<<

W 359 by PREMIX This section lists premix alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix’s component fungicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer to the Site of Action section on the left for more information.

ACTIVE FRAC PREMIX INGREDIENT (%) GROUP REPEATED USE OF FUNGICIDES WITH THE SAME SITE OF ACTION CAN RESULT 18.2% 11 IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF -RESISTANT PATHOGEN POPULATION. QUADRIS TOP Difenoconazole 11.4% 3

Azoxystrobin 7.0% 11 AVARIS Propiconazole 11.7% 3

Azoxystrobin 7.0% 11 QUILT Propiconazole 11.7% 3

Azoxystrobin 13.5% 11 QUILT XCEL by MODE OF ACTION Propiconazole 11.7% 3 (effect on plant pathogen) Picoxystrobin 17.94% 11 APROACH PRIMA This section groups fungicides by their modes of action to assist you in selecting fungicides 1) to maintain greater 7.17% 3 diversity in fungicide use and 2) to rotate among effective fungicides with different sites of action to delay the Fluoxastrobin 18.0% 11 EVITO T development of fungicide resistance. Tebuconazole 25.0% 3

Fluoxastrobin 14.84% 11 FORTIX Flutriafol 19.3% 3

Pyraclostrobin 28.58% 11 PRIAXOR FRAC SITE OF ACTION CHEMICAL ACTIVE PRODUCT EXAMPLES Fluxapyroxad 14.33% 7 CODE FAMILY INGREDIENT (TRADE NAME) Pyraclostrobin 28.58% 11 MITOSIS PRIAXOR D Fluxapyroxad 14.33% 7 DISRUPTERS MBC (Methyl Benzimidazole Carbamates) Topsin, multiple generics and Tetraconazole 20.5% 3 Thiophanates Thiophanate-methyl 1 B1: ß-tubuline assembly in mitosis component in premix Trifloxystrobin 11.4% 11 CELL MEMBRANE STRATEGO Prothioconazole 11.4% 3 DISRUPTERS Cyproconazole Alto and component in premix Flutriafol Trifloxystrobin 32.3% 11 Topguard and component in premix STRATEGO YLD Propiconazole Tilt, multiple generics Prothioconazole 10.8% 3 DMI(DeMethylation Inhibitors)/Triazoles Tebuconazole 7.5% 3 Triazoles Tetraconazole Domark, multiple generics and component in premix OVERRULE 3 G1: C14- demethylase in Difenoconazole Thiophanate-methyl 37.5% 1 biosynthesis (erg11/cyp51) Component of Quadris Top Tebuconazole 7.5% 3 Folicur, multiple generics and Tebuconazole TOPSIN XRT component in premix Thiophanate-methyl 37.5% 1

Triazolinthiones Prothioconazole Proline and component in premix Propiconazole 7.1% 3 PROTOCOL RESPIRATION Thiophanate-methyl 23.7% 1 INHIBITORS Pyridinecarboxamides Boscalid Endura SDHI (Succinate dehydrogenase Tebuconazole 8.47% 3 inhibitors)/Carboximides Component of Priaxor MUSCLE ADV 7 Fluxapyroxad 30.51% M5 Pyrazole-4- carboxamides Solatenol Component of Trivapro complex II: succinate-dehydrogenase Fontelis Azoxystrobin 9.35% 11 Penthiopyrad AFFIANCE Tetraconazole 7.48% 3 Quadris, Equation, Trevo, multiple Azoxystrobin generics Azoxystrobin 13.5% 11 Methoxy-acrylates and component in premix AFRAME PLUS Propiconazole 11.7% 3 QoI (Quinone oustide inhibitors)/ Picoxystrobin Aproach and component in premix Strobilurins C3: complex III: cytochrome 11 Azoxystrobin 11.0% 11 bc1 (ubiquinol oxidase) at Qo site (cyt b Dihydro-dioxazines Fluoxastrobin Aftershock, Evito AZOXY TEB Tebuconazole 18.35% 3 gene) Methoxy-carbamates Pyraclostrobin Headline Azoxystrobin 13.5% 11 AZOXYPROP XTRA Oximino-acetates Trifloxystrobin Component of Stratego YLD Propiconazole 11.7% 3

MULTI-SITE Potassium Phosphite 38.9% 33 CONTACT ACTIVITY Badge and multiple generics CATAMARAN M1 Inorganic Copper (different salts) Chlorothalonil 16.7% M5 Multi-site contact activity Chloronitriles Bravo Weather Stik, multiple generics Potassium Phosphite 49% 33 Chlorothalonil M5 (Phthalonitriles) and component in premix VIATHON Tebuconazole 3.3% 3 UNKNOWN Azoxystrobin 13.5% 11 Phophorous acid COVER XL Unknown Phosphonates Component in premix Propiconazole 11.7% 3 33 and salts Azoxystrobin 11.0% 11 CUSTODIA For more information and links to additional resources visit Soybean Fungicide Resistance Hub at PlantManagementNetwork.org Tebuconazole 18.35% 3

Fluoxastrobin 14.84% 11 PREEMPTOR Flutriafol 19.3% 3

Azoxystrobin 18.2% 11 QUADRIS TOP SB Difenoconazole 7.3% 3

Technical editing for this publication was led by Drs. Heather Kelly, This chart was developed with funding from the soy checkoff. University of Tennessee, Carl Bradley, University of Kentucky, and The United Soybean Board and other partner institutes involved in creation Clayton Hollier, Louisiana State University. of this poster neither recommend nor discourage the implementation of Check for a label and Material Safety Data Sheet at www.cdms.net any device contained herein, and are not liable for the use or misuse of the to confirm status and always consult label prior to use. information provided.

DISCLAIMER: This publication contains recommendations that are subject to change at any time. The recommendations in this publication are provided only as a guide. It is always the pesticide applicator’s responsibility, by law, to read and follow all current label directions Programs in agriculture and natural resources, 4-H youth development, family and consumer sciences, and resource for the specific pesticide being used. The label always takes precedence over the recommendations found in this publication. Use of trade or brand names in this publication is for clarity and information; it does not imply approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may be development. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture and county governments of similar, suitable composition, nor does itguarantee or warrant the standard of the product. The author(s), the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture and University of Tennessee Extension assume no liability resulting from the use of these recommendations. cooperating. UT Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment.