Performance Practice Review Volume 12 | Number 1 Article 1 Keyboard Fingering and Interpretation: a Comparison of Historical and Modern Approaches Jeffrey Swinkin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr Part of the Music Practice Commons Swinkin, Jeffrey (2007) "Keyboard Fingering and Interpretation: a Comparison of Historical and Modern Approaches," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 12: No. 1, Article 1. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.200712.01.01 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Swinkin: Keyboard Fingering and Interpretation Keyboard Fingering and Interpretation: A Comparison of [1] Historical and Modern Approaches Jeffrey Swinkin Copyright © 2007 Claremont Graduate University Robert Donington provocatively suggests, “There is a very interesting general distinction between early systems of keyboard fingering and modern systems. The former exploit the natural differences of length and strength in the human digits, and their changes of position, as aids to good phrasing and articulation. The latter minimize these differences and changes, as an aid to facility and versatility.”[2] That is, early fingerings virtually always imply for a passage a distinct phrasing, grouping, or articulation; they also often have ramifications for other aspects of interpretation, such as dynamics, voicing, and tempo variance (all of which, of course, may play a role in phrasing). Early fingerings substantiate the pedagogical maxim that, on some level, technique and interpretation are inextricable.