as identified from their resources for the future. It is hoped that all who perspectives. The needs of USGS partners will be have an interest in USGS science will use these incorporated into a final document that will be proceedings and the draft science opportunities used as a guide by the USGS to focus and seek document to help identify issues and gaps in additional resources for the future. The document information that they would like the USGS to on Appalachian area science opportunities will be provide. Input is not only solicited, but essential, made available to all who have an interest in the along with participation at a second workshop USGS efforts in the Appalachian region. A new planned for the spring of 2002. This workshop USGS website is being developed for the will invite existing and potential USGS partners to Appalachian region participate and provide input to the final science http://www.AppalachianRegionScience.usgs.gov. opportunities document that will be published and At this website, you can find data and information possibly used as a guide for future USGS research on current and past USGS research in the and data collection in the Appalachian region. Appalachian region, and proceedings from the October 2001 USGS workshop. The website will D. Briane Adams iv CONTENTS SESSION I The Southern Appalachians: A Changing World Sandra Clark, Judith Back, Anne Tubiolo, and Elizabeth Romanawc............................................... 3 A Framework for Integrated Science in the Appalachian Mountain Range John D. Peine .................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview of Current and Future Fossil Energy Geoscience in the Eastern Region lone L. Taylor and Senior Scientists of the Eastern Energy Resources Team................................... 14 Land Surface Change and Analysis Dave Kirtland.................................................................................................................................... 15 The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative in the Northern Appalachian Region Peter Murdoch, Richard Birdsey, and Ken Stolte ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration in the Southern Appalachians: a Dialogue Among Scientists, Planners, and Land Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Restoration in the Southern Appalachians: A Dialogue among Scientists, Planners, and Land Managers W.T. Rankin and Nancy Herbert, Editors 2005 2010 Forest Service Research & Development Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-189 The Editors: W.T. Rankin, Threatened and Endangered Species Program Manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, 1720 Peachtree Rd. NW, Suite 700, Atlanta, GA 30309; and Nancy Herbert, Assistant Director for Research (retired), U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd., Asheville, NC 28804 Cover: Before-and-after photographs of a restoration project on the Buck Creek Serpentine Barrens in western North Carolina. Left: Spring 2005 (photo by Paul Davison, University of North Alabama). Right: Fall 2010 (photo by W. T. Rankin, USDA Forest Sevice) March 2014 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 www.srs.fs.usda.gov Restoration in the Southern Appalachians: A Dialogue among Scientists, Planners, and Land Managers W.T. Rankin and Nancy Herbert, Editors CONTENTS Prologue . iv 1. The Role of Fire in the Southern Appalachians. 1 Did fire occur in the Southern Appalachians historically? . 1 What are the different kinds of fire?. 2 What are the effects of fire on nongame species in the Southern Appalachians? . 3 What are the effects of fire on soils in the Southern Appalachians? . 4 What are the effects of fire on air quality in the Southern Appalachians? . 5 Are there ecosystems in the Southern Appalachians where fire isn’t appropriate? . 7 If we don’t use fire as a management tool, what else do we use? .
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Regions of Virginia Bordering States Major Rivers & Cities Bordering
    5 Regions of Virginia Bordering States West to East All Virginia Bears Play Tag Appalachian Plateau Valley & Ridge Never Taste Ketchup Without Mustard Blue Ridge Piedmont North Carolina Tidewater/Coastal Plain Tennessee Kentucky West Virginia Maryland Major Rivers & Cities Bordering Bodies of Water North to South Alex likes Potatoes Alexandria (and DC) are on the Potomac River. Fred likes to Rap Fredericksburg is on the Rappahannock River Chesapeake Bay Yorktown is on the York River Separates mainland Atlantic King James was Rich. VA and Eastern Shore Ocean Jamestown & Richmond are on the James River. Eastern Shore Rivers Eastern Shore Peninsula Flow into the Chesapeake Bay Source of food Pathway for exploration and settlement Chesapeake Bay Provided a safe harbor Was a source of food and transportation Atlantic Ocean Provided transportation Peninsula: links between Virginia and other places (Europe, Piece of land bordered by Africa, Caribbean) water on 3 sides Fall Line Tidewater - Coastal Plain Region Low, flat land; East of the Fall Land; Includes Eastern Shore; Natural Border between Waterfalls prevent near Atlantic Ocean and Chesapeake Bay Piedmont & Tidewater further travel on Regions the rivers. Piedmont Region Relative Location The mouse is next to the box. The ball is near the box. West of the Fall Line Means "Land at the Foot of the Mountain" Blue Ridge Mountain Region Valley and Ridge Region Old, Rounded Mountains West of Blue Ridge Region Source of Many Rivers Includes the Great Valley of Virginia Piedmont to East/Valley & Ridge to West Valleys separated by ridges Part of Appalachian Mountain System Part of Appalachian Mountain System Appalachian Plateau Region Plateau Area of elevated land that is flat on top Located in Southwest Virginia Only Small Part of Plateau Located in Virginia Dismal Swamp and Valley, Ridge Definition Lake Drummond Ridge: chain of hills Located in Tidewater/Coastal Plain Region Dismal Swamp: Surveyed by George Washington; lots of wildlife Lake Drummond: Shallow lake surrounded by Valley: land between hills swamp .
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of North Central Texas Flora of North Central Texas
    SHINNERS & MAHLER’S FLOR A OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS GEORGE M. DIGGSIGGS,, JJR.. BBARNEY L. LIPSCOMBIPSCOMB ROBERT J. O’KENNON D VEGETATIONAL AREAS OF TEXAS MODIFIED FROM CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF TEXAS (HATCH ET AL. 1990). NEARLY IDENTICAL MAPS HAVE BEEN USED IN NUMEROUS WORKS ON TEXAS INCLUDING GOULD (1962) AND CORRELL AND JOHNSTON (1970). 1 PINEYWOODS 2 GULF PRAIRIES AND MARSHEs 3 POST OAK SAVANNAH 4 BLACKLAND PRAIRIES 5 CROSS TIMBERS AND PRAIRIES 6 SOUTH TEXAS PLAINS 7 EDWARDS PLATEAU 8 ROLLING PLAINS 9 HIGH PLAINS 10 TRANS-PECOS, MOUNTAINS AND BASINS D VEGETATIONAL AREAS OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D SHINNERS & MAHLER’S ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS Shinners & Mahler’s ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) BASS FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON RUTH ANDERSSON MAY MARY G. PALKO AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION MARGRET M. RIMMER MIKE AND EVA SANDLIN INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: PEG AND BEN KEITH FRIENDS OF HAGERMAN NAT IONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION JOHN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms of the United States Are Indeed Keys to an Understanding of the Earth
    of the UNITED STATES U.S.DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The United States contains a great variety of land­ forms which offer dramatic contrasts to a cross­ country traveler. Mountains and desert areas, tropical jungles and areas of permanently frozen subsoil, deep canyons and broad plains are examples of theN ation's varied surface. The present-day landforms- the features that make up the face of the earth-are products of the slow, sculpturing actions of streams and geologic processes that have been at work throughout the ages since the earth's beginning. Landforms may be classified as depositional or erosional. Depositional landforms have the character and shape of the deposits of which they are made. They include beaches, stream terraces, and alluvial fans at the foot of mountains. Erosional landforms are ones that have been created by agents of erosion such as rivers and streams, rain, and ice. The most widespread erosional landforms are those made by running water acting over very long periods of time. Rain, accumulating as a sheet of water on the ground, does not travel far before it gathers in channels. These channels, like branches of a tree, extend from a myriad of branchlets to larger and larger branches and finally to main trunk rivers. Stream channels are abundant in a humid climate and commonly one cannot travel in a straight line for more than a quarter of a mile without encountering one. Stream channels also occur in deserts, but they are farther apart and water runs in them only inter­ mittently.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Plateau Geological History
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Oneida, Tennessee Geology and History of the Cumberland Plateau Geological History Rising over 1000 feet above the region around it, the Cumberland Plateau is a large, flat-topped tableland. Deceptively rugged, the Plateau has often acted as a barrier to man and nature’s attempts to overcome it. The Plateau is characterized by rugged terrain, a moderate climate, and abundant rainfall. Although the soils are typically thin and infertile, the area was once covered by a dense hardwood forest equal to that of the Appalachians less than sixty miles to the east. As a landform, this great plateau reaches from north-central Alabama through Tennessee and Kentucky and Pennsylvania to the western New York border. Geographers call this landform the Appalachian Plateau, although it is known by various names as it passes through the differ­ ent regions. In Tennessee and Kentucky, it is called the Cumberland Plateau. Within this region, the Cumberland River and its tributaries are formed. A view from any over- look quickly confirms that the area is indeed a plateau. The adjoining ridges are all the same height, presenting a flat horizon. The River Systems The Clear Fork River and the New River come together to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, the third largest tributary to the Cumberland. The Big South Fork watershed drains an area of 1382 square Leatherwood Ford in the evening sun miles primarily in Scott, Fentress, and Morgan counties in Tennessee and Wayne and Overlooks McCreary counties in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Climate Change Within the Five Regions of Virginia
    EVIDENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE WITHIN THE FIVE REGIONS OF VIRGINIA Darrell Logan Undergraduate Student Faculty Advisors: Dr. Shobha Sriharan and Ms. Darlette Meekins Appalachian Plateau ■ Plateau: area of elevated land which is flat on top ■ Located in Southwest Virginia ■ Bordered by the states of Tennessee and Kentucky ■ Smallest of all five regions in Virginia ■ Upper layer is covered with forests rich in coal, natural gas, and petroleum - Mount Rogers (highest peak in Virginia) Valley & Ridge • Includes the Great Valley of Virginia and other valleys separated by ridges (the Great Valley lies between the Allegheny and the Blue Ridge Mountains) • It is rugged due to many high and rocky peaks. • The Blue Ridge Mountains and the Valley and Ridge Regions are part of the Appalachian Mountain system. • Located west of the Blue Ridge Mountains Blue Ridge Mountains ■ Old, rounded mountains (stretching from Pennsylvania to Georgia) ■ part of the Appalachian Mountain system (This mountain system stretches from Canada to Alabama. ■ located between the Piedmont and Valley and Ridge regions ■ Source of many rivers Roanoke Valley located in Roanoke, VA Piedmont ■ “Piedmont” stands for “Foot of the mountains” ■ Separated by Virginia’s Coastal Plain by a “Fall line” ■ Fall line consists of rivers, rapids, and small waterfalls “fall” off hard to flow into the ocean ■ Virginia’s largest region ■ State capital is located here (Richmond, VA) ■ Has rolling hills Coastal Plain (Tidewater) ■ Low, flat land with sandy soil ■ located near the Atlantic Ocean and
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Regions of the World
    - "52 ^ A FLORISTIC REGIONS OF THE WORLD Armen Takhtajan Translated by Theodore J. Crovello with the assistance and collaboration of the author and under the editorship of Arthur Cronquist UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London CONTENTS Editor's Preface xv Author's Preface to the English Translation xvii PREFACE xxi INTRODUCTION 1 I. HOLARCnC KINGDOM (HOLARCTIS) 9 A. BOREAL SUBKINGDOM 10 1. Circumboreal Region 10 1. Arctic Province 12 2. Atlantic-European Province 16 3. Central European Province • 17 4. Illyrian or Balkan Province 21 5. Euxine Province 22 6. Caucasian Province 25 7. Eastern European Province 27 8. Northern European Province 29 9. Western Siberian Province 29 10. Altai-Sayan Province 30 11. Middle Siberian Province 31 12. Transbaikalian Province 32 vti Vtii CONTENTS 13. Northeastern Siberian Province 33 14. Okhotsk-Kamchatka Province 33 15. Canadian Province 34 2. Eastern Asiatic Region 39 1. Manchurian Province 48 2. Sakhalin-Hokkaido Province 52 3. lapanese-Korean Province 53 4. Volcano-Bonin Province 56 5. Ryukyu or Tokara-Okinawa Province 58 6. Taiwanian Province 59 7. Northern Chinese Province 62 8. Central Chinese Province 63 9. Southeastern Chinese Province 65 10. Sikang-Yunnan Province 65 11. Northern Burmese Province 68 12. Eastern Himalayan Province 70 13. Khasi-Manipur Province 73 3. North American Atlantic Region 78 1. Appalachian Province 84 2. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Province 91 3. North American Prairies Province 95 4. Rocky Mountain Region 99 1. Vancouverian Province 101 2. Rocky Mountain Province 105 B. TETHYAN (ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN) SUBKINGDOM 110 5. Macaronesian Region 112 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]