Early Detection and Monitoring

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Detection and Monitoring EUROPEAN GREEN CRAB Early Detection and Monitoring WSG.WASHINGTON.EDU/CRABTEAM CITATION Grason, EW, JW Adams, K Litle, PS McDonald, PD Dalton (2016) European green crab early detection and monitoring. Washington Sea Grant, Final Report WSG-TR 16-07. 73 p. EUROPEAN GREEN CRAB EARLY DETECTION AND MONITORING wsg.washington.edu/crabteam Final Report for Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Grant Agreement#: 14-02055 January 30, 2017 Prepared by: Washington Sea Grant University of Washington 3716 Brooklyn Ave. NE Seattle, WA 98105-6716 wsg.washington.edu ii Acknowledgments Washington Sea Grant’s Crab Team would like to thank the Puget Sound Marine and Nearshore Protection & Restoration Grant Program and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for their adaptability to direct funds toward an urgent issue of concern regarding the health of Puget Sound. In particular, the grant program staff (Jeannie Abbott, Maria Hunter, Patricia Jatczak and Margaret McKeown) have been extremely helpful tracking reporting requirements and supporting the projects goals and needs, expected and unexpected. The Crab Team would also like to thank the members of the West Coast European Green Crab Committee, coordinated by Stephen Phillips of the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, for their guidance, information and resources. In particular, Sylvia Yamada, Oregon State University, generously shared her research, expertise and field time to inform and support the project and some of its volunteers. We also appreciate draft reviews by Sylvia and by Tammy Davis of Alaska Department of Fish and Game. As the primary agency partner in the project and as the leader of rapid response efforts, Allen Pleus, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, helped shape the project and ensure its success, while being a strong advocate for the project’s future. Tom Gries, Washington Department of Ecology, provided clear and critical guidance and timely review to establish the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), guiding successful data collection. The complexity of the Crab Team dataset required database design guidance beyond the abilities of staff within the program. Jennifer Scheuerell, Sound Data Management LLC, graciously volunteered her professional talents to make the Crab Team database a reality. Nine University of Washington (UW) undergraduate students have assisted the project at different times, assuming different roles. Before Crab Team even existed as an idea, Chris Tran and Jeffrey Woo took the first pass at suitable habitat identification and conducted the first molt surveys of the project. Their efforts and poster took top honors for a student poster at the 2014 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference. Natalie White, Ian Anderson and Joey VanderWood all contributed to our understanding of volunteer experiences and needs, helping us adjust the protocol after the pilot year. Chelsea Bogrow and Madison Keeley launched and refined our efforts to draft outreach materials and gather contacts of targeted user groups. And Bryton Seyfert conducted his own field project to help us better understand the influence of bait types on trap catches. Crab Team monitoring would not be possible without access to sites identified as high priority habitats; the Team thanks the diverse landowners, from national, state and local agencies to private entities and non-profits, who granted access. The Crab Team’s deepest gratitude is reserved for the talented and committed array of individuals who have brought their passion for protecting and contributing to our understanding of Puget Sound by volunteering their time and personal resources. iii CRAB TEAM STAFF Penelope D. Dalton, Principal Investigator Washington Sea Grant (WSG), Director Jeff Adams, Crab Team Lead WSG, Marine Ecologist Emily Grason, Ph.D., Crab Team Coordinator WSG, Aquatic Invasive Species Specialist Kate Litle, Citizen Science Expert WSG, Assistant Director for Programs P. Sean McDonald, Ph.D., Green Crab Expert UW Program on the Environment, Lecturer/Capstone Instructor UW School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Research Scientist MaryAnn Wagner, Media and Communications Expert WSG, Assistant Director for Communications This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PC 00J29801 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. iv v Abstract The globally invasive European green crab has been on the Salish Sea’s doorstep for two decades, but none were captured from Salish Sea shorelines until 2012. That year, a population was discovered in Sooke Inlet, just west of Victoria, British Columbia. The discovery increased concern about potential impacts of European green crab on Washington’s inland marine shorelines and reinvigorated interest in and support for early detection monitoring. In response, Washington Sea Grant developed the Crab Team with support from the US Environmental Protection Agency and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Crab Team is a volunteer monitoring network carefully designed to maximize the likelihood of detecting green crab while populations are manageable and for gathering related data to increase understanding of natural conditions in suitable green crab habitat. During its first year, Crab Team established seven sites that were monitored by volunteers for the last one or two months of the monitoring season. The approach was then refined using volunteer feedback and staff and peer insights. In 2016, the Crab Team was launched in full, monitoring 26 sites from April to September. The monitoring approach included baited traps, a timed molt search and a habitat survey. All individual organisms collected were identified and counted, with size and sex data collected for a subset of trapped crabs. The data can be used in a variety of ways and will be of increasing value as subsequent years of information are added and particularly if green crab become established at any of the monitoring sites. Of the more than 66,500 live organisms and molts examined during Crab Team’s first two years, only one European green crab was found. Discovery of a green crab in Washington’s inland marine waters demonstrated the effectiveness of the Crab Team approach, but also required a more detailed assessment of population size and distribution. After volunteers collected a green crab on San Juan Island, WDFW coordinated a rapid assessment using Crab Team expertise and equipment as a resource. After two days of intense trapping and searching for molts, evidence (a molt) of only one other green crab was found. The process was repeated again when staff at the Padilla Bay National Estuary Research Reserve found a small green crab. The three-day response effort netted three additional crabs, but there was no evidence of an established population. To further increase the likelihood of green crab early detection in the Salish Sea, the Crab Team developed media relationships, materials and contact lists as part of a broad and ongoing outreach effort. News media coverage reached a wide audience, while groups and individuals likely to spend time on, in or around the water were engaged more directly through presentations, flyers and individual interactions. In this report, we share information about European green crab, the Crab Team approach to monitoring, the Crab Team volunteer training and engagement process and the findings and results from the first two years of Crab Team data collection. vi vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................................III ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... VI INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 10 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 EUROPEAN GREEN CRAB ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Invasion history ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Life history and identification......................................................................................................................................... 12 Potential impacts ................................................................................................................................................................... 16 PUGET SOUND GREEN CRAB MONITORING ............................................................................................................................... 18 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 VOLUNTEER MONITORING EARLY DETECTION PROGRAM ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Risk and Benefit Assessment for Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea Gigas) in South Africa
    Biodiversity Risk and Benefit Assessment for Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in South Africa Prepared in Accordance with Section 14 of the Alien and Invasive Species Regulations, 2014 (Government Notice R 598 of 01 August 2014), promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004). September 2019 Biodiversity Risk and Benefit Assessment for Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in South Africa Document Title Biodiversity Risk and Benefit Assessment for Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in South Africa. Edition Date September 2019 Prepared For Directorate: Sustainable Aquaculture Management Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries Private Bag X2 Roggebaai, 8001 www.daff.gov.za/daffweb3/Branches/Fisheries- Management/Aquaculture-and-Economic- Development Originally Prepared By Dr B. Clark (2012) Anchor Environmental Consultants Reviewed, Updated and Mr. E. Hinrichsen Recompiled By AquaEco as commisioned by Enterprises at (2019) University of Pretoria 1 | P a g e Biodiversity Risk and Benefit Assessment for Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in South Africa CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 9 2. PURPOSE OF THIS RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 9 3. THE RISK ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER ................................................................................. 10 4. NATURE OF THE USE OF PACIFIC OYSTER
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Life-Cycle Analysis of Pacific Ocean Zooplankton by Video Microscopy and DNA Barcoding: Crustacea
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Diversity and life-cycle analysis of Pacific Ocean zooplankton by video microscopy and DNA barcoding: Crustacea Abstract Volume 10 Issue 3 - 2021 Determining the DNA sequencing of a small element in the mitochondrial DNA (DNA Peter Bryant,1 Timothy Arehart2 barcoding) makes it possible to easily identify individuals of different larval stages of 1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of marine crustaceans without the need for laboratory rearing. It can also be used to construct California, USA taxonomic trees, although it is not yet clear to what extent this barcode-based taxonomy 2Crystal Cove Conservancy, Newport Coast, CA, USA reflects more traditional morphological or molecular taxonomy. Collections of zooplankton were made using conventional plankton nets in Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean near Correspondence: Peter Bryant, Department of Newport Beach, California (Lat. 33.628342, Long. -117.927933) between May 2013 and Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, USA, January 2020, and individual crustacean specimens were documented by video microscopy. Email Adult crustaceans were collected from solid substrates in the same areas. Specimens were preserved in ethanol and sent to the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding at the Received: June 03, 2021 | Published: July 26, 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for sequencing of the COI DNA barcode. From 1042 specimens, 544 COI sequences were obtained falling into 199 Barcode Identification Numbers (BINs), of which 76 correspond to recognized species. For 15 species of decapods (Loxorhynchus grandis, Pelia tumida, Pugettia dalli, Metacarcinus anthonyi, Metacarcinus gracilis, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Pleuroncodes planipes, Lophopanopeus sp., Pinnixa franciscana, Pinnixa tubicola, Pagurus longicarpus, Petrolisthes cabrilloi, Portunus xantusii, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, Heptacarpus brevirostris), DNA barcoding allowed the matching of different life-cycle stages (zoea, megalops, adult).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Decapoda
    NATIVE DECAPODA Dungeness crab - Metacarcinus magister DESCRIPTION This crab has white-tipped pinchers on the claws, and the top edges and upper pincers are sawtoothed with dozens of teeth along each edge. The last three joints of the last pair of walking legs have a comb-like fringe of hair on the lower edge. Also the tip of the last segment of the tail flap is rounded as compared to the pointed last segment of many other crabs. RANGE Alaska's Aleutian Islands south to Pt Conception in California SIZE Carapace width to 25 cm (9 inches), but typically less than 20 cm STATUS Native; see the full record at http://www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/dungeness_crab.asp COLOR Light reddish brown on the back, with a purplish wash anteriorly in some specimens. Underside whitish to light orange. HABITAT Rock, sand and eelgrass TIDAL HEIGHT Subtidal to offshore SALINITY Normal range 10–32ppt; 15ppt optimum for hatching TEMPERATURE Normally found from 3–19°C SIMILAR SPECIES Unlike the green crab, it has 10 spines on either side of the eye sockets and grows much larger. It can be distinguished from Metacarcinus gracilis which also has white claws, by the carapace being widest at the 10th tooth vs the 9th in M. gracilis . Unlike the red rock crab it has a tooth on the dorsal margin of its white tipped claw (this and other similar Cancer crabs have black tipped claws). ©Aaron Baldwin © bioweb.uwlax.edu red rock crab - note black tipped claws Plate Watch Monitoring Program .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ocean Intake Effects Study
    City of Santa Cruz Water Department & Soquel Creek Water District scwd2 Desalination Program Open Ocean Intake Effects Study December 2010 Submitted to: Ms. Heidi Luckenbach City of Santa Cruz 212 Locust Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Prepared by: Environmental ESLO2010-017.1 [Blank Page] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Tenera Environmental wishes to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the Santa Cruz Water Department, Soquel Creek Water District, and scwd² Task Force in conducting the Open Ocean Intake Effects Study. Specifically, Tenera would like to acknowledge the efforts of: City of Santa Cruz Water Department Soquel Creek Water District Bill Kocher, Director Laura Brown, General Manager Linette Almond, Engineering Manager Melanie Mow Schumacher, Public Information Heidi R. Luckenbach, Program Coordinator Coordinator Leah Van Der Maaten, Associate Engineer Catherine Borrowman, Professional and Technical scwd² Task Force Assistant Ryan Coonerty Todd Reynolds, Kennedy/Jenks and scwd² Bruce Daniels Technical Advisor Bruce Jaffe Dan Kriege Thomas LaHue Don Lane Cynthia Mathews Mike Rotkin Ed Porter Tenera’s project team included the following members: David L. Mayer, Ph.D., Tenera Environmental President and Principal Scientist John Steinbeck, Tenera Environmental Vice President and Principal Scientist Carol Raifsnider, Tenera Environmental Director of Operations and Principal Scientist Technical review and advice was provided by: Pete Raimondi, Ph.D., UCSC, Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology in the Earth and Marine Sciences Dept. Gregor
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Seal Species Profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014
    (Photograph by G. E. Davis) Harbor seal species profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014 Jacqlynn C. Zier and Joseph K. Gaydos* SeaDoc Society / UC Davis’ Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center Orcas Island Office 942 Deer Harbor Road, Eastsound, WA 98245 *Corresponding author [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Distribution .............................................................................................................. 3 Global .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Local ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Populations .............................................................................................................. 4 Genetic diversity ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Population size ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Longevity and survival ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Metagenetic Analysis of 2018 and 2019 Plankton Samples from Prince
    Metagenetic Analysis of 2018 and 2019 Plankton Samples from Prince William Sound, Alaska. Report to Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) From Molecular Ecology Laboratory Moss Landing Marine Laboratory Dr. Jonathan Geller Melinda Wheelock Martin Guo Any opinions expressed in this PWSRCAC-commissioned report are not necessarily those of PWSRCAC. April 13, 2020 ABSTRACT This report describes the methods and findings of the metagenetic analysis of plankton samples from the waters of Prince William Sound (PWS), Alaska, taken in May of 2018 and 2019. The study was done to identify zooplankton, in particular the larvae of benthic non-indigenous species (NIS). Plankton samples, collected by the Prince William Sound Science Center (PWSSC), were analyzed by the Molecular Ecology Laboratory at the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories. The samples were taken from five stations in Port Valdez and nearby in PWS. DNA was extracted from bulk plankton and a portion of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (the most commonly used DNA barcode for animals) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Products of PCR were sequenced using Illumina reagents and MiSeq instrument. In 2018, 257 operational taxonomic units (OTU; an approximation of biological species) were found and 60 were identified to species. In 2019, 523 OTU were found and 126 were identified to species. Most OTU had no reference sequence and therefore could not be identified. Most identified species were crustaceans and mollusks, and none were non-native. Certain species typical of fouling communities, such as Porifera (sponges) and Bryozoa (moss animals) were scarce. Larvae of many species in these phyla are poorly dispersing, such that they will be found in abundance only in close proximity to adult populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and Its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2016/035 Pacific Region Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions Emily Rubidge1, Katie S. P. Gale1, Janelle M. R. Curtis2, Erin McClelland3, Laura Feyrer4, Karin Bodtker5, Carrie Robb5 1Institute of Ocean Sciences Fisheries & Oceans Canada P.O. Box 6000 Sidney, BC V8L 4B2 2Pacific Biological Station Fisheries & Oceans Canada 3190 Hammond Bay Rd Nanaimo, BC V9T 1K6 3EKM Scientific Consulting 4BC Ministry of Environment P.O. Box 9335 STN PROV GOVT Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 5Living Oceans Society 204-343 Railway St. Vancouver, BC V6A 1A4 May 2016 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Rubidge, E., Gale, K.S.P., Curtis, J.M.R., McClelland, E., Feyrer, L., Bodtker, K., and Robb, C. 2016. Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Redirect Notice
    UC San Diego Research Theses and Dissertations Title The population dynamics of mitten crab larvae in the San Francisco Bay Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/01g8c0ck Author Gonzales, Vanessa Alexandra Publication Date 2010-10-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ABSTRACT THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF MITTEN CRAB LARVAE IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY The Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis, has a history of invasions in numerous countries. In 1992, the Chinese mitten crab was introduced to the San Francisco Bay/Delta system. Since its invasion in the San Francisco Bay, it has become an aquatic nuisance species. Little is known about the population dynamics of the megalopa stage of the Chinese mitten crab in the San Francisco Bay estuary, particularly the megalopa stage. Light traps are often used to sample marine larvae and can provide measures for relative abundance of larvae between sampling locations. As part of an ongoing study to monitor mitten crab larvae in the San Francisco Bay, light trap and plankton tow samples were analyzed for mitten crab megalopae and zoeae. In order to implement low cost sampling devices for mitten crab megalopae such as light traps, it is necessary to be able to identify their larvae in collected samples. Thus, the main objective of this work was to develop a means to distinguish mitten crab megalopae from other native and invasive brachyuran megalopae inhabiting the San Francisco Bay Estuary. The minimal amount of mitten crab megalopae found in light trap samples may be linked to the recent decline of mitten crab zoeae in San Pablo Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Ocean Outfall Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring & Assessment Report
    South Bay Ocean Outfall Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring & Assessment Report 2015 City of San Diego Ocean Monitoring Program Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Division South Bay Ocean Outfall Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring & Assessment Report, 2015 (Order No. R9-2013-0006; NPDES No. CA0109045) Prepared by: City of San Diego Ocean Monitoring Program Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Division, Public Utilities Department Timothy D. Stebbins, Editor Ami K. Latker, Managing Editor June 2016 Table of Contents Production Credits and Acknowledgements ..........................................................................iii Table and Figure Listing ..........................................................................................................iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................x Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................1 T. Stebbins, A. Latker Chapter 1. General Introduction ............................................................................................7 T. Stebbins, A. Latker Background .............................................................................................................................7 Receiving Waters Monitoring .................................................................................................7 Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • King County Zooplankton Monitoring Annual Report 2017
    King County Zooplankton Monitoring Annual Report 2017 31 August 2018 Dr. Julie E. Keister Box 357940 Seattle, WA 98195 (206) 543-7620 [email protected] Prepared by: Dr. Julie E. Keister, Amanda Winans, and BethElLee Herrmann King County Zooplankton Monitoring Annual Report 2017 Project Oversight and Report Preparation The zooplankton analyses reported herein were conducted in Dr. Julie E. Keister’s laboratory at the University of Washington, School of Oceanography. Dr. Keister designed the protocols for the field zooplankton sampling and laboratory analysis. Field sampling was conducted by the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water and Land Resources Division. Taxonomic analysis was conducted by Amanda Winans, BethElLee Herrmann, and Michelle McCartha at the University of Washington. This report was prepared by Winans and Herrmann, with oversight by Dr. Keister. Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their contributions to the successful 2017 sampling and analysis of the King County zooplankton monitoring in the Puget Sound: From King County, we thank Kimberle Stark, Wendy Eash-Loucks, the King County Environmental Laboratory field scientists, and the captain and crew of the R/V SoundGuardian. We would also like to thank our collaborators Moira Galbraith and Kelly Young from Fisheries and Oceans Canada Institute of Ocean Sciences for their expert guidance in species identification and Cheryl Morgan from Oregon State University for assistance in designing sampling and analysis protocols. King County Water and Land Resources Division provided funding for these analyses, with supplemental funding provided by Long Live the Kings for analysis of oblique tow (bongo net) samples as part of the Salish Sea Marine Survival Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4A. Intake Effects Assessment Report
    West Basin Municipal Water District Desalination Demonstration Facility Intake Effects Assessment Report August 13, 2014 Submitted to: Ms. Diane Gatza West Basin Municipal Water District 17140 S. Avalon Blvd., Suite 210 Carson, CA 90746 Prepared by: Environmental 141 Suburban Rd., Suite A2, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ESLO2012-020.1 Executive Summary Executive Summary This report presents an assessment of potential impacts to marine life due to water withdrawals associated with the operation of open ocean intakes for a demonstration ocean water desalination facility constructed and operated by the West Basin Municipal Water District (West Basin) and an intake for a full-scale desalination plant being proposed by West Basin. The demonstration facility uses a wedgewire screen module (WWS) as part of the intake. WWS was designed to reduce impacts on marine organisms by reducing the number of organisms that are entrained, or drawn into the intake, and the numbers of organisms that become impinged on the screen surface. The two objectives of these studies were 1) to determine the potential effects on marine organisms due to the operation of the intakes for the demonstration and full-scale facilities, and 2) to determine the efficiency of the WWS at reducing the effects of entrainment and impingement. The study assessing the potential effects on marine organisms was completed as one phase of the project, while additional studies were conducted to evaluate the efficiency of the screening system at reducing impacts. The combined results from all studies provide an overall assessment of the impacts of the demonstration facility, the proposed full-scale facility, and of the potential reductions in impacts due to the use of WWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Planktonic Associations Between Medusae (Classes Scyphozoa and Hydrozoa) and Epifaunal Crustaceans
    Planktonic associations between medusae (classes Scyphozoa and Hydrozoa) and epifaunal crustaceans Kaden Muffett and Maria Pia Miglietta Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University - Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States ABSTRACT Jellyfish are known to carry various epibionts, including many of the subphylum Crustacea. However, the associations between gelatinous zooplankton and other invertebrates have been chronically overlooked. Crustacea, a massive clade of economically, ecologically, and culturally important species, includes many taxa that utilize gelatinous zooplankton for food, transport, and protection as both adults and juveniles. Here we compile 211 instances of epifaunal crustaceans recorded on Hydromedusae and Scyphomedusae from a century of literature. These include 78 identified crustacean species in 65 genera across nine orders found upon 37 Hydromedusa species and 48 Scyphomedusae. The crustacean life stage, location, nature of the association with the medusa, years, months, and depths are compiled to form a comprehensive view of the current state of the literature. Additionally, this review highlights areas where the current literature is lacking, particularly noting our poor understanding of the relationships between juvenile crabs of commercially valuable species and medusae. Subjects Ecology, Marine Biology, Zoology Keywords Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, Crustacea, Association, Commensal, Epifauna, Marine, Jellyfish, Medusa Submitted 17 December 2020 Accepted 24 March 2021 BACKGROUND Published 23 April 2021 An increased focus on ocean climate research in the past 20 years has made clear the Corresponding author fragility of the world’s oceans and the organisms that live within them. The rate at which Kaden Muffett, species are disappearing, undergoing climate-related range fluctuations, and experiencing [email protected] developmental and behavioral changes is unlike anything seen in the time of record Academic editor Antonina Dos Santos (Walther et al., 2002; Guinotte & Fabry, 2008; Comeaux, Allison & Bianchi, 2012).
    [Show full text]