DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi State Management Plan for Aquatic Invasive Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi State Management Plan for Aquatic Invasive Species Mississippi State Management Plan for Aquatic Invasive Species Final Draft Management Plan Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality—Henry Folmar and Mike Beiser EPA Gulf of Mexico Program—Phil Bass Mississippi Aquatic Invasive Species Task Force Made possible by a grant from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality’s Coastal Impact Assistance Program to the University of Southern Mississippi, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, and the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Compiled and written by the Tulane / Xavier Center for Bioenvironmental Research—Alysia Kravitz Loshbaugh, Richard Campanella, Shelley Meaux, and members of the Mississippi Aquatic Invasive Species Task Force. March 20, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 11 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 14 3 Geographic Scope of Plan ................................................................................................................. 16 3.A Physiography and Soils ........................................................................................................... 16 3.B Drainage Basins of Mississippi ................................................................................................ 16 3.B.1 North Independent Streams Basin ............................................................................. 16 3.B.2 Tennessee River Drainage Basin ............................................................................... 18 3.B.3 Yazoo River Drainage Basin ...................................................................................... 18 3.B.4 Tombigbee River Drainage Basin .............................................................................. 18 3.B.5 Big Black River Drainage Basin ................................................................................. 18 3.B.6 Pearl River Drainage Basin ........................................................................................ 18 3.B.7 South Independent Streams Basin ............................................................................. 18 3.B.8 Pascagoula River Drainage Basin .............................................................................. 18 3.B.9 Coastal Streams Drainage Basin ............................................................................... 19 3.B.10 Mississippi River Drainage Basin ............................................................................... 19 3.C Land Cover .............................................................................................................................. 19 4 Problem Definitions ............................................................................................................................ 21 4.A Important Definitions Related to Invasive Species .................................................................. 21 4.B Mechanisms of Introduction ..................................................................................................... 21 4.B.1 Shipping ...................................................................................................................... 21 4.B.2 Boating........................................................................................................................ 25 4.B.3 Natural Disasters ........................................................................................................ 28 4.B.4 Transportation Corridors ............................................................................................. 29 4.B.5 Media: Ballast Water .................................................................................................. 29 4.B.6 Media: Other ............................................................................................................... 31 4.B.7 Introductions: Aquaculture .......................................................................................... 32 4.B.8 Introductions: Fishing ................................................................................................. 33 4.B.9 Introductions: Horticulture........................................................................................... 35 4.B.10 Introductions: Agriculture ............................................................................................ 36 4.B.11 Introductions: Aquarium and Pet Industry .................................................................. 36 4.B.12 Introductions: Other .................................................................................................... 37 4.B.13 Summary of Species Introduction Pathways for Mississippi ...................................... 38 4.C Species of Concern ................................................................................................................. 40 4.C.1 Plants .......................................................................................................................... 40 Mississippi State Management Plan for Aquatic Invasive Species 1 4.C.1.a Extensively Established Species ................................................................... 40 4.C.1.b Locally Established Species or Species of Potential Concern ...................... 42 4.C.2 Finfish ......................................................................................................................... 54 4.C.2.a Extensively Established Species ................................................................... 54 4.C.2.b Locally Established Species or Species of Potential Concern ...................... 61 4.C.3 Mollusks ...................................................................................................................... 63 4.C.3.a Extensively Established Species ................................................................... 63 4.C.3.b Locally Established Species or Species of Potential Concern ...................... 66 4.C.4 Mammals .................................................................................................................... 67 4.C.4.a Extensively Established Species ................................................................... 67 4.C.4.b Locally Established Species or Species of Potential Concern ...................... 68 4.C.5 Other ........................................................................................................................... 68 4.C.5.a Extensively Established Species ................................................................... 68 4.C.5.b Locally Established Species or Species of Potential Concern ...................... 68 4.C.6 Microorganisms .......................................................................................................... 71 4.C.6.a Human Pathogens ......................................................................................... 71 4.C.6.b Fish Pathogens .............................................................................................. 71 4.D Exacerbating Circumstances ................................................................................................... 74 5 State Jurisdictions ............................................................................................................................. 76 5.A Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks ........................................................ 76 5.A.1 General Authority ........................................................................................................ 76 5.A.2 Aquaculture ................................................................................................................ 76 5.A.3 Private Shooting Preserves ........................................................................................ 76 5.A.4 Nutria Control ............................................................................................................. 77 5.A.5 Boating........................................................................................................................ 77 5.B Mississippi Department of Marine Resources ......................................................................... 77 5.B.1 General Authority ........................................................................................................ 77 5.B.2 Coastal Wetland Protection Act .................................................................................. 77 5.B.3 Aquaculture ................................................................................................................ 77 5.B.4 Boating........................................................................................................................ 78 5.C Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce ........................................................... 78 5.C.1 Aquaculture ................................................................................................................ 78 5.C.2 Plant Pests ................................................................................................................. 78 5.D Mississippi State Department of Health .................................................................................. 79 5.E Mississippi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Borobudur Ship: Recreating the First Trans-Ocean Voyaging
    The Borobudur Ship: recreating the first trans-ocean voyaging Nick Burningham Indonesia is the cradle of trans-oceanic voyaging. tical terms probably derived from the language of the The people of Indonesia Bajau – the so-called Sea-Gypsies of Southeast Asia. are nearly all representatives of a large linguistic group The current theory about the Indonesian colonisa- called Austronesians or Malayo-polynesians. A mari- tion of Madagascar is that they went there for iron ore time people, they moved out of mainland south China mining and smelting. Whatever the reason for their about 6,000 years ago, spreading southwards from voyaging, there is no doubt that they reached Mada- Taiwan, through the Philippines into Indonesia, and gascar and undertook the first regular, purposeful, from there they spread over seas and oceans to popu- trans-oceanic voyaging. Direct contact between Indo- late more of the world’s surface than any other people nesia and Madagascar continued for about 1000 years. in pre-modern times. The Maori of New Zealand, the More controversially, some researchers have Polynesians, Melanesians and Micronesians spread pointed to evidence from linguistics, musicology, met- over the vastness of the Pacific Ocean – they all speak allurgy and archaeology suggesting that Indonesians related languages and have related maritime technolo- established some sort of culture in equatorial west Af- gies. It used to be assumed that the spread across the rica by rounding the Cape of Good Hope. Pacific had occurred through accidental drift voyages, British adventurer Philip Beale, a former RN offi- driven by storms, but the initial spread was to the east- cer who once sailed on EYE OF THE WIND, had an south-east, against the southeast trade winds, and it abiding fascination with that little known aspect of was rapid.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Diseases of Crabs: a Review ⇑ W
    Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 106 (2011) 18–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Invertebrate Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip Minireview Bacterial diseases of crabs: A review ⇑ W. Wang Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity & Biotechnology and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Aquatic Crustacean Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China article info abstract Keywords: Bacterial diseases of crabs are manifested as bacteremias caused by organisms such as Vibrio, Aeromo- Bacteria nas, and a Rhodobacteriales-like organism or tissue and organ tropic organisms such as chitinoclastic Disease bacteria, Rickettsia intracellular organisms, Chlamydia-like organism, and Spiroplasma. This paper pro- Crab vides general information about bacterial diseases of both marine and freshwater crabs. Some bacteria pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus occur commonly in blue crab haemolymph and should be paid much attention to because they may represent potential health hazards to human beings because they can cause serious diseases when the crab is consumed as raw sea food. With the development of aquaculture, new diseases associated with novel pathogens such as spiroplasmas and Rhodobacteriales-like organisms have appeared in commercially exploited crab species in recent years. Many potential approaches to control bacterial diseases of crab will be helpful and practicable in aquaculture. Ó 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. Contents 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas: Upper Coast Cumulative Bird List Column A: Number of Tours (Out of 16) on Which Species Seen Column B: Number of Days Th
    Texas: Upper Coast Cumulative Bird List Column A: Number of tours (out of 16) on which species seen Column B: number of days this species was seen on the 2019 tour Column C: maximum daily count for this species on the 2019 tour Column D: E = endemic; H = Heard only A B C D 16 Black-bellied Whistling -Duck 5 30 Dendrocygna autumnalis 15 Fulvous Whistling-Duck 4 200 Dendrocygna bicolor 1 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 5 Snow Goose Chen caerulescens 11 Wood Duck 1 2 Aix sponsa 12 Gadwall 2 40 Anas strepera 10 American Wigeon Anas americana 7 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 16 Mottled Duck 4 20 Anas fulvigula maculosa 16 Blue-winged Teal 5 150 Anas discors 2 Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera 15 Northern Shoveler 2 3 Anas clypeata 2 Northern Pintail Anas acuta 7 Green-winged Teal 1 3 Anas crecca 12 Lesser Scaup 2 12 Aythya affinis 1 Ring-necked Duck 1 1 Aythya collaris 1 King Eider Somateria spectabilis 3 Surf Scoter Melanitta perspicillata 2 Black Scoter 1 2 Melanitta nigra 1 Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis 13 Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator 2 Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis 7 Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus 1 Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo 15 Pied-billed Grebe 3 20 Podilymbus podiceps 2 Eared Grebe Podiceps nigricollis 16 Rock Pigeon 5 25 Columba livia 16 Eurasian Collared-Dove 3 10 Streptopelia decaocto 16 White-winged Dove 5 10 Zenaida asiatica 16 Mourning Dove 6 6 Zenaida macroura ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    African countries and neighbouring islands covered by the Synopsis. S T R E L I T Z I A 23 Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands by J.P. Roux Pretoria 2009 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It sym- bolises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustain- able use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. J.P. Roux South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Cape Town SCIENTIFIC EDITOR: Gerrit Germishuizen TECHNICAL EDITOR: Emsie du Plessis DESIGN & LAYOUT: Elizma Fouché COVER DESIGN: Elizma Fouché, incorporating Blechnum palmiforme on Gough Island PHOTOGRAPHS J.P. Roux Citing this publication ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-48-8 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakeheadsnepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN a Biologicalmyanmar Synopsis Vietnam
    Mongolia North Korea Afghan- China South Japan istan Korea Iran SnakeheadsNepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN A BiologicalMyanmar Synopsis Vietnam and Risk Assessment Philippines Thailand Malaysia INDIAN OCEAN Indonesia Indonesia U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 SNAKEHEADS (Pisces, Channidae)— A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment By Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Copyrighted material reprinted with permission. 2004 For additional information write to: Walter R. Courtenay, Jr. Florida Integrated Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 For additional copies please contact: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae)—A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment / by Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams p. cm. — (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1251) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN.0-607-93720 (alk. paper) 1. Snakeheads — Pisces, Channidae— Invasive Species 2. Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment. Title. II. Series. QL653.N8D64 2004 597.8’09768’89—dc22 CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Literature Review and Background Information . 4 Taxonomy and Synonymy .
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics of Pomacea Flagellata
    Limnetica, 29 (2): x-xx (2011) Limnetica, 34 (1): 69-78 (2015). DOI: 10.23818/limn.34.06 c Asociación Ibérica de Limnología, Madrid. Spain. ISSN: 0213-8409 Population dynamics of the native apple snail Pomacea flagellata (Ampullariidae) in a coastal lagoon of the Mexican Caribbean Frank A. Ocaña∗, Alberto de Jesús-Navarrete, José Juan Oliva-Rivera, Rosa María de Jesús- Carrillo and Abel Abraham Vargas-Espósitos1 Departamento de Sistemática y Ecología Acuática. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km 5.5, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Received: 25/07/2014 Accepted: 20/11/2014 ABSTRACT Population dynamics of the native apple snail Pomacea flagellata (Ampullariidae) in a coastal lagoon of the Mexican Caribbean Apple snails Pomacea spp inhabit tropical and subtropical freshwater environments and are of ecological and economic importance. To evaluate the population dynamics of P. flagellata, monthly samples were collected from Guerrero Lagoon (Yucatán Peninsula) from June 2012 to May 2013. The measured environmental variables did not differ significantly among the sampling stations. However, salinity was lower during the rainy season, and the temperature was lower during the north season (i.e., the season dominated by cold fronts). The snails were more abundant during the rainy season, and they were restricted to the portion of the lagoon that receives freshwater discharges. The snails ranged from 4 to 55 mm in size, with a –1 maximum estimated length of L∞ = 57.75 mm and a growth rate of K = 0.68 y (the abbreviation “y” means “year”) with a seasonal oscillation; the lowest growth rate occurred in early December.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malacological Society of London
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This meeting was made possible due to generous contributions from the following individuals and organizations: Unitas Malacologica The program committee: The American Malacological Society Lynn Bonomo, Samantha Donohoo, The Western Society of Malacologists Kelly Larkin, Emily Otstott, Lisa Paggeot David and Dixie Lindberg California Academy of Sciences Andrew Jepsen, Nick Colin The Company of Biologists. Robert Sussman, Allan Tina The American Genetics Association. Meg Burke, Katherine Piatek The Malacological Society of London The organizing committee: Pat Krug, David Lindberg, Julia Sigwart and Ellen Strong THE MALACOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON 1 SCHEDULE SUNDAY 11 AUGUST, 2019 (Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA) 2:00-6:00 pm Registration - Merrill Hall 10:30 am-12:00 pm Unitas Malacologica Council Meeting - Merrill Hall 1:30-3:30 pm Western Society of Malacologists Council Meeting Merrill Hall 3:30-5:30 American Malacological Society Council Meeting Merrill Hall MONDAY 12 AUGUST, 2019 (Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA) 7:30-8:30 am Breakfast - Crocker Dining Hall 8:30-11:30 Registration - Merrill Hall 8:30 am Welcome and Opening Session –Terry Gosliner - Merrill Hall Plenary Session: The Future of Molluscan Research - Merrill Hall 9:00 am - Genomics and the Future of Tropical Marine Ecosystems - Mónica Medina, Pennsylvania State University 9:45 am - Our New Understanding of Dead-shell Assemblages: A Powerful Tool for Deciphering Human Impacts - Sue Kidwell, University of Chicago 2 10:30-10:45
    [Show full text]
  • Hypophthalmichthys Molitrix and H. Nobilis)
    carpsAB_covers 6/30/15 9:33 AM Page 1 BIGHEADED CARPS (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and H. nobilis) An Annotated Bibliography on Literature Composed from 1970 to 2014 Extension Service Forest and Wildlife Research Center The information given here is for educational purposes only. References to commercial products, trade names, or suppliers are made with the understanding that no endorsement is implied and that no discrimination against other products or suppliers is intended. Copyright 2015 by Mississippi State University. All rights reserved. This publication may be copied and distributed without alteration for nonprofit educational purposes provided that credit is given to the Mississippi State University Extension Service. By Andrew Smith, Extension Associate Biologist, MSU Center for Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts. We are an equal opportunity employer, and all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, Compiled by Andrew L. Smith national origin, disability status, protected veteran status, or any other characteristic protected by law. Edited by Steve Miranda, PhD, and Wes Neal, PhD Publication 2890 Extension Service of Mississippi State University, cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture. Published in furtherance of Acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914. GARY B. JACKSON, Director (500-06-15) carpsAB_covers 6/30/15 9:33 AM Page 3 Bigheaded Carps (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and H. nobilis): An Annotated Bibliography on Literature Composed from 1970 to 2014 Compiled by Andrew L. Smith Mississippi State University Extension Service Center for Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Forest and Wildlife Research Center Edited by Steve Miranda, PhD Wes Neal, PhD Andrew L.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-122. 2000 11
    FERN GAZ. 16(1, 2)11-122. 2000 11 CHECKLIST OF THE PTERIDOPHYTES OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO Y. S. BAKSH-COMEAU The National Herbarium of Trinidad and Tobago. Department of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, West Indies Key words: checklist, Trinidad and Tobago pteridophytes, types, habitat, distribution. ABSTRACT Three hundred and two species and eight varieties or subspecies in 27 families and 77 genera of ferns and fern allies are listed. Four new combinations and states are made, and one synonym lectotypified. A serious attempt has been made to establish types; selections of specimens studied are cited. INTRODUCTION Recent studies of ferns in Trinidad and Tobago (Baksh-Comeau, 1996, 1999) have combined a review of the pteridophyte collection at The National Herbarium of Trinidad & Tobago with field surveys undertaken to assess the community status of these plants on both islands. This checklist has been developed as an integral part of those studies, but it is also an essential prerequisite to ongoing research covering a reclassification of the vegetation of the islands and to the preparation of a comprehensive vascular plant flora. The herbarium count and field survey revealed 251 species confirmed by voucher specimens housed in Trinidad. Additional species have been attributed to Trinidad or Tobago in early publications for Trinidad and in Floras and monographs for neighbouring areas. The number of species now believed to be indigenous in these islands is 282. Cultivated species that have escaped, and introductions which have become naturalized number 20. Early reports include Grisebach (1859-64) who listed 106 species; Eaton (1878) approximately 78 of the 150 or so species eventually collected by August Fendler; Jenman (1887) had about 184 species; Anon (1889) listed 206 binomials including a few introduced taxa; Jenman (1898-1909), in an incomplete coverage of the fern flora, described 140 taxa of which 10 were new species; Hart (1908), including some cultivated plants, listed 283 binomials of pteridophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutria Nuisance in Maryland in This Issue: and the Search for Solutions Upcoming Conferences by Dixie L
    ANS Aquatic Nuisance Species Volume 4 No. 3 August 2001 FRESHWATER DIGEST FOUNDATION Providing current information on monitoring and controlling the spread of harmful nonindigenous species. Predicting Future Aquatic Invaders; the Case of Dikerogammarus villosus By Jaimie T.A. Dick and Dirk Platvoet he accumulation of case studies of invasions has led to for- mulations of general ‘predictors’ that can help us identify Tpotential future invaders. Coupled with experimental stud- ies, assessments may allow us to predict the ecological impacts of potential new invaders. We used these approaches to identify a future invader of North American fresh and brackish waters, the amphipod crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus. Why Identify D. villosus as Invasive? Dikerogammarus villosus (see Figure 1) originates from an invasion donor “hot spot”, the Ponto-Caspian region, which com- prises the Black, Caspian, and Azov Seas’ basins (Nesemann et al. 1995; Ricciardi & Rasmussen 1998; van der Velde et al. 2000). This species has already invaded western Europe, has moved through the Main-Danube canal, which was formally opened in 1992 (Tittizer 1996), and appeared in the River Rhine at the German/Dutch border in 1994-5 (bij de Vaate & Klink 1995). D. villosus is currently sweeping through Dutch waters (Dick & Platvoet 2000) and has Dikerogammarus villosus continued on page 26 Figure 1. Dikerogammarus villosus Photograph by Ivan Ewart The Nutria Nuisance in Maryland In This Issue: and the Search for Solutions Upcoming Conferences By Dixie L. Bounds, Theodore A. Mollett, and Mark H. Sherfy and Meetings . 27 utria, Myocastor coypus, is an invasive lished in 15 states nationwide, all reporting Nuisance Notes.
    [Show full text]