DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Fenland District Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Fenland District Council Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council Electoral review March 2013 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2013 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 General analysis 7 Electoral arrangements 8 Whittlesey 8 Chatteris 10 March, Elm and Christchurch 10 Doddington and Wimblington 11 Wisbech 12 Roman Bank, Wisbech St Mary and Parson Drove 12 Conclusions 13 Parish electoral arrangements 13 3 What happens next? 17 4 Mapping 19 Appendices A Table A1: Final recommendations for Fenland District 20 Council B Glossary and abbreviations 22 Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We conducted an electoral review of Fenland District Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority. The review aimed to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same. The Commission commenced the review in February 2012. This review was conducted as follows: Stage starts Description 13 March 2012 Submission of proposals of ward arrangements to the LGBCE 4 May 2012 LGBCE’s analysis and formulation of draft recommendations 23 October 2012 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them 7 January 2013 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Draft recommendations Our draft recommendations were for a council size of 39 members comprising 15 single-member wards, six two-member wards and four three-member wards, based largely on a submission from the Council. We proposed a number of minor amendments to improve electoral equality and provide stronger boundaries. All submissions can be viewed on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk Submissions received During the consultation on our draft recommendations for Fenland, we received nine submissions. These included a district-wide submission from Fenland District Council. Whilst the Council acknowledged that the draft recommendations were based mainly on its proposals, on further consideration it now felt that the consequential creation of a number of small parish wards was undesirable and, therefore put forward a number of amendments, especially in relation to March. Chatteris, Wisbech and Whittlesey town councils all made representations, broadly reflecting the Council’s concerns. All submissions can be viewed on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk 1 Analysis and draft recommendations Electorate figures Fenland District Council has forecast an increase in electorate of approximately just over 6% across the district by 2018. While this is a relatively large increase in the electorate, on balance we are persuaded that several large developments – in March, Chatteris and Whittlesey – are likely to go ahead and therefore that the electoral projection is reasonable. Following publication of our draft recommendations, we did not receive any comments on the electorate figures. Having considered the information provided by the Council, we are content that the Council’s projected figures are the best available at the present time. These figures form the basis of the final recommendations. General analysis We have considered all submissions received during the consultation on our draft recommendations. After careful consideration, and despite the level of change from the draft recommendations, we have been persuaded to accept amendments for the March area. Accordingly, we are adopting the Council and March Town Council’s proposal to revert to the existing wards. These wards secure good electoral equality and have recognisable boundaries. The Council did not put forward full proposals for Whittlesey but objected to the Drybread Road area being in a large rural ward, concerns also reflected by Whittlesey Town Council. As a result of the evidence received, we propose modifications to the Benwick, Coates & Eastrea ward to transfer the Drybread Road area into the town. We also propose a number of further amendments to accommodate this transfer and to secure good electoral equality and strong boundaries. In Wisbech the Council and Wisbech Town Council proposed a number of minor amendments to strengthen boundaries. We are adopting these proposals without amendment. In the remainder of the district we are confirming our draft recommendations as final. What happens next? We have now completed our review of electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council. An Order – the legal document which brings into force our recommendations – will be laid in Parliament and will be implemented subject to Parliamentary scrutiny. The draft Order will provide for new electoral arrangements which will come into force at the next elections for Fenland District Council, in 2015. We are grateful to all those organisations and individuals who have contributed to the review through expressing their views and advice. The full report is available to download at www.lgbce.org.uk You can also view our final recommendations for Fenland on our interactive maps at consultation.lgbce.org.uk 2 1 Introduction 1 The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body which conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. This electoral review is being conducted following our decision to review Fenland District Council’s electoral arrangements to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same across the authority. 2 We wrote to Fenland District Council as well as other interested parties inviting the submission of proposals on warding arrangements for the Council. A submission received from the Council during the preliminary period of the review informed our Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council, which were published on 23 October 2012. Consultation on our draft recommendations took place until 7 January 2013. What is an electoral review? 3 The main aim of an electoral review is to try to ensure ‘electoral equality’, which means that all councillors in a single authority represent approximately the same number of electors. Our objective is to make recommendations that will improve electoral equality, while also trying to reflect communities in the area and provide for effective and convenient local government. 4 Our three main considerations – equalising the number of electors each councillor represents; reflecting community identity; and providing for effective and 1 convenient local government – are set out in legislation and our task is to strike the best balance between them when making our recommendations. Our powers, as well as the guidance we have provided for electoral reviews and further information on the review process, can be found on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk Why are we conducting a review in Fenland? 5 We decided to conduct this review because, based on the December 2010 electorate figures, more than 30% of the existing wards have 10% more or fewer electors per councillor than the district average. In addition, Bassenhally has 36% fewer electors than the district average. How will the recommendations affect you? 6 The recommendations will determine how many councillors will serve on the Council. They will also decide which ward you vote in, which other communities are in that ward and, in some instances, which parish or town council wards you vote in. Your ward name may change, as may the names of parish or town council wards in the area. If you live in a parish, the name or boundaries of that parish will not change as a result of our recommendations. 1 Schedule 2 to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 3 What is the Local Government Boundary Commission for England? 7 The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament under the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. Members of the Commission are: Max Caller CBE (Chair) Professor Colin Mellors (Deputy Chair) Dr Peter Knight CBE DL Sir Tony Redmond Dr Colin Sinclair CBE Professor Paul Wiles CB Chief Executive: Alan Cogbill Director of Reviews: Archie Gall 4 2 Analysis and final recommendations 8 We have now finalised our recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council. 9 As described earlier, our prime aim when recommending new electoral arrangements for Fenland is to achieve a level of electoral fairness – that is, each elector’s vote being worth the same as another’s. In doing so we must have regard to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009,2 with the need to: secure effective and convenient local government provide for equality of representation reflect the identities and interests of local communities, in particular o the desirability of arriving at boundaries that are easily identifiable o the desirability of fixing boundaries so as not to break any local ties 10 Legislation also states that our recommendations are not intended to be based solely on the existing number of electors in an area, but also on estimated changes in the number and distribution of electors likely to take place over a five-year period from the date of our final recommendations. We must also try to recommend strong, clearly identifiable boundaries for the wards we put forward at the end of the review.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baseline Report Contents
    Whittlesey DRAFT Neighbourhood Plan Baseline Report Contents Introduction...............................................................1 Relevant Planning Policy.........................................4 Basic Conditions......................................................5 People and Place......................................................6 Flooding...................................................................11 Greenspace.............................................................16 Heritage...................................................................20 Land Use.................................................................24 Roads....................................................................... 28 Walking, Cycling and Public Transport..................32 Introduction This baseline report accompanies the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan and provides some context for the policies set out within it. It aims to give a high-level impression of the Neighbourhood Plan Area; it is not intended to be a detailed technical report but rather an introduction to the Parish, signposting to more detailed information and supplementary documents where necessary. Whittlesey Buttercross 1 Whittlesey Location The map opposite shows the Neighbourhood Plan Boundary. Whittlesey Edinburgh Town Council applied to Fenland District Council to designate the whole of the Peterborough Newcastle Parish of Whittlesey as a ‘Neighbourhood Wisbech Area’. Planning Committee on 29 April 2015 determined the application: The Leeds March entire Parish
    [Show full text]
  • 13 DECEMBER 2018 Report Title: POLLING DISTRICTS and POLLING PLACES REVIEW 1 Purpose
    Agenda Item No: 9 Committee: COUNCIL Date: 13 DECEMBER 2018 Report Title: POLLING DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES REVIEW 1 Purpose / Summary To consider the outcome of the recent review of polling districts and places, as required by the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013. 2 Key issues • The Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 introduced a change to the timing of compulsory reviews of UK Parliamentary polling districts and polling places; • The last compulsory review was agreed by Full Council on 18 December 2014; • Subsequent compulsory reviews must be started and completed within the period of 16 months that starts on 1 October of every fifth year after 1 October 2013, which means the next review should be started and completed between 1 October 2018 and 31 January 2020; • This review is being carried out at this time due to the District and Town and Parish Council elections due to take place on 2 May 2019 and the need to implement changes as a result of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England Review of Cambridgeshire County Council to some parish wards and the Community Governance Review in Whittlesey; • The Council has undertaken a consultation exercise on the proposals within the report and received a number of comments which have been taken into account in the final recommendations. All comments and responses are detailed in Appendix B; • This review has no effect upon the number of electoral wards or councillors. 3 Recommendations That the Council • notes the outcome of the review and the consultation undertaken; • agrees the changes recommended to polling districts and polling places, as detailed in the report at Appendix C; • notes that a review of all polling districts will be undertaken at least every five years and delegates authority to the Returning Officer/Electoral Registration Officer to keep polling districts under review, in the intervening period between compulsory reviews, and propose any changes which appear necessary to Full Council for its consideration and determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Whittlesey Community Groups Public
    WHITTLESEY COMMUNITY GROUPS Due to Coronavirus Meetings may be suspended 1st Coates Brownies Miss Molly Thorner Head Leader www.girlguiding.org.uk Coates Primary School Thursday The Fold, Coates 6pm-7.30pm PE7 2PB Through fun, friendship, challenge and adventure they empower girls to find their voice, inspiring them to discover the best in themselves and to make a positive difference in their community. Whittlesey (Gren Gds) Detachment Army Cadet Detachment Cammander Force 2nd Lt Richard Nicholson www.armycadets.com Ms Elizabeth Hyslop [email protected] 01223 442830 Cadet Administrator General Recruitment inquiries Army Cadet Force Centre Station Road Tuesdays 7pm-9pm Whittlesey PE7 1UF The Army Cadet Force (ACF) is one of the UK's biggest youth organisations. It enables children aged between 12 and 18 to engage in numerous activities, both military and non-military related, to develop the life skills and confidence to succeed in life all whilst having fun and making new friends. We are also looking for enthusiastic adults to join as uniformed volunteers to support and develop our cadets. You do not need any previous cadet or military experience as full training is provided. Please visit the Army Cadets website for more information. Coates Womens Institute Mrs Patricia Brookes 01733 840145 President [email protected] Secretary 01733 208516 Miss Fiona Heaysman Meets Coates Public Hall Meets 1st Wednesday of the month PE7 2BP 7.30pm For ladies of all ages AGM Nov Meetings with guest speakers and activities and visits Defibrillators
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMY and ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 14
    ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 14 March 2019 Democratic and Members' Services Fiona McMillan Monitoring Officer 10:00hr Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP Kreis Viersen Room Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP AGENDA Open to Public and Press 1. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest Guidance on declaring interests is available at http://tinyurl.com/ccc-conduct-code 2. Minutes 7th February 2019 Economy and Environment Committee 5 - 18 3. Minute Action Log update 19 - 24 4. Petitions and Public Questions DECISIONS 5. East West Rail Company Consultation on Route Options between 25 - 54 Bedford and Cambridge 6. North East Cambridge Area Action Plan - Issues and Options 55 - 62 Consultation 2 Page 1 of 260 7. Land North West of Spittals Way and Ermine Street Great Stukeley 63 - 94 Outline Planning Application - Consultation Response 8. Kennett Garden Village Outline Planning Application - 95 - 110 Consultation response 9. Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Outline Planning Application 111 - 174 10. Connecting Cambridgeshire Programme Full Fibre Target 175 - 196 INFORMATION AND MONITORING 11. Finance and Performance Report to end of January 2019 197 - 240 12. Agenda Plan, Training Plan and Appointments to Outside Bodies, 241 - 260 Partnershp, Liaison, Advisory Groups and Council Champions 13. Date of Next Meeting 23rd May 2019 Subject to the April meeting being cancelled. The Economy and Environment Committee comprises the following members: Councillor Ian Bates (Chairman) Councillor Tim Wotherspoon (Vice-Chairman)
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST of ENGLAND Contents
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE EAST OF ENGLAND Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / East of England
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 Bedford (UA) 16 Cambridgeshire 18 Central Bedfordshire (UA) 28 Essex 30 Hertfordshire 37 Luton (UA) 42 Norfolk 42 Peterborough, City of (UA) 53 Southend-on-Sea (UA) 55 Suffolk 55 Thurrock (UA) 64 The English Heritage scheme for identifying and reducing our Heritage at Risk has been running for more than a decade. Over that time, we have reduced the number of historic sites which have been at risk from destruction or demolition in many parts of the East of England region.The first category of assets which we focused on were Buildings at Risk. In our region, which has suffered the vicissitudes of industrial slumps and changing demographics alongside periods of rapid economic growth, this has led to a number of important buildings facing serious threats. Some of these are redundant farm buildings, mills and industrial structures, others are anything from private houses to ornamental follies. With the expansion of the Buildings at Risk Register and developers to proceed with some building projects, to a Heritage at Risk Register we have undertaken an with the reduced availability of funding. We understand, assessment of registered battlefields, registered parks and too, why it may sometimes be necessary to delay a gardens, scheduled monuments, conservation areas and project, although we also know that to put off routine protected wreck sites. These additional categories have repairs can in the long term be a false economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-01-11 AMR 2008-09 Fenland DC Revised FINAL Version
    Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 - 2009 Further copies of this document can be obtained from: Planning Policy Team Fenland District Council Fenland Hall County Road March PE15 8NQ Telephone: 01354 654321 Email: [email protected] It can also be viewed on our website at: www.fenland.gov.uk Documents prepared by Fenland District Council are available in: Community languages, large print, Moon, Braille, and audio cassette. December 2009 Fenland District Council December 2009 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................4 Period Covered................................................................................................4 Spatial Portrait of Fenland ...............................................................................5 Location........................................................................................................5 Population ....................................................................................................6 Migration...................................................................................................7 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................8 Housing ........................................................................................................8 Economy ....................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Fenland Local Plan
    Fenland Local Plan Core Strategy Proposed Submission February 2013 Foreword A Fantastic Future for Fenland Our local communities care passionately about Fenland - and who can blame them? The fantastic scenery, friendly atmosphere and picturesque towns and villages help to make Fenland a great place to live, work and visit. As the district continues to grow and prosper, Fenland District Council wants to work with partners and local communities to help further improve the quality of life for all Fenland residents. We also feel it is important to retain the special qualities that make our district unique. Growth will not only be in housing and population but also in economic activity, jobs and infrastructure. There are also important social and environmental aspects which need tackling, health inequalities to address, and education and skills to be improved. We need to provide services for an ageing population and also deal with migration issues. Fenland District Council has produced this Core Strategy document to explain how the district is expected to grow, in a sustainable way, over the next 20 years and beyond. We believe this document will deliver a bright and prosperous future for Fenland. However, if you think we have not got it quite right, you do have an opportunity to let an independent inspector know, and that inspector will carefully consider your views before the final plan can be adopted. Details of how you can submit your comments to the inspector are shown over the page. We really have valued your input on draft versions of this important document, which will help to shape the next 20 years of key investments by public and private sector businesses and help build a fantastic future for Fenland.
    [Show full text]
  • D|S|Pdevelopment & Viability Consultants
    Fenland District Council D|S|P Development & Viability Consultants D|S|P Development & Viability Consultants Appendix III Market and Values Research For: Fenland District Council Community Infrastructure Levy Viability Scoping & Assessment Final (DSP v7) Dixon Searle LLP The Old Hayloft 28C Headley Road Grayshott Hindhead GU26 6LD www.dixonsearle.co.uk 1 Fenland District Council D|S|P Development & Viability Consultants Appendix III – Contents outline Page Introduction 1 Overall residential market review – re-sales based (by settlement) 3 Fenland context map extract (Local Plan Key Diagram) 4 Re-sale market overview research – values patterns – rightmove 5 Zoopla sourced information and indicative ‘heat maps’ – overall local market 21 DSP New-build housing research 39 Sheltered (Retirement) Housing 44 Economic and housing market context 45 Residential values summary (range of value levels) 55 Commercial market, values & context 56 Stakeholder Consultation and local soundings 117 Land values context and indications 119 EGi property resource extracts for research base follow the above. 2 Fenland District Council D|S|P Development & Viability Consultants Introduction As noted within the main report, this Appendix III document acts as a market report and provides a summary of the comprehensive information review of property values (commercial and residential), land values, general market commentary and wider economic conditions. Collectively, this research helps inform the assumption setting process for the residential and commercial appraisals stage and underpins the assessment by building a picture of values patterns and levels in Fenland District. This also provides the Council with a guide as to the type of information that may be monitored and reviewed in order to inform future updated views where appropriate for keeping an eye on market trends – including for future CIL or related viability considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing an Early Modern Fenland Population: Whittlesey (Cambridgeshire)
    Assessing an Early Modern Fenland Population: Whittlesey (Cambridgeshire) Heather Falvey Abstract Improvement writers argued that drainage would bring prosperity and population growth to fenland communities; locals counter-argued that their communities were already thriving. The detailed surviving records from early modern Whittlesey, in the Isle of Ely, are analysed here to test the accuracy of these opposing claims. Using the returns of the 1523 Lay Subsidy, the 1563 ecclesiastical census, the Lady Day 1674 Hearth Tax records and the 1676 Compton Census, together with bishops’ transcripts and probate inventories, this article finds that although the population did indeed increase after drainage, the pre-drainage population was also increasing. The Michaelmas 1664 Hearth Tax records are analysed to uncover something of the character of the inhabitants and the 1674 Lady Day returns are then used to test the relative wealth of the community compared with that of sub-regions throughout England identified by Tom Arkell. Finally, there is a discussion of Whittlesey’s housing stock. In 1589 Humphrey Bradley, a surveyor from Brabant, observing the condition of the undrained fens, asserted that, as a result of drainage, ‘a vague, deserted Empire without population [would be] turned into a fertile region; and wild and useless products therefrom into an abundance of grain and pasturage; humble huts into a beautiful and opulent city’.1 Fenmen, however, did not share his negative view of their region. In 1604, commoners within the Isle of Ely, opposing
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Fenland District Council Annual Report 2020/21 ® Introduction by the Leader of the Council and Chief Executive “Together we will overcome the impacts of Covid-19 and together we will prosper” When the financial year 2020/21 began in April last year life as we knew it had changed in a way none of us could have predicted. The coronavirus pandemic had shocked the world, unleashing a global health and economic crisis which has impacted us all. Chris Boden Paul Medd Our priorities, as a Council, have been to keep our residents safe and to support them through one of the most Leader of the Chief Executive difficult years in recent history. We’ve been recognised as going “over and above” in our efforts to keep our core Council services running throughout, and we’ve created new services and solutions to meet residents’ needs. We’ve responded to and delivered changes in legislation within days and adapted our working practices at a scale and pace unimaginable in a pre-pandemic era. We have also worked closely with our partners, volunteers and communities to proactively signpost residents to a district-wide network of support services, and worked hard to support our vital local businesses, implementing OUR business rates relief measures, offering advice and guidance on Covid secure measures and support available, Communities and distributing almost £30million in Government coronavirus business grants. And while there have undoubtedly been challenges and setbacks to overcome, the past year has also brought opportunities for transformation, regeneration, and future progress. We embarked on our My Fenland project to transform and significantly improve the services available to residents at the start of the pandemic, implementing new technologies, new ways of working and improved digital channels at speed to meet ever-evolving demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenland Community Safety Strategic Assessment
    FENLAND COMMUNITY SAFETY STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT: ADULT EXPLOITATION VERSION 2.0 DECEMBER 2015 1 ‘Cambridgeshire Research Group’ (CRG) is the brand name for Cambridgeshire County Council’s Research & Performance Function. As well as supporting the County Council we take on a range of work commissioned by other public sector bodies both within Cambridgeshire and beyond. All the output of the team and that of our partners is published on our dedicated website www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk For more information about the team phone 01223 715300 Document Details Title: Fenland Community Safety Strategic Assessment: Adult Exploitation Date Created: December 2015 Description: The purpose of this document is to provide the Fenland Community Safety Partnership with an understanding of key community safety issues affecting the district. This is the third document that will be produced for 2015/16. The focus of this document will be exploitation of adults living or working in Fenland. Produced by: Leigh Roberts Cambridgeshire Research Group Cambridgeshire County Council Additional Contributions: Rob Mitchell Sarah Gove Fenland District Council Mike Hills Cambridgeshire Constabulary On behalf of: The document has been produced by the CRG, on behalf of Fenland Community Safety Partnership and is available to download from http://www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/community- safety/CSP/fenland Geographic Coverage: Fenland district Time Period: Up to December 2015, with historic data where appropriate Format: pdf Status: final Usage Statement: This product is the property of the Research Group, Cambridgeshire County Council. If you wish to reproduce this document either in whole, or in part, please acknowledge the source and the author(s).
    [Show full text]