The Issues of the History of the Amrnien Language Remins of The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2 êîàô¶²´²Ü²Î²Ü кàîàôÂÚàôÜܺð ЭТИМОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ETYMOLOGICAL STUDIES 3 ÐÐ ¶ÇïáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ ³½·³ÛÇÝ ³Ï³¹»Ùdz Ð. ²×³éÛ³ÝÇ ³Ýí³Ý É»½íÇ ÇÝëïÇïáõï ì³½·»Ý гٵ³ñÓáõÙÛ³Ý Ð²ÚºðºÜÀ ºì ÐܸºìðàäºðºÜÀ ²ÏݳñÏÝ»ñ ѳۻñ»ÝÇ Ñ³Ù»Ù³ï³Ï³Ý µ³é³·ÇïáõÃÛ³Ý (гٻٳï³Ï³Ý-ïÇå³µ³Ý³Ï³Ý ï³ñµ»ñ³Ï³ÛÝáõÃÛáõÝ) ºñ¨³Ý 2014 —— • —— Национальная Академия наук РА Институт языка имени Р.Ачаряна Вазген Амбарцумян АРМЯНСКИЙ И ИНДОЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК Очерки по сравнительной лексикологии армянского языка (Сравнительно-типологическая вариативность) Ереван 2014 4 Armenian National Academy of Sciences H. Adjarian Institute of Linguistics Vazguen Hambardzumyan ARMENIAN AND INDOEUROPEAN Essays on Comparative Lexicology of the Armenian Language (Comparative-typological Variativity) Yerevan 2014 5 Printed by the decision of Scientific Council of the Institute of Language after H. Adjaryan of NAS RA Ðî¸ 809.198.1 ¶Ø¸ 81.2Ðb Ð 205 Editor-in-chief Ph. D. Doc. N. M. Simonyan Reviewer Ph. D. M. A.Aghabekyan Ph. D. Doc. H.V.Sukiasyan V. G. Hambardzumyan Ð 205 Essays on Comparative Lexicology of the Armenian Language (Etymological-typological and Variative Studies) / (Editor-in-chief N. M. Simonyan).- Yerevan.: NAS RA Publ., 2014, 186 p.: The present work is dedicated to different questions on the History of Armenian Language and Comparative Linguistics. The statistics of affricate consonants in Armenian is presented, Indo- European variativity, as well as the study of the vernacular and loan- words variativity is suggested, new etymologies are made and those done in the past are being reviewed. The book is suggested for philologists, historians, and general public who are interested in the ancient period of the Armenian language. Ðî¸ 809.198.1 ¶Ø¸ 81.2Ðb ISBN © Hambardzumyan V. G., 2014 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................. Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... Part I. Armenian Etymology and Variative Reconstruction 0. Preliminary .......................................................................................... 1. Current Issues of the Study of the History of the Armenian Language .......................................................................................... 2. The Non-Complete Shift of IE Explosives in Armenian ..................... 3. The Variativity of the IE Languages and Some Questions on Variative Studies of Armenian .......................................................... 4. The Variative Reconstruction of the Armenian Roots of IE Origin .... Part II. The Etymology of the Armenian Words of IE Origin 0. Preliminary .......................................................................................... 1. Arm. ałÍik < IE *al- ............................................................................. 2. Arm. ałtamułt < IE *alghi- .................................................................. 3. Arm. ašan < IE *(e)s-en ...................................................................... 4. Arm. artaxoyr < IE *ar-(t[h]o-) ............................................................ 5. Arm. astuac < IE *Has-t‘ieË-os .......................................................... 6. Arm. gałgał < IE *k[h]oel- ................................................................... 7. Arm. əmpem < IE *p(h)oH(i)- .............................................................. 8. Arm. kamn < IE *ak[h]men ................................................................. 9. Arm. sayl < IE *k[h]oel- ....................................................................... 10. Arm. sÏnel < IE *k‘oer- ...................................................................... 11. Arm. ticc (< tik‟) < IE *di-t ................................................................ 12. Arm. tcanjr < IE *t‘Ús-u- ................................................................... 13. Arm. xawarci < xaw- + IE *treg'- ...................................................... 14. Arm. xawart < xaw- + IE *treg'- ........................................................ Part III. Some IE paralleles between Armenian and Anatolian Languages 0. Preliminary ............................................................................................ 1. Arm. cawi ~ Luv. taËi- ........................................................................ 2. Arm. kaytc ~ Hier.Luv. kati- ................................................................. Bibliography ............................................................................................................. Index of Words ......................................................................................................... Index of Scholars mentioned in the Text .................................................................. 7 Introduction The object of the research is to discuss separately a number of essential issues of the history of the Armenian language which has not only linguistic value but also poses a great importance from the point of view of both historical grammar and comparative linguistics. The immense data on the Armenian language enables to develop and study more thoroughly: it also outlines the probable ways of how the research on the history of the Armenian language should develop under new circumstances on the basis of the previously gained material. This study summarizes the research of some essential issues of the Armenian language in its ancient historical aspect, which also briefly outlines the results of the studies by different scholars. A part of the research was published earlier as scientific articles, another part was introduced as reports at various conferences. And the other part of the research will be published here for the first time. The first chapter discusses some fundamental issues of the history of the Armenian language. The solution of problems supposes a more detailed and extensive study of various facts and evidence of the Armenian language broadly implementing the latest linguistic data about the history of different stages of the Armenian language. The second chapter refers to a very important phenomenon, that is the history of IE plosives and their occurrence in the Armenian language. The latter shows that this phenomenon is not clearly and completely applied in Armenian. The above mentioned will give the etymology of a number of Armenian words that haven‘t ever been studied before or have had ambiguous explanation. These words have become the subject of this study. The latter will allow to illustrate several phenomena which haven‘t been revealed before. The third chapter touches upon the etymology of a number of Armenian words of IE origin. Those words either haven‘t been studied etymologically before or only to a certain extent. The latest 8 data introduced in the comparative studies of the IE languages is used parallelly to the data about the traditional etymology. The etymology of the Armenian words of IE origin enlarges the vocabulary of the native semantic groups connected with different fields of life. During the last three or four decades the study of the IE languages has entered a new development stage and acquired a great interest. New studies have appeared, scolars have begun investigating completely new issues. Some models with incomplete explanation have been targeted again, taken a new modification or interpretation. In the field of comparative linguistics more realistic principles and approaches are worked out, which are nothing but further development of a number of methods and rules in comparativeness. Thus appear new criteria about the relationship of the languages and the history of linguistic phenomena which are substantiated from the point of view of different etymological studies [cf. Jakobson 1957; Якобсон 1963: 95-105; Гамкрелидзе/Иванов 1984, etc.]. In the latest studies of the prehistoric (pre-literary) period of the Armenian language some researchers have focused on issues which have become the center of attention especially with mentioned criteria. Because of its features of archaism the data on Armenian acquires comparably great interest among scholars. The expression and description of both invariant (common) and variative (partial) units acquire greater significance not only for the reconstruction of the IE parent language but also for the discussion of modern trends on split, individual development and contacts of the coherent languages. In some cases theoretical generalization is considered to be ideal and in other cases separation and variative studies seem perfect [Джаукян 1982: 59-67; Djahukyan 1987]. Many problems of the Armenian comparative lexicology can be revised through comparative and typological studies and also by means of so called variative studies. This work touches upon the variativity of some IE words root and several noteworthy problems on the variative study of 9 Armenian which will enable linguists to begin broader research of the subject in the future. The initiation of these studies supposes a new detailed and broad study of different Armenian roots. Thus, several matters on root and form of lexis may become a subject of interest from different aspects which will create a real basis for new etymologies or edition and revision of the old ones. Because of the importance of such issues we are going to investigate problems of the variative reconstruction and typological analysis, the solution of which will make it possible to describe newly