DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 06 2 632 AC 012 611

TITLE Education and Training ProgramsAdministered by V.A. Hearings before the Subcommittee onEducation and Training of the Committee on Veterans":Affairs. House of Representatives, 92nd Congress,First-Session.

INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington,D.C. . House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 593p.

EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$19.74 DESCRIPTORS *Adult Education Programs; *Colleges;Educational Needs; *Educational Programs; *FederalLegislation; Financial Support; Tables (Data); *Veterans Education; Vocational Education I DENT IF IERS *Congressional Hearings; Veterans Administration

ABSTRACT Hearings on one of the major veterans', programs, i.e., education and training for war veteransand certain of their dependents, are listed, and agency reports onthese bills are given. In addition, a list of colleges,together with their location, undergraduate enrollment, 1971-72 fixed costs,and comments are provided. An Information Bulletin from the V.A.relating to veterans' benefits under current educational programs,18 appendix tables, a comparison of independent colleges anduniversities, statements of staff members of the Veterans Administration,Programs of Opportunity Fairs for Veterans in various cities, andcopies of correspondence from various interested groups to Congressmen arepresented. (DB) U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENTHAS BEEN REPRO. FROM DUCED EXACTLYAS RECEIVED THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG. INATING IT. POINTSOF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DONOT NECESSARILY OFFICE OF EDU- . REPRESENT OFFICIAL CATION POSITION ORPOLICY. (:;:;;

) ed.&

A 94

-.r

ky.,1154fry ,111,11. 441C

vr. .)1,! 0..,",,;...4- .,r,,,.....r. -.;715:fn J4ief.f" .,;c.-5.66--.ini" VOiskiit iiit' iii1.4'-'4.-6,19.1. iolitil,':,41,,t.;,,o,et-blig:.1.1-1.tt.t.tuiriii.9.44.,...0':,40,1,fcnel, .,,.it ,,j. 764' l'''r.HIS'elAfi_ lalatIoi;

.,;.:11.f;t A:;)

;04,f EDUCATION AND TRAININGPROGRAMS

ADMINISTERED BY V.A. .

HEARINGS ; BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAND TRAINING OF THE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS'AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-SECOND CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON BILLS RELATED TO EDUCATION ANDTRAINING PROGRAMS FOR VETERANS AND FOR CERTAINOF THEIR DEPENDENTS

NOVEMBER 30, DECEMBER 1, 8 AND 9,1971

Printed for the use of the Committee onVeterans' Affairs

Pages of all hearings nre numbered cumulativelyto permit a comprehensive index at the end of the Congress.Page num- bers lower than those in this hearing refer toother legislation.

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 71-815 0 WASHINGTON : 1972 e 2 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS OLIN E. TEAGUE, Texas, Ohairman W. J. BRYAN DORN, South Carolina CHARLES M. TEAGUE, California JAMES A. HALEY, Florida JOHN P. SAYLOR, Pennsylvania WALTER S. BARING, Nevada JOHN PAUL HAMMERSCHMIDT, Arkansas THADDEUS J. DULSKI, WILLIAM LLOYD SCOTT. Virginia RAY ROBERTS, Texas MARGARET M. HECKLER, Massachusetts DAVID E. SATTERFIELD III, Virginia JOHN M. ZWACH, Minnesota HENRY HELSTOSKI, New Jersey CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio ROMAN C. PUCINSKI, Illinois LARRY WINN, Jn., Kansas DON EDWARDS, California EARL B. RUTH, G. V. (SONNY) MONTGOMERY, MississiPl'iELWOOD HILLIS, Indiana CHARLES J. CARNEY, Ohio LOUISE DAY HICKS, Massachusetts GEORGE B. DANIELSON, California ELLA T. GRASSO, Connecticut LESTER L. WOLFF, New York Oravsn E. MEADOWS, Staff Director

SUBCOMMITTEES (Chairman and ranking minority member ex officio members of all subcommittees)

COMPENSATION AND PENSION W. J. BRYAN DORN, Ohairman RAY ROBERTS JOHN PAUL IrAMMERSCHMIDT G. V. (SONNY) MONTGOMERY JOHN P. SAYLOR WILLIAM LLOYD SCOTT

EDUCATION AND TRAINING HENRY HELSTOSKI, Ohairman THADDEUS J. DULSKI WILLIAM LLOYD SCOTT WALTER S. BARING MARGARET M. HECKLER W. J. BRYAN DORN JOHN M. ZWACH ROMAN C. PUCINSKI CHALMERS P. WYLIE DON EDWARDS LARRY WINN, Jn. GEORGE E. DANIELSON EARL B. RUTH

HOSPITALS DAVID E. SATTERFIELD III, Ohairman JAMES A. HALEY JOHN P. SAYLOR WALTER S. BARING JOHN PAUL HAMMERSCHMIDT THADDEUS J. DULSKI WILLIAM LLOYD SCOTT RAY ROBERTS MARGARET M. HECKLER W. J. BRYAN DORN JOHN M. ZWACH ROMAN C. PUCINSKI CHALMERS P. WYLIE G. V. (SONNY) MONTGOMERY LARRY WINN, JR. DON EDWARDS EARL B. RUTH CHARLES J. CARNEY ELWOOD HILLIS GEORGE E. DANIELSON LOUISE DAY HICKS ELLA T. GRASSO LESTER L. WOLFF HOUSING CHARLES J. CARNEY, Oliairman WALTER S. BARING MARGARET M. HECKLER RAY ROBERTS JOHN PAUL IIAMMERSCHMIDT DAVID E. SATTERFIELD III LARRY WINN, JR. HENRY HELSTOSKI ELWOOD HILLIS

INSURANCE G. V. (SONNY) MONTGOMERY, Ohairman LOUISE DAY HICKS JOHN M. ZWACH ELLA T. GRASSO JOHN P. SAYLOR CHALMERS P. WYLIE (II) 3 CONTENTS

Allen, Gerald 0.(SeeNational Home Study Council.) American Association of Junior Colleges: Malian, John P., Ph. D., director, programsfor servicemen andPage veterans 1760-1762 Morton, Luis, Ph. D., president,Central Texas College, Killeen, Tex 1757-1759, 1761-1769 American Council on Education; letter 1913, 1914 American Legion: Golembieski, E. H., director, veterans'affairs and rehabilitation commission 1731-1738, 1743 Resolutions 1739-1743 Wertz, Terrell M., assistant director,national legislative commis- sion 1730, 1731 American Personnel and Guidance Association:telegram 1911 AMVETS: Sanchez, Leon, legislative director 1754-1756 Association of American Colleges: Ness,Frederick W., president 1883-1888 Association of Jesuit Colleges andUniversities: letter 1912 1913 Baring, Hon. Walter S 1833, 1837, 1843, 1844, 1886-1888, 1891,1893, 1896, 1898-1900, 1902- 1910, 1916 Bills considered, Subcommittee onEducation and Training 1331-1523 13royhill, Hon. Joel T 1846, 1847 National Organization for Women.) Burris, Mrs. Carol.(See Agencies.) Busbee, Marvin P.(SeeNational Association of State Approving Chairman, Subcommittee onEducation and Training(SeeHelstoski, Hon. Henry.) Clarke, Neal.(SeeFairleigh Dickenson University.) Oliver E., staff director 1759- Committee staff: Meadows, 1761, 1888, 1897, 1904, 1905, 1909 Comparison of independentcolleges and universities, 1947-48 versus Council of Independent Colleges and 1971-72, prepared by National 1693-1708 Universities Cost of attendance at institutionsof higher education 1631-1655 Danielson, Hon. George E 1727- 1729, 1743, 1747, 1753, 1833,1834, 1839, 1840, 1843, 1845, 1893- 1895, 1897-1899, 1902, 1903,1907-1910 D'Andrea, Bart.(SeeFairleigh Dickenson University.) Davis, Hon. Glenn 1831, 1832 Devine, Gerry.(SeeFairleigh Dickenson University.) Disabled American Veterans:Huber, Charles, director oflegislation._ 1744-1747 District of Columbia Commission onthe Status of Women.(SeeInterstate Association of Commissions on theStatus of Women.) Dulski, Hon. Thaddeus J 1829, 1831-1834, 1836, 1837, 1839, 1840,1843-1845, 1847-1851, 1853- 1856, 1858, 1859, 1862, 1864,1867, 1868, 1870, 1872, 1873, 1883, 1886, 1888-1893, 1895, 1896 Education and Training Subcommittee.(SeeSubcommittee on Education and Trannng.) attendance 1631-1655 Educational institutions, cost of 1868-1870 Esch, Hon. Marvin L 1727, 1743 Edwards, Hon. Don Fairleigh Dickenson University: Clarke, Neal, student 1891, 1982, 1894 D'Andrea, Bart, student 1895-1897 Devine, Gerry, student 1896-1898 consultant 1889- Silverman, Irwin W., legislative 1891, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1899 (m) IV

Feldman, Stuart F.(SeeNational League of Cities and U.S. Conference of Mayors.) Page Fish, Hon. Hamilton, Jr 1829-1831 Ford, Hon. William D 1858, 1859 Frandsen, Mrs. Alice.(SeeNational Organization for Women.) Fraser, Hon. Donald M 1852, 1853 Fulton, Hon. Richard 1860-1862 Golembieski, E. H.(SeeAmerican Legion.) Grasso, Hon. Ella T 1864-1867 Griffiths, Hon. Martha W 1872, 1873 Halpern, Hon. Seymour 1840-1843 Hansen, Hon. Orval 1856-1858 Heckler, Hon. Margaret M 1898-1900, 1903, 1904, 1908, 1909 Helstoski, Hon. Henry 1331, 1630, 1656, 1692, 1709, 1710, 1713, 1727-1730, 1739, 1743, 1747, 1749, 1753, 1754; 1756-1759, 1762, 1769, 1772, 1774, 1779, 1808, 1810-1813, 1817, 1824, 1826-1828 Hogan, Hon. Lawrence J 1867, 1868 Holcomb, Howard E.(SeeNational Council of Independent Colleges and Universities.) Horton, Hon. Frank 1870-1872 Huber, Charles.(SeeDisabled American Veterans.) Interstate Association of Commissions on the Status of Women: Lewis, Helen, D.C. Commission on the Status of Women 1900-1905 Johnson, Hon. Harold T. (Bizz) 1855, 1856 Lewis, Mrs. Helen.(SeeInterstate Association of Commissionson the Status of Women.) Lovejoy's College Guide: letter 1914, 1915 Lujan, Hon. Manuel, Jr 1849 McLaughlin, Patrick M.(SeeNational Association of CollegiateVeterans1.8,)48 Mallan, John P.(SeeAmerican Association of Junior Colleges.) Martindale, Michael D., statement 1910, 1911 Meadows, Oliver E.(See CommitteeStaff.) Melcher, Hon. John 1832, 1834 Mikva, Hon. Abner J 1843-1845 Mink, Hon. Patsy T 1862-1864 Minnesota Farmers Union: letter 1912 Morton, Luis.(SeeAmerican Association of Junior Colleges.) Moss, Hon. John E 1853, 1854 National Association of Collegiate Veterans: Exhibits submitted 1779-1807 McLaughlin, Patrick M., vice president of external affairs 1777 1808 Patton, Michael R. president 1774-1778, 1808 National Association of State Approving Agencies: Marvin P. Busbee, legislative director 1769-1774 National Catholic Educational Association: letter 1914 National Council of Independent Colleges and Universities: Comparison of independent colleges and universities, 1947-48versus 1971-72, by veterans undergraduate enrollment, total undergradu- ate enrollment, and increases in total costs 1693-1708 Holcomb, Howard E., director of Federal relations 1887 Ness, Frederic W., executive vice chairman 1883-1888 National Farmers Union: letter 1915 National Home Study Council: Allen Gerald 0., former president, state- ment 1916-1919 National League of Cities and U.S. Conference of Mayors: Feldman, Stuart /, program coordinator, Veterans Education and Training Action Committee 1812-1817, 1824-1828 Exhibits submitted 1817-1182143 Resolution Nation.1 Organization for Wbmen: Burris,Mrs.Carol 1906-1909 Frandsen, Mrs. Alice 1905, 1906 Ness, Frederic W.(SeeNational Council of Independent Colleges and Universities or Association of American Colleges.) Newark State College, Newark, N.J.: William Vincent 1808-1812 V

Page O'Hara, Hon. James G 1834-1840 Owen, Olney B.(SeeVeterans Administration.) Patton, Michael R.(SeeNational Association of Collegiate Veterans.) Pucinsl:i, Hon. Roman C 1776, 1777, 1808 Rarick, Hon. John R 1873-1882 St. Lnuis Veterans job fair: Questions and answersof participants_ 1779-1781 Sanchez, Leon.(SeeAMVETS.) Scott, Hon. William Lloyd 1728, 1729, 1743, 1747, 1753, 1754, 1833,1837-1839, 1843, 1844 Silverman, Irwin W.(SeeFairleigh Dickenson University.) Steiger, Hon. William A 1854, 1855 Stokes, Hon. Louis 1845 Stover, Francis W.(SeeVeterans of Foreign Wars.) Subcommittee on Education and Training: Bills considered and agency recommendations 1331-1629 Chairman.(SeeHelstoski, Hon. Henry.) Symington, Hon. James W 1847, 1848 Thomson, Hon. Vernon W 1849, 1850 U.S. Conference of Mayors.(SeeNational League of Cities and U.S. Conference of Mayors.) Veterans Administration: Owen, Olney B., Chief Benefits Director 1709-1729 Publication, "Veterans' Benefits UnderCurrent Educational Pro- grams," title 38, United States CodeNovember1971 1657-1691 Reports on bills 1524-1629, 1710-1727 Veterans Benefits Under Current EducationalPrograms, title 38, United States Code, November 1971_ 1657-1691 Veterans of Foreign Wars: Resolutions 1749-1751 Stover, Francis W., director, nationallegislative service 1747- 1749, 1751-1754, 1837 Veterans Opportunity Fair, Dayton, Ohio,brochure 1782-1807 Vincenti, William.(SeeNewark State College.) Wertz, Terrell M.(SeeAmerican Legion.) Winn, Hon. Larry, Jr 1758, 1810, 1824-1826 Wi.klonsin Governor's Commission on theStatus of Women: letter 1913 Wylie, Hon. Chalmers P _ 1811, 1826-1828 Yong, Hon. C. W. (Bill) 1850, 1851 Zwach, Hon. John M 1888 EDUCATIOr AND TRAININGPROGRAMS FOR VETER- ANS AND CERTAINOF THEIR DEPENDENTS

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30,1971

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SuBcommrrrEE ON EDUCATION ANDTRAINING OF THECOMMITTEE ON VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met at10 a.m., pursuant tocall, in room 334, Cannon House Office Building,Hon. Henry Helstoski(chairman) presiding. Mr. H.ELSTOSKI. Thesubcommittee will come to order. The Subcommittee onEducation and Trainingis meeting this morning to begin hearings on oneof the major veterans' programs; namely, education and trainingfor war veterans and certainof their dependents? which Congress hasextended through the yearsin vari- ous forms since1944. There are pending on theagenda over 50 bills proposingincreases in the educationalallowances and otherwiseseeking to strengthen and improve the severaleducational programs. Without objection, a list of thebills under considerationwill be in- serted at this point in therecord, along with agencyreports thereon. In cases where the agencyhas not yet submitted aformal report, the record will be held open toreceive such reports as theybecome avail- able. (The data referred tofollow :)

BILLS FOR CONSIDERATION RYSUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING, BY NUMBER H.R. 6148-Hon. Henry Helstoskl H.R. 232-Hon. Spark M.Matsunaga Bill Young H.R. 298-Hon. John M.Murphy H.R. 6904-Hon. C. W. H.R. 413-Hon. John R.Rarick (Fla.) Ryan H.R. 7659-Hon. Abner J.Mikva H.R. 1628-Hon. William F. H.R. 7668-Hon. Olin E. Teague H.R. 2505-Hon. John E. Moss Hansen H.R. 2523-Hon. Ogden Reid H.R. 8094-Hon. Orval H.R. 3262-Hon. James C.Corman H.R. 8266-Hon. Olin E.Teague H.R. 3349-Hon. Olin E. Teague H.R. 8282-Hon. James G.Fulton H.R. 3965-Hon. MarthaGriffiths H.R. 8604-Hon. JohnMelcher H.R. 4223-Hon. SeymourHalpern H.R. 8662-Hon. RichardFulton H.R. 4864-Hon. F. BradfordMorse H.R. 9609-Hon. SeymourHalpern H.R. 5052-Hon. John P. Saylor H.R. 9613-Hon. SeymourFlalpern H.R. 5053-Hon. John P.Saylor H.R. 9627-Hon. Marvin Esch H.R. 5188-Hon Glenn R.Davis, forH.R. 9662-Hon. James G.O'Hara himself and Hon. William H. Seiger H.R. 9779-Hon. Ella T.Grasso H.R. 5694-Hon. Patsy Mink Helstoski H.R. 6042-Hon. Manuel Lujan,Jr. ER. 0823-Hon. Henry H.R. 6130-Hon. Richard H.Fulton ER. 9824-Hon. HenryHelstoski (1331)

7 1332

H.R. 9894Hon. William D. Ford H.R. 10605--Hon. Harold T. Johnson H.R. 9968Hon. Louis Stokes (Calif.) H.R. 10043Hon. Marvin L. Esch H.R. 10648Hon. Frank Horton H.R. 10044Hon. Marvin L. Esch H.R. 10774Hon. Joel Broyhill H.R. 10,30Hon. Margaret M. HecklerH.R. 10775Hon. Joel Broyhill H.R. 10166Hon. Olin E. Teague H.R. 11400Hon. Hamilton Fish H.R. 10168Hon. Olin E. Teague H.R. 11534Hon. Olin E. Ter -ue H.R. 10169Hon. Olin E. Teague H.R. 11552Hon. John G. Dow H.R. 10224Hon. Edward J. Patten H.R. 11571Hon. Henry Helstoski H.R. 10391Hon. Joseph M. McDade H.R. 11720Hon. Henry Helstoski H.R. 10432Hon. Donald M. Fraser H.R. 11954Hon. Olin E. Teague (for H.R. 10504Hon. James AV. Symington himself, Mr. Teague of California, H.R. 10543Hon.VernonThomson Mr. Helstoski and Mr. Scott) intro- (Wis.) duced H.R. 11954 on November 30th H.R. 10565Hon. Henry Helstoski at the request of Veterans' Adminis- H.R. 10603Hon. Lawrence J. Hogan tration.

BILLS FOR CONSIDERATION BY SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING, BY AUTHOR Broyhill, Hon. Joel T H.R. 10774 H.R. 10775 Corman, Hon. James C H.R. 3262 Davis, Hon. Glenn R. and Steiger, Hon. Wm. A H.R. 5188 Dow, Hon. John G H.R. 11552 Esch, Hon. Marvin L H.R. 9627 H.R. 10043 Fish, Hon. Hamilton H.R. 11400 H.R. 10044 Ford, Hon. William D H.R. 9894 Fraser, Hon. Donald M H.R. 10432 Fulton, Hon. James G. (Pa) H.R. 8282 Fulton, Hon. Richard H.R. 6130 H.R. 8662 Grasso, Hon. Ella T H.R. 9779 Griffiths, Hon. Martha H.R. 3965 Halpern, Hon. Seymour H.R. 4223 H.R. 9609 H.R. 9613 Hansen, Hon. Orval H.R. 8094 Heckler, Hon. Margaret H.R. 10130 Helstoski, Hon. Henry H.R. 6148 H.R. 9823 H.R. 9824 H.R. 10565 H.R. 10571 Ha 11720 Hogan, Hon. Lawrence J. H.R. 10603 Horton, Hon. Frank H.R. 10648 Johnson, Hon. Harold T H.R. 10605 Lujan, Hon. Manuel, Jr H.R. 6042 McDade, Hon. Joseph M H.R. 10391 Matsunaga, Hon. Spark M H.R. 232 Melcher, Hon. John H.R. 8604 Mikva, Hon. Abner J H.R. 7659 Mink, Hon. Patsy H.R. 5694 Morse, Hon. F. Bradford H.R. 4864 Moss, Hon. John E H.R. 2505 Murphy, Hon. John M H.R. 298 O'Hara, Hon. James G H.R. 9662 Patten, Hon. Edward J H.R. 10224 Rarick, Hon. John R H.R. 413 1333 H.R. 2523 Reid, Hon. Ogden H.R. 1628 Ryan, Hon. William F H.R. 5052 Saylor, Hon. John P H.R. 5053 H.R. 9968 Stokes, Hon. Louis H.R. 10504 Symington, Hon. James W H.R. 3349 Teague, Hon. Olin E H.R. 7668 H.R. 8266 H.R. 10166 H.R. 10168 H.R. 10169 H.R. 11534 ER. 11954 Thomson, Hon. Vernon H.R. 10543 Young, C. W. Bill H.R. 6904 1334

The following identical bills were also considered by the Subcommittee: 1H.R. 2523, introduced by Mr. Reid of New York, January 29, 1971;and H.R. 4864, introduced by Mr. Morse, February 23, 1971.)

92o CONGRESS lsr SESSION H. R. 232

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTA.TIVES

JANUARY 22,1971 Mr. MAtsomm introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to permit certain active duty for training to be countedas active duty for purpose of entitlement to educational benefits under chapter 34 of such title. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That subsection (a) (3) of section 1652 of title 38, United 4States Code, is amended by striking out "and section 1661

5 (a) " and inserting in lieu thereof "of this subsection and

6subsection (a) of section 1661 (except as provided in the

7last sentence.thereof) ". 8 EEc. 2. Subsection(a)of section 1661 of title 38,

9UnitkedStates Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof 1335

2

the following new sentence:"For the purposes of this chap-

2ter and subject to thelimitation in subsection (c) ,if a

3veteran serves for a periodof active duty pursuant to a call

4or order theretoissued to him after August 4, 1964, as a

5Reserve or a member of the NationalGuard or Air National

6Guard of any State, and is aneligible veteran as a result of

7such duty, any period of not morethan six consecutive

8months of full-time duty performedby him after January 31,

91955, for the purpose of obtaininginitial military training

10pursuant to his Reserve,National Guard, or Air National

11Guard 6bligation shall be deemed tobe active duty." 1336

[H.R. 6148, an identical bill introduced by Mr. Helstoski on March 16, 1971, was also considered by the Subcommittee.]

92D CONGRESS 18T SESSION H. R. 298

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JarrunaT 22,1971 Mr. MURPHY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to permit certain active duty for training to be counted as active duty for purposes of entitlement to educational benefits under chapter 34 of such title.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Howe of Representa-

2gives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That subsection (a) (3) of section 1652 of title 38, United

4States Code, is amended by striking out "and section 1661

5 (a)" and inserting in lieu thereof "of this subsection and

6subsection(a)of section 1661 (except as provided in the

7last sentence thereof) ".

8 SEC. 2. Subsection(a)of section 1661 of title 38,

9United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof

12 1337

2 chap- 1the following new sentence:"For the purposes of this (c),if a 2ter and subject tothe limitation in subsection duty in an area desig- 3veteran servesfor a period of active 4 nated as acombat zone by thePresident of the United after 5States, pursuant to a call ororder thereto issued to him 6 August 4, 1964, as aReserve or a member ofthe National 7 Guard or AirNational Guard or anyState, and is an eligible 8 veteran as a resultof such duty, any periodof not more than performed by him 9 six consecutivemonths of full-time duty 10 after January 31,1955, for the purposesof obtaining initial Guard, 11military training pursuant tohis Reserve, Natioml shall be deemed to beactive 12or AirNational Guard obligation 13. duty."

13 1338

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 413

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 22,1971 Mr. Rmucx introduced the following bill; whichwas referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to provide,in cer- tain instances, up to eighteen months of additional educa- tional assistance for graduateor professional study.- 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of 1?epresenta-, 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That (a) subsection (a) of section 1661 of title 38, Unite&

4States Code, is amended by striking out "subsection(c) " 5and inserting in lieu thereof "subsections (c) and (d) " 6 (b) Subsection (c) of such section 1661 is redesignated 7as subsection (d), and, as so redesignated, is amended by: 8striking out "subsection (b)" and inserting in lieu thereof 9"subsections (b) and (e) ". 10 (c) Such section 1661 is further amended by inserting 1339

2

1immediately after subsection(b)the following new sub-

2section:

3 " (c) An eligible veteran whohas received educational

4assistance under this chapter forthirty-six months, or under

5two or more of thelaws listed in section 1791 forforty- 6eight months, and has satisfactorilycompleted at least one 7 year of graduate or professionalstudy is entitled to additional

8educational assistance under this chapterfor a period of up

9to eighteen months ifsuch additional assistance isused for 10 pursuing such graduate or professional study on afull-time

11basis." 12 SEo. 2. (a) Subsection (a)of section 1662 of title 38, 13 United States Code, is amendedby inserting immediately 14 before theperiod at the end thereof thefollowing: `,or

15beyond the date ten years afterhis last discharge in the case

16of a veteran eligible foradditional educational assistance 17 under section 1661(c) ".

18 (b) Subsection (b) of such section1662 is amended by

19striking out "8-year delimiting period"and inserting in lieu

20thereof`8-year or 10-year delimiting period, asthe case 21 may be,".

22 SEC. 3. Section 1791 of title 38,United States Code, is 23 amended by insertingimmediately before the period at the 24 end thereof the following:", and any months of assistance

25received under section 1661 (c) shall notbe counted in ap- 26 plying this section". 1340

92D CONGRESS la Sonar H. R. 1628

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 22, 1971 Mr. RYAN introduced the following bill ; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To provide educational assistance under chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, to children of civilian employees of the United States killed abroad as a result of armed hostilities or civil disorder.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of 1?epresenta- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That paragraph (1) of section 1701 (a) of title 38, United 4States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the

5following new sentence: "The term 'eligible person' also 6 means a child of a civilian officer or employee of the United

7States Government who, while on overseas assignment,

8died on or after November 1, 1960, as a result of armed

9conflict involving military forces or riot or other civil dis-

10order occurring within the country of such assignment."

1.6 1341

2 individual who is an "eligible 1 SEC. 2. In the case of any title 2person" within the meaningof. section 1701 (a) (1) of the amendment 338, United StatesCode, solely by virtue of 4 madeby the first section ofthis Act, and who isabove the 5 age of seventeenyears andbelow the age of twenty-six 6 years onthe date of enactment ofthis Aet, the period referred Code, shall not 7to in section 1712of title 38, United States 8 end with respectto such individualuntil the expiration of 9 the five-yearperiod which begins onthe date of enactment 10 of this Act,excluding from such five-yearperiod any period which ap- 11of time which mayelapse between the date on title is filed 12plication for benefitsunder chapter 35 of such 13 on behalf ofsuch individual and thedate of final approval of Veterans' Af- 14of such applicationby the -Administrator under 15fairs; but in no eventshall educational assistance amended by 16chapter 35 of title 38,United States Code (as be afforded to any suchindivid- 17the first section of thisAct), of this section. 18ual beyond histhirty-first birthday by reason

2 17 71-815 0 - 12 - 1342

92u1092ESSH. R. 2505

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 29,1971 Mr. Moss introduced the following bill; whichwas referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Codeto provide equality of treatment for married femaleveterans. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Houseof Representa-

2dyes of the United States of Americain Congress assembled,

3 That section 102 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is amended 4 as follows:

5 (1) Subsection(b)thereof is amended to readas 6follows:

7 " (b) For thepurposes of thistitle,(1)the term 8'wife' includes the husband ofany female veteran; and (2) 9 the term 'widow' includes thewidower of any femalevet- eran."

18 1343

2

1 (2) The heading ofsaid section is am-ended toread

2as follows: 3 "§ i02. Dependent parents;husbands" 4 (3) The list of sectionheadings is revised to conform

5with paragraph (2) above. 1344

[H.R. 5053, an identical bill introduced by Mr. Saylor on February 25, 1971,was also considered by the Subcommittee.]

92D CONGRESS lcr Swum H. R. 3262

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1971 Mr. Comstarz introduced the following bill; whichwas referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to make the children of certain veterans having a service-connected disability rated at not less than 50 per centurn eligible for benefits under the war orphans' educational assistance program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2lives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That the second sentence of section 1701 (a) (1) of title38, 4United States Code, is aminided by inserting immediately

5before the period the following: ", and the child ofa person 6 who has a service-connected disability ratedat not less than 7 50 per centum arising out of serviceas described in the first 8sentence hereof".

9 SEC. 2. (a) Subsection (a) of section 1732 of title38,

20 1345

2

1 United States Code, is amended by striking out "The educa-

2tional assistance allowance" and inserting in lieu thereof

3"Subjecttosubsection(d), theeducationalassistance

4allowance".

5 (b) Subsection (b) of such section 1732 is ameuded by

6striking out "The educational assistance allowance" and in-

7serting inlieuthereof "Subject to subsection((I),the

8educational assistance allowance".

9 (c) Such section 1732 is further amended by adding at

10the end thereof the following new subsection: " ((1) In the ease of an eligiLle person who is such on

12account of a Parent who has a service-connecteddisability

13rated at not less than 50 per eentum but less than total, the

14educational assistanee to which he is entitled shall be an

15amount per month which bears the sameratio to the amount

16specified in subsection (a)or (b) of this section towhich

17he would have been entitled if he..were an 'eligibleperson'

18under the first sentence of section 1701 (a) (1) as the rate

19of the service-connected disability of his parent bears to100." 20 SEC. 3. Section 1742 of title 38, United States Code, is

21amended (1) by striking out "While the eligibleperson" 22and inserting in lieu thereof " (1) Subject to paragraph(2)

23of this subsection, while the eligible person", and(2) by 24 adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:

25 " (2) In the case of an eligible person who is such on 1346

3

1 account of a parent who has a service-connected disability

2rated at not less than 50 per cent= but less than total,

3the educational assistance to which he is entitled shall bean 4 amount per month which bears the same ratio to the amount

5specified in paragraph (1)to which he would have been

ci entitled if he were an 'eligible person' under the first sentence

7of section 1701 (a ) (1) as the rate of the service-connected

8disability of his parent bears to 100."

9 SEC. 4. In the case of any individual who isan "eligible 10person" within the meaning of section 1701 (a ) (1) of title

1138, United States Code, solely by virtue of the amendments 12 made by this Act, and who is above the age of seventeen

13years and below the age of twenty-three years on the date

14of enactment of this Act, the period referred to in section

151712 of title 38, United States Code, shall not end with n;respect to such individual until the expiration of the five-year

17period whkh beginson the date of enactment of this Act.

22 [H.R. 6904, an identical bill introduced byMr. Young of Florida on Maich 29, 1971, was also considered by the Subcommittee.]

92D CONGRESS 1sT SESSION' .R. 3349

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1971 Tninui of Texas (by request) introduced thefollowing bill ; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, United StatesCode, in order to authorize the Administrator to makeadvance educational assistance payments to certain veterans. and House of Representa- 1 Be it enacted by the Senate

2lives f the United Statesof America in Congress assembled,

3That subsections (d) and (0) ofsection 1681 of title 38, United States Code, are amended toread as follows:

5 " (d) The Administrator shall, except asprovided in educational 6subsection(e)of this section, pay the initial

7assistance allowance of an enrollmentperiod to an eligible

8veteran in an amount notto exceed the educational assist- 9 once allowancefor the month or fraction thereofin which

10pursuit of the program will commence,plus the educational ri

23 1348

2

1assistance allowance for one full month, upon receipt of

2proof that the eligible veteran has been accepted for en-

3rollment in an approved educational institution on a half-

4time or more basis. Such payment shall not be made earlier

5than the first day of the month in which pursuit of the

6program is to commence. Subsequent paymentsof educa-

7tional assistance allowance shall be made each month in

8advance, subject to such reports and proof of satisfactory

9pursuit of such program as the Administrator may require. 10 The Administrator may withhold the final payment of an 11 enrollment period until such proof isreceived and the 12amount appropriately adjusted. If the eligible veteran fails 13to enroll in the course after receiving the initial payment 14of the educational assistance alllowancL, the amount of such 15advance payment may be recovered from any benefit other- 16wise due the veteran under any law administered by the 17Veterans' Administration or such overpayment shall con- 18stitute a liability of such eligible veteran and may be recov- 19ered in the same manner as any other debt due the United

20States. 21 " (e) No educational assistance allowance shall be paid 22to an eligible veteran enrolled in a program of education con- 23sisting exclusively of flight training or exclusively by corre- 24spondence for any period until the Administrator shall have 25received 1349

3 " (1) from the eligible veteran acertification as to

2 his actual attendance during suchperiod or, where the

3 program is pursuedby correspondence, a certificate as 4 to the number(if lessons actually completed by the vet- 5 eran and servicedby the institution, and 6 " (2) from the educationalinstitution, a certifica- 7 tion, or an endorsement on theveteran's certificate, that 8 such veteran was enrolledin and pursuing a course of 9 education during sucL period and. inthe case of an in-

10 stitution furnishing education to a veteranexclusively

11 by correspondence, a certificate, or anendorsement on 12 the veteran's certificate, as tothe number of lessons 13 completed by the veteran and servicedby the institution." 14 SEC. 2. This Act shall becomeeffective on the first day

15of the second calendar monthfollowing the month in which 16enacted, but no advance paymentof the educational assist-

7ance allowanceauthorized under this Act shall beobligated 18or paid prior tothe fiscal year in which the first fullmonth 19of the period of enrollment occurs. 1350 1

[H.R. 10130, an identical bill introduced byMrs. Heckler on July 27, 1971, also considered by the Subcommittee.] was

92o CONGRESS lor Sums H. R.3965

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9,1971 Mrs, thuFFrrns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Codeto provide equality of treatment for married femaleveterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresenta-

2tives of the United States of America in Congressassembled,

3That section 102 of title 38, United States Code, isamended 4as follows:

5 (1) Subsection(b)thereof is amended to readas 6follows:

7 " (b)For the purp;Jes of thistitle,(1)the term 8'wife' includes the husband ofany female veteran; and (2) 9the term 'widow' includes the widowerof any female 10veteran." 1351

, 2 read 1 (2) The heading ofsaid section is amended to

2as follows:

3"§ 102. Dependent parents;husbands".

4 SEC. 2. The analysis ofchapter 1 of title 38,United

5States Code, is amendedby striking out "102. Dependent parents anddependent husbands." 6 and inserting inlieu thereof "102. Dependent parents;husbands."

otn 1352

[H.R. 6130, an identical bill introduced by Mr. Fulton of Tennessee on March 16. 1971, was also considered by the Subcommitteej

92o CONGRESS'EP Ir 1ST &snow ii. R. 4223

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES .

FEBRUARY 10,1971 Mr. HALPERN introduced the following bill; whichwas referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, toau- thorize advance educational assistance allowance payments to eligible veterans at the beginning of any school year to assist such veterans in meeting educational and living ex- penses during the first two months of school, to establish a veterans' work-study program through cancellation of such advance payment repayment obligations under certain cir- cumstances, and to provide for direct payment of educational assistance allowance to educational institutions on an optional. basis. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States of AmeriCa in Congress assembled,

3That this Act may be cited as the "Veterans' Educational 1353 . 4

2

1Assistance Allowance Advance andWork-Study Program

2Act of 1971".

3 SEC. 2. Chapter. 34 of title 38,United States Code, is

4amended by adding at the end ofsubchapter IV a new section

5as follows:

6"§1688. Advances to eligibleveterans; work-study pro-

7 gram 8 " (a) Notwithstanding theprovisions of section 1681 9of this title, and under suchregulations as the Administrator 10shall prescribe, an eligible veteranshall, upon application 11therefor and subject to the provisionsof this section, be paid

12an educationalassistance allowance advance paymentof not 13to exceed $250 immediatelyprior to or at the beginning of 14any school year toassist suth veteran in meeting hiseduca- 15tion and living expenses during thefirst two months of such 16school year. An advance payment of$250 shall be paid to

17any eligible veteranwho intends to pursue a course ofeduca- 18tion on a full-time basis as providedin section 1634 of this 19title, and the Administrator shallprescribe by regulation the 20amount to be paid to veteransintending to pursue courses 21of education on less than a full-timebasis, but in no event 22shall nn advance be paid to a veteran whointends to pursue 23a course ofeducation on less than half-time basis or a,pro-- 24gram exclusively bycorrespondence. Any veteran making 25application for an advance under the provisions ofibis sec- 1354

3 -tiOn shall receive a complete explanation of the rePayment

2requirements of this section.

3 " (b) Any amount advanced to a veteran under this

.4section shill be considered a loan and shall be repayable by

5.the veteran over the periri of his enrollment by deduction's,

6.inipprpximately equal amounts, being made from his month-

7ly educational assistance allowance by the Administrator, or 8 the veteran.fails to qualify for such allowance, the advance

9shall be repayable in such manner as shall be prescribed 10 by the Administrator. Advances made under this section shall

11bear no interest if the veteran enrolls in an approvedcourse

12of education and qualifies for an educational assistance allow- ance under this chapter, except that in any' case in which the- 14 Administrator determines thata veteran has failed to enroll

15in anil puriue an aPProved course of education within thirty 16 days -afteran advance payment is made' to hini under this

17section, the amount .so advanced shall (1) becoine due and 18payable on the first 'day of the next month following the. 19 month in which the Administrator makes such determina- 20'flop, and (2) *from that date bear interest at the 'rate of 6 21 per ceniumper annum on the'unpaid balance. 22 " (c) An advance riayment shall be made under this' 23 seetionto any eligible veferan no more than thirty days prior 24to his expected date of enrollment if such veteran-

25. " (1') submits evidence to the Administrator show-

28 1355

4

1 ing such veteran to be an eligibleveteran as defined

2 in section 1652 (a) (1) of this chapter,

3 " (2) certifies to the Administratorin writing (A) 4 that he is enrolled in, or has appliedfor, been accepted

5 by, and intends to enroll in a specifiededucational instit- tution and is pursuing or plans to pursue aspecified ap- proved course of education duringsuch school year at such educational institution, and(B) the expect# date .9. of enrollment if he has not yetenrolled in an educational

10 institution,

11 " (3)certifiestothe Administrator in writing 12 whether the educational institutiondefines such courses

13 as a full-time courseand the number of semester hours 14 (or equivalent) or clock hours heintends to pursue, and

1.5 " (4) certifies to tbe Administratorin writing that 16 he has at least six months'entitlement to educational 17 assistance remaining under this chapter. 18 " (d) In determining whether anyveteran is eligible 1.9for an advance payment underthis section, the information 20 subsection (c) shall . submitted by such veteran pursuant to 21 be conclusive evidence of hiseligibility unless there is evi- 22 dence in the file of the veteran in theprocessing office estab- 23lishing that such veteran isineligible for such advance 24 payment. 25 " (e) Iii order to process applications foradvance pay-

29 1356

5

1 ments and regular educational assistance allowancepayments 2under this subchapter as expeditiously as possible and other-

3wise to carry out the purposes of this chapter, the A1min- 4istrator shall utilize, to the maximumextent practicable 5and where he determines such 8exvices to be appropriate and 6desirable, the services of any veteran who has receivedan 7 advance under this section and who (1)is pursuing full- time training as determined under section 1684 of this title;

9(2) agrees to perform services, averaging not inexcess 10of fifteen hours per week overa semester or other applicable 11term, in connection with the preparation and processing of

12 necessary applications and other documentsat educational 13institutions or regional offices of the Veterans' Administra- tion, or services in connection with the outreach services 16program uneer subchapter IV of chapter 3 of this title, in 16 return kra partial or total cancellation of his loan; (3) is 17 in need of augmentationof his educational assistance allow- ance entitlement in order to pmsue a program of education 19 under this chapter,as determined in accordance with rept- lations which the Adminiqrator shall prescribe; and (4) 21 is capable, as certified by the educational institutioncon- 22 corned, of maintaining goodstanding in sulk program while 23 performing servicesunder this subsection. The obligation 24of any veteran shall be canceled at the rate of $2 for each 25 hour of such servicesperformed by the veteran.

30 1357

6

." (I).* As used in thissectiOn the terM at thebeginning any year". :means _thebeginning' of any quarter; 3.: sithester, or other Venn onwhich an educationalinstitution

4 .cdSerates. While inthe perforniance of suchseriices, veterans 5:: shall. be deemed to beintermittent employee's of the'United 6: States serving without compensation;except that for purposes Commission such 7of laws administeredhy the Civil Service

8,veterans Shall not' be deemed tobe such emplOyeee. in- 9 .1 1689; Direct. paymentOf allowances to educational n): atitutions 'provlsion of this chapter, 11 "NotWitbstaniling.any other 12 and under such regulations asthe Administrator shall pre-

13seribe, all or part of any educationalassistance allowance 'Vayment may e directly'blade on- behalf of anyeligible. 15:veterah to theeducational institution concernedif the vet- . , 16eran requeststhat such paymentbe made in such manner 17and the edticatimialilistitlition agrees to accept such pai- 18 mentson thatbasis. Direct paymentOfanyedUcationalas- under this section on 19sisCance allowance may not be made 29. behalf of any eligibleveteraU (1) who is pursuing or in- 21tends to pursue a courseof education on lessthan a half- 22-time basis or a programexclusively by correspondence; 23(2) who receives aneducational assistanceallowance ad- (3) to cover other 24vance paymentunder section 1688; or 25than tuition and othereducational costs and expenseswhich

71-815 0 -.72 - 3 -13 1358

7

1the educational institution usually requiresto be paid in full 2 before a nonveteran student is admittedto class." 3 Sm. 3. (a) The table of sectionsat the beginning of 4 chapter 34 is amended by addingafter "1687. Discontinuance of allowances." 5 the following:

"1688. Advances to eligible veterans; work-studyprogram. "1689. Direct ppyment of allowances to educational institutions."

6 (b) (1) The heading for subchapter IV of suchchapter 7is amended to readas follows: 8 "Subchapter IVPayments toor on Behalf of Eligible 9 Veterans";.

10 (2) The analysis of such chapter is amendedby striking

11.out

"Subchapter IVPayments to Eligible Veterans 12 and inserting in lieu thereof

"Subchapter IVPayments to or on Behalf of Eligible Veterans". 1359

92e 'CONGRESS ler SESSION H. R. 5052

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25,1971 referred to the Com- Mr. SAYLOR introduced thefollowing bill; whidi was mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 31of title 38, United StatesCode, to author- who ize additional training oredneatim for certain veterans are nohnger eligible for training,in order to restore employ- ability lost due totechnological changes. Representa- 1 Be it enacted by theSenate and House of Congress assembled, 2tives of the UnitedStates of America in 3 That section 1503(c) of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is 4 amended as follows: (1) 5 (a) by deleting at theend of subparagraph

6 (or'I ;

7 (ia) by deleting theperiod at the end ofsubpara,

8 graph (2) and insertingin lieu thereof ", or"; and

33, 1360

2

1 (c) by inserting immediately after subparagraph

2 (2) the following new subparagraph:

3 " (3) he is no longer employable(after having previously been declared rehabilitated)due to tech-

5 ological changes in or affecting the occupation for

6 which he was previously trained under this chapter."

34 1361

92o CONGRESS iST SESSION .R. 5188

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES MAttcli 1,1971 Mr. DAvis of Wisconsin (forhimself and Mr. &Ems of Wisconsin)introduced the following bill; which wasreferred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL

To amend the warorphaw' and widows' educationalassistance provisions of title 38 ofthe United States Code in order to provide monthlytraining assistance allowances there- under for eligible personsfor apprenticeship and other on- job training.

1 Be it enacted by theSenate and House of Representa- assembled, 2gives of the UnitedStates of America in Congress 3 That (a) subchapterIV of chapter 35 of title 38, United

4States Code, is amendedby redesignating sections 1733, 1736, 51734, 1735, 1736,and 1737 as sections 1734, 1735, 1362

2 11737, and 1738, respectively, and by inserting immediately

2after section 1732 thereof the following new section:

3"§1733. Apprenticeship or other en-job training 4 " (a) Any eligible person may receive the benefits of this 5.chapter while pursuing a full-time 6 " (1) program of apprenticeship approved bya 7 State approving agency tis meeting the standards of

8 apprenticeship published by the Secretary of Laborpur- 9 suant to section 50a of title 29, United States Code, or 10 " (2) program or other training on the job approved 11 under the provisions of section 1777 of this title, 12subject to the conditions and limitations of this chapter with 13respect to educational assistance. 14 " (b) The monthly training assistance allowance ofan 15eligible person pursuing a program described under subsec- 16tion(a)shall be(1) $108 during the first six-month 17period,(2) $81 during the second six-month period, (3) 18$54 during the third six-month period, and (4) $27 during 19the fourth and any succeeding six-month period. 20 " (c) For purposes of this chapter and chapter 36 of 21this title, the terms 'program of apprenticeship' and 'pro- 22gram of other on-job training' shall have the same meaning 23as 'program of education' ; and the term 'training assistance 24 allowance' shall have the same meaningas 'educational 25assistance allowance'."

36 1363

(b) The table of sectionsof such subchapter IVis 2 amended bystriking out "1733" andall that follows and

3inserting in lieu thereof thefollowing: "1733. Apprenticeship or otheron-job training. "1784.- Measurement of courses. "1785. Overcharges byeducational instAtutions. "1736. Approval of courses. "1737. Vscontinuance ofallowances. "1788. Specialized vocationaltraining courses." States Code, 4 SEC. 2. Section 1701(a) of title 38, United following new 5is amended by adding atthe end thereof the 6 paragraph: chapter 36 of 7 " (9) For the purposesof this chapter and 8 this title, the term'training establishment' means anyestab- job, 9 lishmentprotiding apprentice orother training on the 10 including those underthe supervision of acollege or univer- sity or any Statedepartment of education, or anyState 12 apprenticeship agency, or anyState board of vocationaledu- the Bureau 13cation, or any jointapprenticeship committee, or 14 ofApprenticeship and Trainingestablished pursuant to chap- Code, or any agency ofthe 15ter 40 of title29, United States 16 FederalGovernment authorized tosupervise such training." of section 1723 (c)of title 38, 17 SEC. 3. The fiTst sentence 18 United StatesCode, is amended bystriking out "any course

19of apprentice or othertraining on the job,". Stat^q Code, is 20 SEC. 4. Section 1777of title 38, United 21 amended

`37 1364

4 1 (1) by inserting "and eligible persons" immediately 2 after "eligible veterans", and by inserting "other" im- 3 mediately, before "nonveterans", in subsection (b)(1), 4 and 5 (2) by inserting "or eligible person" immediately

6 after "eligible veteran" each place itappears in subsec- tions (b) and (c).

38 1365

24, [H.R. 8662, an identicalbill introduced by Mr.Fulton of Tennessee on May 1971, was also consideredby the Subcommittee.]

920 CONGRESS SEssiox H. R. 5694

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES MAncn 8,1971 Mrs. MINK introduced the followingbill; which was referred to the Com- mitteeon Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, UnitedStates Code, to permit veterans'edu- cational assistance payments tobe applied to the repayment of educational ;Jansunder Federal programs enteredinto by veterans beforecommencing active service.

1 Be it enacted by theSenate and House of Representa- Congress assembled, 2lives of the UnitedStates of America in 3 That (a)subchapter IV of chapter 34 oftitle 38, United 4 States Code, isamended by adding at the endthereof the 5 following new section: before 6"§ 1688. Repayment ofeducation loans entered into

7 active duty the term 'preservice Mu- 8 " (a) As used in this section,

9cational loan' means a loanmade to an cligibb veteran (1)

39 1366

1 before the date he commenced the active duty on which his

2eligibility for assistance under this chapter is based, (2) the

3proceeds of which the veteran used to finance educational 4course work which was undertaken before suchdate, (3) 5provided or guaranteed under a Federal program, and (4) 6which meets all other requirements set forth in this section. 7 " (b) Any eligible veteran who desires that all or part 8of the educational assistance for which he is eligible under 9this chapter be applied to the repayment, in whole or part, 10of a preservice educational loan entered into by him shall 11submit an application therefor to the Administrator which

12shall be in such form and contain such information as the

13Administrator shall prescribe. If on the basis of the appli-

14cation and such other information as may become available

15to him, the Administrator finds that-

16 " (1 )the educational coursework for which the

17 eligible veteran obtained the preservice educational loan

18 would be approved as a program of education within

19 the meaning of this chapter if application therefor were

20 made; 21 " (2)the eligible veteran did not terminate such

22 educational course work because of reasons of =ads-

23 factory progress or his own misconduct or neglect;

24 " (3) the preservice educational loan is evidenced 1367

3

1 by a note or otherwritten agreement which creates a

2 binding obligation under theapplicable law; and

3 " (4)the proceeds of the preserviceeducational

4 loan were in fact used tofinance the pursuit of such

5 educational course work;

6the Administrator shall paydirectly to the creditor, under 7such terms and conditions as arenecessary and appro- 8priate to protect the interestsof the United States, such 9amount of theremaining balance(including interest and

10penalties, including anypenalty for the accelerated repay- 11ment of whole or anypart of the loan) ofthe preservice 12educational loan as wasapplied for by the eligible veteran.

13The Administrator may not pay anyamount pursuant to 14this section in thecise of any eligible veteran whichis 15greater than thetotal amount of educationalassistance to 16which such veteran wouldbe entitled if he satisfactorily 17pursued a program ofeducation to the limit of his entitle- 18ment. For the purposesof the preceding sentencesuch 19total amount ofeducational assistance shall be computed 20on thebasis of the veteran'sdependency status and the 21educational assistance allowancerates payable at the time 22application is made to theAdministrator under this section. 23The period of entitlement toeducational assistance of a vet-

24eran shallbe charged with, andproportionally reduced by, 25any repaymentmade in his behalf pursuant tothis section

41 1368

4

1on such basis as shall bedetermined by the Administrator." 2 adding at the end thereof the following: "1688. Repayment of education loans entered into before active duty."

3 SEC. 2. The amendments made by the first section of this 4 Act shall apply with respect to any preservice educational

5loan within the meaning of section 1688 (a)of title 38,

6United States Code (as added by such first section),made on

7or after the date of the enactment of this Act or madebefore

8such date of enactment in the case of a person on active duty

9in the Armed Forces on such date of enactment or a veteran

10entitled to educational assistance under chapter 34 of such

11title on such date of enactment. 1369

9. FrTsGM S S R. 6042

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES MARCH 15,1071 to the Com- Mr. Ltr.lAx introduced thefollowing bill; which was referred mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of theUnited States Code in order tomake the same criteriafor determining satisfactory pursuance of course work apply inthe case of college leveland non- college level educationalinstitutions.

1 Beit enacted by the Senateand House of Representa-

tives of (he UnitedStates of An:erica inCongress assembled, Code, is 3That (a) section 1681 ( b)of title 38, United States 4 amended- (1) and (2) ; 5 (1) by striking out paragraphs I 6 (2) by redesignating paragraph(3) as paragraph 7 (2) ; and

8 (3) by inserting immediatelybefore paragraph (2) 9 (aS so redesignated) thefollowing new paragraph:

43 1370

2

1 " (1) to any veteran enrolled in a course (except

2 programs of apprenticeship and programsof other on-

3 job training authorized by section 1683 of this title)

4 for any period when such veteran is not puesuing such

5 course in accordance with theregularly established poli-

6 cies and regulations of the educational institution and

7 the requirements of this chapter, or of chapter 36 of

8 this title; or".

9 (b) The first sentence of section 1681 (d)of such title 10is amended to read as follows: "No educational assistance 11allowance shall be paid to an eligible veteran pursuing a

12program of education by correspondencefor any period until 13the Administrator receives 14 " (1) from the eligible veteran a certificate as to 15 the number of lessons actually completed by the veteran

16 and serviced by the institution; and 17 " (2) from the institution furnishing such educa- 18 tion by correspondence, a certificate, or an endorsement 19 on the veteran's certificate, as to thenumber of lessons 20 completed by the veteran and serviced by the institu-

21 tion." 22 SEC. 2. (a) Section 1731 (b) of title 38, United States 23 Code, is amended by striking out "shall be paid" and all 24 that follows thereafter and inserting in lieu thereof the fol- 25 lowing: "shall be paidon behalf of any person enrolled 1371

3

1in a course for any period when such person is not pursuing

2his course in accordance with the regularly established poli-

3cies and regulations of the educational institution and the re-

4quirements of this chapter."

5 (b) Section 1731 (d) of such title is repealed.

6 SEC. 3. This Act applies with respect to the administra-

7tion of educational assistance allowances under chapters 34

8and 35 of title 38, United States Code, during semesters or

9quarters beginning after June 30, 1971. 1372

92o CONGRESS 1ST SESSION 4. R. 6904

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAncli 29,1971 Mr. Youxo of Florida introduced the following bill; which was rderred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, in order tO authorize the Administrator to make advance educational assistance payments to certain veterans. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3That subsections (d) and (e) of section 1681 of title 38, 4 United States Code, are amended to readas follows: " (d) The Administrator shall, except as provided in

6subsection(e)of this section, pay the initial educational

7assistance allowance of an enrollment period to an eligible

8veteran in an amount not to exceed the educational assist- ance allowance for the month or fraction thereof in which

10pursuit of the program will commence, plus the educational 1373

1assistance allowance for onefull month, upon receiptof proof

2that the eligible veteranhas been accepted forenrollment in 3an approvededucational institution on ahalf-time or more 4basis. Such payment shall notbe made earlier than thefirst

5day of the month in whichpursuit of the program is to com-

6mence. Subsequentpayments of educationalassistance allow- 7ance shallbe made each month inadvance, subject to such 8reports and proof ofsatisfactory pursuit of such program as 9the Administrator mayrequire. The Administrator may

10withhold the final paymentof an enrollment period until

11such proof is received and the amountappropriately adjusted.

12If the eligible veteranfails to enroll in the courseafter

13receiving the initial payment ofthe educational assistance

14allowance, the amount of suchadvance payment may be

15recovered from any benefitotherwise due the veteran under

16any lawadministered by the Veterans'Administration or 17such overpayment shallconstitute a liability of such eligible 18veteran and may berecovered in the same manner as any 19other debt due the UnitedStates. 20 " (e) No educational assistanceallowance shall he paid

21to an eligible veteranenrolled in a program of education con- 22sisting exclusively of flight training orexclusively by corre-

23spondence for any period until theAdministrator shall have 24received 25 " (1) from the eligible veteran acertification as to

71-815 0 - 72 - 4 1374

3

1 his actual attendance duringsuch periodor, where the 2 program is pursued by correspondence,a certificate as 3 to the number of lessons actuallycompleted by the vet- 4 eran and serviced by the institution, and

5 " (2) from the educationalinstitution, a certifica- 6 tion, or an endorsementon the veteran's certificate, that

7 tuch veteranwas enrolled in and pursuinga course of 8 edusation during such period and,in the case ofan in- 9 stitution furnishing educationto a veteran exclusively 10 by correspondence,a certificate, or an endorsementon the veteran's certificate,as to the number of lessons 12 completed by the veteran andserviced by the insti- 13 tution."

11 SEC. 2. This Act shall becomeeffective on the first day 15of the second calendar monthfollowing the month in which 16enacted, but no advancepayment of the educational assist-

17once allowance authorized under this Act shall beobligated

18or paid prior to the fiscal year in which the firstfull month

19of the period of enrollmentoccurs. 1375

92n CONGRESS ler Swum

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES Aram 22,1971 Air. Mum introduced the followirg bill;which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL,- To extend the maximum educationalbenefits for veterans to fifty-four months.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate andHouse of Representa-

2Noes of the United States of America inCongress assembled, 3 That section 1661 (c)of title 38, 'United States Code is 4 amended by striking out "in excess of thirty-sixmonths" and

5inserting in lieu thereof "in excess o! fifty-four months".The 6 amendments made by this Act shall apply to eligible veterans 7 discharged or released from active duty after thedate of 8 enactment of this Act. 1376

[H.R. 10774, an identicA bill introducedby Mr. Broyhill of Virginiaon September 21, 1971, was also considered by theSubcommittee.] 92Dia,E2uss R.7668

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES Aram 22,1971 Mr. Tenorm of Texas (by request) introduced the following bill; whichwas referred to the Committeeon Veterans' Affairs

A BELL :To amend chnpter 35 of title38, United Rates Code,so as to provide dducational assistanceat secondary school levelto eligible widows and wives, withoutcharge to any period of entitlement the wifeor widow may have pursuant tosec- tions 1710 and 1711 of this chapter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Houseof Representa-

2tives of the United States of America inCongress assembled,

3 That chapter 35 of title.8, United States Code, isamended 4 by lading the followinnew paragraph :

5"§1726. Special training _for theeducationally disadvan- 6 taged

7 " (a) In thecase of any eligible widowor wife who- 8 " (1) has not receiveda secondary school diploma

9 (or equivalency certificate),und 1377

2

1 " (2) in order to pursue a program of,education for

2 which she would otherwise be eligible,needs additional

3 secondary school training, eitherrefresher courses or

4 deficiency courses, to qualify foradmission to an appro-

5 priate educational institution, theAdministrator may,

6 without regard to the provisions ofsection 1723 (d),

7 approve theenrollment of such widows or wives in an

8 appropriate course or courses, exceptthat no enroll-

9 meat in adult eveningsecondary school courses shall be approved in excess of half-timetraining as defined

11 in section 1733 of this title. 12 " (b) The Administrator shall payeligible widows or 13 wives pursuing a course or courses pursuant tosubsection

14 (a)of this section an educationalassistance allowance as

15provided in sections 1731 and 1732 ofthis chapter. 16 " (c) The educational assistance allowanceauthorized by

17this section shall be paid without charge to anyperidd of

18entitlement the widow or wife may have pursuant to sec- tions 1710 and 1711 of this chapter."

51 1378

(H.R. 9613, an identical bill introduced by Mr. Halpern on July 7, 1971, was also considered by the Subcommittee.]

92e CONGRESS : 1ST SESSION 8094

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5,1971 Mr. HANSEN of Idaho introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To provide equitable treatment of veterans enrolled in vocational education courses. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2lives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That section 1681 (b) (2) of title 38, United States Code, is 4 amended to read as follows: 5 " (2) to any veteran enrolled in a course which does 6 not lead to a standard college degree for any day of 7 absence of excess of thirty days ina twelve-month 8 period, not counting as absences weekends, legal holidays 9 established by Federal or State law during which the 1379

2

1 institution is not regularly in session, or vacationperiods

2 established by the institution in conjunction with such

3 holidays; or". 1380

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION .R. 8266

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1971 Mr. TEAMJE of Texas (by request) introduced the following bill;which was referred to tho Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38 of the United States Codeto provide, in certain cases, for the reimbursement ofveterans for costs incurred by them for flight schoolcause work for private pilot licenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Heuse Repesenta- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1677 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended

4 by adding at the end thereof thefollowing new subsection: 5 " (a) (1) Any eligible veteran who has-

6 " (A) completed a flight trainingprogram approved

7 under subsection (b);

8 " (B) obtained a 'commercial pilot's license;and

54 1381

2

1 " (0) not exhausted hisentitlement to educational

2 assistance under this chapter

3shall be reimbursed asprovided in this subsection by the 4Administrator for the cost incurred bythe eligible veteran

5for flight school courses takenby him for the purpose of

6qualifying for a private pilot'slicense. 7 " (2) The reimbursement made to anyeligible veteran

8ander this subsection may notexceed the smaller of the

9following amounts: " (A) An amount equal tothe actual cost incurred 11 by the eligible veteran forsuch flight school courses, 12 and such veteran's periodof entitlementshallbe 13 charged one month for eachincrement of $175 within

14 such amount. 15 " (B) An amount equal to$175 multiplied by the 16 number of months remaining inthe period of entitle- 17 ment of the eligible veteran,and reimbursement in such 18 amount shall exhausthis entitlementto educational 19 assistance under this chapter. 20 " (3) Each eligible veteranwho applies for reimburse-

21ment tinder thissubsection shall submit suchinformation 22and evidence as the Athninistrator deems appropriate with 1382

3

1respect to the cost and mature of the courses for whioh reim- . 2bursement is sought. Reimbursement may not be made under

3this subsection far any cost incurred for any flight school

4course which did not meet Federal Aviation Agency stand-

5ards at the time such. course was taken." 1383

The following identical bills were also consirfered by the Subcommittee: [H.R. 10391, introduced by Mr. McDade on August 4, 1971; and H.R. 10565, introduced by Mr. Helstoski on September 9, 1971.)

02n CONGRESS iS1` SESSION .R. 8282

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

MAI'11, 1071 Mr. Fuvron of Pennsylvania introduced thefollowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans'Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 34 of title 38of the United States Code to restore entitlement toeducational benefits to veterans of World War II and .the Koreanconflict.

1. Be it enacted by the Senateand House of 1?epresenta-

2lives of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled,

3That section 1651 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended 4 by adding at the end thereof thefollowing new sentence:

5"In addition to the purposes set forth in thepreceding sen-

6tence, it shall be a purpose of this chapter to restoreentitle-

7ment to educational assistanceio veterans of World War 8 and the Korean conflict who failed to exhausttheir entitle-

9ment to education and training under partVIII of Veterans 1384

2

1 Regulation 1.(a)"; -title II of the Veterans' ReadjustmeUt

Assistance Act of1952; or chapter :1:1 ofthistitle,

3respectively.)). SEC. 2. Section 1652 (a) (1) of title :18, United States

5Code, is amended( 1 )by striking out "or (B) " and in- 6selling in lieu thereof ",(13) " and (2) by inserting inthw- 7diately before the period at the end thereof the following: 8", or (C) was entitled to receive education and training 9under the provisions of part VIII of Veterans Regulation

10Numbered 1 (a),title II of the Veterans' Readjustment 11Assistance Act of 1952, or chapter 33 of this title, and either 12received no such education and training or received such 13education and training for less than the maximum period to 14which he was entitled under such provisions". 15 SEC. 3. Section 1661 (a)of title38, United States 1(3 Code, is amended by inserting innnediately before the period 17at the end thereof the following: ", and a period equal to 1.8 the period of his unused entitlement to education and train- 19ing under part VIII of Veterans Reguhition Numbered

201 (a),the Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1952, 91and chapter 33 of this title".

58 1385

92n CONGRE lsr Sissiox SS^ H. R. 8604

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20,1971 Mr. MELCIIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to apply with respect to veterans and war orphans in noncollege level educa- tional institutions the same criteria for determin;ng satis- factory pursuance of course work that is applied with re- spect to veterans and war orphans in college level educa- tional institutions. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That (a) subsection (b) of section 1681 of title 38, United

4States Code, is amended by striking out paragraphs (1) and

5 (2), by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2),and 6 by inserting immediately before paragraph (2)(as so re-

7designated) the following new paragruph: 1386

2

1 " (1) to any veteran enrolled in a course whether

2 or not such course leads to a standard college degree

3 (excluding programs of apprenticeship and programs

4 of other on-job training authorized by section 1683 of

5 this title)for any period when such veteran is not

6 pursuing his coune in accordance with the regularly

7 established policies and regulations of the educational

8 institution and the requirements of this chapter, or of

9 chapter 36; or".

10 (b) The first sentence of subsection(d) of such see- ntion 1681 is amended to read as follows: "No educational

12assistance allowance shall be paid to an eligible veteran pur-

13suing a program of education by correspondence for any 14period until the Administrator receives

15 " (1) from the eligible veteran a certificate as to 16 the number of lessons actmilly completed by the veteran 17 and serviced by the institution; and 18 " (2) from the institution furnishing such education 19 by correspondence, a certificate,or an endorsement 20 on 'the veteran's certificate, as to the number of les- 21 sons completed by the veteran and serviced by the 22 institution." 23 SEC. 2. (a) Subsection (b) of section 1731 of title 38,

24United States Code, is amended by striking out "shall be 25 paid" and all that follows thereafter and inserting in lien

26thereof the following: "shall 'be paid on behalf of any person 1387

3

1enrolled in a course for any period en such person is not

2pursuing his course in accordance with the regularly estab-

3lished policies and regulations of the educational institution 4 and the requirements of this chapter.

5 (b) Subsection (d) of such section 1731 is repealed.

6 SEC. 3. The amendments made by this Act shall apply

7with respect to the administration of educational assistance 8allowances under chapters 34 and 35 of title 38, United

9States Code, during semesters, quarters, or other period of

10course work measurement beginning on or after July 1, 1971. 1388

H.R. 12052, an identical bill introduced by Mr. Fuqua on Det.ember 6, 1971, was also considered by the Subcommittee.

92o CONGRESS ler SESSION .R. 9609

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Jour 7,1971 Mr. HALPERN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the pay- ment of tuition, subsistence, and educational assistance allow- ances on behalf of or tocertain eligible veterans pursuing programs of education underchapter 34 of such title, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That this Act may be cited as the "Vietnam Veterans' Act

4of 1971". 5 8E0. 2. Subchapter IV of chapter 34 of title 38, United

6States Code, is amended by inserting immediately before

7section 1681 the following new seotion:

62 1389

2

1"§1680. Tuition and subsistence assistance allowances for

2 institutional training

3 " (a) In the case of an eligible veteran not on active 4 duty who is .pursuing a program of education or training

5at an approved educational or traininginstitution on a half- 6 time or more basis, the Administrator shall pay directly to

7the educational or training institution on behalf of sucheligible

8veteran the customary cost of tuition, and suchlaboratory,

9library, health, infirmary, or other similar fees as are cus- 10 tomarily charged, and shall pay for books, supplies, equip- 11 ment, and other necessary expenses, excluding board, lodg- 12ing, other living expenses, and travel, which similarly oir- cumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same courses are

14required to pay.

15 " (b) In no event shall the payment authorized by sub- 16 section(a)of this section exceed $1,000 for an ordinary

17school year. If the educational or traininginstitution has no 18 customary cost of tuition, a fair andreasonable rate of pay- ment for tuition, fees, orother charges for such course or

20courses shall bedetermined by the Administrator. 21 " (c) In the event a veteran fails tocomplete his pro- 22gram of educationafter a tuition assistance allowancehas 23 been paid to the educational or traininginstitution on his 24 behalf, the Administrator shall, pursuant tosuch regulations

25as he mayprescribe, require a pro rwta refundof the tuition

71-815 0 - 72 - 5 63 1390

3 1assistance allowance based upon the uncompleted portion 2of the school year for which the allowancewas paid.

3 "(d) While pursuing an approvedprogram of cducaticin 4 or training, other than cooperativeor on-farm training, a 5veteran eligible for tuition assistance benefits under sub- 6 section(a)of this section shall be paid a monthly sub- sistence allowance as set forth in column II, III, IV,or V 8 (whichever is applicable as determined by the veteran's de- 9 pendency status) opposite the basis shown in column I:

"Column I Column II Column III 'column pi Column V

No One Two Mom thin two Bells dependents dependent dependents dependents

Itsimoun1 In column IV, plus

trig; benni fen rt In @ease of two: Full Ilme. $175 6205 230 413 ThreeKtuattar the 124 152 177 10 Half Ilme 81 100 114 7

10 "(e) (1) An eligible veteran entitled to tuitionas-

11sistance under subsection (a) of this section and who isen- 12rolled in an educational institution fora 'farm cooperative' 13 program consisting of institutional agriculturalcourses pre-

14scheduled to fall within 44 weeks of any period of 12con-

15secutive months and who pursues such program on- 16 " (A) a full-time basis(a minimum of 12 clock

17 hours per week), 18 "(B) a three-quarter-time basis(a minimum of 19 9 clock hours per week), or 1391

4 la minimum of 6 clock 1 " (C) a half-time basis

2 hours per week) allowance at, the 3shall be eligible to receive a subsistence (2) of 4appropriate rate provided in the table in paragraph is concurrently en- 5this subsection, if such eligible veteran which is relevant to such 6gaged in agricultural employment under stand- 7institutional agricultural courses as determined

8ards prescribed by the Administrator. allowance of an eligible 9 " (2) The monthly subsistence cooperativp program under this 10veteran pursuing a farm II, III, IV, or 11. chapter shall be paid as set forth in column veteran's 12 (whichever is applicable as determined by the basis shown in column I: 13dependency status) opposite the

Column III Column IV Column V "Column I Column II

No One Two More then two dependents dependents Bath dem: dependent

The amount In column IV. plus the following for etch dependent In amen of two:

$141 $167 OW 110 Full time 101 119 118 7 Threeluerter time 79 92 4 Hell time 67

14 " (f) An eligible veteran,entitled to tuition assistance

15under subsection (a) of thissection, who is enrolled in a

16'coorrative program', other than'farm cooperative' pro- 17 gram, shall be paid amonthly subsistence allowance at the 18 same rate paid forfull-time 'farm cooperative' training as

19provided in subsection (e) of this section.For the purpose

20of this subsection, the term 'cooperativeprogram', other than 1392

5 1a 'farm cooperative' program, means a full-time prJgram

2of education which consists of institutionalcourses and alter- 3nate phases of training in the business or industrial estab-

4lishment with such training being strictly supplementalto 5the institutional portion."

6 SEC. 3. Section 1681 of title 38, United StatesCode, is 7amended to read as follows: 811681. Educational assistance allowances 9 " (a) An educational assistance allowance shall be paid 10to each eligible individual pursuing a program of education 11while on active duty,or to an eligible veteran pursuing a 12 program of education on less than a half-time basisor 13exclusively by correspondence,as follows: 14 " (1) The 'educational assistance allowance ofan in- 15dividual pursuing aprogram of education-

16 " (A) while on active duty,or

17 " (B) on less thana half-time basis, 18 shall be computed at the rate of (i) theestablished charges 19 for tuition and fees which the institutionrequires similarly 20 circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in thesame program to 21 pay, or (ii) $175 per month fora full-time course, which- 22 ever is the lesser. Notwithstanding provisions of section1682 23 of this title, payment of the educationalassistance allowance 24 provided by this subsectionmay, and the educational assist- 25 ance allowance provided by section 1696 (b)shall, be made

66 1393

6 the entire 1to an eligible veteranin an amount computed for

2quarter, semester, or termduring the month immediately

3following the month in whichcertification is received from

4the educational institution thatthe veteran has enrolled in

5and is pursuing a program at suchinstitution.

6 " (2) (A) The educationalassistance allowance of an

7eligible veteran pursuing a programof education exclusively 8 by correspondence shall be computed onthe basis of the

9established charge which the institutionrequires nonveterans

10to pay for the course or coursespursued by the eligible

11veterans. The term 'establishedcharge' as used herein means

12the charge for the course or coursesdetermined on the basis

13of the lowest extended time paymentplan offered by the

14institution and approved by the appropriate Stateapproving

15agency or the actual cost tothe eligible veteran, whichever

16is the lesser. Such allowances shall be paidquarterly on a

17pro rata basis forthe lessons completed by the veteran and

18serviced by the institution, as certified by the institution.

19 " (B) The period of entitlement of any eligible veteran 20 who is pursuing any program of education exclusively by

21correspondence shall be charged with one month for each 22 $175 which is paid to the veteran as an educational assist-

23anco allowance for such course.

24 " (b) (1) The educational assistance allowance of a vet-

25eran pursuing a program offlight training(except as 1394

7

1provided in section 1673 (b) of thischapter), shall be paid 2in accordance with the provisionsof section 1677 of this 3chapter.

4 " (2) The educational assistanceallowance of a veteran 5pursuing a program of apprenticeshipor other on-job train- 6ing shall be paid in accordancewith the provisions of section 71683 of this chapter.

8 " (c) The tuition ar,d subsistenceallowances payable

9under section 1680 of this chapterand the educationalas- 10sistance allowance payable under thissection shall be paid

11as soon as practicable after the Administrator is assuredof 12the veteran's enrollment in andpursuit of theprogram of 13education for the period for which suchallowance is to be 14paid."

15 SEC. 4. Section 1682 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, 16is amended to readas follows:

17 11682. Educationalcertifications and limitations 18 " (a) No tuition assistanceallowance shall be paid to 13an educational or training institutionon behalf of an eligible 20veteran under section 1680 of this chapter untilthe Admin- 21istrator shall have received fromsuch institution a certifica- 22tion of the actual enrollment ofthe eligible veteran at such 23institution, the number ofsemester or clock hours of attend-

24ance he is to pursue, the customary cost of tuition, thecus- 25tomary costof books,supplies, equipment and related

68 1395

8

1 expenses, the customarycharges for laboratory, library,

2health, infirmary or other similarfees, and such other in-

3formation as the Administrator, byregulation, may require.

4 " (lb) The subsistence andeducational assistance allow-

5ances of aneligible veteran provided in sections1680 and

61681 of this chapter shall bepaid only for the period of his

7enrollment as approved by the Administrator, but no such

8allowances shall be paid

9 " (1) to any veteran enrolledin a course which

10 leads to a standard college degreefor any period when

11 such veteran is not pursuinghis course in accordance

12 with the regularly establishedpolicies and regulations

13 of the educational institutionand the requirements of

14 this chapter, or of chapter 36;

15 " (2) to any veteranehrolled in a course which

16 does not lead to a standardcollege degree (excluding ofother 17 programs ofapprenticeship and programs this title) 18 on-job training authorizedby section 1683 of in a 19 for any day of absencein excess of thirty days week- 20 twelve-month period, notcounting as absences State 21 ends or legal holidaysestablished by Federal or in 22 law during which theinstitutionis not regularly

23 session; or

24 " (3) to any veteranpursuing his program ex- dining which 25 elusively by correspondencefor any perii)d

26 no lessons wereserviced by the institution. 69 1396

9 1 " (c) No subsistence or educational assistance allowance

2shall be paid to an eligible veteran enrolled ina course in an 3educational institution which does not lead toa standard 4college degree for any period until the Administrator shall 5have received-

6 " (1) from the eligible veterana certification as to his actual attendance during such periodor where the 8 program is pursued by correspondence a certificate as to 0 9 tbe number of lessons actually completed by the veteran 10 and serviced by the institution; and

11 " (2) from the educational institution,a certifica- 12 tion, or an endorsement on the veteran's certificate, that 13 such veteran was enrolled in and pursuinga course of 14 education during such period and, in thecase of an 15 institution furnishing education tca veteran exclusively 36 by correspondence, a certificate,or an endorsement on 17 the veteran's certificate, as to the number of lessons 18 completed by the veteran and serviced by the institution.

19Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administratormay pay 20an educational assistance allowance representing the initial

21payment of an enrollment period, not exceedingone full 22month, upon receipt of a certificate of enrollment. 93 " (d) The Administratormay, pursuant to such regu- 24lations as he may prescribe, determine enrollmentin, pur- 25suit of, and attendance at,any program of education or 1397

10

1 course by an eligible veteranfor any period for which a

2tuition assistance allowance is paid on his behalf or for

3which he receives a subsistence or educationalassistance

4allowance under this chapter for pursuing such program or

5course."

6 SEC. 5. Section 1661 of title 38, United States Code,is

7amended by

8 (a) inserting in subsection(a) immediately after

9 the words "entitled to" the following: "tuition, subsist-

10 ence or"; and

11 (b) inserting in subsection (c) immediately after

12 the word "receive" the following: "tuition, subsistence

13 or".

14 SEC. 6. Section 1662 of title 38, United States Code, is 15amended by 16 (a) inserting in subsection (a) immedisAely after

17 the word "No" the following: "tuition, subsistence or";

18 and 19 (b) inserting in subsection (c) immmediately after 20 the word^ "date for which an educational" the following:

21 ", tuition or subsistence". 22 SEC. 7. Section 1663 of title 38, United States Code, is 23amended by inserting immediately after the words "eligible 24for" the following: "tuition, subsistence or". 25 SEc. 8. Section 1671 of title 38, United States Code, is

71 1398

11 1 amended by inserting inthesecond sentence thereof

2immediately after the words "entitled to the" thefollowing: 3"tuition, subsistence or".

4 Sm. 9. Section 1674 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, 5is amended by inserting immediately after thewords "shall 6discontinue the" the following: "subsistence or".

7 SEC. 19. Section 1676 of title 38, United StatesCode, 8is amended by inserting in the secondsentence thereof im- mediately after the words "denyor discontinue the" the 10 following: "subsistence or". 11 SEc. 11. Section 1687 of title 38, United States Code,

12is amended by inserting immediately after the words"may 13 discontinue the" the following: "subsistenceor".

14 SEC. 12. Section 1691 of title 38, United StatesCode, 15is amended by striking out in subsection(b)thereof the 16 words "an educational assistance allowanceas provided by 17sections 1681 and 1682 (a) and (b) of this title" and in-

18serting in lieu thereof the following: "a tuitionassistance 19 and subsistence allowance under the provisions of section 20 1680 of this chapter if he is enrolledon a half-time basis 21or an educational assistance allowance under the provisions

22of section 1681 (1) (B) of this chapter if he is enrolledon 23less than a half-time basis". 24 SEC. 13. Section 1693 of title 38, United States Code, is 25 amended to readas follows:

92 1399

12

1 "The 'tuition, sUbsistenceimd 'educational assistance al- -4tiviin'ces atithiirizealiigectibil 1691 (b)' of thiichapter and

3the cost of individualizedtutorialassistance autherized by

4section 1692 (b) of this. ehaPter..shall be paidwithin:it charge 5.* to any-period of 'entitlement the veteranniay have earned

6pursuant to section 1661(a): of this title."

7 Sw. 14.. Section 1781 'of tifle 38, United States Code, is

8amended by inserting immediately after.the word "No" the 9: following: "tuition, subsistence or".

10 Srx. 15. Section 1789 of.title 38, United States Code, is 11.' amended by striking Out the words (flan educational assist-

12ance" and inserting in lieu thereof'the following: "a tuition,

13subsistence or educational assistance allOwance on behalf of 14' or".

15 Ste. 16. The table of sections at the beginning of chap-

16tei:35 is amended 15y-

17 (a). striking out:

"1681. Educational assistance allowance. "1082. Computation of educational assistance allowances.";

18 and :.. 19 (b)inserting in lieu thereof: "1680. Tuition ind subsistence allowances for institutional training. "1681. Educational assistance allowances.. , "1:682. EducatiOnal certifications and limitations.".

20 SEC. 17. This Act shall become' effective September 1,

211971.

73 1400

The following identical bills were also considered by the Subcommittee: [H.R. 10043, introduced by Mr. Esch (for himself, Mr. Aspin, Mr. Anderson of Illinois, Mr. Harrington, Mr. Fish, Mr. Schwengel, Mrs. Chisholm, Mr. Halpern, Eilberg, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Cordova) on July 22, 1971: Eilberg, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Cordova) on July 22, 1971; H.R. 10044, introduced by Mr. Esch (for himself, Mr. William D. Ford, Mr. Edwards of Calif., Mr. Nichols, Mr. Hillis, Mr. Fauntroy, Mr. Cederberg, Mr. Rosenthal, Mr. Blackburn, Mr. Moss, Mr. Grover, Mr. Donohue, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. St. Germain, Mr. De llums, and Mr. Roe) on July 22, 1971; H.R. 10224, introduced by Mr. Patten on July 29, 1971; H.R. 10432, introduced b / Mr. Fraser on August 5, 1971; H.R. 10603, introduced by Mr. Hogan on September 13, 1971; and H.R. 10648, introduced by Mr. Horton on September 14, 1971.]

92D CONGRESS Mr SESSION H. R. 9627

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Jinx 7, 1971 Mr. Esen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for thepay- ment of tuition, subsistence, and educational assistance allow- ances, on behalf of or to certain eligible veterans pursuing programs of education under chapter 34 of such title, and for oher purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That this Act may be cited as the "Vietnam Vetenms' Act 4of 1971".

5 SEC. 2. Subchapter IV of chapter 34 of title 38, United

6States Code, is amended by inserting immediately before

7section 1681 the following new section:

74 1401

2

1"§1680. Tuition and subsistence assistance allowances for

2 institutional training

3 " (1) In the case of an eligible veteran not on active 4duty who is pursuing a program of education or trainink

5at an approved educational or traininginstitution on a half- 6thne or more basis, the Administrator shall paydirectly to

7the educational or training institution on behalf of suclieligible 8veteran the customary cost of tuition, and suchlaboratory, 9library, health, infirmary, or other similar fees as are cus- 10tomarily charged, and shall pay for books, supplies,equip- 11ment, and other necessary expenses, excludingboard, lodg- 12ing, other living expenses, and travel, which similarlycir- 13cumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same courses are

14required to pay.

15 " (b) In no event shall the payment authorized by sub-

16section(a)of this section exceed $1,000 for an ordinary

17school year. If the educational or training institution has no

18customary cost of tuition, a fair and reasonable rate of pay-

19ment for tuition, fees, or other charges for such course or

20courses shall be determined bythe Administrator.

21 (c) In the event a veteran fails to complete his pro-

22grain of education after atuition assistance allowance has

23been paid to the educational or training institution onhis

24behalf, the Administrator shall, pursuant to such regulations

25as he may prescribe,require a pro rata refund of the tuition 1402

3 assistance allowance basedupon the uncompleted portion

2of the school year for which the allowancewas paid.

3 " (d) While pursuingan approved program of education

4or training, other than cooperative or on-farm traimg,a

5veteran eligiblefor tuition assistance benefits undersub- 6section(a)of this section shall be paida monthly sub- 7sistence allowance as set forth in column II, III, IV,or V

8 (whichever is applicable is determined by the veteran'sde- 9pendency status) opposite the basis shown in column I:

"Column I Column II Column Ill Column IV Column V

No One Two Mote thin two Basis dependents dependent dependects dependents

The unounfin coldmn IV, plus the following for eget depended in excess of two:

Full time 8175 $205 1220 SI3 Three-quarter time 128 152 07 10 Hall tim 81 100 114

10 " (e) (1) An eligible veteran entitled to tuition assist- ance under subsection (a) of this sedion and who is enrolled

12in an educational institution for a 'farm cooperative'program

13consisting of institutional agricultural courses prescheduled to

14fall within 44 weeks of any period of 12 consecutive months

15and who pursues such program on-

16 " (A) a full-time basis(a minimum of 12 clock

17 hours per week),

18 " (B) a three-quarter-time basis(a minimum of

19 9 clock hours per week), or 1403

4

1 " (C)a half-timebasis(a minimum of 6 clock

2 hours per week)

3shall be eligible to receive asubsistence allowance at the 4 appropriate rate provided in the table inparagraph (2) of

5this subsection, if suchefigible veteran is concurrently en- 6 gaged in agricultural employment whichis relevant to such

7institutional agricultural courses asdetermined under stand- ards presedbed by the Administrator.

9 " (2) The monthly subsistence allowanceof an eligible

10veteran pursuing a farmcooperative program under this

11chapter shall be paid as set forth incolumn II, III, IV, or 12 V (whichever is applicable as determined by the veteran's 13 dependency status) opposite the basis shownin column I:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV Column V

No One Two More than two dependents Oasts dependents dependent dependents

The amount ln column IV, plus the following for each deperrgent In excess of two:

$10 Full time $141 $167 $192 1 Three-quarter time WI 119 138 7 92 4 Hell time 67 79

14 " (f) An eligible veteran, entitled to tuitionassistance

15under subsection (a)of this section, who is enrolled in a

16'cooperative program', other than 'farmcooperative' pro-

17gram, shallbe paid a monthly subsistence allowance at the 18 same ratepaid for full-time 'farm cooperative' training as 19 provided insubsection (e) of this section. For the purpose

20of this subsection, the term'cooperative program', other than

6 7'7 1404

5

1a 'farm cooperative' program, means a full-time program

2of education which consists of institutionalcourses and alter- 3nate phases of training in the businessor industrial estab-

4lishment with such training being strictly supplementalto

5the institutional portion."

6 SEC. 3. Section 1681 of title 38, United States Code,is 7 amended to read as follows:

8"§ 1681. Educational assistance allowances

9 " (a) An educational assistance allowance shall be paid 10to each eligible individual pursuing aprogram of education 11while on active duty,or to an eligible veteran pursuing a 12 program of educationon less than a half-time basis or

13exclusively by cormpondence,as follows: 14 " (1) The educational assistance allowance ofan in- dividual pursuing a program of education-

16 " (A) while on active duty,or 17 " (B) on less than a half-time basis, 18shall be computed at the rate of (i) the established charges

19for tuition and fees which the institution requires similarly

20circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in thesame program to 21pay, or (ii) $175 per month for a full-time course, which-

22ever is the lesser. Notwithstanding provisions of section 1682

23of this title, payment of the educational assistance allowance 24provided by this subsection may, and the educational assist-

25ance allowance provided by section 1696 (b)shall, be made 1405

6

1 to an eligible veteran in an amountcomputed for the entire

2quarter, semester, or termduring the month immediately

9following the month in which certificationis received from

4the educational institution thatthe veteran has enrolled in 5 and is pursuing a program at suchinstitution. 6 " (2) (A) The educational assistanceallowance of an

7eligible veteran pursuing a program ofeducation exclusively

9by correspondence shall be computed onthe basis of the

9established charge which the institutionrequires nonveterans

10to pay for the course or coursespursued by the eligible

11veterans. The term'established charge' as used herein means 12the charge for the course or coursesdetermined on the basis

13of the lowest extended time paymentplan offered by the

14institution and approved by theappropriate State approving 15 agency or the actual cost to theeligible veteran, whichever

16is the lesser. Such allowances shallbe paid quarterly on a and 17pro rata basis forthe lessons completed by the veteran

19serviced by the institution, ascertified by the institution. 19 " (B) The period of entitlementof any eligible veteran 20 who is pursuing any program of education exclusivelyby

21correspondence shall be chargedwith one month for each 22$175 which is paid to the veteran as aneducational assist-

23ance allowancefor such course. 24 " (b) (1) The educationalassistance allowance of a vet- (except as 25eran pursuing a programof flight training

71-616 0 - 72 - 6 9 1406

7 1provided in section 1673 (b) of this chapter), shall be paid 2in accordance with the provisions of section 1677 of this

3chapter.

4 " (2) The educational assistance allowance ofa veteran 5pursuing a program of apprenticeshipor other on-job train- 6ing shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of section 71683 of this chapter. 8 " (c) The tuition and subsistence allowances payable

9under section 1680 of this chapter and the educationalas- 10sistance allowance payable under this section shall be paid 11as soon as practicable after the Administrator is assured of

12the veteran's enrollment in and pursuit of theprogram of 13education for the period for which such allowance isto be 14paid."

15 SEC. 4. Section 1682 of title 38, United States Code,

16is amended to read as follows:

17"§ 1682. Educational certifications and limitations

if 18 (a) No tuition assitance allowance shall be paidto 19an educational or training institution on behalf of an eligible 20veteran under section 1680 of this chapter tmtil the Admin-

21istrator shall have received from such instithtiona certifica- 22tion of the actual enrollment of the eligible veteran at such 23institution, the number of semester or clock hours of attend- 24ance he is to pursue, the custdmaiy cost'of tuition, the cus- 25tomary costof' books, supplies, 'equipment, and related

60 1407

8

1 expenses, the customaiycharges for laboratory, library,

.2 health, infirmary, or other similar fees,and such other in-

3formation as the Administrator, byregulation, may require.

4 " (b) The subsistence andeducational assistance allow-

5ances of an eligible veteranprovided in sections 1680 and

61681 of this chapter shall bepaid only for the period of his

7enrollment as approved by theAdministrator, but no such 8 allowances .shall be paid

9 " ( 1 )to any veteran enrolled in 4 coursewhich

10 leads to a standard college degree for anyperiod when

11 such veteran is not pursuing his coursein accordance

.12 with the regularly esta.blished policies andregulations

13 of the educational institution and therequirements of this chapter, or of chapter 36;

15 " (2)to any veteran enrolled . in a coursewhich

16 does not lead to a standard collegedegree (excluding

17 programs ofapprenticeship and programs. of other

18 on-job training authorized by section 1683of this title) days in .a P. for any.day of absence in excess of thirty 20 twelve-month period, not counting as absencesweek- ends or legal holidays established byFederal or State

22 law, during which the institution is notregularly in

23 session; or

24 " (3)to any veteran pursuing his program ex-

81 1408

9

1 elusively by correspondence forany period during which 2 no lessons were serviced by the institution.

3 " (c) No subsistenceor educational assistance allowance

4shall be paid toan eligible veteran enrolled in a course inan 5educatimml institution which dc.%not lead to a standard 6college degree for any period until theAdministrator shall 7have received-

8 " (1 )from the eligible veterana certification as to 9 his actual attendance during suchperiod or where the 10 program is pursued by correspondencea certificate as to 11 the number of lessons actually completedby the veteran 12 and serviced by the institution; and

13 " (2) from the educational institution,a certifica- 14 tion, or an endorsementon the veteran's certificate, that 15 such veteran was enrolled in andpursuing a course of 16 education during such period and, inthe case of an 17 histitution furnishing educationto a veteran exclusively 18 by correspondence,a certificate, or an endorsement on 19 the veteran's certificate,as to the number of lessons

20 completed by the veteran and serviced bythe institution. 21Notwithstanding the foregoing, theAdministrator may pay 22an educational assistance allowance representing the initial

23payment of an enrolhnent period, not exceedingone full 24month, upon receipt ofa certificate of enrollment.

82 1409

10 " (d) The Administrator may, pursuant tosuch regu-

2lations as he may prescribe, determineenrolhnent in, pur-

3suit of, and attendance at, any programof education or

4course by an eligible veteranfor any period for which a

5tuition assistance allowance is paid onhis beh,1 or for 6 which he receives a subsistence or educationalassistance

7allowance under this chapter for pursuingsuch program or

8course."

9 SEC. 5. Section 1661 of title 38,United States Code, is 10 amended by (a) inserting in subsection(a) immediately after

12 the words "entitled to" thefollowing: "tuition, subsist-

13 ence or"; and

14 (b) inserting in subsection(c) immediately after

15 the word "receive" the following:"tuition, subsistence

16 or".

17 SEC. 6. Section 1662 of title 38,United States Code, is 18 amended by-

19 (a) inserting in subsection(a) immediately. after

20 the word "No" the following:"tuition, subsistence or";

21 and

22 (b) inserting in subsection(c) immediately after.

23 the words "date for which aneducational" the following:

24 ", tuition or subsistence".

25 SEc. 7. Section 1663 of title 38,United States Code, is

83 1410

11 1 amended by inserting innnediately after the words "eligible 2for" the following: "tuition, subsistence or". 3 SEC. 8. Section 1671 of title 38, United States Code is

4 amended by insertinginthesecond sentencethereof 5immediately after the words "entitled to the" the following: 6"tuition, subsistence or". 7 SEC. 9. Section 1674 of title 38, United States Code,

8is amended by inserting immediately after thewords "shall 9discontinue the" the following: "subsistence or". 10 SEC. 10. Section 1676 of title 38, United States Code,

11is amended by inserting in the secondsentence thereof im- 12mediately after the words "denyor discontinue the" the 13following: "subsistence or". 14 SEC. 11. Section 1687 of title 38, United States Code,- 15is amended by inserting immediatelyafter the words "may 16discontinue the" the following: "subsistence or".

17 SEC. 12. Section 1691 of title 38, UnitedStates Code,

18is amended by strikingout in subsection(b)thereof the 19words "an, educational assistance allowanceas provided by 20sections 1681 and 1682 (a) and (b) of thistitle; except' 21that no enrollmentinadult evening secondary school 22courses shall be approved in excess of halkime training 23as defined pursuant to section 1684 of this title." and in- 24sorting in lieu thereof he following:"a tuition assistance 25and subsistence allowance under theprovisions of section

84 1411

12

11680 of this chapter if heis enrolled on a half-time basis

2or an educationalassistance allowance under theprovisions

3of section 1681 (1) (B) of this chapterif he is enrolled on

4less than a half-time basis".

5 SEC. 13. Section 1,693 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is

6amended to read as follows:

7 "The tuition, subsistence and educationalassistance al- lowances authorized by section 1691 (b) ofthis chapter and

9the cost of individualized tutorialassistance authorized by

10section 1692 (b) of this chapter shall be paidwithout charge

11to any period of entitlementthe veteran may have earned 12 pursuant to se. don 1661 (a)of this title."

13 SEC. 14. Section 1781 of title 38,United States Code, is 14 amended byinserting immediately after the word"No" the

15following: "tuition, subsistence or".

16 SEC. 15. Section 1789 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is 17 amended by striking out thewords "an educational assist- following: "a tuition, . ance" and inserting in lieu thereof the

19subsistence or educational assistanceallowance on behalf of

20or".

21 SEC. 16. The table of sections at thebeginning of chap-

22ter 35 is amended by-

23 (a) striking out: "1681. Educational assistance allowance. "1682. Computation of educational assistanceallowances.";

24 and 1412

13

1 (b) inserting in lieu thereof:

"1680. Tuition and subsistence allowances for institutional training. "1681. Educational assistance allowances. "1682. Educational certifications and limitations.".

2 SEC. 17. This Act shall become effective September1? 31971.

86 1413

92D CONGRESS R. 1ST SESSION 9662

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES JINX 8, 1071 Mr. O'HARA introduced the followingbill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 34 of title38 of the United States Code to restore entklement toeducational benefits to veterans of World War II and the Koreanconflict.

1 Be it enacted by the Senateand House of Representa-

2tines of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled,

3That section 1651 oftitle38, United States Code,is 4 amended by adding at the endthereof the following new

5sentence: "In addition tothe purposeci set forth in the pre-

6ceding sentence, it shall be a purposeof this chapter to re-

7store entitlement toeducational assistance to veterans of 8 World War II and the Koreanconflict who failed to exhaust

9their entitlement to education andtraining under part VIII

10of Veterans Regulation 1 (a) ; title IIof the Veterans' Re- 1414

2

1adjustment Assistance Act of 1952;or Public Law 85-857, 2respectively."

3 SEC. 2. Section 1652 (a) (1) of title 38, UnitedStates

4Code, is amended (1) by striking out "or (B) " andinsert- 5ing in lieu thereof ", (B) " and (2) byinserting immedi-

6ately before the period at the end thereof thefollowing: tt, 7 or (C) was entitled to receive education and training

8under the provisions of part VIII of VeteransRegulation 9 Numbered 1 (a),title II of the Veterans' Readjustment 10 Assistance Aot of 1952,or under Public Law 85-857 and 11either receivedno such education and training or 'received 12such education and training for lessthan the maximum 13period to which hewas entitled under such provisions".

14 SEC. 3.. Each veteran, eligible foreducation and train- ing under the ,provisions of section1652 (a) (1) (C) of this

16chapter, shall be entitled to educationalassistance for a period 17equal to the period of his unused entitlementto education

18 and training under part VIII of Veterans RegulationNum- 10 bered 1 (a),the Veterans' Readjustment Assistance,Act of 20 1952, or Public Law 85-857,as applicable.

21 4C. 4. Section 1662 (u) of title38, United States.Code, 22is amended by adding thereto: "Provided,.That in the.case 23of nay veteran whose eligibility for benefitsarises from 24 section 1652 (a) (1) (C)of this chapter, the eightyears

25 delimitation period shall run from the date of theenactment 26 of this proviso." 88 1415

92m CONGRESS lee SESSION H. R. 9779

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES JULY 14, 1971 Mrs. Gazisso introduced thefollowing bill; which was referred to theCom- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To increase educationaland training assistanceallowances pay- able under title 38 ofthe United States Code.

1 Be it enacted bythe Senate and House ofRepresenta- Congress mumbled, 2tives of the UnitedStates of America in

3That (a) the monthlyeducational assistance allowance pay- 4able for months after December1971 under column II, III, 5 IV, or V of subsection(a) (1) or (d) (2) of section 1682of

6title 38, United StatesCode, for any institutkmal, coopera- of education shall be an 7tive, or farm cooperative program 8 amount equal to the sum of(1) the monthly allowance pay-. 9 able under suchcolumn for December 1971, and(2) the 10 product of the amount specifiedin clause (1) multiplied by

1159.1 per eentum. 1416

2

1 (b) Subsections (b) and (c) (2) of such section1682 2axe each amended by striking out 1175" and inserting in

3lieu thereof "$277".

4 SEC. 2. The monthly training assistance allowancepay-

5able for months after December 1971 under section1683 6 (b) (1)of title 38, United States Code, fora period of 7training thereunder shall bean amount equal to the sum 8of(1) the monthly training assistance allowance payable 9under such section for January 1971, and (2) the product 10of the amount specified in clause(1) multiplied by 59.1

11per centum. 12 SEC. 3. (a) Section 1732 (a) (1) (A) and (a) (2) (B) 13of title 38, United States Code,are each amended by strik- 14ing out "$175" and inserting in lieuthereof "$277". 15 (b) Section 1732 (a) (1) (B) of such title isamended 16 by strikingout "$128" and inserting in lieu thereof 1204". 17 (c) Seetkm 1732 (a) (1) (C) of such titleis amended 18 by strikingout "$81" and inserting in lieu thereof 1129". 19 (d) Section 1732 (b) is amended by strikingout 1141" 20 and inserting in lieu thereof1224". 21 SEC. 4. The amendments made by subsection(b)of

22the first section of this Act and by section 3 shallapply with 23respect to January 1972 and months thereafter. 24 SEC. 5. If at any time after January 1972 the minimum 25wage required pursuant to section 6 of the Fair Labor Stand- .

on 1417

3

1ards Act of 1938 is increased, theAdministrator of Vetemns'

2Affairs shall increase, by a per centum equal tothe per cen- 3 tum increase in such wage, theassistance allowances payable 4 under sections 1682 (a) (1) (b),(c) (2), and(d) (2),

51683 (b) (1), and 1732(a) (1) (A),(B), and (0), (a)

6 (2) (B),and (b), effective for the month inwhich such

7increased minimum wage is first payable, andfor months

8thereafter.

91 1418

92n CONGRESS 'EP 1ST SESSION H. R. 9823

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15,1971 Mr. HEISTORKt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Corn mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To provide equitable treatment of veterans enrolled in vocational education courses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That section 1681 (b) (2) of title 38, United States Code, is 4 amended to read as follows:

5 " (2)to any veteran enrolled in a course which

6 does not lead to a standard college degree for any, day

7 of absence in excess of thirty days in a twelve-month

8 period, not counting as absences weekends, legal holi-

9 days established by Federal or State law dining which

10 the institution is not regularly in session, or vacation

11 periods established by the institution in conjunction with

12 such holidays; or". 1419

92D CONGIIESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 9824

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15,1971 Mr. linisrom introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, to provide additional educational benefits to veterans who have served in the Indochina theater of operations during the Vietnam era.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3. That chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, is amended 4 by adding after section 1683 a. new section as follows:

5"§ 1683A. Educationalassistanceforeligible Vietnam

6 veterans

'7 " (a.) Notwithstawling any other provision of this chap-

8ter, payments for educational assistance shall be made to 1420

1 eligible Vietnam veterans under this section rather than

2 under the preceding provisions of this subchapter.

3 " (b) The Administrator shall reimburseany eligible

. 4 Vietnam veteran enrolled ina full-time or part-time course of education or training under this chapter (includinga co-

6operative program) for costs incurred by such veteran for

7 tuition, for laboratory, library, health, infirmary, and other

8similar fees, and for expenses incurred for books, supplies,

9equipment, and other necessary expenses, exclusive of board, 10 lodging, other living expenses, and travel,as are generally 11required for the successful pursuit and completion of the

12course of education or training in which such veteran is en-

13rolled:eh no,event slmll payment made toan eligible Viet- 14 nam veteran under this section forany expense incurred by

15such veteran exceed the customary amount paid by other

16 students in the same institution for thesame service, priv-

17ilege, material, or equipment; and inno event shall the

18total payments made to oron behalf of any veteran under

19 this subsect;on exceed $3,000 foran ordinary school year, 20unless the veteran elects to have such customary charges

21 paid in excess of such limitation, in which event there shall 22be charged against his period of eligibility the proportion of

23an ordinary school year which such excess bears to $3,000. 24No payments for tuitionor enrollment shall be paid to any 25veteran for apprentice trainingon the job. Payments for

94 1421

3

1tuition and other expenses incurred by anyeligible Vietnam

2veteran may be made by theAdministrator to such veteran

3under this subsection on the basis of such reasonableevidence 4 as the Administrator mayrequire.

5 " (c) Except as provided in subsection (d) ofthis sec-

6don, while pursuing a pregiam of education underthis chap-

7ter of half-time or more, aneligible Vietnam veteran shall

8be paid the monthly subsistence allowance set forthin col- umn II, III, IV, V, orVI (whichever is applicable as de-

10termined by the veteran's dependency status)opposite the

11 extent of program participationshown in column I:

Col. VI, more Col. II, no Col. III, Col. IV, Col. V then 3 de- Col.I.extent of participation In program dependents 1 dependent2 dependents3 dependents Pendent s

$61 Full time $214 Roo $347 $414 157 207 272 315 117 51 time 17i 204 33. Ume 99 137

The amount In col. V. plus the following for each dependent In excess of 3.

12 " (d) An eligible Vietnam veteran receiving compel-

13sation for productive labor whether performed as partof his 14 apprentice or other training on the job atinstitutions, busi-

15ness or otherestablishments, or otherwise, shall be entitled

16to receive such lesser sums, if any, assubsistence or de- 17 Pendency allowances as may bedetermined by the Admin-

18istrator. In no event, however, shall the rate ofsuch allow-

19ance phis thecompensation received exceed $600 per month

20for a veteran without a dependent, or$720 per .month for

21a veteran with onedependent, or $850 for a veteran with

71-815 0 - 72 - 7 1422

4 "1 ':two Or more dependents. Onlyso inudi of the compensation

.2 as is derived. from Productive labor based on the standard

3 workweek for the particular tradeor industry, exchtsive.of 4overtime, shall be considered in computing therate of allow-

5 tutees payable under this subsection. 6 " (e) The Administrator shall prescribe such regula- tions as he deems necessary or appropriate to implement the

8provisions of this seotion. 9 " (f) For purposes of this section

" (1) The term 'eligible Vietnam veteran'means :ii any veteran* who (A) served on active duty for ono 12 hundred eighty daysor more in the Indochina theater

13 of operations, any part of which occurred duringthe 14 Vietnam era, and was dischargedor released there- 15 from under conditions other than dishonorable,or (B) 16 served op active duty forany period of time in the 17 Iridochina theater of operations duringthe Vietnam

18 era if his tour of duty in such theater of operationswas 19 terminated as a. result ofan injury suffered or diseas,e

20 contracted in line of duty while serving in suchtheater 21 of operations, andwas discharged or released from 22 such active duty under conditions otherthan dishon- 23 orable, or (C)was discharged or released from active 24 duty for a service-connected disability incurredas the 1423

5 result of service performed in theIndochina theater

2 of operations during the Vietnam era.

3 ' (2) The term 'Indochina theater ofoperations' 4 moans North or SouthVietnam, Cambodia, or Laos."

5 SEC. 2. Section 1691 (b) of title 38,United States Code,

6is amended by striking mit thesemicolon after the word

7"title" and inserting in lieu thereof a commaand the follow-

8ing: "and shall pay to an eligibleVietnam veteran(as

9defined in section 1683A (f) of this title)pursuing a course 10or courses pursuant tosuch subsection, educational assistance 11as provided insection 1683A of this title;".

12 SEC. 3. The table of sections at thebeginning of chapter 13 34 of title 38, United States Code, isamended by adding

14below "1683. Apprentice or otheron-job training." 15 the following: "1683A. Educational assistance for eligibleVietnam veterans."

16 SEC. 4. The amendments made hy thisAct shall become

17effective on the first day of the secondcalendar month

18following the month in which this Act isenacted. No bene-

19fits shall be paid to any person for anyperiod prior to such

20effective date. 1424

92D2s=" H. R.9894

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19,1971 Mr. WILLIA3L D. FORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, in order to designate certain 'adult evening high school courses as full-timecourses for purposes of educational assistance allowance payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Repre8enta- 2tives of the.United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That section 1684 (a) (3) of title 38, United States Code, 4is amended by inserting " (A) " inunediately after " (3) ";

5and by adding at the end thereof the following:

6 " (B) an adult evening high schoolcourse in which 7 two or more Carnegie units are required per semester

8 shall be considered a full-thecourse ;". 9 SEC. 2. The amendment made by the first section of this 10 Act shall takeeffect on the first day of the month after the 11 monthin which this Act is enacted. 1425

ND CONGRESS 1ST SESSION

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES Juta 21,1971 the Coin- Mr. STONES introduced thefollowing bill; which was referred to mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38,United States Code, to establish aten-year delimiting period for educationalbenefits thereunder in the case ofVietnam cm veterans.

1. Be it enacted by theSenate and House of Representa-

2Lives of the United Statesof Anzerica in Congressassembled, is 3That section 1662 oftitle38, United States Code, 4 amended-

5 ( 1) by amending subsection(a) to read as follows:

6 " (a.) No educationalassistance shall be afforded an eligi- ble veteran under thischapter beyond the date eight years

8after his last discharge orrelease from active duty after Jan-

99 oe

1426

2 1uary 31, 1955, unless such veteran served on active duty

2during the Vietnam era in whichcase no such educational 3assistance shall be afforded beyond the date tenyears after 4 his last discharge or release."; and 5 (2 ) by inserting immediately after "8-year delimit-

6 ing period" in subsection (b) thereof the following:, or '1 10-year delimiting period, as the case may be,".

100 1427

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION R. 10166

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES JULY 28,1971 Mr. TEAGUE of Texas (by request) introduced thefollowhig bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 35 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, to permit eligible wives and widows to pursue a programof education through correspondence courses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senateand House of Representa-

2tives of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled,

3That(a)paragraph (6)of subsection(a)of title 38, 4 United States Code, is amended to read asfollows:

5 " (6) The term 'educational institution' means anypub-

6lie or private elementary school, secondary school,vocational

7school, correspondence school (for wives and widowsonly),

8business school, junior school, teachers college,college, nor- 9 mal school, professional school, university, orscientific or

101 1428

2

1technical institution, or any other institution if it furnishes

2education at the secondary level or above."

(b) Subsection(c)of section 1723 of thistitleis 4 amended by inserting immediately after "any course to be 5 pursued by correspondence" the following: " (except for 6 wives and widows) ". 1429

92D CONGRESS lir Swum H. R. 10168

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES Juix 28,1971 Mr. TEAGUE of Texas (by request)introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans'Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 34 oftitle 38, United States Code, inorder to increase the educationalassistance allowance, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senateand House of Representa-

2lives of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, 3 That thetable (prescribing educationalassistance allowance 4 mtes for eligible veteranspursuing educational programs on

5half-time or more basis) continued inparagraph (1) of see-

103 1430

2

1tion 1682 (a) of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended to 2read as follows:

"Column I Column 11 Column IIIColumn IV Column V

No Ono Two Moro than Type of program depondenla dependent &moderns two dependenla

The amount h Column IV, plus the follow- inpforeach dependent in moss of Institutlonal: two: Pull.tIme $210 $240 Three-quarter time $203 $15 154 178 203 13 lien-time 98 117 Cooperative 131 9 169 200 230 12".

3 SEO. 2. Section 1682 of title 38, United StatesCode, is 4 amended by adding the following twonew subseotions: 5 " (d) The Administrator shall reimburseeach veteran 6receiving eduoational assistance under thissection for the 7. costs of necessary textbooks while pursuing sucha program. 8 " (e) The Administrator shalladjust the assistance 9allowance provided under this section annually,in accord- ance with the average percentage change in the cost of 11tuition and the cost of living for thepreceding calendar 12year." 13 SRO. 3. Section 1661 (c)of title 38, United States 14Code, is amended by strikingout "thirty six" and inserting 15in lieu thereof "forty-eight."

104 1431

92D CONGRESS 18T SESSION .R. 10169

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JuLY 28, 1971 Mr. TEAoux of Texas (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapter 31, United States Code, so as to increase the monthly subsistence allowance, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresenta-

2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That Columns II, III, or IV of subsection 1504 (b) of title

438, United States Code, are amended to read as follows:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV

No One Two or more Type of training dependents dependent dependents

Institutional: Full time $162 $208 $237 Three-quarter time .11i4 153 176 Half time 81 105 116 Institutional on-farm apprentice or other on-Job training: Fulitime 142 177 205".

5 (b) This subsection is further amended by striking out 6 "0" and inserting in lieu thereof "$8".

1.05 1432

2 1 SEC. 2. Section 1504 of title 38, United States Code, 2is amended by adding the followingnew subsection: 3 " (e) The Administrator shall adjust the subsistence 4 allowances under this section annually in accordance with 5the average percentage change in the cost of living for the 6 preceding calendar year."

106 1433

[H.R. 10603, an identical bill introducedby Mr. Hogan on September 13, 1971, was also consideredby the Subcommittee.]

92o CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 10432

IN 1HE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5,1971 Mr. FRASER introdtvled the followingbill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To increase educational benefitsfor veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate andHouse of Representa- 2 -tives of the United States of America inCongress assembled, 3 That this Act may be cited asthe "GI Bill Education Act

4of 1971".

5 SEC. 2. Subchapter IV of chapter 34 of title 38,United 6 States Code, is amended by insertingimmediately before

7section 1681 the following new section:

107 1434

2

1 "§1680. Tuition and subsistence assistance allowances for

2 institutional training 3 " (a) In the case of an eligible veteran not on active

4duty who is pursuing a program of education or training

5at an approved educational or traininginstitution on a half-

6time or more basis, the Administrator shall pay directly to

7the educational or training institution on behalf of such eligible

8veteran the customary cost of tuition, and such laboratory,

9library, health, infirmary, or other similar fees as are cus- p tomarily charged, and shall pay for books, supplies, equip-

11ment, and other necessary expenses, excludingboard, lodg- 12ing, other living expenses, and travel, which similarly eir-

13cumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same courses are

14required to pay.

15 " (b) In no event shall the payment authorized by sub-

18section (a)of this section exceed $1,000 for an ordinary

17school year. If the educational or training institution has no

18customary cost of tuition, a fair and reasonable rate of pay- 19 ment for tuition, fees, or other charges for such course or

20courses shall be determined by theAdministrator.

21 " (c) In the event a veteran fails to complete his pro-

22gram of education after a tuitionassistance allowance has

23been paid to the educational or training institution on his

24behalf, the Administrator shall, pursuant to such regulations

25as he may prescribe, require a pro ratarefund of the tuition .

103 1435

3

1assistance allowance based upon the uncompleted portion

2of the school year for which the allowance waspaid. education 3 " (d) While pursuing an approved program of 4or training,other than cooperative or on-farm training; a

5veteran eligible for tuitionassistance benefits under sUb-

6section(a)of this section shall be paid amonthly sub.-

7sistence allowance as set forth incolumn II, III, IV, or V veteran's de- 8 (whichever is applicable as determined by the 9 pendencystatus) opposite the basis shown incolumn I:

Column IV Column V "Column I Column II Column HI

No One Two More than two dependent apoads dolman(' Basis depndents

Tha 811101111t ill column IV. plus the following tor each dependent In encess of two:

$175 $205 1270 $13 Full time 12B 152 177 10 Three-quarter time 100 114 7 Hall lime II

10 " (e) (1) An eligible veteranentitled to tuition assist- is enrolled 1].ance undersubsection (a) of this soobion and who

12in an educational institutionfor a `farm cooperative' program

13consisting of institutionalagricultural courses preseheduled to

14fall within 44 weeks of anyperiod of 12 consecutive months 15 and who pursuessuch program on- (a minimum of 12 clock 16 " (A) a full-time basis

17 hours per week) , (a minimum of 18 " (B) a three-quarter-timebasis

19 9 clock hours per week) , or 1436

4 1 " (0) a half-time basis(a minimum of 6 clock 2 hours per week)

3shall be eligible to receivea subsistence allowance at the 4 appropriate rate provided inthe table in paragraph (2) of 5this subsection, if such eligibleveteran is concurrently en- 6 gaged in agriculturalemployment which is relevant to such 7institutional agriculturalcourses as determined under stand- ards prescribed by the Administrator. 9 " (2) The monthly subsistenceallowance of an eligible 10veteran pursuing a farm cooperativeprogram under this

11chapter shall be paidas set forth in column II, III, IV,or

12 V (whichever isapplicable as determined by theveteran's 13dependency status) opposite thebasis shown in column I:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV Column V

No Bads Ono Twe Mom thin two dependents dependent dependents dependents

The emount In column IV. plus the following lot each dependent In excess of two: Full time $141 Threeiuuter time $167 $192 $10 Hatt time 101 119 138 67 7 79 92 1

14 " (f) An eligible veteran, entitledto tuition assistance

15under subsection (a) of thissection, who is enrolled ina

16'cooperative program', other than'farm cooperative'pro- 17 gram, shall be paida monthly subsistence allowanceat the

18 same rate paid for full-time 'farmcooperative' trainingas

19provided in subsection (e) of thissection. For thepurpose 20of this subsection, theterm 'cooperative program', other than

110 1437

5

1a 'farm cooperative' program, means afull-time program

2of education which consists of institutional coursesand alter-

3nate phases of training in thebusiness or industrial estab-

4lishment with suoh training being strictly supplemental to

5the institutional portion."

6 SEC. 3. Section 1681 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is 7 amended to read as follows: 8 "§1681. Educational assistance allowances

9 " (a) An educational assistance allowanceshall be paid

10to each eligible individualpursuing a program of education 11 while on active duty, or to an eligible veteranpursuing a 12 program of education on less than a half-timebasis or

13exclusively by correspondence, asfollows:

14 " (1) The educational assistanceallowance of an in-

15dividual pursuing a program of education-

16 " (A) while on active duty, or

17 " (B) on less than a half-time basis,

18shall be computed at the rate of(i) the established charges

19for tuition and fees which theinstitution requires similarly

20circumstanced nonveterans enrolled inthe saMe program to

21pay, or (ii) $175 permonth for a full-time course, which-

22ever is the lesser.Notwithstanding provisions of section 1682

23of this title, payment ofthe educational assistance allowance 24provided by this subsection may,and the educational assist-

ance allowanceTrovided by. section 1696 (b)shall, be made

71-615 0 - 12 - 6 lii 1438

6 1 to an eligible veteran in an amount computed for the entire

.2quarter, semester, or term during the month immediately

3 following the month in which certification is receivedfrom the educational institution that theveteran has enrolled in 5and is pursuing a program at such institution.

6 " (2) (A) The educational assistance allowanceof an 7eligible veteran pursuinga program of education exclusively 8by correspondence shall be computedon the basis of the 9 established eharge whioh the institution requiresnonveterans 10to pay for the course orcourses pursued by the eligible

11veterans. The term 'established charge'as used herein means 12the charge for thecourse or courses determined on the basis 13of the lowest extended time payment plan offeredby the 14institution and approved by the appropriateState approving 15agency or the actual cost to the eligible veteran, whichever

16is the lesser. Such allowances shall be paidquarterly on a 17 pro rata, basis for the lessons completed by the veteran and

18serviced by the institution,as certified by the institution.

19 " (B) The period of entitlement ofany eligible veteran 20who is pursuingany program of education exclusively by 21correspondence shall be charged withone month for each 22$175 which is paid to the veteranas an educational assist- 23ance allowance for such course. 24 "(b) (1) The educational aristance allowance ofa vet- 25eran pursuing a program of flight training(except as

112 1439

7

1provided in section 1673 (b) of thischapter), shall be paid

2in accordance with the provisions ofNotion 1677 of this

3chapter. 4 " (2) The educational assistanceallowance of a veteran

5pursuing a program of apprenticeship orother on-job train-

6ing shall be paid in accordance with theprovisions of section 7 1683 of this chapter. 8 " (c) The tuition and subsistenceallowances payable

9under seotion 1680 of this chapter andthe educational as- 10sistance allowance payable under thissection shall be paid

11as soon aspracticable after the Administrator is assuredof 12the veteran's enrollment in andpursuit of the program of

13education for the period for which suchallowance is to be

14paid."

15 SEO. 4. Section 1682 of title 38,United States Code,

16is amended to read as follows:

17"§ 1682. Educational certifications andlimitations

18 " (a) No tuition assistance allowanceshall be paid to

19an educational ortraining institution on behalf of aneligible 20 veteran under section 1680 of this chapteruntil the Admin-

21istrator shall have received from suchinstitution a certifica-

22tion of the actual enrollment of theeligible veteran at such

23institution, the number of semester orclock hours of attend-

24ance he is to pursue,the customary cost of tuition, the cus-

25tomary cost of books, supplies,equipment, and related

113 1440

8 .1oxpenses, the custc mary charges for laboratory, library, 2health, infirmary,or other similar fees, and such other in- 3formation as the Administrator, byregulation, may require.

4 " (b) The subsistence andeducational assistance allow-

5ances of an eligible veteran provided in sections1680 and 61681 of this chapter shall be paidonly for the period of his

7enrollment as approved by theAdministrator, butno such 8allowances shall be paid-

9 " (1 )to any veteran enrolled ina course whiCh 10 leads to a standard college degreefor any period when 11 such veteran is not pursuing hiscourse in accordance 12 with the regularly establishedpolicies and regulations 13 of the educational institutionand the requirements of 14 this chapter,or of chapter 36;

15 " (2)to any veteran enrolled ina course which 16 does not lead toa standard college degree (excluding 17 programs of apprenticeship andprograms of other 18 on-job training authorized by section1683 of this title) 19 for any day of absence inexcess of thirty days in a 20 twelve-month period, not countingas absences week-

ends or legal holidaysestablished by Federalor State 22 law during which theinstitution is not regularly in 23 session; or 24 " (3)to any veteran pursuing hisprogram ex-

114 1441

9

1 elusively by correspondence for any period duringwhich

2 no lessons wereserviced by the institution.

3 " (c) No subsistence or educational assistance allowance 4 shall be paid to an eligible veteran enrolledin a course in an

5educational institution which does-not lead to a standard

6college degree for any period until the Administratorshall

7have received-

8 " ( 1 )from the eligible veteran a certification as to

9 his actual attendance during such period or where the

10 program is pursued bycorrespondence a certificate as to

11 the number of lessons actually completed by the veteran

12 and serviced by the institution ; and

13 " (2) from the educational institution, a certifica-

14 tion, or an endorsement on the veteran's certificate, that

15 such veteran was enrolled in and pursuing a courseof

16 education during such period and, in the case of an

17 institution furnishing education to a veteran exclusively

18 by correspondence, a certificate, or an endorsement on

19 the veteran's certificate, as to the number oflessons

20 completed by the veteran and serviced by the institution. 21 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may pay 22 an educational assistance allowance representing theinitial 23 payment of an enrollment period, not exceeding onefull 24 month, upon receipt of a certificate of enrollment. 1442

10

1 " (d) The Administrator may, pursuant to suchregu-

2lations as he may prescribe, determine enrollment in,pur- 3suit of, and attendance at, anyprogram of education or 4 course byan eligible veteran for any period for which a 5tuition assistance allowance is paidon his behalf or for 6 which he receivesa subsistence or educational assistance

7allowance under this chapter for pursuing suchprogram or 8course."

9 SEC. 5. Section 1661 of title 38, United States Code, is 10 amended by- 11 (a) inserting in subsection(a) immediately after 12 the words "entitled to" the following: "tuition, subsist- 13 ence or"; and

14 (b) inserting in subsection(c)immediately after 15 the word "receive" the following: "tuition, subsistence 16 or".

17 SEC. 6. Section 1662 of title 38, United States Code, is 18 amended by (a) inserting in subsection(a) immediately after 20 the word "No" the following: "tuition, subsistence or";

21 and 22 (b) inserting in subsection(c) immediately after 23 the words "date for which an educational" the following: 24 ", tuition or subsistence".

25 SEC. 7. Section 1663 of title 38, United States Code, is 1443

11

1 amended byinserting immediately afterthe words "eligible

2for" the following: "tuition,subsistence or". Code, is 3 SEC. 8. Section 1671of title 38, United States 4 amended by insertinginthe secondsentencethereof following: 5immediately after the words"entitled to the" the

6"tuition, subsistence or". Code, 7 SEC. 9. Section 1674 oftitle 38, United States "Shall 8is amended by insertingimmediately after the words

9discontinue the" the following:"subsistence or".

10 SEC. 10. Section 1676 of title38, United StatesCode,

11is amended by inserting inthe second sentence thereofim- the 12mediately after the words"deny or discontinue the" 13 following: "subsistence or". Code, 14 SEC. 11. Section 1687 oftitle 38, United States "may 15is amended by insertingimmediately after the words

16discontinue the" the following:"subsistence or". Code, 17 SEC. 12. Section 1691 of title38, United States

18is amended by striking outin subsection(b) thereof the hy 19words "an educationalassistance allowance as provided

20sections 1681 and 1682 (a)and (b) of this title; except school 21that no enrollment inadult evening secondary

22courses shall beapproved in excess ofhalf-time training

23as defined pursuantto section 1684 ofthis title." and in-

24serting in lieu thereof the following:"a tuition assistance 25 and subsistence allowanceunder the provisions ofsection

117 1444

12

11680 of this chapter if he is enrolled on a half-time basis 2or an educational assistance allowance under the provisions

3of section 1681 (1) (B) of this chapter if he is enrolledon 4less than a half-time basis".

5 SEC. 13: Section 1.693 of title 38, United States Code, is 6 amended to readas follows: 7 . "The tuition, subsistence and educational assistance al- lowances authorized. by section 1691 (b) of this chapter and 9the cost of individualized tutorial assistance authorized by 10section 1692 (b) of 'this chapter shall be paid without charge 11to any period of entitlement the veteranmay have earned 12 pursuant to section 1661 (a)of this title." 13 SEC. 14. Section 1781 of title 38, United States Code, is 14 amended by inserting immediately after the word "No" the 15following: "tuition, subsistence or".

16 SEC. 15. Section 1789 of title 38, United States Code, is 17 amended by striking out the words "an educational assist-

18ance" and inserting in lieu thereof the following: "a tuition,

19subsistence or educational assistance allowanceon behalf of

20or".

21 SEC. 16. The table of sections at the beginning of chap-

22ter 35 is amended by-.

23 (a) striking out:

."1681. Educational assistance allowance. "1682. Computation of educational assistance allowances."; 24 and 118 1445

13

1 (b) inserting in liedthereof: "1680. Tuition and, subsistenceallowances for institutional training. "1681. Educational assistanceallowances. "1682. Educational certificationsand limitations.".

2 SEO. 17. This Act shallbecome effective September 1,

31971. 1446

No CONGRESS 1ST SESSION .R. 10504

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6,197.1. SYMINamN introdneed thelollowing bill; whichwas referred.to the COM- mittes on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL 'l'o amend title 38,. United Staths Code,to provide for the pay- ment of tuition, subsistence, and educational assistanceal- lowances on behalf ofor to certhin eligible veterans pur- suing programs of education under chapter34 of such titlo; to apply automatic cost of living increasesto subsistence allowances; and for otherpurposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresenta-

2tives of the United States of America in Congressassembled, 3That this Act may be citedas the "Veterans' Readjustment 4 Benefits Act of 1971".

5 SEC. 2. Subchlap..IV of chapter 34 of title 38, United

6States Code, is amended by insertingimmediately before 7section 1681 the followingnew section: 1447

2

1"§1680. Tuition and subsistenceassistance allowances for

2 institutional training

3 (a) In the case of an eligible veterannot on active

4duty who is pursuing a programof education or training

5at an approved educational ortraining institution on a half- 6time or more 'basis, theAdministrator shall pay direCtly to

7the educational or traininginstitution on behalf of such eligible 8veteran the customary costof tuition, and such laboratory, 9library, health, infirmary, or othersimilar fees as are cus-

10tomarily charged, and shall payfor books, supplies, equip-

11ment, and other necessary expenses,including board, lodg- 12ing, other living expenses, andtravel, which similarly cir-

13cumstanced nonveterans enrolled inthe same courses are

14required to pay. 15 " (b) (1) Except as provided inparagraph (2), in no 16event shall the paymentauthorized by subsection (a) of this

17section exceed $1,000 for anordinary school year. If the edu-

18cational or training institution has no customarycost of tui-

19tion, a fair and reasonable rate of paymentfor tuition, fees, 20or other chargesfor such course, or courses shall bedeter- 21mined by the Administrator. 22 " (2) An eligible veteran may,however, elect to re- 23ceive more than $1,000 in tuition costsduring any ordinary

24sehool year. Any such excess tuition maybe elected only 25in multiples of $111 and theperiod of entitlement of any 1448

3

1 eligible veteran shall be charged with one month for each

2$111 which is paid to him under this paragraph.

3 " (c) In the event a veteran fails to complete his pro- 4 gram of education after a tuition assistance allowance has

5been paid to the educational or training institution on his

6behalf, the Administrator slmll, pursuant bo sucji regulations

7as he may prescribe, require a pro ratarefund of the tuition 8assistance allowance based upon the uncompleted portion

9of the school year for which the allowance was paid. 10 " (d) While pursuing an approved program of education

11or training, other thancooperative or on-farm training, a

12veteran eligible for tuition assistance benefits under sub-

13section(a)of this section shall be paid a monthly sub- 14sistence allowance as set forth in column II, DI, IV, or V 15 (whichever is applicable as determined by the veteran's de- 16pendency status) opposite the basis shown in column I:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV Column V

No One Two More than two Basis dependents dependent dependents dependents

The amount In column IV, plus the following for each dependent In excess of two: Full time $174 $227 $287 $46 Three-guar ler time In 166 210 34 Hall time 81 104 132 21

17 " (e) (1) An eligibk veteran entitled to tuition assist-

18ance undersubsection (a) of this section and who is enrolled

19in an educational institution for a 'farm cooperative' program

20consisting of institutional agricultural courses prescheduled to

122 1449

4

1fall within 44 weeks of anyperiod of 12 consecutive months

2and who pursues such program on-

3 " (A) a full-time basis(a minimum of 12 clock

4 hours per week),

5 " (B) a three-quarter-timebasis(a minimum of

6 9 clock hours perweek), or

7 " (C) a half-thne basis(a minimum of 6 clock

8 hours per week)

9shall be eligible to receive a subsistenceallowance at the

10appropriate rate provided in the tablein paragraph (2) of

11this subsection, if such eligible veteranis concurrently en- 12 gaged in agricultural employment which isrelevant to such tiinstitutional agricultural courses asdetermined under stand-

14ards prescribed by the Administrator.

15 " (2) The monthly subsistenceallowance of an eligible

16veteran pursuing a farm cooperative programunder this

17chapter shall be paid as set forth incolumn II, III, IV, or 18 V (whichever is applicable asdetermined by the veteran's

19dependency status) opposite the basis shown in columnI:

Column V "Column I Column Il Column III Column IV No One Two More than two dependents dependents Basis dependents dependent

The amount in column IV. plus the following for each dependent In excess of two: $141 $167 $192 $10 Full time 119 133 7 Three-quader time 101 92 4 Half time 67 79

20 " (f) An eligible veteran,entitled to tuition assistance

21 under subsection (a)of this section, who.is enrolled in a

123 1450

5

1'cooperative program', other than 'farmcoopemtive' pro- 2gram, shall be paid a monthly subsistence allowance at the

3same rate paid for full-time 'farm cooperative' trainingas

4provided in subsection (e) of this section. For thepurpose

5of this subsection, the term 'cooperative program', otherthan

6a 'farm cooperative' program, means a full-timeprograin

7of education which consists of institutionalcourses and alter- 8nate phases of training in the businessor industrial estab- 9 lishment with such training being strictly supplementalto 10the institutional portion.

11 (g) (1) As soonas possible after the beginning of each 12 calendar quarter after 1971, the Administrator shalldeter- 13mine the extent by which the price index in the preceding

14calendar quarter was higher than the price index in the appli- 15cable base period. If Ile determines that the price index had

16risen by a percentage (or its level in the base period)equal 17to 3 per centum or more, the amount of each such subsistence 18payment otherwise payable under this chapter shall be 19increased by the same percentage (adjustedto the nearest

20one-tenth of 1 per centum),effective with respect to bene-

21fits for months after the quarter in which thedetermination

22is made.

23 " ( 2 )In the ease of any eligible veteran who first 24becomes entitled toa subsistence payment in or after the

25month in which an increase becomes effective underpara-

124 1451 .

6

1graph (1),the amount of the subsistence paymentpayable

2to or with respect to him onthe basis of such entitlement

3shall be determined by applying suchincrease (or, if more

4than one increase has become effectiveunder paragraph (1) ,

5by applying all such increasessuccessively) to the amount

6of the subsistence payment which would bepayable under

7the provisions of this chapter.

8 " (3) Any increase under paragraph (1)shall apply

9with respect toall subsistence payments payable under

10this chapter during the period in whichsuch increase is effec-

11tive regardless of the provisions underwhich such subsist,

12enee payments arepayable or the manner in which the 13 amounts payable are determined, but shallbe applied with

14respect to the subsistence paymentpayable to or with respect

15to any particular eligible veteranonly after all of the other

16provisions of this chapter which relate toeligibility for and

17the amount of such subsistence payment,and all prior in-

18creases made insuch benefit under this subsection, have been

19applied.

20 " (4) If the amount of the increasein any benefit under 21 'paragraph (1) is not a multipleof $0.10 it shall be raised to

22the next higher multiple of $0.10 in the caseof a multiple

23of $0.05 or adjusted to the nearestmultiple of $0.10 in any

.24other case.

25 " (5) For purposes of this subsection 1452

7

1 " (A) the term 'price index' moans the Consumer 2 Price Index(all items, United States city average) 3 published monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics; 4 and the average level of the price index for the three 5 months in any calendar quarter shall be deemed to be 6 the level of the price index in such quarter; an'd 7 " (B) the erm 'base period'moans- 8 " (i) the calendar quarter commencing October 9 1, 1971, with respect to the first increase under

10 paragraph (1),and 11 " (ii)the calendar quarter immediately we-

12 ceding the quarter in which the determinationcon- 13 stituting the basis of the most recent increase under

14 paragraph (1) was made, with respect toany in- 15 crease under paragraph(1)after the first such 16 increase."

17 SEC. S. Section 1681 of title 38, United States Code, is

18amended to read as follows:

19"§1681. Educational assistance allowances 20 " (a) An educational assistance allowance shall be paid 21to each eligible individual pursuing a program of education 22while on active duty, or to an eligible veteran pursuing a 23program of education on less than a half-time basis or 24exclusively by correspondence, as follows:

1_26

111.lowatbolimilig 1453

8

1 (1 )The educational assistance allowance of anin-

2dividual pursuing a program of education-

3 " (A) while on active duty, or

4 " (B) on less than a half-time basis,

5shall be computed at the rate of (i) theestablished charges

6for tuition and fees which the institution requiressimilarly

7circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same program to

8pay, or (ii) $175 permonth for a full-time course, which-

9ever is the lesser.Notwithstanding provisions of section 1682

10of this title, payment of the educational assistanceallowance

11provided by this subsection may, and theeducational assist-

12ance allowanceprovided by section 1696 (b) shall, be made

13to an eligible veteran in an amountcomputed for the entire

14quarter, semester, or term during the monthimmediately

15following the month in which certification isreceived from

16the educational institution that the veteran has enrolledin 17 and is pursuing a program at such institution.

18 " (2) (A) The educational assistance allowanceof an

18eligible veteran pursuing a program of educationexclusively 20 by correspondence shall be computed on the basis of the

21established charge which the institution requires nonveterans

22to pay for the course or coursespursued by the eligible

23veterans. The term 'established charge' asused herein means

24the charge for the course or coursesdetermined on the basis

25of the lowest extended time.. paymentplan offered by the

71-815 0 -72 - 9 1454

9 1institution and approved by the appropriate State approving 2agency or the actual cost to the eligible veteran, whichever 3is the lesser. Such allowances shall be paid quarterlyon a 4pro rata basis for the lessons completed by the veteran and 5serviced by the institution,as certifild by the institution. 6 " (B) The period of entitlement ofany eligible veteran 7who is punning anyprogram of education exclusively by 8correspondence shall be charged withone month for each 9$175 which is paid to the veteranas an educational assist- 10ance allowance for such course.

11 " (b) (1) The educational assistance allowance ofa vet- 12eran pursuing a program of flight training(except as 13 provided in section 1673 (b) of this chapter),shall be paid 14in accordance with the provisions of section 1677 of this 15chapter.

16 " (2) The educational assistance allowance ofa veteran 17pursuing a program of apprenticeshipor other on-job train- 18ing shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of section 191683 of this chapter. 20 (c) Tbe tuition and subsistence allowancespayable 21 under section 1680 of this chapter and the educationalas- 22 sistance allowance payable under this section shallbe paid 23as soon as practicable after the Administrator is assured of 24 the veteran's enrollment in and pursuit of theprogram of

128 1455

10

1education for the period for which suchallowance is to be

2paid."

3 SEC. 4. Section 1682 of title 38,United States Code,

4is amended to read as follows:

5"§ 1682. Educational certificationsand limitations

6 " (a) No tuition assistance allowanceshall be paid to

7an educational ortraining institution on behalf of aneligible

8veteran under section 1680 ofthis chapter until the Admin- istrator shall have received from suchinstitution a certifica-

10tion of the actual enrollment of theeligible veteran at such

11institution, the number of semester orclock hours of attend-

12ance he is to pursue,the customary cost of tuition, the cus- tomary cost of books,supplies,equipment., and related

14expenses, the customarycharges for laboratory, library,

15health, infirmary, or other similarfees, and such other in-

16formation as the Administrator, byregulation, may require.

17 " (b) The subsistence andeducational assistance allow-

18ances of aneligible veteran provided in sections 1680 and

191681 of this chapter shall bepaid only for the period oi his

20enrollment as approved by theAdministrator, but no such

21allowances shall be paid-

22 " (1 )to any veteran enrolledin a course which

23 leads to a standard collegedegree for any period when

24 such veteran is not pursuing his coursein accordance

25 with the regularly establishedpolicies and regulations

129 1456

II

of the educational institution and the requirementsof 2 this chapter, or of chapter 36;

3 " (2)to any veteran enrolled ina course which 4 does not lead toa standard college degree (excluding

5 programsofapprenticeship and programs ofother

on-job training a(Ithorized by section 1683 of thistitle) 7 for any day of absence inexcess of thirty days in a 8 twelve-month period, not countingas absences week- 9 ends or legal holidays established by Federalor State 10 law during which the institution isnot regularly in 11 session; or

12 " (3)to any veteran pursuing hisprogram ex- 13 chisively by correspondence forany period during which 14 no lessons were serviced by the institution.

15 (c) No subsistenceor educational assistance allowance

16shall be paid to an eligible veteran enrolled ina course in an 17educational institution which does not lead toa standard

18college degree for any period until the Administratorshall 19have received

" (1) from the eligible veterana certification as to o his actual attendance during such periodor where the 22 program is pursued by correspondence a certificate as to

23 the number of lessons actually completed by theveteran 24 and serviced by the institution; and

25 " (2) from the educational institution,a certifica- 1457

12

1 tion, or an endorsement on the veteran'scertificate, that

2 such veteran was enrolled in and pursuing a courseof

3 education during such period and, in tl caseof an

4 institution furnishing education to a veteranexclusively

5 by correspondence, a certificate, or anendorsement on

6 the veteran's certificate, as to thenumber of lessons

7 completed by the veteran and serviced by theinstitution.

8Notwibhstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may pay

9an educationalassistance allowance representing the initial 10 payment of an enrollment period, not exceeding onefull

11month, upon receipt of a certificate of enrollment.

12 " (d) The Administrator may, pursuant tosuch rep-

13lotions as he may prescribe, determineenrollment in, pur-

14suit of, and attendance at, any program ofeducation or

15course by aneligible veteran for any period for which a

16tuition assistance allowance is paid onhis behalf or for

17which he receives a subsistence oreducational assistance

18allowance under this chapter for pursuing such program or

19course."

20 SEC. 5. Section 1661 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, is

21amended by_

22 (a) inserting in subsection (a) immediatelyafter

23 the words "entitled to" the following:"tuition, subsist-

24 ence or"; and

25 (b) inserting in subsection (c) immediately after

I 31 1458

13 1 the word "receive" the following: "tuition, subsistence

2 or". 3 SEC. 6. Seotion 1662 of title 38, United States Code, is 4amended by 5 (a) inserting in subsection (a) immediately after 6 the word "No" the following: "tuition, subsistence or";

7 and 8 (b)inserting in subsection (c) immediately after 9 the words "date for which an educational" the following: 10 ", tuition or subsistence". 11 SEC. 7. Section 1663 of title 38, United States Code, is 12amended by inserting immediately after the words "eligible

1:3for" the following: "tuition, subsistence or". 14 SEC. 8. Seotion 1671 of title 38, United States Code, is 15amended by inserting in the second sentence thereof im- 16mediately after the words "entitled to the" the following: 17"tuition, subsistence orJO. 18 8E0..9. Section 1674 of title 38, United States Code, 19is amended by inserting immediately after the words "shall 20discontinue the" the following: "subsistence or". 21 SEC. 10. Section 1676 of title 38, United States Code, 22is amended by inserting in the second sentence thereof im- 23mediately after the words "deny or discontinue the" the 24following: "subsistence or". 25 SEC. 11. Section 1687 of title 38, United States Code, 1459

14

1is amended by insertingimmediately after the words "may

2discontinue the" the following:"subsistence or".

3 SEC. 12. Section 1691 of title 38,United States Code,

4is amended by striking outin subsection (b) thereof the words "an educational assistanceallowance as provided by sections 1681 and 1682 (a) and(b) of this title; except

7.that no enrollmentinadult evening secondary school

8courses shall beapproved in excess of half-timetraining

9as defined pursuant tosection 1684 of this title." andinsert-

10ing inlieu thereof the following: "atuition assistance 11 and subsistence allowanceunder the provisions of section

321680 of this chapter if he isehrolled on a half-time basis

13or an educationalassistance allowance under theprovisions

14of section 1681 (1) (B) of thischapter if he is enrolled on

15less than a half-time basis".

16 SEC. 13. Section 1693 of title38. United States Code,

17is amended to read as follows:

18 "The tuition, subsistence andeducational assistance al- lowances authorized by section 1691 (h)of this chapter and

20the cost of individualizedtutorial assistance authorized by

21section 1692 (b) of this chapter shall bepaid without charge

22to any period ofentitlement the veteran may have earned

23pursuant to seotion 1661(a) of this title."

24 SEC. 14. Section 1781 oftitle 38, United States Code, is

123 1461

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 10543

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEAtan 8,1971 Mr. Thontsorr of Wisconsin. introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapters 31, 34, 35, and36 of title 38, United States Code, in order to make improvements,in the vocational rehabilitation and educational programsunder such chapters; to authorize an advanceinitial payment and prepayment of the educational assistanceallowance to eligible veterans and persons pursuing a program ofeducation under chapters 34 and 35 of such title; to establish awork-study program and work-study additional educationalassistance allowance for certain eligible veterans; and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by ihe Senate andHouse of Representa-

2tives of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled,

3That this Act may be cited as the"Veterans' Advance Edu-

4cational Payment and Work-Study Act of 1971".

135 1462

2 1 TITLE IINCREASE IN THE AMOUNTS OF LOANS 2 TO AND ELIGIBILITY FOR WORK-STUDY PRO- 3 GRAM OF DISABLED VETERANS ENROLLED 4 IN VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION 5 SEC. 101. Section 1502 of title F8, United States Code,

6is amended by adding at the end thereofa new subsection (d) as follor-s:

8 " (d) Veterans pursuing a program of vocationalre- 9habilitation training under the provisions of this chapter shall 10also be eligible, where feasible, for participation in the work- 11study program provided by section 1687 of this title." 12 SEC. 102. Section 1507 of title 38, United States Code,

13is amended by striking out 1100" in the firstsentence 14thereof and inserting in lieu thereof 1200". 15TITLE IIADVANCE PAYMENT OF EDUCA- 16 TIONAL ASSISTANCE ALLOWANCE AND 17 WORK-STUDY PIiOGRAM 18 SEC. 201 Subchapter II of chapter 36 of title38, 19United State Code, is amended by inserting immediately 20 before section 1781 the followingnew section: 211 1780. Payment of educational assistance allowances 22 "Period for Which Payment May Be Made 23 " (a) Payment of educational assistanceallowances to 24 eligible veterans orpersons pursuing a program of education, 25 other than correspondenceor flight, in an educational institu-

43' 1463

8

1tion under chapter 34 or 35 of this title shall be paid as

2provided in this section and, as applicable, in section 1682

3or section 1732 of thistitle. Such payments shall be paid only

4for the period of such veterans' or persons' enrollment, but

5no amount shall be paid

6 " (1) to any eligible veteran or person enrolled in a

7 course which leads to a standard collegedegree for any 8 period when such veteran or person is not pursuing his 9 course in accordance with theregularly established 10 policies and regulations of the educational institution and 11 the requirements of this chapter or of chapter 34 or 35

12 of this title; or 13 " ('2)bo any eligible veteran or person enrolled in a 14 course which does not lead to astandnrd college degree 15 (excluding programs of apprenticeship and programs 16 of other on-job training authorized by section 1683 of 17 this title) for any day of absence in excess of thirty days 18, in a twelve-month period, not counting as absences

19 weekendsor legal holidaysestablished by Federal or 20 State law (or in the case of the Republic of the Philip- 21 pines, Philippine law) during which the institution is

22 not regularly in session. 23 "Advance Payment of Initial Educational Assistance

24 Allowance 25 " (b) (1) The authorization of an educational assistance 1464

.4 1 allowance advance payment provided in this subsection is

2based upon a finding by the Oongress that eligible veterans 3and persons need additional funds at the beginning ofa 4school term to meet the expenses of books, travel, deposits,

5and payments for living quarters, the initial installment of

6tuition, and the other special expenses whichare concen-

7trated at the beginning of a school term. 8 " (2) Subject to the provisions of this subsection, and 9under regulations which the Administrator shall prescribe, 10an eligible veteran or person shall be paid an educational n assistance allowance advance payment. Such advancepay- 12ment, except. in unusual or extraordinary cases, shall be made

13within fifteen days after receipt of application therefor sub- 14 mitted by the eligible veteran or person pursuant to paragraph

15 (3) of this subsection, but in no event earlier tha.n thirty days

16prior to the date on which pursuit of his program of education

17is to commence and shall be made in an amount equivalent to

18the educational assistance allowance for the monthor fraction

19thereof in which pursuit of the program willcommence, plus

20the educationalassistance allowance forthesucceeding

21 month. In no event shallan educational assistance allowance

22advance payment be made under this subsection toan eligible 2a veteranor personintending to pursue a program of education 24on less than a half-time basis. 1465

Administrator for advance 1 " (3) The application to the

2payment shall include- be an 3 " (A) evidence showing (i) such veteran to (a) (1) of 4 'eligible veteran' as defined in section 1652

5 chapter 34 of this title, or(ii)such person to be an of 6 'eligible person' as defined in section 1701(a) (1)

7 chapter 35 of this title,

8 " (B) a certificate by the eligible veteran or person

9 (i) stating that he is enrolled, or hasapplied for, been

10 accepted by and intends to enroll, in aspecified educa-

11 tional institution and is pursuing, orplans to pursue, a

12 specified approved course of education duringsuch school

13 year at .sucheducationalinstitution,(ii)specifying

14 the expected date of enrollment if hehas not yet enrolled

15 in an educational institution, and(iii)specifying the

16 number of semester hours (orequivalent) or clock hours

17 he is pursuing, or intends to pursue,and

18 " (C) in the case of an eligible veteran,information

19 as to the ntunberof persons he claims as dependents(as

20 defined in section 1652 (d) of thistitle).

21 " (4) For purposes of the Administrator'sdeterMination 22 whether any veteran or person is eligiblefor an advance pay- 23 ment under this section, the evidenceand informationsub- : 24 mitted by such veteran or personpursuani to paragraph (3)

25of this subsection shall establish hiseligibility unless them is

,139 1466

6

1evidence in his file in the processing office establishingthat he 2is ineligible for such advancepayment. 3. "Prepayment of Subsequent Educational Assistance

4 Allowance

5 " (c) Except as provided in subsection (e) ofthis sec-

tion, subsequent payments of educational assistanceallowance 7to an eligible veteran orperson shall be prepaid each month, 8subjeot to such reports and proofof enrollment in and satis- 9factory pursuit of suchprograms as the Administrator mai require. The Administratormay withhold the final payment 11of a periOd of enrollment until such proof isreceived and the 12 amount of the finalpayment appropriately adjusted. In the 13case of an eligible veteran who submittedan application 14 showingone or more dependents, but who does not submit

15evidence, acceptable to the Administratorpursuant to regu- lations he shall prescribe, of suchdependents, the amount of 17 the educational assistanceallowance shall reflect the assumed 12existence of such dependents duringa reasonable period to

19 allow theveteran to furnish such proof, but suchperiod shall 20 not extendbeyond sixty daysor the end of the enrollment 21 period, whicheveris the earlier. 22 "Recovery of Erroneous Payments 23 " (d) Ifan eligible veteran or person fails to enrollin a 24course for which an educational assistanceallowance advance 25payment is made, the amount of suchpayment and any

140 1467

7

1amount of subsequent payments which, in whole orin part,

2are due to erroneousinfornmtion furnished in the certificate

3referred to in subsection (b) (3) (B) of this section,shall 4 become an overpayment and shall constitute aliability of

5such veteran or person to the United States and maybe

6recovered, unless waived pursuant to section 3102 of this

7title, from any benefit otherwise due himunder any law 8 administered by the Veterans' Administration or maybe

9recovered in the same manner as any otherdebt due the 10 United States.

11 "Payments for 'Less Than Half-Time' Training

12 " (e) Payment of the educational assistanceallowance 13 computed under section 1682 (b) (1)of this title for an

14individual pursuing a program of educationwhile on active

15duty, or under section 1682 (b) (2) or 1732 (a)(2) of this

16title for an individual pursuing a program ofeducation on a

17less than half-time basis may, and theeducational assistance 18 allowance computed under section1696 (b) of this title shall, 19 be made in an amount computedfor the entire quarter, 20 semester, or term during themonth immediately following

21the month in which certification isreceived from the educe-

22tional institution that such individual,has enrolled in and

23is pursuing a program at such institution.

24 "Determination of Enrollment,Pursuit, and Attendance

25 " (f) The Administrator may, pursuantto regulations

1.41 1468

8

1which he shall prescribe, determineenrollment in, pursuit of, 2and attendance at, anyprogram of education or course by an 3eligible veteranor person for any period for which he re- 4ceives an educational assistance allowanceunder this chapter 5for pursuing suchprogram or course."

6 SEC. 202. Section 1681 of title 38, United StatesCode,

7is amended to readas follows :

8"§ 1681. Educational assistance allowance

9 "General 10 " (a) The Administrator shall, in accordance withthe 11 applicable provisionsof this section and section 1780 of this

12title, pay to each eligible veteran who is pursuinga program 13of education undnr this chapteran educational assistance 14 allowance to meet, inpart, the expenses of his subsistence,

15tuition, fees, supplies, books, equipment, and othereduca- 16tional costs.

17 "Institutional Training

18 " (b) The edueational assistance allowance oflin eligible 13veteran pursuing a program of education, other thancone- 20 spondenceor flight, at an educational institution shall be paid 21as provided in section 1780 of this title.

22 "Correspondence Training Certifications 23 " (c) No educational assistance allowance shall be paid P4 toan eligible veteran enrolled in and pursuing a program of 1469

9

1education exclusively by correspondence until the Adminis-

2trator shall have received

3 " (1) from the eligible veteran a certificate as to

4 the number of lessons actually completed by the veteran

5 and servicel by the educational institution; and

6 " (2) from the educational institution, a certification,

7 or an endorsement on the veteran'scertificate, as to the

8 number of lessons completed by the veteran and serviced

9 by the institution. 10 "Apprenticeship and Other On-Job Training 11 " (d) No educational assistance allowance shall be paid

12to an eligible veteran enrolled in and pursuing a programof

13apprenticeship or other training on the job until the Admin- istrator shall have received- 15 " ( 1 ) from the eligible veteran a certification as to 16 his actual attendance during such period; and 17 " (2) from the educational institution, a certifica- 18 tion, or an endorsement on the veteran's certificate, that 19 such veteran was enrolled in and pursuing a program of 20 apprenticeship or other training on the job during such

21 period. 22 "Flight Training 23 " (e) No educational assistance allowance for anymonth

24shall be paid to an eligible veteran who is pursning a pro-

71-815 0 - 72 - 10 143 1470

10 1gram of education consisting exclusively of flight training

2until the Administrator shall have receiveda certification 3from the eligible veteran and the institutionas to actual flight 4trsining received by, and the cost thereof to, the veteran dur- 5ing that month." 6 SEC. 203. Subchapter IV of chapter 34 of title 38, 7United States Code, is amended by deleting section 1687 in 8its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof tin_ following:

9 "WORK-STUDY PROGRAM 10"§1687. Work-study additional educational assistance al- 11 lowance; advances to eligible veterans 12 " (a) Notwithstandingany other provision of law, the 13Administrator shall pay a. work-study additional educational 14assistance allowance(hereafter referred to as 'work-study 15allowance') to any veteran pursuingon a full-time basis a 16 course of vocational rehabilitation under chapter 31 of this 17title, or a program of education under this chapter, who 18enters into an agreement with the Administrator to perform 19 services under the work-studyprogram established by this 20section. Such allowance shall be paid in advance in the 21 amount of $250 in return for such veteran's agreement to 22 perform services, aggregatingone hundred hours during a semester or other applicable enrollment period, required in

connection with (1) the preparation and processing ofneces- sary papers and other documents at educational institutions 1471

11

1or regional offices orfacilities of the Veterans' Administra-

2tion,(2)theoutreachservicesprogram under sub-

3chapter IV of chapter 3 of this title,(3) the provision

4of hospital end domiciliary care and medical treatment under

5chapter 17 of this title, or (4) any other activity of the

6Veterans' Administration as the Administrator shall deter- mine appropriate. Advances of lesser amounts may be made

8in return for agreements to perform services for periods of

9less than one hundred hours, the -amount of such advance to

10be prorated on the basis of tbe amount of a full advance. The

13.Administrator may enter into a work-study agreement with a

12veteran who has satisfactorily pursued his coursesduring at 13least one enrollment period for the performance ofservices 14during a period between enrollments if such veteran certifies 15his intention to continue the pursuit of the program during

16 the next enrollment period. . 17 " (b). If an eligible vetzan, after having received in 18advance a work-study allowance under subsection (a)of 19this section, fails to fulfill his work obligationunder the 20agreement for any reason, the amountdue (based upon the 21pro rata portion of the workobligation which the veteran did 22not complete) as computedby the Administrator shall be 23considered an overpayment and shall become dueand pay-

24able at the end of the enrollment period or atsuch time prior 25thereto when thq 'Administrator determinesthat such obliga,

!" 1,1,10 1473

13

1veterans enrolled in such institution to the totalnumber of

2veterans enrolled in all such institutions in theregional area,

3except that, to the maximum extent feasible, 20 per centumof

4the allocated number of agreements shall be reserved for spe-

5cial allocation to those institutions with a substantiallyhigher

6proportion of needy veteran-students than generally prevails

7at other institutions within such area.If the total number

8of agreements allocated to any educational institution cannot

9be filled by such institution, the number of suchunmade po-

10tential agreements slmll be reallocated to such othereduca-

11tional institution or institutions in the regional office area as

12the Administrator shall determine in accordancewith regu-

13lations he shall prescribe.

14 " (d) (1) The Administrator shall,to the maximum

15extent feasible, enter into agreementswith educational tutions under which such institutions willrecommend, within

17their number of allocated agreements, which particular vet- 18 eran-students enrolled in such institutions should beoffered

19work-study agreements under this section. 20 " (2) The determinationof which eligibleveteran-

21students shall be offered work-study agreementsshall be 22 made in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Ad-

23ministrator. Such regulations shall include, but notbe limited

24to, the following criteria-

147 1474

14

1 " (A) the need of the veteran boaugment his edu- 2 cational assistance allowance;

3 " (B) the availability to the veteran oftransporta,- 4 tion to the place where his servicesare to be performed; 5 " (C). the motivation of the ireteran;

6 " (D) in the case of veterans whoare members of a 7 minority. group, the disadvantages incurred by members 8 of such group, and

9 " (E) in the case ofa disabled veteran pursuing a 10 course of vocational rehabilitation under chapter 31 of

11 this title, the compatibility of the work assignmentto 12 the veteran's physical condition. 13 "(e) No work-study agreement shall be entered into

. under this section which would

15 " (1) resultinthedisplacementofemployed

16 workers or impair existing contracts for services,or 17 (2) involve the construction, operation,or main: 18 tenance Of so much of any facility as is used or is to lie

19 used for sectarian instruction or asa place for religious` 20 worship.

21 "§1688. Repayment ofFederal. education loans 22 `5(a) An eligible veteran who is obligated torepay an

23 education loan. made'on.or .afte April 13, 1970, pursuant'. 24to title II of the National Defense.Education Act of 1958,

25part B of title IV of the Higher Education Act .of 1965, part

148 1475

15 1 C oftitle VII and part B of title VIII of the Public Health

2Service Act, the Omnibus Crime Controland Safe Streets 3 Act of 1968, the Migrationand Refugee Assistance Act, or 4 from the revolving fund establishedby section 10 of the Act

5of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. 470), or any

6other education loan made, insured, or guaranteed on or

7after April 13, 1970, under any Federal program, for edu.-

8cation pursued prior, to his performance of active duty serv-

9ice, may make application to the Administrator to accelerate 10 payment of the educational assistance allowancefor the pur-

11pose of paying off or reducinghis indebtedness for such loan. 12 Accelerated payment of educational assistanceallowance

13under this section 'shall be made onthe. basis of unused edu-

14cational entitlement, determined in accordance with section

151661 (a) of this title, earned for the performanceof active 16 duty performed after June 30, 1970. The applicationshall 17 ,contain such information as the Administrator may by regu-

18lation prescribe.

19 " (b) ..Any payment of an accelerated allowance shall-

20 " (1). be made no more than four times per. veteran

21 for each loan made or guaranteed under anyprovision

22 .of law referred to.in subsection (a) of this section,and

23. be'made in an amount which the eligible veteran,within'

24 :the educational' benefits available to him,determines is

25 'most advantageous to him;

149 ( 1476

16

1 " (2).be applied to both principal and. interestre- 2 maining unpaid at the time thepayment is made; and 3 (3)bechargedto any unused entitlement

4 which the eligible veteran has remainingunder section 5 1661 (a)of this title for active duty performed after 6 June 30, 1970, at the rate of educationalassistance

7 allowanw to which he would be entitled,as computed 8 under seCtion 1682 (a)of this title,at the time of 9 application if he were pursuingan approved course 10 of education on a full-time basis.

11 " (c) The Administrator,upon receipt oi an application 12 madepursuant to subsection (a) of this section, shall obtain

13a certification from the head of the Federal departmentor 14 agency involved in makingor guaranteeing the loan in ques-

15tion as to the total amount of the principal and interestout-

16standing on the loan. Upon approval of the application,the 17Administrator shall transfer to such departmentor agency

18 head the amount determined by the eligibleveteran under

18subsection (b) of this section and still outstandingon the loan 20 or loans in question. In thecase of loans federally guaran-. 21teed, directly or indirectly, theagency or department head in 22 question shall make immediatepayment to the lender of the 23full amount transferred to him and shall immediately send 24 notice of suchpayment to the educational institution in ques- 25 tion and otherguarantors or endorsers on the loan."

150 1477

17 1 TITLEIIIMISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTSTO

2 THE VETERANS AND WARORPHANS AND

3 WIDOWS EDUCATIONALASSISTANCE PRO-

4 GRAMS

5 SEC. 301. (a) Section 1731 of title 38,United States

6Code, is amended by

7 (1) inserting in subsection (a)immediately after

8 the word "shall" the following: ", inaccordance with

9 the provisions of section 1780 of thistitle," ;

10 (2) deleting subsections (b) ,(c),and (e) in their

11 entirety; and

12 (3) redesignating subsection (d) assubsection (b).

13 (b) Section 1735 (hereinafterredesignated as section 141733) is amended by striking out"1737" where it appears 15therein and inserting in lieu thereof"1734".

16 SEC. 302. Subchapter II of chapter36 of title 38,

17United States Code, is amended by

18 . (1) striking out section 1786 in itsentirety and

19 inserting in lieu thereof the following: 20"§1786. Measurement of courses 21 (a) For the purposes of this chapter,chapter 34, and 22chapter 35 of this title 23 " (1) an institutional trade ortechnical course of- 24 fered on a clock-hour basis below the collegelevel, involv- 25 ing shop practice as an integral partthereof, shall be

4.4;446, 1478

18

1 considered a full-time course whena minimum of thirty

2 hours per week of attendance is required Withno more 3 than two and one-half hours of rest periodsper week 4 allowed;

5 " (2) an institutional eourse offeredon a clock-hour

6 basis below the college level in which theoreticalor class- 7 room instruction predominates shall be considered a full- 8 time course when a minimum of twenty-five hoursper 9 week net of instruction (which may include customary 10 intervals not to exceed ten minutes between hours of in- 11 struction) is required; and 12 " (3) an institutional undergraduate course offered 13 by a college or university on a quarter- or semester-hour 14 basis shall be considered a full-time course when a mini- 15 mum of fourteen semester hours or the equivalent there- 16 of, for which credit is granted toward a standard college 17 degree (including those for which nO credit is granted 18 but which are required to be taken to correct an educa- 19 tional deficiency), is required, except that where such 20 college or university certifies, upon the request of the 21 Administrator, that (A) full-time tuition is charged to 22 all undergraduate students carrying a minimum of less 23 than fourteen such semester hours or the equivalent 24 thereof, or (B) all undergraduate students carrying a 25 minimum of less than fourteen such semester hours (or

.1 17'9 1479

19

1 the equivalent thereof, are considered to bepursuing a

2 full-time course for other administrative purposes, then

3 such an institutional undergraduate courseoffered by

4 such college or university with suchminimum number of

5 such semester hours shall be considered afull-time

course, but in the eventsuch minimum number of semes- 7 ter hours is less than twelve semesterhours or the equiv.- 8 alent thereof, then twelve semester hours or theequiv-

9 alent thereof shall be considered a full-time course. 10 " (b) For the purpose of this chapter and chapter 34

11of this title, an academic high school course requiringsixteen 12units for a full course shall be considered afull-time course 13when a minimum of four units per year is required,and a pro- 14gram of apprenticeship or a programof other on-job training 15shall be considered a full-time program when theeligible 16veteran is required to work the 'numberof hours constituting 17the standard workweek of the training establishment,but a 18workweek of less than thirty hours shall not beconsidered to 19constitute full-time training unless a lessernumber of hours 20has been established as the standard workweekfor the partic- 21ular establishment through bona fide collectivebargaining. 22For the purpose of this subsection, a unit within anacademic 23high school course is defined to be not less than onehundred 24and twenty sixty-minute hours or theirequivalent of study 25in any subject in one academic year.

153 1480

20 1 (c) The Administrator shall define part-time training

2in the case of the types ofcourses referred to in subsection

3 (a),and shall define full-time and part-time training in the 4case of all other types of courses pursued under chapter 34 or 535 of this title." 6 (2) striking out section 1787 in its entirety and 7 inserting in lieu thereof the following: 81 1787. Overcharges by educational institutions; discon- 9 tinuance of allowances; examination of records; 10 false or misleading statements

11 "Overcharges by Educational Institutions 12 (a) If the Administrator finds thatan educational in- 13stitution has

14 " (1) charged or received fromany eligible veteran 15 or person pursuing a program of education under 16 chapter 34 or 35 of this titleany amount for any course

17 in excess of the charges for tuition and fees whichsuch

18 institution requires similarly circumstanced studentsnot

19 receiving assistance under such chapters whoare enrolled 20 in the same course topay, or 21 " (2) instituted, after the effective date ofsection 22 1780 of this title, a policyor practice with respect to the 23 payment of tuition, fees, or other charges in thecase of 24 eligible veterans and the Administrator findsthat the 25 effect of such policyor practice substantially denies to 1481

21

1 veterans the benefits of theadvance and prepayment

2 allowances under such section,

3he may disapprove such educationalinstitution for the enroll- 4 ment of any eligible veteran or person notalready enrolled

5therein under chapter 31, 34, or 35 ofthis title.

6 "Discontinuance of Allowances

7 " (b) The Administrator may discontinuethe educational

8assistance allowance of any eligible veteran or personif he 9 finds that the program of education or any coursein which

10the eligible veteran or person isenrolled fails to meet any

11of the requirements of this chapter orchapter 34 or 35 of

12this title, or if he finds that theeducational institution offering

13such program or course has violated anyprovision of this 14 chapter or chapter 34 or 35, or fails to meet anyof the

15 requirements of such chapters.

16 "Examination of Records

17 " (c) The records and accounts ofeducational institu-

18tions pertaining to eligible veterans or personswho received 19 educational assistance under chapter 31,34, or 35 of this

20title shall be available for examinationby duly authorized rep- 21 resentatives of the Government.

22 "False or Misleading Statements

23 " (d) Whenever theAdministrator finds that an educe,- 24 tional institution has willfully submitted afalse or mislead- 25 ing claim, or that a veteran or person,with the complicity

155 1482

22

1of an educational institution, has submitted sucha claim, he 2shall make a complete report of the facts of thecase to the 3 appropriate State approvingagency and, where deemed ad- 4visable, to the Attorney General of theUnited States for 5appropriate action."

6 SEC. 303. (a) Chapter 34 of title 38, UnitedStates 7 Code, is amended by- 8 (1) striking out in section 1677 (b) in the second 9 sentence thereof all after "certification" down to the 10 period at 'the end thereof and inserting in lieu thereof 11 "as required by section 1681 (e) of this title'; 12 (2) striking out in section 1682 (b) (2) the last 13 sentence in its entirety; and 14 (3) striking out sections 1684 and 1685 in their

15 entirety.

16 (b) Chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code,is 17 amended by- 18 (1) 'striking out sections 1733, 1734, and 1736 in 19 their entirety;

20 (2) redesignating section 1735as section17331 21 and

22 (3) redesignating section 1737as section 1734.

23 (c) The table of sections -at the beginning ofChapter 34 24 is amended by

'156 1488

23

1 (1) striking out:

"1684. Measurement of courses. "1685. Overcharges by educationalinstitutions." ;

2 (2) striking out: "1687. Discontinuance of allowances." ;

3 and inserting in lieu thereof "WORK-STUDY PROGRAM "1687. Work-study additional educationalassistance allowance; advances to eligible veterans. "1688. Repayment of Federal educationloans.".

4 (d) The table of sections at thebeginning of chapter 35 5 is amended by-

6 (1) striking out: "1783. Measurement of courses. "1784. Overcharges by educational institutions. "1786. Discontinuance of allowances." ; (2) redesignating

"1785. &pproval of courses."

8 88 "1738. Approval of courses.";

9 and

10 (3) redesignating "1737. Specialized vocational trainingcourses."

11 as

"1784. Specialized vocationaltraining courses.".

12 (e) The table, of sections at thebeginning of chapter 36

13is amended by-

1517 1

1484

24

1 (1) inserting immediately before

"1781. Limitations on educational assistance." the following:

"1780. Payment of educational assistance allowances.";

3 and 4 (2) .striking out: "1786. 4xamination of records. "1787. False and misleading statements."; 5 and inserting in lieu thereof

1`1786. Measurement ofcourses. "1787. Overcharges by educationalinstitutions;discontinuanceof allowances; examination of records; falseor misleading state- ments.";

6 SEC. 304. (a) Section 501 (a) of Public Law 91-230 , 7 (84 Stat. 174) is amended by strikingout "Seotion .205 (a)

8 (3) " and inserting in lieu thereof. "Section 205 (b) (3)

9 (b) Effective June 30, 1970, section 205 (b) (3)of 10the National Defense Education Act of 1958 (20 U.S.C.

11 425 (b) (3) )(as amended by subsection (a) of thissec- 12tion)is amended-

13 (1) by striking out " (A) " where itappears after 14 " (plus interest) ";

15 (2) by striking out " (i)", " (ii)", and " (iii) ft 16 wherever they appear therein and inserting in lieu 17 thereof " (A)", "(B) ", and " (0)", respectively; and 18 (3) by striking out ", and (B) shall be canceled 19 for service after June 30, 1970,as a member of the

158 1485

25

1 Armed Forces of the United Sbates at the rate of fq

2 per centum of the total amount of such loanplus interest

3 thereon for each year of consecutive service". 4 TITLE IVEFFECTIVE DATE

5 Sm. 401. This Act shall become effective on the first

6day of the second calendar Month following the month in 7 which enacted.

159 71-815 0 - 72 - 11 1486

92D1SCOT SITSIROENS8 H. R. 10605

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13,197.1 Mr. tronzisom of California introduced the following ; which Was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs :''

A BILL To amend section 1681 (b)of title 38, United States Code, to provide for payment of the educational assistaxice allow- ance in certain cases where a meteran transfers from one approved educational institution to another education institution. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Represenkz-

2tives of the United States of America in Congressassembled, 3That subsection(b)of section 1681 of title 38, United

4States Code, is amended to add at the end thereofthe fol- lowing new clause:

6 "Nothwithstanding the foregoing, wherean eligible 7veteran, who is pursuing a course leading toa standard

8college degree, transfers between consecutiveschool terms

9 from one approved institution to another approvedinsti- 1487

2 tution for the purpose of enrolling in and pursuing a similar

2course at the second institution, he shall, for the purpose

3of entitlement to the payment of the educational assistance

4allowance under this chapter, be considered to be enrolled

5at the first institution for a perio'd of time not to exceed

6thirty calendar days following the termination date of the

7school term of the first institution."

eV 0,1 1488

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 10775

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1971 Mr. BROIIIILL of Virginia introduced the following bill ; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to entitle widows of persons who die of service-connected disabilities incurred in Vietnam to educational assistance for courses pursued by correspondence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tines of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That section 1732 (c)of title 38, United States Code, is 4 amended-

5 (1) by inserting immediately after "anycourse to 6 be pursued by correspondence" in the first sentence 7 thereof the following: "(except as herein provided) "; 8 and 9 (2) by amending the second sentence thereof to 1489

2

1 read as follows: "The Administrator may approvethe

2 enrollment of(1) an eligible person in a course, to

3 be pursued in residence,leading to a standard college 4 degree which includes, as anintegral part thereof, sub-

5 jects offered through the mediumof open circuit tele- vised instruction, if themajor portion of the course

7 requires conventional classroom orlaboratory attend- 8 ance; or (2)the widow of any person whodied of

9 a service-connecteddisability incurred during the Via- l() nam era inthe Vietnam theater ofoperations in a pro- ii grain ofeducation exclusively bycorrespondence." 12 SEC. 2. Section 1732 oftitle 38, United States Code,

13is amended by striking out"No educational assistance al- 14 lowance" in subsection(c) and inserting in lieu thereof

15"Except as provided in subsection(d), noeducational assist- 16once allowance",and by adding at the end thereofthe fol-

17lowing new subsection: 18 " (d) (1)The educational assistanceallowance of a 19 widow pursuing a program of educationexclusively by cor-

20respondence shall be computed onthe basis of the estab-

21lished charge which theinstitution requires nonveterans to 22pay for the course orcourses pursuedby the widow. Such

23allowance shall be paid quarterly on a prorata basis for

24 the lessons completed bythe widow and serviced by the 25institution, as certified by theinstitution.

163 1490

3 1 " (2) The period of entitlement ofany widow who is 2pursuing anyprogram of entitlement exclusively by oorre- 3spondence shall be charged withone month for each $130 4 which is paid to the widowas an educational assistance

5allowance for such course."

164 1491

[H.R. 11552, an identical bill introducedby Mr. Dow on November 3, 1971, was also considered by the Subcommittee.]

92o CONGRESS -111 1ST SESSION H. 11400

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 21, 1971 Mr. Fisn introduced the following bill;which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the UnitedStates Code to authorize the enrollment of eligible veterans in a courseoffered by an in- stitution -which has changed itslocation.

1 Be it enacted bg the Senateand House of Representa-

2tives of the United Stales ofAmerica in Congress assembled, (b) of section 1675 of title 38, . 3That clause (3) of subsection 4 United States Code, isamended by inserting after the words 5 "general locality" thefollowing: "or where the school has 6 made a complete move withsubstantidly the same faculty,

7curricula, and students, without achange in ownership and 8 where the move, in thejudgment of the Administrator, was

9for compelling and justifiablereasons".

163 1492

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION 11534

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 2,1971 Mr. TEAGUE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of the United States Code to authorize the enrollment of eligible veterans in a course offered by an educational institution which has moved to another location, provided certain conditions are met.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That clause (3) of subsection (b) of section 1675 of title 38, 4 United States Code, is amended by inserting after the words

5"general locality" the following: "or where the school has 6 made a complete move with substantially the same faculty,

7curricula, and students, without a change in ownership". 1493

92D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION .R. 11571

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1971 Mr. HELSTOSSI introduced the following bill ; which wasreferred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapters 31, 34, and 35 of title 38, United States Code, to increase the vocational rehabilitation subsistences allowances, the educational assistance allowances, and the special training allowances paid to eligible veterans aml persons under such chapters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3That this Act may be cited as the "Veterans' Education and 4 Training Assistance Act of 1971".

5 SEC. 2. The table(prescribing subsistence allowance

6rates for veterans pursuing a. course of vocational rehabilita-

167 1494

2

1tion) contained in seotion 1504 (b) of title 38, United States 2 Code, is amended to read as follows:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV

No One Two or more Type ol trebling dependents dependent dependents

Institutional: Full time $142 $191 $222 Three-querter lime 103 140 165 Hall time 71 96 108 Institutional on farm, apprentice, or athar on-job training: Full time._ . 124 161 191".

3 SEG. 3. (a) The table (prescribing educational assistance 4allowance rates for eligible veterans pursuing educational

5programs on half-time or more basis contained in section 1682

6 (a) (1) of title 38, United States Code) is amendedto read 7as follows:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV Column V

More than two Type ol program No dependents One dependent Two dependents dependents

The amount in column IV, plus

loilag°Idli;e"niefnotr in excess ol two: Institutional: Full time 6220 $265 $305 20 Threaluetter time 165 199 249 IS Holt lime 110 133 153 10 Ceosaratlee 169 200 230

8 (b) Section 1,682 (b) of such title is amended by strik-

9ing out "$175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$220". 10 (c) Section 1682 (c) (2) of such title is amended by 11striking out "$175" and inserting in lieu thereof 1220". 12 (d) The table(prescribing educational assistance al- 13lowance rates for eligible veterans pursuing a farm coopera-

1 4 tive program) contained in section 1682 (d) (2)of such

1 5 title is amended to read as follows:

18 1495

3

Column V "Column I Column II Column III Column IV More than two Basis No dependents Ons dependent Two dependents dependents

The amount in col- umn IV, plus the following for each dependent in omen ef two: 6149 $174 $250 $11 Full time 7 Three-quarter time 107 126 146 97 Half time 71 83

1 SEC. 4. The table(prescribing educational assistance 2 allowance rates for eligible veteranspursuing an apprentice-

3ship or other on-job training) contained insection 1683 (h)

4 (1) of title 38, United States Code,is amended to read as

5follows:

No One Two or more dependents "Periods of training dependents dependent

First 6 months. 6114 $127 '340 as 97 111 Second 6 months 33 Third 6 months 57 70 55". Fourth and sny succeeding 6-month penal: 28 41

SEC. 5.Seotion 1696 (b) (2) is amended by striking out

7"$175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$220".

8 SEC. 6. (a) Paragraph (1) of section 1732 (a) of title

938, United States Code, is amended to read asfollows:

10 " (1) The educational assistance allowance onbehalf of

11 an eligible persons whois pursuing a program of education

12consisting of institutional courses shall be computed at the

13rate of (A) $220 per month ifpursued on a full-time basis,

14 (B) $165 per month if pursued on a three-quarter-timebasis,

15and (C) $110 per month if pursued on a half-time basis."

169 1496

4

1 (b) Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by strik-

2ing out "$175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$220".

3 (0) Section 1732 (b) of such title is amended by striking 4out 1141" and inserting in lieu thereof 1169".

5 SEC. 7. Section 1742 (a) of title 38, United States Code, 6is amended by striking out "$175", "$55" and 16.80" and

7inserting in lieu thereof 1220", "$69", and 17.30",respec-

8tively.

9 SEC. 8. The amendments made by this Act shall become 10effective on the first day of the second calendar month follow_

11ing the month in which enacted. 1497

92D CONGRESS 1BT SESSION H. R. 11720

IN THE HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 11,1971 Mr. HELsrosici hitroduccd the followingbill ; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend title 38 of theUnited States Code to authorize the 'enrollment of eligible veteransin a course offered by an educational institution which hasmoved to another location, provided certain conditions are met.

1 Be it enacted by theSenate and House of Representa-

2tives of the United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, 3 That clause (3) of subsection (b)of section 1675 of title 38, 4 United States Code, is amended byinserting after the words 5 "general locality" the following : "orwhere the school has 6 made a complete move with substantiallythe same faculty,

7curricula, and students, without a changein ownership". 1498

92o CONGRESS 1ST SESSION R. 11954

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 30, 1971 Mr. TEAGUE of Texas (by request) (for himself, Mr. Traoux ofCalifornia, Mr. Mumma, and Mr. Scow) introduced the following bin; whichwas referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

A BILL To amend chapters 31, 34, and 35 of title 38, United States Code, to increase the rates of vocational rehabilitation, educa- tional assistance, and special training allowances paidto eligi- ble veterans andpersons; to provide for advance educational assistance payments to certain veterans; to make improve- ments in the educational assistance programs; and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3That this Act may be cited as the "Veterans' Education and 4Training Amendments of 1971".

.172 1499

2 1 TITLEIVOCATIONAL REHABILITATION-EDIT- ADJUSTMENTS 2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE RATE

3 SEC. 101. Chapter 31 of title 38,United States Code, is 4 amended asfollows: (b)to read as 5 (a) by amending section 1504

6 follows: " (b) The subsistence allowance of aveteran-trainee is to

8be determined in accordance with,the following table, and

9shall be the monthly amount shownin column II, III, or IV

10 (whichever is applicable as determined bythe veteran's de-

1 1 pendency status) opposite theappropriate type of training

12as specified in columnI:

"Column 1 Column Column Column II III IV

No de- Ono de- Two or Type of training penitents pendent more de- pendents

Institutional: Full-time $146 $196 $227 Three-quarter-time 106 144 169 Half-time. 73 99 110 Institutional on-farm, appren- tice, or other on-job training: Full time 128 166 196

13Where any full-time trainee has morethan two dependents 14 and is not eligible toreceive additional compensation as

15provided by section 315 or section335 (whichever is 4.- 16 *able) of this title, thesubsistence allowance prescribed

173 1500

3

1in column IV of the foregoing table shall be increased by

2 an additional $7 per month for each dependent inexcess of

3two." ;

4 and 5 (b) by deleting in section 1507 "$100" and in- serting in lieu thereof 1200". 7 SEC. 102. Chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, is 8 amendedas follows: 9 (a) by deleting in the last sentence of section 1677 10 (b) 1175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$190";

11 (b) the table contained in paragraph (1) ofsec- 1`) tion 1682 (a ) is amended to read as follows:

"Column I ColumnColumnColumn Column II III IV V

Type of program No de-One de-Two de-More than two pendentspendentpendentsdependents

The amount in column IV, plus the fol- lowing for each de- pendent in excess of two: Institutional: Full time $190 $220 $250 $15 Three-quarter- time 139 102 1E3 11 Half time 88 103 118 it 8 Cooperative 153 180 207 11.";

13 (c) by deleting in section '1682 (b ) and

14 inserting hi lieu thereof 1190";

194 1501

4

1 (d) the table contained in section 1682(d) (2)is

2 amended to read as follows:

"Column I ColumnColumnColumn Column II III IV V

Basis No de-010de-Two de-More than two pendentspendentpendents dependents

The amount in Column IV, . . plus the fol- lowing for each de- pendent in excess of two:

Full time $153 $180 $207 $11 149 8 Three-quarter time... 109 129 5. ,.; Half time 73 86 100

3 (e)the table contained in section 1683 (b)is

4 amended to read as follows:

Two or "Periods of training No de- One de- more de- pendents pendentpendents

First 6 months $160 $178 $917 Second 6 months 120 136 156 Third 6 months 80 98 117 Fourth and any succeeding 6- month periods 40 58 77.";

5 and

6 (f) by deleting in section 1696 (b)"$175" and

7 inserting in lien thereof 1190".

8 8E0. 103. Chapter 35 of title 3, United States Code,is 9 amended as follows:

V')

71-615 0 - 72 - 12 1502

5

1 (a) by amending section 1732 (a) (1) to read as

2 follows:

3 " (a) (1) The educational assistance allowance on be- . 4half 'of .a neligible person who is pursuing a program of

5education consisthig of institutional courses shall be corn-

6puted at the rate of (A) $190 per month if pursued on

7fa full-time basis, (B) $139 per month if pursued on a three-

8I !Harter-time basis, and (C) $88 per month ifpursued on

9a half-time basis.";

10 (b) by deleting in section 1732.(a) (2) 1175"

11 and inserting in lieu thereof 1190"; .

12 (c) .by deleting in section 1732 (b) "$141" and

13 inserting in lieu thereof 1153"; and. (d) by amending section 1742 (a)to read as fol-

15 lows:.

16 " (a) While the eligible person is enrolled in and pur-

17suing a full-time course of special restorative training, the 18 parent or guardian shall be entitled to receive on his behalf

19a special training allowancecomputed at the basic rate of

20$190 per month. ,If the charges for tuition and fees appli-

21cable to any such course are more than $60 per calendar 22 month the basic monthly allowance may be inereased by the 23, amount that such charges exceed $60 a month, upon dec- altion by the parent or guardian of the eligible person to have 1503

6

1 such person's period ofentitlement reduced by one day for

2each $6.80 that the special trainingallowance paid exceeds

3the basic monthly allowance." 4 'TITLEIIADVANCE VOCATIONAL REHABILITA-

5 TION SUBSISTENCE ANDEDUCATIONAL AS-

6 SISTANCE ALLOWANCE PAYMENIIS

7 SEo. 201. Subsection (a)of section 1504 of title 38, 8 United States Code, is amended byadding at the end thereof 9 the following: "TheAdministrator shall pay the initial

10subsistence allowance of a course of .vocationalrehabilitation

11training to an eligible veteran in an amount not toexceed

12the subsistence allowance for the month orfraction thereof

13in which pursuit of the course will commence,plus the sub-

14sistence allowance for one full month, uponreceipt of proof

15that the veteran has been enrolled in anapproved educa-

16tional institution on a half-time or more basis.Such pay-

17inent shall not be made earlierthan the first day of the 18 month in which pursuit of the course is to commence.Sub-

19sequent payments ofsubsistence allowance shall be made

20each month in advance, subject tosuch reports and proof

21of satisfactory pursuit of such program as theAdminis-

22trator may require. TheAdministrator may withhold the

23final payment of subsistenceallowance payable to such v3t-

24eran until such proofis received and the amount appropri-

25ately adjusted. If the,..oligible veteran fails to pursuethe

tV"Y 1504

7

1course after receiving the initial payment of the subsistence

2allowance, the amount of such payment may be recovered 3from any benefit otherwise due the veteran underany law 4 administered by the Veterans' Administration or such over- 5 payment shall constitute a liability of such eligible veteran 6 and may be recovered in the same manner as any other debt

7due the United States."

8 SEC. 202. Subsections (4) and (e) of section 1681 of

9title 38, United States Code, are amended to readas follows:

10 " (d)The Administratorshall,except asprovided 11in subsection (e) of this section,pay the initial educational 12assistance allowance ofan enrollment period to an di- 13gible veteran in an amount not to exceed the educational 14assistance allowalice for the monthor fraction thereof in 15which pursuit of the program will commence, plus the edu-

cational assistance allowance for one full month, upon receipt

17of proof that the eligible veteran has been enrolled inan 18 approved educational institutionon a half-time or more basis. 19 Such payment slmll not be made earlier than the first day of 20the month in which pursuit of theprogram is to commeme. 21Subsequent payments of educational assistance allowance 22shall be made each month in advance, subject to such reports 23and proof of satisfactory, pursuit of suchprogram as the Ad- 24_ ministratormay require. The Administrator may withhold 1505

8

1the final payment of an enrollment period untilsuch proof

2is received and the amount appropriatelyadjusted. If the

3eligible veteran fails to pursue the course afterreceiving

4the initial payment of the educationalassistance allowance,

5the amount of such advance payment may berecovered from 6 any benefit otherwise due the veteranunder any law a4lminis-

7tered by the Veterans' Administration or such overpayment

8shall constitute a liability of such eligible veteran and may 9 be recovered in the same manner as anyother debt due the

10United States.

11 " (e) No educational assistance allowance shall bepaid

12to an eligible veteran enrolledin a program of education con-

13sisting exclusively of flight training orexclusively by cor- 14 respondence for any period until theAdministrator shall have

15received-

16 " (1 ) from the eligible veteran acertification as to

17 his actual attendance during such period or,where the

18 program is pursued bycorrespondence, a certificate as to

19 the number of lessons actually completed bythe veteran

20 and serviced by the institution, and

21 " (2) from the educational institution, acertification,

22 or an endorsement onthe veteran's certificate, that such

23 veteran was enrolled in andpurc.u;ng a course of educa-

94 don during such paiod and, in tilt, easeof an institution 1506

9

1 furnishing education to a veteran exclusively bycorre- 2 spondence, a certificate, or an endorsement on the vet- 3 eran's certificate, as to the munber of lessons completed 4 by the veteran and serviced by the institution." 5 SEC. 203. Subsection (d)of section 1731 of title 38,

6United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 7 "(d) The Administrator shall pay the initial educational

8assistance allowance of an enrollment period on behalf of

9an eligible person in an amount not to exceed the educational 10assistance allowance for the month or fraction thereof in

11which pursuit of the program will commence, plus the edu- 4 cational assistance allowance for one full month, upon receipt

13of proof that the eligible person has been enrolled inan ap-

14proved educational institution on a half-timeor more basis.

15Such payment shall not be made earlier than the first day of 16 jlie month in which pursuit of theprogram is to commence.

17Subsequent paynlents of educational assistance allowance shall

18be made each month in advance, subject to such reports and

19proof of satisfactory pursuit of such program as the Adminis-

20trator may require. The Administrator may withhold the

21final payment of an enrollment period until such proof is

22received and the amount appropriately adjusted. If the 23eligible person fails to pursue the course after receiving the

2 4initial payment of the educational assistance allo7ance, the

iio 1507

10

1 amount of such advance payment maybe recovered from any

2benefit otherwise due the eligible personunder any law ad-

3ministered by the Veterans'Adlninistration or such over- 4 payment shallconstitute a liability of sucheligible person 5 and may be recoveredin the same manner as any otherdebt

6due the United States." SEC. 204. Subdiapter IV ofchapter 34 of title 38,

8United States Code, is amendedby inserting hnmediately

9after section 1687 the following newsection:

10"§1688. Veteran-student employment

11 " (a) Notwithstanding anyother provision of law, the

12Administrator is authorized toutilize on an intermittent

13basis the services of veteran-studentswho are pursuing full-

14time program of education ortraining under chapters 31

15and 34 of this title. Such veteran-students maybe utilized

16to perfonn such services for theVeterans' Administration at

17such times and places as theAdministrator deems advisable.

18 " (b) Veteran-students utilized under theauthority of

19subsection (a) of this section shall be paid anhourly rate

20equivalent to the minimum rate for a grade inthe General

21Schedule contained in section 5332 of title 5,determined by

22the Administrator to be appropriate forthe services ren-

23dered. Such grade determination may, at theAdministra-

:21 tor's discretion, be based upon, but shall not besubject to,

181 1508

11

1 position classification standards issued by the Civil Service 2Commission pursuant to section 5105 of title 5. 3 " (e) While performing the services authorized by sub-

4section(a)of this section, such veteran-students shall not

5be deemed to be employees of the United States for the

6purposes of laws administered by the Civil Service Commis- sion. They shall, however, be considered to be employees

8of the United States for the purposes of the benefits of chap-

9ter 81 of title 5." 10 TITLE IIIEDUCAnoNAL ASSISTANCE 11 P14/611AM ADJUSTMENTS 12 SEC. 301. Section 1671 of title 38, United States Code,

13is amended to read as follows:

14 "Any eligible veteran, or individualon active duty, 15who desires to initiate aprogram of education under this

16ehopter shall submit an application to the Administrator

17which shall be in such form, and contain such information.

18as the Administrator shall prescribe. The application of an

19imfividual on active duty must be approved bya service

20education officer prior to its submission. The Administrator

21shall approve such application unless he finds that sneh 22ve:eran or individual is not eligible for or entitled to the 23educational assistance applied for, or that hisprogram of 24eduealionfailsto meet any of the requirements of this

182 1509

12

1 chapter, or that he is already qualified. TheAdministnttor

2shall notify the eligible veteran or individual of theapproval

3or disapproval of hisapplication."

4 SEC. 302. Clause (3) of subsection (1)) of section 1675

5of title 38, United States Code, is amended byinserting

6after the words "general locality" the following: "orwhere

7 the school has made a complete move withsubstantially

8the same faculty, curricula, and students, without achange

9in ownership".

10 SEC. 303. Subchapter III of chapter 34 of title 38,

11United States Code, is amended by inserting immediately

12after section 1677 the following new section:

13"§1678. Correspondence courses

14 " (a) (1)Each eligible veteran who is pursuing a 15 program of education exclusively by correspondence shall

16be paid an educational assistance allowance computed at the

17rate of 90 per cent= of the established charge whichthe

18institution requires nonveterans to pay for the course or

19courses pursued by the eligible veteran.The term 'est ab-

20fished charge' as used herein means the charge for the

21course or courses determined on thebasis of the lowest ex-

22tended time payment plan offered by the institution and ap-

23proved by the appropriate State approving agency or the

24actual cost to the veteran, whichever is the lesser. Such al- 1510

13 lowance shall be paid quarterly on a pro rata basis for the

2lessons completed by the veteran and serviced by the insti-

3tution.

4 " (2) The period of entitlement of any veteran who is

5pursuing any program of education exclusively by corre'-

6spondence shall be charged with one month for each $190

7which is paid to the veteran as an educational assistance

8allowance for such course.

9 " (b) In any case where an eligible veteran terminates

10his correspondence training before completing the required 11 number of lessons, the institution shall makea pro rata re-

12fund of moneys paid by such veteran and, in addition, such

13institution shall not charge the veteran with any registra-

14tion or similar fee in excess of $50."

15 SEC. 304. Section 1,682 of title 38, United States Code,

16is amended by-

17 (a) repealing subsection (c) thereof in its entirety;

18 and

A (b)redesignating subsection(d),as amended by

20 section 102 (d) of title I of this Act, as subsection (c).

21 SEC. 305. Section 1684 of title 38, United States Code, 22is amended by adding at the end of subsection (a) the fol- 23lowing new sentence: "Notwithstanding the provisions of 24clause (2)of this subsection, in the case of an institution 1511

14

14offering undergraduate courses leading to a standardcollege

15degree which are measured on a quarter or semester-hour

16basis and technical courses which are measured on aclock- 17 hour basis, any of such courses asdetermined by the educa-

18tional institution shall be measured on a semester-hour basis

19for the purpose of computing the educational assistance al-

20lowance payable under this chapter."

21 SEC. 306. (a) The heading for subchapter VI of chapter

2234 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking

23out "Predischarge" and inserting in lieu thereof "Prepara- 24 tory".

25 (b) Subsection (a) of section 1695 of title 38, United

14States Code, is amended to read as follows:

15 " (a) The purpose of this subchapter is to encourage and

16assist veterans in preparing for their future education, train-

17ing, or vocation by providing them with an opportunity to

18enroll in and pursue a program of education or training

19prior to their discharge or release from active duty with the 20 Armed Forces. The program provided for under this sub-

21chapter shall be known asthe Preparatory Education 22 Program (PREP) ."

23 SEC. 307. Subsection (a)of section 1701 of title 38,

24United States Code, is amended as follows:

25 (1) by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows : 1512

15

14 " (6) The term 'educational institution' means any

15 public or private secondary school, vocational school,

16 correspondence school, business school, junior college,

17 teachers college,college, normal school, professional

18 school, university, or scientific or technical institution, 19 or any other institution if it furnishes education at the

20 secondary school level or above."; and

21 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 22 paragraph: 23 " (9) For the purposes <3f-this chapter and chapter 24 36 of this title, the term 'training establishment' means 25 any establishment providing apprentice or other training

14 on-the job, including those under the supervision of a

15 college or university or any State department of educa-

16 tion, or any State apprenticeship agency, or any State

17 board of vocational education, or any joint apprenticeship

18 committee, or the Bureau of Apprenticeship rid Training 19 established pursuant to chapter 40 of 6'29, or any

20 agency of the Federal Government authorized to suj.sr-

21 vise such training."

22 SEC. 308. Section 1720 of title 38, United States Code, 23is amended by inserting after the first sentence in sub- 24section (a) thereof a new sentence as follows: "Such coun- 1513

16

1 seling shall not be required wherethe eligible person has

2been accepted for, or is pursuing, courseswhich lead to a

3standard college degree, at an approvedinstitution."

4 SEC. 309. The first sentence ofsubsection (c)of sec-

5tion 1723 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended to

6read as follows:

7 "The Administrator shall not approve theenrollment

8of an eligible person in any course ofinstitutional on-farm

9training, any course to be pursued by correspondence(ex- cept as provided insection 1727 of this chapter) ,open

circuit television (except as hereinprovided),or a radio, 11 4

12or any course tobe pursued at an educational institution

13not located in a State or in theRepublic of the Philippines." SEC. 310. Clause(3)of subsection(b)of section

151725 of title 38, United States Code, is amended byinsert- ing after the words "general locality" thefollowing: "or

17where the school has made a complete move withsubstan- tially the same faculty, curriculums, and students,without a

19change in ownership."

20 SEc. 311. Subchapter III of chapter 35 of title 38, 21 United States Code, is amended by insertinginunediately

22after section 1725 the following now sections: 23 1 1726. Special training for the educationally disadvan- 24 taged 25 " (a) In the case of any eligible widow or wife who-

187 1514

-17

", (1) has nut receiveda .secondary school diploma

2 (or equivalency certificate),and

:3 " (2) in order to pursue a program of education for 4 which she would otherwise be eligible, needs additional

5 secondary school training, either refresher coursesor de- 6 ficiency courses, toqualify for admission to an ap- 7 prvriate educational institution, 8the Administrator may, without regard to the provisions of

9section 1723 (d), approvethe enrollment of such widows OT 10 wives in an appropriate courseor courses to be pursued in a

11 State.

12 The Administrator shall pay eligible widowsor 13wives imrsning a course or courses pursuant to subsection 14 (a)of this section an educational assistance allowance as 15provided in sections 1731 and 1732 of this chapter; except 16that no enrollment in adult evening secondary school courses

17shall be approved in excess of half-time training as defined

18in section 1733 of this title.

19 (c) The educational assistance allowance authorized

20by this section shall be paid without charge toany period

21of entitlement the widow or, wife may have pursuant tosec-

22 tions 1710 and 1711 of this chapter.

23 "§1727. Correspondence courses 24 " (a) (1) Each eligible wifeor widow (as defined in section 1701 (a) (1)(B), (0), or (D) of this chapter)

188 1515

18

1 who is pursuing a program of education exclusively by cur-

2respondence shall ly3 paid an educational assistance

3ance computed at the rateof 99 per centum of the estab- 4 lished charge which the institution requires other individuals

5enrolled in the same program to pay. The term 'established

6charge' as used herein means the charge for tbe course or

7courses determined on thebasis of the lowest extended time 8 payment plan offered by the institution and approved by

9the appropriate State approving agency or the actual cost

10to such eligible person, whichever is thelesser. Such allow-

11ance shall be paid quarterly on a pro ratabasis for the

12lessons completed by the eligible person and serviced by

13the institution.

14 " (2) The period of entitlement of any eligible person 15 who is pursuing any program ofeducation exclusively by

16correspondence shall be charged with one month for each 17 $19 0 which is paid to the eligible person as aueducational

18assistance allowance for such course.

19 " (b) In any case where an eligible person terminates

20his correspondence training before completing the required

21 number of lessons, the institution shall make a pro rata 22 refund of moneys paid by such eligible person and, in

23addition, such institution shall not charge the eligible person

24with any registration or similar fee in excess of $50." 1516

19 SEC. 312. Section 1731 of title 38, United States Code, 2is amended by

e. (a)inserting in clause(2)of subsection(b) 4 immediately after the words "standard college degree" the following: " (excluding programs of apprenticeship and programs of other on-job training authoriml by 7 section 1738 of this title) "; and 8 (b) amending subsection(e)to read as follows: 9 " (e) No educational assistance allowance shall be paid

1()to an eligible person enrolled in a program of education con- sisting exclusively of correspondence mmrses for any period

12until the Administrator slmll have received (1)from the

13eligible person n certificate ato the mnnber of le4sons

14actually completed by the eligible person and serviced by

15the institution, and (2) from the educational institution,a

16certification,or an endorsement on the eligible person's

17certificate, as to the number of lessons completed by the eligible person and serviced by the institution."

19 SEC. 313. Clause (2) of subsmtion (a) of section 1732

20of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

21end thereof the following: "Notwithstanding provisions of

22section 1731 of this title, payment of the educational assist:- 23ance allowance provided by this clause may be made to an 24eligible person in all amount computed for the entire quarter, 1517

20 following the 1semester, or term duringthe month iminediately

2month in which certification isreceived from the edncatiimal pursniwz a 3institution that the personhas enrolled in and is 4 program at such institution."

5 SEc. 314. Subsection(a) of section 1733 oftitle 38,

6United States Code, isamended to read as follows:

7 (a) For the purposes ofthis chapter of- 8 " (1) an institutionaltrade or technical course in- 9 fered on a clock-hour basisbelow tlw college level shall 10 volving shop practice as anintegral part thereof, minimum of 11 be considered afull-time course when a

12 thirty hours per week ofattendance is required with

13 no morethan two and one-halfhours of rest periods per

14 week alloweth

15 " ( 2 ) an institutional eourseoffered on a clock-hour theoretical or 16 basis below the collegelevel in which

17 classroom instructionpredominates shall beconsidered twenty-live hours 18 a full-time coursewhen a minimum f

19 per week netof instruction(which may include cus-

20 tomary intervals not toexceed ten minutesbetween

21 hours of instruction) isrequired;

22 " (3) an academichigh school courserequiring full- 23 sixteen units for a full courseshall be considered a is 24 time course when aminimum of four units per year

25 required. For the purposeof this chutse, a unit isdefined

71-815 0 - 72 - 13 191 1518

21 1 to be not less tlmn one hundred and twenty sixty-minute

2 hours or their equivalent of study inany subject in one 3 academic year;

4 " (4) an institutional undergrahatecourse offered

5 by a college or university on a quarter-or semester-

hour basis shall be considered a full-timecourse when 7 a minimum of fourteen semester hours or the equivalent 8 thereof, for which credit is granted toward a standard

9 college degree (including those for whichno credit is 10 granted but which are required to be taken to correct

11 an educational deficiency),isrequired,except that 12 where such college or university certifies,upon the 13 request of the Administrator, that (A) full-time tuition 14 is charged toall undergraduate students carrying a

15 minimum of less than fourteen such semester hoursor 16 the equivalent thereof, or (B)all undergraduate stn.- 17 dents carrying a minimum of less than fourteen such. 18 semester hours or the equivalent thereof, are consid- 19 ered to be pursuing a full-time course for other admin- 20 istrative purposes, then such an institutional under- 21 graduate course offered by such college or university 22 with such minimum number of such semester hours 23 shall be considered a full-time course, but in the event 24 such minimum number of semester hours is less than 25 twelve semester hours or the equivalent thereof, then

11'2 1519

22 shall twelve semesterhours or theequivalent thereof and 2 be considered afull-time course; of apprenticeship or aprogram 3 " (5) a program considered a fall-time 4 of other on-jobtraining shall be is required towork 5 programwhen the eligible person the standardworkweek 6 the number ofhours constituting workweek of less 7 of the trainingestablishment, but a considered toconstitute 8 than thirty hoursshall not be number of hourshas 9 full-time trainingunless a lesser workweek for the par- 10 been established asthe standard collective bar- tieular establishmentthrough bona fide clause (2) of 12 gaining. Notwithstandingthe provisions of institution offering 13 this subsection,in the case of an leading to a standardcollege de- 14 undergraduate courses measured on a quarter orsemester-hour 15 gree which are which are measured on a 16 basis and technical courses such courses asdetermined by the 17 clock-hour basis, any shall be measured on asemester- 18 educational institution educational hour basis for the purposeof compufing the payable under thischapter." 20 assistance allowance chapter 35 of title38, 21 SEC. 315.Subchapter IV of by insertingimmediately 22United StatesCode, is amended section: 23after section1737 the following new on-job training 24'11738. Apprenticeshipor other section 1701 (a) 25 " (a) An eligible person(as defined in 1520

'23

1of this clmpter) may receive the benefits of this chapter 2while pursuing, in a State, a full-time- 3 " (1)program of apprenticeship a.pproved by a 4 State approving agency as meeting the standards of 5 apprenticeship published by the Secretary of Labor

6 pursuant to section 50a of title29,or

7 " (2) program of other training on the jobap- 8 proved under the provisions of section 1777 of this 9 title,

10subject to the conditions and limitations of this chapter with 11 respect to eduCational assistance. 12 " (b) (1) The monthly training assistance allowance 13of such eligible person pursuing a program described under 14subsection (a) shall be (A) $160 during the first six-month 15period, (B) $120 during the second six-month period, (C) 16880 during the third six-month period, and (1)) $40 dur- 17 ing the fourth and any succeeding six-month period. 18 " (2) In any month in which an eligibleperson pur- 19 suing a program of apprenticeship or apogram of other 20 on-job tmining fails to completeone litindred and twenty 21 hours of training in such month, the monthly trainingas- 22 sistance allowance set forth in subsection(b) (1)of this 23 section shall be reduced proportionately in the proportion 24 that the number of hours worked bears to one hundred and 25 twenty hours rounded off to the nearest eight hours.

S. 1521

24

1 (c) For purposes of thischapter and t,hapter 36 of 'pro- 2 this title, the terms 'programof apprenticeship' and

3gram of otheron-job training' shall havethe same meaning

4as 'programof education': and the term'training assistance

5allowance' shall have the samemeaning as 'educational as-

6 sistance allowance'."

SEC. 316. Section 1777 oftitle 38, United StatesCode,

8is a meilded

9 (a) by amending clauses( I ) and (2) of subsec-

10 tion (b) to read as Mows:

11 " (1) the wages tohe paid the eligible veteran or

12 eligible person (A) upon entranceinto training, are

13 not,lessthan the wages paidother nonveterans in

14 the same training positionand arc atleast, 50 per

15 centma of the wagespaid for the job forwhich he is

16 to be trained, and(II)such wages will heincreased

17 inregular periodic incrementsuntil, not later than

18 the last full month ofthe training period, theywill

19 be at least 85 per centumof the wages paid for the

20 job for which sucheligible veteran or eligible person

21 is being trained; and

22 " (2)there is reasonable certaintythatthe job

23 for which the eligible veteran oreligible person is to

24 be trained will be available tohim at the end of the

25 training period."; and 1522

25 1 h) by inserting "or eligible person" inmwdiately 2 after "eligible veteran" each place itappears in sub- 3 section (c).

4 SEC. 317.The table of sections at the beginning of

5chapter 34 of tide 38, United States Code, is amendedby : 6 (a) inserting immediately after

"1077.Flight training."

7 the following:

"1678.Correspondenm conrses."; 8 (b) inserting hmnediately after

"1087.Discontinuance of allowances."

9 the following:

"1688.Vetentn-st talent employment." ;

10 and ii (c) striking out "SUBCHAPTER VIPREDISCHARGE EDUCATION PROGRAM"

12 and inserting in lien thereof: "SITBCHAPTER VIPREPARATORY EDUCATION PROGRAM"

13 SEC. 318. Table of sections at the beginning ofchapter 1435 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by: 15 (a) inserting immediately after "1725. Period of operation for approval."

16 the following:

"1726. Special training for the eduentionally disadvantaged. "1727. Correspondence comes.",

17 and

126 26 after 1 (b) inserting inunediately

"1737. Specialized vocationaltraining courses."

2 the !Awing: -17:1S. Apprenticeship Orother on-job (mining". TITLE IVEFFECTIVEDATES become ef- 4 SKr. 401. Titles I andII of tlils Act shall fective on tho first dayof the second calendarmonth fol-

6lowing the month in whichenacted. effective 7 SEC. 402. Section 30:3 ofthis Act shall become which occurs 8upon the firstenrollment of an eligible veteran fol- 9on orafter the first day ofthe second calendar month

10lowing the month in whiChenacted. Sm. 403. Section 305and the last sentence ofsection 12 314 of this Act shallbecome effective upon thefirst enroll-

13ment or subsequentre-enrollment of an eligible veteran or the enactment 14person which occursafter the effective date of

15of this Act.

197 Veterans' Administration recommendation, introduced as H.R. 3349

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE orrulE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFMRS, TV ashington,D.0.,January X, /977. Hon. C.un. ALIWRT, Speaker of the House of Representatives, IV ashington, D.C. DEAR MR. SPEAKER : Enclosed is a draft bill to amend title 38, United States Code, in order to authorize the Administrator to make advance educational assistance payments to certain veterans. The draft bill would authorize the Administrator to make an initial ;alvance payment of the educational assistance allowance granted under chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, to veterans enrolled in an educational institution half-time or more, plus tlw allowance for 1 full month, upon receipt of proof that the eligible veteran has been accepted for enrollment in an approved educational institution. Such payment would be made not earlier than the first of the month in which pursuit of the program is to commence. Thereafter, payments would continue to be made in advance at the beginning of each month in which the veteran pursues his program of education. The veteran who enrolls in institutional training must make arrange- ments for the payment of his tuition either prior to commencement of classes or shortly thereafter. The amount which he is required to pay often will deter the veteran from entering training because his initial out lay will i.ra in oft his available funds. Under existing law, the veteran can receive only a partial month payment of his Veterans' Administration educational assistance allow- ance after he has completed his first calendar month of training. This payment is received after the necessary enrollment data has been sub- mitted by the school and processed by the Veterans' Administration. By authorizing the advance, payment when he has been accepted for euollment, lie can be provided with funds to meet initial tuition and ongoing subsistence needs. Administrative control over the propriety of such payment is pro- vided for by aut horizing the Administrator to withhold final payment of an enrollment period until proof of satisfactory pursuit of the program is furnished. Certification requirements for the pursuit of flight training and correspondence courses would be retained. The draft bill would carry out the recommendation of the President in his message of this date on measures not enacted during the 91st Congress. An advance payment proposal was included among the rec- omnwndations contained in the March 1970 report of the President's Committee on the Vietnam Veteran and was incorporated in draft legislation submitted to the Congress last year. We believe that the measure will serve a threefold purpose. It will aid the veteran by providing him with the monetary allowance at the time of his greatest need; it will be helpful to the Veterans' Adminis- tration by simplifying procedures for making the initial payment of the educational assistance allowance at the time school enrollments are at their peak; and it will remove much of the pressure from edu- cational institutions in me6ing enrollment certification requirements. 128 9ZcI

popaupso pup luompuuo Jo gip p 4ju1 u0pupy.101 pplom xi! pasuaaput sSuiwo ut ppm rua.x 6T I,z; Jo mt; uo!ipLu oAt am posopt: 01(4 oaujo Jo quoLuojuutiN puu iwipuff 1111(4 atogi si ou uoqaafcio 04 mu 1Io9ul1Iosaul JO siq psodoad `uoputsp`lo[ puu lulu %II lutmulOullo pluom aq ut p.103Dli twAt Jo imp luop!sam ,tilaumu!s (rivwki NO10:1 volnapptpupy

V rrIM oj, pIIIIlu 0I111 pallori Rams '41)03 113 Jap.lo ozpot11011 ati; .1011rwmpupv 03 anion .1411 ptuoiruattpa 0300391980 quatuSild tu03.).% 911 dff 1)dpill0 fig alfl pl(3) ONli011 Jo ted.liioludto.uldu Jo ogi NINA tols Jo V nobum 88,10003 'paiqucuttto nu, 3 si1011a0sqns pint (,)) JO 11011408 isot JO owl P0ill1;1 IS $op %Imo .).111 impubmiu 1)110.1 su smollo,f : , (P) OILL 301110I8IuIllipV 'Hugs 1d,1ax.1 poplsoml posqus 110! (0) JO Jo 1111 maunilloano '110104N 51111 WU 1114111h) 11:11111 031111gSISSII 00(11:AMillt 1041.111 110 010ur:110 1111.1apm 01 1111 JIlIlOIlID loll 01 i0a.m-.0 11:411p0 1111101 HIM 01111 441111 .10j 0111 qiumu 00 11011.mj, 3000,0114 Iii 110111. 11118.111(1 0114 ulltarioad 'Option:m10m it! s11 a113 111:01110 11111o1 14818811 0411 11.101111 0.01 .10J 0110 1111.1 1101111 11 .1oJ 00 1116110110J 111 11 11 pa4a 1(1 Jo road 11111 1 1 a1) 010101111 11.1410A 8011 11a.ui 1)01(100011 1 Hulls Ii 1110Ao.old 10001111a111)0 Ism uotiu allt!)-Jimi .10 0.10111 .sistu1 galls ualuSud 110111st 41)) 1011 .101 0p11111 .101101:0 111311) 0111 11 480 Sup JO 011) Imittua nnsand J0 tutu.:10.1(1 s! 01 00u01111u04 pl,m1htsqus $lualu.Sud jo ittu011ttaup0 u 0411111s!s8 -moult oallu Ul5 II I opmu vita mum!! II! si13 '001111 parglis 04 !pus 51.10d.).1 tutu jtstall JO S.topuls!Jits Aus.tu(1 JO Ipus .10114/48111)1111n7 Sum Italsliwilpv 001 Sum itimpol.t% 0111 luttu 1110111.1ml Jo nu am110011.) III 1)011041 !Dint gaits joold s!. pasiaaat imu 0111 lunOtuu Solula(10.1(Idu Taisufpu n 41(1, 1111 1 111 1 JO 010 110.101.M 11J 1:11 01 (punt) It! am 48.1110.) 0,)1,111 1404.1 .1111(.1 luou1Sud 110118 og 13.01p4 11011 H 1 14MS:i11 0.01 '001111.110110 011 1111101110 Jo lup11 o.u1 Sud maw Sum .1.10111 111 .11 -1111111111 -1/0a0.t0a01 11104 II lI 111011011 10 081A1.1011 011p 0111 110.1414A SOO ptuam sq am s1tuaapA 1811111111/V 0.1 IIOU .10 110(18 1110111.iltd14.t0 (WIN amilistwar 011111:: .101111101I su .q!up:11 Jo !pus Intaolos pm: S11111 p0.1JA031.1 III 010 Sulu .141110 Nap oup 0111 1 111f 1)01 saitti (4) 0 luttoispattpa oattumssit dattuAtOut: Hugs 0(1 mud 04 u tittaap.t JO .10 Pimento U Ii lutt.11-10.141 JO tumitatip Slosistilax.,-) 4112)11 21till!lu1 Hugs s.tull Slas!sttpx.) St! 4an0pitodso.1.100 .10.1 p01.14(I 1111m alp tifillualslultuity -itast,304.1 04 sill 111111411 00ultpu0lilt 2ulattp (I) limaj om!...1110 Itimmas stt U 01001)11.W Sit poljad 43mo% 0111 tuu.1;.(13,1 s! itansaud '4011,tpum180.1000 0) IJ J0(100111 JO $31088.11 Sllumall p0441(1m0.1 t! at!) itu.t010.% p111: pamAlas 0111 .110!Jullisiiii pun 110 OM (r.) 1110.tj 4111 11:110!litanito 1811! '1101.1t4! u 1mm:0111410a pl4ul0sa0p110 as.nuta JO ,1111.101.1.1 1.144 '011:3111 lutp 11.1118 11110,tios sus% 1)0110.1114 II! Putt 1-1111118.111(1 tt 11 1101 11J -11.111pa 0.Mpo .t011.1 11.1118 p01.1011 ittItt III 1 411 .180.) JO 1111 1s111 III 111111181 Jo itioulas.mptio 11014 01 11 in:0014s SiosIstilaxa ',0110010,1s0amia u '041101111000 nu utt.1010S uo 0111 .). OJ 11.1 $,II '011:01111000 st: 04 Jul no .1,0101 JO Sllos:S41 PO101(10103 Sti Putt paolsaits St! 010'11111pm! 7...3.4s sm.]; lav !Imp 0111000q a.tila,u10 am pm!! Sup JO OIL! .18 putta attp1t011:0 Jo 0111 inuout 2ulmoiloj Jul 111110111 II! tialust 'palattim lug ou oaltuspil 1110111.Si0d luti0rptmly0 oaultisissu oaltlutowit paml.totilnu .1aplut "av nulls og JS.I OLD Jo Nut( .101.1(1 01 alp posu .1u4S Lt! 1l litIj inuom Jo 1)01.10d watulloalto .s.10000

G6T 1526

Veterans' Adninistration report on H.R. 6904

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR uP VETERANS' AFFAIRS Wa Rhington, D.C., April 27, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on. V eteran.0 Affairs, flow of Representatives. iVadthigton, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 6904, 92d Congress, a bill to anwnd title 38, ITnited States Code, in order to authorize the admin- istrator to make advance educational assistance payments to certain veterans. H.R. 6904 would authorize the administrator to make an initial advance payment of the educational assistance allowance granted under chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, to veterans enrolled in an educational institution half-time or more, plus the allowance for 1 full month, upon receipt of proof that the eligible veteran has been accepted for enrollment in an approved educational institution. Such payment would be made not earlier than the 1st of the month in which pursuit of the program is to commence. Thereafter, payments would continue to be made in advance at the beginning of each month in which the veteran pursues his program of education. The bill is identical to the draft bill transmitted to the Speaker with my letter of January 260971, urging its enactment which is set forth in House Committee Print No. 4copy enclosed, and which was in- troduced as H.R. 3349. We were advised by the Office of Management and Budget in connection with that letter that there was no objection to the presentation of the draft bill and that its enactment would be in accord with the proaram of the President. It is estimated thaeenactment of the bill would result in increased outlays in fiscal year 1972 of $55 million. We recommend favorable consideration of H.R. 6904 by your committee. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, AdminietratOr. Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 3262 andH.R. 5053

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., June 24, 1971. HOD. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 3262and H.R. 5053, identical 92d Congress bills to amend title 38 of theUnited States Code to make the children of certain veterans having aservice- connec ted disabilityrated at not less than 50 per contum eligible for benefits under the war orphans' educational assistance program. These bills would amend section 1701(a)(1) of title 38,United States Code, to expand the definition of "eligibleperson" to include the child of a peram who has a service-connecteddisability of not less than 50 percent, arising out of service after thebeginning of the Spanish-American War. The educational assistance allowance payable to those children made eligiblefor benefits by this legislation would be limited to the same ratio of theallowance provided under sections 1732 and 1742 of title 38, UnitedStates Code, as the service-connected disability bears to 100 percont. (The first three sectionsof H.R. 3262 and H.R. 5053 amending sections 1701, 1732, and1742 are technically deficient in their adaptation to the presentlanguage of these sections.) The periods of eligibility currently set forth insection 1712 of title 38 would remain unchanged ; however,provision is made in the subject bills to permit any person made eligible thereunderwho is between the ages of 17 and 23 years on the dateof enactment to remain eligible until the expiration of 5 years from the dateof enactment. It should be noted that Public Law 90-77 extended the upperlimit of the basic eligibility period from the eligible person's 23dbirthday to his 26th birthd ay. The purpose of the War Orphans'Educational Assistance Act of 1956 (Public Law 634, 84thCongress) was to provide educational assistance to the children of veterans who died of disease orinjury incurred or aggravated in line of duty, thefinancial assistance being designed to replace what the veteran ordinarily wouldhave provided. War orphans educational assistance benefits weresubsequently ex- tended (Public Law 88-361) to the children of veteranswho have a service-connected total disability permanent in nature,thereby recog- nizing that a veteran so disabled would encounterspecial difficulties in providing college or other advance educationfor lus children. We are of the view that the benefits provided underthe war orphans' educational assistance program should continue to bAlimited to those children who have been deprived of completeparental support by reason of death ortotal and permanent disability of the child's parent. Moreover, it is noted that additional assistance throughincreased disability compensation on account of thechildren for whom assistance is sought under H.R. 3262 and H.R. 5053has recently been granted through the enactment of Public J2aw,91-376,approved August 12,

201, 1528

1970. That law increased to $44 and $35, respectively, the additional allowance for dependents per month granted under sections 315 and 335 of title 38 to a totally disabled veteran on account of a, child over tho age of 18 years who is pursuing a course of instruction at an approved school, with proportionately lesser amounts payable on account of the children of veterans who are rated partially disabled, but not less than 50 percent. It is estimated that the first year's direct, benefit cost of H.R. 3262 or H.R. 5053, if enacted, would be $39.1 million and the direct benefit cost over the first 5 years would be $301.2 million. A table detailing an estimate of partAcipation by individuals and costs over the first 5 years follows:

Number of Direct benefits Fiscal year Individuals (in millions)

1st 50, 000 $39. 1 2d 85, 000 65. 1 3d 90, 000 68. 2 4th 89, 000 67. 5 5th 81, 000 61. 3 _ _ .... _ 5-year total . _...... 301. 2 In addition to the direct benefits costs, enactment of either of these measures would also entail additional administrative costs resulting from required counseling. It is estimated that these additional adminis- trative costs would approximate $9.7 million the first year mid $24.6 million over the first 5 years. A table setting forth details on these estimates follows:

Cost (in millions)

Gukfance Personnel Fiscal year Counselings center fees and travel Total

1st 101, 000 $6.2 $3.5 $9. 7 2d 67, 000 3.9 2.6 6. 5 3rd 34, 000 1.5 1.7 3. 2 4th 30, 000 1.3 1.5 2. 8 5th 25, 000 I. 1 1.3 2. 4

5-year total 14.0 10.6 24. 6 In estimating costs as set forth above, we have assumed the date of enactment would approximate the beginning of fiscal year 1972 and that the upper age limit for the 5-year extension of training would be changed to "below the age of twenty-six years." For the foregoing reasons, we recommend against favorable action by your comnuttee on H.R. 3262 or H.R. 5053. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the standpoint of the administration's program Sincerely, DONALI'E. Joitxsox, Adm in istrator. 1529

Veterans' Administration report onH.R. 56',:and H.R. 8662, a bill introducedfollowing submission of tais report

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF'VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington; D.O., July 741971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE;'" Chairnuzri, COntmittee 'on. Veterans'Affairs, House qf Representatives, . : Washington, D.O. . . MR. CHAIRMAN: This will'. respond to:your retest for a report. ;by .the Veterans'Administration on H.R. 5694, 92 QOngress, a amend. fide' 38,. ViiitedState§ 'Code, to pernift.')*eterans' educational assistance payMents to eapplied 'to 'tile re.paythent' of prograths entel'ed into by'Veterans educational 1.6ans .under . before ComMeneing active service, The Would '.airmid subchapter...ITO'Chapter- 34. 'Of title .38, Uhited .Stats COde; 1)Rdd lug a'new spetioi,) 1688.Permitting e6rtain eligible 'vetiwans it§SistlinCe benefits earneidunder the'Gr bill' for repayment' of' educationalloans Made to them mid& IfariOas. Federal progranis 'prior 6,theirentry ihto active servicC.' Scetion 1 o:r the meisptti Would.parmit .certiiih veterans tO ápjIy to. the Athuitiistratoifor. iepay*.nt Of all or part.-of ail klucational loan entered' into.prior to,commencethent of 'active fluty Wher'euch loan %Vas ntilized to finance-educational course work undertakenbefOre that date and which was provided orguaranteed under a Fdderal program: 'Repayment, which wouldbe made :directly to theeiWitor, Would tie granted proVided:thoedUCtitional'course work for which the eligible veteyan obtained the loanwould he apprdved as a program cif etiocatio.ii hithin the ProvisiOnSof chaPter.34;. the veteran did.ii6( telinin*p the Piogi.am -because,' of i.easons.61 unsatisfaetory progress dr.hiS.pWn misconduct or neglect;the loan iS evidenced by a note dr other writeen .a.greement Creating abinding obligation under 'applicable.' law; and the proceed§ of the loanwer6 in fact used to , financehis" educationai pursuit. :The repaythent amotint wouild becomputed on the basis' f the %'et( .tin's dependency status atthe time of his application;wonld be limited' VS. tho tOtal hinouht OfeduChtiOnal assistance to whigh' ie would.li' entitled under chapter 34 and 1iieducational entit104nt wouhl be redUCed. by 'the amouni of tberepayment. 'Section 2 of the nuásure Proifides:that, with respect *tojhe pe servieelOO,'"the repayniera .aufhority gralitedund.er section; 1 'ould.' apply to any pi.eservice lban made 'on orfitter the 'date 'di the enhet- inent.;.orciithe case of a person oh actiVe' duty atthe' tiMe of 'the bill's enaetifient, t6 anY loan mit& beforesuejt date; or, in theCase of, a. veteran onti.tled to educational.asistahee under chapter34: on the (lat.& of 64a0ment; 'any.lOan'made'before suCh date. The basic 'philosophy-of the eduCationalassistance prograth vided in the GI bill is to help thereturning veteran adjustfroM

4.10? 1530

military to civilian life by affording him'monetarv aid to obtain the educational status he might normally have aspire'dto and obtained had he not served his country in time ofnational emergeiwy. It has never been intended as either a financial bonus for havingserved (re as a reimbursement for preservice educational cost, paidor unpaid. Enactment of thismeasure wiAildot 6 believe, represent a significant departu ^e; from this Junderly;ingpypor pf ;the GI bill program. rhe MeiSiire Wmild be diserunniatoryin vaiieliA Way's. The Veteran' who could not ,obtaina loan but. who worked his way through school would not benefit,nor would the veteran who used his savings to finance, his schooliog:, It, is reasonableto assume that those veterans would initiate deinands for equalityof treatment through, reiniburse:-: went. An equitable basis. of distinction betweensuchgtoups and those: who would benefit from the bill is (fiificultto ascertam. the,bill would .create inequities within the 4)ecialclass it is Seeking .to aid. Th,e yeteran' whohas majle 110.0p-tient to'redUce the 'outatanding:lean emit()have...the entire debt paid 'off;,ene while whO.,partiallY, paid hii lean-. Would. benefitiO lesser '6xteqt., Yet; thel may hAve, taken the saMe training,at th'e.saMe time: '1 he proposed payments are' 'foia preSeOice iiieurred debt,"which; may have covered trainingcompleted before entering ainilitaryieiyiee Obligation. The current GI bill created'4 reServoir 'of more than 3 Million men who-servedbetween February 1', 1955, and itS 'effective date Of J110'1,1966, moat Of whon Weii.education And training,' They did'not receiVe 'any: retreactiie 'benefit for .trainMg complete0prior to the enaCtMent Of ,the 01 bill neirwere retroietive 46016 provided. wider either theWorld ,War or liorean MO& This bill woiikl' create a retrnitetive benefitfor a speCial 'dais. There would . appear to be nO equitable basis for the. creationOf thiS special clasiof. beneficiaries. . Weare Of the vie w. that' there .would be a great temptation' to the veteran who Is already:trained and, Whohas an Out.Standiiig Federal' ediwational lean to apply all of his entitlementto Pay for such' a loan. rather than to uie the benefit to stUdy the advancesmade in 'hia educational field during, his period 'of active duty. The demandsof our society are such that, with .everchanging advancesin technology,. graduate training has became eoniinonplace and .notthe'exeeption'.- If a 'veteran exhausts .his educational assistance allowance "to offset'a prior loan, the allOwanCe would not be 'availableto continue his educa don, thus again thwarting thepurpose of the veterans' educational assistance program. . Much of the information neededas a basis for estimating the cost of H.R. 5694 is not available. HoweVer, basedon various asSumptions we estimate the direct benefit cost for the first year. would be $372.2 million and the first 5-year direct benefitcost would be $618.8 million. A breakdown stating:the .nuinerous tiSkiinptiOnson which our cost e§timate is baied, as well as a. detailed 5-year Cost figure, isincluded aS attachrnent to thia report. For the foregoilig reaSOns, we recommend, against faVorable.action. by,your corninittee on H.R. 5694. The views expresSed in ;this report'are equally applicable to H.R. 8662, an identiCal 92d COngress bill;upon which you dim) requested a report. 1531

We are advised by the 01.ficeof Management. and Budgetthat there is no objection to the presentationof this report from thestandpoint of the Administration's program.. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON', Admini.trator. Enclosure. COST ESTIMATEH.R. 5694,921) CONGRESS Much of the informationneeded as a basis for estimatingthe cost of this proposal is notavailable; therefore, this attempt to assessthe likely magnitude of cost underthis proposal is based upon thefollowing assumptions: FIRgT ASSUMPTION The eatiniate 3f. veterans towhom .this benefit sfouM beapplicable is based upon Department ofDefense estimates ofseparations:from the .Armed Forces fromfiscal year 1902 to date, andprojected to646al year 1976::: ;1 !,. SECOND ASSUMPTION Veterans returning. to civil life areexpected to request full repayment of, the, remainingbahince on their loan when thefirst postservice pay- ment becomes duewithin 1 year of separation. THIRD ASSUMPTION The rate of.annualrepayment of these loans usually mustbe equal to at least one-tenthof the loan.

FOURTH ASSUMPTION , . Based on information fromthe .9ffice of Education, we.have es'ti- mated that the weighted averagcloap will be $833 in fiseal year1972. We have anticipated an increaseof 6 percent per year fromthis point, and a 4-percent decrease per year,retrospectively.,

FIFTH ASSUMPTION Past experience 'concerningthe proportion of chapter 34trainees who had completed 1 or more yearsOf college prior toservice will remain relatively unchanged. Thisexperience is as follows: 1 yearcollege- 6.5 percent; 2 yearscollege-4.4 percent; 3 yearscollege-1.8 percent; 4 years college-6.3 percent;and 5 years college-2.5 percent.

SIXTH ASSUMPTION Estimates obtained fromparticipating Federal agenciesindicate that approximately one in four personsin college Obtains a loan.However, in view of the liberality ofthis proPosal, kisanticipated that after enactment of this bill theparticipation rate for veteranswould increase to 30 percent.

21.Z 1532

SEVENTH ASSIMPTiON tis estimated that of those veterans who will obtain loans, the average number of loans is one for each year of college aperience.

EIGHTH ASSU erI ON The number, of. eligible persons who will request loan :repayment, without having entered training will be about two-thirds as large as the number of trainees who will request such repaytnent. ,,.. . '

. - .. ..,... . . :.:i , NINTH. ASSUMPTION' :. . Loans by college students comprise .about, 98 percent of the total number of loans. The other 2 percent will be from schools below the college level:.;This assumption iS based ..on 'Office oLEducation . .. ( : exp_erience.,- . ,- .. . -.. !,,.k Based upon; UK foregoing assumptions, it 6 estimated. that te.'cost: of enactment of H.R. 5694 over the first 5 years will be as follows:.,,

. -t Direct -Persons using repayment plan . benefits . cost Trainees Others' ,(miltfons)

Fiscal yea r- 1972. 1 169,000 . 112, 003 281, 000 $372. 2 1973 21,00'3 13, 000 34, 000 72.6 1974 17, 000 11, 000 28, 000 60, 1 1975 -; . 16, 000 11,009 26, 000, . ; 59. 4 1976 13, 000 9, 000 22, 000 54. 5

5-year total 618. 8

The separation rates on which the,above estimates are basedare frequently revised by the Armed' Forees. If the sharp decfineiniepara- tion rates estimated by the Department of .DefenS6 (fikal t ear 1972. through fiscial year 1976) do(4 not Occur, the costs estimated EtboVe would be proportionately indeaSed:' The amount of administrative cost cannot be determined until administrative procedures which would be required to implement this proposal arc further defined, but these costs,are eNpected .to be substantial. The aboVe estimates do,not include administrative costs. . , .

206 Veterans' Administrationreport on H.R. 232,H.R. 2523, and H.R. 4864

VETERANS/ ADMINISTRAnONI OFFICE OF THEADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., July 16,1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee onVeterans' Affairs, House of Representatives,Washimgton, D.C. request for a report DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN:This will respond to your by the Veterans'Administration on H.R. 232,H.R.2523, and H.R. 4864, identical 92dCongress bills, to amendtitle 38 of the United certItin active duty fortraining to be counted States Code to permit benefits under as activeduty for purposes ofentitlement to educational chapter 34 of such title. section 1652(a) (3) and1661(a) of title These bills would amend "active 38, United StatesCode, to enlarge thedefinition of the term duty" in the case ofcertain veterans. Those whoserved for a period of active duty pursuant to acall or order thereto issuedto them aftkr August. 4, 1964, as Reserves ormembers of the NationalGuard or Air National Guardof any State, and who areeligible veterans for the purposes ofeducational assistance as aresult of such duty, may include any period of not morethan 6 consecutive monthsof full- time dutyperformed bythem after January 31,1955, for the purpose military training pursuant totheir military of obtaining initial would be deemed tobe Reserve componentobligation. That period active duty for the purposesof chapter 34 of title 38. The current GI bill(Veterans' ReadjustmentBenefits Act of 1966, amended) limits educationalbenefits to veterans whohave served as than 180 days, andspecifically on activeduty for a period of more the excludes any periodduring which anindividual served under active duty for trainingprovisions of section 511(d)of title 101United of any period of activeduty for training in States Coae. The exclusion also provided in the computation ofeligibility and entitlement was GI bill. the Korean conflict exclusion was that apersonwho had no The rationale for such an period of Reserve prior service by enlistingin a standard 6-year training in an (ration would only receiveup to 6months of basic active duty fortraining status, followingwhich he was generally expected to merelyattend adesignated number ofdrills annually, usually in the evenings or onweekends, and serve a2-week tour of training, each year for alimited number of years. active duty for such as is The granting ofeducational benefitspremised on service would appear to be adeparture from the re- proposed in these bills successive GI bill adjustment concept. Theprimary purpose of each veterans in theirreadjustment frommilitary to has been to assist concluded civilian life. Congress,in enacting theselaws, obviously

71-815 0 - 72 - 14 1534 that the readjustment needs of personswho serve for comparatively short periods of time on active duty fortraining are not comparable to the needs of those who arerequired to serve on active duty for periods which are generally not less than 18months and are usually longer. Fulfillment of the military servio3requirement under a Reserve program permits a moreorderly planning of an educational program than would be possible if educationalplans were to be interrupted for a period of 2 years or more. Current law recognizes thosesituations which may require readjust- ment benefits such as injury ordisease incurred during active duty under section 511(d) of title 10,United States Code. Thus, should a reservist suffer an injury or disease while onactive duty for training or regularactive duty, he is entitled to the same compensationbenefits as other veterans.In addition, should he become economicallyincapaci- tated due to service-connected disease orinjury, he is entitled to vo- cational rehabilitation up to 48 months,which is in excess of the 36 months educational allowance maximumunder the GI bill. The Reserve Forces report from theDepartment of Defense to the Congress stated that 14,811 members ofReserve units were called to regular active duty service in January 1968,and that another group of 21471 was called to active dutir servicein May 1968 (the most recent callup). The average length of t active duty was approximately 15 months. Under existing law, each eligible veteranreceives 11/2 months (or the equivalent thereof in part-time educationalassistance) for each month or fraction thereofof his service on active duty after January 31,1955. If, however, an eligible veteran hasserved a period of 18 months or more on active dutyafter January 31, 1955, and has been released from such service under conditions that wouldsatisfy his active duty obliga- tion, he is entitled to educational assistancefor a period of 36 months. Any reservist who is called to active duty for morethan 180 days earns entitlement to educational benefits on the samebasis as regular mem- bers of the Armed Forces. Under somecircmnstances, the extension of entitlement to cover the initial basicperiod of active duty for train- ing as contemplated by the subject bills wouldresult in a dispropor- tionate accrual of entitlement. For example,if a reservist served a period of 12 months on active duty the extensionof entitlement for 6 months of active of active duty for trainingpreviously served in con- nection with his enlistment m a militaryReserve component would then, under the provisions of the subjectbills, give him a total of 18 months creditable service and, therefore, hewould be eligible for 36 months of educational benefits. Likewise, if a reservist completed 2 weeks activeduty for training annually dui ing the years 1956 through 1968, or atotal of 26 weeks, he would acquire entitlement for educationalassistance based upon 6 months active duty which, as indicatedabove, would be entirely con- trary to the rationale forexclusion of periods of active duty for train- ing as a basis for eligibility foreducational benefits. You also requested a report on H.R. 298and H.R. 6148, similar purpose. 92d Congressbills. These measures are identical in purpose with the three measures cited earlierin this report except that I-I.R. 298 and HR. 6148 limit the aboveservice to active duty in an area

208 1535

by the President ofthe United States. It designated as a combat zone rather than the areas wherethe is our view thatthe period of service should be the governingfactor. The fact that aveteran veteran served in acombat zone should notoffer him had been designated to serve position would controvert cur- greater entitlementto benefits. Such a for all vet- rent policywhich providesnondiscriminatory treatment riod. erans servingduring the same pe National It is estimatedthat at least 60 percentof the Reserves, National Guard called, orordered, to tictive dutyafter Guard, and Air full entitlement on thebasis of August 4, 1964,already have earned for the others is prior active duty. The averageperiod of active duty monthn, thereby makingthis group eligible for estimated to be 12 to 14 would credit addi- an initial 18to 21 months ofentitlement. The bills these veterans. tional entitlement to of the other identi- It is estimated thatenactment of H.R. 232 or one result in a first year's costof $1,194,000 and atotal 5- cal bills would cost of the first 5 year costof $9,413,000. Adetailed estimate of the yearsfollows:

Individuals Cost Fiscal yen 1, 190 81, 194, 000 1972 1, 990 2, 040,000 1973 2, 230 2, 308, 000 1974 ?, 030 2, 117, 000 1975. 670 1,754, 000 1976 9,413, 000 5-year total

submitted It should bepointed out that theestimated cost figures higher than thosesubmitted on identical or on these measuresare in our report to similar purpose 91stCongress bills commented on committee under date ofDecember 19, 1969(Committee Print your in the trend of actualparticipation No. 166). Thisis due to changes 91-219 sirce as well asincreases in benefit ratesenacted in Public Law the earlier estimate wasmade. 298 and H.R. 6148, onthe other hand, wouldbe The cost for H.R. the considerably less thanthe $9.4 millioncited above as most of reservists and guardsmencalled to active dutysince August 41_1964, to a combat zone.However, we do nothave sufficient were not sent estimate for those measures. data to provide thebasis of a precise cost In view of theforegoing, we recommendagainst favorable con- sideration by yourcommittee of H.R. 232 or anyof the identical or similar purpose bills. received from the Officeof Manaaement andBudget Advice has been tins report from the that there is noobjection to thepresentation of standpoint of theadministration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Achnirizi8trator.

209 1536

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 2505, H.R. 3965, and H.R. 10130, a bill identical to H.R. 3965 which was introduced following submission of this report

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION,. OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, ashington,D .0.,July 27, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committm on V eteram' Affairs, House of Representatives, TV aslang ton, D .0. DEAR MR. CHAMMAN : The following comments are furnished as requested on H.R. 2505 and H.R. 3965,92d Congress. As stated in their titles, the bills propose to."provide equality of treatment for married female veterans." They seek to accomplish this by amending 38 U.S.C. 102 (b) to delete certain criteria that currently restrict the eligibility of the husband or widower of a female veteran for certain benefits under laws we administer. With the exception of hospital care in private contract hospitals and certain benefits where dependency is a factor, the laws providing veterans' benefits make no distinction between a female veteran and a male veteran. With respect to increased benefits payable to a v3t- eran because of a "dependent" or "wife," 38 U.S.C. 102(b) requires that the husband of a female veteran must. be incapable of self-main- tenance and permanently incapable of self-support due to mental or physical disability. This is pertinent with respect to the payment to a veteran with servke-connected disabilities of additional compen- sation for a "wife,- payment, of increased educational assistance allow- ances to a veteran for a "dependent," and reduction of benefits payable to a veteran receiving hospitalization or similar care if he is without a "wife." Similarly, section 102(b) provides that for a "widower" to have the same status as a "widow" with respect to survivor benefits, the "widower" must have been incapable of self-maintenance and perma- nently incapabable of self-support due to mental or physical dis- ability at the time of the veteran's death. This provision is significant in connection with the payment of benefits to a "widow" under the death compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, and death pension programs under chapters 11,13, and 15, respectively, of title 38, United. States Code. Again, while the law. (38 U.S.C. 1801 (a) (2) ) provides that the widow of a qualified veteran is eligible for the loan guaranty and direct loan benefits which the Veterans' Ad- ministration administers if the veteran died of a service-connected disability and the widow is not eligible for the,benefits as a reSult of her.own service, the widower of a female veteran would appear to be similarly eligible only if he was incapable of self-maintenance and permanently incapable of self-support due to mental or physical dis- ability at the time of the veteran'sdeath. H.R. 2505 or H.R. 3965, if enacted, would remove from the law the additional requirements that must now be met in the case of husbands

210 1537 and widowers. As aresult, benefits for husbandsand widowers of female veterans wouldbecome payable underthe same condition that now apply towives and widows of maleveterans. As a matter ofinformation, there is onedistinction in the area of benefits between male andfemale. veterans whichwould not be affected y. of title 38, UnitedStates Code, kor.X.hez. .*ction 601(4). ( Nfins'Ireterahe"AilmiiiiStration facilitieS"for the piirpOse of hoS- pita] care to...inelndeprivate facilities forwhich the Administrator contracts ftir'paposeSOf .proVidMg such care"for women veterans of any-wth..1"the historical reaSonfor this provision wasthat the Vet- adequate facilities to providefor emimns''AdiniiiiStration did not have the hospital pre offemale veterans.in all casesand it was deemed more eiintrOit for their care as necessarythan. to equip them. This provision,therefore, was incorporated special facilities for convenience rather than to ih 1d 1aW .fts it' matterof administrative afford female veterans anadditional benefit. of and attitudes towardthe ern- years; thcciraimstances Women, today, gen- fe in as have'changed considerably. eriiilf'work'beeitUse-the 'family needs the moneyand the incOme they SignifiCant in the support ofthe family. On theprinciple that cushion family liv- Veterans Administrationbenefits are designed to Iirg...fitandalds fer:the loss of, orlessened, income stemmingfrom the ferandisability, schoolattendance, or death, itWould seem appro- of actual dependencyfor the husbands 1iatfO drop the requirement provisions of .widOwere of .veteran-wives;Moreover, the existing lv discriinifiation between thesexesthe nondependenthus- band' bi-widoff does nothave equal protectionagainst economic have entitlement toVeterans Administration hazard :he'dOeS not. And also, from 'heneti6.:t6, Which thenondependent wife is eligible. prOposed revision of thelaw would be aliracticaVstandpoint,. the often time eiiSiter to adMiniSter since thedependency determinations are administer satisfactorily. óhsiming and' (Moult to current data upon '"The 'Veterans'.Administration lacks adequate precise estimate of the costof these measures. which Jo, predicate a magnitude estimate, HhWeVer,' baSed onavailable information, as a enacted, could affect some300 cases the lkliei,e'that the bills, if $500,000. The cost 11't,4'S'ear 'at An approximateadditional cost of -reitiahf at. abeut the .SamelOrel for each ofthe succeeding 4 -A hid . . 'yosi..8:!: :: . . l'ht¶ittera Adininistrati on recognizesthat the provision ofbene- dependency of husbands.andwidowers of female JR'S' r*irdlessiof..thT the. enactment' of. these'bills would thii'V'woUld. flow from appliCable'to- our cA§tithfc a 'gignifiCant: changein the prineipleS Vor the reasont cited ohmic,however, we support of H.R. 2505 ThiS ltislatren 'andireCoinniend'.fvorable consideration ; Wtir-LW:19(55.by Sroiwcomthittee..receiitil froth the, OfficeofManagement and Nitc-i*Ce5' résentation-of this report. VuidOi`thift there is .0ôobjectiOn to:the. fp iTcint tlib'qiiiidpOintOfthen Administration'sprogram... . . ".1 " *Sviiiodeely; Dortith JOM9**; :4dm4thtra,tar.

211, Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 8282, H.R. 10391, H.R. 10565 (introduced following submission of this report), and H.R. 9662, a similar purpose bill

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., August 11, 1071. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR Mn. CHAIRMAN : This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 82821 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 34 of title 38 of the United States Code to restore entitlement to educational benefits to veterans of World Wa.r II and the Korean conflict. This bill would amend sections 1651, 1652, and 1661 of title 38, United States Code to restore to veterans of World War II and the Korean conflictentitlementto educational benefits which they did not utilize under prior provisions of the World War IIGI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Congress) and the Korean conflict GI bill (Public Law 550, 82d Congress). The primary purpose of the World War II and Korean GIbills (as well as the current law) was to assist veterans in their readjust- ment from military to civilian life. World War II wasofficially termi- nated on July 25, 1947, approximately 24 years ago. For most veterans educational benefits under the World War II GI bill ended on July 25, 1956-9 years after the official termination date. It appearsreasonable to consider that the 9-year period granted these veterans totake advan- tage of the financial benefits authorized under thatlaw was a liberal one. It gave a veteran 9 yearsin which to complete a 4-year standard college degree course, or 108 months in which to utilize themaximum 48 months of entitlement provided under that law. For educational benefit purposes the Koreanconflict officially ended on January 31, 1955over 16 years ago.The Korean conflict GI bill allowed each eligible veteran 8 years from the date ofhis separation from a pe:iod of Korean conflict active duty oruntil January 31, 1965 (10 years from the termination date), whichever waslater, to pursue his program of education. In addition, a. Koreanconflict veteran who remained on active duty after January 31, 1955is eligible for educa- tional benefits under the current GI bill based upon anyportion of service after that date not used for education ortraining under the prior law. We believe that World War II veterans andKorean conflict veterans have had ample time to pursue education ortraining to assist them in meeting the concept of the respectiveGI bills, namely, readjust- ment from military to civilianlife. We would also like to point out that enactmentof this measure would result in a major administrative problemin the area of records. Under our document retention schedule, manyof the rehabilitation and education folders of World War IIand Is.orcan conflict veterans have been destroyed. The schedule calls fordestruction of the folders 4 years after completion ordiscontinuance of training or disallowance

212 1539

and after settlement ofappeals or any other pend- of the application entitle- ing matters. It wouldbe necessary to reconsttact a veteran's ment vcord, tothe extent possible,from various microfilmpayment records. This wthild be anextremely difficult:undertaking.It would' present a monumentaland costly task ifrequired on a large scale potentially involve millionsof veterans who eitherchose since it could full not to take anytraining under the priorlaws or who did not take advantage of theirentitlement. this As a technical matterthe reference in thebill to "chapter 33 of title" is inappropriatesince that section of law wasrepealed by section 4 of Public Law89-358. of estimating the extentto which WorldWar II We have no meaas and considering and Korean conflictveterans, at their present age, and social status,would avail themselvesof their present economic training. Most of these this opportunity foradditional education and labor force and probablycould not spare the time veterans are in the but they might be to participatein a full-time educational program, not in the able to take part-time courses.Retired veterans and others might enroll for full-timetraining. For this labor force, however, We repson, we areunable to estimate theprobable cost of H.R. 8282. would, instead, like tocite some factors ,vhich webelieve would be pertinent to a betterunderstanding of thepotential magnitude of the cost should thisbill be enacted. These are asfollows : that among veterans ofWorld War II and the Our records show months of entitlement were Korean conflictapproximately 500 million allowed to expireunused. When multipliedby the average value of chapter 34, the dollarvalue of this unused a monthof training under fur- entitlement wouldapproximate $83 billion.This value might be ther expanded bypending legislation whichwould substantially in- under chapter 34. creaseeducational allowance rates (5 percent) of the If, under the proposedextension, only one in 20 eligible veterans were to use anaverage ofonly 12 months oftraining under chapter ,34, the costof direct benefitswould approximate $1.7 billion. will be as high orhigher for In addition, itis likely that the cost would be the latter portionof the 8 years inwhich these veterans in the first few years.This is because an in- eligible for training as have emasing number wouldreach retirement ageand therefore would educational interest. the time to pursue some new favorable action For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against by your committee onH.R. 8282. in this report areequally applicable toH.R. The views expressed and H.R. 9662, asimilar pur- 10391, an identical92d Congress bill, before your pose 92dCongress bill, which arepresently pending committee. by the Office ofManagement and Budgetthat there We are advised this report from thestandpoint is no objection tothe presentation of of the administration'sprogram. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON,Administrator.

213 1540

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 8094, H.R. 9613, ..Ind H.R. 9823, a similar purpose bill

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., September 22, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEA.R MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 8094, 92d Congress, a bill to provide equitable treatment of veterans enrolled in vocational education courses. This bill would amend section 1681 (b) (2) of title 38, United States Code, to exclude those vacation periods established by the institution in conjunction with certain holidays for absence counting purposes in computing the educational assistance allowance payable to veterans pursuing courses not leading to a standard college degree. Current law (38 U.S.C. 1681(b) (2)) presently provides that no educational assistance allowance shall be paid to any veteran enrolled in a course which does not lead to a standard college degree (excluding programs of apprenticeship and other on-job traming authorized by section 1683 of title 38) for any day of absence in excess of 30 days in a 12-month period, not counting as absences weekends or legal holidays established by Federal or State law during which the institution is not regularly in session. The first GI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Congress) was enacted on June 22, 1944. This represented the first major scholarship undertaking by the Federal Government and many problems developed in the administration of this program, As a result, the Congress created a select committee to make an investigation of the program. This committee conducted a lengthy study and during this investigation numerous inadequacies in the law relating to such matters as full-time courses, required attendance, and attendance in subversive-type schools were found. It was also brought out that many fly-by-night vocational and trade schools had been created which catered ex- clusively to veterans The findings and experience of the select committee were utilized in drafting the Korean conflict GI bill (Public Law 550, 82d Congress). History has shown that the Korean program met with marked success and most of the areas of abuse detected in the earlier World War II proaram were eliminated. Section 1681(b) (2) of the present GI bill Is similarP in content to the corresponding section 231(b) (2) in Public Law 550. Based upon the present allowance of 30 days of absence in a year, without any reduction in the amount of the benefit received, the veteran may be absent 11% percent of the time. And, this does not include the extra days off because of Federal or State holidays (there

214 1541 itre now nine Federal holidays listedin 5 U.S.C. 6103). We believe that allowance with pay for 1134 percent of the time in a year provides for a most reasonable amount of time away from school. Traditionally, the vocational-type courses and degree courses have been given at separate institutions, with different organizations and procedures. Today, in many; eases; both academic and vocational training are being given by the same institutions. The different pro- cedures necessary for the vocational operations stem from the nature of the training. The distinction is in the course and noL the school or student. To increase the amount of absence with pay which this bill would do, would dilute the training schedules of the vocational-type courses for theindividual veteran. In these courses shop practice and theory are essential instructions. To miss more than the minimal of either would be detrimental to the veteran in his effort to succeed in the program. It is estimated that if H.R. 8094 were enacted the first year cost of the bill would be $1.5 million and the first 5-year cost would be $6.2 million. A detailed 5-year-cost estimate follows: Additional direct penefits cost in millions Year: 1st $1. 5 2d 1. 4 3d 1. 3 4th 0 3th 1. 0 5-year total 6. 2 The above estimate is based.on the first full 'year being fiscal year 1972. For the foregoing reasons, .werecommend against favorable action by your, committee on H.R. 8094. As a i,echnical matter, we note that the subjects bill does not incor- porate the exclusion of veterans in apprenticeship orother on-the-job training presently cmtained in section 1681(b) (2). This exclusion was placed m the section when the Congress enacted Public Law 91-584. A different measurement has been applied to these veterans (38 U.S.C. 1683(b)(2)) premised upon the number of hours of training they receive each mouth. Should your committee give consideration to the subject bill, we urge that this exclusion beretained. The views expressed in this report are equally applicable toH.R. 9613, an identical bill, and H.R. 9823, a similar purposebill, which are presently pending before yourcommittee. We were advised by the Office of Management and Budgetin regard to a report to the chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, on S. 1776, a bill identical to H.R. 9823, thatthere was no objection fromthe standpoint of the administration's program to the presentation of that report to thatcommittee. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON,Administrator,

215 1542

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 10130 (Note report on H.R. 2505 and H.R. 3965, dated July 27, 1971.)

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, W ashington,D.0.,September R8,1971. OIAN E. TEAouE, Chairman,ommittee on. V eterans' Aff airs, House of Representatives, W ashington, D .0. DEAR Mn. CHAIRMAN : This is in response to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 10130, Rd Congress. The bill proposes to provide equality of treatment for married female veterans. It seeks to accomplish this by amending 38 U.S.C. 102 (b) to delete certain criteria that currently restricts the eligibility of the husband or widower of a female veteran for certain benefits under laws we administer. The bill is identical with H.R. 3965, 92d Congress, with respect to which the Veterans' Administration submitted a report to your com- mittee on July 27, 1971. The views expressed in that letter, a copy of which i s enclosed. and the recommendation for enactment are equally appl icable to H.R. 10130. S i ncerely, Johns,. J. CORCORAN) General Coun8el.

g11.6 1543

Veterans' Administration report onH.R. 10565 (Note report on H.R. 8282 andH.R. 10391, dated Aug. 11,1971.)

VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OPVETERANS' AFFAIRS, 1Vashington, D.C., October 8, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAuur., Chairman, Committee on Veterans'Affairs, House of Representatives,Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. Cn.lnimAx : Thiswill tespond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration onH.R. 10565, 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 34 oftitle 38 of the United StatesCode to restore entitlement to educational benefits toveterans of World War II and the Korean conflict. This bill is identical to H.R. 8282,92d Congress, a bill on which we submitted ourviews to your committee on August11, 197. The views expressed in that report areequally applicable to H.R. 10565. We were advised by theOffice of Management and Budgetthat there was no objectionfrom the standpoint of theadministration's program to the presentation ofthe renort on RR. 8282 to yourcommittee. Sincerely, DONALD JouNsoN, Administrator.

217 1544

Veterans' Administration recommendation, introduced as H.R. 11954 VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 27, 1971. Hon. CA RL ALBERT, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Enclosed is a draft bill to amend chapters 31, 34, and 35 of title 38, United States Code, to increase the rates of vocational rehabilitation,educational assistance,and special training allowance paid to eligible veterans and persons; to provide for advance educational assistance pk,,aents to certain veterans; to make improvements in the educational assistance program; and for other purposes. The draft bill presents in one comprehensive form a measure which would provide desirable technical changes in the educational benefit program, including an advance pay proposal which has already been presented to the Congress, and rate increases in all educational benefit programs provided under the GI bill. These rate changes represent, for the most part, an increase of 8.6 percent which reflects the rise in consumer prices since the last veterans educational allow- ance rate adjustment became effective on February 1, 1970. Larger increases, approximating 48 percent, are provided in the on-job and apprentice ivograms since experience has shown that this is the area of greatest need and it is believed that such upward adjustment will materially aid in stimulating job opportunities for veterans. A detailed section-by-section analysis of the provisions of the draft bill, including cost estimates for each section, is also enclosed. We request that this bill be introduced and strongly recommend its favorable consideration. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this proposed legislation to the Congress. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator.

A BILL To amend chapters 31, 34 and 36 of tale 38, United States Code, to increase the rates of vocational rehabilitation, educational assistance and special training allowance paid to eligible veterans and per- sons; to provide for ad ranee educational assistance payments to certain veterans; to make improve- ments in the educational assistance programs; and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the "Veterans' Education and Training Amendments of 1971". 1545

TITLE IVOCATIONAL REHABILITATION-EDUCATIONAL AS- SISTANCE RATE ADJUSTMENTS SEC. 101. Chapter 31 of title 38, United States Code, is amended asfollows: (a) by amending section 1504(b) to read asfollows: "(b) The subsistence allowance of a veteran-traineeis to be determined in accordance with the following table, and shall be themonthly amount shown in cohunn II, III, or IV (whichever is applicable asdetermined by the veterans' dependency status) opposite the appropriate type oftraining as specified in in column I:

"Column I Column II Column III Column IV No One Two or more Type of training dependents depetuhnt dependents

Institutional: $146 $196 $227 Full-time 169 Three-quarter-time 106 144 Half-time 73 99 110 Institutional on-farm, apprentice, or other on-job training: Full-time.... 118 166 196

Where any full-time trainee has more than twodependents and is not eligible to receive additional compensation as provided by section315 or section 335 (which- ever is applicable) of this title,the subsistence allowance prescribed in columnIV of the foregoing table shall be increased by anadditional $7 per month for each dependent in excess of two."; and (b) by deleting in section 1507 "$100" and insertingin lieu thereof "$200". SEC. 102. Chapter 34 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended as follows: (a) by deleting in the last sentence of section1677(b)"$175"and inserting in lieu thereof "$190"; (b) the table contained in paragraph(1) of section 1682(a) is amended to read as follows:

Column Column Column Column V "Column I IV No One Two More than two dependents dependents Type of program dependents dependent

The amount in column IV plus the following for each dependent in excess of two: Institutional: $250 $15 Full-time 5190 $220 185 . 11 Th ree-quarter-time 139 162 88 103 118 8 Half-time 207 11."; Cooperative 153 180

(e) by deleting in section 1682(b) 1175"and inserting in lieu thereof "S150"; (d) the table contained in section 1682(d)(2) is amended to read as follows:

Column IV Column V "Column I Column II Column HI No One Two More than two dependents dependents Basis dePendents dependent

The amount in Column IV, plus the following for each dependent In excess of two: $153 $180 $207 $11 Full-time 149 8 Three-quarter-time 109 129 5. ; 73 86 100 Half-time .

keit9 1546

(e) the table contained in section 1683(b) is amended to read as follows:

No One Two or more "Periods of training dependents dependent dependents

First 6 months 8160 $178 8197 Second 6 months 120 136 156 Third 6 months 80 98 117 Fourth and any succeeding 6month periods 40 58 77." an d (f) by deleting in section 1696(b) "$175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$190". SEC. 103. Chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, is amended as follows: (a) by amending section 1732 (a)(1) to read as follows: "(a) (1) The educational assistance allowance on behalf of an eligible person who is pursuing a program of education consisting of institutional courses shall be computed at the rate of (A) $190 per month if pursued on a full-time basis, (B) $139 per month if pursued on a three-quarter-time basis, and (C) $88 per month if pursued on a half-time basis."; (b) by deleting in section 1732(a)(2) "$175" and inserting in lieu thereof "$190"; (c) by deleting in section 1732(b) "$141" and inserting in lieu thereof "$153"; and (d) by amending section 1742 (a) to read as follows: "(a) While the eligible person is enrolled in and pursuing a full-time course of special restorative training, the 'parent or guardian shall be entitled to receive on his behalf a special training allowance computed at thebasic rate of $190 per month. If the charges for tuition and fees applicable to any such course are more than $60 per calendar month the basic monthly allowance may be increased by the amount that such charges exceed $60 a month, upon election by the parent or guardian of the eligible person to have such person'speriod of entitlement reduced by one day for each $6.80 that the special training allowance paid exceeds the basic monthly allowance." TITLE IIADVANCE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SUBSISTENCE AND EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE ALLOWANCE PAYMENTS SEC. 201. Subsection (a) of section 1504 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at thc end thereof the following: "The Administrator shall pay the initial subsistence allowance of a course of vocational rehabilitation training to an eligible veteran in an amount not to exceed the subsistence allow- ance for the month or fraction thereof in which pursuit of the coursewill commence, plus the subsistence allowance for one full month, upon receipt of proof that the veteran has been enrolled in an approved educational institution on a half-time or more basis. Such payment shall not be made earlier than thefirst day of the month in which pursuit of the course is to commence. Subsequent payments of subsistence allowance shall be made each month in advance, subject to such reports and proof of satisfactory pursuit of such program as the Administrator may require. The Administrator may withhold the final paymentof subsistence allowance payable to such veteran until such proof is receved and the amount appropriately adjusted. If the eligible veteran fails to plume the course after receiving the initial payment of the subsistence allowance, the amount of such payment may be recovered from any benefit otherwise due the veteran under any law administered by the Veterans' Administration or such overpayment shall constitute a liability of such eligible veteran and may be recovered in the same manner as any other debt due the United States." SEC. 202. Subsections (d) and (e) of section 1681 of title 38, United States Code are amended to read as follows: "(oi) The Administrator shall, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, pay the initial educational assistance allowance of anenrollment period to an eligible veteran in an amount not to exceed the educational assistance allowance for the month or fraction thereof in which pursuit of the program will commence, plus the educational assistance allowance for one full month, upon receipt of proof that the eligible veteran has been enrolled in an approved educational institution 1547 on a half-time or more basis.Such payment shall not be made earlier than thefirst day of the month in which pursuit of the programis to commence. Subsequent payments of educational assistanceallowance shall be made each month inad- vance, subject to such reports andproof of satisfactory pursuit of such program as the Administrator may require. TheAdministrator may withhold the final pay- ment of an enrollment period untilsuch proof is received and the amount ap- propriately adjusted. If the eligible veteranfails to pursue the course after re- ceiving the initial payment of the educationalassistance allowance, the amount of such advance payment may be recoveredfrom any benefit otherwise due the veteran under any law administered bythe Veterans' Administration or such over- payment shall constitute a liabilityof such eligible veteran and may be recoveredin the same manner as any other debt duethe United States. "(e) No educational assistance allowanceshall be paid to an eligible veteran enrolled in a program of education consistingexclusively of flight training or ex- clusively by correspondence for any perioduntil the Administrator shall have received "(1) from the eligible veteran a certification asto his actual attendance during such period or, where the programis pursued by correspondence, a certificate as to the number of lessonsactually completed by the veteran and serviced by the institution, and "(2) from the educational institution, a certification, or anendorsement on the veteran's certificate, that such veteran wasenrolled in and pursuing a course of education during suchperiod and, in the case of an institution fur- nishing education to a veteran exclusively bycorrespondence, a certificate, or an endorsement on theveteran's certificate, as to the number oflessons completed by the veteran and serviced by theinstitution." SEC. 203. Subsection (d) of section 1731of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: "(d) The Administrator shall pay the initialeducational assistance allowance of an enrollment period on behalf of aneligible person in an amount not to exceed the educational assistance allowance for themonth or fraction thereof h which pursuit of the program will commence, plusthe educational assistance allowance for one full month, upon receipt of proof thatthe eligible person has been enrolled in an approved educational institution on ahalf-time or more basis. Such payment shall not be made earlier than the first dayof the month in which pursuit of the program is to commence. Subsequentpayments of educational assistance allowance shall be made each month in advance,subject to such reports and proof of satis- factory pursuit of such progra::1 as theAdministrator may require. The Adminis- trator may withhold the final p ayment of anenrollment period until such proof is received and the amount app.opriatelyadjusted. If the eligible person fails to pursue the course afterreceivinCthe initial payment of the educationalassistance allowance, the amount of such advance payment maybe recovered from any benefit otherwise due the eligible personunder any law administered by the Veterans' Administration or such overpaymentshall constitute a liability of such eligible person and may be recovered in the same manner asany other debt due the United States." SEC. 204. Subchapter IV of chapter 34 of title38,United States Code, is amended by inserting immediately after section 1687 thefollowing new section: "§1688. Veteran-student employment "(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, theAdministrator is author- ized to utilize on an intermittent basis theservices of veteran-students who are pursuing full-time programs of education ortraining under chapters 31 and 34 of this title. Such veteran-students may beutilized to perform such services for the Veterans Administration at such timesand places as the Administrator deems advisable. "(b) Veteran-students utilized under theauthority of subsection (a) of this section shall be paid an hourly rate equivalent tothe minimum rate for a grade in the General Schedule contained in section5332 of title 5, determined by the Administrator to be appropriate for the services rendered. Suchgrade determina- tion may, at the Administrator's discretion, be based upon,but shall not be subject to, position classification standards issued by theCivil Service Commission pursuant to section 5105 of title 5. "(c) While performing the services authorized bysubsection (a) of this section, such veteran-students shall not be deemed to beemployees of the United States for the purposes of laws administered by theCivil Service Commission. They shall, however, be considered to be employees of theUnited States for the purposes of the benefits of chapter 81 of title 5."

221 1548

TITLE IIIEDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS SEC. 301. Section 1671 of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: "Any eligible veteran, or individual on active duty, who desires to initiate a program of education under this chapter shall submit anapplication to the Administrator which shall be in such form, and contain such information, as the Administrator shall prescribe. The application of an individual on active duty must be approved by a service education officer prior to itssubmissi,m. The Administrator shall approve such application unless he finds that such veteran or individual is not eligible for or entitled to theeducational assistance applied for, or that his program of education fails to meet any of the requirements of this chapter, or that he is already qualified. The Administrator shall notify the eligible veteran or individual of the approval or disapproval of his application." SEC. 302. Clause (3) of subsection (b) of section 1675 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the words "general locality" the following: "or whcre the school has made a complete move with substantially the same faculty, curricula, and students, without a change in ownership." SEC. 303. Subchapter III of chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting immediately after section 1677 the following new section: "§ 1678.Correspondence courses "(a) (1) Each eligible veteran who is pursuing a program of education exclu- sively by correspondence shall be paid an educational assistance allowance computed at the rate of 90 per centum of the established charge which theinsti- tution requires nonveterans to pay for the course or courses pursued by the eligible veteran. The term 'established charge' as used herein means the charge for the course or courses determined on the basis of the lowest extendedtime payment plan offered by the institution and approved by the appropriateState approving agency or the actual cost to the veteran whichever is the lesser. Such allowance shall be paid quarterly on a pro ratabitsis for the lessons completed by the veteran and serviced by the institution. (2) The period of entitlement of any veteran who is pursuing any program of education exclusively by correspondence shall be charged with one month for each 8190 which is paid to the veteran as an educational assistance allowance for such course. "(b) In any case where an eligible veteran terminates his correspondence train- ing before completing the required number of lessons, the institution shall make a pro-rata refund of monies paid by such veteran and, in addition, suchinstitution shall not charge the veteran with any registration or similar fee in excess of $50.00." SEC. 304. Section 1682 of title 38, 'United States Code, is amended by (a) repealing subsection (c) thereof in its entirety; and (b) redesignating subsection (d), as amended by section 102(d) oftitle I of this Act, as subsection (c). SEC. 305. Section 1684 of title 38, United States Code, is amended byadding at the end of subsection (a) the following new sentence:"Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (2) of this subsection, in the case of aninstitution offering undergraduate courses leading to a standard college degree which are measured on a quarter or semester-hour basis andtechnical courses which are measured on a clock-hour basis, any of such courses as determined by the educational institution shall be measured on a semester-hour basis for the purpose of computing the edu- cational assistance allowance payable under this chapter." SEC. 306. (a) The heading for Subchapter VI of chapter 34 of title 38,United States Code, is amended by striking out "Predischarge" and insertingin lieu thereof "Preparatory". (b) Subsection (a) of section 1695 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended to read as follows: "(a) The purpose of this subchapter is to encourage and assist veteransin pre- paring for their future education, training, or vocation by providing themwith an opportunity to enroll in and pursue a program of education ortraining prior to their discharge or release from active duty with the Armed Forces.The program provided for under this subchapter shall be known as the PreparatoryEducation Program (PREP)." SEC. 307. Subsection (a) of section 1701 of title 38, United StatesCode, is amended as follows: (1) by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows: 1549

private secondary "(6) The term 'educationalinstitution' means any public or correspondence school, businessschool, junior college, school, vocational school, university, or scientific teachers' college, college, normalschool, professional school, education at the or technicalinstitution, or any _otherinstitution if it furnishes secondary school level or above.'; and (2) by adding at the endthereof the following newparagraph: chapter and chapter 36of this title, the term "(9) For the purposes of this apprentice or other 'training establishment' means anyestablishment providing those under the supervisionof a college or univer- training on the job, includingof education, or any Stewapprenticeship agency, sity or any State department joint apprenticeship coinmit- or any State boardof vocational education, or any Apprenticeship and Trainingestablished pursuant to chap- tee, or the Bureau of authorized to supervise ter 4C of tit1c 29, or any agencyof the Federal Government such training." title 38, United StatesCode, is amended by inserting SEC. 308. Section 1720 of sentence as follows: "Such after the first sentence insubsection (a) thereof a new where the eligible personhas been accepted for, counseling shall not be required college degree, at an approved or is pursuing, courseswhich lead to a standard institution." 1723 of title 38, United Six.. 309. The first sentenceof subsection (c) of section follows: States Code, is amended to read as the enrollment of aneligible person in "The Administrator shall not approve to be pursued by corre- any course ofinstitutional on-farm training, any coursechapter) open circuit spondence (except as providedin section 1727 of this provided), or a radio, or any courseto be pursued at television (except as herein State or in the Republicof the an educationalinstitution not located in a Philippines." of title 38, United States SEC. 310. Clause (3) ofsubsection (b) of section 1725 after the words "generallocality" the following: Code, is amended by inserting with substantially the same "or where the school hasmade a complete move without a change inownership." faculty, curricula, and students,chapter 35 of title 38,United States Code, is Sue. 311. Subchapter III of the following new sections: amended by insertingimmediately after section 1725 "§ 1726.Special training for theeducationally disadvantaged "(a) In the case of anyeligible widow or wife who "(1) has not received asecondary school diploma(or equivalency certifi- cate), and of education for which shewould other- "(2) in order to pursue a program training, either refresher wise be eligible, needsadditional secondary school to qualify foradmission to an appropriate courses or deficiency courses,Administrator may, withoutregard to the pro- educational institution, th: widows or wives visions of section 1723(d).. tipprovethe enrollment of such cr:urses to be pursuedin a State. in an appropriate course or pursuing a course or "(b) The Administrator shall payeligible widows or wives subsection (a) of thissection an educationalassistance courses pursuant to this chapter; except that no allowance as provided hisections 1731 and 1732 of secondary school coursesshall be approved in excess enrollment in adult evening this title. of half-time training asdefined in section 1733 of section shall be "(6) The educational assistanceallowance authorized by this paid without charge to anyperiod of entitlement the.widow or wife may have pursuant to sections1710 and 1711 of thischapter." "§1727. Correspondence courses widow Os defined in section1701(a)(1)(B), (C) "(a)(1) Each eligible wife or of education exclusivelyby or (I)) of thischapter) who is pursuing a programallowance computed at the correspondence shall be paid aneducational assistance requires other of the established chargewhich the institution rate of 90 per centum program to pay.The term 'establishedcharge' individuals enrolled in the same courses determined onthe basis as used herein meansthe charge for the course or time payment plan offeredby the institution andapproved of the lowest extendedState approving agency orthe actual cost to sucheligible by the appropriate allowance shall be paidquarterly on a pro person, whicheveris the lesser. Such and serviced by the rata basis for the lessonscompleted by the eligible person institution. entitlement of any eligible personwho is pursuing any "(2) The period of correspondence shall be chargedwith one program ofeducation exclusively by

71-5150- 72 - 15 223 1550

month for each $190 which is paid to the eligible person as an educational assistance allowance for such course. "(b) In any case where an eligible person terminates his correspondence training before completing the required number of lessons, thc institution shall makea pro rata refund of monies paid by such eligible person and, in addition, such institution shall not charge the eligible person with any registration or similar fee inexcess of $50.00." SEC. 312. Section 1731 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by (a) inserting in clause (2) of subsection (b) immediately after the words "standard college degree" the following: "(excluding programs of apprentice- ship and progran 3 of other on-job training authorized by section 1738 of this title)"; and (b) amending subsection (e) to read as follows: "(e) No educational assistance allowance shall be paid toan elig- ible person enrolled in a program of education consisting exclusively of correspondence courses for any period until the Administrator shall have received (1) from the eligible person a certificate as to the number of lessons actually completed by the eligible person and serviced by the institution, and (2) from the educational institution, a certificationor an endorsement on the eligible person's certificate, as to the number of lessons com- pleted by the eligible person and serviced by the institution." SEC. 313. Clause (2) of subsection (a) of section 1732 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: "Notwithstanding provisions of section 1731 of this title, payment of the educational assistance allowance provided by this clause may be made to an eligibleperson in an amount computed for the entire quarter, semester, or term during the month immediately following the month in which certification is received from the educational in- stitution that the person has enrolled in and is pursuinga program at such in- stitution." SEC. 314. Subsection (a) of section 1733 of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: l'(a) For thepurposes of this chapter "(1) an institutional trade or technicalcourse offered on a clock-hour basis below the college level involving shop practiceas an integral part thereof, shall be considered a full-timecourse when a minimum of thirty hours per week of attendance is required withno more than two and one- half hours of rest periods per week allowed; "(2) an institutional course offered on a clock-hour basis below the college level in which theoretical or classroom instruction predominates shall be considered a full-time course when a minimum of twenty-five hoursper week net of instruction (which may include customary intervals not to exceed ten minutes between hours of instruction) is required; "(3) an academic high schoolcourse requiring sixteen units for a full course shall be considered a full-time course when a minimum of four units per year is required. For the purpose of this clause, a unit is defined to be not less than one hundred and twenty sixty-minute hoursor their equivalent of study in any subject in one academic year; "(4) an institutional undergraduatecourse offered by a college or university on a quarter- or semester-hour basis shall be considered a full-time course when a minimum of fourteen semester hours or the equivalent thereof, for which credit is granted toward a standard college degree (including those for which no credit is granted but which are required to be taken to correct an educational deficiency), is required, except that where such college or university certifies, upon the request of the Administrator, that (A) full-time tuition is charged to all undergraduate students carryinga minimum of less than fourteen suchsemester hours or the equivalent thereof,or (B) all under- graduate students carrying a minimum of less than fourteen such semester hours or the equivalent thereof, are considered to be pursuinga full-time course for other administrative purposes, then such an institutional under- graduate course offered by such college or university with such Minimum number of such semester hours shall be considereda full-time course, but in the event such minimum number of semester hours is less than twelvesemester hours or the equivalent thereof, then twelve semester hoursor the equivalent thereof shall be considered a full-time course; and "(5) a program of apprenticeship or aprogram of other on-job training shall be considered a full-time program when the eligibleperson is required to work the number of hours constituting the standard workweek of the 224 1551

workweek of less than thirtyhours shall not training establishment, but a lesser number of hours be considered to constitutefull-time training unless a standard workweek for theparticular establish- has been established as the Notwithstanding the provisions ment through bona fidecollective bargaining. institution offering under- of clause (2) of thissubsection, in the case of an standard college degreewhich are measured graduate courses leading to a which are measured on a quarter- orsemester-hour basis and technical courses basis, any such courses asdetermined by the educational on a clock-hour semester-hour basis for the purposeof institution shall be measured on a under this chapter!, computing the educationalassistance allowance payable of chapter 35 of title 38,United States Code, is SEc. 315. Subchapter IV following new section: amended by inserting immediatelyafter section 1737 the Apprenticeship or other on-jobtraining 1 1738. of this chapter) may "(a) An eligible person(as defined in section 1701(a) chapter while pursuing, in aState, a full-time receive the benefits of this approved by a State approvingagency as "(1) program of apprenticeship Secretary of Labor meeting the standards ofapprenticeship published by the pursuant to section 50a oftitle 29, or "(2) program of other training onthe job approved underthe provisions of section 1777 of this title, respect to educational subject to the conditions andlimitations of this chapter with assistance. assistance allowance of sucheligible person "(b) (1) The monthly training (A) $160 during the pursuing a program describedunder subsection (a) shall be $120 during the secondsix-month period, (C)$80 during first six-month period, (B) fourth and any succeedingsix- the third six-month period,and (D) $40 during the month period. eligible person pursuing a programof apprentice- "(2) In any month in which an hundred and twenty ship or a program of other on-jobtraining fails to complete one month, the monthlytraining assistance allowanceset hours of training in such reduced proportionatelyin the forth in subsection (b) (1) ofthis section shall be hundred and twenty proportion that the numberof hours worked bears to one hours rounded off to the nearesteight hours. and chapter 36 of thistitle, the terms 'program "(c) For purposes of this chapter training' shall have the same of apprenticeship' and'program of other on-job allowance' meaning as 'program ofeducation'; and the term'training assistance shall have the same meaning as'educational assistanceallowance'." SEC. 316. Section 1777 oftitle 38, United StatesCode, is amended and (2) of subsection(b) to read as follows: (a) by amending clauses (1) eligible person (A) upon "(1) the wages to be paidthe eligible veteran or the entrance into training, are notless than the wages paidother nonveterans in and are at least 50percentum of the wagespaid for the same training positiontrained, and (B) such wageswill be increased inregular job for which he is to be of the training period, periodic increments until, notlater than the last full month which such they will be at least 85percentum of the wagespaid for the job for eligible veteran or eligible personis being trained; and that the job for whichthe eligible veteran "(2) there is reasonable certaintyavailable to him at theend of the training or eligible personis to be trained will be period."; and "eligible veteran" (b) by inserting "or eligibleperson" immediately after each place it appears insubsection (c). of chapter 34 oftitle 38, SEC. 317. The table ofsections at the beginning United States Code, isamended by: (a) inserting immediately after "1677. Flight training." the following: "1678. Correspondence courses."; (b) inserting immediatelyafter "1687. Discontinuance of allowances." the following: "1688. Voteran-studont employment.";and (c) striking out "Subchapter VIPredIscharge EducationProgram"

225,, 1552

and inserting in lieu thereof: "Subchapter VIPreparatory Education Program". SEC. 318. The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by: (a) inserting immediately after "1725. Period of operation for approval." the following: "1726. Epecial training for the educationally disadvantaged. "1727. Correspondence courses.", and (b) inserting immediately after "1737. Specialized voeatimml training courses." the following: "1738. Apprenticeship or other on-Job training.". TITLE IVEFFECTIVE-DATES SEC. 401. Titles I and II of this Act shall become effective on the first day of the second calendar month followhig the month in which enacted. SEC. 402. Section 303 of this Act shall become effective upon the first enrollment of an eligible veteran which occurs on or after the first day of the second calendar month following the month in which enacted. SEC. 403. Section 305 and the last sentence of section 314 of this Act shall be- come effective upon the first enrollment or subsequent re-enrollment of an eligible veteran or person which occurs after the effective date of the enactment of this Act.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATE OF.DRAFT BILL TITLE IVOCATIONAL REHABILITATION-EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE RATE ADJUSTMENTS

This title provides rate increases in all areas of educational benefits 1 under chapters 31, 34 and 35 of title 38. With the exception of on-job and apprentice benefits, the rate changes, for the most part, approxi- mate 8.6 percent. This percentage represents the increase in the cost of living which has occurred since the last general rate increase became effective on February 1, 1970. The rate increases provided for on-job and apprentice trainees approximate 48 percent. Experience has shown that these are the areas where the greatest need occurs and the larger increases will provide incentives to stimulate job opportunities for veterans. Section 101 Subsection (a) of this section amends section 1504(b) to provide increases in the monthly subsistence allowance rates for veteran- trainees who are pursuing vocational rehabilitation training courses. The rate for a single veteran without dependents who is pursuing full- time institutional training would be increased from $135 per month to $146 per month. Comparable increases are provided for those trainees pursuing part-time training and for those pursuing institutional on- f arm, apprentice, or other on-job training full time. Subsection (b) amends section 1507 to increase the amount of the loan which may be made to trainees from $100 to $200.

226 1553

Section, 102 1677(b) to increase Subsection (a) ofthis sectionamends section for flighttraining coursesfrom $175 the monthlyentitlement charge month. paragraph (1) of to $190 per amends the tablecontained in Subsection (b) monthly educationalassistance rates section 1682(a) toincrease the half-time pursuing full-time,three-quarter-time and for veterans The rates forcooperative training institutionaleducational courses. who increased. Thesingle veteranwithout dependents would also be coursewould, for example,be is pursuing afull-time institutional $190 per month. the current $175monthly rate to increased from 1682(b) to increasethe rates for Subsection (c)amends section servicemen onactive duty andfor those educationalpursuits by than half-time coursesto $190 permonth. pursuing less 1682(d) (2) toincrease the ratesfor Subsection (d)amends section The single veteran agricultural cooperativeprograms. pursuit of pursuing a full-time coursewould, for example, without dependents month. from $141 permonth to $153 per monthly be increased amends section1683(b) toincrease the Subsection (e) pursuing apprenticeand on- training assistancerates for veterans job trainingprograms. the educational amends section1696(b) to increase Subsection (0 for personspursuing PREP courses assistanceallowance maximum from $175 to$190 per month. Section 103 amends section1732(a) (1) toincrease Subsection (a)of this section children, educational assistanceallowance payable to the rate of educational programsunder chapter 35. widows andwives pursuing half- increases apply tofull-time,three-quarter-time and The rate for example,would be increased time training.The full-time rate, $190 permonth. from $175 to 1732(a) (2) toincrease themonthly Subsection (b)amends section of eligible persons assistance ratepayable in the case educational less thanhalf-time basis. pursuing pi ogramsof education on a monthly amends section1732(b) toincrease the Subsection (c) payable in the caseof eligible persons educationalassistance rate which consist ofinstitutional cooperative educationcourses pursuing phases of trainingin a business orindustrial coursesand alternate the special establishment. amends section1742(a) to increase Subsection (d) allowance to thosechildren who are restorative trainingassistance special restorativetraining. in need of title I of theproposal wouldapproximate It is estimtedthat cost of for the firstfull year. $175 million of the bill toincrease thebenefit rate No change ismade in title I III of the coursetraining. Section303 of title for correspondence replace section1682(c) of title 38 draft bill adds a newsection 1678 to current provisionsare authorizes suchtraining. The which currently the new section,the benefit rate repealed by section304. In enacting month, a figurewhich is raised from$175 to $190 per for such training rate providedfor flight training. is identicalwith the higher

221 TITLE IIADVANCE VOCATIONALREHABILITATION SUB- SISTENCE AND EDUCATIONALASSISTANCE ALLOW- ANCE PAYMENT Section 201 This section would amend section1504(a) to authorize the Ad- ministrator to makean initial advance payment of the subsistence allowance granted under chapter31 to veterans enrolled ina voca- tional rehabilitation traininaprogram on a half-time or more basis, plus the allowance foronefbullmonth, upon receipt of proof thatthe eligible veteran has been enrolled inan approved educational institu- tion. Such payment would be madenot earlier than the first of the month in which pursuit of theprogram is to commence. Thereafter, payments would continue to be made inadvance at the beginning of each month in which theveteran pursues his program of training. Administrative controlover the propriety of such payment ispro- vided for by authorizing theAdministrator to withhold finalpayment to such veteran until proof of satisfactorypursuit of theprogram is furnished. Section 202 This section would amendsubsections (d) and (e) of section1681 to authorize the Administratorto make an initial advancepayment of the educational assistanceallowance granted under chapter34 to veterans enrolled in an educational institutionon a half-time or more basis on the same premiseas provided under section 201 of this title for vocational rehabilitationtrainees. Certification requirementsfor the pursuit of flight trainingand correspondencecourses pursued under chapter 34 would be retained. Section 203 This section would amendsubsection (d) of section 1731to extend the advance pay principleto eligible wives, widows, and childrenwho are pursuing educational programson a half-time or more basis under chapter 35. sect;on 204 This section would adda new section 1688 to chapter 34 setting forth new language which wouldgive the Administrator authorityto employ, as intermittent employees,veteran-students enrolled in full- time programs of educationor training under chapters 31 and 34. This would diversifycurrent Veterans Administration'sauthority to hire these veteran-studentsand utilize their servicesat such times and places as the Administratordeems advisable. Thisnew section would also authorize theAdministrator to pay the goingrate for the job classification for the workwhich would be performed. No cost would be incurred if titleII were to be enacted, but additional outlays would be required in thefirst fiscal year of approximately$89 million because of advances madein that year which would normally not be paid until the following fiscalyear. This amount would, how- ever, be recouped from subsequent paymentsmade to these veterans or eligible persons.

2Z8 1555

incorporated in section202 of this titleis virtually The proposal the Congress onJanuary 26, identical with aproposal transmitted to expanded to include advance payprinciple has been 1971. This 31 and wives,widows and children veteranstraining under chapter training under chapter35. ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TITLEIIIEDUCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS Section, 301 States Code, to amends section 1671of title 38, United This section application for GIBill educationbenefits be require aserviceman's be considered approved b3r aservice educationofficer before it may by theAdministrator. opportunity would beavailable to By requiringsuch approval, an of training whichhe discuss with theserviceman the various courses This would acquainthim with theeducational oppor- might pursue. correspondence programsbut frau' tunities not onlyfrom commercial education officercould determinewhether all sources.The service serviceman is suitablefor of educationselected by the the program satisfactorily completedwithin the limits of his aptitudesand could be his presentenvironment. would not result in anyadditional It is estimatedthat this section cost. Section 302 would amend clause(3) of subsection(b) of section This section language to theso-called two-year rule of section 1675to add new enrollment of veteransin courses wherethe school has authorizing location outside thegeneral locality made a complete moveto a new site, where it isdetermined that theschool has substan- of its former curricula and students,without a tially retainedthe same faculty, change in ownership. may not approvethe enroll- Under currentlaw the Administrator in any courseoffered by aneducational institution ment of veterans operation for lessthan two years. where such coursehas been in section 1675presently states thatwhere Clause (3) ofsubsection (b) of veterans maybe has been offeredfor more than two years, a course though the schoolhas moved toanother enrolled in such a courseeven (VAR 14251 the same generallocality. By regulation location within locality" has beendefined to mean a (D)), the term"same general distance of the location withinnormal commuting move to a new also states thatin such a casethe original location.This regulation essentially the same. body and curriculamust remain faculty, student find it necessary torelocate as additional Established schools may demands caused byincreases in the facilities are requiredto meet for such as the needfor library spaceand the need number of students of VAR 14251(D)with refer- additional classrooms.The application have different within the "samegeneral locality" may ence to a move city rather than arural area. application wherethe school is in a would be made proposed change,the determination Under the found in each case.Primary im- based upon theindividual facts as such factors as(1) retention offaculty, portance wouldbe placed on the same studentbody, (2) no changein ownership,(3) substantially and (4) the samecurriculum. 1556

It is estimated that enactment of this section would not result in any additional cost. Section 303 This section would add a new section 1678 to chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, to bring into one section the applicable lawper- taining to correspondence courses. Subsection (a)(1) of tho new section provides for computation of the educational assistance allowance based upon 90 percent of the estab- lished charge which the institution requires nonveterans topay for pursuit of the same course or courses. Current law (section 1682(c) (1)) provides for computation basedon the full cost of the program. This is the onlyprogram which will return 0 to the veteran the full cost of his tuition. It also is training which per- mits the trainee to train at any pace he chooses, thereby allowing him to pursue vocation or avocation as he wills. In all other training pro- grams authorized under chapter 34, the veteran has a stake in his own training by meeting himself a part of the cost of hisown education. By requiring the eligible veteran topay a minimal 10 percent of the cost of the course, he will have such a stake find will give greater thought to his choice of a training objective and t !Lemeans of achieving his goal. This change would have the effect of placing the correspondence training program on a par with flight training in that the veteran, under both programs, would be required topay a minimal amount towards his own education. This subsection also increases the benefit payable under the correspondence trainingprogram by providing that a veteran's entitlement would be charged with one month for each $190 paid to him as an educational assistance allowance instead of the current $175 figure. This is the same benefit which is provideda veteran under title I of the bill who is pursuinga flight training program. The remainder of this new subsection merely representsa duplication of lan,guage which is contained in current law. Subsection (b)of the new section would requireinstitutions offering correspondence courses to havea pro-rata refund policy premised upon the number of lessons serviced and would allowa maximum registration or similar fee of $50. Courses offered by educational institutionsare approved for the training of veterans who will receive educational assistance under two standards. Those courses which have been accredited require less supervision and control by state authorities than those which are nonaccredited. This proposal would make one uniform standard for all correspondence schools, a change we believe will be equitable and will provide protection for veterans in thoseareas where it has been alleged that abuses have occurred. It is estimated that enactment of this provision would result in direct benefit savings as follows: Direct benefit savings Year: Minions 1st $7 f:nd 8 3rd 8 4th 6 5th 6

Total 5-year savings 35 230 1557

Section, 304 and merely reflectsthe shift of This section is technical in nature currently certainprovisionsconcerning correspondencecourses contained in section 1682of title 38 to the newsection 1678 proposed to be set up by section303. Section, 805 This section wouldamend section 1684 oftitle 38 to provide for the measurement of trade ortechnical courses, given at aninstitution offering courses leading to astandard college degree, on asemester hour basis for the purposeof payment of theeducational assistance allowance. Current law (section1684(a)(2)) provides for themeasurement of the trade or technical courses on aclock-hour basis with aminimum of 25 hours weekly toqualify for full-timeattendanen Junior colleges andcommunity colleges areoffering both profes- sional courses as part of adegree program andtedmical courses which generally may lead tocertification for a trade or atechnical license. The college courses aremeasured on a credithour or semester hour basis. (Under a conversionformula equival(nt semesterhours are is offered on aquarterly, trimester, or determined where a course clock hour other time basis.) Thetechnical courses are measured on a in the same school, and meetthe same high basis. They are both given, association for educational standardsestablished by the accrediting the area. There has beenvocal dissatisfactionraised in these schools by veterans where theyattend courses at the sameschool but are paid The standards establishedfor these courses at under different criteria. quality training is these college-levelinstitutions generally insures being offered equivalent tothe college level courseswhich are measured on acredit-hour basis. Thechange 'n languagerecommended would permit the school tohave the teclmical courseswhich meet their high standards for college-levelwork measured on asemester-hour basis. It is estimated thatthe7e would be nosignificant additional cost should this section beenacted. Section, 306 authorized by This section wouldamend the PREP program subchapter VI of chapter 34of title 38. Subsection (a) of thissection amends thesubchapter heading to change the name of the programfrom PredischargeEducation Pro- crram toPreparatory EducationProgram. Although eligibility forPREP assistance beginsearly in military of 181 (lays of activeservice), many service- service (after compleiion is men consider the programto be one designedfor an individual who service. The present nameof the program about to leave military good deal of this Predischarge EducationProgramaccounts for a confusion. Therefore, tohelp alloviate thismisunderstanding the name wouldbe changed to PreparatoryEducation Program. the purpose section(section 1695(a)) of the Subsection (b) changes from program toincorporate the changein the name of the program Predischarge to PreparatoryEducation Program. Section, 307 of title 38 to This section amendssubsection (a) of section 1701 first revision amendsparagraph (6) to in- make two changes. The definition of "educational clude correspondenceschools within the 231 1558 institution." This change is made necessary by the addition, in section 311 of the draft proposal, of a now section 1727 to chapter 35 per- mitting wives and widows to pursue correspondence courses. The rationale and cost estimate for this new section are set forth in the discussion of section 311 of this analysis. The second change adds a new paragraph (9) Pdding the term "training establishment" to the definitions currenv applicable to chapter 35. Under current law, wives, widows and children are entitled to other educational benefits, but they are not eligible to pursue appren- tice or other on-job training programs. The change made in this section (as well as those changes made in chapter 35 by sections 309, 312(a), 314, 315, and 316 of this bill) extend such training opportunities to them. A college education may not be suitable for everyone. Offering these individuals the opportunity to pursue on-job and apprenticeship training programs would afford those desiring post high school training another way of entering an occupation. Such programs would also offer forms of training in which these individuals would be able to receive high financial reward upon completion. It is estimated that enactment of this program, which is limited by the proposed new section 1738(a) to pursuit of training in a State, would result in the following costs:

Direct Number of benefits cost individuals (in millions)

Fiscal year: 1st 1 2, 500 $1.4 2d 4, 500 4.8 3d 6, 000 5.4 4th 6, 10C 5.0 5th 6, 100 4.7

5 year total 21.3

1 In making this estimate, we have assumed an effective date of the 3d quarter of fiscal year 1972. Section 308 This section would amend section 1720 of title 38 to eliminate mandatory counseling for certain children training under the provi- sions of chapter 35. Current law (section 1720) provides that the Administrator shall arrange for counseling for all children entering training under chapter 35 to assist the parent or guardian and the child in selecting an educa- tional or vocational objective. Under the chapter 35 program, the Government acts as a substitute parent standing in the place of the deceased or disabled paTent in providing financial assistance to enable the child to pursue his educa- tion. The responsibility imposed by law calls for the furnishing of this counseling assistance in helping the child in making a reasonable choice of an objective. There are, however, many cases where a child is already enrolled at or is attending a college and it can be assumed that in those cases a reasonable choice has been made and a suitable objective chosen. Mandatory counseling is an obvious duplication in such cases. While the mandatory requirement would be removed, any further counseling .232 1559 or guidance the childmight need would still be available throughthe school or the Veterans Administration, ifrequested. It is estimated that enactment of this sectionwould result in savings in the program ofapproximately $1 million per year over the next five years. Section 309 This section amends section 1723 of title 38 toeliminate the bar on pursuit of apprentice and other on-job training programsby chapter 35 beneficiaries. The rationale for thischange is elaborated on in the analysis of section 307. This section also exemptswidows and wives from the bar on pursuit of correspondence coursetraining. The rationale for this change is elaborated on in theanalysis of section 311. Section 310 This section would amend clause (3) ofsubsection (b) of section 1725 of title 38 to add new language to theso-called two-year rule author- izing enrollment of chapter 35 individuals in courseswhere a school has made a complete move to a newlocation outside the general locality of its former site. This provision is identical with the onecontained in section 302 of the proposal and the discussion andrationale set forth in the discus- sion of that section apply equally to thissection. It is estimated that enactment of thissection would not result in any additional cost. Section 311 This section would add a new section1726 to subchapter III of chapter 35 to provide authority for eligiblewives and widows to pursue secondary level training without charge totheir basic entitlement. Similar authority has already been giveneducationally disadvantaged vete' ans by section 1691 of chapter 34.The authority granted here would be a logical extension of similarbenefits to educationally disadvantaged wives and widows. Theseindividuals, due to the death or disability oftheir veteran-husbands, are required to assumethe responsibility for support of themselves andtheir families. By permitting them to pursue secondarylevel training they would be given an opportunity* to obtain the necessarytraining required for entrance into higher education withoutlosing their follow-on eligibility for college training. In extending this authority, pursuitwould be limited to training within a State. This has the effect ofeliminating secondary training for Philippine wives and widows. Itshould be pointed out that the majority of those individuals who wouldbe made eligible are already over the age of 50 and the purposeof the program would be of little benefit t., them. Further, most of them havealready taken advantage of the vocational training benefitspreviously provided to them under chapter 35 and thus they have been trainedfor a vocation designed to help them support themselves and theirfamilies. It is estimated that enactment ofthis proposal would result in the following costs:

23d 1560

Number of Direct individuals benefits cost

Fiscal year : 1st 700 $784, KO 2d 2, 000 2, 240, 000 3d. 2, 300 2, 576, 000 4th 2, 200 2, 464, 000 5th 1, 700 1,904,000

Total 5 year cost 9, 969, 000

This section would also add a new section 1727 to subchapter III of chapter 35 to provide authority for eligible wives and widows to pursue correspondence courses. This would provide these wives and widows with still another means of obtaining an education which would aid them in helping to support themselves and their families in the manner in which the veteran, but for his death or disability, would have provided for them. The extension of correspondence school training to wives and widows would be. subject to these same safeguards proposed for veterans under section 303 of the draft bill. In essence, this means that the entitlement of a widow or wife would be charged one month for each $190 paid to her in the form of an educational assistance allowance; the educational assistance allowance wouhl be computed based upon 90 percent of the established charge which the institution requires other individuals pursuing the same program to pay; and would require ;.nstitutions offering correspondence courses to have a pro rata refund policy premised uponthe number of lessons serviced and would allow a maximum registration or similar fee of $50. It is estimated that enactment of this new authority would result in costs ranging from under $500,000 in the first year to approximately $1 million in the fifth year. There is no experience in the chapter 35 program to use as an indicator of any precisefigures. Section 312 Subsection (a) of this section amends clause (2) of subsection (b) of section 1731 of title 38 to exempt programs of apprentice or other on-job training pursued by wives, widows and children under the authority of the new section 1738 added to chapter 35 by section 315 of this bill from the absence counting provisions for courses not leading to college degrees. This would equate such measurement with that presently applicable to apprentice and on-job training programs pursued by veterans under chapter 34. (The estimated cost of the apprentice, on-job programs is set forth in section 307 of the analysis.) Subsection (b) has two purposes. First, it repeals the present lan- guage of subsection (e) of section 1731which is no longer applicable in view of the advance payment proposal set forth in section 203 of this draft bill. Second, it would establish a requirement, comparable to that now applicable to correspondence courses pursued by veterans under chapter 34, that correspondence course benefits may not .be paid to those wives and widows made eligible to pursue such training by theDewsection 1727 added by section 311 of the draft bill until

234 the Administrator has received a certificationfrom the eligible person and the institution as to the number of lessonscompleted by the eligi- ble person and serviced by the institution.The same requirement is imposed ill conjunction with the conespondence programpursued by veterans under chapter 34. Section 313 This section amends clause (2) of subsection(a) of section 1732 to permit lump sum educational assistanceallowance payments to be made to eligible widows; wives and childrenwho are pursuing educa- tional programs on less than a half-time basis.Payment would be made for an entire term, semester or quarterin the month following the month in which certification is receivedfrom the educational institution that the person is enrolled in and ispursuing his program of education. This would equate the less thanhalf-time payment sys- tem for chapter 35 with that alreadyestablished for chapter 34. This would improve the administrative proceduresfor handling, these paymen ts. It is estimated that enactment of this sectionwould not result in any additional costs. Section 314 This section amends subsection (a) of section 1733 toincorporate three revisions. The first inserts a new clause(3) which provides for the measurement. of high school courses underchapter 35 so as to accommodate the authority granted by section 311permitting eligible wives and widows to pursue secondary training.The second inserts a new clause (5) providingfor the measurement of certain on-job and apprenticeship training programs which would bepermitted under the authority of the new section 1738 added to chapter 35by section 315 of this proposal. The third change is identicalwith the one contained in section 305 of the proposal and relates to measurementof technical courses pursued at schoolsoffering deglee programs. Section 315 This section would amend subchapter IV of chapter 35 toinsert a new section 1738 whichcontains the basic authority for the payment of a subsistence allowance to those wives,widows and children who would become eligible to pursue apprentice andother on-job training programs. Tbe rationale forthis program is set forth in the analysis of section 307". Section 316 This section would amend section 1777 ofchapter 36 of title 38 to incorporate references to wives, widows and childrenwho would be permitted to pursue programs of apprentice and otheron-job training. The rationale for this prograln is set forth in theanalysis of section 307. Section 317 This section is technical in nature andmerely reflects in tho table of sections at the beginning of chapter 34 of title38 the necessary heading changes required to be made because ofthe proposals made in sections 204, 303, and .306.

235 1562

Section. 318 This section is technical in nature and merely reflects in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 35 of title 38 of thenew sec- tions added to such chapter by sections 311 and 315 of this proposal. TITLE IVEFFECTIVE DATES Section 401 This section provides that the rate adjustments and advancepay provisions contained in titles I and II shall become effectiveon the first day of the second calendar month following the month in which enacted. Section 402 This section provides that the provisions of section 303 relating to correspondence course training shall become effective upon the first enrollment of an eligible veteran which occurs on or after the first day of the second calendar month following the month in which enacted. Section 403 This section provides that the revisions in the law concerning the counting of vocational training in certain institutions (sections 305 and 314) on a semester-hour basis shall become effective whena person affected by such a change either first enrolls or at the time of Ws subsequent re-enrollment occurring after the effective date of the enactment of this Act.

236 1563

Veterans' Administrationreport on H.R. 5188

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THEADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' Washington, D.C., November29, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee onVeterans' Affairs,House of Representatwes, Washington, D.C. This will respond to yourrequest for a DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: Congress, report by theVeterans' Administration onH.R. 5188, 92d and widows' educationalassistance a bill toamend the war orpluals' provide provisions of title 38of the United StatesCode in order to monthly training assistanceallowances thereunderfor eligible persons training. for apprenticeshipand other on-job United The purpose of thebill is to amendchapter 35 of title 38, States Code, to providemonthly trainingassistance allowances for apprenticeship and otheron-job training. eligible persons for Educational Assistance The original purposeof the War Orphans' Law 634, 84tb Congress) wasto provide educa- Act of 1956 (Public education would otherwisebe tional opportunitiesfor children whose by reason of thedeath of a parentfrom a impeded or interrupted Forces during disease or injury incurred oraggravated in the Armed War II, or the Koreanconflict, and therebyaid World War I, World status which theymight such children inattaining the educational such normally have aspired toand obtained butfor the dee:a of parent. of Under the provisionsof the original law,the Administrittor not appiovethe enrollment of aneligible Veterans' Affairs could recreational, appren- person in any coursewhich was a vocational or ticeship, other trainingon-the-job, institutionalon-farm training, than that given at aninstitution of higherlearning flight trainino. other pursued by correspondence, for which credit isgranted, courses to be television, or radio, or any courseto be pursued at aneducational institution not locatedin a State. of the law, amendatorylegislation has Since the original enactment prohibi- enlarged the purposeof the benefit andmodified some of the training allowed undeithat program. Chapter 35 tions to the types of special restorative tiaining now provideseducational assistance and allowance for the sonsand daughters ofveterans who died or were permanently and totallydisabled as the resultof a service-connected line of duty after thebeginning of the Spanish- disability incurred in also been extended to American War. Benefitsunder this law have widows of such veterans aswell as the wivesand certain wives and in action, children of servicemenwho are prisonersofwar, missing or internedby a foreign power.

237

a. ut 1564

A college education may not be suitable for everyone. We believe that offering such eligible child' en, wives, and widows the opportunity of pursuing programs of apprentices* and on-job training would permit them to pursue types of training in which they would be able to receive high financial reward upon completion. Such training would offer those individuals who desire post high school training another way of entering an occupation. The opportunity of pin suing this type of training would be a way of taking advantage of job opportunities which miglt not otherwise be available to them. We would recommend, however, that it be limited to training within a State. This would have the effect of eliminating pursuit Of such programs in the Philippines. We would like to point out that most of those individuals wbo would be made eligible by this proposal are now over age 50 and the purpose of the program would be of little benefit to them. In addition, many of them have already taken advantage of the vocational training benefits provided under chapter 35 and thus have been trained for a vocation. It is estimated that enactment of this proposal would result in additional direct benefits cost the first fiscal year of $1.4 million and $21.3 million over the first 5 years. A table detailing the number of individuals affected and the added cost by years is as follows:

Number of Direct benefits individuals cost (millions)

Fiscal year : 1972 (3) 2, 500 $1. 4 1973 4, 500 4.8 1974 6, 000 5.4 1975 6, 100 5. 0 1976 6, 100 4. 7

Total, 5-years 21. 3

In making these estimates, we have not included any administrative cost; we have assumed enactment effective the third quarter of fiscal 1972, and we are of the view, that there would be no significant cost changes if the Philippines beneficiaries were to be eliminated as suggested. The provisions of H.R. 51SS, with the amendments suggested above, have been included in the administration's omnibus education bill submitted to your committee. We, therefore, recommend enactment of the administration's provisions in lieu of H.R. 5188. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presenta tion of this report from the stnndpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALDE.JOHNSON,Administrator.

238 1565

Veterans' Administration report on H.R.8266

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFiCE OF TIM ADMINISTRATOR OFVETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 29, 1971.. HON. OLIN'E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans'Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR.CHAIRMAN: This is inreply to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration onH.R. 8266,.92d Congress, a bill amending section 1677, of title38.United States Code toprovide, in certain cases, for the reimbursementof veterans for costs incurred by them for flight school coursework for private pilot licenses. This proposal, if enacted, wouldauthorize reimbursement for the cost of flight school cour.es.taken toqualify for a private pilot's license, to any eligible veteranwho has (a) completed a flight training program approved under section 1677;(b) obtained a commercial pilot's license; and (c) not exhausted hisentitlement to educational assistance. Reimbursement would be made to the extentof any unused educa- tional assistance entitlementunder chapter 34. The prerequisites under the currentlaw for educational assistance .-7benefits for'the pursuit of flight training(section 1677) resulted from considerable adverse experience.with,the program in the early phases of the World War II GI bill. Many veteransduring that period pursued and completed only enoughtraining to obtain a private pilot'slicense. Since such a license did not qualifyfor employment in the industry, the traininacould only be considered avocational orrecreational in nature,and*did not meet the legislative intent to provide educational assistance in attainina a vocationalobjective. This wasrecognize% and corrected by the Congress when it .re- established flight training as anacceptable educational program under Public Law 90-77. That enactmentprovided, in addition to certain other prerequisites, that a veteran must possessa privatepilot'S license and that pursuit of the come offlight instruction be "necessary for the attainment of a reco,o;nizedvocational objective in the fieldof: aviation" or that such training be"generally recognized as ancillary'. to the pursuit of a vocationalendeavor other than aviation."Assurance was thus writteninto the law that the veteran'sobjective extended beyond the acquisition of a privatepilot's license for purely recrea- tional purposes. Moreover, to further assure theparticipation of only those veterans of a serious purpose, Congresslimited the payment of educational assistance to 90 percent of theestablished charges of tuition.Thus, the veteran must pay the costsof obtaining a privatepilot's license plus 10 percent of the costs of theadvanced training to receiveassist- ance under section1677.

71-815 0 - 72 - 16 239 1566

The wisdom of this approach has become apparent. As of June 1971 there were 32,673 veterans and 5,170 servicemen pursuing flight train- ing under the current program. This would seem to indicate that veterans of serious purpose have the ability to secure; a privatepilot's license without much apparent financial problem. The integrity of the flight training program and the limitation of its benefits to the serious mmded would be undermined by enactment of H.R. 8266: Many courses leading to a commercial pilot's license are available at a cost of $1,500 to $2,000. Under the bill a veteran could acquire both a private and a commercial license at a cost of only $150 to $200 since the Veterans' Administration would reimbursethe cost of the private license and pay 90 percent of the cost of obtaining the commercial license. This would have the effect of reducing the cost to the veteran of obtaining a commercial license below his present cost of acquiring only a private license. It would clearly encourage enrollment in flight training for recreational purposesthe very intention Con- gress sought to avoid. It is estimated that the direct benefit cost for fiscal year 1972 would be $27.8 million. Following is a breakdown of the estimated cost for this and the ensuing 4 years.

Number of Direct benefits eligible persons (millions)

Fiscal year; 1st 37. 100 $27. 8 2d 10. 500 7. 9 3d 9, 800 7.4 4th 8, 400 6. 3 5th 7, 700 5. 8

Total, 5-years 55. 2

In developing these estimates, information was obtained which indicates that most veterans who start a commercial pilot's course go on to completion. Aboutnine in 10 of these take advance courses such as instrument rating, andmultiengine courses. Based upon the cost of the courses most likely to be taken and value of full entitlement, it would appear that most of these veterans will have some entitlement lemaining to apply against the cost of their private pilot's license. It is also assumed that cost in the first year will include payment to all veterans who had completed a commercialpilot course, retroactive to October 1967 when flight training was first authorized under current legislation. For the foregoing reasons, the Veterans' Administration opposes enactment of H.R. 8266. We me advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the standpoint of the Administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator.

240 1567

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. p894

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C. November 29, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House ofRepresentatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your requestfor a report on H.R. 9894, 92dCongress, a bill to amend title 38, United States Code, in order to design& e certain adult evening highschool courses as full-time coursesfor purposes of educational assistance allowance paymen ts. The bill proposes to amend section 1684(a)(3) oftitle 38) United States Code, to provide that an adult eveninghigh school comb con- sisting of two or more Carnegie units per semester shall beconsidered a full-time course.The language of the bill is susceptible of various technical constructions. The sponsor's statement at the timehe intro- duced the bill, however, clearly shows that the purposeis to permit the paylnent of GI bill e.ducational assistanceallowance benefits for full-time adult evening secondary school attendance.Our comments are premised onthis understanding. At the time the Veterans' ReadjustmentBenefits Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-358) was enacted, authority was giventhe Adminis- trator of Veterans' Affairs toestablish certain standards for the measurement of high school programs.Pursuant to that authority, the Administrator promulgated regulations definingfull-time high school training to consist of at least 25 clock hours of instruction perweek. These regulations also provided that noenrollment in an adult evening secondary program would be approved in excessof half-time training. This limitation was subsequently enacted intolaw by Public Law 90-77 and is presently contained in section 1691(b)of title 38. The limitation was premised on irregularities andabuses which occurred during the Korean conflict GI bill educational program.Many instances were found where veterans were unable towork full time during the daytimeto 4:30 or 5 o'clockand reachschool in time for the evening sessions. It was also found that in manyinstances, because of bus schedules or other reasons, many veteransleft their classes before the end of the session. In enacting Public Law 91-219, Congress provided(38 U.S.C. 1684(a) (3)) that an academic high school courserequiring 16 units for a full course shall be considered a full-time coursewhen a minimum of four units per year is required. A unit was definedby that law as being not less than 120 60-minute hours or theirequivalent of stud3i in any subject in 1 academic year. In approving this language the Congressadopted, for GI bill purposes, the Carnegie anitfor measurement of high school courses.

241 1568

A Carnegie unit is a standard of measurement fordescribing the secondary school subject matter pattern that comprises the entranee requirements of a college and was defined originally bythe Canwgie Foundation for Advancement of 'reaching. This meatsurement assumes 16 units of work in a 4-year secondaryschool pattern. A single unit represents a year's study in any subject of notless than 120 60-minute hours or their equivalent. The normal high school semester averages between 16 and 19weeks in length. A veteran completing two Carnegieunits in this period of time has to attend class for at leaLst 240 hours during the semester or an awerage offrom 12 to 16 hours per week. While this is somewhat less than the 25 clock hours per week previouslyrequired for full-time secondary school attendance, nevertheless, itisstill a demanding schedule for a night student. This is especially true in the caseof an adult who has probably been out of sclmol for someperiod of time. Such r, student would need to spend a great deal of timein out-of-class study. It is emphasized that when the Congress amended thelaw in 1970 (Public Law 91-219) to meastn e high school coursesby the unit, instead of the dock hour, it did not see fit to change therestriction on enrollment in evening high school courses. We believe thatauthorizing payment for full-time adult eveninghigh school attendance would encourage many veterans to assume a verydemanafing course load which they couhl not satisfiactorily complete and stillwork full time. This could again lead to the repetition of the abuseswhich occurred during the Korean conflict GI bill program. If the committee should gwe furthet consideration tothis bill, we believe thatsafeguards should be added to pa otect against the prior abuses which occuared. In addition, the limitation which current exists in section 1691(b) of title 38. It is estimated that the first-year cost of enactment of theproposal would be $4 million and the cost over the first 5 yearswould be $33 million. In making this estimate, we have assumed that the measme would not become effective untilthe middle of the current fiscal year. A breakdownof the eAimated cost by years and by number of individuals follows:

Estimate of Number of direct !melds individuals cost (millions)

Fiscal year ; $4. 0 1st 13, 300 2d 13, 800 8,3 7. 9 3d 13, 200 4th 10, 900 6. 5 5th 10, 500 6. 3 Total, 5 fiscal years 33. 0 'For the foregoing reasons, we recommend against favorable con- siderátion by your committee on H.R. 9894. We are admed by the Office of Management andBudget that there is' no objection to the presentation of this reportfrom the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALDE.JOHNSON,Administrator.

242 Veterans' Administration report onH.R. 10169

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OFVETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 29 , 1971. HOD. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans'Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DF4AR MR. CHAIRMAN: This willrespond to your request for a report by tne Veterans' Administration onH.R. 10169, 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 31,United States Code, so as to increase the monthly subsistence allowance, and for other purposes. Section 1 of the bill would amend section1504(b) of title 38, United States Code, to increase the rateof monthly subsistence allowance payable to veterans pursuingvocational rehabilitation training under chapter 31. The rate for a single veteranwithout dependents, who is pursuing a full-time institutional program,would be increased from the present rate of $135 permonth to $162. Similar increases would be granted to veterans withdependents and those who are pursuing training on less than a full-timebasis or on a different training basis. The increases provided underthe bill would, in general, range from 12.8 percent to 20.8 percent,with a greater increase provided for dependents in excess of twowhere the veteran is not entitled to in- creased compensation undersections 315 or 335 of title 38 premised upon dependency. The Cost of Living Councilhas exempted income maintenance programs such asvocational rehabilitation training, from coverage duringthe current freeze. Based on this ruling, and recognizing our obligation to both the Nation'seconomic goals and to the veteran and his family in this criticaltime, the Veterans' Administration feels justified in supporting anadjustment in these benefit payments to compensate for priceincreases since the date benefits werelast in- creased (February 1, 1970).Since the rate increases proposed inH.R. 10169 far exceed the rise in the costof livina which has occurred since the last rate changt, we wouldrecommendat-lesser adjustment increase in benefits, more commensuratewith the rise in the cost of living, rather than the increases proposedin H.R. 10169. Section 2 of the bill would add a newsubsection (c) to provide for annual adjustments insubsistence benefits premised upon the average percentage chanae in the costof living for the preceding calendar year. Thisproposalbwould associate benefit rates with the average per- centage change in the costof living. We are urging enactmentof an increase in the educational benefitsbased upon the current increase in the cost of living and haveforwarded a draft bill to the Speakerwlih has been referred to your committee.However, automatic adjustment in benefits is without precedentin veterans' benefit programs and

243 1570 should be considered more carefully beforebeing embodied in legisla- tion, as proposed in H.R. 10169. It is estimated that enactment of H.R. 10169would result in added direct benefits cost of $3.4 million the firstfiscal year and a cost of $32.6 million over the first 5 fiscal years.A detailed breakdown show- ing number of individuals affected anddirect benefits cost for each of the next 5 fiscal years is as follows:

Direct benefits Individuals cost (millions)

Fiscal year: 32, 000 i a 4 lst 33, 000 7. 0 2d 34, 000 7.2 3d 35, 000 7. 4 4th 36, 000 7.6 5th Iota!, 5 years 32. 6

For the 1st fiscal year the number al individuals applies to the entire yearwhile the cost figure is only 34 as great as it wield have been tor the entire year. It is emphasized that this costestimate takes into account only the additional cost dueto the initiallyproposed rate increase. It does not reflect subsequent increases due to a risein the cost of living since we are not in anyposition to predict such increases. As aguideline, any increase in the costof living of a magnitude of 3 percent occurring after the initial rate increase wentinto effect would cost approximately $500,000 per year foreach10,000 trainees. Subsequent cost-of-living rate increases would, of course,be compounded. Our estimate of direct benefits cost isbased upon the number of veterans already expected tobe in training. If the higher benefits which would be made available by thisproposal should induce vet- erans to entertraining who otherwise would not havetrained, the entire cost of training for such personswould be considered to be additional direct benefits cost attributable tothis proposal. Such possible added cost is not susceptible of anymeaningful estimate. For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against enactment of H.R. 10169 by your committee. We are advised by the Office ofManagement and Budget that there is no objection to the presentationof this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALDE.JOHNSON,Administrator.

244 1571

Veterans' Administration report on H.R.10543

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 29, 1971. HOD. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs,House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your requestfor a report 13,- the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 10543, 92dCongress, a bill to amend chapters 31, 34, 35, and 36 of title 38,United States Code, in order to make improvements in the vocationalrehabilitation and educational programs under such chapters; toauthorize an ad- vance initial paymentand prepaylnent of the educational assistance allowance to eligible veterans and persons pursuing a programof educa- tion under chapters 34 and 35 of such title; toestablish a work-study program and work-studyadditional educational assistance allowance for certain eligible veterans; and for other purposes. This measure would amend chapters 31, 34, and 35of title 38, United States Code, in four primary respects, namely, toauthorize an advance educational allowance payment to veterans; to create a new work-study programwhereby veterans could perform services for the Veterans' .Administration and havetheir advance partially or wholly canceled; to provide for ca'icellation ofFederal educational loans through utilization of educational entitlementearned under the GI bill; and to make various changes in presentlaw to combine certain administrative provisions applicable to bothchapters 34 and 35 into chapter 36. More specifically, section 101 of the bill wouldpermit veterans receiving vocational rehabilitation training underchapter 31 to par- ticipate in the work-study program provided by thisbill. Section 102 would increase from $100 to $200 the amount of aloan which could be made to a disabled veteran who is commencing a programof vocational rehabilitation training. We favor the enactment of the latterprovision. Section 201 would add a new section 1780 to chapter 36of title 38. Subsection (a) of the new section would combine intothe new section certain administrative provisions presentlycontained insections 1681 and 1731 which provide the basicenrollment period for which educational assistance allowances may be pidfor all programs other than correspondence, flight, apprenticeship, andother on-job training. Subsections (b), (c), and (d) of the new section 1780would authorize an advance payment programunder which an eligible veteran or person who is imrsuing a programof education on a half-time or more basis may apply for and be granted an advance paymentof his edu- cational assistance allowance. They would allow prepaymentof sub- sequent educational benefits andprovide for recovery of payments where the veteran or person fails to enrollafter receiving an advance.

2115 1572

The advance payment would be made within 15 days after receipt of an application except in unusual or extraordinary cases, but not earlier than. 30 days prior to the ,late the eligible veteran's or person's program of education is to commence. Payment wouldbe in an amount equivalent to that payable for the month or fraction thereof in which the program is to commence plus the amount payable for the succeed- ing month. Subsequent payments would be prepaideach month with the final payment subject to proof of enrollment and satisfactory pursuit of the program of education. In order to qualify for the advance, the applicant would be required to submit evidence showing himself to be an eligible veteran or person; certify that he is enrolled in, has applied fore been accepted by, and intends to enroll in a specified institution; certify that he is pursuing or phms to pursue, a specified approved course of education during such school year at such educational institution; state the expected enroll- ment date and the number of semester or clock hours he is pursuing or intends to pursue and, in the case of a veteran, indicatethe number of dependents he claims. If the veteran or eligible person fails to qualify for such an allowance, the advance would constitute a liability and the Administrator would be permitted to recover the amount of the pay- ment from any other Veterans' Administration benefits due the veteran or in the same manner as any other debt due the UnitedStates. Under present law (38 U.S.C. 1681), the educational ass:itance allowance of an eligible veteran pursuing a program of education on a half-time or more basis is paid in arrears as soon as practicable after the Administrator is assured of the veteran's enrolhnent in and pursuit of the program of education for the period for which such allowance is to be paid. These payments do not begin, however,until after the veteran has enrolled and completed each month of training. The President's Committee on the Vietnam Veteran, in its study, recognized that this delay in the initial payment of the educational allowance could have the effect of discouraging program participation by a veteran who cannot afford the initial outlay required by most schools and the necessary money for subsistence for himself and his family until the first payment is received. The Committee, in .its report to the President dated March 26, 1970, made the following recommendation No. A-1: Encourage veterans to enter and follow through with a training program by providing an advance education assistance payment to help the veteran meet the initial costs of entering training. A draft measure to carry out this recommendation was sent to the Congress last year, but was not enacted into law. The President, in his message to the Congress dated January 26, 1971, urged the Con- gress to consider advance payment legislation. A newdraft bill was submitted to the Speaker of the House by letter of the. same date, urging its enactment (copy enclosed). This resulted in the introduc- tion of H.R. 3349 which is presently pending before your committee. H.R. 3349 would authorize the Administrator to make an initial advance payment of the educational assistance allowance granted under chapter 34 of title 38, to veterans enrolled in an educational institution half-time or more, plus the allowance for 1full month, upon receipt of proof that the eligible veteran hasbeen accepted for enrollment in an approved educational institution. Such payment

246 1573 would be made not earlier than the first of the month in which pursuit of the program is to commence. Thereafter, payments would continue to be made in advance at the beginning of each month in which the veteran pursues his program of education. Administrative control over the propriety of such payment is provided for by authorizing the Administrator to withhold final joay- ment of an enrollment period until proof of satisfactory pursuit of the program is furnished. In addition, if the eligible veteran fails to enroll in the course after receiving the initial payment of the educational assistance allowance, the amount of such advance payment may be recovered from any benefit otherwise due the veteran under any other law administered by the Veterans' Administration or such over- payment shall constitute a liability of such eligible veteran and may be recovered in the same manner as any other debt due the United States. Advance payments would not be permitted to be made to veterans pursuing flight or correspondence training ptograms. The recent amendment of the GI bill (Public Law 91-219) provides for a lump-sum payment of the educational assistance payable to veterans who are attending school on a less than half-time basis and to eligible servicemen for the entire quarter, semester, or term during the month immediately following the month in which the enrolhnent certification is received. The advance payment proposals in both H.R. 3349 and the draft proposal would, we believe, be a desirable extension of the present law in that veterans attending school on a half-time or more basis would be permitted to apply for an advance paymentprior to their enrollment in school. The advance pay provisions of H.R. 10543 contain certain pro- cedural restrictions relative to the administration of this proposed program which we believe could best be left to administrative deter- mination. We are particularly concerned with the time frame lhnita- tions on advance payment, that is, within 30 days prior to training and 15 days after receipt of application. For these and other reasons, we favor H.R. 3349 which does not contain such restrictions on the Administrator's flexibility in adjusting to changing circumstances. Subsection (e) of the new section 1780 would incorporate into chapter 36 certain provisions presently set forth in section 1682(b) (2) concerning lump-sum payments to individuals pursuing programs of education while on active duty or on a less-than-half-time basis. The effect would be to extend this lump-sum payment system to individ- uals eligible under chapter 35 as well as to those individuals currently eligible under chapter 34. Subsection (f) merely incorporates present provisions of sections 1681(c) and 1731(c) into chapter 36. Section 202 of the bill is an administrative change which revises section 1681 of chapter 34 of title 38 concerning payments to eligible vet(lrans of educational assistance allowance and includes references to the new section 1780. Section 203 of the bill would add two new sections (1687) and 1688) to chapter 34. The first new section proposes a work-study program while the second would establish a new plan under which veterans could utilize their GI bill educational entitlement to repay or cancel Federal educational loans. The proposed new work-Audy program would apply to veterans pursuing, on a full-time basis, a course of vocational rehabilitation

247 1574 under chapter 31 or a program ofeducation under chapter 34. The veteran would be paid anadvance of $250 in return for his agreement to perform services which maybe related to the processing of necessary papers at educationalinstitutions or regional offices or facilities of the -Veterans' Administration, service inconjunction with the outreach services program, services in the hospital,domiciliary care and medical treatment programs, or servicesrelated to any other activity of the Veterans' Administration as the Administratorshall deem appropriate. The $250 advance would be repaid by theperformance of 100 hours of services. Advances of lesser amountscould be made on a repayment basis through the performance of aprorated number of hours of service. If the veteran failed to fulfill hiswork obligation, the amount due, based upon the pro rataportion of the work obligation not completed, would be considered an overpaymentand treated like overpayments in other programs. The proposal requires the Administrator,based upon a prescribed annual study, to allot work-study agreementsthrough regional offices, with the regional offices to furtherallocate agreements to educational institutions within their areas. It also setsforth criteria for the selec- tion of the students for the work-study programincluding needs of the student to augment hisallowance, motivation of the veteran, disadvantages of minority groups, andavailability to place where services are to be performed. I strongly support the idea thatneedy veterans attending school under the GI bill should have an opportunity toaugment their income through work-study arrangements. Theadministration is seriously concerned with the financial plightof all college students, including veterans, who struggle with therising costs of higher education in their efforts to enter or finish school. For anystudent in this difficult situation, help is most effective if ittakes into account his total financial situation. Under the Higher Education Act of 1965,student assistance in the form of loan, grant, and work-study programsreach colleges through- out the country and already gofar to meet the needs of students, including veterans. Accordingly, while Iendorse the objective of the work-study provisions of this bill, I must opposethem as duplicative of the existing work-study programwhich is better designed to reach the neediest veteran students andprovides them with higher benefits. Moreover, amendments to the HigherEducation Act proposed earlier this year by the administrationand now under consideration by the Congress provide a comprehensiveapproach to students' finan- cial problems through loans, grants,and work-study assistance which would be more effective, bettertargeted, and simpler to administer than the work-study provisions of11.R. 10543. The Office of Educa- tion estimates that 95 percent of allreturning veterans would be found eligible to participate in the generalhigher education programs. I recognize that one intent of the'proposedwork-study provisions of H.R. 10543 is to increase the possibilitiesfor GI student employment in the Veterans' Administration. While VAalready has a substantial work-study program and hires sizable numbers ofreturning veterans, it wool(' be cleisrable to diversify VA'sauthority in this area by pro- viding new language which would permit theAdministrator to employ, as intermittentemployees, students enrolled in full-time programsof

248 1575 education or training under chapters 31 and 34 of title 38. Instead of the basis set forth in the subject bill for paying these student-veterans, we would recommend paying themin accordance with the going rate for the job classification. We believe that in nearly all instances this would be more per hour than that payable under the bill. A draft of a suggested amendment to carry out our recommendation is enclosed as an attachment to this report. The new section 1688 proposed in section 203 of H.R. 10543 would offer veterans with GI bill educational entitlement a new option, namely, the opportunity to use accelerated educational assistance allowance to repay, in whole or in part, certain Federal direct or guar- anteed loans. These would be loans made to the veteran after April 13, 1970, for education pursued prior to his performance of active.duty service. The veteran would be granted four separate opportunities to have unused entitlement (at the rate of educational assistance to which he would be entitled at the time of application and based upon full-thne training) applied to both principal and interest for each loan as he determines is most advantageous to him.The active duty upon which such entitlement is earned would be that which was performed after June 30, 1970. This new section would supplant section 501 of Public Law 91-230 which currently provides loan cancellation at a rate of 12percent per year for up to a maximum of 4 years of service after June 30, 1970. Historically, the educational assistance allowance has been provhled by th3 Congres.s to encourage returning vetertms to continue their education and training. The federally supported loan program, open to both veterans and nonveterans, Was intended to assist those vial insufficient financial means to cbtain some needed education and also encourage persons to train in fields where a need forspecially trained persons existed, such as in teaching and in medicalsubspecialties. The repayment provisions for these loans are very liberal, with ninny containing substantial forgiveness when the borrowers engage in employment in the field for which he trained or for work in specially designated areas. The returning veteran has 8 years from his release from active duty to avail himself of the educational assistance provided under the GI bill. We believe there would be groat temptation to the veteran who has college training and an outstanding Federal education loan to apply all of his entitlement to pay off part or all of the loan. The demands of our society are such, with everchanging technological and methodological advances that graduate training has become common- place, and not the exception. It is now the key to a better job. If a veteran used his entitlement to offset a prior loan, the educational assistance allowance would not be available to continue his education. The temptation to spend his earned entitlement to erase an old loan would be strong. We oppose this provision as we do not believe it will assist the readjustment of veterans and it is not consistent with the purposes of the educational assistance program. It would simply refill the loan coffers of other agencies at an accelerated rate to provide the non- veteran population more funding. It would discriminate against the student who worked to pay for his education and could very well negate the purposes for which many Federal educational loan programs were designed. 249 1576

The remaining sections of the subjectbill are primarily administra- tive in context and would make requiredchanges to combine various provisions presently contained in chapters 34and 35 into a single unit within chapter 36. In addition, provisionspresently contained in the National Defense Education Act providing forloan cancellation for service in the Armed Forces (referred toearlier in this report) would be repealed. Concerning the cost of H.R. 10543, ifenacted, the advance and prepayment of educationalasAstance allowances under chapters :34 and 35 would involve additional costsonly to the extent that adminis- trative costs may be increased or overpaymentsmight occur. Increases in administrative costswould not be substantial and provisionis made in the bill for the recovery of overpayments. We have no prior experience withthe work-study program to use as a firm basis farestimating the numbers of trainees whomight be usefully employed by the Veterans'Administration on a limited part-time basis to perform necessary services.Therefore, we have not attempted to estimate annual participation ratesand costs applicable to each of the next 5 years,but, instead, have estimated an annual rate of participation and costwhich reasonably might be expected in 1 full year of operation of theseprovision3 after they become effective and are fully installed. This annual rateof participation and cost is estimated as follows:

Estimated costs (millions)

Adminis- Direct Number trntive benefits To In

$35.1 Trainees employed in work-study program 123, 000 $4- 5 $30. 6

Much of the information needed as a basis forestimating the mag- nitude of the cost of the loan repaymentproposal is not available; therefore, the estimate submitted here is ofnecessity based on a series of assumptions which are set forth indetail in an attachment to this report. Based upon the informationavailable and the assump- tions made, our estimate of costs for thefirst 5 years is as follows: Direct benefits costs Fiscal year: Millions 1972 Nowinal 1973 SS. 9 1974 23. 3 1975 36. 5 1976 44. 7 5-year total 113. 4 These estimates assume that eligible peNonswill not apply for repay- ment action after they have served morethan 180 days on active duty, but would wait until they have been separatedfrom the Armed Forces. Veterans are expected to request full repaymentof the bal- ance of their loan whenthe first postservice payments become one. It is anticipated there will be a substantialincrease in administra- tive cost due to the provisions for repayment ofthese Federal educa- tion loans. However, the extent of such Increase cannotbe determined

250 1577

until administrative procedures which would be required to implement this proposal are further defined. In summary, we favor the provisions of the bill increasing the amount available to chapter 31 veterans for loans from $100 to $200; we favor the administrative changes as we believe they should con- tribute toward administrative simplicity; and we are in favor of the principle of advance payment of educational assistance allowances, but recommend enactment of provisions for handling such payments as set forth in the draft bill entitled "Veterans' Educution and Train- ing Amendments of 1971" transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives this date rather than those contained in H.R. 10543. As set forth earlier in this report, we do not recommend enact- ment of the work-study proposal in view of the existing broader work- study program which is better designed to assist the neediest veteran- students. However, we propose the enactment of general statutory authority permitting the employment of veteran-students as inter- mittent employees. Finally, we oppose the enactment of the provision permitting repayment of Federal education loans by using educational assistance entitlement earned under the GI bill. The Office of Management and Budget has no objection to the submission of this report. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator.

AMENDMENT II.R. 10543, 92d Congress, is amended as follows: Beginning on page 10, line 9, strike out all t hat follows through line 20, page 14, and insert in lieu thereof the following: 11687. Veer/in-student employment "(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator is au- thorized to utilize on an intermittent basis tbe services of veteran-students who are pursuing full-thne programs of (education or training under chapters 31 and 34 of this title. Such veteran-students may be utilized to perform such services for the Veterans Administration at such times and places as the Administrator deems advisable. "(b) Veteran-students utilized under the authority of subsection (a) of this section shall be paid au hourly rate equivalent to the minimum rate for a grade in the General Schedule contained in section 5332 of title 5, determined by the Administrator to be appropriate for the services rendered. Such grade determina- tion may, at the Administrator's discretion, be based upon but shall not be subject to, position classification standards issued by the Civil Service Commission pursuant to section 5105 of title :5. "(e) While performing the services authorNed by subsection (a) of this section, such veteran-students shall not be deemed to be employees of the United States for the purposes of laws administered by the Civil Service Commission. They shall, however, be considered t o be employees of the United States for the purposes of the benefits of chapter 81 of title 5."

ASSUMPTIONS USED IN ESTIMATING COST OF LOAN REPAYMENT PROPOSAL CON- TAINED IN SECTION 203 OF H.R. 10543, 92D CoNGRESS FIRST ASSUMPTION Persons who might benefit from this proposal are categorized into two groups: a. Persons eligible for loan repayment who would have been in training anyhow under current provisions of chapter 34. b. Persons eligible for loan repayment who would not have entered training under chapter 34 but who will use this opportunity to repay their educational loan by charge against entitlement under chapter 34.

251 1578

SECOND ASSUMPTION Approximate 2% of the loan repayment will be for veterans enrolled in schools below college level. This assumption recognizes Office of Educationexperience which indicates that 98% of their education loans are made to collegestudents.

THIRD ASSUMPTION Past experience concerning the proportion of chapter 34 traineeswho had completed one or more years of college prior to service will continuerelatively unchanged. This experience is as follows: 1 year 6.5%; 2 years4.4%; 3 years. 1.8%; 4 years 6.3%; 5 years 2.5%; or a total of 21.5% who completed one or more years of college prior toservice. However, not all of these veterans would have received this training after April 13, 1970. This cost estimate includesonly those years of training (loans) which are likely to have occurred subsequent to April 13, 1970. FOURTH ASSUMPTION Estimates obtained from participating Federal agencies indicate that ap- proximately one of four college trainees receives an education loan; therefore, we have assumed that one of four veterantrainees who had completed one or more years of college prior to servieq receivedsuch a loan. Further, because of the apparent liberality of this proposal, we assmne that this proportion for veterans eligible for loan repayment will be increased to one of three.

FIFTH ASSUMPTION A relatively few veterans will be in an occupational field which exempts them from paying up to half' their loan. However, the fact that they can repay the entire loan by charging iLc, chapter 34 entitlement may cause some ofthem to change to a more lucrative filed of employment and use this repaymentdevice. In any event, all of the veterans in such occupational fields are likely to use this device for repayment for at least half of their loan.

SIXTH ASSUMPTION Some veterans eligible for loan repayment may elect to conserve all of their chapter 34 entitlement for purposes of current training. We have assumed that this number will reduce the 33% (one of three) cited in the fourthassumption to 30%. We further aSSIIITIC that the remaining veterans will have sufficient unused entitlement to cover the entire amount of loan.

SEVENTH ASSUMPTION Most of the veterans who request loan repayment will request repaymentof the entire loan in one payment. Based upon information from the Officeof Edu- cation, we have estimated that the weighted average loan made forFiscal Year 1970 was equal to $833, annual rate. To allow for the annual increasein school costs and the cost of living, we have assumed an annual increase of6% in the average amount of loan. These average rates are used to estimate the average total amount of loan incurred by aneligible veteran over all the years covered by his loan. EIGHTH ASSUMPTION The number of eligible persons who will request loan repayment without entering training (Assumption 1.b) are about two-thirds as large as the number of trainees who will request such repayment. Therefore, we multiplied the esti- mated cost applicable to trainees by the factor 167% to provide for thetotal cost of loan repayments. NINTII ASSUMPTION There will be some cost avoidance for other agencies because of early repayment of the loan and cancellation of inkrest payments which otherwise wouldhave been paid by the Federal government. The amount of such offset in cost is notreflected in the estimate of cost which.would be paid by the Veterans Administration.

2 -.. 1579

TENTH ASSUMPTION There will be an appreciable increase in administrative cost to the Veterans Administration. However, the extent of such increase cannot be determined until administrative procedures which would be required to implement this proposal are further defined. Therefore, the cost cited is for direct benefits only,

ELEVENTH ASSUMPTION The estimate of veterans to whom this proposal would be applicableis based upon Department of Defense estimates of separation rates for Fiscal Year 1973 and subsequent years. Veterans separated prior to Fiscal Year 1973are presumed to be ineligible. If the sharp decline in separation rates estimated by the Depart- ment of Defense (reduction to about one-third the Fiscal Year 1970 rate by Fiscal Year 1976) does not occur, this could increase the direct benefitscost through Fiscal Year 1975 to as much as twice the estimated level.

!253 1580

Veterans' Administration report onH.R. 11534, H.R. 11400, a similar purposebill, and H.R. 11720, which wasintroduced following submission of this report

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OFVETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 29, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans'Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This responds to yourrequest for a report by the Veterans' Administration onH.R. 11534, 92d Congress, abill,, to amend title 38 of theUnited States Code to authorize theenroll- ment of eligible veterans in a courseoffered by an institution which has changed its location. Thiswill also serve as a report onH.R. 11400, a bill of similar purpose. These bills are designed to establishcriteria under which an educa- tional institution which has movedits location from thegeneral locality of its former site may beauthorized to enroll veterans in courses which havebeen in operation for 2 years. Under current law, section 1675(a)prescribes that the Adminis- trator may not apj?rove theenrollment of veterans in a courseoffered by an educational institutionwhere such course has been inoperation for less than 2 years. Clause (3) ofsubsection (b) of section 1675 states that this restriction shall not apply to a courseoffered for more than 2 years in an educationalinstitution which has moved toanother site "within the same general localitx." The term "same generallocality" has been administrativelydefined by the Veterans' Administration to mean a newlocation "within normal commuting distance of theoriginal location" where theinstitu- tion remains essentially the same as tofaculty, student body, and curriculum. Section 1675(b)(3) had its derivationin section 227, PublicLaw 550, 82d Congress, the Veterans'Readjustment Act of 1952,and has a long historyof like administrativeinterpretation and application. The enactment of the limitationrequiring that a change oflocation of an institution be within the samegeneral locality resulted from the experience gained in the administrationof the World War IIReaajust- ment Educational programand was intended as asafeguard against some opportunisticinstitutions which offeredunsatisfactory educa- tionkl programs and after exploitingthe available veteran-student population in one area changed theirlocation to other areas tobegin the same process over again. Recent experience with the program,however, has shown that there are establishedschools which have found it necessaryto relocate as additional facilities are required to meetdemands caused by increases in the number of students, such asthe need for library spaceand

254 1581 additional classrooms. Land and communityredevelopment no doubt have played a role in creating shortages ofavailable large land sites which it is reasonable to anticipate would be necessaryfor the expan- sion of educational institutions. The additional new language proposedin H.R. 11534 would au- thorize the Administrator of Veterans'Affairs to approve enrollment in a course offered by an institutionwhich has .changed its location with substantially the same faculty,curriculums, and student body, without a change in ownership. It is estimated that enactment of this billwill not result in any additional costs. In view of the foregoing, we recommendfavorable consideration of this legislation by your committee. Theprovisions of H.R. 11534 have been incorporated into an omnibuseducation bill which has been transmitted to your committee. We are advised by the Office ofManagement and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation ofthis report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator.

71 -815 0 - 72 - 17 , 1582

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 10166

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 29, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman,Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 10166, 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, to permit eligible wives and widows to pursue a program of education through correspondence courses. The creneral concept of the educational prop am provided under chapter35 of title 38 has been to allow eligible individuals to pursue a program of education which would be a followup to their high school education by offering them an opportunity to obtain supple- mental assistance for educational opportunities at the college level or at vocational technical institutions. Although under current law eligible wives and widows may train on a basis ranging from less than half-time through cull-time at institutions of higher learning or at vocational or trade schools, such law still bars the pursuit of correspondence courses. If this bill were to be enacted, eligible wives and widows would have available the same broad scope and diversity of correspondence courses now offered to veterans under chapter 34. We feel, however, that this measure should be amended to extend to these groups the same limitations and provisions which appear as section 303 in our draft bill entitled "Veterans' Education and Training Amendments of 1971" which is being transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives this date. We also note that H.R. 10166 does not provide any specific pro- visions for the payment and computation of educational assistance premised on correspondence lessons completed nor for the amount of UR; entitlement to be charged for this type of training. However, our omnibus education bill contains such provisions. Further, as a technical matter, H.R. 10166 does not specify in subsection (a) the specific section of title 38 intended to be amended. In preparing this report we have assumed that it was intended to arnend section 1701(a)(6) of chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code. There is no experience in the chapter 35 program that might be used as an indicator as to the number of wives and widows who might wish to utilize correspondence course trainina. If we assume that one in five eligibles enrolling under chapter 35 training would elect a correspondence program (similar to our experience with chapter 34

65-086-71No. 120

256 1583

2 trainees), we estimate the costwouhl range from under $500,000 in the first year to approximately$1 million in the fifth year. For the foregoing reasons, werecommend enactment of the corres- pondence training provisionsincluded in the Administration's"Vet- erans' Education andTraining Amendments of 1971"in lieu of H.R. 10166. We are advised by the Officeof Management and Budgetthat there is no objection to thepresentation of this report fromthe.standpoint of the Administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON,Administrator.

257 Vet. Letters 92-120 1584

Veterans' Administration reporton H.R. 4223 and H.R. 6130

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOROF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C'., November 30, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respondto your request for a report by the Veterans' Administrationon H.R. 4223 and H.R. 6130, identical 92d Congress bilis to amend chapter 34 oftitle 38, United States Code, to authorize advtulce educationalassistance allowance payments to eligible veterans at the beginningof any school year to assist such veterans in meetingeducational and living expenses during the. first 2 months of school, to establisha veterans' work-study program through cancellation of suchadvance payment repayment obligations under certain circumstances, andto provide for direct payment of educationalassistance allowance to educational institutions on an optional basis. The bills would amen] chaptor 34 of title38, United States Code, by adding two new sections (1688 and 16S9)at the end of subchapter IV. The proposednew section 1688 would authorize advancepay- ments of educational assistance benefits to veteransto assist them in meeting education and livingexpenses during the first 2 months of the school year and would permit themto participate in a work-study program whereby they could have their advance partiallyor totally cancelled through performing certain services.The proposed new section 1689 would permit payment of the educationalassistance benefits directly to the educational institutionson behalf of and at the request of the veteran. More specifically, the proposednew section 1688 would authorize an advance payment of the educational assistance allowance inan amount not to exceed $250 to an eligible veteran who intendsto pur- sue a full-time course of education with advances in lesser amountsto eligible veterans intending topursue programs of education on less 1 tlym a full-time basis. No advancepayments would be made, how- ever, to veterans intending to pursue programs of educationon a. less than half-time basisor by correspondence. The advance would be considered a loan to be repaid by deductions, inapproximately equal amounts, from the 'eteran's monthly educational assistance allowance. To qualify for Oe advance,to be made not earlier than 30 days prior to the veteran's expected date ofenrollment,the veteran would be required to submit evidence showing he isan eligible veteran; certify that l:e is .enrolled in, has applied for, has beenaccepted by, or intends to enroll in a specified school; certify whether the school defines the courses to be full-time and the numberof semester or

258 1585 clock hours he intends to pursue; and certify that he has at least 6 months of educational entitlement remaining available to him under chapter 34 of title 38. In the event a veteran fails to qualify for the allowance after the advance has been made to him, such advance would be repayable in such manner as the Administrator presciibes. If the veteran fails to enroll in and pursue an approved course of education within 30 days after the advance payment is made to him, the payment would be- come due and payable on the first clay of the monthfollowing the month in which the Administrator determines the veteran has failed to enroll. The loan would bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from that date. The proposed new section 1688 would also establish a work-study program under which a veteran who has received an advanceeduca- tional assistance payment, who is pursuing a full-time program of education, who agrees to work up to 15 hours a week, who is in need of augmentation of his educ ational benefit to remain in school, and who is capable of maintaining good standing in school while working, may lcrform services for the Veterans'Administration and have his loan canceled at the rate of $2 for each hour worked. Such veterans would assist in the processing of educational applications filed with the Veterans' AdminiStration or would perform various outreach services for educationally disadvantaged veterans. While performing such services, the veteran would be considered an intermittentemployee ofthe Veterans' Administration serving without compensation, except that for purposes of lawsadministered by the Civil Service Commission (such as those related to leave, retirement, etc.),these veterans would not be deemed to be suchemployees.. Under the provisions of current law (38 USC 1681), theeducational assistance allowance of an eligible veteranpursuing a program of education on a half-time or more basis is paid in arrears as soon as practicable after the Administrator is assured of the veteran'senroll- ment in and pursuit of the programof education for the period for which such allowance is to be paid. These paymentsdo not begin, however, until after the veteran has enrolledand completed each month of training. The President's Committee on theVietnam Veteran recognized that this delay in the initial paymentof the educational allowance could have the drect of discouraging programphrticipation by a veteran who cannot afford theinitial outlay required by most schools and the necessary money for subsistencefor himself and his family until the first payment is received. The committee, inits report to the President dated March 26, 1970, madethe following recommenda- tion No. A-1: Encourage veterans to enter and follow through with atraining program by providing an advance education assistance payment tohelp the veteran meet the initial costs of entering training. A draft measure to carry out thisrecommendation was sent to the Congress last year, but was notenacted into law. The President, in his message to the Congress datedJanuary 26,1971, urged the Con- ()Tess to consideradvance payment legislation. A new draftbill was submitted- to the Speaker of the Houseby letter dated January 26, 1971, urging its enactment (seeHouse Committee Print No. 7). This 259 1586 resulted in the introduction of H.R. 3349 which is presently pending before your committee. H.R. 3349 would authorize the Administrator to makean initial advance payment of the educational assistance allowance granted under chapter 34 of title 38 to veterans enrolled in an educational institution half-time or more, plus the allowance for 1 full month, upon receipt of prod that the eligible veteran has been accepted for enrollment in an approved educational institution. Such payment would be made not earlier than the first of the month in which pursuit of the program is to commence. Thereafter, payments would continue to be made in advance at the beginning of each month in which the veteran pursues his program of education. Administrative control over the propriety of such payment is provided for by authorizing the Administrator to withhold final payment of an enrollment period until proof of satisfactory pursuit of the program is furnished. In addition, if the eligible veteran fails to enroll in the course after receiving the initial payment of the educational assistance allowance, the amount of such advance pay- ment may be recovered from any benefit otherwise due the veteran under any other law administered by the Veterans' Administration or such overpayment shall constitute a liability of such eligible veteran and may be recovered in the same manner as any other debt due the United States. Advance payments would not be permitted to be made to veterans pursuing flight or correspondence course training programs. The recent amendment of the GI bill (Public Law 91-219) provides for a lump-sum payment of the educational assistance payable to veterans who are attending school on a less than half-time basis and to eligible servicemen for the entire quarter, semester,or term during the month immediately following the month in which the enrollment certification is received. The advance payment proposals in both H.R. 3349 and H.R. 4223 would, we believe, bean extension of and comparable to the present law in that veterans attending school on a half-time or more basis would be permitted to apply for an advance payment prior to their enrollment in school. H.R. 3349 represents, inour view, a better design to aid the veteran in his attempt to obtain his education than H.R.4223 in that the amount of the advance payment he would receive under H.R. 3349 would generally be greater when dependents and beginningdates of school are taken into account. This largeramount would provide the veteran with the funds he needs at the time he initiates histraining. H.R. 4223 also contains provisions which would permitveterans who have received advanceson their educational assistance allowance to be employed as intermittent employees of the Veterans' Ad- ministration to assist in processing educational applicationsand to work in the outreach program. Concerning this advancepay and work-study proposal, we believe, however, that the advancepay and related provisions contained in title II of the administration's "Veterans' Education and Training Amendments of 1971" would bemore administratively feasible than those put forward in H.R. 4223 and would providegreater control to prevent overpayments. Concerning work-study,we strongly support the idea that needy veterans attending school under the GI bill should havean op- 260 1587 portunity to augment their income through work-study arrange- ments. The administration is seriously concernedwith the financial plight of all college students, including veterans, who struggle with the rising costs of higher education in their efforts to enter or finish school. For any student in this difficult situation, help is most effective if it takes into account his total financial situation. Under the Higher Education Act of 1965, student assistancein the form ofloan, grant, and work-study programs reachcol- leges throughout the country and already go far to meet the needs of students, including veterans. Accordingly, while we endorse the objective of the work-study provisions of H.R. 4223, we must oppose them as duplicative of theexisting work-study program which is better designed to reach the neediest veteran studentsand provides them with higher benefits. Moreover, amendments to the Higher Education Actproposed earlier this year by the administration and now under consideration by the Congress provide a comprehensive approach tostudents' financial problenis through loans, grants, and work-study assistance wluch would be more effective, better targeted, and simpler toad- minister than the work-study provisions of thisbill. The Office of Education estimates that 95 percent of all returning veteranswould be found eligible to participate in the general highereducation programs. We recognize that one intent of the proposed work-study provisions of H.R. 4223 is to increase the possibilities for GI student employment m the Veterans' Administration. While theVeterans' Administration already has a substantial work-study program and hires sizable num- bers of returning veterans, we believe it would be more desirable to diversify our authority in tbis area. Accordingly, our omnibusbill contains a provision permitting the Administrator to employ, asin- termittent employees, students enrolled in full-time programs,rather than the work-study program as suggested in the bill. Instead ofthe basis set forth in the subject bill for paying these student-veterans, we would recommend paying them in accordance with the going ratefor the job classification. We believe that in nearly all instancesthis would be more per hour than that payable under the bill. The proposed new section 1689, contained in H.R. 4223,would provide that all or part of any educational assistanceallowance pay- ment may be made directly to the educationalinstitution concerned on behalf of any eligible veteranif the veteran requests it andthe school agrees to accept the payment. Direct paymentwould not be made on behalf of any veteran who is purusing orintends to pursue a course on less than half-timebasis or a program exclusively by cor- respondence; who receives an advance paymentunder the proposed section 1688; or, to cover other than tuition and othereducational costs and expenses which the educational institutionusually requires to be paid in full before a nonveteran student isadmitted to class.. We believe that the proposed section 1689needs clarification since it is subject to at least two conflictinginterpretations. If it is meant that the veteran's name would beretained as the sole payee andthe address of the school used, no prohibitioncurrently exists and this is, in fact, actually being done at the present time. 61. 1588

Under another interpretation, this section would permit the school to be identified as the payee with the money being credited to the ac- count of the veteran beneficiary. This would result in an assignment of benefits. The current GI bill provides foran educational assistance allowance, payable only to the veteran, to meet, in part, the expenses of the veteran s subsistence, tuition, fees, supplies, books and equip- ment (38 USC 1681(a)). Under the original World War II GI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Congress), a direct payment was made to the school in addition to a monthly subsistence allowance. During the course of hearings on the Korean GI bill (Public Law 550, 82d Con- gress), it was indicated that a single monthly payment in an amount considered to be equitable to assist the veteran in the payment of his tuition and other school costs and his living expenses would achieve a desirable objective by giving the veteran a financial interest in hisown training. The proposed change made in H.R. 4223 would completea cycle and return to the probleins and abuses resulting under the World War II GI enactment. Examples of what might result are falsification of the veteran's progress and attendance records, high-interest charges for tuition time, and collusion between school officials and veterans in falsely obtaining the educational assistance payment. Regarding the cost of H.R. 4223, if enacted, there is no prior experi- ence which we may use as a guide as to how many of the eligible veterans might request an advance payment. Similarly, we have no prior experience with a work-study program to provide a firm basis for estimating the numbers of trainees who might be usefully employed by the Veterans' Administration, on a limited part-time basis, to perform necessary services. Therefore, we have not attempted to estimate annual participation rates and costs applicable to each of the next 5 years, but, rather, have estimated an annual rate of participa- tion and costs which reasonably might be expected in 1 full year of operation of these provisions after they become effective and are fully installed. Some later decline in this annual cost rate might be expected because of fewer loans to be processed after the number of trainees reaches a peak. The annual rate of cost. "or the advanced payment and work-study provisions related thereto is estimated as follows:

Number of trainees Estimated cost (in millions) employed in work-study Adminis- Direct Number of loans program trative benefits Total

1,243,000 94, 600 $9. 3 623. 6 $32. 9

The cost of the provision for direct payment of educational as- sistance allowance to schools would be limited to administrative costs necessary to effect such payments. On the assumption that such payments would be made only for those persons who do not elect the advance payment, the annual rate of participation and cost would approximate three quarters of a million dollars. This cost might be increased to $3.6 million if the restraint of no dire( t payment on behalf of veterans receiving advance payment were to be lifted.

26,2 1589

In summary, we are infavor of the principle ofadvance payment of educational assistanceallowance payments for veterans.We believe, however, that theprovisions for handling such payments as set forth in ouromnibus bill are preferable tothose contained in H.R. 4223. While we cannotrecommend enactment ofthe work- study provision as setforth in H.R. 4223, werecommend enactment of general statutoryauthority permitting theemployment of veteran- students as intermittentemployees as proposed in ouromnibus educa- tional amendments. If itis made clear that theproposed section 1689 is to be interpreted asretaining the veteran as thesole payee with being authorized, we wouldhave no objection to the school address the benefit to the its enactment. Shouldit be interpreted as assigning school, we would stronglyrecommend against favorableaction by your committee onthat portion of H.R. 2423. We are advised by theOffice of Management andBudget that there is no objection tothe presentation of this reportfrom the standpoint of theadministration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON,Administrator.

263 1590

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 10168

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., November 30, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 10168, 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, in order to increase the educational assistance allowance, and for other purposes. The purpose of this bill is to encourage our returning veterans to take education and training which will fit them for productive and rewarding employment in our civilian economy. It is therefore worthwhile to review briefly the extent to which these deserving men and women now are taking advantage of benefits akeady enact,:d by the Congress. Since enactnwnt in May 1966 the Vietnam era GI bill has provided education and trainily, to 1.8 million Vietnam vetorans, together with an additional .8 million veterans who left service after 1955. The participation rate has shot up by any index. In the past 3years, the participation rate of Vietnam era veterans, on a cumulative basis, has risen from 16 percent to 35.2 percent. There is evidence thatmen are entering training more quickly after discharge; the first year partici- pation rate in this period has risen by 25 percent. The GI bill,more- over, has fitted the aspirations and talents not only of the college-bound. individual but also of the man who wants technical training, who wants a job with built-in training opportunities, and the man who wants to finish high school and learn a trade. The enrollment of veterans inon- the-job training (OJT) has risen by 121 percent in fiscalyears 1969-71, from 66,000 to 146,000. The enrollment in courses below college level has risen from 330,000 to 522,000. This impressive record results, we believe, from the motivation and drive of our veterans, encouraged by the activeconcern of the Con- gress and the President.. To assure that this momentum is maintained,. the Congress and President have acted on two occasions since the present. GI bill first was enacted in 1966 to adjust GI bill allowances to the rising costs of living and education. Over this period., the basic monthly allowance fora single veteran rose by 75 percent, from $100 to $175, with matching increases for dependents. The President has been keenly aware that despite these massive increases veterans do not have it easy on most campuses. Studies by the Veterans' Administration show that veterans ofteninu t augment their income by part-time employment. We recognize the GI bill was not designedand given the diversity of tuition charges among schools of the veterans choice, could not be equitably designed to cover all of a. veteran's educational costs. Nevertheless, the 1"resident has been.

464 1591 greatly concerned thatyises inliving costs since the last adjustmentof February 1970, not tip thebalance adversely against a veteran's decision to enter or continuetraining. There are other adjustments in the basic program needed toimprove educational opportunities,in- cluding those providedservice-disabled veterans and thoseextended for war widows and orphans. Accordingly, this administrationhas designed an omnibus bill to meet this very real concernshared by your committee and thePresi- dent. The text of this billhas been transmitted to yourcommittee. To avoid repetition here,it is sufficient to note that theadministration bill provides for an 8.6 percent averageincrease in GI bill allowances, representing the rise in consumerprices since the last a djustment ofthe allowances in February 1970. In this context, we note thatthe provisions of H.R. 10168provide increases in GI bill rates far in excessof the rise in prices and other changes beyond those needed tomaintain the growth momentumof this program. Section 1 of H.R. 10168would amend section 1682(a) of title 38, United States Code, to increase the rateof monthly educational assist- ance payable toveterans pursuing institutionaland cooperative train- ing under chapter 34. The rate for asingle veteran without dependents, who is pursuing a full-timeinstitutional program, would beincreased from the present rate of $175 permonth to $210, or 20 percent above the current rate. Similarincreases are provided for those veteranswith dependents who are pursuingfull-time training and thosewith or without dependents who arepursuing three-quarter or half-timetrain- ing. The additional amountpayable for dependents in excessof two in the case of a veteran pursuingthree-quarter-time training would amount Lo 30 percent.Similar increases for cooperativetraining are also included. Section 2 of H.R. 10168 would add a newsubsection (d) to section 1682 of title 38 authorizingthe Administrator toreimburse veterans, receiving educational assistanceunder that section, for the costsof necessarytextbooks. It should be pointed outthat in enacting the Korean conflict GI bill (PublicLaw 550, 82d Cong.) and the cur- rent GI bill(Public Law 89-358), the Congressprovided for payment of an educational assistanceallowance to meet, in part, the expenses of the veteran's subsistence,tuition, fees, supplies, books, andequip- ment. This changefrom the approach of theWorkl War II GI bill was premised uponhearings held prior to the enactmentof the Korean GI bill and was designed toprovide the desirable objective ofgiving the veteran a stake in his owntraining. These same lu lringsalso found that overcharges weremade during the World War .11 program for supplies, books, and toolsand that in some casesthe tools were being pawned CT sold by the veteran,thereby causing abuse of the program. We believe that enactmentof the proposal to reimburse veterans for the cost of textbookswould bring us back to someof the problems and abuses of the WorldWar II GI bill. It is alsoreasonable to antici-

265 1592

pate that demands for reimbursement for costs of other aids the vet- eran needs, while pursing his educational program, would quickly arise. As a technical matter, it should be pointed out that a subsection (d) relative to farm cooperative educational asthstance already existsin section 1682. Consequently, the subsection should be redesignated if the provision is to be considered further. Section 2 of H.R. 10168 also proposes to add a new subsection (e) to section 1682 which provides for annual adjustments in the educa- tional assistance allowances premised upon the average percentage change in the cost of tuition and the cost of living for the preceding calendar year. Tlth proposal would associate benefit rates with theaverage per- centage change in the cost of living. However, automatic adjustment in benefits is without precedent in veterans' benefit programs and should be considered more carefully before being embodied in legisla- tion, as proposed in H.R. 10168. Section 3 of the bill would amend section 1661(c) of title 38 to provide that an eligible veteran may receive as muchas 48 months of educational assistance, instead of the preFent 36 months, if he served 24 or more months on active duty. Historically, a statutory limit has been set on the maximum months of entitlement a veteran has been permitted to earn under each of the various GI bil.enacted by Congress. For example, under the World War II GI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Cong.) a veteranwas granted entitlement not to exceed 4 years. Thus, a World War II veteran could receive up to 48 months of full-time assistance, or the equivalent of 5% ordinary school years of 9 months each. The entire problem of operations under the World War II GI bill was studied by the House Select Committee to investigate the educational and training program under GI bill during 1950. That committee recommended a 36-month limitation on educational entitlement as being sufficient to permit a veteran to obtaina B.A. degree. As a result, Congress, in enacting the Korean GI bill (Public Law 550, 82d Congress), set a 36-month limitation on the maximum entitlement which a Korean conflict veteran could earn. This 36- month limitation was carried over into the Veterans' Readjustment Benefits Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-358) which is current law. It would appear that the 36 months of entitlement now afforded is sufficient to complete a vocational or a 4-year collegeprogram. In addition, existing law presently permits certain eligible veterans to receive assistance allowances beyond the 36 months of entitlement and also makes provision for those who are educationally idis- advantaged. Eligible veterans who have not completed their high school education, or who need to undertake deficiencycourses to pursue higher education, may receive educational assistance without any charge against their entitlement. It is estimated that enactment of this proposal would result in additional direct benefits cost amounting to $187.8 million the first fiscal year and a cost of $1,569.9 million over the first 5 fiscalyears. A detailed breakdown showing the estimated direct benefits cost for each of the next 5 fiscal years is as follows:

266 1593

Additional direct benefits cost minio»a Fiscal year: $187. 8 1st l 385. 5 2d 375. 0 3d 4th 313. 7 5th 308. 9 Total 1, 569. 9 1 First year costs are only one-half asgreat as they would hare been for theentire year since they are premised on a half-yearrather than a full-year basis, A table detailing the addeddirect benefits costs by fiscal year attributable to the rate increase,textbooks, and extended entitlement is included as an attachment tothis report. For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against enactmentof H.R. 10168 by your committee. We are advised by theOffice of Management andBudget that there is no objection to thepresentation of this report fromthe standpoint of the administration's program. Sin cerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator.

H.R. 10168.ADDITIONAL 0 IRECT BENEFITS COST

Rate increase Textbooks Extended entitlement Total Cost cost Cost Cost (ini:lions)ladividuals (n.ii'ons) Fiscal year (millio.ls) Individuals I (millio...$) lndividua:s I

953, 000 $115. 1 1, 040,000 $56- 0 52,000 $16.7 1st2 $187. 8 231. 4 1, 040,000 119.4 54,000 34.7 2d 385. 5 952, 000 321. 1 989,000 120. E 52,000 33. 3 3d 375. 0 905, 000 181. 9 818,000 105. 1 42,000 26. 7 4th 313. 7 743, 000 174.9 782,000 106. 3 42,003 26. 7 5th 307.9 709, 000 507.4 138. 1 5-year total 1, 569.9 924.4

included in the number receiving reimbursement for thecost of textbooks. I The individuals receiving the rate increase are j4as great as they would, 2 For the 1st fiscal year, data on individualsapply to the entire year, while cost figures are only have been kr the entire year.

.267 1594

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 11552 (note report on H.R. 11400, dated November 29, 1971.)

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., December 7,1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR IVIR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond toyour request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 11552, 92d Congress, a bill to amend title 38 of the United States Code to authorize the enrollment of eligible veterans in a course offered byan institution which has changed its location. This bill is identical to H.R. 11400, 92d Congress,a bill on which we submitted a report to your committee on November 29, 1971. The views expressed in that report are equally applicable to H.R. 11552. The proposal made in H.R. 11552 is similar to theone set forth in section 302 of the Administration's proposed Veterans' Education and Training Amendments of 1971 which has been introducedas H.R. 11954. We were adivsed by the Office of Management and Budget that there was no objection from the standpoint of the administration's program to the presentation of the report on H.R. 11400 to your committee. Sincerely, FRED B. RHODES) Deputy Administrator (For and in. the absence of Donald E. Johnson, Adminiarator.)

268 1596 raised from $175 to $277. A similar increase, from$141 to $224 monthly, is proposed for computing the rate of assistancepayable under section 1732(b) for individuals pursuing full-timeinstitutional courses combined with alternate supplemental phases of training in business or industry. The increases proposed would be paid commencingwith the allow- ances payable for January 1972, and the Administrator would be required to further increase the various education andtraining as- sistance allowances by a percentage equal to anAincreasethat might be enacted after January 1972, in the minimumwage, under section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Should further consideration be given to the bill,there are several technical errors or disparities for which remedialsuggestions would he furnished to the committee staff. The following alternative cost estimates forthis proposal were prepared on the basis of two assumptions. First, assumingthat the President's economic policy will retain the minimumwage at its current level, these increases, approximating 59.1percent, would result in the following estimated increase in directcosts for the first 5 years:

Direct benefits cost (in Fiscal year ndividuals millions)

1st (half year) 1,249,000 $516. 3 2.1 %293,000 907. 8 3d 1,249,000 873. 8 4th 1,042,000 729. 5 5th 1,001,000 703. 9 5-year total 3, 731. 3

An alternate estimate is based upon the assumption thatthe mini- mum wage increases proposed in S. 2259 will be enacted. That bill provides for the minimum wage to be raised from $1.60per hour to $1.80 in February 1972, and to $2 in February 1974. The firstincrease in the minimum wage, which wouldoccur 1 month following the approximate 59.1-percent increase proposed in H.R., 9779,would result in a 12.5-percent increase in the educational assistanceallow- ance, and the second would result in an additional 11.1-percentup- ward adjustment. In the final analysis, the assistanc.e allowancerate after the second increase would representa 98.9-percent increase above the current educational assistance allowance payable.Total increases over the 5-year period would be:

Direct benefits cost (in Fiscal year Individuals millions)

1st (half year) 1,249,000 $659. 1 2d 1,293,000 1, 215.1 3d 1,249,000 1,308,8 4th 1,042,000 1, 221. 7 5th 1,001,000 1, 179. 0

5-year total 5, 583.7

270 1597

Estimates of direct benefits cost under both assumptions arebased urn the number of personsalready expected to be in training. If the higher benefits which would be madeavailable by this proposal should induce additional veterans to enter training whootherwise would not have trained, the entire cost of training forsuch persons might be consid ,red to be additional directbenefits costs attributable to this proposal. Such possibleadded costs are not susceptible of .ny meaningful estimate. The increases in the education allowancesproposed by this bill would represent a complete departure fromthe philosophy of the current rate structure of the educationalassistance programs. Moreover, it is abundantly clear that the cost expenditures, which enactmentof these increases would involve, reflect an approachentirely inconsistent with the President's effcrts to maintain control ofeconomic pressures. An alternative approach, incorporated inthe administration's omnibus bill, would be in consonance with the President'seconomic program and would provide for substantial increases ineducational allowances. In view thereof, the Veterans' Administration recommendsagainst favorable consideration of H.R. 9779. We 'are advised by the Office of Management andBudget that there is no objection to the presentationof this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, FRED B. 'RHODES, Deputy Administrator (For and in the absence of Donald E. Johnson, Administrator).

,

1 7:-

71-815 0 - 72 - 18 271 1598

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 7668 and H.R. 10774

VI.TERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OP VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., December 8, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 7668 and H.R. 10774, identical 92d Congress bills to amend chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, so as to provide educational assistance at secondary school level to eligible widows and wives, without charge to any period of entitlement the wife or widow may have pursuant to sections 1710 and 1711 of this chapter. The purpose of the bill is to permit those widows and wives who are eligible for educational benefits under chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, to pursue high school training or to take refresher or deficiency courses needed to qualify for admission to appropriate educational institutions. The original purpose of the War Orphans' Educational Assistance Act of 1956 (Public Law 634, 84th Congress) was to provide educa- tional opportunities to children of veterans of World War I, World War II, or the Korean conflict whose parent died as the result of a disease or injury incurred or aggravated by such service. This aot was expanded by later enactments toinclude the children of veterans who died or were permanently and totally disabled as the result of a disease orinjury incurred or aggravated by service in the Armed Forces after the -beginning of the Spanish-American War, and to also include the wives and widows of such veterans. This program was designed to provide educational opportunities for those children who had their education impeded or interrupted due to the death or disablement of the veteran parent, and to assist wives and widows in preparing, to support themselves and their families at a standard of living level which the veteran, but for his death or disablement, could have been expected to provide for his family. The main purpose of the act has been to provide a continuation to the eligible person'shigh school education by offering him the opportunitytoobtain supplementalassistancefor educational opportunities at the college level or at vocational technical institutions. In providing these benefits, theCongress has barred the enrollment of eligible children, wives, and widows in certain types of courses, including courses which are avocational or recreational in character, as well asapprenticeship, on-job, flight, institutional on-farm, corre- spondence, and secondary level training courses. Some of these limita- tions have beenmodified over tbe years, but no change has been made as yet inthe secondary level bar.

272 1599

In enacting PublicLaw 90-77, the Congressapproved a special program of aid toeducationally disadvantaged veterans.This gave those veterans who had notCowie! ed their high schooltraining or needed refresher ordeficiency courses anopportunity to pursue such training, without charge totheir basic period ofentitlement, and thereby not lose theireligibility for follow-an collegebenefits. The grant of similarbenefits to wives and widows, asproposed in H.R. 7668 and H.R. 10744,would be a logical adjunct tothe benefits them under chapter 35.Many of these wives presently provided for veterans, are and widowS, especiallythose who married Vietnam era still young.. Many ofthem failed to completetheir secondary level training, choosing instead to marry.These wives and widows, due to the death or disabilityof their veteran husbands,have had to assmre the responsibilityfor support of themselvesand their families. This 'extension of the educational programwould give them an opportunity to obtain the necessarytraining required for entranceinto higher education without losingtheir eligP)ility fcr follow-oncollege training. In an omnibus educationbill recently transmitted to your com- mittee, the administrationhas imtluded provisions forsubstantially the same benefits asprovided by H.R. 7668. Ourbill, however, would within a State, thus eliminatingpursuit of second- be limited to training the ary leveltraining in the Philippines.Most of those individuals in Philippines who wouldbecome eligible under this programwould be the wives of disabledPhilippine veterans who servedduring World War II. The majority ofthese persons are now over age50 and the purpose of the programextended here would be oflittle benefit to them. Further, many of themhave already taken advantageof the vocational training benefits whichhave been made available tothem. under chapter 35 and havethus been trained for avocation designed to help them support themselvesand their families. It is estimated thatenactment of this billwould result .in added for the first fiscal year of$952,000 and $11,480,000 direct benefits cost individuals over thefirst 5 fiscal years. Abreakdown of the number of and the estimated costby years is shown in thefollowing tables:

Individuals Direct benefits cost United Philippine United .Philippine Total Islands States Tr,tal Fiscal year Islands States

700 I, 000 $168, 000 $784, 000 $952, 000 300 2, 744, 000 1st . 504, 000 2, 240, 090 900 2, 000 2, 900 2d 2, 576, 000 3, 024, 000 800 2, 300 3, 100 448, 000 3d 2, 464, 000 2, 744,000 500 2, 200 2, 700 280, 000 4th 1, 904, 000 2, 016, 000 200 1, 700 1, 900 112, 000 5th 1, 512, 000 9, 968. 000 11, 480, 000 5-year cost

f Peso rates. In making these estimates, wehave made the following assumptions: (a) About 14 percentof the wives and widowseligible for chapter 35 training inthe Philippines might be expected totrain under this proposal.

273 1600

(b) About 1 percent of the wives and widows now eligible for chapter 35 training in the United States and about 2 percent of those who subsequently become eligible might be expected to train under this proposal. (e) One-iourth of those who would be eligible under this proposal would enter in the fiscal year in which they become eligible, and one-half would enteri n the second year with the remainder entering over the next 3 yews. It should be pointed out that we have no data as to the number of eligible wives or widows who are educationally disadvantaged. We do know, however, that the distribution by level of training in the current program indicates that 28 percent of the wives and widows in traininc; (excluding the Philippines) are enrolled in schools below the collepp level. In the Philippines, the percent of wives and widows enrolled in schools below the college level is much higher. More than 9 of 10 (93 percent) of the women in the Philippines train below the college level. We would estimate that in the Philippines alone there would be nearly 10,000 wives and widows potentially eligible for training as dis- advantaged trainees. We have no basis for determining how many of the potentially eligible wives and widows, either in the United States or the Philip- pines, might enter training as disadvantaged trainees. In the Philip- pines, because the educational assistance allowance is unusually at- tractive (by their economic standards) and because of their lower level of educational attainment, enrollments could be extremely heavy. If amended to conform to the relevant provisions of our omnibus bill, we would have no objection to favorable consideration by your committee of H.R. 7668 or H.R. 10744. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, FRED B. RHODES, Deputy Administrator (For and in the absence of Donald E. Johnson, Administrator).

2741 . 1601

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 11571

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., December, 15 ,971. Hon. OLIN E: TEAGUE, Chairman, Cominittee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This responds to your request.for the views of the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 1157492d Congress, a bill to amend chapters 31, 34, and 35of title 3S, United States Code, te increase the vocational rehabilitation subsistenceallowances, the educational assistance allowances, and, the special.training allowances paid to eligible veterans and persons under suchchapters. . The basic law which this:proposal wouldamendchapters 31, 34, and 35 of title 38,. United StatesCodeestablished a program of educationalandvocationalreadjustmentassistanceforeligible veterans who served in the Armed Forces afterJanuary 31, 1955. That law provides for payment of educationalAssistance Allowances to meet, in part, the expenses ofthe veteran's subsistence, tuition, fees,*supplies, books, and equipment. Framed as it was,in the light of the so-called Korean GI bill (Public Law550, 82d Congress), it is clear that the Readjustment. Benefits Act of 1966is based upon the same fundamental approach; that thismethod of payment achieves the desirable objective of giving the veteran afinancial interest in his own rehabilitative training... Section 2 of the bill would amend the tableof rates in section 1504(b) of chapter 31 of title 33United States Code, toprovide a 5 to 6 percent increase in the subsistenceallowance payable .fOr the pumuit of a. course of vocational rehabilitation,including institutional onfarin, apprenticeship, or other onjeb. training.It. would provide for an increase from $135 per month to $142 permonth -in the rate payable for a full-time trainee with no dependents,and cominensprate ..mereases for trainees with 'otherdependency and!or training status, i.e.,, less than full-time training and one or two_dependents.. The alloWance for each dependent in excess of twowould remain at $6 per month. . . 'Section 3 would amend the educational assistanceallowance rate table in section 1682(a)(1) of chapter 04 toincrease, from $175 to .$220 monthly, the rate of educational assistanceallowance payable .to veterans with no dependentsattending a full-time institutimud prograM, and to provide like increases'ranging, from 25:7,percent to as high as 35.8 percentfor attendees of Jess than,full-time training. The additional amounts payable for :dependents in excessof. tWo are increased in some cases by as much .as 50percent..Similar increases are proposed for cooperativetraining.

45-086--71---No. 129 1602

.2 The proposal also would raise to $220 the maximum dollar rate under section 1682 (b) for computing the allowance payable toan individual attending school while on active duty (includingas prescribed in section 5the rate for PREP trainees un(ler section 1696(b)), or where attendance is on less than half-time basis. Like- wise., it would raise to $220 tlie'staadard for charging monthlyen- titlement...where. a .correspondence course is pursued...These increases represent A raise 'front the prior rates of 27.7 percent... The table of assistance :allowances payable for farm cooperative training wider section 1,682 (d) (2) also is amended to reflectan increase of 6:5. percent. Section 4 Of the Proposal amends the table in section 1683(b) (1) to reflect a similar 5.5-percent increase in the monthly allowance payable for apprenticeship or other.on-job training assistance. The proposed bill makes no change in the flight training rates,so that Veterans taking such training would continue to be charged with 1' month of entitlement for each $175 of educational assistance allow- ance paid. Section 6 of the bill would. effect increases in the educational assist- ance allowance under the War Orphans' and Widows' Educational Assistance Act, chapter 35 by amending section 1732(a) to raise the .aSsistance payable froM $175 to $220a month for full-time training; 'from $128 to $165 for three-fourths time; and from $81to $110 for half-time training. Also, the maximum dollar standard established for computing the allowance payable for less than half-time training would be raised to a rate of.$220. These changes reflecta range of increases from 19.9 to 35.8 percent. Similar increasesar e proposed for individuals pursuing a full-time program consisting of institutionalcourses to- gether with alternate phases of training in businessor industry under section 1732(b). Section 7 amends the provision relating to special allowances for special restorative training under subchapter V of chapter 35as set forth in section 1742(a). It would authorize computation of the special alloWance at the basic rate of $220per month instead of $175 as pres- ently provided. It also raises from $55 to $69 the ceiling of charges for .tuition and fees whichserve as the standard for. determining the basic monthly allowance paYable and also increases from $6.80to $7.30 the perday factor to determine entitlement used. The rate increases prOVided by this proposal in most instances,are far above the increases in the cost of living since the lastrate struGture change in February 1970was enacted by Public Law 91-219. Veterans under the GI bill attending public schools received educationalas- sistanCe for a school year of $1,385 under the World War IIprogram as compared with $1, 575 under the currentprogram stated in constant dollars. The average costs of tuition are $238 and $343, respectively. Thus, the remainder for otherexpenses would be $85 more for tfie .Vietnam veterans .as compared to those of World War II. It is realized that the cost Of edUcation in private schools has inGreased considerably since 1949, and thus the current Vietnamera veteran attending private school may not be in as gooda position as the World War II veteran attending a.similar private school. It should be noted, however, that of the veterans attending an institution of higher learning,79 percent are in public schools, while only 21 percent chose themore expensive

4. 276' Vet. Letters 92-129 1603

N3 private institutions.which would require the veteran totspend Ilis;own funds. " :.-.: : ; The impressive growth in participation byVidtnam, era::ireterans in MIA' training and education benefifssUggeats-thereis.littleiieed to reVise the basic :benefit structure asproposeds by this ;bill. 'Since enactment .in May 1966,, the Vietnam era. GI billhas PrOvided: educw- tion and training to .1.8 million Vietnam .veterans, together with an additional 0.8 million veterans .who left. serviceafter .The..pare- ticipation rate has shot upward by any index. In-the'.paSt ,.3 'years, the participation rate of-Vietnam era veterans, .ona'.curnulativ'e basis, has risen from 16-to 35.2 percent. There is evidence-that.,hien: are entering training more quickly atter discharge; thefirst'yearkpai*tici:- pation rate in. this.period has risen, by:25 percent: .TheYGI.billi,more- over, has fitted the aspirationsand talents not' only!of bound individual but also of the man who wantstechnical training, who wants a job with built-in training opportunities,and the man who wants to finish high school and learn a trade.The enrollment of veterans in on-the-job training (OJT) has risenby 121 percent during fiscal years 1969-71, from 65,000 to 146,000. , ! What is needed now is to maintain this momentumof growth. This can best be done bypreservMg the.basic.structure of. the-post-Korean GI bill and by providing an increase in benefits.to .coverthe rise in consumer prices since the lastbenefit adjuStMerit in February 1970. The administration has desired an omnibus., bill,nown.pending .betore your committee, to meet thisneed. The -omnibus hill .provideslor. an 8.6-percent increase in GI bill allowances and other programsadjust- ments to improve educational opportunitiesfor veterans, war widow's, and orphans. The estimated number of trainees affected by.enaetmentof H.R. 11571 and the increase in direct benefits.coatforthefirst. 5 years_.are:

Direct benefits Fiscal year Individuals cost (millions)

1,281,000 $425. 6 1st 1,326,000 429. 7 2d 1,283,000 412. 6 3d 077,000 344. 0 4th 1, 1,037,000 331. 5 5th 1, 943.4 5-year total

The estimates of direct benefits and administrative costcited above are based upon the numberof veterans already expected tobe in training. If the higher benefits which would bemade available by this proposal should induce additional veterans to entertraining who otherwise would not have trained, the entire costof trainMg for such persons might be considered tobe additional direct benefits cost attributable to this proposal. Such possible added costis not suscep- tible of any meaningful estimate. Cost estimates by chapter are set forth inattachment A. No cost estimate is made for servicemen, orfor veterans pursuing correspondence training or training on less than ahinf-time basis, since they are paid on thebasis of actual costs of trammg.However, it is observed that there would be anadditional overall cost occasioned

Vet. Letters 02-120 277 by a slower rate of -exhaustion of entitlementresulting from the. pro- posed higher monthly cost factor authorized in 'charging entitlement underthis proposal...... Th increases proposed by this bill in .th& education. alloWances Would i'epresent a rate ,structure inconsistent with the congressionally recognized- objective of the. current -veterans'.educational assistance .programs to .. provide a..partial,.. not a fWI,. subsidy of cducational aSsistance: Suth structural changes are not .needed and woul(1 under- mine the .Natiori's efforts to control inflation... In vieW thereof, the Veterans' Administration recommendwagainst faiorable consideration of H.R. 11571 .byyour committe& We are advised by the Office-of Managethent and Budget that there is' no objection to,th presentation of this tepdrt from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, 1)oNALo E. JOHNSON, Administrat.w.. . ATTACHMENT A

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN COST OF DIRECT BENEFITS FOR ALL VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS

IGoHars in milhonsj

All chapters Ch. 31 Ch. 34 Ch. 35

Direct Direct Direct I Dire:t benefits . . benefits benefits benefits Fiscal year Individnals costIndividuals cost I nviduals cost Individuals cort

1st 1, 281, 000 $425. 6 32, 000 $2. 4 1, 190, 000 5403. 5 59, 000 $19. 7 2d 1, 326, 000 429. 7 33, 000 2. 5 1, 232, 000 406.9 61, 000 20. 3 ld 1, 283, 000 4I2 6 34; 000 .2. 6 I, 186, 000 389. ? 63, 000 20. 8 4th. 1, 077, 000 344. 0 35, 000 2. 6 979, 000 320. 4 63, 000 21. 0 5th I, 037, 000 331. 5 36, 000 . 2. 7 939, 000 308. 2 62, 000 20. 6 , .

. Tcdal t 1, 943.4 12..8 1,,qs.2 102.4

2'43 Vet. Letters 92-429 1605

Veterans' Administration report onH.R. 6042 and H.R. 8604

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OFVETERANS' AFFAIRS, ashington, D.C.,December 16, 1971. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, C ommittee on V eterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, ashing ton, D.0. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN : This will respond to yourrequest for a report by the Veterans' Administration onH.R. 6042, 92d Congress, a bill to amend title 38 of the United StatesCode in order to make the same criteria for determining satisfactory pursuanceof course work apply in the case of college level and noncollegelevel educational institutions. The bill would amend section 1681of chapter 34 and section 1731 of chapter 35 of title 38, United StatesCode, to remove the specific absence-counting and certification requirementprovisions currently applicable to veterans, wives, widows, andchildren pursuing courses of training not leading to a standardcollege degree. In conjunction with absencecounting, current law provides that no allowance shall be paid on behalf of any personenrolled in a course which does not lead to a standardcollege dearee for any day of ab- sence in excess of 30days in a 12-monthperiod°, not counting as absence weekends or legal holidays establishedby Federal or State law during which the institution is not regularlyin session. Based upon this present allowance,the veteran or eligible person may be absent 111/2 percentof the time. This is not evenconsidering the extra days off because of Federal orState holidays. There are now nine Federal holidays listed 'in sectiOn6103 of title 5, United States Code. We believe that allowance with payfor 111/2 percent of the time in a year provides for a most reasonableamount of time away from school. Certifications of attendance reports havebeen required under all three GI billsWorld War II,Korean opnflict, and the curentpro- gram. Under theWorld War II GI bill, quarterlycertifications were submitted. It was felt that under theKorean GI bill tighter control would improve the program ;therefore, monthly certifications were required. Under the World War IIGI bill program, schools took advantage of the reporting procedures andfailed to record absences, interruptions, or discontinuances oftraining. This resulted in a large number of overpayments. Under the present system, veterans andeligible persons attending a course which does notlead to a standard collegedegree are required-to sian the certification, as well as anofficial of the. school: Thus, the-- st6udent,as well as theschool, shares the responsibilityof accurate reporting.

g7.9 1606

In the Administration's omnibus "Veterans' Education and Train- ing Amendments of 1971" we have included provisions which would provide for measurement of techthcal or trade courses offered by an institution which also offers college degree courses on a semester-hour rather than a clock-hour basis. We would also, in those cases, waive for those trade and technical courses the absence-counting and certifica- tion requirements applicable under current law. We believe that the high standards which these institutions are required to meet in con- nection with their college degree courses would assure the same high standards would be applied to the trade and technical courses. We would, therefore, waive the absence and certification requirements in these limited areas. In all other instances, however, we would recom- ment continuing; the present absence and certification requirements. It is estimated that enactment of H.R. 6042 would result in addi- tional direct benefit costs the first half fiscal year of $800,000 and $6.1 million over the first 5 fiscal years. For the foregoing reasons, we recommend against favorable action by your committee on RE. 6042. The views expressed in this report apply equally to H.R. 8604, a similar purpose 92d Congress bill which is also pending before your committee. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON)Administrator. 1608

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 9824

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OP THE ADMINISTRATOR OP VETERANS/ AFFAIRS) TV ashington, D .0.,December 23,1971. HOD. OLIN E. TEAGUE) Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Haase of Representa- tives,Washington,D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN : This will respond toyour request for a re- port by the Veterans' Administrationon H.R. 9824, 92d Congress, a bill to amend chapter 34 of title 35, United States Code, to pro- vide additional educational benefits forveterans who have served in the Indochina theater of operations during the Vietnamera. The proposal would add a new section 1683A. to chapter 34per- mitting payment of additional educational benefits to thoseveterans who served in the Indochina theater of operations during the Viet- nam era. The proposed new section provides for payments ofup to $3,000 for an ordinary school year to veteranspursuing education or train- ing under chapter 34 (with certain exceptions) tocover costs in- curred by them for thition, laboratory, and other fees andexpenses, exclusive of board, lodging, and other livingor travel expenses. The payments would not exceed those costs paid by other nonveterans attending the same instiution and pursuing thesame courses. In acklition to the tuition grant, the measure also provides for the payment of a subsistence allowance which is substantially inexcess of (and is in lieu of) the educational assistance allowance presently beinff paid to eligible veterans. ender the terms of the WorldWar II GI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Cong.), tuition, fees, books, and other necessary expensesup to a maximum of $500 per ordinary school year were paid directly to the educational institution by the Veterans' Administration. Thisre- quired contracting with such institutions for this service,a method found to be unsatisfactory and an area subject to much abuse. The findings of the House Select Committee to Investigate the Educa- tional and Training Proffram Under GI Bill during 1950, showed that there were many inalquacies in the law which led to multiple problems. Included among the abuses was veteran enrollment aimed at financial gain rather than serious educational intent with exploita- tion of the veteran as well as the. Government. It was also found that overcharovs were made for supplies, books, and tools and in many instancesthe toolswere being sold or pawned by the veteran. In enacting the Korean conflict GT bill(Public Law .550, 82d Cono..), the Congress provided an educational benefit proffram de- sign'ed tomeet, in part, the expenses of the veteran's subsidence, tui- tion, fees, supplies, books, and equipment. This was premised on the select committee's investigation which indicated that this method of

282 1609 payment, made directly to the veteran, would achievethe desirable objective of 'giving the veteran a financial interest in his own train- ing. The current GI bill (Public Law 89-358), which established a program of educational benefits for veteranswho served on active duty in the Armed Forces after January 31, 1955, adopted the partial assistance approach which originated in the Korean bill. The proposed new subsistence rate alone would, in the caseof a Vietnam veteran who is attending school on a full-timebasis and has four dependents, result in an increase of 86 percent abovethe total benefits now beincr paid to him. This increase does notinclude the tuition and othersChool cost benefits provided by the bill. When these large subsistence rates are coupled with the grant oftuition, up to $3,000, and other benefits, it is apparent that the overallincreases awarded under the bill would be totally unwarranted. It should also be pointed out that the proposed newsection 1683A sets ceilings on the amount of combined wages andsubsistence allow- ance an eligible veteran mayreceive. These ceilings, we believe, could have an adverse effect on the amount of subsistencewhich veterans pursuing on-the-job training, apprenticeship, or cooperative programs would receive. The assistance presently being paidunder these pro- grams is premised upon the paymentof a salary by the employer. The proposal couM result, in some cases, in reducina benefits to a veteran whose. earnings plus subsistence would exceeddie ceilings set forth in the bill. In addition, since the veteran would have the totalresponsibility for reporting employment earnings to the Veterans'Administration, we believe that such a systemwould lead to many inequities over- payments due to lack of timely reporting, and otherabuses of tilepro- gram. We do not feel that theoccasion for inaccurate reporting, as was found to occur under the World War II GI bill, shouldbe repeated. And this would impose a serious administrative burden onthe Vet- erans' Administration in constantly adjusting subsistencebenefit pay- ments to veterans based upon such areporting system. Under the provisions of the bill relating to thedefinition of "eligible Vietnam veteran," the increased benefits would beprovided those vet- erans discharged or releasedfrom active duty due to a service- connected disability. It can be presumed that many ofthese veterans, so injured, presently qualifyfor educational benefits under chapter 31 of title 38, United States Code. These benefits havetraditionally been more liberal than thoseprovided under chapter 34. The definition would also have the effect of granting to those veteranswho qualify under this bill simply because of active duty in theIndochina theater of operations, benefits that veteransof other service couldacquire only by having suffered a service-connected disabilityserious enough to require specialrehabilitationassistance.Clearly this would be inequitable. For Veterans' Administration purposes, the period ofservice rather than the area where the veteran served has long beenthe criterion in awardingr benefits. Under the terms of this bill, veteranswho have been designated to serve in a combat zone wouldbe offered greater entitlement to benefits. That position would be contraryto the estab- lished congressional policy which providesnondiscriminatory treat- ment for all veterans serving duringthe same period.

:1' 033 1610

In addition, since the measure fails to include certain offshore areas within the geographical limitations specified in the bill, there would be no provision for those Navy or Air Force personnel ,who werck not stationed on the specified land areas, but were cruising or flying in the area. This would also be discriminatory. The impressive arowth in participation by Vietnam era veterans in GI bill training an''d education benefits suggests there is little need to revise the basic benefit structure as proposed by this bill. Since enact- ment in May 1966 the Vietnam era GI bill has provided education and training to 1.8 million Vietnam veterans, together with an additional 0.8 million veterans who left service after 1955. The participation rate has shot upward by any index. In the past 3 years, the participation rate of Vietnam era veterans, on a cumulative basis, has risen from 16 percent to 35.2 percent. There is evidence that men are entering train- ing more quickly after discharge; the first year participation rate in this period has risen by 25 percent. The GI bill, moreover, has fitted the aspirations and talents not only of the college-bound individual but also of the man who wants teclmical training, who wants a job with built-in training opportunities, and the man who wants to finish high school and learn a trade. The enrollment of veterans in on-the-job training (OJT) has risen by 121 percent during fiscal years 1969-71, from 65,000 to 146,000. What is needed now is to maintain this momentum of growth. This can best be done by preserving the basic structure of the post-Korean GI bill and by providing an increase in benefits to cover the rise in consumer prices since the last benefit adjustment in February 1970. The administration has designed an omnibus bill '(H.R. 11954), now pending before your committee to meet this need. The omnibus bill provides for an 8.6-percent increase in GI bill allowances and other program adjustments to improve educational opportunities for vet- erans, war widows, and orphans. If the measure should be given further consideration, there are a number of other defects in the bill which would require changes that could be developed through conferences between members of your committee's staff and representatives of the Veterans' Administration. It is estimated that the direct benefit cost of H.R. 9824 would be $485.3 million the first year and $2,266.3 million over the first 5 years. A detailed cost analysis is enclosed as an attachment to this report. In summary, because of the inequitable features of H.R. 9824, the lack of need for such a bill and its inconsistence with the national effort to contain inflation, we recommend against enadment of H.R. 98124. Instead, we recommend enactment of the administration's omni- bus bill which is designed to meet the educational needs of all Viet- nam era veterans in an equitable manner. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON, Admini8trator.

COST ESTIMATIGH.R. 9824, 92o CONGRESS It is estimated that the increase in direct benefits cost during the first year under H.R. 9824 would be $485.3 million and would total $2,200.3 million over 284 1611 the first 5 years. In arriving at this estimate, we haveassumed that the pro- posal would become applicable before the beginning of the1971-72 school year. This estimate is also premised on the number ofpotentially eligible veterans presently in training. A detailed breakdown by individuals andcost over the first 5-year period is as follows :

Fiscal year Individui. is Cost (millions)

457, 000 $485.3 1st 0 487, 000 536.7 2d 462, 000 528.2 3rd 403.5 4th 340, 000 253, 000 312.6 5th 2, 266.3 5-year total

A detailed breakdown of direct benefits cost by typeof training is set forth in attachment A. , If the higher benefits which would be made availableby this proposal should induce additional veterans to enter training 'who otherwise wouldnot have trained, the entire cost of training for such persons would beconsidered to be additional direct benefits cost attributable to this proposal. Suchpossible added cost isnot susceptible of any meaningful estimate. In estimating the cost of the bill, we have excluded all veteransof the Indo- china theater of operations who are pursuing flighttraining, correspondence training, or training on less than a half-time basis. Alsoexcluded are those veterans ,who did not have the requisite service in theIndochina theater of operations. The ceiling limitations (subsection (f) of the proposed newsection 1683A), for Indochina theater veterans, woWd limit full-ttmetrainees to earnings of about $400-$500 per month, continget.t upon the number of theirdependents. The same monetary ceilings would be applicable topart-thne trainees, so it would be possible for them to have higher earnings, tothe extent that their subsistence allowance is lower. It is expected that about 500,000 traineeswould e effected by the ceiling in the first year,and that approximately 130,000 trainees wouldbelikely to have their educational assistance allowance reduced (in some cases canceled) by the ceiling. These estimates assumethat on:lob trainees and half-time school trainees are full-time workers andthat an ap- preciable number of the three-quarter-time and full-time trainees are alsofull- time employed. The earnings estimated for these full-timeemployed 'trainees are based upon data developed forveterans age 20-24 from the Census Current Population Survey. For the purposes of comparing what the proposed bill would cost if the restrictions on combined earnings andallowances for trainees were not imposed, we have prepared a chart showing such costs(attachment B). Additional administrative costs attributable o the provision of the billsetting income ceilings might approximate $0.4 million the first year, accumulatingto about $1.8 million over the first 5 years.

ATTACHMENT A

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN COST CF DIRECT BENEFITS AS PROPOSED IN H.R. 9824

(Dollars in millions]

Direct benefits cost

Total all types training I HL BCL 01T Total individ- Grand Rate Rate Rate Rate Fiscal year uals total increase Tuition increase Tuitionincrease Tuition increase

1st 457, 0110 $485.3 $152.1 $333. 2 $85.6 $290.6 $4.8 $42. 6 $61.7 2d 487, 000 536.7 169.6 367. I 88. 4 318.2 5.6 48.9 75.6 48. 8 75.0 3d 462,000 528.2 163.0 365. 2 83.2 316.4 4.8 56.1 4th 340, 000 403.5 120.6 282.9 60.7 243.0 3.8 39.9 42. 7 5th 253,000 312.6 90.9 221.7 45.4 191.1 2.8 30.6

5-year total 2, 266.3 696:2 1, 570. 1 363.3 1,359.3 21.8 210. 8 311.1

g85' 1612

ATTACHMENT B

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN COST OF DIRECT BENEFITS UNDER H.R. 9824 IF THE SUBSISTENCE WERE NOT TO BE REDUCED BY APPLICATION OF THE CEILING [Dollars in millionsi

Direct benefits ,:ost

Total all types training IHL BCL OJT Total individ- Grand Rate Rate Rate Rate Fiscal year uals total increase Tuition increase Tuition increase Tuition increase

1st 457, 000 $648.5 $315.3 $333. 2 $176. 0 $290.6 $23.7 $42. 6 $115.6 2d 487, 000 716.2 349.1 367.1 181.8 318.2 25.6 48.9 141.7 3d 462, 000 701. 1 335.9 365. 2 171. 2 316. 4 24. 1 48.8 140.6 4th 340, 000 531. 4 248. 5 282.9 124.8 243.0 18.6 39. 9 105. 1 5th 253, 000 408.7 187.0 221.7 93.4 191.1 13.6 30.6 80.0

5-year total 3, 005.9 1,435.3 1, 570. 1 747.2 1, 359. 3 105.6 210.8 583. 0

: 1613

Veterans' Administrationreport on H.R. 9609and H.R. 12052, identical bills, andH.R. i)627, H.R. 10043,H.R. 10044, H.R. 10224, H.R. 10432, H.R.10603, and H.R. 10648,similar purpose bills VETERANS'. AnnimsTamoN,. . OFFICE OF TILEADMINISTRATQR OF VETERAW.AFFAPS. . W ashington, D.C.,Deeerarer. 9,:10x.

. , , . . Hon..Orax E.. TEAWE, . 4714017492t Committee on,VeteraW Affqiyi.s,1.1,quoe of,:.gepresental ayes, Washington, D.C. for a-re- DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN : Thiswill respond .to yourrequest port by the Veterans'Administration on H.R. 9609and'H.R. 12052, identical 92d Congress bills toamend title.38, United.States 'Code, to provide for the paymentof tuition, subsistencer-andedUcational assistance allowances onbehalf of . or tocertaini.eligible. veterans pursuing programs of educationunder chapter34 ofsuch title,.-and for other purposes. Section 2 of the bill proposes toadd a new .section 1680to. Chapter 34. Subsection (a) of theproposed new section ..provides: for .payment institutions owbehalf .otaneligible direct to educational or training .of .tuition, veteran not on active 'dutyfor .the 'customary _cost laboratory, library, health,infirmary, or other.similar fees and- for for books, supplies,equipment, and other .neces- expenses incurred- and otherliving or.travel sary expenses,exclusive 'of board, lodging,nonveteransenrolled in, the expenses whichsimilarly circumstanced same courses arerequired to pay. Subsection.(b). of the new section limits this payment. to a sumnot in excessof $1,000for an ordinary school year. Under the terms of the.World Warn GIT bill(Pnblic Law 34 fees, books, andothernecessary, expenses ..up 18th Cong.), tuition, directly to a maximum of$500 per ordinaryschool yearwere paid to the educationalinstitution .by the Veterans'.AdministrationThis required contracting with suchinstitutions for this service, a.method found to be unsatisfactoryand an .area subject tomuch abuse. The findings of .the House.Select. 'Committee to.Investigate the Educa- tional .and TrainingProgram 'Under Bia,during -195O showed that there were.manyinadequacies in the.lawWhich:led to m.ultipl.e problems..Included smong.theabuses was veteranenrollment .aimed at financial gain4ather than seriouseducational.. intent ,with.. ex- ploitation of the veteran .aswell :as. ,the GovernmentIt ;was :also found that overcharges woremade.. tot'supplics,,bpoks,, and toctis the.tools were.beingsuld or pawnpd by the yeteran. in many instances 132d In; enacting. theKorean. conflict GI.bilt' (P.ublic LO,W 050.ri Cong.),. the. Congressprovided an educationalbenefit, program,.,deT signed to meet, in part,the expenses of, theveteran's subsistence; tmtion,, fees.,supplies,boOks, andequipment, This ,was,prernised.on i which:indicated that. this Me'thod the selectcommittee's.nvestigation would:4chie* gle desiraT of payment, madedirectly to the veteran,

71-815 0 - 72 - 10 1614

ble objective of giving the veteran a financhd interest in his own training. The current GI bill (Public Law 89-358), which estab- lished a program of educational benefits for veterans who served 'on active duty in the Armed Forces after January 31, 1955, adopted the partial assistance approach which originated. in the Korean bill. It is our view that enactment; of the: tuition payment,as proposed in the bill. would complete a cycle returning to the probkms and belieVelhis WOnla!agifin aive rise to such abuses as falsification of veteran's progress and attendarice records and 'Collusion between Schaal-officials and veterans in falsely ob- tainingedheatiOnali assiStmiee paynients.",'; ; ' Furthermore,... increased -edlicationi assistance benefits related to rises in costs of living have, already been proposed in'theVeteraiis edttion and trainig amefidmentS, of .191 *hick was' transmitted to the Congress on November 27, 1971. '; -Subsection. (b) of .the proposed new section 1680 .also 'provides that Where an educational or training, institution haS 110 customary cost of tuition, the Administrator of Veterans' Affaitswould.be authoriied.to set .a fair. . and:reasonable rate of payment for. tuition, fees, or other charges for the course; We' belieVe that this provision. also 'ottersan 'area.of Potential abuse: Based onpast ekperience with the World. War II GI bill program, we found that under this provision. the schools would be able. to. include all costs, including some. already subsidized in ivhole. or in part by theFederal Government. An example would be eacher& ; salaries..These could, be 'included in a school's submission to the Veterans'. Administration, for a determination of a fair andreason-. ablepayment based on.actual cost plus a reasonable profit. In the 'edUcational program all other costs are- governed by the imOunt charged-to. similarly eircuinstanced nonvetetans for the same tointe. To' allow'a tuition payment where :nonveterans in like trainina are 'not charged.tuition would be a contradiction to a basic principle of the program: Sortie Statelaws prohibit, charging tuition to resident students. This, therefore, would pose a difficult administrative prob- kin in:setting fah' and reasonable rate fot tuition. fees, or. other Charges for' the coarse as requited by *this portionof :the bill. SubsectiOnc).of- .the iiroposed 'new ,section teUnites educational or training inStitutionS -which. have 'received tuition assistance payments veteranW 'behalf. to tefuna -a pro rata amount: of the tuition When the 'veteran failsta- complete' his Trogranr, of education: This refund iS WithOnt regard tO the .estatoli4hed,iefund.pOlicy, of -the school. Ininatifutions of hied learninV;; the normal maximuni period ..for refundSextendsonlY 8 ta l.(21" Weeks after the start. Of thecourse.. This is iniether reaSon schOOls, Would. InWe 'for abuSing.the initial, tuitioir and fee stateinent 'SO a ta.COverthe tithes when the tuition went& haVe to be:refunded past .the nOrinal. petiOd;This pro 'tidal policy would; :in addition; blither separate 'the ti4atilierit 'bf the. veteran' Student froM that' 'Of 'thelhanyeteran by requiring different refund policies ThiS subsectian àlsô fail&tô ,dekgriqte ta'WhOth the refnne.' is tO. be WObelieve.it 'is ytopeitha the refnii&Of tnitionslioula be-made to the .Veterans''Admin iittation; hat td the 'lieterin..." ; :SnbsectiOns. ()(O.,. arid" (f ): 'of the ptoposodf new. :SectiOn provide kir the payinent of ,aSnbaistened alloWanee tO those veteranS eligible for the tuition' 'asSiStaithe. The allaWance payable tb"these vete;aris; 288 1615 1616 while termed a subsistenceallowance, would, withtwo,pMioroxeep- ,AdministratiVe cost due to the direct payments to the. institii- tions, be at the same rate asthe educational assistanceallowanceatori flops 'Waal& approainmfe .7.8 ilutllloss ; the firstyear andrtleclineto rend), being paid to theseveterans. Veterans notaligiblefor the Mition $5::94ifillidir by the'fifth allowance would be thosewho are training on lessthanhalf 'time, while estilMites Of direct benefits and adthinistratire'dost cited above on active duty,pursuing flight or :correspondence coursetraiuMg, or are -bused 'Upon the: handier of veterans alloady: oilpected td be in pursuing apprenticeship orother onjob programs.These veterans, training: If-the higher :benefits whieh would be :Made: available: by under the provisions ofSection 3, of the billovouldcontinuelo'be paid WS: proPosal: Should induce: additional 'Veterans ; tO; enter training the same rate of educationalassistance allowance that they,are. pre& whoi otherwise would:not have trained, the:entire lost,of training cntly being paid. Webelieve that it would bediscrimMatory toward fdd Stich peraons might be considered to be additional direct' bene- qmyment of tuition and, other :coda fitacest 'attributable to this proposal. Sueltpossible addedoost isnet veterans under some programs snseeptilileOf either in whole or in partand not to giventherveterans similaYtreat- any m'eaningful eatiniate. ; : : ment because of theirchoice of training. The views expressed in tlds ?. repdrt apply emtally to lilt 9627, Sections 4 through 16 of thebill are either restatementol exiiting 31161004)1, :HAI. '10044, HR. '10224, H.R. 10432;:412..10603; and law or are clarificationsof present law tomake the current dew cout: H.R. 410648, similar purpose bills, whicham :also ;pending before sistent with the newtuition-subsistence paymentprovisions provided Votti 'committee. Thesemeasures 'are identical to H.R. 9609 and H.R. in H.R. 9609. 12052 with the exception of section 12. In H.R. 9627 and the other all post-Koreancondict veterans.whohavo misted:measures,' section12: containsa provision repealing the Iiin- We wish to point out that disab, aserviee-connected injury evaluatedat 30 percent or ,more itatidn, cuurently,set forth in section 1691(b) of title 38. barring ling. or if less than 30percent disabling mid have apronounced enrollment:in adult evening Secondary schoolcosuses in excess of lmndicap, and are foundin need of vocationalrehabilitation:on half4timdtraining. 1 account of suchdisability, may pursuetraining under chapter:01. On -November:29,:1971, we submitteda seport to yom committee . inoppositionito; H.Th. 9894, Educational benefitsprovided under thatchapter havebeen more a bill which would accomplish the sales under bhapter 34. Forexample, a.maximtun purposd as seetion; 12. of MR: 9627 and the other cited bills. The liberal than those provided viewsrwhich We expressed in that report concerning the termination of 18 months of trainingis provided under chapter31. Charges:for paid directly to the schoolby the Vet- of:the messing adult secondary; limitationare equally applicable to tuition, fees, and supplies are ieetion 12 of 'these measures. :Further, the cost estimate submitted erans' Administrationand, in addition,subsistence allowances and benefits are paid to the veteran.Under H.R. cat 31.11 .9891 would be in addition to the cost estimateon H.R. 9609 disability compensation set: forth earlier in this report, 0609 benefits for chapter31 beneficiarieswould rise relative to those veteran under chapter31: It- appears tofus For the. xeasons set forthin this report and inour report on MR. provided for the disabled Mut 9894,:we reCommend against favorable consideration by that the bill wouldthus equate the benefitsof the two programs your com- concept of additionalbenefits for thosimmt-: mittee of, A.R. 9609 or,II.R. 9627or of any of the other measures thereby depart from the included in this report., mans whosuffered service-connecteddisabilities. ; enactment of thebill would result inadded Wo.; are adviaed :by: the Office of Management and Budget that It is estimated that and $2,935.8 million thereis no objeetion to the presentation of thisreport from the stand- direct benefit costs of$615 million the first year point of the administration's program. over the first5 years. A. detailedbreakdown showingnunabers 'of total cost for each ofthe ne5 yeers is as ;$incerely, individuals affected and DONALD E. JOHNSON, Administrator. follows:

Individuals shmt militbimfor benefits tultiort ant& payments milions)

PAW near: 953,000 so 352,090 905,901) at 743,000 709.000 510.4 its 2,935.5 5 year tote have assumed a9mmnth school year In snaking this estimate, we also ex- for both college andbelow collegelevel trainees. We have active duty and all veteranspursuing onjob, cluded all pemous on well as those flight, and correspondencetraining programs, as training on less than ahalf-time basis. 290 289 1617

Veterans' Administrationreport on H.R. 413

V ETERAN s' A Inn NISTRAT1 0 N. OFFICE OF THEADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., Jaa.uar.q 31,1.972. Olin E. TEAGUE, Chairman. Oommiffee on Veterans'Affairs, Representatives, 14'ashington,D.C. House of request for a DEAR CHAIRMAN:This will respond to your report by theVeterans' Administration onH.R. 413, 92d Congress, ti bill to amend title 38of the United StatesCode to provide. in certain instances, up to 18 monthsof additional educationalat.Isistance for graduate or professionalstudy. The bill would amendsection 1661 of title 38,United States Code, to provide a veteranwith up to 18 mmithsof additional educational entitlement provided hehas received educationalassistance for a (or 48 months if he iseligible under two or maximum or 36 months 1. year of more VAprogryms), has satisfactorilycompleted at. least graduate or professionalstudy, and uses suchmtitlement for pursuing study On a. full-timebasis. graduate Or professional extend tlw The bill would also amendsection 1662 of title 38 to delimiting date for utilizingeducational assistance to current 8-year utilized, and would 10 yea.rs ivhere thisadditional entitlement is amend section 1791 toexclude any additionalmonths or enitlement granted by this proposalin determiihng themaximum period of entitlement under two or moreprograms. Historically, a statutorylimit has bee» set. onthe maximum number of months of entitlement avaiht ble under each ofthe GI bill programs. The World War Jil GIbill (PubEc Law 346,78th Cong.),lwoi:ided of benefits. This meantthat a veteran, under maximum of 48 months 5g ordinary school years that program, couldreceive the equivalent of of training of 9 monthseach. In enacting theKorean conflict. 01 bill (Public Law 550, 82dCong.), Congress limitedthe maximum amount months which would cover4 ordinary school of entitlement to 36 permit a years of 9months eachsufficientin »lost instances to, veteran to attain astandard college degree.Current law, which was modeled after the Korean program,is consistent inallowing 36 months months if the Veteranis eligible under more.than of entitlement (48 e»titlement which a veteran earns one VAprogram).-The educational used hv him in pursuingcollege-level (includinggraduate »nd may be cooperative, post7graduate)., below-college-level,on-job, flight:, farm or correspondencetraining.' In each of the 01bill programs, the statutoryIhnitation on the maximum number ofmonths of entitlementhas apPlied uniformly to without regard' to thekind of courses the veterans all eligible persons providing were pursuing.The subject bill woulddepart from this by 1618

2 additional entitlement for a select group of veterans who already have received the maximum amount of assistance to which theyare entitled. Assisting such a select group in attaining graduate-levelor profes- sional degrees is a worthy area of concern. We, nevertheless, feel that the extension of preferential treatment to this category of veterans would be discriminatory as to those other veterans who have received maximum entitlement and wish to pursue further trainingon other than a full-time institutional graduate level basis; to those whoare in graduate school, but were not eligible for the full 36 months of entitle- ment; and to those who have utilized their 36 months of entitlement; but have not completed the requisite year of graduate study. Further, it would grant added entitlement to those who have al- ready received the maximum months of assistance while doing nothing for those veterans who qualify for less than the standard maximum months of entitlement. Further, it would imply that veterans enrolled in graduate schools are more important and more deserving of assist- ance than those veterans who are enrolled in other types of training. It is estimated that enactment of this proposal would result in added direct benefits cost of $18.6 million the first fiscalyear and a total of $210.9 million over the first 5 fiscal years. A detailed break- down of individuals affected and direct benefits cost for each of the next 5 fiscal years is as follows:

[Dollars in millions)

Direct Fiscal year Individuals benefits cost

1972 (31 yea r) 25, 000 $18. 6 1973 2b, 000 37. 3

1974 , 27, 000 40. 2 1975 34, 000 50. 7 1976 43, 000 64.1

5-year total 210. 9

In making this estimate, we have made the following assumptions: (a) Veterans who have completed as much as 18 months of active duty in the Armed Forces would be entitled to the full 18 months of additional entitlement and a 10-year delimiting period if they meet the other required conditions concerning graduate or professional study; (b) Only full-time college students would use this benefit; (c) Veterans who had completed 1 or moreyears of college prior to entering training under the GI bill would be entitled to continuous benefit coverage while pursuing their graduateor professional studies, whereas those who enteras first year college students must carry their own expenses during the firstyear of graduate or professional studies before they become eligible for additional entitlement under this proposal; (d) Additional cost estimated Under this proposal is basedupon veterans who would enter college level training under existing provisions of the GI bill, except that these trainees wouldcon- tinue to receive benefits for a longer period of time under this proposal; and

Vet. Letters 92-148 1619

3

(e) For veterans enteringtraining in the first year ofcollege, half of them will complete 4 yearsof college in 4 years, and ofthis latter group, 45 percentwill enter graduate school. For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against favorable con- sideration of H.R. 413 by yourcommittee. We are advised by theCoffice of Management andBudget that there is no objection to thepresentation of this report fromthe standpoint Of the administration's program. Sincerely, DONALD E. JOHNSON,Administrator.

293 Vet. Letters 92 .14s 1620

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 7659

. VETERANS'. ADMINISTRATION, , OFFECE. OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington; DA:January 31, 197.g.

Holl. OLIN E. TEAGUE, . . Mairman, Committee On Veterane Affairs,

[Muse of Representatives, Washington; D. a . DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond to your request for a report by the Veterans' AdrniniStration on H.R. 7659, 92d Congress, a bill to extend themaxinibm educational benefits for veterans to 54 months. The bill would amend section 1661(c) of title 38, United States Code, to increase from 36 months to 54 months the maximum educa- tional benefits for veterans. This expansion of the benefit would be Rmited to those eligible veterans discharged or released from active duty after the date of enactment. The underlyina puipose of all educational assistance programs World War II, eorean conflict and the current lawhas been to help veterans make an .early adjustment from military to civilian life by affording themMonetary aid to.obtain an "educational .statuS 'they might normally. have aspired to*- and obtained had they not served their country in time of natiOn'at.einergency. It was not contemOVted that thi's assistance was to" be a continuing benefit. The Veterans Readjustment Benefits Act of 1966 (Public taW 89-358) provided A. maximum 0.36 months of educational benefits to eligible veterans *bp had ,Serried4more than 180 days on active duty, any part of-which was after.4anuary 31, 1955. Entitlement was earned at therate.of one month Of 'benefits for each month or fraction of active duty served tilt& that date. A sUbSequent enactment amended the law to Kovide that entitlement would be premised on one and one-half months of benefit for each month or fraction thereof served after January 31, 1955. As further amended, the current law authorizes 36 months of entitlement for those veterans who served for 18 months or more; permits veterans who have not received a high school diploma or its equivalent or who need deficiency, refresher or remedial training before entering college to obtain such training wi hout charge to their entitlement; and allows up to 48 months of entit ement where the veteran is eligible under more than one VA educational program. The program has permitted thousands of veterans to successfully attain their educational pursuits. The assistance now afforded al!ows an eligible veteran to attend four years of college, based on acutal, semester attendance of about 9 months for each year. Mternatively, he may attend a below college level institution or training establish- ment for 3 full years. We believe that 36 months of entitlement to pursue education or training is reasonable and equitable.

cori-080-.»77.2:77.11,14 9

294 1621

2

Concerning costs, as noted earlier inthis report, the measure would apply only to those individualsdischarged after the date of its enact- ment. This means that noadditional cost would be incurreduntil fiscal year 1975. Any additional costfor fiscal year 1975 would, in turn, be limited to persons whobegan. training atter enactment ofthe proposal in fiscal year 1972 andtrained on a full-time basis without Eterruption...It is likely.that onlyA'retatively fe.w appren iCe trainees would be in this group. In fiscal year1976, a few graduate or professional 'students might qualify forbenefits. In fiscal year 1977 and 1978, on the other hand, thenumber of persons benefiting under this propOsal would increaserapidly, perhaps reaching 65,000 partici- pants at a cost of $78.4million in fiscal year 1978. The direct benefits cost of H.R. 7659tor the first 5 years, assuming enactment in fiscal year 1972,would be as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

Diree benefits Individuals cost Fiscal year

1972 1973 1974 2,000 $0. 5 1975 18,000 15. 8 1976 18.3 5-year total

For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against favorable con- sideration of H.R. 7659 by yourcommittee. We are advised by the Office ofManagement and Budget that there is no objection to the presentationof this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, . FREDB.RHODES, Deputy Administrator (For and in the absence of Donald E. Johnson Administrator). 1

.I.Aret.:"ietters 92:-.149 1622

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 10504

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION', OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, ashington, D.C., January 31, 1972. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This will respond toyour request for a report by the Veterans' Administration on H.R. 10504, 92d Congress,a bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of tuition, subsistence, and educational assistance allowanceson behalf of or to certain eligible veterans pursuingprograms of education under chapter 34 of such title; to apply automatic cost of living increases to' subsistence allowances; and for other purposes. Section 2 of the bill proposes to adda new section 1680 to chapter 34. Subsection (a) of the proposed new section provides for payment direct to educational or training institutionson behalf of an eligible veteran not on active duty for the customary cost of his tuition, laboratory, library, health, infirmary,or other similar fees and for expenses incurred for books, supplies, equipment, and other necessary expenses, exclusive of board, lodging, and other living or travel expenses which similarly circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the same courses are required to pay. (It should be noted that the printed version of the bill includes board, lodging, andso forth, as expenses which would be paid, butwe have been informed by the author of the bill that this was a printer'serror and it was his intent that they be excluded.) Subsection (b) of thenew section limits the payment, with one exception, to a sum not in excess of $1,000 for an ordinary school year. Under the terms of the World War II GI bill (Public Law346, 78th Cong.), tuition, fees, books, and othernecessary expenses up to a maximum of $500 per ordinary school year were paid directly to the educational institution by the Veterans' Administration. This required contracting with such institutions for this service,a method found to be unsatisfactory andan area subject to much abuse. The findings of the House Select Committee To Investigate the Educational and Training Program Under GI bill during 1950 showed that there were many inadequacies in the law which led to multiple problems. Included among the abuseswas veteran enrollment aimed at financial crain rather than serious educational intent with exploitation of the veteran as well as the Government. It was also found that overcharges were made for supplies, books and tools and in many instances the tools were being sold or pawned by the veteran. In enacting the Korean conflict GI bill (Public Law 550, S2d Cong.), the Congress provided an educational benefitiwograrn designed to

65-050-72-L-No. 150 1623

meet., in part, the expenses of theveteran's subsistence, tuition, fees, supplies, books, and equipment. This waspremised on the select committee's investigation which indicated that thismethod of pay- ment, made directly to the veteran,would achieve the desirable objective of giving the veteran a financial interest inhis own training. The current GI bill (Public Law 89-358), whichestablished a program of educational benefits for veterans who served onactive duty in the Armed Forbes after January 31, 1955, adopted thepartial assistance api?roach which originated in. the Korean bill. It is our view that enactment of the tuition payment, asproposed in the bill, would complete a cycle returning to theproblems and abuses of the World War II GI bill. We believethis would again give rise to such abuses as falsification of veterans' progressand attendance records and collusien between school officials and veteransin falsely obtaining educational assistance payments. 'Furthermore, increased educational assistance benefitsrelated to rises in coats of living have already been proposedin the "Veterans' Education and Training Amendments of 1971' which wastransmitted to the Congress on November .27, 1971. Subsection (b) of the proposed new section 1680 also providesthat lvhere an educational or training institution has no customarycost of tuition, the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs would beauthorized to set a:fair and reasonable rate of paymentfor tuition, fees, or other charges for the. course. We believe that, thisprovision also offers an area of potential abuse.Based on past experience with the World War ,GI bill program, we found that under this provisionthe schools would be able to include.all costs, including somealready subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government.An examp- le would be teachers' salaries. These could be included in a school'ssubmission to the Veterans' Administration for adetermination of a fair and reason- able payment based on actual cost plus a reasonableprofit. In the educational program all other costs aregoVerned by the amount charged to similarly circumstancednonveterans for the same course. To allow a tuition payment where nonveteransin like training are, not chargedtuition would be a contradiction to a basic principle of the program. Some State laws prohibitcharging tuition to resident students. This, therefore, would pose a difficultadministrative problem in Setting a fair and reasonable rate for "tuition, fees, orother charges for the course" as required by this portion of the bill. Subsection (c)' of the proposed new section requireseducational or training institutions which have received tuition assistance payments on the veterans'behalf to refund a pro rata amount of the tuittion when the veteran fails to complete his program ofeducation. This refund is without regard to the established refund policyof the school. In institutions .of higher learning, the normal maximum,period for refunds extends only 8 to 10 weeks after the start. ofthe course. This proposed change would require refunds on a pro ratabasis without lithitation as to the' extent of course completionattained prior to termination. Thus, if a veteran completed 80 percent ofhis enrollment period, a refund to reflect the remaining 20 percent,would have to be made to him.

Vet. Letters 92-1150 1624

3 This subsection fails to designate to whom the refund is to be paid. We believe it is proper that the refnnd of tuition should be made to the Veterans' Administration, not to the veteran. Subsections (d), (e) and (f) of the proposed new section provide for the payment of. a subsistence allowance to those veterans .eligible for the tuition assistance. The allowance payable to these veterans, while termed a subsistence allowance, would, with two minor excep- tions, be at the same rate as the 'educational assistance allowance currently being paid to these veterans. Veterans not eligible for 'the tuition allowance .would be those who are training on less than half- time, while on active duty, ijursuing flight or 'correspondence co.urse training, or pursuing apprenticeship or other on-job programs. TheSe Veterans, under the provisions of section 3 of the bill, would continue to be paid the same rate of educe tional assistance allowance that they are presently being paid. We believe that it would be .diSeriininatory to award veterans under some programs payment of tuition and other costs either in whole or in part and not to give other veterans similar treatment because of their choice of training. Subsection (g) of the proposed new section would require that the Administrator determine as soon as poSsible after the beginning of each calendar quarter after 1971 *the extent:by which the' price indet in the preceding calendar quarter was higher than the price index in the applicable base period.' If he determines that the-price inde has risen by three percent' or more, the .amount of each' 'subsistence payment otherwise payable under chapter 34 would be increaSed by the same percentage, adjusted to the nearest one-tenth of Ipercient, effectivewith respect to benefits for monthS after the quarter in which the determination is made. lf a veteran becomes entitled to a subsist- ence payment. in or after the month in which a cost-of-living iricreAse is required, the amount of subisstgnce alloWance payable .shall .be determined, by adding all the applicable retroactive cost-oNiving increases to the amount rof the subsistence payment Ntilich. would be payable. This jwoposal would associate benefit 'rates ith the percentage change in the cost of living. The effects of the precedent which would be set by subsection (g) require extremely careful study and considera'- tion if the Conaress is to preserve equitable relationships of the various VA benefits. Historically, the Congress has periodically acted to adjust rates of VA benefits such as compensation, pension, and GI bill .allowances, to copewith rising prices. While the GI billallowanCe was intended by Congress to cover only part of the veteran's school costs, there have been' three. 'upward adjustments of allowanceS, cnmulatively ibereasing the bask individual benefits by 75 percent, since flip current GI bill first was. enacted in 1966. 'We .recognize', -moreover, that it. is time for another adjustment ,of 8:6.percent to cover .price increases since the la.st adjustment of February 1970. The admin- istration's proposal to accomplish this'increase in allownifees,'toðer with other program improvements, is incorporated in- the !Tetberans': Education and Training Amendments of 1971",. (H.R. 1.1950, now pending before your committee, We believe this record of action by. the Congress and the President is eminently reasonable and. precludes any necessity for the automatic adjustnient proposed in subsection (g). 298' Vet. Letters 92-150 1625

4

Sections 4 through 16 of the bill (with theexception of sec. 12 which' is discussed later in this report) areeither restatements of existing law or are clarifications of present law to makethe current law con- sistent with the new tuition-subsistence paymentprovisions provided in H.R. 10504. We 'wish to point o.ut that allpost-Korean conflict veterans who have a service-connected injury evaluated at30 percent or more disabling, or if less than 30 percent disablingand have a pronounced handicap, and are foundin need ofvocational rehabilitation on account of such disability, may pursuetraining under chapter 31. Education benefits provided.. under thatchapter have been more liberal than those provided under chapter 34.For example, a maxi- mum of 48 monthsof training is provided under chapter 31.Charges for tuition, fees, and supplies are paiddirectly to the school by the Veterans' Administration and, inaddition, subsistenee allowances and disability compensation benefits arepaid to the veteran. Under H.R. 10504, benefits for chapter 34beneficiaries would rise relative to those provided for thedisabled veteran under chapter 31. It appears to us that thebill would thus equate the benefits of the two programs and therebydepart from the concept of additionalbenefits for those veterans who sufferedservice-connected disabilities. Section 12 of the bill, mentioned earlier,contains a provision repealing the limitation, currently set forthin section 1691(b) of title 38, barring enrollment in adult eveningsecondary school courses in excess of half-time training. OnNovember 29, 1971, we submitted a report to yourcommittee in opposition to H.R. 9894, abill which would accomplish the same purpose assection 12 of H.R. 10504. The views which we expressed in that reportconcerning the termi- nation of the evening adult secondarylimitation are equally applicable to section 12 of this measure. It is estimated that enactment of thebill would result in added direct benefits cost of $809.7 millionthe first fiscal year and a total of $4,042 million over the first 5 fiscal years.A detailed breakdown showing numbers of individuals affected andtotal cost for each of the next 5 fiscal years is as follows:

Direct benefits cost (n millions)i

Number of Rate increase Total Fiscal year individuals Tuition and fees

$809, 7 953, 000 :656. 0 $153. 7 1st 2 (3/4 year) 206.2 900.5 2d 952, 000 694.3 905, 000 682. 3 197. 1 879.4 3d 162.3 735.2 4th 743, 000 572.9 709, 000 561.1 156.1 717. 2 5th . 4, 042.0 5-fiscalyear total

* Excludes additional cost which might occur because ofproposed costofliving increases in educational assistance allowance. ... 2 Full fiscal year applies io individuals and 3/4 fiscal year applies to cost. In 'making 'these estimates of directbenefits costs, we have assumed that the increase would be effective thesecond quarter of fiscal year 1972; that the tuition and feesallowance would be paid by the Veterans' Administration to educationalinstitutions; and that veterans electing exCess tuition at a charge of 1month's entitlement for each Vet. Letters 92-150 299 1626

5 $111 would be trainees in private schools or out-of-State students in public schools (subsec. (b) (2) of the proposednew sec. 1680). Administrative cost due to.the direct payments to the institutions is estimated at $8 million the firstyear, declining to $6 million by the fifth vear. We' are not ina position to predict cost-of-living increases and therefore would not know when such increases mightoccur, nor would we know the exact percentile rate of increase. As a guideline, the estimated cost for a 3 percentile increase, occurring after the j)roposed rate increases went into effect, would approximate $5.15 million per 100,000 trainees. Subsequent cost of living rate increases would, of course, be compounded. The estimates of direct benefits and administrative cost cited above are based upon the number of veterans already expected to be in training. If the higher benefits which would be made available by this proposal should induce additional veterans to enter training who otherwise would not have trained, the entire cost of training for such persons might be considered to be additional direct benefits cost attributable to this proposal. Such possible added cost is notsus- ceptible of any meaningful estimate. For the foregoing reasons, we recommend against favorable action by your committee on H.R. 10504. We are advised by the Office of Management and Budget that there is no objection to the presentation of this report from the stand- point of the administration's program. Sincerely, FRED B. RHODES, Deputy Administrator (For and in the absence of Donald E. Johnson, Administrator).

300 Vet. Letters 92-150 1627

Veterans' Administration report on H.R. 9968

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS'AFFAIRS, Washington, D.C., January 31, 1972. Hon. OLIN E. TEAGUE, Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. l.:HAIRMAN: This will respond to your requestfor a report by the Veterans' Administration onH.R. 9968, 92d Congress, a bill to amend title 38, UnitedStates Code, to establish a 10-year delim- iting period for educational benefits thereunderin the case of Vietnam era veterans. The underlying purpose of all educationalassistance programs World War II, Korean conflict and the currentlawhas been to help veterans adjust from military to civilianlife by affording them mone- tary aid to obtain aneducational status they might normallyhave aspired to and obtained had they not servedtheir country in time of national emergency. It was not contemplatedthat this assistance was to be a continuina benefit. Under theWoRd War II GI bill (Public Law 346, 78th Cong.), a veteran had 4 years from the dateof his separation from the service in which to start his program of educationand, once started, he Was allowed a period of 9 years, or until July 25, 1956,whichever was later, in which to use his period of entitlement.The Korean conflict GI bill (Public Law 550, 82d Cong.), granted a veteran aperiod of 3 years following his separation from service in which to commencehis pro- gram of education ortraining and 8 years from January 31, 1955, or the date of his discharge or release,whichever was later, in which to complete his program of education ortraining. No assistance could be granted such veterans beyondJanuarv 31, 1965. Under the Veterans' Readjustment ActOf 1966 (Public Law 89-358), veterans who were dischargedsubsequent to January 31, 1955, have 8 years from June 1,1966 (date of enactment of currentlaw), or 8 years from the date of their discharge or releasefrom active service, w.hich- ever is later, inwhich to complete their program of education.In the case of veteranspursuing programs of flight training, farmcooperative training, or apprenticeship nr on-job training,the eligibility, premised upon the provisionsof Public Law 90-77, is 8 years fromthe date of last separation from service afterJanuary 31, 1955, or August 31, 1975, whichever is later, tocomplete such programs. No time limitation as to when the veteran must commencehis training was enacted in the current law, presumablybecause of the difficulty in administerina such a provision, the changes ineducational facaties, and thenumeber of students in attendance.

65-086-72No. 181

301 1628

2 The World War II program set a delimiting date of 9 years. The Korean conflict program, on the other hand, set an 8-year limitation. The current program, which is patterned to a large extent on the suc- cessful Korean program, also contains an 8-year limitation. It seems evident that the Congress consided a time limitation to be desirable. We believe that extending the.riod to 10 years as is proposed in H.R. 9968, exceeds the period reasonably necessary for an educational program to assist in readjustment to civilian life, and that the current 8-year provision is entirely adequate. Under the 8-year limitation, for example, a veteran, with a maximum entitlement of 36 months, need attend only 4 to 5 months of full-time instruction a year, or a compar- able amount of part-time training, to make full use of his entitlement. To extend the limitation to 10 years would permit a reduction of such attendance to 3 to 4 months a year. We believe that with our ever changing positions in engineering and other scientific fields, as well as changes in approaches to the arts, a cohesiveness in education is necessary and that training should not be drawn out over an excessive period Of time. There has been an impressive growth in participation by Vietnam veterans in GI bill training and education benefits. Since enactment in May 1966, the Vietnam era GI bill has provided education and training to 1.8 million Vietnam veterans, together with an additional 0.8 million Veterans 'who left service after 1955. The participation rate has shot upward by any Mdex. In the past 3 years, the participation rate of Vietnam era veterans, on a cumulative basis, has risen from 16 percent to 35.2 percent. There is also strong.evidence that men are entering training more quickly after discharge; the first year partici- pation rate in this period has risen by 25 percent. This would indicate less need for an extension of the delimiting date because of the accel- erated rate of entitlement use. We note that the measure proposes to extend the increased delimita- tion peried only for Vietnam era vetertins. Section 101(29) of title 38, United States Code, defines the Vietnam era as the period beginning August 5, 1964, and ending on such date as shall thereafter be deter- mined. by Presideritial proclamation or concurrent resolution of the CongreSs. It would appear that limiting it to only these veterans would discriminate ao.ainst those. other veterans who are eligible for educa- tional benefitsbased upon service during the period from Jaimary 31, 1955, to August 4; 1964. Since all post-Korean veterans are eligible to train until June 1, 1974, there would be no cost in the first 3 fiscal years should H.R. 9968 be enacted. It is esthnated that in.the fourthfiscal year, if the measure were limited to Vietnam era veterans, as proposed.by the bill, the cost would be $44.1 million and, if extended to all veterans, the cost for that:year would be $117,2 million. In the fifth fiscal year the estimated cost would be $67.7 million for Vietnam veterans and $140.8 million for all eligibie 'chapter 34 veterans. Thug, the 5-yenr estimated cost would be $111.8 Million for Vietnam veterans and $258 million for all chapter 34 eligibles: After the ifth fiscal year, those still eligible to train under this proposal would only be from the Vietnam era and estimated cests for the following 5 fiscal years would amount to $295.6 million, ranging from $67.7. million to $50.5 million per year. A table

302 yet., I.etters 1 '4

1629

3 showing a breakdown for the first 5fiscal years, by individuals (both Vietnam era and all ch. 34 eligibles)and by direct benefits cost, follows:

AS PROPOSED IDollars in millions)

Direct Direct Individuals benefits cost Fiscal year Individuals benefits cost Fiscal year

If all ch. 34 eligibles are 1st 0 $0 0 0 included: 2d 0 0 0 1st 0 3d 0 0 41, 000 $44. 1 2d 4th 0 0 5th 63, 000 67. 7 3d 4th 109, 001) 117. 2 131, 000 140.8 5-year total III. 8 5th 5-year total 258. 0

It should be pointed outthat in making these estimates wehave assumed that of those veteranswho will have entered trainingwithin the present 8-year limit, onein 20 will train each year duringthe 2 additional years. For those veteranswho will not have enteredtraining during their first 8 3 ears afterdischarge, we assume that 1 percent will train each year. For the foregoing reasons, werecommend against favorable con- sideration by your committee ofH.R. 9968. We are advised by the Officeof Management and Budgetthat there is no objection to thepresentation of this report from the standpoint of the administration's program. Sincerely, FRED B. RHODES, Deputy Admhzistrator (For and in the abs(nce of Donald E. Johnson, Administrator).

71-815 0 - 72 - 20 303, Vet. Let ters O2 151 1 1630 Mr. HELsTocia. Without objection, theportions of a publication which lists numerous institutions of highereducation7 with enrollment, by sex, the type of institution, that is,whether public or private, and the 1971-1972 fixed costs tuition fees7 androom and board, estimated total cost, will be included at thispoint in the record. (The portions of the publication describedfollow :)

304 1631

Abbreviations used in the college list:

11.1Broorn and board Mmen only g-1910.1971 figures Cocoordinate (separate 11911.1972 not available) affiliated college) Pupublic last Hutton Prprivate Institution est estimate Ccoeducational qtrs.quarters Wwomen only sems.semesters 1632

1971.1972 FIXE0 COSTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION In tONCRHOOLRL VEUNIT E COMMENTS Type MenWomenTeter TurnersFees II IL 0Tafel A

Abilene Christian Col. Abilene. Tex. Pit 1700 1500 3203 $1203 $103 $ 140 12110 Academy of the New Church Ellyn Alhyn. Pa. PIC 50 60 110 570 130 870 1570 Adams Slate Col. Alamos.% Col. PvC 140 1300 2703 384 803 1181 Out of state +1450 Ade lphl Univ. Garden City, N. Y. PIC 1403 1803 3203 2160 280 1275 3715 Adrian Col. Adrian, Nick Pit 760 770 1530 1770 48 974 2792

Agnes Scat Col. Decatur, Ca. PrW .. . 700 700 2020 50 1103 3150 Akron, Univ. of Akron. O. PvC 10100 5700 15,800 480 120 1050 1650 Out of stale +$600 Alabama, Univ. of University, Ala. PvC 8500 5000 13,500 510 840 1350 Out of slats +5510 Huntsville Huntsville, Ala. PvC 8C0 500 1300 525 1000' 1525 Out of stale +5525. 4 qtrs. avail...No housing; *campus est. Alabama Slate Univ. Montgomery, Ala. PvC 1150 1650 2800 330 685 1015 Out of state +1270. 4 PM avail. Alaska. Univ. of: College, Alas. Pu C 10:0 600 1603 ... 288 1163 1151 Out 01 stale +$300 Alaska Methodist Univ. Anchorage, Alas. Pit 250 230 480 15C0 103 1403 3CCO Albany Stale Col Albany, Ga. PvC 803 1403 2200 390 771 1164 Out of stale +5405. 4 qtrs. avail. Albertus Magnus Col. New Haven, Conn. PrW .. . 550 550 1700 ..... 1303 3000 Albion Col. Albion, Mich. PrC 920 920 1840 2029 31 1180 3231

Albright Col. Reading. Ps. PIC 700 600 1301 2100 . 980 3080 Albuquerque, Univ. of Albuquerque. N. M. Pet 700 500 1200 1080 60 IMO 2110 3 sems. avail Alcorn Agr. & Mech. Col. Lama, Miss, PvC 1103 1400 2503 600 360 960 Out of stale +$600. Acceleration avail. AldersoteBroad du s Col. Philippl, W.Va. Pit 603 600 1200 1400 112 918 2160 4 qtrs. avail. Alfred Univ. Alfred, N.Y. PrC 1350 660 2010 2500 30 1300 3130 N.Y. Slate Colo! Ceram. See: New Yodt, Stale Univ. ce

Allegheny Col Meadville, Pa. PIC 1030 720 1750 2210 18 1105 1113 Allen Univ. Columbia, S.C. PrC 350 403 750 650 310 750 1780 Alliance Col Cambridge Springs, Pa.Pit 410 160 603 1300 90 950 2340 Alma Col. Alma, Mich. PrC 650 650 1301 1789 38 1075 2902 3 sems. avail. Alma Whits Col.t Zarephath, N. 1. PIC 120 40 160 860 72 500 1432

Alvernia Col. Reading, Pa. PrW . 300 301 1103 201 1103 2401 Alverno Col Milwaukee, Wis. PrW . 800 803 1202 . . . 9C0 2100 American International Col. Springfield, Mass. Pit 1180 720 1903 1560 193 1041 2797 American Univ., The: Washington, O.C. Pit 2410 2170 1950 2160 64 1C00 3221 Amherst Col. Amherst, Mass. Pit 1203 30 1230 ......

Anchorage Community Col Anchorage. Alas. PvC 510 310 820 . 2C0 Out of stale +$300. 3 sems, avail. No housing Anderson Col. Anderson, Ind. PIC NO 810 1710 1410 110 803 2380 Andrews Univ. Berrien Sprinp, Md.PIC 780 720 1500 1644 21 978 2643 1 qtrs. avail. Angelo State Col. San Angelo, Tel. PvC 2280 1600 3880 103 130 920 1150 Out of slats +5303. Acceleration avail. Anna Maria Col. Paton, Nam NW .... . 620 620 1400 10 1103 2510

Annhurst Col. Woodstock, Conn. PrW .. 480 480 1403 103 1103 2600 Antioch Col. Yellow Springs, O. PrC 1250 920 2170 2903 220 812 3962 Work.study proiram Appalachian Stale Univ. Boone, N. C. Pv C 3000 3200 6203 434 732 1186 Out of slats +5750. 1 SOL avail. Aquinas Col.: Grand Rapids, Mich. Pit 550 600 1150 1390 .. 930 2320 Arizona, Univ. 01 Tucson, Ariz. PuC 12,300 8403 20.700 319 KO 1139 Out of stale +MO

Arizona State Univ. Tempe, Ada. Pv C 10.503 7500 18,000 320 980 1300 Out of stale +MO Arkansas, State Col. of Conway, Ark. Pv C 2100 2403 4500 300 10 720 1030 Out of stale +5390 Arkansas, Univ. ol Fayetteville. Ark. PvC 7000 4000 11X0 300 900 1202 Out of slats +5430 Little Rock Little Rock, Ark. PvC 1803 1203 3C00 225 225 Outof state +5110 Monticello College Heights, Ark. PuC 1350 650 2000 301 26 708 1034 Out of state +$270. AcCeleration avail,

Arkansas A & hi Col. College Illights, Ark. See: Manus, Univ. of, Monticello Arkansas A hi & N Col. Pine Bid . Ark. PuC 1190 1520 3010 300 55 703 MSS Out 01 stale +1303 Arkansas Col. Batesville. Ark. Pit 250 150 400 1302 . 1050 2350 Arkansas Pohlad. Col Russellville, Ark. Pv0 1790 903 2690 . 310 760 1070 Out of state +5710 Arkansas Stale Univ.: Slate College, Ark. PuC 3190 2130 5320 307 678 915 Out of state +1270. Acceleration avail.

Armstrong Col. Berkeley, Cal. PIC 310 280 603 1050 18 1125 2193 4 qtrs. avail. Armstrong Stale Col. Savannah, Ca. PuC 1520 980 2503 . . 360 . . 360 Out of state +5405.4 qtrs. avail. No housing Asbury Col. Minima, Ky. Pit 500 500 10:0 1250 190 660 2103 Ashland Col. Ashland, 0. PIC 1370 1280 2650 2144 10:0 3144 Assumpari Col. Worcester, 11aSS. Pito 700 300 10:0 POO 170 1150 3520

Athens Col Athens, Ala. Pet 680 350 1030 1050 32 1084 2166 3 tams. avail. Atlantic Christian Col. Wilson, N. C. PIC 850 650 1703 950 88 703 1738 Auburn Univ. Auburn, Ala, PuC 9303 4503 12,800 150 750 1202 Out of state +$450. 4 qtrs. avail. Montgomery Montgomery, Ala. PuC 800 400 1200 150 . 450 Out of state +5450. 1 qtrs. avail. No housing Augsburg Col. Minneapolis, Minn. PIC 803 650 1650 1650 130 1003 2780

8 9

306 1633

UNDERGRADUATE 1971.1972 MEN COSTS COMMENTS .. ENROLLMENT NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION ROBMN Typo ManWomanTotal To MonFact

A (continued) $901*81252 Out of stale +5405. 4 qtrs. avail. 'No housIna; 1200 3003 .. 5352 Augusta Col. Augusta, Ga. PuC 1803 olloampus est. 78 1080 3123 Rock Island,10. PrC 900 903 1803 51965 Augustine CA. 250 760 2810 Guaranteed tuition & lee pNn avail PIC 880 1040 1920 1803 Augustine CA. Stove Flillk S. D. 103 1120 2820 PIC 480 170 850 1650 AIMa Col. Aurera,111 1043 3003 Guaranteed cosl 660 IN 1150 2003 Austin CM. Sherman, Tex. PrC Out of gale +5480. 1 qtrs. avail. 225 850 1093 PuC 2200 1303 3910 II Austin Peay State Univ. Clarksville, Tenn. 1043 2160 30 470 503 1030 130 Avila co, Kanus City, Mo. PIC 2574 460 1000 1403 124 1050 Ausa Pacific CA. Ansi, Cal. PrC 520

B 2103 125 1238 3463 Babson Path. Mass. PrC 1000 80 ICAO Babson CM. 1350 40 902 2290 keWeration avail. Baldwin City, Ka n. PrC 460 403 880 Baker Univ. 3150 2241 139 1090 3473 Bef ea, 0. PIC 1550 1600 Bakloin.Wallace Col. .... 990 1530 Out of slate +5540. 4 Omni& NC 7100 7900 15,000 540 Ball Slate Univ. Munoe, Ind. . 790 No housing 30 270 750 40 ..... Ballimote CA. el Commerce Baltimote, Md. PIC 240 1503 100 1203 2803 Lake ROM Ill. PiW .... 550 550 Bard CA, 750 VI 854 1625 Concord, N. C. PrC 203 400 603 BarberScotia CA. 2430 120 1200* 3750 imy board PrW . .. 1950 1950 Barnard Cc/. New York, N. Y. 1050 2410 PIC 311 350 650 1790 IN Bauington CA. Bennington, R. I. 2625 650 650 1503 25 1103 Barry Col. Miami Stmts. Fla. PrW .. 2100 150 1250 3503 Actelentice avail. PrC 603 503 1103 Bates CA. Lewiston, Me. 34 890 1824 PIC 3503 3030 6500 900 Baylot Univ. Waco. Tex. 75 1200 3475 .. 800 800 2200 Beaver CA. Glenside, Pa. PM 750 1840 3 sems. nail. i70 350 620 1050 40 Belheven Ce4. lesbian, Miss. PIC 980 2440 870 410 1350 1440 20 Bellarmine CA. Louisville, Ky. PrC ICAO 145 635 2C60 Belmont, N. C. Pold 720 .... . 720 Belmont Abbey CA. 63 640 1663 3 sems. avail. PIC 450 458 NO 960 Belmont CA. Nashville, Tenn. 3100 1030 4103 Guaranteed cost Beloit, Wis. PrC 900 NO IIKO Out of Gala +5400. 4 qtrs. avail, Beloit Cci. 324 2149 1293 PuC 2820 1860 4703 IN Bemidji Slate CM. BernIdik Minn, 803 1916 3 sems. avail. 600 900 1500 1103 16 Benedr0Col. Columbia, S. C. PrC 1095 116 764 1945 Greensboro, N. C. NW . .. 650 650 Bennett Col. 3225 ...... 1100 432$ Bennington, Vt. PrC 50 503 550 Bennington Cat . . 1315 3295 PrC 2103 100 2203 1980 Bentley Col. Waltham, Mau. sso 781 PrC 680 750 1430 ..., ix Guaranteed tuition. Acceleration rail. Berea Cob Berea, Ky. 90 1015 2255 503 503 1010 ireo Berry CA. Mount Berry, Gl. PrC 850 2115 PrC 400 340 MO 1295 Bethany Col. Lindsborl Kan. 1130 3254 530 1140 1503 624 Bettis ny, W. Va. PrC 610 1670 Bethany CA. 960 . . 660 Bethany, Okla. PrC ION 850 1900 Bethany Nazarene Col. 1376 65 893 2331 Mishawaka, Ind. PrC 240 260 500 Bethel CA. 1430 8 823 2261 PrC 210 190 4110 Bethel CA, N. Nudon, Kan. 1803 .. 760 2560 PIC 480 600 IMO Bethel CA. St. Paul, Minn. 990 15 851 1666 4 qtrs. avail. PrC 300 150 450 Bethel Col. *have, Tenn. 1062 141 796 1943 Daytona Beach, Ra. PrC 501 BOO 1303 BethuneCookman CA. 1576 .. . 950 2526 PIC 750 :.11 1603 La filinda, Cal. 850 2150 Guarenteed tultian. Acceleration avail. Bide Col. 520 1040 1103 ... BilminghamSouthern CA. Birmingham, Ali. PrC 520 1350 149 964 2463 Dellis, Tee. PrC 850 1050 1900 Bishop CA. 336 93 710 1136 Out of state +$384 Spearfish, S. D. PuC 1503 1103 2600 Black Hills Stile CA. 1400 75 215 1750 Carlinville, Ill. PrC 320 280 600 Blackburn Col. 1730 75 1100 2905 PrC 750 350 1100 Bloomfield CA. Blcomfield, N.1. 720 1420 Out of state +5726 2100 4000 650 50 Blownsbutg Slate CA. Bloomsburg. Pa. PuC 1900 Out of state +5600. 'No housing; oRoarnpus est. 222 .... 700 922 Bluefield, W. Va. PuC 650 330 950 Bluefield Slate CA. 750 112 710 1572 'Day students PrW N 350 380 Blue Mountain Col. Blue Mountain, Miss. 1780 70 950 2801 Blunter', 0. PrC 400 360 760 Bluffton CA. 670 103 1035 1805 PIC 1830 1740 3570 Bob/ones Univ. Greenwile, S. C. 2503 45 150 3795 erc 4600 2303 6900 Boston CO. Chestnut Hill, Mass. 200 60 .. 260 Out of slate +Poo. No housing NC 25C0 2900 5400 Boston Slate Col. Boston, Mess. 2030 116 1231 3437 PrC 6200 850314,703 Boston Univ. Boston, Mass. 2700 95 1303 4015 Brunswick, Me. PrC 920 103 1020 Bowdoin Col. 203 162 903 1262 Out of Hate +5250 PuC 650 703 1350 Bowie Stale CA. Bowie, Md. .... 1035 1665 OuI of slate +5900 4 MN, mil. 6300 630012,600 660 BoMing Green Slate Univ. Bolding Green, O. PuC 1903 ..... 1043 2903 Peoria, Ill, PIC 3103 1703 4800 Bradley Univ. 2903 ... 1250 4150 Waltham, Mass. PIC 1130 1070 2200 4 qtrs. evert. 'Woolen only Brandeis Univ. 1203 55 1100' 2155 Gainesville, Gl. PIC 20 450 470 Bum CA. 900 96 803 17% PrC 340 330 670 Bustle CA. Owensboro, Ky. 39 905 2131 450 550 1030 1190 Boar Clill CA. - SIOW Cily, la. PIC 11 10

307 1634

UNDERGRADUATE 1971.1172 TIRED COSTS NAME OT INSTITUTION LOCATION ENROLLMENT COMMENTS Top. MonWomanTotal Tuitionnew R & IITotal B (continued)

Briarcliff Col. Briud ill Mann, N. Y.NW ._... 650 650 _._ MO 13660 Bridgeport, Univ. of Bridgnert, Conn. PIC 7311 2010 4303 WOO $IMI 3203 Acceleration avail. Badwater Col. 81'111in/ter, Va. PIC 420 400 820 1500 225 850 2515 Bridninter Slate Col. &Mineola, Mass. PuC 1150 2350 3503 203 117 010 1117 Out of slate -WOO Brigham Young Unlv. Provo, Ul. PIC 13,003 12,8025,80 910 125 1725 Latter Day Saint member 1303 less

Brown Unlv. Providence, R. I. Ka 2903 ...... 2603 7850 1360 4210 'Ste Pembroke Col. Bryan Col. Dayton, Tenn. PIC 240 240 480 1020 916 19% Bryant Col. Providence, R. I. Pt 11150 450 2303 1700 127 1150 2977 Bryn Maw: Col. Blyn Mavw, Pa. PAY 803 803 2450 50 1350 3150 Budirmil Univ. Lewisburg,Pa. PIC iiio IMO 2820 2700 30 925 3655

Buena Vista Col. Storm Lake, Ia. PIC 550 290 840 1703 .... . 840 2540 Butler Univ. Indianapolis, id. PIC 1100 1200 2300 1650 .... 450 2CO3

C

Caldwell Col. for Women Caldwell, N. J. PAY . . ICC 703 1503 ._... 1175 2675 California, Univ. of Berkeley: Berkeley. Cal. PuC 9%0 7200 17 COO 475 10/5 1550 Obis: 1/avis. Cal. PuG 4200 4030 i2O3 475 1075 1550 Irvine: Irvine, Cal, PtiC 180 1300 2900 471 1075 1546 Los Angeles: Los Angeles. Cal. PuC 9000 %CO 16,803 472 1075 1547 Outof state+51203 Riverside: Riverside. Cal. Pu C 1700 1400 3103 495 1015 1570 San Diego: La Jail, Cal, RIC 1700 900 2600 465 10/5 1543 Senn Barbara: Santa Barbara, Cal. MIC 5300 5203 1 _ ..._ 501 1075 1576 Senn Cm:: SIMI/ Cruz. Cal. PuC 1338 1203 California Baptist Col. Riyersid Cal. PIC 310 380 760 1200 4/ 115 11 4

California Col. of Arts & Crafts Oakland, Cal. Pit 660 820 1480 1450 .. 650' 2103 'Room only California Inst. of Tech. Pasadda, Cal. PrC 730 40 770 2565 115 1225 3935 California Stale Col. Dominguez Hills Gardena, Cal. PuC 1630 1630 3260 143 1364' 1507 Out of stall +51110. 'No housing;

Fullerton Fullerton, Cal. PuC 8390 589014280 .. 150 1210 1350 °vole! stare$1270 Heyeord Hayward. Col. PuC 7903 600313,903 114 1175 1319 Out of slate +81110. 4 qtrs. avail.

Long Beach LCAR Buck Cal PuC 11,470 781019210 164 1400 1564 Out of stale +51110 Los Angeles Los Angeles, Cal. PtiC 10,200 680317,033 204 1303' 1504 Dut of state +51480. 4 qtrs. avail. 'No housing; . offeampus est. San Beinardino San Bernarcfino, Cal. PuC 1503 1300 303 .. r. 142 . 142 Oul of stile +11110. No housing Cahfornia State Col. California, Pa. PuC NM 2300 5103 650 50 603 1308 Out el stall +5126. 3 sams. avail. California Sine Polytech. Col.: San Lois Obispo, Cal. PuC 10:0 %CO 11,003 -__ 150 1%9 1239 Out of stile +1891. 4 Mrs. nail.

Kellogs.Voorhis P011104111. CO. PtiC 8CO3 4030 12,003 163 1101 1263 Oul of state +81110. 4 qtrs. avail. Calvary Bible Col. Kansas City, Mo. PIC 220 160 380 960 103 KG 1121 Calvin Col. Grand Rapids, Mid,. PIC 1750 1600 3350 1503 910 2410 Chr. Ralomied Cli. member tuition less Campbell Col. Bulls Creek. N. C. 1403 PIC KO 2200 550 601 833 1950 Campbellsville Col. Campbellsville, Ky. PrC 490 460 950 780 BO 790 1650 Guaranteed toil's." plan avail. 3 MTN. avail.

Canislus Col. Buffalo, N. Y. Pie 1850 550 2400 1850 ... . 1101 2950 Capital Univ. Columbus, O. Me 800 903 1703 1925 1.75 1045 3145 Nursing & mclic +8250 Cardinal Cushing Col. Blookline, Mass. PAY ...._ 400 400 1150 100 1450 2%0 Cardinal Stritch Col. Milwaukee, Wis. PIC 61 340 400 1103 ___ %0 2(60 Cringe Col. Northfield, Minn. Pre 880 570 1450

Carlow, Col. . Pittsburgh, Pa. PAY 780 780 1950 50 8150 3150 CameglMelion Univ. PittsburO, Pa. PtC iisd sso 3203 2500 .._ 1150 3650 Carroll Col. Helena. Mont, Pit 570 410 980 1150 128 150 2120 Carrcil Col. Waukesha. Wis. PIC 600 600 1200 1125 170 1060 3055 Cation.Nevanan Col.: Jefferson City, Tenn. Pie SCO 850 1750 1103 ... . 230 1980 In2tals student 1103 len

Carthage Col. Kenosha, Will. Me 720 600 1320 1950 66 920 2936 Cne Western MOONS Univ. Cleveland, 0. Pie 3103 1300 4400 2385 85 1230 3100 Castieton Slate Col. Castleton, ht. PuC 650 KO 1250 475 173 1040 1688 Out of state +1750 Calawba Col. Salisbury, N. C. PIC 560 530 1090 1300 160 150 2120 4 qtrs. avail. Catholic Univ. of America Washingtoe, D. C. PrC 1340 970 2310 2003 46 1340 Mb

CatIodic Univ. of Puerto RicoPonce, P. R. PIC 2000 3000 5010 703 50 670 1420 Cedar Crest Col. Allentown, Pa. PrW .... . KO KO 2250 163 1150 3563 Centenary Col. of Louisiana Shreveport, La. PIC 510 350 860 1203 103 IN 2170 Music +1103. 3 stms. nail. Central Col. Pella. Ia. PIC 650 560 1210 1761 25 810 2666 3 sems. avail. Central Comecticut State Col. New Britain, Conn. PuC 3603 3403 %CO 103 103 175 1075 Out of state +8603

12 13

.1 . 30 8 1635

UNDERGRADUATE 071.072 ROOD COSTS ENROLLMENT COMMENTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION Type NonWomenTafel GrilseneeIT S. I Taal C (continued) $ 930 $2103 Acceleration and. Fayette, Mo. Pie 500 403 930 11203 Central Methodist Col. 970 1410 Out of state +1544 Mt. Pleasant, Mith. Pue 6800 7310 14,110 $440 Central Michigan Univ. 765 1065 Out of state +8450. 4 Ohs. avail. Pit 6030 4503 10,500 . . 303 Central Missouri State Col. Watrensburg, Mo. Out of slate +8375 6500 320 . .. 750 1070 Central State Cot. Edmond, Olda. Pue 4000 2500 1790 177 168 415 1630 Out 01 state +1525. 4 GIL avail. Genteel State Univ. Wiltorfone, 0. Puc 1520 1170 263 875 1135 Out of state +1360 Central Washington Slate Col.Ellensbutg, Wash. Puc 4030 3570 7600 71 700 1980 Ceded S. C. Pre 150 170 320 1210 . Central Wesleyan Col. 3100 Danville, Ky. Pre 420 320 740 1900 150 1050 Centre Col. of Kentucky 768 1128 Out of state +1280 Charlton, Neb NC 1560 1070 1630 330 30 Chadron Stale Col, 930 1910 Chaminade Col, of HMI& Honolulu, Havnil Pre 490 350 840 1030 80 1800 95 1003 1195 Chapman Col. Orange, Cal. Pie 880 880 1760 650 925 63 1175 1180 Out ol state 44300 Charleston. Col. on Charleelon, S. C. Poe 330 310 2150 60 1315 3625 Pittsburgh, Pa. NW . . 600 600 Chatham COL 2800 Philadelphia, Pa. PrW .. 600 600 1500 100 1103 Chestnut Hill Col. 720 1630 Out of stale +1570 Cheyney SIM Cd. Cheyney, Pa. hie 1060 1020 2080 720 190 Pie 1340 870 2210 1475 . 14/5 3940 Chicago, Univ, of Chicago, Ill. Out of state +11057. Acceleratien mil. Pit 1403 2300 3700 525 50 575 Chicago Stale Univ. Chicago, in. No housing 150 1050 1203 Out of date +1890 Chico State Col, Chico, Col. Pit 5510 4730 10,240 1000 1150 35 900 1085 Christian Btothers Col. Memphis, Tenn. Pre 950 50 PO 850 1750 Latter Day Saint membet 1540 less Church Cot of Hawaii, Tho Lee Cebu, Itermil PrC 620 610 1230 1635 Out of state +1345.Noncity tesident +$210 Cincinnati, 0. Pue 11.670 668018,350 405 105 1125 Cincinnati. Univ. of 132 1419 Out of state +$550 Charleston, S.C. PuM 2030 2030 557 . . Citadel, The 601 1553 clank, col Orangeburg. 5. C. Pre 280 560 840 803 146 803 1500 119 1210 3899 Claremont Men's Col, Claremont, Cal. PrM 803 3700 650 50 684 1384 Out of state +1726 Clarion State Col. Chni011, Pa. Pit 1700 2CCO 1115 220 890 2335 Clark Col. Atlanta, Ga. Pre 400 803 1240 1640 140 1100 3840 Clark Univ. Worcester, Mau. Pre 820 820 2600 1550 100 80 1100 3580 Clarkson Col. of Tech. Potsdam, N.Y. Pre 15C0 50 845 1515 Out of state +1700 Clemson. S. C. Poe 5503 1000 6503 150 470 Clemson Univ. 1255 3595 Cleveland Inst. of Music, TheCleveland, 0. Pre 103 103 200 1203 140 1000 1555 Out of state +$550. 4 ohs. avad. Cleveland State Univ. The Cleveland, 0. Pue 10,850 4650 15,500 555 930 803 1150 Out of state +$50 Clinch Valley Col. Wise, Va. Put 503 400 350 580 470 1050 1150 50 1000 3200 Coe Col. Cedar Rapids, Ia. Pre QS INV 70 945 2215 Coker Col. Hertorille, S. C. PrC SO 359 1530 1500 160 1150 3810 Colby Col. Waterville, Me. Pre 830 700 1150 2800 90 1X0 4190 Colgate Univ. Hamilton, N, Y. Pie 1910 330 330 121 ICOO 1458 Out of stall +$1081 Colorado, Univ. 01 Bouldet, Cd, Poe 10,103 6600 16,703 2200 203 1000 3403 Colotado Col., The Colorado Springs, Cd Pie 1010 680 1693 800 1310 Out c s state +1903 Colorado School ol Mines Golden. Col. Pue 1380 40 1420 403 110 See: Colorado Stale Col. Crtdey, Col. Univ. of Northern Cotorado 170 156 1050 1476 Out of state +$181.4 qtrs. avail. Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, Cd. Pue 10,520 6520 17.040 250 220 470 625 III 787 1523 Columbia Bible cee. Cambia, S. C. Pre Guaranteed tuition. No housing 103 750 1403 41 . 1411 Columbia Col. 1 Chicago, Ill. Pie 650 1703 2800 76 1203 4076 Columbia Col, New York, N.Y. Ptia 1703 ..... 840 850 1350 1103 1450 3 mos. avail. *Day students Columbia Col. Columbia, S. C. PrW 10* 940 1503 121 850 1472 Columbia Union Col. Takoma Park, Md. Pee 440 460 50 190 1031 1141 Out of stale +1750 Concord Col. Athens, W. Va. Pue 1000 11C0 NCO 1250 2403 1653 25 825 2500 Concerdia Col. Moorhead, Minn. Pt 2150 440 803 890 . 825 1705 4 qtrs. avaN. Concotdia Col. St. Paul, Minn. Pie 360 . 400 730 60 800 1590 Concordia Senior Col. Fort Wayne, Ind. PrM 400 .. 1230 690 150 930 1770 Concordia Teachers Col. Rivet Forest, IR. Pre 470 760 155 785 2035 Concordia Teachers Col. Seward, Neb. Pre 680 860 1540 1095 15 1140. 1445 Out ol state +1703. *Way board Connecticut, Univ. of Storrs. Con. Poe 61103 6300 150 293 1560 2103 130 1120 3950 Connecticut Col. New London, Conn. Pie 280 1210 803 800 ... 3250 Converse Col. Spartanburl S.C. PrW ...... 2C0 1900 1103 'No housing; olf.campus ed. Cooper Union, The New York, N.Y. PIC 730 180 910 .... 430 950 1420 160 910 3510 Cornell Col. Mount berm Ia. Pie 520 2175 625 140 4200 Cornell Univ. Ithaca, N.Y. Pie 7640 1730 10,370 See: New York, Stall Univ. of State SeeMelled Scholl 720 103 840 1660 Corpus Chtisti, Univ. of Corpus Chrhtl,Tel. Pre 500 200 700 Lookan Mountain, Covenant Col, 1190 Tenn, Pre 180 200 380 1110 110 900

1103 2500 1703 . ICCO 1700 Creighton Univ. One% Neb. Pre 1400 PIO 1480 132 970 1580 Culver.Stockton Col. Canton. Mo, Pie 493 290 1800 720 120 510 1350 Cumberland college Williamsburg. Sy, FIC 970 130 350 930 1800 203 1300 3300 Curry Col. Milton, Mass. Pre 580 IS 14

309 1636

DNOEREIRADUATE 1971.1972 FIXED COSTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION ENROLLMENT COMMENTS Typo MnWomenTotal TuitionFoss R L BTatel D !Unto Stole Col. Modison, S. D. PuC 760 580 1340 $ 336 $81 $ 670 $1017 Out of state +0381. *5.doy board Dokoto Wesleyan Univ. Mitchell, S. D. PIC 303 210 510 1125 155 810 2110 Dons, Univ. of Univ. of Do ills Sto., Tex. PIC 503 KO 1000 1350 20 1040 2410 Do llos Boptist Col. Dolly, Tex. PrC 880 570 1450 1100 140 840 2010 Accelerotion soul. Dona Col. Moir, Neb. PIC 420 380 800 1260 220 7110 2260

Oirtmeuth Col. : Bonner, N. H. PIM 3103 . 3100 2550 1250 3800 4 turns alit Oavid Lipscomb Col. Noshville, Tenn. PIC 1150 1150 2300 1200 900 2100 4 qtrs. loll Oovidson Col. Davidson, N. C. PIN IMO 1000 2050 190 925 3165 Dovis 6 Elkin Co 14 Elkins, W. Vo. PrC 503 400 900 1803 1150 2950 Guorenteed.cest pion avoil. (Nylon, Univ. ol Doylui 0. PrC 4270 2210 6500 1600 103 950 2650 3 sems. snit

Defionce Col., The Delon* 0. PIC 640 360 1000 2050 910 2960 Accelerotion and. De townie, Univ. of Nework. Del. PIC 5700 4670 10,370 1103 1110 7210 In.stote student $77$ less De Iowan Mote Col. Dover, Del. PuC 903 703 1600 372 750 1172 Out ofstate +$425 Denison Univ. Gronville, 0. PrC 1150 930 208C 2375 185 1150 3710 Denver, Univ. of Denvu, Col. PIC 3503 2503 6000 2403 1203 3603

DePoul Univ. Chicago, III. PrC 4000 2000 6000 1740 9 1140 3889 4 Mts.oval!. DePouw Univ. Greancaslle, Ind. PrC 1210 1160 2370 2350 150 1200 3703 Detroit Univ. of Detroit. Mich. PIC 3200 1600 4800 1703 . 1129 2820 'Detroit Bible Col. Detroit, Mich. PrC 160 80 240 704 30 103 1534 °that Col. ol Business Deli tam, Mich. PIC 550 350 900 1104 33 900' 2037 4 qtrs. snit 'Noheisting:ott.camp us est.

Dickinson Col. Carlisle, Pa. PrC 920 640 1560 2350 200 1250 3303 Dickinson Mote Col. Dickinson, N. D. PuC 950 760 1710 407 503 500 1407 Out ol state+4403 Milord Univ. New Orleans, La. PIC 490 690 1180 1000 WO 1800 Doane C444 Crete, Neb. PIC 510 290 800 1410 190 850 2450 Guoronteed tuition & fees Or. Mortin Luther Col.: New Ulm, Minn. PIC 210 620 650 580 410 993

Dominican Col. Houston, Tex. PAY . 300 300 1000 90 ICCO 2030 Dominican Col. Boeing, Wis. PIC 350 403 750 1450 ICCO 2450 Dominican Col. of Blouvelt: (Knoell, N.Y. PIC 130 203 310 1000 100 . 1103 No housing Dominican Col. 01 Son RofaelSon RAC Cal. PrW . 403 400 ISCO 1250 2750

Don Bosco Col. Nowitin, N. J. PIM 110 130 1200 60 . . 1260 Guoronteed tuition. No housing

Woke Unlit: Des Moines, la. PIC 2660 1850 4510 1780 1010 2810 Drew Univ. Modison, N. J. PrC 650 700 1350 2350 IBS 1165 3703 (kneel Univ. Philadetptill, Po. PrC 4300 1200 5503 1600 172 1200 2172 Drury Col. Springfield, Mo. PrC 500 SCO 1000 1600 33 920 2553 3 suns. avail. Dubuque, Univ. 01 Dubuque, lo. PrC 520 350 870 1550 90 410 2580

Duke Univ. Durtilm, N. C. PICo 3020 1830 4900 2300 1103 3400 Dunturton Col. of Holy Cross Woshington, D. C. PrW 500 SOO 1800 . . 1250 3050 Duquesne Univ. Pittsburgh, Po. PIC 2703 1900 4600 2000 1190 3190 Dlouville Col. Buffalo, N. Y. PAY . . 1200 1200 1750 115 1160 3025

E

Eaillum Col. Richmond, Ind. PIC DX 500 1100 2340 260 1100 3700 East Conlin Univ. Greenville, N. C. PuC 4560 4740 9300 219 189 850 1253 Out of slats +1732 Cost Control Slot, Col. Ado, Oklo. PuC 1630 1000 2680 355 14 700 1059 Out of state +$450 Cost Shows. ug Slot. Col.: Cost Stroudsbtue, Po. PuC 1110 1490 2620 540 732 1272 Out ol state +$480 Cost Tennessee Stole Univ. Johnson City, Tenn. PuC 6120 408010,200 . 255 966 1221 Out of state +4180. 4 qtrS. snit

Cost Tsxos Boptist Col. Morsholl, Tex. PrC 400 400 800 750 50 750 1550 Cost Tosos Slots Univ. Commerce, Tex. PuC 5003 3000 8030 103 U 766 955 Out of stale +$300 Eoslern Boplist Col. St. Davids, Po. PIC 240 300 540 1850 220 1170 3240 Eastern Connecticut State Col. Willimontic, Conn. PuC 590 1060 1650 100 125 870 1035 Out of slate +4600 Eastern Illinois Univ. Chorleston,111. PuC 3120 4403 8220 335 161 1010 1506 Out of stote +$401. 4 qtrs. ova

Eostern Kentucky Univ. Richmond, Ky. PuC 5200 4400 9600 240 60 760 1%0 Out ol stets +UM Eastern Mennonite Col. Horrisonburg, Vo. PrC 470 490 960 1440 201 855 2496 Cistern Michlgon Univ. Ypsilinti, Mich. PuC 7200 6708 13.900 408 30 1960 1498 Outof stile +$657 Cistern Phritono Col. Billings, Mont. PuC 2450 1750 4200 225 177 175 1271 Out of Mote +3868. 4 qtrs. nod. Cesium New Mexico Univ. Portoles, N. M. PuC 2010 1580 3620 180 248 767 1195 Out of Mote +1540

Elstern Oregon Col.: Ls Gronde, Ore. PuC IMO 803 1800 408 . 900 1303 Out of stole +$1G77 Eastern Woshington Stole Col. Cheney, Wish. PuC 4050 2703 6750 447 786 1211 Out of stole +1912. 4 qtrs. Snit Edgecliff Col. Cincinnott 0. PrC 50 570 620 1203 108 1203 2503 Edpwood Col. Modison, Wis. PIC 70 MO 580 1400 1023 2403 Edinboro Mote Col Edinboro, Po. PuC 2503 3500 6000 650 50 684 1384 Out 01 stole +SUS. Actelerotion mil.

Elitobeth City Stole Univ. Elitobeth Cily, N. C. PuC 610 720 140 214 312 730 1276 Out of gots +$586 Elitobethlown Col. Elizobetlitown, Po. PrC BOO 710 1530 1840 125 980 2945 Elmhurst Col.: Elmhurst,111. PrC 850 900 1750 1903 1100 3030 Accelerotion avoil. Elmiro Col. Elmira, N. Y. PrC 350 1000 1350 2625 45 1125 3115 Elon W. Elon College, N. C. PIC 1070 550 1620 1190 . 787 1977

16 17

aio UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT 1971.1972 FIXED COSTS NAME GT INSTITUTION LOCATION COMMENTS Typo MnWomenTotal TuitionFoos R & liTotal E (continued) Emerson Col. Boston, Mass. PrC 740 960 1703 12175 $140 $1275 13590 Emmanuel Col. Boston, Mass. PrW 1330 1380 1703 136 1103 2936 Emory & Henry Cc& Emory, Va. PrC 520 330 850 1290_ 903 2190 3 sems. avail. Emory Univ. Atlanta, Ga. PrC 1450 950 2103 2403 .. 1250 3650 4 qtrs. avail. Emporia, The Col. of Emporia, Kan. PrC 600 300 903 MO 210 954 2144 Guaranteed tuition

Erskine Col. Due Well, S. C. Pit 430 340 770 1503 175 920 2595 Guaranteed tuition & fees Eureka Col. Eureka. III, PIC 370 210 580 1845 120 1025 2990 Evangel Col. Springfield, Mo, Prt 580 620 1203 960 112 868 1940 Evansville. Univ. of Evansville, Ind. PIC 1500 1500 3030 1350 54 930 2394

F Fairfield Univ. Fairfield, Conn. PrC 1100 41:10 2290 2003 35 1200 3235 Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Madison, N. /. PrC 1030 740 1740 1925 172 1210 3307 Rutherford, N. 1. PIC 12C0 600 ISM 1925 135 1210 3270 Teaneck, N. /. PIC 29% 1600 3600 1925 135 1210 3270 Engineering +$175 Fairmont Slate Col. Fairmont, W. Va. Put 1960 1530 3490 150 101 810 1141 Out of state +5750

Fayetteville Stale Col. Fayetteville, N. C. PuC 600 820 1420 150 220 741 1111 Out of state +$650 l orris Malt CM. Big Rapids, Mich. Put 6650 2850 9500 375 1011 1386 Out of stale +0167 403 Finch Cd. New York, N. Y. PrW . 400 2703 240 1800 4740 Finthy Colt Findlay, 0. Pit too 400 1203 1650 910 2550 Fisk Univ. Nashville, Tenn. PIC 450 7130 1230 1750: 1115 2175

Fitchburg State Cc43 Fitchburg. Mass. Put 1203 1600 2803 KO 45 630 875 Out of state +WO 3500 Out of state +1180 Florence State Univ. Florence, Ala. Put 1700 1800 310 . 792 1162 Florida. Univ. of Gainesvilledla. PuC 10,700 6800 17.500 450 1165 1635 Out of stale +Mk 4 qtrs. avail. Florida Anr. & Mech. Univ. Tallahassee, Fla. Put 2300 2100 4403 450 750 1201 Out of state +$900. 4 qtrs. avail. Florida Atlantic Univ. axe Raton. Ila, Put 3500 2500 6003 450 1050 1500 Out of stale +Mk 4 qui, mil.

Florida Memorial Cc& Miami, Fla. PrC 300 403 703 1103 201 1032 2206 Florida Presbyterian COL St. Petersburg, Fla. Prt 540 540 1030 Florida Southern Cc43 Lakthnd, na. PIC 720 750 1470 203 . 2680 Florida Slate Univ., The TallahaSsee, Fla. Put 9500 8503 11_1103 483 1803 1483 Out of state +6910. 4 qtrs. avail. Florida Technological Univ. Orlando. ne. S330 450 431 1442 Out of state +POO. 4 OS avail.

Ionlbonne Col. St. Louis, Mo. PrW _ 700 703 1603 SO IMO 2650 3 sems. arail, Fort Hays Rams State Cc4. Hays, Kan. Put 3010 2440 5450 410 850 1260 Out of state +UM 3 sena. avail. Fort Lewis MI Durango, Col. PuC 1140 750 1190 245 165 632 1262 Out of state 44455.3 urns. avail. Out of state +1405. 4 qtrs. avail. Fort Valley State Col. Fort Valley, Ga, PuC 903 1600 2500 315 66 714 1095 Fort Wayne Bible Cot Fort Wayne, Ind. PrC 230 250 480 1024 101 850 1975

Fort Wright Col. ol the Holy Names Spokane, Wash. PrW IV 310 310 1300 SO 950 2300 *Special students Framingham Stale C014 Framingham, Matt Put 280 1710 2010 200 SO 510 750 Out of state +6403 Franklin & Marshall Cat Lancaster, Pa, Prt 1450 450 19E0 2550 1120 3670 Franklin tol. Franklin, Ind. PrC 480 320 800 2050 20 990 3060 Franklin Pierce Cc4. Rindge,N. H. PIC 800 250 1050 2000 ISO 1250 3400

Free Will Baptist Bible Cc& Nashville. Tenn. Prt 250 150 103 630 60 880 1570 Fresno State Cc4. Fresno, CH. Put 7350 5130 12.680 140 1268 1108 Out of state +11110 Friends Univ. Wichita, kin. PrC 590 440 1030 1275 20 1005 2303 4 qtrs. Wail. 5000 Out of state +0630 I, T. Nicholls State Col. Thibadaus, La. PuC 39% 29% 300 ... 750 1050 Furman Univ. Greenville, S. C. Prt 1020 920 1940 1603 46 1125 2771

G . Gallaudel tol. Washingtan, 0. C. PrC 520 480 IMO 462 155 1100 1817 Gannon Col. Erie, Pa. PIC 2100 350 2450 1280 63 880 2223 General Motors Inst. Mint, Mids. PrC 3010 20 3030 950 40 840 1130 Work.study program 2703 Geneva Col. Beam nos, Pa. PrC 710 580 1300 1650 ISO 903 George Fos Col. Newberg, Ore. PrC 230 240 470 1620 103 903 2628

George Peabody tor. for Teachers Nashville, Tenn. PrC 340 930 1210 1400 80 775 2255 3 sems, avail. George Washington Univ., The Washington, O.C. PrC 2500 2300 4800 George Williams Cc4, Doymers Gram,111. PrC 450 250 700 isto i so KISS toss I n.state student 150 less. Acceleration avail. Georgetown Cal. Georgetown, Ky. PrC 650 650 1303 1400 20 875 2295 Georgetown Univ. Wathingtm, 0. C. PrC 3100 1100 4200 2350 .._. 1250 3603

Georgia, Univ. of atilt Ca. PuC 9000 600015,010 405 72 1190 1557 Out of slate 4040. 4 Omni!. Out of state +$405. 4 qtrs. avail. Georgia Col. at Mitledgenlle Milledgeville, Ga. PuC 803 1350 nso .420 615 1041 Out of stale +5105.4 qtrs. avail. Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, Ga. Put 6503 190 6690 405 59 910 1401 Georgia Southern CO. Statesboro. Ga. PuC 3060 3240 6303 315 63 760 1138 Out of state +$405 Out of state +8405. 4 qtrs. avail. Georgia Southwestern Cc4. Americo*. Ga. Put 1500 900 2400 375 66 703 1141 1638

UNOTASAADUATI 1.71.1872 IITTO COSTS NAN( Or INSTITUTION LOCATION DINOLINUIT commons Typo lhoWotn Total 'WallowFoot II 4 IITotal G (continued) tom Stale Univ. Atlanta. Ga. PA 6200 4140 10.340 6 405 6 11 61240 $1623 ON of slats +040. 4 Om avail. No houstag: c114smpus Ist GtOlVan COurl Cd. Lakewood, N. J. PrW 700 703 1403 133 1150 2660 Gettysburg Cd. Gettysburg, Pa. KO 1900 Pt 103 3350 . ID) 1310 Glassboro State Cd. Glassboro. N. J. Pit 1603 3240 4803 350 124 1031 1474 Out °fatale +050 Orville Stale Cd. Glenville, W. Vs. PoC 910 110 1710 150 66 00 1106 OA 41 11114 +$750

Goddard Cd. Plainfield. Vt. Prt 503 503 1030 2700 750 3450 Goldm Gate Cd. San Fromm*. Cat. Pt 1310 200 1503 990 17 1250' 2257 3 swot lad. No housing; oft.ampus est. Gonna Univ. Spokane. Wash. Prt 103 1050 2350 1450 55 930 2415 AD:Haulm arid. Good Counsel Cd. White Plains, N. Y. PrVI 503 503 1603 1140 2740 Gordon Cd. Wormarn, Mass. NC 403 440 640 1860 96 1115 3141 4 qtrs. wad.

Goshen Cd. Goshen, Ind. Pt 530 640 1170 1715 15 110 2540 3 SUN, Nod. Courtier Cd. Towsco. Md. PrW 1CO3 1030 2003 61 1503 3561 Goa &Me lat. Omaha. Neb, Prt 260 320 540 603 60 730 1610 Grocetond Cd. Lamont, la. PIC 6)3 630 1260 1375 895 2210 Gambling Col Gambling, L.a. PA 1103 200 3800 503 256 640 1396 00 ol state +19:0

Wand Canyon Col. Phoenix. Agit. Ibt 310 290 603 960 50 770 IMO 5-day board Grand Volley Slate Cd.: Allendale, Midt. Put 1610 1290 2903 375 999 1374 Out of state +$615. 4 qtn. avail. Meat Fobs. Col ol Great Falls. Mont. Pt 400 300 710 930 120 900 1950 Greentboro Cd. Greensboro. N. C. Prt HO 40 590 1200 160 790 2150 Greenville Cd. Greenville, Ill. Prt 03 430 NO 1380 150 ICCO 2530

Chong!' Col Grinnell, la. Pit 650 603 1250 2630 166 940 3736 Grove City Col Grove City, Pa. Pt 1350 703 2050 990 115 960 205 Monad CM. ., Gmersbolo. N. C. Prt 520 480 1030 1550 258 166 2614 Gustavo Adolphus Cd. St. Pelee, Minn. Prt 903 1CO3 1900 3140 Guaranteedeosl plan ned. GoryneddMerry Col. Gwynedd Volley, Pa. PrW 620 620 1500 33 1400 2930

H Hamilton Col Clinton. N. Y. P.C. 920 920 2350 250 1300 3903 no Wand Col. Handing Univ. St. Paul, Mmn. Prt KO 650 1250 2000 1090 3090 Hampdet.Sydney Col. Hampden .Sydnet Va. PrM 700 740 1755 245 740 2740 Hampton Inst. Hampton, Va. Prt 1CO3 1300 7300 1403 13.7 820 2350 Hanover Col. Hanover, Ind. Prt 540 410 1020 1925 155 950 3030

Harding Cd. Searcy, Ark. Pt 1CO3 ICCO 2000 1056 91 775 1922 liardin.Sounons Univ. Abilene, Ter. Prt 150 803 1650 990 110 165 1965 Hartford. Univ.01 Hartford, Cann. PIC 2100 .1550 3650 1875 136 1650 3661 liartradi Col Oneonta. N. Y. PIC 120 150 1670 2200 1300 3303 Harvard Col. Cambridge, Man. NM 4903 4900 MCI . . 1670 4470

Harvey Mudd Col Claremont. Cal. Prt 370 33 403 2500 310 1110 3920 Hastings Col Hastings, Neb. Prt 460 440 900 1750 140 920 2110 Goonntetd tuition Maenad Col. Hayed ord. Pa. PiM 650 650 2325 175 1300 3100 Hann, Um. of Honolulu, Hawaii Put 10,350 995020.30 I 70 62 730 962 Out of data +1690 Hebrew Col Brookline, Mass. Prt 40 60 110 403 5 .. 405 No Imolai lindelbea Col. Tiffin. O. Prt 640 610 1250 2125 40 965 3133 Hellenic Cot Brookline, Mass. Prt 80 10 90 1200 155 493 11148 Henderson State Teachers Col. Arkadelphia, Ark. PuC 2033 1450 3450 AO 688 988 Out of state +POO Hada Col Conway, Ark. Pt 580 Ed 980 1200 38 122 2060 High Not Cd. High Point, N. C. Prt 503 MO 1010 1000 385 265 2150 Instate studest 6150 less

Hillsdale COI. HalSdalt, Midi. Pt 640 503 1110 2065 104 MO 3109 Halm Cot Hiram, 0. Prt 640 550 1190 2235 235 180 3350 4 qln. nail. Hobort Col Geneva. N. Y. P.C. 1070 1070 2575 75 1225 3115 no num Smith Cal. liolstre Univ. Hempstead, N. Y. Prt /AO 2700 6503 1450 180 1403 MO New College Hempstead. N. Y. Pit 160 190 350 2303 170 1503 3970 3.yr. BA. program

Haim Cd Ildhns College, Va. PrVI 1050 1050 3750. 35 3185 Includm ROB Holy Cross. Cd. of the Worcester, Mem. Poo 2400 2403 2410 50 1133 3660 Holy 1 amily Col 1 Philadelphia,. Pa. PrW 420 420 1250 ICOO 2250 Holy lady tc4. Manitowoc. Wm. Pt 60 250 310 803 . 760 1503 No housing; off sunPus eal. Holy Names. Col, ol the Oakland, Cal. PrW 550 550 1403 50 1190 2640

Hood Cd. Frederick, Md. NW , 00 00 2150 61 1250 3468 Hope Col Holland, Mich. Prt 1080 1020 2110 1770 75 90 2135 Houghton Col Houghton. N. V. Ibt 503 NO 1200 1660 161 1020 2841 Houston. Univ. of Houston, Tea. Put 10,00 MOO 15 6C0 100 136 933 1169 Out of dote +$300 Houston Baphst Cd. Houston, Tex. Pic Ho ow Ho 1200 10 ICCO 2210 Guaranteed tuition

20 21

312 1639

UNOESORADUATS 11714172 FIXED COSTS I COMMENTS HAMS OF emwmtution LOCATION INAOLLMENT Typo ManW..VIM! Turner.Fey.II IL IITAO H (continued) 12003 Cuarantised tuition & fens Howard Payne Col. Brownwood, Tes. PrC 750 703 1450 111:00 11E03 500 111 1052 1690 Howard Unn. 191113inflo, . 0. C. Pit 3850 3550 70 1262 Out of slate +11125 Humboldt State Col. Arcata, Cal. Put 3933 2100 6030 112 1100 2703 Huntmgdon Col. kiontgcmery, Ala. PrC 250 450 703 1300 903 10I5 2595 Huntington Col. Huntington. Ind. ItiC 300 350 650 1490 90 2135 Huron EA Huron, S. 0. PrC 410 190 603 1203 35 900 1904 Hustoriillotson Col. Austin. III PrC 380 129 803 803 147 957

1 7913 Idaho, The Col. of Caldwell, Ida, Pre 580 420 1003 1950 13 950 1165 Out of state +1550 Idaho, Univ. of Moscow., Ida. Put 3190 1960 5750 320 1145 Put 3300 2000 5300 340 MO 1140 Out cd Mate +MOO Idaho State Univ. Pocatello. Ida. Out of Mate +SM. 'Men +140 Illinois. Univ. of Urbana, Ill. Put 04,500 8780 23330 396 152 995* 1541 513 Out of state +1851. No housing Chicago Circle Oilman, 10. Put 10.090 5870 15.960 396 117

2810 IllinMs Benedictine Col. tide. III. NC 710 260 970 1665 20 1125 903 2403 HMCO COI. Acksonydle, ID. PrC 430 310 770 1450 50 Chicago, Ill. Pre 2140 160 2300 7003 1103 3100 Illinois Inst. of Tech. Out of state +1720 Ithmus State Univ. Normal, IL PuC 73:0 9000 16.200 345 In 1120 1590 Music & nummg +1100 Illinois Wesleyan Univ. Bloomington, Ill. PrC 710 870 1650 2330 45 1203 3575

Immaculata Col. Immaculata. Ps, PrW 820 320 1403 65 IVA 2665 1450 Immaculate Conception Sem. Conception, Mo. NM 90 90 750 50 650 1952 Incarnate Word cos San Anti/m.1m. PrC 50 960 1010 960 77 915 2440 Indiana Central Col. Ind4mPold, Ind. PrC 540 580 1129 16E0 840 2615 Indiana Inst. of Tech. hi Mayas, Ind. PrC Rd 10 710 1503 75 1010

1486 Out of slate +3544. 3 MOS. avail. Indiana State Univ. Terre Haute, Ind. PuC 6950 5710 12.660 544 942 995 1645 Out of slate +1340 Indiana Univ. blovmrigton, Ind. NC n.sso 650 600 Fort Wayne Foil Wayne, Ind. Put 2030 603 600 Kokomo Kokomo, Ind. Put 700 600 600 Northwest Gary, Ind. Put 2020 600 OutofMale+1600.No housing 603 Purdue al Indianapolis Indianatiokk Ind. PliC MO 603 Smith Bend South Pod, inn. pug 2350 0:0 600 Jettison, Ind. Put 1080 0:0 600 Southeast Out cd data +1600 Indiana Univ. of PennsylvaniaIndiana, Pa. PuC 4000 WO 4800 650 60 684 1391 2860 Fusee at $14. WOM.gudy pretran, Insurance, The Col. of New York, N. Y. Pre 340 10 350 1272 cc Ho

. 2660 *No housing; ofkampus est. lona Col. Non Rochelle, N. Y. PrC 2300 650 2950 1630 IVA. lowa, Univ. ot Iona City, la. Put 7500 6500 11,CO3 620 1114 1731 Oul of Mate +0630 lows State Univ. of Science 8 Out ol Mate +0630. 1 qtrs. tvad. Tech. Ames, Ia. NC 11.560 5330 16.940 600 870 1470 lows Wesleyan Col. Mt. Pleasant. Ia. Pit 500 350 850 1700 150 975 2775 Ithaca Col. now. KY. PrC 1700 2000 3700 2403 Ice 1755 3955

1 Jackson Col. for Women Medford, INISL Pito See: Tufts University 647 417 Out of state +SM. a qtrs. and. Jackson Stale Col. Mon, ass PuC 2703 2603 003 350 Jacksonville, Ala. Put 2800 2203 50:0 329 7E0 1020 Out of Mate 4 8150 Jacksonville State Col. In.:tate student $50 less. 3 sems. avail. Jacksonvill Univ. Jacksonville. Fla. PrC 1380 880 2260 1403 164 1CO3 2564 . 10:0 2600 Jamestown Col. Jamestown. N. 0. PrC 340 240 580 1600

1996 Jarvis Christian Col. Hawkins, Tax. PrC 370 410 780 1140 121 735 Out of state +1350 JIM" City State Col. Jersey CM, N. J. Put 1603 2600 1200 350 81 118 1249 Jewish Studies. The Col. ol ChiCIM, III. SOC. Sportus Cd. of Judaea Min Brown Univ. Siloam Springs, Ad. Pa 400 KA 802 900 150 903 1950 2612 1 sans. had. John Carroll Univ. Cleve.:M.0. PrC 2403 603 3000 1612 1CO3

40 4030 Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore, Md. PrC 1903 110 2910 27E0 1290 2031 Johnson C. Smith Univ. Charlotte, N. C. PrC 600 650 1250 1138 870 475 153 1040 1668 Out ot stale +8750 Johnson State Col. Johnson. Vt. Put 480 480 960 500 500 903 n Ito3 1975 Accelerabon avail. Judson Col. Marion, Ala. PM 2203 990 3190 Accelmatimi soil Juniata Col, Huntingdon, Ps, PIC 650 550 1200

K 4 oth. avail. Kalamazo, Mich. PrC 740 640 1380 1380 345 1350 3075 Kalamazoo Col. Out of slats +8590 Kansas, Univ. of Lomita, Kan. PuC 11.590 780019,390 457 903 1357 62 Sid 1232 Oul of MM. +1395 Ill nsas State Col. of PittsbumPittsburg. Kim. Put 300. 3620 4700 300 76 910 1216 Out of state +1395 Kansas State Teachers Col. Emporia, Kan. Put 3250 3150 6400 303 476 961 1437 Out of state +$590 Kansas State Univ. Manhattan, Kan. Put 7050 5103 12,150 23 22

313

- 1640

UNOCRORAOUATE 117141172 PIRGS COSTS NAIL OF INSTITUTION 1.3CATION ENROLMENT COMMENTS Typo MonWomen Tavel TM IonFoos II fetal K (:ontlnued) Kr us Wesleyan Univ. Salim Kan. PrC 380 220 600 $1503 $ $C0 11400 Gumanteed.cost plan nail. Kearney State Col. Kenney, Neb. PuC 3300 2503 6203 Keene Slate Col. Keene. N. H. PuC 803 1203 2030 lig 818 41 PA g."1:121:11311 Kent State Univ. Kent, 0. PuC 11,650 973021,380 672 1064 1736 Out of stale +WO. 4 ors. Walt Kentucky. Univ. of Lesington, Ky. PuC 7603 6200 13)300 330 1030 1360 Out of state +5700

Kentucky State Colg frankfort. Ky. PuC 690 530 1210 240 80 588 903 Out of state +6500 Kentucky Wesleyan Col. Owensboro, Ky. NC 450 303 750 1270 120 850 2240 I ostate student 5150 less Kenyon Col. Gambier, O. PiC 150 450 13C0 2400 215 1170 3785 Keuka Col. Keuka PM, N. Y. PrW 850 850 2445 55 9., 3450 King Col. Bristol, Tenn. NC 260 150 410 1303 no esi 2303

King's Col. Briarddl Manor. N. Y. PrC 350 450 800 1600 33 895 2528 King's Col. Wilkeslarre, Pa. PrC 1650 3C0 1950 1850 100 1100 3050 Kirkland Col.: Clinton, N.Y. PrCo 415 US 2400 1100 1303 *See Hamilton Col. Knox Col. Galesburg. III. NC 903 650 1556 2655 1295 39:0 Knoxville Col. Knoxville, Tenn. PiC 600 700 1XO 1050 900 1950 Kul:town State Col. Kutztown, Pa. PuC 1550 2450 4c03 650 50 770 1420 Out ol state +5725. 3 sems. avail.

L Ladydill Col. Highland fobs. N. Y. PrC 30 550 580 15C0 115 1250 1865 Layette Col. Easton, Pa. PrC 1690 NO 1960 2503 1170 3670 Ult. Erie Col. Painesville. 0. POI 600 600 3400 Lakt forest Col. Lake forest III. NC 650 600 1250 2750 45 1100 3895 Lakeland Col. Sheboygan, Wis. PrC 4C0 250 650 1600 150 1039 2779 Acceleration mad.

Lamar State Col. ol Tech. Beaumont. TH. PuC 5003 3300 8303 100 56 860 1036 Out of state +1300 Lambuth Col. Jackson, him. PiC 450 450 900 1350 110 800 2240 3 Slins. avid. Lane Col. Jackson. Tenn. PrC 160 403 940 850 117 800 1767 Langston Univ. Langston, Okla. PuC 610 590 1200 2143 74 7(0 1461 Out of slate +SIN La Grange Col. La Grange. Ga. PIC 3C0 300 600 1098 42 675 1115

...aSalle Col. Philadelphia, Pa. NC 1300 3C0 3600 1600 INC 2800 Science +5100 LaVerne Col. LaVeme, Cal. PrC 370 310 710 1850 40 980 2170 3 urns. avail. Lawrence Inst. of Tedi. Southfield. Mich. NC 2200 100 2300 855 45 see 1460 4 qtrs. avail. *Limited housin1 room only Lawrence Univ. Appleton. Wis. Pic 730 610 1370 2610 430 3600 Lebanon Valley Col. Arinville. Pa. PrC 550 4C0 950 1950 70 1050 3070

Lee Col. Cleveland, Tenn. PrC 560 580 1140 800 51 775 1626 Lehigh Univ. Bethlehem. Pa. PrIA 3230 150 3380 2450 1150 3603 Lektoyna Col. Syracuse. N. Y. PrC 1050 650 1700 MOO 10 1050 3060 LeMoyne-0wen Col. Memphis, Tenn. NC 220 410 630 710 65 775 No housing Lenoir Rhyne got. Hickory, N. C. PrC 640 660 1300 1275 141 675 2091

Lesley Col. Cambridge. Mm PrW . 693 630 2350 90 1200 3640 LeTowneau Col. Longview, Tes. PrC 710 100 810 1120 83 925 2128 3 semi. mad. Lewis ES Clark Col. Portland. Ore. PIC 840 860 1700 1900 315 1050 3265 4 ota. avail. Lewis Col. Lockport, Ill. PiC 1703 700 2100 134 61 1003 2411 Limestone Col. Gaffney, S. C. NC iCC SO) 703 1225 1070 2215

Lincoln Memorial Univ. Harrogate. Tenn. PrC 440 780 720 1245 855 2100 4 otrs. nail. Lincoln Univ. Jefferson City, Mo. PuC 1160 810 1970 350 13 7C0 1063 Out of state +1270 Lincoln Univ. Lincoln University, Pa.PIC 660 320 1030 1100 300 1100 2500 Lindenwood Colleges. The St. Charles, Mo. PrCo NC 550 750 1950 85 1150 3185 Linfield Col. McMinnville, Ora. PrC 600 480 1080 1603 100 975 2675

Little Rock Univ. Little Rock, Ark. See: Arkansas. Univ. of, Little Rock Livingston Univ. Livingston, Ala. PuC 1203 603 1800 390 613 750 1203 Out of state +5180. 4 ohs. nail. Livingstone Col. Salisbury, N. C. PIC 4C0 KO 900 800 100 680 1580 Lod Haven State Col. to* Hato. Pa. PuC INC 1400 2600 650 115 720 1485 Out ol state +8610 Lorna Linda Univ. Riverside, Cal. NC 790 790 1580 1626 972 2599

Lone Mountain Col. San Francisco, Cal. PIC HO 503 600 8503 30 13C0 2810 3 Slins. mad. Long Island Univ.. Brooklyn Center Brooklyn, N.Y. PrC 3000 160 4cco 1676 1172 2818 C. W. Post Center Greenvale, N. Y. PIC 4990 2140 7130 1152 750 1902 Southampton Col. Southampton, N. Y. PrC 830 390 1220 AU 240 1350 3574 Longwood Col. farmville, Va. PuW 2300 2300 400 130 1015 1545 Out of stale +6350. Acceleration avail.

Loris Col. Oubuoue, la. NM 1550 .. 1550 Me 950 2450 Loretto Heights Col. Denver, Col. PIC 140 620 7E13 150 1350 9ncludes REB Louisiana Col. Pineville, La. PrC SO) 410 910 600 162 732 1491 Louisiana Polytechnic Inst. Ruston, La. See: Louisiana Tech. Univ. Louisiana State U.11 MM Col.Baton Rouge. La. PuC 8100 5400 13,503 320 745 1065 Out ol state +6630

24 25

314 1641

UNOERGRAOUATE 11714171 new COSTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION ENROLLMENT COMMENTS Typ menWomenTotor TuitionFees es Tetra L (Continued) Louisiana State U. 1 ASM Coll Alesandria, La. PuC 520 320 640 MO $ 160 Out of state +3503. No housing Nee Orleans. La. PuC 4600 3603 1203 260 1 8I5 1135 Out of state +3630.1.day board Louisiana Tech. Umv. Ruston, La. PuC 1680 1350 7030 290 607 1097 Out ol state +3630. 1 qtrs. avail. Louisville, Univ. of Louisville, Ky. PuC 3170 1430 4E03 $1050 900 1950 Out of state +1903 Lowell Tech. Inst. Lowell, Mass. PuC 3300 200 3500 ?CO 90 755 1015 Out of state +$400

Loyola Col.: Baltimore, Md. PIM 903 40 940 ISCO CI 1103 7618 'Day students Loyola Univ.: Chicago, III. PIC 4300 2500 VICO 1650 15 WO 2715 Loyola Umv. New Orleans, La. PrC 1550 850 2400 ISCO 50 1103 2650 Loyola Umv. of Los Angeles Los Angeles, Cal. PIC 1800 100 1903 1111$ SS 1065 2935 Luther Col. Omani% la. PIC 1030 1020 2050 1600 429 910 2935 !limning Col. Williamsport. Pa. PrC 9C0 600 1500 1950 1050 3030 Lynchburg Col. Lynchburg. Va. PrC 723 800 1570 1450 200 1150 MO Guaranteed cost Lyndon State Col. Lyndonville, Vt. PuC 410 310 720 475 116 1010 1631 Out of state +3750

M Macalester Col. St, Paul, Minn. PrC 1130 1030 2130 2250 1030 3250 McKendrea Col. Lebanon.111. PrC 350 200 550 1550 160 1170 2880 MacMurray Col. Jacksonville, Ill, Ka SCO SCO 1030 2250 103 1150 3500 McMurry Col. Abilene, Tea. PIC 750 950 1300 960 64 790 1814 McNees. State ca. Lake Charles, La. PuC 2600 1800 4400 274 760 1034 Out of state +3630 McPherson ca. McPherson, Kin. PrC 360 260 640 1240 110 SU 2294 Madison Col. Harrisonburg, vs. PuC 870 2980 3803 440 265 861 1566 Out of state +1403 Madonna Col. Livonia. Mich. PrW 700 700 850 50 900 1803 Maine, Univ. of Orono, Me. PuC 5180 3410 8690 450 12 1070 1512 Out of state +$900 Farmington Farmington, Me. PuC 560 840 1400 240 1000 121i: Out of state +$1030

Fort Kent Fent Kent Me. PuC 210 210 470 240 85 ICOO 1325 Out of state +$760 Portland-Gorham Portland, Me. PuC 1600 1750 3350 350 17 1030 1367 Out of state +1650 Presque Isle. Presque Isle, Me. PuC 270 380 650 250 1000 1250 Out of state +11030 Malone Col. Camon. 0. PrC 370 340 660 1466 114 924 zsts Manchester Col. N. Manchester, Mt PIC 750 750 /NO 2560

Manhattan Bible Col. Manhattan. Kan, Pt 90 80 170 510 72 724 1316 Manhattan Coll Orons, N.Y. PrM 3100 3803 1700 1150 MO Manhattanville Col. Purchase, N. V. PrC BO 1370 1400 2400 1350 3750 Out of state +8396. 1 qtrs. avail. Mankato State Col. Mankato, Minn. PuC 6200 5550 11.750 324 170 655 1199 Mansfield State Col. Mansfield, Pa. PuC 1240 1790 3030 650 30 710 1100 Out of state +11190. 3 sems. avail.

Marian Col. Indianapolis, Ind. PrC 530 570 1100 1300 103 860 2160 Marian Col. of Fond du Lac Fond du Lac. Wis. PrC 60 350 410 KO 60 815 1735 Marietta Col., The Marietta, 0. PIC 1160 740 1940 1050 1050 3100 Mating Col. St, Lows, Mo. PrW 250 250 700 36 900 1636 Marion Col. Marion, Ind. PrC 470 480 900 1470 160 900 1930 3056 Marist Col. Poughkeepsie, N. Y. PrC 1050 SOO 1550 1750 50 1250 Marlboro Col. Marlboro, VI. PrC 170 ICO 270 2700 126 1050 3676 Engineering +3150 Marquette Univ. Milwaukee, Wit PrC 4100 2700 6900 1635 10 950 2795 Mars Hal Col. Mars NI, N. C. PrC 800 700 1500 1150 60 703 1910 Marshall Univ. Huntington, W. Va. PuC 9170 150 170 1000 1270 Out of state +$800

Mary Baldwin Col. Staunton, Va. PrW 730 730 3600' U SU 3.9r. 0.A, program avail. Ir.cludes R&O Mary Cot. Bismarck. N. O. PIC 120 380 600 SOO 31 633 1761 Mary flardinlaylor Col. Belton, Tea. PrC 300 600 930 640 80 730 1450 Guaranteed Witco Mary Manse Col, Toledo, 0. PrW 41:0 400 I209 40 900 2140 Mar) Washington Col. of the Univ. of Va. Fredericksburg. Va. PuC 30 2100 2130 685 87 698 1470 Out of state +3755 Marprest Col. Oavenport, la. PrC 103 650 750 1400 950 2350 Mary vove Col. Detroit. Midt NW 750 750 1403 50 IMO 2650 Maryland, Univ. of : College Park. lad. PuC 15030 11,030 26030 410 980 1390 Out of state +1603 51 1150 1164 Out of stale +3200 Eastern Shore Princess Anne, Md. PuC 503 350 850 260 Maryland State Col. princess Anne, Md. Sea: Univ. of Maryland, Eastern Shore

Marylhurst Col.: Marylhurst, Ore. NW 41:0 400 1100 56 910 2166 Marymount Col. Los Anples Cal. PAS 850 850 1815 35 1140 1990 Marymount Col. Salina, Kin. PrC 170 460 580 1400 1050 2450 Marymount Col. Tarrytovm, N. Y. PrW 1050 1090 2100 115 1300 3815 Marymount Manhattan Col. New York, N: Y. PrW 730 730 1950 40 1800 3790

Maryville Col. St Lows, Mo. NW 40° 540 580 IVO 30 1300 2930 'Special studenls Maryville Col. Maryville, Tenn. PIC 420 400 810 1375 135 900 2410 Acceleration avail. Worms? Cog Scranton, Ps. PrW 1300 1300 1380 ICO 1109 2580 Massachusetts. Univ. of Amherst: Amherst. Mass. PuC 8803 6900 15,700 200 701 1090* 1491 Out of state +$400. 1.day board Out 01 state +$400. No housmg Boston Boston, Mass. PuC 2400 2100 4500 200 54 254

26 27 1642

UNOLRORADUATIL Is 714s7srissoCOSTS NAYS Of INSTITUTION LOCATION DISOLLNDIT CONIUNTS Type NenWomenTalaI Tuttle,Toes II *enrol M (continued) Masa:buses lnst. of To:h. Cambridge, Mus. Pre 3800 300 4103 12650 3230 11450 $4330 Mayville State Cc& Wynne. N. D. PvC 510 410 920 285 103 633 1015 Out of state +$681. 4 qtrt mad. Molaille C44. Buffalo, N. Y. Pre 10 250 130 1:60 30 . 1080 No housing Memphis kademyof Arts, The Memphis. Tenn. Pre 90 BO 170 ISO 15 1200 KM Cooly resident $150 less Memphis State Univ.: Memphis. Tenn. Pge 10,103 1103 18.305 26$ . umo 1303 Out of state +5480

Menlo Ca Menlo Park eal. Pre 550 120 670 2030 170 1250 3150 Mercer UMv. Macon, Ga. Pre 9C0 600 1503 11105 . 981 2786 Cuarinteed tuition. 4 qtrs. mad. Mercy C44. Dobbs Ferry, N. Y. Pre 250 750 1003 1503 200 1703 No housing Mercy Cc& of Detroit Detroit, Mich. Pre 203 11C0 1333 1250 150 1200 7600 Mteryhurst Cc& Erre, Pa. Pre 300 550 850 1550 125 1030 2675 Acceleration avail.

Meredith Cot. Raleigh. N. e. NW .. . 11C0 1103 1500 . 1030 2505 Mernmo:k C44. N. Mdover, Mask Pre 1200 803 NCO 1703 13$ 1200 3035 /ANNA C0I. CISMAIM,Pa. Pre 350 400 750 1600 70 910 2580 Methodist C44. Fayetteville, N. C. Pre 430 329 750 9:0 333 IMO 22(0 Miami, Univ. of Coral Gables, Ilk Pre 6503 350010,MO 2000 114 116$ 3279 kliarni Univ. Oxford. 0. Put 6303 6300 11.603 603 172 1140 1912 Out of stata +$1050. 4 qtrs. avad. Michigan, Univ. of Ann Pace. Mid. PvC 13,030 IVO] 23,003 568 1236 1804 Out ot Mate +51732.3 terms avad. Michigan State Univ. E. Lansing, Midi. PvC 18,110 15,42033.530 630 . 1013 1713 Out of stole +Oa 4 sos. mai. Michigan Technological Umv. Houghton. Mich. Put 4600 6C0 5203 480 _. 1010 1530 Out of Oats +$60. 4 Ors. avid. Middl Tenn. State Umv. Murfreesboro, Tenn. PvC 4210 1140 7550 268 730 968 Out of stale +5480. Acceleration avail.

Middlebury C44. Middlebury, M. Pre 980 700 1680 Midland Lutheran C44 .1 Fremont, Neb. Pre 540 520 1560 1050 180 800 2030 Midwestern Univ. Wichita nos, Tex. PvC 1800 1203 3CCO 103 90 920 1110 Out ot stale +3300. 5.day toad Mdlersville State Cc& millersime. Pa. PvC 2050 2350 4400 650 0 720 1458 Out of state +$640. Acceleration sued. Mdlipll Cd. WWI. Tenn. Pre 480 360 840 950 152 1102 3 sant avail.

MilMiin Univ. Decatur, III. Pre 750 7C0 1450 2150 50 1130 3130

Mills C44. Oakland, Cal. PM ... 903 903 . 2010 215 1590 3885 Mdls CO. ol (dug NewYolk.N. Y. PrW 450 450 2203 .. 1312 3582 Mdlsaps ect. Jackson. Miss, Pre 520 480 1003 IMO 410 750 2160 3 urns. avail. Milton Col. Milton, Wm. Pre 620 260 380 1450 130 1030 2580

Milwaukee School of Eng. Milwaukee. Wis. Pre 1730 10 1710 1803 1:60 2850 4 qtrs. avail. Minnesota. Univ. of Minneapoks. Mmn. PvC 32.03019= 51.:03 399 123 1115 1637 Out of stole +1741 Minot State Cog Mince, N. D. Pue 1400 1403 2803 3% 550 946 Out of stale +$331. 4 Mrs. mil. Misericordia Ca Dallas, Pa, PrW 9C0 9C0 16:0 130 1030 2730 Mississippi, Univ. of Umversity, Miss. he 4303 2350 6650 --51%-- 9:0 1405 Out of state +1600

Mississippi CO. Clinton, Miss. PIC 970 780 1750 iso4 94 E40 1618 Mississippi State ect. lot Women C44 umbus, Miss. PuW 2603 2603 541 733 1280 Out of stole +1600 Mississippi State Univ. State Mtge, Miss. Put 5503 2030 7503 418 74 760 1252 Out ol state +1600. 3 sems. avail.

Mississippi Valley State Cc& Ma Rena, Mess. Put 1203 1340 2510 271 . 517 788 Oat ol state +1600 Missouri. Univ. of Cdumbia, Mo. Put 10.030 7003 17,003 518 970 1470 Out of state +$920

" "" Kansas City, Mo. Put 3430 2350 6280 510 1010 1520 Out of state +$920 Rolla, Mo. Put 51:0 103 5600 5.0 1475 Out of stale +1920 " "" SL Lours. Mo. Put 5250 3150 9103 509 . 509 Out of state +3910. No housing Missouri Southern State CO. Joplin. Mo. Put 1900 1300 3203 190 120 1010 Noncounty +1110, out of state +5601 Missouri Valley to, Marshall, Mo. Pre 620 260 880 1295 74 950 2319

Molloy Catholic CO. for Women Rockville Centre,N.Y. PM DV 803 1100 207 1607 No housing Mcermuth Col. Monmouth, M. Pre 770 530 1350 2470 45. 1125 3640 Mcomouth CO. W. Long Branch, N.J. Pit 2100 21:0 4503 16:0 10 1203 2810 Montana, Univ. of Missoula. Mont. Put 5170 2660 7830 414 900 1314 Out of state +$667. 4 Ott avail. Montana CO. of Mineral Science & Tech. Butte, Mont. Put 703 300 IMO 325 803 112$ Out of state +5667

Montana State Univ.: Bozeman, Mont. Put 5110 2980 8030 . 427 870 1297 Out of state +5668 Montclair State CM. Upper Montclair, N. J. Put 2503 3503 6000 350 119 IMO 1469 Out of state +1703 Monterey Inst. of Foreign Studies Monterey, ea Pre 103 90 190 1750 115 1500 3365 luMor.seniol program only. °No housing; off-campus est. Montevallo. Univ. ol Montevallo. Ma. Put 1250 1100 2650 360 730 1090 Out ol state +$210 Moorheld State CM. Moorheod, Minn. Put 2800 NCO 5103 381 90 152 1326 Oat of state +$336. 4 qtrs. avail.

Moravian CO. Bethlehem, Pa. Pre 730 510 1270 2165 78 1203 3513 Morehead State Univ. Morehead, Ity. Put 3203 3203 6103 240 70 803 1110 Out of state +$500 Morehouse CM. Atlanta, Go. NI 1103 1103 1250 150 1105 2505 Morgan State CO. Baltimore, Md. Put 1940 2210 4150 203 193 963 1353 Out of stall +5303 Morningside Cog Sous Cal, Ia. PIC 640 600 1260 1610 90 803 2503

28 29

: 316 1643

UNDERGRADUATE 111714872 11E10 COSTS NAME 01 INSTITUTION LOCATION ENROLLMENT COMMENTS Typo Al.nMimeoT4NaI Tub loo 1.. R & II T4NaI M (continued) Morris Brown Col. Atlanta, Ga. NC 600 950 1550 $1225 $203 $ 810 51235 Morris Hervey Col. Charleston, W. Va. PrC 1000 850 1850 1400 112 950 2462 Imitate student WO less Mt. hotel C. Mt. angel. Ore. PrC 170 ISO 320 1395 57 993 2442 4 qtn. vail. Mount Angel Sern. Saint Bencd.d. Ore. NM 100 ICO 1100 25 900 2015 Mount Holria Col. S. Hadley, Mau. PrW 20* 1780 1800 2450 1400 3850 'Exchange students

Mount Marty Col. Yankton, S. O. Pit ISO 450 600 950 220 900 2070 Mount Muy Col. Milwaukee, Wis. PrW 9% 9% 1000 20 903 1920 Mount Mercy Col. Cedar Rapids, ta. NC 90 510 s 0 1260 250 1000 2510 Mount Saint Agnes Col.! Baltimore, Md. PrW 150 43 1300 1200 2500 Mount Saint Joseph on the Ohio, Col. of Mount Saintloseph,O.PrW 9% 900 1300 120 1140 2560

Mount Saint Mary Col. Hooksett. N. N. NW 300 300 1500 125 1200 2825 Mount Saint Mary Col. Newburgh, N. Y. PIC 80 640 720, 1650 95 1200 2445 Mount Saint Marys Col. Ernmitsburg. Md. NM 1103 1100 1510 140 1050 2710 Mount St. Scholastics Col. Atchnco, Kan. Ste: St. Benedict's Cd. Mount St. Vmant. Col. of Riverdale, N. Y. PM 1000 IMO VICO 30 1400 3230

Mount Union Col. alliance, O. NC 670 590 1260 1920 240 993 3150 MuhlenberaCol. Allentown, Pa. PrC 900 GOO 1500 2150-- 1050 1303 Mundelein Col Chicago, IU. NW 1100 1100 1650 36 1080 2766 Murray Slate Univ. Murray, Ky. Put 3500 MO 6203 300 20 710 1030 Out of state +8503. Acceleration suit Muskingum Col. New Conmrd, 0. NC 750 720 1470 2204 62 1050 1316

N Hamm Col. Springvale, Me. PrC 570 310 880 2300 50 1250 3600 National Col. of [due. Evanston. III. PrC 60 580 640 MO 1500 3900 4 qtrs. /mai. Nazareth CH. Nusreth, Mkh. NC 30 470 9% 1272 35 1050 2367 Nuareth Col. of Rochester Rochester, N. Y. NW . 1200 1200 1800 44 1150 2941 Nebraska. Univ. of: Lincoln. Neb. Put 9103 535014,03 458 880 1133 Out of stets +8500

Omaha Omaha, Neb. Put 5500 2600 8103 600 60 .. 660 Out of state +5460. No houHng Nebraska Wesleyan Univ. Lincoln. Neb. Prt 650 650 1100 1600 95 9% 2591 Guaranteed tuition NevIda. Utiv. of Reno, Nev. Put 3703 MOO 6103 .. 520 1150 1610 Out of state +51000 Las Vegas, Nev. Put 4090 2410 6500 529 1103 1629 Out of state +$1000 New Col. Sarasota, Flo. PrC 320 210 130 2903 45 1300 4215 311. BA Prott1^1

New England Col. Henniker, N. H. NC ICC 370 1070 29% 177 1103 3277 New Hampshire, Univ. of Durham. N. H. Put 4403 3500 7990 810 115 1000 1925 Out of state +81190 New Hampshire Col. Manchester, N. N. NC 750 250 1000 1815 1200 3025 New Haven, Univ. ol West Haven, Cam. NC 2200 400 2600 1185 40 1150 2675 New Mesh* Univ. of: Albuquerque, N.M. Put 6310 4200 10.500 420 911 1353 Out of state +MO

New Minim Highlands Univ. Las Vegas, N. M. Put 1620 880 MO 130 15 765 1110 Out of state +5525. 4 qtrs. evail. New Minim Inst. ol Tech. Sccono, N. M. Put 720 ISO 870 210 110 820 1140 Out of state +5630 New Mexico Stale Univ. Las Cruces. N. M. Put 5500 2703 8200 414 60 880 1391 Out of slats +WO New Rochelle, Col, of New Rodielle, N. Y. NW 9% 9% 2050 40 1750 3340 . New York. The City Univ. of Brosidyn Col. Brooklyn, N. Y. Put 7740 8560 16.300 I66 I90

New York. N. Y. Put 8400 480313200 116 . 116 City Col. Out of state +5900. Noricsty resident +5401 Hebert H. Lehman Col. Brom, N. Y, Put 3000 4303 7100 120 .. 120 130 No housing Queen1 Col. Fleshing, N. Y. Put 6500 850015.000 130 . York Col. Flushing, N. Y. Pu0 1500 1200 2702 I80 180 New York, State Univ. of Albany, N. Y. Put 1050 4020 8070 550 25 1170 1745

Bi:framton, N. Y. Put 2720 2210 4930 550 25 1130 1705 PvC 7510 5170 12.690 550 25 1130 1705 Stony Break, N. Y. Put 4090 2730 6810 550 25 1094 1669 New Yolk. State Univ. of St4te Utrv. CH. Brockport. N. Y. Put 3340 3960 7100 550 25 1110 1705 Buffalo, N. Y. Put 2690 3580 6270 550 25 1103 1675

2420 4280 550 25 1162 1737 " '" Cortland, N. Y. Put 1860 Out of state +$350 Fredonia. N. Y. Put 1650 2350 4003 550 25 1110 1705 Cloaca. N. Y. Put 1580 2380 3960 550 25 11111. 1723 New PHU, N. Y. PvC 2290 2980 5270 550 25 1200 1775 Old Westbury, N. Y. Put 220 180 400 550 25 1130 1705 .

Oneonta, N. Y. Put 1670 2800 4170 550 25 1103 1675 ...... Oswego, N. Y. Put 1350 3103 6450 550 25 1130 1705 Plattsburgh, N. Y. Put 1730 2403 4130 550 25 1150 1725 Potsdam, N.Y. Put 1240 2550 3790 550 25 1170 1745 ...... Purduse. N.Y. PvC 190 130 523 550 25 IMO 15/5 30 31

4,31.7f UNDUKIRAOUATC 1971.1972 HSU) COSTS NAIIIC OF INSTITUTION LOCATION CNROLLNCIOT COMMUITS Typo elooWootenTotal TWO..nowt & Total N (continued) New York, Stile Unica! (cont.) State Univ. Col. (cant.) Her kimer&cenemwo Fienlifort. N. Y. Put 80 $ 550 $ 25 $ 575 Out of state +$350. No housmg Col. of Agr- Cornell Ithaca. N. Y. Put 1990 460 2450 550 350 $1403 2303 Col. of Commits. Alfred Allred, N. Y. PuC 410 90 500 550 280 1300 2130 Col. Of Forestry, Symons* Syrocust N. Y. Put 1230 80 1310 550 25 1255 11130 Col. of Human (Won, Cornell Ithaca, N. Y. PuC 30 1040 1070 550 425 1403 2375 Out of gat' +1350 Col. of Indus. & labor Rel. Cornell Ithaca, N. T. Put 390' 70 460 550 303 1403 2250 Downstate Medical Coster Brooklyn, N. Y. PuC 90 240 330 550 25 550 1125 Out of state +1350. 'Room ooly Nantime Col. at f t. Schuyler Broom. N. Y. Pukt 780 780 550 25 1190 1 165 Out of slate +$350 Upstate Medical Center Syron's*. N. Y. PuC 50 260 310 550 25 550' 1125 Out of stale +1350. 'Room only New York Univ. New York. N. Y. PrC 5700 4003 9700 2550 178 1803 4528 Newark Col. of Eng.: Newark. N. J. Put 2900 60 2960 403 90 750 1240 Out of state +$400. 'No hOosing; Off Cantpus est. Newark State Col. Union, N. J. PuC 1320 3120 4440 350 132 1030 1412 Out of state +1350 Newberry Col. Newberry, S. C. NC 530 270 803 1303 170 920 2390 Nevwcaib Col. New Orleans, U. Piro 1420 1420 2100 225 1720 3665 'See Tubule Univ. Newton Col. ol the Sacred Heart Newton, Mass. NW 350 350 2100 1303 3400

Niagara Univ. Univ., N. Y. PrC 1750 850 NCO 1800 100 1100 300) Nichols Col. Dud, Mass. NC 700 10 710 1650 40 1200 2890 Norfolk State Col.: Nod li, Va. Put 2130 2010 4140 420 35 775 1230 Out of slots +1170 North Adams Stole Col. North Adams, Mass. Put 550 750 1303 200 65 700 965 Out of state +1400 North Carolina, Univ. of Chapel Hill, N. C. Put 7820 1320 11.140 225 173 1017 1415 Out of slate +$725

Asheville Asheville, N. C. Put 500 500 1033 260 144 960 1361 Out of state +1590 Charlotte Charlotte, N. C. Put 1610 1340 2950 225 157 80:1 1182 Out of state +6725. '5-day board Greensboro Greensboro, N. C. PuG 550 4450 5000 225 280 740 1245 Out of state +$725 Wilmington Wilmingtoo, N. C. Put 900 540 1440 260 117 850 8727 Out Of state +$540. 3 sans. avail. North Carolina Agr. & Tedi. State Univ. Greensboro, N. C. Put 2280 1530 1800 251 292 745 1188 Out of staM +$699

North Carolina What Unly6Durham, N. C. Put 1300 2030 3303 200 197 675 1072 Out of state +1750 North Carolina Slots Univ.st Raleigh Raleigh. N.C. PuC 9303 212011,420 225 196 899 1320 Out of state +$725 North Carolina Wesleyan Col.Rocky Mount. N. C. PrC 350 350 700 1500 ,030 2500 North Central Col. Naperville, Ill. PrC 403 41:0 803 2016 42 1050 3147 North Oaktal. Univ. of Grand forks, N. 0. Put 3970 3050 7020 354 92 780 1226 Out of state +9578 ...... - Sendoff, N. 0. . Put 100 60 160 265 70 543 898 Out of slate +9381 North Oaktall State Univ. Farr, N. 0. Put 4203 2030 6200 354 81 803 1235 Out of state +1579 North Georgia Col. Oahlonega. Ga. Put 603 603 1200 315 90 819 1224 Out of state +$405. 1 rpm avail. North Park Col. Chico/oil PrC 560 603 1160 1920 125 1095 3140 Guaranteed cost. 4 qr.. oval. North Taus State Univ. Dance, Teri. Put 6303 440310.903 100 130 952 1182 Out of state +9303

Northeast Louisiana State Col.Monroe. U. Put 4210 3320 8030 258 800 1058 Out of state +8630 Northeast Missouri State COI. Kirksville, Mo. Put 3250 2550 5800 260 736 996 Out of state +9460 Northeastern COMM Bible Inst. Essen Toils, N. J. PrC 140 140 280 900 170 IOU 2153 Northeastern Illinois State Col. Chicago. III. Put 1403 3203 4800 420 81 501 Out of stole +1846. 3 sons. oval. No housing Nortneastern Stott Col. Tahlequah, 011a. PuC 3260 2500 5760 315 15 760 1090 Out of slate +1435

NOdheNterts Univ. Boslon, Mau. PrG 11000 4003 15.030 1700 152 1350 3202 Co-op study.reloted jobs lot upperdasvnen Northern Arizona Univ. flagstoll, Ant. Put 4450 4003 8450 301 750 1051 Out of slate +1693 Northetn Colorado, Univ. of Greeley, Col. PuC 3840 5303 9140 255 135 834 1214 Out of stale +psi). 4 qtrs. oval. Northern Illinois Univ. Denalb. III. PuC 8*90 4540 18.430 345 142 1080 1567 Out of state +1720 Northern Iowa, Univ. of Cedar falls, lo. Pu C 3610 4500 8140 603 860 1460 Out of state +$400

Northern Michigan Univ. Marquette. Mich. PuC 4303 3033 7300 510 32 1084 1626 Out of state +11190 Northern State Col. Aberdeen, S. 0. Put 1700 1500 3203 336 71 620 1027 Out of WM +1384 NOdhland C01. Ashland, Wis. NC 480 220 700 1795 66 920 2781 Northrop Inst. of Tech. Inglewood, Cal. NG 2030 10 2010 1167 16 1153 2671 4 qtrs. avail. Northwest Missouri State Col.Maryville, Mo. Put 3CO3 2$00 5800 300 WO 1100 Out of state +1360

Northwest Natarene C01. Nampa. Ida. PrC 520 603 1120 1125 193 945 2268 Northwestern Col. Orange City, Ia. PrC 390 360 750 1550 830 2380 Northwestan Stole Col. Alva, Okla. Put 1450 1150 NCO 336 14 620 970 Out of state +1464 Northwestern Stole Univ. Natchitoches, U. PuC 4930 282 760 1012 Out of Note +$630. 3 sems. avail. Northwestern Univ. tvansto.111. PrC 3750 2690 6440 2700 1250 3950 4 qtrs. avail.

Norwich Univ. Northfield, Vt. PIM 950 950 1900 226 1001 3130 Notre Oame, Col. of Belmcot. Cal. PrC 100 530 620 1450 53 1200 2703 Notre Oame. Univ. of Notre Chime, Ind. PrM 6500 6500 2203 50 ICOO 330 Notre Oame Col. Clevelond, 0. PrW . 603 603 1033 120 ICOO 2120 Notre Oame of Marylend, Col. of Baltimore. Md. PrW 630 630 1503 85 1200 2155 1645

UNDERGRADUATE 111714972 Ftsus Co SYS NANEDEINMOTUUDN LDEMOON ENROLMENT CosuagneS Tyn menWomenTAW Irvine. Fewe n is a ismer 0 Oakland City Col. Oakland City, Ind, PrC 380 320 700 $1215 $ 51 $ 812 $2078 4 on avail. Oakland Uliv. Rochester, Md, PuC 2700 2600 5300 624 30 1050 1704 Out of state +6634. 3 urns. avail. Oakwood Col, Huntsville, Ala. PrC 300 340 640 1496 72 750 2318 4 pHs. avail. Obeihn Col. Oberlin, 0, PrC 1400 1200 2603 2550 170 1110 3903 Occidental Col. Los Angeles, Cal. PrC 1020 730 1753 2400 60 1300 3760

Ohio Dominican Col. Columbus, 0. PrC 303 503 BOO 1400 1180 2503 Ohio Northern Univ. Ada. O. NC 1503 700 2203 1815 156 975 2946 Engineering & pharmacy +9195. 4 obs. avail. Ohio State Univ.. The Columbus. O. PuC 20,160 13.54033,700 630 1018 1648 Out of state +61050. 4 qtrs. avail. Ohm Univ. Athens, O. PuC 11.203 800019.203 660 16 12U 1960 Out of state +91050. 4 ohs. avail. Ohm Wesleyan Univ. Delaware, O. NC 1280 1220 2503 2453 1125 3575

Oklahoma, Univ. of Norman, Okla. PuC 7780 4803 12.503 420 10 880 1310 Out of state +9660 Oklahoma Baptist Univ. Shawnee, Okla. PIC BOO 900 1700 753 35 820 1605 Oklahoma Christian Col. Oklahoma City, Okla. PrC 580 Ea 1180 1010 710 1790 3 sems. avail. Oklahoma City Univ. Oklahoma City, Okla. PrC 980 720 1700 900 25 810 1735 Oklahoma Col. of Liberal ArtsChickasha. Okla. PuC 360 570 930 441 30 1065 1536 Out of state +WO. 3 sems. avail.

Oklahoma Stale Univ. Stillwater, Okla. PuC 14,000 6000 20.000 448 14 760 1222 Out of state +9700. 3 sems. avail. Old Dominion Univ.: Norfolk, Va. PuC 3640 2740 6380 470 1160 1630 Out of stale +$400. No housing:off campus est. Olivet Col. Olivet. Mich. NC 470 400 870 1770 55 1000 2125 Olivet Nuarene Col. Kankakee, 13. PrC 950 1000 1953 1200 la 920 2228 Oregon, Univ. of Eugene, Ore. PuC 6160 4653 10,1130 537 960 1467 Out of state +91098. 4 ohs. avail.

Oregon Col. of (due. Monmouth, Oft PuC 1700 2000 3700 408 825 1233 Out of state +$669. 1 ohs. avail. Oregon State Univ. Corvalhs. Ore. PuC 8700 470013,400 480 960 1440 Out of stale +91100. 4 qtrs. avail. Nava Univ. Otla ea, Kan. PrC 503 330 830 2930 Acceleration avail. Otterbein Col, Westerville, 0. PrC 700 700 1400 3190 Ouachita Baptist Col. Arkadelphia, Ask. PrC fa 700 1503 Ea 150 775 1525 Guaranteed tuition

Our Lady of Holy Clots Col. New Orleans, La. PrC 20 130 153 700 ZO 720 No housing Our Lady of the Elms. Col. ofChicopee, Mass, PrW 580 580 1300 100 903 2300 Our Lady of the Lake Col. San Antonio, Tel. PrC 150 1000 1153 1050 53 930 2030 Acceleration avail. Ozarks. The Col, of the Clarksville, Ark. PIC 390 260 650 Ea 53 850 1503

P Pace Ca NewTOO,N. Y. PrC 3000 100) 4C00 1760 131 1425 3316 Pacific. Univ. of the Stockton, Cal. PrC 1850 1753 3600 2510 100 1320 3930 Acceleratien avail. Pacific Christian Col. Long Beach, Cal. PIC 130 90 220 753 81 870 1701 Pacific Ca Fresno, Cal. PIC 220 220 440 1203 105 915 2220 Pacific Lutheran Univ. Tacoma, Wash, PrC 1203 1300 2503 1503 DO 980 2653

Pacific Oaks Col, Pasadena, Cal. PIC 20 253 270 1203 1203 No housing Paola Union Col. Angwin, Cal. PrC 1000 IOW 2000 1626 870 2496 Pacific Univ.: Forest Grove, Ore. PIC 810 430 1240 IVO 91 870 2661 In .state student $100 less Paine Col.) Augusta, Ga. PrC 253 450 700 10:0 903 1903 Pan American Col. Edinburg. Tex. PuC 2900 2400 5300 100 92 713 975 Out of state +$303

Panhandle State Col. Goodwell, Okla. Pue 880 520 1400 310 46 603 956 Out ol state +9425 Park Ca Parkville, Mo. PiC 503 220 720 1930 44 1140 3114 Guaranteed tuition Parsons Col. Fairfield, la. PrC 1503 503 2000 1570 153 1080 2600 3 sems. avail. Pasadena Col, Pasadena, Cal. PrC 680 Ea 1210 1440 96 615 2421 Paterson Stale Col. Wayne. N. J. See; William Paterson Cot of New Jersey, The

Pembroke Col, Providence, R. I. PIC° 1203 1200 2853 1360 4210 See Brown Univ. Pembroke Slate Univ. Pembroke, N. C. PuC 1200 BOO 2C00 200 130 503 830 Out of state +9603 Penn Wesleyan Col, Allentown, Pa, PrC 100 53 150 1035 190 770 1995 Pennsylvania, Univ. of Padadelphu, Pa. PrC 4050 2753 7603 2450 337 1403 4187

Pennsylvania State Univ., The University Park, Pa, PuC 24.020 1026034230 675 . 1035 1710 Out of stale +$825. 4 rpm avail.

Pepperdine Col. Los Angeles, Cal, PrC 700 503 1200 1660 14 101:0 2874 3 sems. avail, Peru State Col. Peru. Neb. PuC Ea 400 10:0 330 40 760* 1150 Out of state +$280.1.day Laud Peslalom Proebel Yeutter& Col, Chap, Ill, NC ZO 280 300 1353 .. 1203 2553 Pfeiffer Cott Maritimes, N.C. PrC 453 453 900 975 265 755 1995 Pharmaceutical Sciences, Col. ofColumbia Univ. New York, N. Y. PrC 270 50 320 2033 1800 3803

Philadelphia Col. of Art Philadelphia. Pa. PrC 520 580 1100 2100 203 1203 3503 Philadelphia Col. of Pharmacy & Science Philadelphia, Pa, PrC 620 280 900 1650 560. 2210 'Room only Philadelphia Col. of Textiles & Science , Philadelphia, Pa. PrC 1100 100 1203 1E00 1000 2600 3 sems. avail. Philadelphia Musical Acad. Philadelphia, Pa, NC 200 100 300 2000 1000 X00 No housing; 01k/mous est. Phillips Univ, Enid, Okla. PIC 800 600 1400 1120 70 650 1840 Guaranteed tuition

34 35

319 71-8150-72 - 21 1646

U NaMANDLIATC 15714172 FIXOD COSTS NADAS OF INSTITUTION LOCATION CONNINTS Tip.M.Wm..',NM TuitionfeeeNall ToLLI P (continued) Pieduot Col. Demoted, Ca. PrC 303 303 603 $1125 $ 60 $ 110 61995 1 dn. and. Pikevilla Col. Mute, Hy. PrC 330 270 603 KO 54 IGO 1804 Pntsburgh. Univ. of: Pdtsburgh, Pa. NC MO DX13,030 1500 X 1100 XS Itstate Raul 950 less. 3 WM rail. Peer Col. Claremont. CO. PrC 150 530 680 2503 15$ 1400 4055 Plymcoth State Col. Ptymouth, N. H. Pot IMO IND 2200 530 72 110 1602 Out of dats +WO

PMC Calms Chester. Pt Pre 13E0 Z(O 1560 2050 180 1203 3430 Poldect Inst. of Buddy. Brooklyn. N. Y. PrC 2 03 80 2COO 2100 ...... 21E0 No honing Pomo Col. Claremont. Cal. Pt 750 550 1)30 2400 112 1400 3912 Patient Univ. of Portland. Ore. Pre 930 650 1580 11113 35 1050 XIS koduotion avail. Portlend Stara Univ. Portland. Ore. PuC 6560 05011.310 SCO 1050 1550 Out of slate 441000. °No housiri; °Lemons at

Prato Vrew Av.& Mech. Col.Pun 4 View, Tu. Pue DX 2100 4303 100 III 791 1042 Out of date 44300 Pratt Inst. Brooklyn, N, 4, PrC 1950 1700 3150 2240 85 1350 8575 Presbyterian Col. Chilton. S. C. PIC KO 250 450 1415 150 915 2550 Prescott Col. Prescott, Anz. PIC 110 170 350 2083 160 1160 DX Pimcetto Univ. Princeteo, N. J. Pre 3170 540 3710 21300 1460 4260

Principie CO. MAIL III. PrC 400 403 803 2331 240 1260 3191 Providence Col. Provident*, R. I. Pre 210 303 2300 1950 1160 3050 Puerto Rico. Univ. of Rio Piedras. P. R. PuC 15,100 16.400 31.500 147 .. SCO 647 'Limited bowing: atampors est Puget Samt Univ. of hums. Wash. PrC 1E0 1203 2603 1800 110 950 2160 Purdu Univ. Lalayette, Ind. PuC 13403 72(1 20.600 ... . 700 1140 1840 Out of stole +$903

Q eeris Cd. PAY Charlotte. N. C. 650 650 )88)* 70 . .. 3370 'Includes RIB On' cd. Quincy, IU. PIC 110 803 1803 1400 21 910 2131 unmet Col. Hamden, Conn. NC 1303 IMO 2303 1550 120 1250 2920

R

WWII Col. Cambridge. Mast PAY 1240 1240 2/03 1670 4470 Radford Col. Radfccd, Vo. PoN 410 4000 411 1019 1500 Out of slate +6399. 4 dn. ant RandclphAboall Cd. Ashland. O. PrC 803 60 860 2075 803 XX Randolph.Mdon Woman's Col. Lynchburg. Vo. PAY 130 830 68 3043. indodes WW1 end RIB hdlandi. Univ. of Redlands, Cal. Pre 950 8E0 1750 2250 42 1050 3342

Reed Col. Portland. Ore. PrC 650 454 1160 21013 110 1050 IMO Indite stolen! SIC° lus Regls Col. Denver. Col. PrC 803 503 1)30 ISCO 80 1160 2680 Rads Col, Weston, Mass. PAY KO $OO 1700 105 1200 X05 Renuebor Polytech. Ind. Troy, N. Y. PIC 3500 203 340 2475 13$ 1200 3810 Mode Island. Univ. of Kingston. R. I. PuC 4550 3440 8003 ._,.. 464 1150 -.514 Out of stole .141050

Motile Wand Col. Providence, R. I. Pit 110 MO 3500 . . . 370 98 1295 Out of state +$685 Rhoda Wand Sokol of Design Providence. R. I. Pt KO 603 1200 1350 so 1175 XOS Rid Univ. Houston. Tu. PrC 1710 620 2400 ?um 70 1270 3440 Richmond, Univ. ol Richmond. Va. Pito 1980 620 2603 1303 o5 950 2315 Ricker Col. Moulton, Me. PIC 520 120 640 1775 50 110 2125

Rile Col. Trenton. N. J. Pre 2160 1440 3000 1700 .. IMO 2703 Rio Grande Col. Rio Grande, O. PrC 480 350 130 17(0 10 1050 2760 Ride CAL Wok Wis. PIC 640 360 IMO 2405 50 965 3420 Srviel COI. Nashua, N. H. PrW ... 40) 403 1350 60 IMO 2410 Roanoka Col. Salem, O. Pt 740 500 1240 1900 .... 900 21C0

Robert Monis Col. ComPolit Pa. Pt 2100 1103 3203 1203 50 9E0 2150 Robens Wesluan Col. North Chili. N. Y. Pt 350 40) 750 1593 25 981 2599 Rochester, Dmv. of I Rochester, N. Y. PIC 3100 2200 5830 2600 160 1250 3950 Rochester Inst. ol Tech. Rochester. N. Y. PIC 3020 710 4400 2160 140 1260 3500 Rockford Col. Rockford. III. PIC 350 350 700 1903 1160 8000

Rockhunt Col. Kansas City. Mo. PiC 950 250 1200 1400 90 920 2410 Aadoration avail. Rods, Mountain Col. Biltmgs. Mont. PIC 330 230 560 1400 113 90) 2413 Gunuteed tuition & fees Rollins Col. Winter Park, Fla. PrC 600 503 1100 2400 140 1060 3003 Roosevelt Univ. Chicago, Ill. PrC 3100 1850 4950 1650 30 1300 2910 Rosati, Col. River Forest, III PrC 29 680 700 ISCO .... 1200 2703

Rmsry Hill Col. Buffalo, N. Y. PrC 50 1150 1200 1050 1250 3103 SON Pdytedi. Inst. Terre Haute, Ind. NM 1050 . 1050 1875 . 1170 3045 Routront Col. Rosemont, Pa. PAY 650 650 1700 146 1400 3216 Russet! Sou Col. Troy, N. 4 PAY . 1450 1450 1700 160 1200 8000 Rust Col. Hay Springs,Miss. Pt 260 420 co 950 82 803 1132

36 37

320 1647

UNDUNINADUATI 11714172 11I80 COSTS CHROLLISCNT CONSIONTS NAYS OF INSTITUTION LOCATION Type NesWootenTenet TelliesFeesII11Teta

R (COnlints0O1) Roars Univ.. The Stile Univ. of New Jersey $1666 Out of state +WO Neer Brunswick, N. J. PuW 6530 6530 $ 403 $128 $1034 (Mottos Col 103 14 474 014 of Mato +5100. No housing Newark, N. J. PuC 2902 DEO 4700 Newark 1133 1666 Out of slate +VW New Bruntendr, N. J. PuIA 12,350 . 12.350 403 128 fluUtcs Col. 1503 KO 30 180 Out of state +WO. No housing South Jmey, Col of; Camden. N. 7. RC 803 700

R 176 940 1116 Out of state +51110 Sacramento, Cal. PeC 7253 580313,050 Sacramento State Col 680 20 850 2120 Guarartteed tuition Wichita, Kan PrC 340 340 1250 Stored Hurt Cot 100 1150 2250 PIW . 350 350 1003 Sacred Hurt Cot Belnwmt, N. C. 1450 No housing Bodupod, Conn. PrC 1100 700 1800 1450 . Sacred Heart Univ. 2550 1202 200 1100 1500 29 1010 ST. Ambrose Col. Dump:4 In PrC 1035 205 Lorrain:, N. C. P0 440 420 860 1701 1E4 St AUNT/ Presbenian Col 3070 'Nursing division Mandiestw, N. II ITIA 1200 202 1110 1903 11E0 X(I 125 2100 8aIvih.N.C. PrC 450 670 1120 975 Si Auustine's Gol. 167 12(0 2157 Stamford, CtAIL PrM 50 . 50 800 St Basil's Col. 2603 PrW 800 803 1650 75 815 St. Benedict. Col. of St lough, Minn 25 VS 2250 Atchison, Kan. PrC 03 500 100 1)50 SI. Benedict's Col. 600 130 2015 St. Ballard, Ala. NC 503 100 1015 IN St Bernard Col. 150 1200 2950 SL Bonavuture.N. Y.NC 100 600 2000 1600 St. Bonnenture Univ. 100 1300 1700 10 350 2660 St. Catherine, TAT Cot of St. Paul, Mmn. PrW Out of state +$316 4500 3900 POO 324 90 325 1239 St. Cloud Stare Cot St. Dud, Minn. PriC

750 350 1100 1202 75 1103 2315 St. P7ward's Univ. Austin, Tex, PrC 120 120 1703 U 1200 2918 Sa;nt Elizabeth, Cot of Convent Ststins, NA. FTW 900 900 1350 50 10)3 2403 SI. Paws, Col, ol Joliet, III P1W 303 360 660 1000 5 IMO 2005 Saint Panned Col. Fort Warn Ind. PiC 500 ISO 650 1710 110 1103 2910 St. I mans Col Biddeford, Me. PC 70 4870 No housing Brooklyn. N. Y. PrC 1600 202 IMO 1800 St. !Tams Col 1600 1570* 1023 2570 '60ence +0100 Loretto, Pa. PrC 1003 600 St. frown Col 640 650 1030 80 IMO 2092 St. John Col. of Cleveland Cleveland, 0, PIC 10 150 1430 1925 74 1150 3149 St. John Fisher Col. Rochester, N. Y. PrC 1280 190 160 350 2450 1150 3610 St. John's Col Annapolis, Md. PrC . 1150 3610 Santa Fe. N. M. PiC 160 130 290 2450 Pilil 1503 1500 1650 60 875 2515 St John's Unit Celledevdle. Mar. 'flo housing; on -campus est. 3400 9100 1703 120 1500 3320 St. John's Univ. Jammu, N. Y. PrC 5703 NW .. $50 $50 1500 55 ITV 2155 Saint Joseph Col: W. Harttord, OM 550 550 1800 100 1150 3060 Sant Joseph Col fmnutsburg. Md. PrW 110 1100 10 700 1810 St Joseph Seminary Col. St Benedict, La. ITC ._. 1E4 170 1150 230 100 2420 Si Joseph the Provider, Colo! Rutland, in. PrC 10 ITC 1060 420 1480 1750 80 350 2780 Saint Joseph's Col Rensselaer, Ind. 01 Ne housing PrC 610 310 960 810 21 Celumet Cut Chinon, Ind. NC 130 150 580 1400 80 IMO 2480 St, Joseph's Cot N. Windham, Me. No howling PIC 50 520 570 1400 95 . 1495 St. Jostrites Col. thooldyn, N. Y. 2050 . 1225 205 Philaddphia, Pa. PIC 1630 370 1600 Saint Joseph's Cot 41 1145 3968 Canton, N. Y. PrC 8750 ISO 2100 26110 St. Lawrence Unrv. 1110 2730 St. Leo, Fla. PiC BOO 110 1200 1640 St leo Col 5203 38 IMO 3133 3 sems. and. St touis Hui,. St. lours. Mo. IIC 3500 1700 1900 KO 250 650 1403 33 980 2410 St. Martin's Col Olympia, Wash. F1C 503 ._ 915 II /5 St. Mary, The Col of Omaha, Neb. pryl 500 1203 NW .. 600 600 950 103 803 1150 SI Mary C01. /*NI, ILIA 250 600 00 2060 Saint Mary of the Plains Col. Dodge C414n. PrC 359 1200 SlMarynt.theMcods, St. Mary.of.the.Woods Cot 500 1023 2520 Ind. PrW .... . 500 1520--

1600 80 1210 3633 Notre Owe, InI. MI . 1600 2250 Saint Mary's Col 50 950 25/0 Winona, Mink NC 800 250 1050 1500 SI. Mary's Col. 300 1200 1103 56 1115 3061 St. Mary's Col. of California St. Mary)CcOut CalPrC 900 120 670 330 103 900 1310 Out of state +050 SI. Mary's Col of Maryland; St. Mar/2010d. NC 350 500 503 1300 120 1203 2620 St. Mary's Dominican Cot New Orleans, U. MI 900 2060 Baltimore, Md. PrM NO . 260 1102 St. Mary's Sem. I Univ. 1080 2336 San Antonio, Tea. PrC 2030 800 2800 1216 10 St. Mary's Univ. 1106 1976 SI. Meinnd, Md. PIM 303 .. 300 810 . Saint Meinrad Col. 30 1270 030 103 1050 3150 St. Michael's Cot Winooski, VL PrC 1210 . . 900 2190 W. (*Pere, Wis. PrC 910 750 1650 1800 St Norbert Col. " 39 38

321 1648

UNONICIRAOUATI NAME Or INSTITUTION LOCATION INROLLININT lsnosn new costs CONINIIINTS Typo NonWoo..To NI TuitionToo.II & Soul S (continued) St. Olaf ed. North 1eld. Mum Pit 1310 1310 2650 $2250 11150 13100 SI. Paul Bible ed. St. Paul, Minn. 210 Pit 230 470 992 103 164 1159 St. Paul's Coll Laniancovi le, Va. RC 293 310 61)0 800 183 770 1153 'Women +POO SI. ernes ed. Jersey City. N. J. Pit 1150 730 2430 MO 118 SI. Procolaus ed. 1818 No honing Lisle, 111. Ste: Ilhnom Benedchne Col.

Saint Rost. The ed. of Albany, N. Y. Pit 170 IMO 970 1710 47 900 2617 St. Sdielastma. ed. of NIA. Minn. Pit 130 750 880 1140 21 910 2101 Sid Tema. ed. of W mom, Mink PM 1050 1050 1400 50 925 2375 SI. Thomas, ca at Saint Paul. Minn. PIM . 77110 2310 1650 65 962 2677 SI. Thomas, Univ. of Houston, Tu. Pit 670 IN 1390 IMO 100 100 1900 St. Maas MMus Col. Sparldidl. N. Y. WC 110 280 380 IMO 50 IMO 2350 St. Thomas Seminar/ ed. Denim Col Pill 110 110 750 75 900 112$ St. Vincent ed. Latrnbe. Pa. PIM 950 950 1300 203 900 NO St. %win ed. Chicago, In. WC 110 61:0 703 1503 90 IMO 2590 Seem ed. Wirmlon.Salem, N. C. POI 600 603 301:13* 42 , 3012 Includes R81 Salem ed. Salem, W. Va. Pit IMO 300 1XO 1500 30 100 2330 STITT Sills Coll Salem, Mass. Put 1603 2100 4000 20:1 BO SO 1110 Out ot slate +1103 Salisbury Stall ed. Salida/ix, Md. Put 520 710 1330 200 11$ 870 1225 Out ol slate +1250 Salvo Regina ed. Newport. R. 1. FIW 703 710 1700 50 1000 2750 Samfixd Univ. Biunmgham, All. Prt 1150 850 2003 998 72 900 IWO IASUN %Klett $90 len Sam Houston State Wm. Huntsville, Tu. Put 6003 400310,010 100 76 790 966 Out ot slats + S300. 3 sems. avail. Ssn Diego, Univ. of San ()mac, Cal. Pit 770 580 1350 15C0 160 12170 2860 Sot kg* Slate Colt San Diego, Cal. Put 19.200 147 1917 2124 Out ot Silts +$890 Ssn Fisacruo. Unrt. of San Fianosco, Cat. Pit 2003 1603 3600 1632 1100 2732 Ssn Niacin:* Stale 019 San Fianasco, Cal. Put 70311 60M 13.000 132 1136 1268 Out of stale +11022 Ssn lose State ed. San lose. Cal. Put 11.503 10303 25000 118 lb 1103 1264 Out of state +$111:0 Sala Oars. Umv. of Santa Clara, tel. Prt 2010 1180 3260 196$ 1161 3126 STAN Fe, ed. of SONS Ft N. M. Pit IMO 103 1103 IMO 100 850 2038 Sarah Lawrence ed.: Broomall., N. Y. Prt 120 550 670 2900 20 1403 1320 Savannah Stale ed.: Savannah, Ga, Put 1020 1070 2090 331 660 1011 Out of state +$405 Saud Col Nashville, Tenn Pre 50 60 110 IMO IMO MO &talon, Univ. of Scranton, Pa. PIM 1550 .. 1550 1470 90 910 2170 Sumps Col. Claremont. Cal. FIW 560 560 110 3910. Includes Moon and RIB Seattle Pacific ed. Seale, Wash. Pre IMO 1000 1300 166$ 930 2595 1 qtrs. avail Seattle Univ. Seattle, Wash, Pit 1103 1300 3M0 1530 975 2505 4 olis. SCAL Salon Hall Univ. S. Change. N. 1. NC 1500 4500 X00 1710 110 1100 2910 Setw Rill Col. Mamba& Pa, POI 750 750 1703 60 1050 2110 Shaw Univ. Raleigh. N. C. Pit 500 503 1000 1510 178 870 2561 3 semi wad. Shenandoah td. Wmchestei, Va. 270 280 Pt 550 MO 1200 2300 MAN +000 Shepherd ed. Stiepheidslown, W. Vs Put 1030 1030 2060 150 102 928 1110 Out ot stale +$750 Stamm ed. Mount Carroll, Ill. Pit 210 160 103 1980 180 1180 IUD Shippensbuig Slate ed. Shippensbuig. Pa. Put 1750 MOO 3750 651 51 720 112$ Out ol state +$725. 4 Om. avail. Shoitei Cd. Roma, Ca. Prt 220 290 510 1200 900 2110 MON +8150 Siena Col. Loudonville, N. Y. 12110 130 Pt 1410 1640 50 1200 2190 Siena Heights ed. Achian, Mich. Pit 60 640 703 970 910 IWO Simmoas Col. Boston, Mass. PAII 161:0 1600 24C0 120 1250 3770 Simpson ed. Indianola. la. Pit 520 503 1020 2080 9oo 2980 SONS Falls Col. Sioux Falls, S. D. Pit 450 103 MO 1200 170 112 2112 Guamateed tuition Shidmors ed. Saratoga Springs. N.Y.PrW . 1850 IMO 2803 62 1425 RBI Acceleration wail. Slipper/ Roth State ed. Slipper/ Rock. ra. Put 2110 21100 403 722 720 1112 Out of state +$550 Smith Col. Northampton. Mass. PrW 2103 2103 2450 50 1403 3900 Sonoma Slate ed. Rohnert Park, Cal. Put 1710 1500 3203 133 1200 1133 Out of slats +$1110 South, Univ. of the Sensate, Tenn. Pit 720 230 950 1950 215 900 313$ South Alabama. Univ. of Mobile. Ala. Put 5690 1453 501 1960 Ouf of SUN +5550. 4 atm. mil. South Carolina, Univ. of Columbia, S. C. Put 7110 3903 11,000 550 850 1100 Out of slate +1710 Scuth UNION SNIT Co1.1 Orangeburg. S. e. Put UM 1360 2560 150 136 639 1125 Oul of stale +1480 South Dakota, Univ. of Vermillion. S. D. Put NM 1650 4450 South MIMS Schad ol Mines 363 9$ 110 1266 Out of slate +1512

Sad Ttch. Rapid City, S. D. Put 1150 250 171:0 391 150 750 1291 Out of stlte +8514 SOO Oasts Stitt Univ. Brookrngs, S. D. Put DM 2200 5500 391 83 800 1219 Out of state +SW South Floods, Univ. of Tampa, Fle. Put 9103 6103 15,103 450 915 136$ Out of state +11350. 4 qtrs. avail. Scuthusl Missouri Stale Col.Cape Giiarduu. Mo. Put 3103 3650 7350 210 768 963 Out of slate +$280 Southeastern Bible ed. Buminghani. Ala. NC 110 110 220 640 164 710 1581 Scuth.Castern Bible ed. Lakeland. Fla. Pit 320 300 620 640 61 403 1141 Southeastern Louisiana Col. Hammond, La. Put 3503 2110 5600 200 100 Southeastern Massachusetts 615 975 Out ot state +5630 Univ. NorthOartmouth,Mass.Put 2214 1403 3600 200 60 260 Oul of slate +WM No housing 40 41

322 1649

ONOERORAOUATE 11111.1112 FIXED COSTS COMMENTS ENROLLMENT NAME OF ONSTITUTION LOCATION Type MeeINerolow'MO Tullio.euwo n Tolol S (continued) 3000 9 MO $ 800 $1130 Oist al Ole +5436 Southeastern State Cd. Went, Okla. Put 1503 1500 2150 $ 50 Southern California, Umv. ofLos ROOK Cel. PrC 5110 2790 WOO 2250 3450 520 1030 130 WO 2010 Southern Csfifornia CM. COW Mesa. Cal. NC 300 220 Out of state +3450. 4 qtrs. Mil 6100 255 129 915 1299 Southern Colorado Stale Cd.Pueblo, Cd. Pit 4203 2500 Southern Connecticut State Out of state +3600 4600 7200 ICO 1CO 710 930 Col. New Nom Cam. PuC 2600 145 1050 1546 Out al state +$843. 4 qtrs. avail. Cartondale.111. Pit 14.000 1000 22.000 351 Southern Illinois Univ. 1S1 1135 Dallas, Ter. PIC 3170 2953 6320 1800 3* Southern Methodist Univ. 90 850 2410 southern %leerily Cpa Collegedale. Tenn. PIC 650 100 1150 1410 8303 477 7 MS 1129 Out of Mate +3600. 4 atm ma. Southern Mississippi. Umv. ofHattiesburg. Wm. PuC 4790 3510 Out of state +5669. 4 qtrs. avid. 7300 5000 401 950 1353 Southern Oregon Cd. Ashland, Om. Pit 2700 2600 MO 10 6% 1006 Out of state +5270 Southern State Cot: Magnolia. Ark. Pit 1503 1103 Out of slate +9120 320 1220 336 170 615 1131 Southern Slate Col. Springfield, S. 0. PvC 903 Out of state +3405 750 1850 216 129 162 1161 Southern Utah State C44.1 Cedar Cde,Ut. PvC MO Out of stale +3600 4400 4000 8400 300 160 1060 Southwest 44301111 SteteCd,Springfield. Mo. PuC 10,103 1CO 98 816 1014 Out of state +IVO Southwest Tens Slate Cd. Sin Mamas. Tea PuC 5150 5051 2130 560 490 1050 1800 950 Southwestern at Memphis Memphis. Tenn. PIC Guaranteed tuition 703 1100 65 765 2230 Southwestern C44. Win6e4d, Ku. PrC 410 290 Southwestern Louisiana, The .-214 724 1001 Out of state +5500 Merle. Le. PuC 5260 3693 %SO Univ. ot 136 21 624 981 Out 0 Mate +WA. 3 sems. avail. Southwestern State Cd. Weathertord, Okla. NC 3600 1600 5200 420 860 1324 S 160 2089 Southwestern Univ. Geolleasen. Tel. NC 440 1170 45 1103 2165 Louisville. Ily. PIC 50 680 730 Sustain' Cd. 90 MO 2440 ARISE Gs. PrW 1030 1030 3250 Spefrnan Cd. 603 10 610 4 Olt leNI. No hoeing Spertus Col. of basica Chwago.111. PtC 220 290 510 1550 930 2450 Spring Arta Col. Wm" NW, Malt PIC 340 420 160 903 1300 1110 2400 Senn" Ifill Cd. Mobile, Ala. NC 530 310

110 1950 1933 246 1103 3141 Springfield Col. Springfield, Mass. NC 1110 4 qtrs. avail. 4120 2180 6300 2110 I295 3905 Stanford Univ. Stanford, Cal. NC Out at stale +81110. No housing 1250 2660 358 . 153 Stanislaus State Col. Turlock, Cal. Pat 1410 Out al stale +$5: 4400 9203 ISO 129 1070 1319 Stephen f . Austin State Umv3 Nacogdoches, Tee PuC 0300 1900 1903 300 Stephens Col. Columbia, Mo. NW

----- 1303 860 2160 Guaranteed tuition avail. Sterling. Ilan. NC 350 300 650 Sterling Col. 105 1??0 3275 'See Yeshiva Col. New York. N.Y. PtCo 650 650 1850 Stern Col. for Women 1050 2903 Detand, N. PIC 960 850 1810 1750 110 Sletson Univ. 1200 1400-- 1CO3 zoo Steubenville. The Col. of Steubenville, 0. PrC 703 530 20 1310 2300 40 1052 3392 Stevens Inst. al Tech. Hoboken, N. I. NC 1320

780 670 1450 1800 50 1150 3110 Stonehill Col. II. (enten, Msss. NC Out of state +8930 2000 5000 438 950 1318 Stout State Univ. Menomonie. Wis. PuC 3000 3 sate avad. 'No housing; olf.tainpara eft 503 2030 1400 TO 1400' 2920 Suffolk Univ. Boston, Usu. NC 1503 Out of state +$300 1600 1200 MO 201 101 MO 1008 Sul Ross State Col. Alpine, Tee Pit 700 600 1310 1900 231 1160 3181 Susquehanna Univ. Selinsgrove, Pe PrC 210 1115 3845 Swarthmore, P PrC 680 520 1200 2450 Swarthmore ca. 50 ICOO 3450 Sweet env, Va. NW 720 720 2803 Sweet Briar Col. 2600 ISO 1303 4050 Syracuse, N. Y. Pt 5050 4300 9350 %quest Univ. See: New York, State Univ. of State supported schools

T 150 2110 Guaranteed tudion Malibu, Kan. PrC 120 180 400 1150 110 labir Cof 3110 110 50 160 1703 220 1250 Tahoe Col.) ...arth Uhl Talice.Csl.NC 350 600 ICOO 145 855 2000 Talledep Col. Talladegs, Ala. NC 250 650 2130 160 1050 2100 Tampa, Univ. of Tampa, flu. NC 1480 600 1400 154 1100 2654 Acceleration avail. Talk* Cal. Tokio, Mo. NC 400 200 180 948 Out at state +3300 Stephenville, Ten. PuC 2103 1103 3200 110 68 Tarleton State Col. 135 957 2790 Upland. Ind. PIC 710 710 1420 16% Taylor Univ. 60 3390' 'Includes tuition Ind RIB Denver, Col. NW 903 900 Temple Buell Col 2370 Out of state +WO 1503 5500 11000 970 1400 Temple Univ. P11110030*, Pa. PuC Out of stale +5615.4 OS MIA 11,000 3I5 45 1020 1380 Tennessee, The Univ. of Knonville, Tenn. PuC 11.300 61133 Out of stste +1615 2090 1760 3850 315 50 NO 1305 Cliellancoge, Tenn. PuC Out 01 Mete +$480 2CO3 4400 255 150 1005 Tennessee State Univ. Nashville, Tenn. PuC 2400 6400 725 840 3065 Out of state +$480. 4 ota. Mad. Tennessee Technologic/00nm. Cookeville, Tenn. PuC 4100 2300 1200 140 90 900 1730 Acceleration avail. Tennessee Temple Cd. Challincoge, Tenn. NC 600 6C0 650 990 10 1103' 1800 S-day board Tennessee WesItyen Cd, Athens, Tenn. PIC 350 303 43 42

323 1650

UNDERGRADUATE 1971.1972 710E0 COSTS NAME Or INSTITUTION LOCATION ENROLLMENT COMMENTS Typ. MonWomen Tetet TeItIonroes R aTeel T (tOntlnited) Teas, The Umr. of Arlington Arlington. Tex. PvC 7000 X00 10.000 $ 100 $ 42 51030 61172 Out of HMI +$X0 CI Paso El Past Tex. PuC 8640 3430 12.070 100 150 903 1150 Out ol stele +1X0 Teas Ago. & Mech. Univ. College Station, Tex. PuC 10,730 1340 12400 100 110 940 1150 Out ol stele +1X0 Teas Arts & Indust:in Univ.Kingsville, Tex. PuC 4300 2700 7000 100 70 740 910 Out al state +1= Teas Chrishm Umr. Fort Worth, Tex. NC 2330 2300 4600 1600 48 803 2443 Cologne tuition

Teas Lutheran :M. Seguin. Tex. PrC 529 480 1(03 1127 105 363 2095 Teas Southern Univ. Houston. Tex. PuC 2500 2503 50X 100 76 695 871 Out of state +1= Teas Technological Univ. Lubbock, Tex. PuC 11,350 7103 11.450 100 134 916 1150 Out ol stele +$X0 Tem Wesleyan Col. Fort Worth. Tex. PIC 1240 800 2003 900 29 866 1795 Teas Woman's UniV. Denton. Tex. PuW . 4803 4800 100 88 700 888 Out of stAte +$100

Thiel Col. Greenville, pa PrC 730 670 1370 1900 275 1000 3175 Thomas More Col. Fort Mitchell. Ky. PIC 710 400 1110 1216 110 1030 2356 3 San nail. Tifl Col. Forsyth. Ga. POW . 650 650 774 42 633 1449 4 pm. pa Toledo, Univ. ol Toledo. 0. INC 8150 5200 14.050 too no 1300 2050 Ode state +31050. 4 OW- auml. Tonson Slate Col. Baltimore, Md. PuC 2400 3600 6000 200 187 1010 1397 Out of state +$250

Tran4lvania Col. Lexington. Ky. PIC 430 429 930 1970 1080 3050 Guaranteed cost. 4 qtrs. avail. Trenton Sille Col. Ttentont N. J. MX 1510 3030 4510 350 114 1000 1464 Out of stele +5350 Trinity CO. fallout. Conn. PIC 1050 450 1500 2500 235 1780 4015 Trinity CO. Washington, D. C. PrW 750 750 2000 12 1200 3212 Trinity CO. Deerfield, III. PrC 360 410 770 1660 80 990 2730

Trimly CO. Durham, N. C. PICO See: Duke Univ. Trinity Col. Burlington, vt. PrW .. . 550 550 1100 122 950 2172 Trinity Um. San Antonio, Tex. PIC 1150 1150 2303 1750 120 1150 3020 Tri.StIte CO. Angola, Ind. PrC 1800 103 1903 1404 81 990 2475 4 Ma avail Troy Stale Univ. Troy, Ala. PuC 2333 1550 3350 405 600 1205 Out of state +6110

Tubs Univ. Medford. Mass. PIC° 2100 1300 3400 2850 35 1429 4305 Tutane Et% New Orleans, La. PIC° 2750 2750 2100 220 1085 3405 lea Neriscab CO. Tusalum CO. Greeneville. Tenn. PIC 360 250 610 1650 27 1025 2702

Tuskegte Inst. Tuskegee, Ala. PIC 1a00 1503 3000 1075 . . 725 1803

U

Union CO. Barbourville. Ky. PrC 500 330 803 1423 ... 753 2176 Unite CO. Lincoln, Neb. PrG CO 500 903 1600 75 850 2525 Unen CIR. Schenectady, N. Y. PrC 1503 303 1803 2500 60 1145 3705 Union Univ. Jackson, Tenn. PIC 450 450 903 1000 760 1760 Mcaleratim avail. Umted Sates International Univ. San Diego, Cal, PvC 1580 1390 2970 1890 120 1200 3210 Guaranteed luitim plan avail. 4 qtrs. avail.

Upper IMO Cd. Fayette. la. PrC 620 370 990 1316 280 900 2496 Upsets Col. E. Orange. N. J. PrC 750 650 1403 1880 30 1050 1160 Ursinus CIR. Collegeville, Pa. PrC 620 530 1150 1960 29 1050 2510

Ursuline CO. for Wow Cleveland, O. PrW . 503 503 1200 100 1400 2332 Utah. Univ. of Salt Lake City, Ut. PuC 8950 519014.180 480 921 1401 Out of stste +Ass. 4 qtrs. avail. Utah Stale Univ. Logan, Ut. PvC 3903 2550 6450 353 80 786 1219 Out of state +1510. 4 qtrs. avail. Utica CM Utica, N. Y. PrC 1130 600 1700 2080 .... 1100 3180

V Vetdosta State CO. Valdosta, Ga. PuC 1450 1450 2903 375 750 1125 Out ol state +PDS. 4 qtrs. eyed. Valley City State CIR. Valley City, N. D. PuC 750 729 1470 285 120 618 1023 Out 41state +$396. 4 qtrs. avail. Valparaiso Univ. Valparaiso. Ind. PIC 1950 1770 3720 1820 164 975 2959 Music +510 Vanderbilt Univ. Nashville, Tenn. PrC 28X 1500 4300 2000 83 11133 3263 3 ums. mil. Vann CIR. Poughkeepsie, N. Y. NC 150 1403 1750 2500 30 1300 3330

Vermont, Univ. of, & Stale Agricultural CO. Burlington, Vt. PvC 3600 3200 6803 750 In 1(03 1878 Out of state +61403

Villa Mari, Cc43 Erie Pa. PrW . 600 600 1300 . .. . 1 tO3 7300 %llama Univ.: Villanova, Pa. INC 4500 803 5300 1800 70 1200 3070 Vuginit Univ. of Charlc..!sville. Va, PuC 5800 1200 7000 365 172 1100 1637 Out of stele +$347 yoginit Ccamonivulth Univ.Richmond, Va. PvC 3840 3620 7460 470 86 190 1445 Out of state +$470

Vaginli RUIN Inst. Lexington, Va. PuM 1200 ... . 1200 300 395 670 1365 Out of Hite +61055 Vitgaa Polytech. Inst. Blacksburg. Va. Ric 8429 2400 10,820 480 87 0 1427 Out of stale +1510.4 qtrs. avail. Virgin4 51414 CIR.I Petersburg, Va. PuC 1250 1530 2780 460 ao ISO 1370 Out of state +$260 Vomit UnOn Univ. Richmond, Va. PIC 600 703 1303 1140 720 1160 Viterbo CM Le Crosse, Wts. NC 29 380 400 1180 980 2160

44 45

324 1651

UNOCRGRADUATC 19714872 FIXED COSTS ENROLLMENT COMMENTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION Typo NonWomenTeNd TANN..FoosII I. IITotal

W 9 50$1025 $3075 Wabash Cd. Crawfoodssille, Ind. PoM 880 180 97000 Staten bland, N.Y. NC 1480 1080 2560 7080 50 1750 3380 Wagner CS. 2670 Wake Forest Univ. Wmston.Selem, N.C.NC 1800 903 2700 1650 150 170 75 8130 2525 Walla Walla Col. College Place, Wash. NC 780 BOO 1580 1650 116 1000 2160 Walsh CS. Cenlon, 0. NC 700 300 1000 1344 240 440 1615 105 885 2605 Guaranteed bubo' plan avid. WainerPaCINE Cca. Poilland, Oie. NC 200 PIC 700 700 1400 1650 95 850 2595 Waitburg Col. Waveily. la. Out of state +$390 Topeka, Ol. Pit 1200 1700 4900 525 50 930 1565 Weshburn limy. of Topeka 3303 Washington 9 Jefferson CS. Washington, Pa. PiC 830 100 930 2000 153 1150 903 3100 Washington 9 Lee Univ. Lexington. Va. Pokt 1300 1300 2260 1377 Out of stale +$648. 0 qtrs. mil. Weslungton, Univ. of: Seettle, Wash. INIC 14.600 HMO25.660 432 945 NC 360 390 750 2100 121 1000 3221 Washington Col. Chestertown. Md. Out of stale +4900 Pullman. Wash. PuC 7050 530012.350 496 985 1411 Was/unto+ State Univ. 1700 3650 Washington Univ. SI. Lows, Mo. Pre 2360 1700 4000 2450 750 80 803 1630 Wayland Baptist Col. Plainview, Tex. PIC 500 660 1100 Out of stale +42130. 3 sems. nal. Wayne, Neb. PuC 1470 1120 2590 330 50 6% 1076 Wayne State Col. 1488 Out ot state+9942.4 qtrs. avail. lYcnIen only Detroit, Mich. PuC 9910 737017.280 528 960 Wayne State Univ. 126 1000 2906 Waynesburg Col. Waynesburg. Pa. PIC 700 400 1100 1780 Webb Inst. of Naval 1203 1200 Glen Cove, N. Y. PM 20 80 Architecture 405 775 1110 Out of state +$405. 4 qtrs. avail. Weber State CS. Ogden. Ill, PuC 6110 3790 10,660 St. Lois. Mo. PIC 210 4 50 720 1900 1203 3103 Webster Cd. 40 1103 3640 Wellesley CS. Wellesley, Mass. NW . 1250 1750 2503 670 2720 45 IMO 3845 Wells CS. Alum, N. Y. NW 670 120 805 2710 Wesleyan Col. Macon,Ca. PAY 460 460 1785 2700 225 1350 4275 Guarenfeed tuition Wesleyan Univ. Middletown.COon. PrC 1350 203 1550 650 80 720 1450 Out of stale +4726 West Chester State CS. West Chester, Pa. PuC 2250 3570 5820 1000 3000 450 173 1323 Out of state +9900. 4 qtrs. aVill. West Flooida, Univ. of: Pensacola, Fla. PuC MOO Out of Slate +5405. 4 qtrs. avail. Caircillon. Ga, PuC 3000 2800 5800 371 125 12111 West Georgia Col. 1310 Out of state +$600 W. Liberty, W. Va. PuC 2003 1600 3600 232 178 903 West Liberty State CS, 1201 Out of stale +4750 West Virginia Inst. of Tech. Monlgomery. W. Va. PuC 1903 660 2500 50 207 947 50 234 972 1256 Out of Male +9350 Institute. W. Va. PuC 2600 1400 4000 West Virginia State Col. DM 1332 Out of state +9630 West Virginia Univ. Morgantown,W. Va. PuC 7450 440011.8 50 292 250 1133 2783 3 semi. avail. Wsst Virginia Wesleyan Col. Bakhannon, W. Va. PIC 820 830 1700 1400 29 903 1901 Western Beptist Bible CS, Salem, Ore. NC 600 680 1280 975 243 615 1059 Out of state +4900. 4 qtrs. avid. Wester' Carolina Univ. Cullowhee, N. C. PuC 2550 1840 4390 200 Word, 0. NW 500 500 2624 1216 1140 Weslein Col.. The 870 1086 Out of stale +9400 Westirn Connecticut State Col. Danbury, Conn. PuC 1160 1900 3060 100 116 300 910 1230 Out of state +9500 Westein Kenlucky Univ. Bowling Coen% Cy. PuC 6000 500011.000 Westminster. Md. PIC 550 550 1100 3950 1000 2950 Western Marytand Cd. 430 915 1345 Out of state +$570. Acceleration avail. Western Michigan Univ.: KilarrOZOO, Midi. PuC 10000 850018.500 753 1150 Out ol stale +$668. 4 terms Mil. Dillon, Mont. Pit 550 500 1050 397 Western Montana Cd. 80 1090 7640 Western New England Cd. Springfield, Mass. PrC 1240 210 1450 1470 es, 1172 Out of state +4540 Western New Memo Umv. She, Cits. N. M. PuC 750 620 1370 120 us 141 824' 1265 Out of state +1692. 4 qtrs. avail. '5.day board Western State Col. of Colorado Gunnison. Col. Pit 1800 1200 3000 100 950 1397 Out ot state +W1. 4 OW. mil. Western Washington Siete W. Bellmghlon, Wash. PuC 4900 4600 9500 --447 100 785 1085 Out of state +4400 Westfield State Cd. Westfield, Mns, PuC 770 1530 2300 200 LeMars, la. PIC 630 420 1050 1475 150 815 2500 Westover Col. 900 7910 Guaranteed tuition Plan avail. Fulton. Mo. NM 660 660 1950 60 Westminster Col. 840 2590 New Wilmington. Pa. NC 850 750 1600 1750 Westminster Col. 825 2110 3 sems. avail. Westminster CS. Sell lake City. Ut. PIC 520 330 850 1210 75 202 1052 2954 Westmont Col.: SaMa Barbera, Cal. NC 400 450 8 50 1700 Meilen Cott Wheaton, Ill. NC 920 850 1770 1650 54 1015 2119 Norton, Mau. PrW 1200 1160 3050 15 1650 4055 Wheaton Col. 1613 100 1240 7973 Wheeling Col. Whetting. W. Va. NC 460 230 690 660 1900 1100 3000 Wheelock Col. Boston, Mass. Pt 10 590 1100 1950 903 ZOO Whitman Col, Willi Wills Wish. PIC 610 490 2000 1700 86 950 2736 Whittier Col. Whilfar, Cal. PIC 950 1050 1600 151 903 2651 Guaianteed tuition Whitworth Col. Spokane. Wash. NC 550 650 1200 360 35 925 1310 Out of state +9590 Wichita Slate Univ, Wichita, Kan. NC 8100 0900 13.000 1240 930 1170 3 sems. avail. Wilberforce Univ. Wilberforce.O. PrC 550 650 1200 170 MOO Marshall, Ter. NC 260 260 500 900 230 Wiley Cd. 25 1203 7975 Willies.Baue, Pa. . PrC 1400 1100 2500 1750 Wilkes Cd. 1300 1685 185 910 2840 Willamette Univ. S11011. Ore. PrC 750 550 3610 660 60 900 1600 Out ot state +6934 William & Mary. Col. of Williemsburg. Va. Pit 1950 1660 310 720 703 314 700 1714 William Carey Col. Hattiesburg, Miss, PrC 410 WM 40,4 OM 47 46

.325 1652

UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT 1971.1972 FIRED COSTS NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION COMMENTS Typo AlanWoolenTotal 'FlattenFoos R leTotal W (continued) William Jewell Col. Liberty, Mo. PrC 600 100 1000 $1250 $150 $ 950 32350 Whom Poterson Col. ol New Jersey, The Weyne, N.1. PuC 2200 3300 5500 350 89 1150 1589 Out of go 4435o williim Penn Col. PrC Oskoloose, 14. 503 250 750 1580 161 920 2661 Wi Ililm Smith Col. Geneva, N. Y. Pito 503 503 2575 70 1225 3870 lee Hobert Col. WI lliom woods Col. Fulton, Mo. PrW . 350 850 2890 Williams Col. Williamstown, Mess, PrC 1250 180 1430 2350 203 1330 MO Wilmington Col. Wdmington, 0. PrC 580 100 980 1755 135 1035 2895 4 qtrs. tail. Wilson Col. Chombersburg. Pa. PrW 503 503 2400 40 1203 WO Windhim Col. Putney, Vt. NC 600 350 950 2350 150 1050 3550 Winono Stole Col. Winone, Minn, PuC 1770 1700 300 384 90 855 1329 Out of stole +6468 Winston.Solem Mote Univ. Winston.Silem, N. C. PuC 550 900 1150 150 338 738 1226 Out of stote +$650 Winthrop Col. Rock Hill, S. C. PuW 3500 3500 150 320 850 1320 Out of stole +1660 Wisconsin, Univ. of Midison, Wis. PuC BAD 10600 21,100 430 78 UR 1511 Out of stite +$1290 Milidukee Mitwoukee, Wis. PuC 7503 5400 12.930 430 78 1040 1548 Out of stale +31290 Wisconsin Stele Univ. Flu Cloire, Wis. PuC 3650 4450 MOO 430 880 1310 Out of stole +8930 La Crosse, Wis. PuC 1190 3910 7300 446 880 1326 Out of Ma +$930 Oshkosh, Wis. PuC 6050 5550 1100 350 105 950 1105 Out of slate +51300 Pletteville, Wis. PaC 3400 1600 5000 440 950 1390 Out al state +$930 River Fills, Wis. PuC 3000 1250 4250 292 100 825 1217 Out ol stele +3933. 4 qtrs. mil. Stevens Point, Wis. P uC 5000 3650 8650 320 100 900 1320 Out of state +51130

Superior, Wis. PaC 1160 980 2110 446 960 1406 Out of sten +5930 Whilewiter, Wis. PuC 5403 4203 9600 375 50 900 1325 Out of stale +$930 Wittenberg Univ. Springfield, 0. PrC 1203 1340 2510 2316 1110 3456 I qtrs. non. Wofford Col. Sportanburg, S. C. PIC 1000 40 1040 1860 1030 2950 Wcenon's Col., The Ourhim, N. C. Pito See: Ouke Univ.

Wuselbury Col.: . Los Angeles, Cal. PIC 1730 860 2590 1242 3 1125 2370 Guerenteed tuition plan avail. 4 quo, eyed. Wooster, The Col, ot Wooster, O. PrC 900 800 1700 3821. 4 qtrs. avid. includes tuition, fees. 1188 Worcester Polytech. inst. Worcester, Miss. PrC 1800 80 1880 2525 110 1025 3660 Worcester Stole Col. Worcester, Moss. PuC 1203 1800 3030 203 80 . 280 Out of state +5400. No housing Wright State Univ. Olyton, 0. PuC 4320 2880 noo 570 1180 2050 Out of state +8900. 4 qtrs. will. Wyoming. Univ. of Urine, Wyo. PuC 4503 2700 7203 384 908 1292 Out of state +$666

X Xavier Univ. Cincinneti, 0. PIC 1950 250 2200 1365 110 UR 2515

Y

Yale Univ. New Haven, Conn. PIO 4001 800 4800 2900 1500 MO Yonkton Col. Yankton, S. 0. PrC 456 250 703 1295 230 972 2197 Yeshivo Col. New York, N. Y, Prto 1650 . 1650 1850 105 1320 3275 qt. Stern Col. for Women York Col. of Pennsylvania York, Pe, PrC 1000 650 1650 1100 121 1030 2251 Youngstown State Univ. Youngstown, 0. PuC 10,203 5100 15.300 450 120 925 1495 Out of stWe +4480. 4 qtrs. rail.

'

ite 49

326 1653

Bowdoth Col Illinois Wesleyan bah. Northwesteth CM. Colby Col. Krus Col. Parsons Col. Index by State St Ambrose Cot Meine,Unlv. el Late Font Di. Masson Col. Betbunetonmen Col tins DL Simpson Col. Alabama Pacific Christina Col. bond Ins Cot Inlet Col. Pack Col. Fiona. Univ. ol Loyola Unit SI. Francis Col Alabama, Univ. el floods ALIA Univ. McKandree Col. !lantana Col. Mohan Stste Univ. Pacific bets Cot Mellow Col. St. loseoWe CoL Pacific Union DL Florida Atlantic Univ. MaclAndayCoL Mhem Col. Munn Col. Florida Msmuilul DL Winn Univ. William Penn Col. Auburn Univ. florid' Presbyterial Col. Moracolk Col. BinningnmSoulhern Col. PIPPerdwe Pater Col. Fluids Rankers Col. Munn& Col. Maryland Homan State Univ. Florida Stets Univ.. The Nations! Col. ol Ian Kansas Ballirrure Col. of Consent Millington Col. Florida TnnolOgIcal Uolv. North Central Col Bonnie Stele DI. Jacksonville Slate Col. Redlands, Univ. of gnat Ulin. Sadamento Slate DI. thcinomille Univ. North Park Col. Cnurnbta Union Col. kdson Col. St. Mays Cob of Cs1. Mon Univ. 01 NortheatInn lb Siete Col ._11°...V.I. Ducher Livingston Univ. New Col. Northern Illinois Univ. m "Fr Montrralla Univ. of Sth Dem Univ. el Emporia. The Cot of Hood Col San Dego Slate DI. Rollins DI. Northwestern Univ. Oakwood Col. Fat Nays Kansas Stele Col. laths Hopkins thae. Sth Francisco. Univ. el St. Leo Cob Olivet Nnunnetol. blends Univ. Loyola Col. St. Bernard Col. San Frarnsco Slate Cot ScullsEastern Bible Col. Penner:I Frani Manion. Univ. of Samford Unlv. Kamm Univ. of SIR loss Stste Cot South Florida, Univ. of Teachers CM Morgan Stele Col. South Alabama. Univ. of Ksnsas State CM V Sane Clare. Urn. el Stetson Univ. Pekin* Col. Pilltbut Mount Saint Col. Southeastern Bible Col. Tank Univ. of Quincy CM. Swig Nib Col DODOS Cot Onus State ..nchers Cot Mourn Saint e Col Sown Stste CM. Well Florida, Unlv. of Rock/wd Col. Notre Own of Cot of Talladega DL Onus Stele Untt. Southern Cal- Univ. of Roos/welt Univ. Slain Wsilfys. Uth. St knee Col. Tray Stele Univ. Routh Col. Saint Jonah Col. Totems Inst. Southus California Col. Carnal& McPherson Col. Stalad Univ. AptsScitt DI. St. Francis. DM of SAVAltlin Bible Col. St. Melt US 01 MOW Stanislaw Slate Col. St. Savill SI. Hang SentUniv. Ala Sta State Col. Shinn Col. Manmount DI. Tahoe Cob Armstrong State DI. Dine Univ. Salabor/ State Col. Alaska. Univ. of Southern IAN* Univ. Unita Sinn Aumste Col. Sacred Heart Col. Towson lets DI. Dunn Cot ol Maks Washington Col. Alaska nonlethal Univ. Intimation! Univ. Berry CoL St Banditti Col. Anchorage Community DI Trinity Col. Western MuyInd Cot Westmet CM. Menu Col. St. Mary Col. Whittler Cot Wheaton Col. KI. Mass et the Rein Col. Wotan Col. Clark Cot Mains Druth Univ. Southwestern DI. Arlin& Univ. of Fon Unify Slate CM. Muting Col. Anon State Univ. Colorado Tabor SOL Massachusetts Dwell. Univ. of I ndiarla knetkan Intimating Cot Grand Canyon Col. Mum Stste Cot Gornto Col. at /nano Cob Washburn Unlv. of Topeka MOM Stele Univ. Amherst Col. Northern Arizona Univ. Colorado. Univ. of Bell State Univ. Prnatt Col. Georgie Inst. of Tech. Anna Marla Colorado tol-lle Bethel Col. Assumption Col. Colorado ktool olKines Georgie Southern Col. Mu Univ. Donis Southwestern CM. Babson Col. ArhianiU Cola* Slate Univ. ConcwWe Senn Col. Kentucky Bentley Col. Darner, Univ. in Giorgio Stste Univ. Arkansas, State Cot of DP...". Univ. Asbury DL Boston DL Fort Leon Col, L. Grange Col. Arkansas. Univ. of Darn Col. Rennin@ Col. Boston Slate Col. Mamas A111111 Col. Loretto IleitMe Col. Wet, Univ. Ennsville, Univ. of Mulhouse Col. Rene Col. Boston Univ. Mamas Col. Northern Color* Unlv. 01 Fort Ware Irnie Col. Brescia Col. Branch Univ. Artansas Polytech. Col Bells Col. Mans Broom F. !Milo Cot North Georgia Cot Canthelliville cm Bridgewater Slate Col. Arkansas State Univ. St damn Swing Col. Goshen Col. Centii Col. of Kantudy Cardinal DOM COL Sonars Colo. Slate Col. Palm Cot Mending DM Homer Col. Cumberland rot LIPS Univ. Henderson Stste Tem& BasIl Col. Hutment Col. Notional Cob (astern Kant cky Univ. Western Slate Cot of Colo. Savannah State DL Cady tot Teachers Col. um Central Col. Geonettne. QM. Emerson Col. Mends% Col. Shona DI. Indians Pistol Tett Kentucky. Univ. of Rachman Col. Emmarwol Cot Ion Brown Univ. Connecticut Indiana Slate Unn Kentucky Stets Col. Fitchturg Slate Col Ouachita ltantst Col. Till Col. Indira Univ. Kenna, Wittman Cot Alberto Morn CM Valdosta State Col. Framingham State Col brans. The Col. el the Marcheslet Cot Louisville. U nim el Conon Col. Mahon CM. Wesleyan CM. Mann Col. Southern Stste CoL alidlend. Univ. of West Dont. Cot Monehead Stele Univ Kinard DI. d....01Col. Morn Siete Unin Central Corn Sine Col. vs; e One, Unlv. el Hebrew Col. California Comecticut, Univ. of Pikeville Col. Hells n It Col Hawaii Oakland Cly Col. Molding CM. Holy Cross. Coto, do Armstrong Col. Comedic"' Col Pone Univ. Anna Pack Col. (Angleton% Stele Cot Charninade Col. el Ikeohno Ikon More CoL Jackson Cot for Worn Rose Polytect Int. Transylvania Cot. Lesley Cot Bina Col. Feirteld Univ. Dinh DI. ol Nana en Saint Danis Cot California. Univ. of Martinet W.W.I Knelt Univ. of Un on gut Lowell Tent last Saint lostoh e DE Massachusetts. Univ. of California Banat CoL Manna en. St. Mary ettlwalocds Cat Wn" at Mann Univ. Califothie Col. of Ane g Mateachusette hist of OthelliCANC SO. Idaho Saint Mary's Col. Cs3Sts Saud Nest Univ. Saint Monad Col Tent Idaho. The Cot el Merrimack Col. California Inst. el Tech. St. IlasKs Col. Taylor Univ. Louisiana Califmna Stale Col. Saint Meth gm. then. Univ. of Mount thesis Col. Idaho State Univ. Matra Col. Centime DI. of Dubin" Newton Coto! the Wed California Male Polyttch. Southun tern State DI. Valorise WM. Trinity ca Manhunt Neurone DI. Marl Unlv. Mean Col. Wabash Col. F. T. Nichols Slate Col. Chapman CoL Wesleyan Univ. Nichols Col. western tot Stale Grartang Col KWh Man Slate Col. Digo Mrs Col. Illinois Louisiana Cot Claremont Meng CoL thle Univ. Nontheasten Univ. Aueustana Col. LcuisIgna Siete Univ.& Dominican CoL of San On tidy of the Elms. Cot of Iowa Col. Inn MM Col. itukirne Cot Rafael Delaware Briar Dill Col. turnips' Tech. tint.. hewn State Col. Bent Col. Rein Col. Delon Univ. of Blackburn Col. Bona gni. Col. tonna Univ. Salem Slate Col. Colon Gate Col. Bradley Univ. Central Cob McKean State Col. Harvey MwAd Col. None Slate DI Doman Cot MOM U.N. of Coe Col Newansb DI. Smith Col. Nen KW% Cot of the Drn0 Cel ft.mtbstst U. Stet Cot Humboldt State Cot District of Columbia ChICM: Dna CM Scuttwastern Mast Unit. Columbia Col. Dike Univ. Northwestern Slate Urn. Swingfield Col. Laguna Col. Americo Univ.rne Conordie Teachers Cot !Mune. Unit of Our Lady of Moly Cross Col. Loma Linda Univ. Catholic Univ. el Mena SI owd.ill Cot DePaut Univ. Donlan Col. Mineola Seminary Col. Lone Mountain GM. Ounbarlon Col. ol lloly Suffolk Univ. Eastern Minis Grinnell Col. SL Mang Dominkan CM. Loyola Univ. of L.A. Cross Tulle Univ. Elmhurst Col. Ins Stste Univ. of Southeastern Lumina Col. WellesIty Mmdruunt Cot Callaudat Col. (dela Cot kin° Te.M. Southwestern Lcuisisna. Menlo Col. Grn.WaskIngton Univ. De Menne NewDewCol. Dap Williams Col. Ine Weskyan Col The Univ. el Westfield Stste Mills DI. Gagnon Urn. torn CM Monterey Inst. el S011ils Greenville Col. Tulin Urn. Wheaton Cot Nomad Univ. Illinois. Univ. of Luthet Col. Studies Wheaten! Col. T thdly ththols Benedictine Col. Northrop Inst. of Tech. KolluesIC01. Wilms Col. Illinois Col. Moningsids Cot Nob e Dame. Coto, Mains Wormier Polyteck. hot Florida Illinois Int. of Tack. ascot Mots Cal. Worcester Slate Col. Occidental Col. Minns SIM Univ. Northam Ina. Univ. el Wes DI. Pacific. Univ. of the Bunt*. 0. 50 1654

MI Chigoes (Indio Univ. Rider Col. Saint Row, Mu Cot d Ade Ian Cod. Undedood Cola. The Rutted Unto. The State Defiance Col., The Bed Mod Col. St. Thomas *dims COL Allow Cd. Monde CH. Univ. of New Jersey Denison Unh. Bdknell Univ. Alma Cot Marrone Col. Sarah torerce Col. (dgechll Said (liesbelk Col. of Gem Col. Celilontia Stale Col laden' Univ. Mistook Urn. 01 St. Peter's Cd. %dew Cot talon Col. Aquinas Cot Missouri Soother' %date Col. Heidelberg Col. SHONA lb*. Steln Col. for Mote Cannegleaftlloo tido, Calvin Col. Stele COL Moom Cedar Crost Stenos Inst. of Tent SreCUSt Univ. Central Madden Univ. Missod Villet Col. Ttenton Stele Col. lohm Carton Univ. Chatham Cot Una. Cot Kent Stele Udv. 0I1,011 Univ. of Notthen1 Ms. Mate Col. Undo Col. Ude Cid Chestnut Lill Cd. Idled Bible Cd. Norden! Mo. Stela Col Weld Lel. William Paltered Col. of Vassar Col. Gwynn Stile tat. Detroit Col. of Business Park Cot fam Jersey. Tht tHe Itte Clanton State Cot Eastern %hien Unk. Naked Col. Wyse, Col, Malone Col. &ninon Cel. Webb Inst. of Neve rents Stele Col. St. tails Una. Modelle Cd. The Onkel Undo. Coma *dots inst. Saddest M. Stets Cot i kektectute Mary Mama Col. %mind Udv. N, O'ff Mam Wells Col. Muni UN. Gond Valley Stole Col. Southwest Mi. $tetil at. nimoNenlue. Unk. of last Stroudsburg Mete Col IkItsdate Cot, Stephens Ca, Willdn Smith Cot MOunt Saint Mph ea (Went ad kteako Univ. YrshiviUniv. Endo Bootist Col. Hod Cot Takla Cot New Mesita link. of the Ohio. Cii. of Idinboro Stale Col. kalememo Wrshington Udv. flem MAain Righter* ugly. Mount Ude Col. Elizabethtown Col. Inane* lost. of ink Nebstel Col. New Mend Inst. of ink Worth Cardin/ Musklogrom Cot Indian &Madan Cd. Nod Gone Cd. Madonna Col. Westminster Col. New Menke Stale Univ. ApOstachian Stets Wily Gannon Col. Muntow Col. Willioon knell Gal. SI. John's Col. Mollie Vidalia Col. Obrdm Col. Caned Cot Mercy Col. of Iktroil William Wads Cot Sanls Fe. Col. of flarbekolle at. Ohio OcrnInkao Col. Gettysburg Cot Michigan, Univ. of Mftttitte 14t. duke dip Bole* A)Oty Ohio Northern Udv. Grove CdpCol. Michigan Stele Univ. Bennett Cot Ohio 31114110p Tht Coped Mercy Col. %titan ink. UM, Montana Campbell cot Ohio link. &ream d Cii. %seed Col. Cerroll Cot New YOrk Ceded Col, Ohio Wasklan Univ. Holy f antiW Cot Otterbein Cot. Northern Michigan Univ. tisteln Matilde Cot Odelyni Davidson Col. Imonsaitals Col. Oakland Unip Great fella Col. of tilled Univ. Ode Univ. Rio Made Cot Odin Univ. of SI. Jen W. of Clevelond (hint Cot Montana. Unk. of Simard CM. lest Combas link. Pennsykants Siena Heights Col. Montana Lek of saidel Briattlift (Wats% City Stoll Univ. Steubenville.% Cal of Angels Col. Sebr4 Mgr Col. Salted A Teak WNW Col. llon Col. Toledo. Univ. of annd's Col. Wade State Univ, leonine SOW Unit. Undid Cat foe Wbetil Kutdolm Stale Col. Cluksoo Celli Tack %Medd Mantel- WitthCel. Western Midden Univ, PocW Mooted Col. Colgate Unip Owensboro Col. Wand Col. Wriltne COL the Western Montana Cit Coddle Cot. Guilford Col. tddlo Cd. Wilbeducs Ude. Lebanon %Mtn Cot. MittnesOta Cooper Union.% High Point Col. %min/tee Col. Cornell Unk. JoMsco C. Smith Univ. tehigh twit Amryturg Cot Wittereng Unit Nebraska Oceninicol GO. of Ellatmelt tend Mllve Cd. Wad Unto. Bemidji State Cot. Woosld N4 Col. Of loch Haven Stile Ca. Cludwo Stele Cot 111Yourille Col. Livingstone Cot Wet Slew Udv. BONI GM Illnits Cot Mars Hill Col. Wyoming Col. Coneondie Teachers Col. Bode Univ. Celleton Col. CrelehtOn Univ. finch Col. Mendith Cot. Mensfield Slate Col. Youngstas State %coedit Cot. Oloothole Dana Cal GeOdCaueSet Get. Methodist Col. Mernmod Col. Concordia Cal, 1St. PatiO Done Col. Iliellitet Col. North Camila Univ. Of Dr. Martin tomer Col. Uwe fiblo Inst. Ilert*Ch Rath Carolina & Ted. OklahOmil rif:sirar 41.C41 Custetve Adtphus Col. Cutup Col. Hobut Col. Stele Univ. Milleetyllie L.sts Cot Hewing Ulla Belhdy NNW% Cot Riflery State Cot Holstre Unk. berth Caroline Gebel behr. Mneticordia Col. Maudeller Centml Stets Cd. Midland totherin Cot Houghton Col. Nord Undo State Ent Central State %mid Col. MoNeto Mete Col. Nebraska. Univ. of Inward. TM Col. of Unk. at Rodeo tongstmt Ueda %denting Cot Minoesols.Unk.of PIM, rnkyan Col. HebraskaWesteyon Univ. lons Cod. North GatottosWesInd NtntMitictatStal 5l. %odd Side Col. PM Stole Col. Owe Col. Col. Pennsylvania. UM.. of St. Beoedic I. Cal of Nonthdetem Side Col St. Mary.% Cot ol dud Col. Pembroke Ante Univ. Oklahoma. Unk. of Pennsylrere Slate UM. SL Catherine, The Col, of Wild Rog's Col. %Mee Col. Wolatedis Col, pi Aol St. Cloud Slete Cot OhlshOnut Bootist Univ. Philadelphia Cll. of Wire Slate Cd. IOW land Cot Queens Col OMINOmo Ctahlliti Col. AL hohn's Undo. Phatinacy tmlyeldt Col. Settee Newt Col. Oktelsone Clly Ude. Sclera St. daty's Cot Phildelphle Col. of teMorm Col. St. Andem's Presbyterian 011alume Cot of liberel St. Olst Col. Nevada taw islard Udv. Cot. Oils THIlietStlerce SI. Paul Ibble Col. dada. Unk. of Mondial Cot St. AantstIne's Col (Medd Stale Unh7. Philadelphia MusintAtad St. Scholastics. Col of Pittsburgh, Unk. of learkollawills Col. Salm Col. .fiatetondle Slate Cd. Saint feted Cot of Wrist Col Shaw Univ. Phillid Nat ten. Silat Thema. Cel. of Retort laortis Cii. Indyerouat Trinity Col. Scuthiestem Stitt Col. Wirdna Stele Col. Now Hampshitt Rosenwel Cot. ligrzzonanianhatlan Col. Wake %est linty. %threatens Stele Col. Oilltmath Col. Wrstern Candi Udv. SI. Francis Col. ftaddin Pitrtit CA. Salm Moors Col. Missigglppl %icy Cat WitisionSolem Stoll Univ. Keene Siete Col. MIN Col. of Edo. Woman's Cd., Tht Oregon SI. Wand Cot Mann MIA Cot. Mount SI. Many Cot (Mon Ottrol Col. Suinton. Unk. of Belhlven Cd. Wald Catholic Col. I or Neer (mended. Women Goal foe Dd. Seco Hill Cot. Hen Hampshire. Unk. of Blue WWI* Cot Mourn Saint Mary Col. North Maki(' trimsClad Skipornstarg State Cot. Jackson Stole Col. Nen Hand% Col. Modt St. Yount. Col. ot Windt Male Cot %Feld Col. Slippery Sod Stall Col. Willows Col, Plymouth SUM Col. Nnweth Col. of Rochester dontown Ilawildst Cot Soodelums %tee Cot Unip of Wm %Ante. Col. of Mary Col. MI, WO Col. Snarthowee Col Mississippi Col. St. Mselm's Col. Net Wok Ghe City Univ. of Mayville Siete Col. Moutd Mmel Sem. Temple Unk. Missksiod SUN Cat tam VOLUM Univ. of Mind SUM Col. tketen.Unts .111 Thiel Col. %Wand Nem York Univ. Mirth 01101i. Unto of Orem Cot of COW. Welds Cot MissISsigrol State Ude. New Jetted Magus Unit. North Deliote State Md. %ton Stale Unk. ma Mule Cd. Mnsissirdi Yelled Slate Col. Alma White Col. Pme Valley City Nue Col. Pm% Univ. Widow Univ. Rust Col. Bloomfield Col. Pludlleutiut Sciences, Portland My. of Washington A legend Col. Scuthetn Miss.. Unk. of CANN! Col. fee Women at. OfColton* MHO Portland Stele Oda wtynesbutf Cal William Cult col. Don Bosco Col. West Chestst Slide C41 Polyteclt Wolof Broody, Anon Ude rd Id. OOP %II inst. tiasthesOCinegon Cot. Wm^..W!or cit A/110CA Col. Feltlelgh Dickinson Unk. Wooten !Welk Col. Willies MisfOuri Rensselaer Polyteck Not. Ashland Col. Cowin Cant Cot Rebell% Westopo Cd. Wntetn Sadist Bible Col. /Yaw^ Cii. Ada Col. lisIdinWsiteee Col. , Glassboro Stall Col. Rochester+. Univ. of Wide/dile dip Pod Col. of PINS rm. Giver, Bible Col. /envy CRT Stele Col. Riddle, Into, Tech. *Ad %NM Methodist Cd. Monmouth Cd. Biding %en State Univ. Roun Hill Col. Cadet Unk. %test %sari Slate Col Montclair Stale Cot Russell Sage Cot Penniyivilnim Rhode Island Cukor Stockton Col. Case Western Ileum Woad Cot of Ind St. Bonavonture Univ. (14... tho Imm Garth Banitctoo Col. (Mary Cd. Netted Stale Col. Conks! Slate Univ. ;' Albright Cot towel Col St. fonds Col. Brown Univ. Horlheastens Wields St. lohn fiVwe GAL CIrcinnatl Univ. of " Allegheny Col. Bryant Col. Itotdrue Col. Cleveland Inst. Of ads Bible Inst. St. lohn's Univ. educe Cd. Pemba:Al Col. Immaculate CorictOtkon The Billiton State Cot. St. Joseph's Cot Almada Cot litosidence CeL Sem. %ditto Univ. St. (menet Univ. Cleveland Stele Univ.% Beaver Col. dodo Island. Mem. of 00101. link. of Bloomsburg Stale Cot 52 Rhode Istend Cot 53

328 1655

Mile Island School ol Straw CO. Randonhliscon COL tes ChM% Univ. ol goortipti Mato Woman's Dont Col Salve Nelms CAL Univ. * hellashinici Cot Richmond. Univ.* COninican Col. Rotate tel. SOuth Carolina fast Term Biotlit tel. %Plots Col. Allen Univ. fest Teen State Univ. Shenandoah tot. Benedictea Hodushonems Univ. Snot Bin/ Cot Bob ice* Univ. Mont& Unlv. Of Yowl" hon. ol Central Wesleyan Cal. Hanlon BOUst Cot Weals tommorratelth Chariest," Cot ol Honig Pere Cat Univ. Citadel. TM IluslosTillotsto Cot Taginie Military Inst. Chem CO. loarnate Word Cot Virginia Penton Inst. Clemson Univ. boss thrislien Cot Virginia State tet toter CO. Limo Slate tel.* Tech. *emit Union Univ. Cenci* Bible Col. LeTowneso Col Weft*** & Let Univ. Celumble Cot IklAulty tel. WiltlemMOY. Cot el Como Cal Man Hen* Bolo CO. Entine Cot Midwestern Una. Fannin Univ. NOM Ttils Shit UAW Washington Limestone CeL Ott lady ot the US$ Cot Central Wash. Stste Col. *stern tel. Pen Amnion Cot Intern Wash. Stele tot. Piesbyterian CO. Profit thor UM Col Fort Wright Col. el the Sara Carolina. Univ. 01 Ca Univ. Holy Notts South CirOlifil SIMI COL St. Levies Univ. Gongs Univ. Winthrop CO. Maryl Univ. Polk Lutheran Univ. Vonore tel. SI. hones. Univ. of Puget Sound. Univ.* Son Nostra Stele Univ. St. tel. %Ahern Methodist Univ. Seattle Polk CO. South r :hotel Southwest hen Stale Cat Seattle Univ. Aqvtlasa tel. Southwestern Univ. Wein Welts tel. tilos Hills State tot Stephen F. 141011 SIMI COI wattmeter" Univ. el hetet e Slott tet Sol hots Stale cot Wallington Stale Univ. Coate Wesleyan Univ. Tinton State Cot Western Wash. State Cot Ho* CO. Tens. The Univ. of Mittman CO. Moot Malty tot Too All Unre. Whitworth Cal. Nathan Sista CO. Teo. AIM Univ. Sim Fells tot To.. tnrstien Univ. West Virginia South Oatots. Ur*. el Tom Control tel. ea Sara Calcite School ol Tom Smithern Univ. *demon Braun* Mrflal&TICIL BohmCO. Tens Ttchologleal Univ. Bluefield Mlle tel. Soffit Mete Stele Univ. Tens Wesleyan Col. sworn Sudo CO. Tim Wran's Univ. COM.010 VA den Cel. lam L ERAS Cel. Trinity Univ. Feinnont Sire tel. WOW Bettist Cot Glenn* Stott tel. Wiley Col. Tenn sssss Marshall Univ. Auttin Posy Stint Univ. Moon Newsy Cal. Delmont tel. Utah Salve Cal. lielhti Cot Brigham *wig Univ. LOOM CO. Well COM), Stet e CO. Bryan tel. Southern Utah State CO. Carson *nun Col. West Thelma inst. ol Ton Utah. Univ. el not *guile Stott Cat civlstlinBrotheis CO. Uteh Stan Univ. Covenant Cat Weber Stale Cot West Yoga* Univ. David Lipman tot. Weshointter cot West *inn Wesleyan tel. East Tennessee Stine Univ. Wheeling CO. Fisli Univ. hee Will egotist Bate CeL Vemient Wisconsin George Peabody Col. foe lienaington cot leathers tastleton Stale CeL Moms Cal Itlet Got** Cot Beloit CO. ildonille Cal. lemson Stale Cot Wilmot Snitch Cal. Lamtuth ta. Lyndon Male CO. Carroll tel. Left Cot Ube* Col Carthage Got. Lee tot Ibenlebure Tht Clominman Cal. Lellomelfeen Col. Nee dcli Univ. Idgenood CO. Lincoln Merman Univ. St.limph the halide" goy loin Cel. Warp* tet Col.* wood cei. Mon*" Acad. of Arts. The Memers Cot LIMN. UNIV. Memphis Stele Univ. Trinity Cot MaIM C41, el lord do Lao tAndle Tenn. Sten Unm. Yr *oat U.*. el Moonlit Univ. Milligan CO. W. Tam Col. Milan tot Sundt Col. Mina** Sao* GI CAC South. Univ. ol Ute Mani Mot CO. Catkin &entice*, CO. Virginia !forth** Cot Southwestern of Memel* BridgorPer Col Amon Cal was*. The Univ.* Cinch Witty Col. Stine** tel. mature State Univ. Easton WOW* tel. Stout State Univ. motet Toe" Univ. hoey g HMV CW. Viterbo CO. rennet Tette* tel. WMOKI.O.U.Ir 4 1111.04143041C01. ninon Wesleyan Col. Newton Inst. Wane* State Univ. usadum tot Ilona Col. Oen Univ. Longos* Cot Wyoming radon!' Unly. Loch*/ .CoL liWa1011 WynorenIUaOv.OI Texas Mary I elkin Col. Abiltnedemon on. Mem Washington tot Puerto Rite Angelo Slate CO. Welding ca. CatholicUniv. al PA AltIlla Cal. Old kentoon Univ. Purto Pox Uric* Baylo Univ. baud 54

329 1656 Mr. HELSTOSKI. Finally, without objection, dataprepared by the Department of Veterans' Benefits, Veterans' Administration,contained in their information bulletin numbered DVB IB24-72-1, dated Jan- uary 18, 1972, entitled "Veterans Benefits Under Current Educational Programs, title 38, U.S. Code, Chapters 31, 34 and35, November 1971", will be placed in the record at this point. (The data referred to follows :)

,

,

330 1657

Department of Veterans Benefits INFORMATION BULLETIN Veterans Administration DVB IB 24-72-1 Washington, D.C. 20420 January 18, 1972

VETERANS BENEFITS UNDER CURRENT EDUCATIONALPROGRAMS

Title 38, U. S. Code, Chapters 31, 34and 35

November 1971

I. SCOPE

Fall semester trainees in the 6thschool year under the current GI bill are highlightedin thio issue.

Progress and status of theeducational assistance programs administered by the Veterans Administration arereviewed. Each of these three programs isidentified and briefly des- cribed on pages 11 and 12.

II. NUMBERS IN TRAINING

Nearly one and a quarter mil1io persons weretraining under VA educational programs in November 1971. This repre- sents a 21 percent increase during thepreceding 12 months (table 1).

It is interesting to note thattrainees currently en- rolled in college increased about 25 percentwhile trainees in schools below the lollege levelincreased 18 percent in the last 12 months. The 91,000 veterans currentlyenrolled in on-job training is 7 percent higher than a year ago.

The nuMbers of persons trained during eachof the last 5 Fiscal years is given in appendix table9. The total nuMb:Ar of individuals who will be intraining under the three VA educational assistance programsduring the current fiscal year is expected to bedbout 2 million.

331 1658

DVB IS 24-72-1 January 18, 197 2

Table 1

ALL PROGRAMS

Increase in Trainees in Last 12 Months

November November Percent Program and Type of Tw.ining 1971 1970 Increase

Total - All Trainees 1,241,921 1,025,268 21.1%

Vocational Rehabilitation - Chapter 31

Total 20 166 18,734 College 15,058 13,170 14.3 Other Schools 3,957 4,412 - 10.3 On-Job Training 1,022 1,011 1.1 Institution on Farm 129 141 - 8.5

Educational Assistance - Chapter 34

Grand Total 1,180,976 971,422 21.6 College 736,537 590,053 E1T3 Other Schools 348,386 295,535 17.9 On-Job Training 90,795 84,662 7.2 Cooperative Farm 5,258 1,172 348.6 Flight 1/ (24,264) (36,142) -32.9 Correspondence2/ (231,167) (180,039) 28.4

Veterans 1.106,234 912,195 21.3 College 725,398 580,325 25.0 Other Schools 284,783 246,036 15.7 On-Job Trainees 90,795 84,662 7.2 Cooperative Farm 5,258 1,172 348.6 Flight 1/ (20,926) (31,380) -33.3 Correspondence 2/ (172,064) (136,356) 26.2

Servicemen 74,742 59,227 26.2 College 11,139 9,728 14.5 Other Schools 63,603 49,499 28.5 Flight 1/ (3,338) (4,762) -29.9 Correspondence (59,103) (43,683) 35.3

Educational Assistance - Chapter 35

Grand Total 40,779 35.112 16.1 College 36,906 31,551 17.0 Other Schools 3,835 3,540 8.3 Special Restorative Training 38 21 81.0

Wives and Widows 5,466 4,574 19.5 College 4,116 3,112 32.3 Other Schools 1,346 1,460 - 7.8 Special Restorative Training 4 2 100.0

Sons and Daughters 35,313 30,538 15.6 College 32,790 28,439 15.3 Other Schools 2,489 2,080 19.7 Special Restorative Training 34 19 78.9

1/ Flight trainees are counted under "Other Schools" g/Correspondence trainees are counted under "Other Schools"or "College" as appropriate.

3:32 1659

January 18, 1972 DVB /B 24-72-1

I/I. HIGHL/GHTS OF EXPERIENCE UNDER THE CURRENTGI B/LL

Almost 3 million persons had enteredtraining under the current G/ bill through November1971. This number includes more than 2 million veteransand servicemen from the Vietnam era. The cost of this training throughNovember 1971 was $4.4 billion.

Summary data for eligible veteransand servicemen, ap- plications for training and characteristics oftrainees are given below, while detailed characteristics oftrainees are given in section IV.

A. Post-Korean Veteran Population throughNovember 1971

° Eligible for GI bill Educational Benefits 8,640,000

Vietnam era - Total 5,524,000

Service between Korean conflict and Vietnam era 3,116,000

B. Applications Received for Training through November 1971, Chapter 34

Total 3,597,531

Veterans 3,313,465

Vietnam era (2,295,928)

Servicemen 284,066

C. Persons Entered Training and Cost throughNovember 1971, Chapter 34

Total 2,923,336

° Veterans 2,705,684

° Vietnam era (1,884,304)

333 1660

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

Servicemen 217,652 o Educational assistance paid (In billions) $4.4

D. Trainee Characteristics (Cumulative and Current)

Cumulative Thru In Training NoveMber 1971 November 1971

o Completed at least 4 years high school at time of appli- cation 91g 93%

Had less than a MO school education at time ofapplication 9% 7%

oCompleted at least 1 year of college at tima of appli- cation 24% 23%

Were paid educational assistance allowance for one or more depen- dents 42% 48%

College trainees attended public schools 76% 79%

Below college trainees attended private schools 86% 84%

College trainees attended full-time training 59%; 67% 1661

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

Below college trainees attended full-time training 23% 19% 99% Males 99%

Cumulative Thru June 1971

Median age for Vietnam era veteranswhen they entered training 24.5 yrs

oMedian age for post- Korean veterans when they entered training 25.9 yrs

IV. PROFILE OF TRAINEESUNDER THE CURRENT GI BILL

A. Traineelitt2E4Re_2t-TEILIIALLAng_ilaiBing_Tiat veterans More than three offive (62%) of the 1,181,000 bill are en- and servicemen trainingunder the current GI college level rolled in college. Most of these 737,000 trainees (84%) areundergraduates.Of these undergraduate students, 42 percent arein junior colleges. college level The percentage oftrainees enrolled at the veferans and is even higher (64%)for the 943,000 Vietnam era servicemen enrolled underthe current GI bill. training A smaller percentageof Vietnam era veterans are compared to in schools below thecollege level, 23 percent bill. 26 percent for all veteranstraining under the current GI training Data for veterans andservicemen in training by time and type of training aregiven in appendix tables 1and tables 3 and 2 for total chapter 34trainees and in appendix Comparable data 4 for Vietnam era veteransand servicemen.

335 71-815 0 - 72 - 22 1662

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

for persons ever trainedare given in appendix iebles 5 through 8.

About three of five veteranstraining under the current GI bill (58%) are enrolledon a full-time basis, whileapprox- imately one of seven (15.5%) isenrolled for correspondence training only. Among Vietnam era veterans in training,the percentage enrolled for full-timetraining is higher (6574) while the percentage enrolledfor correspondence training (12.9%) is lower.

Almost 75,000 servicemenon active duty are included in the count of GI bill trainees.About four in five of these servicemen (7970 are enrolled incorrespondence schools while only 5.6 percent of the servicemenare training on a full- time basis, primarily incollege.

B. State Comparisons of Trainees bvType of Training

There are substantial differencesin the percentage dis- tribution of trainees bytype of training between the states (see appendix table 11). These percenta9es relate to trends in type of training whichdo not necessarily correspondto the participation rates shown inappendix table 10.For ex- amplefthe state which is highestin percentage of on-job trainees OreimicnO0 is nextto the lowest in overall partici- pation by Vietnamera veterans.

C. Regional Participation Rates forVietnam Era Veterans

The overall participationrate for Vietnam era veterans and servicemen was 38.1 percentin November 1971. Partici- pation varied by state froma high of 53.8 percent in Hawaii to a low of 19.9 percent in WestVirginia.

Substantially higher participationrates occur in the western half of the nation, with thehighest rates appearing in California, Arizona, Washington,Colorado and Hawaii. Participation rates were lower inthe eastern half of the nation, with the lowest rates occurringin Mississippi, thn Great Lakesstates and Appalachia, extendingnortheast to

336 VIETNAM ERA VETERANS BY RATE OF PARTICIPATION THROUGH November 1971 CHAPTER 314 Chart 1

Less than 307. 1664

DNB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

Maine. In the southeastern region, beginning with Virginia and extending to Florida, the participationrate was higher than in the eastern half overall.

Participation rates for individual states gonerally follow these regional patterns (chart 1 and appendixtable 10.

Participation rates for individual states and regions reflect a combination of the three training categories (MIA, BCL and OJT).Of these, trainees enrolled in institutions of higher learning represent the largest share (60%)and are a major factor in the total participation rate of each state.

Enrollment in college is influenced by several factors. Tuition and local availability appear to have the greatest effect. In the five states having the highest participation rate, cost of tuition in public colleges is freeor very low while the five states with lowest overall participationrates have relatively higher tuition costs.

Student capacity (based upon student enrollmentas a percentage of the 18-to 24-year-old population) showsa 40 percent availability in the five states with highestpar- ticipation compared to a 30 percent availability inthe five lowest states. Availability and tuition costare mainly related to the capacity and charges of state andlocal colleges.

D. Participation Rate by Year of Separation from Armed Forces

More than two of five Veterans who were separated from the Armed Forces in calendar year 1967 (41.2A alreadyhave entered training. This was the first year in which veterans were eligible to enter training under the current GI bill upon separation from the Armed Forces.The entry rate for veterans separated prior to 1967 is less becausesome of them had completed their training before benefitsbecame available and some already had made other commitments. Entry rates for persons separated in calendar years subsequent to 1967are smaller because they have had less time to enter training.

.338 1666

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

Growth .in the participationrate during the past 12 months is indicated by the slashmark on the bars shown in chart 2. Note that there was substantialgrowth for each year of separation (even for thoseseparated prior to 1964) but that this growth isprogressively greater foryears sub- sequent to 1967. This growth in participationrate by year of separation is relatedto the amount of time incivil life. The participation rate forveterans separated after the current GI bill was enacted isexpected to exceed the 50per- cent level established by WOrldWar II veterans.

E. School Training by ProprietaryStatus of School

The shift from private to publiccolleges appears to have leveled off with 78.3percent of current GI billcollege level trainees enrolled in publiccolleges. An exception is noted for veterans training inhospitals where 67 percentare enrolled in private institutions. The distribution isre- versed for veterans trainingin schools below the college level where 86 percentare attending private schools.An exception is noted forveterans training in secondary and elementary schools where 96percent are attending public schools. Analysis of these data indicatesthat job-oriented education is mainly obtainedin private schools whileacadem- ically oriented training ismostly received in publicschools.

Of veterans engaged inon-the-job training, 90percent received their trainingfrom the private sector while10 per- cent were employed ingovernmental activities.

F. On-The-Job Tre.ning OutreachEffort

This effort was started duringJuly 1971, to "seek and find" additional job vacandiesfor the returning Vietnam. veterans. Through November 1971, DVBstations have reported visits to 27,800 job trainingestablishments throughout the country. During these visits,over 14,200 new jo training , programs were developed withemployers. The employers esti- mated that thesenew programs could accommodateover 26,500 new trainees.

340 1667

January 18, 1972 DVB IB 24-72-1

G. Educationally Disadvantaged Trainees

Free entitlement is provided for educationally disadvan- taged trainees under chapter 34. The use of this benefit assists them in completing high school or in taking remedial or deficiency courses needed to meet the entrancerequire- ments for their educational program.At the end of November 1971, 27,132 trainees were using free entitlement.

V. RESUME OF THREE CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

A. Veterans Educational Assistance Program

The current GI bill(PL 89-358) became effective June 1, 1966. It was enacted by the Congress to provide educational or vocational opportunities to veterans whoseambitions may have been thwarted or impeded by virtue of service in the Armed Forces after January 31, 1955.Also,these opportunities were made available to servicemen on active duty who had com- pleted two or more years of service (later reduced to 181 days). Up to 36 months of 5111-time school or on-job training is provided for persons who complete 18 months of active duty in the Armed Forces.

B. Vocational Rehabilitation Program

Veterans suffering from service-connected or aggravated disabilities which cause a pronounced employment handicap may receive up to 48 months of education ortraining to re- store their employability. The full cost of their training is paid by the Veterans Administration and,in addition,they receive a subsistence allowance while in training and for 2 months thereafter. Before starting training and while in training, these disabled veterans receive assistance from a vocational rehabilitation specialist or a counseling psychol- ogist. Necessary employment assistance is provided following completion of training.

341 1668

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

C. Dependents Educational AssistanceProgram

This third educationalprogram serves survivors or depen- dents of those veterans who diedfrom service-connected causes or whose service-connected disabilityis rated total and permanent. Wives and children ofservicemen who are prisoners of war, missing inaction, or interned bya hostile foreign government formore than 90 days are also eligible under this program. Up to 36 months of full-timetraining is provided in approvedschools.

VI. COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PASTREADJUSTMENT TRAINING PROGRAMS -- THREE GI BILLS

A. Review of ParticipationRates

The overall participationrate for Vietnam era trainees, after the first 66 monthsunder the current GI bill, is 38.1 percent, compared to 38.8 parcent for theKorean conflict and 42.9 percent for WorldWar II trainees.

When participationrates by type of trainingare consid- ered separately we findthat the current GI bill alreadyhas surpassed its two predecessorsin percentage of eligible persons entered school training (appendixtable 13). Almost 35 percent of the Vietnamera veterans and servicemen have entered school training,compared to 33 percent for theKorean conflict and 31 percentfor World War II veterans.

Inherent in this increasedparticipation in school training under thecurrent GI bill is an increase inpercent of eligible veterans enteringcollege level training, from 13.6 percent for WorldWar II trainees to 21.2 percentfor the Vietnam era.

The larger overall participationrates under prior G/ bills compared to thecurrent GI bill may be attributedto differences in the types oftraining available. The rapid expansion of on-job andtrade school training underthe World War II GI bill includedmany situations which were found to

342 1669 1670

January 18, 1972 DVB IS 24-72-1 DVB /B 24-72-1 January 18, 197:

were identified as non-high be unsatisfactory: these wereeliminated by legislative re- school graduates when to civil life. they return straints and therefore did notprovide the basis for the same type of mushroom growthin trainees under the current GTbill as occurredfollowing World War /I. Further, the current VII. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION situation relative to farm trainingis vastly different from FOR SERVICE-DISABLEDVETERANS . conditions after World War /I andthe Korean conflict. Only A total of 20,166 service-disabled developed significant farmtraining oppor- veterans were partic- a few states have ipating in vocational tunities under the current GI bill. rehabilitationtraining in November (appendix table 1971 17). Three of four, 15,058were enrolled in college, which is D. Dependency Status for Trainee Payment an increase of 14 percentover the number a year ago. Of these, 89 percentwere full-time students. schools below the college In During the past 12 months there hasbeen an increase in level therewere 3,957 participating as compared to 4,412 the percentage of chapter 34trainees receiving additional a year earlier, indicatinga shift from below college level payment for dependents, from 40.9percent for all post-Korean to college level training. and 36.8 percent for Vietnam eratrainees last year, to 42.5 percent and 39.6 percent,respectively in November 1971 VII/. EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE (appendix table 15). FOR DEPENDENTS AND SURVIVORS OF TOTALLY DISABLEDOR DECEASED VETERANS Much of the difference in percentageof trainees paid for dependents under the current GIbill, compared to the There were 40,779 dependentsor survivors receiving educational assistance two earlier groups, is due to alarger percentage of trainees in November 1971. Of these, 35,313 (86%) were benefits under the current program sons and daughtersof veterans. They were mainly who are ineligible for such attending college less than half-time training or (92%) as comparedto a lesser percentage because they are enroll,d in of wives and widows because they are servicemen onactive duty. enrolled in college (75%). Orphans and widows C. Prior Educational Attainment represented 62 percentof the persons receiving educationalassistance while dependents disabled veterans of current G/ bill (92.5%) represented 38 percentand de endents of Most of the trainees under the prisoners of had completed high school, or theequivalent thereof, prior war amounted to less thanone perEent, to making application to theVeterans Administration for educational assistance. The difference between Vietnam era earlier GI bills in this 044-46( trainees and trainees under the two EDWARD R. S because of the current em- BEAMAN respect is probably exaggerated Director, Program high school equivalency planning phasis placed upon attainment of a and Budgeting Service Development). certificate (General Educational APPROVED: Many of the veterans who areshown by their military separation document (DD Form 214) to benon-high school graduatesindicate on their applicationsfor educational assis- OLNEY B. OWEN tance that they completedhigh school, probably on the basis Chief Benefits Director of a GED certificate. This causes an understatement ofthe extent to which trainingbenefits are used by persons who Distribution: CO: RPC 2922 SS (243) PLD: DVBFS, 5 each

343 344 1671

January 18, 1972 DVB /8 24-72-1

LIST OF APPEND/X TABLES

Appendix Table page

1 All Persons in Training under 18 Chapter 34 by Level of Training Showing Full-Time and Part-Time Training Status as of November 1971

2 Percentage Distribution of all 19 Persons in Training Under Chapter 34 by Level of Training Showing Full-Time and Part-Time Training Status as of November 1971

20 3 Vietnam Era Veterans and Service- men in Training UnderChapter 34 by Level of Training Showing Full- Time and Part-Time Training Status as of November 1971

4 Percentage Distribution ofVietnam 21 Era Veterans and Servicemen in Training Under Chapter 34 by Level ofTraining Showing Full-Time and Part-Time Training Status as of November 1971

22 5 All Persons Ever in TrainingUnder Chapter 34 by Level of Training Showing Full-Time and Part-Time Training Status CumulativeThrough November 1971

345 1672

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972

Appendix Table Page

6 Percentage Distributionof all 23 Persons Ever in TrainingUnder Chapter 34 by Levelof Training Showing Full-Timeand Part-Time Training Status CumulativeThrough November 1971

7 Vietnam Era Veterans and Service- 24 men Ever in Training UnderChapter 34 by Level ofTraining Showing Full-Time and Part-TimeTraining Status Cumulative ThroughNovember 1971

8 Percentage Distributionof Vietnam 25 Era Veterans andServicemen Ever in Training UnderChapter 34 by Level of TrainingShowing Full-Time and Part-Time TrainingStatus Cumu- lative Through November1971

9 Persons in Training During Fiscal 26 Year by Program andPeriod of Service

10 Chapter 34 Participation Rate for Viet- 27 nam Era Veterans by Stateand Type of Training

11 Chapter 34 Traineesby Type of Training 28 and State of Residenceat Time of Application

12 Chapter 34 Percentage Distribution of 29 Trainees by Type andProprietary Status of Facilityas of November 1971

346 1673

January 18, 1972 DVB IB 24-72-1

Appendix Table Page

13 Comparison of Eligible Veterans 30 and Participation Rates After First Sixty-Six Months of Educational Assistance Under Three G/ Bills

14 Three G/ Bills - Total Number 31 Trained, Level of Training and Cost

15 Three G/ Bills - Dependency Status 32 for Trainee Payment

16 Three G/ Bills - Educational Level 33 of Trainees at Time of Application

17 Chapter 31 - Vocational Rehabili- 34 tation for Service-Disabled Veterans

18 Chapter 35 - Dependents Educational 35 Assistance

Symbols Used in Appendix Tables

Data Not Available NA

Not Applicable

Percent less than 0.09% 0.0

Quantity Zero 0

-347

bow& ALL PERSONS IN TRAINING UNDER CHAPTER 34 AS OF NOVEMBER 1971BY LEVEL OF TRAINING SHOWING FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME TRAINING STATUS TableAppendix 1 TotalLEVEL - AllOF TRAININGLevels Total Time1%311 TOTAL TimePart pondence Corres- Total TimeFUll VETERANS TimePart pondence Corres- Total TimeFullSERVICEMEN TimePart PendenneCorres- College - Total 1,180,976 736,537 490,034647,709 244,387302,100 231,167 2,116 1,106,234 725,398 486,369643,590 237,098290758o 172,064 1,931 11,13974,742 4,119 11,520 59,103 UndergraduateGraduate 621,223109,117 417.778 69,130 202,834 39,876 611111 617,234102,196 415,81867,493 200,865 34,615 551 88 3,9896,921 1,9601,6373,665 1,9695,2617,289 185 6023 Helov College - TotalVocationalNon-Degree or Tech. 353 644 6.191 66,880 3 126 57,713 1 677 229,051 1,394 290441 5 968 66,426 3,058 53,482 1,618 170,133 1 2 63 6o3 22 454 68 4,231 58,918 102 OtherPost-High Voc. Schoolor Tech. 242,676 65,793 39,69317, 314 18,935 8,514 184,048 39,965 199,722 49,468 39,64417,176 18,502 8,299 141,576 23,993 42,95416,325 138 49 433215 15,972 FlightHigh TralninpSchool 24,26415,653 4,729 - 24,264 5,886 5,038 - 20,92614,667 4,462 - 20,926 5,641 4,564 - 3,338 986 -267 3,338 245 42,472 -474 On-Job Training-TotalCoop. Farm 90,795 5,258 90z725 5,144 114 - 5,258 5,144 114 _ _ _ - - OtherApprentice 31,34859,447 31,34859,447 -_ _ 31,34859,44790,795 31,34859,44790,795 _- _- _- _- _- _- PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF ALL PERSONS IN TRAINING UNDER CHAPTM 34 BY SHOWINGLEVEL OF FULL-TIME TRAINING AND PART-TIME TRAINING STATUS AS OF NOVEMBER 1971 TableAppendix 2 LEVEL OF TRAINING Total TimeFull TOTAL TimePart pondenceCorres- Total TimeFull VETERANS TimePart pondenceCorrea- Total TimeFullSERVICEMEN TimePart pondenceCorres - Total - All Levels 100.0 54.9 25.6 19.5 I 100.0 58.3 26.2 15.5 100.0 5.6 15.4 79.0 College - Total UndergraduateGraduate 52.662.4 9.3 35.441.6 5.9 17.220.7 3.4 0.00.1 55.865.5 9.2 37.644.0 6.1 18.221 4 3.1 0.00 1 14 8 5.39.2 2.62.24 9 2.67.09 7 0.10.00 2 Below College - TotalNon-Degree 30.0 0.5 0.35.7 0.14.9 19.4 0.1 26.3 0.5 6.10.3 0.14.8 15.4 0.1 85.2 0.3 0.70.1 5.70.1 78.8 0.1 t4 Cot: OtherPost-HighVocational Voc. Schoolor Tech. 20.6 5.6 3.41.5 1.60.7 15.6 3.4 18.1 4.5 1.63.6 1.70.7 12.8 2.2 21.957.5 0.10.2 0.3 21.456.8 crt Pk_co; FlightHigh TrainingSchool 2.11.3 O. - 2.10.5 0.4 - 1.91.3 0.4 - 0.51.9 o.4 - 4.51.3 0.4 - 0.30.64.5 0.6 - On-Job Training - TotalCoop. Fax 7.6o.4 7.6o.4 0.0 - - 0.58.2 8.20.5 0.0 - - - - - ApprenticeOther 2.65.0 2.65.0 - - 2.85.4 2.85.4 _- ' -_ _- _- _- _- VIETNAM ERA VETERANS AND SERVICEMEN IN TRAINING UNDER SHOWING FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME TRAINING STATUS AS CHAPTER 34 BY LEVEL OF TRAINING OF NOVEMBER 1971 TableAppendix 3 Total TimeFull TOTAL TimePart pondence Corres- Total TimeFull VETERANS TimePart pondence Corres- Total TimeFullSERVICEMEN TimePart PondenceCorres - CollegeTotal - All- Total Levels 602,914943,225 435,103568,704 166,265202,864 171,657 1,546 591375868,_483 431,438564,585 158,976191,344 112,554 1,361 11,13974,742 3,6654,119 11,520 59,103 UndergraduateGraduate 514,996 83,126 374,566 57,862 140,00625,180 424 84 511,007 76,205 372,606 56,225 138,037 19,919 364 61 3,9896,921 1,9601,637 1,9695,2617,289 185 6023 Below College - TotalNon- Degree 259,741 4,792 53,031 2,675 36,599 1,079 170,111 1,038 196,138 4,563 52,571 2,607 32,368 1,020 111,193 936 63,603 229 454 68 4,231 59 58,918 102 OtherPost-HighVocational Voc. or School orTech. Tech. 180,062 52,837 32,52414,602 13,157 6,271 134,381 31,964 137,108 36,512 32,47514,464 12,724 6,056 91,90915,992 42,95416,325 138 49 215 15,972 FlightHigh School Training 13,01511,518 3,650 - 13,015 4,102 3,76u -. 10,532 9,677 3,383_ 9,6773,857 3,292 - 3,338 986 - 267 .245 433 42,472 - 474 On-Job Training - TotalCoop. Farm 80,570 2,309 80,570 2,255 - 54 -- 80,570 2,309 2,255 54 - - - 3,338 - - OtherApprentice 28,08852,482 28,0882,482 -- - 28,08852,482 28,08852,48280,570 ------SHOWINGFULL,TIME AND PART-TIME TRAINING ALL PERSONS EVER IN TRAINING UNDER CHAPTER STATUS CUMULATIVE THROUGH NOVEMBER 1971 34 BY LEVEL OF TRAINING TableAppendix 5 LEVEL OF TRAINING Full TOTAL Part Corres - FullVETERANS Part Correa - FullSERVICEMEN Part Corres - Total Time Time uondence Total Time Time . CollegeTotal - -All Total Levels 12 .0 0.4 3 336 1 407 60 931 3 o 6 3 0.1 6 9 58 153132 12 70 38 235 684 1 386 .18 914 346 61866 470 135 4 2 26 4 754ndence 217 6 2 51Total 859 20 687 Time 60 12 Time 136ndence 836 UndergraduateGraduate 1,264,972 299,778 741,820179,525 521,093119,867 2,059 386 1,243,225 271,171 732,060172,439 509,259 98,399 1,906 333 21,74728,607 17 504 9,7607,086 21,468 11,83433 956 153399 53 Below College-- TotalNon-Degree 25,344 10,505 12,131 2,708 23,839 2 1 0 9,847 24 11,477 33 44 2,515 542 16 1,505 7 3 3 183 26 173 658 654 1 6 437 193 OtherPost-HighVocational Voc. Schoolor Tech. IFAIPAP3k071NrA4.11t4:27irdtP1,-227/731,137237,402 161,746 74,607 56,000 106,795 199,169 73,850 54,214 71,105 38,233 757 1,786 35,690 00".4C74 FlightHigh TrainingSchool 81,80855,304 11,970 106,61281,80828,929 462,779 14,405 626,042 68,36346,284 160,316 10,974 102,68321,916 363,04313,394 105,095 9020 1,430 996 7,0133,929 99,736 1,011 On-Job Training - TotalCoop. Farm 221,475 6,116 221,475 5,957 159 6,116 5,957 68,363 159 13,445 - 13,445 OtherApprentice 131,760 89,715 131,760 89,715 131,760221,475 89,715 131,760221,475 89,715 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF ALL PERSONS EVER 16 TRAININGSHOW/NG UNDER FULL-T/ME CHAPTER AND 34 PART-TIME BY LEVEL TRAININGOF TRAINING STATUS CUMULAT/VE THROUGH NOVEMBER 1971 - TableAppendix 6 LEVEL OF TRAINING Total . TimeFull TOTAL TimePart pondenceCorres- Total TimeFull VETERANS TimePart pondence Correa- Total SERVICEMENTimeFull TimePart pondenceCorrea - CollegeTotal - -All Total Levels 100.0 54.4 31.948.2 22.331.6 20.2 0.2 100.0 57.0 33.951.3 22.932.0 16.7 0.2 100.0 23.8 8.09.5 15.627.6 62.9 0.2 UndergraduateGraduateNon-Degree 43.310.2 0.9 25.4 0.46.1 17.8 0.44.1 0.10.0 10.146.0 0.9 27.1 0.46.4 18.8 0.43.7 0.10.0 10.013.1 0.7 0.34.53.2 9.90.35.4 0.10.00.1 CP.) Below College - TotalPost-HighVocational Schoolor Tech. 38.0 8.2 2.68.7 1.99.3 20.0 3.7 34.8 7.3 2.79.2 2.09.1 16.5 2.6 17.576.2 0.31.5 12.0 0.8 16.462.7 cinCA) OtherFlightHigh Voc. School Training or Tech. 24.9 2.81.9 0.45.5 - 2.81.03.6 15.8 0.5 - 23.1 2.51.7 0.45.9 - 2.50.83.8 13.4 0.5 - 48.3 6.24.2 0.50.7 - 6.23.21.8 45.8 0.5 - Coop. Farm 0.2 0.2 -0.0 - 8.20.2 8.20.2 0.0 ------On-Job Training - TbtalOtherApprentice 7.63.14.5 4.57.63.1 -- - 3.34.9 3.34.9 -_ -- _- - -_ - VIETNAM ERA VETERANS AND SERVICENENSHOWING EVER FULL-TIME IN TRAIN/NG AND UNDERPART-TDM CHAPTER TRAINING 34 STARUS CUMULATIVE THROUGH NOVEMBER BY LEVEL OF TRAINING 1971 TableAppendix 7 - LEVEL OF TRAINING Total TimeFull TOTAL TimePart pcndenceCorrea- Total TimePart VETERANS TimeFull pondenceCorrea- Total TimeFullSERVICEMEN TimePart pondenceCorrea- CsIlegeTotal -- TotalAll Levels 1,1712,101,956 815 1.126,768 758.665 409,891577,419 397,769 3,259 1,119,9561,884,304 1,106,081 741,161 375,935517,290 260,933 2,860 217,652 51,859 17,50420,687 60,12933,956 136,836 UndergraduateGraduate 970.451184,924 631.984118,584 337.252 66,112 1.215 228 948.7'34156,317 622.224111.498 325.418 44,644 1.062 175 21.74728,607 9.7607,086 11.83421 ,468 153399 53 Below College - TotalNon-Degree 751,144 16,440 189,106 8,097 167,528 6,527 394.510 1,816 585,351 14,935 185 923 7,439 141,355 5,873 258.073 1,623 165.793 1,505 3,183 658 26,173 654 136,437 193 00 VocationalOtherPost-High Voc. or School orTech. Tech. 496,945166,777 120,077 56.721 66,55635,100 310,312 74,956 391,850128,544 118,647 55,964 62,62733.314 210,576 39,266 105,095 38,233 1,430 757 1,7136 35.690 FlightHigh TrainingSchool 43,67641,096 9,725 - 43,67622,129 9,242 - 30,23132,076 8,729 - 30,23115,116 8,231 - 13,445 9.020 - 996 13,445 7,0133,929 99,736 1,011 - On-Job Training - TotalCoop. Farm 178.997 2,650 178.997 2,583 - 67 - 178,997 2,650 178,997 2,583 - 67 - -_. -_ -_ - OtherApprentice 102.789 76,208 102,78976,208 -- -- 1o=.789 76.208 102.789 76.208 - _.- ..- - _- - BY LEVEL PERCENTAGEOF TRAINING DISTRIBUTION SHOWING FULL-TIME OF VIETNAM AND ERA PART-TIME VETERANS TRAINING AND SERVICEMEN STATUS EVERCUMULATIVE IN TRAINING THROUGH UNDER NOVEMBER CHAPTER 197134 TableAppendix 8 LEVEL OF TRAINING Total TimeFull TOTAL TimePart pondenceCorres- Total TimeFull VETERANS TimePart pondenceCorrea- Total TimeFullSERVICEMEN TimePart _pondenceCorrea - CollegeTotal - All- Total Levels 100.0 53.6 27.4 19.0 100.0 58.6 27.5 13.9 100.0 9.5 27.6 62.9 UndergraduateGraduate 46.255.7 8.7 30.136.1 5.6 16.0 3.119.4 0.10.00.2 50.459.5 8.3 33.039.3 5.9 17.320.0 2.4 0.10.00.2 10.013.223.9 4.53.38.1 15.6 5.49.9 0.10.00.2 Below College - TotalNon-Degree 35.8 0.8 9.00.4 0.3 8.0 18.8 0.1 31.1 0.8 9.90.4 7.50.3 13.7 0.1 76.1 0.7 1.40.3 12.0 0.3 62.7 0.1 OtherPostVocational -High Voc. Schoolor Tech. 8.0 2.7 1.7 3.6 6.9 3.0 1.8 2.1 17.5 0.3 0.8 16.4 FlightHigh School Training 23.7 2.11.9 0.55.7 - 2.11.03.2 14.8 0.4 - 20.8 1.61.7 0.56.3 _ 0.81.63.3 11.2 0.4 - 48.2 6.24.2 0.50.6 - 6.23.21.8 45.8 0.5 - On-Job Training - TotalCoop Farm 8.50.1 0.18.5 0.0 - - 9.40.1 9.40.1 0.0 ------OtherApprentice 3.64.9 4.93.6 - - 4.05.4 5.4..0 - ..- ..- -_ - - 1682

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 1972 Appendix Table 9

PERSONS IN TRAINING DURING FISCAL YEAR BY PROGRAM AND PERIOD OF SERVICE

Fiscal Year

Program ELL 1970 1969 1968 1967,

Post-Korean Educational Assistance Program - Chapter 34

In training during year - Total 1,584,8661.1210UI1925,013 686,919 1467,881 Institutions of higher learning 917,389 677,240-528,515 413,714 338.185- Schools below college level 521,873 416,658 330,000 254,576 129,08 On-Job training 145,604 U6,833 66,498 18,629

Children's Educational Acmistance Program - Chapter 35

In training during year - Total '0,724 45,391 43,269 IO,I80 37,191 Institutions of higher learning 45,383 110,695 38,436 I6-,641 33,328 Schools below college level 5,282 4,638 4,788 4,395 3,821 Special restorative training 59 58 45 42 42

Period of service of deceased or totally disabled veteran

World War I 480 512 575 648 746 World War II 30,250 27,930 27,316 24,988 25,258 Korean Conflict 8,474 7,587 7,123 6,363 6,111 Other 11,520 9,362 8,254 8,481 5,076

Wives and Widows Educational Assistance Program - Chapter 35

In training during year - Total 8,796 Institutions of higher learning 5,326 : Schools below college level 3,459 3,187 1,372 - Other 11

Period of service of deceased or totally disabled veteran

World War I 111 102 41 - - World War II 2,981 2,631 1,146 - - Korean Conflict 949 697 235 - Other 4,755 3,641 1,397 -

Vocational Rehabilitation Program for Disabled Veterans - Chapter 31

In training during year - Total 30.471 24.457 18.969 14.373 12.547 Institutions of higher learning 20,116 14,928 10,390 6,490 5,058 Schools below college level 8,550 7,934 7,333 6,851 6,585 Job training 1,625 1,418 1,132 898 772 Institutional on farm 180 177 114 134 132

Period of service of veteran

World War II 681 812 878 945 687 Korean Conflict 809 891 1,133 1,678 2,155 Peacetime 28,981 22,75416,958 11,750 9,705 Vietnam era (22,907) (16,522) NA NA NA Other (6,074) (6,232) NA NA NA

Total all trainees 1,674,857 1,287,650900,000 741,772 517,621

56 1683

January 18, 1972 DVB IB 24-72-1 Appendix Table 10 CHAPTER 34

PARTICIPATION RATE FOR VIETNAM FIIA VETERANS BY STATE AND TYPE OF TRAINING

Througa November 1971 Veteran Trainees Population Percent of Veteran Population Correa. g/ State (000) Number Total IHL BCL OJT

Total Y 5,524 2,101,956 38.1 21.213.6 3.3 7.2

Alabama 86 28,397 33.0 17.014.2 1.8 3.3 Alaska 8 2,304 28.8 17.2 9.9 1.7 3.7 4.4 5.6 Arizona 46 23,506 51.1 33.713.0 4.1 Arkansas 40 14,392 36.0 20.212.7 3.1 2.9 4.0 California 598 282,622 47.3 34.8 9.6 2.9 8.4 Colorado 59 29,004 49.2 29.516.8 4.6 Connecticut 81 25,627 31.6 17.9 8.4 5.3 3.8 Delaware 16 4,580 28.6 17.7 7.1 4.3 District of Columbia 24 9,143 38.1 20.112.9 5.1 2.9 4.2 Florida 182 69,339 38.1 23.9 11.3 2.9 2.9 4.8 Georgia 97 41,970 43.3 20.0 20.4 Hawaii 19 10,070 53.0 30.813.9 8.3 5.7 Idaho 23 7,202 31.3 21.7 7.7 1.9 4.9 3.6 Illinoia 302 88,635 29.3 16.4 9.3 4.9 6.8 Indiana 149 38,433 25.8 12.310.5 3.0 5.0 Iowa 77 22,132 28.7 16.1 10.4 2.2 Kansas 56 22,421 40.0 24.9 13.4 1.7 5.7 4.9 Kentucky 81 19,838 24.5 12.6 9.8 2.1 Louisiana 90 27,549 30.6 16.511.3 2.8 3.4 5.4 Maine 30 7,720 25.7 13.1 9.5 3.1 Maryland 102 35,578 34.9 21.1 10.2 3.6 4.7 3.7 Massachusetts 151 46,784 31.0 18.8 9.1 3.1 5.4 Michigan 249 79,303 31.8 18.3 9.6 3.9 Minnesota 116 42,290 36.5 18.8 13.6 4.1 4.4 1.8 3.4 Miasiasippi 39 11,387 29.2 18.2 9.2 4.7 Missouri 128 41,317 32.3 18.310.9 3.1 Montana 19 7,860 41.4 26.711.2 3.5 4.7 Nebraska 38 15,143 39.9 22.0 13.0 4.9 5.1 Nevada 13 4,736 36.4 20.113.5 2.8 6.7 New Hampshire 22 6,683 30.4 16.6 9.0 4.8 5.6 New Jersey 192 49,401 25.7 14.1 8.9 2.7 3.7 4.4 New Mexico 30 12,362 41.2 25.213.9 2.1 3.5 New York 455 132,680 29.2 16.9 7.5 4.8 North Carolina 107 38,920 36.4 19.411.8 5.2 1/4.4 1.2 North Dakota 19 6,784 35.7 22.311.4 2.0 5.4 Ohio 315 79,009 25.1 13.4 9.0 2.7 Oklahoma 68 28,205 41.5 26.5 12.9 2.1 3.7 Oregon 67 25,719 38.4 27.6 8.8 2.0 4.3 Pennsylvania 346 97,808 28.3 13.5 11.1 3.7 5.7 Rhode Island 22 9,208 41.9 23.614.5 3.8 6.4 South Carolina 54 20,877 38.7 18.0 16.6 4.1 4.6 5.5 South Dakota 17 5,677 33.4 20.111.4 1.9 Tennessee 100 33,674 33.7 18.5 12.4 2.8 4.8 5.2 Texas 270 104,460 38.7 24.4 12.2 2.1 1.5 5.8 Utah 29 11,966 41.3 31.0 8.8 4.3 Vermont 14 3,117 22.3 11.2 6.9 4.2 Virginia 105 37,195 35.4 20.6 10.6 4.2 5.6 Washington 103 50,109 48.6 30.315.2 3.1 7.8 West Virginia 62 12,272 19.9 10.5 7.0 2.4 3.6 Wisconsin 135 40,10 4 29.7 16.110.6 3.0 5.8 Wyoming 10 3,546 35.5 25.4 7.5 2.6 4.7

Outside U.S. 2/ 63 15,286 24.3 15.5 8.4 0.4 1.3

1/The total includes 217,652 servicemen trainees.Since these servicemen are not distributed proportionately by state they are omitted from state comparisons.

2/Correspondence trainees are already counted in IHL or HCL, as appropriate.

3/Area iacludes Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. Possessions and outlying areas, and foreign countries. 1684

DVB IB 24-72-1 January 18, 197 2

Appendix Table 11 CHAPTER 34

TRAINEES BY TYPE OF TRAINING AND STATE OFRESIDENCE AT TIM OF APPLICATION

(In Training, November 1971)

Total Trainees Percent by TYze of Training State of Residence Number Percent IHL BCL OJT Farm 1/ Correa 2/

Total 1,180,976 100.0 62.4 29.9 7.7 0.4 19.6

Alabama 18,689 100.0 55.5 39.3 5.2 0.0 12.8 Alaska 2,074 100.0 46.5 49.5 4.0 0.0 33.2 Arizona 16,196 100.0 68.1 24.8 7.1 0.0 Arkansas 20.0 8,710 100.0 54.9 36.6 8.5 7.4 California 14.4 190,958 100.0 75.4 20.3 4.3 0.0 Colorado 14.8 19,977 100.0 56.6 38.6 4.8 0.0 Connecticut 31.2 16,138 100.0 60.1 24.1 15.8 0.0 Delaware 17.5 2,895 100.0 64.1 26.2 9.7 0.0 District of Columbia 20.1 5,544 100.0 64.5 29.0 6.5 0.0 Florida 11.6 42,895 100.0 65.5 27.3 7.2 0.4 Georgia 15.6 26,533 100.0 48.0 46.1 5.9 0.0 Hawaii 14.6 6,427 100.0 60.5 26.5 13.0 0.0 Idaho 20.3 4,580 100.0 64.1 30.1 5.8 0.0 Illinois 25.0 53,566 100.0 60.1 28.0 11.9 0.1 Indiana 21.1 23,692 100.0 50.0 39.3 10.7 0.0 Iowa 30.4 12,992 100.0 54.7 38.7 6.6 Kansas 7.7 21.0 14,410 100.0 60.3 36.2 3.5 0.0 Kentucky 23.2 12,383 100.0 54.1 38.5 7.4 Louisiana 0.0 26.0 16,486 100.0 55.6 36.5 7.9 0.3 Maine 13.7 5,108 100.0 50.2 39.1 10.7 0.0 Maryland 29.0 23,376 100.0 66.3 26.4 7.3 0.0 19.5 Massachusetts 28,697 loo.o 67.2 23.3 9.5 0.0 Michigan 15.6 45,766 100.0 63.4 27.0 9.6 0.0 19.8 Minnesota 23,565 100.0 52.8 36.4 10.8 2.1 16.7 Mississippi 7,254 100.0 57.3 36.6 6.1 0.0 Missouri 18.2 24.374 100.0 60.9 30.2 8.9 1.8 18.0 Montana 4,715 100.0 58.7 32.2 9.1 0.0 20.0 Nebraska 11,055 100.0 51.9 39.9 8.2 11.5 Nevada 19.3 3,092 100.0 51.0 41.2 7.8 0.0 31.9 New Hampshire 4,183 100.0 54.6 31.5 13.9 0.3 New Jersey 25.9 29,683 100.0 65.8 25.2 9.0 0.0 New Mexico 17.4 8,507 100.0 61.1 35.0 3.9 0.0 21.7 New York 80,104 100.0 64.2 26.1 9.7 0.0 20.1 North Carolina 23,731 100.0 54.4 31.7 13.9 0.7 16.9 North Dakota .4,262 100.0 49.8 43.3 6.9 0.3 28.8 Ohio 43,769 100.0 59.5 30.9 9.6 0.0 Oklahoma 23.1 17,151 100.0 69.5 25.9 4.6 0.7 13.4 Oregon 14,337 100.0 73.1 21.3 5.6 0.0 Pennsylvania 13.4 56,355 100.0 54.2 34.8 11.0 0.0 Rhode Island 25.6 5,723 100.0 63.9 29.2 6.9 0.0 21.5 South Carolina 14,205 100.0 47.6 44.1 8.3 0.0 21.4 South Dakota 4,189 100.0 47.1 48.1 4.8 Tennessee 9.5 28.1 19,780 100.0 58.0 33.6 8.4 0.0 Texas 15.9 67,955 100.0 64.5 31.3 4.2 0.0 Utah 20.8 8,284 100.0 68.6 27.3 4.1 0.0 Vermont 23.2 1,816 100.0 50.3 31.9 17.8 0.1 22.5 Virginia 25,608 100.0 58.7 32.2 9.1 0.0 25.1 Washington 29,381 100.0 63.9 30.7 54 0.0 20.9 West Virginia 7,306 100.0 56.2 32.3 11.5 0.0 22.1 Wisconsin 24,810 100.0 58.4 32.4 9.2 1.6 23.1 Wyoming 2,247 100,0 66.6 27.2 6.2 0.0 22.6 Outside U.S. 2/ 15,443 100.0 45.6 53.7 0.7 0.0 32.2

1/Farm trainees already counted in BCL

2/ Correspondence trainees alreadY counted in IHLor BCL as appropriate

2/ Area includes Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,U. S. Possessionsand outlying areas, and foreign countries

")t's':),

.r 1685

January 18, 1972 DVB IB 24-72-1 Appendix CHAPTER 34 Table 12

PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TRAINEES BY TYPE AND

PROPRIETARY STATUS OF FACILITY AS OF NOVEMBER 1971 .

Proprietary Status of Facility 1/ PUblic Private Training Training Time Time Type of Facility Total TotalFullPart Total Full Part

Insitutions of Higher Learning 100.0 78.3 53.824.5 21.7 11.6 10.1

University/College 100.0 67.9 51.4 16.5 32.1 16.5 15.6 Hospital 100.0 32.1 31.8 0.3 67.9 67.2 0.7 Teachers College 100.0 99.0 75.223.8 1.0 0.6 o.4 Junior College 100.0 94.8 56.2 38.6 5.2 3.1 2.1

Other Schools 100.0 13.7 9.7 4.o 86.3 8.6 77.7

Technical 100.0 9.8 8.6 1.2 90.2 15.3 74.9 Business 100.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 99.9 19.0 80.9 Secondary/Elementary 100.0 96.2 44.7 51.5 3.8 1.4 2.4 VocAtional/Trade 100.0 13.3 10.3 3.0 86.7 6.380.4

Job Training Establishments 100.0 9.9 9.9 90.1 90.1

Total. 100.0 54.9 38.0 16.9 45.116.828.3

1/The proprietary status and training time percentages may vary slightly from thoseshown in Section III D and appendix tables 1-8. This is because some institutions Provide more than one type of training, causing tabulations by type of facility to differ from tabulations by type of training. Appendix AFTER FIRST SIXTY-SIX MONTHS COMPARISON OF ELIGIBLE VETERANS OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.UNDER AND PARTICIPATION RATES - Table 13 World War II June 44 - THREE GI BILLS Korean Conflict Sept. 52 - Post-Korean 1/ VietnamJune 66Era - 1/ June 66 - Veteran Population 15,283,000 Nov. 49 Feb. 5,303,000 58 8,640,000Nov. 71 5,524,000Nov. 71 SchoolTotal traineesTrained PercentPercent, 4,697,9596,552,498 42.9% 1,763,1832,056,139 38.8% 2,695,7452,923,336 33.8% 2,101,956 38.1% BelowCollege college (17.2%)(13.6%) 30.8% (13.3%)(20.0%)33.3% (12.8%)(18.4%)31.2% 1,920,309 (13.6%)(21.2%)34.8% FarmOn-Job Percent 1,348,255 506,284 8.8% 208,061 84,895 3.9% 221,475 2.5% 178,997 3.2% 1/ Percent Includes 217,652 servicemen 3.3% 1.6% 0.1%6,116 0.f%2,650 1687

January. 18 1972 DVB KB 24-72-1 Appendix. THREE GI BILLS Table 14

TOTAL NUMBER TRAINED, LEVEL OF TRAINING AND COST

Comparison for World War II Korean Conflict,Post-Korean and Vietnam Era

Cumulative thru Nov. 1971 WW4I Conflict Post- 1/ Vietnam Eta (Ended) ::::::) Koreati Veterans Servicemen

Total Trained 7,800,0002,391,000 2,923,3361,884,304 217,652 Percent 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

College 2,230,0001,213,0001,590,0941,119,956 51,859 Percent 28.6 '50.7 54.4 59.4 23.8

Below College 3,480,000 860,000 1,105,651 582,701165,793 Percent 44.6 36.0 37.8 313.9 76.2

On-Job Ttaining 1,400,000 223,000 221,475 178,997 MO Percent 17.9 9.3 7.6 9.5

Institution on Farm 690,000 95,000 6,116 2,650 Percent 8.9 4.0 0.2 0.2

Cost $ 14.5 $4.5 $ 4.4 NA NA (In Billions)

1/ Includes Vietnam Era

v. 361

_ DEPENDENCY STATUS FOR TRAINEE PAYMENT THREE GI BILLS TableAppendix 15 Comparison for WM XX, KoreanHConflict, Post-Korean and Vietnam Era Percent Total OnwimPWW100.0 II Conflict KbreanOmildein100.0 (ro Nov. 1971) Korean100.0Post- (M Nov. 1971) Vietnam 100.0 Era Not.paid for Dependents 46.1 46.0 57.5 1, . 60.4 Paid for twoone orDependent moreDependents 30.223.7 36.517.5 27.215.3 21.817.8 V servicementraining,Includes correspondence personstrainees with for schools, dependents if they arepost-Korean enrolled andin leasVietnam than era. or flight training/ also includes all half-time 1689

January 18, 1972 DVB ID 24-72-1

Appendix Table 16 THREE GI BILLS

EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF TRAINEES AT T1ME OF APPLICATION

Comparison for World War II, Korean Conflict, Post-Korean andVietnam Era

Post Vietnam Eta 1/

(1EI:d!Id) C(;:fdleldt (T:o2:!71) (To Nov.71)

Tata]. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

0-8 Grade 20.1 9.3 1.5 1.3

1-3 years of high school 25.1 19.7 7.3 6.2

4 years of high school 38.5 44.5 67.5 71.2

1-3 years of college 11.6 18.3 13.6 12.1

h or more years of college 4.7 8.2 10.1 9.2

Median educational level 12.1 Yrs. 12.5 Yrs. 12.6 Yrs. 12.6 Yrs.

1/Servicemen not included

363:: 1690

DVB X13 24-72-1 January .18,1972 ,,

Appendix Table 17 CHAPTER 3; .

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION FOR SERVICE-DISABLEDVETERANS

Veterans in Training,November.1971

Trainees *Type of Training Full Total Time Total .

Tbtal 20,166 18,155 2,011 1,0112 969 College level 15,058 13,409 1,649 933 716 Schools below collegelevel 3,957 3,595 362 109 ; Job training 1,022 1,022 Farm training 129 .129 10 OS

' 3_ DEPENDENTSPersons in EDUCATIONAL Training Novetber ASSISTANCE 1971 CHAFTER 35 AppendixTdble 18 Total Total Orphans 100%Children Disab. of Widows Wives100% of Children POW Wives POW College Graduate 36,90640,779 1,634 19,82021,361 TOT 12,93413,912 443 4,1643,126 384 1,266 954 94 4o36 1 36 Jr.Cther College Undergraduate 26,082 9,190 14,500 4,613 9,6442,847 1,4401,302 441419 32 3 25 65 SpecialBCL Restorative 3,835 38 1,522 19 963 15 1,036 2 . 310 2 4 1692

Mr. HELSTOSKI. Withoutobjection, a comparison of independentcol- leges, and universities, 194748versus 1971-72, showing veteranun- dergraduate enrollment, totalundergraduate enrollment, andincreases in total cost at theeducational institutions cited, the record at this point. will be inserted in (The data referred to follows :)

366 7

1693

ODMPARISON OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

1947-48 vs 1971-72

by

Veterans Undergraduate Enrollment,

Total Undergraduate Enrollment,

and

Increases in Total Costs

Howard E. Holcomb Director of Federal Relations National Council of Independent Colleges and Universities One Dupont Circle, Suite 770 Washington, D. C. 20036

202-293-1245

f

71-815 0 - 72 - 24 a67 :A 1694

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans _InCreaies ALABAMA Athens 256 na 91f 126 :-/ox Birmingham Southern 1339 701 1031 13 3x,' Huntingdon 815 na 684 30 ' 3x Mobile na na 606 51 na' St. Bernard (1) (1) 632 40 4x Tuskegee Institute 2588 1375 2729 177 3x

ARKANSAS Arkansas College 426 158 398 31 4x Ouachita Baptist 831 na 1322 69 3ic

CALIFORNIA Azuza Pacific 126 41 800 54 6x Biola College 878 na 1628 .118 5x California Baptist na na 675 90 na California Inst. of Tech. 785 527 786 6 3x California Lutheran .(2) (2) 980 38 2x7 Claremont Men's 243 164 804 24 4x College of Notre Dame 125 (1) 622 97 na Dominican of San. Rafael 301 4 359 20 2x Harvey Medd na na 401 3 ha' Holy Names 237 na 455 8 3x Immaculate Heart 1119 na 937 7 3x Loma Linda U 986 na 1735 116 4x Loyola U of L.A. 1549 na 1934 78 3x Narymount (3) (3) 775 (3) na Monterey Inst. of Foreign Studies (2) (2) 431 111 na Occidental 1201 625 1749 30 '3x Pacific College (2) (2) 447 22 na'' Pacific Oaks (2) (2) 123 5 na Pomona 1115 na 1300 9 4x Saint Patrick's (i) (1) 105 4 2x Southern California COL 267 na 540 na 5X Stanford U 15796 7011 17998 291 3x. U of Redlands 1246 382 1774 53 4x . U of San Diego (2) (2) 1242 91 na U of San Francisco 2250 1496 4728 375 9x U of Santa Clara 1106 na 3362 74 3x. Whittier 1249 507 1815 66 3x Pepperdine U 4431 2299 4641 639 5x COLORADO Colorado College 1040 na 1792 45 4x Loretto Heights 439 na 846 33 4x Regis na na 1414 137 na CONNECTICUT Albertus Magnus 210 na 502 na 3x Bridgeport Engineering Inst. 475 285 397 151 3x

(1) Was a junior college (2) Not in existence (3) College forWomen

-41, 1695

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple ...... Cost Institutions Increases _by-State Total Veterans Total Veterans

Connecticut (cont.) Hartford Col for Women (3) (3) (3) (3) ..9x Post.Junior Col 262 172 493 25 na Sacred Heart U (2) (2) 2042 na 33 4x Trinity College 865 540 1583 5756 400 3x U of Bridgeport 2157 1747 830 na U of.Hartford na no 7007 na U of New Haven na na 2504 934 4x Yale U 5676 3365 4739 37

: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3x Catholic U 4666 1927 6486 387 0 Dunbarton 471 0 736

na. . George Washington U na na 5586 335 na Howard U 4437 na 7199 328

FLORIDA 4x Bethune Cookman 660 156 1219 65 na EmbryrRiddle Aeron. U na na 1186 401 na Florida Inst of Tech na na 1271 185 na, Florida Memorial na na 821 68 na, Florida Presbyterian (2) (2) 1099 10 78 na Saintf-Leo (1) (1) 1154 3x U of,Tampa 1078 380 2319 340

GEORGIA na Andrew na na 295 9 na Atlanta Baptist na na 270 61 3x BerrvCollege 659 77 973 55 61 3x Brewton-Parker 102 na 618 63 5x Clarke 849 142 1183 15 na Emmanuel 119 20 324 Emory4 2152 na 3204 44 4x na Gordon Military na na 503 103 3x Morehouse 893 7 1227 70 4x Reinhardt 122 6 310 5 3x Shorter 222 na 591 39 5x Young Harris 294 no 343 10

HAWAII 221 na Chaminade na na 1585

IDAHO 4x. Northwest Nazarene 649 na 1114 44

. _ ILLINOIS 3x Augustana 1413 889 2056 50 98 4x Aurora 609 275 1020 Barat (3) (3) (3) (3) 4x Blackburn 325 69 627 7 4x Elmhurst na na 1891 253 14 8x Eureka 333 142 655. (2) Not in existence (3) College for Women

369 1696

1947-48 1571-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions ------Cos t by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Illinois (continued) George Williams 345 na 600 37 3x Greenville 453 44 838 36 2x Illinois Benedictine 106 na 1021 32 Illinois Inst of Tech 12x 3289 2284 4381 412 Illinois Wesleyan U 3x na na 1687 13 na Judson na na 326 21 Kendall na 194 na 1600 100 Knox 842 362 1437 11 4x Lake Forest U 742 319 1224 15 4x Lewis 350 50 2400 184 2x Loyola U 6630 2000 11251 459 MacCormac Junior 7x 400 350 207 6 4x MacMurray College (3) (3) 980 13 4x Millikin U 1371 852 1505 32 8x Monmouth 913 261 1203 23 4x National Col of Education na na 603 2 na North Central 904 387 932 North Park 24 5x 828 na 1080 na Principia 4x 454 na 803 7 3x Rockford (3) (3) 743 20 Robert Morris 3x (2) (2) 406 11 na Roosevelt U 5434 2700 5185 965 4x Rosary 728 2 825 4 4x Saint Xavier 533 (3) 977 21 Shimer na 261 12 375 10 3x Tolentine (2) (2) 102 2 na Trinity College na na 796 U of Chicago 34 na 2947 1146 2144 18 Wheaton 4x 1593 500 1933 10 Northwestern U 4x 21128 9941 9372 90 INDIANA 5x Butler U 4219 2645 2553 111 9x Concordia Senior (2) (z) 436 6 DePauw U na 2180 695 2253 4 4x Earlham 769 na 1168 10 Fort Wayne Bible 4x 279 53 490 49 Franklin 5x 630 270 743 51 4x Hanover 659 310 1034 4 Huntington 5x 337 na 548 29 Indiana Central 4x 440 193 2334 265 4x Indiana Last of Tech 1102 998 636 40 4x Marian . 247 1 923 Manchester 26 3x 831 223 1410 23 4x Oakland City 180 64 645 42 6x Rose-Hulman Inst of Tech 550 400 1100 25 Saint Francis 5x (3) (3) 943 90 Saint Joseph's 4x 601 301 1197 38 3x Saint Joseph's Calumet (2) (2) 1665 182 Saint Mary's na ------646 na 1874 0 na (2) Not in existence (3) College for Women

370 1697

1947-48 19'ri-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Indiana (continued) Saint Meinrad 148 na 259 5 5x Taylor U 449 na 1420 12 5x U of Evansville 2694 na 4672 335 7x U of Notre Dame 4220 3587 6439 108 3x Valparaiso U 1851 876 3729 52 4x

IOWA Briar Cliff 338 na 957 139 4x Buena Vista 535 326 884 44 6x Central 513 na 1256 23 4x Coe 1313 400 1323 59 3x Dordt na na 970 15 na Grand View na na 1214 110 na Iowa Wesleyan 580 328 687 32 4x Loras na na 1476 93 3x Harycrest 508 31 961 25 4x Morningside 1477 na 1612 119 3x Mount Mercy 126 na 649 49 3x Mount Saint Clare 221 na 260 6 3x Northwestern na na 691 26 14x Ottuma Heights 101 1 375 1:: 4x Simpson 712 274 957 35 5x U of Dubuque 681 215 904 99 4x Upper Iowa U 474 264 879 60 6x Wartburg 554 146 1361 49 3x Westmar 402 132 979 34 4x

KANSAS Baker U 648 na 868 15 4x Bethany 400 95 689 22 4x Bethel 438 na 481 8 4x College of Emporia 424 132 631 60 4x Donnelly (2) (2) 627 80 na Friends U 577 264 923 54 5x Kansas Wesleyan 514 255 568 37 4x na Marymount (3) (3) 592 26 McPherson 406 74 578 21 4x Ottawa U 660 227 759 20 5x Sacred Heart 82 na 624 61 5x Saint John's 277 26 283 8 4x Saint Mary 379 na 602 15 3x Saint Mary of the Plains (2) (2) 467 na na Sterling 324 90 524 32 4x Tabor 343 4 412 6 5x

KENTUCKY Bellarmine na na 1655 234 na 4x Berea 1163 294 1449 31 4x Brescia 167 na 957 116 (2) Not in existence (3) College for Women

371 1698

1947-48 1921-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions ------Cost '- by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Kentucky (continued) Campbellsville 225 na 856 65 Cumberland 435 145 1820 194 3x Lees Junior na na 423 9 Midway Junior 20 na 187 1 Southeastern Christian na na 122 6 Spalding 891 na 763 26 10x Sue Bennett 172 47 181 8 '4x Thomas More 399 76 1812 198 6x Translvania 548 297 775 14 Union 437 242 708 42 7x

LOUISIANA Dillard U 636 103 984 35 4x Tulane U 3875 1767 4252 137 6x

MAINE , Bowdoin 1080 365 1007 9 4x - Colby 1084 150 1538 10 '4x; Hasson (3) (3) 878 18 4x Saint Francis na na 564 20 -na

MARYLAND College of Notre Dame 419 3 549 0 3x Columbia Union 720 na 1011 81 6x.-- Goucher 741 8 1020 0 Hood 538 na 550 1 3x Johns Hopkins U 1757 1083 2020 25 4x Kirkland Hall na na 101 4 -na Md Inst College of Art 511 266 907 66 10x Mount Saint Mary's 628 '413 1131 64 Peabody Consery of Mnsic 672 231 292 12 . na Saint John's 270 183 356 12 Saint Mary's Sem & U 370 na 226 5 4x U of Baltimore 1687 na 3757 893 Washington na na 781 10 Western Maryland 871 295 1120 11 5x

MASSACHUSETTS

Amherst 1161 575 1232 17. 3x Anna Maria 36 na 580 15 na Babson 557 434 964 73 Bradford Junior 271 0 324 0 '.3x Boston U 14377 2000 13138 532 4x Clark U 857 na 2433 32 5x' College of the Holy Cross 1079 939 2379 13 3x Dean Junior Col na na 909 26 'na Emmanuel 758 0 1225 0 Endicott Junior 296 0 820 0 3x Gordon 365 na 813 28 5x

(3) College for Women

372 1699

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions - - - Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Massachusetts (continued) Harvard U 5600 3326 6073 89 4x Merrimack 134 84 2100 48 10x 2x Nichols 257 155 702 85 Northeastern U 8806 7176 29306 4400 3x 3x Smith. 2169 (3) 2329 (3) Stonehill na na 1591 12 na Suffolk U 1507 1356 2897 379 3x Tufts U 2512 1672 3698 32 7x Wentworth Institute 815 na 1530 147 8x Western New England 630 347 2405 441 13x Wheelock 351 0 783 0 2x Worcester Junior 544 411 936 94 Worcester Poly Tech 860 619 1878 24 3x

MICHIGAN 4x Albion 1259 510 1809 10 11 4x Alma, 664 305 1328 5x Andrews U 1033 na 1557 114 4x Aquinas 575 183 1430 185 3x Calvin 1394 483 3306 124 6x Detroit Inst of Tech 2825 1604 1148 140 4x Hillsdale 715 279 1043 45 4x Hope. 1189 437 2101 43 Lawrence Inst of Tech 2496 1873 4107 1019 2x 3x Madonna 219 na 727 15 3x Mercy College of Detroit 237 na 1620 54 5x Nazareth 312 na 432 7 3x Olivet 330 na 832 28 3x Siena Heights 382 na 567 43 2x Suomi 167 65 399 26 5x U of.Detroit 8339 4605 6977 655 3x Wood Junior 175 na 224 10

MINNESOTA 5x Augsburg 907 362 1520 97 3x College of St. Catherine 800 20 1367 1 3x College of St. Scholastica 450 7 915 33 3x College of St. Teresa 569 1 987 2 3x College of St. Thomas 2116 1419 2024 10 4 3x Concordia 1121 602 2402 17 5x Gustavus Adolphus 1263 511 1918 13 5x Hamline U 1193 na 1283 29 5x Macalester 1571 637 2096 11 4x Saint Olaf 1660 564 2650 5

MISSISSIPPI 8x Lane na na 921 64 4x Millsaps 800 339 996 44 8x Mississippi College 1411 na 1909 152 13 5x Rust 205 61 747 3x Tougaloo 378 na 752 17 (3) College for Women

373 1700

1947-48 19/1-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

MISSOURI Avila 239 (3) 750 14 3x Central Methodist 823 na 806 47 na Columbia College 357 na 658 19 3x Culver-Stockton 504 216 682 46 4x Evangel (2) (2) 1228 33 na Fontbonne 368 0 738 0 2x Kansas City Art Inst 590 374 593 49 4x Kemper Military 140 na 130 3 -- Lindenwood Colleges 483 (3) 651 22 3x Marillac (3) Missouri Valley 563 282 846 31 3x Notre Dame 70 (1) 340 1 na Park 577 108 604 32 6x Rockhurst 790 493 1147 96 6x St. Louis 338 247 625 36 3x St. Mary's of O'Fallon (3) (3) 353 47 na School of the Ozarks 550 (4) 1130 60 na Stephens 2126 2 2052 2 3x Webster 351 na 1091 55 4x Westminster 584 342 685 9 3x MONTANA College of Great Falls 434 154 1031 186 2x Rocky Mountain 205 149 550 30 3x

NEBRASKA College of Saint Mary 125 na 560 11 4x Concordia Teachers 168 19 1737 28 6x Creighton U 2193 1394 2687 87 3x Dana 287 5 848 35 4x Doane 459 157 711 21 4x Hastings 760 290 826 8 4x Midland Lutheran 446 165 821 29 4x Nebraska Wesleyan U 830 297 1177 22 6x Union College 1270 na 810 49 4x NEW HAMPSHIRE Dartmouth 3167 1847 3987 . 95 4x Rivier 128 na 666 23 4x Saint Anselm's 575 431 1674 85 5x NEW JERSEY Bloomfield 200 80 1698 150 4x Centenary (3) College of Si. Elizabeth (3) Fairleigh Dickinson U na na 16115 2040 na Georgian Court 235 na 730 1 2x Monmouth 723 319 5020 331 5x (2) Not inexistence (3) College for Women (4) Was a high school

374 1701

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

New Jersey Rider na na 3670 213 na Stevens /nst of Tech 1480 na 1299 23 3x Union College 775 na 3624 507 -- Upsala 1757 956 2027 115 5x

NEW MEXICO College of Santa Fe 148 90 1265 188 3x

NEW YORK Academy of Aeronautics 835 751 1198 390 3x Adelphi U 2574 355 7855 476 3x Bard 293 75 773 3 2x Canisius na na 3126 266 6x Cazenovia 175 0 480 0 4x Clarkson 1757 1298 2323 67 3x Colgate U 1443 1000 2269 6 ix Columbia U 3919 2604 4799 264 5x College of New Rochelle 861 0 967 0 3x College of White Plains 387 0 479 0 2x Concordia 141 20 433 4 4x Cooper Union na na 915 24 na Dominican of Blauvelt (2) (2) 636 20 na Dowling (2) (2) 1164 146 na D'Youville 449 na 1293 5 7x Eisenhower (2) (2) 773 13 na Elizabeth Seton (2) (2) 360 0 Ila Elmira 593 185 2558 178 3x Finch 280 7 344 0 2x Fordham U 6542 3199 8371 944 3x Hamilton 599 359 941 19 4x Hartwick 591 265 1687 20 4x Hobart and Wm Smith na na 1658 19 3x Hofstra U 2231 1396 11963 904 9x Houghton 762 200 1202 17 2x Iona 1562 1300 3107 172 6x Juilliard 1035 na 662 9 2x Keuka 430 0 778 0 4x Kirkland na na (3) (3) Le Moyne 446 268 1723 50 10x Long Island U 3750 2083 5289 696 5x Manhattan 2658 1788 3668 222 5x Manhattanville na na 1093 4 na Maria (2) (2) 380 8 na Marist 32 4 1515 198 5x Marymount Manhattan (1) (1) 720 1 na Medaille na na 497 11 na Mercy (2) (2) 1583 80 na Molloy

(I) Was a junior college (2) Not in existence 1702

1947-48 1971-72 Envalment Enrollment Multiple Institutions "COst by State Total Veterans Total Veterans InCresses New York (continued) Nazareth of Rochester 522 na 1415 2 4x Niagara U 1492 959 2417 Pace 95 6x 6893 4440 6512 1045 8i Packer 127 0 75 0 5x Paul Smith's 265 170 1123 96 Poly Inst of Brooklyn 2x 3670 2411 2061 140 4x Rensselear Poly Inst 3972 2929 3439 37 Roberts Wesleyan 3x (1) (1) 655 20 Rochester Inst of Tech na 5812 2750 10040 1710 Rogers 5x (2) (2) 236 1 na Rosary Hill 44 na 1249 48 Russell Sage '6x 724 128 1355 1 St. Bonaventure U 3x 1513 1100 2194 na St. Francis 2x 878 500 2580 250 4x St. Joseph's 560 na 530 2 4x St. Lawrence U 1245 614 2290 21 St. Thomas Aquinas 4x (2) (2) 660 8 na Surah Lawrence 353 3 772 5 Siena 3x. 2720 1947 1910 Syracuse U 109 5x na na 8821 204 .na Trocaire na na 442 1 U of Rochester na 4826 1295 5338 232 Utica 4x 1429 663 2628 297 Vassar 6x 1370 44 2106 13 3x Villa Maria na na 560 14 Wagner na 1352 827 3588 96 Webb Inst of Naval Archit nil, 70 na 82 2 Wails na (2) New York U 26438 14359 10932 463 St. John's U 5699 3325 8594 335 NORTH CAROLINA Brevard 467 248 531 7 3x Campbell 583 101 2401 275 Catawba 5x 788 na 1133 31 4x Chowan na na 1545 55 4x Davidson 957 na 1057 5 Duke U 3x 4008 na 5186 51 3x Greensboro 369 (3) 590 15 3x Guilford 592 284 1740 305 4x High Point 859 na 1060 60 3% Johnson C. Smith U 825 120 1036 55 4x Lees-McRae 244 na 670 8 3x Lenoir Rhyne 843 438 1395 87 3x Livingstone 389 10 745 13 5x Mars Hill 1051 250 1467 75 5x Methodist (2) (2) 756 59 na Montreat-Anderson 321 na 313 10 Mount Olive 4x ----- na na 328 20 na (1) Was a junior college (2) Not in existence (3) Collegefor Women

376 1703

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions ------Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

North Carolina (continued) North .Carolina Wesleyan (2) (2) 623 50 na Peace 260 0 506 0 3x

Pfeiffer 338 na 1088 68 . 4x Queens na na 672 0 na Saint Andrews Presbyterian (2) (2) 892 16 na Salem 397 32 530 1 .3x Wake Forest U 1700 1043 2814 42 4x Warren Wilson 190 na 361 6 4x Wingate 352 122 1667 52 3x.

NORTH DAKOTA Jamestown 500 na 536 19 5x Mary (1) (1) 534 43 na

OHIO Ashland 562 250 2544 70 4x Baldwin-Wallace 1729 863 3135 132 4x Bluffton 306 na 676 10 5x Capitol 1081 301 1868 55 5x Cedarville 149 47 970 45 4x Col of Mt St Joseph 434 1 794 3 4x Col of Steubenville 318 218 1304 79 6x Col of Wooster 1330 na 1796 na 3x Defiance 699 400 1049 73 5x Denison 1339 450 2098 3 3x Edgecliff 350 na 800 5 4x Findlay 372 na 1175 67 7x Heidelberg 807 na 1240 54 5x John Carroll U 2246 1488 3210 187 2x Kenyon 633 304 1294 9 4x Malone (2) (2) 836 38 na Marietta 1228 752 1913 25 4x Mary Manse 608 9 554 3 3x Mount Union 944 330 1304 9 3x Muskingum 952 na 1268 20 4x Notre Dame 305 (3) 605 (3) 2x Oberlin 2083 800 2592 20 4x Ohio Dominican 256 (3) 965 36 ,s7x Ohio Wesleyan 2121 507 2543 10 4x Otterbein 1039 401 1400 67 4x Rio Grande 194 112 750 20 5x St John of Cleveland 517 0 348 4 Walsh na na 899 74 na Western (3) (3) 351 0 3x Wilberforce 500 30 1328 60 4x Wittenberg 2385 709 3415 67 na Xavier U 3163 1715 2918 175 4x

OKLAHOMA Oklahoma Baptist U 1328 296 1587 75 2x Oklahoma City U 2131 1388 1780 163 2x (1) Was a junior college (2) not in existence (3) College for Women

117 1704

1947-48 1971-72 ...... Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Oklahoma (continued) Oral Roberts U na na 1336 22 na Phillips U 1126 na 1361 236 4x U of Tulsa 4037 2154 4855 572 3x

OREGON Concordia na na 152 4 na George Fox 162' 33 432 18 4x Lewis and Clark 1060 593 1786 35 4x Marylhurst (3) (3) (3) (3) na Mt Angel 84 na 294 26 6x Pacific U 907 555 1204 86 3x Reed 732 351 1186 15 4x Warner Pacific 198 3 468 33 6x Willamette U 1211 na 1320 17 3x

PENNSYLVANIA Albright 742 395 1338 45 3x Allegheny 1050 250 1750 19 3x Alliance 200 na 585 33 6x Beaver 606 (3) 802 (3) 3x Bryn Mawr 549 na 792 0 3x Cabrini 43 na 394 na 2x Carlow 400 110 1045 1 10x Carnegie-Mellon U 3600 2000 3292 78 3x Chestnut Hill 486 (3) 626 (3) na Delaware Valley 180 68 1224 104 3x Drexel U 4119 na 6989 815 4x Elizabethtown 359 20 1514 94 3x Franklin and Marshall 1302 1016 1915 35 4x Geneva 1445 709 1605 99 4x Gettysburg 1203 na 1903 10 4x Haverford 450 10 700 2 2x Holy Family na na 752 0 na Immaculata 354 0 1473 0 3x Juniata 662 265 1222 17 5x Keystone Junior 511 267 1153 68 3x King's 555 464 2669 312 7x Lafayette na na 1934 26 na LaRoche na na 402 21 na La Salle na na 3781. 267 na Lebanon Valley 817 445 1017 17 5x Lycoming 798 379 1432 35 3x Marywood 710 15 1498 5 3x Mercyhurst 401 .0 954 30 3x Moravian 369 310 1345 58 3x Mt Aloysius Junior 87 0 509 18 3x Muhleriberg 1285 991 1605 54 3x PMC 868 724 2661 482 2x

(3) College for Women

378 1705

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Pennsylvania (continued) Phila Col of Textiles and Science 432. na -AO 320 6x Phila Musical Academy na na 282 12 na Point Park (2) (2) 2000 423 na St Joseph's na na 2015 68 na St Vincent 841 510 986 45 3x Susquehanna U 432 na 1342 47 4x Swarthmore 1068 389 1166 10 3x Thiel 586 200 1384 13 4x U of PennaylWania fill na 7720 371 na U of Scranton 2328 1808 2392 227 2x Ursinus 986 438 1137 22 3x Valley Forge Military Jr 50 na 110 na na Villa Maria 286 0 659 2 3x Villanova U 3488 1509 7450 409 3x Washington & Jefferson na na 1094 18 na Waynesburg 889 518 1057 67 3x Wilkes 1102 500 2575 125 3x Wilson 481 0 455 0 3x York 444 0 2514 309 7x 9x Duquesne U 4537 2961 5191 541 PUERTO RICO Catholic U of P.R. na na 4923 446 na Inter American U 489 na 12775 1041 3x

RHODE ISLAND Providence 1979 1012 2543 237 na Salve Regina na na 989 167. na

SOUTH CAROLINA Benedict 768 200 1487 106 6x Coker 383 37 410 14 3x COnverse 448 0 778 0 3x Erskine 489 na 714 21 3x Furman U 1326 na 2245 73 3x Newberry 642 300 804 25 4x North Greenville Jr 200 na 612 59 4x Presbyterian 515 262 857 21 4x Voorhees na na 736 43 na Wofford 762 31 1030 46 4x

SOUTH DAKOTA Augustana 887 400 2051 85 5x Dakota Wesleyan 501 200 569 29 3x Freeman Junior 78 4 56 2 4x Huron 436 na 730 42 3x Mount Marty 48 0 524 16 5x Presbyterian (2) (2) 359 15 na Sioux Falls 458 na 955 133 3x Yankton 427 188 502 24 4x

(2) Not in existence

379 1706

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment MUltiple Institutions ------'Copt by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

TENNESSEE Aquinas Junior na na 309 56 na Beluent (2) (2) 882 62 na Bethel 383 110 471 48 4x Bryan na na 455 32 na Carson-Newman 799 232 1728 90 4x Covenant (2) (2) 394 18 na David Lipscomb 722 228 2196 59 3x Fisk U 971 na 1324 15 4x Freed-Hardman 373 130 851 15 4x. Hiwassee 238 69 614 37 4x Johnson Bible 145 na 239 14 6x Lambuth 373 125 834 23 5x : LeMoyne-Owen 372 131 713 50 4x Lincoln Memorial U 554 207 634 51 4x :1 Maryville 898 255 833 18 12x Milligan 507. 203 758 25 4x Scarritt 56 na 75 4 3x Tennessee Temple 135 33 1286 128 8x Tennessee Wesleyan na na 691 43 na Trevecca Nazarene 397 80 760 35 6x Tusculum 458 170 560 17 4x' Union U . 886 375 862 51 v3x7 U of the South 515 279 938 16 3x Vanderbilt U 2965 1344 4585 48

TEXAS Abilene Christian 1614 800 2949 243 '5x Baylor U 4781 2556 6380 304 2x Concordia (2) (2) 260 8 na Dallas Baptist na na 2611 94 .na Dominican 150 na 374 na 7x East Texas Baptist na na 735 57 na Ft Worth Christian na na 86 3 na Hardin-Simmons U 2405 na 1401 119 3x Huston-Tillotson 659 188 717 20 5x Incarnate Word 679 29 1196 100 -- Jarvis Christian 220 40 645 16 8x Lubbock Christian na na 1126 46 na Mary Hardin Baylor 517 0 763 62 2x McMurray 622 168 1296 135 3x Our Lady of the Lake 400 29 1240 172 3x Southern Methodist U 9011 5231 10016 505 4x Southwestern 858 301 862 28 3x Texas Christia U 4084 2159 5443 232 3x Texas Lutheran 290 30 1017 22 5x Trinity U 1966 691 2479 120 10x U of Corpus Christi na na 565 64 na U of St Thomas 80 5 1446 79 9x Wayland Baptist 501 132 746 45 4x William Marsh Rice U 1483 639 2562 12 na ------(2) Not in existence

380 1707

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple InstitUiions ------Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

UTAH Brigham Young U 4815 na 22627 1322 2x Westminster 308 50 813 125 7x

VERMONT Bennington 324 2 600 2 4x Marlboro 56 50 225 4 na Middlebury 1180 494 1846 25 4x Norwich U 616 321 1028 8 4x St Michael's 740 458 1269 33 4x s VIRGINIA Averett 396 30 889 55 3x Bridgewater 512 185 877 11 4x Emory 6 Henry 672 267. 799 32 3x Hollins 370 0 1091 0 3x Lynchburg 663 325 1730 77 4x Mary Baldwin 340 na 764 na 3x Marymount of Virginia na na 580 0 na Randolph-Macon 537 302 784 8 3x Roanoke 624 250 1355 81 4x Saint Paul's 454 128 512 13 5x Southern Seminary Jr 250 0 300 0 2x U of Virginia 3871 na 6576 188 na Virginia Wesleyan (2) (2) 626 37 na Washington E. Lee 1332 767 1610 86 3x

WASHINGTON Fort Wright 200 0 339 7 3x Gonzaga U 1184 1079 2232 130 3x St Martin's 397 na 574 91 4x Seattle Pacific 913 228 1692 76 4x Seattle U 2469 687 2306 343 10x Walla Walla 1156 478 1852 127 Whitworth 748 298 1352 94 4x

WEST VIRGINIA Alderson-Broaddus 186 78 1067 79 4x Bethany 815 na 1138 7 4x Davis 6 Elkins 844 452 815 21 4x Morris Harvey 2638 781 3095 308 3x Ohio Valley na na 151 6 na Wheeling na na 683 9 na

WISCONSIN Alverno 323 0 1101 3 4x Beloit 1097 na 1768 13 3x Carroll 861 425 1259 15 3x Carthage 712 276 1342 104 4x Dominican 161 0 795 25 7x

(2) Not in existence

381 1708

1947-48 1971-72 Enrollment Enrollment Multiple Institutions Cost by State Total Veterans Total Veterans Increases

Wisconsin (continued) Edgewood 115 0 437 8 4x Holy Family na na 606 25 na Marian of Fond du Lac 158 0 550 9 9x Marquette U 6983 4002 8032 388 na Milton 365 228 836 72 4x Mount Mary 959 6 791 4 2x Mount Senario na na 228 12 na Northland 366 158 632 25 5x Ripon 684 190 1027 3x St Norbert 841 na 1659 33 4x Viterbo 129 na 485 na 2x

TOTALS: 588,776 232,215 1,046,645 62,166

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

1947-48 1971-72

Peak post-World War I/ college College enrollment of veterans-- enrollment of veterans--1,245,000 917,000 (DVB IS 24-71-8)*

Slightly more than 50% of veterans Slightly more than 20% (21.1%) of enrolled in independent colleges veterans enro/led in independ- ent colleges (DVB IB 24-71-8)*

All independent colleges enrolled Independent colleges enrolled about slightly more than 50% of all students one-third of degree students

Veterans benefits provide up to $1175 Veterans benefits provide $1575-- an increase of about 30%

Total costs at independent colleges Total costs of education at 90% of competitive with public colleges independent colleges have in- creased 300Z or more since 1947-48

In the 620 independent colleges The 620 colleges show veterans responding to this survey (1,000) comprise less than 10% of their veterans approximated one-half total enrollment their total enrollment

*Department of Veterans Benefits, InfonunionBulletin, September 8, '971. 1709 Mr. HELSTOSKI. We are pleased to have as our firstwitness, Mr: 'Olney B. Owen, chief benefits director of the Veterans'Administration, who is charged with the overall responsibility for theadmMistration of these educational programs. I think it would behelpful and of interest to the members if Mr. Owen could at the outset give us abrief lip-to-date report on the progress of the current programfor our Viet- nam era veterans and,in his discussion of the legislative proposals on the agenda, we will be pleased to receive anyspecific recommendations he may be in a position to make on behalf of the Administratorof Vet- erans' Affairs, Mr. Owen. STATEMENT OF OLNEY B. OWEN, CHIEF BENEFITS DIRECTOR,VET- ERANS' ADMINISTRATION, ACCOMPANIED BY: X. C. PECKARSKY, DEPUTY CHIEF BENEFITS DIRECTOR ; J. T. TAAITE, IR.,DIREC- TOR, COMPENSATION, PENSION, AND EDUCATIONSERVICE; A. T. BRONAUGH, ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL; JOHN IL KERBY, ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL Mr. OWEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Before I proceed, Imight introduce my associates. On my immediate right is Mr. Al Bronaugh, associate general counsel of the Veterans' Administration; on my im- mediate left, Charlie Peckarsky, deputy chief benefits director,and adjacent to him is Mr. James T. Taaffe Jr., the director of compen- sation pension and education serviceof the department of veterans benefits. I. will be pleased to give you a summary of the education program to date. Let me say, of course drat we had a GI billproviding bene- fits for the World War IIveteran and, also, for the Korean veteran. The authority to provide benefits under those bills has expired. In 1966in fact effective June 1, 1966the Congress enactedthe current GI bill. It is basically provided in three chapters oftitle 38, U.S. Code. Chapter 31 provides vocational rehabilitationtraining to the seriously disabled veteran, who by definition are those 50 percent or more disabled due to serviceconnected disability. For those less than 30 percent disabled, there must be a definite finding for need of vocational training to overcome a pronounced employment handicap. Chapter 34 is sometimes referred to as the general education bill. This provides payment of an allowance for a veteran attending college or high school or vocationaltraining, on-the-job training, farm train- ing, flight training. We provide payments each month for thesevarious benefits, except in some instances where we pay on completion of a correspondence course by the quarter orcompletion of flight training or part-time training; in lumps= payments. We provide benefits toservicemen who train under the GI bill provisions. Chapter 35 relates primarily to the wives of prisoners of war or per- sons missing inaction or the widows of veterans who died with service- connected disability, wives of those who are 100-percent disabled due to service-connected disabilities also, to theorphans and children of t1i e. similar type situations. We have what we think has been an excellent participationin the icurrent GI bill. It is now at a little better than 35 percentparticipa- 71-815-72-25 383 1710 tion. This is comparable to the participation in the Korean bill at the same stage and also the World War II bill. We have had tremendous interest or participation in the college- kvel training. In fact, better than 60 percent ofour participants are at this level. We have had a tremendous increase in the past yearor so in. the on-the-job trainin(t. We hope to further stimulate this participation. We have provided outreach under the current bin thatwe did not provide under the other bills. This isan effort on the part of the VA to take the message of the benefits available not only as to educa- tion but medical care compensation. pension, housing, and insur- ance to the veteranmide.ven to the serviceman while still in service whereby they are fully informed of the benefits thatare available and, hopefully, they will take advtange of these. We have stressed .education in particular becausewe know from the experience of the other bills that this will better the lot of this particular serviceman in society as he re-adjusts and chooses his place LE society. We have had participation by all segments of the population, the below-college level, even those who have not completed high school. Even as to race we have had good participation,as between whitt!s and blacks and So on. 'This, Mr. Chairman, gives you a current readingon the education program. Mr. IIELgrosiu. Thank you, Mr. Owen. Do you want to continue with your statement ? Mr. OWEN. Thank you. Mr. Chairman and members of the sub- committee It is a pleasure to appear before you today to present the views of the Veterans' AdministratiOn on various bills pending beforeyour cominittee which would amend the current GI bill educational program. These proposals generally have as an Objective the encouragement of our returning veteransand their widows and orphansto take education and training which will fit them for productive and reward- ing employment in our civilianeconomy. I would therefore like to review briefly the extem to which these deservingmen and women now are taking advantage of benefits already enacted by theCongress. Since enactment in March, 1966 the Vietnani era GI bill has provided education and training to 1.8 million Vietnam veterans, together with. an additional 8,000,000 vqerans who left service after 1955. The participation rate has shot upward byany index. In the past 3 years, the participation rate of Vietnam era veterans, on a cumulative basis, has risen from 16 percent to 35.2 percent. There is evidence tha,;, men are entering training more quickly after discharge; the first year participation rate in this period hasrisen by 25 percent. The GI bill, moreover, has fitted the aspirations and talents not only of the college- bound individual but also of the man who wants technical training, who wants a job with built-in training opportunities, and theman who Wants to finish 4.h-school and learn a trdae. The enrollment of veter- ans in on-the-job trainin,t (OJT) has risen IV 121 percent in fiscal year 1969-1971, from667000 to146,000. The enrollment in courses below college level has risen from 330,000 to 522,000.

384 This impressive record results. we believe,from the motivation and drive of our veterans, encouraged by the active concern of the Cono Tess and the President. To assure that. this momentum ismaintained, the Congress and President 'have acted on two occasions since the present GI bill was enacted in 1966 to adjust GI bill allowances to the rising costs of living, and education. Over this period, the basic monthly allowance for a single veteran rose bv 75 percent, from $100 to $1751 with matching increases for dependents. The President has been keenly aware that despite these massive in- creases, veterans do not have it easy on most campuses. Studies by the Veterans' Administration show that veterans often must augment their income by part-time employment., We recognize the.GIbillwas not designedand given the diversity of tuition charges among. schools, could not be equitably designedto cover all of a veterans educational costs. Nevertheless, the-President has been greatly con- cerned that rises in living costs since the last adjustment of February, 1970, not tip the balance adversely against a. veteran's decision .to enter or continue training. There .are other adjustments in the basic pro- ()Tam needed to improve educational opportunities; including those provided service-disabled veterans and those extended for war widows and orphans. Accordingly, this administration has designed an omnibus bill to nwet this very real concern shared by your committee and the Pres- ident. The bill is divided into four titles. The first title would increase the present rates of subsistence allowance plyable to veterans training under chapter 31 of title 38. would increase the educational assistance allowance payable to veterans pursuing educational programs wider chapter 34, and would increase the educational assistance allowance payable to wives, widows, orphans and children of veterans pursuing educe,tional programs under chapter 35; Title II would permit act; yance payment of the subsistence and educational assistance allow- ances payable under chapters 31, 34 and 3 5 to veteran-trainees, veter- ans, wives, widows, orphans and children ; title III contains a number of proposed improvements in the G.I bill educational proo-ram; and title IV sets out various effective dates for the changes wiiich would result from this pinposal. The rate increase proposals which we have included in title I of our draft would, in general, pinvide increases approximating 8.6 percent' for veteran-trainees under chapter 31 Imd for veterans, widows, wives,' orphans, and children training under chapters 34 and 35. This increase reflects the rise in consumer prices since the last increase in education and tarining benefits. A larger increase is proposed for veterans who are pursuing on-job and apprentice training programs, where expe- rience has sgown that the grwtest need and a requirement for further sthnuhis of job opportunities for veterans. We believe that such rate increases are in accord with the policy a.nd puiposes sought to be accomplished under phase II of the President's : econoniic control program. . It is .estimated that the rate changes which are pinposed in title I of the dinit bill would cost approximately $175 million for the first ful I year. Title II of the draftbill would authorize the Administrator to make initial advance paymenis o the subsistence allowance to veterans train-

385 1712 ing under chapter 31 and of the educational assistance allowance to veterans, widows, wives, orphans, and children pursuing educational programs under chapters 34 and 35. The advance would 'be limited to those individuals whoare pursuing educational training on a half-time or more basis and would consist of the partial or "stub" month payment covering the month in which the pursuit of the proot'ram of education or training is tocommence plus 1 full month's benefit. Thereafter, payments of subsistenceor educational assistance allowance would be made at the beginning of each month in which the trainee, veteran, or eligible person pursues his program. The advance would not be made earlier than the first day of the month in which pursuit of the program of education or training is to commence and would be made only upon receipt of proof that the eligible veteran or eligible person has, in fact, been enrolled inan approved educational institution. Administrative controls over tIt e. program have been provided by permitting the Administrator to withhold the final payment of an en- rollment period until proof of satisfactory pursuit has been submitted and, in cases where the eligible veteran or person fails to pursue the course after receiving an advance, the advance may be recovered from any other benefit otherwise due such individual under any law admin- istered by the Veterans' Administration. Otherwise, such overpayment would constitute a. liability of such individual and may be recovered in the same manner as any other debt due the United 8tates. Present certifications for veterans pursuing programs of flight or correspondence training under chapter 34 would continue to be required. No cost would be incurred if title II were to be enacted, but addi- tional outlays would be required in the first fiscal year of approxi- mately $89 million because of advances made in that year which would normally not be paid until the following fiscal year. This amount would, however, be recouped from subsequent payments made to these veterans or eliaible persons. The proposrtl incorporated in section 202 of this title is virtually identical with the proposal which we transmitted to the Congresson January 26, 1971. It has, however, been tightened up to some degree in that the present proposal requires proof of the enrollment of the individual before the advance may be made. We believe it is only equitable to extend this advance pay principle to the vocational trainees and wives, widows and children instead of limiting it to chapter 34 veterans, as provided by our original presentation. In title III of our proposal, we are recommending various amend- ments to the current GI bill educational program designed to: Place correspondence trainina on a partial reimbursement basisas presently provided in other GI rnll education programs; liberalize the restric- tions on enrollment of veterans and persons in schools which have moved their locations; modify measurement of certain limitedvoca- tional courses; extend on-job and apprentice training to certain wives and widows and children; extend secondary level training andcor- respondence training to certain wives and widows; eliminate manda- tory counseling for certain children; permit lump-sum benefitpay-

386 1713 ments to wives, widows and childrenpursuing less than half-time training ; and make certain technical changes. For the convenience of the committee, wehave attached, as appen- dix A, a detailed analysis including cost dataand a statement of our reasons for advocatingyourfavorable consideration of these several title III provisions. Tihs appendix alsoincludes an explanation of the provisions of title IV which would set the effectivedates for this legislation. At this time I would like to submit appendixA with the request that it be made a part of our record. Mr. HELSTOSKL Without objection, it is so ordered. Mr. OWEN. Mr. Chairman, I would like to turn mypresentation to the various proposals pending before your committee onwhich you have requested the views of the Veterans'Administration. These billS have been summarized in appendix B which is alsoattacheti to my statement. -.'At this time I would like to request thatappendix B be made a part of the record. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Without objection, it is so ordered. Mr. OWEN. With your permission, I would like toapproach these measures in the same order asprovided in our draft proposal; namely, rate increases, advance pay, and programadjustments. H.R. 11571 would amend section 1504 (b) ofchapter 31 to increase the rate of vocational rehabilitation subsistenceallowance by an aver- age of from 5 to 6 percent.It would also amend various sections of chapter 34 to increase the educational assistanceallowance for pursuit of mstitutional, cooperative, active duty, correspondence,farm co- operative, on-job, apprenticeship, and PREP courses: The basic rate for many of these areas would be increased from the current rateof $175 to $220 per month. In most areas the increaseswould range from 25.7 to 35.8 percenthigher in the case of dependentsin excess of two. However, in the farm cooperative on-job andapprentice areas the increases amount to only 5.5percent: The bill would also amend chapter 35 to increase benefit rates for wives, widows, and children ranogm between 19.9 and 35.8 percent.No increase would be provided under the bill in the entitlement charge rate or those veterans pursuing flight trainina programs. H.R. 10169 would amend section 1504(b) of chapter 31 toinmase the rates of vocational rehabilitation subsistence allowanceranging from 12.8 to 20.8 percent. This measure would also require the Ad- ministrator to annually adjust such rates in accordance with the aver- age percentage change in the cost ofliving for the preceding calendar year. H.R. 10168 would amend section 1682 (a) of chapter 34 toincrease the rates of educational assistance allowance for veteranspursuing institutional training on a half-time-or-more basis and cooperative trainina. The increases would range from 20 to 30 percent. Thebill would tilso provide for reinibursement for these veterans for the costs of necessary textbooks; would require the Administrator toannually adjust such rates in accordance with the average changein the cost of tuition and the cost of living for the preceding year;and would provide a maximum of 48 months of educational entitlementfor veterans.

387 1714

H.R.. 9824 would adda new section 1688A. to chapter 34 providing for paymentsup to $3,000 for an ordinary school year tocover 'costs incurred for tuition, laboratory and other feesand expenses, exclusive of board, lodging, and other hyingor travel expenses for those vet- erans who served in the Indochina theater of operations duringthe Vietnam era. In addition to this benefit,the measure also provides for designating the present educational assistanceallowance as a sub- sistence allowance and increasing thecurrent rates substantially for these veterans. Increases in subsistencerates for institutional training would range from 22.2 to 86 percent andeven higher in a few instances. Ceiling would be set on the amount of combinedwages and subsistence allowance an eligible veteranmay receive. H.R. 9779 would provide rate increases of59.1 percent across the board for pursuit of institutional, cooperative,farm cooperative, on-job and apprenticeship training byveterans, as well as rate increases of nearly 58.3 percent for correspondence trainingby veterans service- men on active duty, and veterans trainingon less than alialf-time basis. Rate increases for wives, widows,and children training under chapter 35 wouldrange from 58.3 to 59.3 percent. All rate increases would become effective for months commencingafter December 1971, and further increases would be provided bya percentage equal to any increase in the minimuinwage enacted after January 1072. Mr. Chairman,we oppose the enactment of these measures. For the most part, they propose rate increases far inexcess of price increases. As I stated earlier, the Veterans' Administrationfavors increases in benefit rates, but believes they should. inmost eases, be adjusted to an amount which would compensate for price increaseswhich have occurred since benefitswere last increased on Februa7 1, 1970. Instead of the rate proposed in these bills,we wouli favor the rate increases proposed in our draft proposal, with increases beingmade in -all programs and not limited to a fewas proposed in some of the pending measures. We oppose antoniatic adjustments in theserates as proposed in sonie of the bills. This form of adjustment is without precedent in the veterans benefitprograms and we feel it should be considered more carefully before being embodied in legislation for this program. We oppose the payment for tuition and other education costs as returning to the inequities of the World War II GI billpro- ()Tam and the ablises which occurred. We also oppose the increase in the maximum entitlement from 36 to 48 months since thecurrent total is sufficient, in mosteases to take a veteran through a 4-year proaram of colleae education. We further oppose the granting of additional benefii'sto certain veterans who served in certain areas. The period of service. rather than thearea where the veteran served, has been the criterion in awarding benefits. MR. 3349 and MR. 6904 are identicalmeasures which authorize the Administrator to make advance payment of the educational assist- ance allowance to veterans training under chapter 34 on a half-time- or-more basis. These bills are also identical with a draft pmposal which the Veterans' Administration transinitted to Congress by letters to the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate dated Janu- 'ary 26, 1971. The proposal on advance pay which we have made .in title. II ofour draft bill is virtually identical with that contained in H.R. 3349 and

388 1715 Ha 6904, except that we have 'extendedthe payment propOsal to veterans training under chapter 31and wives, widows, and children training under chapter 35. We believe thisis a logical extension to these two chapters of the benefitwhich would be exiended only to the chapter 34 beneficiaries under theearlier proposal. In addition, we have tightened to some degree therequirement for entitlement to receipt of the advance payment. Theearlier proposal would permit the payment to be made upon receiptof proof that the veteran had been accepted for enrollment. Ourrevised plan calls for submission of proof that the individual has beenenrolled. It is our view that our current proposalis more equitable in that it extends the advance payment benefit toeligible participants in all three of the educational proaramsunder the GI bill, rather than limiting it to chapter 34. Wefuive also,as I mentioned,tightened the qualification to some degree to provide greateradministrative control over the proaram. H.R. 4223 and H.R. 6130 are identicalbills to authorize an advance educational assistance payment not toexceed $250 to certain veterans training under chapter 34. To qualifyfor the advance, the veteran would have to submit evidenceshowinfr he is an eligible veteran; must certify he is enrolled in, his appliedfor, has been accepted by, or in- tends to enroll in a specified school; mustcertify whether the school defines the courses to be full time andthe number of semester orclock hours he intends to mime; andcertify he has at least 6 months of entitlement remaining. The advancewould be considered a loan to be repaid by deductionin approximately equal amounts,from the veteran',s monthlyeducational assistance allowance. If the veteran fails to qualify for the advance afterreceiving it, or if he fails to pur- sue the program,the amount would be recoupableunder specified procedures. These bills nlso permit a veteran whohas received an advance, is pursuing a full-time prooTam ofeducation, agrees to work up to 15 hours a week, is inneeeof augmentation of his educational benefit to remain in school, andis capable of maintaining goodstanding in school while working, to performservices for the Veterans' Adminis- tration and have his loan canceled atthe rate of $2 for each hour worked. These two bills also provide that all or partof any educational assistance allowance. payment may be madedirectly to an educational institution on behalf of any eligible veteranif the veteran requests it and the school agrees to acceptthe payment. Direct payment would not be made where a veteranis pursuing correspondence courses, where he ia training on aless-than-half-time basis, or where he re- ceived an advance payment. Thedirect payment would be used to cover tuition andother educational costs and expensesthe school usually requires to be paid in fullbefore a nonveteran student is admitted to class. H.R. 10543 is virtually identicalwith S. 3657, 91st Congress, as passed by the Senate, and on which wepresented our views to your subcommittee on September 29, 1970. H.R.10543 is also identical to S. 740, which has been introducedin the 92d Congress. Briefly,, this measure contains anadvance payment plan, a work-study program, permits cancellation of certainFederal education loans through the

389 1716 use of earned GI bill educational entitlement, and makes various, technical and administrative changes in the GI billprogram. Mr. Chairman concerning these advancepay and work-study pro- posals, we wish io reiterateour opposition as presented last year. We. believe that the advance pay provisions contained in title II ofour draft proposal would be more administratively feasible than thoseput forward in these bills cited above and would provide greater controls: to 'prevent overpayments. Concernina work-study, wo strongly support the idea that needy veterans atteriding school under the GI bill should havean opportunity to augment their ncomei through work-study arrangements. The ad- ministration is seriously concerned with the financial plight of all' colleffe students, including veterans, who struggle with the rising costs''of higher educationin their efforts to enter or fmish school. For any student in this difficult situation, help is most effective if it takes. into account his total financial situation.

Under the Higher Education Act of 1965, student assistance in the. form of loan, grant, and work-study proarams reach colleffes through- out the country and already go far to'm meet the needs ''of students,. including veterans. Accordingly, whilewe endorse the objective of the work-study provisions of H.R. 10543, we mustoppose them as dupli- cation of the existing work-study program which is better designed to reach the neediest veteran students and provides them with higher- benefits. Moreover, amendments to the Higher Education Act proposed earlier this year by the administration andnow under consideration by the Congress provide a comprehensive approach to students' fi- nancial probkms througrh loans grants, and work-study assistance which would be more effective, !better targeted, and simpler to ad- minister than the work-study provisions of this boll. The Office of Education estimates that 95 percent of all returninff veterans would be found eligible to participate in the general riigher education programs. We recognize that one intent of the proposed work-study provi- sions of H.R. 10543 is to increase the possibilities for GI studentem- ployment in the Veterans' Administration. While the Veterans' Administration already has a substantial work-studyprogram and hires sizable numbers of returnina veterans,we believe it would be more desirable to diversify our aUthority in this area. Accordingly, our omnibus bill contains a provision permitting the Administrator to employ, as intermittent employees, students enrolled in full-time programs rather than the work-study program as suggested in the bill. Insteild of the basis set forth in elle subject bill for paying these student-veterans, we would recoimnend paying them in accordance with the going rate for the job classification. We believe that in nearly all instances this would be moreper hour than that payable under- the bill. We also oppose the loan cancellation proposal made in H.R. 10543 as we do not believe it is consistent with the purposes of the educational assistance program. It would simply refill the loan coffers of other agencies at an accelerated rate to provide for the nonveteran population more funding and could very well negate the purpose for which many- Federal educational loan programswere designed. 1717 We do favor the provision of the bill which would increase the amount of the loan available to vocational rehabilitation traineesfrom $100 to $200. This provision is included in title I of our omnibus educa- tional amendments. Finally, Mr. Chairman, I would like to address myself to those pro- posals pending before your committee which propose various other changes in the GI bill educational program and on which we have been requested to testify. ' H.R. 7668 and H.R. 10774 areidentical bills to permit wives and widows to pursue secondary level training without charge to entitle- ment. Similar authority has already been granted to educationally 'disadvantaged veterans under chapter 34. This proposal would, we believe, be a logical extension of similar benefits to educationally dis- advantaged wives and widows since they, due to the death or disability of their veteran-husbands, have had to assume the responsibility for support of themselves and their families. These wives andwidows would, thereby, be given an opportunity to obtain the necessary train- ing required for entrance into higher education without losing their eligibility for follow-on college training. In favoring this proposal, we would recommend that the program be limited to training within a State, thereby eliminating pursuit of secondary level training in the Philippines. Nfost of those wives and widows who would be made eligible by this proposal are now over age .50 and the purpose of the program would be of littlebenefit to them. In addition, many of them have' already taken advantage of the voca- tional training benefits already available to them under chapter 35 and thus have been trained for a vocation designed to help them support themselves and their families. Our omnibus bill contains a section almost identical to these bills, limited to such training within a State. H.R. 5188 would amend chapter 35 to permit elinible wives, widows, and children to pursue prooTams of on-the-job'I'and apprenticeship training. The purpose of thebenefit program for wives, widows '. and children is to assist them in preparing to support themselves and their families at a standard of living which the veteran, but for his service, could have expected to provide for his family. We, therefore, favor the extending of the on-the-job and appren- ticeship training opportimities to wives, widows, and children. Our omnibus bill contains provisions similar to H.R. 5188, limited to train- ing within a State. H.R. 10166 would permit eligible wives and widows to pursue pro-

service, by ,cnlisting ina standard:6-year period of Reserve obligation, would only receivetip to 6:molt1 is of basic training in an active.duty for training status. 'Thereafter, he wouldgenerally. be expected to merely attend a designated number ofdrills annually, usually in the evenings or on weekends, andserve a 2-week tour of active duty for training each year fora limited number of years. The (minting of educational benefits premisedon service. such as is proposebdin these bills, would bea departnre from the readjustment concept of the GI bill proffram,since thosepersons serving. for these comparatively short period's of timeon active duty for training would not require readjustment to civilian lifeas is. the case with the man under strict military control for longer periodsof timeffenerally not less than 18 months. We, therefore,oppose enactmentof these bills. . RR. 8282, 9662, 10391, and 10565are bills having as their purpose the restoration of educational entitlementto veterans of World War II and the Korean conflict not utilized by themunder prior provisions of the World War II and Korean conflictGI bills. The primary purpose of both of these earlierprograms was to assist veterans in their readjustment from militaryto civilian life. It should be noted that World War IIwas officially terminated on July 25, 1947approximately 24 years agoand thatthe Korean conflict of- ficially ended January 31, 1955over16 yeal'c ago. Most veterans who served in World War II had untilJuly 25, 1956, or 9years after the official termination dateto complete their education, while most veterans who served during time Koreanera had until January 31, 1965, in which to complete their huining. It is our view that. World War IIveterans and Korean conflictve- teran:, have had ample time topursue education or training to assist them in meeting the concept of therespective GI bills; namely,re- adjustment from.military to civilian life. Weare, therefore, opposed to enactment of any of these bills which wouldreopen these benefits to these veterans. I-I.R. 9894 would have the effect of permittinff thepayment of GI bill educational asistance benefits for full-time ridultevening second- ary school attendance. 'In enacting the Veterans ReadjustmentBenefits Act of 1966,au- thority was given to the Administrator to establishcertain standards for the measurement of high schoolprograms. Pursuant, to that author- ity, the Administrator promulgated reffulationsdefining full-time high school training to consist of at least 725clock hours of instruction per week. and also provided that no enrollment inan adult evening secondary program would be approved inexcess of half-time training. This limitation was subsequently enacted into lawby Public Law 90-77. In enacting Public Law 91-219, the Congress chanffedthe measure- ment of high school courses to premise themon theearnegieunit, but did not see fit to change the restrictionon evening enrollment. We be- lieve that enactment of legislation lifting the restrictioncould very well again lead to abuses of thepaigram, such as those which occured the Korean conflict program, which led to theenactment of the currea limitation:We, therefore, oppose this ILK 2505; 3965, and 10130are identical bills which would, in effect, place the husbands of female veteranson a parity with wives of male 1719 veterans. for, purposes of paymentof veterans benefits in behalfof. a, spouse. .The changewould remove the requirementtimt the husband, be incapable of self-maintenanceand permanently incapableof self-., support due,to mentalor.physical disability toqualify for the depend-

. ency benefit.. . . The. change would have a broadeirect on many proginms adminis- tered by the Veterans' Administration.In the educational program,the. effect would .be to grant tofemale veteran students, who aremarried,' the additional benefit providedfor a dependent. In recent years the circumstanCesof and attitudes toward the em- ployment. of'females have changed considerably. Women, today, gener- ally work because the familyneeds the money, and the incomethey earn is significant. in the support of thefamily. We believe it wouldbe ap-. propriate to drop the requirementof actual dependency for thehus- bands of female veteran students,and we, therefore, would favor en- actment. of this measure. We do not believe that anysignificant benefit costs wouldbe in- curred by enactment of thisbill H.R. 8094, 9613, and 9823 aresimilar purpose bills which would re- Vise the counting of absences in the case of veteranspursuing courses which do not lead to a college degree.They would exclude vacation periods established by the institution inconjunction with certain holi- days in computing the educationalassistance allowance for these veterans. Under current law, no allowance maybe paid to any veteran en- rolled in a course which does not lead to astandard colleo-e degree (excluding apprenticeship and on-jobtraining) for anycray of ab- sence in excess. of 30days in a 12-month period, notcounting as ab- sences weekends orvarious legal hol i days. l3ased upon the current. formula, a 'veteran maybe absent 111A per- ' cent of the time and still be paid thefull allowance. We b that allowance for pay with such an amount ofpermissible absence pro- vides a most reasonable amount, of time awayfrom school. We would,. therefore, oppose enactment of these bills. I would like to add that in ouromnibus proposal, we are recom-. mending a semester-hour, i»stead of a clock-hour,basis for measuring. benefits for veterans pursuing technical and trade coursesat institu- tions which also furnish college, level courses. Inconnection with this change, we would, in those limited cases, placethose individuals under. the Asence provisimis already applicable tocollege level trainino. H.R. 6042 would apply the same criteria fordeterminingsati;fac- tory pursuit of course work in the case of collegelevel and noncollege level educational institutions. The effect of the, bill would be to remove therequirements for cer- tifications of attendance for veterans pursuingbelow college leveL courses under chapter 34, andfor wives, widows, and childrenpursu- inm such courses under chapter 35, as well as to removeprovisions on aaence counting which are presently contained in title. 38. Under current la w,.these. indiv i duals may notbepa id an educaConal. assistance allowance for ally day of absence in excess of 30days in a. 12- month period, not counting As absence weekends or leoalholidays es-. tablished by Federal or State 'law during 'which theastitutionis not: regularly in session.' The 30-day absence allowancepermits the veteran 1720

or person to be absent 111/2 perceat of the time and still be. paid the full benefit. We believe this providesa most reasonable amount of time away from school. Further certifications of attendance reports have been required under all three GI bills (World War II, Norean conflict,and current law). We believe that this isa requirement which should be continued, as it. has the effect, in many cases, of holding.down the number ofover- payments which could result if weare not-informed of interruptions or discontinuances of training. We, therefore, oppose the enactment of this bill. I would again like to mention that in conjunction withour omnibus proposal, we are recommending that technicalor trade courses offered by schools which Wlso offer college levelcourses be measured on the semester-hour, rather than the clock-hour, basis. In these limitedcases, we would also eliminate the absence and certification requirements for those persons. Mr. Chairman, this concludesmy presentation. My associates and I will be plea.sed to respond toany questions you may have. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Appendixes A and B will be madeapart of record. (The documents referred to follow :)

APPENDIX A Section 301 of our draft bill would require a servicemanon active dnty who wishes to pursue GI Bill educational trathhig to have his applicationfor benefits approved by a service education officer before it is submitted to the Administra- tor. This change woual allow the service education officer to review and discuss with the serviceman the program of education the servicemanproposes to pur- sue: would permit the service education officer to determine Whether the selected program is suitable for the individual serviceman's aptitudes ; and would also permit the service education officer to determine whether theprogram selected conld be satisfactorily completed within the serviceman's current environment. We believe this recommendation. would be beneficial to the individualservice.7. man and could assist in alleviating problems which have arisen in ceitainareas. It is estimated that enactment Of this section would not result inany additional cost. .Sections 302 and 310 would amend chapters 34 and 35 of title38 to modify .the. present .bar on the enrollment of eligible veterans and eligiblepersons in courses where a school haS made a complete move to a new location which is outsidethe general locality of its former site. Current law prohibits the Administrator from approving the enrollment of eligible veterans and persons in any course offered by an educational institution where such course has been in operation for less than twoyears. If the course has been in operation for more than two years, but the schoolmoves to a new loca- tion which is not within the same general locality as its prior site, the two4ear bar is reimposed. The term "same general locality" has been defined byregula- tion to mean a move to a new lotation within normal commuting distanceof the ullginal site. The regulation also requires. in sucha case, that the facultY,. stu- dent body and curricula must remain essentially the same. . Under our proposed changes in the law. the Administrator WOuld be ableto approve enrollment in a course where tho school has moved but has substantially retained the same faculty, curricula and student body; withouta change in owner- ship. This proposal would provide greater flexibility in thearea of school reloca- tions so as to recognize today's changing conditions whereby nhoolSare required to relocate due to the need to expand because of increasing numbersof students or perhaps the need for larger facilities: Often the unavailability of nearby land or other conditions preclude such expansion unless the entire school is moved to another site which may be some distance removed. It is estithated that enactment of these sections would not resifit inany addi- tional cost. . Section 303 would add a new section 1078 to chapter 34 to incorporate ina separate section those provisions on correspondence course training whichare presently contained in section 1682(c) of title 38.

1394 1721 In proposing this change, we suggest revision of the program in twomajor respects. The first change would provide for computationof the educational assistance allowance based upon 90 percent of the established charge whichthe instituton requires nonveterans to pay for pursuit of the same course or courses. The second proposed change would impose a requirement calling for arefund to the 'veterans of monies paid prorated on the basis of lessons completed and serviced by the school. It would also set a limitation of $50 on charges a school may make for registration or similar fees. In addition,the current rate of $175 Per month charge against entitlement forpursuit of correspondence course train- ing would be increased to $190. Current law provides for computation of the correspondence benefit based upon the full cost of the program. This form of training is theonly program under chapter 34 which will return to the veteran the full cost of histuition. All other Programs require him to have a stakein his own training. The first change pro- posed would put correspondence training on a par with theflight training pro- gram' currently authorized by section 1677 oftitle 38. It would also require tbis program to meet the criteria set forth in section 1681(a) which statestlmt the educational assistance allowance provided for chapter34 programs is designed "to meet in part" the veteran's cost of tuition and other expenses.By having the veteran pay a minimal 10% of the correspondence course cost, he will have a stake in his own training and will, in addition, give greaterthought to his choice of a training objective and the means otachieving his goal. Courses offered by educational institutions are approved for thetraining of veterans under two standards. Those courses which have beenacredited require less supervision and control by the state authorities thannonaccredited courses. Accredited courses, for the most part, fall under the control of anationally recognized accrediting agency or association. In the case ofcorrespondence schools this is the National Home Study Council. A number of abuses have occurred in the correspondence field.To help alle- viate this situation, we believe that closer supervision over theaccredited schools should be maintained by state authorities. This can be hadif the accredited schools are required to meet the stricter standards fornonaccredited schools. Those schools which are not accredited are required to refundcharges on a pro rata basis, which essentially means the veteran pays,proportionally for the amount of training received. The schools may also retain$10 for registration paperwork, and the like. The accredited correspondence schools, on the other hand,have as a refund policy one that is based on the passage of time. Thestandards set for these schools eall for the school to retain 10 percent of the contractprice nf the course, not to. exceed $50, if the student cancels within 48 hours. If thestudent cancels .within 30 days, the school may retain 15 percent of the contractprice plus $50, without regard to the number of lessons serviced. Shouldthe student cancel after three months it can cost him 50 percent of the contract;price plus $50. Yet, it may take him that amount of time to bind that the course is notsuited for :him. It is our view that charges made by these schools should be based uponthe services rendered to the veteran studentthe lessons serviced. Theschools should be entitled to a reasonable fee for administrative work which is necessary to set up the course for the student. We feel that a fee ofUp to $50 would' be reasonable to cover this expense for each Individual enrolled. Under existing law the serviceman or veteran may be responsible for the .entire cost of the course without receiving any payments from. the Veterans' Adininistration. The proposal made here would offer protection to the eligible person while at the same time there would be no financial loss to the school. It Is estimated that enactment of this section would result in savings the first full year of $7 million and a five-year saving of $35 million.

, Section 304 of the proposal is technical and merely reflects the switch of the correspondence provisions of chapter 34 from section 1682(c) into the proposed new section 1678. Sections 305 and 314 of the draft bill are proposed changes which we believe would help alleviate another problem which has arisen in the administration. of the educational programs. The changes proposed here would permit the meas- urement of technical or trade courses, which are given at an institution which also offers courses leading to a standard college degree, on a semester-hour rather than a clock-hour basis for the purpose of the payment of the educational assistance allowance. These changes would apply to both chapters 34 and 35. Under current law, these trade or technical courses are measured on a clock- 1799

hour basis with a minimum of 25 hours weekly requiredto qualify for full-time at tenda nee. Today, many junior and community colleges are' offering both professional. courses which lead to a degree and technical courses which generally lead to certification for a trade or a technical license. The formercourses are measured on a semester-hour basis while the latter courses are measuredon a. clock-hout basis. (Under a conversion formula equivalentsemester hours are (letermined where a course is offered on a quarterly, trimester,or other lime basis.) Both the professional and technical conrsesare given in the same school and they both nwet the same high educational standards established by the accrediting associa- tion for the area. Dissatisfaction has arisen in certain areas where veterans attend thesame school, but are paid under the different criteria. The standards established for technical courses at these college-level institutions generally insure that quality training is being offered for these mursesequiva lent to the college levelcourses which are measured on a credit-hour basis. The changes recommendedhere would permit the school to have these technicalcourses, which meet their high standards for college-level 'work, measured on a semester-hour basis. It is estimated that there would be no significant additional cost should this proposal be enacted. Section 300 of the draft proposal would change the title of the Predischarge Educational Program (PREP) to Preparatory Education Program (PREP), and would also amend the purpose clause of the program to reflect such change. Although eligibility for PREP assistance begins early in military service after completion of 181 days of active servicemany servicemen consider the program to be designed for an individual who is about to leave military service. Changing the name of the program would, we believe, help alleviate this misunderstanding. Section 307 has two purposes. The first amends subsection 1701(a) of title 38 to revise paragraph (6) to include correspondence schools within the defint- tion of education institution so as to accommodate the change in chapter 35 by section 311 permitting wives and widows to pursue correspondence training. The rationale and cost estimate are set forth in the discussion of that section. The second change adds a new paragraph (9) adding the term "training estab- lishment" to the definitions currently applicable to chapter 35. The change made here (as well as the changes made in chapter 35 by sections 309, 312(a), 314, 315, and 316 of the bill), is designed to extend to wives, widows and children the opportunity to pursue on-job and apprentice training. Under current law, wives, widows and children are entitled to other educational benefits, but they are not eligible to pursue apprentice or other on-job training programs. The change made in this section (as well as those changes made in chapter 35 .by sections 309, 312 (a), 314, 315 and 316 of this bill) extend such -training opportnnities to them. A college education may not be suitable for everyone. Offering these individuals the opportunity to pursue pn-job and apprenticeship training programs would afford those desiring post high school training another way of entering an occupa- tion. Such programs would also offer forms of tranining in which these indi- viduals would be able to receive high financial reward upon completion. The basic authority for extending these Programs to wives, widows and chil- dren is contained In, section 315, which proposes adding a new section 1738 to chapter 35; Other changes have also been proposed to be mdde in chapter 35 which wthild:' add a definitiOn of "training establishment" to seetion 1701'; amend section 1723 to remoVe the current bar to pursuit of such programs; amend section 1731 to specifically exclude these Prograras froM the annual absence counting provisions of that section; amend seetion 1733 to insert d ineainre- ment basis whieh is identical with t1Mt extended to veterans pitrsuing siich programs under chapter 34; and dmen section 1777 of litle 38 to incorporate 'therein references to wives, .widoWs and childron' tO reflect these' neiv prOgraMS under the approval authority for State approving agencies., proVision has also 'been made ta limit the program to traidinir Withind State; thereby exchiding .pursnit of,such trainingin the PhilipPines..N7iSt of.these individuhls in the Philib- pines Who WOW' become eligible tinder'ibis prOgrain Would .he;the wireS .of di4- .ableft Philippine vefcrans'%illo served during WOrld War U the'inajority of stly_Vd.e persons ati!.now over age 50 'and:the prograw extentleA:.bere *mid be 6f jittle bedefietd 'them It shOuld' be pointed out that- most .; of them byre already takeh 396 1723 advantage of the vocational training benefits.Whieh have been' made available to them under chapter.35 and they thus havebeen trained for a vecation designed , to help them sUpport themselves and theirfamilies.. . . Iis estimated that entietinene of thisbenefit eitension wOuld cost $1.4 million the first half-year (assuming an effective ciate ofthe third quarter of fiscal year 1972). and $21.3 million ever the first five years. Section 308 of the draft -propoSal would amend Section 1720 of,chapter .35 to eliminate mandatory counseling for certain ehIldrentraining under the provisiOns of that chapter. Current law requires the Administrator to arrange counselingfor all children entering training to assist the parent or guardian and thechild in selecting an educational or vocational objective. There are, however, many caseswhere a child, main becoming eligible for benefits, is alreadyenrolled at or is attending a college and it can be assumed that in those cases areasonable choice has -already been made and a suitable objective chosen.Mandatory counseling would, in such cases, be a duplication. It shouldbe emphasized that while the mandatory re- qUirement would he removed, any further counseling orguidance the child might need Would still be available through the school orthe Veterans Administration, if requested. It is estimated that enactment of this sectionwould result in savings in the program of approximately $1million per year over the next live years. Section 311 of the draft would also add a newsection 1727 to subchapter III chapter 35 to provide authority for eligible wives and widows to pursuesecondary level training without charge to their basic entitlement.Similar authoritY has already been given educationally disadvantaged veteransby section 1691 of chapter 34. The authority granted here would be a logicalextension of similar benefits to educationally disavantaged wives end widows.These individuals, due to the death or disability of their veteran-husbands, are requiredto assume the responsibility for support of themselves and their families. Bypermitting them to pursue secondary level training they would be given anopportunity to obtain the necessary training required for entrance into highereducation without losing their follow-on eligibility for college tthining.

. In extending this authority, pursuit would be limited totraining within a State. This would have the effect of eliminating secondary training for Philippine wives and widows.. It should be pointed out that the majorityof those individuals who would be made eligible are already over the age of50 and the purpose of the program would be .of little benefit to them. Further, most of themhave al- ready taken advantage of the vocational training benefits previously,provided-to them under chapter 35 and thus they have beentrained for a vocation, designed to help them support themselves and their families. It is estimated that enactment of this proposal wouldresult in additional direct benefits cost the first year of $784,000 and a totalIlve-year cost of $9,968,000. Section 311 of the draft would also add a new section1727 to subchapter III of chapter 35 to proVide authority for eligible wives and widows to pursue cor- respondence courses. This would provide these wives and widowswith still an- other means of .obtaining an education .which would aid them inhelping to sup- port themselves and their families in the manner in which theveteran, but for his death or disability, would have provided for them. Theextension.of cor- respondence school training to wives and widows would be subject to these same safeguards proposed for veterans under section 303 .of the draftbill. In essence, this means that the entitlement of a widow or wife would be.charged one month for each $100 paid to her in the form of an educational assistanceallowance ; the educational assistance allowance would be Computed based upon..90percent of the established charge which the institution requires otherindividuals pursuing, the same program to. pay ;,tuid would require institntions offeringcorrespond- ence CoUrses tO:.have.a. pro ..rata refund policypremlsed. upon the number oft lessons Serviced and would allOW a maximum registration or similarfee of $50. It is estimated that enactment of this new authority wouldresult in costs ranging from under $500,000 in the first year to approximately $1 millionin the fifth year. There is no experience in the thapter 35 program to use as anindicator of any precise figures. Subsection (a ).of section 312 of the (Iraft bill would amendchiiise.(:2) of.sub- section (b) of section 1731 to exempt programs' of apprentice ?ir'other:on-job. training pursued. by Wives.,.. wid ()wk.:. a n d ild ten from the absence .4*Con n ting provisions: for: contses .not .leadilig. to :a college.degree.'This would equate such

397 1724

measurement with that presently applicableto veterans pursuing similar training under chapter 35. Subsection (b) of section 312 would repealthe present language of subsection (e) of section 1731 which isno longer applicable in view of the advance payment proposal set forth in Section 203 of the draftbill. In lieu of the present subsection (e), new language would be insertedwhich would establisha requirement, com- parable to that now applicable tocorresPondence courses pursued by veterans under chapter 34, that correspondencecourse benefits may not be paid to those wives and widows made eligible topursue such training by the new section 1727 added by section 311 of thc draftbill until the Administrator hasreceived a certification from the eligibleperson and the institution as to the nUmberof lessons completed by the eligibleperson and serviced by the institution. The same requirement is imposed in conjunctionwith the correspondence pursued by veterans under chapter 34. program Section 313 of the proposal Wouldamend clause (2) of subsection (a) ofsec- tion 1732 to permit lumpsum educational assistance payments to be madetd eligiblewidows, wives and childrenwho are pursuino* educationalprograms on less than a half-time basis. Payment wouldbe made for an entire term, semester or quarter in the month following the monthin which certification is received from the educational institutionthat the person is enrolled in and ispursuing his program of education. This would equate theless than half-time payment system for chapter 35 with that alreadyestablished for chapter 34. This wouldimproVe the administrative procedures forhandling these payments. It is estimated that enactment ofthis section would not result in costs. any additional Section 314 would amend subsection(a ) of section 1733 to incorporatethree revisions. The first insertsa new clause (3) which provides for theMeasurement of high school courses under chapter35 so as to accommodate theauthority granted by section :311 permitting eligiblewives and widows to puriue secOndary training. The second insertsa new clause (5) providing for the ineasurententof certain on-job and apprenticeshiptraining programs which would bepermitted under the authority of thenew section 1738 added to chapter 35 by section315 of this proposal. The third changeis identical with the one containedin section 305 of the proposal and relates tothe measurement of technical at schools offering degree prograMs. courses pursaed: Sections 317 and 318 of the proposalare merely technical changes reqUired to be made in the tables of sections forchapters 34 and 35 because of the proposals to add employment of veteransauthority ; to change the correspondenceprograth for veterans; to permit widows, wivesand children to pursue on-job and prenticeship programs, and to permit ap- training. wiyes and widows' to pursuesecondary Title II', the final title of the draft,contains certain proposed effectivedates. The rate increase and advancepay proposals in titles I and II would becomeef- fective on the first day of thesecond calendar month followingthe month ia which enacted ;the change in the correspondencecourse pursuit by veterans would beome effective on the firstenrollment of a veteran whichocurs on or after the first day of the second calendarmonth following-the month in whichenacted thereby continuing the present computationand entitlement charge for those veterans in training prior to that dateand the change in measurement Of,tech.- nical courses at certain schools would bemade effective on the first enrollmentor' re-enrollment of a veteranor person occurring after the effective date proposal's enactment. of the There is one other proposed substantivechange in the laW on Which I would like to commentour proposed changein section 101 of title I to increasethe amount of the loan which may be madeto trainees under the vocational rehabili- tation program in chapter 31 from $100to $200. We believe this would beof aS- sistance to these trainees and wouldnot result in any net additional cost. APPENDIXB

RATE INCREASE PROPOSALS H.R. 9779.Provides increases of59.1% in educational assistanceallowances Payable to veterans under chapter 34, andincreases ranging from 58.3% to 59.3% for widows and children underchapter 35. Also authorizes Administratorto further adjust rates after January1972, on the basis ofany adjustments made in,

398 1725 the minimum wage. Ultimate purpose is to establish minimum wage structure under the Fair Labor Standards Act as the base and criteria for educational assistance payments. . Assuming no change in the minimum wage, first year direct cost would be $516.3 million with 5 year total costs of $3,731.3 million. Assuming a raise in minimum wage to $1.80 (from January 1972) and to $2.00 (from February 1974), first year costs would amount to $650.1 million with 5 year costs of $5,583.7 million. H.R. 9824.Amends chapter 34 to pay additional educational benefits fr vet-. erans who seryed in Indochina theater of operations during Vietna m era. Monthly rate for full-time veteran without dependents would increase frem $175. to $214. Also pays up to $3,000 per ordinary school year for costs of tuition, laboratory, books, supplies, etc., exclusive of board and room and other living- and travel expenses. Sets limits ,on amount of compensation veteran training on the job or in apprentice programs may receive in wages and VA. subsistence. Estimated first fiscal year cost would be $485.3 million and first five fiscal years. would be $2,266.3 million. 10168.Amends chapter 34 to increase monthly rate of educational as- sistance allowance payable 'to veterans pursuing institutional and cooperative. training. Monthly rate for a full-time single veteran without dependents would, increase from $175 to $210. Comparalle increases provided for veterans with de- pendents pursuing full-time, three-quarter-time or half-time institutional train-. ing. Also authorizes future rate increases adjusted annually premised upon average percentage change in cost of tuition and cost of living for preceding: calendar year ; authorizes Administrator to reimburse veterans for costs of tex- books ; and extends maximum GI Bill entitlement from 36 to 48 months. First fisc:li year estimated cost, premised upon enactment in third fiscal quer-. ter, is $187.8 million and $1,569.9 million for first five ilsal years. HR 10169.Amends chapter 31 to increase monthly rate of subsistence. allowance payable to veterans pursuing vocational rehabilitationtraining.. Monthly rate for single veteran without dependents would increase from $135 to. $162. Also auhorizes future rate increases adjusted annually premised upon. average percentage change in cost of living for preceding calendar year. First fiscal year estimated cost. premised upon enactment in third fiscal' quarter, is $3.4 million and $32.6 million for first live fiscal years. H.R. 11571.Provides increases of between. 5% and 6% in subsistence allow-. ances. payable to vocational rehabiltation trainees ; increases in rates of educa- tional assistance allowances ranging from 25.7% to 35.8% for veterans pursuing institutional and cooperative training ; increases in rates for veterans pursuing training on less-than-a-half time basis, for servicemen on active duty, and for- servicemen pursuing PREP training by 25.7%; increases rates for veterans pur-. suing farm cooperative training, .on-job and apprentice training by 5..5%; and. provides increases for wives, widows and children training under chapter 35

ranging from 19.9% to 35.8%. : Estimated first fiscal year. cost is $25.6 million and $1,943.4 million for the, first live fiscal years. ADVANCE PAY-WORK STUDY PROPOSALS H.R. 3349 and H.R. 6904.Identieal bills to amend chapter 34 to make advance payments of educational assistance allowance benefits to veterans enrolled half-. time or more. Advance would be made no earlier than first of month school term begins; would be made upon receipt of proof veteran has been accepted for enrolls ment in an approved school ; and would consist of partial month's ralowatry.e plus one full month in advance with subsequent monthly payments made at beginning of each month. Final payment could be withheld if satisfactory pursuit of pro-, gram is not furnished. If veteran fails to enroll after receiving advance, amount would be recouped or become a debt. Proposals would not result. in any additional cost, but would result in increased outlays of $98 million in fiscal year 1973 which would be recouped from subse-. quent payments. H.R. 4223 and H.R. 6130.Identical bills to amend chapter 34 to authorize advance payments of educational benefits up to $250 to veterans pursuing half- time or more training. The advance would be made prior to or at beginning of school year ; would be considered a loan to be repaid by deductions from veteran's monthly alowance; would be made upon a certification by veteran concerning

399 1726 application for or errollment in a sehool ; and minld be paid tallim no. earlier than 30 days prior to enrollment. Also provides a work-study program under which veterans may cancel their loans by agreeing to work up to 15 hoursn week performing certain services for the Veterans Administration. Also permits pay- ment, at veteran's request, of all or part of hs educational benefit direct to the school to cover tuition or other casts providing he is attending on a half4ime or more basis. Estimated annual cost for advances and work Study IS $32.9 million, plus $750,000 for direct paynient tr schools. 10543.Increases vocational trainee loan to $200 ; authorizes advance educational payments to veterans, children, wives and widows trainingon a half-time .or more basis, no earlier than 30 clays prior to commencenut. of train- ing. upon application setting forth certain data concerning entitlement to benefits, dependents, etc. ;establishes a work-study program under which veterans may be iglid up to $250 in return for an agreement to perform certain types of services for the Veterans Administration or at schools processing veterans' educational applications: permits cancellation of Federal education loans through utiliza- tion of GI Bill entitlement; and makes various administrative changes in the provisions of chapters 34 and 35. No .cost involved for advance payments. Annual estimated cost of work study is $35.1 million. Nominal cost for loan cancellation during fiscal 1972five-year cost would be $113.4 million.

EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS H.R. 9894.Permits veterans to enroll in and pursue full-time evening second- ary educational courses. Estimated first fiscal year cost, premised upon an effective date of the third quarter, would be $4 million and the five-year fiscal cost would he $33 million. H.R. 5.138.Authorizes wives, widows and children to pursue programs of on-job and apprentice training. Estimated first fiscal year cost would be $1.4 million and estimated five-year cost would be $31.3 million.

. H.R. 10166.Permits wives 'and widows to pursue proglams of education through correspondence courses. There is no experience in the chapter 35 program that might be used asan indi- cator as to the number of eligibles who would utilize such 'training. No cost estimate possible. H.R. 7668. and. H.R. 10774.Identieal bills to provide educational benefits to Avidows and wives, without charge to entitlement, while pursuing secondary level training.' Estimated first year cost would be $952,000 and first five-year cost would be $11,430,000. H.R. 8094, H.R. 9613 and H.R. 9823.- T:Ixcludes vacation periodsas absences in computing educational. allowances able for vocational educational courses not leading to a standard college der .. Estimated one year eost $1.5 miltA and 5-year cost $6.2 Million. H.R. 8282, H.R. 9662, H.R. 103d1 and H.R. 10565.Identical to H.R. 10391. Similar tO H.R. 9662. To restore to World War II and Korean conflict veterans entitlement to educational benefits unused under' the World War II and ,Korean cornet GI Bills. Unable to estimate costs because of unknown factors relating to these veterans. H.R.'232,. H.R. 2523 and H.R. 4364.-Identical bills which woUld, in effect, authorize the inclusion of np, to six months of active duty for training performed after January 31, .1955 as .a reservist or National Guardsman' for 'purposes of computation of entitltment to educational 'assistance benefits if .such reservist or guardsmen became eligible by virtue of active duty service after August 4, 1964. , Estimated -first 'Year 'cast would he .$1,194,000' and five-year eost .wonld ,be

$9,413,000. . . 11.1?.. 298 'aw7 ITR 6148.--.-Similar Purpose, bills to ILM- 232 11Th 2523 and 11.R: 4864 haVing -the same objective excePt that they, would rOauire that the servide after Angfist .4, 1964 have 'been in a conitiai zone'as designated .by .the . President " ' . COSts'nnder theSe bills WOulebe considerably 'leis than 'the coSt for The Other measures cited. 142--!:7----11!:' 4.7 400 1727

.10130.LThis bill introduced by Congresswoman Heckler, and the identical bills H.R. 2505 and H.R.3965, would, In effect, place husbands of female veterans on a parity with wives of male veterans for purposes of payment ofveterans benefits in behalf of a spouse. 11.1t. 6042.Amends section 1681 (b) to make the same criteria for determining satisfactory pursuit of course work apply to college level as well as noncollege educational institutions. EStimated cost of first fiscal year, premised on a third quarter effective date, is $800,000 and $6.1 million for first live years. H.R. 11400 and-11.R. 11534.Similar bills which would establish criteria under which an educational institution which has moved its location from the gr.meral locality of its former site may be authorized to enroll veterans in courses which have been in operation for two years. It Is estimated that enactment would not result in any additional costs. 8266.Amends section 1677 to permit reimbursement for cost of flight school courses taken to qualify for a private pilot's license to individuals who have completed a flight training program, have obtained a commercial pilot's license, and have not exhausted their GI Bill entitlement. Reimbursement would be limited to unused entitlement. Estimated first fiscal year cost is $27.8 million and $55.2 million for first, five years. Mr. HELSTOSKI. At this point we have members of the Education awl Thtining Subcommittee with us this morninn. ; Mr. Edwards of California, Mr. Danielson of California, andMr7 Scott of Virginia. Mr.. Edwards, are there any questions ? Mr. EDWARDS. No questions, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Illasmisru. Mr. Danielson? Mr. DAxnusox. Yes ; I have a couple. During the early part of the presentation you referred to orphans and children on a number of instances. Is there any difference in benefits. between orphan' and nonorphan children.? Mr. OWE.N. There is 1th difference in benefiti: I merely used the terminology because children do embrace the orphans Mr. DANIELSON. They do? Mr. OWEN. They do, but I wanted to emphasize that we did have benefits for orphans of veterans who died in Service. Mr. DANIELSON. My question was, only to elicit information. I thought perhaps we had a. different standard for orphans than for nonorphans.' . . On page 15 you referred ft, training within a State. I am sure I under- stand the Objective that you seek to achieVe there. It is My understand, inn.and tell me if I am correct a State, as used within the Veterans Cale, einbraces tbe District 'of Columbia; Puerto Rico; the, Virgin Islands, Guam?

Mr. OWEN. Thatis Correct: . . . 'Mr. DANIELSON. On' page 18 you fire ref e.i hitô dropping on main, tenance of a husband, tlie sponse of a. fetnal'e`iieferan. I with' yoU would expand on that a little, please? Mr: Own:v.' Mr.' Congresstnan, under current.W ]av .find regulations We Can pay fui.additiOnal benefit' kW a dePendenkjniSband, provided there is an actual dependency, Whereby We can .pat a veteran husband an additional benefit by the mer6faetthaf li6doeSifive a Wife or helms a child. Mr:DANTEtsor.'Let'us forget children-for it Mr. OWE'N.:- There is rio. the Wife ..eStfibliSlt .anY type. of dependency.. le presumed 'that. She) iS 'clepefidelit upoii he husband, and we pay the additional benefit.. 1728 But in the reverse situation there must be a showing of dependency before we can pay for the veteran wifea husband who may be a dependent. We attempt to put this on an equal basis, topay both situations on the assumption that they are dependent by virtue of the fact that they have the relationship of husband and wife. Mr. DANIELSON. Regardless of whether the nonveteranspouse is employed ; is that correct ? Mr. OWEN. That is correct, yes. Mr. DANIELSON. I realize that the numbers of female members of our armed services and, therefore, female veterans, is very small rela- tive to the male. Mr. OWEN. Correct. Mr. DANIELSON. I think it is a 2-percent maximum femalecom- ponent. Aside from that fact, do you have any basis foryour con- clusion that you do not expect there would beany substantial increase in the benefits paid because of this change? Mr. OWEN. Aside from the fact that there is only 2 percent ofour military population made up of females is the fact,that we have a very small number of females participating in the educational pro- °Tams. So by operation of these two factors we hiow it would be very insignificant in the matter of cost. Mr. DANIELSON. For my information, how many female participants do we have? Mr. OWEN. We would have to total that. I would be crlad to supply it for the record. Mr. DANIELSON. Can you give me a ball park figure, within 100,000 ? Mr. OWEN. Probably 10,000. M. ITELgrosm. Mr. Scott, do you have any qusstions Mr. Scorr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Owen, I recall whenyou were hero last time you reminded me you were a constituent of mine, so let me compliment you highly on your presentation today. As I understand, this omnibus bill is primarily an upward adjust- ment in allowances. Is that the main thrust of the bill ? Mr. OWEN. That is correct, Mr. Congressman. One title doespro- vide for substantial rate increases, and thenwe are suggesting.other provisions that we feel would improve the entire educationprogram. Mr. Scorn But it is not any broad-scale change in. existing law other than changes in amounts ? Mr. OWEN. There is no change in tlie basic philosophy of the bill; that is right. Mr. Scorr. Now, I notice on page 9 of your testimony thatyoli men- tioned 36 months as the maximum time, and that, ofcourse, is with the usual school term being 9 months, times 4 years. The existing law contemplates that a person would be helped to Obtainan undergraduate degree. But if he should miss in one semester and have to go over for another semester beyond the standard 4-year course, then it would not be covered by the GI bill ; is this correct ? Mr. OWEN. Your statement is correct. Mr. Scorr. All right, sir, thank you very much. Mr. HELSTOSICL Thank you Mr. 'Cowen. Thank you for your testimony and your presentation during your appearance this morning. Mr. DANIELSON. Mr. Chairman, may I ask the gentremon one more question

402 1729

-Mr. HELsTosicr. Yes, Mr. Danielson. Mr. DANIELSON. On this dependency, Irealize, in view of the status -of today's law and particularly the recentdecision of the Supreme 'Court, that it would be probably unconstitutionalto have a classifi- cation of sex as the lodestone as tti whether we would pay adependency allowance, but you don't believe there would be anyviolation of our 'Constitution if the differentiation were based on aclassification of de- pendenCy. So that dependency alloWance would bepaid for a spouse regardless of sex, male or female, provided thatthe spouse is in fact :a dependent, but that youcould not do it based upon sex. I understand your presentation. I am notquarreling with it here at :all, but I wonder if the administration hasgiven any .consideration 'to changing the basis for thisallowanCe to one of true dependency rather than the artificial one which is no longertelerable, the one of :sex. Mr. OWEN. We would have no position onthis subject at this time. Mr. DANIELSON. I know you have not now,.but my question was really 44 admonition ; that is, would you pleaseconsider that ?

Mr. OWEN. We Would be pleased to do so ; yeSsir. . Mr., HELsToskr. Mr. Owen, I would:like to ask onequestion. The proposal in the onmibus bill makes, this an 8.6-percentadjustment, .approximately. This. is.in terMsof. the currentcOstotliving increases. There is, no anticipation in the onmibus bill,then, for the anticipation f future cost of living, increases and ,commensurateraises for the vet- eran, entering aschool year other, than at this partieUlar. moment. He will not be able by. tlie time the end of thatparticular .seliool year is cOncluded, those two semesters in that given calendaryear, keep pace with the rise in the cost of living. He willagain be behind the rate .of increase in the cost of living. Mr. OWEN. Mr. Chairman, I would notdifter from you in your .conclusions, but, after all, we do have the President's programthe po. dayfreeze and phase II,.where it is the desire and, thehope of thead-

ministration to level out these increases. . be, on rather ten- . Then, again, in supporting legislation, we would lions grounds tospeculate what the future :might hold for uS. So we present, based :upon current conditions, what wethink is a reasonable increase. in the monthly paymeiltS., Mr. Scow. Mr. Chairman, if you, would yieldfor .a .moment. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Yes, Mr. Scott. Mr. Scam These, current rates, are, you.,thinking of November- December 1971 or are you going back to someDepartment of Labor 'cost index ? Mr..OWEN. These are based on the 8.2-percent increasesfrom Feb- ruary 1, 1970, throughOctober of this year, 1971. On this basis, al- most a half a percent .of the 8.6.. percentproposed is available for unanticipated price rises.. :.

, . . Mr. Scorr. Thank you. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Then it is.apparent I wish topoint out that by en- :actment time we will be far behindanticipated current. increases, in the cost of living. . Mr. Owen, we would like to thank you forappearing this morning lbefore the subcommittee. 17.30 We have a gentleman from tlie American Legion Mr..Terry Wertz,. to .introduce the director of the veterans a !fairs. and rehabilitation commission as our next witness. Mr. ertz and Mr. Golembieskil, we are happy. to have, you here- before the subcommittee this morning.. STATEMENT OF E. H. GOLEMBIESKI; DIRECTOR, VETERANS' AF- FAIRS AND REHABILITATION COMMISSION; ACCOMPANIED BY TERRELL WERTZ, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR; NATIONAL LEGIS- LATIVE .COMMISSION Mr. WEirrz. Mr. Chairman, the American Legion welcomes theop- portunity to present its views and recommendationson the measures pending consideration before your committee to modify and expand the profframs of vocational rehabilitation for the service disabled vet- eransarid educationalassistance for veterans and for certain widows, wives, children, and orphans. The American Legion bas consistently supported the education and training prograrir for eligible veterans and, since the enactment of the original GI bill, has sought over the period Of years improvements where necessary to meet the needs of that program. In 1944 the number of veterans entitled to benefits at that time posed a problem to the Members of Conaress because the Members were faced with a tremendous dollar outlay ti) meet the Obligation. The same is true today. The veteran in 1944 could attend school full time, on the original GI bill, and while we do not expect that the vet- eran should have the benefit banded to him on a silver platter, we be- lieve. as in 1944 under the first GI bill that the Vietnam'yeteran shcmld lie afforded the samv opportunity at this time. Under present condi- tions he cannot do this. We. are tremendously impressed by the faet. that a great. number of students find it necessary to drop out of school ona. full-time basis because they cannot sustain themselves in schoolon a full-time basis on the present subSistence allowance, or rely on some other form of assistance to meet the inereasingcost. In 'arriving at this conclusion, the legion established an ad hoc study committee to provide information concerning the needs of the veterans. During this study period they contacted various organiza- tions, associations, and colleges and have found there isa. very real need for an improvement in our educational program in order that- these men may continue in school on a full-time basiS. .If they do have to drop out of school, as many are presently doing,: we think .the education and training benefit Program becomes meaningless. Again, I .have emphasized that while we do not think this issome- thing that should be handed on a silver platter to the veteran, it is somethina which we believe he is entitled to, or the Congress has determieed he_s entitled to. These records clearly establish that the concept. 'of providino- educational assistance to our veterans has been most beneficial to ouiNation. Mr. Edward Golembieski, the director of the Veterans' affairs and. rehabilitation commission, directed the commiSsion and made the study

404 17.31 of the ad hoc comniittee, and. I would.like. to .present as .our witness at this time Mr. Edward.Golembieski, to present .to you the proaram which we believe would.be that most effectivefor the Vietnamveteran. GOLE:MBIES.Kr. Thank yon, Mr. Chairman..My statementwill be directed to thiise areas'Of specific interest to theAMericaii Legion ratherthan addressMg itself to the. varietyof specific bills. Mr. Chairmananemembers of the subcommittee, the American Legion welcomes this' opportunity to presentits views and recom- mendations oil the measmespending your consideration to further improve, to modify administration, and toexpand the prOgrams of vocational rehabilitation for the service-disabledveterans, and edu- cational assistance for Veterans and forcertain wives, widows, chHdren, and orphans. We have analyzed the purpose of the manybills which have been assigned this subcommittee. Some of theprovisions of these measures aro in accord with ourmandates and some are not. If you have no objection, Mr. Chairman, my statement Will bedirected to tliose areas of specific interest to the American Legion.To authorize tuition pay- ments; establisli Veterans'Administration guaranteed and direct edu- cation loan programs; adjust tuition andsubsistence payments an- nually in accordance with increased tuition and costof living in- creases, and to increasethe maximum period of eligibility forViet- mmi era veterans to 48months. Educational aSsistance programsfor Vietnam era veterans of our Armed Forces were developedby the Congress to: one, extendthe benefits of higher education to elyr''ible young personswho might not otherwise. be able to afford sucheduaction; two, provide vocational readjustment and restore educationalopportunities to those veterans whose careers have been interruptedby reason of active duty in the Armed Forces; three, aid such persons inattainino the vocational and educational status which they mightnormally riave aspired to and attained had they not served ourNation. Since the enactment of Public Law89-358, approved March 3 1966, monthly educational assistance paymentshave been increased, on the average, by 75 percent. Despite thelast increases ineducational.assistance payments author- ized by the Veterans Educationand Training Ameanents Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-219) effectiveFebruary 1, 1970, education ex- penses aloneoften exceed the monthly educationalassistance payment . from the Veterans' Administration. Increased costs of tuition, books, fees,and other charges, as well as food,housing, medical care, and othernecessities of living, cause many veterans to make a second sacrificefor our country by either notusing their eligibility for educational assistance, orby pursuing a program of education or trainina atconsiderable financial cost to themselves or to theirfamilies oreependentsa personal circumstance for nutny veterans in marked contrast to thedeclared conwressional purpose of the veterans educational assistance programesablished in 38 U.S.C., chapter 31. The financial plight of veteranspursuing courses in institutions of higher learning is clearly reflected by"1971-72 student charges at State colleges, and universitiescovering tuition, required fees, room,

405 1732 nd board," a joint report prepared by the American Association of Stath Colleges and Universities and the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges. According to this report : Median charges for 1971-72 in all categories would have reached even higher levels if President Nixon's wage-mice freeze had not prevented a number of universities from making increases they had planned but not implemented. Campus reports ilidicate that there will probably be additional increases after the freeze although they may not be as steep as originally planned. Tuition and required fees accounted for the most significant increases in charges among members of both Associations. The median charge for a resident tuition and required fees at NASULGC institutions was $482 for 8.8 percent increase over the 1970-71 median of $443. AASCU institutions had a median charge of $405 for resident tuition and required fees, which was 8.3 percent above the 1970-71 level of $370. Non-resident tuition and required fees took a giant leap aniong NASTJLGC institutions, with the median thcreasing 17 percent from $1.077 in 1970-71 to $1.200 in 1971-72. The sizable increase is primarily attributable to the fact that a large number of state universities raised charges to non-resident students to an amount equal to the fun or the major cost .of instruction. AASCU insti- tutions, which have not yet adopted this trond, had a Median increase of four percent, moving from $840 to $874. Total costs for an academic year, including tuition, required fees, room and board charges, grew less steeply than tuition 'and required fees alone. The median total charge for resident students at NASULCC institutions was 5)1,411, increasing by 4.4 percent from $1,351 in 1970-71. Resident student§ at AASOU thstitutions will pay a median rate of $1,227, which is Mily 1.6 percent More than the 1970-71 median of $1,208. The large increases in non-resident tuition were. reflected in the, amount of the increase in the median total charges fur non-resident students at NASULGC institutions. The 1971-72 Median total charge for non-residents was $2,241, in- creasing 12.7 percent from the 1970-71 median of $1,988. The non-resident median total charge at AASOU increased less' than ono percent, going from $1,618 to $1,627. A 1968 report, by the Office of Education. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, in "Projections of Educational Statistics tO 1976-77" states: The estimated average basic student chargeS (tuition, reqUired fees hoard and room) by, publicly controlled institutions of higher education; in 19416-67 dollars. increased from $874 in 1956-57 to $1,034 in 1966-67.. The chargek are expected to reach $1.211 by 1976-77. The estimated average basic student charges by non-publicly controlled institutions of higher education were $1,486 in 1956-57, $2,125 in 1966-67, are expected to reach $2,748 in 1976-77. A further ilhistration of the increasing averap charges. for academic. year cost of education in 4-year colleges is the following quoted from the February 22,1971, issue of U.S. News & World Report :

This year Next year 5 years ago (estimate) (estimate)

Public colleges: Tuition and fees $326 $442 $472 Dormitory room 304 416 441 Board 437 559 579

Total $1, 103 $1, 417 $1, 492

.Private colleges: Tuition and fees 1,368 1, 924 2, 057 Dormitory room 418 . 539. 575 Board 528 626 649

Total $2, 314 3, 089 3, 281

406 1733

None of the foregoing median and averagecosts, current and pro- jected, included the cost ofclothing, books, transportation, and incidentals. In addressing ourselves to theincreased costs of education in insti- tutions of higher learning, we should notoverlook the trend that has and is occurring below the collegelevelin technical and vocational schools. Although we have no datashowing the trend in percentage increase for such programs, wehave data which supports the fact that the current educationalassistance payments fall considerably short of meeting the students cost of the programs.As an illustration, the following is quoted from theRyder Technical Institute Electronics Training Center, Philadelphia :

Room and Books and board (average Tuition supplies per week) Program Hours

2, 000 $2, 200 $250 $35 Electronics technology 125 35. Drafting technology 2, 400 2, 750

To further illustrate this point,it is asked that the attached pro- gram costs fromthe Lincoln, Ryder, and GreerInstitutes be made a part of the record. Mr. HELgrosicr. Withoutobjection, it is so ordered. (The documents referred to follow :)

LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTENEWARK, BALTIMORE,PHILADELPHIA, WASH INGTON, INDIANAPOLIS, DES MWNES

Average room. Books and and board (per week) Program Hours Tuition supplies

1, 415% $2, 231. 25 $40 Automotive-diesel technology 40 Automotive technology 1, 080 1, 715. 00 720 1, 145. 00 40 Automotive mechanics 40 Engine tune-up 337;41 556. 25 337;f 556. 25 40 Diesel engines 40 Automatic transmissions 225 387. 50 1123 f 218. 75 40 Automotive air conditionin; 40 Air conditioning, ref rigeration and heating technology.... 1, 300 2, 055. 00 800 1, 295. 00 40 Air conditioning and refrigeration servicing 40. Heating system service 300 500. 00

RYDER TECHN ICAL INSTITUTE, ELECTRON ICS TRAIN INGCENTERPENNSAUKEN, PH ILADELPH IA, ALLENTOWN

$2, 000 a300 $250. 00 $35 Electronics technology 175. 00 35 Computer technician 930 1, 245 1, 350 160. 00 35 Electronics servicing 1, 400 2, 750 125. 00 35 Drafting technology 2, 400

RYDER TECH N ICAL INSTITUTEDALLAS

$65. 00 $35 Automotive diesel technology $1, 462 $2, 245 1, 125 1, 750 58. 00 35 Automotive technology 22. 00 35 Automotive mechanics 675 1, 090 595 8. 00 35 Diesel engines 338

407 1734

NATIONAL PROFESS IONAL, TRUCK DRIVER TRAINING-ATLANTA, MILLVILLE, N.J.

Average room Books and and board Program Hours Tuition supplies (per week)

Tractor-trailer operators 135 $200. 00 $653. 00 $35

GREER TECHNICAL INSTITUTE-CHICAGO, ILL

Automotive mechanics 600 $895. 00 $12. 00 $40 Automotive tune-up 240 365. 00 12. 00 40 Body and fender repair 500 895. 00 17. 00 40 Diesel mechanics 600 955. 00 32. 00 40 Diesel truck mechanics 900 1, 435. 00 34. 00 40 Refrigeration and air conditioning 475 795. 00 90. 00 40 Refrigeration 325 .495. 00 90. 00 40 Combination welding 480 960. 00 40. 00 40 Gas welding 125 365. 00 22. 00 40 Arc welding 125 365. 00 36. 00 40

GREER TECHN ICAL INSTITUTE-BRAIDWOOD, ILL.

Heavy equipment operator (trucks, bulldozers, end loaders and scrapers) 290 $795. 00 $40 Heavy equipment operator motor graders) 200 795. 00 40 Heavy equipment operator combination 1 and 2) 390 1, 431. 00 40 Heavy equipment operator back hoe and dragline) 2J0 795. 00 40 Heavy equipment operator (back hoe, dragline, shovel and clam) 400 1. 590. 00 40 Heavy equipment mechanics 540 £50. 00 40 Heavy equipment mechanic and operator 1, 300 3, 800. 00 40 Professional truck driver 160 935. 00 40

Mr.GOL1011111SKI.In national convention in Houston, August 31, September 1, 2, 1971, the American Legion approved Resolution 342 which, in part, mandated the organization to sponsor and support legislation to amend 38 U.S.C. 34, so as to provide that in the case of an eligible veteran not on active duty who is pursuing a program of education or training at an approved educational or training institu- tion on n half-thne or more basis, the Veterans' Administration shall pay directly to the educational or trainina institution on behalf of such eligible veteran the customary cost of tuition,.. and such labora- tory, library, health, infirmary, or other similar fees customarily charged, and slull pay for books, supplies, equipment, and other necessary expenses, excluding board, lodging, other living expenses, and travel, as are generally required for the successful pursuit and completion of the course by other students in the institution, but in no event shall the payment authorized exceed 75 percent of such tuition cost and fees or $1,000, whic.hever is the lesser, for an ordinary school year. Resolution 842 pmposes that the language of clmpter 34 of title 38, United States Code, be amended so as to provide that the current edu- cational assistance allowances under section 1682 be redesignated as subsistelice allowances and continued at the same dollar levels as set :,ut in the table under subsection (a.) (1.\ of this section. Under .the original. GI bill, the 'Veterans' Administration paid a school directly for tuition, fees, and other institutional costs in addi- tion to subsistence payment6 to tlie veteran. Abuses by some college ad- ministrators of this system caused the Congress to revise the system of pa.yment of educational assistance to the Korean conflict GI making him responsible for meeting all edncational costs from the $130 monthly payment made direct to him. 408 .1735

In advocating restoration ofthe tuition-subsistencemethod of pay- ment, we believe. that the presentdegree of sophistication inthe Vet- .e.rans' Administration and theState approval agencies,added to the fact. that our recommendationwould permit payment of not morethan pe.rcent of tuition costs but notin excess of $1,000, woulddeter col- lege administrators fromresortingto these former abuses. With respect to the provisionof guaranteed and directeducation loans for these eligible veteransthere is evidence. that. as thefinancial costs of educationincrease, more individuals areturning to loans or 'credit as a; way out. Study non', paylater is the only way a largeshare of today's veterans can get.into college and stay there.Even with the change to the tuition-subsistencepayment urged earlier inthis state- ment, many veteranswill have to resort t.o Obtaining aloan or credit through the eollege or universityplan. The following table.illustrates the trend :

New Government guaranteed student loans (private Tota capital) (millions)

School year: $330, 088 $248 1967 515, 000 436 1968 787, 000 687 1969 922, 000 840 1970 1, 100, 000 1, 000 1971 (estimated) Resolution 342 referred to above urgeslegislation to amend 38 U.S.C. 34, to provide: (1) in addition totuition, costs and fee paymentsand educational assistance allowanceauthorized by such chapter, educa- tional assistance loans made. toeligible veterans pursuing a program of education or training underthe provisions of this chapter,13y a lending institution authorized to dobusiness in a. State or in theDis- trict of Columbia may, with theapproval of the Administratorof Veterans' Affairs, be guaranteed bythe United States; (2).whenever the Administrator fin-ds th at eligible veterans are un abl e toobtain educational assistance. loans fromcommercial lending sources at rea- sonable rates and on reasonable termsand conditions, he beauthorized to make educational assistanceloans to such veterans onthe same terms and conditions prescribed for loansguaranteed under this chapter. The American Legion believesthat the establishment of guaran- teed and direct. loans would have atremendous impetus on veteran utilization of the education andtraining programs availableunder .chapter 34 of this title. As you know, sonieinstitutions offering undergraduatestudy have and under the changesof units to changed to the quarter system, this courses the studentis required to take either12 or 16 units. Under system 12 units areconsidered a minimumacademic full-time load, and under this system 16units axe found to be tooheavy a load for all but an exceptionally fewstudents. When so certified by theinstitution; full-time.educationalassistance payinents are authorizedfor 12 semester hours orthe equivalent thereof. If the program of educationis pursued on a 12-unitbasis, the present 36-montli eligibility will not coverthe veteran's programobjectives. 409 1736 In view of this, we recommend that the maximum elioibility be ex- tended to 48 months, based on the formula of 2 monthsfor each month of active duty where such duty extended beyond 180 days.

INCREASE ME MONTHLY SUBSISTENCE PAYMENTS UNDER CHAPTER 31 OF TITLE 381 TJNITED STATES CODE Under this chapter, vocational rehabilitation is available to disabled veterans for the purpose of restoring employability to the extent con-, sistent with the degree of disablement, lost by virtne of the handicap . due to service-connected disability. The full cost of tuition fees books, supplies, et cetera is paid by the. Veterans' Adininistration. In addition, monthly subsistence allowances:

are a.uthorized under section 1504. . . These subsistence allowances were last increased effective Febru- ary 1, 1970, under Public Law 91-219. Sincethen, in terms of' (1967=100), the Consumer Price Index has advanced from 116.3 to. 122.6 on November 1, 1971, an increase of about 5.3 percent. It is recommended that these subsistence allowances be increased to. reflect this increased cost of housing, food, and other necessities. H.R. 10169, would, if approved, raise the monthly subsistence allow- ances to a level more commensurate with today's costof these basic necessities..

PROVIDE THAT VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCITOOL STUDENTS NOT DE REQUIRED. 'XO MAKE MONTLY CERTIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE SeCtion 1681(d) of Title 38, United States Code, specifies that 110` educational assistance allowance shall be paid tO .an eligiblt veteran enrolled in a course which does not lead to a standard college degree for :any period until the Vderans' Administration ;has received -from the eligible veterans a certification as to his actual attendance 'during- such period, and a certification from the educational institution or en- dorsement on the veteran's certificate that such veteran was enrolled in and pursuing a course of education during-such period. 'Section 1681 of this title also provides that no educational assistance allowance shall be paid to any veteran enrolled in a. course which leads.. to a standard college degree for any period when such veteran is not purSuing his course in accordance with the regularly stablished policies and regulations of the edneational institaition, and the require- ments of this chapter and chapter 36. By regulation, the Administrator Of Veterans'. Affairs has provided that schools which have veterans Or eligible perSons enrolled in cOurSes. which lead to 4, standard college degree are not 'required to submit. monthly certification for stbdents enrolled ill such courses. Payment for the final month in the period of enrollment is not madeuntil a Certifica- tion is received from the instiution showing that the veteran has and is pursuing the program for which enrolled. Vocational-technical education is classified as below College level training, yet colleges offering such courses are directed Under-similar conditions as other institutions of higher learning. Consequently, voca-

410 1737 have to be on (=pus onthe same basis as :tional-technical students leading to a standardcollege :students pursuingacademic programs degree. that title 38, UnitedStates Code, in itspertinent It is recommended authorize the Administratorof Vetera.ns' provisions be amended to certification proceduresfor Affairs to provide byregulations the sanie vocational-technical colleges as are nowauthorized institutionswhere to a standard col- :a studentis pursuing a programof education leading lege degree. ON-THE-JGB TRAININGBENEFITS TO EXTENDAPPRENTICESHIP AND OTHER RECEIVE EDITCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO WIVES AND WIDOWSELIGIBLE TO CODE UNDER CI LAMER 35 OFTITLE 3 S UNITED STATES Section 1703 (a) ofchapter 35 providesthat the Administrator ot not approve theenrollment of an eligible person 'Veteran's Affairs shall the job. in any course ofapprentice or other training on and widows are notsuited, by reason of age, Many eligible wives training to which they .education, or for other reasons,for institutional liinited under suchchapter. .are presently limitations for institutionaltype education Notwithstanding these obtaining objec- or training,these wives andwidows a.re capable of apprenticeships andon-the-job trainino programsin tives through motel services, and hospital and nUrsing carefacilities food, hotel,and in other areas of publicneed for scrViees. ;1700 declares the purposeof chapter 35 is to As you know, section them- assist these wives andwidows to preparethemselves to support selves and their.families.' this chapter whichforbids the pursuit .ofaPpren- The language of We urge ticeship and on-the-job'trainingis in conflict with its purpose. enactment of legislation todelete this restriction. 'WIDOWS TO ENROLL IN CORRESPONDENCE TO PERMIT ELIGIBLEWIVES AND COURSES , 1723 (c) of title 38,United States Code, pro- At present, section enroll- hibitS the Administratorof Veterans' Affairsfrom approving ment of an eligible. personin any courseto be pursuedby correspondence. under chapter 34 From the Veterans'Administration's experience GI bills, many veteranssuccessfully completed of such title, and earlier acquire courses bycorrespondence, which enha.ncedtheir ability to skills or make up educationdeficiencies, enabling them tocommand better salaries or put theminto a competitive positionfor supervisory positions. As we pointed out.in connection withon-the-job apprenticeship traininz for wives andwidows, this restriction iscontrary to the pur- poseofthe benefit for these beneficiaries. 35 We support the purposeof H.R. 10166, thatis, to amend chapter of this title to authorizethe Administratortaapprove courses through correspondence for eligiblewives and widows..

411 1738

Tr PERMIT ELIG1 BLE WIVES AND WIDOWS TO ENROLL IN CORRESPONDENCE LEVEL FOR ELIGIBLE WIVES AND WIDOWS Chapter 35 Of title 38, United States Code, provides that the Ad- ministrator shall not approve the enrollinent of an eligible person in any course which is to be pursued as a part of his regiilar secondary school ethication. In the case of an eligible veteran, under chapter 34 of such title the Administrator may approve his enrollment in an appropriate course of courses needed to receive a secondary school diploma. It further provides that educational assisttuice payments mav be made to an eligible pemon pursuing such course or courses without charge to any period of enrollment. We believe that them are numbers of wives and widows in need of secondary school course or courses to qualify them to pursue education or trainina beyond high school. For this reason, we urge enactment of. H.R. 7668? Mr. Chairman, there are some who say that veterans education programs are too expensive. According to the Veterans' Administra- tion, the Nation has invested an estimated $21.7 billion to educate approximately 12.$ million veterans. In evaluating the charge that the program is expensive,we should consider : (1) A college graduate veteran can expect to earn about, $213,000 more in a lifetime than he could with only a high school (2) The Bureau of Internal Revenue estimates it will collect $40,000 on this increased income. (3) Since the VA spends under the current educational assistance provisions, about $6,300 in 36 months for a. veteran to earn his college dearee, the Federal Government will get back about six times its orig- intbil investment throughtaxes alone. As to its expensiveness, in terms of other federally assisted educa- tion program, the special analysis of the Feder0 budget shows the following outlays by agency for fiscal 1972

Estimate Federal agency (millions) Percent

Agriculture L225 10 Defense 1,104 8. Health, Education, and Welfare: Office of Education 4,830 36 Other HEW 2,204 16. Housing and Urban Development 167 1 Interior 364 3 National Science Foundation 546 4 Office of Economic Opportunity 290 2 Veterans' Administration 1,734 12 Other L072 7

Total Federal outlays 13,536 100,

Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. With 3rour permission, I would like to introduce into part, of the record the resolutions approved by the American Legion both at the national executive committee and at its last convention.

412 Mr. HELSTOSK1. That willbe made a part of therecord along with the appended information youhave submitted with youtestimony. (The documents referred tofollow :) LGION, Poirri,ANn, FIFTY-SCOND ANNUAL NATIONALCON ENTION, Tin; AMERICAN Onaox, SEPTEMBER 1, 2, 3, 1970 Resolution : No. 193 (Maryland). Committee : Reha bilitation. Subject: Sponsor and supportlegislation to amend 38 USC,chapter 35, so as to authorize educational assistancebenefits at high wIwol level toeligible wives alai widows. Whereas, chapter 35, title 38,United States Code, precludes theenrollement of an eligible person in any omrsewhich is to be pursued as part ofhis regular secondary school education ; and Whereas, many eligible wivesand widows are in need of asecondary school education to qualify for education ortraining above the secondarylevel; and Whereas, veterans trainingunder chapter 34, title 38,USC, may pursue secondary school courses leadingto a high school diploma orequivalency certi- ficate : and Whereas, under chapter 34, title38, USC, such time used insecondary school training is not charged to anyperiod of entitlement : Now,therefore, be it in National Conventio», assoubledin Port- Resolved, by The American Legion and sup- land, Oregon, September 1, 2, 3,1970, That The American Legion sponsor port legislation to amendchapter 35, title 38, United StatesCode, so as to author- ize educational assistance atthe secondary level for eligiblewives and widows; and be it further. charge to Resolved, That such secondaryschool training he provided without any perio(l of entitlement. Approved. FIVIy-TIIRD NATIONAL CONVENTION Or T.REAMER/CAN LEGION HELD IN HOUSTON, TENAS, AUGUST 31, SEPTEMBER1, 2, 1971 Resolution No. 342. ConnnitteeVeterans Affairs andRehabilitation. Subject: Sponsor and supportle.rislation to authorNe tuitionpayments and to establish VA guaranteedanedirect education loan program for Vietnam era veterans. Whereas, the purpose ofeducational assistance programsdeveloped by the Forces is to : Congress for veterans of our Armed who might 1. Extend the benefits ofhigher education to eligible young persons not otherwise be able toafford such edcation ; I readjustment and restoreeducational opportunities to 2. Provideoention of active duty in those veterans. whose careershave been interrupted by reason the Armed Forces; and 3. Aid such persons inattaining the vocational andeducational statuswhich they might normally haveaspired to and attained hadthey not serve their country ; and Whereas, despite increases ineducational assistance paymentsauthorized by the Veterans Educationand .Training AmendmentsAct of 1970, effective February 1, 1970, education expensesalone often exceed themonthly payment, leaving little or none of theallowance to meet living expenses:and Whereas, The American Legionsupported the enactment of theSeivicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, approvedJune 22, 1944 ; and Whereas, under this Act, theVeterans Administration wasauthorized to pay to institution, for each personenrolled in full-time or the educational or training ordinary school year, toward thecustomary part-time training, up to $500 for an other similar cost of tuition,amisuch laboratory, library, health, infirmary, and tind for books, supplies,equipment, and other fees as are customarily charged,and board) as were generally'required for the expenses (exclusive of room in the institu- successful. pursuit and completionof the course,by other students tion ; and

413 1740

Whereas, this Act, in addition, authorized the payment of a monthly subsistence :allowance while enrolled in and pursuing a course of $65 per month if without .dependents, and $90 per month with dependents (increased January 19, 1948 to $75 and $105, and to $120 per month for those with more than one dependent) ; and Whereas, a comparison of average education costs and allowances in the case of a single veteran attending an institution of higher learning under the World War 11 and post-Korean Conflict bills, fifty-five months after they were enacted, showed the following:

Post-Korean World War II conflict

Educational allowance $675 $1,575 'Tuition: Public 140 339 Private 396 1,627 'Tuition, room and board: Public 6110 1, 259 Private 850 2, 680

and -Whereas, a joint report on 1970-71 student charges from the American Asso- ,ciation of State Colleges and Universities and National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges states : "A look at what has happened to student costs over the past five years most ,effectively tLiderscores the alarming rise in charges in every category. Compara- tive data on total costs shown hem w..Ire the national medians for both NASULGC and AASCU for the 1965-60 academic year. In summary there has been an aver- age yearly increase of over six per cent in total charges to resident students for both associations. NASULGC schools have increased total charges to, nonresi- dents on an average of almost seven per cent annually, and AASCU schools have had an annual average increase of better than eight per cent." ; and Whereas, the Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Wel- fare "Projections of Educational Statistics to 1976-77" reported : "The estimated average basic student charges (tuition and required fees, board. and room) by publicly controlled institutions of higher education, in 1936-67 dollars, increased from $874 in 1956-57 to $1,034 in 1966-67. The charges are expected to reach $1,211 by 1976-77. The estimated average basic student charges by nonpublicly controlled institutions of higher education were $1,486 in 1956-57, $2,125 in 1966-67, and are expected to reach $2,748 in 1976-77." ; and Whereas, The American Legion belioves that no qualified veteran should be barred from an education because of lack of -birds; and Whereas, under existing federal programs, any student may apply for federally guaranteed loans from commercial lending institutions or banks ; and Whereas, students face mounting difficulty in obtaining these loans in times of tight money (the competition for student loans is stiff, and the student is further handicapped by the interest ceiling of 7 percent) :Now, therefore, be it Resolved, by The American, Legion in National Convention assembled in, Houston, Tetras, August 31, September 1,'14 1971, That The American Legion sponsor and support legislation to amend Chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code. so as to provide that in the case of an eligible veteran not on active duty who is pursuing a program ot education or training at an approved educational or training institution on a half-time or more basis, the Veterans Administration shall pay directly to the educational or training institution on behalf of Such .eligible veteran the customary cost of tuition, and such laboratory, library, health, infirmary, or other similar fees customarily charged, and shall pay for books, supplies, equipment, and other necessary expenses, excluding board, lodg- ing, other living expenses, and travel, as are generally required for the successful pursuit and completion of the course by other students in the institution, but in no event shall the payment authorized exceed 75 per cent of such tuition cost -and fees or $1000, whichever is the lesser, for an ordinary school year; and be :it further

414 1741

Resolved, That while pursuing an approvedprogitmof education or training, a veteran eligible for such tuition,costs, and fee assistance shall .be paidthe monthly educational assistance allowance aspresently authorized in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 1682 of title38, United States Code; and be it finally Resolved, That -Chapter 34 of title38, United States Code, be amended to provi : 1. in addition to tuition, costs and feepayments and educational assistance allowance authorized by such Chapter,educational assistance loans made to eligible veterans pursuing a program ofeducation or training under the provi- sions of this Chapter, by a lending institutionauthorized to do business in a State or in the District of Columbia may,with the Approval of the Administrator of Veterans Affairs, be guaranteed by theUnited States ; 2. whenever the Administrator findsthat eligible veterans are unableto obtain educational .assistance loans fromcemmercial lending sources at reason- able rates and on reasonable termsand conditions, lie be authorized tomake educational assistance leans to such veterans onthe same terms and conditions prescribed for loans,guaranteed under thisChapter.

FIFTY-THIRD ANNUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION,THE AMERICAN LEGION, HOUSTON, 'TEL, AUGUST 31, SEPTEMBER 1, 1971 Resolution : No. 471 (Idaho). Committee: Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation, Subject : Sponsor and support legislationto amend title 38 .1.150 to provide that vocational-technical students not be requiredto make -monthly certification of attendance. Whereas, since vocational-technicaleducation .is classified as below college level training ; and Whereas, vocational-technical colleges aredirected under .similar conditions as other institutions of higher learning; and Whereas. vocational-technical studentshave to be on campus for counselling and advising on the same .basis asstudents in flic academic programs : Now, therefore, be it. Resolved, by the American Legionin National Convention assembled in Hous- ton., Texas, kunst 31, -September 1, 2,1971, That The American Legion sponsor and support legislation to amendtitle 38, USC, to provide that avocational- technical student he required to make thesamocertification of school attendance as is required of astudent enrolled in a course which leads to astandard col- lege degree. Approved.

FIFTY-THIRD ANNUAL NATIONALCONVENTION, THE AMERMAN LEGION, HOUSTON, TEN., AtTousT 31, SEPTEMBER 1, 2,1971 Resolution : No. 544 (Mississippi). Committee: Veterans Affairs andRehabilitation. Subject : Sponsor .aud suport legislationto amend title 38 USC soils to extend apprenticeship and other on-jobtraining benefits ,to . eligible wives and widows, and wives of prisoners of warand missing in action, under Chap- ter 35. Whereas, Public Laws 90-631 and91-584 amended title 38 USC making certain wives and widows of veterans,and wives of POW/MIAs eligible for educational assistance under Chapter 35 whilein institutonal training; and 'Whereas, many eligible wives andwidows are unable to attend institutional training due to the expense ofdependents and other factors; and Whereas, there are many jobobjectives the eligible widow or wife could be capable of reaching obtainablethrough apprenticeships and other on-jobtrain- ing. such as (1) hospitals andnursing-care facilities, (2) office managerships and related fields, (3) food,hotel ma motel services. and (4) welfare,recreation, education, and other area§ serving apublic need: Now, therefore, be it Resolved. by The- AmericanLegion in. National Convention assembled in Houston, Texas, August 31,September 1, 2, 1971, That The American Legion sponsor and supportlegislation to amend Chapter 35, title38, United States

TI-S1:1-72-27 415 1742

Code, to provide apprenticeship and other on-the-job training to eligible wives and widows of veterans and wives of prisoners of war and thoseservicemen missing in action. Approved. NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF 'rim AMER.ICAN LEGION, MAY 54, 1971 Resolution No. 14. Commission : National Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation. Subject : Sponsor -and support legislation to permit.eligible wives and, widows to enroll in correspondence courses. Whereas, the Congress of the United States provided the war orphans Educar tional. Assistance Program for t4e purpose of providing opportunities for educa- tion to children whose education would otherwise be impeded or interrupted by reason .0f- disability or death of a parent arising as a resultof service in the ArMed Forces ; and Whereas, CongresS further extended his.Educational.Assistance Program. to widows of vetenufs who died of a service-connected disability and to wives of veterans who are totally .isabled. because of service-connected disabilities for the pUrpOSe of *assisting them in. preparium to support themselves: and their families at a standard of living levelwhicri the veteinn, but for his death or service-connected (Usability, could have expected to provide for his family; and Whereas, 38 USC 1723 (C) provides that the Administrator of Veterans Affairs shall not approve the enrollment of an eligible person in any course to be pur- sued by correspondence; and Whereas, for veterans educational assistmice, under chapter 34, title 38; USC, the Administrator of Veterans Affairs may approve .educational training exclu- sively by correspondence providing such lessons are serviced by an institution; and Whereas, some wives and widows, particularly those with small children, find it difficult to take institutional type training: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the. National Executive Committee of The .Ameriewt, Legion,in regillar meeting assembled in Indianapolis, Indiana, May 5-6, 1971, ThatThe American Legion sponsor and support legislation to amend chapter 35. title 38, United States Code, so as to permit eligible wives and widows theright to pur- sue educational training throughcorresponthmce courses. .

NATIONAL EXECUTIVE CONIMrrTEE MEETING OF TLIE AMERICAN LEGION, MAY r)--6,1971 Resolution No. 44. Connilission : National Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation. Subject: Sponsor, and support legislation to improve the educational assistance and vocational relmbilitational programs provided under title 38 USC. Whereas, the purpose of educational assistance programs developed byCon- gress for veterans of our armed forces is toextend the benefits of higher educa- tion to qualified and deserving yomfg persons who might not otherWise beable to afford such an education; provide vocational readjustment and restore educa; tional opportmlities to those' veterans whose careers have been interrupted or impeded by reason of active duty in the armed forces; and aid such persons in attaining the vocational and educational status which they might normally have aspired to and attained had they not served their country ; and Whereas, despite several increases in educational benefits, payments to vet- erans have not kept pace with the rising costsof education, food, housing, medical care, and other necessities of living; and Whereas, these increased costs cause many veterans to make a second sacrifico by either not using their eligibility for educational assistance or bypursuing a program of education or training under considerablefinancial cost to themselves or to their families nnd dependents:and Whereas, The American Legion believes that the effectiveness of educational and vocational assistance benefits provided these veterans shouhlbe comparable to those nmde available to veterans of World War H:Now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the National Executive Committee of The American Legion in reguktr meeting assembled, in Indianapolis, Indiana, on May 5-6, 1971, That The

416 1743

American Legion shall sponsor andsupport legislation' to amend title 3SUnited States. Code,. Chapter 34, to (1)increase the monthly educationalassistance payments wider section 1032(a) asfollows :

Plus the fol- lowing for each dependent in No dependents 1 dependent 2 dependents excess of 2

Institutional: 8210 $240 $265 $15 Full-time 154 178 203 13 Three-quarter time 117 131 9 Half-time 98 169 200 230 12 Cooperative

(2) provide that the educationalassistance allowances payable under such chapter shall be adjusted annuallyin accordance with the average percentage change in the cost of tuitionand cost of living for the precedingcalendar year ; (3) reimburse the veteran forthe cost of textbooks ; and (4) increase the maximumperiod of eligibility to 4S months ;. and beit further Resolved, That the monthlysubsistence allowance payable to veterans pursu- ing vocational rehabilitation under 3SUSC Chapter 31 be inereased to a level commenwrate with today's cost. offood, housing, transportation .and other necessities ; and be it finally Reso1v3d, mat the NationalAmericanism and Veterans Affairs and Rehabilita- tion Commissions jointly study theveterans. 'ethication assistance program to determine the feasibility of furthersupplementing the educational assistance allowance by the payment of aspecific amount ot be applied toward the cost of tuition. We want to thank you forappearing here this morning. Are there any questionsfrom the members of the sub-committee? Mr. Edwards? Mr. EDWARDS. No questions. Mr. HErsrom. Mr. Danielson, arethere any questions ? Mr. DANIELsoN. No questions. Mr. HEisrosx.r. Mr. Scott ? Mr. Scorr. Mr. Chairman, I wouldlike to ask one question or per- haps to share with the witnesses.I notice that theLegion does feel that at present allowances and eventhe proposed increased allowances under the omnibus bill is notsufficient for many veterans to attend a college for. the 36 months. Yet, oneof the thrusts of your presentation is that this be increased to 48 months.Now, I am wondering if it wouldn't be better for this coMmittee orsubcommittee to concentrate, if this measure is liberalized, on helping the veteransfor the 36 months rather than to attempt to ao to the 48months. If you had your choice one way or theother,what''wouldyour thinking be? Mr. GoianDiEsiu. Well, the order ofpriorities, I think we should improve the situation for the individual whohas a 36-month eligibility. Mr. Scorr. But you still want the other ? Mr. GounimEsio. Yes ; if possible. Mr. Scorr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. HELgrom. Thank you for appearinghere this morning Mr. Wertz and Mr. Golembieski andpresenting your testimony. As our next witness we have Mr.Charles Huber, who is the director of legislation for the Disabled AmericanVeterans. 1744

STATEMENT OF 'CHARLES HUBER, DIRECTOR OFLEGISLATION, DISABLED AMERICAN 'VETERANS; ACCOMPANIED BY:WILLIAM FLAHERTY, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LEGISLATION;WILLIAM B. GARDINER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FORLEGISLATIVE RE- SEARCH Mr. Humn. Mr. Chairman, accompanyin a me thismorning is a Mr. William Flaherty, the assistant directorof legislation, and Mr. Wil- liam Gardiner, assistant director for legislative research. Mr. Chairman and members of the snbcommittee, onbehalf of -the Disabled American Veterans I wish to expressappreciation for the opportunity to present our views concerning someof the education and training bills now before you for consideration. I also want to express our appreciation:to thecommittee for sched- uling these hearings 'at this particular time. In 'ourview, it reveals yet another instance of thiscommittee's determination to raise 'the echicational and income levels of those men .and womenwho are Called upon to serve in theNation's Armed Forces in time of .war. Indeed, it is a Well-established fact that the lives of 'manyveterans; particularly disabled veterans, have been made.easier .andhappier today 'as 'a direct result of .this.committee'sefforts. As you know, Mr. Chairman, the. DAVmembership is comprised of honorably discharged veterans who werewounded,..injured.or otherwise disabled as the result of their wartimemilitary serVice. 'We are, therefore,.concerned 'principally with those legiSlativeproposals which .directly affect the service-connecteddisabled, their dependents and survivors. We think it isgenerally accepted by theAmerican people that those who serve in our Armed Forces .bear a.disproportionate:burden of citizenship. While they are off servingtheir country, .others o.f their age are preparingfor occupational or professianal careers. We'think it 'only fair that the 'exservicemenbe given the:opportunity to 'secure the, 'educational and training.advantages lost 'during their .period of active Militai'y duty. However, because the .monthly ratespresently available are insuffi- cient, many eligible Vietnam veteranscanna afford to applY foredu- cation or trainma :and,consequently, they are forced into an .already 'saturated jobm4ket. In this regard, it .would .appear to he a 'matter simPle justice that the level ofbenefits for Vietnam veteranS be 'brought in line -with those authorizedfor .veterans of the Korean conflict. In 1952, the average cost 'of a collegeeducation was less than .$1,000 per year andthe educational allowance available tothe Korean conflict veteran amounted to'$110 per month. Today the yearly cost for tuition, books, fees andsupplies 'averages nearly :$2,090; 'yet the assistance offered a veteran pursuing afull-time course of study in an institution of higher learning is only.$175 a month. The most recent educationalallowance increases proVided ;by Pub- lic taw 91-219-althoughsubstantial at the timestillfell short by approximately 25 percent of.achieVing full 'comparability with the educational benefits provided for veteran§of the Korean conflict.

418 1745

H.R. 11571 This disparity would berectified by approval of thependino., bill H.R. 11571.. Introduced by thedistinguished chairman of this,sulicom- mittee, the measure would amendchapters 31,. 34, and 35 oftitle 38, United States Code, to increase,respectively the vocational.rehabih- tation subsistence allowances,the educational assistanceallowances, and. the special trainingallowances paid to eligible veteransand, per- sons under thesechapters. Educational assistance allowancespayable to veterans in training under the provisions of chapter 34would be increased from the present $175 to $220 per month for veteranswithout dependents who are en- gaged in full-time institutionaltraining; from $128 to $165 forthree- quarter-time trainino.; from $81 to$110 for half-time training;and from. $141 to $169fa cooperative training. Comparable increases are proposed for veterans in trainingunder apprenticeship oron-the-job training programs -and for servicemenunder the predischarge educa- tion program. Additional amountspaid for dependents under theGI bill would also be increased. Mr. Chairman, statistics revealthat during the Koreanconflict, GI bill allowances, for veteransof that era covered approximately98 per- cent of the averagetuition, board and room costs atpublic and non- public colleges. The 25.7-percentincrease in training allowances pro- posed by H.R. 11571 would,in our judgment, restorecomparability with the educational benefitsoffered veterans of the Koreanconflict. We feel the proposed increases areentirely reasonable and supportable in light of the marked increasein the cost of education. Under provisions of the bill,the monthly.subsistence allowancepaid to disabled Veteransengaged in .full-time institutional coursesunder chapter 31 Would be increasedfrom $135 to $142 for a 'veteranwithout dependents; from $181 to $191 for aveteran with one dependent,and from $210 to $222 for a veteranwith two or more dependents. COmparable increases averaging 51/2 percentwould also be provided for vetans: pursuinginstitutional training on less than afull-time basis. and to disabled veterans infull-time institutional on-farm, ap- prenticeship, or other on-the-jobtraining. Since tuition fees, books andsupplies are furnished veteransin training under the vocationalrehabilitation program, the proposed increase ni subsistence allowancesis based,.not upon the increa.sed eost of echication, but upon the rise in theConsumer Price Index. Inasmuch as the CPIhas incinsed by approximately8. percent since the rates Were last adjusted in February1970, we respectfully ask that H.R. 11571 be amended to reflect thisactual increase. H.R. 7668 We. also urge the committee's support ofH.R. 7668 which would pro- vide educational assistance pt the secondaryschool level to eligible wiveg and widows without charge to anyperiod of entitlement they may have pumiant tosection 1710 and 1711 of chapter 35. Under present law, Mr. Chairman, educationalbenefits under chap- ter 35 are generallyrestricted to institutional training at the post secondary school level. 1746 These restrictions, in our opinion, severely limit the educational opportunities offered to educationally disadvantaged wives and widows of service-connected, totally disabled or deceased veterans. Accordingly, we would recommend that this group of beneficiaries be ffranted the same consideration that was preViously accorded to edu- cationally disadvantaged veterans. by Public Law 90-77. Enactment of the bill would enal;le these wives and widows to pur- sue high school courses necessary toqualify them for admission to an institaion of higher learning. We, therefore, urge your approval of this logical progression of the original purpose Of the War Orphans Educational Assistance Act. 1LR. 5052 The pending bill H.R. 5052 would provide for the retraining of eligible service-connected disabled veterans who are no longer employ- able in the field in which they were previously rehabilitated. Due to the rapid advancement in technology, the shifts in occupational require- ments, and the obsolescence of many training skills, a growing number of disabled veterans are unable to compete in. today's work force. Con- sequently, they find themselves no longer employable in the field for which theY have been trained. H.R. 5052, Would help alleviate this problem by authorizina additional training or education for these veterans to restoreemployability .whicli has, been lost, due to circum- stances beyond their control.

11.R. 5053 H.R. 5053 would amend title 38, United States Code, to make the children of certain veterans having a service-connected disability rated at not less than 50-percent eligible for benefits under the war orphans educational assistance program.

. As mentioned earlier, Mr. Chairman, educational assistance under present law is authorized for children of yeterans who are permanently mid totally disabled from service-connected causes. Under terms of H.R. 5053, the child of a veteran who has a service- connected disability rated at not less than 50 percent would be made eligible for these educational benefits. The Veterans' Administration has conceded that a 50-percent rating puts a man in the class of "seriously disabled." This bill refers specifi- cally to seriously disabled individuals rated at 50, 60, 70, 80, and p0. percent. These high-disability ratingsue ,for diseases.orinjuries that are always present and must be overcoMe by constant extraeffort which often causes a serious weakening of physical well-being .at an abnor- mally early age. Gainful employment very often is restrtcted for this group. In many cases, they are unable to lay away the substantial sum of money now needed to put a child or children through colleffe: The bill does not seek the full educational assistancegrant7ed chil- dren of the totally disabled, but only the amount which would be paid on a, proportionate basis. We earnestly urge the committee to act favor- ably on this important measure.

420 1747

ELIGIBILITY FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION Mr. Chairman, during the 87th Conaress, Public Law87-815, was enacted which authorized vocationaliTehabilitation 'for veterans who have a service-connected disability Tated for compensation purposes at 30 percent or more. If rated less than 30 percent, it mustbe clearly shown that the disability has. caused a 'pronounced" employment handicap. As a result of this restriction, many members of the DAVwhose service-connected disabilities fall within the 10- and 20-percent cate- fforiesbut who are otherwise eli(ribleare denied vocational trainina under chapter 31 of titl 38. It has long been the historical policy of the UnitedStates to provide areater benefits for war veterans than for veteranswho served durina peacetime. The 30-percent disability requirement for entitlement tovocational rehabilitation may, therefo' re, have been justifiable for peacetime vet- erans at the time thisprovision was made effective by Public Law 87-815. With the enactment of Public Law 90-77 .onAugust 31, 1967, however, the situation changed dramatically and certain wartimebene- fits were granted to veterans who served in theArmed Forces on or after August 5, 1964,the so-called Vietnam era. Inasmuch as the Congress has given statutory recoanition tothe August 5, 1964 date for purposes of wartime benefits,we.' feel that vet- erans who serve in theVietnam era should be given the same oppor- tunity for vocational rehabilitation as that previouslyprovided for veterans of other wars. Mr. Chairman, the DAV has always held to the viewthat anyone who served his country faithfully and honorably should-7U hehas the capacity to absorb it, the motivation to pursue itbegiven every op- portunity to advance himself educationally socially, and economically. The bills which we have been discussing here this morningwill, in our judgment, provide this meaningful opportunity. Thank you for allowing us to express,our views inthese important matters. Mr. HELSTOSICI. Thank you for being before thesubcommittee this morning, along with your assistants. Do you have any questions, Mr. Danielson? Mr. DANIELSON% NO ctuestions. Mr. 1413MOSKI. Mr. Scott, are there any questions ? Mr. SCOTT. No questions. Mr. ITErsrosKI Thank you gentlemen. . We have as our next witness Francis Stover, the Director of the National Legislative ServiCe of Veterans ofForeign Wars,Mr. Stover, we are pleased to have you appear.

STATEMENT OF FRANCIS W. STOVER, DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL WARS' . LEGISLATIVE SERVICE OF VETERANS OF FOREIGN Mr.. STOVER. Mr. ChairMan and members of thesubcommittee, thank you for the privilege of appearing. before this.distinguished subcommittee.to present the position.of theVeterans ofVoreign Wars.

421 1748 regarding the large number of bills under consideration which will amend, improve and liberalize GI bill education and training assist- ance for Vietmim veterans.. My name is Francis IV. Stover and my title is' Director of the National Legislative Service of the Veterans of FOreign ars of the United States. The Veterans of Foreign wars is proud of its record down through. the years which resulted in tlm third GI bill and the liberalizina amendments which. have been approved by Congress' subsequent tO the enactment of the GI bill hi 1966. Most recent improvement was the 35.-percent increase in GI bill training rates and other liberaliza- tions as provided in Public Law 91-219. It will be recalled this legis- lation,. depsite trying tactics and opposition to the size of the increase by high level Administration spokesmen, was developed- and approved by the ConFess in record time. The Congress deserves the highest commendation, and this subcommittee in particular, for making pos- Sible the 35-percent increase which has been in effect for the past two years; There is no' question that the climbing GI bill enrolhnent can be contributed directly to the higher allowances which Were voted by the Conaress in 1970. Anotrier objection that has been raisedover the last several years is the failure, of a sufficient number of 'veterans to participate in the GI bill' as compared' to veterans of previous wars. The Veterans of For- eign Wars has again lent its support to the very comprehensive contact' and' outreach program conducted by, the Veterans' Administration with active duty servicemen and veterans at the time and.place of their discharge and separation from the Armed. Forces. Undoubtedly,. the Veterans'' Administration today is extending every possible effort to contact Vietnam veterans wherever they ar e. to apprise them of the rights and benefits to which they are. entitled. upon their return to civilian life. In addition, representatives of the Veterans' Administration and the Department of Labor followup on this contact service after the veteran has returned home. The Veterans' Administration has also instituted other programs for reaching the veteran. in the hope that no veteran will be overlooked or bypassed. All will aaree. that the agares- sive publicity and contact program conducted by die Veterans' Aemin- istration has, in the main, been extremely successful and is another major factor which has helped the GI bill enrollment to sharply in- crease during the last several years. Already, more Vietnam veterans have trained under the Vietnam era GI bill than the Korean GI bill. This number is expected to in- crease as the number of troops from Vietnam are withdrawn and re- turn to civilian life. The Veterans of Foreign Wars has been extremely concerned with respect to the successful readjustment of Vietnam veterans. Our orga- nization has been appalled at the high imemployment rate which has persided with respect-to Vietnam veterans. The Veterans of Foreign Wars has expressed its deep disappointment that more veterans acre not taking on-the-job- training.under the GI bill. In that regard, the delegates to Our most recent national, convention which was held in toallas, Tex. last August, adopted a number of resolutions expressing

.422 1740 the concern and aspirations of theVeterans of Foreign Wars with respect to educational andreadjustment benefits for the Vietnam vet- eran. It would bedeeply appreciated, Mr. Chairman,if the text of these resolutions could be nmde a partof my remarks at the conclusion of my statement. Mr. IlErsrosiir. They will bemade a part of the record,without objection, it is so ordered. (The doctunent referred to follows :)

RESOLUTION ADOPTED AT THE 72ND NATIONALCONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATESHELD IN DALLAS, TEXAS, AuousT13 Tmtouon 20, 1971 RESOLUTION NO. 010 Be it resolved by the 72nd NationalConvention of the Veterans of Foreign.Wars of the United States, That we seek approvalof the following recommendations by administrative changes or legislation, asapplicable :

V. Anthorize immediate paymcnt of.educational allowance in an amount not to exceed 90 days, 10 days prior toindicated date of enrollment, on tbe job training is excluded.

BB. Eliminate the termination date on VAeducational and job training benefits. CC. Re-establish educational and job trainingbenefits for those veterans of World War II, Korean and Post Korean Servicewho did not fully utilize their VA entitlement. RE:sor.unox No. 648Surroar S. 216S--"TIIEVIMNAM VETERANS ACT OF 1971" Whereas, Maryland Senator Charles McC. Mathias,Jr. has introduced S. 2168 known as "The Vietnam Veterans Act of 1971 ;"and Whereas, this bill will liberalize and increaseeducational and training as- sistance for returning Vietnam veterans under the GIBill ; and Whereas, this proposal is in line with nationalmandates of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to improve the GI Bill for ourVietnam comrades ; and Whereas, the V.F.W. strongly supports theintent and purpose of this bill to liberalize the GI Bill assistance for Vietnam veterans ; and Whereas, one of the reasons some of theseveterans have not availed them- selves of GI Bill assistance is because of theunrealistically low educational and training rates; and Whereas, another reason is the failure to fullyapprise these returning vet- erans of the full significance ofthe opportunities they now have under theGI Bill : Now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the 72nd National Conventionof the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, That we vigorously supportS. 2108. RESOLUTION NO. 066-INCREASE GI EDUCATIONALBENEFITS FOR VIETNAM VETERANS Whereas, at the present time the Federal aid toVietnam veterans seeking a higher education is limited to $175.00 per monthfor a single veteran from which be must pay all expenses, includingtuition, board and room, books, etc. ; and Whereas, married veterans with dependents aresuffering a like handicap with inadequate grants under the Vietnam educationaid law in their attempt to complete their educational program ; and Whereas, a student under present allowancescannot attend a private school such as was possible nnder the WorldWar II GI Bill ; and Whereas, the World War II GI Billpaid tuition fees in full, plus books and many other considerations ;and Whereas, part-time jobs that wouldsupplement present allowances to enable the veteran to carry on hiseducational program are almost nonexistent;Now, therefore, be it

423 1750

Resolved, by the 72nd National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign. Wars of the United St lies, That we urge Congress to re-establish veterans' educational assistance at the same level as it was for veterans of World War II. RESOLUTION NO. 678-RE5TORE EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS TO WW II AND KOREA VETERANS Win:reas, because of economic conditions, industrial merger and bankruptcies have taken their toll on countless veterans with long and dependable employ- ment records ; and Whereas, many of these veterans have skills suited only to the need of their former employer ; and Whereas, their entitlement to educational and vocational benefits under World War II or Korea service has expired ; and Whereas, these veterans are in dire need of education and training to qualify for ii`.:111 employment at a time when because of age or family responsibility, the need is the greatest; Now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the 72n1 National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United. States, That we urge the Congress of the United States to restore educational benefits to World War II and Korea veterans who has not previ- ously used their.full entitlement. RESOLUTION NO. 712-ADEQUATE FUNDS FOR "Jons FOR VETERANS" PROGRAM -tMS, it has been the Veterans of Foreign Wars' long established policy to pr mote maximum employment for all veterans, with preferential serVice to disalled veterans ; and Whereas, the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1044, as amended, provides by law the establishment of facilities for an adequate counseling and placement service for veterans ; and Whereas, the Secretary of Labor's policies, in accordance with the intent and purpose of Congress, state there slmll be an effective job counseling and em- ployment placement service for veterans and it is the responsibility of the Veterans Employment Service to see that the policies of the Secretary of Labor are carried out by the public Employment Services; and Whereas, due to the softening of the economy, veteiansparticularly young veterans recently returned from Vietnamare finding it increasingly difficult to find suitable employment; and Whereas. the "Jobs for Veterans" campaign, a national cooperative effort on the part of government, business, labor and other organizations to assist in an Intensified national effort to provide veterans with maximum employment and tra ining opportunities has been launch ed ; and Whereas, additional Veterans Employment Representatives are needled in the local State Employment offices to adequately serve the large number of vet- erans now in need. of job training, counseling, testing, job development and placement : Now, therefore he it Resolved., by 72nd National Convention, of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, That we seek through the U.S. Congress adequate funds to successfully carry out the "Jobs for Veterans" program in all local offices of the State Employment Services.

RESOLUTION NO. 719VETERANS READJUSTMENT APPOINTMENT PROGRAM Whereas. it has always been an objective of Veterans of Foreign 1Vars of the U.S. to assist returning servicemen to adjust satisfactorily to civilian life, includ- ing the finding of gainful and meaningful employment; aml Whereas, military personnel being separated at this time are often confused in finding work leading to a rewarding career, particularly those veterans with limited education and no pre military employment ; and Whereas, the President has fully understood this problem and has issued Executive Order 11521 in .1970 providing for special Veterans Readjustment Appointments in civilian federal employment for those Vietnam Era Veterans with less than 14 years of education who are interested in furthering their training, and the U.S. Civil Service Commission has in 1971 extemThd the cover- age of these $pecial appointments to include all positions in federal agencies at Grade 5 and below; and 1751 during 1070 and Whereas, over 3,200 suchappointments were made nationally currently the rate of thesehirees exceeds 400 eachmonth ; and Foreign Wars of the U.S.and all other veterans Whereas, the Veterans of Readjustment Ap- organizations have recognizedthe value of this Veterans pointment system and havepledged their full supportto this program : Now, therefore, be it Veterans of Foreign lVars Resolved, by the 72n(lNational Convention of the of thc United States, That wedo hereby reaffirm ourpledge to assist returning hereby recommend that suchveterans investfgatl Vietnam Era Veterans, and do Appointment, offering boll; the possibility of securing aVeterans Readjustment employment and training ; andbe it further and other Officers at all Resolved, That ourmembership, Service Officers, veterans, the U.S. levels of orga»ization, pledge ourassistence to the returning the Veterans Administration,and other appropriate Civil Service Commission, "matches" between the skillsand federal agencies in makingthe best possible opportunities that may exist. needs of the veterans andthose civilian employment commander in chief of Mr. STOVER. In addition,Mr. Chairman, the the Veterans of ForeignWars, Joseph L. Vicitesof Pennsylvania, has put his stain]) ofapproval on the prioritylegislative goals of our organization for this current year.These goals are arepresentative list which, it is hoped, will of the legislativeobjectives of our organization be approved by theCongress. In the field ofeducation and training, the goals which stand atthe head of our listfor congressional ap- proval by this 92d Comrressread as follows: EXPANDED GI EDUCATION ANDTRAINING BILL 1. Increased GIbill assistance to includethe cost of books, tuition and fees. 2. More funds forstepping up on-the-jobtraining for the hundreds of thousands of unemployedveterans who do notwant to go to college or desire institutionaltraininv. in GIbilftraining rates. 3. Cost-of-livint, increase to 48 4. Advanceedbucational payment and increase entitlement mo nt] I 8. 5. Restore educationalbenefits to World War IIand Korean veter- ans who have notheretofore used full entitlement. VETERANS MORE MEANINGFUL. ASSISTANCEFOR RETURNING VIETNAM 1. Expanded contactand outreach program toinsure that every Vietnam veteran knows of hisveterans rights andbenefits. 2. Complete support of acrash program toprovide jobs for the lmndreds of thousands of unemployedveterans. 3. More job training programswith extra emphasis on veteranswith no civilianemployment skills or experience. 4. Establish low cost lifeinsurance program forVietnam veterans similar to NSLI program forWorld War II and Koreanveterans. Mr. Chairman, in line with thesemandates and goals of theVeterans of Foreign Wars, ourorganization stronglyrecommends approval of legislation which willprovide a cost-of-hvingincrease in the GI bill training, rates. Before a veterancangd a job, he must havetrain- in°.for a job. Either he must go toanstitutionn i of higher learning ortake on-the-job training. Ineither case, when. a veterantakes train- ing under the GI bill, he no loncreris classified as unemployed.Most important, upon the completion4 his education and traming,.he will then be qualified for employmentand be in a much betterposition to be hired, thus no longer being astatistic in the list of unemployed.

425 1752 The best solution to this problem is to make the assistance available under the GI bill so attractive that all veterans, regardless .of their family obligationovill not forego this opportunity. EVidencereaching the Veterans of Foreign Wars indicates that .many veterans would much rather go to school under the GI bill, but they just cannot afford this because of the low train ngratespresently authorized. They come out of the service ;are. in many instances married with children, and it is necessary that they go to work just to meet the basic necessities of life. The high cost of -education, together with the high cost. of living, is just too much for veterans who Must provide not only for themselves but for their .gr, ing families us they begin their start in civilian life. As indicated, the Veterans of Foreign Wars favors not only the increased GI bill rates, but endorses legislation before you which would provide for the. Veterans' Adininistration to reimburse Vietnam veterans for the cost of books and education fees, and, together with the subsistence allowance, will undoubtedly bring thousands of vet- erans into the training program. Mr. Chairman, let's not forget. that. the money invested in the GI bill is mone:- invuted in America. Without the GI bill of World War II, it is extremely doubtful that this country today would be the leader of the free world. The millions who have trained under this act have already increased their earning power and they have paid the Federal Government, back many times over in income taxes for the assistaiwe provided them at a crucial time. in their life whim 'they needed it most. AnOther byproduct of a generous GI bill relates to .the pension program. Unquestionably, the increased incomes of World War .II veterans can be traced in great part to the GI bill training of World War II and Korean veterans. Because of the increased income of these veterans, it is extremely doubtful that manr of them will ever be .entitled to a VA pension. This again will resiilt in an eventual saving o our Governmemt as we look down the road to the end of this century -when the great bulk of World War II veterans will be in retirement. Because. of the GI bill, it is estimated that the great majority of World War II veterans will not be in need. of a VA. pension because of the increased income which these veterans earned as a result of their GI bill assistance. It is realized that the findin g of jobs for veterans is not the primary responsibility of the Veterans' Administration. However, the Veterans of Foreiom Wars is supporting and participating in the. President's Jobs for'N'eterans programs and other proarams which the Federal, State, and local governments haveestablishn to provide assistance to Vietnam veterans who are looking for employment. Agahi, the Veter- ans' Administration has been domg an admirable job reaching the returning Vietnam veteran to apprise him of his rights and benefits. However, we feel that more can be done in this regard. For instance, the Veterans of Foreign Wars has advocated free tek- phone seiwice for veterans on a. nationwide basiS. This is already being done in several States. To be successful, however, it requires someone who answers the phone to be extremely well qualified to handle all inquiries and follow up effectively. This requires additional compe- tent staff.

-426 1753

The Veterans of ForeignWars lent its fullest supportto additional funds for Veterans'Administration regional officeswhen the Veterans' Administration appropriation wasunder consideration. Oneof the principals of our conviction wasthe Veterans'Administration needs more qualifiedpersonnel to effectivelyreach the returning Vietnam vdteran to make siire thathe takes advantage ofthe GI bill and all other assistance to whichhe might be entitled. Another priority goal ofthe Veterans of ForeignWars is the ad- vance GIbill payments. This wouldprovide the veteran with money to pay his tuitioncost at the time heenrolls. e favor proposals before you which will putthe VA or GI bill cheeksin the hands of the veterans at least acouple of weeks beforehe actually enrolls in school or college. These, Mr. Chairman, arethe principalrecommendations of the Veterans of ForeignWars regarding the manybills before you. It. is noted that you dohave several bills before youwhich would restore entitlement to certain WorldWar II and Korean veteranswho find themselves unemployedand did not previouslyex:iaust their entitle- ment. This positionof the Veterans ofForeign Wars hasP developed because of many olderveterans who areunemployed because of the defense, and similarindustries, together with cutback in the aerospace, veterans to find their economic adjustments,whidi have caused many skills obsolete and nolonger needed in ourfast-changing society. In summary, Mr.Chairman and members ofthe subcommittee, the administration is lendingits support to costrof-livingincreases for veterans programs.The Veterans of ForeignWars is extremely hope- ful and stronglyrecommends that thissubcommittee recommend legis- lation to the fullcommittee which will provide acost-of-living in- crease for the morethan 1 million veteranstakincr trainina under the GI bill. In addition,it is the conviction of thecreteransi'of Foreign Wars that any and all moneyprovided for GI bill trainingis not oi y deSperately needed by thereturning Vietnam veteran,but in the long times rim, is aninvestment in Americawhich will be paid back many in the years ahead. Thank you very muchfor the privilege of comingbefore the sub- committee. Mr. I-IErsro.Thank you for appearingbefore us this morning, Mr. Stover. Are there any questions,Mr. Danielson? Mr. DANIELSON. Noquestions. Scott, do you have anyquestions ? Mr. HELSTOSIEL Mr. here. Mr. Scorr. Mr.Stover, I woula add mythanks to you for beino wereperhaps a little moreconcise than someofb the Your comments that. others. We had only sixtypewritten pages, so I commend you on The committee istrying to hear as muchtestimony as possible. Now, I asked therepresentative, I believe, of theAmerican Legion priorities, both of you favoringthe 48 months rather than in order of priority, would you give greater the present 361if it is a question of priorityto an increasein the allowance for thepresent time that the entitled to under GIeducational benefits ? veteran is increase in the allowance if Mr. STOVER. Wewould, support an there had to be achoice. The greaterbenefit would be for those pres-

427 1754 ently under the 36-month limitation. At least a cost-of-living increase in the rates must be authorized as a matter of priority. Mr. SCOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Those are the only questions I have. Mr. HELgrositt. Thank you very much, Mr. Stover. We have one more witness to hear this morning, Mr. Leon Sanchez, who is leaislative director of the AMVETS. Mr. Sa;chez, the subcommittee is pleased to ha,ve you appear.

STATEMENT OF LEON SANCHEZ, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AMVETS Mr. SANCEZ. Mr. Chairman and members of this Subcommittee on Education and Training, I wish to thank you for the invitation to pre- sent the position of AMVETS on proposed education and training legislation for veterans. The importance attached to these prowrams is manifested by the numerous bills which have beenintroducled for consideration. At the outset, Mr. Chairman, I wish to extend paiticular oreetings to you, Congressman Helstoski, from your AMVET friends in Garfield, N.J., and relate that your presence attheir night of instal- lation,.which I also attended, was very much appreciated. Your friends in Lyndhurst would also like to extend their support of your effortS on behalf of our new veterans of the Vietnam era.

At. our national convention held in LosAngeles last August the delegates approve& a resolution. submitted by the Department of Maryland to support legislation that would authorize a 40-percent increase in educational payments to veterans pursuing educational courses. We believe that experience has shown that therecan 'be no argument that veterans education benefits help, not only the individual veteran, but the expenditures are returned to the Government in the form of the increased taxes .paid due to the increased earning power achieved by the veteran utilizing these programs. Statistics prepared on the World ar. II G-I bill programs have shown this, and we of AMVETS feel that an increase in subsistence allowances are war-. ranted at this time. Another resolution, submitted by the Department of Michigan, man- dates AMVETS to support legislation recommending that the law be changed to entitle a female veteran the same allowance for her spouse as the male veteran receives. At the present time the law .states that, in order for a female veteran to be entitled to additional moneys for her spouse, he must be incapable of self-support,.either physically or mentally. We fail to see the logic in this since the male veteran's spouse need not be physically incapacitated in order for increased subsistence,' allowance being authorized. This discriminates against the .female veteran seekina to utilize her educational benefits and, in' some in- stances, she worild not avail herself due to this limitation. The bills, entitled ER 6904, II.R. .3349, ER. 4223, H.R. 6130 au- thorizing the Administrator to make advance educational assistance payments to certain veterans, have received the support Of our national legislative committee and merit the approval of this committee. We have found that, in to many instances, the veteran finds itnecessary to terminate his education course due to a. delay in the receipt of sub-

428 1755 sistence allowance. Theknowledge of prospectiveveteran students that no delays will beenconntered in receipt ofsubsistence .paymentS will result in an increasedparticipation in the educational programs of the Veterans'Administration. consideration by this Bills have beenintroduced and are under . committee to restore entitlementto educationalbenefits to veterans of World War II andthe Korean conflict. Wefind merit in these,pro- posals, in view of theunemployment problemsbeing faced by these veterans today. If theirentitlement was restored, manyuneinployed World War II and Koreanveterans would find, a newlease on.life, and reeducate themselvesand become once againthe proud ,bread- winner, support his familywith restored pride in,his capability. Although we have noconvention mandate on theseproposals, Or thinking is that this ispositive, worthwhile legislation,.warranting and positive consideration. your thoughtful this committee, we all In conclusion, Mr.Chairman and members of is not .the best ,course toattempt in realize that a college education be. many instances,and that apprentice andon-the-job training should utilized. This program warrantsstudy and revision so that morevet- erans will find itpossible to participate. . The present apprenticeand on-the-job trainingbenefits need im- mediate adjustment toeliminate the inequalityof benefits to the veteran. We submit that drastic6-month adjustments toapprentices and on- the-job trainees is notrealistic, nor are the increasesby the trainees wages comparableto offset the reduction. Let us compare. .A single veteran attendingschool for 36 months, receives atotal of. $6,300 in benefits. Compare (his tothe 4-year apprentiCe, Whowily re- ceives $1,944for a maximum of 24months training during the 4.-year. period. Overlooked is that exceptfor the "blue chip" type of appren- ticeships (electrical, sheetmetal, buildino trades, and soforth) hourly wages, even atjourneyman rates are notablways appreciably high. Also, it would seem that veteran,benefits have been only related tothe higher wage constructionindustry, whereas Many, many,on-the-job training wages begin atthe minimum wage of $1.60 perhour, with 6-montkin- creases of 5 centsper hoar. In suchinstances, the trainees receive an approximate salary increaseof $9 per month, while hisbenefits from the VA are reduced by $27.The $27 redtiction perSists.ateach 6-month schedule so that in 2 yearshis wanes have increased $27.permonth, but he has lost $81 a month inVAbeafits. I should also be rememberedthat an apprentice must attendschool at night or different.hours than his work schedule, as .partof his .dp- prentice program. Thisis expensive to the veteran intravel and time, plus other expenses connectedtherewith. LI most instanees, theday- time Or nighttime studentattending school has a part-time job to sup- plement his VA benefits, sohow can one possibly justify the,reduction in benefits tothe apprentice or on-the-jobtrainee because of his hourly wane, everybit of which is beiug earnedin- direct pmportion to his probductivity efforts. Apprentice and on-the-jobtrainees should receive the same amount of benefits as a full-timestudent, with no reduction at 6-monthinter-

429 1756

ValS. 'The benefits Should be equitable to Student i,eterans and will en- Courage :Mere apprentice and orithe-job 'trainees, fis inviting More einpleyerS to partidipate in tlie prop,tain.' ' The VA could .benefit appreciably by having fewer aWard actions procedilres;' and- 8iMplifiCation of the Wage and hour training agree- thentsCdidd enceitrage more firms te act'. . ... To be' apprOVed, Only a training tigreenient need' be' entered' into; With a' 'single' stiphlatithi,- benefits there would not conflict With the union Wade scales, 'Which Often preVents a firth from participating becanse air iiiiionscalé does not Meettlie 85' 'percent Of the Journey- inah rate fOrthe last 6-Months training period. ' By changing this benefit for greater equality 'to the 'Veteran, the en-7,' tire pregrani coiild be siniplified arid prOvide adequate benefits to the veteran and hiS dependents, less' paperWOrk for the VA ,and the State approving authority.. There.seeMS tO be no juStification for penalizing' the 'apprentice 'or on-thejobItainee: ApprOximately only 25 percent Of the poPulation attend' 'college, yet there is Often greater 'need' for people to. inutile other &Mato provide the many goods and servideS- that are .needed in our modern and complex society.' ' . Our 'ObjectiVe should alwaYs'be "equal beliefits 'to :all Veterans," and serious cOnsideratiOn should be given this recointhended change; Which will relieve financial pressures now experienced by the veteran trainee. It 'ifinst tilSOl.)e Considered 'that On-the-job training MaY be the only Solution tO 'the &Wein Of the edhcatiohitllY. diSadvantaged; school. completion is not the only answer, nor does' it folloW 'that a high school diploma will insure employment. ;On-the:job and apprenticeship training 'not only. Provides employ- Ment' bUt althoSt guaranteeS a career in that endeavor... TheSe are' the .vieWs 'of AMVETS (AmeriCan. VeteranS Of World War II, 'Korea and Vietnam): On behalf of 'National' COMmander, JosePh, F., RiniSey, Jr. 'Of Honston, Tex:; I ,again eipresS the ii,N*7 dation of our' organizaliOn 'for yone invitatiOn to teStify here' today. We recegnize the taSk facing' you in eValhating, the fad§ and infonna- tion SUbiriitted 'for the purpose Of establiShing fait and equitableedu- cation benefits to (Mr returning veterahs..We stand ready to aSsist you in 'any way,possible.. HEigroSict." 'Thank you' Mr, Sanchez. We certainly appreciate yOur teStimony this incithing. Are there' any 'qheStions of Mr. 'SancheZ? :If there are 'hone, the subcommittee extends its thanks;' Mr.' Sanchez, for apPearing before This Concludes (Mr testimony 'this .mOrn),.. The 'sfibcothinittee will meet at 10 O'clock toniorrOw 'morning tO receive ' further teSthnOny: .(Wherenpori,' at 12 :05 p.m. the sacominitted adjourned; tOiccon- voiie at 10 ap., TneSday, Deceinber1; 1911..)

430 EDUCATION AND TRAININGPROGR'SMS FOR. \TETER-. ANS AND CERTAIN'OF THEIR DEPENDANTS'

' TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1 1971 ,

HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES, , SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION ANDTRAINING. OF TIIECOMMITTEE ON VETERAN& ArrALIRS, a8hington,..9.0. The subconunittee met at 10a.m., Pursuant to call, in' room 334, Cannon House Office Building,Hon. Henry Helstoski (chairman) presidino. Mr.IfEtsiuslit. The subcommittee will come tO order. We are here this morning 'onthe Subcommittee on Education.and Training to hear testimony fromfive witnessee, the first ofwhich is Dr. Luis M. Morton andDr. John P. Malian, presidentof' Central Texas College of Killeen,Tex.; tind director of programsfor service- men andveteransAmerican Association 'ofJunior Colleges, respectively. Mr.MOrton,you maybegin your testimony. STATEMENT OF LUIS MORTON, Ph. D,PRESIDENT OF CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE, KILLEEN,TEX.;; AND JOHN.P. MALLAN, Ph. D,, DIRECTOR, PROGRAMSFOR SERVICEMEN ANDVETERANS,' AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OP JUNIORCOLLEGES , Dr. MORTON. Mr. Chairmanand'inembei:s Of the subcOmmitteej am Luis Morton, Jr'.preeident of Cenfi.al TexasCollege, Killeen Tex. Central Texas Co llege is locatedin the center of in activemilitary reservation. It is a rather extensiveoperation that developed about 43k. years ago, and webuilt almost $10 million worthof facilities there to service primarily themilitaiy. We have in excess of 3,000different military personnel every year. Sothat gives you a little understanding of some of the problems that weface. With your permission, I will enter mystatement upon the record and make a brief oralpresentation about the concerns of theAmerican' Association of Junior Colleges,and I would direct you to the bottom of the front page where it says :"Suggestions for Legislative Action." 1. To provide adequatestaff. for the Veterans' Administration'and Defense Department education programs. I would hke to comment verybriefly that I would hope, Mr.Chair- man andmembers of the subcommittee,partiOularly in the area of counseling the veterans,that we think in 'terms ofcomprehensive counseling involving careerand technicalLyocational education and (1757)

71-S15-72-28 431 1758 not just in terms of the traditional college ororiented counseling, because so many of these people actually would benefit from a compre- hensive counseling where they might be moved in the direction of zareers to service the needs of theNation in an applied sense rather than just the routine college system that many times grinds them. out and there is not much left of them.

. So it, is possibly, a defect with the counseling system itself, not just in the military, but in our colleges and in our. sChoelS, It is almost totally college or .academically oriented instead of oriented toward the technical-vocational, which we realize is a very needed thina. 2. Increase the GI benefits in one of several ways : Higherbenefit levels, subsidized GI loan program, similar to the subsidized national .defense student loan programs under the Office of Education; a new .examination of the question of direct payment of veterans' tuition and. fees to the institution. 3. Establish an advance payment or prepayment system for GI benefits, including PREP. 4. Lower the 'maximum. colkge hours for PREP. in section 1601

-from 25 to 15 hours. . It is ouite possible that many can assimilate 25 hours each week, and think-a very highly capable .and determined person could do it; but also if you are going to expand the PREP, proaram, if there-was :an option. also .for a lesser amount, you mightbe' able to motivate :many more to enter the project. 5. Permit high school equivalency programs underPREP. 6. Permit more private colleges to participate in PREP and sec- tion 1691. 7. Establish a direct institutional payment system for PREP. .8: Make available advance grants or loans:for .overseas PREP.: At this point, Mr. Chairman, I would conclude the official presen- tation, and I Would be available for any commentS or questions you may have. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Thank you, Mr. Morton. Mr. Winn, do you have any questions of these gentlemen ? Mr. WINN. Thank you Mr. Chairman. Mr. Morton, would Ivou 'elaborate on No. 4, on thelowering of the clock hours again ? I think I understood it, buit seems like that percentage of lowering the requirements is quite a drop. Dr. Mowrox. What I am suggesting is probably an option. I see nothing basically wrong with 25 solid hours during the week. I am not sure that the learning process can stand that much whenthey have also to meet their military mission, and the trooper must do other thinas as well as stndy. MT. WINN. You think it may be too heavy a load, for some? Dr. Morrrox. For some ; yes, str. Mr. WINN. So you want fo drop the required hours down to 15 hours 'of required, and those who could carry 20 to 25 hours could do .so ? Dr. MonTox. I would think so, sir. Mr. WINN. Thank you. HELSTOgKi. One question Mr. Morton, on 5, the high school equivalency programs underPAP..Can you giveine an estimate of the percentage of non-high-school graduates ?

432 1759

Dr. Moirrox. I beg your pardon? Mr. HELSTOSKI. Can you submitthe percentage of people who are not high school graduatesand who could conceivably comeunder such programs ? Dr. MORTON. I couldn't answerthat, sir. I don't have thestatistics. Possibly Dr. Mallon from theAmerican Association of JuniorCol- leges can. I could onlyrelate to my own institution inthat case. Dr. MALLAN. Mr. Chairman,PREP, of iourse, is a program for men in the armed services, men onactive duty. The last figure Ihave seen from the Defense Departmentis that between 20 and 25 percentof all enlisted men in the Armed Forceslack a high school diploma orequiv- alency. This is particularlyhigh in some segments of the Army,the rround force units, and the Marine Corps. 1.The services are particularlyconcerned with the decline in thedraft, with more reliance on voluntaryenlistment, and about the percentaae of non-high-school graduatesIncreasing. If the draft falls off astrie Vietnam war winds down,there will be a larger and laraer percent- age of menwho are not high school graduates.TheywoulSlike at least to bring these men up tothe high school equivalency level. As the PREP law isworded now, a man can be enrolledin PR.EP only to work on a diploma, solie has to meet all of the hourrequire- ments and course requirementsfor a standard diploma. We and the DefenseDepartment feel we would do a muchbetter job of helping more men if wepermitted men in the service to beenrolled as in the highschool equivalency program. Thisis now permitted for veterans. A veteran, asI am sure 3-ou know, under,section 1691, may be enrolledin a GED or equivalency program.A serviceman under PREP may not. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Thank you,Dr. Mall= STAFF DniEcTon. Let me pursue alittle more this question that Mr. Winn asked about 25 and 15hours. In recent legislation, Ibelieve in the same bill that created thePREP program, we changedthe method of measurina what you wouldcall accelerated high school programs. These areta typical programs offered by many public schoolsand many juniorcolle(res in the community ot meetthe demands at home to put thestudenethroughan accelerated programto get him a high school diploma. In that instance we chanffethe method of measure. Those programs were measured25 clockFlours, and we changed the measurement method by law to measure highschool credit. We now measurethose courses on thehigh school credit basis. The result is, I think, similar towhat you suggest here, thatthe man ends upwith a lesser number of clockhours per week than he does under the 25-hour requirement. My question to you is : Do youbelieve this PREP programwould submit itself to measurementof that sort, say the Carnegieunits ? Dr. MORTON. I think that you canmeasure anythingb-37 almost .any unit system that you want to use. I think what I was trying topoint out is that we develop something that is reasonably prudent sothat a man will be able to meet hismili- tary mission und atthe same time the trooper wouldhave an oppor- tunity to have time to study.But by the time he spends 25 hours,and then, you have the twoother aspects of his life he must meet,he is in a pretty tight bind. 433 1760' STAPP Dmimon. I believe the Carnegie system has allowed thepro- gram tO achieve that-becanse theSe hien iii effed, .do not go! tO:school 25' lionrs a week. They go here, as 'you. suggest, 15 hinirS'' Week, 'and it is considered full-time. The other question I .wanted was on iteni 6. You uSe theterniinology to "permit more priVath colleges. to. participate, . in. .PREP."*What dOes the word "periiiit" Mean? :" ' Dr. MATA4:-. Nay I speak tOthat.411% ChairMan; and if I 'May. .also respond'afterwards to Ali% MeadoWs' preViOus 'question. t The prOblem Of the .private college; Mr.MeadoWs; there Is' a Section of the laW whiCh says that a private institntiOn'. may para0 pate in such a program as PREP 'only if it,htiS offered 4 shnilar pragram for at least 2, yeais previously.. There are SOirie very 'well 'qualified institu--- tiOns. 'excludedfor example, there' is .a snialichnick-relat:ed.inStitu- tion 'in .the State. of .DelaWaret ond 'of .'orir colleges It i§,,r4oilally accredited. It' is non profit 'It' IS repUtable institntiOn, going 'back inany.'years whi eh' Would' like to offer' PREP:at 'nearbfAVForee base. They canna do sO eVen at sUch a rePntablei inStittition',heCarisa theyhave not offered' a, course forthe 9 preViOus'year's'",',..',',.,',', I think there' is an anomalY' in the' laNV. 'that .Wis ñotsii When PREP was Written. There are 'not tob Many 'C011ages: that (Ni-biikt be; affected. But there are accredited nOnprofit institUtionS'Whieli Would like to do a 'good job in the PREP prOgrarn under', Section' 1601, but ai..e excluded. I Can 'aiVe ybu: the statUtory reference tO"WhiCh that refers. '. On the Ca pie irie unit,' Mr. 'Chairman, one' prOblein; is that the Car- negio unit applies' OnlY to high SobOol leVel prOgrams. ManY, of the people enrolled in PREP are taking a .preparatory; or'reMedial pOst- secondary program.. Their schedules Canna' ba ineaSured In:Carnegie. units and they MUSt.be in 'class, therefore; 26 hours' a week'. . . , Staff Dinnoron..Ona final questiOn:. COuld you give''US.'fin' idea of.. the kope of theparticipation of the jOhior College grobpin PREP prograin? In other WOrdS, ghre u§.4: broad -sketch.of Where they aro now in the Military PREP pro'irrain. . Di MALAk. On page 3' of the teStimOny you will find a statement there are noW between 50. and '60 PREP 'prograMS at ñi.iIitrbases- located in 23 States. Five of these are at military hospitals.. There are. prograinS at Military hospitalS under PREP. ., Plans are Underway through out assodiation 'fOr 'at 50,. more. " . , , ", . , PREP programs in various parts Of the country'Itn.' . . We have listed what are, to the best Of our owledge the States... whiCh there are .rioW PREP proabrain0Ocated., .. We are also' 'working, aS you Willsee in the later pait :Of,'theteSti- mony, on overseas PREP .proposals,:to brino.,PREP to kit'Vhieiten in Eopeur and- 'Various: parts. of the' Far Easti. We aie 0064, with.

Army now tOaccomPlish:this., . So We have thade a. dent in bringing' PREP to .militarbaSes,'. but these are many bases and many hospitalS:in 1,nany liarts 'of,tb:e cOnntry where PREP-is not heing offered.. STATr DIriEbTon. This is.not theant to be tInestion, bnt'alniost every dontact we haVe had in, eXplOring Where (Trams were developed"We alwayS gotttie anSwer that One..Ofthaprob- lems. waS that the'militarY cornmanderS; theloCki I 'Military, eo'ninianders 1761 were not too .cooperativein freeing up. the men to, meet the.schedules necessary to.put in their 25,hourS a:week.Can you. give us any comment aS to how vou view thiaprogram? Do you. agreethat the situation is

, . improving'? .. . ; . 1 will. be More Specifie. I. hadthe pleasure *of visiting Mr.'Morton's institUtion,,and he.had a small PREP programgoing there. He didn't tell me,:but the people running theprogram teld me,, that it could be inuch,largor and do a. greatdeal more than they are doing and would like to do more but theclasses were small.- One class was. 25. Some of the people I talked to indicatedthat the problem. was that the military didn't seem :to bepushing the program very, much. Is there a comment about that? Dr. MORTON. I think you will findthat inherent within the system, -because even If a commander of alarge poSt. let us say ;that has 40 or 45.000, troOperS,. 'and even if thedivisional commanders and ,all, the way'down, to, the battalion level, inueh of the time the.deciSion is still going to.be madedown at the serffeant's level and he may nothaVe the imderstandiug that he 'shouldof the significance of snch a program. Consequently, that is where, it startsstalling out, from thebattalion level on down. . Wo have had. very excellentceoperation from the commander's level, from the diVisional level,froM the deputy division level. They pass the word and it is written, and we areservicing over 3,000, which, I think, is over more than any collegein this Nation of the military. But it. is very difficult forthe,conimander himself to go down toid follow the thin°. through down to thesergeant's level to see that he frees them upweali the so t.o speak. I. think it is inherentwithin6aoodwill, the systemthat they want them to meet their military mission, as 'I think,personally, they should.- That is their primary objective. Findingtime to release them is not always easy from thesergeant's pthnt -of view or Oren from thecompany commander's point of view. I think youwould understand that it would be. a. very natural problem thatwould arise. Now, I can't speak for other postsother than Fort Hood where we have reasonable cooperation there. Dr.. MALLAN. Mr. Chairman., I.could add a few remarks to that. We have had excellent cooperation, ourcolleges have, at Some military installations. There .are others, however,where, I am afraid, we,have run into the sitnatiohMr. Meadows describes, someone otherthan the commandina officer or someone downthe line has not been too inter- ested. Onecif the thingswe are concernedabout is that neither the Secretary of Defehse hor the SecretarieSof variouss serVices have at any time issued adirective down through the channelsin the services which 'would strongly recommend thatwherever' it is compatible with the-military mission, particularly for menwho will be separating from the service in 6. Months whodO not have high levels of educatiOnand job training, that time beMade available..If this could be' done more clearly than it is now, I think it wouldbe helpful. There are directives out Which,in effect, simply say that PREPis a. program.which. -might be considered by bases..There .is not a very strona orientation from the topdown suggesting that PREP is a..highly desiale program for servicemen to participate in;: Whenit. is com- patible with the mission. 1762 I have suggested, sir, ot page 1 of this testiniony the SuggeStion of legislative oversight; that it would be very 'useful if this committee would request from the Department of Defense what has been done with PREP since the passage of Public Law 91-219 and .what Men have been enrolled in what bases find what the plans are in the Depart- ment of Defense for imPlementing PREP in the next 12 Months. I think it would be useful. There is no overall inventory. I think it Would be useful if the Department of Defense could plit together for your committee such information. Mr. HimsTosKr. Thank you. Would yon want to continue with your testimony, sir ? Dr. Moirrox. There is one other minor comment. At the bottom. No. G of the legislative oversight. This may seem like a ,very iimOeuous method of doing something that is certainly not for national considera- tion, but Where it suggests a simple handbook explaining some Of these programs, just a simple thing like that Would do a 'frreat deal. Youare. dealing with people you have tO explainh things', eo. 'in rather *SimPle. terms. . Mr. ETELSTOSICL Thank you very much; Di'. IliOrtonnd Dr. Malian, We certainly appreciate your appearance here this morning to offer the testimony. The testimony will be:made a part of therecord and the document. (The document referred to follOws:)'

FURTHER STATEMENT OF PEESIMNT LUIS' M. MORTON, jR. Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am Luis M. Morton, Jr., Presi- dent of Central Texas College, Killeen. Texas..With your permission I will enter my statement upon 'the record and make a brief oral presentation about the con- cerns of the Association and about some bf the programs for veterans and sem-ice- men which my own college is carrying out. Before I do so, however. I would like to sumnarize the recommendations which appear later in this testimony.

A SLIMMADY Or RECOMMENDATIONS Suggestion; for legislative oversight 1. The Committee on Veterans Affairs should request the VA and DOD'to make . publicly available information 'about the number of men' en'rolled in PREP each month since March, 1970rwhen P.L. 91-219 became law, the bases where.the men enrolled, and the names of the ,educational Institutions which .offered! PREP. There is apparently' no overall national inventorY of. PREP programS. . 2. Similar informa tiOn should be 'made available 'ontntorial and Section 1691 programs. . , The Committee should ask the Defense Department to prepare abistory of steps taken to implement PREP since March, .1970, and plans for PREP for the coming year, both ID the United States and overSeas. . 4. The Department of Labor and U.S. OffiCe of Education ShouM be' asked to describe their current programs and plans for counselling and skill training for veterans and separating servicemen. . 5. All of this information should be made publicly.available. 6. The VA and DOD should be asked bY The Committee to publish and distribute widely a simple handbook explaining programs such as PREP; tutorial, and Section 1601. Suggestions for Legislative 4ction; 1. Provide adequate. staff for the VA and Defense Department education programs. 2. Increase G.I. benefits in one or several.ways: higher benefit levels ; 1763

a subsidized' G.I. loan program,similar to the subsidized NDSL loan programs under the Office of Education ; a new examination of thequestion of direct payment ofveterans tuition and fees to the institution ; 3. Establish an advance payment orprepayment system for G.I. benefits,includ- ing PREP. 4. Lower the maximum clockhours requiremei4. for. PREP andSection 1691, from 25 to 15 hoins. .5. Permithigh school equivalency programunder PREP, . 6. Permit more private colleges toparticipate in PREP and Section1691.. 7. Establish a direct institutionalpayment sytsem for PREP. S. Make available advance grants orloans for overseas PREP. Briefly, the American Association ofJunior Colleges: (AAJC) and theNation's junior colleges have a very strong interestin the problems of veterans andservice- men. I am informed that over300,000 veterans now attend janiorand community colleges. We expect this number to growover the next several:years.A great many junior 'colleges alsoconduct educational and training programsfor men still in service, and many more wouldlike to do so.- junior colleges today constitute oneof the fastest-growing parts ofAmerican education, as I am sure you know. There are over1100 two-year colleges, enrolling over 2,700,000 students. Thisnumber is growing very rapidly,andin many states a good majority of allcollege freshmen and sophomores areenrolled in two-year colleges. The Chairman's own stateofTextismy statehas one of theNation's most vigorous systems of juniorcolleges. . Junior and community colleges offernot only the .first two years oftraditional college work at a low cost to the studentand taxpayer. They.also provide awide range of vocational and technical programs,to provide skilled manpowerfor almost every occupation'and profession:Most colleges offer evening andpart-time programs, serving many adultswho want .to upgrade themselves intheir work. They are conveniently located,within-commuting distance of much of theNation's population. More colleges open each year,often: with large enrollments intheir first year. We believe they are truly"opportunity colleges." . . . . 27w AMC-Carnegie Program, fOrVeterans and Servicentet . Public :Law 91-219, the G.I. Billamend- About the time that Congress passed in de- ments of 1910, the AmericanAssociation Of Junior .Colleges was engaged veloping a new, nationwide program tohelp More colleges developprograms for the serviceman and veteran. This program,assisted by a grant from theCarnegie foundation, has enabled the Nation'stwo-year Colleges to carry out aunique pro- gram for veterans over thepast 18 mouths, a program unlikethat of any. other national organization., The AAJC and its membercolleges.have worked actively andaggressively to take advantage of the remarkablyinnovative new programs for veteranswhich were developed by the Houseand Senate Veterans AffairsCommittees under the leadership of Chairman Olin Teague,Senator Alan Cranston, and manyotherS. These programs include the "PREP" programfor servicemen authorized bySec- tions 1695-1696 of P.L. 91-219, the"tutorial" pronram, authorized bySections 1692, the "Section 1691" program forremedialveterans education and the new emphasis, on veterans outreach spelled,outin Sections 240-244 of the law. The AAJC has also worked onother, related programs,, describedbelow. Let me mention some of these programsin detail : . 1. PREP.Between 50 and 60PREP programs at military bases,located in 23 states, have been established.Most of these programs, whichinvolve the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, havebeen established at junior colleges,with the assistance of the AAJC program. Plans areunder way for at least 20 more PREP programs, including severalwhich will be carried out on U.S.Navy ships at sea. .(The states in which PREP andclosely related projects are locatedat present, according to the best availableinformation, include Arizona, California,Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii,Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland,Massa- chnsetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada,New Jersey, .New Mexico, NorthCarolina, South Carolina, Texas,Washington, Pennsylvania, and RhodeIsland.) 2, ,Hospital Programs.AAJChas had a strong interest hiestablishing, educa- tional and counselling programsfor wounded and disabledservicemen and GIs and veterans hospitals. At leastfive military hospitals at both military hospitals colleges, snpported by 2ww have cooperativeeducational programs with junior

437 1764

PREP or in one case by Vocational Rehabilitation funds. Many other colleges have expressed an interest in working with military and V. hospitals. !In addition to formal educational 'programs, there are possibilities for occa- sional counselling by college staff and students. For example, staff members at Northern Virginia Community College and other colleges have madeseveral counselling visits to wounded men at Walter Reed Hospital. We hope other col- leges will develop similar programs. 3. Overseas PREP.Plans are actively under way to establish juniorcollege programs overseas, to bring PREP to servicemen in Europe and partsof Asia. Several junior colleges in different states have submitted proposals to the De- partment of the Army, to establish overseas PREP as soon aspossible. 4. Skill Training mid. Project Transition..The AAJC is very actively inter- ested in working with the federal government in the new program outlined. by President Nixon some months ago, to greatly expand skill training and voca- tional education .programs for servicemen in their final months of duty, both overseas and in the United States. In this way, some of the mostdisadvantaged servicemen, those who lack educational credentials and marketable job skills, would have the chance to upgrade themselves and findemployment or contirre their education and training after separation. AAJO staff have had several meetings with officials of the Department of Labor and Department of Defense to explore this possibility. Many junior collegesal- ready offer comparable skill training programs, and are in an excellent position to expand their programs to help servicemen. A number already workwith Project Transition, the existing Defense Department skill training program, in such fields as law enforcement and pollution technology ; many more colleges would like to do so. 5. Overseas Cousselling.Some months ago a special AAJC team visited Viet- nam at the invitation of the commandng generaL CreightonAbrams, to survey existing educational and counselling programs for servicemen and to suggest new programs. A program very much like that which AAR) suggestedto the Defense Department has now been established by the U.S. Office of Education, which is sending special educational counsellors to Vietnam, other parts of Asia, and Europe. AAR/ staff are working closely with this very worthwhile project. 6. "External Degrees" and Vocational Education in the Services.At the request of the Department of Defense, AMC staff are developinga plan for a nationwide and possibly worldwide 'program for the education 'of 'men in the services, in vocational fields as well as academic fields. The plan calls for a system under which a serviceman could take off-duty courses in postsecondary vocational as well as academic subjects, as he moved from one military base to another, working with a nearbY two-year college. One or more junior colleges would also establish programs overseas, so that servicemen could continue to accumulate credits wherever they Were stationed. In this way, in a three- or four-year tour of duty a man could accumulate enough credits for an Associate's 'Degree or a certificate in some 'vocational field. He might continue on to get a Bachelor's Degree at cooperatinglour-year colleges. An AAJC, survey of some 200'junior colleges located near military bases in the United States indicates that a great many are interested in this possibility. 7. Veterans Ontreach.AAJC has recently begun a new and exciting nation- wide outreach piogram, th cooperation with The Anierican Legion. Under this program, local Legion posth will make available to cooperating juniorc011eges lists of servicemen separating each month in that area. The college, using its own funds or funds available from such programs asCollege Work Study or the Emergency Employment Act, will contact-returning veterans personally and counsel them about continuing their edtication. Where possible, student veterans will be used as outreach workers, to contact other veterans. Over 200 colleges in all parts of the country have already applied to the Legion to participate in this program, and more colleges, are applying daily. AAJC hopes that in the next' year, with the assistance of veterans' organizations, the Veterans Administration, and the colleges, a great many more veterans can be contacted about taking advantage of the G.I. Bill. 8. Tutorial and "Section 169.1."Colleges in all parts of the country are par- ticipating in the tutorial:program, which is intended to help veterans enrolled in school and:in atademic difficulties, and the "Section 1691" program, which provides for remedial and development courses for veterans at no charge to their G.I. Bill entitlement. These programs have apparently not been as well

438 1765 all' publicized as we wish by theVeterans Administration,and are not reaching taking advantage of them: the veterans who shouldClubs.AAJC be has also given someassistance to' student 9. Student Vetcram growing up in many.partsof the country. 'Mostvet- veterans clubs, which are have Proved, erans of thisVietnam, era are mature andcapable young: men, who They are in an 'excellentposition, to speak for them- their abilities in the service. growing on many campuses, selves about their ownneeds. Veterans clubs are- when, requested to' do so: and AAJO has given themhelp and technical advice Suggestions for legislative action of the country havehad extensive experience Junior colleges in many parts P.L. 91-219 became with PREP and over new programsin the 20 months since have reported to us onrwhat they consider to bethe law in 'March 1970. They well as the weaknesses of strengthsand weaknesses of these new programs, as Bill. existing programs like the G.I.AAJC believes that there are anumber of steps On the basis of their reports, all which the Congress of theUnited. States should. takein order to Strengthen. educational, training, ancounselling programs forservicemei . and veterans.. oversight, to give theCongress and the American Some steps involve legislative have done .to implement people a clearer pictureof what the federal agencies P.L. 91-219, in the past 20months. Other steps involvefederal legislation. SUggestions for LegislativeOversight Veterans Affairs shOuld requestthat the Veterane 1. The House Committee on Department make publiclyavailable informa- Administration and' the Defense &tek month. after March, tion about the number ofservicemen enrolled in PREP where these men Wereenrolled', and the .names ofthe 1970; the military bases provided, PREP programs. Asfar as we know, educational institutions which made by 'any federalagency. nO overall nationalinventory on PREP has been request similar fromthe Veterans Administration on 2. The Committee shouldSection 1691as a minimum,information about the the tutOrial program and -by state and number of veterans Currentlyenrolled in each of th'ese programs, by edueational institution. Defense 3. The Committeeshould request theVeterans AdMinistration and Department to prepare ananalysis of PREP, explainingthe stepe which were by these agencies and byindividual znilitary taken to implement this program and the present. Theagencies bases and VA regionaloffices 'between March, 1970implementation of PREP in should also be requested topresent phuis for the during the coming year.Each agency should be the United States and overseas, of PREP as seen bythe asked tO comment onthe strengths and weaknesses agency. Education should be asked 4. The Department ofLabor and the U.S. Office of they have taken toestablish educational andjob coun- to describe steps which and separating serv- selling programs, and skilltraining programs for veterans to take in the icemen during the past year,and the steps which they propose coming year. should be made publicly availableby the Committee 5. All of this information organizations will have an oppor- so that interestededucational institutions and tunity 'to work more effectivelywith these programs. Administration and DefenseDepartment should be requested 6. The Veterans bases, and educationalinsti- to publish and distributeto all VA offices, militaty PREP, tutorial, and tutions a simple handbookdescribing programs such as interested groups how toparticipate in such programs. Section 1691, and telling that many local VAofficials No such 'handbook nowexists; our colleges reportthese. programs. As a result, and base personnel arerelatively unfamiliar with many colleges andmost veterans are not awareof them. Suggestions for LegislativeAction Administration (1414 DefenseDepartment MoreAdequate 1. Give the VeteransPrograms.Both' federal agencies, aswell as the Labor Staff for Educational legitimately pointed out, thatthey arebeing required Department and HEW, have and servicemen without to work with constantlygrowing numbers of veterans proportionate increases in staff.The Veterans Administrationat both the na- much in need of additionalstaff to work in the tional and regional levels is very There is no doubt field of education as well asoutreach and other programs.

439 1766

that we are failing the nation's veterans if we do not provide the staff necessary for the proper administration of these greatly expanded programs. In tho Defense Department, a tiny handful of people in DOD and in each service are responsible for major worldwide programs for education and train- ing, affecting several million servicemen. It is little wonder that these men have not been able to give adequate attention to PREP, when they have so many other responsibilities. Similarly. military bases at 'home and abroad are very understaffed in terms of educational personnel. They simply cannot give the time for education or counselling necessary for the thousands of men whom they serve. It is our hope that members of this committee Will discuss this matter with the Appropriations Committee at the proper time. 2. Increse G.I. Benefits.There is no question that today's veteran cannot pro- vide for bis own subsistence as well as the costs of tuition, fees and. books at most colleges. This is true even for single men. The situation is more difficult for the large percentage of veterans who are married; and many of whom haVe children. The Vietnam era veteran is simply not as fairly treated asthe World War II veteran, who usually received the full cost of tuition,' fees, and books, plus a living allowance. What is more, the present system discriminates against veterans depending on where they happen to live and' which institutions they attend. A veteran fortu- nate enough' to live where he can attend a free or almost free community col-. lege may possibly be able to make ends meet. Another veteran, in a state or city where even the public colleges charge a tuition of $400 or more a year, 'cannot. Veterans who attend residentfal colleges, even relatively low-cost public col- lOgeS, are further discriminated against. So are almost all veterans who attend. private colleges. '.The World War II G.I. Bill experience proved the benefits, to the nation and the individual, of allowing every yeteran to attend the college of his' choice, provided.that he qualifled,for it. A. whole generation of today'S leaders caMe out of small and large' colleges, public and private institutions, two-year and four- year colleges. Today's G.I. Bill, on the other hand, discriminates against many veterans, many states, and .many colleges. There are three ;-;eneral ways to aid the veterans in terms o G.L benefits: A. substantial increase in benefits.Many Members of Congress have supported a substantial increase in G.I. benefits from the present $175 per month for single Men and. the comparable figures for those with dependents. This appears to be minimum action necessary to help the veteran help himself. A subsidized 0.1. Man system.The American' Legion, at their 53rd National Convention in Houston, Texas, held August 31September 2, 1971, urged that a system of guaranteed veterans loans be established, similar to the Guaranteed' Student Loan Program under the U.S. Office of Education. We would go a step beyond' this excellent suggestion, and propose a subsidized loan system like the National Defense Student Loan Program which has served so many students so well. If other students are entitled to subsidized loans at 3 percent, it seems more than reasonable to establish a separate loan program for student veterans Who are no better able than other students to bear the costs of more expensive limns. This veterans loan program could probably be administered by the NDSL program, in order to reduce administrative casts. Loans should be made available to students as soon aS they are accepted for college, in order to help them meet expenses during the critical months when their funds are limited and they may not have received their benefit checks. However. we helieVe that wherever possible veterans are entitled' to outright benefits. not merely loans. Direct 'payment of tuition and fees to the Inatitution.Veterans organizations like The American Legion. many members of Congress and probably all educators would prefer a G.T. Bill system which provided a direct payment or tuition, fees. and books to the institution. plus a direct subsistence allowance to the veterah. Almost all veterans would prefer such a system, proyided that it gave .them at least as mueli or more subsistence support as they receive now, plus payment of part or all of their tuition and fees. The Amerie:m Legion. at, their last national convenfion. proposed a system under which the VA would pay directly to the institution the customary cost of tuition. books. fees and supplies, provided that in no event the sum paid exceeded 75 iweent of the total cost or $1,000 for an ordinary school year, whichever is the lesser. 440 1767 for payments to theinstitution of. up to Similarly, S. 2163 would provide and other such charge's. .$1,000 per year, based on thecustomary cost of tuition Other similar bills have beenfiled in both Houses. that the Chairman. ofthis committee andOther It is our understanding such a system, because of abusesat the time Members of Congress have opposed however, because Of the of the World War IIG.I. Bill. It is .our suggestion, mounting costs of education andthefinancial pressures on bothstudent veterans should be reopened. and colleges that the question War II ernwere broUght We believe that some of theabnses of the post-World advantage of the about because of so-called"fiy-by-night" schools which took accreditation at thattime. Atightening of accredit- much looser laws relating to would take care of much'of ino laws and proceduressince the nineteen-fortiee other the problem. Officials of the NationalCommission on Accrediting and accrediting agencies would be happyto work with thiscoMmittee on this problem, we are sure. Congress, with the assistanceof specialists in auditing We also believe that the against the abuse of and administrative procedures,could develop safeguards GI. Bill funds paid directlyto. institutions. Billionsof dollars in federal aid institutions now, in, the form, ofresearch grants, fellowshipsand !Ws directly to Department,"NASA, other assistance progra»zssponsored by HBW, the Defense and many other federal agencies.Fiscal, personnel, andadministrative account- developed to .aceount for thesefunds; there have been ing procedures have been why similar safeguards could notbe very few casesof abuse. We see no reason developed for the G.I. Bill. procedure .under It might even be possible,if this were desirable, to set up a which the student veteran "signsoff" on the check before theinstitution 'Cashes it. In this way, there wouldbe further assurance thatthe veteran knows where his benefit check is; goingand for what purpose.There, are doubtless other administrative devices to protect theinterest of the veteran as well asthe public. this .admittedly complexproblem be subjected to . In any case, we urge .that veterans wouJ' be belie- careful. review .by theCongress. We believe that many generous system but by one whichrecognizes the dif- fitted .not only by a more does not penalize the veteranwho .oeleas ferential costs of educationwhich expensive, by la vir,g a college away fromhome or one which is somewhat more of his very limited subsistenceallowance.. to pay the iacreased cost out for G.L Wewlits 3. Establishivg an. advancepayment or prepayment system including PREP. Both theadministration and many Membersof Congress have the.. veteran would receivehis first G.I. check and supported plans under which in all parts of the subsequent checks sooner.Reperts from veterans and colleges still one of the greatest problemsmany veterans face. country tell us that this is the veteran in a des- Checks may arrive from oneto three months late, leaving perate financial situation atthe same time that he needsto concentrate most Veterans from disadvantagedbackgrounds, unable to actively on his studies. especially hard hit by thesedelays. draw upon other resources, are appropriate form of prepayment as soonas, We. nrge that Congress adopt appliedan to PREP as well as tothe regular G.I. possible. This system should be problems because of benefits, .since many PREPprojects have run into serious delays in receiving checks. 4.. Lowering the cloele,!hoursrequirements for PREP and SectionMi.Under enrolled in PREP or in theremedial "Section 1691" pro- present law, a student week in order to receive reim- gram for veterans mustbe in class 25 clock hours a for non- bnrsement asn full-time stndent.Hours in equivalent remedial programs from 9 to 15 a week. veterans would nsually be program for service- : The PREP ,program.which is a remedial or preparatory and men on active duty,has been very hard hitby this regulation. Colleges ndlitary base personnel tell usthat as a result of thisone.regulation many fewer servicemen are being enrolledin PREP. than would otherwisebe the case. The first objection to the25-hour rule is educational:It is contrary to all for adult men, learning to studyand work on their modern educational practice Rather, such men need tocombine own, to be confinedin class 25 hours a week. assisted indi- necessary classroom workwith independent study, in many cases and with programmed learning.Many of these men vidualy by faculty or tutors. confining situation of endless did not do well in schoolpreviously because of the class hours; as active adultsoldiers they do not respond any morefavorably. The second objection o the25-hour rule is administrative.The services are

441 1768 not in .a position;, espeeially as 'military ma npOwer IS cut back, to '. release very many men from duty 25 hours a week; or.even. ri.substantial' part' of 25. hours. Some soldiers are managing a 25 honr nrograM oir thek own 'time; '4' or. 5. liours, each. evening, but this is a killing pace with 'active duty, and'Still does not inclede tiMe for study. The third' objectien is that colleges are 'not geared. to.' working with Students: on a 25-hour basis, either in terms of staffing-patterns or budgetary arrangements.

. We therefore urge that the 25-hour rule beredheed in:the case of PREP. (and-. also Section 1091; which has had shnilarproblems): to a maximuthof 15-hours for full-time reimbursement. Permitting high, school' equivalency Prograins-Under.PREP.At present the: PREP' law has been interpreted to mean that all' PREP. programs must lead either to) a high school diploma or to courses preparatory to poStseconditry edu- cation or trainfng. ThiS has been taken by the VA tO mean that a program lead- ing to a high school equivalency, or General Educational Development' (GED) certificate cannot be supported by PREP 'funds. This requirement for serviceme differs :from that for veterans, who umler Section. 1691 of the same law are entitled to' draw veteran's benefits while enrolled in a program leadthg to "a secondarY school diploma' (or equivalency certificate)." The diploma .requirement has greatly restricted.the use of PREP in the educa- tion of high School dropouts in. the service, both in the United StateS and over- seas: Educational practice in all 50 states, as well as DepartMent of.Defense programs,,have strongly emphasized the use of the GED* or equivalency- certif- icate for:many years. Literally tens of thousandS of high school dropouts, both military and civilian, complete the GED each year. ,The GED. is recognized by the state departments of education in everystate, by every major ethicational organization, and for admission to most college& It is also recognizedby most employers. Further, it is much less expensive,' in terms of time and-money; to prepare a student for the GED than to help him' make up what may 'be one to four: years of high 'school diploma work. For adults on acdve duty, the GED ts.obviously a better Way toWard selNinprovement than'the repetition of countless hours of routine. high school work. . . This anomaly in the PREP law has meant that many fewer serVicemen have been enrolled in PREP' than wmild (itherwise be the ease: It has led to substan- tial' Mays' in establislthig programs for servicemen Overseas, since few:colleges are legally able to offer .a diploma overseas, 'while many could offer the GED progra m. We urge that this part of the PREP' law be amended: 6: Permitting more private colleges to participate. in: PREP. and Section 1691.-7-Under present law, a private, non-profit regionally accredited college may not participate in PREP (or in: Section 1091 for Veterans). unless it has offered' shnilar courses for more than two years. This part of the law has. kept some well qualified and' interested colleges from participating in PREP and..Section 1691. We urge that it be amended. 7. Direct institutional payments for PREP.Whatever the pros and cons of direct tuition payments to the institution for veterans, we believe there- is a. clear case for direct payment to the college for servicemen enrolled'in PREP. The situation is quite different, because the serviceman on; active duty already receives subsistence. The PREP' payment is. intended to be. used only kir his tuition, fees, books and supplies and is paid over to the college as soon as he receives it. PREP checks now arrive two or three months after the program. begins, so that the college is forced to invest. what may be thousands of dollars in. local tax- payers' money in salaries, supplies. etc., while waiting for clwcks. Sometimes there are further delays. red tape problems of various kins. In some instances, servicemen have actually left the service or have been transferred to another base or overseas before the PREP checks ever arrived. Since the serviceman must personally sign over his check--usually for several hundred dollars, made out to him alonesome colleges have suffered financial losses and others have hesitated of refused to undertake PREP. A system of advance payment for PREP and other veterans' programs, as pro- posed above, would help. But we also believe that a very good case can be made for direct payment of PREP checks ta the college, which is being paid for carry-

442 ,17,69

for the individual-G.-I.This is the practice ing out a specific .educational.service Rehabilitation, and many _followed in the case. Of manpower'training, 'Vocational which:ere .based on -a contradtIn advance and payment other federal PregraniS, and wiII encou rage. mo re col- to the college. We 'believethat it makes 'sense here.safeguards :can ,4 set up asfor eges to:participate.We ,,believe .tha t.adequate Vocational Rehabilitation a nd,other federal programs. advaace grants orloans far overseas-P.R.EP.A final prob- S. Maki»t/ aiditable .advance -payment leth whieh has 'plagned PREP'hilts .first 20 months 'is that of training. The.Army is veryanxious to establish PREP for overseas education.andBut 'under the present-PREP ;law, :a ,college which .programs for .men .overseas.. thousand dollars An establishes an overseas .programmust invest up to several local taxwyers' funds toestablish programs overseas,With ail 'financial .pay- mentto come retroactivelyovellafter the progra m is set up. 'paYing their travel expenses .overseas,.coverin!, 'their This means hlirhkg staff. whatever books,an'dsup- living costs -while: they ,develop.the program, ;purchasing :students, .and offering .classesfor a couple of plies. are necessary, enrollingreimbursement at all from thePREP cheeks ! niontlisbefore there is any by local tax- It's hazardous financially nndpolitically tor a college .supported, payers and responsible to a'locally elected' board .toundertake such an .enterprise, usually:not:even residents of thatconununity: or state:This 'to serve GIs,who are relatively:few c011eges Avere in aposition to.submit over- is one major reason why Department of the Army. seas proposals in responseto the recent request.of the Defense Officials to make somefunds available out of 'We have nrged Army and initial costst of these present DOD 'budgets, 'includingtravel funds, to cover the programs. until Ihey !are'financially .established. We pointedout that 'other col- leges hich go .overseas tooffer.educational ;programs, .such asthe University of Maryland, are ,provided withtravel costs and often withinexpensive housing arrangements.' `We suggested' that even'loans from the military wouldhelp:re- informed that such funds are notavailable. solve this problem. However, we were take.steps 'to-assure that We u ige! the :committee toreview this .problem,:and Ito such as PREP. servicemen overseas have accessto educational opportunitiesdirectly to the Advance Payment of PREP .ehecksworld. help, .as would payment imtitution. Some other systemof advance grants or loans,for overseas PREP, to make this. system work -asit is intended. may be necessary 'Department "could author- It is 'also probable 'that'high -officials of the Defense ize:advance grants under.present programs, if .they werepersuaded of the im- portance of this.problem. Ia conclusion, .we veryinuch appreciate the interestof this committee. We.are greatlyindebted to the Chairman andother Members for their-interestin -veterans 'and for their support oflegislation which -has and 'servicemen over -the .years, al:setter education. :madelt posible ;for the.nation's:colleges to:help more men get Wel ook forward. to workingclosely with you in theluture. Mr. ItErsrosKr. Wehave as our next witnessMarvin Busbee, Association of State ApprovingAgen- ,director of the National South : cies andialso:the director .of the Divisionof Veterans Education, -Carolina Department, ofEducation. STATEMENT 'OF NARVINP. SUSBEE, LEGISLATIVEDIRECTOR AGENCIES NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOF STATE APPROVING Busny.E. Mr. Chairman, my nameis Marvin P. Busbee,legis- lative director of theNational Asociation ofState Approving Agen- cies. lam also chiefsupervisor of the StateApproving Agency, 'South Carolina State Departmentof Education, and havebeen in this sec- This statement is for theNational Associa- tion for the past 25 years. recall, is tion of State ApprovingAgencies. This asociation, you may composed of employeesof agencies establishedby executive order of the Governor of theState or by State law.Most of these agencies are within departments ofeducation; however, theyalso include 'Gov- ernor's Veterans' Councils,Departments of Veterans'Affairs, and other State agencies. 1770 I consider it a distinct privilegetopresentthis statement befOre this congressional subCommittee and tO record.the wholehearted.SUpport'of the National Association of State Approving Agencies.. , Since 1946, the .members of our association have performed the func- tions of approving agencies as authorized by the original GI bill and

subsequent leoislation that providede educational. 'assistance benefits for Korean ;eterans and sons and .daughters of deceased or. disabled veterans and the newly =feted legislation for our "cold war" veterans. It has been our responsibility to approve coUrses and superviSe the educatoinal institutions and 1;usiness establishinentS that have offered

education and training to eligible persons and veterans: . . It has also been our responsibihty iff furnishing at the request of the Administrator, any -other services in conjunction' with the provisions of chapters 34 and 35, title 38, U.S. Code. The most recent service requested by the Administrator was for promnotional visitspreap- proval visits, and completion of preapproval for on-the-job. traming.' This request was originated by the chairman, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, to the President and was incorporated in his pro- gram to assist unemployed. veterans ; $3.5. 'million Was .approVed for increased services by State approvina agencies and VA and of which the State apprOving agencies wasalfocated $1 million of thisamount with 'the .Veterans' Administration' yetaining the remanider of $2.5 million. The statement presented today is on the- following legislation :

ADVANCE PAYMENTS OF TtITION Enrollments have increased by approximately:50 percent. This has caused considerable delay to those veterans and eligible persons-who have been. enrolled and may have received an allowance check. To the large numbers that have yet to be enrolled this is causing Undue hard- Ships. The regional office in my StateHSoUth Carolinahad hopefully set a target date to complete enrollments by Thanksgivina. In visiting institutions in our State, we hear one major complat2'nom allowance check. It appears that advance payments of tuition is the only solution to alleviate not only the hardships endured by those endeavoring; to further their education but equally-.if not more importantto alle- viate this conditionthrit deprwesa veteran from receiving an educa- tion in that he dannot afford the luxury -of 3 or more months -with- out income. INCREASED ALLOWANCES We, members of the National Association of State Approving Agen- cies, are very cognizant that the education program for veterans states, among its provisions, the purpose of aiding such persons in attaining the vocational and educational status which they might haxe normally have aspired to and obtained had they not served their counti.y. Since the passage of the original "GI Bill of Rights," Public Law 346, all phases of our economy in terms of wages and prices has had an upward swing exclusive of a short period in the early 1950's. According to information published in "A Fact Book on Higher Education," compiled from American Universities and Colleges Amer-

444 .1771

ican Council. on Education,. tuition:'rates in various institutions has steadily increased:since 1947. Thesetrends show an increase of 322 per- cent in 12 public institutionsand 463 percent in 26 private collegesand universities.. Using these two catembories,tuition has increased 23and.29 percent respectively since 1967-68. with roomand board increasing 20 and 17 percent. As a part of this statement, Ihave included as exhibit A a chart showinirtuition costs and room and boardcosts.for the years 1947-48, 1967-68,b and 1970-71 taken from. theSame source on large public uni- verSities, other public institutions,private college and. univerSitieS, private men's college, privatewomen's College, and both publiC and private medical schools. Also, as a part of this statementincluded as exhibit B, in. a pro- jection of estimated 'average charges196940doll arsper full-time undergraduate. resident d.egree creditstudent. This chart projects increases ranging froth 10 percent to35.percent to the year'1974.75. In addition- to the rising cost oftuition, We have experienced an in- crease in the consumerprice index. In a study by -Mohamman.A. Akhtan, assistant professor of economieS,Guilford University College, Greensboro, 'N.C., retail prices of food,1949-1970, based on grocery store prices on. food for faniilyconsumptionnot away froth home-H. which accounts tO approximately 20 percentof total fOOd in the current U.S. consumer price indexretailfOod prices in South Carolina ad- vanced more than 50 percent from1949 to 1970 with most of the increase occurring after 1964. These foodprices in South Carolina, like those elsewhere in the Nation, havebeen increasing at an. accel- erated rate since 1965 or in a. 6-yearperiod from 1964 and 1970 rose 33.48 percent..In 1970, t.he retail storefood value- of a dollar in. South Carolina was 3.6 .cents less than thenational average. The U.S. Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Statistics using the year of 1967 as $1 shows adecline in purchasing power of the dollar of 13.9 cents in. food at home. Total consumerprices show a decline 16.9 cents. ILL 766S Again our association in its contactwith school officials has learned that many wives and widows have notbeen in a position to take ad- vantage. of their benefits and preparethemselves for an educational or vocationalobjective, inasmuch as they do not havethe basic or secondary education to enable them to enter apost-secondary course of education. Approximately 16 percent of veterans beingdischarged in South Carolina do not have a high schooldiploma or have riot been able to pass the tests to secure ageneral education certificate..Based onthis percentage, it is realistic that theirwives or widows would be at least on this educationallevel and most likely this percentagewould be higher for them. Allowing them to receive educationalbenefits in order to maintain themselves and their family while reaching aneducational level, would allow them to enter a post-secondary course. In the early part of this century,discussion as to whether or not a (rirl should be (riven the advantairesof an education was frequently 445 1772 justified with this 'educate a girl, and you educate,a family." Another -big factor for consideration in the dropout problem today is the unedu- ,cated parents and this eonsideration for Dur wives ,and widows ,could do much to eliminate this factor in a few generations. We could very well say, "educate the parents, and you educate generations." Nothing but good could ,come with this legaslation. MR. 9894 Our asSociation unanimously adopted a resolution Which is atth,ched as exhibit C. It is our position that .adulteducation evening 'clatses :should not be limited tO a maximum of one-half time: II.R. 5188 Again, .our .association :adopted a resolution which is attached ,as exhibit D. It is, ouropinion that .eligible persons :should :not be .denied their benefits as preseribed, to by ,law unless they .pursue institutional training..Many people either by mclination, :ability, or choice ,do not desire to attend an institution to further their , education. These persons have ,a,desire to learn by doing by worlOngon-the-job .or apprenticing IM ,order to learn a-skill or -craft -or to prepare them- selves for their life's vocation. We, in !the association, :cannot refute that time -old statement .of `no better way to learn than ,by doing" and in the -final .analysis that is the ,culmmation all training. SECTION n The National Association of State Approving Agencies, having observed the operation of the educational programs under all previous legislation, is convinced beyond doubt that these programs are a result of the ffreatesteducational legislationthat has ever been enacted by the U.S. Congress. During this -important era which is ,an educational era and as this committee considers -the advisability of legislation, I hope-the need for a well-balanced American will not beoverlooked. The security of our cherished freedoms, our economic growth and productivity, our social well-being, and ,our moral standard depends not only upon the select few, 'but upon every citizen in 'between. Pro- visions for education is important and necessary. The average Mr. and Mrs. America has made and will continue to-make up the solid founda- tion. Therefore, it is paramount that provisions for education and training include opportunities for the acquiring of skills and abilities to fit the needs of all the people. Prior hearings have established beyond any doubt that the eilucational advantages provided for vet- erans have been successful.They have succeeded- even beyond the ex- pectations of the wise and foresighted legislators who could see them. Mr. Chairman, in representing the National Association of State Approving Agencies, I would concur with the proposed legislation covered in this statement. Mr. Chairman, I would like to thank you for the opportunity in submitting this statement on behalf of our association. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Thank you very much, Mr. Busbee. Exhibits A. 13. C, and D will be madc a part of the record. Without objection,it is so ordered. (The documents referred to follow :)

446 1773

EXHIBIT A

Tuition and Room and Tuition and Room and resident board resident board

20 private women's 20 large public univer- colleges: 438 639 sities: $495 1947-48 $130 1, 520 I, 127 1947-48 886 1967-68 1967-68 363 I, 876 1, 226 458 948 1970-71 1970-71 9 public medical schools: 380 12 public institutions: 382 1947-48 1947-48 157 747 754 1967-68 1967-68 406 802 502 907 1970-71 1970-71 9 private medical schools: 28 private colleges and 1947-48 608 I, 838 universities: 588 1967-68 1947-48 442 2, 246 1, 675 I, 029 1970-71 1967-68 1, 168 1970-71 2, 080 20 private men's colleges: 517 1947-48 475 1, 709 923 1967-68 1, 088 1970-71_ -.... 2, 197

EXHIBIT B UNDERGRADUATE RESIDENT DEGREE-CREDIT ESTIMATED AVERAGE CHARGES (1969-70DOLLARS) PER FULL-TIME STUDENTS IN INSTITUTIONS OFHIGHER EDUCATION

Tuition and required fees Total tuition, board, and room Unl- Other Other 4-year 2-year 4-year 2-year All varsity Year and control All varsity

$297 $159 1967-68: $1, 106 $874 $315 $406 $1, 181 $1, 331 1, 374 991 Public 2, 337 1, 956 1, 440 1, 702 Nonpublic 2, 449 2, 825 Projected: 321 199 1970-71: I, 170 978 327 426 Public 1, 214 1, 366 1, 527 1, 116 2, 503 2, 142 1, 569 I, 855 Nonpublic 2, 584 2,979 333 204 1971-72: I, 194 999 335 439 Public . I, 232 1, 389 1, 583 1, 169 2, 571 2, 220 1, 621 1, 915 Nonpublic 2, 648 3, 054 344 211 1972-73: 1,216 1, 019 342 452 I, 249 1, 413 1, 640 1, 221 Public 2,640 2, 297 1, 673 1, 975 Nonpublic 2, 712 3, 128 356 219 1973-74: 1,240 I, 040 349 466 1, 265 1, 437 1,696 1, 273 Public 2, 708 2, 375 1, 725 2, 036 Nonpublic 2, 776 3, 204 367 22 7 1974-75: 1,263 1, 061 356 479 Public 1, 282 1, 460 1,752 I, 32 5 2, 776 2, 452 1, 777 2, 096 Nonpublic 2, 840 3, 278

Source: U.S. Office of Education, projectivesof educational statistics. EXHIBIT "C"

RESOLUTION Chapter 34, Tile 38,United States Code, limits Whereas : Section 1691 (b), Courses to a maximum of one- enrollment in AdultEvening Secondary School half time training as defined inSection 1684, of this title ;and schools in the UnitedStates offer standardhigh Whereas : Many secondary (at night), and school courses, leading to ahigh school diploma, of any person after age19 Whereas : Many state lawsprohibit the enrollment school diploma day program,and in the standard high of the law does notlimit evening enrollmentof Whereas : The provision maximum of one-half timetraining. veterans in other typesof school courses to a Now therefore, the National Associationof State ApprovingAgencies Be it resolved : By Minnesota, June 14-16,1971, that in conferenceassembled in Minneapolis,

71-815 0-72-29 447 1774 consideration be given to amending Section 1691 (b), Chapter 34, Title 38, United States Code, to permit the enrollment of veterans in Adult Evening Secondary school courses in excess of one-half time training as defined pursuant to Sec- tion 1684 of this Title, and Be it further resolved ; that this resolution be forwarded to all interested parties. EXIIIMT "D" "Resolution requesting the Senate and House of Representative in Congress to amend title 38 extending apprenticeship and other on-job training ,benefits to eligible wives and widows of veterans." Whereas, Public Laws 90-631 and 91-584 amended Title 38 making Certain wives and widows of veterans eligible for educational assistance under Chap- ter 35 while in institutional training, and Whereas, Many eligible wives and widows are unable to attend institutional training due to the expense of dependents and other factors, and Whereas, there are many job objectives the eligible widow or wife could be capable of reaching obtainable through Apprenticeship and other On-Job Train- ing such as :(1) Hospitals and nursing-care facilities, (2) Office managerships and related fields, (3) Food, hotel and motel services, and (4) Welfare, recrea- tion, and other areas serving a public need. Now, therefore, be it resolved tlmt : The National Association of State Approv- ing Agencies respectfully request the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress to favorably consider enacting legislation amending Title 38 to extend Apprenticeship and other On-Job training educational benefits to eligible wives and widows of veterans under Chapter 34 and/or Chapter 35. Mr. HELSTOSKI. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for appearing before this committee this morning. Are there any more questions ? If not, the subcommittee wishes to thank you very much. We have as our next witnesses from Cape. Girardeau, Mo. Michael R. Patton, president of National Association for Collegiate Veterans and Patrick M. McLaughlin, from Clmuncey, Ohio.

STATEMENT OF MICHAEL R. PATTON, PRESIDENT OF THE NATION- AL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGIATE VETERANS, AND PATRICK M. MC LAUGHLIN, VICE PRESIDENT OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS Mr. PATTON. Thank you Mr. Chairman. My name is Michael Pat- ton, I am the president fo the National Association of Collegiate Veterans. It is a real pleasure today and an honor to present the views of the National Association of Collegiate Veterans before the subcommittee today. The NACVI is here today representing over 250,000 veterans in 20 States. We represent veterans enrolled in vocational and technical schools, in 2-year community colleges and in public and private 4-year colleges and universities. We are a very young oraanization as vet- erans' organizations go having been founded in 196?at Mankato State University, Mankato,Minn.But we are growing very rapidly. Our main purpose is to assist the veteran in his return to civilian life ; to make this trying transition period go as smoothly as possible.

GI BILL INADEQUATE The NACVI believes the Vietnam era GI bill to be totally inade- quate to meet the needs of the majority of Vietnam era veterans. This inadequacy is due in large part ot the skyrocketing cost of education and the upward spiraling cost of living. As an example of the rise

448 1775 in the cost of education(tuition and books) let's iook atMichigan State University, a publicinstitution. Tuition and book expenses amounted to $185 in 1945, $345 in 1958,and $730 in 1971. The1971 fig- ure is nearlyfour times as great as the figurein 1945. Has the GI bill kept pace? NoTE.We have attachedstatistics taken at OpportunityFairs in Dayton and Columbus, Ohio and aJob Fair in St. Louis, Mo.We are sure you will beinterested to note the large percentageof veterans who stated that the GI bill wasinadequate for their needs. This ran about 73 to 74 percent. Some veterans have adistinct advantage over othersby the mere Let's compare schools inOhio and Missouri. fact of State residency. (tuition, fees and Ohio University inAthens, Ohio has a basic cost books) of $900 per student yearwhile Forest ParkCommunity Col- lege in St. Louis, Mo. costs$600 per student per year. If youtake a for a 9-month school yearand subtract single veteran receiving $1,575 is left with the $900 and $600respectively, the Ohio University veteran $676 for living expenses andthe Missouri veteran has$975. Breaking these figures down into monthlyamounts, we find that theOhio Uni- versity veteran has $75 permonth to meet his basicliving expenses. This is the same monthlysubsistence allotment that theWorld War II veteran received 25 years ago.Let's look back for a momentat the wealthy Missouri veteran. Hebas the huge sum of $108 permonth to meet his living expenses.This $108 compares with aMissouri un- employment compensationfigure of $228 monthly. After World War II,State colleges and universitiesactively re- cruited veterans, (at OhioUniversity in 1947, of 26,000students slightly over 14,000 wereveterans). These universities went sofar as to provide verylow-cost housing in quonsethuts. This is not the case today. Few colleges oruniversities are activelyrecruiting veterans. And to date, I do not knowof any college oruniversity providing special low-cost housing to veterans,not even quonset huts. Added to the veteransproblems, at some schools veterans arenot eligible for National DefenseStudent Loans or WorkStudy Money. In a sense the veteran ispenalized for receiving theGI bill. It is our understanding that the GI bill hasbeen earned by a veteranwho has served his country in time of war,and should not detractfrom his eli Inky to receive otherfinancial assistance. though we are dealingprimarily with veterans'education and another present dayinequity which training, I would like to mention eligible to is of some importance.After World War II a veteran was continue his servicemen's grouplife insurance at hisactive duty rate. Some of you may still havethis coverage today.But the Vietnam era veteran is only allowed toconvert his servicemen's grouplife insur- policy. He must pay thegoing rate for the ance policy to a commercial continuation of the type of insurance hedesires. NACVI recommends a Vietnam era veterans group lifeinsurance for as long as theindividual veteran is inclined to paythe premium.

VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION STATISTICS We feel it is necessary tospeak to the issue ofVeterans' Administra- tion statistics concerning theGI bill. It is ourcontention the VA statistics are misleading anddo not present an accurateappraisal of

449 1776 individuals benefiting from the GI bill. For instances,as of June 1971, according to the VA, 34.8 percent of Vietnamera veterans--and I believe yesterday Mr. Olney Owen said that fig,ureswas 35.2 percent now"had taken advantage" and not completed trainingor received a degree under the GI bill. The 35.2 percent includes any and all veterans who had used at least 1 month of his entitlement, and who for whatever reasons had dropped from theprogram. What we find objectionable is that the statement in itself contends theveteran has completed a training programor received a degree vis-a-vis the GI bill. We ask this committee to request of the VAa breakdown by acutal numbers of those completinga program under the GI bill. In other words, a statistical statement specifying the number of monthsper capita completion rate of those Vietnamera veterans enrolled under the GI bill. It is our contentiononce these facts are brought to light, other questions will arise as to the misleading nature of VA statistics concerning veterans of the Vietnamera. Mr. PIICINSKI. May I ask a question at this point. Youare familiar with the action we took on the higher education bill wherewe included GI benefits as one of those Federal expenditures for participating programs by universities to qualify for one-third of the institutional ,that is, in that program. Now, don't you feel that with that incentive universities themselves are going to do two things : One, recruit more veterans into the univer- sity, because the more veterans they have themore money they qualify for under the institutional aid formula.? Two, don't you believe they will develop specialprograms and what- not to keep that veteran in school as long as possible? Wouldn't that cure some of the 'questions we are raising here ? Mr. PATTON. On the VA statistics? Mr. PIICINSKI. Yes, sir. Mr. PATTON. I believe that will help. I really believe it will help, but part of the reason these fellows are forced to drop out of the school is the fact that they can't make iton the GI bill itself. If the institution does provide .help and does go along with them and give a student loan or work-study, that will help a large number of veterans. Mr. PIICINSKI. One thing, it seems tome, we ought to haveand I am glad to have your testimonyI would strongly recommend that we have some greater degree of correlation of what is in that higher education package. We have a tendency to legislate exclusively for veterans. As a result, the other institutions treat veteransas a kind of a problem unto themselves, and they are not, as you have indicated in your statement here. Theyare not a problem unto themselves. We have, for instance the equal opportunity grant program and it is a very big program. Now, I don't know of anyreason why Vietnam veterans should not be given a first priority for EOG grants if, indeed, they need those grants to complete their college education, as you say they need them. They get up to $1,400 a year additional assistance. The point I make is that we cannot expect to take care of all of the veterans' problems through specific veterans' legislation and then treat these veterans like second-class citizens in all of the other programs. I feel what we have to impress upon these universities is that that veteran is a veteran, and American citizen, and despite the GI bill

450 1777 the efforts of this corLittee and others to take of rights and despite these veterans care ofthe additional specialproblems of veterans, should not be, then, disallowedand disengaged fromexistingprograms. would seem to me,ought to have thehighest The EOG program, it $1,400 and he is a priority for a Vietnam veteran.If he needs that and he qualifies for anEOG grant, he member of a minority group to that? ought to (Yet it as a firstpriority. What would you say MCLAUGHLIN. We are glad to see an actof this nature come Mr. Viet- about because basicallywhat we were sayingin some institutions did not qualify forstudent loans andwork-study pro- nam veterans they made on the GIbill kept them ° because the amount of money they said there is alevel and you guys get some bTamsoff. In other words, qualify. We have to (nyeit to other money and,therefore, you don't needy people. But, of course,the institutionsdon'to6ften take into consideration the veteranis solely on his own,whereas the other student receiving one-half of hisfinancial aid at home, etcetera. may be here that the VAgive us a Mr. PIICINSKI. Ithink your suggestion in readout of afollowthrough of this 34 percentwill prove valuable establishing to what extent arethese universities andthe loan officers ingenuity to help this veteran.But I suspectand really using their instances this, of course, is what we areobjecting tothat in too many universities say this veteranhas this GI bill.So they loan officers in of the GI bill,ignoring try to treat that veteranwithin the framework that the fact that thisGI is eligible for allof the other programs in university. excellent suggestion youmake. I think that is an tutorial assistance you Mr. MCLAUGHLIN.One other point on the for mentioned. As it stands now, aveteran can qualifyfor $50 a month effect at the universities 9 months on tutorialassistance. This is not in Administration, sinceactivating the and colleges becausethe Veterans' the col- program last year,have not mandated tothe universities and this sort of program up.For instance, at OhioUni- leges how you set assistance, you mustreceive a versity, in order toqualify for tutorial not only in signed statement from yourprofessor saying you are but you are indeedfailing the course. danger of failing the course because Now, you won't knowthis until halfwaythrough the quarter halfway through thequarter. But when you don'thave a midterm till professor you receivethe results and if youreceive a 13ad test, your this gets in and this getsback to the VA andthe quarter is signs it ; before you can get any money over andyou mayhave failed the course for tutorial assistance.the program at presentkeep it frombeing So the restrictions on mentioned to the Veterans' effective at all. This issomething we have this Administration and wewould like to seesomething done about initiated. nationally to get that program committee Mr. PATroN. At thispoint we wouldlike to submit to this Athens, Ohio, MessengerOctober 3, an articlethat appears in the iidvantage of 1971, regarding thenumber of Vietnamveterans "taking college." The article states,"The head of the the GI bill to go to veterans are taking Veterans' Administrationsags six of 10 Vietnam advantage of the GI bill to goto college." Withinformation of this nature reaching thegeneral public it is nowonder many people are unaware of thedeficiences existing in theVietnam era C4I bill.

41 1778

OPPORTUNITY PAIR The NACVI, working in conjunction with the Veterans Education and Training Action Committee, has created, initiated, and partly organized a new concept in veterans 1-day outreach attempts in Ohio this fall. The State of Ohio was selected because in our opinion it serves as a representative segment of the Vietnam veteran popula- tion. We fully intend to complete a comprehensive study of the needs of Ohio veterans and compliment this study with sufficient examples from throughout the Nation. Our new concept is called an opportunity fair for veterans. The opportunity fair concept. stresses the importance of education, training, apprenticeship, and social services to the vet- eran, as opposed to an indirect connotation of jobs for all. Due to the economic plight confronting our countrythat is, no jobswe must stress alternatives to the Vietnam veteran. Education and trainina are the alternatives to nonexistent full-time employment. We are subm6 itting to this committee the results of a questionnaire dis- tributed at opportunity fairs in Dayton and Columbus, Ohio, and at a. job fair in St. Louis, Mo. For the sake of brevity, we shall mention only the most significant findings. Almost 40 percent of the veterans poned indicated as their first preferenceDayton, Columbus, and St. Louiseither education or training. The figure jumps to generally 70-75 percent for those indi- cating a second preference. In effect, this suTiported our contention that veterans are significantly interested in areas other than employment. In other words, given a choice between unemployment compensation and education or training, the veteran will surely take the education or training. But, the GI bill must be improved and expanded to enable greater numbers of veterans to utilize the bill.

NACVI LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS The NACVI believes the following provisions should be incorpo- rated into the Vietnam era, GI bill. 1. Extend the period of entitlement from 36 to 48 months. 2. Authorize payments for tuition, fees, books, related supplies, and medical expenses. A figure of $1,000, as has been introduced in other bills to the committee?would be accepti ble to the national association. 3. Provide for a minimum of a 20-percent increase in the monthly assistance allotment. This would raise the $175 to $210 for a single veterans, $246 for one dependent, et cetera. 4. Authorize an advance payment of up to 2 months of a veteran's allotment to be payable upon notification of a veteran's acceptance into an accredited program. H.R. 10168, if amended to include H.R. 3349or H.R. 6904which deal with advanved payments and also amended to authorize payment for tuition, fees, and niedical expenses would be a bill that would satisfy a very large majority of our members. Thank you very much for this opportunity to present our views to you today. We have tried to be brief and we would appreciate any questions you might have about our statement. Th ank you.

452 1779 information in your Mr. HELSTOSKI. Withoutobjection the appended testimony will be made a partof the record. (The document referred tofollows:)

ST. LOUIS VETERANS JOBFAIR-NOVEMBER 11, 1971 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS INPERCENTILES

(2) What opportunity are youmost interested in at thefair? Percent 60. 1 Employment 13. 0 Education 10. 31 36.3 On job training 13. 0 Apprenticeship 2. 0 Social services 1. 0 Other list them in the orderof (2) If you have morethan one preference, please importance to you. 35.1 percent had secondchoices : Percent 10.4 Employment 37On.3 Education 20. 91 74.6 job training 16.4 Apprenticeship 8. 9 Social services 12.6 percent had third choices. Percent 4. 2 Employment 16. 6 Education 27. 5} 91.6 On job training 37. 5 Apprenticeship 4.2 Social services interested you? (3) If education is yourthing, what group of schools most 67 percent filled out question*5 : Percent 16. 9 Vocational schools 26.9 Technical schools 18. 4 Community colleges 9. 2 Priva te colleges 28. 4 State universities (4) Did you attend collegeprior to entering theservice? 32.9% attended college prior toservice. prior to service. 67.1% did not attend college it be adequate to meet your (5) If you plan to attendcollege on the GI Bill, will needs. needs, but 73.0% of that 26.3% said the GI Bill wouldbe adequate to meet his 26.3% had not attended college. 73.7% said the GI Bill wouldnot be adequate to meethis needs. In your opinion, is this JobFair a success? if so,why? If not, why not? Listed below are numerous answersto this question : walked into the building. Butlooking around I would I don't know. I have just represented. I have takentraining under say there seems tobe enough companies surprised to see no one the GI Bill for Hotel/MotelManagement and I'm very field. here from this ever-growingemployment, you are at leastgiven the opportunity Yes. If you are not offered not consider and to come in contact with manycompanies you would otherwise it gives you the idea 'that atleast the businessmen inthe area are making a stab at the unemploymentproblem. Yes, because a group ofbusinessmen are trying to help thevets. in my opinion. And Ithink it is very worth- The Job Fair was a big success Most of all, because we while to us veterans, as well asthe community and state. really need the jobs. be a lot of people tryingto Yes. Many businesses arerepresented and it seems to talk to veterans and gettingsomething done. 453 1780

In hoping that this organization will bring help to the most and many of us, I feel that the Job Fair (or should I say the Veteran's Job Fair !) is of great importance. I feel if I had the opportunity, I would give each individual a hand- shake who represented this to our fellow men. I wish great success to the organiza- tion and to myself I wish Good Luck. No. I um still without a job, and have been for 11 months and 11 days. Would have been great if jobs in general weren't so tight now. Maybe the Nixon administration is at blame? No. Why come this far to be told there are no jobs available? Why is it that young veterans get jobs, and will not keep them, and the older ones need jobs and are not hired because of their age? No. Some of the business representatives were not cordial and made you feel ill at ease. I have talked to a number of representatives and they all have told me nothing. I haven't visited enough booths to give a good analysis but so far I think that the Job Fair will be a success. It can't be a total success because not everyone desiring employment will be employed. I hope that the Job Fair will be a success for my.self and many others. I do think that there is a lot of credit to be handed out to ull the people that have made it possible. Yes, I do think it is a good idea. It kind of makes you feel that there is still a chance for you in the future. Yes, if only to acquaint firms with individuals for future reference. Generally a very good attemptshould be held several di'. y s. Yes, because it has opened up a lot of possibilities and ideas for me. No, because most of these employers are not hiring, just making a show. Not enough technical positions. Many firms represented here have people laid off and others are not taking applications. Should be more than one day. Yes. Over-all I think this is a wonderful thing. It's good to see business taking an interest in the plight of the vet. I could not find anything, but thank you for the opportunity. Joh Fair is very much a success. The opportunity afforded an individual to meet so many employers in one day at the same location is unsurpassed by an employment service or the like. Any veteran who does not take full advantage of this opportunity is only cheating himself. The only suggestion I can make is that the larger compainies, such as Ralston, IBM, American Can, might do well by having more representatives present to handlt, the larger nunther of people that inevitably congregate around their booths. I am undecided because I do not know if the employers Imre are actually hiring veterans or just merely trying to establish an image for the publics' eye. A success? It depends on how many people get jobs. As for myself, it seems that people with college and advanced degrees get very little benefits from the program. le you could set up counseling for people in their areas of interest or education, i.e., Psych, Business, Social work, and tell them which companies have jobs or programs in these fields, it would save some time for all people concerned. It seems that the fair is geared toward the high school and technical areas. which is good, hut not completely adequate for all veterans. Yes, because never before has the public done something such as lids to show that they really care about the veteran. Yes. It gives the unemployed vet opportunity to cover a Lit of ground in a short while ! NoI spent two years of my life in the army and they turn me down for every- thing I looked at. Better try next time. This gives veterans an opportunity to be hired quicker, more jobs are avail- able, less time is wasted looking for a job and I believe there is a better chance of getting what you want. Big waste of everyone's time. Most employers with whom I spoke had no immediate job openingthe "We'll call you, don't call us" cliche was alluded. I don't think that the Joh Fair was a success for the majority of the veterans, because I think most of the people went to the Fair seeking jobs and the jobs were not there. The press built the Fair to the point that I thought I could go there and get a job and not just an interview. Most of the companies represented at the Job Fair did not have jobs to offer, which was the Fair's downfall. On the

454 1781 Missouri. I would very enclosed paper, Question 8 wantssupport for a GI Bill for much like to support this idea.Today I am going to write myState Congressman and urge him to press for a billsimilar to the bill that Illinoishas. If there is anything else that I can do, please write me. I think the Job Fair was a success.I think that a listing by jobtypes (salesmen, machinest, etc.) might be helpful infinding the companies in which theapplicant would be interested. Yes, at the least it has shownthat the veterans are needingassistance to get into the job market. around the No, most of the places aren'thiringthey tell you they will call you first of the year, which doesn't helpmuch. I can talk with 30 companiesin one day where it would takesix months other- wise. You can get a general ideawhere to look for jobs. here at Job Fair than they werewhen I went The employers were friendlier lot of running to their employment offices.As a whole it wasn't bad. It saved a around and gas money, also time. Yesthe selection and number ofcompanies participating wereexceptional. I would like to see the companies mantheir desks until the closingtimemany companies left early. Not sucessful right now.Employers are not hiring becauseof economy situation. Yes. This gives a man in doubt aplace to start in reference to jobideas and opportunities.

45S. 1782

METER S poTUMMY FARR

OCT. 13, 19719A.M. to 5PM.

UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON ARENA

Learn about your opportunities for JOBS, EDUCATION, and TRAINING

Dayton area employers and educational institutions willhave representatives at the Fair to answer your questions. ALL VETERANS ARE INVITED 1783

OPPORTUNITY FAIR FOR VETERANS1971

Sponsored By

The Opportunity Fair ForVeterans Committee

Honorary General Chairman

James H. McGee - Mayor,The City of Dayton

Internal Chairman

James A. Devlin

Co-Chairmen

Leslie D. Stickler - -Frederick M. Jones

Organizations Participatingin the Committee

American Legion of Ohio Amvets City of Dayton Dayton Daily News Disabled American Veterans Montgomery County VeteransService Office National Alliance ofBusinessmen National Association ofCollegiate Veterans,Incorporated Ohio ApprenticeshipCouncil Ohio Bureau of EmploymentServices Ohio Bureau of VocationalRehabilitation Sinclair Community College Sinclair Community College -Veterans Club U.S. Department of Labor -Veterans Employment Service U.S. Civil ServiceCommission University of Dayton University of Dayton - VeteransClub Vetsrans of Foreign Wars Veterans Administration Center -Dayton Veterans Administration -Regional Office Cleveland WHIO WING WLW-D Wright Patterson Air ForceBase - Project Transition Wright State University Wright State University -Veterans Club 1784

Page 2

Special Thanks and Recognition toContributors to the Opportunity Fairfor Veterans:

Al-win Training, Inc. American Legion of Ohio American National Red Cross Amato Barker Furnace Company City Transit Company Civitan Club Dayton Art Institute Dayton Porta-Ad Company Dayton Stencil Works Company Disabled American Veterans Electronic Computer ProgrammingInstitute George's Salem Rent -Alla Hobart Manufacturing Company Hobart SchoOl of Welding International Accountants Society,Inc, International Broadcasting School, Inc, I.T.T. Technical Institute Kiwanis Club of Beavercreek Kiwanis Club of Centerville Kiwanis Club of Dayton View F.W. Latz Paper Company Maimi Jacobs Junior College ofBusiness Lee Miles School of Real Ettate National Alliance of Busineessen National Association of CollegiateVeterans, Ince Printing Service Company Progress Technical College, Inc, RETS Electronic Schools Reynolds & Reynolds Company Sinclair Community College StudentGovernment Southern Ohio College University of Dayton Student Government Veterans of Foreign Wars Wright Patterson Air Force Base Wright State University Student Government

Sincere apologies to thoee groups and organisationowho may have been over. looked in the listing of contributors. Bo assured yourcontributions were appreciated and helped to insure the success of the 1971Opportunity Fair for Veterans,

458 1785

Page3 EMPLOYERS

Wing Booth # 03. A 115 ACACIA MUTUALLIFEBSURANCE Sales &Management Positions -Trainees

38 ADVANCE FOUNDRY Mechanical & Electrical Maintenance

82 AETNAIDE INSURANCE CO. Sales of Equity Products -Trainees

A 94 ANCHOR RUBBER CO. Receiving Clerks - Sales Trainees

A 149 BACHUS-PAIMERT GMC TRUCK INC. Truck Mechanics

85 BEHRLE PRINTING CO.INC. Opportunities in Printing Industry

14 Ra BRYANT CHEVROLET CO. Mecaulnics - Auto Air ConditioningRepairman &Trainees

A 169 BURROUGHS CORP. Sales Representatives - OfficeEquirment Repairmen

A 129 CASSANO ENTIMPRISES Food ,iervice & Restaurant ManagerTrainees

CINDACO INC. A 137 Equipment Engineering &Sales of lialkMaterial Handling

A 126 CONTROL DATA CORP. All areas of Computers - Operation,Progarodng, Management, Repairmen

B 48 CORDAGE OF DAMN Warehousemen - Salesmen

B 58 DAP INC. College Graduates in Chemistry

A 162 DAYTON MENTAL HEALTH CENTER Nurse Aides - Orderlies -.Attendants-Warehouseman Maintenance Repairman - Barber

A 144 DAYTON ORNAMENTAL IRON CO. Welders - Designers - Trainees

B 36 DAYTON POWER &LIGHT CO. Possible Training in Entry Level Positions

40 DAYTON SCALE DIV. - HOBART MFG. CO. See Hobart Mfg. Co.

68 DAYTON STEEL FOUNDRY Maintenance Repairman - Machinists -Trainees

459 1786

Win& Booth # Page I,

A 142 DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER CO. Pipefitters - Inatrumentman - Sheet Metal Workers

D 54 DEFENSE ELECZIONIC SUPPLY CENTER Career Opportunities in the Military Supply Field

B o4 DELCO41DRAINE DIV., C&1C Career Opportunities with Delco-Moraine

155 DOMING OFFICE FAUTEMENT Sales Representatives - Trainees

A 168 =macSECURITIES CORP. Salesmen - Trainees

B 39 'EIDER BEEMAN Career Opportunities in Retail Trade

A 166 ENGIDICOD HILLS 3NC. Building Trades - Carpenters - Plumbers

B 25 KUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY of the U.S. Sales Mhnagement - Underwriters - Trainees

70 FEDERAL JOB INFORMATION CENTER All U.S. Civil Service Commission Opportunities

A 137 FRISCH'S RESTAURANTS Manager Trainees - Kitchen Personnel- Trainees

72 FULLER BRUSH CO. Sales Representatives

A 163 GEM MACHINE CO. INC. Machinists - Welders

81 GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL Lab Technician - Microbiologist - Nurse Aides - Internal Auditor

40 HOBART MANUFACTURING CO. General - Technical.- Professional Personnel

170 HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. Management Trainees-Service Station Attendants - Mechanics

4 1718 INLAND MFG. DIV., GMC Opportunities with Inland

42 'JACKSON CaiMUNICATIONS Cable Splicers-Communication Equignent Installers- Linemen-Military Oriented Trainees

36 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN Managers & Aasistant Managers - Trainees

60 KETTERING AIRCRAFT CO. 3NC. Machine Operatora

460 1787

Page 5 Booth #

20 BILLKNAPPIS INC. Complete Restaurant Staff

A 133 Lk CON PATTERN WORKS INC. Opportuaities in the IndustrialPattern-Making Field

A 128 LANG'S CHEVROLET - OLDS Auto Sales &Service Positions -Mechanics

A 132 LINCOLN MOVING&STORAGE Drivers - Van. Forman

A. 124 LITHO PRINT INC. Opportunities in the PrintingIndustry

CO. A 141 THE MANUFACTURERSEQUIPMENT Opportunities in Saes&Service of Industrial Equipment

B 78 MASTER DIV. OF =RING CO. Production Machine Operators -Trainees

75 THE MAZER CORP. Trainees in Machine Operation=

57 THE MC CALL HUNTING CO. Opportunities in Printing &Printing Management

A 165 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Sales Management - Salesmen -Trainees

B 146 MUM PLATING CI. INC. Opportunities in the Chrome PlatingIndustry

A 156 MIAMI VALLEY CRAPITR-NATIONALASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS Career Opportunities in the SocialService Field

B 80 MIAMI VkLLEY TRUCK EQUIFMENT INC. Installation of Truck Beds - Truck &Trailer Body Repairmen - Hydraulic Mechanics -Trainees

B 45 MCDSTATE PAINT MFG. CO. Mixer Operators - Tinters -Trainees

Company) B 43 MISCO (McCall Decanation Services Computer OpenMAsns & Programming

A 130 MOBIL OIL CORP. glectrical - Machine - Metal Trades -Building Trades Specialists - Process & Lab Technicians &Instrument Specialists -Trainees

B 21 MONSANTO REZEARCH CORP. - MOUND /AB Accountants - Safety & Electronic Engineers

B 47 MONTOVERY COMMWELFARE DEM Experienced CaseWorkers - Social Workers

77 MUTUAL OF NEW YORK &ties careers - Management Trainees

461 1788

Wing Bootb-1 Page 6

51 NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO. (Production) Administrative-Office-Field Service Technician Degree Graduates in Business Administration& Engineering

41 NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO. (Sales) Sales Careers (Business Degrees) - Trainees

63 OHIO BELL TELEPHONE Operator-Service Representative-Order Typist - Line:Ian - Installer -Splicer -Apparatusman-Cable Repair - Trainees in all positions

A 123 OHIO STATE PATROL Career Opportunities in Police Work

35 PACIFIC FINANCE Careers in Consumer Loan Field - Trainees

A 120 PEFFLEY T.D. & P.A. INC. Auto Sales & Service-Mechanics

62 PENNINGTON BREAD CO. Salesmen - Drivers

A 121 PINKERTON'S INC. Industrial &Business Security - Guards

A 127 THE AIMMUM PLOCH4R SONS INC. Steel Fabricators, including welding & layout work also trainees

A 140 PEN:MR-DAIWA INC. Machine Trades

A 152 RANKIN & HOUSER Truck Drivers - Salesmen

65 REESE OPTICAL CO. Optical Grinders - Lens Grinders - Lab Workers - Optical Sales Representatives - Trainees

55 RENAULT OF DAYTON INC. Sales & Service - Mechanics

A 154 REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS CO.

. Data Processing - Computer Progrmamars

64 SACKSTEDER'S CATERING SERVICE Food Service Workers

A 159 SALEM CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH Auto Sales & Service -Mechanics

A 145 SEARS ROEBUCK &CO. Appliance Repairman

A 110 SHELL OIL COMPANY Management Trainees - Service Station Attendants

462 1789 3

Page 7 Wing Booth #

A 134 TIE SPECIALTY PAPERS CO. Maintenance Personnel - ProductionWorkers

18 THE STANDARD OIL CO. Management Trainees - ServiceStation Managers & Attendants

150 STANLEY HOME IMUCTS Salesmen - Home Demonstrators

66 STENGERS fORD Mechanics

A 143 STIGUATER HC6PITAL Physical Therapists

A 167 SUNSHINE BISCUITS INC. Opportunities in the Baking Industry

A 157 SYNERGY DIV. - SYSTEMS RMSFARCH Careers in the-ta7077fRaustry

B 76 THE TAIT MFG. CO. Engineering &Hydraulic Technicians -Mechanical Engineers 1

B 83 TECINOLOGYACIENTIPIC SERVICES INC. Eiectronic-Medical-High Vacuum-Electro-Mechanical- CATV-BATV - Instrumentation Technicians

A 153 THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMMIES Sales Managemmnt-Salesmen-Trainees

A 151 U.S. POST OFFICE Postal Employment Opportunities

A 118 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION CENTEP Career Opportunities in tilt, VeteranaAdministration 1

i

B 52 WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY Miscellaneous Workers

WRIGHT-PAITERSON AIR FORCE BASE A 147 AEROMUTICAL SYSTEMS DIV. Information on Technical/Professional Careere

A 148 2750th AIR BASE WING, WRIGHT PATTERSCR AIM FORCE BASE Civilian Careers with U.S. Air Force

73 XEFt01 CORPORATION College Grad Salesmen - Trainees

71-816 0-72-30 463 M 4 1

1 1 8 .3 glE1 Eu . I go 11 _ iIi10mt'lligP.ilr,W !,p, INI`igiillil°011,18.. B ilgPN

44 1 . 1 0 1 4 01.4 4 413101.41.113141".4

--: : qs IAil lisA !Hi P i i i IIP a 8 4 1 ii M4,1- B t imlm a '22Jii,Ifltfit31,N.IghralIVON! ..`',713'71 ppog8guprmliggmolio§ luim . .p-g B U 0 53 r4 fiRH s - A h.`"'- Lg @ .., 0 7 A ME:tt,,,As °'1g1h.""111111"in4 4 . 8 d o enngt1 1

'-;B 22Br.c's'''''4'2"4?-. 2"'"s179"MA'4' 1144mmmmm44m4M0144MM01444444 1792

Page 10 SUPPORTIVE & TRAININGAGENCIES

ELIE Booth #

86 AMERICAN LEGION National Veterans Organization Dedicated to Serving Veterans - Service Officers Available

A 88 AMMICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS Services to Veterans and their Dependents

53 AMVETS National Veterans Organization Dedicated to Serving Veterans - Service Officers Available

A 98 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING Apprenticeship Information

26 DAYTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Community Information on Employers and Busineseea

31 DAYTON OIC Occupational and Sldlls Training

A 107 DAYTON PUBLIC NIGHT SCHOOL, DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION Adult Education - High School Diploma - Trades Training

A 161 DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS National Veterans Organization Dedicated to Serving the Disabled Veteran - Service Officers Available

A 112 GARFIEW TRAINING CENTER Manpower Development &Training Act (MDTA) - Skill Center Training

6 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES REHABILITATION CENTER Vocational Evaluation and Training for the Disabled

A 87 HEALTH CAREERS OF OHIO Educational Information on Health Careers mile:WIC Program

10 LABOR EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT PROGRAMDAYTON URBAN LEAGUE Building Trade Apprenticeships

24 LABOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION' Veterans' Reemployment Rights

2 LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF DAYTON Information on Assistance to Veterans

A 96 MONTGOMERY COUNTY VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE Local Veteran Services

7 MONTGOMERY COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT Food Stamps Information - Financial & Medical Assistance

30 OHIO ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGIATE VETERANS, DIV, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLIEGIATE VETERANS Serving the Veteran on Campus

466 1793

Page 11

SUPPORTIVE & TRAINING AGENCIES(Cont.)

11- Booth #,

DIPLOME? SERVICE DIV. : B 5 OHIO BUREAU OF EMPIDYMF::1' SERVICES - Job Placement Assistcnce - VocationalCounseling & Testing . Institutional and on-the-job Training

UNEMPLOTHENT COMPENSATIONLIIV. B 4 OHIO BUREAU OF EPLOYMENT SERVICES - Unemployment Claims Information ,

B 3 OHIO BUREAU OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION State Vocational Training Programs for theDisabled

A 99 OHIO STATE APPRENTICESHIP COUNCIL Veterans Consultant on ApprenticeshipTraining in Ohio

A 95 OHIO STUDENT LOAN COMMISSION Guaranteed Bank Loans

B 1 OKBUDSMAN Community Grievances

A 116 RAP BOOTH "Have You Got it All Together?"

A 117 SHALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Financial Assistance to Self-Employed Veterans

B 12 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Benefits Available to Disabled Veterans

27 SPECIAL SERVICES IN HIGHER EDUCATION For the Disabled College or UniversityStudent

A 93 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION Know All Your Veterans, Benefits

A 92 VA GI BILL Educational & On-The-Job & Apprenticeship Training Benefits

A 91 VA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION Complete Education or Training for the ServiceDisabled

A 90 VA DISABILITY BENEFITS How to File a Claim for VA Compensation

74 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS National Veterans Organization Dedicated to ServingVeterans - Service Officers Available

467 1794

OPPORTUNITY FAIR QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS

The first set of statistics were arrived at by combining the answers of two questions. The first--What opportunity are you most interested in at the fair? (Listing: Employment, Educa- tion, On-Job-Training, Apprenticeship, Social Services and Other.) The second question states--If you have more than one preference, please list them in the order of importance to you.

I. DAYTON: Opportunity being sought in order of preference.

1st Preference 2nd Preference 3rd Preference

EMPLOYMENT 60.40 28.20% 13.30%

EDUCATION 23.80 . 30.60 23.40 APPRENTICESHIP 7.50 24.70 33.30 ON JOB TRAINING 6.62 9.42 13.30 SOCIAL SERVICES 1.76 7.06 16.60

I. COLUMBUS: Opportunity being sought in order of preference.

1st Preference 2nd Preference 3rd Preference

EMPLOYMENT 59.20% 16.60% 15.00% EDUCATION 22.60 41.60 5.00 APPRENTICESHIP 7.83 12.50 45.00 ON JOB TRAINING 7.83 20.80 20.00 SOCIAL SERVICES 2.62 8.34 15.00

NOTE: That for first preference in both Dayton and Columbus fully 4o percent of vets polled indicated either educa- tion or training. Regarding second and third preference one can readily view the predominance of aducation ang training. In effect, this supports our contention that veterans are signifi- cantly interested in areas other than employment. Our duty is to present alternatives to the veteran showing him an objective within reach. In other words, the state of the economy being what it is (i.e. no jobs), we must stress alternatives to the Vietnam veteran. Education and training are the alternatives to full-time employment. That is why the Opportunity Fair stresses the importance of education, training, apprenticeship and soc ial services to the veteran, as opposed to an indirect connotation of jobs for all.

1

468 1795

2

Our next objective was todetermine the type of institution the veterans were attracted to,and in what o:der. education. II. DAYTON: School preferenceof those seekiLg higher

a) Technical Institutes---31.90% b) State Univereities 29.00 c) Vocational Schools 18.95 . d) Communiey Colleges e) Private Colleges education. I. COLUMBUS: School preferenceof those seeking higher a) State Universities j9.1% Technical Institutions- 33.7 c) Vocational Schools 15.2 d) Community Colleges 7.6 e) Private Colleges 4.3

NOTE: One can readily viewthe,trend towards technical and vocational education apparent inboth cities.

In response to a general questionrelating to the adequacy or inadequacy of the GIBill, we received the followinginformation.

III. DAYTON: a) 34.5% indicated the GI Billwould be adequate to meet their needs after enrollment inschool.

65.5% indicated they would need financialassistance in addition to the GI Bill or part-timeemployment, or both.

'COLUMBUS: a).29.9% indicated the GI Bill would beadequate to meet their needs after enrollment inschool.

70.1% indicated they wouldneed.financial assistance in both. additf.on to the GI Bill orpart-time employment, or College. IV. Of those wishing to attend aState University or Private DAYTON: a) 19.7% indicated the GI Billwould be adequate. 80.3% indicated it would not.

COLUMBUS: a) 24.4% indicated the GI Billwould be adequate. 75.6% indicated it would not.

469 1796

3

V. Of those wishing to attend a Technical Institute,Community College, or Vocational School.

DAYTON:

a) 44.8%indicated the GI Bill would be adequate. 55.2%indicated it would not.

COLUMBUS:

a) 27.8%indicated the GI Bill would be adequate. 72.2%indicated it would not.

VI. DAYTON: a) Of those who had attended college prior to the service.

1) 19.5% indicated the GI Bill would be adequate; 80.5% indicated it would not.

b) Of those who had not attended college prior to theservice.

1) 39.4% indicated the GI Bill would be adequate. 60.6% indicated it would not. COLUMBUS: a) Of'those who had attended college prior to.theservice. 1) 27.3% indicated the GI Bill would be-adequate. 72.7% indicated it would not.

b) Of those who had not attended dollege prior tothe service.

1) 28.9% indicated the GI Bill would be adequate. 71.1% indicated it would not.

VII. We asked-Would you be willing to support aState GI Bill for Ohio veterans?

DAYTON: COLUMBUS:

85.5%- Yes 88.5%- Yes 3.8%- No 3.8%- No 10.7%- Undecided 7.7%- Undecided

VIII. Futr. .J1-1I0 OPPORTUNITY FAIRS CIN( .AATI NOV. 30 YOUNATOWNDEC. 1 CLEVELAND FEB. (tentative) 1797

at The following commentswere expressed by Veterans Veterans in Ohio. They were responding to Opportunity Fair for Veterans by the NationalAssociation of Collegiate a question posed distributed at the event. The question-- (NACVI) on a questionnaire Success? If so, why? In your opinion, isthis Opportunity Fair a If not, why not? the comments No effort has beenmade to edit the response, questionnaire. These comments appear here asthey appear on the the of the suggestions orcriticism expressed by do not encompass all Although, they are arepresentative veterans attending thefair. sample.

DAYTON OPPORTUNITYFAIR

(Oct. 13, i971)

what need's help in agood Job, in we need Because it help the Gi. hope i must close thiseletter. in I help. So pleas help us so now i be the, one you called.

The Fair was a good success.

do success., but whathas it been able to The Fair itself seemed a or late fortiesand for the veteran ofIMII?He's now in his middle (college) education, he'sin pretty bad shape. if he has no higher of age, regardlessof his Employers are reluctantto hire him because still has good andresponsible being a veteran. The older "vet" qualities for employment.

condition, no difficult to determinebecause of present economic jobs available

Opportunity Fair is aSuccess, because,judging In my opinion the person's questionsefficiently. by my experiencewith it, it answers a from which I very helpful. One of the booths The list of booths was legal-aid society ofDayton. I sought help wasunmanned, VIF., the educational opportunitiesand educational sought information on pleased and satisfied. benefits for veterans. On the whole, I was

However, if there weremore programs On the whole, it wassuccessful. successful and alsobe year), it would be more (say 2 to 4 times per of the economy andthe employment in closer touchwith the near future whatsoever Also, I received noformal notification situation overall. fair, I found aboutit on my own. as of8:00 A.M. to day about the

1 2

Yes--if one person can benefit from this assistance, then it cannot be a total loss. If more than one, progresswas good. If more than 2 people, then it was a success.

The Opportunity Fair was successful in that anindividual could make contact with numerous employers. Criticisms: 1. Some representatives did not remain at their booths. Between 3:00-5:00 P.M. many representatives were absent. 2. There seemed to be some mix-up in the placementof booths. Some reps were not in the area allotted them. The hostesses and services provided by theRed Cross were greatly appreciated.

In my opinion: I believe the Opportunity Fair was a greatsignificant con- cept for veterans in obtaining first handrelations with perspective employers, educators and assistance towardtheir future goals.

The last question on this form is mostdifficult to answer in these times of economic recession. If one ccmes here unemployed he will view the line at certain bootheswith sinking hopes. The colleges and universities are overrepresented. A large lie has been perpetrated in this country that'education isthe panacea for all Dur ills, it is not. I appreceate the opportunity that the fair possibly offers and the time invested byemployers is generous. The idea of the fair is sound when the economy is sound.

It's a very good idea. Even the slightest hint of help orinterest is appreciated and useful. However, I did notice at the latterpart of the day, many representative wereleaving before the publecized end of the program. This deprived many of the guys theopportunity' to talk with them. If this problem could be alleviated,it would help.

I feel that this Opportunity Fairis a success, in that the turn-out has shown that Vets areinterested in such a program as this. It affords the Vet the opportunityto confront situations that interest him most. As I see it the set-up is veryproficient, and well organized.

Out of nine employers that I had circledto see I found one booth Nol to were very helpful manned. However, the school booths that I talked and had plenty of literature available 1799

3

would not be available Many contacts availablewhich more than likely Be sure to remind co.'sto be honest, i.e. this easily elsewhere. plans to do so. don't say they mighthire if in"fact they have no

that the company'sdidnt remain untill The only criticism is left school eariler the stated time of 5 PM. Knbwing this I would have to get here. very relaxed andoffered a chance to The atmosphere here was going door to door talk with manyrepresentatives. It was better than and also one can be awareof possible employment.

Most of the Businessmen think that the whole thingis a Big Farce. for one purpose--Advertismentof their Product. here seem to have come look good in the Their only other motivecould be to make themselves eyes of the public. Success--my question isSuccess for Whom? As to the question of would say this is very Considering the motives ofthe emploYers (?), I I cannot see any successfor the unem- successful for them, although years of ployed veteran without acollage degree or 3 or more experience. recieve I'm sure that the "VetsOpportunity Carnival" will community, after overhearing aconversation of much acclaim from the from the taped inter- some newsmen concerningthe cutting of criticism views. perhaps yourselves, You have succeeded infooling the public and have succeeded, but 'we'have not succeeded. the Business Representatives anyway? Who was the "VetsOpportunity Carnival" for,

aspects of the fair verygood. But As far as the education about the employment phrase was verypoor. For example NCR has street without jobsand they out here 4,000 or more people in the the fair was rapping to a vet about ajob. It appears to me that just a waste of my timeand your time too.

had plenty ofinformation everyone was veryinterested in helping and technical schools andState schools for me. Im sure there are more for This is a good placeto start looking that could be represented. type of employer It gives a person achance to meet every employment. of phone calls anddriving all or school and nothave to make a lot over downtown

oppertunity fair is a successin so far as to I believe this into contact with so many give individuals theoppertunity to come employers at one time. not represented There were too manycompanies listed that were training programs. The training programs and not enough offering The lack of trainingis, I would the gratest assetto the fair. believe, ono of the major ruazonof the unemployed.

473 1800

Yes--because it gave me leads to find employment throughout Ohio and other states. But there were no hospital representatives here and there were a lot of veterans with prior medical experience that would like to continue in this field.

Yes. I would say the fair was successful. It gives the veteran an opportunity to contact a large number of potential employers without excessive expense from travel etc. It also gives him an opportunity to discuss what types of positions are available and what training

is needed to qualify. .

I think it was a big joke. I'm not trying to be funny, but I came here to see five companies. Out of those five only one was present.

In my opinion the fair isn't very good, as far as Jobs! are concerned yes there is a opportunity to see and hear abouttra jobs that are open, but the job requirements are so high that! Well let me put it this way.The fair is a beautiful thing for someone who has three (3) or more years in. college! Br.t a big disappointment to someone that hasn't finished hign school! And this was my first fair.

The fair was a success to some maybe that had college or special training in the service. I graduated May 70, went into the service Dec 11, 70, and received honerable disscharge Mar 18, sorry for it. I am married and have one son.We bought $10,000.00 of household goods, and a car and paid cash.We only owe for rent.We have no hospitalization or life insurance because of our money situation, I would like to get in on apprenticiship onair condition- ing and heating, like ButlerInc, and go to a vccational school on Hope road and.train while getting experience aud being.paid for it. Salem Chrysler Plymou.11 isnt but a mile from my home but I can't get

. a job without a certificate from a school. I can finance my training at night school and still learn what I don't know at work and get paid for it. But how can 1.),:ple like us get some jobs we want withcct a degree and still knowing most ebo.]: the job. We need the job training and go to school at the same time. A friend of mine, Bruce Ballard works at Butler lleating and air conditioning and that I eould do with training in the job and go to school to learn about it. But how can we get a chance?

I feel the Fair is very good. It helps people such as myself to get out and meet these people. It makes you feel as though people do care about a Vet.

I think that you should have more thing for students on a part time base

474 1801

5

responcible . Sir: I feel this is an excellentprogram, and who ever is organization should most certainlybe congradulated for its concept, and veterans need is here, with and thanked. The information that most eager help to locateit. for the V.O.F. I expect to hear muchapplause from the community I also hope tnat industryand the V.A., and deserves it and more. affair 2or 3 Vet. Service Clubs take note andsponsor this type of times each year.

Many Vets, like my self,who are unskilled ans whohave families, need Jobs now. Not talk of schools.

No. We are trained in one thing. And must work in another. We need jobs. trained men in a The ones that are or didn'thave f.ighting mos. are the new world. good career field. Give us the same job in

not Sure I think this opportunity isfair, but for those who did Graduate from High school has a poorchance. It I think the Fair was a success. It was well organized. out about jobs and schoolswithout spending helped a lot of people find that days going from cne place toanother. I would suggest, however, The employment card alsoneeds it be extended to morethan one day. explain disabilities ashandicapped Veterans won't more room on it to then turned down have false hope built upwhen applying for a job and when they fully explaintheir handicap.

475 1802

COLUMBUS OPPORTUNITY FAIR

(Oct. 20, 1971)

Yes--but no one is hiring.

I think the fair iu a complete success on information tothe Veteran. The only thing wrong is that people come here hoping to get a job yet only if you have thequalification could you be accepted.

I am undecided because of my late appearance. Judging from tho Vets here when I came, I would say the attendance was low. I think this fair should have been announced much earlier and held on aweekend. Maybe this will gather more Vets here. I hope that another fair will be planned soon. Thank you.

I think the fair is a good idea I have been back 4 weeks from Viet Nam I am drawing unemployment now but have met some companys atthe fair so maybe I can get a job. Keep up the good work

Fair. In the future, increase the amount of info.telling the when, where, and time o the fair--low attendance may beto not enough yuople RF7Tng of T77fair. Thanks to the people who set up the "Fair"--and to the firms that took parts

I think it was a lot of sucess not because it might give me ajob. But because it brought a lot of jobs that are to befound to my attention.

Yes, Because I think its about time people showed someappreciation for returning vet. I've tryed to get quite a few jobs since I'vebeen out and from what I've encountered the statement made onT.V about hiring the vet didn't mean a thing. This program seems to be doing a little more thanjust talking about it.

Yes. Because it's main purpose has been fulfilled. That is to inform the Vets about where the jobs are or educational opportunities,etc. One suggestion is that all the representatives staythe full time. While making my rounds I found a few representativeshad closed shop. I did check these booths more than once over a3i hr. period. Another suggestion is that when a representativeleaves'his booth he should put a sign saying that he will or will not return.

1

476

MP' 1803

2

The success will accure if and only if it assist people in finding a source of employment that will aid them inbettering their present standard of living.To make a display of non-available jobs is of no service to the veterans. Veterans are aware of promises that have been made in the past.To make games and present information is not what is needed. Success is employment or the persuit of a goal that is for a better over all person

Furnished tnformation on career and education opportunities. Was able to apply for several job opportunities at one centrallocation, plus had several questions to ask about educationalopportunities.

it is succesful as far as employees are concernedbut as for the job seekers it is a different situation employers are seenin the lime light as for doing their part for the community but not reallygiving up the jobs in the future I think youshould omitt employers who do not have openings or not expecting openings forquite some time and then maybe next time there will be some hiring alongwith all the talking and advertising

'In my personal opinion the Veterans Fair is a mostrewarding ocassion. It has given the Veteran a opportunity to view civilianlife as it now is and what is available to him. I only hope there is more advance publicity in the future as we did not reach our maximum.

If I were to give the fair a rating it would be aB. There were some salesmen that came unprepared with thefull facts pertaining to the job at hand. They shoul,d express more the advantages anddisadvantages of the job-- whether they prefer college graduates or a personwith experience of out program and not beat around the bush. They should have more interstate eorp. representedfrom other states .and cities and not just from Columbus because not everyoneis planning to stay in this area. All in all though I think it opened up my thoughtsand will help me decide better on what I want to do in life. Thank you.

I.would express an opnion that this is only apartial success due to the availability of jobs in theColumbus area in some fields. Many of the people I talked to at severalbooths were very friendly but express a view that no jobs are at thistime open within the organiza- tions that they represent.This may be due to the wage-prizefreeze and total economic state of the nation. Also where jobs are availible, there is often times no adequate program forfarther training or advancment. 71

1804

3 It has good meanings, but why have all these employers and no jobs.

I'm attending O.S.U. & can only stay here.a few minutes today; so I don't feel that I'm qualified to answer question #9. I'd like to recomment that the opportunity fair be held through the late afternoon & evening, or on a weekend; so that more people could take advantage of it.

It is a great idea.Seems to be well organized. The attitude of the people I talked to was very enthusiastic and sincere. I learned alot about financial assistance for education. One gripe that hasn't been satisified is: The G.I. Dill which I am receiving is NEVER-on time. I've been enrolled eligible for full benefits since-177r. But I've only received 3 checks (one of which was $6.38). My wife had to forego this quarter at O.S.U. so I could continue at C.B.U. etc.

I went to 6 tables and found all of them empty. It's a bigger farse I expected. yes It enables an Ex-GI to find the job or school he wants. Being that there all here in one building, it helps to find answers faster, without having to drive allover the state. A job well done. Thank you.

No--because you leave with a feeling that there is.no posiibility of a job unless you have a marketable trade

I do not know enough about this opportunity Fait to comment on it. But any program that helps Veterans to meet prospective employes and allows them to apply for jobs must in itself be a good program.'

I think that generally speaking the fair was a success. I feel that it should have had greater coverage by.the news media so more Veterans could take advantage of the opportunities offered. I would have like to seen a greater representation of employers, although representation was adequate.

There is a very large selection of job prospects school and apprinticeship training. It would be almost impossible not to find something to assist a veteran to obtain employment.

478 1805

4

No. job. I've been to most of the placesand I got no response towards a will give you a chance toget experience. They want experience but nobody have a relative Some places will hire you ifyod know somebody or you working for them.

talked with had no openings Unsuccessfull All or the employer I available

good opportunity to be gotteninformed on a I thought it was a very educational as variety of jobs & companies. I feel also that it was concerned to aee how manyservicemen are in far as some companies were But as a need of jobs & skills to getback into a civilian career. specific job opportunities &job offers, it help to veterans as far as jobs after failed tremendously. Veterans want somewhere to turn.for yeeks or even months. This was not they have hoofed it for several the businesses & the city the place for that. It was a big success for of Columbus, I guess, though.

I'm grateful to the Associationin bringing together so many . and pro- representatives for EmpolymentOpportunities and services. had in obtaining information one viding the first real help I've in Empolyment & Education and VeteranBenefits, since being released lift to my morale. 1969 It has beem a real help and and I would like to comment. onthat I observed, the press be blowing up what was reallygoing on and there news media appeared to The Fair was was and air of itbeing used to a politicaladvantage. the TV Media would haveit seem a sucess but not a big as Veterans Next year I would suggest, ifpossible in helping the when he first comes to thefair where to start I had no Ideal were to go or the thought I started at the moviesthat where being shown with to start. but they had their ownsubject that they could help me where about No help there! So I stumbled around for they wanted to convey. but wasted a lot of 40 min trying to find my way andfinally did, time doing it.

from Greatest helping-hand I've seenoffered Vets, since Returning the USAF in March '69. participating-- I comment all thesepersonnel organizing or A damn good sham!

Fair was not succesfullBecause there I would not say the However, I feel Definately was an exchange ofideas and information. which type of.job they werequalified those present wear not certain on about themselves for and the companies tended tosupply simply information rather than how they could use theVet. lack of sufficient newspapercoverage or Also I might add, the in need of rather publisity on the fairprobably caused fewer people this service to be awareor it.

71-815 0-72--31 479 1806

5 From what I participated in, yes, it was a success. The people involved were friendly and willing to answer all questions--from jobs to equality. One thing--I attended in UMafternoon and all the booths weren't manned.

I got my notice of the fair at 300 the afternoon of the fair.When I arrived most of the prospective employers had already left. I could have found a job if I had known about the fair earlier.

The veterans opportunity Fiar--Is a great asset to veterans return- ing from the service Keep up the good work

The Opportunity Fair is an excellent idea. There is nothing you can do if jobs aren't readily available, or if firms simply aren't hiring. This would obviously be the best aspect of the job fair. However, talking to employers is a help in evaluating yourself as well as the employer. You get an idea of what they're looking for and what you can do to make yourself more qualified for employment in the field of your interest. This Fair also shows someone cares and this is extremely important to the Vets.

Whether or not the fair was a success depends largely on what the objective was. If the objective was to provide job opportunities for veterans then it failed. I don't think the participants were really interested in hiring vets.

Too Many Tables With No one at the Table--No Signs saying when they will be there.Also a help would be whether immeadite Employ-. ment is available. What each company does. ie heating & cooling Machinist, Sales. These would be great helps in the Interviews.

'From what I observed and information I received I would say it should have been a success. I liked the large representations from various fields.

This "Veterans Opportunity Fair" is a BIG success for the city of Columbusit shows that our city cares about, and is trying to help, us veterans. But, the fair, in general, has offered very little opportunity to me. I reeived Little or no job or training opportunity from any of the companies with whom I talked! So, for me, the fair offered only more disappointment in my job hunting.

It is a very fine fair that possibly could be improved by running it longer or possibly once a month.

480 1807

(A.:0Plc5:,,5, 6 In 10 Viet Veterbig", Making Use Of GI. Bill I heI ielnamveteranfrorn. WASHINGTON (AP) The athMntage of the GI Bill in one head of the Veterans Adminis war or another. And our pro.Appalachia. some parts of the tration says six et 10 Vietnant jectiens show that there wouldSouth, some parts of my own veterans are taking advantage be even higher use of It. Alidwest, who are high school of the GI Bill to go to college Q: !kw dnes Vietnam veter:dropouts; move back into their twice the rate.of World War II an participation in the college 'c.o.small towns and we find it diffi- the VA is benefits of the current al Bill make personal and di- veteransand that red contact. placing inore emphasis un cnmpare withWorld WarII educational benefits for veter- men Mak advanlap of the bill We'rehavingin ichbetter success inthe inner citybe- ans from disadvantaged areas.and went to colleee. Six ont tO' VA Administrator Donald E.10 of the Vietnam veterans arecause you can go two bloeks I Johnson asid an interview going to college. andfind 10 vet n:ans.0 u t thatwhileGI benefitsare Q: Unemployment amongthere in my part of the country 1 available for college education. Vietnamveteransis 'running you have to drive 10 miles to "we try to poim out that, there higher than uneipploymentinfind oneveteranandthen are other things below college therestof the country. Areyaieve got a time and expense .and personnel problem. level completionofhighthere any programs for veter school, omthe-job berm- ans who don't wam to go to col- Q: What are you doing about fits." lege? these people? A: We're looking for answers. The VA i.shaving success A: 'The prnblemofjobless- Ihaveputon a verydis- :reaching veterans from inner-ness or unemployment among tinguished educator who is the city areas, Johnson said. but aVietnamera veterans is a real problem. One of the things thatP residentmlectofthe Rural problem still remains reaching Education Association, put him veterans from nwal areas to in-we proposed to the President and which he accepted was theon as a short-Omer consultant form them of the benefits avail- to see if he can devise some able to them. creatiotiofmoreon-thelob way to reach the educationally Excerpts from the interview: training programs for Vietnam- in the rural Q. The primary responsibilityera veterans. Our recommenda-disadvantaged forveteranstion was that we spend some areas. for finding jobs If your overall programs theLabor Depart-money to contract what we call Q: hes with areso ment. What is the VA doing tostate approval agenciesbashofjobsforveterans good,whyIstheirrateof help? catty gate departments Of pith. unemployment stillso high? A:Well,you were correctlie constructionto go out to Irs comingdown.But that primary respoesibility forthesmall andmediurmsized we've got an bveimll unemploy- finding employment for all citi-businesses andhelpestablish the country zens lies with the Departmentnmtheloh traMing positions. ment problemin It's about the only We began in uly and we'rewhick has come about because of Labor. .of a slowing down in the econo- veterans program thatI know making some goodprogress et that is not under our pHs- and theer's been a rather dra-my w hicir was largely triggered by the conversion from a war- diction. But any problem or the math:intreaseinon-thelnh time economy to a peace-time veteran is a problem of nurs. training programs. So we began s.onie lime ago Q: Low do you get inform- As we change priorities there to takethe information about bun aboutthese programs te the GI Bill and tilt; programs veterans who mightparticipate alwajs a conversion problem to temporary availabletoin them? 'and itleads and the benefits unempltonent. It's hit the Viet- the troops w hile they were still A: We're gone into the inner on active duty. We call itOut- cities to reach the unemployednam veterans but I think we've !turned the corner there. reach. We've had men in Viet' there, toendmrage themto nam. We have them in allthe takesomekindof training. majnr separation pints, in nil- We'relugoverobsessedwith Itary hovitals talking to these the idea thatevNybody's got to men while they're stillin uni go to college. We try to point form. out that there are other things Q: Do you follow up after dis below college level. charge? Butwhile we recognize the A: Immediately after they're prohkmi of unemployment discharged and w hen DOI) (the amongtheedueationhIlydis- DefenseDeiewtment)notifies advantaged in the hmer us of that discharge, we wild a we findin this mance that half letter to the veteran based upon of the educationally disadvant. the edueatkinalattainmentof ad veterausare inrural th at i vidmi America.IIliinksometimes There has been gtmd partid- they are kind of theforgotten pation. A littleover half the people. Vietnam veterans have taken 481 1808 Mr. HELSTOSKI. I would like to make one comment as to the first point extending entitlement from 36 to 48 months. Actually the 3fi months is a period based on a 4-year course of study. Are you sug- gesting a 5-year course of study, Mr. Patton. Mr. PATI'ON. Sir, I believe it would do two things : For one thing, with the present GI bill 12 hours is considered full-time. So many veterans take 12 or 13 hours because that is considered full-time. Full- time or 13 hours to attain the 120 to 230 hours needed for a degree runs 10 semesters. So that is roughly 45 to 50 months, depending on the institution you are attending. Now, if a veteran is able to take more hours and planning to get through school taking the normal 16- or 17-hour load, this might allow him to go onto a graduate program. But if I might add here, after World War II the GI bill provided 4 years of educational benefits. Now, this wasn't just 36 months. If you chose to go to school 48 months you were able to do that after World War II. The fact is that many of the veteransmost of the veterans, I might saychose to go to school the 4 years and take an undergradu- ate degree. Well, an undergraduate degree in 1950, I would say, would be equivalent in the job market to a master's degree today or possibly post-masters work. So this would be roughly commensurate with what the World War II veteran was able to attain on the GI bill. A man could go and get at least a master's degree and propably work on a doctorate today. Mr. MCLAUGHLIN. There is another point I would like to add to this. When you get a chance to look at some of the statistics we have com- piled at some of these fairs at Ohio and Missouri, you will see there is a trend toward technical and vocational training, technical schools, vocational schools, under the GI bill. So I think this trend will continue and the number of veterans wishing to attain this sort of technical edu- cation will increase. So I think that probably the number of veteranscomparably, anyhowwishing to go on to graduate work will not be that great. But I think it provides them with the opportunity and it does not cut the GI bill off immediately 8fter graduation from a 4-year school. It gives them the opportunity to go on when in, many cases, this man is married. Perhaps he has a child or two he must support. It is extremely difficult to make it if you have only the GI bill to go on. So it gives a man the opportunity to continue and compete with his peers, because his peers are now going on to graduate study. This is the reason why, essentiallly, we would like to see this go to 48 months. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Do you have any questions, Mr. Pucmski? Mr. PUCINSKI. No. Mr. HELSTOSKI. I want to thank you for appearing; before this com- mittee to present your testimony. 111r. Patton, Mr. McLaughlin. As our next witness we have Mr. William Vincenti from Newark State College in Newark, N.J. STATEMENT OF WILLIAM VINCENTI, NEWARK STATE COLLEGE, NEWARK, NJ. Mr. VINCENTI. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity of appearing before you today. With your permission, I would like to enter my statement on the record 482 1809 and make a very brief oral presentationabout our concerns at Newark State College. I am the director of the veteransidentity program, which is a spe- cialized program for veterans out ofNewark State College in New Jersey. Also, I am president of a newlyformed organization entitled c'American Educators for Veterans' Opportunities." I shall center my remarks with fourmajor points, which are : 1. The need for specializededucational programs for today's veterans. 2. The need for a nationaleffort coordinated by the Veterans'Ad- ministration or a newly formed organizationspecifically charged with thoresponsibilityof developingeducational opportunitiesfor veterans. 3. The need for a system offinancial incentives for postsecondary schools in order that educational programswill be made available on a largo scale. 4. The need for an increasein the educational assistanceavailable under the GI bill. On the first point, just to go alongwith some of the previous wit- nesses, studyingthe problem that today's veteranhas, we find the very fact that as aveteran he is receiving moneyfrom the GI bill it precludes him from receiving substantialassistance from other Fed- eral or State funded programs. Thefact that he receives as a single veteran $1,700 for an academic yearturns out to be very closelythe cutoff point for many of the funded programs,which means that if he applies for another grant hereceives very little, if anything,in addition to what he is receiving from theGI bill. Figures stated in a recent newspaperarticle indicate that the typical assistance that a family or an individual mustgive to himself as he prepares to go to collegeis on the order of $1,600. You can seethat the $1,700 he receives from the GIbill already is above that figure. On the second point, I see a verystrong need for a nationaleffort to coordinate the multiplicityof programs and ideas which arebeing generated for veterans. I think this issomething which can be done through the Veterans' Administration orit can be done, if you so desire, through another organizationwhich works either in conjunc- tion with the VA or autonomous from it. Third, as you probably know,institutions of higher education are operating unler what is commonly called afinancial crunch in try- ing to meet theirneeds, and many of the private colleges, aswell as public colleges, are reeling under thisfinancial crunch. I am happy to hear about Congressman'sPucinski's amendment to the Higher Education Act, and I see that as awelcome point toward improvmg the lot of veterans as they seekhigher education. Fourth, I reiterate once again that theGI bill allotment is above the amount of money that funding sources use as acutoff point, and it might be advisable if this particularallotment were removed from any statement ofearnings for a veteran so it would not becounted as he applies for grants and/or loans. Finally, today's veteran is returning to asociety which is very degree conscious, to the extent thathe himself feels he is required to enter higher education.While this factor is applied to him, many culturally disadvantaged and low-incomebackground veterans need specialized programs. 483 1810

I thank you. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Thank you, Mr. Vincenti. Mr. Winn, do you have any questions ? Mr. WINN. yes ;-1 would like to ask a question of Mr. Vincenti about his brief statement that the $1,700 is not enoughyou do not say it is not enough, but you say when they get the GI rights it makes them ineligible for other grants. Do I unaerstand you right that you are saying that you think thej, ought to receive the $1,700, the veterans under the GI bill, and also be eligible for one, two, or threemore arants? Mr. VINCENTI. Yes; you understand me correctly. I think we, as veterans ourselves, are faced with having to locate either full- or part- time jobs to support ourselves. Today's veteran is also faced with that problem. With the rising costs across the entire spectrum, I think it would be a distinct advantage to him if he could gain substantial support from grant agencies, lending institutions. The fact that he must go out and seek usually full-time employ- ment to support himself really puts a damper on his getting involved in full-time programs in colleges. Mr. WINN. Don't you think this puts us in a spot of giving $1,700 educational benefits to the veteran and at the same time, if he is able to get additional grants and additional outside money, this takes away from the alreally short funds that are available to other students ? Mr. VINcENTr. I guess it depends on where we determineour priorities must lie. It certainly does. Mr. WINN. The priority has already been stated in that this vet- eran, because he is eligible, gets $1,700, where many of us get many, many letters from students that are unable to get student loans at all. I don't know how the other members of the committee feel, but I feel that we want to be more than fair to the veterans. But at thesame time we have other people who are justas anxious to secure an edu- cation that are having a real hard time securingany funds for addi- tional schooling. Mr. VINCENTI. An additional factorand Iam sure you are famil- iar with thisis that the veteran isa bit older than some of the people you are talking about whoare seeking additional aid. Typically, their life styles, their life experience, the fact that they have served in the service, causes them to seek to live on theirown away from their families, and they really do not have the kind of support typically that your recent high school graduate has from theirown families. Mr. WINN. Well, bathcally, you are right; but, of course, there are exceptions. You have the veterans whoare going back to school who are married who can rely upon their wives in some cases to help them. We have a high percentage of people in this Nation, theyoung people, the younger ones you referred to, that do wantan education that can- not get help from home. The parents are havinga tough time, or maybe there are no parents. I would just be reticent to change that unless we develop an additional program someway. But we appreciate your testimony. Thankyou. Mr. VINCENTI. Again that is one of the points I have made, that there should be specialized programs for veterans. Aswe look at, for example, a program in the State of New Jersey,an educational op-

484 1811 portunity fund program, we find that a very, very small percentage of the people in that program are either from the agebracket that a veteran would most commonly be from or are veteransthemselves. So they do need specialized programs. Mr. "HEISTOSKI. Mr. Wylie, are there any questions? Mr. WYLIE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would just like to saythat I am sorry to be so late. I am a member of the Banking andCurrency Committee, and we were considering in executive committeethe so- called Economic Stabilization Act or phase II ofthe wage and price freeze, which most members of the committee are concernedabout at this time, not that this is not important. I think thisis important. But let me say I am basically in favor of yourposition. I know generally that it is for increased educational benefits for veteransand I will read your testimony with much interest. Thank you verymuch. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. VINCENT!. Thank you, Mr. Wylie. Mr. HEISTOSIEL Thank you very much for appearingbefore us this morning and giving us the benefit of your testimony. (The testimony of William G. Vincenti to besubmitted for the record follows :) PREPARED STATEMENT OF WILTIAld G. VINOENTI Mr. Chairman Olin Teague, members of the committee, thank youfor the op- portunity of appearing before you today, I hope that what I amabout to offer will be of some assistance to you in your deliberations. I shall center my remarks about four major points, they are :1) The need far specializcd educational programs for today's veterans, 2) Theneed for a na- tional effort coordinated by the Veterans' Administration or anewly formed organization specifically charged with the responsibility of developingeducational opportunities for veterans, 3) The need for a system offinancial incentives for post-secondary schools in order that educational programswill be made avail- able on a large scale, The need for an increase in the educationalassistance available under the G.I. Bill. I. Recent V.A. press releases indicate the average ageof today's veteran is 26.7 years. Existing specialized programs for admissionsto post-secondary schools are intended for the age group 18-21. The recenthigh school graduate has a specialized program under E.O.G. or E.O.P. The veryfact that a veteran receives money through the G.I. Bill precludes him fromreceiving substantial assistance from these programs if he manages to be included inthem. Further, his very age, maturity, and life experiences causehim to be much different than his younger counterparts. The veteran is ahighly motivated individual who desperately wants to succeed. Unlike the recenthigh school graduate who may have little or no direction the veteran hastasted life and is ready to take his place in society. Among his needs is the need for specialized programs which seek toassist him through his initial experiences in higher education. Theold "saw" which indi- cates that the freshman year is the most difficult of theentire college experi- ence continres to be true for today's veteran. IL There is a need for a national effort to be mounted tocoordinate the multi- plicity of programs and ideas which are being generated for veterans.While I firmly believe that each institution should find it possible to createits own pro- grams and initiatives, I also believe that astrong foundation undergirding the national effort would provide substantial impetus to thiseffect. The VA. certainly could assume this responsibility.However, you may wish to consider a separate organization which mightoperate either autonomous or semi-autonomous from the V.A. to develop educationalopportunities for veterans. HI. As we study higher education today, we find manyof these institutions operating under a Financial crunch. which has many ofthe private colleges reel- ing. With costs continuing to increase both in thepublic and private sector, many 1812 find themselves unable to offer substantial considerations to this significant seg- ment of the population, namely the veteran. Financial incentives, of the kind offered by Congressman Pucinski, either through the Higher Education Act or through additional allocations under the G.I. Bill would enable higher education the opportunity of serving many more veterans. IV. The costs of gaining an education either from a public or private institu- tion continue to increase unabated. Faced with these mounting costs the vet- eran generally seeks the least expensive institution to attend. However, this very factor, of low cost, works to his disadvantage since the general student finds it necessary to tighten his belt also. It is worthy of note that for the first time in many years more than fifty per- cent of New Jersey's college bound students are attending within the state. Further, at Newark State College, this past year found approximately 5,000 freshman applying for 1,000 seats. Also, the very fact that a veteran is receiving G.I. Bill monies precludes him receiving substantial assistance from existing federal and state prgrams of financial assistance. He can locate loan programs but lie prefers not to place himself in debt. If the G.I. Bill allotment were removed from any statement of earnings this would be a valuable assist. This veteran finds himself in difficult straits. He must locate part-time or full- time employment to augment his income. Certainly we were faced with this sit- uation also. However, Jobs are difficult to find in today's market place. The De- partment of Labor indicates that the unemployment rate for veterans is sig- nificantly higher than the general public. Additionally, the veteran is returning to a society which is degree conscious, to the extent that he feels required to enter higher education. While this factor is applied to him, many are from educationally disadvantaged, culturally distinct, low income backgrounds. Mr. HELSTOSKI. We have as our final witness Mr. Stuart F. Feld- man, program coordinator, Veterans Educational and Training Action Committee representing the National League of Cities and U.S. Con- ference of Mayors.

STATEMENT OF STUART F. FELDMAN, PROGRAM COORDINATOR, VETERANS EDUCATION AND TRAINING ACTION COMMITTEE, NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES AND U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS Mr. FELDMAN. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I would like to read our statement. As I said I am pleased to be here today to pre- sent the views of the Nationul League of Cities and U.S. Conference of Mayors on behalf of its member cities and State leagues on pro- posed legislation to increase veterans education assistance allowances. The opportunity to present these views before you, Mr. Chairman, and the distinguished committee is of major importance to us. Mayors Richard Lugar and Wesley Uhlman of Indianapolis and Seattle wished they could have made this presentation, butwere prevented from doing so by the fact that the annual convention of the National League of Cities is being held this week. We are greatly indebted to this committee for the guidance we have received from your members who serve on our Veterans Education and Training Action Committee (VETAC) ; the Committee Chairman Olin Teague, Congresswoman Margaret Heckler, Congressmen Wil- liam Dorn and Roman Pucinski were kind enough to join. I might also state our appreciation for the willingness of Staff Director Oliver Meadows to share with us his wide knowledge of veterans questions. VETAC is a special effort by. our organization which, in aeneral, pro- vides technical assistance to, and representation for, our N"ation's cities and affiliated organizations.

486 1813 The Veterans Education andTraining Action Committee is co- chaired by Mayors Carl Stokes andRichard Lugar, chairman of the National League of Cities, and cosponsoredby the National Urban Coalition. This committee is deeplyconcerned for the well-being and the future of today's veterans.These men have served under difficult conditions in a little understood warand return to an economy where employment prospects are anythingbut bright. We are particularly concerned, as an organization of mayors,with the large numbers of men returningwith a high school education orless to our cities. Par- ticularly hard hit are the inner cityveterans whose unemployment rates of up to 20 percent are not uncommon.We feel that one solu- tion to this problem of the returningveteran is the increased use of GI bill opportunities,particularly if those opportunities canbe com- bined with a part-time job. I would like, at this point, toinsert in the record a molutionwhich summarizes the points of view of ourorganizations. It will be pre- sented today to the Convention ofthe National League of Cities,hav- ing been adopted by the human resourcessubcommittee on Monday. I will not read that resolution now. Mr. HELSTOSICE. Without objection,the resolution will be made a part of the record. (The document referred tofollows :)

RESOLUTION ON EDUCATION, TRAINING, ANDJOB OITORTUNFITES FOR TILE VIETNAM VETERAN All levels of government haveresponsibilities to provide opportunities forthe men who served our country, many asdraftees. This responsibility isheightened by the difficult economic situation towhich these men return at a rate of one million per year. The vast "scholarship" resources of theG.I. Bill, with $1.9 billion to support student veterans this fiscal year, and withCongress having a commitment to appropriate more funds as more veteransenroll, represent a major resource to train and educate our citizens. TheVeterans Education and TrainingAction Committee (VETAC) of the National Leagueof Cities and the U.S. Conference of mayors provides a means tohelp organize national action onbehalf of the veteran. Parallel local efforts are needed, mobilizingpublic and private resources, to create education, trainihg and Jobopportunities for veterans, particularlythose with a high school education or less. Toaccomplish thls city governments should : 1. Mount an outreach effort through ModelCities and C.A.A.'s, aimed at recent vets, staffed by vets, to help vets use theGI Bill ; act as a clearinghouse forjobs ; and obtain commitments from the educationcommunity to serve the men. 2. Meet the program guideline goal ofgiving recent veterans one third ofEmer. gency Employment Act jobs. 3. Adopt the VETAC split job concept,whereby two veterans share oneforty hour job while both take full time educationand training under the GI Bill. Recognizing the major contribution to leadershipand a skilled work force made by the current G.I. Bill, as well as theWorld War II and Korean G.I. Bills, we call upon the Federal government to amendthe GI. Bill to : 1. Reflect the impact of inflation on thecosts of education, training and subsistence. 2. Provide comparable benefits in dollarterms to the World War II GI.Bill. 3. Give a veteran returning to fulltime education and training at lessthan a graduate level, an initial year of benefitsat a higher rate, than for subsequent years. This would minimizethe amount of work he must do tosupport himself, while he makes the difficult transition toeducation. Mr. FELDMAN. On the subjectof the leffislation at handtoday, there aro manybills before this committee.Ife know, Mr. Chairman, that

487 1814 you and the committee are open to suggestions and ideas as to the shape of GI bill leaislation. We recognize that the GI bill is not designedas a completesbubsidy for educationalcosts, but rather to give a man a substantial start toward that education. Our testimony will focuson general principles rather than specific provisions of the individual bills. Our feeling is that today's veterans ought to have the sameoppor- tunity as World War II veterans to obtainan education. The major increases in the cost of living since the last GI bill increases in March 19701 and particularly the major increases in the cost of education, require an adjustment ni GI bill benefits. The committee will, we are sure, carefully examine those costs and will be obtaining expert testi- mony and advice from organizations and Federal agencies more expert to comment on those costs than we are. Our study of participation rates suggestone posscble idea in allocat- ing veterans benefit funds. We would like to suggest that higher bene- fits for the first year of colleae or post-high school education might be a great attraction to manyvebterans, if theyfelt that they could obtain the first year of education without going deeply into debt. Ifan addi- tional $40 or $50 a month could be made available for this 1year, men with limited previous college attendanceor without high school de- grees, could devote the bulk of their time to their studies. Such a dif- ferential would still require in mostareas of the country a major stu- dent contribution. After that first year when the veteran could become educationally competitive, he could hold down the kind of part-time job responsibilities thata regularly competitive student veteran does. The particular concorn of our mayorsis for veterans with a high school education or less, particularly those who gainedno special skills in the service, and those who return to cities from lowincome, blue collar and minority backgrounds. In this regard, we find most interesting the findings ofa 1971 De- fense Department research study on veterans' college enrolhnent. That study shows that veterans with a high school educationor less are far less likely to use the GI bill to obtain a college education thanveterans of like ability with preservice college attendance. The figures in table 4 of the appendix to my statement show that 48.8 percent of veterans, who score in the highest ability category of the Armed Forces entry test, and who had preservice college,use the GI bill to return to education. That, ofmen who scored in the second ability category, and mini in both categories havea good chance of success in college about 46 percent use the GI bill to return to college. In contrast, of tile men scoring in those two categories withno pre- vious college, 26.4 percent of those in the first category and 18.9per- cent in the second category use the GI bill to ao to college. One of the principal purposes of the GIbbill,as recognized in the law, is togive opportunities to men who could not otherwise afford aneducation. We think that if funds wcre available to substantially cover the first costs of post-high-school or high school completion, many young men who might not otherwise fully realize their abilities would use the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that the GI bill affords. This is because so many of thesemen lack confidence in their educa- tional abilities and a complete understanding of what college is. Robert Ford, a recent veteran who used his GI bill opportunities, explains why veterans like himself fail touse their chances. It is 488 1815 primarily because of the unsophisticatedhigh school graduate's lack of comprehension of what college means.Mr. Ford's letter is attached as an appendix. When we talk of college inconnection with the Defense Depart.. ment study, it includes the juniorand community college systems. These are a new phenomenon in our countryin comparison with post- World War II when California wasthe pioneer. The junior and com- munity colleges offer not only the traditionalacademic education, but also high-quality, low-cost technicalinstruction. The DOD statistics from some majorcities, and these tables are attached as table 10 of the appendixes to ourtestimony, show that in Atlanta 10.6 percent of the high schoolgraduate veterans use the GI bill to go to college, versus 30.2 percent ofthose with 1 to 3 years of pre- service college ;in Baltimore, 13.3 percent versus50.3 percent ;in Chicago, 12.7 percent versus 43.9 percent ;in Cleveland 14.1 percent versus 45.5 percent ;in Detroit, 16.3 percent versus 50.3 percent ; inLos Angeles, 20.8 percent versus 44.5 percent ;in New Orleans, 11.9 per- cent versus 35.9 percent; andin Pittsburgh, 14.1 percent versus 49.4 percent. We want to discuss quickly severalother problems that are addressed by legislation or by proposalscontained in other testimony. We agree with the American Association ofJunior Colleges that more must be done to expand the use of PREP andtutorial programs, and find their testimony most constructive on thatsubject. We would suggest, how- ever, that a numberof changes in the PREP programmight be achieved by less restrictive administrativeinterpretations of the 1970 law, whose intent, we believe, was to dramatically create newopportunities for servicemen and veterans. Further, webelieve that combined legislative and administrative changes may beneeded to deal with tilt problem of payments delays, both as theyaffect individual student veteransand educational institutions. Let me briefly describe theefforts we are undertaking, Mr.Chair- man, through theVeterans Education and TrainingAction Committee. I think these are relevant to thiscommittee's delluerations for several reasons. One, you areconcerned with the effectivedelivery of services, particularly educational services to veterans.This committee directed the Veterans' Administration to carry on amajor outreach effort in the 1970 amendments. As we understandit, the Veterans' Administra- tion has not been given the additional resourcesnecessary to carry out that effort. However, the mayorsfeel that they have substantial capac- ity through their model cities andcommunity action agencies that, if trained and involved, and hereVA assistance would be mosthelpful, could provide reference servicesfor veterans. One of the othermajor functions of our national effort thatshould be of interest to this com- mittee is to systematically providepart-time jobs for student veterans. As the philosophy of the GIbill does not contemplate that afull scholarship would be provided toveterans but rather significant read- justment assistance, we feelthat particularly the low incomeand minority veterans need an'assured source of part-time employment. That is why our resoultionand overall efforts have focused onthe Emergency Employment Act. Under the Office ofEconomic Opportunity $1 million grant, our organizations, through VETAC, areundertaking demonstration proj- ects in 13 cities. Underthe sponsorship of the mayor, anumbrella 1816 committee is formed which combines a veterans education, training and jobs thrust. All relevant organizations, both public and private, Fed- eral, State, and local, are involved. A heavy representation of recent veterans also participate. Projects staffs consist of recent veterans who have used GI bill opportunities. These men reach out for their fellow veterans and assist them through what appears, to men lacking an education orientation, to be a difficult system. In this, we complement and work with the Veterans' Administration. The committee is staffed by recent veterans and is under the direc- tion of a city agency. These veterans in turn go out and reach their fellow veterans who have not availed themselves of the GI bill oppor- timities and explain to them how to use those opportunities, help them through the sometimes torturous process of college or school applications, and assist them in filling out their GI bill forms. The committees have two other major tasks besides the recruitment task. One is to obtain a commitmei .from the education institutions in the community to provide educational opportunities for recent vet- erans in large numbers, and to offer the courses they need to become educationally competitive. The third principal activity is to obtain for veterans part-time jobs so that they can use the GI bill opportunities. We have programs underway in Indianapolis, Seattle, Los Angeles, Wichita, and Miami. Others in Detroit and Chicago will begin within a few weeks. We are joining with the Appalachian Regional Commission, which has voted $250,000 to be added toour $60,000 for at least three Appalachian projects. Seattle is the most advanced project. Joe Garcia, a young veteran, came to the city's human resources administrator, Ed Sing ler, and offered to work on veterans' problems. He returned day after day, working as a volunteer. Sing ler hired him, and when our program was announced, Seattle aggressively pursued a commitment from our organization to become one of the project cities. Given that commitment, Garcia and his staff of veterans, with Mayor Wesley Uhlman and Singler's firm backing, raised $120,000 from other local sources, including $60,000 from the community action agency, to mount an across-the-board veterans effort. It emphasizes the creation of educatimi and training opportunities for returning GI's and the part-time jobs these men need to complete such education. The veterans have been able to obtain commitments for at least 180 public jobs from city, county, and State agencies. These jobs will prob- ably bring in salaries of close to a million d.ollars for veterans. Many of them will be split between two veterans, both of whom will go to school full time and share the 40-hour job income, and work responsibilities. This split job concept is one VETAC developed and persuaded the Labor Departmet to write into its guidelines for the Emergency Employment Act. We are hopeful that the Federal Gov- ernment would adopt a split job for Federal hiring and, thereby aid student veterans. Seattle. veterans have worked with the Veteran's Administration to develop a $115,000 drug project. All of the activities for veterans will be housed out of the Seattle Veterans Action Agency. This group has the cooperation of the Veterans' Administration in Seattle and its contact people are being trained by the VA. We are hopeful that the

490 1817

Seattle project will set a patternfor projects sponsored byother cities. In this regard, we werefortunate that the enactment ofthe Emer- gency EmploymentAct coincided with this major veteranseffort. For manyadditional cities, other than those we canfund with the limited dollars of our grant, are undertakingveterans outreach efforts.These can be fundedthrough the Emergenc3r EmploymentAct. In addition, Model Cities has adopted a newcitywide planned variations program which makes $80 million available to16 cities, many ofwIlich we believe will undertake VETAC programs. But, even more importantly, ourcities are adopting our splitjob idea and enabling veterans enrolledin the GI bill to share a40-hour job while both go back to school.A number of mayors incities which are not receivingproject grants are alreadyundertaking four-point veterans programs. Theexciting example of the Seattleproject and the adoption by the League ofCities of the vethrans education,train- ing and jobs resolution shouldinvolve other cities to additionalactions on behalf ofveterans. Mr. Chairman, this concludes mypresentation. I would be delighted to answer any questions youmight have. Mr. HELSTOSKL Thank you.Without objection, the appendedinfor- mation will be made a part of the record. (The document referred to follows:)

CITY ADOPTION OF THE SPLIT JOB CONCEPT NOVEMBER 4, 1971. Mayor Sam. Yorty today issued anadministrative directive which would "significantly increase" Jobs for Vietnam andKorean veterans who need part- time work. number of positions available toveterans The Yorty plan could double the provid- under the Federally-funded EmergencyEmployment Act (EEA) which is ing $23,329,000 to produce newmunicipal service jobs to offset currentlyhigh unemployment. Yorty urged City department managers toconsider hiring two Vietnam or Korean veterans now using their GIBills for education and trainingfor each available full-time EEA position, with each man, orwoman, working half-time. "Since these veterans would already be receiving$175 a month in educational or training benefits, thehalf-time City salary would combineto make a living wage and provide badly neededpart-time employment," Yortyexplained. "The proposed plan has the necessaryflexibility to fit into any departmental operation. Any time division could be used aslong as it would give eachemployee forty hours of work during any giveneighty-hour pay period," Yorty said. "We have a great debt and responsibilityto these veterans," the Mayor as- serted, "and we should do everythingpossible to provide both educationaland employment opportunities particularlywith the wind-down of U.S.involvement in Vietnam." "The transition from battlefield tocivilian life becomes increasinglydifficult (luring periods of economic slowdownsand ll'enerally high unemployment,"Yorty noted. "Government and private enterprise alike needto face the problem of our returning veterans with creativity andcommitment, providing meaaingful employment opportunities wherever andwherever possible," Yorty said.

[Reprinted from the Congressional Record,Senate, March 31, 1970, 5-4683) A VETERAN VIEWS THEPROBLEM AND PROPOSES ASOLUTION DurfcArfirox, PA., January 28, 1970. To Senator ALLEN CRANSTON andChairman OLIN E. TEAGUE. in my senior DEAR CHAIRMAN TEAGUE ANDSENATOR CRANSTON : I am currently year at the CapitolCampus, Pennsylvania StateUniversity. I am going to school on the GI Bill, andrecognize the various reasons why manyveterans do not take 43,1 1818 advantage of this program. Many persons haveexpressed the critical reason as the veterans feeling uncertainabout their ability to however, an even more critical go to college. There is, reason which, combined with uncertainty,prevents many veterans from reaching thecampus. This is the problem of "HOW". Many veterans are simplyunaware of the basic procedures required college. Accompanying this, they to enter as : types of courses available, are unaware of all aspects of college lifesuch study methods, and in general,just what will be required of them as a collegestudent. This unawareness has been The reason is that virtuallyrepeatedly overlooked becauseof one main reason. everyone who is concerned with highereducation is himself a product ofhigher education, eitheras a graduate or a current faculty member. Thesepersons have been college oriented days. They prepared to since high school go on, were counseled in this respect,and finally entered the world of higher education.Because of this atmosphere, tion," persons who today or "college orienta- are in a position to effect theenrollment of veterans are also, through no fault of theirown, overlooking the criticalreason for what appears to be a lack of interest in theGI Bill. Many veterans indeed becameveterans because of a or simply a lack of interest in their poor economic background own education. The maturity, discipline,and motivation which they gainin the service still leavesthem in the dark as far as college is concerned :If anything, college hasbecome even more unknown. In short, many veterans wantto go to college if how. someone would only show them For this reason, the veterans fraternities of Harrisburg AreaCommunity College and the Capitol Campus,Pennsylvania State University, haveinitiated a program designed to recruit veteransinto college. From discussionsamong our- selves, we have found thatmost of us had experiencedthe same problems when we were attemtphig toenter college. I cannot over-emphasize the value of the human aspect ofour approach. We are veterans talking to veterans. Wespeak the same language, this means we first describe and through our own experience in college andgenerally try to reduce the fear of theunknown. We then describedifferent courses and methods of scheduling to fitjobs or other situations. Wetry to answer any questions about college andwe even help to sulnnit applications.We also have an unwritten code that once a veteranbecomes a student our beststudents in any particular course will tutorany GI who is having trouble in thatparticular course. In other words, when we counsel,we tell veterans, " if you go to school, we'll make sure you stay.° I feel that our methods wouldbe highly successful nationwide withan adequate program. I am enclosing a few items aboutus with the hope that we may shed some light on the current problems connectedwith the GI Bill. As veterans who are now college students,we do know what others areup against and we hope to help themovercome these problems by using our experiences. Concerning the current proposals, Ihave noticed that Senator Cranston's bill would provide finances forspecial, or developmentalcourses. This is most important particularly toour fellow veterans belonging to minoritygroups or from poor economic backgrounds.In many cases, these specialcourses are their only hope to be able to competeacademically in the classroom with the students. younger I would welcome the opportunityto expand on these many otherareas at your request, and hope that I have been ofsome assistance. Respectfully yours, RonEnr D. Fonn.

We are working with Mr. Ford toimplement his idea, lie is a member ofour National Committee, whowas hired by Governor Shafer to run the Pennsylvania Action for Veterans Education (PAVE) inPennsylvania. Governor Shapp sub- sequently named him State Director of theSelective Service.

LISZ 1819

CITY SPONSORED VETERANS THE INITIAL PROGRESSREPORT OF THE FOREMOST PROJECT (To DATE) CITY OF SEATTLE, EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES, Seattle, Wash., October11,1071.

MEMORANDUM To: Ed Sing ler, Director,Office of Human Resources. From : Joe Garcia, Coordinator,Veterans' Affairs. Subject: Six-week report to theNational League of Cities/U.S.Conference of Mayors. with the hope that itwill The following informationis being made available Action Center (SEA-VAC)is coordinating its efforts explain how Seattle Veteran creating alternatives when with existing communityservicing agencies and needed. SEA-VAC is funded jointlyby City of Seattle,1 Officeof Human Resources, Action Agency (Seattle-KingCounty Economic Op- and the local Communitycommunity emphasis is generatedby the Outreach portunity Board, Inc.). The the component of SEA-VAC andthe Administrativefunction is carried out by of the program. Also,additional staff support Planning and Services Component Supplement Program (ESP), for P&S is provided bythe work-study, Employment functions of SEA-VAC. All programdecisions are made by and the volunteer Director and OutreachCoordinator. staff input and implementedby the Program institutions Primary coordination has beenaccomplished with the educational County area, a job team hasbeen functional for aboutsix- in the Seattle-King Security, Concentrated Employ- weeks and coordinatedwith State EmploymentCenter to insure the highest ment Program (CEP),and Manpower Services and a linkage hasbeen established andstrengthen rate of veterans contact ; veterans with healthproblems. with the local V.A. Hospitalto process and refer mental as well as physicalproblems. Education to Aid Returning Working closely with theMayor's Task Force on together all the EducationInstitutions in the Veterans, SEAVAC brought treat, he educational Seattle-King County area todiscuss, but more importantly military problems the returningveterans are confrontingafter seperation from approximately 5,500 veteransin our area lack a high service. Realizing that college to expand theirAdult school education werequested a local community to accomodate moreveterans. After numerousmeetings Basic Education Program granted permission to makeveteran referrals with the program's director we were list. In the interim, we are prepar- that would be givenpreference on the waiting five-teacher team that volunteertheir time to tutor and ing these veterans via teacher teams work at the assist our referrals to insureABE/GED success. The SEAVAC Center. National Alliance of At the present time we areworking closely with the grant from the Departinentof Labor to provide Businessmen (NAB) in a special We are also planning part-time jobs for student-veteransin the inivate sector. future. Veteran In School" fundraising campaign in the near a "Sponsor A (1) secure enough fundsto request federal We hope to accomplishtwo things : Program in our area ;and, (2) :matching funds to create aVeterans Work-Study support for part-timejobs. to enlist private employersthe first rough draftof Veterans-SpecialTraining We have just completed(VETSTEP). This programis designed for theedu- and Education Programveteran that needs alot of personalcontact and cationally disadvantaged supportive services thatwill instill seIf-confidence attention with an array of of society. This programwill and help the participantback into the mainstreamEducational half-way center be in contact with localuniversities and become an for veterans. in conjunction withthe Mayor's TaskForce on In the area of employment,Veterans we have succeededin securing free Employment to Aid Returning operations of this Job space for theSEAVAC Job Team.During the six-week about 450 veterans, made104 direct job referrals,304 Team we have processed in jobs. We haveexcellent supportive service referrqlsand placed 50 veterans* the State, County andCity BEA offices andthis work- linkages established with. are deeplyconcerned with ing relationship isbeing strengthened. Of course, we Programs but the low numbers of theSpecial Veterans beinghired in the EEA League of Cafes and U.S.Conference 1 This represents a $50.000grant from the National Committee Program. of Mayors' 0E0-funded VeteransEducation and Training Action 493 1820

have been insured that this problem area is beingrectified. We plan to continue to closely monitor this matter. SEA-VAC JobTeam coordinates all its efforts with the Veteran Employment Representativesfrom State Employment Security Offices. Other programs in the employment field beingcoordinated through our Job Team are National