DOCSLIB.ORG

1 the Immune System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 the Immune System j 5 1 The Immune System 1.1 Introduction (Section 1.4). We then introduce the major classes of molecule involved in functions such as the detection of infection, the All living things – animals, plants and even bacteria – can act as recruitment of cells to infected sites, communication between hosts for infectious organisms and thus have evolved mechan- cells and tissues, signalling within cells, and, usually, elimi- isms to defend themselves against infection. Infection can be nation of the infectious agent (Section 1.5). by other living things, non-living things (viruses) and possibly The immune system that humans have evolved is, however, even molecules (prions). Since it is so crucial to our own not perfect and we discuss some of these imperfections at the survival, much of our understanding of immunity has come end of this chapter (Section 1.6). The immune system is a very from studies in humans – particularly in relation to the causes effective killing machine, and if it goes wrong it can cause and prevention of disease – but deep insights have also come severe disease and even death of its host. To cover these latter fi from experimental studies in animals such as mice. For these areas we rst consider how the immune system is able to reasons, in this book we concentrate on the immune systems discriminate between what needs to be eliminated and what – of humans and mice. These, along with other more recently does not particularly in the case of adaptive immunity, which evolved organisms (e.g. birds and amphibians), have the most has evolved to recognize molecular structures largely at ran- complex and sophisticated immune systems, but the origins dom. We then introduce the different ways in which the of these can in many instances be traced back to the most immune system can cause damage if it becomes directed not distant and ancient species in evolutionary history. to infectious agents, but to otherwise harmless targets, includ- In this chapter we provide an overview of immunology in ing many inert substances around us and within the tissues of which we introduce the key players in immunity, largely the host itself. We discuss the problems of transplants (some focussing on the immune systems of humans and mice. We of which can even attack their hosts) and why the immune start by briefly considering how infection can be sensed by the system fails to reject malignant tumours (cancer). Finally, we host organism and how it is possible for a host to recognize turn from problems to solutions and introduce two areas in many very different infectious agents (Section 1.2). We then which either the intact immune system and components of fi introduce the tissues and specialized organs where immune immunity can be harnessed for our own bene t and from responses occur (Section 1.3). Toeliminate different infections which tools can be derived to treat disease. effectively, immune responses need to be tailored to particular By the end of this chapter you should have insight into of types of infection. This requires a variety of cells and molecules the basic properties and functions of the immune system, that can interact coherently to generate the mechanisms that and will understand the principles of its roles in defence are needed to eliminate each type of infection. As these against infectious disease. You will start to have an appre- mechanisms help to bring about or effect the elimination ciation of why it is pivotal to life, disease and death, and how of infectious agents they are termed effector mechanisms. it is important not only in prevention of disease but in its Defence against infection is divided into two main forms causation. This chapter will lead you on to the following termed innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate chapters where different areas of immunity are discussed defence mechanisms are present in different forms in all in greater depth. multi-cellular organisms, including plants. Adaptive defence mechanisms have evolved more recently in vertebrates. In 1.2 vertebrates, the interaction of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms is essential for the generation of effective immu- Host Defence Against Infection nity to infection. To introduce the mechanisms of immunity we start by We need immune responses to defend ourselves against describing the different types of immune cells and their infection. Many different kinds of organism have the potential function in innate and adaptive immunity to infection to infect us and, if they do so, can cause us harm in many Exploring Immunology: Concepts and Evidence, First Edition. Gordon MacPherson and Jon Austyn. Ó 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2012 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 6 j 1 The Immune System different ways. To deal with all these potential threats we, defence. In mammals, defence mechanisms can be passive or as hosts for infectious agents, need a variety of different kinds active. Passive defence comes in the form of natural barriers of host defence mechanisms. Indeed this applies for any that hinder infection. Examples are skin, which prevents living organism. access of microbes to the underlying tissue, and gastric acid in the stomach which, not surprisingly, can kill many 1.2.1 microbes that might be ingested with food. Their existence Infectious Agents is quite independent of the presence of infection. Active defence is brought about by immune responses that involve To understand how the immune system works in infection we a diversity of different effector mechanisms that are induced need to know who the aggressors are. Potentially infectious by the presence of infection and which may eliminate the agents include the following: microbe. Thus, all forms of active immunity depend on specific recognition of molecules present in the infecting . Viruses, which are non-living entities. Common examples agent. This is turn leads to a response, involving are influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) the interaction of cells and molecules to produce different and herpes simplex virus (HSV,which can cause cold sores effector mechanisms that can often eliminate the infection. or genital ulcers). Immunity is itself divided into two different forms – innate . Bacteria, are single-celled prokaryotic organisms. Exam- and adaptive. Innate responses occur rapidly and can generate ples include Staphylococcus and Streptococcus that cause effector mechanisms that are effective within minutes or acute infections such as abscesses and sore throats, and hours of infection. In contrast, adaptive immunity takes Mycobacteria that cause chronic infections such as tuber- much longer to become effective, usually over a few days. culosis and leprosy. In immunity to most forms of infection, however, both innate . Fungi, which are unicellular, such as Candida that causes and adaptive immunity are essential. A major advantage of thrush, or multicellular. adaptive immune responses, not seen with innate immunity, . Parasites, which are eukaryotic organisms. Some are sin- is that they generate memory – a second infection with the gle-celled protozoa that cause diseases such as malaria, same microbe elicits a stronger, faster and usually more others are large, multicellular organisms (metazoa) such as effective response. See Figure 1.1. tapeworms. In this book, for convenience, we will sometimes refer to 1.2.3 smaller infectious agents, including viruses, as microbes Immune Recognition because they are microscopic in size. However, many para- sites, the metazoa, are often far from microscopic in size. Different types of cells and molecules are involved in the initiation of innate and adaptive immune responses although, 1.2.2 as mentioned above, their interaction is essential in defence Host Defence against most infectious agents. So what do the innate and adaptive arms of immunity do in general terms? Broadly All organisms possess mechanisms to defend themselves speaking we can view some components of the innate against infection, and immunity is a specialized form of host immune system as being involved in the detection of Fig. 1.1 Mechanisms of defence against infection. Natural barriers. These stop infectious agents entering the host or provide a hostile environment. Physical barriers to infection include the epithelia of the skin, lung and airways, and the gastro-intestinal and urogenital tracts. Cells in these barriers may also secrete agents that kill infectious agents. Innate immunity. This is the first form of immunity induced by infectious agents. Cells and molecules such as phagocytes and complement can make rapid responses that may eradicate the infection. Adaptive immunity. Later adaptive responses may be generated if the infectious agent is not killed by innate immunity. Cells and molecules such as lymphocytes and antibodies take longer to become effective, but adaptive immunity can also lead to a state of long-lasting resistance to re-infection termed immunological memory (not shown). 1.2 Host Defence Against Infection j 7 harmful things that represent danger to the organism, 1.2.3.1 Recognition in Innate Immunity: Pattern Recognition such as general classes of microbes that may have infected the Receptors host. Other components then endeavour to eliminate the The key components of the innate immune system include microbe. In contrast, the adaptive immune system can dis- cells such as phagocytes and soluble molecules such as criminate very precisely between individual microbes, even of complement. These work together to sense the presence of the same type, but can generally only make a response if it has infection. The recognition of potentially dangerous microbes been informed by the innate system that what is being usually leads to the generation of inflammation, familiar to us recognized is dangerous. If so, adaptive responses may then all. One way of viewing this is that the innate immune systems help to eliminate the microbe, if it has not already been of multi-cellular organisms can generate alarm signals in eradicated during the earlier innate response.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IFM Innate Immunity Infographic
    UNDERSTANDING INNATE IMMUNITY INTRODUCTION The immune system is comprised of two arms that work together to protect the body – the innate and adaptive immune systems. INNATE ADAPTIVE γδ T Cell Dendritic B Cell Cell Macrophage Antibodies Natural Killer Lymphocites Neutrophil T Cell CD4+ CD8+ T Cell T Cell TIME 6 hours 12 hours 1 week INNATE IMMUNITY ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Innate immunity is the body’s first The adaptive, or acquired, immune line of immunological response system is activated when the innate and reacts quickly to anything that immune system is not able to fully should not be present. address a threat, but responses are slow, taking up to a week to fully respond. Pathogen evades the innate Dendritic immune system T Cell Cell Through antigen Pathogen presentation, the dendritic cell informs T cells of the pathogen, which informs Macrophage B cells B Cell B cells create antibodies against the pathogen Macrophages engulf and destroy Antibodies label invading pathogens pathogens for destruction Scientists estimate innate immunity comprises approximately: The adaptive immune system develops of the immune memory of pathogen exposures, so that 80% system B and T cells can respond quickly to eliminate repeat invaders. IMMUNE SYSTEM AND DISEASE If the immune system consistently under-responds or over-responds, serious diseases can result. CANCER INFLAMMATION Innate system is TOO ACTIVE Innate system NOT ACTIVE ENOUGH Cancers grow and spread when tumor Certain diseases trigger the innate cells evade detection by the immune immune system to unnecessarily system. The innate immune system is respond and cause excessive inflammation. responsible for detecting cancer cells and This type of chronic inflammation is signaling to the adaptive immune system associated with autoimmune and for the destruction of the cancer cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Environments of Haematopoiesis and B-Lymphopoiesis in Foetal Liver K
    Environments of haematopoiesis and B-lymphopoiesis in foetal liver K. Kajikhina1, M. Tsuneto1,2, F. Melchers1 1Max Planck Fellow Research Group ABSTRACT potent myeloid/lymphoid progenitors on “Lymphocyte Development”, In human and murine embryonic de- (MPP), and their immediate progeny, Max Planck Institute for Infection velopment, haematopoiesis and B-lym- common myeloid progenitors (CMP) Biology, Berlin, Germany; phopoiesis show stepwise differentia- and common lymphoid progenitors 2Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Mie University tion from pluripotent haematopoietic (CLP) soon thereafter (10). The first Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan. stem cells and multipotent progenitors, T- or B-lymphoid lineage-directed pro- Katja Kajikhina over lineage-restricted lymphoid and genitors appear at E12.5-13.5, for T- Motokazu Tsuneto, PhD myeloid progenitors to B-lineage com- lymphocytes in the developing thymus Fritz Melchers, PhD mitted precursors and finally differenti- (11), for B-lymphocytes in foetal liver Please address correspondence to: ated pro/preB cells. This wave of dif- (12). Time in development, therefore, Fritz Melchers, ferentiation is spatially and temporally separates and orders these different Max Planck Fellow Research Group organised by the surrounding, mostly developmental haematopoietic stages. on “Lymphocyte Development”, non-haematopoietic cell niches. We re- Three-dimensional imaging of progen- Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, view here recent developments and our itors and precursors indicates that stem Chariteplatz 1, current contributions on the research D-10117 Berlin, Germany. cells are mainly found inside the em- E-mail: [email protected] on blood cell development. bryonic blood vessel, and are attracted Received and accepted on August 28, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essential Role of UBXN3B in B Lymphopoiesis Tingting Geng Et Al. This File Contains 9 Supplemental Figures and Legends
    An Essential Role of UBXN3B in B Lymphopoiesis Tingting Geng et al. This file contains 9 supplemental figures and legends. a Viral load (relative) load Viral Serum TNF-α b +/+ Serum IL-6 Ubxn3b Ubxn3b-/- Ubxn3b+/+ 100 100 ** Ubxn3b-/- ** 10 10 IL-6 IL-6 (pg/ml) GM-CSF (pg/ml) GM-CSF 1 1 0 3 8 14 35 0 3 8 14 35 Time post infection (Days) Time post infection (Days) Serum IL-10 Serum CXCL10 Ubxn3b+/+ Ubxn3b-/- 10000 1000 +/+ -/- * Ubxn3b Ubxn3b 1000 100 IFN-γ (pg/ml) CXCL10 (pg/ml) CXCL10 100 10 0 3 8 14 35 0 3 8 14 35 Time post infection (Days) Time post infection (Days) IL-1β IL-1β (pg/ml) Supplemental Fig.s1 UBXN3B is essential for controlling SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Sex- and-age matched littermates were administered 2x105 plaque forming units (PFU) of SARS-CoV-2 intranasally. a) Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) quantification of SARS-CoV-2 loads in the lung at days 3 and 10 post infection (p.i). Each symbol= one mouse, the small horizontal line: the median of the result. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001 (non-parametric Mann-Whitney test) between Ubxn3b+/+ and Ubxn3b-/- littermates at each time point. Ubxn3b+/+ Ubxn3b-/- Live Live 78.0 83.6 CD45+ CD45+ UV UV CD45 94.1 CD45 90.9 FSC-A FSC-A FSC-A FSC-A Mac Mac 23.0 38.1 MHC II MHC II CD11b Eso CD11b Eso 5.81 7.44 CD19, MHCII subset F4_80, CD11b subset CD19, MHCII subset F4_80, CD11b subset Myeloid panel Myeloid 70.1 65.6 94.2 51.1 CD19 F4/80 CD19 F4/80 Neu DC Neu DC 4.87 1.02 16.2 2.24 CD11b, Ly-6G subset CD11b, Ly-6G subset 94.9 83.3 Ly-6G Ly-6G MHC II MHC II CD11b CD11c CD11b CD11c Live Live 82.3 76.5 CD45+ CD45+ 91.1 91.3 UV UV CD45 CD45 FSC-A FSC-A FSC-A FSC-A Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Lymphoid panel Lymphoid 20.1 0.29 54.1 1.17 4.27 0.060 39.2 2.55 CD4 CD4 CD19 CD19 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 47.0 32.6 7.21 37.5 67.7 28.0 7.27 51.0 CD3 CD8 CD3 CD8 Supplemental Fig.s2 Dysregulated immune compartmentalization in Ubxn3b-/- lung.
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Immunity in the Lung: How Epithelial Cells Fight Against
    Copyright #ERSJournals Ltd 2004 EurRespir J 2004;23: 327– 333 EuropeanRespiratory Journal DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00098803 ISSN0903-1936 Printedin UK –allrights reserved REVIEW Innateimmunity in the lung: how epithelialcells ght against respiratorypathogens R. Bals*,P.S. Hiemstra # Innateimmunity in the lung: how epithelial cells ® ghtagainst respiratory pathogens *Deptof Internal Medicine, Division of R Bals, P S Hiemstra #ERS JournalsLtd 2004 PulmonaryMedicine, Hospital of the Uni- versityof Marburg, Philipps-University, ABSTRACT: Thehuman lung is exposed to a largenumber of airborne pathogens as a # resultof the daily inhalation of 10,000 litres of air Theobservation that respiratory Marburg,Germany; Deptof Pulmonology, LeidenUniversity Medical Center, Leiden, infectionsare nevertheless rare is testimony to the presence of anef®cient host defence TheNetherlands systemat the mucosal surface of the lung Theairway epithelium is strategically positioned at the interface with the Correspondence:P S Hiemstra,Dept of environment,and thus plays a keyrole in this host defence system Recognition Pulmonology,Leiden University Medical systemsemployed by airwayepithelial cells to respond to microbialexposure include the Center, P O Box9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The actionof the toll-like receptors Netherlands Theairway epithelium responds to such exposure by increasing its production of Fax:31 715266927 mediatorssuch as cytokines, chemokines and antimicrobial peptides Recent® ndings E-mail: p s hiemstra@lumc nl indicatethe importance of these peptides
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer
    cancers Editorial Targeting Innate Immunity to Treat Cancer Matthew Austin and Harriet Kluger * Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, WWW211B, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 September 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 In recent years, it has become clear that the immune system plays a critical role in rejecting malignant cells. Through the complex interplay between multiple cell types from both the adaptive and innate immune systems, immune cells are able to identify and destroy tumor cells. Multiple mechanisms of escape from immune surveillance have been characterized and are being harnessed for therapeutic benefit. Proposed mechanisms include, but are not limited to, alteration of surface antigens [1,2], down-regulation of necessary components for antigen presentation [3], secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines by tumor cells or cells in the tumor micro-environment [4], and upregulation of expression of immune inhibitory molecules [5]. Drugs that target these immune-evasion mechanisms and successfully re-invigorate the immune response include inhibitors of PD-1, its ligand PDL-1, and CTLA-4, all of which have dramatically revolutionized cancer care [6–8]. Other classes of immune therapies that have been approved by the food and drug administration include CAR-T and natural killer (NK) cellular therapies [9], cytokine therapies [10], oncolytic viruses [11] and dendritic cell therapies, such as sipuleucel-T [12]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are thought to primarily work by activation of cytotoxic T cells [13], are the most widely used; however, they are only active in a subset of cancer patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Cell Migration in Inflammation: Present and Future Therapeutic Targets
    REVIEW DAMPENING INFLAMMATION Immune cell migration in inflammation: present and future therapeutic targets Andrew D Luster1, Ronen Alon2 & Ulrich H von Andrian3 The burgeoning field of leukocyte trafficking has created new and exciting opportunities in the clinic. Trafficking signals are being defined that finely control the movement of distinct subsets of immune cells into and out of specific tissues. Because the accumulation of leukocytes in tissues contributes to a wide variety of diseases, these ‘molecular codes’ have provided new targets for inhibiting tissue-specific inflammation, which have been confirmed in the clinic. However, immune cell migration is also critically important for the delivery of protective immune responses to tissues. http://www.nature.com/natureimmunology Thus, the challenge for the future will be to identify the trafficking molecules that will most specifically inhibit the key subsets of cells that drive disease processes without affecting the migration and function of leukocytes required for protective immunity. The past three decades have witnessed an explosion of knowledge in they deploy to migrate to target tissues? How do trafficking molecules immunology, which is being increasingly ‘translated’ into new thera- regulate effector cell recruitment in vessels and during subsequent trans- pies for seemingly unrelated human pathologies caused by excessive or endothelial and interstitial migration? Which trafficking molecules are misdirected inflammatory responses. Although such diseases can affect promising targets for safe and effective drug inhibition? Which migra- any part of the body, almost all inflammatory conditions are restricted tion-directed drugs might be effective in which disease(s) and why? to particular target organs or tissue components1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Qnas with Max D. Cooper and Jacques F. A. P. Miller
    QNAS QnAswithMaxD.CooperandJacquesF.A.P.Miller QNAS Brian Doctrow, Science Writer Anyone who has ever contracted chicken pox can thank the adaptive immune system for future pro- tection against the disease. It is also thanks to this system that vaccines prevent diseases. The adaptive immune system provides organisms with a memory of past infections, enabling the body to quickly kill returning infections before they can do significant damage. Immunologists Jacques F. A. P. Miller and Max D. Cooper determined that adaptive immunity requires 2 distinct cell types that perform comple- mentary functions. Miller’s findings, published in the early 1960s in Lancet (1) and Proceedings of the Royal Society (2), showed that the ability to distinguish one’s own cells from foreign cells, a key feature of the adap- tive immune system, depends on lymphocytes, now known as T cells, matured in an organ called the thy- mus. Subsequently, Cooper reported in Nature (3) that Max Dale Cooper. Image courtesy of Georgia Research antibody production depends on a separate set of Alliance/Billy Howard. lymphocytes, dubbed B cells. The division of labor between T and B cells is a fundamental organizing principle of the adaptive immune system, the discov- did cancer research. I started working on leukemia and ery of which laid the groundwork for modern immu- this gave me an interest in lymphocytes. nology and made possible many subsequent medical advances, including monoclonal antibody produc- Cooper: I became interested through patients that I tion, vaccine development, and checkpoint inhibi- was taking care of: Children that had deficient immune tion therapies for cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Cells, Tissues and Organs of the Immune System
    Immune Cells and Organs Bonnie Hylander, Ph.D. Aug 29, 2014 Dept of Immunology [email protected] Immune system Purpose/function? • First line of defense= epithelial integrity= skin, mucosal surfaces • Defense against pathogens – Inside cells= kill the infected cell (Viruses) – Systemic= kill- Bacteria, Fungi, Parasites • Two phases of response – Handle the acute infection, keep it from spreading – Prevent future infections We didn’t know…. • What triggers innate immunity- • What mediates communication between innate and adaptive immunity- Bruce A. Beutler Jules A. Hoffmann Ralph M. Steinman Jules A. Hoffmann Bruce A. Beutler Ralph M. Steinman 1996 (fruit flies) 1998 (mice) 1973 Discovered receptor proteins that can Discovered dendritic recognize bacteria and other microorganisms cells “the conductors of as they enter the body, and activate the first the immune system”. line of defense in the immune system, known DC’s activate T-cells as innate immunity. The Immune System “Although the lymphoid system consists of various separate tissues and organs, it functions as a single entity. This is mainly because its principal cellular constituents, lymphocytes, are intrinsically mobile and continuously recirculate in large number between the blood and the lymph by way of the secondary lymphoid tissues… where antigens and antigen-presenting cells are selectively localized.” -Masayuki, Nat Rev Immuno. May 2004 Not all who wander are lost….. Tolkien Lord of the Rings …..some are searching Overview of the Immune System Immune System • Cells – Innate response- several cell types – Adaptive (specific) response- lymphocytes • Organs – Primary where lymphocytes develop/mature – Secondary where mature lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells interact to initiate a specific immune response • Circulatory system- blood • Lymphatic system- lymph Cells= Leukocytes= white blood cells Plasma- with anticoagulant Granulocytes Serum- after coagulation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammation and Introduction to Wound Healing
    Inflammation and Introduction to Wound Healing Alan D. Proia, M.D., Ph.D. February 14, 2011 Proia©/DUMC 1 Objectives Understand basic concepts of acute, chronic, and granulomatous inflammation Recognize key leukocytes participating in inflammatory responses Distinguish acute, chronic, and granulomatous inflammation Proia©/DUMC 2 What is Inflammation? Response to injury (including infection) Reaction of blood vessels leads to: » Accumulation of fluid and leukocytes in extravascular tissues Destroys, dilutes, or walls off the injurious agent Initiates the repair process Proia©/DUMC 4 What is Inflammation? Fundamentally a protective response May be potentially harmful » Hypersensitivity reactions to insect bites, drugs, contrast media in radiology » Chronic diseases: arthritis, atherosclerosis » Disfiguring scars, visceral adhesions Proia©/DUMC 5 What is Inflammation? Components of inflammatory response » Vascular reaction » Cellular reaction How: Chemical mediators » Derived from plasma proteins » Derived from cells inside and outside of blood vessels Proia©/DUMC 6 Historical Highlights Celsus, a first century A.D. Roman, listed four cardinal signs of acute inflammation: » Rubor (erythema [redness]): vasodilatation, increased blood flow » Tumor (swelling): extravascular accumulation of fluid » Calor (heat): vasodilatation, increased blood flow » Dolor (pain) Proia©/DUMC 7 Types of Inflammation Acute inflammation Chronic inflammation » Short duration » Longer duration » Edema » Lymphocytes & » Mainly neutrophils macrophages
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Dynamics in Leukocyte Transendothelial Endothelial Actin-Binding Proteins and Actin
    Th eJournal of Brief Reviews Immunology Endothelial Actin-Binding Proteins and Actin Dynamics in Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration Michael Schnoor The endothelium is the first barrier that leukocytes have Ag-1 and macrophage-1 Ag or the b1-integrin very late Ag-4 to overcome during recruitment to sites of inflamed tis- on leukocytes mediate firm adhesion. Subsequently, leukocytes sues. The leukocyte extravasation cascade is a complex reach the site of transmigration by intraluminal crawling. Leu- multistep process that requires the activation of various kocytes can crawl as much as 60 mm in a macrophage-1 Ag/ adhesion molecules and signaling pathways, as well as ac- ICAM-1–dependent fashion before they transmigrate (2). tin remodeling, in both leukocytes and endothelial cells. Transmigration (also known as diapedesis) occurs either trans- Endothelial adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin or cellularly or paracellularly, with the majority of transmigration ICAM-1, are connected to the actin cytoskeleton via events being across paracellular junctions both in vivo and actin-binding proteins (ABPs). Although the contribu- in vitro (3, 4). Finally, leukocytes have to cross pericytes and tion of receptor–ligand interactions to leukocyte extrav- the basement membrane (BM) to conclude extravasation. This asation has been studied extensively, the contribution of occurs through gaps in the pericyte layer that coincide with endothelial ABPs to the regulation of leukocyte adhe- regions of the BM that contain less extracellular matrix proteins sion and transendothelial migration remains poorly un- and, therefore, pose a thinner barrier for the transmigrating derstood. This review focuses on recently published leukocyte (5, 6). All of these steps require cell movement and evidence that endothelial ABPs, such as cortactin, myo- actin cytoskeletal remodeling in both cell types involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Instant Notes: Immunology, Second Edition
    Immunology Second Edition The INSTANT NOTES series Series Editor: B.D. Hames School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Animal Biology 2nd edition Biochemistry 2nd edition Bioinformatics Chemistry for Biologists 2nd edition Developmental Biology Ecology 2nd edition Immunology 2nd edition Genetics 2nd edition Microbiology 2nd edition Molecular Biology 2nd edition Neuroscience Plant Biology Chemistry series Consulting Editor: Howard Stanbury Analytical Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry 2nd edition Medicinal Chemistry Organic Chemistry 2nd edition Physical Chemistry Psychology series Sub-series Editor: Hugh Wagner Dept of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK Psychology Cognitive Psychology Forthcoming title Physiological Psychology Immunology Second Edition P.M. Lydyard Department of Immunology and Molecular Pathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK A. Whelan Department of Immunology, Trinity College and St James’ Hospital, Dublin, Ireland and M.W. Fanger Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA © Garland Science/BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, 2004 First published 2000 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Second edition published 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or
    [Show full text]
  • Granulocyte Transfusions in Haematopoietic Cell Transplants and Leukaemia: the Phoenix Or Beating a Dead Horse?
    www.nature.com/bmt EDITORIAL Granulocyte transfusions in haematopoietic cell transplants and leukaemia: the phoenix or beating a dead horse? © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 Bone Marrow Transplantation (2021) 56:2046–2049; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01399-3 You should make a point of trying every experience once, excepting incest and folk-dancing. (and perhaps granulocyte transfusions?) Sir Arnold Bax Why is it some things which are so intuitive and seem easily proved continue engendering controversy and debate (Fig. 1). The example at hand is granulocyte transfusions. It has been known for >50 years infection risk increases precipitously in people when their blood granulocyte concentration is <0.5 × 10E + 9/L [1, 2] (Fig. 2). Whether, given the development of more effective systemic and oral non-absorbable antibiotics and anti-fungal drugs, often given prophylactically 0.5 × 10E + 9/L remains the threshold for increased infection risk or whether the threshold is closer 0–0.2 × 10E + 9/L is unknown. It is also possible there is no blood granulocyte nadir requiring granulocyte transfusions or where a benefit of granulocyte transfusions can be convincingly proved. Regardless, the seemingly simple remedy to decreased Fig. 1 Centre for the Study of Rationality. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem. blood granulocytes is to transfuse granulocytes from normals or, formally, from persons with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Amino™ (now renamed CelltrifugeTM)orbyfiltration leukapheresis Why should granulocyte transfusions be different than RBC and in persons with granulocytopenia and gram-negative sepsis. platelet transfusions which are convincingly safe and effective.
    [Show full text]