DOCSLIB.ORG

Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT August 2017 Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project IS/EA Project Information 1. Project Title Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project California Department of Water Resources Division of Environmental Services 3500 Industrial Blvd. West Sacramento, CA 95691 2. Lead Agency Name and Address U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Bay-Delta Office 801 I Street, Suite 140 Sacramento, CA 95814 Karen Enstrom Yolo Bypass Habitat Restoration Program Division of Environmental Services [email protected] 3. Contact Person and (916) 376-9778 Phone Number Ben Nelson Bay-Delta Office [email protected] (916) 414-2424 4. Project Sponsor’s California Department of Water Resources Name The project area includes Fremont Weir, a portion of the Fremont Weir Wildlife Area, two downstream agricultural road crossings in the Tule Canal, and an area within the northern Elkhorn Basin. Fremont Weir is located adjacent to the Sacramento River, between River Mile (RM) 82 and RM 84, along the northern boundary of the Yolo Bypass. The Yolo 5. Project Location Bypass is located in Yolo County and extends from the Fremont Weir northeast of Woodland, California, south to the Cache Slough Complex near the city of Rio Vista, California. The project area is located within the United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute Knight’s Landing, Gray’s Bend, and Verona quadrangles. 6. General Plan Agriculture Designation 7. Zoning Agricultural Intensive 8. Surrounding Land Surrounding land uses include agriculture and open space. Uses and Setting August 2017 Page i Project Information The proposed project may require permits or approvals from the following: United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Central Valley 9. Other Public Agencies Flood Protection Board, California State Lands Commission, California Whose Approval may Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Office of Historic be Required Preservation, Yolo County, and the State Water Resources Control Board or Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Page ii August 2017 Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project IS/EA Contents Project Information ................................................................................................................................. i Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ xvii 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Area .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Background ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3.1 Regulatory Compliance .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Existing Project Area Features To Be Modified ..................................................................... 4 1.3.2.1 Fremont Weir ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2.2 Fremont Weir Fish Ladder .............................................................................................. 4 1.3.2.3 Scour Channels and Deep Pond Extending Downstream from the Fremont Weir Fish Ladder ........................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.2.4 Tule Pond ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2.5 Tule Canal ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2.6 Agricultural Road Crossing 2 .......................................................................................... 8 1.3.2.7 Agricultural Road Crossing 3 .......................................................................................... 8 1.3.3 Other Existing Facilities in the Project Area ........................................................................ 12 1.3.3.1 Agricultural Road Crossing 1 ........................................................................................ 12 1.3.3.2 Agricultural Road Crossing 4 ........................................................................................ 13 1.3.3.3 Wallace Weir ................................................................................................................. 16 1.3.3.4 Toe Drain ....................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.3.5 Lisbon Weir ................................................................................................................... 16 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 18 1.5 Purpose and Intended Use of this IS/EA ...................................................................................... 18 1.6 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May Be Required ........................................................ 19 1.7 Document Organization ............................................................................................................... 19 2.0 Description of the Proposed Project and No-Action Alternative ............................................... 21 2.1 No-Action Alternative .................................................................................................................. 21 2.2 Proposed Project ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.1 Proposed Modifications to Existing Facilities in the Project Area ....................................... 21 2.2.1.1 Fremont Weir Fish Ladder Modification ....................................................................... 21 2.2.1.2 Fremont Weir Stilling Basin Modification .................................................................... 23 2.2.1.3 Upstream Channel Modification ................................................................................... 23 2.2.1.4 Reach 1 Modification .................................................................................................... 27 2.2.1.5 Agricultural Road Crossing 2 Modification .................................................................. 27 2.2.1.6 Agricultural Road Crossing 3 Modification .................................................................. 29 2.2.2 Proposed Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 29 2.2.2.1 Fremont Weir Fish Passage Structure Construction ...................................................... 30 2.2.2.2 Fremont Weir Stilling Basin Construction .................................................................... 32 2.2.2.3 Upstream Channel Construction .................................................................................... 35 2.2.2.4 Reach 1 Construction..................................................................................................... 36 2.2.2.5 Agricultural Road Crossing 2 Construction .................................................................. 36 2.2.2.6 Agricultural Road Crossing 3 Construction .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.37 2.2.3 Operation and Maintenance .................................................................................................. 39 2.2.3.1 Fremont Weir Fish Passage Structure Operation and Maintenance .............................. 39 August 2017 Page v Contents 2.2.3.2 Fremont Weir Stilling Basin Maintenance .................................................................... 42 2.2.3.3 Upstream Channel Maintenance .................................................................................... 42 2.2.3.4 Reach 1 Maintenance ..................................................................................................... 42 2.2.3.5 Agricultural Road Crossing 2 Maintenance .................................................................. 42 2.2.4 Anticipated Construction Equipment .................................................................................... 42 3.0 Environmental Setting, Discussion of Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ................................ 44 3.1 Resources Eliminated from Further Analysis .............................................................................. 45 3.1.1 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................... 45 3.1.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts ......................................................................................................... 45 3.1.3 Indian Sacred Sites ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2
    For DFG use only Proposal No. Region Section 1: Summary Information 1. Project title: Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2. Applicant name: California Department of Water Resources 3. Contact person: Ted Sommer, PhD 4. Address: Department of Water Resources. 3500 Industrial Blvd, 2nd Flr. 5. City, State, Zip: West Sacramento CA, 95691 6. Telephone #: 916-376-9772 7. Fax #: 916-376-9688 8. Email address: [email protected] 9. Agency Type: Federal Agency State Agency Local Agency Nonprofit Organization University (CSU/UC) Native American Indian Tribe 10. Certified nonprofit Yes No Organization: 11. New grantee: Yes No Previous recipient of a Cal-Fed Science award. 12. Amount requested: $878,020 13. Total project cost: $878,020 14. Topic Area(s): Primary: At-Risk Species Assessment Secondary: Estuary Foodweb Productivity, Fish Passage, Lowland Floodplains and Bypasses, and Shallow Water and Marsh Habitat. 15. ERP Project type: Primary: Research Secondary: Monitoring and Planning. 16. Ecosystem Element: Primary: Essential Fish Habitats Secondary: Bay-Delta Aquatic Food Web, Freshwater Fish Habitat, Tidal Perennial Aquatic Habitat 17. Water Quality N/A Constituent: 18. At-Risk species Central Valley spring-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Delta smelt critical benefited: habitat; Sacramento River winter-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Central Valley fall-/late-fall-run Chinook salmon ESU, Green Sturgeon ESU 19. Project objectives: Perform research to guide Yolo Bypass restoration actions to enhance passage for migrating adult salmon and sturgeon, and optimize juvenile salmon rearing. Analyze existing salmon and food web data, conduct telemetry, genetics, and physiology studies, and evaluate isotopes for assessing population-wide floodplain use.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Land Management Plan EDAW California Department of Fish and Game I Table of Contents
    YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2008 YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA 45211 COUNTY ROAD 32B DAVIS, CA 95618 CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ AREA MANAGER 530/757-2431 PREPARED BY: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ YOLO BASIN FOUNDATION CONTACT: ROBIN KULAKOW IN ASSOCIATION WITH: EDAW 2022 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 CONTACT: CHRIS FITZER 916/414-5800 JUNE 2008 FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game Bay Delta Region 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 PREPARED BY: EDAW, Inc. 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)414-5800 APPROVED BY: Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 The Mission of the California Department of Fish and Game ..................................................... 1-6 1.2 Purpose of Wildlife Areas ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 History and Purpose of Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project
    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife December 2017 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 Contact: Craig Weightman (707) 944-5500 Prepared by: Douglas Environmental 1517 28th Street Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Doug Brown Principal (916) 739-8407 December 2017 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Division 6, Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6, Sections 15070 and 15071 of the California Administrative Code, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife does cause to be filed with the State of California, this Mitigated Negative Declaration. 1. Title and Short Description of Project: Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project (proposed project) The proposed project includes five major improvements, identified as Project Components, that are being proposed to enhance the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) ability to manage wetland resources and agricultural operations within the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area (YBWA). Specific improvements include installing new water control structures, expanding canals, installing box culverts and two con-span bridges, replacing existing culverts, raising road grades, separating dual function ditches, relocating an existing water pump, and installing two new pumps. 2. Location of Project: The proposed project is located within the northern portion of the YBWA within the southern portion of Yolo County, California. The YBWA is located directly west of the City of West Sacramento and is approximately 2.5 miles east of the eastern edge of the City of Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Land Management Plan EDAW California Department of Fish and Game I Table of Contents
    YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2008 YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA 45211 COUNTY ROAD 32B DAVIS, CA 95618 CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ AREA MANAGER 530/757-2431 PREPARED BY: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ YOLO BASIN FOUNDATION CONTACT: ROBIN KULAKOW IN ASSOCIATION WITH: EDAW 2022 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 CONTACT: CHRIS FITZER 916/414-5800 JUNE 2008 FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game Bay Delta Region 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 PREPARED BY: EDAW, Inc. 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)414-5800 APPROVED BY: Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 The Mission of the California Department of Fish and Game ..................................................... 1-6 1.2 Purpose of Wildlife Areas ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 History and Purpose of Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo County, California
    Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Yolo County, California December 2012 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 625 Court Street, Room 202, Woodland, CA 95695 December 2012 Final Page 1 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan This Page Intentionally Blank December 2012 Final Page 2 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements Yolo County would like to thank those Yolo County Operational Area collaborators and partners who participated in the planning and development of this document. The official Yolo County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee provided the oversight and dedication to this project that was required and without their commitment; this project would not be possible. As with any working plan, this document represents planning strategies and guidance as understood as of the date of this plan’s release. This plan identifies natural hazards and risks and identifies the hazard mitigation strategy to reduce vulnerability and make the communities of Yolo County more disaster resistant and sustainable. December 2012 Final Page 3 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 6-1999 Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration. Programmatic EIS/EIR Technical Appendix CalFed Bay-Delta Program Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation CalFed Bay-Delta Program, "Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration. Programmatic EIS/EIR Technical Appendix" (1999). California Agencies. Paper 353. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/353 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALF ED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM Eco~y~tem Re~toration Program Plan, ~trategic Plan for Eco~y~tem Re~toration SfATE DEPOSI10RY LAW LIBRARY JUN 2 5 t999 GOLDEN GATE U~i vtl<SIT\' m Draft Programmatic EIVEIR Technical Appendix 212 · 1~~~ June 1qqq T I R GRAM 1. Define 2. Select ·· Problem Goals and Objectives 3. Prepare Conceptual Models CAL FED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM Cover background image courtesy of California Department of Water Resources Digital Image Library. http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/photos/dwr Photo ID: 5640 1631 2672 0029 DWRID: 8310-447 CALFED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE CHAPTER 1 . INTRODUCTION . • • . • • . • . • • • . • • • • . • . • . • • . • • • • . • • . • • • . • • • . • • . • • . • • • • . • 1 Relationship of the ERP to the CALFED Bay-Delta Program Mission ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area: a Birding Hotspot in the Making
    Site Guide Reprinted from the Central Valley Bird Club Bulletin Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area: A birding hotspot in the making Joan Humphrey, 733 M Street, Davis, CA 95616 Dan Stoebel, 603 Oriole Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 A new addition to California’s State Wildlife Areas, the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area (YBWA), is just waiting to be discovered by birders. YBWA is a developing birding hotspot covering over 2,500 acres of permanent and seasonal wetlands, with an additional 1,200 acres of riparian and upland habitats. The focus of the largest wetlands restoration project west of Florida, it required 7 years and a major cooperative effort from concept through construction. The YBWA, now managed by the California Department of Fish and Game, opened in November 1997, and has already proven to be a rich and diverse area. The site has qualified as “Globally Important” in the American Bird Conservancy’s United States Important Bird Areas Program. As its name suggests, the YBWA is located totally inside the Yolo Bypass, a flood control system that receives water from the Sacramento River in periods of heavy flows. The land surrounding the YBWA is agricultural, although in winter fields are fallow and often flooded. Occasional heavy flooding turns the bypass into an inland sea, which attracts rafts of ducks and other waterbirds. Just north of YBWA are other wetland areas which reinforce wildlife interest in the region. Conaway Ranch has developed extensive wetland habitat to support breeding waterfowl and the City of Davis has recently established a 400-acre wetlands site. Duck clubs to the south of the wildlife area also provide winter habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Yolo County Open Space & Recreation Resources
    2.0 YOLO COUNTY OPEN SPACE & RECREATION RESOURCES This Chapter presents an overview of the characteristics of open space lands, existing open space resources, recreation patterns and activities, and recreation opportunities in Yolo County. For additional information, please refer to the Open Space and Recreation Element Background Report. 2.1 What Are Open Space Lands? Yolo County has abundant open space and numerous recreational opportunities. The open space available for recreation can be categorized into three very specific environments; (1) the grasslands of the central part of the county, (2) the Coast Range to the west, including the Blue Ridge mountains, and (3) water resources the riparian areas, including Cache Creek, Putah Creek, and the Sacramento River. Physical Characteristics The landscape of Yolo County is varied and allows for a wide range of recreational activities. The Delta/Sacramento River. The Delta/Sacramento River is that section of Yolo County following the Sacramento River and Yolo Bypass. The majority of visitor-serving businesses in this area can be found in one of three communities: Knights Landing, West Sacramento and Clarksburg, with West Sacramento by far the largest. Four County parks are located in this area, serving the three communities: Knights Landing Boat Launch, Elkhorn Boat Launch (near West Sacramento), Clarksburg Boat Launch, and Helvetia Oak Grove. Recreational opportunities in the Delta region include boating, fishing, cycling, wine tasting, bird watching, and sightseeing. Grasslands. The Grasslands area of Yolo County is the relatively flat terrain making up the majority of the county. Most of this area is productive agricultural land. Regional parks make up the majority of the recreational opportunity space and include Grasslands Regional Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Nishi Gateway Project Historic Resources Survey and Evaluation Report
    Nishi Gateway Project Historic Resources Survey and Evaluation Report PREPARED FOR: City of Davis PREPARED BY: Ascent Environmental 455 Capitol Mall Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Chris Mundhenk Alta Cunningham, M.A. April 2015 Ascent Environmental Historic Resources Survey and Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ II 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Description and Background............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Project Area ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Early Settlement ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 The City of Davis ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.3 Transportation ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES The Yolo Basin is rich in cultural history. From the earliest Native American inhabitants to those farming and residing there in recent times, the Yolo Basin has been an important part of people’s being and livelihood. This section provides information on the prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic settings, previous cultural resource investigations in the property and surrounding vicinity, and resources that have been documented and recorded in the Yolo Wildlife Area. The following text was developed through a cultural records search, review of literature and existing data sources, Yolo Wildlife Area staff information, Foundation program information, and EDAW staff expertise. 3.6.2 ETHNOGRAPHIC SETTING The Yolo Basin is within the ethnographic territory of the Patwin. The word “Patwin” literally means “the people” in the native tongue. Although native people did not identify themselves as Patwin, this name is used to describe a series of linguistically and culturally related groups who occupied a portion of the lower Sacramento Valley west of the Sacramento River and north of Suisun Bay. Major sources of information on these groups include the works of Bennyhoff (1977), Johnson (1978), Kroeber (1925), McKern (1922 and 1923), Powers (1877), and Work (1945). These people spoke dialects of a single historically related language. Use of the Patwin language extended southward to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta system. There were numerous dialects, which were historically recorded including Hill, River, Cache Creek, Lake, Tebti, Dahcini and Suisun (Shipley 1978). Powers (1877) identified 14 tribes based upon linguistic differences, while Merriam, using linguistic and geographic boundaries identified 10 tribes within three broad distinct dialect divisions (Patwin, Win, and Pooewin).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage EIS/EIR
    Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2017 Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior California Department of Water Resources Bureau of Reclamation Mission Statements The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report Lead Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) State Clearinghouse # 2013032004 ABSTRACT Reclamation and DWR have made available for public review and comment the Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project (Project) Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR). The Draft EIS/EIR addresses methods to improve fish passage and increase floodplain fisheries rearing habitat in the Yolo Bypass to benefit
    [Show full text]
  • Davis, California: Citywide Survey and Historic Context Update Prepared by Kara Brunzell, Brunzell Historical for the City of Davis, 2015
    Davis, California: Citywide Survey and Historic Context Update Prepared by Kara Brunzell, Brunzell Historical for the City of Davis, 2015. Brunzell Historical Davis, California: Citywide Survey and Historic Context Update October, 2015 Contents Davis, California: Citywide Survey and Historic Context Update .............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Preparer ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Historic Register Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 2 National Register of Historic Places & .................................................................................................. 2 California Register of Historic Resources ............................................................................................. 2 City of Davis Register of Historical Resources ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]