DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 6-1999 Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration. Programmatic EIS/EIR Technical Appendix CalFed Bay-Delta Program Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation CalFed Bay-Delta Program, "Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan, Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration. Programmatic EIS/EIR Technical Appendix" (1999). California Agencies. Paper 353. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/353 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALF ED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM Eco~y~tem Re~toration Program Plan, ~trategic Plan for Eco~y~tem Re~toration SfATE DEPOSI10RY LAW LIBRARY JUN 2 5 t999 GOLDEN GATE U~i vtl<SIT\' m Draft Programmatic EIVEIR Technical Appendix 212 · 1~~~ June 1qqq T I R GRAM 1. Define 2. Select ·· Problem Goals and Objectives 3. Prepare Conceptual Models CAL FED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM Cover background image courtesy of California Department of Water Resources Digital Image Library. http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/photos/dwr Photo ID: 5640 1631 2672 0029 DWRID: 8310-447 CALFED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE CHAPTER 1 . INTRODUCTION . • • . • • . • . • • • . • • • • . • . • . • • . • • • • . • • . • • • . • • • . • • . • • . • • • • . • 1 Relationship of the ERP to the CALFED Bay-Delta Program Mission ........................................... 1 The Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration ................................................................................. 1 The Bay-Delta Ecosystem ................................................................................................................ 2 The Need for Restoration ................................................................................................................. 3 What is Ecosystem Restoration? ...................................................................................................... 4 The Scope and Focus of the ERP ..................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2. ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT .......••••..•..........•..••....•.....•••..•••.....• 7 The Advantages Ecosystem-Based Management. ............................................................................ 7 Contrasting Ecosystem-Based and Species-Based Management.. ................................................... 7 Elements of Ecosystem-Based Management... ................................................................................. 8 Addressing the Uncertainty Inherent in Natural Systems through Adaptive Management.. ......... I 0 Reducing Uncertainty by Learning From Restoration Actions ...................................................... 11 Experimental Protocol for Adaptive Management... ...................................................................... 14 Addressing Political, Regulatory and Economic Uncertainty ........................................................ 14 CHAPTER 3. THE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROCESS .....•••.•••••••••.••••.•.......•••.....•••... 16 Defining the Problem ..................................................................................................................... 16 Defining Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 16 Developing Conceptual Models ..................................................................................................... 16 Defining Restoration Actions ......................................................................................................... 19 Monitoring Restoration Actions ..................................................................................................... 19 Evaluating and Revising Problems, Goals, Objectives, Conceptual Models and Restoration Actions ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Decision Nodes ............................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 4. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .••....••...••••••••.....•••..•••.•••••.••...•....••.••..•••......• 21 Development of CALF ED Program Mission and Objectives ........................................................ 21 CAL FED Ecosystem Restoration Goals ........................................................................................ 21 CALF ED Ecosystem Restoration Objectives................................................................................. 26 Relationship of Goals, Objective, Targets and Actions ................................................................. 28 Strategic Plan for Ecosystem Restoration _.. CALFED -BAY-DELTA Table of Contents -....._PROGRAM June 7999 CHAPTER 5. IMPLEMENTING THE ERP .................................................................. 29 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 29 Refining the List of ERP Actions for Stage 1 oflmplementation.................................................. 30 Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 30 Demonstration Watersheds ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Critical Uncertainties and Impediments to Restoration ................................................................. 34 Seizing Upon Restoration Opportunities ........................................................................................ 37 Regulatory Compliance .................................................................................................................. 43 CHAPTER 6. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS ..••••.• 45 Institutional Structure ..................................................................................................................... 45 Public lnvolvement. ........................................................................................................................ 46 Public Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 47 Scientific Review ........................................................................................................................... 47 Dispute Resolution ......................................................................................................................... 48 Information Management System .................................................................................................. 49 APPENDIX A. DEFINING THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS: A HISTORICAL APPROACH •••...•••.••••••.•••...•.....•••.••••••••••••••••••.•.•••••..•••...••••••••••••• A-1 The Importance on a Historical Perspective ................................................................................ A-1 Conditions Before European Colonization .................................................................................. A-1 Present Conditions and Trends .................................................................................................. A-13 APPENDIX B. FURTHER ExAMPLES OF CONCEPTUAL MODELS ................................. B-1 Landscape Level Model ............................................................................................................... B-1 Conceptual Mode I of Entrainment ............................................................................................... B-1 Model of Contrasting X2 Relationships ....................................................................................... B-2 Conceptual Model of Meander Migration in a Regulated River. ................................................. B-4 APPENDIX C. AN ExAMPLE OF ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT USING CONCEPTUAL MODELS: CHINOOK SALMON AND DEER CREEK .................................. C-1 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... C-1 Background .................................................................................................................................. C-2 Overall Conceptual Model for Spring-run Chinook Salmon. ....................................................... C-3 A Systemic, Process-Based Strategy for Ecosystem Restoration of Lower Deer Creek. ............. C-7 Implementing Adaptive Management ........................................................................................ C-12 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ C-13 APPENDIX D. DRAFT STAGE 1 ACTIONS .••...•.•..•.••••..••••••••••••••••.••••..•..•••....•.•.••.•. D-1 Draft Delta Stage I Actions......................................................................................................... D-I Draft
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites
    Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes 1 S1 2 S4 3 S7 4 S9 5 S11 Port of Sacramento S12 (Department of 6 1,710,000 3, 5 South Island Prospect Island Interior Bureau of Land Management?) 7 S13 S14 8 USACE N/A 3 Grand Island Placement Site S16 9 USACE 3,000,000 3 Rio Vista Placement Site DWR, Mega S19 10 Sands, Port of 20,000,000 3 Decker Island Placement Site Sacramento S20 Port of Sacramento 11 1,000,000 3, 5 Augusta Pit Placement Site (DWR?) S31 12 Port of Sacramento Placement Port of Sacramento Site Reclamation S32 13 Districts 999 and (six segments) 900 S35 DOW Chemical 14 Montezuma Hills Placement 890,000 3 Company Site 15 SX Sacramento Muni 1 Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes Utility District Sherman Lake (Sherman 16 USACE 3,000,000 3 Island?) 17 Montezuma Wetlands Project Montezuma LLC Montezuma Wetlands 18 Montezuma LLC Rehandling Site Expanded Scour Pond Dredge material 19 Placement Site (also called Yes DWR according to WDR #R5- 250,000 1, 2, 3,4 Sherman Island?) 2004-0061 Port of Stockton McCormack Pit Placement maintenance material 20 Site (also called Sherman Yes DWR only 250,000 3,4 Island?) WDR R5-2003-0145 Proposed Iron House Levy repair and 21 Jersey Island Placement Site Restoration 3 Sanitation District maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 California Regulations for Waterfowl and Upland Game Hunting, Public Lands
    Table of Contents CALIFORNIA General Information Contacting DFG ....................................... 2 10-11 Licenses, Stamps, & Permits................... 3 Waterfowl & Upland Shoot Time Tables ................................... 4 Game Hunting and Unlawful Activities .......................... 6 Hunting & Other Public Uses on State & Federal Waterfowl Hunting Lands Regulations Summary of Changes for 10-11 ............... 7 Seasons and Limits ................................. 9 Effective July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Waterfowl Consumption Health except as noted. Warnings ............................................. 12 State of California Special Goose Hunt Area Maps ............ 14 Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Waterfowl Zone Map ....Inside Back Cover Natural Resources Agency Upland Game Bird, Small Game Secretary Lester A. Snow Mammal, and Crow Hunting Regulation Summary ............................. 16 Fish and Game Commission President Jim Kellogg Seasons & Limits Table ......................... 17 Vice President Richard B. Rogers Hunt Zones ............................................ 18 Commissioner Michael Sutton Hunting and Other Public Uses on Commissioner Daniel W. Richards State and Federal Areas Acting Executive Director Jon Fischer Reservation System .............................. 20 General Public Use Activities on Department of Fish and Game Director John McCamman All State Wildlife Areas ....................... 23 Hunting, Firearms, and Archery Alternate communication formats are available upon request. If reasonable
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh Iii Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SHILOH III WIND PLANT PROJECT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN P REPARED BY: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2800 Cottage Way, W-2650 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Mike Thomas, Chief Habitat Conservation Planning Branch W ITH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM: ICF International 630 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Brad Schafer 916.737.3000 February 2011 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh III Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan. February. (ICF 00263.09). Sacramento, CA. With technical assistance from ICF International, Sacramento, CA. Contents Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.2 Species Covered by the HCP ...................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Proposed Action Addressed in this EA ....................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action .......................................................................... 1‐2 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed Action .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2
    For DFG use only Proposal No. Region Section 1: Summary Information 1. Project title: Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2. Applicant name: California Department of Water Resources 3. Contact person: Ted Sommer, PhD 4. Address: Department of Water Resources. 3500 Industrial Blvd, 2nd Flr. 5. City, State, Zip: West Sacramento CA, 95691 6. Telephone #: 916-376-9772 7. Fax #: 916-376-9688 8. Email address: [email protected] 9. Agency Type: Federal Agency State Agency Local Agency Nonprofit Organization University (CSU/UC) Native American Indian Tribe 10. Certified nonprofit Yes No Organization: 11. New grantee: Yes No Previous recipient of a Cal-Fed Science award. 12. Amount requested: $878,020 13. Total project cost: $878,020 14. Topic Area(s): Primary: At-Risk Species Assessment Secondary: Estuary Foodweb Productivity, Fish Passage, Lowland Floodplains and Bypasses, and Shallow Water and Marsh Habitat. 15. ERP Project type: Primary: Research Secondary: Monitoring and Planning. 16. Ecosystem Element: Primary: Essential Fish Habitats Secondary: Bay-Delta Aquatic Food Web, Freshwater Fish Habitat, Tidal Perennial Aquatic Habitat 17. Water Quality N/A Constituent: 18. At-Risk species Central Valley spring-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Delta smelt critical benefited: habitat; Sacramento River winter-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Central Valley fall-/late-fall-run Chinook salmon ESU, Green Sturgeon ESU 19. Project objectives: Perform research to guide Yolo Bypass restoration actions to enhance passage for migrating adult salmon and sturgeon, and optimize juvenile salmon rearing. Analyze existing salmon and food web data, conduct telemetry, genetics, and physiology studies, and evaluate isotopes for assessing population-wide floodplain use.
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project
    Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project Prepared for CSAMP/CAMT Project funded by State and Federal Water Contractors Prepared by Graham Long and Sally Rudd Compass Resource Management Ltd. 604.641.2875 Suite 210- 111 Water Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1A7 www.compassrm.com Date May 4, 2018 April 13th – reviewed by TWG and comments incorporated Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Approach .......................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Definition ........................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 9 Evaluation of Trade-offs ................................................................................................. 17 Discussion and Recommendations ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Go Outside and Play!
    Go Outside and Play! Department of Regional Parks 10361 Rockingham Dr, Ste 100, Sacramento, CA 95827 (916) 875-6961 www.sacparks.net Annual Regional Parks Passes Available 1. Vehicle $50.00 2. Motorized Vessel/Trailer/Oversize Vehicle $100.00 3. Non-Motorized Vessel (kayak, canoe, etc) $30.00 *Vehicle Annual Pass purchased separately 4. Vehicle with Horse Trailer (trailer allowed in equestrian staging areas only) $75.00 Prices subject to change WHERE TO PURCHASE AN ANNUAL PASS Regional Parks Office (10361 Rockingham Dr, Ste 100) in Rancho Cordova American River Parkway Foundation Office (5700 Arden Way) in William B. Pond Recreation Area Effie Yeaw Nature Center (2850 San Lorenzo Way) in Ancil Hoffman Park Call 916-875-6961 To request an application by mail Purchase online www.arpf.org Multiple local retailers offer the Annual Pass for sale. For a complete list, please visit www.arpf.org Credit cards are accepted through the website, the American River Parkway Foundation Office, and the Regional Parks Office. Please make checks payable to Sacramento County. 1 of 2 REGIONAL PARKS PASS STIPULATIONS NO REFUNDS — NO REPLACEMENTS Passes are valid for a 12-month period from month purchased. Passes are valid for one vehicle entry only. A pass does not guarantee entry into parks that are full or closed for any reason, Check #_________ _______________ Horse Trailer including inclement weather or flooding and is not valid for entry to special fee __________ $_____________ areas or special events. _______________ Cash Cash All passes must be displayed from the rear-view mirror or placed where they are Pass #__________________ visible from the vehicle’s front exterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Proposed California Waterfix North Delta Diversion on Flow Reversals and Entrainment of Juvenile Chinook Salmon
    Prepared in cooperation with National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service Effects of the Proposed California WaterFix North Delta Diversion on Flow Reversals and Entrainment of Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) into Georgiana Slough and the Delta Cross Channel, Northern California Open-File Report 2018–1028 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Image showing junction of the Sacramento River, Delta Cross Channel, and Georgiana Slough in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, northern California, February 21, 2014. Image source: Google EarthTM. Effects of the Proposed California WaterFix North Delta Diversion on Flow Reversals and Entrainment of Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) into Georgiana Slough and the Delta Cross Channel, Northern California By Russell W. Perry, Jason G. Romine, Adam C. Pope, and Scott D. Evans Prepared in cooperation with National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service Open-File Report 2018–1028 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more i nformation on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information pr oducts, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or tpr naoduc mes is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Flood Control
    4 Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Flood Control 4 Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Flood Control This chapter addresses the water resources within the Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project (Project) area and describes potential effects of Project implementation on those resources. Water resources include hydrology, hydraulics, and flood control. The analysis provided in this chapter includes a description of existing environmental conditions; methods used to assess environmental effects; potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of Project implementation; and mitigation measures recommended to avoid or minimize adverse effects under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and significant impacts under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Federal, State of California (State), and local regulations that pertain to flood control, hydraulics, and hydrology are summarized. 4.1 Environmental Setting/Affected Environment This section presents the environmental setting for hydrology, hydraulics, and flood control in the Project area. 4.1.1 Hydrology and Hydraulics The Project area for hydrology and hydraulics consists of the Sacramento River from Shasta Dam to Rio Vista, the Yolo Bypass, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) in the vicinity of Cache Slough (Figure 4-1). These areas are described below. 4.1.1.1 Sacramento River The Sacramento River has been divided into two reaches, one above the Fremont Weir, and one below the Fremont Weir. These two reaches are discussed separately because they are affected by the proposed project differently. 4.1.1.1.1 Sacramento River from Shasta Dam to Fremont Weir Flows in the 65-mile Shasta Dam to Red Bluff (River Mile [RM] 244) reach of the Sacramento River are regulated by Shasta Dam and are reregulated downstream at Keswick Dam (RM 302), as shown in Figure 4-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 15-1A Recreational Facilities in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties
    Snug Harbor Resort Delta Protection Vieira's Resort Rio Vista Cliffhouse Shoreline Fishing Access SACRAMENTO Isleton COUNTY Glass Beach Duck Island RV Park Sandy Oxbow Marina Beach Park Delta Bay Marina SOLANO Brannan Island Spindrift Fishing Marina Perry's COUNTY Access Boat Harbor Grizzly Island Willow B & W Resort Marina Owl Berm Wildlife Outrigger Harbor Delta Isle Area Marina Marina Lighthouse Korth's Pirates Lair Resort and Marina Delta Riverboat Islands Marina Venice Pumphouse Island Duck Club Powerlines Sherman Island Launch Refrigerator Beach Ramp Franks Tract State Eddos Recreation Area Boat Harbor Willowest Harbor Winter Martin's Bethel Island Island Sherman Cosumnes River Marina Sugar Riverview Park Lake Marina Preserve Barge Pittsburg Marina Barbara Mariner Cove Marina Caliente Isle Marina Resort Central Park Price Marina Anchor Delta Resort Addition Park Barbara Antioch Marina Inc Price Regional Shoreline San Joaquin Stoneman Marina Park Antioch Oakley Yacht Club Delta Park North Central Regional Shoreline Pier De Anza Gemini Marina Park City Big Regional Trail Park Marchetti Gaylord Big Break Marina Break Regional Cypress Sunset Harbor Park Sports Park Trail Community Oakley (Legless Park Rhode Island Gentrytown Almondridge Lizard) BB Delta Wildlife Area Stoneman Mountaire Sam's Harbor Buchanan Highlands Park Harbour Park Land Bank Shoreline Park Chichibu Park Park Ranch Park Park Crockett Trail Creekside Summer Lake SAN Park Laurel Hillcrest Park Park Community Holland Country Ball Park Park Riverside JOAQUIN Manor Park
    [Show full text]