DOCSLIB.ORG

Title of RRC Report River (If Specific) Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Title of RRC report River (if specific) Date of report Customer Habitats and Hydromorphological Assessment of Durleigh Durleigh Brook, Apr-18 Environment Agency Brook: Options Appraisal Somerset Options to improve the amenity value of the river at Western Cleddau, Apr-18 Natural Resources Wales Haverfordwest Pembrokeshire Struthan Bhraigh nan Allt restoration design study: Struthan Bhraigh nan Mar-18 Lochaber Fisheries Trust Restoration of Relic Course and Peatland Hydrology Allt River Habitat Survey in Wales: analysis for Area Statements - Mar-18 Natural Resources Wales 2018 Identification of opportunities for ecological improvement in Irk, Manchester Mar-18 Environment Agency the River Irk Catchment Morphie Dyke, River Formalising the dyke breach Feb-18 Carlton Power North Esk Restoration and habitat enhancement opportunities Roding, Epping Forest Feb-18 Epping Forest District Council New Forest RHS Millersford Brook Nov-17 Forestry Commission Identification of opportunities on the River Machno at Cwm Machno Aug-17 National Trust & NRW Penmachno Upper Bedford Ouse Thrift Farm May-17 Bucks CC and Thrift Farm Catchment Icklingham Mill Sluice, River Lark Lark May-17 Environment Agency Option Assessment for Icklingham Mill Sluice River Don Feasibility Study Identifying Opportunities for River Restoration and Habitat Don Apr-17 Environment Agency Creation River Lark Structures Assessment High level options assessment for 20 in-channel structures Lark Mar-17 Environment Agency between Bury St Edmunds and the River Great Ouse confluence Catchment Partnership Action Fund Various Aug-16 Environment Agency Lessons Learned Review Isle of Man Department of Silver Burn Weir Assessment Silver Burn Jul-16 Environment, Food & Agriculture Options for River Restoration and Habitat Enhancement Par Moor Jun-16 Environment Agency Whilst Reducing Flood Risk in Par, Cornwall The Geomorphological Impact of High Head Run-of-River N/A Apr-16 Natural Resources Wales Hydropower Schemes in Wales The Cumbrian River Delivery Process and Technical Evaluation of the Cumbrian N/A Nov-15 Restoration Strategy River Restoration Strategy Partnership Western Hampshire Options for Restoration and Enhancement Sep-15 Wessex Water Avon Options for restoring a brook following straightening Checkley Brook Aug-15 Environment Agency Identification of opportunities for restoration at Braunstone Braunstone Brook Jul-15 Environment Agency Park, Leicester: notes to support aspirations Cowbridge Beck, Advice on deculverting and river realignment options May-15 Environment Agency Billingham Identification of habitat and water quality issues, and Clun Apr-15 Natural Resources Wales opportunities for enhancement and improvement Comments on the physical river restoration proposals on the Lathkill Mar-15 Natural England upper Lathkill, above Over Haddon Advice on river restoration and realignment options Skerne, Burdon Mar-15 Environment Agency Restoration, flood retention and enhancement opportunities Ouse Burn Dec-14 Environment Agency and examples Options for habitat enhancement and river restoration, Devon Sep-14 Devon Angling Association including opportunities for Natural Flood Management Options for natural flood risk management and opportunities for river enhancement, restoration and Afon Rhondda Apr-14 Natural Resources Wales aesthetic improvements Notes on how to improve the condition of the Allt Sanna Allt Sanna Feb-14 Scottish Natural Heritage Notes on how to improve the condition of the Struthan Struthan Bhraigh nan Feb-14 Scottish Natural Heritage Bhraigh nan Allt Allt Notes on site designation and bank erosion close to A82 Coe Feb-14 Scottish Natural Heritage (Glen Coe) Options for restoration of Croy Burn, Loch Flemington Croy Burn Jan-14 Scottish Natural Heritage A short evaluation on the weir removals on the River Dove, Dove Jan-14 Natural England Beresford Dale, Derbyshire Support to 42 Catchment Restoration Fund projects in Various trusts and charitable England - technical support and review of monitoring N/A Dec-13 bodies protocols Review channel design and monitoring/maintenance Gade Nov-13 Environment Agency proposals River Restoration Options for Long Brook and Tributaries Long Brook Jun-13 Environment Agency River Restoration Options for Tory Brook and Tributaries Tory Brook Jun-13 Environment Agency Options for restoration and enhancement for the River Colne May-13 Spelthorne District Council Colne at Staines Moor Scottish Environment Funding pilot catchment measures delivery N/A May-13 Protection Agency Effectiveness of measures to complement, or as an N/A Mar-13 UKWIR alternative to, abstraction reduction Assessment of Issues and Options Relating to the Removal or N/A Feb-13 Environment Agency Replacement of Gauging Structures Assessment of Options for River Restoration at Bude Neet Feb-13 Environment Agency Assessment of Options for River Restoration Menalhyl Feb-13 Environment Agency Environment Agency and Options for river restoration and habitat enhancement Lustrum Beck Jan-13 Stockton Borough Council Assessment of potential for realigning Burnock Water Oct-12 ATH Resources What can be achieved in 'revealing the Roch'? Through Roch Sep-12 Environment Agency Rochdale Assessment of Options for River Restoration Tone Sep-12 Environment Agency River Welland Water Framework Directive Pilot Catchment RRC assessment of measures applied at Sutton Basset, Welland Sep-12 Environment Agency Drayton and Welham Assessment of Chalk River Flows at Macroinvertebrate and Chilterns Chalk Stream Aug-12 Environment Agency Macrophyte Sampling Sites Flow Assessment Rehabilitation potential of the Marsh Mills reach in Long Brook Aug-12 Environment Agency Plymouth Understanding the value of proposed in-stream habitat World Wide Fund for Nature Cray Aug-12 improvements in South London (WWF) Hydromorphological assessment Great Ouse Jul-12 Environment Agency Rivers Agency (Northern Ireland), Limavady & Moyle Assessment of Options for River Restoration at Ballymoney Ballymoney Jul-12 Councils, Ballymoney Council Riverside Park and Northern Ireland Environment Agency Progressing restoration options and achieving flood risk management and habitat gains from Bampton to Helton, in Lowther, Eden Jun-12 Eden Rivers Trust Cumbria Appraisal of river enhancement options at Arnos Park Pymmes Brook, Lee Mar-12 Environment Agency Appraisal of river enhancement options at Oak Hill Park Pymmes Brook, Lee Mar-12 Environment Agency Assessment of Options for River Restoration Nedern Brook Feb-12 Environment Agency Deculverting strategy for Northern England N/A Feb-12 Environment Agency Potential impact and opportunities to remove a weir on the Lark Jan-12 Environment Agency River Lark in the Centre of Bury St Edmunds River Ise Headwater: Cut-off Loop Restoration - Short Ise Jan-12 Revital-ISE options report for discussion Summary of preferred options for Narborough Mill – main Nar Dec-11 Environment Agency channel and mill leat Fixed point photographic baseline survey (and repeat survey Kirk Bun, Lennoxtown Dec-11 East Dunbartonshire Council reports between 2011 and 2013) London Borough of Barking Mayes Brook Monitoring Coordination including report (and Mayes Brook Nov-11 and Dagenham and quarterly reviews between 2011 - 2013) Environment Agency Maximising the ecosystem value of the River Avon in Bath Bath and North East Somerset Avon Nov-11 and NE Somerset Council Recommendations for Management Ilketshall Beck Oct-11 Environment Agency Comments on the River Chelt Restoration Plan Chelt Aug-11 Environment Agency Assessment of Receiving Waters at Nine Sewage Works, Yorkshire Water Aug-11 Yorkshire Water Potential for River Restoration to Improve Water Quality Assessment of Options for River Restoration Granta Jul-11 Environment Agency Weir removal, lowering and modification: A review of best N/A Jul-11 Environment Agency practice Issues Assessment and Options for Restoration Fochabers Burn Jun-11 Spey Fishery Board Assessment of Options for River Restoration Gade May-11 Dacorum Borough Council Opportunities for Habitat Enhancement at Bath Road, Luton Lee Apr-11 GSS Architecture Restoration project method statement Logie Burn Apr-11 Dee Vision Partnership Etherow and Glossop Assessment of Options for River Restoration Mar-11 Environment Agency Brook Assessment of Options for River Restoration Granta Mar-11 Environment Agency Assessment of Options for River Restoration Hiz Mar-11 Environment Agency Weir Removal Options and Opportunities Kirklees, Croal and Irwell Feb-11 Environment Agency Roach and Major Assessment of Options for River Restoration Feb-11 Environment Agency Tributaries Assessment of options for river restoration Chelt Jan-11 Environment Agency History, work records and implications for future Brue Dec-10 Environment Agency maintenance practices River Restoration Options through Darlington Skerne Nov-10 Darlington Borough Council Norfolk Rivers Internal River Restoration Strategy and Plan Nar SSSI Sep-10 Drainage Board Comments on “Charmouth STW Erosion Solutions” Char Jul-10 Wessex Water Norfolk Rivers Internal Appraisal of Restoration Options Langor Brook Jul-10 Drainage Board Croal and Major Assessment of Options for River Restoration Jul-10 Environment Agency Tributaries Forss, Caithness, Notes on Options for Fisheries & Habitat Enhancement Jun-10 Forss House Fishing Scotland Scottish Environment Options for demonstration project sites considered within a Peffery, Dingwall Apr-10 Protection Agency and Firth catchment-wide context Fisheries Trust Summary of potential
Recommended publications
  • Solent & South Downs Fish Monitoring Report 2015

    Solent & South Downs Fish Monitoring Report 2015

    Solent & South Downs fish monitoring report 2015 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Authors: P. Rudd & L. Swift Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 77 Foreword Welcome to the annual fish report for the Solent and South Downs area for 2015. This report covers all of the fisheries surveys we have carried out in Hampshire and West & East Sussex in 2015 and is the ninth annual report we have produced in succession.
  • Wendover Kingshill Chalfont St

    Wendover Kingshill Chalfont St

    HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE HS2 (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL 14 July 2015 Petitioner – The Chiltern Society No. 0761 A1194 (1) 0761 / 1 HOC/00761/0003 Chiltern Society Presentation 1. About the Chiltern Society 2. AONB & Countryside issues 3. Water related issues 4. AONB Planning Policy 5. Three Bore Tunnel Option 6. Mitigation Hierarchy 7. Chiltern Society’s Conclusion A1194 (2) 0761 / 2 HOC/00761/0004 1. About the Chiltern Society o Founded 50 years ago • to conserve and enhance the Chiltern Hills • to campaign for the AONB to be confirmed • to campaign against the M40 cutting • to reinstate footpaths post-WWII o Registered charity o 7,000 members A1194 (3) 0761 / 3 HOC/00761/0005 500 volunteers – the largest group in any AONB A1194 (4) 0761 / 4 HOC/00761/0006 Chiltern Society - interest groups o Rights of Way o Site management o Walking o Cycling o Rivers & wetlands o Planning o Heritage o Photographic A1194 (5) 0761 / 5 HOC/00761/0007 Chiltern Society - what we do o Maintain rights of way o Manage 13 nature reserves and heritage sites o Participate at all levels of the UK planning system o Work with a wide range of national, regional and local environmental organisations o Work on chalk streams and wetlands o Provide opportunities to volunteer and learn new skills o Support local community groups A1194 (6) 0761 / 6 HOC/00761/0008 Chiltern Society – some notable achievements o Founded Chiltern Open Air Museum o Restored Lacey Green Windmill and Ewelme Watercress Beds o Created the Chiltern Way long distance circular footpath
  • Cherishing the Chess

    Cherishing the Chess

    The Chilterns Chalk Streams Project aims to conserve all major chalk streams in the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and to encourage enjoyment and Cherishing understanding of them. The Project achieves these aims by: the Raising awareness of the importance of chalk streams and the need to conserve them Giving advice to landowners and managers on riverside management Chess Practical conservation to physically improve chalk stream habitats, assess habitat quality and locate and protect rare species Providing education resources for schools to help children understand the chalk stream environment Improving physical access to the streams where appropriate, and providing information about their special qualities For more details see the project website: www.chilternsaonb.org/chalk-streams-project Useful contacts: The River Chess Association is a voluntary organisation that seeks to protect and enhance the River Chess by a combination of practical conservation work and lobbying. To find out how you can help visit: www.riverchessassociation.org or email [email protected] Environment Agency Apollo Court, 2 Bishops Square Business Park St. Albans Road West Hatfield, Herts AL10 9EX Tel: 03708 506506 www.environment-agency.gov.uk 0800 807060 (Incident hotline) Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust Water Vole Recovery Project The Lodge, 1 Armstrong Road, Littlemore, Oxford, OX4 4XT Tel: 01865 775476 www.bbowt.org.uk Three Rivers District Council Three Rivers House, Northway Rickmansworth, Herts Wd3 1RL Tel: 01923 776611 www.threerivers.gov.uk Chiltern District Council King George V Road Amersham Bucks HP6 5AW Tel: 01494 729000 www.chiltern.gov.uk Led by the Chilterns Conservation Board, the Chilterns Chalk Streams Project is a partnership of statutory How YOU can help agencies, local authorities and voluntary bodies committed to conserving the chalk stream environment.
  • South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District

    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District

    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area..........................................................................................................................
  • Lca 13.5 Misbourne Upper Chalk River Valley

    Lca 13.5 Misbourne Upper Chalk River Valley

    LCA 13.5 MISBOURNE UPPER CHALK RIVER VALLEY LCA in Context LCA XX LCA 13.5 MISBOURNE UPPER CHALK RIVER VALLEY KEY CHARACTERISTICS • Shallow chalk valley, gently sloping and indented by smaller dry valleys to produce smoothly rolling valley sides, with a relatively wide, flat bottomed floodplain. Valley sides steepening in the upper reaches. • On the valley sides the underlying chalk, and free draining lime-rich soils predominately support arable cultivation, with some calcareous grassland and woodland on higher slopes. • Ancient and semi-natural woodland associated with higher slopes and dry valleys, creating a visual boundary of the area, including mixed, broadleaved and coniferous woodland, which possess significant biodiversity and ecological value. • The valley floor is characterised by rough grassland, permanent pasture and paddocks, and divided into smaller scale fields, by low hedges and wooden post and wire fencing. • The narrow and gently flowing Misbourne River, meanders down the valley, with occasional ponds often located near farmsteads or small villages. The river often runs unnoticeably through this lower landscape. • A string of hamlets and farmsteads exist along the valley floor, with nucleated rows of larger settlements focused along roads. The larger village of Great Missenden is situated in the northern part of the area. Distinctive churches are often a feature of villages. • Post medieval parkland at Shardeloes and Missenden Abbey. Shardeloes House is a visually prominent feature on the valley side. • Varying patterns of field enclosure, with a mix of regular and irregular field boundaries. Large scale fields dominate the valley sides, with smaller scale field divisions along the valley floor.
  • Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Update July 2017

    Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Update July 2017

    Three Rivers District Council Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Update July 2017 Report details Three Rivers District Council Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Update Report prepared for: Three Rivers District Council Reference: Project Report: CPR2415a Copyright: © TRL Limited Report date: July 2017 Report status/version: Scoping Report Update Quality approval: Katie Millard Project Manager Rob Gardner Technical Reviewer Disclaimer This report has been produced by TRL Limited (TRL) under a contract with Three Rivers District Council. Any views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of Three Rivers District Council. The information contained herein is the property of TRL Limited and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the customer for whom this report was prepared. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the matter presented in this report is relevant, accurate and up-to-date, TRL Limited cannot accept any liability for any error or omission, or reliance on part or all of the content in another context. Contents amendment record This report has been amended and issued as follows: Version Date Description Editor Technical Reviewer Draft v0.1 09-05-2017 Draft for review KM RG Draft v0.2 10-05-2017 Technical review KM RG Final v0.3 11-05-2017 Final version, draft previously seen by client KM RG Post- 28-07-17 Scoping Report Update to take account of KM RG consultation comments made during the consultation from 12th update May to 16th June 2017. Post Consultation Update
  • Drought Management Plan 2018 Affinity Water

    Drought Management Plan 2018 Affinity Water

    Drought Management Plan 2018 Affinity Water November 2018 Security Notice This document has been written in compliance with our security policy so that no redaction is required for publication. Codes have been used to preserve the security of our production locations. Drought Management Plan November 2018 Page 2 of 130 Asset Strategy document control sheet Document amendment history Version Status Date Amendment to this version V1 Draft 12/05/2017 First draft V2 Draft 14/12/2017 Amendments following public consultation Minor amendments to incorporate lessons learned from V3 Final 26/11/2018 2017/2018 drought experience and changes to draft WRMP19 Document approval Document title Drought Management Plan 2018 e-Document location https://stakeholder.affinitywater.co.uk/drought-management.aspx Name Signature Title Date Anneka Johnson- Senior Asset Author/originator 06/11/2018 Marshall Scientist Technical Reviewer Becky Pointer Asset Manager 08/11/2018 Approver 1 HoD Head of Water Affie Panayiotou 14/11/2018 (internal use) Strategy Approver 2 Legal Head of Legal Julie Smith 16/11/2018 (external use) Services Approver 3 AS Interim Asset Marie Whaley 26/11/2018 Director Strategy Director Disclaimer This document has been prepared in accordance with the Affinity Water Quality System and is uncontrolled for use outside the company except for those recipients on the controlled circulation list. Uncontrolled copies will not be updated if and when changes are made. If you do not have a controlled copy and you wish to make use of this document, you should contact Affinity Water to obtain a copy of the latest available version.
  • BBOWT Water Vole Recovery Project

    BBOWT Water Vole Recovery Project

    Berks, Bucks and Oxon Water Vole Recovery Project 2016 Report Water vole carrying food for young, Chris Hughes, River Windrush Julia Lofthouse, Mammal Project Officer Gavin Bennett, Mammal Project Assistant Contents 1 Introduction 2 Water Vole Surveys Survey Methodology Survey Participants Survey Results 3 Mink Control Background Information Mink Control Results 2015- 2016 Analysis of Mink Control Schemes 4 Alert Maps and Local Key Areas 2017 5 Water Vole Recovery Project Updates 2016 Bayswater Brook Ewelme Stream and River Thames Great Ouse and Padbury Brook Holy Brook and Sulham Brook Hurst Ditches Kennet & Avon Canal Lower River Kennet, Foudry Brook and River Thames at Sonning Lower River Windrush Mill Brook Oxford Canal River Alderbourne River Glyme and River Dorn River Ock, Sandford Brook and River Stert Upper Thames 1 Introduction The water vole Arvicola amphibius is Britain’s fastest declining mammal which has been lost from approximately 89% of its former range since 1900. In the 1950s-60s changes in river engineering practices and agricultural intensification caused the water vole population to decline. These changes resulted in habitat loss and degradation which caused fragmentation and isolation of water vole populations. Since the 1980s an introduced predator, the American mink Neovison vison has decimated water vole populations as its range has expanded throughout England, Scotland and Wales. Mink are able to counter the water voles’ anti-predatory behaviours since they swim well, hunt efficiently and female mink are small enough to enter water voles’ burrows. The Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust launched its Water Vole Recovery Project in 1998. The aim of the project was to arrest the decline of water voles within the three counties and to work to stabilise and increase the water vole population.
  • South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy

    South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy

    South Hampshire: Integrated Water Management Strategy Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) December 2008 Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Note This document has been produced by ATKINS for PUSH solely for the purpose of the Integrated Water Management Strategy for South Hampshire. It may not be used by any person for any other purpose other than that specified without the express written permission of ATKINS. Any liability arising out of use by a third party of this document for purposes not wholly connected with the above shall be the responsibility of that party who shall indemnify ATKINS against all claims costs damages and losses arising out of such use. Atkins Limited Document History JOB NUMBER: 5056925 DOCUMENT REF: 5056925 / 70 / DG / 23 05 Final for Distribution PS ED HR PS 2/12/08 04 Final PS RH HR PS 4/11/08 03 External Draft for Review HR/JS/PS AB BSP PS 02 Internal draft review HR/JS/PS AB AB PS 01 Draft in progress HR/JS/PS ED BP PS Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Revision Purpose Description Client: PUSH South Hampshire Integrated Water Management Strategy Acknowledgements The Atkins team would like to thank the Steering Committee for its advice and support throughout the project. The technical specialists in the Environment Agency have also been very supportive. We would like to thank Tony Burch from the Environment Agency who has provided detailed comments and recommendations for improved flood risk management which we have included within this document. Susanne Grigsby, David Lowthian and Tim Sykes have also provided important advice which has helped to steer the project with respect to water quality and understanding the methodology and conclusions of the Review of Consents investigations.
  • Lca 19.2 Lower Misbourne Settled River Valley

    Lca 19.2 Lower Misbourne Settled River Valley

    LCA 19.2 LOWER MISBOURNE SETTLED RIVER VALLEY LCA in Context LCA XX LCA 19.2 MISBOURNE LOWER SETTLED RIVER VALLEY KEY CHARACTERISTICS • Narrow and shallow valley with low valley sides. The valley topography is not prominent and the flat floodplain dominates the character area. • The valley cuts into the Upper Chalk formation and this forms the edges of the character area, with Alluvium comprising the central floodplain zone, gradually widening towards the south. • The River Misbourne is largely hidden and inconspicuous, emerging and becoming more visible within settlement. The river becomes more prominent towards the south, with associated wetland meadows along its course. • A largely settled and developed landscape, with some pockets of rough grazing and pasture and paddocks interspersed, often close to settlement edge. • Limited woodland, with tree cover predominantly associated with transport corridors, acting as screening for roads. Areas of broadleaved woodland located in the south of the area, for example at the Old Rectory Meadows SSSI. • Dense settlement is linearly dispersed along the valley and road corridors. Higher settlement densities and more recent modern origin found in the town edge at Gerrards Cross. • Smaller, yet still relatively densely settled village of Chalfont St Peter and Chalfont St Giles lie in the north of the character area, and these possess a stronger historic character, with distinctive historical architecture of flint and stone churches and timber framed buildings. • Some early field enclosures remain, including pre 18th century co-axial and irregular enclosures. Archeologically elements include, distinctive churches, such as St Giles Church, in Chalfont St Giles and St Peter’s Church, in Chalfont St Peter’s.
  • South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report March 2019 www.jbaconsulting.com SWH Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Stage 1 i Fiona Hartland 8A Castle Street Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8DL Revision history Revision Amendments Issued to Ref/Date 2018s0161 SW Draft Report Three Rivers Hertfordshire District Council L1 SFRA v1.0 / Dacorum Borough 27/03/2018 Council St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Thames Water Canal and River Trust 2018s0161 SW Draft Report –DBC, SADC, Environment Hertfordshire TDC, WBC, CRT comments Agency L1 SFRA v2.0 / incorporated 20/03/2018 2018s0161 SW Final Draft Report – HCC Three Rivers Hertfordshire comments incorporated. District Council L1 SFRA v3.0 / Dacorum Borough 02/05/2018 Council St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Canal and River Trust 2018s0161 SW Final Report – Cumulative Three Rivers Hertfordshire Impacts Assessment District Council L1 SFRA v4.0 / (incorporating comments SWH Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Stage 1 i Revision Amendments Issued to Ref/Date from HCC and EA) and Dacorum Borough London Colney model Council outputs included St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Contract This report describes work commissioned by Claire May, on behalf of Three Rivers District Council, by an email dated 31 January 2018. Nathan Chapman, Emily Jones and Fiona Hartland of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .............................
  • Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013

    Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013

    Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy July 2013 Hampshire County Council Economy, Transport and Environment Department, The Castle, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 8UD Tel: 0845 603 5638 Fax: 01962 847055 www.hants.gov.uk No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from HCC. Any advice, opinions or recommendations within this document; should be read and relied upon only in the context of this document as a whole, do not in any way purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion, are based on the information made available to HCC at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practises as at the date of this document. No liability is accepted for any use of this document other than for the purpose for which it was originally prepared and provided. Hampshire County Council cannot accept responsibility for any use or reliance on the contents from this report by any third party. Maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 [2011]. Document Control Information Document Information Document Reference Draft Hampshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for consultation Document Revision - Report Status Final Date July 2013 Author Susannah Hardwick – CH2M Hill Checker Andy McConkey – CH2M Hill Approver Pete Errington – Hampshire County Council Date of Next Review 2017 Foreword The Flood & Water Management Act, which came into being in 2010, placed a number of statutory duties on Hampshire County Council in its new role as Lead Local Flood Authority to address local flood risk.