Cambridgeshire Economic Assessment Place Profile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appointments to Outside Organisations
CAMBRIDGESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO OUTSIDE BODIES: COUNTY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS REPS GUIDANCE MEETINGS NAME OF BODY APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE(S) CLASSIFICATION CONTACT DETAILS PER ANNUM Chairman of the Economy and Other Public Body South Cambridgeshire District Greater Cambridge Council Partnership Environment Committee – Councillor Ian Bates South Cambridgeshire Hall Executive Board Cambourne Business Park Cambourne Quarterly 1 Cambridge Deputy Leader of the Council – CB23 6EA Councillor Roger Hickford (substitute) Other Public Body Democratic Services Cambridgeshire and Leader of the Council – Councillor Steve Count Room 117 Peterborough Shire Hall Combined Authority Cambridge 11 1 Deputy Leader of the Council – CB3 0AP Councillor Ian Bates (substitute) Other Public Body Anne Gardiner Cambridgeshire and Councillor David Connor Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Councillor Lucy Nethsingha Peterborough Combined Combined Authority Authority 11 2 – Overview and Substitutes: Scrutiny Committee Anne Gardiner Councillor Lina Joseph anne.gardiner@cambridgeshi Councillor David Jenkins repeterborough-ca.gov.uk REPS GUIDANCE MEETINGS NAME OF BODY APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE(S) CLASSIFICATION CONTACT DETAILS PER ANNUM Other Public Body Anne Gardiner Cambridgeshire and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Peterborough Combined Combined Authority Councillor Nichola Harrison Authority – Audit and 5 1 Substitute: Governance Councillor Graham Wilson Anne Gardiner anne.gardiner@cambridgeshi Committee repeterborough-ca.gov.uk 1. Councillor Simon Bywater Other Public Body Democratic Services Cambridgeshire and Room 117 Peterborough Fire 2. Councillor Ian Gardener 3. Councillor Derek Giles Shire Hall Authority Cambridge 4. Councillor John Gowing CB3 0AP 5. Councillor Linda Harford 6. Councillor Sebastian Kindersley 6. Councillor Mac McGuire 3 13 7. Councillor Lucy Nethsingha 9. Councillor Kevin Reynolds 10. Councillor Terry Rogers 11. Councillor Jocelynne Scutt 12. -
Index of Haslingfield Site Assessment Proforma
South Cambridgeshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Report August 2013 Appendix 7i: Assessment of 2011 'Call for Sites' SHLAA sites Index of Haslingfield Site Assessment Proforma Site Site Address Site Capacity Page Number Site 150 Land at River Lane, Haslingfield 71 dwellings 1836 Site 163 Land at Barton Road, Haslingfield 49 dwellings 1843 SHLAA (August 2013) Appendix 7i: Assessment of 2011 'Call for Sites' SHLAA sites Group Village Haslingfield Page 1835 South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Site Assessment Proforma Proforma July 2012 Created Proforma Last July 2012 Updated Location Haslingfield Site name / Land at River Lane address Category of A village extension i.e. a development adjoining the existing village site: development framework boundary Description of promoter’s Approximately 100 houses proposal Site area 3.15ha (hectares) Site Number 150 The site is on the eastern edge of Haslingfield. The western boundary of the site is adjacent to the rear gardens of houses in Cantelupe Road. A byway - River Lane follows part of the southern boundary from Cantelupe Road before it becomes a bridleway, which Site description continues eastward alongside the River Rhee. A track follows most & context of the eastern boundary of the site. There is open countryside to the north. The flood plain of the River Cam or Rhee is to the east and south east of the site. To the south west of the site is the Haslingfield recreation ground. The site is an arable field. Current or last Agriculture use of the site Is the site Previously No Developed Land? Allocated for a non-residential use in the No current development plan? Planning None history Source of site Site suggested through call for sites SHLAA (August 2013) Appendix 7i: Assessment of 2011 'Call for Sites' SHLAA sites Group Village Page 1836 Site 150 Land at River Lane, Haslingfield Tier 1: Strategic Considerations The site is within the Green Belt. -
Rectory Farm BARRINGTON, CAMBRIDGE
RectoRy FaRm BARRINGTON, CAMBRIDGE RectoRy FaRm 6 HASLINGFIELD ROAD, BARRINGTON, CAMBRIDGE, CB22 7RG An attractive Grade II listed village house with extensive period outbuildings in a superb position next to the church Reception hall, sitting room, family room, vaulted drawing room, kitchen/dining room, rear hall, utility room, pantry, cloaks w.c. First floor – 4 double bedrooms, family bathroom, shower room, Second floor – 2 attic rooms Extensive range of traditional outbuildings comprising double-sided open bay cart lodge, former hay barn, cow shed, brick barn. Attractive gardens and grounds, ornamental pond with “Monet” style arched bridge. In all 1.27 acres Savills Cambridge Unex House, 132-134 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 8PA Contact: James Barnett BA (Hons) MRICS [email protected] 01223 347 147 www.savills.co.uk Situation Rectory Farm is set behind the historic All Saints Parish Church in the north-eastern corner of the popular and attractive South Cambridgeshire village of Barrington. Well known for having the largest village green in England, the village has good facilities including a shop/post office, football and cricket pitches, a popular pub/restaurant and a primary school. Secondary schooling is available at Melbourn Village College and there is also a wide selection of independent schooling available in Cambridge. Further amenities are in Melbourn (4 miles), Harston (3.3 miles) and the market town of Royston, 7 miles to the south-west. More comprehensive shopping, recreational and cultural facilities are available in the high tech university city of Cambridge which is 8 miles to the north east. For the commuter there are mainline rail links to Cambridge and London King’s Cross from local stations at either Shepreth (1.8 miles) and Foxton (2 miles) to the south and direct services from Royston into London King’s Cross (from 38 minutes). -
Community Governance Review of Haslingfield Parish
Community Governance Review of Haslingfield Parish Terms of Reference www.scambs.gov.uk 1. Introduction 1.1 South Cambridgeshire District Council has resolved to undertake a Community Governance Review of the parish of Haslingfield. 1.2 This review is to address the population growth in respect of the new housing development at Trumpington Meadows: to consider whether the creation or alteration (and thus naming) of existing parish boundaries and any consequent changes to the electoral arrangements for the parish(es) should be recommended. 1.3 In undertaking this review the Council has considered the Guidance on Community Governance Reviews issued by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, published in April 2008, which reflects Part 4 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in HealthAct 2007 and the relevant parts of the Local Government Act 1972, Guidance on Community Governance Reviews issued in accordance with section 100(4) of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 by the Department of Communities and Local Government and the Local Government Boundary Commission for England in March 2010, and the following regulations which guide, in particular, consequential matters arising from the Review: Local Government (Parishes and Parish Councils) (England) Regulations 2008 (SI2008/626). (The 2007 Act transferred powers to the principal councils which previously, under the Local Government Act 1997, had been shared with the Electoral Commission’s Boundary Committee for England.) 1.4 These Terms of Reference will set out clearly the matters on which the Community Governance Review is to focus. We will publish this document on our website and also in hard copy. -
Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent
APPENDIX 2 Energy Company Obligation: Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent On behalf of Action on Energy Cambridgeshire including: Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. Date of publication: **TBC** Version: 1.4 URL: [insert webpage SOI has been published on] 1) Introduction 1.1. Fuel poverty in England is measured using the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) indicator, which considers a household to be fuel poor if: they have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level); and were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.1 1.2. Nationally the 2015 figures for England estimate that 2.5 million households suffer from fuel poverty, 11% the total.2 Living in a cold home doubles the risk of respiratory problems in children; increases the risk of minor illnesses; exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and is associated with 3 times the level of excess winter deaths as the warmest homes.3 1.3. Action on Energy Cambridgeshire is a collective of the city and district councils that work together for mutual benefit in addressing fuel poverty. We welcome the introduction of Flexible Eligibility as part of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) as it will allow us to support additional vulnerable households under broader criteria. 1.4. Fuel Poverty is a serious concern in our county and affects over 19,000 households4 contributing to more than 800 Excess Winter Deaths on average each year.5 Although our collective actions helped reduce fuel poverty across the county by an estimated 1468 households from 2013-2015 however there is still more to be done. -
Feedback Feedback
News & Views around Volume 4 Issue 7 October 2010 Editorial Contact: Janet Erskine 01763 838300 [email protected] MOBILE LIBRARY TIMETABLE FEEDBACK th 8th October, 12 November from our County Councillor The Church 13.25 – 14.05 DISAPPOINTING ENDING The Flint Cross junction BUT HOPE REMEMBER - Melbourn Library – appears to be finished in terms FOR THE Use it or lose it! of safety works and, when FUTURE asked, Highways said that the 50MPH speed limit, which we FEEDBACK understood would be integral to from the Parish Council Great Chishill's cricket season the scheme, will indeed be ended in disappointment as the imposed - that's one of the last Youth Club Funding 1st eleven’s three-year spell in bits of work still to do. Thanks County Councillors voted by a the top flight of village to people who have been in small majority to cut the Youth competition in Cambridgeshire touch with concerns. A budget by a third (£1million). came to an end. With just a few comment about visibility and Consequently our Youth Club is points separating the four the new bollards has also been in need of funding. Our lead teams involved in the battle to taken back to Highways and worker, Dan, is currently avoid the dreaded drop, it came they are coming out to have a funded by the County Council down to the last round of look at the problem. but this funding will most fixtures on the final Saturday probably end at the end of of the season. A poor Thriplow Recycling March 2011. -
24 Haslingfield Road, Harlton, CB23 1ER Prices From
Plot 1 & 2, 22 - 24 Haslingfield Road, Harlton, CB23 1ER Prices from £1.35m rah.co.uk 01223 800860 A SUPERIOR INDIVUDAL DETACHED 5-BEDROOM FAMILY HOME SET IN PART WOODED GROUNDS OF AROUND ½ ACRE WITH PICTURESQUE VIEWS OVER OPEN COUNTRYSIDE Reception hall – sitting room – living room – cloakroom and WC – Open-plan kitchen / dining / family room – utility room - garden room – gallery landing - master suite with dressing room and en-suite shower – two en-suite bedrooms – two further double bedrooms - family bathroom – underfloor heating to the ground floor – double garage – large garden – 10 year warranty Location: Harlton is a charming village situated within pretty countryside to the south west of the University City of Cambridge. With a public house, parish church and a range of clubs and societies which operate within the village, Harlton is a cherished village to live. Primary schooling together with a range of shopping facilities are available in the neighbouring villages of Haslingfield and Harston whilst a wider range of amenities are available in Great Shelford. The village lies approximately seven miles away from Cambridge with access for the M11 motorway (junction 12) a few minutes-drive away and a short drive to both Foxton and Shepreth train stations, both operated by Great Northern line to Cambridge and London Kings Cross. The Property: Set aside in this beautiful village, the property is one of a pair of exceptional detached 5-bedroom homes offering well designed bright and spacious accommodation set across two floors and set in around 1/2 an acre, with views over open countryside. The property is built to an outstanding design with modern day family living in mind. -
Final Recommendations - Eastern Region
Final recommendations - Eastern region Contents 1. Initial proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Bedfordshire p10, recommendations p11 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Norfolk Cambridgeshire p12, recommendations p13 Hertfordshire p14, recommendations p15 Norfolk p15, recommendations p16 3. Campaigns p4 8. Sub-region 3: Essex p17, recommendations p18 4. Major issues p5 9. Sub-region 4: Suffolk p19, recommendations p20 5. Final proposals recommendations p7 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The Eastern region was allocated 57 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of one from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bedfordshire 6 6 6 Cambridgeshire, 27 27 27 Hertfordshire and Norfolk Essex 18 17 17 Suffolk 7 7 7 2. Under the initial proposals six of the existing 58 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals continued to retain six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies that crossed county boundaries - one between Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, and one between Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire. In Suffolk, Bedfordshire and Essex it was possible to allocate a whole number of constituencies to each county. 1 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,000 representations regarding the Eastern region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed constituency of North East Hertfordshire. -
Baseline Report Contents
Whittlesey DRAFT Neighbourhood Plan Baseline Report Contents Introduction...............................................................1 Relevant Planning Policy.........................................4 Basic Conditions......................................................5 People and Place......................................................6 Flooding...................................................................11 Greenspace.............................................................16 Heritage...................................................................20 Land Use.................................................................24 Roads....................................................................... 28 Walking, Cycling and Public Transport..................32 Introduction This baseline report accompanies the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan and provides some context for the policies set out within it. It aims to give a high-level impression of the Neighbourhood Plan Area; it is not intended to be a detailed technical report but rather an introduction to the Parish, signposting to more detailed information and supplementary documents where necessary. Whittlesey Buttercross 1 Whittlesey Location The map opposite shows the Neighbourhood Plan Boundary. Whittlesey Edinburgh Town Council applied to Fenland District Council to designate the whole of the Peterborough Newcastle Parish of Whittlesey as a ‘Neighbourhood Wisbech Area’. Planning Committee on 29 April 2015 determined the application: The Leeds March entire Parish -
Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Fenland District Council
Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council Electoral review March 2013 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2013 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 General analysis 7 Electoral arrangements 8 Whittlesey 8 Chatteris 10 March, Elm and Christchurch 10 Doddington and Wimblington 11 Wisbech 12 Roman Bank, Wisbech St Mary and Parson Drove 12 Conclusions 13 Parish electoral arrangements 13 3 What happens next? 17 4 Mapping 19 Appendices A Table A1: Final recommendations for Fenland District 20 Council B Glossary and abbreviations 22 Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We conducted an electoral review of Fenland District Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority. -
1 | Page Statement from Hinxton and Other South Cambridgeshire Parish Councils to the Uttlesford District Council Planning Polic
Statement from Hinxton and other South Cambridgeshire Parish Councils to the Uttlesford District Council Planning Policy Working Group meeting, Thursday 31 May 2018 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed North Uttlesford Garden Community. Although I speak for Hinxton, my comments are fully supported by the chairs of the parish councils of Ickleton, Duxford, Pampisford, Whittlesford, Little Abington, and Great Abington - that is, by all those parishes in South Cambridgeshire that are directly affected. It is clear that Uttlesford is not proud of this proposed new town. You could not have pushed it further away. More than half of its edge is actually defined by the Essex-Cambridge county boundary. What a bizarre site for a town purporting to provide homes for people working in Uttlesford! Whatever the short-term political convenience of this choice, it has profound long-term implications for our parishes. We abut on half the proposed new town boundary, but we shall have to bear far, far more than half of the infrastructural and amenity costs. This is because the town would be high in our River Cam watershed, with all the flooding and pollution management implications bearing on our down-stream villages. It is because the town would be on top of the main aquifers of our water supplier, Cambridge Water, but not of yours, Affinity Water. It is because the traffic for the new town cannot possibly rely on the winding road to Saffron Walden. It will overwhelmingly be forced onto the already congested roads of South Cambridgeshire. It is because, over the years while the new town grows, the costs of its health, education and other needs will unavoidably be borne by our nearby communities in South Cambridgeshire. -
Paper on the Origins of the MONKS Surname
monksname.doc The Derivation in England of the Family Names of MONK and MONKS, (and their phonetic variations). Based on research by Peter MONCK.1 Overview The names evolved from William LE MOIGNE, from St Lo in Normandy who came to England with William the Conquerer. In French the name means “the Monk”. King William gave Le Moigne the manor of Owers in Devon, where he settled. In England the name evolved to MOIGNE, MOINE, MOYNE and MOYGNE (with and without the prefix ‘le’). The Latin version of the Norman name, as used in medieval times in the church, was MONACHUS, from which DE MONACHO, MONIAC, MONKYS and the many phonetic variations of MONK and MONKS derived (for example: MONKE(S); MONCK(S); MUNKE(S); MUNCKE (S); MOUNK(S); MOUNKE(S)). A clear evolutionary trail for these early developments of the name is obtained from records associated with property owned by the families over several centuries, as illustrated below. More recently, from the late 18th century, parish records show variations within the one family group (for example children and grandchildren of William MONKS and Ann née FLOOK, who married at Holy Trinity, Stapleton, Gloucestershire, in 1765, were christened variously as MONKS, MONK, and MOUNKS.) Ralph, a son or grandson of William Le Moigne, was held in sufficient esteem by Henry 1st to be created a Grand Sergeant (a member of the inner court) and Larderer- in-Chief to the Kings of England. For this service he was granted 50 hides of land in five manors: Shipton Moigne in Gloucestershire (21 hides); Maddington in Wiltshire (4 hides); Great Easton in Essex (10 hides); Owermoigne in Dorset (10 hides); and Lambourne in Berkshire (5 hides).