DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report 15-05 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 1200, Portland OR 97232 · (503)238-0667 ·

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report 15-05 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 1200, Portland OR 97232 · (503)238-0667 · Assessing the Status and Trends of Spring Chinook Habitat in the Upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek: Annual Report 2014 publication date: March 31, 2015 Authors: Dale A. McCullough, Seth White, Casey Justice, Monica Blanchard, Robert Lessard, Denise Kelsey, David Graves, and Joe Nowinski Technical Report 15-05 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 1200, Portland OR 97232 · (503)238-0667 · www.critfc.org Funding for this work came from the Columbia Basin Fish Accords (2008-2018), a ten-year tribal/federal partnership between the Bonneville Power Administration, Bureau of Reclamation, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, US Army Corps of Engineers, and The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. Assessing the Status and Trends of Spring Chinook Habitat in the Upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek BPA Project # 2009-004-00 Report covers work performed under BPA contract #(s) 64398 Report was completed under BPA contract #(s) 64398 Report covers work performed from: January 2014 – December 2014 Dale A. McCullough, Seth White, Casey Justice, Monica Blanchard, Robert Lessard, Denise Kelsey, David Graves, and Joe Nowinski Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC), Portland, OR 97232 Report Created March 2015 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. 1 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Methods ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Stream biota ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Fish Populations ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Benthic Macroinvertebrates ......................................................................................................................... 14 Stream Habitat .................................................................................................................................................. 16 CHaMP Habitat Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 16 CHaMP Data Collection in the Minam River ................................................................................................. 21 Analysis of CHaMP Data Relative to Landscape Metrics ............................................................................... 21 Water Temperature ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Water Chemistry ........................................................................................................................................... 23 Large Woody Debris (Remote Estimation) .................................................................................................... 23 Riparian Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Hydrology-Low Flows .................................................................................................................................... 24 Road Density ................................................................................................................................................. 24 Restoration Database .................................................................................................................................... 25 Life Cycle Model ................................................................................................................................................ 26 Results ................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Stream Biota ...................................................................................................................................................... 27 Fish Populations ............................................................................................................................................ 27 Benthic Macroinvertebrates ......................................................................................................................... 29 Stream Habitat .................................................................................................................................................. 32 CHaMP Habitat Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 32 Analysis of CHaMP Data Relative to Landscape Metrics ............................................................................... 36 Water Temperature ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Water Chemistry ........................................................................................................................................... 44 Large Woody Debris (Remote Estimation) .................................................................................................... 47 Riparian Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 49 2 Hydrology-Low Flows .................................................................................................................................... 51 Road Density ................................................................................................................................................. 51 Restoration Database .................................................................................................................................... 51 Life Cycle Model ................................................................................................................................................ 56 Coordination and Data Management ............................................................................................................... 58 Fish Database Development ......................................................................................................................... 58 CRITFC GIS Database ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Upload Data to CHaMP Website ................................................................................................................... 58 Development of Road Layer in the Upper Grande Ronde Basin ................................................................... 58 GIS Tool for extraction of landscape data from riparian buffers and watershed polygons .......................... 58 Coordination with regional agencies, tribes, and landowners ..................................................................... 59 Dissemination of Project Findings ..................................................................................................................... 61 Presentations ................................................................................................................................................ 61 Publications ................................................................................................................................................... 64 Draft journal article based on CHaMP data .................................................................................................. 64 Discussion/Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 65 CHaMP Habitat Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 65 Water Temperature ...................................................................................................................................... 66 Fish Populations ............................................................................................................................................ 66 Benthic Macroinvertebrates ......................................................................................................................... 67 Hydrology-Low
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains
    2015 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Prepared by: Gretchen Sausen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Grande Field Office February 2016 2015 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Prepared by: Gretchen Sausen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Grande Field Office February 2016 ABSTRACT Bull trout were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1998 due to declining populations. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) recommends monitoring populations in subbasins where little is known, including the Grande Ronde and Imnaha subbasins. Spawning survey data is important for determining relative abundance and distribution trends in bull trout populations. Without adequate funding, it had been difficult to find sufficient numbers of experienced bull trout surveyors and packers for surveys in the back-country, and to obtain adequate supplies to get the work accomplished. Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) funding for Phase III of the project, supported the continued survey of bull trout spawning areas in years 2013 through 2015 in the Wallowa Mountains of Northeast Oregon. This report summarizes the 2015 bull trout spawning data collected in the Wallowa Mountains of NE Oregon and compares this with past years’ data. The report includes a comparison of OWEB Phase III project funded years (2013-2015) as well as previous years’ data. Bull trout spawning surveys have been conducted on similar index areas for selected Grande Ronde and Imnaha River streams from 1999 to 2015. These surveyed streams are located within the bull trout core areas of the Wallowa River/Minam River and Imnaha River bull trout core areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat: Annual Report 2010 Publication Date: March 31, 2010
    Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat: Annual Report 2010 publication date: March 31, 2010 Authors: Dale A. McCullough, Casey Justice, Seth White, Rishi Sharma, Denise Kelsey, David Graves, Nicole Tursich, Robert Lessard, and Henry Franzoni Technical Report 10-11 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 1200, Portland OR 97232 · (503)238-0667 · www.critfc.org Funding for this work came from the Columbia Basin Fish Accords (2008-2018), a ten-year tribal/federal partnership between the Bonneville Power Administration, Bureau of Reclamation, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, US Army Corps of Engineers, and The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. Annual Report (2010) Monitoring recovery trends in key spring Chinook habitat Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Authors: Dale A. McCullough, Casey Justice, Seth White, Rishi Sharma, Denise Kelsey, David Graves, Nicole Tursich, Robert Lessard, and Henry Franzoni Project Number: 2009-004-00 Proposer: CRITFC Short Description: Monitoring recovery trends in key spring Chinook habitat Province(s): Blue Mountain Subbasin(s): Grande Ronde Contact Name: Dale A. McCullough Contact email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents A : 165. Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation ..................................................................... 4 B : 191. Watershed Coordination - Coordinate with regional
    [Show full text]
  • Ralph I. Gifford Photographs, Circa 1910S - 1947
    Guide to the Ralph I. Gifford Photographs, circa 1910s - 1947 Title Ralph I. Gifford Photographs (P 218-SG 2) Dates circa 1910s - 1947 (inclusive) 1935-1947 (bulk) Creator Gifford, Ralph I. Summary The Ralph I. Gifford Photographs consist of images taken by Gifford throughout Oregon, primarily during the 1930s and 1940s. The photographs depict many Oregon landmarks and scenes, including the Oregon Coast, Crater Lake, Mount Hood, the Wallowa Mountains, and the Snake River Canyon. The collection includes numerous images of sport fishing as well as several photographs of Native Americans. Ralph Gifford was the son of Benjamin A. Gifford and took over his father©s Portland photography business around 1920. In 1936, Ralph became the first photographer of the newly established Travel and Information Department of the Oregon State Highway Department, a position he held until his death in 1947. Quantity 2.5 cubic feet, including 2089 photographs (17 boxes, including 2 oversize boxes, and 1 map folder) Restrictions on Access Collection is open for research. Oregon State University Libraries, University Archives 121 The Valley Library Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331-4501 Phone: 541-737-2165 Email: [email protected] Web: http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu/archives Finding aid prepared by Lawrence A. Landis; updated by Elizabeth Nielsen, 2011. Funding for encoding this finding aid was provided through a grant awarded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. PDF Created May 28, 2013 Guide to the Ralph I. Gifford Photographs, circa 1910s - 1947 Page 2 of 31 Biographical Note Born in Portland, Ralph I. Gifford (1894-1947) worked in his father©s (Benjamin A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grande Ronde River Canyon a Few Miles Below the Mouth of the Waflowa River
    Figure 17. The Grande Ronde River Canyon a Few Miles Below the Mouth of the Waflowa River. Figure 18. A Gravel Riffle on the Lower Grande Roride River Approximately 14 Miles Above the Mouth (11-2-59). -58- Table 14.Mean Monthly Flows for the Lower Grande Ronde River Water!ear Location Oct Nov.at RondowaDec. andJan. Troy, Oregon,Feb. 1954-1957Mar. A Water Years. /J J A 1954 TroyRondowa 821543 1,059678 1,6511,035 1,5921,045 1,7542,837 1,7402,701 3,67].5,724 4,4585,568 4,5193,716 1,7982,409 988723 874613 1955 TroyRondowa 794557 845577 752504 794511 891559 1,286854 4,4623,176 6,8905,127 6,4975,556 2,6612,092 490700 705505 1956 Rondowa 657 1,112 2,737 2,501 1,421 4,034 7,390 8,964 5,852 2,6672,052 74].961 808616 1957 RondowaTroy 616910 1,540694 1,4024,189 3,494719 1,6872,085 4,1035,652 10,7805,168 11,7908,771 4,8197,543 1,450 615 51]. /InforznationTroy taken805 from USGS973 Water2,299 Supply1,044 Papers2,496 Nos. 1347,5,822 1397,7,812 1447, and11,510 1517.5,863 1,711 875 752 Table 15. Lower Grands Ronde River Moan Maximtun and Mean Minimum Daily Flows, in Cubic Foot Per Second, curing the Winter Months of the Period1953-54 through 1956-37. .21 Flow Year L2ction Sta:e Jan. Feb 1953 - 54 Rondowa High 2,070 1,850 2,190 3,270 74 728 j370 .]I1QQ Troy High 3,430 2,960 3,680 5,420 Low i.280 3Q 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Program
    GRANDE RONDE BASIN SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM 1995 - 2002 Project Status Report FISH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; NORTHEAST REGION OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Timothy L. Hoffnagle Richard W. Carmichael William T. Noll Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife La Grande, Oregon December 2003 Fish Research and Development Project Oregon Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Program Project Status Report Project Period: 1 October 1995 - 31 December 2002 Prepared for: U. S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P. O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 Project Number 1998-010-01 and Lower Snake River Compensation Plan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Suite 343 Boise, Idaho 83709 Contract Number 14-16-0001-96507 Prepared by: Timothy L. Hoffnagle Richard W. Carmichael William T. Noll Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife La Grande, Oregon December 2003 Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of our co-managers in the Grande Ronde Basin Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Program: Nez Perce Tribe, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and Manchester Research Station (NOAA Fisheries). This work could not have been completed without the assistance of the fish culturists, research biologists and management biologists from ODFW and the co-management agencies. We also thank the Bonneville Power Administration and Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service) for their support and funding of this program and its facilities. Lastly, we thank Dr. Timothy A. Whitesel and all who developed and worked on this project since its inception. Citation: Hoffnagle, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa River
    Wallowa County - Nez Perce Tribe Salmon Habitat Recovery Plan With MultiMulti---SpeciesSpecies Habitat Strategy August 1993 Revised September 1999 This document is intended to be dynamic, designed to change with new knowledge and changing conditions in a manner that will promote understanding and cooperation among all parties involved. All identified fish, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and birds in the County are addressed, including issues on both private and public lands. The document should not be interpreted as a regulatory instrument, law, or inflexible policy. Some of the proposals and actions in this document are based on recognized current scientific information and understanding. Other proposals are derived from the observations and experience of local land managers. As new information becomes available from research or monitoring activities, proposals and actions will be modified annually to reflect the new knowledge. Efficient use of limited resources is needed for the benefit of society and the environment. Table of Contents Page SUPPORT ORGANIZATION i USER GUIDE ii ABBREVATIONS v INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Mission 1 Scope of the Plan 1 History of the Plan 2 WALLOWA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT 3 Physical Features 3 Climate 3 Population and Economy 3 DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM 5 Status of Stocks 5 Chinook 5 Other Fish Species 6 Impacts of Land Management Practices 10 DESIRED HABITAT CONDITIONS FOR CHINOOK SALMON 11 PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES 13 Streams Segments Considered 13 Analysis Factors 14 Solutions 15 STREAM ANALYSIS BY STREAM
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Prepared By
    2017 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Prepared by: Gretchen Sausen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Grande Field Office February 2018 1 2017 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Report 2 2017 Bull Trout Redd Monitoring in the Wallowa Mountains Prepared by: Gretchen Sausen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Grande Field Office February 2018 ABSTRACT Bull trout were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1998 due to declining populations. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) recommends monitoring bull trout in subbasins where little is known about the populations, including the Grande Ronde and Imnaha subbasins. Spawning survey data is important for determining relative abundance and distribution trends in bull trout populations. This report summarizes the 2017 bull trout spawning data collected in the Wallowa Mountains of northeast Oregon and compares this with past years’ data. Bull trout spawning surveys have been conducted on similar index areas for selected Grande Ronde and Imnaha River streams from 1999 to 2017. These surveyed streams are located within the Wallowa River/Minam River and Imnaha River bull trout core areas. Surveys in 2017 were conducted by the Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the Service, U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Freshwater Trust, and fisheries consultants. Objectives of the survey included: (1) locate bull trout spawning areas; (2) determine redd characteristics; (3) determine bull trout timing of spawning; (4) collect spawning density data; (5) determine and compare the spatial distribution of redds along the Lostine River in 2006 through 2017; and (6) over time use all of the data to assess local bull trout population trends and the long-term recovery of bull trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Oregon Hatchery Program Grande Ronde – Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project
    Northeast Oregon Hatchery Program Grande Ronde – Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project Biological Assessment May 2004 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration and Nez Perce Tribe Under Master Contract No. 589 with: Environmental Science Associates 710 Second Avenue, Suite 730 Seattle, WA 98104 Prepared by: FishPro, a Division of HDR 3780 SE Mile Hill Drive Port Orchard, WA 98366 Prepared by: FishPro, a Division of HDR Patty Michak, Senior Fisheries Biologist Becky Holloway, Environmental Scientist Nisqually Environmental Laura Scott, Senior Environmental Scientist Under contract to: Environmental Science Associates Jan Mulder, Project Manager Field Surveys: Fisheries and Aquatic Environment Surveys: Fisheries surveys were conducted by Patty Michak on July 17th, 18th and 19th, 2002. An additional survey was conducted by Patty Michak and Becky Holloway on September 25th, 2002. All surveyors are widely experienced in the fisheries field, and Patty Michak has greater than 20 years of experience. Wildlife and Plant Surveys: Floral and faunal surveys of the project sites were conducted on July 17th, 18th and 19th, 2002. Surveys were conducted by Laura Scott. Ms. Scott is proficient in planning and conducting field and office studies of wildlife and plant communities and reviewing projects for the potential presence of, or documented habitat for, federal or state-listed threatened, endangered or sensitive species of plants using a variety of survey protocols. Past efforts include the evaluation of potential adverse impacts on plant communities or listed plant species resulting from specific development proposals. Field surveys led by Ms. Scott have been conducted in conjunction with, or under the direction of, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Incremental Method Meeting Summary
    1 Wallowa Falls Project Relicensing June 13, 2013 Instream Flow Incremental Methodologyy (IFIM) AgA ency Meeting Summary Start Time: 9:00 a.m. End Time: 5:00 p.m. Subject: Tour tailrace area and discuss tailrace Attendees: See attendance list at the barrier challenges, tour bypass reach including conclusion of this summary lower fish barrier habitat reach and tailrace re-route layout (see Agenda at the conclusion of this summary) Assignments PacifiCorp: Schedule a summer agency visit during low flow period. USFWS (Gretchen Sausen): Provide Wallowa River Core area Assessment information (part of “in progress” bull trout recovery plan process) that was developed by local recovery team members in September 2011, (USFWS 2011); provided via email on 7/3/13 and attached at the conclusion of this summary PacifiCorp: Review literature and available data to better understand the potential for channel ice formation as a result of increased winter flows in the bypass reach. (see response at the conclusion of this summary) PacifiCorp: Schedule an IFIM Conference call week of July 8, 2013 for continued discussion. PacifiCorp: Record West Fork flow above Project tailrace during the fall spawning period. Introduction Following introductions, Russ Howison (PacifiCorp) provided opening remarks that included a statement that the purpose of the meeting was to tour tailrace area and discuss tailrace barrier challenges, then tour the bypass reach including lower fish barrier (fafalls), habitat reach immediately below, and tailrace re-route layout. See attached agenda. A summary of the meeting discussion is provided below. Agency Fisheries Goals and Management Objectives USFWS - A USFWS-buull trout recovery plan revision is currently on hoold and the most recent Bull Trout Recovery Plan is from 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for Subbasin Summaries
    Draft Grande Ronde Subbasin Summary June 1, 2001 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Lead Writer M. Cathy Nowak, Cat Tracks Wildlife Consulting Subbasin Team Leader Bruce Eddy, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Contributors Asotin County Building and Planning Asotin County Conservation District Asotin County Noxious Weed Board Bureau of Land Management Columbia Intertribal Fish Commission Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Grande Ronde Model Watershed Lower Snake River Compensation Plan National Marine Fisheries Service Natural Resources Conservation Service Nez Perce Tribe Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Natural Heritage Program Oregon State University Oregon Water Resources Department U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Umatilla National Forest, USFS Union Soil and Water Conservation District Wallowa Whitman National Forest, USFS Wallowa Resources Wallowa Soil and Water Conservation District Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Grande Ronde Subbasin Summary Table of Contents Subbasin Description ......................................................................................................................... 1 General Description ................................................................................................................... 1 Fish and Wildlife Resources...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Review of Areas with Wilderness Potential March 2010
    Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Review of Areas with Wilderness Potential March 2010 Wallowa-Whitman NF Areas with Wilderness Potential Page 1 of 100 Note: Roadless Areas located within the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area begin on page 63. Beaver Creek Roadless Area ( #6276) - 12,530 Acres Overview History: The Beaver Creek Roadless Area was inventoried during RARE II and was allocated to non- wilderness uses. Timber sales and associated road construction has reduced the area from 23,100 acres to its present size. The remaining undeveloped area includes the La Grande Watershed, which was protected by a 1938 agreement, amended in 1945, between the Secretary of Agriculture and the City of La Grande. It was supplemented by a Memorandum of Understanding in 1984 between the City of La Grande and the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Effective January 1992, the City of La Grande and the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest agreed to protect and manage the watershed for future use. The 1990 Wallowa-Whitman Forest Plan allocated this area to non-wilderness uses with 192 acres in timber, 11,190 in wildlife/timber, and 1,585 as old-growth. Location and access: This area lies in Township 5 South, Range 37 East, 12 miles southwest of La Grande within the Grande Ronde River/Beaver Creek Watershed. Both Jordan and Beaver Creeks are tributaries to the Grande Ronde River. The main access to the area is from the north via Forest Road 4305. The majority of the Beaver Creek Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) boundary is within the Beaver Creek Roadless area. The WUI area was identified through a collaborative effort as part of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP).
    [Show full text]
  • Grande Ronde River Subbasin Plan
    Grande Ronde Subbasin Plan May 28, 2004 Prepared for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Lead Writer M. Cathy Nowak, Cat Tracks Wildlife Consulting Subbasin Team Leader Lyle Kuchenbecker, Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program Grande Ronde Subbasin Plan Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary...............................................................................................................12 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Description of Planning Entity ...................................................................................... 12 2.2. List of Participants......................................................................................................... 13 2.3. Stakeholder Involvement Process.................................................................................. 14 2.4. Overall Approach to the Planning Activity ................................................................... 14 2.5. Process and Schedule for Revising/Updating the Plan.................................................. 15 3. Subbasin Assessment ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1. Subbasin Overview........................................................................................................ 15 3.1.1. General Description............................................................................................... 15 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]