This Is the End of Mur I Jl~2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Is the End of Mur I Jl~2 i I . ....! r " , k ! . i FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 THIS IS THE END OF MUR I JL~2 0D ~~1D EIZCTIO~ p. The above-esc~ibed ,-t.,-- oe fc~ti~ ..... file pursiuant to the fo11owing ex,.;ptio provided i the- 'reedon of " ""iio Ace TSu.$ . Sect ion" 5 2 (b):- (1) Classified:Infor- ti- -I,. (6) Personzal privacy. i!! (2) Internal r 1es and (7)rivest,.gatory i practices ) .,Ex- ed byv othe_ staute (9).1' ell Information :i (4) Trade secrets and co~mercia1 or Cgeographic or -financial information geophysical) (5)"* Internal Doch'ents J L I, datex "I .~" ?EC 9-2!-77 , 4 a ... i ii iz' !J ii ' r i i FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WSHINCTON. D.C. 20463 February 14, 1983 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Charles 14. Kerr, Treasurer Citizens for Sarbanes d/o Venable, Baetjer and Boward 1800 Mercantile Bank & Trust Building Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Re: MUR 1500 ., Dear Mr. Kerr: __ On October 29, 1982, the Commission notified you of a complaint alleging that your committee had violated certain S sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. The Commission, on February 8, 1983, determined that on the - basis of the information in the complaint (and information provided by you) there is no reason to believe that a violation C of any statute within its jurisdiction has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission closed its file in this matter. This S matter will become a part of the public record within 30 days. ~Sincerely,. ~Charles N. Steele By: K nnt .Gos Associate General Counsel cc: Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes * w .. .. + Vw +++... +....+ ++' + r+i..+.. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 6~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Charles M. Kerr, Treasurer Citizens for Sarbanes d/o Venable, Baetjer and Howard 1800 Mercantile Bank & Trust Building Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Re: MUR 1500 Dear Mr. Kerr: On October 29, 1982, the Commission notified you of a S complaint alleging that your committee had violated certain sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended.. The Commission, on , 1983, determined that on the basis of the information in the complaint (and information C provided by you) there is no reason to believe that a violation of any statute within its jurisdiction has been committed. Accordingly, tbe Commission closed its file in this matter. This matter will become a part of the public record within 30 days. +'+. Sincerely, .... Charles N. Steele General Counsel By: Kenneth A. Gross Associate General Counsel cc: Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes '!&%17)~FEDERAL WASHNGTCON, ELECTIOND.C. 20*3 COMMISSION February 14, 1983 REUN RCITREQU/ESTED Lawrence J. Hogan d/o Hogan for Senate P.O. Box 545 Seabrook, Maryland 20706 Re: MUR 1500 Mr. Hogan: ! Dear the allegations Commission has reviewed The Federal Election and determined that on dated October 25, 1982, (and "- of your complaint provided in your complaint the basis of the information there is no reason to S by the Respondents) Act of . information provided Federal Election Campaign that a violation of the believe Act'), has been committed. 1971, as amended ("the th_ iei . hm adecde osekjdcato cls Acrd gl.y th Commissiona complainn The Act allows See this matter. dismissal of this section. review of the Commission's S 437g(a) (8). - 2 U.S.C. attention which information come to your " Should additional a violation ofthAcyumyfla 2 U.S.C. you believe establishes requirements set forth in complaint pursuant to the S 111.4. S 437g(a) (1) and 11 C.F.R. Sincerely, Charles N. Steele General Counjsel/7 Associate General Counsel ' ' 'i . ' . ' . ... i......., - V Y ,J.~. BEFORE TIlE PED3ML ELECTION CO)SQSROu In the Matter of Citizens for Sarbanes MUR 1500 Senator Paul S. Sarbanes CERTIFICATION I, Marjorie W. Enunons, Secretary of the Federal Election Comission, do hereby certify that on February 8, 1983, the Commnission decided by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions in MUR 1500: 1. Find no reason to believe the Citizens for Sarbanes violated 2 U.S.C. S 434(b) and no reason to believe Citizens for Sarbanes or Senator Sarbanes violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a~f). 2. Close the file. 3. Approve and send the letters as attached to the First General Counsel's Report dated February 3, 1983. Commissioners Aikens, Elliott, Harris, McDonald, McGarry and Reiche voted affirmatively in this matter. Attest: Date Marjorie W. Enumons (JSecretary of the Commission Received in Office of Commission Secretary: 2-3-83, 4 :03 Circulated on 48 hour tally basis: 2-4-83, 2:00 V February 3, 1983 MZMOMANDWI TO: Marjorie V. Emns FROM: Phyllis A. Kayson SUBJC: MUR 1500 Please have the attached First General Counsel 's Report distributed to the Coniission on a 48 hour tally basis as a sensitive matter. Thank you. Attachmet cc : Mims FESRALU~fl~IN CWUISSIOR Q 5:OF- .Th 1325 KI StreetwN.W. CW5T Washington, D.C. 20463 83FfB 3 p4l: 03 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S8EPR DATE AN TINE OS TRNITTAL KURM 150 DY OUC To THU CWUISIOU1 I 3 .--.f . DATE C7INJTI RUCEIZVED SENSITIVE ,,,, CONFPLAINAN'S INM: Lawrence J. Hogan RESPONDENTS' NAMS: Citizens for Sarbanes and Senator Paul S. Sarbanes a ,.. REEVN STAkTUTE: 2 U.S.C. SS 434(b) and 441a(f) INTRA REPOUS8 CHECKED: None FEDERAL AGENC IES CHECKED: None 0Y S0U!ARY OF ALEGTIONS8 This matter is in all pertinent respects identical to the central allegation made in MUR 1486. (In that matter, Citizens for Sarbanes was also made a respondent). Complainant here .,,merely reiterates the assertion made by the complainant in MUR S 1486 and seeks to ensure that Senator Sarbanes and Citizens for Sarbanes are included in MUR 1486. No new facts or legal analysis is presented by Mr. Hogan. FACTUAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS An in-depth analysis of the activities of the Council for a Livable World as they affect the Sarbanes organization is presented in the MUR 1486 General Counsel's Report circulated -2- " this same date. There the General Counsel recommends that the i Commission find no reason to believe the candidate committee respondents violated 2 U.S.C. SS 434 or 441a(f). For the reasons stated therein and due to the lack of any additional factual data or legal analysis in Mr. Hogan's complaint, the Office of General Counsel recommends that the Commission determine there is no reason to believe the Citizens for Sarbanes Committe violated 2 U.S.C. S 434(b) and no reason to believe Citizens for Sarbanes , or Senator Sarbanes violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(f). __ Recommendations 1. Find no reason to believe the Citizens for Sarbanes violated CO2 U.S.C. S 434(b) and no reason to believe Citizens for Sarbanes or Senator Sarbanes violated 2 U.S.C. S 441a(f). 2. Close the file. 3. Approve and send the attached letters. _______________ Charles N. Steele Date General Counsel By: ._ _ _ _ __ _ __,_ _ _ _ Kenneth A. Gross -' Associate General Counsel Attachments 1. Response to complaint 2. Proposed letter to Lawrence Hogan 3. Proposed letter to Citizens for Sarbanes E, .."J~RANDfOWARD 83 JAN 14 PtI: ATTOMN IYi AT L.Aw i3 -* A PAtTNERSNOP SWIUON@ P6@r66IONA. COSPORATroNS 1600 M3SCA~mLC SIAl • TmwgT Sua.wo O630O P. O*bo mI.TIM@E. MAS.YLAND I101 *0 U .U *000w 0 dO.. (3@.~3.474*@ 000 w. pII. € 0o) I-IMO0 oI 050£l 6060 .a0* 6 . : esos. o A. 00*30 0A.6., 60666 a,.I 066. P060 0*0i0 S. *00*0W VENAIE SAUI..DO N@0WAR. a COVsiZY • amo.. m6 05Mm .UIn660~A OlO. , ..* .oodevuI Il 6306 P3NNSYWAN AV.SlUO. N. W. mm 30*09556. dO OSIabO . 03. AO. 06656.0. 0*000* SEW. d06W96 ..e o -.gg 9 0 I, . 0966 6o 090 . OUoHpoP. ,,. 9b5mis 66963 g. ~* . ibIOa i6o0g . i0gol° I * dl., 60.. 005 o II II N II*I 0 0W 9 .069060 AEbbSI .eemuI 605eoI0. oaevlu. ogI-Ietl u @0*00 30 050. og0*0 [email protected] walin0g 60066 N0003 0 244-7544 January 12, 1983 CERTIFIED MAiL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AssociateKenneth A. General Gross, CounselEsquire Federal Election Commission Washington, D. C. 20463 Re: MUR 1486 L1500 Dear Mr. Gross: This letter is written in response to your letters of October 22 and 29, 1982, advising me, as treasurer .of Citizens for Sarbanes (the "Sarbanes Committee"), of the above-referenced complaints, and is intended to serve as the Sarbanes Committee's response. With regard to MUR 1486,. the Complaint filed by The Washington Legal Foundation does not name the Sarbanes Committee as a respondent. The Complaint does appear to allege, however, that the Sarbanes Committee received in-kind contributions from the Council for a Livable World attributable to fund-raising costs which have not been reported by the Committee and whiich have a value in excess of'the $5,000 contribution limit applicable to multi-candidate political action committees. The other allegations made in the Complaint appear to be directed to CLW and the other named respondents rather than the Sarbanes Committee. MUR 1500, Kenneth A. Gross, Esquire January 12, 1983 Page Two filed by Senator Sarbanes' Republican opponent in the 1982 - Maryland general election, Lawrence J. Hogan, likewise appears to be addressed to the reporting of in-kind contributions to the Sarbanes Committee .by CLW. Although neither complaint is particularly clear on the point, both also appear to question the CLW practice of collecting contribution checks made to the Sarbanes Couuaittee and forwarding those checks to the Sarbanes Committee.
Recommended publications
  • Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8
    CONTENTS Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8 JULY 15, 1974 Vol. X, No. 14 50 CENTS POLITICS: REPORTS islation, but the implementation now under way of the new law's rules is still a controversial topic. COLORADO Daniels, a Denver businessman and part-owner of the Utah Stars basket­ Furthermore, there is some danger ball team, has drawn the bulk of his that the burning issue of the upcoming In only six states this year, incum­ support from state and Denver party Denver congressional race may spill bent governors will face or have faced leaders. Competition between the two over into state politics. A bitter fight serious primary challenges. GOP aspirants perhaps peaked in is expected between U.S. Rep. Patricia In South Dakota and Texas, respec­ Denver June 1 when delegates to the Schroeder (D) and State Rep. Frank tively, Democratic incumbents annihi­ state assembly were chosen. Daniels Southworth. Southworth, president of lated more liberal challengers with sur­ needed a strong showing from his the Denver Board of Education, is an prising ease. In Florida, Gov. Reubin Denver supporters but failed to get outspoken opponent of school busing Askew (D) is expected to have the it. In the pre-meeting acrimony, Den­ and is expected to make it his major same success, but in Oklahoma, the ver GOP Chairman James Aspinal, a issue. The publicity given busing could politi~allife expectancy of Gov. David Daniels backer, denied Denver GOP conceivably complicate the state guber­ Hall (D), embattled by investigations Secretary Mary Hofstra, a Vanderhoof natorial race as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland” of the Richard B
    The original documents are located in Box 16, folder “Convention Delegates - Maryland” of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 16 of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library +<+····~ ..... _ ...:... .;..:. ....... ; r .c~ ·- ...__ 4 ·~·. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON MEETING WITH MARYLAND DELEGATION Monday, July 26, 1976 5:00 PM (30 minutes) The State Dining Room From~m Field I. PURPOSE To meet informally with the Maryland delegates. II. BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS AND PRESS PLAN A. Background: At the request of Rog Morton you have agreed to host a reception for the Maryland delegates. B. Participants: See attached list. c. Press Plan: White House Photo Only. Staff President Ford Committee Staff Dick Cheney Rog Morton Jim Field Jim Baker Paul Manafort Roy Hughes .. f ,. ' ' ' President Ford Committee 1828 L STREET, N.W., SUITE 250, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 (202) 457-6400 July 20, 1976 INFORMATION ON THE MARYLAND DELEGATION RICHARD ALLEN DEAR DICK Salisbury 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Bob Dole Office of the Republican Leader United States Senate Washington., D
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas .. http://dolearchives.ku.edu 4990 Sentinel Drive., #506 Bethesda., Maryland 20876 April 21., 7992 The Honorable Bob Dole Office of the Republican Leader United States Senate Washington., D. C. 20575 Dear Bob: We would especially like you to attend as we pay Tribute to Maryland's three Republican members of the House of Representatives., Helen Bentley., Connie Morella and Wayne Gilcrest., in support of their re-election. Included in our program will be United · States · Senatorial Candidate., Alan Keyes as well as the other fine Candidates for Congress from Maryland. This event will launch the Federation's "Send-Off for Victory"., "Call to Arms"., "Out to Win" campaign to re-elect the Bush/Quayle team and to ELECT a Republican majority from Maryland to represent us in the Congress of the United States. We have a great opportunity to achieve these goals!! We expect a large attendance from all areas of Maryland. We want 7992's Special Event to be one of inspiration and dedication to give a rousing send-off to Republican Women Workers for victory in November. They are "Ready to Co". I don't have to tell you., Bob., what a great favorite you are in Maryland. I have had many requests to urge your presence - - even for a little while. Your presence will be deeply appreciated and help make the Day a resounding success! We extend all good wishes to you., and look forward to your favorable reply. \. · Sincerely yours., Mrs. Cary Creenip ermann MFRW President ., Day on Capitol Hill Page 1 of 5 ,,- , I ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Association of Election Officials Representing the Local Election Boards of the State of Maryland
    Maryland Association of Election Officials Representing the Local Election Boards of the State of Maryland MEMORANDUM To: Michael Cogan, Chairman, Maryland State Board of Elections Linda Lamone, Esq., Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections From: David Garreis, President Maryland Association of Election Officials (MAEO) Date: August 5, 2020 Re: Plan for Success - 2020 Presidential General Election The members of the Maryland Association of Election Officials (MAEO) are writing to provide our plan for the successful conduct of the 2020 Presidential General Election. The State of Maryland is at a critical juncture in the Election process. There are slightly more than 90-days until Election Day. The Election Community must have a set-in-stone plan for the conduct of the General Election. Failure to do so will result in the failure of the Election process in Maryland. MAEO has provided the Maryland State Board of Elections (SBE) and the Governor with our professional, non-partisan recommendations for conducting the General Election in writing and in conference call meetings several times. MAEO is dedicated to providing all eligible voters with the ability to cast their ballot in a safe and secure manner. We are making our final appeal to your decision making authority before we enter a period where no amount of backpedaling or last minute changes will avoid a catastrophic failure of the 2020 Presidential General Election. We are providing four common-sense recommendations for the conduct of the Election in the hopes that the powers that be will find a way to adopt these policies and provide the voters of Maryland with a convenient and hassle-free opportunity to vote, either by mail-in ballot, during early voting, or on Election Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief
    No. 20-855 ================================================================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. LAWRENCE HOGAN, IN HIS CAPACITY OF GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, Respondent. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- JOSEPH G.S. GREENLEE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION 1215 K Street, 17th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 378-5785 [email protected] January 28, 2021 Counsel of Record ================================================================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................ i INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE ............... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................ 1 ARGUMENT ........................................................... 3 I. Personal property is entitled to full consti- tutional protection ....................................... 3 II. Since medieval England, the right to prop- erty—both personal and real—has been protected against arbitrary seizure
    [Show full text]
  • The 1966 Maryland Gubernatorial Election
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1975 The 1966 aM ryland gubernatorial election : the political saliency of open occupancy. Michael S. Hatfield University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Hatfield, Michael S., "The 1966 aM ryland gubernatorial election : the political saliency of open occupancy." (1975). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2506. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2506 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE 1966 MARYLAND GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION THE POLITICAL SALIENCY OF OPEN OCCUPANCY A Thesis Presented by Michael S . Hatfield Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 1975 Major Subject Political Science THE 1966 MARYLAND GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION THE POLITICAL SALIENCY OF OPEN OCCUPANCY A Thesis Presented by Michael S . Hatfield Approved as to style and content by: Glen Gordon. Member of Committee TO JANE Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/1966marylandgube00hatf INTRODUCTION It is hypothesized that the salient open occupancy issue accounted for much of the variance in electoral preference in the 1966 Maryland Guber- natorial Election. We propose to validate this assertion by (1) establishing the existence of definite attitudes on integrated housing and political representation of such attitudes (2) verbal and quantitative analysis of candidates' campaigns and voter support in the primary and general elec- tion, and (3) analysis of the place occupied by the open occupancy issue in the campaign and the degree to which it determined electoral preference in this election.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioners, V
    No. 20-___ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. LAWRENCE HOGAN, in his capacity of Governor of Maryland, Respondent. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— CARY J. HANSEL MARK W. PENNAK HANSEL LAW, P.C. Counsel of Record 2514 North Charles Street MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC. Baltimore, MD 21218 9613 Harford Road (301) 461-1040 Ste. C #1015 [email protected] Baltimore, MD 21234 (301) 873-3671 mpennak@ marylandshallissue.org Counsel for Petitioners December 21, 2020 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case is about whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Takings Clause and Due Process Clause of the Maryland Constitution protect lawfully acquired and lawfully owned personal prop- erty that the State legislature subsequently decided to ban totally. In Horne v. Dep’t of Agric., 135 S.Ct. 2419, 2427-28 (2015), this Court held that “direct appropria- tions of real and personal property” are treated “alike.” Yet, in a published ruling broadly applicable to all types of personal property, the Fourth Circuit has ruled that this holding in Horne applies to personal property only if the regulation in question requires the owner to “turn over” the property to the government or a third party. The Fourth Circuit also construed the Maryland Con- stitution in such a way as to effectively eliminate any protection for lawfully purchased personal property.
    [Show full text]
  • Stacie Taranto
    Defending ―Family Values‖: Women‘s Grassroots Politics and the Republican Right, 1970-1980 By Stacie Taranto A.B., Duke University, 2001 A.M., Brown University, 2005 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Stacie Taranto This dissertation by Stacie Taranto is accepted in its present form by the Department of History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_______________ __________________________________________ Mari Jo Buhle, Advisor Date_______________ __________________________________________ Robert Self, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_______________ __________________________________________ Naoko Shibusawa, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_______________ __________________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii Stacie Taranto, Curriculum Vitae April 21, 1979, Winchester, MA ________________________________________________________________________ Education Brown University, Providence, RI Ph.D., History, May 2010 A.M., History, May 2005 Duke University, Durham, NC A.B., History, May 2001 Honors Distinction in History Magna Cum Laude University of San Paolo, Madrid, Spain Study Abroad Program, Fall 1999 Awards American Association of University Women American Dissertation Fellowship, 2008-2009 Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation Dissertation Fellowship
    [Show full text]
  • <G.U. Moves Closer ·Toward Acquisition of Local Campus
    Vol. LVI,. No. 9 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, D.C. Friday, November 3,1972 <G.U. Moves Closer ·Toward Acquisition Of Local Campus - by Andy Lang The University will take a step toward acquisition of the property and buildings owned by Dunbarton College Monday. A report that will include a recommendation to look into means to acquire the property will be delivered Monday to University President the Rev. R. J. Henle, S.J. The report will be compiled from statements made by several University administrators and student representatives who inspected the Dunbarton facilities two weeks ago. Fr. Ryan said he could not -------------- my opinion, if the University de­ reveal the contents of the report cides to buy the property, we until it is presented to Fr. Henle. would need some kind of regular Information about the report's rec- University-sponsored transportation ommendation was obtained· from other sources. to the campus," he said. Johnson said the classrooms at Dunbarton dormitories and buildings may be acquired by the University after the girls' school closes next The Dunbarton campus includes Dunbarton "were small in size, spring. (Photo by Chris Arndt) . 365 dormitory beds. Academic fa- comparable to those in Walsh. cilities and a new three-floor library There are no large lecture halls, but Rueckel Hails Forsyth Record also are on the campus. the classrooms are highly conducive Dunbarton, a college for girls, to small classes and seminar discus­ will close at the end of this aca- sion groups. Pressure Leads to Resignation demic year because of financial "Th'e condition of the dorms is difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H11774
    H11774 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE December 18, 1998 Hobson Metcalf Scarborough ica, against William Jefferson Clinton, Presi- tion brought against him, and his corrupt ef- Hoekstra Mica Schaffer, Bob dent of the United States of America, in forts to influence the testimony of that em- Horn Miller (FL) Sensenbrenner maintenance and support of its impeachment ployee. Hostettler Moran (KS) Sessions against him for high crimes and misdemean- In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton Houghton Morella Shadegg Hulshof Myrick Shaw ors. has undermined the integrity of his office, Hunter Nethercutt Shays ARTICLE I has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has Hutchinson Neumann Shimkus In his conduct while President of the betrayed his trust as President, and has Hyde Ney Shuster United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in acted in a manner subversive of the rule of Inglis Northup Skeen law and justice, to the manifest injury of the Istook Norwood Smith (MI) violation of his constitutional oath faith- fully to execute the office of President of the people of the United States. Jenkins Nussle Smith (NJ) Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by Johnson (CT) Oxley Smith (OR) United States and, to the best of his ability, Johnson, Sam Packard Smith (TX) preserve, protect, and defend the Constitu- such conduct, warrants impeachment and Jones Pappas Smith, Linda tion of the United States, and in violation of trial, and removal from office and disquali- Kasich Parker Snowbarger his constitutional duty to take care that the fication to hold and enjoy any office of Kelly Paul Solomon laws be faithfully executed, has willfully cor- honor, trust, or profit under the United Kim Paxon Souder States.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    March 30, 2020 The Honorable Lawrence Hogan, J Robert Green Governor of Maryland Secretary of Md. Dept. of Public Safety & Cor. Services State House 6776 Reisterstown Rd., Ste 310 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Baltimore, MD 21215 re: Coronavirus and bipartisan support for protection of inmates of Md. prisons and detention centers Dear Governor Hogan and Secretary Green: I write you again on behalf of Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform (MAJR), updating our support for you to take proactive steps to prevent the further spread of coronavirus in Maryland prisons and detention centers. Earlier today, the first three coronavirus infections have been reported in Md. prisons, following yesterday’s report of numerous infections from Clifton Perkins Hospital which is frequented by correctional officers. Coronavirus infections, as of yesterday, also were reported in prisons or detention centers in Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York and Wisconsin with Governors’, corrections officials, and/or court orders for expedited releases in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, California, Colorado, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah. We thank you for your early steps making Maryland a leader in civilian public health measures. But, more is needed to protect Marylanders in correctional custody. For this reason, MAJR also urges you to take the primary steps as recommended by faculties of Johns Hopkins Schools of Public Health, Medicine and Nursing, as well as Community- Oriented Correctional Health Services, and the Vera Institute, stated below. Prioritize prevention first and foremost. To reduce contact between people, corrections authorities and other detention administrators should: 1. Use their authority to release as many people from their custody as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Hogan (R-Md) Governor of Maryland
    LARRY HOGAN (R-MD) GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND Life in Brief Quick Summary Born: May 25, 1956 Highly popular Republican governor in a blue state who juxtaposes pro-business, anti-tax Hometown: Edgewater, MD message with across-the-aisle work on climate and infrastructure Current Residence: Annapolis, MD • Son of a U.S. Congressman and native Marylander with early interest in politics Education • Founded a real estate business; frustration with • BA, Government and Political Science, Florida state tax environment spurred him to create State University, 1978 Change Maryland, an anti-tax advocacy non- profit, which fueled his gubernatorial campaign Family • Focused time in office on providing financial • Wife, Yumi, is an artist and instructor at relief to the state taxpayers, including through Maryland Institute College of Art tax breaks, lowering toll prices, and removing • Three stepchildren regulations that hinder business • Champions Chesapeake Bay restoration and Work History has joined national coalitions to address climate • Governor of Maryland, 2015-Present change • Founder, Change Maryland • Pursues public-private partnerships to fund state • Appointments Secretary, Office of Governor Bob infrastructure such as the Purple Line expansion Ehrlich, 2003-2007 • Well respected in his state and amongst fellow • Founder, Hogan Companies governors; second Republican governor in the state’s history to be re-elected and was Electoral History unanimously elected by his peers to chair the • Ran unopposed in 2018 gubernatorial primary National Governors Association and won general election by 11.9%; first elected in 2014 by 3.8% Approach and Motivations Professional Affiliations Results-oriented Republican whose moderate stances help him achieve bipartisan goals • Appalachian Regional Commission • Says he seeks the best solutions, regardless of • Maryland Science Center the side of the political aisle they come from • National Governors Association • Considers his father his biggest political • Southern States Energy Board inspiration, citing Hogan Sr.’s dedication to • St.
    [Show full text]