DOCSLIB.ORG

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,932,613 B2 Taylor (45) Date of Patent: Jan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,932,613 B2 Taylor (45) Date of Patent: Jan USOO8932613B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,932,613 B2 Taylor (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 13, 2015 (54) ECTOPARASITE CONTROL METHOD WO 98.07423 A1 2/1998 WO O 170671 A2 9, 2001 (75) Inventor: Wendy Sue Taylor, Landenberg, PA W. 89.3 A. 33: (US) (Continued) (73) Assignee: E I du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS c Londershaunsen Michael: "Approaches to new parasiticides' Pesti (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this cide science, vol. 48, No. 4, 1996, p. 269-292, XP002561859 ISSN: patent is extendedb) b ord adjusted under 35 OO31-613X. U.S.C. 154(b) by 595 days. S.K. Meegalla et al. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett. (2006), 1702-1706. PN.R.Usherwoodet al., “Towards the development of ryanoid insec (21) Appl. No.: 12/670,494 ticides with low mammalian toxicity' retreived from STN Interna 1-1. tional Database accession No. 9725325 & Toxicology Letters, vol. (22) PCT Filed: Jul. 28, 2008 82/83 No. COM 1995 pp. 247-254. G.P. Lahm et al: “Insecticidal antirhanilic diamides: A new class of (86). PCT No.: PCT/US2008/071287 potent ryanodine receptor activators' Bioorganic & Medical Chem S371 (c)(1), istry Letters, vol. 15, Sep. 13, 2005 pp. 4898-4906. (2), (4) Date: Jan. 25, 2010 PCT/US2008/071288 International Search Report, Mar. 4, 2010. PCT/US/2008/071288 International Preliminary Report on Patent (87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2009/018185 ability, Mar. 9, 2010. PCT Pub. Date: Feb. 5, 2009 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner — Audrea Buckley US 2010/0204281 A1 Aug. 12, 2010 (57) ABSTRACT O O This invention relates to a method of controlling or preventing Related U.S. Application Data infestations of ectoparasites, preferably hematophageous (60) Provisional application No. 60/962,568, filed on Jul. ectoparasites, on an animal by administering to the animal a 30, 2007. composition comprising an parasiticidally effective amount of a compound of Formula 1, oran N-oxide, or a pharmaceu (51) Int. Cl. ( ) tically or veterinarily acceptable salt thereof, AOIN 25/02 2006.O1 A6 IK3I/4I55 (2006.01) (52) setts (2006.01) R2 1 CPC ............ A0IN 43/56 (2013.01); A61 K31/4155 (2013.01) \ USPC ........................................... 424/405; 514/183 O M 3 (58) Field of Classification Search R1 N R USPC .......................................................... 424/405 R NH See application file for complete search history. / \ (56) References Cited O o NC R7 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 6,001,384 A 12/1999 Jeannin R41 ns 2004/O198984 A1 10, 2004 Lahm et al. 2007/O161037 A1 7/2007 Gutteridge 2009.0036407 A1 2/2009 Taylor wherein 2009.0036497 A1 2/2009 Taylor R" is Me, Cl, Br or F: 2009.0036498 A1 2/2009 Taylor R’ is F, Cl, Br, C-C haloalkyl or C-C haloalkoxy; 2009.0036499 A1 2/2009 Taylor 2009, O104145 A1 4/2009 Hughes et al. R is F, C1 or Br; 2009/0275471 A1* 11/2009 Funke et al. .................. 504,100 R" is H; C1-C4 alkyl, C-C alkenyl, C-C alkynyl, Cs-Cs 2010/0056469 A1* 3/2010 Langewald et al. .. ... 514/53 cycloalkyl, or C-C cycloalkylalkyl, each optionally 2010/0120616 A1* 5/2010 Breuninger et al. .......... 504,100 substituted with one substituent selected from the group 2010/O197738 A1 8/2010 Taylor consisting of halogen, CN, SMe, S(O)Me, S(O).Me, 2010/0210601 A1* 8/2010 Taylor ........................... 514,143 and OMe: 2011 OO15153 A1 1/2011 Taylor R is H or Me: FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS R is H. For Cl; and R7 is H, For C1. EP 1717237 A1 2, 2005 GB 2321012 A1 7, 1998 5 Claims, No Drawings US 8,932,613 B2 Page 2 (56) References Cited OTHER PUBLICATIONS PCT/US2008/071287 International Search Report (International Phase of this Application), Feb. 11, 2010. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS PCT/US2008/071287 International Preliminary Report on Patent ability (International Phase of this Application), Feb. 2, 2010. W. 29.3 A. 39 Ohkawa et al., Pesticide Chemistry, Wiley Verlag Chapters 11 and 12 WO 2006007595 A2 1/2006 Jul 17, 2007. WO 2006/068669 A1 6, 2006 Office Actions and Responses in U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,566, Jul. 2, WO WO 2006,108552 * 10, 2006 2012. WO 2006128867 A1 12/2006 Office Actions and Responses in U.S. Appl. No. 12/670.663, Jun. 14. WO 2007O 17433 A2 2, 2007 2012. WO 2007020877 A1 2, 2007 Office Actions and Responses in U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,551, Feb. 1. WO WO2007/020877 A1 2, 2007 2012. WO 2008104503 A1 9, 2008 WO 2008125410 A2 10, 2008 * cited by examiner US 8,932,613 B2 1. 2 ECTOPARASITE CONTROL METHOD The invention also comprises a compound of Formula 1 for use as a medicament. The invention also relates to the use of a compound of FIELD OF THE INVENTION Formula 1 in the manufacture of a medicament for the treat 5 ment of an infestation of an ectoparasitic insect on a animal This invention relates to certain methods for controlling ectoparasitic insects on homeothermic animals DETAILS OF THE INVENTION As used herein, the terms “comprises.” “comprising.” BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION “includes.” “including.” “has.” “having.” “contains” or “con 10 taining.” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover Ectoparasitic insects are particularly bothersome for ani a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a composition, a mals including humans. They are annoying as well as possi mixture, process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises bly harmful due to the potential transmission of diseases. a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those Although substantial need has existed in the industry for elements but may include other elements not expressly listed products which control or eradicate Such ectoparasites, prior 15 or inherent to Such composition, mixture, process, method, art attempts have failed to provide effective formulations article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the which are capable of fully eradicating or controlling them contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of while also being non-toxic to humans and animals. the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not In an attempt to meet the consumer demand for products of present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), this nature, various pesticides, insecticides and insect repel and both A and B are true (or present). lant formulations have been developed. These products often Also, the indefinite articles “a” and “an preceding an suffer from drawbacks relating to their toxicity or lack of element or component of the invention are intended to be efficacy due to evolved resistance of the parasites. There is a nonrestrictive regarding the number of instances (i.e. occur pressing need therefore for new chemical compounds effica 25 rences) of the element or component. Therefore “a” or “an cious against Such pests which are relatively non-toxic to the should be read to include one or at least one, and the singular animal species they are used to protect. word form of the element or component also includes the plural unless the number is obviously meant to be singular. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In the above recitations, the term “alkyl, used either alone 30 or in compound words such as “alkylthio’ or “haloalkyl This invention relates to a method of controlling or pre includes straight-chain or branched alkyl, such as, methyl, venting infestations of an ectoparasitic insect, preferably a ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, or the different butyl isomers. The hematophageous ectoparasitic insect, on an animal by admin term "halogen', either alone or in compound words such as istering to the animal a composition comprising an parasiti “haloalkoxy’, includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine. cidally effective amount of a compound of Formula 1, or an 35 Further, when used in compound words such as “haloalkyl, N-oxide, or a salt thereof, or “haloalkoxy”, said alkyl oralkoxy may be partially or fully Substituted with halogen atoms which may be the same or different. Examples of “haloalkyl include FC, CICH, CFCH and CFCC1. Examples of “haloalkoxy' include R2 40 CFO, HCFO, CC1-CHO, HCFCHCHO and CFCH.O. One skilled in the art will appreciate that not all nitrogen containing heterocycles can form N-oxides since the nitrogen O | MN 3 requires an available lone pair for oxidation to the oxide; one RI N R skilled in the art will recognize those nitrogen-containing 45 heterocycles which can form N-oxides. One skilled in the art R NH / will also recognize that tertiary amines can form N-oxides. N \ Synthetic methods for the preparation of N-oxides of hetero O cycles and tertiary amines are very well known by one skilled NC R7 in the art including the oxidation of heterocycles and tertiary 50 amines with peroxy acids such as peracetic and m-chlorop R41 N NR5 erbenzoic acid (MCPBA), hydrogen peroxide, alkyl hydrop eroxides Such as t-butyl hydroperoxide, Sodium perborate, and dioxiranes such as dimethydroxirane. These methods for wherein the preparation of N-oxides have been extensively described 55 and reviewed in the literature, see for example: T. L. Gilchrist R is Me, Cl, Br or F: in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, vol. 7, pp 748-750, S. R’ is F, Cl, Br, C-C haloalkyl or C-Chaloalkoxy: V. Ley, Ed., Pergamon Press: M. Tisler and B. Stanovnik in R is F, C1 or Br; Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 3, pp 18-20, A. R" is H; C-C alkyl, C-C alkenyl, C-C alkynyl, C-Cs J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neuroactive Insecticides: Targets, Selectivity, Resistance, and Secondary Effects
    EN58CH06-Casida ARI 5 December 2012 8:11 Neuroactive Insecticides: Targets, Selectivity, Resistance, and Secondary Effects John E. Casida1,∗ and Kathleen A. Durkin2 1Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 2Molecular Graphics and Computational Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; email: [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013. 58:99–117 Keywords The Annual Review of Entomology is online at acetylcholinesterase, calcium channels, GABAA receptor, nicotinic ento.annualreviews.org receptor, secondary targets, sodium channel This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153645 Abstract Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. Neuroactive insecticides are the principal means of protecting crops, people, All rights reserved livestock, and pets from pest insect attack and disease transmission. Cur- ∗ Corresponding author rently, the four major nerve targets are acetylcholinesterase for organophos- phates and methylcarbamates, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for neonicotinoids, the γ-aminobutyric acid receptor/chloride channel for by Public Health Information Access Project on 04/29/14. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013.58:99-117. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org polychlorocyclohexanes and fiproles, and the voltage-gated sodium channel for pyrethroids and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Species selectivity and acquired resistance are attributable in part to structural differences in binding subsites, receptor subunit interfaces, or transmembrane regions. Additional targets are sites in the sodium channel (indoxacarb and metaflumizone), the glutamate-gated chloride channel (avermectins), the octopamine receptor (amitraz metabolite), and the calcium-activated calcium channel (diamides). Secondary toxic effects in mammals from off-target serine hydrolase inhibi- tion include organophosphate-induced delayed neuropathy and disruption of the cannabinoid system.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Reliance on Insecticides to Manage Spotted Wing Drosophila
    Reducing reliance on insecticides to manage spotted wing drosophila Hannah Burrack, Katie Swoboda-Bhattarai, and Lauren Diepenbrock Department of Entomology Topics New SWD initiatives Research updates Pesticide rotation programs Timing insecticide applications Recommendations Development and Implementation of Systems-Based Organic Management Strategies for Spotted Wing Drosophila Three years: 1 Sept 2015 through 31 Aug 2018 Project goals: Support the development of novel organic SWD management strategies that will increase NOP compliant management options for growers and decrease their reliance on broad-spectrum insecticides. USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative Award Number 2015-51300-24154 OREI Objectives Objective 1: Develop semiochemical-based behavioral management tactics for SWD Objective 2: Develop cultural control tactics and evaluate their efficacy and feasibility for reduction of SWD damage Objective 3: Develop effective chemical control strategies that minimally disrupt biological suppression of pest complexes Objective 4: Develop an integrated outreach approach to evaluate and implement organic SWD management strategies Project Director: Ash Sial Ahmad University of Georgia Co-Project Directors: Hannah Burrack North Carolina State University Matt Grieshop Michigan State University Christelle Guedot University of Wisconsin-Madison Kelly Hamby University of Maryland Rufus Isaacs Michigan State University Donn Johnson University of Arkansas Jana Lee United
    [Show full text]
  • TN723: Pest Management Post Neonicotinoids
    TECHNICAL NOTE TN723 April 2019 • ELEC Pest Management Post Neonicotinoids (Integrated Pest Management National Advice Hub T: 0300 323 0161 Technical Note 2) E: [email protected] W: www.fas.scot Summary • Several neonicotinoid insecticides have been withdrawn • One of the two remaining neonicotinoid insecticides are being withdrawn in 2022 or under review • The impact of the loss of all bar one of the neonicotinoid insecticides is summarised below Introduction Scotland this particularly impacted winter oilseed rape, where The neonicotinoid class of insecticides have been in use in the UK for these seed treatments were routinely used for controlling pests at the last 20 years or so, with uses in the arable and horticultural sector the emergence of the crop. In April 2018, member states of the targeting a wide range of insect pests. European Union agreed upon a total ban on imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam use from the end of 2018 except within closed One of the first neonicotinoid actives to become available was greenhouses. This led to the final use of clothianidin seed treatments imidacloprid which was used as a seed treatment on oilseed rape, on cereals in the autumn of 2018. Other neonicotinoid actives such as cereals and sugar beet and also available as a foliar spray treatment thiacloprid and acetamiprid are not subject to this restriction, however, and granules for adding to soil/compost. Imidacloprid was soon thiacloprid has a use up date of October 2022, and acetamiprid followed by other neonicotinoid actives such as clothianidin (seed remains as the only neonicotinoid insecticide available for use at the treatment), thiacloprid (foliar and soil treatment), thiamethoxam (foliar current time.
    [Show full text]
  • ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) and Diaprepes Abbreviatus (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)
    ANTIFEEDANT EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICALS AND PLANT EXTRACTS AGAINST Schistocerca americana (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) AND Diaprepes abbreviatus (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) By ANDRES FELIPE SANDOVAL MOJICA A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Andres Felipe Sandoval Mojica 2 To my family, the source of my strength 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my committee members Dr. John Capinera, Dr. Michael Scharf, and Dr. Heather McAuslane for their advice, support and commitment to this study. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 8 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 12 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................................... 12 Pest Insects..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Flavin-Dependent Monooxgenase Confers Resistance To
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by MPG.PuRe Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 115 (2019) 103247 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ibmb A flavin-dependent monooxgenase confers resistance to chlorantraniliprole in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella T Mark Mallotta, Sarah Hamma, Bartlomiej J. Troczkaa, Emma Randalla, Adam Pyma, Charles Granta, Simon Baxterb, Heiko Vogelc, Anthony M. Sheltond, Linda M. Fielde, Martin S. Williamsone, Mark Painef, Christoph T. Zimmerg, Russell Slaterg, Jan Eliasg, ∗ Chris Bassa, a College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK b School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia c Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany d Department of Entomology, Cornell University AgriTech, Geneva, NY, USA e Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK f Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK g Syngenta Crop Protection, Werk Stein, Schaffhauserstrasse, Stein, Switzerland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, is a damaging pest of cruciferous crops, and has evolved resistance to Plutella xylostella many of the insecticides used for control, including members of the diamide class. Previous work on the mo- Flavin monooxygenase lecular basis of resistance to diamides has documented mutations in the target-site, the ryanodine receptor, in Resistance resistant populations of P. xylostella worldwide. In contrast the role of metabolic resistance to this insecticide Chlorantraniliprole class is significantly less clear. Here we show that overexpression of a flavin-dependent monooxgenase (FMO) Diamide confers resistance to the diamide chlorantraniliprole in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Insecticide Efficacy and Insecticide Adaptive Response in Italian Populations of Drosophila Suzukii
    Bulletin of Insectology 74 (1): 103-114, 2021 ISSN 1721-8861 eISSN 2283-0332 Evaluation of insecticide efficacy and insecticide adaptive response in Italian populations of Drosophila suzukii Stefano CIVOLANI1,2, Giacomo VACCARI3, Stefano CARUSO3, Luca FINETTI1, Giovanni BERNACCHIA1, Milvia CHICCA1, Stefano CASSANELLI4 1Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Italy 2InnovaRicerca s.r.l., Monestirolo, Ferrara, Italy 3Consorzio Fitosanitario di Modena, Italy 4Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy Abstract Monitoring sensitivity to insecticides is crucial to prevent outbreaks of invasive pests characterized by high reproductive and adap- tive potential such as the Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera Drosophilidae). The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible appearance of resistance to cyantraniliprole, deltamethrin and spinosad. Field trials on commercial sweet cherry or- chards in Northern Italy showed that two out of six strains were not fully controlled using cyantraniliprole and deltamethrin, while spinosad was thoroughly effective. At the bioassay, two populations showed a decrease in deltamethrin and cyantraniliprole sus- ceptibility (LC50 values 12.7-21.0 and 3.4-5.8 times higher than those from the untreated populations, respectively). Biochemical analyses revealed that low resistance to the pesticides was associated with high monooxygenase and carboxylesterase activities (range 2.68-4.37-and 1.97-2.73 times higher than in the wild population). A dose-dependent increase in cytochrome P450 monoox- ygenase Cyp12d1 and ryanodine receptor gene expression was found when a strain with low resistance to cyantraniliprole in field trials was treated with increasing dosages of the diamide in bioassays.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Offsite Movement of Agricultural Chemical Residues: Walnuts
    UC Agriculture & Natural Resources Farm Title Controlling Offsite Movement of Agricultural Chemical Residues: Walnuts Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p21k710 Authors Prichard, Terry Grant, Joseph A. Schwankl, Lawrence J. Publication Date 2016-03-01 DOI 10.3733/ucanr.8460 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ANR Publication 8460 | March 2016 http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu Controlling Offsite Movement of Agricultural Chemical Residues: Walnuts INTRODUCTION his publication provides growers of walnuts with information on farming practices that can help Treduce the occurrence of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid pesticides in surface water, TERRY PRICHARD, University of including streams, lakes, ponds, rivers, and drainage ditches. It describes the current regulatory California Cooperative Extension approach to surface water protection; gives background information on the safe and effective use Water Management Specialist; of pesticides, integrated pest management, JOSEPH A. GRANT, University of California Cooperative Extension and handling runoff water; and demonstrates Pomology Farm Advisor, San the self-assessment of the potential risk of Joaquin County; LAWRENCE J. offsite movement of an insecticide using SCHWANKL, University of California flowcharts for specific management practices Cooperative Extension Specialist, and orchard conditions in walnut. The risk Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center self-assessment focuses on issues that affect either
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Pesticides on Soil Characteristics in Selected Paddy Cultivated Areas of Kanniyakumari District
    IJSART - Volume 5 Issue 6 –JUNE 2019 ISSN [ONLINE]: 2395-1052 Effect of pesticides on soil characteristics in selected paddy cultivated areas of Kanniyakumari District 1 2 3 S. Jaya Kumar , R. Pratheebha and P. Rama Devi 1 Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Marthandam, Kanyakumari - 629 165, Tamil Nadu, India 3Aditanar College of Arts and Science, Tiruchendur - 628 216, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract- The study was designed to investigate the effect of The presence and bio-availability of pesticides in soil pesticides on the soil physico-chemical characteristics in the can adversely impact human and animal health, and beneficial selected paddy cultivated areas of Kanniyakumari district. plants and soil organisms. These are detrimental to living Soil samples were collected seven days before and after the organisms in the soil, vital to soil health and productivity. application of pesticides like carbofuran, chlorantraniliprole and profenofos from the flooded paddy field after cropping. Pesticides in soil undergo a variety of degradative, The physico-chemical properties were determined by transport, and adsorption / desorption processes depending on following standard methods and the results were tabulated. the chemical nature of the pesticide and soil properties. The results obtained in the present study are discussed in Pesticides are applied to protect crops from pests and diseases terms of changes in the soil physical and chemical only around 15% 0f the preparation hits the target. The rest is characteristics. The experimental results showed that the distributed in the soil and air. Pesticides interact with soil characteristics like soil pH and Electrical conductivity organisms and their metabolic activities and may alter the differed significantly after pesticide application against the physiological and biochemical behaviour of soil microbes respective control.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilisation Du Chlorantraniliprole (CORAGEN 20 SC) Dans Le Contrôle Des Principaux Insectes Ravageurs Du Cotonnier Au Burkina Faso
    Tropicultura 2295-8010 Volume 37 (2019) Numéro 1, 258 Utilisation du chlorantraniliprole (CORAGEN 20 SC) dans le contrôle des principaux insectes ravageurs du cotonnier au Burkina Faso S. A.O. Héma, I. Ouédraogo, L. Bourgou & G. Vognan S. A.O. Héma : Burkinabé, PhD, chercheur, Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Programme Coton Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. E-mail: [email protected] I. Ouédraogo : Burkinabé, PhD, chercheur, Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Programme Oléo-protéagineux, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. L. Bourgou : Burkinabé, PhD, chercheur, Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Programme Coton Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. G. Vognan : Burkinabé, MSc, chercheur, Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Programme Coton Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Reçu le 17.07.17 et accepté pour publication le 03.08.18. DOI: 10.25518/2295-8010.258 Résumé : Dans le cadre de la recherche de molécules alternatives aux pyréthrinoïdes efficaces contre les insectes ravageurs du cotonnier au Burkina Faso, le chlorantraniliprole, une molécule de la famille des Diamides Anthraniliques, a été testé en station de recherche et chez les producteurs. Les résultats ont montré en station de recherche une bonne efficacité du chlorantraniliprole àla dose de 20 g.ha-1 sur les principaux ravageurs du cotonnier. En effet, cette molécule a contrôlé en moyenne 95,5 % des larves de Helicoverpa armigera, 93,6 % des larves d’Anomis flava et 76 % des larves d’Aphis gossypii par rapport au témoin non traité. Cela s’est traduit par un gain de capsules saines de 17,6 % et un supplément de coton graine de 65,4 % par rapport au témoin non traité.
    [Show full text]
  • Monsanto Petition (19-091-01P) for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Insect-Protected MON 88702 Cotton
    Monsanto Petition (19-091-01p) for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Insect-Protected MON 88702 Cotton OECD Unique Identifier: MON-887Ø2-4 Final Environmental Assessment December 2020 Agency Contact Cindy Eck Biotechnology Regulatory Services 4700 River Road USDA, APHIS Riverdale, MD 20737 In accordance with federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Sustainable Management of Carrot Weevil in the Holland Marsh, Ontario
    AN INVESTIGATION OF SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF CARROT WEEVIL IN THE HOLLAND MARSH, ONTARIO By Zachariah Donald Scott Telfer A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Sciences Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Zachariah Donald Scott Telfer, January 2017 ABSTRACT AN INVESTIGATION OF SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF CARROT WEEVIL IN THE HOLLAND MARSH, ONTARIO Zachariah Donald Scott Telfer Advisors January 2016 Drs. Cynthia Scott-Dupree and Mary Ruth McDonald The carrot weevil (CW), Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte), is a major carrot pest in Canada. Larval CW feeding renders carrot roots unmarketable. The efficacy of the CW IPM program was evaluated. Field trials and analysis of historical data determined CW monitoring did not effectively relate to CW damage and CW has likely developed phosmet resistance. Field trials showed that foliar, seed treatment, or in-furrow insecticide applications generally failed to reduce CW damage, although foliar applications of novaluron and cyantraniliprole showed some efficacy. Throughout field trials, damage from an apparent 2nd CW generation was observed. The Holland Marsh (Ontario) was surveyed for natural enemies of CW. All known natural predators and one parasitoid of CW were found although their impact on the CW population is unknown. Future CW research at the Holland Marsh should focus on improving monitoring techniques, evaluating new insecticides, and examining the feasibility of conservation biological control. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deep gratitude to my co-advisors, Drs. Cynthia Scott-Dupree and Mary Ruth McDonald. Your advice and guidance throughout my degree have been incredibly helpful in both the creation of this thesis as well as my plans for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Degradation of Flubendiamide in Vivo by Fungi and in Vitro by Laccase
    Annals of Microbiology (2019) 69:1517–1529 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-01536-w ORIGINAL ARTICLE Soil and entomopathogenic fungi with potential for biodegradation of insecticides: degradation of flubendiamide in vivo by fungi and in vitro by laccase George M. Yada Jr1 & Igor S. Shiraishi1 & Robert F. H. Dekker1 & Jéseka G. Schirmann2 & Aneli M. Barbosa-Dekker2 & Isabela C. de Araujo1 & Lucas M. Abreu 3 & Juliana F. S. Daniel1 Received: 27 June 2019 /Accepted: 11 November 2019 /Published online: 25 November 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Purpose Flubendiamide is a highly toxic and persistent insecticide that causes loss of insect muscle functions leading to paralysis and death. The objective was to screen for filamentous fungi in soils where insecticides had been applied, to isolate entomo- pathogenic fungi from insect larva (Anticarsia gemmatalis) that infest soybean crops, and to use these in biodegradation of insecticides. Method Filamentous fungi were isolated from soils, and growth inhibition was evaluated on solid medium containing commer- cial insecticides, Belt® (flubendiamide) and Actara® (thiamethoxam). A total of 133 fungi were isolated from soil and 80 entomopathogenic fungi from insect larva. Based on growth inhibition tests, ten soil fungi, 2 entomopathogenic fungi, and Botryosphaeria rhodina MAMB-05 (reference standard) were selected for growth on commercial insecticides in solid media. Fungi were grown in submerged fermentation on media containing commercial insecticides and assayed for laccase activity. Result Isolates JUSOLCL039 (soil), JUANT070 (insect), and MAMB-05 performed best, and were respectively inhibited by 48.41%, 75.97%, and 79.23% when cultivated on 35 g/L Actara®, and 0.0, 5.42%, and 43.39% on 39.04 g/L Belt®.
    [Show full text]