Senate the Senate Met at 10 A.M., and Was Ing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senate the Senate Met at 10 A.M., and Was Ing E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 143 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997 No. 35 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m., and was ing. That debate will continue until Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, I object called to order by the President pro 12:30 today, at which time the Senate to further proceeding in this matter at tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. will recess until the hour of 2:15 for the this time. weekly policy conferences to meet. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The joint PRAYER When the Senate reconvenes at 2:15, resolution will be placed on the cal- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John there will be an additional 30 minutes endar. Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: for closing remarks, followed by a roll- Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, I yield the floor. Lord, forgive us when we envy the call vote on passage of Senate Joint gifts, talents, and success of others Resolution 18. Therefore, Senators can f rather than praise You for all You have anticipate the rollcall vote at approxi- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME mately 2:45 today. given to each of us. Sometimes we The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Following that vote, the Senate will covet the opportunities and skills of the previous order, leadership time is resume consideration of Senate Joint others when they seem to exceed our reserved. Resolution 22, the independent counsel own. We admit we miss becoming the f distinctively different persons You resolution. We will be continuing dis- have in mind. A limiting formula re- cussions with the Democratic leader in MORNING BUSINESS sults: Our comparisons multiplied by the hope of reaching a consent agree- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under combative competition, equals the ment to allow us to complete action on the previous order, there will now be a stress of envy. You do not play favor- this resolution. Also this week, it is period for the transaction of morning ites, or pit Your people against one an- possible that the Senate will consider a business until 11:30, with Senators per- other. You are for us and not against resolution regarding Mexico and their mitted to speak therein for up to 5 us. certification in the antidrug effort. In minutes each. You have promised that if we humble addition, the Senate may begin consid- Under the previous order, the Sen- ourselves in Your sight, You will lift us eration of the nuclear waste legislation ator from Colorado is recognized to up. We know You will multiply our po- prior to our adjournment for the speak for up to 15 minutes. tential beyond our wildest expecta- Easter recess. (The remarks of Mr. CAMPBELL per- tions. So we press on with a liberating Again, I remind my colleagues that taining to the introduction of S. 457 are formula: An honest recognition of the since this is the last week of session located in today's RECORD under assets You have given each of us, mul- prior to the adjournment, I hope all ``Statements on Introduced Bills and tiplied by Your indwelling power, will Senators will continue to cooperate Joint Resolutions.'') The PRESIDING OFFICER. The equal greater excellence without stress and adjust schedules accordingly as we Chair observes, in my capacity as a today. Thank You dear Lord. Amen. attempt to schedule legislation and votes. I thank my colleagues. Senator from Kansas, the absence of a f quorum. RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING f The clerk will call the roll. MAJORITY LEADER MEASURE PLACED ON THE CAL- The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. ENDARÐHOUSE JOINT RESOLU- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I ask able acting majority leader is recog- TION 58 unanimous consent that the order for nized. Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, I un- the quorum call be rescinded. Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, thank derstand there is a resolution at the The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. you. desk and it is due for its second read- SMITH of Oregon). Without objection, it I thank the Chaplain, again, for an ing. is so ordered. outstanding opening prayer. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. f f ROBERTS). The Senator is correct. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM SCHEDULE The clerk will read the joint resolu- tion for the second time. Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I have Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, today, The legislative clerk read as follows: not had the opportunity to come to the following morning business, at 11:30, A joint resolution (H.J. Res. 58) disapprov- floor to talk about the pending matter. the Senate will resume consideration ing certification of the President under sec- I want to devote a little time this of Senate Joint Resolution 18, the Hol- tion 490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of morning to the constitutional amend- lings resolution regarding the constitu- 1961 regarding foreign assistance for Mexico ment offered by the distinguished Sen- tional amendment on campaign fund- during fiscal year 1997. ator from South Carolina, Senator · This ``bullet'' symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S2377 S2378 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE March 18, 1997 HOLLINGS. I am a cosponsor of that leg- am in cycle now. I will be running in and get comments about what families islation, and I proudly come to the 1998. My budget, Mr. President, is $5 are thinking about. That education is floor in my advocacy of the passage of million. I have already indicated that. lost when any candidate spends two- his amendment. That is no secret. I will be raising and thirds to three-fourths of his time I give him great credit. He has come spending $5 million to be reelected. doing nothing but dialing for dollars. to the floor for years addressing, in I have heard colleagues on the Senate WENDELL FORD, our distinguished myriad ways, the issue of campaign fi- floor say, ``Well, you know, the nation colleague who sits right at this desk, nance, the problems that we have asso- spends less than $2.7 billion on dog and said fundraising was a major factor in ciated with campaign finance, the dif- cat food, so why should we be worried? his determination not to run for reelec- ficulties, constitutionally and statu- We spend a lot more on dog and cat tion. We are going to lose an able pub- torily, in addressing all of the problems food than we spend in political races.'' lic servant. When he was first elected that he has so eloquently outlined now I do not think that is a proper com- to the Senate in 1974, his campaign for a long period of time. Year after parison unless we have only 535 dogs cost $450,000. But he estimated he year, in Congress after Congress, fight and cats in this country. If you had 535 would have to raise $4.5 million for the after fight, Senator HOLLINGS has been dogs and cats, that comparison would race in 1998. He said, ``I don't want to extraordinary in his effort to address work. I tell you, if we were spending raise $4.5 million in Kentucky. I don't this issue in a consequential and com- $2.7 billion on 535 designated dogs and want to have to go through that. I prehensive way. cats, my sense is we would be outraged. don't think it is right. I don't want to I want to talk a little bit about the There would be all kinds of complaints have to sit in some cubicle called a `po- circumstances that I see facing all of that dog and cat food is way too high. litical office' and dial for dollars day us politically right now and my rea- ``I can't afford to keep a cat or a dog.'' after day. I don't want to do that.'' So sons for supporting the constitutional How is it we can afford a political he is hanging it up. amendment. There are at least four process so denigrated today by prac- How many more WENDELL FORDs, primary reasons why I believe that the tices that we all abhor that we are how many more talented public serv- constitutional amendment needs to be willing to spend $4.5 million per Sen- ants will hang it up or will not even addressed. I am of the view that statu- ator? So, Mr. President, the cost is start? So, Mr. President, this is a very torily we are incapable of adequately something that I think is very clearly serious problem from the point of view addressing every one of the nuances, an issue that we have to address, be- of candidates themselvesÐRepublican every one of the problems that have cause it is only going to get worse. or Democrat. arisen as a result of our efforts to ad- We used the increases in campaign I recruit candidates, and one of the dress meaningful campaign finance re- costs since 1976 to estimate what the hardest things for me is to convince form in the past. I do not have with me cost of an election will be in the year possible candidates to run knowing the record that we have compiled, but 2025. Most of us, hopefully, will still be they have to raise $4.5 to $5.5 million. we have spent hours and days and around. I will not be here, but I will be, You go tell some businessman to give weeks in testimony and in hearings hopefully, living.
Recommended publications
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data
    March 2013 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data March 3, 2013 25 men and 10 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 5 men and 2 women Speaker of the House John Boehner (M) Gene Sperling (M) Rep. Raul Labrador (M) Kathleen Parker (F) Joy Reid (F) Chuck Todd (M) Tom Brokaw (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 7 men and 1 woman Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Sen. John McCain (M) Sen. Majority Whip Dick Durbin (M) Cardinal Timothy Dolan (M) Bob Woodward (M) David Sanger (M) Rana Foroohar (F) John Dickerson (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 4 men and 3 women Gene Sperling (M) Sen. Kelly Ayotte (F) James Carville (M) Matthew Dowd (M) Paul Gigot (M) Mayor Mia Love (F) Cokie Roberts (F) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 6 men and 1 woman Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (M) Gene Sperling (M) Rep. Steve Israel (M) Rep. Greg Walden (M) Mark Zandi (M) Stephen Moore (M) Susan Page (F) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 3 women Fmr. Gov. Mitt Romney (M) Ann Romney (F) Bill Kristol (M) Kirsten Powers (F) Fmr. Sen. Scott Brown (F) Charles Lane (M) March 10, 2013 25 men and 13 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 6 men and 3 women Sen. Tim Kaine (M) Sen. Tom Coburn (M) Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (F) Rep. Cory Garnder (M) Joe Scarborough (M) Dee Dee Myers (F) Rep. Marsha Blackburn (F) Steve Schmidt (M) Ruth Marcus (F) Fmr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vision Thing”: George H.W
    “The Vision Thing”: George H.W. Bush and the Battle For American Conservatism 1988­1992 Paul Wilson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN April 1, 2012 Advised by Professor Maris Vinovskis For my Grandfather, who financed this project (and my education). For my beautiful Bryana, who encouraged me every step of the way. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter One: The Clash of Legacies.......................................................................................... 14 Chapter Two: The End of the Cold War and the New European Order ................ 42 Chapter Three: 1992 and the Making of Modern American Conservatism....... 70 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................ 108 Bibliography....................................................................................................................................... 114 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to the University of Michigan library system for providing access to the material used in the making of this thesis. Thanks to Professor Maris Vinovskis, who provided invaluable knowledge and mentorship throughout the whole writing process. Much gratitude goes to Dr. Sigrid Cordell, who always found the resources I needed to complete this
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 447 537 CS 510 454 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (83rd, Phoenix, Arizona, August 9-12, 2000). Advertising Division. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE 2000-08-00 NOTE 311p.; For other sections of this proceedings, see CS 510 451-470. PUB TYPE Collected Works Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. nVer,71-rnmpsne, Adolescents; *Advertising; Agenda Setting; Audience Response; Blacks; Consumer Economics; Females; Health Education; Higher Education; Information Sources; Internet; Job Skills; *Journalism Education; *Marketing; *Mass Media Effects; Newspapers; Presidential Campaigns (United States); *Smoking; *Social Responsibility; World War II IDENTIFIERS Advertising Effectiveness; Breast Cancer; Communication Strategies; *Political Advertising ABSTRACT The Advertising Division section of the proceedings contains the following 14 papers: "The Effectiveness of Banner Advertisements: Involvement and Click-Through" (Chang-Hoan Cho and John D. Leckenby); "Messages of Hope: Developing Health Campaigns that Address Misperceptions of Breast Cancer Held by Women of Color" (Cynthia M. Frisby); "Advertising and the Consumer's Hunt for Information: Traditional and Internet Sources" (Catherine Ilse Pfeifer); "Presidential Primary 2000 Videocassettes: A Framing Study" (John Parmalee); "Influence of Cigarette Promotion on Juvenile Susceptibility to Smoking: A Path Analysis" (Hye-ryeon Lee, Kristie A. Taylor and Stacey Nofziger); "Smoking in the News: Intermedia Agenda-Setting and the Anti-Tobacco Advertising Campaign" (Stacie Lee Greene); "What the Real World Really Wants: An Analysis of Advertising Employment Ads" (Sally J. McMillan, Kim Bartel Sheehan, Brandt Heinemann and Charles Frazer); "Effective Communication of Brand Extensions" (Jooyoung Kim); "J.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Teams in the Newsroom: a Qualitative Inquiry Into How They Work (Or Don’T)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository TOPIC TEAMS IN THE NEWSROOM: A QUALITATIVE INQUIRY INTO HOW THEY WORK (OR DON’T) Leslie-Jean Thornton A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Chapel Hill 2006 Approved by Advisor: Patricia A. Curtin, Ph. D. Frank Fee, Ph. D. Steve May, Ph. D. Mary Alice Shaver, Ph. D. Ken Smith, Ph. D. © 2006 Leslie-Jean Thornton ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT LESLIE-JEAN THORNTON: Topic Teams in the Newsroom: A Qualitative Inquiry Into How They Work (Or Don’t) (under the direction of Patricia A. Curtin, Ph.D.) Newspaper newsrooms in the 1990s, hard-hit by financial pressures and steady declines in circulation, sought ways to be more efficient and attract more readers. One result was the creation of topic teams: groups of journalists assigned to produce reports on topics deemed to be of interest to targeted readers. As newspapers reorganized to enable such teams, newsrooms became more participatory and less authoritarian, altering decades of journalistic routines, culture, and job descriptions. Although the first experimenters were greeted with jeers and suspicion, topic-team newsrooms were widespread by the turn of the century. This study is the first to contextualize the adoption of topic teams in the United States in terms of history and journalistic experience. In-depth interviews with topic-team journalists yielded insights into management, professional values, newsroom practices, and the interaction of all three.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED OR DIVIDED Barbara A
    Previous Participants 2002 2004-Spring 2004-Fall 2005 2006 Ken Auletta Madeleine Albright Paul Gigot President Bill Clinton Eleanor Clift Westchester Community College Catherine Crier Zbigniew Brzezinski Joe Klein David Gergen Walter Isaacson Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Cokie Roberts Daniel Henninger Foundation Dorothy Rabinowitz Steven Roberts Marvin Kalb Norman Ornstein cordially invites you to the President's Forum 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 R. Glenn Hubbard Paul Krugman Ari Fleischer Dan Balz Elliott Abrams a Scholarship & Program Fund Benefit Irwin Kellner Rich Lowry Paul Gigot Dr. Alan Brinkley Leslie Gelb Jane Bryant Quinn Richard Norton Smith Joe Lockhart Bob Herbert Nita Lowey Paul Volcker Sean Wilentz Mark Shields Kimberley Strassel Richard Murphy 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tom Friedman David Nasaw Amb. Richard Murphy Dr. William Burns David Gergen Lynne Olson Trudy Rubin Dr. Henry Kissinger Richard Norton Smith David Woolner Paul Stares Margaret Warner The Road Ahead: Westchester Community College Foundation Board Ruth Suzman, Chairman Joanne Landau Katherine Stipicevic Susan Yubas, President George P. Lindsay Evelyn Stock UNITED OR DIVIDED Barbara A. Abeles Edith Landau Litt David Swope Hon. Joaquin Alemany Patricia Lunka George M. Thom, '66 Hon. Robert Astorino Matthew McCrosson Elinor F. Urstadt George E. Austin Philip J. McGrath Lucille S. Werlinich Glenn R. Bianco Dr. Belinda S. Miles Renee M. Brown Katherine Moore Joseph P. Carlucci Eon S. Nichols Directors Emeriti Myrna Clyman Martha Nierenberg Walter Korntheuer Sunday Afternoon James W. Cobb Hon. John Nonna Hon. Frances MacEachron November 20, 2016 Susan L. Cohen David A. Oestreich Frank S. McCullough Jr. Lisa W. Connors Dr. Heather Ostman Theodore Peluso 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Law Review
    Chapman Law Review Volume 22 Board of Editors 2018–2019 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief AMY N. HUDACK Managing Editor HOPE C. BLAIN Senior Articles Editors Production Editor CARLOS BACIO DANTE P. LOGIE JAMIE L. RICE JAMIE L. TRAXLER Senior Notes & Comments Editor MEGAN A. LEE Senior Symposium Editor KYLEY S. CHELWICK Senior Submissions & Online Editor NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI ±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±± Articles Editors RAYMOND AUBELE MARLENA R. MLYNARSKA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS SYDNEY L. WEST __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors MICHAEL D. BENVENUTI JILLIAN C. FRIESS ALEXIS SAKARIS REBEKAH E. COOPER KIMIA HASHEMIAN KAYLEE A. SAUNDERS CAROLINE J. CORDOVA W. WALKER MACON ALEX J. VALLE MYAGMARSUREN DAVAASUREN MICHAEL A. MEISSNER PAIGE V. WILLIAMS ALEXIS M. FASIG AMANDA B. PETERSON BROOKE E. YEGAN BETHANY J. RING Faculty Advisor CELESTINE RICHARDS MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY GUY AMBRAMO ADMINISTRATION RICHARD AFABLE MARILYN ALEXANDER DANIELE C. STRUPPA LISA ARGYROS ’07 President DONNA FORD ATTALLAH ’61 RAJ S. BHATHAL GLENN M. PFEIFFER KEN BUNT ’93 Provost and Executive Vice JAMES P. BURRA President for Academic Affairs MICHAEL J. CARVER PHILLIP H. CASE HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. AKIN CEYLAN ’90 Executive Vice President and Chief IRVING M. CHASE Operating Officer HAZEM H. CHEHABI JEROME W. CWIERTNIA SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS ZEINAB H. DABBAH (JD ’12) Executive Vice President of DALE E. FOWLER ’58 University Advancement EMILY HADDAD STAN HARRELSON HELEN NORRIS GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. Vice President and Chief LARRY HIGBY Information Officer MARK HILBERT WILLIAM K. HOOD BRIAN K. POWELL ANDY HOROWITZ Vice President and Chief Human MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 Resources Officer JENNIFER L.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Thomas Is the First Choice": the Case for Clarence Thomas
    "JUDGE THOMAS IS THE FIRST CHOICE": THE CASE FOR CLARENCE THOMAS Thomas L. Jipping* "HOLD FOR GOVERNOR SUNUNU" Those were the words I heard when the telephone rang at 4:30 p.m. on June 27, 1991, less than three hours after Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall, that "old soldier of liberalism,"' announced his retirement. 2 John Sununu, former Governor of New Hampshire and chief of staff to President George Bush, was clear and succinct. The President's advisors would meet the next morning, he said, to recommend a candidate for filling the Marshall vacancy. He asked me to fax him a memo by 8:00 p.m. listing my top three recommendations and assessing their political pros and cons. My first choice was then-U.S. Circuit Judge Clarence Thomas, and on July 1, 1991, calling him the "'best person for this position'," 3 Bush nominated Thomas to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. On September 27, 1991, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee voted 13-1 to send the nomination to the full Senate without a recommendation, 4 and on October 15, 1991, the U.S. Senate voted 52- 48 to consent to his appointment. 5 Justice Thomas is now serving his ninth term on the Court. Vice President for Legal Policy and Director, Judicial Selection Monitoring Project, Free Congress Research & Education Foundation. M.A., State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo (1989); J.D. cum laude, SUNY at Buffalo (1987); B.A. with honors, Calvin College (1983). Law clerk to the late Judge William D.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment of President William Jefferson Clinton
    106TH CONGRESS DOCUMENT 1st Session SENATE 106±3 "! IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD PURSUANT TO S. RES. 16 VOLUME VII Transcript of October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell, and debate on H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry. Committee Print, Ser. No. 8, December 1998 Printed at the direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate, pursuant to S. Res. 16, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999) JANUARY 8, 1999.ÐOrdered to be printed 1 105th Congress Ser. No. 8 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT "! AUTHORIZATION OF AN INQUIRY INTO WHETHER GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE IM- PEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MEETING OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HELD OCTOBER 5, 1998 PRESENTATION BY INQUIRY STAFF CONSIDERATION OF INQUIRY RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF INQUIRY PROCEDURES COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Chairman DECEMBER 1998 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53±446 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D.
    [Show full text]
  • Give Facts a Fighting Chance: a Global Playbook for Teaching News Literacy
    February 2019 Visit us at newslit.org. GIVE FACTS A FIGHTING CHANCE A global playbook for teaching news literacy Copyright © 2019 by The News Literacy Project. All rights reserved. The map on page 15 from the study Challenging Truth and Trust: An Organized Inventory of Social Media Manipulation is included with the permission of Philip N. Howard, Ph.D., of the Oxford Internet Institute. For more information and to obtain permission to reproduce this book or any portion thereof, please contact: The News Literacy Project 5335 Wisconsin Ave. NW Suite 440 Washington, DC 20015 USA [email protected] 3 Table of contents Acknowledgments ............................................. 4 Foreword........................................................... 5 Chapter 1 History of the News Literacy Project .................... 7 Chapter 2 A Brief History of Misinformation ...................... 11 Chapter 3 News Literacy and Civics Education ................... 19 Chapter 4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices ................. 22 Chapter 5 Resources ......................................................... 37 Strategic Overview 2018-2022 .......................... 43 4 Acknowledgments This project could not have come together without the contributions of several News Literacy Project team members: our founder and CEO, Alan Miller; our senior vice president of education, Peter Adams; our senior vice president of communications, Christine Nyirjesy Bragale; our vice president of production, Darragh Worland; our director of partnerships, Damaso Reyes; our senior
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the origmal or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, vdnle others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b%inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographicaUy in this copy. ISgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for aity photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & HowcQ Ln&nnabon Company 300 Noith Zed) Road, Ann Arbor NQ 4S106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 PERFORMING POLITICS: A THEATRE-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE 1996 NATIONAL NOMINATING CONVENTIONS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by John Brooks Lawton m , A.B., M.A.
    [Show full text]