Homathko River Remediation at Mile 4.0, and Effectiveness Monitoring of 3.5 Mile Restoration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Homathko River Remediation at Mile 4.0, and Effectiveness Monitoring of 3.5 Mile Restoration FOREST INVESTMENT ACCOUNT - LAND BASED PROGRAM - Stream Restoration Project - Homathko River Remediation at Mile 4.0, and Effectiveness Monitoring of 3.5 Mile Restoration. Summary Report: 2009/10 IS# COTSA386884 Project No. 6886008 By Warren Warttig, RPBio Senior Planning Biologist International Forest Products Ltd. Forestry & Land Use Division 1250-A Ironwood Street Campbell River, BC V9W 6H5 [email protected] March 31, 2010 This page is intentionally left blank 2 Abstract In December of 2009, workers in the Homathko River area noticed an area of substantial erosion near 4.0 mile on the Homathko Mainline and reported it to DFO and the Campbell River Salmon foundation, and finally International Forest Products Ltd. (Interfor). The concern was, that left untreated, would eventually break through into Cumsack Slough, which is a highly productive rearing area for Salmonids. The site was inspected by DFO on March 4th, and plans developed to protect Cumsack Slough. While on site, effectiveness monitoring on restoration work in 2006 and 2007 was completed. Snow and wind delayed the project start until March 26, 2010. The project entailed armouring the erosion area with large angular rock and was completed by March 30, 2010. 3 This page is intentionally left blank 4 Table of Contents: Abstract............................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Location ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Project............................................................................................................................................ 11 Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................................................ 12 DFO Mitigation Plans and Effectiveness Monitoring ..................................................................... 13 5 This page is intentionally left blank 6 Acknowledgements The author wishes to acknowledge the help of the Campbell River Salmon Foundation (in particular Mike Gage) and Richard Powley, Rick Senger, and Mel Sheng from DFO for their assistance (past and present). 7 This page is intentionally left blank 8 Introduction Cumsack Slough is a unique ground-water fed wetland; it is Figure 1 over 700 ha in size and a very productive salmonid rearing area (figure 1 and 2). The Slough is considered to be threatened by the lower Homathko River which is shifting river-right towards Cumsack Slough near the 3.5 to 4.0 Mile on the Homathko Mainline. This has been an ongoing problem since (at least) 1993. The earliest known report was prepared by Hay and Company (Hayco) for Scott Paper in 1993, and Mike Miles and Associates Ltd. has previously prepared Figure 2 reports for this area for Interfor in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Extensive armouring has been completed from 2000 to 2004 by Interfor with only moderate effect only 300 m of the outside bend remaining intact. In 2005 Mel Sheng (DFO) designed a deflection groin and Newbury weir to mitigate the erosion problems, and in March 2006 the deflection groin and weir were constructed (figure 1), along with some in channel excavation. Due to limited funds, only a small weir was finished in 2006, and in 2007 the weir was extended both upwards Figure 3 and outwards. This project was completed with joint funding from the Pacific Salmon Foundation and Forest Investment Account (thru Interfor). It is this project that is the subject of the effectiveness monitoring in this report. In December of 2009, workers in the Looking down stream Homathko River area noticed an area of substantial erosion near 4.0 mile on the Homathko Mainline (figures 3 and 4) and reported it to DFO and the Campbell River Salmon foundation, and finally International Forest Products Ltd. (Interfor). The concern was, that left untreated, would eventually break through into Cumsack Slough, which is a very large and highly productive rearing area for Salmonids. 9 The Homathko River is a large river with a drainage basin of Looking up stream Figure 4 5335 square kilometres. The mountains flanking the Homathko River are the highest in the Coast Mountains and include Mount Waddington west of the river (in the Waddington Range) and Mount Queen Bess east of the river, adjacent to the Homathko Ice field. Also flanking the Homathko River on the west are the Niut Range, which is in the angle of the Homathko and its main west fork (Mosley Creek) and the Whitemantle Range (which is to the south of the Waddington Range) forming the mountainous ridge dividing Bute and Knights Inlets. The Homathko begins in the northern part of the Niut Range then descends to the Chilcotin Plateau coming close to Tatla Lake and Tatlayoko Lake before piercing the Pacific Ranges en route to the sea at the head of Bute Inlet. Figure 5 Location The mouth of the Homathko River is at the head of Bute inlet about 104 km at 16° from Campbell River (figure 5). The river contains Steelhead, Coastal Cutthroat Trout, Bull Trout, Rainbow Trout, Dolly Varden Char, Chinook Salmon, Chum Salmon, Coho Salmon, Pink Salmon, Longnose Sucker, Longnose Dace, Redside Shiner, Starry Flounder, River Lamprey, Eulachon, Three-Spine Stickleback, and Sculpin (FISS Data Base). It is a glacial fed system, so preferred instream window is March-April to coincide with traditional low flow periods. The Homathko River is in Region 2 (code ACT) within DFO District 5, sub-district 13N, South Coast Division. The watershed code for the Homathko River is 900-406900, and watershed identifier is 00000HOMA. The Homathko River Valley has had an extensive logging history which continues today. It is a Figure 6 prizes recreational fishing area. The Homathko River areas and tributaries of the Homathko River have recently been of interest for independent power producers. The erosion point of concern is located near 4 mile on the Homathko mainline (figure 61) approximately 600m upstream of the 2006 restoration works (figure 1). 1 The figure 6 picture was taken prior to the deflection groin being constructed 10 Project The site was inspected on March 4, 2010 by DFO (Richard Powley), a Homathco First Nations Fisheries advisor (Don Sinclair), and Mike Gage of the Campbell River Salmon Foundation. A helicopter reconnaissance of the area was completed to look for accessible rock. A contractor (Bjornson Holdings Limited) had equipment in Scar Creek (approximately 30 km form the proposed Homathko work site), so it was planned to take advantage of this efficiency to get the project completed. During the March 4 trip, Richard Powley took measurements of the proposed work site and developed a mediation plan for the site. Mr. Powley also completed an effectiveness monitoring inspection of the previous restoration work that was completed in 2006 and 2007. Snow and wind delayed the project start until March 26, 2010. The Campbell River Salmon Foundation covered the expense of flying the Bjornson Crew into Scar Creek to initiate the project which entailed armouring the erosion area with large angular rock and was completed by March 30, 2010. Severe windstorms caused significant access problems the night of March 26 and again on March 27 and required clearing with heavy equipment. The rock source originally identified during the reconnaissance turned out to include too much small rock so an alternate source 6km away was utilized. The windthrow and long haul distances added significant costs to the project. Approximately 140 loads of large angular rock was transported to the erosion site constituting about 2,400 m³ of rock. The rock was placed initially by the excavator and then top filled with the dump truck. Armouring length was approximately 35m. 11 Cost Breakdown Sum of Invoice $ M/E Consultant Project Invoice # Total Mar VIH SC 6886008-09 125131 1,718.75 Bjornson SC 6886008-09 IFP10-01 17,455.00 Grand Total 19,173.75 Original budget = $10,860 12 DFO Mitigation Plans and Effectiveness Monitoring 13 Homathko Main Rip Rap Repairs - 2010 A site reconnaissance was conducted on March 4th, 2010 to evaluate requirements for repairing minor erosion at the upstream end of rip rap bank protection along the right bank of the Homathko river, approximately 10 km. (river distance) upstream of the mouth. The following photographs illustrate the erosion site: At this point, it would probably be sufficient to simply fill the eroded void with rock. It might also be useful to construct a small groyne upstream of the tree pictured above. But, it should be pointed out that these are site-specific measures that will only buy some time – erosion at the upstream extend of the rip rap will be an on-going problem unless it is extended almost 600 m upstream to the crossing at the top of the meander loop. Note that such measures don’t necessarily have to consist of continuous rip rap – a series of groynes could also do the job. Nevertheless, either option would likely cost many hundreds of thousands of dollars. An alternative
Recommended publications
  • Scottish Coast Range Expedition 2002
    Scottish Coast Range Expedition 2002 West Pillar, Mount Gilbert (Photo: Simon Richardson) Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The Team 3 3. Gurus, Climbing Literature and Maps 3 4. Climbing 4 5. Conclusion 6 6. Diary of Events 6 7. Expedition Accounts 7 8. Acknowledgments 7 Mt Raleigh, The Cleaver, Mt Gilbert (l-r) (aerial photograph from the west) (Photo: Bivouac.com) Page 2 1. Introduction The primary aim of the expedition was to climb a new line on the unclimbed, 3000’ south face of Mount Gilbert (3098m), situated in the Coast Range of British Columbia, Canada at Lat. 50° 52.0’N, Long. 124° 16.0’W. Secondary objectives included investigating a potential line on the west face of Mount Gilbert as well as other lines on adjacent mountains. 2. The Team Chris Cartwright 39 yr, British, Human Resource Professional Scottish Winter: Approx. 150 new routes, mostly Grade V and above with numerous Grade VII and harder. Highlights include Fubarbundy (VIII 7) on Liathach, Magic Bow Wall (VIII 8) on Sgurr an Fhidhleir, The Crack (VIII 8) on Ben Nevis, The Link Direct (VIII 7) on Lochnagar. Alps: Highlights include ascents of many summer classics plus first ascents of the South Pillar Freney Direct, Crystal Tripper on Aiguille Jardin and winter ascents including the Dru Couloir. Expeditions to Himalayas, Alaska and numerous trips rockclimbing throughout the world. Simon Richardson 43 yr, British, Petroleum Engineer. Scottish Winter: Approx 300 new routes (140 Grade V and harder, 30 Grade VII and harder). Highlights include first ascents of The Cardinal (VIII,8) Beinn a'Bhuird, The Crack (VIII,8) Ben Nevis, Magic Bow Wall (VIII,8) Sgurr an Fhidhleir, Redemption (VIII,7) Lochnagar.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Wheel Drive: Mountain Biking British Columbia's Coast Range
    Registration 1/5/16, 12:00 PM Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Registration Registration No. 9XSX-4HC1Z Submitted Jan 4, 2016 1:19pm by Erica Evans Registration Sep 1, 2015- Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting for Aug 31 RKMF Expedition Grant 2015/2016/Group Application Approval This is the group application for a RKMF Expedition Grant. In this application you will be asked to provide important details concerning your expedition. Participant Erica Evans Colorado College Student Planned Graduation: Block 8 2016 CC ID Number: 121491 [email protected] [email protected] (435) 760-6923 (Cell/Text) Date of Birth: Nov 29, 1993 Emergency Contacts james evans (Father) (435) 752-3578 (436) 760-6923 (Alternate) Medical History Allergies (food, drug, materials, insects, etc.) 1. Fish, Pollen (Epi-Pen) Moderate throat reaction usually solved by Benadryl. Emergency prescription for Epi-Pen for fish allergy 2. Wear glasses or contacts Medical Details: I wear glasses and contacts. Additional Questions Medications No current medications Special Dietary Needs No fish https://apps.ideal-logic.com/worker/report/28CD7-DX6C/H9P3-DFPWP_d9376ed23a3a456e/p1a4adc8c/a5a109177b335/registration.html Page 1 of 12 Registration 1/5/16, 12:00 PM Last Doctor's Visit Date: Dec 14, 2015 Results: Healthy Insurance Covered by Insurance Yes Insurance Details Carrier: Blue Cross/ Blue Shield Name of Insured: Susanne Janecke Relationship to Erica: Mother Group Number: 1005283 Policy Number: ZHL950050123 Consent Erica Evans Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Consent Form (Jul 15, 2013) Backcountry Level II Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, EE) Erica Evans USE THIS WAIVER (Nov 5, 2013) Backcountry Level II Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, EE) I.
    [Show full text]
  • CHILCOTIN CENTRAL COAST DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY APE LAKE Photo: Kari Medig
    CHILCOTIN CENTRAL COAST DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY APE LAKE Photo: Kari Medig DESTINATION BC Seppe Mommaerts MANAGER, DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT Jody Young SENIOR PROJECT ADVISOR, DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT [email protected] CARIBOO CHILCOTIN COAST TOURISM ASSOCIATION Amy Thacker CEO 250 392 2226 ext. 200 [email protected] Jolene Lammers DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 250 392 2226 ext.209 [email protected] MINISTRY OF TOURISM, ARTS AND CULTURE Amber Mattock DIRECTOR, LEGISLATION AND DESTINATION BC GOVERNANCE 250 356 1489 [email protected] INDIGENOUS TOURISM ASSOCIATION OF BC 604 921 1070 [email protected] CHILCOTIN CENTRAL COAST | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................1 6. A DISTINCTIVE DIRECTION ..........................................................30 a. Distinctive Destination for the Chilcotin Central Coast a. Vision b. Distinctive Direction for the Chilcotin Central Coast b. Goals c. Guiding Principles for Destination Development II. ACRONYMS ...........................................................................................5 d. Motivating Experiences 1. FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................7 e. Development Themes 2. INTRODUCING THE STRATEGY .....................................................9 7. STRATEGY AT A GLANCE ................................................................38 a. Program Vision and Goals 8. STRATEGIC PRIORITIES .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department Of· Fisheries of Canada Vancouver, B. C
    DEPARTMENT OF· FISHERIES OF CANADA VANCOUVER, B. C. 1968 This booklet lists the names and shows the locat·ions of all main stem salmon spawning streams in British Columbia, exclusive of those streams draining through Southeastern Alaska. Not all tributary streams have been included in the listing. I I This material represents a portion of the information being . ' collected for the preparation of an inventory of salmon bearing streams in the Pacific Region. PREPARED BY RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BRANCH IN COLLABORATION ·WITH CONSERVATION & PROTECTION BRANCH Edited by C. E. Walker DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES OF CANADA PACIFIC AREA MAP SHOWING PROTECTION DISTRICTS AND STATISTICAL ,l\.REAS '- ·-" " . ~--L~-t--?.>~1> ,j '\ "·, -;:.~ '-, ~ .., -" '.) \ 'Uppe_r Arrow Loire \ ) \ ' ('ZC:t;I ;-Koafenoy ;:Lower (!~ LoJ<e Cranb~~"\ \Arrow ',\ ·• ·~ ·\. 1 i 1.AP NU. P. DIS1 • STA'rI3TICAL lAREAS LOCA'rION ..... ··-· ..... -~ ...... ... ~- ............... .. - . ................. ~ .. - ····-·~ --· ·---' --~ .. -'•··--·--·---- .. ·--""'· .. ..._..-~ ...-- ....... ..~---·-··-.-·- ... ---·· l 1 Sub-~District Cari boo ') 1 Sub-District Prince GeorGe ') .) 1 3ub-·-DJ.strict Kamloops.--Lj_llooet· 2 ~issioti-Harrison: Chilli.'wa ck--HoyJe Lower Fraser River ~~ 28 & 29 Howe Sound: New Jestminster 6 3 17, 18, 19 & 20 Nanaimo, Duncan, Victoria c.: 'Port San Juan 7 3 l~· Comox 8 3 15 Toba Inlet (~estview) () ,/ 3 16 Pender Harbour 10 Li- 22 & 23 Nitinat & Barkley Sound 11 Li- 24 Clayoquot Sound 12 l+ 25 Nootka Sound 13 l+ 26 Kyuquot Sound 14 5 J.l Seymour - Belize 15 5 12 Alert Bay (Broughton) 16 5 12 Alert Bay (Knight Inlet) , 1 ..... 17 5 --J Campbell River .., () ..L ~) 5 27 Quatsino Sound 6 9 &·10 Rivers Inlet & Smith Inlet ,..., ,.. 20 ( 0 Butedale (Fraser I\each) 21 '7 6 Butedale (Ki tima t Ar::.1) ') ') l.-t·- '7 7 Bella Bella r'"J ( 8 Bella Coola 8 3 Nass ..
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 SUMMIT of EXCELLENCE AWARD Don Serl
    2017 SUMMIT OF EXCELLENCE AWARD Don Serl The Banff Mountain Film and Book Festival is proud to announce Don Serl as the 2017 recipient of the Summit of Excellence Award, which recognizes an individual who has made a significant contribution to mountain life in Canada. Regarded as one of Canada’s most accomplished and prolific mountaineers, Serl has about 200 first ascents to his name. “With the Summit of Excellence Award now being presented to deserving recipients outside of the Canadian Rockies, Don Serl was an obvious and easy choice,” said Nancy Hansen, Summit of Excellence selection committee member. “Over several decades, Don has made significant contributions to Canadian mountain climbing and culture and is humble about his achievements, preferring to discuss new ideas and what others have done. He is a wealth of information about climbing on the West Coast and enjoys sharing his knowledge.” Born in Victoria and raised in Kamloops, Serl discovered a love for the mountains at the age of 25. while working as a chemist in Vancouver. In 1974, Serl trained in the Federation of Mountain Clubs of British Columbia (FMCBC) basic mountaineering course where he said his “energies and imagination were unleashed” and by 1975 he completed his initial first ascent on the north face of Mt Cheam in British Columbia. Since then “he has reigned as the preeminent Coast climber” according to author and climbing peer Chic Scott. Heavily influenced by Canadian climber Dick Culbert, Serl’s horizons opened after an Alpine Club of Canada trip into the multi-summitted Waddington Range, followed by numerous expeditionary trips into remote corners of the Coast Mountains in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Roosevelt Elk in British Columbia
    A Management Plan for Roosevelt Elk in British Columbia September 2015 Executive Summary Roosevelt elk (Cervus canadensis roosevelti) serve an important ecological role in coastal ecosystems of British Columbia (BC). They are prey for top predators and they influence plant phenology and successional pathways in their preferred habitats. Roosevelt elk are also important in First Nations culture and provide resident and guided hunting and viewing opportunities. Economic benefits generated by these uses benefit communities, regions and the province. This plan presents a synopsis of current management objectives and strategies for Roosevelt elk that will direct management from 2015-2025 according to provincial wildlife policy and ongoing consultation and engagement with First Nations and stakeholders. Roosevelt elk are on the Provincial Blue List and are subject to a conservative, limited-entry hunt in the West Coast and South Coast Regions. Although their global distribution is smaller and more fragmented than pre-1900, the BC population is growing, particularly in the South Coast Region where translocations have re- established Roosevelt elk into portions of their historic range. Roosevelt elk are managed by Elk Population Units (EPUs). Population size and trend, harvest rate and habitat suitability have been estimated for all EPUs. Indicators are monitored according to conservation priorities and available funding. Given the conservation status of Roosevelt elk and the high demand for cultural, subsistence, recreational and commercial uses, the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (FLNR) has management goals of increasing the population, expanding its distribution and mitigating threats, such that the subspecies could be removed from the Provincial Blue List within the 2015-2025 time period.
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 1 REGION 2 Hunting in BC Parks Only the Parks, Conservancies, Protected Areas and Recreation Areas Listed Below Are Open
    Hunting in BC Parks Only the Parks, conservancies, protected areas and recreation areas listed below are open to hunting during the specified time periods. Maps noted in the following list are published in the Hunting and Trapping Synopsis and at the end of this list. Individuals visiting BC Parks, either a Park, Conservancy, Recreation Area or Protected Area should be aware that the Park Act and its regulations apply, as do the hunting regulations. Visit www.bcparks.ca for more information on other activities allowed or prohibited in specific parks. REGION 1 w 4In keeping with Section 29 of the Park, Conservancy and Recreation Ug iwey/Cape Caution - Blunden Bay Conservancy Area Regulation, the following Parks and Recreation Areas are only open . .(MU 1-14, 5-7) to the discharge of firearms, bows and crossbows during a lawful game Vargas Island Park . (MU 1-8) hunting season: Wahkash Point Conservancy . .(MU 1-15) White Ridge Park . (MU 1-9) Atna River Park . (MU 1-14) Woss Lake Park . (MU 1-11) Bear Island Conservancy. (MU 1-14) Yorke Island Conservancy . (MU 1-15) Bella Coola Estuary Conservancy . (MU 1-14) ✚ Bligh Island Marine Park . (MU 1-12) Waterfowl includes ducks, coots, common snipe, snow geese, Ross’s geese Bodega Ridge Park. (MU 1-1) Canada geese and cackling geese. Brooks Peninsula Park . (MU 1-12) Burnt Bridge Creek Conservancy . (MU 1-14) REGION 2 Cape Scott Park (waterfowl only)✚ the area east of Dakota Creek is open to all hunting . (MU 1-13) In keeping with Section 29 of the Park, Conservancy and Recreation Area Carmanah Walbran Park.
    [Show full text]
  • SMZ Foreword
    Foreword BC Spaces for Nature is a solutions-oriented, conservation organization created in 1990 to promote the protection of British Columbia’s rich diversity of wilderness and wildlife. BC Spaces works with individuals and organizations throughout the province to ensure that British Columbia’s wild spaces remain intact. Given this mandate, BC Spaces recognized the potential that Special Management Zones could make in safeguarding these values. Hence this Citizens’ Guide has been written to help the public ensure that the Special Management Zones will indeed achieve their potential. After over 125 years of forest development, British Columbia still contains extensive temperate forests. These wildlands contain an extraordinary range of plants and animals that are the envy of the world. Consequently, British Columbians have a global responsibility to steward the environmental values of our province. However, for many years British Columbia’s forests have been subjected to damaging logging practices and unsustainable overcutting. In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, this led to increasing conflicts between the logging industry and conservationists. In places such as Carmanah Valley and Clayoquot Sound the tensions of these confrontations became intense. To help resolve these conflicts the B.C. government sponsored a series of land use planning processes to designate the landbase for the management of both economic and ecological values. The zones delineated through these public negotiation exercises included: Protected Areas, Integrated Management, Enhanced Resource Use and Special Management. In particular, the establishment of Special Management Zones to maintain and enhance values other than timber - such as environmental and social concerns - were critical to achieving success at the negotiation table.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of British Columbia
    No. 90 0913 Victoria Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: ROGER WILLIAM, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nations Government and on behalf of all other members of the Tsilhqot’in Nation PLAINTIFF AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF THE CARIBOO FOREST REGION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF’ S REPLY APPENDIX 1B PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS’ SUBMISSIONS ON DEFINITE TRACTS OF LAND WOODWARD & ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMPANY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA JUSTICE, CANADA Barristers and Solicitors Civil Litigation Section Aboriginal Law Section 844 Courtney Street, 2nd Floor 3RD Floor, 1405 Douglas Street 900 – 840 Howe Street Victoria, BC V8W 1C4 Victoria, BC V8W 9J5 Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2S9 Solicitors for the Plaintiff Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Solicitor for the Defendant, Majesty the Queen in the Right of The Attorney General of Canada the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region ROSENBERG & BORDEN LADNER ROSENBERG GERVAIS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Barristers & Solicitors 671D Market Hill Road 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Vancouver, BC V5Z 4B5 Burrard Street Solicitors for the Plaintiff Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2 Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region Exhibit 43 Photograph 38 Plaintiff’s Reply Appendix 1B Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendants’ Submissions on Definite Tracts of Land A. Southeast Tsilhqox Biny (Chilko Lake): west Ts’il?os (Mount Tatlow) and Relevant Portions of the Tl’echid Gunaz (Long Valley), Yuhitah (Yohetta Valley), Ts’i Talhl?ad (Rainbow Creek), Tsi Tese?an (Tchaikazan Valley) and Tsilhqox Tu Tl’az (Edmonds River) Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveryv47 2019 Final for Website
    Spectacular 2019 Niut Lakes Camp a Smashing Success by Stephen Partington WHAT AN AMAZING SETTING for a Nature loomed large to the west and south Vancouver camp! while the vast Chilcotin Plateau Twelve minutes or so in the heli- stretched invisibly to the east. copter was all it took to hop overtop From here, the Nature Vancouver of the imposing mountains tower- 2019 campsite ofered a stunningly ing above Bluf Lake south of Tatla gorgeous 360-degree view free from Lake and to be deposited near the any signs of humans. Nature was at treeline about 1000 m higher than our doorstep. Te quiet was delicious. the chopper launch pad. No-one needed to hike anywhere— Instant wilderness! we were already there! Helicopter delivery of all goods And there we were—on a small and personnel was key to the com- plateau forested with patches of low fortable establishment of our near- pines at about 2000 m elevation alpine occupation. Not many who and tucked among a series of small attended this camp would have been lakes and ponds. Te rugged Niut happy to make the hike to such a Range peaks of the Coast Mountains place. Our fight was feetingly short View of lakes, Goat Ridge, glacier and Niut Peak from Snow Patch Peak. Photo: Caroline Penn 48 Discovery at a little more than 10 km, but the level as a root embedded within the terrain that we few over was rugged, mantle of the earth. rocky, steep and trackless. Te geologic conditions changed Geology of the Niut Range radically, however, about 5 million years ago when a shift in the ofshore Te Niut Range is a place where plate subduction zones resulted in the immense geological events have appearance of the Cascade Volcanic unfolded.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Hazardous Processes in High Mountains
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Climate change and hazardous processes in high mountains Clague, John J ; Huggel, Christian ; Korup, Oliver ; McGuire, Bill Abstract: The recent and continuing reduction in glacier ice cover in high mountains and thaw of alpine permafrost may have an impact on many potentially hazardous processes. As glaciers thin and retreat, existing ice- and moraine-dammed lakes can catastrophically empty, generating large and destructive downstream floods and debris flows. New ice-dammed lakes will form higher in mountain catchments, posing additional hazards in the future. The magnitude or frequency of shallow landslides and debris flows in some areas will increase because of the greater availability of unconsolidated sediment innew deglaciated terrain. Continued permafrost degradation and glacier retreat probably will decrease the stability of rock slopes. Cambio Climático y peligros naturales en altas montañas. La reciente y continua reducción de la cobertura glaciaria en alta montaña y el deshielo del permafrost pueden tener un impacto negativo en muchos procesos potencialmente peligrosos. A medida que los glaciares reducen su espesor y retroceden, los lagos formados por diques de hielo o morenas pueden vaciarse catastróficamente, resul- tando en grandes y destructivas inundaciones o flujos detríticos río abajo. Nuevos diques de hielo vana formarse en zonas más altas de las cuencas montañosas, generando peligros adicionales en el futuro. La magnitud o frecuencia de movimientos en masa superficiales y flujos detríticos va a aumentar en algunas áreas debido a la mayor disponibilidad de materiales no consolidados en nuevos terrenos desglasados.
    [Show full text]
  • 462 the AMERICAN ALPINE JOURNAL CANADA Yukon
    462 THE AMERICAN ALPINE JOURNAL CANADA Yukon Territory Mount Vancouver, Northeast Ridge. The 1975 M.I.T. Outing Club Expedition assembled in mid-June at Haines Junction. We consisted of Cliff Cantor*, Bob Dangel, Paul Ledoux, Rob Milne*, Hal Murray, Bob Walker, John Yates and me as leader. We conversed briefly with a Japanese party that had just completed an ascent of the north side of Mount Vancouver, a route we had considered as a possible alternative if we found the northeast ridge impractical. On June 16 in the evening, we were transported in three helicopter loads to a strikingly beautiful location near the base of the northeast ridge at 4800 feet on the Hub- bard Glacier. The ridge above us rose in a series of steps to a snow- covered peak at 10,600 feet, above which it widened and became easier, merging with the main summit mass at 11,500 feet. We planned a high camp just beyond P 10,600, from which we felt we might push to the summit in one day. Climbing at night to obtain better snow condi- tions, we explored route possibilities and established Camp I above an active icefall which guarded a large, amphitheater-like basin on the south side of the ridge. From here, we were able to reach the 8200-foot plateau on the ridge with relative ease, occupying Camp II on June 22. We fixed 1100 feet of rope below the plateau to facilitate load carrying. Above the plateau, the ridge rose in three steps to P 10,600, the first step being the most difficult.
    [Show full text]