Making Your Campus More Financially and Environmentally Sustainable through Grants, Incentives and Third-Party Financing

July 25, 2019 Who We Are

2

Steve Gehringer, James Hayes, THE STONE HOUSE GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

4 Introductions 6 Energy Data & Benchmarking 13 Campus & Utility Master Planning 20 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Projects 28 Discussion of Financing Options and Structures 31 Discussion and Questions 4  1,500 students from 31 states and 22 countries  170-acre suburban campus located 25 miles from downtown  Residential, private,  11:1 Student – faculty ratio  Ursinus is consistently ranked in the top tier of National Liberal Arts Colleges and was one of five schools designated an “Up and Coming” college by U.S. News & World Report. THE STONE HOUSE GROUP

 20 Years  300+ Clients  2 Offices

 4 Countries  15+ States  15,807,400 SF commissioned  84 FCAs  83 LEED Projects

5  79 Energy Models Our Higher Ed clients include:

6 7 SHG Approach to Energy Management

8

 View energy management from 4 main perspectives to ensure a comprehensive approach

 Find the balance between financial and environmental sustainability Annual Main Meter Energy Costs by FY

9

$1,400 Total Energy Spend: $1.1M $1,200

$1,000

$800 Fuel Oil Natural Gas $1,000's $600 Electric

$400

$200

$0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit Cost of Fuels ($/MMBTU)

10

$30.00 New electric contract started July 2017, and runs through June 2020

$24.89 $25.26 $24.92 $25.00

$22.00 $20.00

$16.44

$15.00

$10.37 $10.29 $10.00

$5.88 $5.97 $5.72 $5.00 TBD

$- Natural Gas FY 2017-18 Fuel Oil Electricity FY 2017-18 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 MBTU per GSF: Colleges and Universities

11

Surveyed Institutions: 140 Babson College St. John’s College Ursinus 14/15 Swarthmore College 103.9 Ursinus 16/17 120 University of Connecticut 99.2 Ursinus 15/16 University of 96.4 Ursinus College Rochester Institute of 100 Technology

80 Avg. 78

60

40

20

0 Energy $/GSF: Colleges and Universities

12

$2.25 Surveyed Institutions: Babson College Rutgers University Bates College St. John’s College Dickinson College Swarthmore College Gettysburg College University of Connecticut Haverford College University of Pennsylvania $1.75 Moravian College Ursinus College Rochester Institute of Technology Ursinus 14/15 $1.36 Ursinus 16/17 Ursinus 15/16 $1.23 $1.22

$1.25 Avg. $1.31

$0.75

$0.25

($0.25) Upcoming Changes to Campus Energy Costs

13

Energy BPS & BWC Commons New Chiller Natural Gas IDC Projects AC +$36k -$13k Contract +$100k -$210k +$17k -$14k 14 Utility Master Plan

Summary of Findings Considered and NOT Recommended

15

 Monetizing heating and cooling plants by selling energy infrastructure  Combined Heat and Power (micro-turbine and back-pressure turbine)  Conversion from steam to hot water distribution  Full decentralization of boilers  Conversion from natural gas to biomass or biofuel Campus Steam System

16

 Good condition + efficient operation = no major changes  Recommendations:  Reduce outgoing steam pressure  Phased transition to decentralized domestic hot water systems with a summer boiler in the Central Boiler Plant to provide steam for re-heats  Replace the burner on Boiler #1 with a dual-fuel burner Campus Electric System Capacity and Description 17

 Local Utility Service from PECO, provided at 33,000 Volts

Current limits of PECO peak demand contract: 2,592 KW

2016/17 Ursinus peak demand 2,310 kW

Projected 2019 peak with IDC, Commons, and a new chiller 2,700 kW

Capacity of College’s primary utility transformer 4,750 kW (College distribution at 4,160 Volts) Capacity of PECO’s metering equipment 4,100 kW Ability to upgrade PECO’s CT’s to provide additional capacity Campus Chilled Water System Current & Future Capacity requirements 18

1600 Current capacity: 1500 tons

1400

1200  Decision to add one (1) 1000 750-ton chiller to the

800 Chiller Plant now  New chiller is 20% more 600 efficient with part and full- 1000 400 load requirements

200

0 Chiller Plant BWC Ritter BPS Helffrich Gym The Commons IDC Future Res Hall GSF 667,685 42,716 29,145 57,778 101,714 20,000 45,000 50,000 GSF/TON 668 668 668 668 668 668 668 668 PEAK TONS 1000 64 44 87 152 30 67 75 19 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Measures Summary of Energy Efficiency Measures

20  Building Automation System  Decentralize water heating (BAS) upgrades, expansion, during summer months and optimization  Convert constant volume  Complete campus lighting systems to VAV’s (Bakes, upgrades Thomas, Berman, etc)  Perform Retro-  Create energy & Commissioning at several temperature policies facilities  Install a new chiller at  Reduce steam pressure at Central CHW Plant Central Heating Plant 21 Sample detail of Energy Capital Investment Plan 22 23 Sample Detail of BAS Control Recommendations Provide demand-controlled ventilation

24

 Myrin Library  Air handling unit ventilation rates are designed to maintain adequate ventilation during design occupancy levels. DCV sequencing through zone CO2 sensors enables reductions in ventilation air (and associated heating and cooling loads).  This ECM can provide a rapid payback due to the large, open nature of the spaces. Replace the track metal halide lighting with LEDs 25

 Replacing the current 1,500 W fixtures with LED fixtures (567 W each) will provide immediate energy savings. Additional savings will be realized through a reduced re- lamping frequency.  Opportunities may also exist for bi-level lighting to provide safety while increasing output as needed. Lights currently operate all evenings. Provide occupancy-based operation at the Field House 26

 Occupancy sensors are recommended at the field house to limit space lighting and index AHUs to a standby mode with relaxed setpoints and reduced fan energy.  These control measures will be coupled with related components (eg daylight sensors for perimeter lights, CO2 sensors for ventilation savings). Optimize VAV Control

27  VAVs observed throughout use a staged method of heating in which airflow is increased when heating is required. While this can increase the VAV capacity, it also consumes a greater amount of energy input (related to heating, cooling and fan energy) per BTU of heat provided to the space.  Optimized control can increase airflow only when this capacity is required or as needed to prevent stratification by supply air that is excessively warm. Energy Efficiency Measures Savings

28

Energy Projects, Total Cost $1,300,000

15% Electric Savings ($91,000)

25% Natural Gas Savings ($69,000)

Electric Procurement Savings (after 2020) ($50,000)

Estimated Annual Energy Savings ($210,000) Financing Options that were quickly eliminated

29

 ESCO / PPA / ESA High cost of implementation Energy Lease Burdensome contracting process or Energy High cost of on-going M&V Projects Loan Less flexibility to substitute Identified as projects the preferred Less ability to self-perform work structure. Energy Financing Options (2017)

30 Borrow from Unrestricted Reserves Ursinus College Self-Finance and Payback Energy Savings Creates lack of alignment with sources Line of Credit, Existing Bank and users Energy Lending Firm # 1, Capital 4.25% over 5 years Lease Energy Lending Firm #2, 9.43% over 7 years Energy Loan

Sustainable Energy Fund 4% over 5 years

Energy Lending Firm #3, 5.75% over 10 years Energy Loan Borrowing from the SEF allows Ursinus to meet Bond Covenants 31

 Non-recourse financing  Secured against equipment installed Not borrowed against existing buildings or property  Cash flow positive  No prepayment penalty  Preserves Ursinus Capital for other projects identified in the Campus Master Plan Advantages to Financed Energy Project Implementation 32

Reduces Cycle Maintenance with Modernizes Facilities & Upgraded Equipment Optimizes Energy Performance With New Technology

Utilizes 3rd Party Ability to complete energy Energy Financing projects in-house and Preserves Capital Budget with outside contractors Ability to leverage Utility Incentives Projects Completed to Date

33

 LED Lighting Upgrades: HVAC / Controls:  Floy Lewis Bakes  Steam pipe insulation  Bomberger  VFD Drives  Richter/North  Boiler #1 Conversion to Gas  Musser  BPS Next Up:  BWC   Olin RCx  Facilities  Chiller Plant Optimization  Kaleidoscope  New Hall  Off-Campus Houses Measurement & Verification: Lighting

34

Bomberger Entry Lobby 1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

1 kWh's 0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0 8/6/2018 0:00 9/6/2018 0:00 10/6/2018 11/6/2018 12/6/2018 1/6/2019 0:00 2/6/2019 0:00 3/6/2019 0:00 4/6/2019 0:00 5/6/2019 0:00 6/6/2019 0:00 7/6/2019 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 Measurement & Verification: Lighting

35

Kaleidoscope Plaza Circuit #7 3

2.5

2

1.5 kWh's

1

0.5

0 8/6/2018 0:00 9/6/2018 0:00 10/6/2018 11/6/2018 12/6/2018 1/6/2019 0:00 2/6/2019 0:00 3/6/2019 0:00 4/6/2019 0:00 5/6/2019 0:00 6/6/2019 0:00 7/6/2019 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 Thank you! Questions?

36

James Hayes, THE STONE HOUSE GROUP Steve Gehringer, Ursinus College [email protected] 610-868-9600

Please visit THE STONE HOUSE GROUP’s booth in the Reception Gallery!