DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Plan Formulation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Plan Formulation Report Appendix A Plan Formulation Report This page left blank intentionally. Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat and Fish Restoration Project Plan Formulation Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation August 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Study Area Location and Description .................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Authorization ....................................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Problems, Opportunities, Constraints, and Objectives ........................................ 1-5 1.4.1 Problems .................................................................................................. 1-6 1.4.2 Opportunities............................................................................................ 1-8 1.4.3 Planning Constraints .............................................................................. 1-10 1.4.4 Planning Objectives ............................................................................... 1-10 1.5 Related Studies, Projects, and Programs............................................................ 1-11 1.5.1 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan .................................................... 1-11 1.5.2 American River Common Features General Reevaluation Report ........ 1-12 1.5.3 Sacramento River Bank Protection Project General Reevaluation Report ..................................................................................................... 1-12 1.5.4 California EcoRestore ............................................................................ 1-13 1.5.5 Experimental Agricultural Floodplain Habitat Investigation at Knaggs Ranch on Yolo Bypass.............................................................. 1-13 1.5.6 Lower Sacramento/Delta North Regional Flood Management Plan ..... 1-13 1.6 References .......................................................................................................... 1-14 2 Existing and Future Conditions ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Water Resources ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Land Use and Agricultural Resources ..................................................... 2-6 2.1.3 Socioeconomics ....................................................................................... 2-9 2.1.4 Environmental Justice ............................................................................ 2-11 2.1.5 Biological Resources ............................................................................. 2-14 2.1.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................. 2-18 2.1.7 Water Quality ......................................................................................... 2-21 2.1.8 Air Quality ............................................................................................. 2-21 2.1.9 Soils, Geology, and Mineral Resources ................................................. 2-22 2.1.10 Visual, Scenic, or Aesthetic Resources.................................................. 2-23 2.1.11 Indian Trust Assets ................................................................................ 2-24 2.1.12 Recreation .............................................................................................. 2-24 2.2 Future Without Project Conditions .................................................................... 2-30 2.3 References .......................................................................................................... 2-30 3 Alternative Formulation Process ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Process Overview................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Initial Alternatives ............................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Identification ............................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.2 Formulation .............................................................................................. 3-4 Draft Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project EIS/EIR i Table of Contents 3.2.3 Alternative Screening............................................................................. 3-13 3.2.4 Screening Results ................................................................................... 3-24 3.2.5 Value Planning ....................................................................................... 3-25 3.3 Alternative Refinement ...................................................................................... 3-25 3.4 References .......................................................................................................... 3-26 4 Features of Alternatives .................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Hydraulic Modeling ................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 Fish Benefits and Fish Passage Modeling ............................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Agricultural Impact Modeling ................................................................. 4-3 4.1.4 Economic Analysis .................................................................................. 4-4 4.2 No Action Alternative .......................................................................................... 4-4 4.3 Components Common to Multiple Action Alternatives ...................................... 4-5 4.3.1 Agricultural Road Crossing 1 and Cross-Canal Berms ........................... 4-5 4.3.2 Downstream Channel Improvements ....................................................... 4-7 4.3.3 Operational Timeframe ............................................................................ 4-8 4.3.4 Best Management Practices ..................................................................... 4-9 4.4 Alternative 1: East Side Gated Notch ................................................................ 4-12 4.4.1 Facilities ................................................................................................. 4-13 4.4.2 Construction Methods ............................................................................ 4-21 4.4.3 Operations .............................................................................................. 4-24 4.4.4 Inspection and Maintenance .................................................................. 4-25 4.4.5 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ................................................. 4-26 4.4.6 Alternative 1 Preliminary Costs ............................................................. 4-27 4.5 Alternative 2: Central Gated Notch ................................................................... 4-27 4.5.1 Facilities ................................................................................................. 4-28 4.5.2 Construction Methods ............................................................................ 4-31 4.5.3 Operations .............................................................................................. 4-32 4.5.4 Inspection and Maintenance .................................................................. 4-33 4.5.5 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ................................................. 4-33 4.5.6 Alternative 2 Preliminary Costs ............................................................. 4-33 4.6 Alternative 3: West Side Gated Notch ............................................................... 4-33 4.6.1 Facilities ................................................................................................. 4-35 4.6.2 Construction Methods ............................................................................ 4-37 4.6.3 Operations .............................................................................................. 4-39 4.6.4 Inspection and Maintenance .................................................................. 4-39 4.6.5 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ................................................. 4-40 4.6.6 Alternative 3 Preliminary Costs ............................................................. 4-40 4.7 Alternative 4: West Side Gated Notch – Managed Flow ................................... 4-40 4.7.1 Facilities ................................................................................................. 4-42 4.7.2 Construction Methods ............................................................................ 4-46 4.7.3 Operations .............................................................................................. 4-48 4.7.4 Inspection and Maintenance .................................................................. 4-48 4.7.5 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ................................................. 4-49 4.7.6 Alternative 4 Preliminary Costs ............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 4-6 Hydrology, Water Quality and Hazardous Materials
    Section 4-6 Hydrology, Water Quality and Hazardous Materials This section addresses potential impacts related to hydrology, water quality, and hazardous materials resulting from the implementation of the Proposed Project. Impacts on surface water and groundwater resources that may result from the Proposed Project are identified, and mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for potentially significant impacts on surface water and groundwater resources are described. The potential impacts related to hazardous materials that may exist as a result of the prior farmstead and agricultural use on the Alamo site will also be described. The Proposed Project contains existing agricultural water supply lines. No additional water supply would be required as a result of Project implementation, therefore this issue is not discussed in this section. 4-6.1 STUDY METHODS Methods used to identify and evaluate hydrological resources in the study area consisted of a review of existing documentation. Hazardous materials discussion is based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update and Phase II investigation for the Alamo Creek Detention Basin (Dunn Environmental 2010). 4-6.1.1 Regional Setting Vacaville is located in the southern Sacramento Valley at the eastern foot of the Vaca Mountains on east- sloping alluvial fan surfaces that drain to the Sacramento River. The Sacramento River Basin encompasses approximately 26,500 square miles and is bounded by the Sierra Nevada to the east, the Coast Ranges to the west, the Cascade Range and Trinity Mountains to the north, and the Sacramento– San Joaquin Delta (Delta) to the south. Five creeks (Alamo, Ulatis, Gibson Canyon, Sweeney, and Horst Creek) pass through and provide drainage for the Vacaville area.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2
    For DFG use only Proposal No. Region Section 1: Summary Information 1. Project title: Evaluation of Floodplain Rearing and Migration in the Yolo Bypass 2. Applicant name: California Department of Water Resources 3. Contact person: Ted Sommer, PhD 4. Address: Department of Water Resources. 3500 Industrial Blvd, 2nd Flr. 5. City, State, Zip: West Sacramento CA, 95691 6. Telephone #: 916-376-9772 7. Fax #: 916-376-9688 8. Email address: [email protected] 9. Agency Type: Federal Agency State Agency Local Agency Nonprofit Organization University (CSU/UC) Native American Indian Tribe 10. Certified nonprofit Yes No Organization: 11. New grantee: Yes No Previous recipient of a Cal-Fed Science award. 12. Amount requested: $878,020 13. Total project cost: $878,020 14. Topic Area(s): Primary: At-Risk Species Assessment Secondary: Estuary Foodweb Productivity, Fish Passage, Lowland Floodplains and Bypasses, and Shallow Water and Marsh Habitat. 15. ERP Project type: Primary: Research Secondary: Monitoring and Planning. 16. Ecosystem Element: Primary: Essential Fish Habitats Secondary: Bay-Delta Aquatic Food Web, Freshwater Fish Habitat, Tidal Perennial Aquatic Habitat 17. Water Quality N/A Constituent: 18. At-Risk species Central Valley spring-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Delta smelt critical benefited: habitat; Sacramento River winter-run Chinook spring-run salmon ESU critical habitat; Central Valley fall-/late-fall-run Chinook salmon ESU, Green Sturgeon ESU 19. Project objectives: Perform research to guide Yolo Bypass restoration actions to enhance passage for migrating adult salmon and sturgeon, and optimize juvenile salmon rearing. Analyze existing salmon and food web data, conduct telemetry, genetics, and physiology studies, and evaluate isotopes for assessing population-wide floodplain use.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Updated: December, 2017 CURRICULUM VITAE Jeffrey A. Nittrouer Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences Rice University [email protected] sedimentology.rice.edu +1 (713) 348-4886 (office); +1 (206) 251-2444 (mobile) Education 2010 PhD, Geological Sciences, University of Texas 2006 M.S., Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University 2003 B.S., Geology, University of Washington Employment Assistant Professor 2012- Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Rice University NSF Earth Sciences Post-doctoral Fellow and assistant instructor 2010-2012 Department of Geology and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Research and Teaching Assistantships 2006-2010 Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas 2003-2006 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University Laboratory Assistant 2001-2003 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington References Dr. Gary Parker Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Michael Lamb Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology Dr. David Mohrig Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas Dr. James Best Depts. of Geology, Geography, Mechanical Science and Engineering, and Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois 1 Publications (published & in review) *indicates supervised student and/or post-doc studies [32] *Demet, B. P., Nittrouer, J. A., Anderson, J. A, and L. M. Simkins, “Sedimentary processes at ice sheet grounding-zone wedges: comparing planform morphology from the western Ross Sea (Antarctica) to internal stratigraphy from outcrops of the Puget Lowlands (Washington State, U.S. A.)”, in review at Earth Surface Processes and Landforms [31] *Stokes, M., Nittrouer, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Floodplain Development in an Engineered Setting
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 34, 291–304 (2009) Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published online 9 December 2008 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/esp.1725 FloodplainJohnChichester,ESPEarthEARTHThe0197-93371096-9837Copyright20069999ESP1725Research Journal Wiley Surf.ScienceSurface SURFACE ArticleArticles ©Process. &UK of2006 Sons, Processes the PROCESSES JohnBritish Ltd.Landforms Wiley and Geomorphological Landforms AND & Sons, LANDFORMS Ltd. Research Group development in an engineered setting Floodplain development in an engineered setting Michael Bliss Singer1,2* and Rolf Aalto3,4 1 School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK 2 Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 3 Department of Geography, Archaeology, and Earth Resources, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 4 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Received 25 February 2008; Revised 20 May 2008; Accepted 2 June 2008 * Correspondence to: Michael Bliss Singer, Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Engineered flood bypasses, or simplified conveyance floodplains, are natural laboratories in which to observe floodplain development and therefore present an opportunity to assess delivery to and sedimentation within a specific class of floodplain. The effects of floods in the Sacramento River basin were investigated by analyzing hydrograph characteristics, estimating event-based sediment discharges and reach erosion/deposition through its bypass system and observing sedimentation patterns with field data. Sediment routing for a large, iconic flood suggests high rates of sedimentation in major bypasses, which is corroborated by data for one bypass area from sedimentation pads, floodplain cores and sediment removal reporting from a government agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Land Management Plan EDAW California Department of Fish and Game I Table of Contents
    YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2008 YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA 45211 COUNTY ROAD 32B DAVIS, CA 95618 CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ AREA MANAGER 530/757-2431 PREPARED BY: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ YOLO BASIN FOUNDATION CONTACT: ROBIN KULAKOW IN ASSOCIATION WITH: EDAW 2022 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 CONTACT: CHRIS FITZER 916/414-5800 JUNE 2008 FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game Bay Delta Region 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 PREPARED BY: EDAW, Inc. 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)414-5800 APPROVED BY: Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 The Mission of the California Department of Fish and Game ..................................................... 1-6 1.2 Purpose of Wildlife Areas ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 History and Purpose of Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Resiliency of Our Nation's Water Resources
    CONCEPTS FOR THE NEXT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT: PROMOTING RESILIENCY OF OUR NATION’S WATER RESOURCES INFRA- STRUCTURE (116–44) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 19, 2019 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: https://www.govinfo.gov/committee/house-transportation?path=/ browsecommittee/chamber/house/committee/transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–989 PDF WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Aug 31 2005 18:32 Oct 27, 2020 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\116\WRE\11-19-~1\TRANSC~1\41989.TXT JEAN TRANSPC154 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon, Chair ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, SAM GRAVES, Missouri District of Columbia DON YOUNG, Alaska EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas RICK LARSEN, Washington BOB GIBBS, Ohio GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania JOHN GARAMENDI, California RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia ROB WOODALL, Georgia ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana JOHN KATKO, New York DINA TITUS, Nevada BRIAN BABIN, Texas SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York GARRET GRAVES, Louisiana JARED HUFFMAN, California DAVID ROUZER, North Carolina JULIA BROWNLEY, California MIKE BOST, Illinois FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida RANDY K. WEBER, SR., Texas DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey DOUG LAMALFA, California ALAN S. LOWENTHAL, California BRUCE WESTERMAN, Arkansas MARK DESAULNIER, California LLOYD SMUCKER, Pennsylvania STACEY E.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnecting Rivers to Floodplains
    FPR Program Resource DRAFT I Reconnecting Rivers to Floodplains Returning natural functions to restore rivers and benefit communities River Restoration Program Spring 2016 Reconnecting Rivers to Floodplains About American Rivers American Rivers protects wild rivers, restores damaged rivers, and conserves clean water for people and nature. Since 1973, American Rivers has protected and restored more than 150,000 miles of rivers through advocacy efforts, on-the-ground projects, and an annual America’s Most Endangered Rivers® campaign. Headquartered in Washington, DC, American Rivers has offices across the country and more than 200,000 members, supporters, and volunteers. Rivers connect us to each other, nature, and future generations. Find your connections at www.AmericanRivers.org, www.facebook.com/americanrivers, and www.twitter.com/americanrivers. Flooding on commercial parking lots built along Ribary creek in North Bend, WA. Photo credit Jonathon Loos. Acknowledgments Written by Jonathon Loos and Eileen Shader This work is generously supported by the Lapham Family whose financial contributions provide the Anthony A. Lapham Fellowship, an opportunity to carry out a research-based project to advance the mission and objectives of American Rivers. This document is owed to the guidance of Eileen Shader, and detailed review by herself and other members of the American Rivers Restoration team; John Cain, Laura Craig and Brian Graber. We would like to thank our Science and Technical Advisory Committee and external reviewers for their time and thoughtful review of this work. This document truly reflects knowledge and expertise of individuals from across the spectrum of floodplain practitioners and scientists. Cover Photo credit Jonathon Loos, Yakima River, Washington 1 Reconnecting Rivers to Floodplains Executive Summary Riverine floodplains are dynamic systems that play an important role in the function and ecology of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project
    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife December 2017 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 Contact: Craig Weightman (707) 944-5500 Prepared by: Douglas Environmental 1517 28th Street Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Doug Brown Principal (916) 739-8407 December 2017 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Division 6, Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6, Sections 15070 and 15071 of the California Administrative Code, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife does cause to be filed with the State of California, this Mitigated Negative Declaration. 1. Title and Short Description of Project: Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Habitat and Drainage Improvements Project (proposed project) The proposed project includes five major improvements, identified as Project Components, that are being proposed to enhance the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) ability to manage wetland resources and agricultural operations within the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area (YBWA). Specific improvements include installing new water control structures, expanding canals, installing box culverts and two con-span bridges, replacing existing culverts, raising road grades, separating dual function ditches, relocating an existing water pump, and installing two new pumps. 2. Location of Project: The proposed project is located within the northern portion of the YBWA within the southern portion of Yolo County, California. The YBWA is located directly west of the City of West Sacramento and is approximately 2.5 miles east of the eastern edge of the City of Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Background Information and Flood Control Alternatives for Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach CA
    SENT VIA EMAIL Technical Memorandum DATE: July 17, 2009 To: Neal Conatser, Assistant Engineer, Marin County Department of Public Works From: Michael Love P.E., Principal Engineer, Michael Love & Associates [email protected] / ph: 707-476-8938 / fax: 707-476-8936 Subject: Review of Background Information and Flood Control Alternatives for Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach CA. Project Background Easkoot Creek in Stinson Beach, California is a tributary to Bolinas Lagoon in western Marin County. The creek drains a watershed of approximately 1.59 square miles (FEMA, 1997) of steeply sloping hills that border the Pacific Ocean before flowing through the town of Stinson Beach and into Bolinas Lagoon. Due to a lack of channel capacity, the stream frequently overflows its banks between the Arenal Avenue and Calle de Arroyo crossings (Figure 1). Nearly half of this 2,000-foot channel reach is located within the National Park Service (NPS) Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) and is adjacent to several parking lots. The current-day stream reach of Easkoot Creek downstream of the GGNRA parking lots crosses under a series of streets, collectively referred to as the “Calles”. The Calles from Calle del Pinos to Calle del Arroyo frequently experience flooding from Easkoot Creek, compounded by occasional flooding from wave overtopping to the west. Regular out-of-bank flooding also occurs upstream of the Calles within the GGNRA parking lots and in the area of the Parkside Restaurant. Currently, flooding within lower Easkoot Creek is exacerbated by sedimentation that reduces channel capacity. Sedimentation and the resulting decrease in channel capacity likely contributed to the out-of-bank flooding that occurred at the Park Entrance during a relatively small flow event on January 25, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area Land Management Plan EDAW California Department of Fish and Game I Table of Contents
    YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2008 YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA 45211 COUNTY ROAD 32B DAVIS, CA 95618 CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ AREA MANAGER 530/757-2431 PREPARED BY: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CONTACT: DAVE FELIZ YOLO BASIN FOUNDATION CONTACT: ROBIN KULAKOW IN ASSOCIATION WITH: EDAW 2022 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 CONTACT: CHRIS FITZER 916/414-5800 JUNE 2008 FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE YOLO BYPASS WILDLIFE AREA PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game Bay Delta Region 7329 Silverado Trail Napa, CA 94558 PREPARED BY: EDAW, Inc. 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)414-5800 APPROVED BY: Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 The Mission of the California Department of Fish and Game ..................................................... 1-6 1.2 Purpose of Wildlife Areas ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 History and Purpose of Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo County, California
    Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Yolo County, California December 2012 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 625 Court Street, Room 202, Woodland, CA 95695 December 2012 Final Page 1 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan This Page Intentionally Blank December 2012 Final Page 2 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements Yolo County would like to thank those Yolo County Operational Area collaborators and partners who participated in the planning and development of this document. The official Yolo County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee provided the oversight and dedication to this project that was required and without their commitment; this project would not be possible. As with any working plan, this document represents planning strategies and guidance as understood as of the date of this plan’s release. This plan identifies natural hazards and risks and identifies the hazard mitigation strategy to reduce vulnerability and make the communities of Yolo County more disaster resistant and sustainable. December 2012 Final Page 3 Yolo County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]