DOCSLIB.ORG

Ambury Properties Limited NZ Comfort Group – Ohinewai Foam Factory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ambury Properties Limited NZ Comfort Group – Ohinewai Foam Factory Ambury Properties Limited Photos and Logos NZ Comfort Group – Ohinewai Foam Factory ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS REPORT TO SUPPORT AN APPLICATION UNDER THE COVID-19 RECOVERY FAST TRACK CONSENTING ACT TO AN EXPERT CONSENTING PANEL May 2021 LEAVE THIS PAGE BLANK TV3 Document control Project identification Client Ambury Properties Limited Client representative David Gaze Bloxam Burnett & Olliver (BBO) BBO details Level 4, 18 London Street, Hamilton 3240 BBO representative Stuart Penfold BBO rep. contact details 07 834 8532 [email protected] Job number/s 145860-20 Job name Foam Factory ECP Fast Track Application Report name and number Ohinewai Foam Factory C-19FT AEE Final 14.05.21 Redacted version K:\145860 Ohinewai Development\20 Foam Factory Fast Track EPA Application\AEE 2021\Ohinewai File path Foam Factory C-19FT AEE FINAL 14.05.21 - Redacted version.docx Report status Status Name Signature Date Report prepared by Stuart Penfold 14 May 2021 Checked by John Olliver 14 May 2021 Approved for issue Kathryn Drew 14 May 2021 Document history Version Changes Signature Issue date V1 V2 V3 Client/other consultant logos – insert logos in the table below. START AT THE RIGHT-HAND MARGIN. Leave the table blank if N/A. TV3 LEAVE THIS PAGE BLANK TV3 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Information requirements from the Act .......................................................................................... 2 1.2 Order in Council information requirements ..................................................................................... 2 2. Background ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 The Applicant .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Wider Development ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Waikato District Plan Review ........................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Site Selection Process ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Importance of Progressing the Fast-Track Application .................................................................... 6 2.6 Existing Resource Consents and Consenting Approach ................................................................... 7 3. Project Location & Site Description ............................................................................. 9 3.1 Site context ....................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Site zoning ........................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Site ownership and legal description ............................................................................................. 12 3.3 Applicant’s legal interest in the land .............................................................................................. 12 3.4 Land adjacent to the site ................................................................................................................ 13 3.5 Road network ................................................................................................................................. 16 3.5.1 Balemi Road .................................................................................................................................... 16 3.5.2 Lumsden Road ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.5.3 Tahuna Road ................................................................................................................................... 16 3.5.4 State Highway 1 Ohinewai Interchange ......................................................................................... 17 3.5.5 Walking and Cycling Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 17 3.6 Topography and Soils ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.7 Existing Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 18 3.8 Existing Fauna ................................................................................................................................. 18 3.9 Existing watercourses ..................................................................................................................... 19 3.9.1 Drain 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.9.2 Drain 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.9.3 Drain 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 20 3.9.4 Drain 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 20 3.10 Receiving environment ................................................................................................................... 20 3.11 Archaeology .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.12 Historical Land Uses ........................................................................................................................ 20 4. Proposed Activities ................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Consented Activities ....................................................................................................................... 22 4.2 Construction commencement ........................................................................................................ 22 4.3 Earthworks ...................................................................................................................................... 22 4.3.1 Certification of Management Plans and pre-start meeting ........................................................... 22 4.3.2 Site clearance ................................................................................................................................. 23 4.3.3 Installation and certification of erosion and sediment control devices. ........................................ 23 4.3.4 Geotechnical remediation works ................................................................................................... 23 TV3 4.4 Dust Management .......................................................................................................................... 25 4.5 Works duration and site stabilisation ............................................................................................. 26 4.6 Traffic movements – construction ................................................................................................. 26 4.7 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures ....................................................................................... 27 4.7.1 ESCP Philosophy ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.7.2 Team Approach .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.7.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Devices and Measures................................................................... 28 4.7.4 Last Line of Defence ....................................................................................................................... 31 4.7.5 Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 31 4.7.6 Additional Measures....................................................................................................................... 31 4.7.7 Artificial drain diversions ................................................................................................................ 32 4.7.8 Contamination Management ......................................................................................................... 32 4.7.9 Ongoing earthworks for civil construction activities ...................................................................... 33 4.8 The Foam Factory ........................................................................................................................... 33 4.8.1 Factory Layout ................................................................................................................................ 33 4.8.2 Bulk and location ............................................................................................................................ 34 4.8.3 Signage...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ashburton/Harakeke River Catchment E.Coli Modelling Project
    Ashburton/Harakeke River Catchment E.Coli Modelling Project Ben Coventry Ashburton Catchment 1) River mouth 2) Urban area 3) Farmland 4) Hills and lakes A good proof- of-concept catchment within Canterbury. Goals and Objectives • Estimate baseline E.Coli loading in the Ashburton River based on measurements taken for swimming advisories. • Model the progression in E.Coli levels down the length of the river. • Determine significant indicators of E.Coli loading based on the model and other data. Current Progress E.Coli Counts on Ashburton River 10000 1 4 1000 2 3 100 5 6 10 7 E.Coli E.Coli Counts (MPN/100mL) 8 1 26/11/16 15/01/17 06/03/17 25/04/17 14/06/17 03/08/17 22/09/17 11/11/17 Date of Sample Collection 1) Heron Rd 5) Digby’s Bridge State Highway 1 Ashburton River Above Mouth 2) Lambie’s Stream 6) Hills Rd SH72 North Branch Heron Rd 3) Quarry Rd 7) State Highway 1 4) SH72 North Bra 8) Ashburton River Above Mouth https://www.lawa.org.nz/explore- data/canterbury-region/river-quality/ashburton- riverhakatere-catchment/ Dairy Farm in the Selwyn-Waihora Catchment by Connor Imeson 250 Hectares 1000 cows 54 bail-rotary shed Supply Fonterra Boundary Map Showing Locations of Wells , Pivots and Waterways Map showing Waterways Path from Farm to Lake Ellesmere The dark blue lines are waterways that flow through the property into Lake Ellesmere To do’s • Work out the travel time of the ground water from farm to lake • Work out travel time of surface water from farm to lake • Look at the Overseer results for farm Spatial Trends in Quality and Quantity Along the Waikato and Waipa Rivers By Shaun Morgan Waikato River Catchment and Waipa River Sub-catchment • Aim: To model downstream changes in river flow and quality indicators in order to examine the effects of the Waipa River on the Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Hortnz Submission On
    COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1 WAIKATO AND WAIPA RIVER CATCHMENTS TO: Waikato Regional Council COMMENTS ON: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 Waikato and Waipa River Catchments NAME: Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) ADDRESS: PO Box 10 232 WELLINGTON 1. HortNZ’s submission, and the decisions sought, are detailed in the attached schedules: 1.1. HortNZ wishes to be heard in support of this submission. 1.2. This submission is supported by a technical report that is to be read in support of this submission. The report has been lodged with the Waikato Regional Council via FTP file Transfer and is titled “Values and Current Allocation of Responsibility For Discharges” Jacobs Technical Report in Support of the Horticulture NZ Submission on Healthy River Plan Change”. 1.3. The Plan and this submission cover a wide range of issues and there are potential consequential amendments that will be required to give effect to the relief sought in this submission. Decision sought: 1.4. Other changes or consequential amendments as are necessary to give effect to the matters raised in this submission. 2. Background to HortNZ and its RMA involvement: 2.1. Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) was established on 1 December 2005, combining the New Zealand Vegetable and Potato Growers’ and New Zealand Fruitgrowers’ and New Zealand Berryfruit Growers’ Federations. 2.2. On behalf of its 5,500 active grower members HortNZ takes a detailed involvement in resource management planning processes as part of its National Environmental Policies. HortNZ works to raise growers’ awareness of the RMA to ensure effective grower involvement under the Act, whether in the planning process or through resource consent applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Socio- Political Life of the Waikato River MARAMA MURU-LANNING
    6. ‘At Every Bend a Chief, At Every Bend a Chief, Waikato of One Hundred Chiefs’: Mapping the Socio- Political Life of the Waikato River MARAMA MURU-LANNING Introduction At 425 kilometres, the Waikato River is the longest river in New Zealand, and a vital resource for the country (McCan 1990: 33–5). Officially beginning at Nukuhau near Taupo township, the river is fed by Lake Taupo and a number of smaller rivers and streams throughout its course. Running swiftly in a northwesterly direction, the river passes through many urban, forested and rural areas. Over the past 90 years, the Waikato River has been adversely impacted by dams built for hydro-electricity generation, by runoff and fertilisers associated with farming and forestry, and by the waste waters of several major industries and urban centres. At Huntly, north of Taupiri (see Figure 6.1), the river’s waters are further sullied when they are warmed during thermal electricity generation processes. For Māori, another major desecration of the Waikato River occurs when its waters are diverted and mixed with waters from other sources, so that they can be drunk by people living in Auckland. 137 Island Rivers Figure 6.1 A socio-political map of the Waikato River and catchment. Source: Created by Peter Quin, University of Auckland. As the Waikato River is an important natural resource, it has a long history of people making claims to it, including Treaty of Waitangi1 claims by Māori for guardianship recognition and management and property rights.2 This process of claiming has culminated in a number of tribes 1 The Treaty of Waitangi was signed by the British Crown and more than 500 Māori chiefs in 1840.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato River Water Take Proposal
    WAIKATO RIVER WATER TAKE PROPOSAL Lower Waikato River Bathymetry Assessment Changes Consequent to Development for Watercare Services Ltd December 2020 R.J.Keller & Associates PO Box 2003, Edithvale, VIC 3196 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 8 2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 “NATURAL” VARIABILITY IN FLOW RATES ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 HISTORICAL CHANGES IN BATHYMETRY ........................................................................................... 9 2.4 HYDRO DAM DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 9 2.5 SAND EXTRACTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 LOWER WAIKATO FLOOD PROTECTION ......................................................................................... 10 2.7 LAND USE CHANGES ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato and Waipā River Restoration Strategy Isbn 978-0-9922583-6-8
    WAIKATO AND WAIPĀ RIVER RESTORATION STRATEGY ISBN 978-0-9922583-6-8 ISBN 978-0-9922583-7-5 (online) Printed May 2018. Prepared by Keri Neilson, Michelle Hodges, Julian Williams and Nigel Bradly Envirostrat Consulting Ltd Published by Waikato Regional Council in association with DairyNZ and Waikato River Authority The Restoration Strategy Project Steering Group requests that if excerpts or inferences are drawn from this document for further use by individuals or organisations, due care should be taken to ensure that the appropriate context has been preserved, and is accurately reflected and referenced in any subsequent spoken or written communication. While the Restoration Strategy Project Steering Group has exercised all reasonable skill and care in controlling the contents of this report, it accepts no liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss, damage, injury or expense (whether direct, indirect or consequential) arising out of the provision of this information or its use by you or any other party. Cover photo: Waikato River. WAIKATO AND WAIPĀ RIVER RESTORATION STRATEGY TE RAUTAKI TĀMATA I NGĀ AWA O WAIKATO ME WAIPĀ RESTORATION STRATEGY FOREWORD HE KUPU WHAKATAKI MŌ TE RAUTAKI TĀMATA FROM THE PARTNERS MAI I TE TIRA RANGAPŪ Tooku awa koiora me oona pikonga he kura tangihia o te maataamuri. The river of life, each curve more beautiful than the last. We are pleased to introduce the Waikato and Waipā River Restoration Strategy. He koanga ngākau o mātou nei ki te whakarewa i te Rautaki Tāmata i ngā Awa o Waikato me Waipā. This document represents an exciting new chapter in our ongoing work to restore and protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato and Waipā rivers as we work towards achieving Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato, the Vision & Strategy for the Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Hydrology of the Waikato River
    EARTH SCIENCE JOURNAL, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1967 NOTES ON THE HYDROLOGY OF THE W AIKATO RIVER G. T. Ridall Hydrologist, Waikato Valley Authority GENERAL The catchment area of the Waikato River is 5,500 square miles. If its source is accepted as being the Upper Waikato, then its distance to the sea at Port Waikato including its journey through Lake Taupo is 266 miles. It rises, together with the Whangaehu, the Rangitikei and the Wanganui, between the volcanic region of Ruapehu 9,000 ft. above sea level and the Kaimanawa Ranges 5,000 ft. above sea level. The river flows northwards for 34 miles into Lake Taupo, losing its identity into the Tongariro for the last 26 miles to the lake. It emerges from Lake Taupo resuming its proper name and, still flowing northwards, passes for more than 100 miles through a series of lakes formed by hydro- electric dams to Cambridge. From here it continues through a deeply incised channel to Ngaruawahia where it is joined by its major tributary, the Waipa River. From Ngaruawahia to the mouth, a distance of 60 miles, shallow lakes and peat swamps predominate on both sides of the river, many of them protected and drained and developed into rich dairy farms. From Mercer, 35 miles downstream of Ngaruawahia, where slight tidal effects are discernable at low flows, the river changes its general northerly direction to a westerly one and, still 9 miles from the mouth, enters the delta. Here it is fragmented into many channels before emptying into the broad expanse of Maioro Bay and finally emerges by two fairly narrow channels into the sea on the west coast, 25 miles south of Manukau Heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Sports Park Reserve Management Plan
    Waikato District Sports Park Reserve Management Plan Adopted by Council 8th June 2015 This Reserves Management Plan has been prepared by the Waikato District Council (the Council) under the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977 Section 41. Adopted by Council on 8th June 2015 Process timeline Call for suggestions 8 October 2014 Draft Management Plan released for submissions 14 January 2015 Submissions closed 20 March 2015 Hearing 13 May 2015 Management plan adopted Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose of this plan .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Reserve management plan requirements .................................................................... 1 1.2 Relationship with general policies ................................................................................. 2 1.3 Waikato-Tainui Joint Management Agreement ......................................................... 2 1.4 Structure of this plan ....................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Council and delegations .................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Implementation ................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Waikato Regional Sports Facility Plan .......................................................................... 4 2.0 The reserves ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Allocation Policy and Its Implementation in the Waikato Region
    Water Allocation Policy and its Implications in the Waikato Region Brown, Edmund Scientist (hydrologist), Waikato Regional Council, Hamilton, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The Waikato River is New Zealand’s longest River, though relatively small on international scales. It drains the central North Island and has New Zealand’s largest lake (Lake Taupo) at its headwaters. The upper reaches have sustained flows fed by large aquifers which are recharged by rainfall events providing relatively constant river flows, whereas the lower reaches respond more directly to rainfall events having more peaky flows after rainfall and extreme low flows during dry periods. Consumptive allocation from the river is relatively low with only about 3% of the mean annual flow being allocated. However, more than seven times the river’s flow is allocated for non-consumptive purposes before discharging to the Tasman Sea. The majority of this non-consumptive allocation is for hydro power generation and as cooling water at both thermal and geothermal power stations which produce up to 25% of New Zealand’s electricity. The upper half of the river has been heavily modified with the construction of eight dams for power generation. This has resulted in a succession of cascading dams replacing the previously uncontrolled river. The Waikato River also provides drinking water for Auckland City (NZ’s largest city) and Hamilton City (NZ’s 4th largest city). In recent years there has also been considerable growth in water requirements for pasture irrigation to support the intensification of dairy farming in the catchment. Operators of the power stations are concerned that any further consumptive allocation will further reduce their ability to generate electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand WAIKATO CONSERVANCY Lower Waikato River and Estuary (10) Location: Rangiriri, 37°26'S, 175°08'E; centre of delta, 37°21'S, 174°46'E. The Lower Waikato River is approximately 34 km southwest of the city of Auckland at Port Waikato and 72 km south of the city of Auckland at Rangiriri, North Island. Area: Lower Waikato River, c.3,500 ha (56 km from Rangiriri to Port Waikato); estuary c.588 ha. Altitude: Sea level to 10 m at Rangiriri. Overview: The Waikato River, between Rangiriri and Port Waikato, passes through large areas of mineralised swamp and shallow lakes, and finally discharges through a diverse delta habitat to the sea. It provides habitat for a range of threatened bird species, and supports New Zealand's largest eel fishery. Physical features: The site comprises the Lower Waikato River from Rangiriri downstream for about 56 km to Port Waikato at its mouth. The basement rocks of the Waikato Region are comprised of Mesozoic "greywacke-type" rocks that have undergone extensive alteration to form dissected fault blocks around the perimeter of the Waikato catchment. During the early Tertiary, coal measures with associated freshwater and shallow marine sediments were laid down, although today many have been removed by erosion. Following this period, a series of several different phases of volcanism occurred. As a result of extensive sediment deposition at this time, the Waikato River, which previously flowed out to the Firth of Thames, changed course to flow out into the Hamilton Basin, bringing much sediment with it and causing extensive deposition and creating small lakes and swamps.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal
    REPORT Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal - Board of Inquiry River Ecology Assessment Prepared for Watercare Services Limited Prepared by Tonkin & Taylor Ltd Date December 2020 Job Number 1014753.100 Tonkin & Taylor Ltd December 2020 Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal - Board of Inquiry - River Ecology Assessment Job No: 1014753.100 Watercare Services Limited Document Control Title: Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal - Board of Inquiry Date Version Description Prepared by: Reviewed Authorised by: by: 11/12/2020 1.0 Final Liza Kabrle Dean Miller Peter Roan Distribution: Watercare Services Limited 1 electronic copy Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (FILE) 1 electronic copy Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Project background 4 2.1 Description of the consent application 4 2.2 Proposed abstraction rate and intake design 5 2.3 Indicative construction methodology 6 3 Waikato Regional Plan 8 3.1 Planning limitations 8 3.2 Information requirements 8 3.3 Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 (Healthy Rivers) 9 3.4 National Policy Statement – Freshwater Management 9 4 Assessment methodology 11 4.1 Step one: Assigning ecological value 11 4.2 Step two: Assess magnitude of effect 11 4.3 Step three: Assessment of the level of effects 12 4.4 Assigning an RMA interpretation to level of effect 12 5 Ecology of the Waikato River 13 5.1 Waikato River water quality 13 5.1.1 WRC water quality records 13 5.1.2 Watercare Waikato River water quality records 14 5.2 River freshwater biota 15 5.2.1 Macroinvertebrates 15 5.2.2 Fisheries 16 5.3
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato Region Shallow Lakes Management Plan: Volume 2
    Waikato Regional Council Technical Report 2014/59 Waikato region shallow lakes management plan: Volume 2 Shallow lakes resource statement: Current status and future management recommendations www.waikatoregion.govt.nz ISSN 2230-4355 (Print) ISSN 2230-4363 (Online) Prepared by Tracie Dean-Speirs & Keri Neilson (Waikato Regional Council) with input from Paula Reeves (Wildland Consultants) and Johlene Kelly (Alchemists Ltd.) For Waikato Regional Council Private Bag 3038 Waikato Mail Centre HAMILTON 3240 10 October 2014 Document #: 2256414 Approved for release by Clare Crickett Date May 2015 Disclaimer This technical report has been prepared for the use of Waikato Regional Council as a reference document and as such does not constitute Council’s policy. Council requests that if excerpts or inferences are drawn from this document for further use by individuals or organisations, due care should be taken to ensure that the appropriate context has been preserved, and is accurately reflected and referenced in any subsequent spoken or written communication. While Waikato Regional Council has exercised all reasonable skill and care in controlling the contents of this report, Council accepts no liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss, damage, injury or expense (whether direct, indirect or consequential) arising out of the provision of this information or its use by you or any other party. Doc # 2256414 Page iii Acknowledgement The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Paula Reeves (Wildland Consultants Ltd, and later Waipa District Council), and Johlene Kelly (Department of Conservation and later Alchemists Ltd.) to Parts I and II of the Shallow Lake Management Plan. Members of the Waikato District Lakes and Freshwater Wetlands Memorandum of Agreement Group and of the Waipa Peat Lakes Accord (John Gumbley, Paula Reeves, David Klee, Tim Manukau, Jenny Charman, Giles Boundy and Ben Wolf) are also thanked for their valuable feedback on earlier versions.
    [Show full text]