DOCSLIB.ORG

South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) December 2008 Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Note This document has been produced by ATKINS for PUSH solely for the purpose of the Integrated Water Management Strategy for South Hampshire. It may not be used by any person for any other purpose other than that specified without the express written permission of ATKINS. Any liability arising out of use by a third party of this document for purposes not wholly connected with the above shall be the responsibility of that party who shall indemnify ATKINS against all claims costs damages and losses arising out of such use. Atkins Limited Document History JOB NUMBER: 5056925 DOCUMENT REF: 5056925 / 70 / DG / 23 05 Final for Distribution PS ED HR PS 2/12/08 04 Final PS RH HR PS 4/11/08 03 External Draft for Review HR/JS/PS AB BSP PS 02 Internal draft review HR/JS/PS AB AB PS 01 Draft in progress HR/JS/PS ED BP PS Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Revision Purpose Description Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Acknowledgements The Atkins team would like to thank the Steering Committee for its advice and support throughout the project. The technical specialists in the Environment Agency have also been very supportive. We would like to thank Tony Burch from the Environment Agency who has provided detailed comments and recommendations for improved flood risk management which we have included within this document. Susanne Grigsby, David Lowthian and Tim Sykes have also provided important advice which has helped to steer the project with respect to water quality and understanding the methodology and conclusions of the Review of Consents investigations. Representatives of the Water Companies have also provided very helpful assistance on the assessments of water supply and wastewater management. In this regard, particular thanks are due to Mike Dannatt (Portsmouth Water) and Bob Tambling (Southern Water). Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Contents Section Page Glossary of Terms 5 Executive Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Background to this Report 11 1.2 Objectives of the South Hampshire IWMS 11 1.3 Approach to the IWMS 12 2 Context for the IWMS 16 2.1 Environmental Background 16 2.2 Environmental Context for the IWMS priority issues 17 2.3 Review of relevant environmental policy 22 2.4 Review of relevant planning policy 23 3 Water Supply 26 3.1 Overview 26 3.2 Responsibility for Water Supply 26 3.3 Forecasting the Balance between Supply and Demand 28 3.4 Identification and Appraisal of Resource Options 50 3.5 Reducing Forecast Uncertainty (Target Headroom) 60 3.6 Summary 60 4 Wastewater Management 69 4.1 Overview 69 4.2 Capacity Assessment 76 4.3 Summary 110 5 Flood Risk Management 114 5.1 Overview 114 5.2 Planning Policy & Flood Risk 117 5.3 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 120 5.4 IWMS review of development and flood risk 124 5.5 Conclusions 132 5.6 Recommendations 134 6 Planning and Water Management 147 6.1 Water Management and the Planning System 147 6.2 Opportunities and Constraints of the Current System 150 6.3 Recommendations 154 ` 1 FINAL Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy 7 Summary 164 7.1 Scope of Work undertaken 164 7.2 Conclusions 165 7.3 Recommendations 174 8 References 192 9 Appendices 194 Appendix A : Review of Relevant Planning Policy and Guidance 195 Appendix B : Review of relevant environmental policy & Guidance 209 Appendix C : Flood Risk Management 235 List of Tables Table 2.1 South Hampshire housing allocation by location and phasing between 2006 and 2026 distributed and phased as follows as set out under Policy SH12 24 Table 3.1 Portsmouth Water Source Types and Licensed Quantities 28 Table 3.2 Southern Water Source Types and Licensed Quantities 28 Table 3.3 Peak Period SDB in South Hampshire in 2007 31 Table 3.4 Scenario 1 (Baseline) Demand Forecast for the PUSH Area based on no population and household growth to 2026 35 Table 3.5 Scenario 2a Demand Forecast for the PUSH Area based on population and household growth to 2026 41 Table 3.6 Scenario 2b Demand Forecast for the PUSH Area based on population and household growth to 2026 42 Table 3.7 Scenario 4 Demand Forecast for the PUSH Area based on population and household growth to 2026 47 Table 3.8 Scenario 5 Demand Forecast for the PUSH Area based on population and household growth to 2026 48 Table 3.9 Multi-Criteria Analysis of Resource Options 55 Table 3.10 “Short-list” of Preferred Resource Options 59 Table 4.1 Summary of PE growth 77 Table 4.2 DWF comparison between study and Southern Water figures 81 Table 4.3 Baseline situation in 2006/07 84 Table 4.4 Summary of scenario growth forecasts 85 Table 4.5 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 92 Table 4.6 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows (assuming no change in existing DWF consent) 94 Table 4.7 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 96 Table 4.8 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 98 Table 4.9 Predicted quality consents on the basis of 2025/26 flows and loads 100 Table 4.10 Peel Common predicted interim N consents – Scenario 1 101 Table 4.11 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 104 Table 4.12 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 106 Table 4.13 Predicted quality consents on the basis of Scenario 1 2025/26 flows 109 ` 2 FINAL Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Table 5.1 Descriptions of the Flood Zones 119 Table 9.1 South Hampshire housing allocation by location and phasing between 2006 and 2026 distributed and phased as follows as set out under Policy SH12 203 Table 9.2 Substances monitored under the Shellfish Waters Directive 211 Table 9.3 Significant Water Management Issues identified through the RBMP process. 219 Table 9.4 Summary description and licensing strategy for WRMUs. 224 Table 9.5 SMP Policies from the Western Solent and Southampton Water SMP 1998 and the Eastern Solent and Harbours SMP 1997. 237 Table 9.6 Policy units and selected policies 241 List of Figures Figure 2.1 Environmental Designations in South Hampshire 19 Figure 3.1 Areas of PUSH supplied by Portsmouth Water and Southern Water 27 Figure 3.2 Schematic of the Supply Demand Balance (SDB) 30 Figure 3.3 Scenario 1 (Baseline – No Growth) Forecast Peak Period Supply Demand Balance for Southern Water’s Hampshire South WRZ 38 Figure 3.4 Scenario 1 (Baseline – No Growth) Forecast Peak Period Supply Demand Balance for Portsmouth Water’s WRZs 38 Figure 3.5 Scenario 2 (a&b) Peak Period Forecast Supply Demand Balance for Southern Water’s Hampshire South WRZ 39 Figure 3.6 Scenario 2 (a&b) Peak Period Forecast Supply Demand Balance for Portsmouth Water’s WRZs 40 Figure 3.7 Scenario 3 Peak Period Forecast Supply Demand Balance for Southern Water’s Hampshire South WRZ 44 Figure 3.8 Scenario 3 Peak Period Forecast Supply Demand Balance for Portsmouth Water’s WRZs 44 Figure 3.9 Summary of Scenarios 1-5 for the Peak Period Demand Forecast for Southern Water’s Hampshire South WRZ 49 Figure 3.10 Summary of Scenarios 1-5 for the Peak Period Demand Forecast for Portsmouth Water’s WRZs 49 Figure 4.1 Location and outline catchments for wastewater treatment works in the PUSH region 71 Figure 4.2 Forecast flow growth and quality consents at Ashlett Creek Fawley 89 Figure 4.3 Forecast flow growth and quality consents at Bishops Waltham 90 Figure 4.4 Forecast flow growth and quality consents at Budds Farm Havant 91 Figure 4.5 Forecast flow growth at Bursledon 93 Figure 4.6 Forecast growth at Chickenhall Eastleigh 95 Figure 4.7 Forecast flow growth at Millbrook 97 Figure 4.8 Forecast flow growth at Peel Common (including Woolston) 99 Figure 4.9 Forecast flow growth at Portswood 102 Figure 4.10 Forecast flow growth at Romsey 103 Figure 4.11 Forecast flow growth at Slowhill Copse Marchwood 105 Figure 4.12 Forecast flow growth at Southwick 107 Figure 4.13 Forecast flow growth at Thornham 108 ` 3 FINAL Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Figure 4.14 Forecast flow growth at Wickham 109 Figure 5.1 Source-Pathway-Receptor Model 114 Figure 5.2 Extract from the PUSH SFRA website, showing the variation in flood hazard across Portsmouth. 122 Figure 5.3 PUSH Site Allocations 141 Figure 5.4 Flood Zones (2007) 142 Figure 5.5 Flood Zones (2115) 143 Figure 5.6 Impact of Land Use Change on Surface Water Runoff 144 Figure 5.7 Groundwater Flooding 145 Figure 5.8 Surface Water Sewer Flooding 146 ` 4 FINAL Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Glossary of Terms Term Meaning / Definition PWS Public Water Supply WRMU Water Resource Management Unit RSS Regional Spatial Strategy SRSS Sub region spatial strategy RoC Review of Consents (Stage 4 Review of Consents for the Hampshire Natura 2000 sites) LDF Local Development Framework EA Environment Agency PUSH Partners for Urban South Hampshire IWMS Integrated Water Management Strategy SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SEP South East Plan SEEDA South East England Development Agency DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government WWTW Waste water treatment works EiP Examination in Public Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs LPA Local Planning Authority PPS Planning Policy Statement GOSE Government Office for the South East OFWAT Water Services Regulation Authority DWI
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solent & South Downs Fish Monitoring Report 2015
    Solent & South Downs fish monitoring report 2015 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Authors: P. Rudd & L. Swift Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 77 Foreword Welcome to the annual fish report for the Solent and South Downs area for 2015. This report covers all of the fisheries surveys we have carried out in Hampshire and West & East Sussex in 2015 and is the ninth annual report we have produced in succession.
    [Show full text]
  • South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District
    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013
    Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013 Hampshire County Council Economy, Transport and Environment Department, The Castle, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 8UD Tel: 0845 603 5638 Fax: 01962 847055 www.hants.gov.uk No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from HCC. Any advice, opinions or recommendations within this document; should be read and relied upon only in the context of this document as a whole, do not in any way purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion, are based on the information made available to HCC at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practises as at the date of this document. No liability is accepted for any use of this document other than for the purpose for which it was originally prepared and provided. Hampshire County Council cannot accept responsibility for any use or reliance on the contents from this report by any third party. Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 [2011]. Document Control Information Document Information Document Reference Draft Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for consultation Document Revision - Report Status Final Date July 2013 Author Susannah Hardwick – CH2M Hill Checker Andy McConkey – CH2M Hill Approver Pete Errington – Hampshire County Council Date of Next Review 2017 Foreword The Flood & Water Management Act, which came into being in 2010, placed a number of statutory duties on Hampshire County Council in its new role as Lead Local Flood Authority to address local flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 19.1 Baseline Data
    AQUIND Limited APPENDIX 19.1 Baseline Data CONTENTS APPENDIX 19.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT DATA 1 TABLES Table 1 – Designated Sites within 0.5 km of the Site 1 Table 2 – Summary of Topography within Site Boundary 2 Table 3 – Tracer testing in the Bedhampton and Havant Catchment (defined by the BGS) 3 Table 4 – Main geological and hydrogeological units 4 Table 5 - Installation Summary 6 Table 6 - Records of Groundwater Level Monitoring (to date) for the Cable Route (Section 2 to Section 9) 8 Table 7 - Groundwater water quality results 9 Table 8 - Installation Summary 10 Table 9 – Records of Groundwater Level Monitoring (to date) 10 Table 10 – Groundwater water quality results 101 Table 11 - Summary of Watercourses within and adjacent to Study Area 11 Table 12 - Summary of WFD Operational Catchments within or downstream of the Site Boundary 127 Table 13 – Summary of Flood Defences within and Adjacent to Site Boundary 178 Table 14 – Summary of Defence Schemes Completed and Proposed on Portsea Island 189 Table 15 – Summary of Coastal Flood Defence Formation around Portsea Island, Farlington Marshes and Ports Creek 20 Table 16 – Summary of Sewage Network within and adjacent to Site Boundary 202 Table 17 – Summary of Water Supply Network within and adjacent to the Site Boundary 223 Table 18 – Summary of EA Product 4 Data – Still Water Levels 23 Table 19 – Summary of Magnitude of Effect/ Probability of Flooding 234 AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR PUBLIC | WSP PINS Ref.: EN020022 | Document Ref.: Appendix 19.1 Legislation Baseline Data February 2019 AQUIND Limited APPENDIX 19.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT DATA 1.1.1.1 This Appendix provides the supporting baseline environment data for PEIR Chapter 19 Water Resources and Flood Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • SANITARY SURVEY REPORT the Solent 2013
    EC Regulation 854/2004 CLASSIFICATION OF BIVALVE MOLLUSC PRODUCTION AREAS IN ENGLAND AND WALES SANITARY SURVEY REPORT The Solent 2013 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT Cover photo: Oyster sampling in the Solent CONTACTS: For enquires relating to this report or For enquires relating to policy matters on further information on the the implementation of sanitary surveys in implementation of sanitary surveys in England: England and Wales: Simon Kershaw Beverley Küster Food Safety Group Hygiene Delivery Branch Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Enforcement and Delivery Division Barrack Road, Food Standards Agency The Nothe Aviation House Weymouth 125 Kingsway Dorset London DT43 8UB WC2B 6NH +44 (0) 1305 206600 +44 (0) 20 7276 8000 [email protected] [email protected] © Crown copyright, 2013. Native oysters and other bivalve species in the Solent 2 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT STATEMENT OF USE: This report provides a sanitary survey for bivalve molluscs in the Solent, as required under EC Regulation 854/2004. It provides an appropriate hygiene classification zoning and monitoring plan based on the best available information with detailed supporting evidence. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) undertook this work on behalf of the Food Standards Agency (FSA). CONSULTATION: Consultee Date of consultation Date of response Environment Agency 19/04/2013 - Isle of Wight Council 19/04/2013 - New Forest District Council 19/04/2013 - Portsmouth Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southampton Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southern IFCA 19/04/2013 21/05/2013 Southern Water 19/04/2013 - RECOMMENDED BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Cefas, 2013. Sanitary survey of the Solent. Cefas report on behalf of the Food Standards Agency, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for classification of bivalve mollusc production areas in England and Wales under of EC Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Evidence Net Fishing Management for Estuaries, Harbours and Piers in Dorset, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight
    Supporting Evidence Net Fishing Management for Estuaries, Harbours and Piers in Dorset, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Annex I: Table of Proposed Net Management Areas Annex II: Existing Measures Annex III: Net Management Area Selection Evidence Annex IV: Temporal Salmonid Migration Annex I – Table of Proposed Net Management Areas 21 No. Area Map Management proposal Timing 1. Chichester Harbour 1 No additional net use closure - 2. Langstone Harbour: Bridge 1 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Lake and associated rivers 3. Langstone Harbour: all areas 1 No additional net use closure - excluding Bridge Lake 4. Portsmouth Harbour: Fareham 1 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Creek and River Wallington 5. Portsmouth Harbour: all areas 1 No additional net use closure - excluding Fareham Creek 6. Southsea Pier 1 Closure to all net use within 100 All year metres of pier structure 7. River Meon 2 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 8. Rivers Test, Itchen and 2 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Hamble 9. Southampton Water – Dock 2 Closure to all net use within 3 metres All year Head to Calshot of the surface, except ring nets 10. Lymington River 4 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 11. Keyhaven 4 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year 12. Sandown Pier 3 Closure to all net use within 100 All year metres of pier structure 13. Bembridge Harbour and River 3 Closure to all net use, except ring nets All year Yar (eastern) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • 399 13 SD14 Document Template: Environment Agency Letter
    Rob Clark Our ref: EA/Pre-Cons/2018 Southern IFCA Your ref: 64 Ashley Road, Date: 6th December 2018 Poole, Dorset BH14 9BN Dear Rob, Netting Review - Environment Agency Pre-consultation Response Thank you for progressing the netting review in the Southern IFCA District. The Environment Agency welcomes the furthering of this area of work as we consider it vital in ensuring that migratory salmonid stocks are afforded an adequate level of protection whilst within the marine phase of their life-cycle reflecting the risks posed by netting activities. Please consider this letter as the Environment Agency's response to the Southern IFCA pre- consultation on the netting review which is currently underway and closes on the 7th December 2018. We have set our response out in line with the questions in the consultation. We do not wish for our response to remain confidential. We are of the opinion that the level of protection provided to migratory salmonids should reflect the importance of these species to the achievement of WFD objectives within freshwater, their statutory designated conservation status within SSSIs and Natura 2000 sites throughout the district, and their UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) designations. There should also be due consideration to the socio-economic value and benefit to iconic, internationally important freshwater fisheries within the South East and South West River Basin Districts which are dependent upon a surplus of these fish species over and above the level necessary to maintain self-sustaining stocks. We would also like to make Southern IFCA aware that the UK Government is a signatory to the NASCO convention which seeks to implement a precautionary approach towards the management of Atlantic salmon stocks where there is uncertainty in the available evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)
    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034) Adopted March 2017 (Updated July 2018) South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 - 2034 Contents Figure i: South Hampshire part of the PUSH Sub-Region: ......................................................................... 1 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and Purpose of the South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy ........................... 2 1.2 The Benefits of a Green Infrastructure Approach ......................................................................... 5 2. Drivers for a strategic GI approach ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 National Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 25 Year Environment Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3 PUSH Spatial Position Statement 2016 ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Solent, New Forest and River Itchen European Protected Sites ................................................... 17 2.5 Protected Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 19 3. A GI Strategy for South Hampshire ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South East River Basin District River Basin Management Plan Updated: December 2015
    Water for life and livelihoods Part 1: South East river basin district River basin management plan Updated: December 2015 LIT 10317 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local councils, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Contacts For more details about river basin management plans contact: Andrew Pearce, Area Manager Email: [email protected] You can also call the National Customer Contact Centre: South East River Basin Management Plan Bradmarsh Business Park, PO Box 544 Rotherham, S60 1BY 03708 506506 (local rate) Monday to Friday 8am to 6pm Published by: Further copies of this report are available Environment Agency on the river basin management plan web pages Horizon House https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/river- Deanery Road ( Bristol basin-management-plans-2015). BS1 5AH and via our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Implementation Plan (2018)
    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Implementation Plan (2018) Draft for PUSH Joint Committee – 4 December 2018 South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Implementation Plan 2018 Contents Glossary................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction and Background ......................................................................................... 3 2. The Importance of Green Infrastructure ......................................................................... 5 3. The Implementation Plan ............................................................................................... 9 4. The Strategic Projects .................................................................................................. 13 P1. Strategic Recreation Access Network Project ........................................................... 15 P2. Strategic Flood Risk & Water Quality Project ............................................................ 21 P3. Solent Recreation Mitigation Project .......................................................................... 28 P4. New Forest Strategic GI & European Sites Mitigation Project .................................... 33 P5. Havant Thicket Reservoir GI Project ......................................................................... 36 P6. England Coastal Path Initiative .................................................................................. 38 P7. South West Hampshire Forest Park Project .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire County Council Economy, Transport and Environment
    Hampshire County Council Economy, Transport and Environment Department The Castle Winchester Hampshire SO23 8UD Tel: 0845 603 5638 Fax: 01962 847055 www.hants.gov.uk No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from HCC. Any advice, opinions or recommendations within this document; should be read and relied upon only in the context of this document as a whole, do not in any way purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion, are based on the information made available to HCC at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practises as at the date of this document. No liability is accepted for any use of this document other than for the purpose for which it was originally prepared and provided. Hampshire County Council cannot accept responsibility for any use or reliance on the contents from this report by any third party. Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 [2011]. Document Control Information Document Information Document Reference Draft Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for consultation – Document 3 – LFRMS Action plan Document Revision - Report Status DRAFT Date 26/09/2012 Author Checker Approver Date of Next Review Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Measures to achieve our objectives 1 1.2 Ward specific action plans 4 1.3 Ward summary 4 2 Ward specific action plans 14 Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Document 3 – LFRMS Action Plan 1 Introduction 1.1 Measures to achieve our objectives 1.1.1.1 It will not be possible to deliver all potential flood risk management measures within the first phase of this Strategy, therefore we have developed a phased approach to implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • 17/02957/REM Proposal Description: Berewood Phase 9B
    Case No: 17/02957/REM Proposal Description: Berewood Phase 9b. Reserved Matters Application comprising 75 residential dwellings, associated amenity space, access, garages, parking, internal roads, pathways and associated landscaping. (Matters of layout, appearance, access, landscape and scale pursuant to application ref: 10/02862/OUT). Discharge of conditions 3, 6, (ii) a) b) d) f) h) i) j) k) I) m) n), 11, 18 (AFFECTS THE SETTING OF A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) Address: Berewood Phase 9B West Of Marrelsmoor Avenue Waterlooville Hampshire Parish, or Ward if within Southwick And Widley. Wickham ward. Winchester City: Applicants Name: David Lee (Redrow) Chris Fletcher (Wow) Case Officer: Mrs Jill Lee Date Valid: 20 November 2017 Site Factors: County Heritage Site CIL Zones for Winchester City Council Local Plan Policy Site Portsmouth Water Operational Area Solent Disturbance and Mitigation Zone Recommendation: Application Permitted Case No: 17/02957/REM General Comments. This application is reported to Committee as it is for major development within the West of Waterlooville Major Development Area (MDA). The application site is within the administrative area of Winchester. The originally submitted plans have been amended to take on board some of the comments made by consultees and officers. The main changes are as follows: Removal of overly large block of flats Relocation of affordable housing to an area with improved aspects and amenity value Balconies added to block D. The provision of three wheelchair accessible units. Adjustment of private housing mix to 17 x 3 bed units and 28 x 4 bed units. Materials change to meet Design Code requirement for high quality materials Updates to highways plans, engineering plans and landscaping drawings to reflect minor layout changes.
    [Show full text]