Reference List 2015
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Peat Database Results Hampshire
Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K. -
Pump up the Volume
PUMP UP THE VOLUME BRIngIng down costs and IncReasIng JoBs In the offshoRe wInd sectoR report Clare McNeil, Mark Rowney and Will Straw July 2013 © IPPR 2013 Institute for Public Policy Research AbOUT THE AUTHOrs Clare McNeil is a senior research fellow at IPPR. Mark rowney is a research fellow at IPPR. Will Straw is associate director for climate change, energy and transport at IPPR. AcknOwLEdgMEnTs the authors would like to thank Richard howard and adrian fox of the crown estate, Paul Reynolds from gL garrad hassan, Bruce Valpy from BVg associates, and aram w ood at statkraft for comments on an earlier draft of the report. we are also grateful to our IPPR colleagues graeme cooke, tony dolphin, Rick Muir, nick Pearce and Reg Platt for their comments. all of the views contained in this report are those of the authors and any errors remain ours alone. we owe a debt of gratitude to people at many organisations with whom we spoke over the course of the research. this includes alstom, the carbon trust, climate change capital, the committee on climate change, the crown estate, the danish wind Industry association, the danish embassy in London, dong energy, the energy technologies Institute, the german offshore wind energy foundation, greenpeace, Mainstream Renewable Power, Rwe, siemens UK, tata steel, the tUc, Vestas, and gL garrad hassan. thanks also to a number of civil servants across the government who engaged with us over the course of the project. thanks finally to sian ferguson at ashden trust and to gordon edge, nick Medic, Maf smith and Jennifer webber at RenewableUK for their kind sponsorship of this project and guidance throughout. -
Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted. -
Appendix E Technology
Appendix E E Appendix Electricity Statement Year Ten 2015 Technology E Appendix Electricity Ten Year Statement 2015 1 Contents The transmission network is made of many different equipment types. Descriptions of the different equipment, its capabilities, usage, limitations and expectations for development are presented here. Appendix E E1 – Overhead lines . 2 E2 – Underground cables for power transmission . 5 E3 – Onshore cable installation and landfall . 7 E4 – Switchgear . 12 E5 – Transformers . 15 E6 – Shunt reactors . 19 E7 – Shunt capacitor banks . 21 E8 – Static VAR compensators (SVC) . 23 E9 – Static compensator (STATCOM) . 26 E10 – Series compensation . 28 E11 – Quadrature boosters & series reactors . 31 E12 – Submarine three core cables . 33 E13 – Submarine single core cables . 37 E14 – Subsea cable installation AC & DC . 41 E15 – Offshore substation platforms . 45 E16 – HVDC: current source converters . 49 E17 – HVDC: voltage source converters . 52 E18 – HVDC: extruded cables . 55 E19 – HVDC: submarine mass impregnated cables . 59 E20 – HVDC: overhead lines . 62 E21 – HVDC: switchgear . 64 E22 – Technology availability for offshore strategic optioneering . 66 E23 – Unit costs . 80 Appendix E Electricity Ten Year Statement 2015 2 Appendix E1 – Overhead lines Overhead lines (OHLs) are used by electricity transmission companies as the default preferred solution for connections between power stations, distribution companies and bulk electricity power users. With air as the main insulating medium, overhead lines are designed using a balance between energy to be transported, security, costs and electrical mechanical, civil performance and environmental trade-offs. Figure E1.1 OHL maintenance E Appendix Electricity Ten Year Statement 2015 3 An OHL route consists of one or more Dependencies and impacts conductors suspended by towers . -
PIPE SUPPORTS LTD Company Profile
PIPE SUPPORTS LTD Company Profile CONTENTS Page 2. Address, Location and Function. Page 4. Financial, Legal and Commercial. Page 5. Facilities. Page 7. Design Capability. Page 8. Quality Assurance and Controls. Page 8. Membership of Trade Associations and Technical Committees. Page 8. Sales Representation. 21/01/2014 Page 1 of 8 Address, Location and Function 1.1 Name and Address: Pipe Supports Limited Unit 22, West Stone Berry Hill Industrial Estate Droitwich Worcs WR9 9AS 1.2 Telephone Number: +44 (0) 1905 795500 1.3 Fax Number: +44 (0) 1905 794126 1.4 E-mail address: [email protected] 1.5 Web site address: www.PipeSupports.com 1.6 Factory Address: Unit 22, West Stone Berry Hill Industrial Estate Droitwich Worcs WR9 9AS 1.7 Location: Approximately 2.5 miles from M5 Junction 5, and 6 miles from M5 Junction 6, just off A38. 1.8 Access to Factory: Good via driveway - minimum width approximately 5m. Roller shutter opening into factory 4.5 m x 4.5 m. EOT crane capacity of 5 tonnes. Max. lift height 4 metres. 3 Fork lift trucks capacity 5 tonnes. 1.9 Principal Function of Company: The design, manufacture and supply of pipe hangers, restraints and associated equipment for all types of pipework installations in the industrial, commercial, power generation and petrochemical sectors. Secondary services include site survey and piping analysis combined with the long-term monitoring of piping performance. 1.10 Product Listing: PSDesigner – Software for Designing Pipe hanger Assemblies. PSLCAD - Computerised Support Design / Drawing System -
Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs
Waste & Minerals Development Framework Hazardous Waste – Review of the Future Management Needs Final October 2011 Prepared for East Sussex County Council/ Brighton and Hove City Council East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Revision Schedule Hazardous Waste – Study into Future Management Needs October 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 06/06/2011 Initial Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 02 22/06/2011 Final Draft Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate 03 29/09/2011 Final Angela Graham Mike Nutting Mike Nutting Principal Associate Associate URS/Scott Wilson 12 Regan Way Chetwynd Business Park Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6RZ Tel 0115 9077000 Fax 0115 9077001 East Sussex County Council Waste & Minerals Development Framework Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of East Sussex County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed [Proposal Dated 14 April 2011]. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson.. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report. -
Shaping Tomorrow. Performing Today
Shaping Tomorrow. Performing Today. Company Profile Content page 1 Market position 3 2 Quality, Health, Safety, Security and Environment 5 3 Financial stability 9 4 Reference list offshore steel structures 10 5 Reference list offshore wind turbine foundations 17 6 Manufacturing, organisation and technical capabilities 22 7 Qualified workforce 33 8 Strong cooperations 34 9 Labour regulations and work conditions 35 10 Accessibility 36 11 General contact information 38 2 1 Market position 1.1 Welcome to Sif Sif is an independent company from The Netherlands, specialised in the manufacturing of tubular structures. Our markets are mainly the offshore wind energy as well as the offshore oil and gas industry. We provide employment for over 600 highly skilled, qualified and motivated employees. 1.2 In-house experience and expertise Our 300kt+ annual production capacity, five production lines, unique process know-how in the rolling of heavy steel plate material and best-in-class submerged arc welding techniques, have put us in a position in which key players in the industry know exactly and appreciate what we stand for: highest reproducible quality and consistent productivity throughout the projects awarded to us. 1.3 Impressive track record Unique processing capabilities are combined with a proven track record in high quality and on-time delivery. Our way of doing business is focusing on our customers objectives. That’s why our customers perceive us as a genuine high-end co-creator and reliable partner for their projects. We understand the importance of maintaining certifications to all relevant industrial standards, including an effective quality management system certified in accordance with NEN-ISO 9001 2015 and ISO 3834-2 requirements for welding. -
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
SOLIHULL METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL Net Zero Action Plan: Report August 2021 CONTENTS 1. Background & Context Page 4 2. Net Zero Action Plan Page 9 2.1 Non-Domestic Buildings Page 18 2.2 Domestic Buildings Page 28 2.3 Transport Page 37 2.4 Waste Page 49 2.5 Industry Page 58 2.6 Natural Environment Page 63 2.7 Energy Supply Page 75 2.8 Council Influence Page 83 3. Conclusions & Next Steps Page 88 4. Appendix Page 91 INTRODUCTION Action Plan Overview & Scope A Collaborative Approach This report was commissioned by Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council We recognise that the Council can’t achieve the Borough target by (SMBC), who aspire to meet a Borough-wide net zero target of 2041 in-line themselves. The Net Zero Action Plan seeks to help the Council understand with the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) ambition. As an which stakeholders in the Borough will need to be engaged and to help focus organisation, the Council itself has a 2030 net zero ambition. resourcing and funding towards actions with the greatest positive impact. Where stakeholders across society can contribute; it stands to make the Plan The Net Zero Action Plan Report is an exploration of the actions Solihull will more relevant, more deliverable and more likely to unlock the various social need to consider to meet its ambition of a net zero Borough. The Council & economic co-benefits that climate change mitigation can offer. will use this work to help inform the nature and extent of action and the report is a key element in planning the Borough’s response to the Climate Action Plan Objectives Emergency. -
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Improved Generation Dispatch In Power Systems Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine t A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the diploma of Membership of Imperial College -by- Fergal McNamara Electrical Energy Systems Section Department of Electrical Engineering Imperial College August 1990 Page i Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems To my Mother and Father Page ii Improved Generation Dispatch in Power Systems ABSTRACT The economic allocation of generation among individual generating sets performed in an En ergy Management Centre relies on simple models of power plant behaviour. The plant is re garded as a power source which can be varied at will, with some maximum rate of change. However, there are many other relevant power station attributes, which, although clearly re cognized, are not explicitly taken in consideration in the Energy Management Centre. Primary control of grid frequency, achieved by governor action, relies on the fact that some generators are operating above the minimum pressure necessary to achieve their dispatched load. The response of such a generator to a frequency deviation from nominal, termed the governor gain, is an automatic control action aimed at reducing supply and demand imbal ance and hence containing frequency within limits. The ability of a generating unit to provide active power reserve for frequency regulation is a function of its dispatched load and operating pressure. If this relationship and the associated costs are known then the required reserve can be scheduled in the most economic way over the entire power system by an enhanced dispatch algorithm which includes the operating pressure. -
Land Adjacent to Fawley Power Station, Fawley
Planning Committee - 28 July 2020 Report Item 1 Application No: 19/00365/OUT Outline Planning Permission Site: Land Adjacent to Fawley Power Station, Fawley Proposal: Outline application for land within the New Forest National Park Authority comprising the removal of structures on the quarry site and provision of 120 new homes, 1000 square metres of new civic space including provision for Early Years Learning (Use Class D1), 200 square metres of drinking establishments (Use Class A4), a two form entry primary school, flood defences / sea wall, public open space and habitat enhancement of existing land, hard and soft landscaping, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace, a saline lagoon, tidal creek, reconfiguration of the existing access and creation of a new access from the B3053 and access road through the site, associated infrastructure and engineering works (access to be considered) (AMENDED DESCRIPTION AND AMENDED PLANS). Applicant: Fawley Waterside Ltd Case Officer: Natalie Walter Parish: FAWLEY SUMMARY This is an outline planning application with all detailed matters (layout, scale, appearance and landscaping) reserved for subsequent approval. The only matter of detail to be considered at this time is the means of access. The application is though accompanied by very detailed supporting documents that include an Environmental Statement, Parameter Plans and a Design Code that subsequent reserved matters’ applications must adhere to. Submitted in May last year, the application has been the subject of extensive discussions and negotiations with the applicant and statutory consultees, both prior to and following submission. The principle of the proposed development has been established through the site-specific allocation in the Authority’s recently adopted Local Plan (Policy SP26). -
Fawley Power Station Major Development Test Topic Paper
Proposals for land adjacent to Fawley Power Station National Parks Major Development Test – Background Paper (May 2018) 1. National Planning Policy and Guidance – Background 1.1 Since 1949 national planning policy has included coverage of major development affecting National Parks. Originally known as the ‘Silkin Test’, the precise wording of the major development test has been amended over time and the current wording is set out in paragraph 116 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2012). This paragraph of the NPPF states: Planning permission should be refused for major developments in these designated areas except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated they are in the public interest. Consideration of such applications should include an assessment of: . the need for the development, including in terms of any national considerations, and the impact of permitting it, or refusing it, upon the local economy; . the cost of, and scope for, developing elsewhere outside the designated area, or meeting the need for it in some other way; and . any detrimental effect on the environment, the landscape and recreational opportunities, and the extent to which that could be moderated. 1.2 The major development test is also referred to within the Government’s online National Planning Practice Guidance resource (NPPG) which states: Planning permission should be refused for major development in a National Park, the Broads or an AONB except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated to be in the public interest. Whether a proposed development in these designated areas should be treated as a major development, to which the policy in paragraph 116 of the Framework applies, will be a matter for the relevant decision taker, taking into account the proposal in question and the local context. -
Subsea Controls Project References
SUBSEA CONTROLS PROJECT REFERENCES INTRODUCTION Proserv has been manufacturing control systems in the UK since 1976 and has considerable experience in subsea production system engineering and subsea control system design. As the industry technology has advanced into locating much of the production equipment on the seabed so Proserv has developed control, monitoring and safety shutdown systems which are able to operate in this equipment either from the surface, or the subsea environment. Early involvement in the Subsea arena began for Proserv in the 1980’s with the design and prototype manufacture of our own subsea control module, using our in-house spool-type control valves. These whilst initially adapted and evaluated for subsea use did not show the degree of durability of the carbide shear seal type valves used in our subsea control systems today. A number of subsea hydraulic systems for short step-outs and SSIV controls were made, but it was the development of our Wellcon multiplexed electronic programmable control modules employing shear-seal valves that established Proserv presence in the subsea market. In 1992 our first complete multiplexed Electro-Hydraulic subsea control system was developed and the first full system deployed the following year. In 1999 the Artemis subsea control system was developed adding deep water ROV deployment to the product line. The inclusion of the Sicom OCC modem technology in 2007 enabled open and high performance subsea network availability. In 2014 Proserv launch the latest generation subsea electronics Artemis 2G (A2G) which provides operators with a reliable, more accessible and flexible system with increase data and power performance and full compliance with latest SIIS, IWIS, ISO and API specifications With much more reliance on oil and gas field life extension and brownfield expansion of older field the Artemis and A2G technology from Proserv now provides an alternative to using the original Equipment Manufacture with the Augmented Controls Technology (ACT) provided by Proserv subsea controls technology.