DOCSLIB.ORG

Housing and Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 ii Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 Havant Borough Core Strategy Foreword The Havant Borough Core Strategy is a very important document. It sets the planning framework for our communities until 2026. In preparing this strategy the council has sought to address local needs, especially for housing and economic development, with an emphasis on high quality design and stewardship of the borough’s high quality natural and built environment. The Core Strategy has been prepared working closely with partner organisations, including the Havant Local Strategic Partnership, the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH), local communities and agencies. There have been three major public consultations – Issues and Options consultation in 2006, the Preferred Options consultation in 2008 and consultation on the Draft Core Strategy in 2009. The Submitted Core Strategy was then subject to a Public Examination in September 2010. The council would like to thank all those who have responded to these consultations, giving their ideas and opinions which have helped the council in shaping the Core Strategy. Planning often presents a difficult balance between national and regional policy and local need and aspirations. We trust that local residents, employees and employers will find that we are fulfilling our task of setting out a vision for the future of our borough with policies that reflect their own aspirations whilst delivering on national and regional requirements. Councillor David Guest Havant Borough Council Deputy Leader and Planning and Development Portfolio Holder Adopted by Havant Borough Council 1 March 2011 iii Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 iv Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 Havant Borough Core Strategy Contents Foreword Chapter Page 1. Introduction and Vision 1 2. Health and Wellbeing 23 3. Promoting Havant Borough’s Economy 32 4. Regeneration and Community Support 48 5. Community Safety 54 6. Housing 56 7. Caring for our Borough 65 8. Spatial Distribution and Strategic Sites 86 9. Infrastructure, Implementation and Monitoring 106 10. Development Management Policies 122 Appendices 1. Evidence Based Studies 149 2. Housing Trajectory (2009) 151 3. Havant Borough Nature Designations – Policy CS11 153 4. Havant Borough Flood Risk Projections for 2115 – Policy CS15 154 5. Non Residential Parking Standards – Policy DM4 155 6. List of Saved Local Plan Policies that are Superseded by the Core Strategy 168 Glossary 171 This document is available in many other formats such as Braille, large print and on CD or tape. Other languages are also available. To request any of these formats please contact 023 9244 6609. v Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 Index of Strategic Core Strategy Policies Page CS1 Health and Wellbeing 24 CS2 Employment 33 CS3 Skills and Employability 39 CS4 Town, District and Local Centres 41 CS5 Tourism 45 CS6 Regeneration of the Borough 49 CS7 Community Support and Inclusion 52 CS8 Community Safety 54 CS9 Housing 57 CS10 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 64 CS11 Protecting and Enhancing the Special Environment and Heritage of Havant Borough 66 CS12 Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) 69 CS13 Green Infrastructure 72 CS14 Efficient Use of Resources 74 CS15 Flood and Erosion Risk 77 CS16 High Quality Design 80 CS17 Concentration and Distribution of Development within the Urban Areas 86 CS18 Strategic Site Delivery 87 CS19 Effective Provision of Infrastructure 108 CS20 Transport and Access Strategy 109 CS21 Developer Requirements 113 Signposting The Local Development Framework relies on the principle that national, regional and other strategies and plans are not repeated. To help readers find their way to the relevant national, regional and other local documents hyperlinks have been provided throughout the document. The links are grouped together around the ‘signpost’ symbol. These links were correct at the date of publication, but may be subject to change by individual organisations. Strategic Sites Information regarding the strategic sites, Policy CS18, can be found on the following pages: Page 1. Havant Public Service Village 89 2. Havant Thicket Reservoir 92 3. Dunsbury Hill Farm 95 4. Major Development Area and Waterlooville Town Centre Integration 99 5. Woodcroft Farm 104 vi Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 Index of Development Management Policies Page Health and Wellbeing - Community Facilities, Recreation and Open Space DM1 Recreation and Open Space 122 DM2 Protection of Existing Community Facilities and Shops 123 Promoting Havant Borough’s Economy DM3 Protection of Existing Employment and Tourism Sites 125 DM4 Static Holiday Caravan Development 127 DM5 Control of Class A3, A4 and A5 Food, Drink and Entertainment Uses 128 DM6 Coordination of Development 129 Housing DM7 Elderly and Specialist Housing Provision 130 Caring for Our Borough DM8 Conservation, Protection and Enhancement of Existing Natural Features 134 DM9 Development in the Coastal Zone 135 DM10 Pollution 137 Infrastructure - Transport DM11 Planning for More Sustainable Travel 145 DM12 Mitigating the Impacts of Travel 145 DM13 Car and Cycle Parking on Residential Development 146 DM14 Car and Cycle Parking on Development (excluding residential) 146 DM15 Safeguarding Transport Infrastructure 146 DM16 Freight Transport 146 Please contact the Planning Policy Team about the Core Strategy and other LDF queries at: Havant Borough Council Civic Offices Havant Hampshire PO9 2AX Email: [email protected] Telephone: 023 92446539 vii Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 viii Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 1. Introduction and Vision What is the Core Strategy? 1.01 Havant Borough Council is working with the local community and its partners to produce the Havant Borough Local Development Framework (HBLDF). The HBLDF will guide the future development of the borough up to 2026. This will affect everyone who lives, works or visits the borough. 1.02 The Havant Borough Core Strategy is one of the documents within the HBLDF. The HBLDF is made up of a collection of planning documents and the Core Strategy is the principal document setting out the broad detail and direction of development in the borough. 1.03 The Core Strategy will be followed by a Development Delivery (Allocations) Plan that will detail where development will occur. In addition, a number of supplementary planning documents will provide more information on how policy is to be applied in particular circumstances or on particular issues/sites. However, the Core Strategy itself, taken as a whole, is the over-arching document which sets the overall policy framework for all other local development documents. All other local development documents must be consistent with the Core Strategy. What the Core Strategy Seeks to Achieve 1.04 The Core Strategy describes the council’s long term vision and objectives for what the borough will be like as a place in 2026. It closely aligns with the Sustainable Community Strategy, Forward Together, produced by the Havant Local Strategic Partnership. 1.05 The Core Strategy sets out how the council believes the borough should develop. The Core Strategy identifies the strategic sites that are considered fundamental to achieving the overall vision and further details on these sites are provided in the document. The Core Strategy also identifies the required physical and social infrastructure (including green infrastructure) necessary to support new development and meet future needs. 1.06 The document contains strategic policies and some detailed development management policies against which individual planning applications will be assessed. When considering planning applications the council will consider all the policies contained in the Core Strategy that are relevant to the proposal. It is therefore essential that the Core Strategy is always read as a whole. 1.07 Where possible the Core Strategy has been designed to address risks and allow for flexibility in order to ensure the vision and objectives are met. Regular monitoring will be undertaken as part of the council’s Annual Monitoring Report and if appropriate, a review or partial review of the document will be undertaken to ensure it is responsive to any changes in circumstances. The Statutory Requirement of the Core Strategy 1.08 Government guidance identifies a number of principles that must be adhered to so that core strategies and other development plan documents can be considered legally compliant and sound. 1.09 Legal Compliance – the document must have been prepared in accordance with the Local Development Scheme; have regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy, Forward Together; be compliant with the Statement of Community Involvement; be subject to a sustainability appraisal; have regard to national policy and associated regulations relating to publication, advertisement and consultation. 1.10 Soundness – a Core Strategy must be justified, effective and have regard to national policy. 1 Havant Borough Core Strategy March 2011 1.11 To be ‘justified’ it must be founded on a robust and credible evidence base that has included participation of the local community and others that have a stake in the area and evidence that research is robust so that any choices in the plan are backed up by facts. It must also be evident that it is the most appropriate strategy when considered against reasonable alternatives. A continuous Sustainability Appraisal of the Core Strategy has been undertaken
Recommended publications
  • F!13Il-.-.; A:: It: Identification of Littoral Cells

    F!13Il-.-.; A:: It: Identification of Littoral Cells

    Journal of Coastal Research 381-400 Fort Lauderdale, Florida Spring 1995 Littoral Cell Definition and Budgets for Central Southern England Malcolm J. Bray, David J. Carter and Janet M. Hooke Department of Geography University of Portsmouth Portsmouth, POI 3HE, England ABSTRACT . BRAY, M.J.; CARTER, D.J., and HOOKE, J.M., 1995. Littoral cell definition and budgets for central southern England. Journal of Coastal Research, 11(2),381-400. Fort Lauderdale (Florida), ISSN 0749­ ,tllllllll,.e 0208. Differentiation of natural process units is promoted as a means of better understanding the interconnected . ~ ~ - nature of coastal systems at various scales. This paper presents a new holistic methodology for the f!13Il-.-.; a:: it: identification of littoral cells. Testing is undertaken through application to an extensive region of central ... bJLt southern England. Diverse sources of information are compiled to map 8. detailed series of local sediment circulations both at the shoreline and in the offshore zone. Cells and sub-cells are subsequently defined by thorough examination of the continuity of sediment transport pathways and by identification of boundaries where there are discontinuities. Important distinctions are made between the nature and stability of different boundaries and a classification of types is devised. Application of sediment budget analysis to major process units helps to clarify the regional significance of different sediment sources, stores and sinks. Within the study area, it is shown that sediments circulate from distinct eroding cliff sources to well defined sinks. Natural beaches are transient and dependent upon the continued functioning of supply pathways from cliff sources. Relict cells with residual circulations are identified as a consequence of interference.
  • Community Infrastructure Levy

    Community Infrastructure Levy

    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE STATEMENT July 2013 Infrastructure Statement Introduction The Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) require the City Council to submit “copies of the relevant evidence” to the examiner. The purpose of this statement is to set out the City Council’s evidence with regard to the demonstration of an infrastructure funding gap, confirmation of the Council’s spending priorities (the draft list), and clarification of its approach in respect of S106 contributions. The City Council is also seeking to comply with the Government’s Community Infrastructure Levy Guidance (April 2013) which sets out the more detailed requirements in respect of the funding gap at paragraphs 12 -14, and of the prioritisation and funding of infrastructure at paragraphs at 84 - 91. In respect of the latter, the principal aim of this statement is to provide transparency on what the Council, as a charging authority, intends to fund in whole or in part through the levy, and those known matters where S106 contributions may continue to be sought (CIL Guidance, paragraph 15). Infrastructure Funding Gap The Government’s CIL Guidance states: • “A charging authority needs to identify the total cost of infrastructure that it desires to fund in whole or in part from the levy” (paragraph 12); • “Information on the charging authority area’s infrastructure needs should be directly related to the infrastructure assessment that underpins their relevant plan.” (paragraph. 13); • “In determining the size of its total or aggregate infrastructure funding gap, the charging authority should consider known and expected infrastructure costs and the other sources of possible funding available to meet those costs.” (paragraph 14).
  • Solent & South Downs Fish Monitoring Report 2015

    Solent & South Downs Fish Monitoring Report 2015

    Solent & South Downs fish monitoring report 2015 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Authors: P. Rudd & L. Swift Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 77 Foreword Welcome to the annual fish report for the Solent and South Downs area for 2015. This report covers all of the fisheries surveys we have carried out in Hampshire and West & East Sussex in 2015 and is the ninth annual report we have produced in succession.
  • South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District

    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District

    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area..........................................................................................................................
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents

    Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents

    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
  • South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy

    South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy

    South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) December 2008 Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Note This document has been produced by ATKINS for PUSH solely for the purpose of the Integrated Water Management Strategy for South Hampshire. It may not be used by any person for any other purpose other than that specified without the express written permission of ATKINS. Any liability arising out of use by a third party of this document for purposes not wholly connected with the above shall be the responsibility of that party who shall indemnify ATKINS against all claims costs damages and losses arising out of such use. Atkins Limited Document History JOB NUMBER: 5056925 DOCUMENT REF: 5056925 / 70 / DG / 23 05 Final for Distribution PS ED HR PS 2/12/08 04 Final PS RH HR PS 4/11/08 03 External Draft for Review HR/JS/PS AB BSP PS 02 Internal draft review HR/JS/PS AB AB PS 01 Draft in progress HR/JS/PS ED BP PS Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Revision Purpose Description Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Acknowledgements The Atkins team would like to thank the Steering Committee for its advice and support throughout the project. The technical specialists in the Environment Agency have also been very supportive. We would like to thank Tony Burch from the Environment Agency who has provided detailed comments and recommendations for improved flood risk management which we have included within this document. Susanne Grigsby, David Lowthian and Tim Sykes have also provided important advice which has helped to steer the project with respect to water quality and understanding the methodology and conclusions of the Review of Consents investigations.
  • Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013

    Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013

    Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013 Hampshire County Council Economy, Transport and Environment Department, The Castle, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 8UD Tel: 0845 603 5638 Fax: 01962 847055 www.hants.gov.uk No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from HCC. Any advice, opinions or recommendations within this document; should be read and relied upon only in the context of this document as a whole, do not in any way purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion, are based on the information made available to HCC at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practises as at the date of this document. No liability is accepted for any use of this document other than for the purpose for which it was originally prepared and provided. Hampshire County Council cannot accept responsibility for any use or reliance on the contents from this report by any third party. Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 [2011]. Document Control Information Document Information Document Reference Draft Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for consultation Document Revision - Report Status Final Date July 2013 Author Susannah Hardwick – CH2M Hill Checker Andy McConkey – CH2M Hill Approver Pete Errington – Hampshire County Council Date of Next Review 2017 Foreword The Flood & Water Management Act, which came into being in 2010, placed a number of statutory duties on Hampshire County Council in its new role as Lead Local Flood Authority to address local flood risk.
  • Memorandum of Understanding 2013

    Memorandum of Understanding 2013

    MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Agreed on 28th June 2013. The parties to this memorandum of understanding (MoU) are: (1) BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BOROUGH COUNCIL of Civic Offices, London Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 4AH; (2) EAST HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL of Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire GU31 4EX; (3) EASTLEIGH BOROUGH COUNCIL of Civic Offices, Leigh Road, Eastleigh, Hampshire SO50 9YN; (4) FAREHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL of Civic Offices, Civic Way, Fareham, Hampshire PO16 7AZ;1 (5) GOSPORT BOROUGH COUNCIL of Town Hall, High Street, Gosport, Hampshire PO12 1EB; (6) HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL of The Castle, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 8UJ; (7) HART DISTRICT COUNCIL of Civic Offices, Harlington Way, Fleet, Hampshire GU51 4AE; (8) COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF HAVANT of Public Service Plaza, Civic Centre Road, Havant, Hampshire PO9 2AX; (9) NEW FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL of Appletree Court, Lyndhurst Hampshire SO43 7PA; (10) NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY of Avenue Road, Lymington SO41 9ZG: (11) RUSHMOOR BOROUGH COUNCIL of Council Offices, Farnborough Road, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 7JU; (12) TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL of Beech Hurst, Weyhill Road, Andover, Hampshire, SP10 3AJ; (13) WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL of City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, Hampshire SO23 9LJ. 1 Fareham Borough Council accepts this MoU as a guide for development in all areas of Fareham Borough other than Welborne which, due to its complexities, requires a separate agreement with the County Council. CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. PURPOSE.............................................................................................................
  • Foundation Document- Stage 1 Towards the SEMS Management Scheme

    Foundation Document- Stage 1 Towards the SEMS Management Scheme

    February 2002 (amended Feb & July 2002) i February 2002 (amended Feb & July 2002) ii Solent European Marine Sites Foundation Document- Stage 1 towards the SEMS Management Scheme. Compiled by: Rachael Bayliss February 2002 (Updated February 2002) (Updated July 2003) Cover photographs: ã Hampshire County Council & Solent Forum ISBN 1 85975 534 8 February 2002 (amended Feb & July 2002) iii February 2002 (amended Feb & July 2002) iv Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Legislative Background 3 2.1 The Habitats and Birds Directives and the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance 2.2 The Habitats Regulations 1994 2.3 Competent and Relevant Authorities 2.4 Management Scheme 2.5 English Nature’s Role 3.0 European Marine Sites in the Solent 7 3.1 European Marine Sites 3.2 Special Areas of Conservation within the SEMS 3.3 Special Protection Areas and Ramsar sites within the SEMS 3.4 Solent European Marine Sites 3.5 Other Designations Adjacent to the SEMS 4.0 Management Structure 17 4.1 Relevant Authorities in the Solent 4.2 SEMS Management Group 4.3 SEMS Strategic Advisory Group 4.4 SEMS Project Officer 4.5 Cluster Groups 4.6 Other groups 4.7 Relationship with Other Coastal Initiatives 4.7.1 Links to the Solent Forum 4.7.2 Links to other groups/initiatives 5.0 English Nature’s Regulation 33 Advice 23 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Conservation Objectives 5.3 Favourable Condition Table and Monitoring 5.4 Operations 6.0 Plans & Projects 27 6.1 Determination of Significant Effect 6.2 Appropriate Assessment 7.0 SEMS Management Scheme 29 7.1 Introduction
  • APPENDIX 19.1 Baseline Data

    APPENDIX 19.1 Baseline Data

    AQUIND Limited APPENDIX 19.1 Baseline Data CONTENTS APPENDIX 19.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT DATA 1 TABLES Table 1 – Designated Sites within 0.5 km of the Site 1 Table 2 – Summary of Topography within Site Boundary 2 Table 3 – Tracer testing in the Bedhampton and Havant Catchment (defined by the BGS) 3 Table 4 – Main geological and hydrogeological units 4 Table 5 - Installation Summary 6 Table 6 - Records of Groundwater Level Monitoring (to date) for the Cable Route (Section 2 to Section 9) 8 Table 7 - Groundwater water quality results 9 Table 8 - Installation Summary 10 Table 9 – Records of Groundwater Level Monitoring (to date) 10 Table 10 – Groundwater water quality results 101 Table 11 - Summary of Watercourses within and adjacent to Study Area 11 Table 12 - Summary of WFD Operational Catchments within or downstream of the Site Boundary 127 Table 13 – Summary of Flood Defences within and Adjacent to Site Boundary 178 Table 14 – Summary of Defence Schemes Completed and Proposed on Portsea Island 189 Table 15 – Summary of Coastal Flood Defence Formation around Portsea Island, Farlington Marshes and Ports Creek 20 Table 16 – Summary of Sewage Network within and adjacent to Site Boundary 202 Table 17 – Summary of Water Supply Network within and adjacent to the Site Boundary 223 Table 18 – Summary of EA Product 4 Data – Still Water Levels 23 Table 19 – Summary of Magnitude of Effect/ Probability of Flooding 234 AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR PUBLIC | WSP PINS Ref.: EN020022 | Document Ref.: Appendix 19.1 Legislation Baseline Data February 2019 AQUIND Limited APPENDIX 19.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT DATA 1.1.1.1 This Appendix provides the supporting baseline environment data for PEIR Chapter 19 Water Resources and Flood Risk.
  • The Making of Havant 2

    The Making of Havant 2

    The Making of Havant St Faith’s Church and West Street circa 1910. Volume 2 of 5 Havant History Booklet No. 41 View all booklets, comment, and order on line at hhbkt.com £5 The Roman Catholic Church and Presbetery in West Street. The wedding of Canon Scott’s daughter was a great attraction. 2 Contents The Churches of Havant – Ian Watson 5 St Faith’s Church 5 The Reverend Canon Samuel Gilbert Scott 11 John Julius Angerstein 13 The Bells of St Faith’s Church 13 The Roman Catholic Church – Christine Houseley 16 The Methodists 19 The Reverend George Standing 22 Dissenters 26 Lieutenant General Sir Frederick Fitzwygram 31 Havant’s Bricks – Their Time and Place – Ian Watson 37 Local Volunteers and Territorials 49 Law and Order – Pat Dann 61 The Agricultural Uprising 69 Education 71 Private Schools 78 Most of the articles contained in these five The Making of Havant booklets are the original work of the Havant Local History Group, which were written in the late 1970s. They have been edited by Ralph Cousins and John Pile and have only been amended where further information has become available or where landmark locations have changed. Our grateful thanks should be extended to the members of the group for their hard work in putting together this reminder of Havant’s past history. Ralph Cousins – August 2014 023 9248 4024 [email protected] 3 Overhaul of the bells at St Faith’s Church in 1973. This bell weighs 15½ cwt (800kg). From the right Michael Johnson and Morgan Marshall.
  • A Collection of Articles on the Havant Reformed Church

    A Collection of Articles on the Havant Reformed Church

    A Collection of Articles on the Havant United Reformed Church (Formerly the Havant Congregational Church) North Street Congregational Church circa 1920. Compiled by Ralph Cousins Havant Borough History Booklet No. 49 £5 The Dissenters’ meeting-house was the Independent Chapel in The Pallant 2 Contents A Chapter in the Early History of Havant United Reformed Church John Pile The Revd Thomas Loveder Dissenting Minister of Havant John Pile The Sainsbury Family Connected with Havant United Reformed Church from the Late 1700s Gillian M. Peskett The Revd William Scamp, Protestant Dissenting Minister 1803-1846 Gillian M. Peskett A Brief History of the Dissenters’ Cemetery in New Lane Gillian M. Peskett ‘Loveability, Sympathy and Liberality’: Havant Congregationalists in the Edwardian Era 1901–1914 Roger Ottewill An interesting academic study by Roger at page 68 which gives in depth detail on another aspect of dissent in Havant. 3 North Street Congregational Church circa 1910 4 A Chapter in the Early History of Havant United Reformed Church John Pile Research in any field of enquiry is cumulative and builds upon the efforts of others. Anyone studying the history of Havant United Reformed Church is quickly made aware of the debt owed to Jack Barrett who, as church archivist for many years, was responsible not only for preserving the existing records but for searching out new facts and drawing new conclusions from the material at his disposal. The Reverend Anthony Gardiner came to Havant in 1983 and brought new expertise to bear upon the subject and in 1994 he and Jack collaborated on a revised version of Havant United Reformed Church: a history that Jack had written in 1985.