DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Statutory Stage 1 Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Medworth Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility Non-Statutory Stage 1 Consultation Consultation Feedback Report September 2020 2 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Report for MVV Environment Limited 1 Wood Street Copyright and non-disclosure notice London The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright EC2V 7WS owned by Wood (© Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited 2020) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Wood under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in Main contributors this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose Hannah Nelson indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in Simon Ford this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be Chris Chadwick disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Wood. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party Issued by who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Chris Chadwick ................................................................................. Third party disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this Approved by disclaimer. The report was prepared by Wood at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It David Kenyon does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is ................................................................................. able to access it by any means. Wood excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud Wood or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited exclude liability. Booths Park Chelford Road Knutsford WA16 8QZ Management systems 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 This document has been produced by Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited in full compliance with our management systems, which have been certified to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 by LRQA. Document revisions No. Details Date For publication 11/09/20 September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 3 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Contents 1. Introduction 6 1.2 Background to the Project 6 1.3 Structure of the report 6 2. Methods of Consultation 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Consultation strategy 8 2.3 Purpose of the consultation 8 2.4 When did the consultation take place? 9 2.5 Consultation zone 9 2.6 Who was consulted 9 Prescribed consultees 9 Local authorities 9 Local communities 10 Wider consultees 11 2.7 Consultation method 11 Channels of communication 11 Consultation materials 13 Advertising and publicity 15 Hard to reach groups 15 3. Feedback 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 How consultees could respond 16 3.3 Feedback received 16 3.4 Data processing and analysis 16 3.5 Quality Assurance 17 3.6 The Developer’s responses 17 4. Design 18 4.1 Introduction 18 4.2 Prescribed Consultees 18 General Design 18 4.3 Members of the Public 18 General Design 18 Visual Impact 19 4.4 Wider consultees 19 4.5 The Developer’s response to issues raised regarding design 19 September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 4 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited 5. Environment 22 5.1 Introduction 22 5.2 Prescribed Consultees 22 Assessment methodology 22 Flood risk 22 Traffic impacts 22 5.3 Members of the Public 23 Policy considerations 23 Assessment methodology 23 Air quality and human health 23 Climate change 23 Construction impacts 24 Historic environment 24 Flood risk 24 General environment 24 Noise 24 Safety 24 Traffic impacts 25 Waste storage and disposal 25 5.4 Wider consultees 25 5.5 The Developer’s response to issues raised regarding environment 25 6. Community 31 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Prescribed Consultees 31 6.3 Members of the Public 31 Local economy and jobs 31 Local projects and social value 31 6.4 Wider consultees 32 Local projects and social value 32 6.5 The Developer’s response to issues raised regarding community 32 7. Other Comments 35 7.1 Introduction 35 7.2 Prescribed Consultees 35 Consultation 35 7.3 Members of the Public 35 Consultation 35 Cost 36 Electricity and heat connections 36 Location 36 Waste transportation 36 7.4 Wider consultees 36 7.5 The Developer’s response to issues raised regarding other comments 37 8. Next steps 42 Table 2.1 Exhibition venues 12 Table 2.2 Document inspection locations 13 Table 4.1 Issues raised regarding design 19 Table 5.1 Issues raised regarding environment 25 September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 5 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Table 6.1 Issues raised regarding community 32 Table 7.1 Issues raised regarding other comments 37 Appendix A Local Authority Comments on Consultation Strategy Appendix B Consultation Zone Appendix C List of stakeholders consulted Appendix D Press Releases Appendix E Consultation Invitation Flyer Appendix F Feedback Form Appendix G Newspaper Advertisements September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 6 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited 1. Introduction 1.1.1 This Consultation Feedback Report (CFR) has been prepared by Wood on behalf of MVV Environment Ltd (the Developer). It presents the results of the non- statutory Stage 1 consultation1 (the Stage 1 consultation) that took place on proposals for the Medworth Energy from Waste (EfW) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Facility (hereafter referred to as the ‘Project’) on land at Algores Way, Wisbech, between 16th March and 4th May 2020. 1.1.2 This CFR sets out details of the consultation undertaken, and a summary of the feedback received in relation to the Project. It also sets out the Developer’s response to the representations made during the consultation and explains where and how they have influenced the Project proposals. 1.1.3 This CFR will inform the Consultation Report that is required to accompany the Development Consent Order (DCO) application. 1.1.4 As noted in sections 2.4 and 2.7, the approach to Stage 1 consultation was revised due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the related lockdown. As a result, the Developer has arranged a second round of non-statutory consultation which is programmed to take place in Autumn 2020, subject to the prevailing government guidelines. 1.2 Background to the Project 1.2.1 The Developer intends to make an application to the Secretary of State for a DCO for the Project. It is a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) under Part 3 Section 15 of the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008) due to the fact that it will be a generating station located in England and will have a generating capacity of over 50 megawatts (MW). The DCO application will be submitted to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 1.2.2 The proposed development will recover useful energy in the form of electricity and steam from over half a million tonnes of non-recyclable (residual) municipal and commercial and industrial waste each year. Generating over 50 MW, the electricity will be exported to the grid. It will also have the capability to export steam and electricity to users on the surrounding industrial estate. 1.2.3 The proposals include connections to supply the steam and electricity on a private wire basis, following the former railway line adjacent to the western boundary of the EfW CHP Facility site. The proposals will also include a grid connection, access improvements, a temporary construction compound and a substation. 1.3 Structure of the report 1.3.1 The remainder of this CFR is structured as follows: 1 An early stage of pre-application consultation not undertaken pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act 2008. September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 7 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited ⚫ Section 2 - presents a summary of what was consulted on. The section also explains who was consulted and the methods used during the consultation; ⚫ Section 3 - presents details of the feedback mechanisms used, the number of representations received and describes how the analysis of feedback was managed; ⚫ Section 4 - sets out a summary of the representations received from prescribed consultees, members of the public and wider consultees in relation to the design topic, together with the Developer’s current response; ⚫ Section 5 - sets out a summary of the representations received from prescribed consultees, members of the public and wider consultees in relation to the environment topic, together with the Developer’s current response; ⚫ Section 6 - sets out a summary of the representations received from prescribed consultees, members of the public and wider consultees in relation to the community topic, together with the Developer’s current response; ⚫ Section 7 - sets out a summary of the representations received from prescribed consultees, members of the public and wider consultees in relation to the other comments topic, together with the Developer’s current response; ⚫ Section 8 - sets out the next steps in the process. September 2020 41310-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-J-0002_S4_3 8 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited 2. Methods of Consultation 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 The Developer sees pre-application consultation as not just a key requirement of the PA 2008 but as a crucial method in raising awareness and understanding about the Project.
Recommended publications
  • Baseline Report Contents

    Baseline Report Contents

    Whittlesey DRAFT Neighbourhood Plan Baseline Report Contents Introduction...............................................................1 Relevant Planning Policy.........................................4 Basic Conditions......................................................5 People and Place......................................................6 Flooding...................................................................11 Greenspace.............................................................16 Heritage...................................................................20 Land Use.................................................................24 Roads....................................................................... 28 Walking, Cycling and Public Transport..................32 Introduction This baseline report accompanies the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan and provides some context for the policies set out within it. It aims to give a high-level impression of the Neighbourhood Plan Area; it is not intended to be a detailed technical report but rather an introduction to the Parish, signposting to more detailed information and supplementary documents where necessary. Whittlesey Buttercross 1 Whittlesey Location The map opposite shows the Neighbourhood Plan Boundary. Whittlesey Edinburgh Town Council applied to Fenland District Council to designate the whole of the Peterborough Newcastle Parish of Whittlesey as a ‘Neighbourhood Wisbech Area’. Planning Committee on 29 April 2015 determined the application: The Leeds March entire Parish
  • Farcet Farms Yaxley Fen, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE7 3HY an Outstanding Farm with Grade 1 Land Capable of Growing Root Crops, Field Vegetables and Cereals

    Farcet Farms Yaxley Fen, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE7 3HY an Outstanding Farm with Grade 1 Land Capable of Growing Root Crops, Field Vegetables and Cereals

    Farcet Farms, Cambridgeshire Farcet Farms Yaxley Fen, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE7 3HY An outstanding farm with grade 1 land capable of growing root crops, field vegetables and cereals Peterborough 4 miles, Huntingdon 21 miles, A1(M) J16 4 miles Mainly grade 1 land over three farms | Irrigation licences for about 224,258m3 of water Refrigerated stores for 1,400t onions | Insulated storage for 500t onions | 1,650t grain storage A two bedroom dwelling and planning consent for a further dwelling | Two solar PV schemes About 1,265.26 acres (512.06 ha) in total For sale as a whole or in up to three lots Lot 1 – Yaxley Fen Farm About 481.88 acres (194.58 ha) Grade 1 land | Four sets of farm buildings 350 Tonne grain store | Two bedroom dwelling and planning application for a further dwelling Summer abstraction licence | Solar PV Lot 2 – Holme Road Farm About 521.45 acres (211.06 ha) Grade 1 and 3 land | 70,000m3 irrigation reservoir with ring main Lot 3 – Black Bush Farm About 262.93 acres (106.42 ha) Grade 1 and 2 land | Refrigerated stores for 1,400 tonnes onions | Further storage for 500 tonnes onions with drying floor | 1,300 tonne grain store | 50,000m3 irrigation reservoir with ring main | Solar PV 500000 600000 East Region 1:250 000 Series Agricultural Land Classification This map represents a generalised pattern of land classification grades and any enlargement of the scale of the map would be misleading. This map does not show subdivisions of Grade 3 which are normally mapped by more detailed survey work.
  • Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Fenland District Council

    Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Fenland District Council

    Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Fenland District Council Electoral review March 2013 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2013 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 General analysis 7 Electoral arrangements 8 Whittlesey 8 Chatteris 10 March, Elm and Christchurch 10 Doddington and Wimblington 11 Wisbech 12 Roman Bank, Wisbech St Mary and Parson Drove 12 Conclusions 13 Parish electoral arrangements 13 3 What happens next? 17 4 Mapping 19 Appendices A Table A1: Final recommendations for Fenland District 20 Council B Glossary and abbreviations 22 Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We conducted an electoral review of Fenland District Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority.
  • Huntingdonshire. [Kelly's

    Huntingdonshire. [Kelly's

    74 STANGROUND. HUNTINGDONSHIRE. [KELLY'S 1538, but is imperfect. The living is a vicarage, net destroyed by fire in 1899· Edward Westwood esq. yearly value £4oo, including 2I4 acres of glebe, with is lord of the manor. The principal landowners are residence, in the gift of the Master and Fellows of Em- Lieut.-Col. Charles I sham Strong J .P. the Corporatirm manuel College, Cambridge, and held since 1905 by the of Peterborough and the vicar. In the vicarage garden Rev. Edmund Gill Swain M.A. and formerly scholar of is an ancient cross, 5ft. 2in. in height, discovered on that college. The chapelry of Farcet was formerly an- the Farcet road, where, till 1865, it formed a bridge nexed to this living, but by Order in Council, 27th over a ditch. The soil is a rich loam; subsoil, clay February, 1885, the parishes are now separated. The and gravel. The chief crops are wheat, barley and Baptists and Primitive Methodists have places of war- beans. The area of South Stanground civil parish is ship here. The Cemetery, opened in IB9o, is under the I,279 acres of land and 8 of water; rateable value, control of a Joint Burial Committee of 6 members. £7,6I3; the population in 191I was 1,3-92. The popu­ Charities :-Edward Bellamy, in r657, left a rent-charge lation of Stanground ecclesiastical parish, which of £3 yearly to apprentice one boy alternately in this extends into the Isle of Ely, is 1,463. parish and Farcet: William Bellamy, in I704, and Robert Sexton, Arthur Seaward.
  • 13 DECEMBER 2018 Report Title: POLLING DISTRICTS and POLLING PLACES REVIEW 1 Purpose

    13 DECEMBER 2018 Report Title: POLLING DISTRICTS and POLLING PLACES REVIEW 1 Purpose

    Agenda Item No: 9 Committee: COUNCIL Date: 13 DECEMBER 2018 Report Title: POLLING DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES REVIEW 1 Purpose / Summary To consider the outcome of the recent review of polling districts and places, as required by the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013. 2 Key issues • The Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 introduced a change to the timing of compulsory reviews of UK Parliamentary polling districts and polling places; • The last compulsory review was agreed by Full Council on 18 December 2014; • Subsequent compulsory reviews must be started and completed within the period of 16 months that starts on 1 October of every fifth year after 1 October 2013, which means the next review should be started and completed between 1 October 2018 and 31 January 2020; • This review is being carried out at this time due to the District and Town and Parish Council elections due to take place on 2 May 2019 and the need to implement changes as a result of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England Review of Cambridgeshire County Council to some parish wards and the Community Governance Review in Whittlesey; • The Council has undertaken a consultation exercise on the proposals within the report and received a number of comments which have been taken into account in the final recommendations. All comments and responses are detailed in Appendix B; • This review has no effect upon the number of electoral wards or councillors. 3 Recommendations That the Council • notes the outcome of the review and the consultation undertaken; • agrees the changes recommended to polling districts and polling places, as detailed in the report at Appendix C; • notes that a review of all polling districts will be undertaken at least every five years and delegates authority to the Returning Officer/Electoral Registration Officer to keep polling districts under review, in the intervening period between compulsory reviews, and propose any changes which appear necessary to Full Council for its consideration and determination.
  • Whittlesey Community Groups Public

    Whittlesey Community Groups Public

    WHITTLESEY COMMUNITY GROUPS Due to Coronavirus Meetings may be suspended 1st Coates Brownies Miss Molly Thorner Head Leader www.girlguiding.org.uk Coates Primary School Thursday The Fold, Coates 6pm-7.30pm PE7 2PB Through fun, friendship, challenge and adventure they empower girls to find their voice, inspiring them to discover the best in themselves and to make a positive difference in their community. Whittlesey (Gren Gds) Detachment Army Cadet Detachment Cammander Force 2nd Lt Richard Nicholson www.armycadets.com Ms Elizabeth Hyslop [email protected] 01223 442830 Cadet Administrator General Recruitment inquiries Army Cadet Force Centre Station Road Tuesdays 7pm-9pm Whittlesey PE7 1UF The Army Cadet Force (ACF) is one of the UK's biggest youth organisations. It enables children aged between 12 and 18 to engage in numerous activities, both military and non-military related, to develop the life skills and confidence to succeed in life all whilst having fun and making new friends. We are also looking for enthusiastic adults to join as uniformed volunteers to support and develop our cadets. You do not need any previous cadet or military experience as full training is provided. Please visit the Army Cadets website for more information. Coates Womens Institute Mrs Patricia Brookes 01733 840145 President [email protected] Secretary 01733 208516 Miss Fiona Heaysman Meets Coates Public Hall Meets 1st Wednesday of the month PE7 2BP 7.30pm For ladies of all ages AGM Nov Meetings with guest speakers and activities and visits Defibrillators
  • ECONOMY and ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 14

    ECONOMY and ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 14

    ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 14 March 2019 Democratic and Members' Services Fiona McMillan Monitoring Officer 10:00hr Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP Kreis Viersen Room Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP AGENDA Open to Public and Press 1. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest Guidance on declaring interests is available at http://tinyurl.com/ccc-conduct-code 2. Minutes 7th February 2019 Economy and Environment Committee 5 - 18 3. Minute Action Log update 19 - 24 4. Petitions and Public Questions DECISIONS 5. East West Rail Company Consultation on Route Options between 25 - 54 Bedford and Cambridge 6. North East Cambridge Area Action Plan - Issues and Options 55 - 62 Consultation 2 Page 1 of 260 7. Land North West of Spittals Way and Ermine Street Great Stukeley 63 - 94 Outline Planning Application - Consultation Response 8. Kennett Garden Village Outline Planning Application - 95 - 110 Consultation response 9. Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Outline Planning Application 111 - 174 10. Connecting Cambridgeshire Programme Full Fibre Target 175 - 196 INFORMATION AND MONITORING 11. Finance and Performance Report to end of January 2019 197 - 240 12. Agenda Plan, Training Plan and Appointments to Outside Bodies, 241 - 260 Partnershp, Liaison, Advisory Groups and Council Champions 13. Date of Next Meeting 23rd May 2019 Subject to the April meeting being cancelled. The Economy and Environment Committee comprises the following members: Councillor Ian Bates (Chairman) Councillor Tim Wotherspoon (Vice-Chairman)
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST of ENGLAND Contents

    HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST of ENGLAND Contents

    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE EAST OF ENGLAND Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
  • Peterborough and District Family History Newsletter May 2020 from the Acting Chairman… We Are Still in Our Lockdown Situation As Our Second Newsletter Is Sent

    Peterborough and District Family History Newsletter May 2020 from the Acting Chairman… We Are Still in Our Lockdown Situation As Our Second Newsletter Is Sent

    Peterborough and District Family History Newsletter May 2020 From the Acting Chairman… We are still in our lockdown situation as our second newsletter is sent. May is the month when we normally hold our AGM, an important milestone when several key actions are taken. As soon as we meet again, we shall hold an AGM to formally approve those actions which your committee are assuming. You already know that Gill Cable resigned from the position of Chair due to pressures of work, and that the committee accepted Vice- President Michael Kennelly’s offer of becoming Acting Chair. Our Secretary, Helen Tovey, told us that she would be retiring at the AGM because of house moving (and job pressures). The committee has accepted the offer of Sadie McMullon, our Journal Editor, to take on the office of Secretary as well. During May Helen and Sadie will complete the hand-over. Michael Kennelly will also take over the Programme Organiser’s functions on a temporary basis. On your behalf I express our gratitude to these people for all that they have done and all that they are about to do – and wish them well. I think that we are unlikely to meet formally until October, but will keep you updated. The committee are planning to hold an ‘on-line’ meeting. Now a warning which has no relation to family history. Recently I have received two official looking emails reminding me that I have not paid my TV licence and suggesting that I set up a new Direct Debit payment to do so.
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / East of England

    Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / East of England

    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 Bedford (UA) 16 Cambridgeshire 18 Central Bedfordshire (UA) 28 Essex 30 Hertfordshire 37 Luton (UA) 42 Norfolk 42 Peterborough, City of (UA) 53 Southend-on-Sea (UA) 55 Suffolk 55 Thurrock (UA) 64 The English Heritage scheme for identifying and reducing our Heritage at Risk has been running for more than a decade. Over that time, we have reduced the number of historic sites which have been at risk from destruction or demolition in many parts of the East of England region.The first category of assets which we focused on were Buildings at Risk. In our region, which has suffered the vicissitudes of industrial slumps and changing demographics alongside periods of rapid economic growth, this has led to a number of important buildings facing serious threats. Some of these are redundant farm buildings, mills and industrial structures, others are anything from private houses to ornamental follies. With the expansion of the Buildings at Risk Register and developers to proceed with some building projects, to a Heritage at Risk Register we have undertaken an with the reduced availability of funding. We understand, assessment of registered battlefields, registered parks and too, why it may sometimes be necessary to delay a gardens, scheduled monuments, conservation areas and project, although we also know that to put off routine protected wreck sites. These additional categories have repairs can in the long term be a false economy.
  • Outline Descendant Report for Robert North

    Outline Descendant Report for Robert North

    Outline Descendant Report for Robert North 1 Robert North (1703 - ) b: 1703 + Elizabeth King (1703 - ) b: 1703, m: 1723 in Widford 2 Mary North (1724 - ) b: 1724 2 John North (about 1727 - 1808) b: Abt. Aug 1727 in Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, England, d: Jul 1808 in Widford, Hertfordshire, England + Mary Hana Watson (about 1723 - 1790) b: Abt. Dec 1723 in Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, England, m: 09 Nov 1753 in Oxfordshire, England, d: 15 Aug 1790 in Syresham, Northamptonshire, England 3 Elizabeth North (about 1754 - ) b: Abt. 1754 in Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, England 3 Joseph North (about 1755 - 1842) b: Abt. Sep 1755 in Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, England, d: 21 Mar 1842 in Grandborough, Buckinghamshire, England + Susan Chapel (1756 - 1833) b: 1756 in Swanbourne, Buckinghamshire, England, m: 17 May 1785 in St Swithun's, Swanbourne, Buckinghamshire, England, d: 16 Aug 1833 in Grandborough, Buckinghamshire, England 4 William North (1785 - ) b: 1785 in Granborough, Buckinghamshire, England 4 Mary North (1785 - ) b: 1785 in Granborough, Buckinghamshire, England 4 Ellizabeeth North (1789 - ) b: 1789 in Granborough, Buckinghamshire, England 4 Ann North (1790 - ) b: 1790 in Granborough, Buckinghamshire, England 4 Joseph North (1794 - 1865) b: 1794 in Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, England, d: 1865 + Elizabeth Allen (1797 - ) b: 1797 in Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, England, m: 14 Oct 1815 in Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, England 5 Joseph North (1816 - ) b: 14 Sep 1816 in Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, England + Maria
  • 2010-01-11 AMR 2008-09 Fenland DC Revised FINAL Version

    2010-01-11 AMR 2008-09 Fenland DC Revised FINAL Version

    Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 - 2009 Further copies of this document can be obtained from: Planning Policy Team Fenland District Council Fenland Hall County Road March PE15 8NQ Telephone: 01354 654321 Email: [email protected] It can also be viewed on our website at: www.fenland.gov.uk Documents prepared by Fenland District Council are available in: Community languages, large print, Moon, Braille, and audio cassette. December 2009 Fenland District Council December 2009 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................4 Period Covered................................................................................................4 Spatial Portrait of Fenland ...............................................................................5 Location........................................................................................................5 Population ....................................................................................................6 Migration...................................................................................................7 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................8 Housing ........................................................................................................8 Economy ....................................................................................................10