Sheldon--Tabor-2009.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sheldon--Tabor-2009.Pdf Earth-Science Reviews 95 (2009) 1–52 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Quantitative paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic reconstruction using paleosols Nathan D. Sheldon a,⁎, Neil J. Tabor b a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 CC Little, 1100 N. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA b Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750395, Dallas, TX 75275, USA article info abstract Article history: Paleosols (fossil soils) are preserved throughout the geologic record in depositional settings ranging from Received 8 April 2008 alluvial systems to between basalt flows. Until recently, paleosols were studied using primarily qualitative Accepted 15 March 2009 methods. In recent years, paleopedology has shifted from a largely qualitative field based on comparisons Available online 27 March 2009 with modern analogues to an increasingly quantitative endeavor. Some of this change has been a result of applying existing techniques to new materials, but many of the innovations have been the result of applying Keywords: new techniques to new materials, including thermodynamic modeling of soil formation, isotope paleosols paleoclimate geochemistry, and applications of empirical relationships derived from modern soils. A variety of semi- paleoenvironments quantitative and quantitative tools has been developed to examine past weathering and pedogenesis, and to isotopes reconstruct both paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic conditions at the time that the paleosols formed. geochemistry Though it is often not possible to achieve the same temporal resolution as with marine records for pedogenesis paleoclimatic reconstructions, proxies based on paleosols are potentially a much more direct means of making paleoclimatic reconstructions because soils form at the Earth's surface, in direct contact with the atmospheric and climatic conditions at the time of their formation. Paleoclimatic and environmental properties that may be reconstructed using the new proxies include provenance, weathering intensity, mean annual precipitation and temperature during pedogenesis, nutrient fluxes into and out of the paleosols, the atmospheric composition of important gases including CO2 and O2, the moisture balance during pedogenesis, the soil gas composition, reconstructed vegetative covering, and paleo-altitude. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................... 2 2. Qualitative methods ........................................................... 4 2.1. Taxonomic and stratigraphic approaches .............................................. 4 2.2. Semi-quantitative methods .................................................... 5 2.2.1. Compaction........................................................ 5 2.2.2. Ichnology ........................................................ 6 3. Quantitative methods overview ...................................................... 7 4. Clay mineralogy of soils and paleosols ................................................... 7 4.1. Occurrence of clay minerals .................................................... 7 5. Whole rock geochemistry......................................................... 8 5.1. Analytical methods ........................................................ 8 5.2. Provenance and pedogenesis .................................................... 8 5.2.1. Major element ratios and pedogenic processes ....................................... 8 5.2.2. Major element weathering indices ............................................. 10 5.2.3. Trace element ratios ................................................... 11 5.2.4. Rare earth elements. ................................................... 12 5.3. Mass-balance calculations ..................................................... 13 5.3.1. Pedogenesis and diagenesis ................................................ 13 5.3.2. Precambrian atmospheric CO2 from mass balance...................................... 14 5.4. Paleotemperature ......................................................... 15 ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 734 647 7569. E-mail address: [email protected] (N.D. Sheldon). 0012-8252/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.03.004 2 N.D. Sheldon, N.J. Tabor / Earth-Science Reviews 95 (2009) 1–52 5.5. Paleoprecipitation ......................................................... 16 5.5.1. Content of Fe–Mn nodules in vertisols ........................................... 16 5.5.2. Depth to Bk horizon .................................................... 16 5.5.3. Bw/Bt horizon geochemistry ................................................ 17 5.6. Long-term chemical weathering .................................................. 17 6. Thermodynamic approaches........................................................ 18 6.1. Simple versus complex systems ................................................... 18 6.2. Single-equation approaches .................................................... 18 6.2.1. Precambrian atmospheric CO2 ............................................... 18 6.2.2. Earliest Triassic soil formation ...............................................20 6.3. Multiple-equation approaches ...................................................20 7. Stable isotope approaches .........................................................22 7.1. Stableisotopiccompositionofpedogenicmineralsaspaleoenvironmentalproxies..............................22 7.1.1. Mineral-water isotope fractionation and the jargon of stable isotope geochemistry .......................22 7.1.2. Stable isotope fractionation factors of common pedogenic minerals . ............................23 7.1.3. Relationship between hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in continental waters ..........................25 7.2. Carbon in soils...........................................................25 7.2.1. One-component soil CO2 ..................................................25 7.2.2. Two-component soil CO2 ..................................................26 7.2.3. Three-component soil CO2 .................................................27 7.3. Soil and paleosol carbonate.....................................................27 7.3.1. Pedogenic calcite δ18O values ................................................27 7.3.2. Pedogenic siderite as a proxy for soil moisture δ18O values ..................................30 7.4. δ13C values of soil carbonate ....................................................30 7.4.1. Calcite from one-component of soil CO2 ...........................................30 7.4.2. δ13C of pedogenic siderite .................................................31 7.4.3. Calcite derived from 2-component soil CO2 mixing .....................................31 7.4.4. Soil carbonates formed by mixing of three-components of soil CO2 ..............................35 7.5. δ18O and δD of hydroxylated minerals ................................................36 7.5.1. Origin of residual deposits .................................................37 7.5.2. Variations in soil moisture δ18O and δD values........................................37 7.5.3. Single-mineral paleotemperature estimates .........................................38 7.5.4. Mineral-pair δ18O values ..................................................40 7.6. Paleo-vegetation/paleo-photosynthesis ...............................................40 8. Future approaches and challenges ..................................................... 41 8.1. Boron isotopes ........................................................... 41 8.2. Energy balance models.......................................................42 8.3. “Clumped isotope” paleothermometry................................................43 9. Summary ................................................................44 Acknowledgements ..............................................................44 Appendix A. Supplementary data ........................................................44 References ..................................................................44 1. Introduction but has some fundamental limitations, namely the need for taxonomic uniformitarianism. Continuing on with the grassland example, the Increasing recognition of paleosols (fossil soils; Fig. 1) in non- origin of grasses is most likely in the Cenozoic (e.g., Strömberg, 2002). marine strata has opened up new types of paleoenvironmental and However, paleosol-based estimates for the origin of grasslands as paleoclimatic reconstructions. While good quantitative paleoclimatic evidenced by Mollisol-like paleosols range from Eocene to Miocene data may be obtained from plant fossil assemblages using either (Retallack, 1997a,b, 2001a,b) depending on the strictness of one's nearest living relative (e.g., Leopold and Clay-Poole, 2001; Utescher taxonomy. Furthermore, others (Terry, 2001) have described Oligo- and Mosbrugger, 2007) or leaf morphometric approaches (e.g., Wolfe, cene-age paleosols as “Mollisols” without meaning to connote that a 1994; Uhl et al., 2007), those approaches yield snap shots of past grassland ecosystem was present. On the other hand, there are some environments and are relatively rare in the fossil record. Paleosols types of paleosols found in the Earth's past for which there are preserved in continental basins on the other hand, raise the possibility
Recommended publications
  • Engineering Behavior and Classification of Lateritic Soils in Relation to Soil Genesis Erdil Riza Tuncer Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1976 Engineering behavior and classification of lateritic soils in relation to soil genesis Erdil Riza Tuncer Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Tuncer, Erdil Riza, "Engineering behavior and classification of lateritic soils in relation to soil genesis " (1976). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5712. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5712 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic: Soil Classification
    Programme: M.Sc.(Environmental Science) Course: Soil Science Semester: IV Code: MSESC4007E04 Topic: Soil Classification Prof. Umesh Kumar Singh Department of Environmental Science School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences Central University of South Bihar, Gaya Note: These materials are only for classroom teaching purpose at Central University of South Bihar. All the data/figures/materials are taken from several research articles/e-books/text books including Wikipedia and other online resources. 1 • Pedology: The origin of the soil , its classification, and its description are examined in pedology (pedon-soil or earth in greek). Pedology is the study of the soil as a natural body and does not focus primarily on the soil’s immediate practical use. A pedologist studies, examines, and classifies soils as they occur in their natural environment. • Edaphology (concerned with the influence of soils on living things, particularly plants ) is the study of soil from the stand point of higher plants. Edaphologist considers the various properties of soil in relation to plant production. • Soil Profile: specific series of layers of soil called soil horizons from soil surface down to the unaltered parent material. 2 • By area Soil – can be small or few hectares. • Smallest representative unit – k.a. Pedon • Polypedon • Bordered by its side by the vertical section of soil …the soil profile. • Soil profile – characterize the pedon. So it defines the soil. • Horizon tell- soil properties- colour, texture, structure, permeability, drainage, bio-activity etc. • 6 groups of horizons k.a. master horizons. O,A,E,B,C &R. 3 Soil Sampling and Mapping Units 4 Typical soil profile 5 O • OM deposits (decomposed, partially decomposed) • Lie above mineral horizon • Histic epipedon (Histos Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Soil Science W
    Basic Soil Science W. Lee Daniels See http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/430/430-350/430-350_pdf.pdf for more information on basic soils! [email protected]; 540-231-7175 http://www.cses.vt.edu/revegetation/ Well weathered A Horizon -- Topsoil (red, clayey) soil from the Piedmont of Virginia. This soil has formed from B Horizon - Subsoil long term weathering of granite into soil like materials. C Horizon (deeper) Native Forest Soil Leaf litter and roots (> 5 T/Ac/year are “bio- processed” to form humus, which is the dark black material seen in this topsoil layer. In the process, nutrients and energy are released to plant uptake and the higher food chain. These are the “natural soil cycles” that we attempt to manage today. Soil Profiles Soil profiles are two-dimensional slices or exposures of soils like we can view from a road cut or a soil pit. Soil profiles reveal soil horizons, which are fundamental genetic layers, weathered into underlying parent materials, in response to leaching and organic matter decomposition. Fig. 1.12 -- Soils develop horizons due to the combined process of (1) organic matter deposition and decomposition and (2) illuviation of clays, oxides and other mobile compounds downward with the wetting front. In moist environments (e.g. Virginia) free salts (Cl and SO4 ) are leached completely out of the profile, but they accumulate in desert soils. Master Horizons O A • O horizon E • A horizon • E horizon B • B horizon • C horizon C • R horizon R Master Horizons • O horizon o predominantly organic matter (litter and humus) • A horizon o organic carbon accumulation, some removal of clay • E horizon o zone of maximum removal (loss of OC, Fe, Mn, Al, clay…) • B horizon o forms below O, A, and E horizons o zone of maximum accumulation (clay, Fe, Al, CaC03, salts…) o most developed part of subsoil (structure, texture, color) o < 50% rock structure or thin bedding from water deposition Master Horizons • C horizon o little or no pedogenic alteration o unconsolidated parent material or soft bedrock o < 50% soil structure • R horizon o hard, continuous bedrock A vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils Section
    Soils Section 2003 Florida Envirothon Study Sections Soil Key Points SOIL KEY POINTS • Recognize soil as an important dynamic resource. • Describe basic soil properties and soil formation factors. • Understand soil drainage classes and know how wetlands are defined. • Determine basic soil properties and limitations, such as mottling and permeability by observing a soil pit or soil profile. • Identify types of soil erosion and discuss methods for reducing erosion. • Use soil information, including a soil survey, in land use planning discussions. • Discuss how soil is a factor in, or is impacted by, nonpoint and point source pollution. Florida’s State Soil Florida has the largest total acreage of sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Aeric Haplaquods in the nation. This is commonly called Myakka fine sand. It does not occur anywhere else in the United States. There are more than 1.5 million acres of Myakka fine sand in Florida. On May 22, 1989, Governor Bob Martinez signed Senate Bill 525 into law making Myakka fine sand Florida’s official state soil. iii Florida Envirothon Study Packet — Soils Section iv Contents CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 WHAT IS SOIL AND HOW IS SOIL FORMED? .....................................................................3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................7 Texture......................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • (Hardpan) for Precision Agriculture on So
    SITE - SPECIFIC CHARACTERIZATION, MODELING AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF SUB-SOIL COMPACTION (HARDPAN) FOR PRECISION AGRICULTURE ON SOUTHEASTERN US SOILS by MEHARI ZEWDE TEKESTE (Under the Direction of Randy L. Raper and Ernest W. Tollner) ABSTRACT Natural and machinery traffic-induced subsoil compacted layers (soil hardpans) that are found in many southeastern US soils limit root growth with detrimental effects on crop productivity and the environment. Due to the spatial variability of hardpans, tillage management systems that use site-specific depth tillage applications may reduce fuel consumption compared to the conventional uniform depth tillage. The success of site-specific tillage or variable depth tillage depends on an accurate sensing of the hardpan layers, field positioning, and controlling the application of real-time or prescribed tillage. The over arching objective of the work was to understand and advance the art and science of soil compaction analysis and prediction with an eye towards compaction management in precision farming. The specific objectives were (1) To investigate the influences of soil parameters (soil moisture and bulk density), and the soil-cone frictional property on the interpretations of cone penetrometer data in predicting the magnitude and depth of hardpans, (2) To determine spatial variability for creating hardpan maps and (3) To investigate a passive acoustic based real-time soil compaction sensing method. The soil cone penetration problems were also modeled using finite element modeling to investigate the soil deformation patterns and evaluate the capability of the finite element method to predict the magnitude and depth of the hardpan. Laboratory experiments in a soil column study indicated that the soil cone penetration resistances were affected by soil moisture, bulk density and cone material type.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to IMPROVE SOIL DRAINAGE Charlotte Germane, Nevada County Master Gardener
    GOT COMPACTION? HOW TO IMPROVE SOIL DRAINAGE Charlotte Germane, Nevada County Master Gardener From The Curious Gardener, Summer 2011 Do you suspect you might have a drainage problem in your garden? If your soil does not drain quickly enough, your plants will drown. Soils in the foothills Your soil drainage may not be as bad as you think it is. There’s so much talk in the foothills about clay soil that some gardeners assume they have poorly draining soil, and grumble about it, when they actually have pretty respectable loam. The USDA has mapped soil types and found that in the lower foothills the soil can be sandy loam over heavy sandy loam, or loam over clay loam. Above 2000 feet, it is typically loam over clay loam with cobblestones. An unusual feature of foothills soil is the serpentine outcropping. This combines poor drainage with toxic levels of magnesium. If you need to grow in a serpentine soil area, use raised beds. The serpentine soil under the beds will not provide adequate drainage. Another foothill soil issue that makes for poor drainage is “layered soil”. Soil naturally transitions from one kind to another, but layered soil means soil that changes abruptly, making it hard for water to move through easily. Layered soil occurs naturally (soil on top of rock or a clay pan) and can also be created by digging with rototillers and heavy equipment. Check for poor grading, over-irrigation, and thatched lawns Before you label your soil the culprit, walk your garden and evaluate the grading. It is possible that at the time of your home’s construction, or during a later landscaping project,the soil was graded so the water drained toward an area with no easy outlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilization and Destabilization of Soil Organic Matter: Mechanisms and Controls
    13F7H GEODERLIA ELSEVIER Geoderma 74 (1996) 65-105 • Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls Phillip Sollins, Peter Homann, Bruce A. Caldwell Department of Forest Science Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Receed 1 December 1993; revised 26 July 1995; accepted 3 April 1996 Abstract We present a conceptual model of the processes by which plant leaf and root litter is transformed to soil organic C and CO 2. Stabilization of a portion of the litter C yields material that resists further transformation; destabilization yields material that is more susceptible to microbial respiration. Stability of the organic C is viewed as resulting from three general sets of characteristics. Recalcitrance comprises, molecular-level characteristics of organic substances, including elemental composition, presence of functional groups, and molecular conformation, that influence their degradation by microbes and enzymes. Interactions refers to the inter-molecular interactions between organics and either inorganic substances or other organic substances that alter the rate of degradation of those organics or synthesis of new organics. Accessibility refers to the location of organic substances with respect to microbes and enzymes. Mechanisms by which these three characteristics change through time are reviewed along with controls on those mechanisms. This review suggests that the following changes in the study of soil organic matter dynamics would speed progress: (1) increased effort to incorporate results
    [Show full text]
  • Murphey Et Al. 2019 Best Practices in Mitigation Paleontology
    PROCEEDINGS of the San Diego Society of Natural History Founded 1874 Number 47 1 May 2019 BEST PRACTICES IN MITIGATION PALEONTOLOGY By Paul C. Murphey Paleo Solutions, 2785 Speer Boulevard, Suite 1, Denver, CO 80211, U.S.A.; [email protected]; Department of Paleontology, San Diego Natural History Museum, 1788 El Prado, San Diego, CA 92101, U.S.A.; [email protected] Department of Earth Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, 2001 Colorado Boulevard, Denver, CO 80201, U.S.A. Georgia E. Knauss SWCA Environmental Consultants, 1892 S. Sheridan Avenue, Sheridan, WY 82801 U.S.A.; [email protected] Lanny H. Fisk PaleoResource Consultants, 550 High Street, Suite 108, Auburn, CA 95603, U.S.A. (deceased) Thomas A. Deméré Department of Paleontology, San Diego Natural History Museum, 1788 El Prado, San Diego, CA 92101, U.S.A.; [email protected] Robert E. Reynolds Department of Paleontology, San Diego Natural History Museum, 1788 El Prado, San Diego, CA 92101, U.S.A.; [email protected] For correspondence, write to: Paul C. Murphey, Paleo Solutions, 4614 Lonespur Ct. Oceanside, CA 92056 Email: [email protected] [email protected] bpmp-19-01-fm Page 2 PDF Created: 2019-4-12: 9:20:AM 2 Paul C. Murphey, Georgia E. Knauss, Lanny H. Fisk, Thomas A. Deméré, and Robert E. Reynolds TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . 4 Introduction . 4 History and Scientific Contributions . 5 History of Mitigation Paleontology in the United States . 5 Methods Best Practice Categories . 7 1. Qualifications. 7 Confusion between Resource Disciplines . 7 Professional Geologists as Mitigation Paleontologists. 8 Mitigation Paleontologist Categories .
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoenvironmental Constraints from Paleosol-Loess Sequences: Evaluating Clumped (∆47) Isotopic Records in Biogenic and Pedogenic Carbonate
    Paleoenvironmental constraints from paleosol-loess sequences: evaluating clumped (∆47) isotopic records in biogenic and pedogenic carbonate Katharine Huntington, Department of Earth and Space Sciences The project goal was to advance understanding of how the geochemistry of biogenic and pedogenic (formed in soil) carbonates record surface environmental temperatures and soil water compositions relevant to the interpretation of proxy records in Quaternary loess-paleosol sequences and cultural layers. Reconstructing Quaternary paleoenvironments is important for a broad range of paleoclimate, geology, biology, anthropology and archaeology studies. The geochemistry of carbonate minerals formed at and near the Earth surface can provide quantitative environmental constraints including the δ18O values of water, δ13C-based information about vegetation, and most recently, estimates of Earth-surface temperatures from clumped isotope (∆47) thermometry. Early efforts to develop clumped isotope thermometry in modern-Holocene soils raise many 18 questions about how to interpret not only ∆47 temperatures but also conventional δ O and δ13C values in soil and loess carbonates. We conducted a study of biogenic, pedogenic, and geogenic carbonates of different types from two Quaternary paleosol-loess deposits, the Nussloch (Rhine Valley, SW Germany) and Palouse (eastern Washington state) loess-paleosol sequences. Carbonate δ18O, δ13C 14 and ∆47 analyses were conducted in the University of Washington IsoLab as well as C dating of carbonates to determine their age and pedogenic vs. geogenic nature. In the 18 13 Nussloch, the δ O, δ C and Δ47 data for multiple carbonate types revealed the effects of geogenic carbonate input, pedogenesis and environmental factors on the isotopic variations, and showed that geogenic “bulk loess” carbonates that are poor environmental proxies can still provide important context for interpreting the isotopic signature of pedogenic and biogenic carbonates (Zamanian et al., in revision).
    [Show full text]
  • The Retention of Organic Matter in Soils
    Biogeochemistry 5: 35-70 (1988) © Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht Printed in the Netherlands The retention of organic matter in soils J.M. OADES Department of Soil Science, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064 Key words: organic matter, turnover, organomineral interactions, clay, base status, cation bridges, oxide surfaces Abstract. The turnover of C in soils is controlled mainly by water regimes and temperature, but is modified by factors such as size and physicochemical properties of C additions in litter or root systems, distribution of C throughout the soil as root systems, or addition as litter, distribution of C within the soil matrix and its interaction with clay surfaces. Soil factors which retard mineralization of C in soils are identified from correlations of C contents of soils with other properties such as clay content and base status. The rate and extent of C mineralization depends on the chemistry of the added organic matter and interaction with clays of the microbial biomass and metabolites. The organomineral interactions are shown to depend on cation bridges involving mainly Ca in neutral to alkaline soils, Al in acid soils and adsorption of organic materials on iron oxide surfaces. The various organomineral interactions lead to aggregations of clay particles and organic materials, which stabilizes both soil structure and the carbon compounds within the aggregates. Introduction Soils represent a major pool (172 x 10'°t) in the cycling of C from the atmosphere to the biosphere and are the habitat for terrestrial photosynthet- ic organisms which fix some 11 x 1 0"°tCy-1, about one half of which eventually finds it way into soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical and Biochemical Effects Recorded in the Tree Root Zone – Soil Memory, Historical Contingency and Soil Evolution Under Trees
    Plant Soil (2018) 426:109–134 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3622-9 REGULAR ARTICLE Biomechanical and biochemical effects recorded in the tree root zone – soil memory, historical contingency and soil evolution under trees Łukasz Pawlik & Pavel Šamonil Received: 17 September 2017 /Accepted: 1 March 2018 /Published online: 15 March 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract increase in soil spatial complexity. We hypothesized that Background and aims The changing soils is a never- trees can be a strong local factor intensifying, blocking ending process moderated by numerous biotic and abi- or modifying pedogenetic processes, leading to local otic factors. Among these factors, trees may play a changes in soil complexity (convergence, divergence, critical role in forested landscapes by having a large or polygenesis). These changes are hypothetically con- imprint on soil texture and chemical properties. During trolled by regionally predominating soil formation their evolution, soils can follow convergent or divergent processes. development pathways, leading to a decrease or an Methods To test the main hypothesis, we described the pedomorphological features of soils under tree stumps of fir, beech and hemlock in three soil regions: Haplic Highlights Cambisols (Turbacz Reserve, Poland), Entic Podzols 1) The architecture of tree root systems controls soil physical and (Žofínský Prales Reserve, Czech Republic) and Albic chemical properties. Podzols (Upper Peninsula, Michigan, USA). Soil pro- 2) The predominating pedogenetic process significantly modifies files under the stumps, as well as control profiles on sites the effect of trees on soil. 3) Trees are a factor in polygenesis in Haplic Cambisols at the currently not occupied by trees, were analyzed in the pedon scale.
    [Show full text]