Supplement H5o. 2 Ci)E Patatme ®Alette Jßo. H$T of Utfc Starrt)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplement H5o. 2 Ci)E Patatme ®Alette Jßo. H$T of Utfc Starrt) Supplement H5o. 2 Ci)e patatme ®alette jßo. H$t of utfc Starrt), me. VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION ORDINANCE, 1944. ORDER BY THE HIGH COMMISSIONER UNDER SECTION 3. IN EXERCISE of the powers vested in him by section 3 of the Village No. 23 of 1944. Administration Ordinance, 1944, the High Commissioner has ordered, and it is hereby ordered, as follows : — 1. This Order may be cited as the Village Administration (Village Citation. Councils) Order (No. 4), 1946. 2. The whole of the village lands of the villages specified in the Application of Schedule to this Order shall be brought within the operation of Part Part II of the II of the Village Administration Ordinance, 1944. Ordinance. 3. The Village Administration (Village Councils) Order, 1946, pub• Amendment of lished at page 93 of Supplement 2 to the Gazette No. 1469 of 24th Order published January, 1946, shall be re-entitled the Village Administration (Village in Gaz: 24.1.46, Councils) Order (No. 2), 1946, and accordingly in paragraph 1 thereof p. 93. the expression "Order (No. 2), 1946" shall be substituted for the ex• pression "Order, 1946". , 4. This Order shall be deemed to have come into force on the first day Commencement. of March, 1946. .SCHEDULE ־ Name of Village Sub-District District I'billin Haifa Haifa 'Isfiya Haifa Haifa Tira, Et Haifa Haifa By His Excellency's Command, 5th March, 1946. J. V. W. SHAW (Y/13/45) Ghief Secretary. ROAD TRANSPORT ORDINANCE. RULES MADE BY THE HIGH COMMISSIONER UNDER SECTION 23. IN EXERCISE of the powers vested in him by section 23 of the Road Cap. 128. Transport Ordinance, the High Commissioner has made the following rules:— t 1. These Rules may be cited as the Road Transport (Routes and Citation. Tariffs) (Amendment) Rules, 1946, and shall be read as one with the Road Transport (Routes and Tariffs) Rules, 1934, hereinafter referred Gaz: 1.3.34, to as "the principal Rules". p. 159. — 429 — 430 THE PALESTINE GAZETTE NO. 1481—SUPPLEMENT NO. 2. 14th March, 1946 Amendment of ß. Paragraph (Z>) of Schedule II to the principal Rules (as enacted Schedule II to by Rule 3(2), of the Road Transport (Routes and Tariffs) (Amendment• the principal No. 15) Rules, 1945) shall be amended by the addition of the follow• Eules. ing route and particulars immediately after Route No. N.25 thereof: — Gaz: 21.12.45, p. 1491. No. Maximum Fare chargeable Description of Route ply per Passenger to Route Number of Omnibuses authorised • of Maximum N. 26 Haifa—Beyrouth • 4 • Haifa—Beyrouth, or vice versa ^ 500 mils per single jouruney Amendment of 3. Paragraph (b) of Schedule VI to the principal Rules (as enacted Schedule VI to by Rule 6 of the Road Transport (Routes and Tariffs) (Amendment the principal ]\f0> !5) Rules, 1945) shall be amended by the addition of the following —:u'es• route and particulars immediately after Route No. L.7^־ Gaz: 21.12.45, p. 1491. No. Maximum Fare chargeable Description of Route ply per Passenger to Route Number of authorised ׳ Omnibuses of Maximum L.8 Beisan—Samakh—El Hamma 1 (a) Beisan—Samakh, or vice versa— 70 mils per single journey. (b) Samakh—El Hamma, or vice versa— 40 mils per single journey. ־ ,c) Beisan—El Hamma) or vice versa— 110 mils per single journey. By His Excellencyfs Command, 7th March, 1946. J. V. W. SHAW (HT/64/45) , Chief Secretary. LOCAL COUNCILS ORDINANCE, 1941: BY-LAWS MADE BY THE LOCAL COUNCIL OF EL BIRA UNDER SECTION 9. No. 36 of 1941. LN EXERCISE of the powers vested in them by section 9 of the Local Councils Ordinance, 1941, the Local Cuncil of El Bira, established Gaz: 31.7.41, under the Local Councils (El Bireh) Order, 1941, with the approval p. 1173. of the District Commissioner, Jerusalem District, have made the fol­ lowing by-laws: — Citation. 1• These By-laws may be cited as the El Bira (Prevention of Noises) By-laws, 1946. Prohibition. 2. No person shall within the area of the local council of El Bira— (a) in any street or public place or in connection with any shop, business premises or other place which adjoins any street or pub­ lic place to which the public are admitted, or (&) upon any other premies, 14th March, 1946 THE PALESTINE GAZETTE No. 1481—SUPPLEMENT NO. 2. 431 by operating or causing or suffering to be operated any wireless loud­ speaker, gramophone, amplifier, or any similar instrument make or cause or permit to be made any noise which shall be so loud and so ־ -continuous or repeated as to cause a nuisance to occupants or in mates of any premises in the neighbourhood or persons in any place of worship in the neighbourhood. 3. Any person contravening any provision of these By-laws shall be Penalty, guilty of an offence and, on conviction, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding five pounds and in the case of a continuing offence to. an additional fine not exceeding one pound for every day during which the offence is continued after conviction or after written notice from the President of the Local Council of such contravention : Provided that no proceedings shall be taken against any person for any offence against these By-laws in respect of premises other than those specified hr paragraph (a) of by-law 2, unless the nuisance be s continued after the expiration of a fortnight from the date of service on such person of a written notice of contravention signed by the * President of the Local Council. MUSA FABATNAHMAD HAMMAD President, Local Council of El Biro. Approved. !J. H. H. POLLOCK ־ .7th March, 1946 (G/47/37). District Commissioner, Jerusalem District. LOCAL COUNCILS ORDINANCE, 1941. LOCAL AUTHORITIES (BUSINESS TAX) ORDINANCE, 1945. BY-LAWS MADE BY THE LOCAL COUNCIL OF FALUJA. IN EXERCISE of the powers vested in them by section 9 of the Local No. 36 of 1941. Councils Ordinance, 1941, and by section 3 of the Local Author- No. 29 of 1945. ities (Business Tax) Ordinance, 1945, the Local Council of Faluja, established under the Local Councils (Faluja) Order, 1937, with the Qaz. 9,9.37 approval of the District Commissioner, Gaza District, have made the p. 819. following By-laws: — 1. These By-laws may be cited as the Faluja (Local Business Tax) Citation. By-laws, 1946. , 2. In these By-laws— . , - Interpretation. "Council" means the Local Council of Faluja; . "place or premises" means any shop, house, room, hut, kiosk or part thereof, in which any specified trade or business is carried ., : on, and includes land whether surrounded by a fence or not; "President" means the President of the Local Council of Faluja; "specified trade or business" means• any trade or business specified in the Schedule; "tax" means the local business tax imposed by these By-laws. 3. —(1) Any person carrying on any specified trade or business within Imposition of the Local Council area of Faluja for any period during any financial tax. year shall pay to the Council tax in the amount set out in the second column of the Schedule, opposite such trade or business, in respect of each place or premises where such trade or business is carried on by such person. 432 THE PALESTINE GAZETTE NO. 1481—SUPPLEMENT NO. 2. 14th March, 1946 (2) Where two or more persons carry on different specified trades or businesses in the same place or premises, each of such persons shall pay the tax in respect of the trade or business carried on by him in such place or premises. (3) Where one person carries on two or more specified trades or businesses in the same place or premises, tax shall be payable only in respect of one of such trades or businesses, and where, in accordance with the Schedule, the amounts of tax payable in respect of the said ent, tax shall be paid in respect of such־trades or businesses are diffei one of the said trades or businesses as under the said Schedule is subject to the highest tax. Payment of tax. 4. The tax shall be paid : — (A) in respect of any specified trade or business which any person carries on for any period during the financial year ending on the 31st day of March, 1946— on the twenty first day of March, 1946; (B) in respect of any specified trade or business which any person carries on for any period during any financial year subsequent to the financial year ending on the 31st day of March, 1946, in two ' equal instalments as follows: — • ; (a) if he carries on such trade or business on the first day of April - of such subsequent financial year— ;, (i) the first instalment on the first day of July of such subsequent financial year, • *. (ii) the second instalment on the first day of October of such subsequent financial year; (6) if he begins to carry on such trade or business after the first • . .־, —day of April of such subsequent financial year (i) the first instalment within thirty days from the date on which he begins to carry on such trade or business, (ii) the second instalment within four months from the date on which he begins to carry on such trade or business. Power to re- 5. Any person carrying on any specified trade or business who claims N quire production to have paid the tax in respect of such trade or business in accordance of receipts for with the provisions of these By-laws shall, on demand made in that tax. behalf *by the President, or by any official of the Council authorised by the President, produce for inspection to the person making the demand any receipts held by him in respect of the tax which he claims to have paid.
Recommended publications
  • The Absentee Property Law and Its Implementation in East Jerusalem a Legal Guide and Analysis
    NORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL The Absentee Property Law and its Implementation in East Jerusalem A Legal Guide and Analysis May 2013 May 2013 Written by: Adv. Yotam Ben-Hillel Consulting legal advisor: Adv. Sami Ershied Language editor: Risa Zoll Hebrew-English translations: Al-Kilani Legal Translation, Training & Management Co. Cover photo: The Cliff Hotel, which was declared “absentee property”, and its owner Ali Ayad. (Photo by: Mohammad Haddad, 2013). This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position or the official opinion of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is an independent, international humanitarian non-governmental organisation that provides assistance, protection and durable solutions to refugees and internally displaced persons worldwide. The author wishes to thank Adv. Talia Sasson, Adv. Daniel Seidmann and Adv. Raphael Shilhav for their insightful comments during the preparation of this study. 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 2. Background on the Absentee Property Law .................................................. 9 3. Provisions of the Absentee Property Law .................................................... 14 3.1 Definitions ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • O Occupied East Jerusalem
    Occupied East Jerusalem “De-Palestinization” and Forcible Transfer of Palestinians A situation of systematic breaches of State obligations under the ICCPR JOINT NGO REPORT to the UN Human Rights Committee For the Committee’s Review of the Fourth Periodic Report of ISRAEL Submitted by: The Civic Coalition for Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem (CCPRJ) Contact: Zakaria Odeh, executive director Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 2343929 www.civiccoalition-jerusalem.org The Coalition for Jerusalem (CFJ) Contact: Aminah Abdelhaq, coordinator Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6562272 url: www.coalitionforjerusalem.org The Society of St. Yves, Catholic Center for Human Rights (St. Yves) Contact: Dalia Qumsieh, head of advocacy Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6264662 url: www.saintyves.org 1 Content Introduction Paragraph RECOMMENDATIONS A. Constitutional and legal framework within which the Covenant is implemented by Israel in occupied East Jerusalem (Art. 1, 2) Question 4: Application of the Covenant in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) 4 – 11 Question 5: Equality and non-discrimination in Israeli law, courts; other measures 12 – 22 Recommended Questions to the State party (Art. 1 and 2) B. State of Emergency (Art. 4); derogations from international standards Questions 12, 19: Progress in review of Israel’s state of emergency; derogations 23 – 25 from international standards (complementary issues) Recommended Questions to State party (Article 4) C. Freedom of movement and residence (Art. 12, 2; also 14, 17, 23, 24, 26) Questions 20, 21: Complementary information on Palestinians in East Jerusalem 26 – 34 D. Protection of the Family, Protection of the Child (Art.23, 24, 2; 12, 14, 17, 24, 26) Question 25: Measures taken by the State party to revoke the Citizenship and 35 – 45 Entry Into Israel Law; right to marriage E.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 133, August 2009 Issue
    Applied Research Institute ‐ Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 133, August 2009 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem • A group of Israeli settlers attacked Ras Salah area in Al Khader village west of Bethlehem city and razed lands owned by Riziq and Nasri Shihada and mowed 30 Roman Olive Trees. Palestine Info (August 4, 2009). • Israeli settler activists converging on an abandoned Israeli military base they are seeking to transform into a settlement. Settler groups have been holding weekly events at the hilltop base, including religious services, lectures, and martial arts trainings, all under heavy military guard. Maannews (August 10, 2009). • The Israeli Occupation Bulldozers demolished the third floor of a building owned by Khaled Muhammad Jibrin in Al Walajeh village northwest of Bethlehem city and confiscated the construction materials that were in the site. Wafa (August 12, 2009). • Dozens of Israeli settlers marched at the abandoned military base of Ush Ghurab ʺShdemaʺ to protest what they call ʺvandalism by Arabs and Applied Research Institute ‐ Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org international anti‐Israel activistsʺ who as claimed had destroyed part of the Jewish activists’ storage room. At the head of the march was Knesset Member Yaakov Katz (Ketzaleh) from the National Union, who promised to open an active office in Shdema.
    [Show full text]
  • Tightening the Ring of Israeli Settlement Around the Old City of Jerusalem Map Notes
    Tightening the Ring of Israeli Settlement around the Old City of Jerusalem Map Notes December 2018* Numbers below are pegged to numbers on accompanying map. Sheikh Jarrah 1 & 2 Plans for the Ohr Somayach Yeshiva (also, “Glassman Yeshiva”) and a privately promoted office building – Two Israeli plans for buildings to be constructed on a lot of roughly 5 dunams on the southwest edge of the neighborhood, next to the Green Line, on the Palestinian side. The plan for the Ohr Somayach Yeshiva (Plan No. 68858) calls for construction of an eleven-story building with eight levels above ground and three below, including a dormitory for hundreds of students and housing for faculty. The plan was submitted by the Ohr Somayach Institutions, to which the Israel Land Authority has already allotted land without a transparent tender process, and approved for deposit by the District Planning and Building Committee in July 2017. In the master plan for the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, the lot is designated for public buildings to serve neighborhood residents. The plan for the six-story office building (Plan No. 499699), submitted by private Israeli entrepreneurs, was deposited in April 2018, and in August 2018, the Local Planning and Building Committee recommended it for approval by the District Committee. The plan was approved in December 2018. 3 & 5 Plans for new construction in Um Haroun (Sheikh Jarrah) necessitating the eviction of Palestinian families – Two plans for new residential buildings that will necessitate the demolition of existing Palestinian homes: Plan No. 14151 for construction of a three-story building with three residential units and Plan No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Sheikh Jarrah
    ENFORCING HOUSING RIGHTS: THE CASE OF SHEIKH JARRAH Report of the fact-finding mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory May 2011 Enforcing Housing Rights: The Case of Sheikh Jarrah Report of the fact-finding mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory May 2011 1 © Avocats Sans Frontières (ASF) May 2011 ASF has given mandate to a delegation of English lawyers to prepare an independent report examining the legal situation in Sheikh Jarrah. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent those of ASF, or those of the donor, the Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation of the Kingdom of Belgium. Avocats Sans Frontières Rue de Namur 72 1000 Brussels - Belgium Tel: +32 2 223 36 54 WWW.ASF.BE Cover photo: the demolition of the Shepherd Hotel in Sheikh Jarrah, 9 January 2011. ©Atef Safadi Printed: Graffikka, Belgium. [email protected] 2 Acknowledgement The delegation would like to thank everyone who contributed to the making of this report, in particular Stijn Denayer, who coordinated the project for ASF, and Valentina Azarov, who accompanied the mission in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The delegation wishes to express its gratitude to all the people and organisations who met with the mission during its visit in December 2010, including the evicted Sheikh Jarrah families. The delegation would also like to thank photographer Atef Safadi. With the support of KINGDOM OF BELGIUM Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation 3 Table of Contents Acronyms 6 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Context of intervention 7 1.2. ASF’s fact-finding mission and objectives 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheikh Jarrah Affair: the Strategic Implications of Jewish Settlement in an Arab Neighborhood in East Jerusalem
    The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Established by the Charles H. Revson Foundation The Sheikh Jarrah Affair: The Strategic Implications of Jewish Settlement in an Arab Neighborhood in East Jerusalem Yitzhak Reiter and Lior Lehrs 2010 The JIIS Studies Series no. 404 The Sheikh Jarrah Affair: The Strategic Implications of Jewish Settlement in an Arab Neighborhood in East Jerusalem Yitzhak Reiter and Lior Lehrs © 2010, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies The Hay Elyachar House 20 Radak St., 92186 Jerusalem http://www.jiis.org.il E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents The Authors ........................................................................................................ 5 Summary............................................................................................................. 6 Introduction.......................................................................................................11 Part A – Historical, Political, and Legal Background................................... 13 1. The Histories of Sheikh Jarrah and Shimon HaTzadik ............................... 13 2. The Use of Symbols of Heritage and Holiness............................................ 20 7KH*HRSROLWLFDO6LJQL¿FDQFHRIWKH1HLJKERUKRRG ................................... 22 4. Proprietary and Legal Issues Behind the Displacement of Palestinian Families..................................................................................... 23 5. The Eviction of Palestinian Residents ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem & Its Changing Boundaries
    Jerusalem & Its Changing Boundaries INTRODUCTION JANUARY 2018 When US President Trump, ignoring the history of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and of the international consensus on Jerusalem, triggered a storm in the Middle East on 6 December 2017 by announcing the US’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and his intention to move the US embassy to the city from Tel Aviv, he notably stressed that this did not represent a change in US policy on the future borders of Jerusalem, which would remain subject to negotiations among the parties involved. While the international rejection of Trump’s statement on Jerusalem – clearly reflected in the votes in the UN Security Council (14-1) and the General Assembly (128-9) – was nearly unanimous, his declaration has given “support and comfort to the Government of Israel in its pathologic denial of the occupation, of the Palestinian narrative, and of the simple fact that Jerusalem’s status is a matter of dispute, not merely betweenIsrael and the Palestinians, but with respect to the entire international community.”1 Palestinian fears that Trump’s statement will induce the Israeli government to try even more aggressively to demonstrate – and do everything to consolidate – its “exclusive” control over the city (via settlement expansion, property destruction, encroaches on Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, etc.) were clearly justified as the latest Israeli legislative move has shown. On 2 January 2018, the Knesset passed a bill (an amendment to the Basic Law on Jerusalem) that requires a special two-thirds majority vote (as opposed to the previous absolute majority) to relinquish any part of Jerusalem to the Palestinians under a future peace accord, which effectively means that Jerusalem will never be on the negotiating table.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem Syndrome, Which Can Be Triggered by a Visit to the City
    Jerusalem, showing municipal borders and neighbourhoods Metropolitan Disorders—10 yonatan mendel NEW JERUSALEM ncyclopædias of psychology cite a type of religious psychosis known as the Jerusalem Syndrome, which can be triggered by a visit to the city. Symptoms can include bellow- ing liturgical songs, delivering moralistic sermons and an Eintensified concern with cleanliness and ritual purity. Though similar reactions have been recorded at other holy cities, notably Rome and Mecca, Jerusalem holds the record for this psychopathology.1 From the point of view of any normal urban logic, however, the city itself appears crazier still. Its boundaries extend far beyond its core population centres, encompassing dozens of villages, barren hilltops, orchards and tracts of desert, as well as new-build suburbs with scant relation to the historical city; in the north, they stretch up, like a long middle finger, nearly to Ramallah, to take in the old Qalandia airport, some 10 kilometres from the Old City walls, and bulge down almost to Bethlehem in the south. Jerusalem’s former Deputy Mayor, Meron Benvenisti, has said of these monstrously extended city limits: I’ve reached the point that when someone says ‘Jerusalem’ I am very cynical about it. This is a term that has been totally emptied of its content. Today there is no geographic concept called ‘Jerusalem’, and instead I suggest using a new term, ‘Jermudin’, which is the territory stretched from Jericho to Modi’in. Someone decided to rub the hills that have no connection to Jerusalem with holy oil, and today we need to deal with a ‘Jerusalem’ region, which is unmanageable and which is held by force.2 But if the cityscape of Jerusalem has no decipherable urban logic, what rationality has shaped its growth? In Benvenisti’s view, ‘it all started from the post-1967 municipal borders and the famous principle of maximum new left review 81 may june 2013 35 36 nlr 81 square kilometres of land and minimum number of Arabs.’3 There is much to be said for this hypothesis; but we will have to begin a little earlier than that.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheikh Jarrah
    Dispossession and Eviction in Jerusalem December 2009 The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinians’ Rights in Jerusalem DISPOSSESSION & EVICTION IN JERUSALEM The cases and stories of Sheikh Jarrah December 2009 The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem is an independent, non-governmental, non-profit coalition of organizations, institutions, societies and individuals dedicated to the protection and promotion of Palestinian rights in Jerusalem. © The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem, December 2009 All Rights Reserved The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem JERUSALEM – Dahiat Al Barid Email: [email protected] http://www.ccdprj.ps Prepared by: David Hughes, LL.M, Main Researcher, (Civic Coalition) Nathan Derejko, LL.M, (Civic Coalition) Alaa Mahajna, LL.M, (Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel) Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the staff and member organizations of the Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem for making the present study possible. In particular, Zakaria Odeh, Vykintas Lideikis, Natalie Tabar, Becca Nagorsky, Saleh Abu Hussein, and the Hanoun, Al-Ghawi, Sabbagh, Al-Kurd, Maher Auwada, and Nasebeh families for their insightful comments and valued contributions. The views expressed here are attributable exclusively to the Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem. The Civic Coalition would like to thank the
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Regarding the Case of Sheikh Jarrah
    FACT SHEET Page | 1 REGARDING THE CASE OF SHEIKH JARRAH – THE OCCUPIED JERUSALEM Prepared by: Nida’a Yousef, Nasser Thabet Edited by: Hassan Imran, Hiba Birat Revised by: Rawan Husseini, Ihsan Adel Translated by: Asma Louzon, Maryam Alqam, Kerim Assaf Translation Assistant: Saja Abuammouneh English version edited by: Ahmed Almassri, Summia El-Awawdeh Special thanks to the attorneys Hosni Abu Hussein and Sami Irsheed from Jerusalem - The lawyers of the Sheikh Jarrah residents case before the Israeli courts All rights reserved © Law for Palestine - United Kingdom May 2021 Executive Summary: This last week the world bore witness to an escalation of tension in the Sheikh Jarrah Page | 2 neighborhood- a Palestinian area located north of the Old City of the occupied East Jerusalem- due to the demands of Israeli settlers to forcibly evict Palestinian families who live in the neighborhood. As a result, many civilians have been either injured or arrested and tension in the entire Palestinian territories is at an all-time high. Over the past few years, a number of Palestinian families have been forcedly evicted from this neighborhood, and more than 27 Palestinian families, approximately 500 persons, are also under threat; these families are at risk of dispossession and forced eviction. It is obvious that the facts documented in this paper bear out the Israeli occupation’s true intentions; supported by their courts and discriminatory laws, the occupation is seeking to transfer ownership of these homes from their original owners to Israeli settlers. According to the legal analysis of the rules of international law, Jordanian laws, Ottoman documents, and Israeli laws, we find ourselves facing a situation of forceful land usurpation aided by discriminatory policies and laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Procedures on Forced Evictions in East Jerusalem
    Joint Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Procedures on Forced Evictions in East Jerusalem Date: 10 March 2021 Submitted by: 1. The Palestinian Human Rights Organisation Council, compromising of: - Al-Haq, Law in the Service of Man - Al Mezan Center for Human Rights - Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association - Palestinian Centre for Human Rights - DCI - Defense for Children International – Palestine - Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center - Aldameer Association for Human Rights - Ramallah Center for Human Rights Studies - Hurryyat - Center for Defense of Liberties and Civil Rights - The Independent Commission for Human Rights (Ombudsman Office) - Observer Member - Muwatin Institute for Democracy and Human Rights - Observer Member 2. The Civic Coalition for Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem 3. Community Action Center, Al-Quds University 4. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies For the attention of: - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, Mr. S. Michael Lynk; - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons, Ms. Cecilia Jimenez-Damary; Joint Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Procedures on Forced Evictions in East Jerusalem – 10 March 2021 - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, Mr. Balakrishnan Rajagopal; - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Ms. E. Tendayi Achiume; - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Mr. Francisco Cali Tzay; and - The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadt Des Unfriedens Explosive Mischung: Jerusalem Wurde Seit Dem Abschluss Der Oslo-Abkommen Vor 21 Jahren Schauplatz Unzähliger Terroranschläge
    AUSLAND Givat Zeev Hussein Abu Khdeir Schuafat, Ostjersualem Neve Yaakov Racheli Ibenboim Mea Schearim, Westjerusalem Har Juli 1997 Adar April 2002 Yafo Str. Pisgat Zeev Mahane Jehuda Ramot Markt Alon Shuafat Juni 2003 Jänner 2002 Rmat März 1996 Grüne Linie Shlomo August 2001 Yafo Str. (Waenstillstands- grenze von 1949) Mai 2003 März 2002 French Hill King GeorgBen-Jehuda-Str. Str. Juni 2002 Jerusalem Stadtgebiet HEBRÄISCHE Dez. 2001 Oktober 2014 UNIVERSITÄT JERUSALEM Sept.1997 November 2014 ZENTRALE Juli 2002 STADTZENTRUM Februar 1996 BUSSTATION 6. März 2015 Nahalat Shimon Sheikh (Campus Osnat Kollek Mea Schearim Jarrah Mount Scopus) Rehavia, Westjerusalem Juli 2008 Februar 2015 November 2014 HEBRÄISCHE Beit Orot Har UNIVERSITÄT ZENTRUM Scharon-Haus Maale Nof JERUSALEM Maale Adumim Bashir Bashir KNESSET ALTSTADT Die Trennmauer Rehavia, Westjerusalem Rehavia David Maale März 2002 Silwan Zeitim Jänner 2004 Ir David Talbieh Österreichisches WEST- Feb. 2004 Hospiz Kidmat Zion JERUSALEM Emek Refaim/ Grabes- Abu Dis kirche November 2002 Deutsche Kolonie Muslimisches OST- Viertel September 2003 Via Dolorosa Kiryat JERUSALEM Juni 2002 Menahem Tempel- berg WESTJORDANLAND Jabal Christliches Felsendom JERUSALEM Mukabar Viertel Klagemauer ISRAEL Jüdisches Viertel 2km Armenisches Sur Bahir Viertel ALTSTADT Oktober 2008 Gilo Har Homa Issa Freij Christliches Viertel, Altstadt von Jerusalem Stadt des Unfriedens Explosive Mischung: Jerusalem wurde seit dem Abschluss der Oslo-Abkommen vor 21 Jahren Schauplatz unzähliger Terroranschläge. Der Bau von jüdischen Siedlungen in Ostjerusalem und profilinfografik•noa dem angrenzenden Westjordanland trägt zur Spannung in der heiligen Stadt bei. 60 profil 11 • 9. März 2015 Givat Zeev Wo die Götter wohnen Hussein Abu Khdeir Jerusalem, Israels „ewig geeinte Hauptstadt“, ist heute Schuafat, Ostjersualem Neve geteilter denn je: zwischen Israelis und Palästinensern, Yaakov zwischen Christen, Juden und Moslems, zwischen religiösen und säkularen Juden.
    [Show full text]