Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Knockdown of apolipoprotein E enhanced sensitivity of Hep3B cells
to cardiac steroids via regulating Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome
Miao Liu, Li-Xing Feng, Peng Sun, Wang Liu, Tian Mi, Min Lei, Wanying Wu,
Baohong Jiang, Min Yang, Lihong Hu*, De-An Guo*, and Xuan Liu*
Authors’ Affiliation: Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
Corresponding Author: Lihong Hu, De-An Guo, and Xuan Liu. Shanghai Institute
of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 501 Hai-Ke Road, Shanghai
201203, P.R. China. Tel/Fax: 86-21-50272789. E-mail: [email protected] (Lihong
Hu), [email protected] (De-An Guo), [email protected] (Xuan Liu).
Running Title: APOE knockdown sensitized Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids.
Key Words: apolipoprotein E, Hep3B cells, cardiac steroids, Na+/K+-ATPase
signalosome
Abbreviations:
BF, bufalin; OUA, ouabain; DIG, digitoxin; APOE, apolipoprotein E; STR, DNA
profiling; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; FPKM, fragments per kilobase of exon per
1
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
million fragments mapped; STRING, Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting
Genes; TBST, Tris-buffer saline containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20; PRNP, prion
protein;FBLN1, fibulin 1; COL18A1, collagen, type XVIII, α1; NID1, nidogen 1;
BCAM, basal cell adhesion molecule; APOC1, apolipoprotein C-I; C3, complement
component 3; CTSB, cathepsin B; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate
3-kinase.
Financial Support: This work was supported in part by supports received by X. Liu
from the Shanghai Science & Technology Support Program (13431900401), the
Shanghai Science & Technology Innovation Action Program (15140904800), the
National Nature Science Foundation of China (81373964) and the National Science &
Technology Major Project of China (2014ZX09301-306-03).
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
Word Count (excluding references): 4998
Total Number of Figures and Tables: 6 figures and 0 tables.
Supplemental Materials: 5 supplemental figures and 1 supplemental document
(including 3 supplemental tables and supplemental figure legends).
2
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Abstract This study compared the sensitivity of human hepatoma Hep3B, SK-HEP-1,
SMMC-7721 and BEL-7402 cells to cardiac steroids including bufalin (BF), a bufalin
derivative (BF211), ouabain (OUA) and digitoxin (DIG). Hep3B cells exhibited
relatively low sensitivity to cardiac steroids. Expression levels of subunits of
Na+/K+-ATPase were high in Hep3B cells. However, co-localization of
Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolin was nearly undetectable in Hep3B cells. By using
RNA-Seq technology, we found a total of 36 genes to be differentially expressed
between Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells, which are highly sensitive to cardiac
steroids. Our bioinformatics analysis determined that these genes were mostly
comprised of extracellular space, protein binding and extracellular region. Among
these 36 genes, apolipoprotein E (APOE) played a critical role, since knockdown
APOE expression induced co-localization of Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolin and
increased sensitivity of Hep3B cells to both proliferation-inhibiting and cytotoxic
effects of BF or BF211. Also, the effects of BF on PI3K/AKT/GSK3β and apoptosis
signal cascades were enhanced in APOE knockdown cells. The results of our study
confirmed the role of Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome in cytotoxicity of cardiac steroids
and suggested that APOE regulated the sensitivity of cells to cardiac steroids by
affecting formation and function of Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome. In addition,
intercellular interaction with high level of Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit may be also a
factor in the low sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids.
3
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most aggressive malignancies (1, 2).
The percentage of patients benefited from surgical treatment is low and the efficacy of
chemotherapy agents such as doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil is limited (3).
Huachansu injection, derived from a water-soluble extract of the traditional Chinese
medicine ChanSu, is commonly used in China to treat patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma (4, 5). ChanSu is obtained from skin and parotid venom secretion glands of
toads (6). Cardiac steroids such as bufalin (BF) are the active components of ChanSu
(7). In the last 20 years, interest of developing cardiac steroids into anti-cancer agents
substantially increased (8-12). Our lab also tried to develop derivatives of BF as
possible new anti-cancer agents (13). Synthesis of promising BF derivatives such as
BF211 (Patent Publication Number CN 102532235 B) had been reported (14).
However, the research and development of cardiac steroids as new anti-cancer agents
was hindered because the mechanisms of their anti-cancer effects had not been fully
understood.
In the present study, we studied possible factors that contribute to the sensitivity
of hepatoma cells to cardiac steroids to understand the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of
cardiac steroids. We tested the cytotoxicity of representative cardiac steroids such as
BF, BF211, OUA and DIG, whose structures were shown in Supplemental Figure S1,
in 4 types of hepatoma cell lines and one type of embryonic liver cell line.
Interestingly, one of the cell lines, Hep3B, exhibited lower sensitivity to cardiac
steroids when compared to other cell lines. Expression levels of subunits of 4
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Na+/K+-ATPase, the direct target of cardiac steroids, in Hep3B cells and other cells
were compared. RNA-Seq technology was also used to compare the expression
profiles of Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells, which is the cell line with the highest
sensitivity. In total, we found 36 genes that were differentially expressed between
Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 cells. APOE (apolipoprotein E) protein might be an important
factor in regulating the sensitivity of cells to cardiac steroids, which was confirmed by
examining the cytotoxicity of cardiac steroids and signal cascades in Hep3B cells
transfected with siRNAs for the APOE gene. Finally, we also observed the role of the
Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit in the sensitivity of Hep3B cells.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
OUA and DIG with a purity of 98% were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich
Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A). BF with a purity of 98% was isolated from
ChanSu (13) and BF211 with a purity of 98% was synthesized by a structure
modification of BF (14). Stock solutions of the chemicals were prepared in DMSO to
the concentration of 0.1 M as stock solution and stored at -20°C.
Cell culture
The human hepatoma cell lines Hep3B, SK-HEP-1, SMMC-7721 and BEL-7402
were purchased from the Cell Resource Center of Shanghai Institutes for Biological
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, P.R. China) in 2012. Human
embryo liver L-02 cells were purchased from the BioHemes Company (Wuxi, P.R.
5
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
China) in 2015. The suppliers declared that the cells passed the test of DNA profiling
(STR) before sending to us. No authentication was done by the authors. In our lab,
cells were expanded according to the supplier’s protocols and then cryopreserved in
liquid nitrogen. For each experiment, cells were thawed and further cultured for at
least 3 passages before subjecting to treatments. Furthermore, cells were passaged for
fewer than 6 months after resuscitation. Cell culture mediums used for the cell lines
were MEM for Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 cells, RPMI-1640 medium for SMMC-7721
and BEL-7402 cells, DMEM (high glucose) for L-02 cells, respectively. The mediums
were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin and 100
μg/mL streptomycin.
MTT Assay
Cell proliferation was assessed using MTT assay (15). Briefly, the Hep3B,
SK-HEP-1, SMMC-7721 , BEL-7402 and L-02 cells were seeded into 96-well plates
at a density of 7 × 103, 3 × 103, 5 × 103, 5 × 103 and 4 × 103 cells/well, respectively,
and allowed to grow overnight before treatment with BF, BF211, OUA or DIG at
different concentrations, or 0.1% DMSO (solvent control) for 72 h. After treatment,
the cell viability was evaluated by checking the absorbance at 570 nm.
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay
LDH release of cells was measured using the CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive
Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega). Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and
incubated overnight before treatment with BF, BF211 at different concentrations, or
0.1% DMSO (solvent control) for 24 or 48 h. After treatment, medium from each well
6
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
was collected to measure the amount of released LDH according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Cells exposed to a lysis buffer (9% Triton X-100) were
used as positive control. Cell death was represented by percentage of released LDH in
the medium over total cellular LDH, LDH release of positive control cells.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR analysis
Total RNAs were extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse
transcribed using a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with a gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR amplifications were
performed using the SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa), and the thermal profile
was 95 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 sec and 61 °C for 25 sec.
Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and the mean threshold cycle (Ct) value was
calculated. The relative expression level was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. The
mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. Primer sequences for
PCR analysis are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy
Cells cultured on Poly-D-lysine-coated cover slips were fixed with cold 4%
Paraformaldehyde for 20 min. After washing with PBS three times, cells were
blocked for 2 h with PBS contained 0.1% Tween-20 and 1% BSA. Subsequently, cells
were incubated with the antibodies listed in the Supplemental Table S2 and the nuclei
were stained with DAPI. The stained cells were then observed with a laser-scanning
confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000, Japan).
RNA-Seq
7
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
The RNA-Seq was serviced by the Encode Genomics Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.
(Suzhou, China). Briefly, Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells in the exponential phase
were harvested in Trizol. The total RNA was converted into a cDNA library of
template molecules suitable for subsequent cluster generation and validated using an
Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Each library was sequenced using the 2 × 100 bp
paired-end Illumina/Solexa platform and averaged 70 million reads. The obtained
sequence reads were aligned to the genome (hg19 download from UCSC).
Cufflinks1.1.0 was used to identify differentially expressed genes and measured
transcript abundances with FPKM (fragments per kilobase of exon per million
fragments mapped). For differential expression tests, Cuffdiff from Cufflinks software
was applied over FPKM values. Significantly differentially expressed genes were
selected using multiple-test adjusted p-values.
Bioinformatics analysis
To obtain more information about significantly differentially expressed genes and
to assign statistical significance to our analysis, the gene list was submitted to
BioProfiling.de (http://mips.helmholtz-muenchen.de/proj/ppispider/) (16) and used
ProfCom_GO for grouping genes into functional classes. In addition, the STRING
(Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) database(http://string.embl.de/)
(17) was also used to predict physical or functional associations among these genes.
Confirmation of differentially expressed genes found in RNA-seq using
semi-quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR
Total RNAs extraction and reverse transcription were conducted as described
8
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
above. Semi-quantitative PCR amplifications were performed using the Premix Ex
TaqTM (TaKaRa). The thermal profile for cDNA synthesis was 98 °C for 15 seconds,
61°C for 10 sec, and 72 °C for 22 sec of 30 cycles and a final extension at 72°C for 5
min, with a final hold at 20°C in a thermal cycler. Primer sequences of the genes are
listed in Supplemental Tab. S1.
Influence of APOE knockdown on Hep3B cells
Validated siRNA for APOE (Sigma-Aldrich) was transfected into Hep3B cells by
using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s
protocol. Expression levels of APOE protein in wide type, APOE knockdown
(transfected with siRNA for APOE for 24 h) and negative control cells (transfected
with scrambled negative control siRNA) were checked using Western blotting assay.
Cytotoxicity of BF or BF211 on APOE knockdown cells was checked and compared
with the negative control cells. Briefly, APOE knockdown cells or negative control
cells were treated with BF or BF211 at different concentrations for the indicated time
periods. Then, cell viability and cell death were checked using MTT and LDH assay
as described above.
The expression levels of subunits of Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolins in APOE
knockdown cells and negative control cells were checked using real-time PCR
analysis as described above. The subcellular location of Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit
and caveolin-1 was observed using Laser scanning confocal microscopy as described
above. Apoptosis in cells treated with BF was measured using an Alexa Fluor 488
Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis kit (v13245, Life Technologies). The DNA
9
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
histogram of cells treated with BF was observed using flow cytometry analysis (18).
Western blotting assay
The Western blotting assay was conducted as described before (15). Antibodies
used in Western blotting assay were listed in Supplemental Tab. S2.
Checking the influence of ATP1B1 knockdown on Hep3B cells
Validated siRNA for ATP1B1 (Sigma-Aldrich) was transfected into Hep3B cells
by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen). Scrambled negative control siRNA
(Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the negative control. Cytotoxicity of BF or BF211 on
ATP1B1 knockdown cells was checked using MTT, LDH release assay and flow
cytometry analysis of apoptosis and then was compared to the negative control cells.
The subcellular location of E-cadherin in ATP1B1 knockdown cells and negative
control cells was observed using the Laser scanning confocal microscopy as described
above.
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the differences between the treated and the
control groups. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM, and results from a
minimum of three independent experiments were used for the statistical analysis.
Results
Hep3B cells exhibited lower sensitivity to cardiac steroids compared with other
hepatoma cells and embryo liver L-02 cells
As shown in Fig.1 A-B, among the 5 types of cells, Hep3B cells exhibited the
10
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
lowest sensitivity to BF or BF211. Similar results were found for the treatment of
OUA, DIG (Supplemental Fig. S2A-B). To check whether Hep3B cells were resistant
to all chemotherapy agents, we also studied the sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cisplatin,
a commonly used anti-cancer agent, and compared the results to SK-HEP-1 cells
which exhibited high sensitivity to cardiac steroids. As shown in Supplemental Fig.
S2C, the sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cisplatin was similar to or even higher than the
sensitivity of SK-HEP-1 cells. These results suggested that the low sensitivity of
Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids was not based on deficiency in cell death signaling
and execution pathways but might be related to specific response to cardiac steroids.
Expression levels of subunits of Na+/K+-ATPase in different cell lines
As shown in Fig. 1C, the mRNA expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase α1
(ATP1A1), α2 (ATP1A2), and β1 (ATP1B1) subunit in Hep3B cells were significantly
higher than other hepatoma cells as well as L-02 cells. The protein expression levels
of Na+/K+-ATPase α1 and Na+/K+-ATPase β1 in the cell lines were further
confirmed using Western blotting analysis (Fig.1 D). These results showed that the
low sensitivity of Hep3B cells may not be related to expression level of
Na+/K+-ATPase.
Co-localization of Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolin in Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1
cells
Caveolins were markers of caveolae and were the partners of Na+/K+-ATPase in
forming the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome (19). As shown in Fig. 2A, expression
levels of caveolin-1 and caveolin-2 in Hep3B cells were lower (0.03 and 0.40 fold)
11
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
than that of SK-HEP-1 cells. The expression level of caveolin-3 was higher (2.28 fold)
than that of SK-HEP-1 cells. Immunocytochemical staining of the Na+/K+-ATPase
α1 subunit and caveolin-1 was used to determine the subcellular localization of
Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolins. As shown in Fig. 2B, the level of the
Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit in Hep3B cells was stronger but the level of caveolin-1
was lower compared with the SK-HEP-1 cells, which was consistent with results of
the RT-PCR assay and Western blotting assay. Further, co-localization of the
Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit and caveolin-1 on the plasma membrane, which indicated
possible formation of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome, was observed in SK-HEP-1
cells but barely observed in Hep3B cells.
Genes differentially expressed between Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells
Transcriptomic data sets were donated to NCBI SRA database (accession number:
SRX434118, SRX434119). By using cufflinks software, the RNA-seq reads mapped
to the human genome were assembled per gene and condensed into FPKM expression
values, which provided a sample-centered absolute measure of the expression level of
each gene in the studied cell population (20). As shown in Fig. 3A, summarized
FPKM expression values of Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells were represented on a
scatter plot (log10 scale of FPKM). This plot showed a strong linear correlation
between the two types of cells. Most of the genes run along the diagonal and can be
considered common genes, genes with similar expression levels in the two types of
cells. By setting the q-value<0.05, we detected 36 significantly differentially
expressed genes, as shown in the dispersed gene dots in Fig. 3A. The names and
12
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
FPKM values of the 36 proteins are shown in Supplemental Tab. S3. Enrichment
analysis results of molecular functions of the 36 genes (Fig. 3B) suggested that
extracellular space, protein binding and extracellular region were the first three
distinct cellular functions related to the 36 genes. Further, we found a possible
interaction network of the 36 genes as predicted (Supplemental Figure S3) and a close
interaction among 9 genes including APOC1, APOE, BCAM, C3, COL18A1, CTSB,
FBLN1, PRNP and NID1. APOE was located at the center of the interaction network.
The expression levels of the 9 genes were further confirmed using RT-PCR (Fig.3 C).
As shown in Fig. 3C, PCR analysis results of the expression levels of the 9 genes in
Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells were consistent with the results of RNA-seq.
Influence of APOE knockdown on sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids
and localization of Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolins
As shown in Supplemental Fig. S4, the protein expression level of APOE was
higher in Hep3B cells than in other hepatoma cells. The results were consistent with
the results of both the RNA-seq analysis and the RT-PCR analysis. Transfection of
siRNA for APOE silenced the expression of APOE in Hep3B cells (Fig. 4A). APOE
knockdown did not induce significant change in expression levels of the
Na+/K+-ATPase subunits or caveolins (Fig. 4B). But, as shown in Fig. 4C-D, MTT
assay results showed that the proliferation-inhibiting effects of BF or BF211 were
enhanced in cells with APOE knockdown. Further, results of the LDH release assay
showed that the cytotoxic effects of BF or BF211 were also enhanced in cells with
APOE knockdown (Fig. 4E-F). Notably, as shown in Fig. 4G, APOE knockdown cells
13
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
exhibited colocalization of the Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit and caveolin-1, which
indicated a possible formation of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome.
Influence of APOE knockdown on BF-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and
activation of PI3K/AKT/GSK3β/caspase signal cascades
As showed in Fig. 5A-B, BF-induced apoptosis was enchanced in cells with
APOE knockdown. Results of checking the activation of the PI3K/AKT/GSK3β
pathway and caspase-dependent apoptosis in APOE knockdown cells and negative
control cells were shown in Fig. 5C, 5D and Supplemental Fig. S5. As shown in Fig.
5C, in the negative control cells, BF treatment for 24 h slightly inhibited the
PI3K/AKT/GSK3β pathway. While, BF treatment induced a strong decrease in
phosphorylation of PI3K and AKT, as well as in GSK3β in APOE knockdown cells.
BF treatment for 24 h did not induce considerable caspase-3 activation and PARP
cleavage (Supplemental Fig. S5). But, after 48 h of BF treatment, caspase-3 activation
and PARP celeavage could be observed, especially in APOE knockdown cells (Fig.
5D). Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 5E, BF induced siginificant increase in percentage
of cells at G2/M phase and cells at sub-G1 phase in cells with APOE knockdown.
Results of checking cell cycle regulators (Fig. 5F) suggested that CDC25C and CDC2
but not cyclin D1 might be involved in the G2/M arrest of BF-treated cells. The
decreasing effects of BF on CDC2 level were slight stronger in APOE knockdown
cells than that in negative control cells. These results indicated that APOE knockdown
enhanced sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest induced by
BF.
14
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
The influence of Na+/K+-ATPase β1 knockdown on Hep3B cells
To study the role of the high level of Na+/K+-ATPase β1 (ATP1B1) in Hep3B
cells, the sensitivity of Hep3B cells with ATP1B1 knockdown was also studied.
Transfection of siRNA for ATP1B1 silenced the expression of Na+/K+-ATPase β1 in
Hep3B cells (Fig. 6A). Results of the MTT assay (Fig. 6B-C), the LDH release assay
(Fig. 6D-E) and the apoptosis assay (Fig. 6F) all indicated that ATP1B1 knockdown
increased the sensitivity of Hep3B cells to BF or BF211. Further, since the
Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit was closely related to intercellular junctions (21), the
location of E-cadherin, an adherens junction protein (22), was observed. As shown in
Fig. 6G, knockdown of ATP1B1 resulted in the disassembly of adherens junctions,
which could facilitate binding between BF and the Na+/K+-ATPase.
Discussion
Many prior studies reported the cytotoxicity of cardiac steroids in cancer cells
including hepatoma cells (23-25), but their mechanisms were not fully understood. In
the present study, we investigated the cytotoxicity of representative cardiac steroids
(BF, BF211, OUA and DIG) in 4 types of hepatoma cells and embryo liver L-02 cells.
Hep3B cells exhibited relatively low sensitivity to cardiac steroids. Understanding the
mechanism of low sensitivity of Hep3B cells is helpful to understanding the
cytotoxicity mechanism of cardiac steroids. Since Na+/K+-ATPase on the plasma
membrane is the accepted direct target of cardiac steroids, the expression of
Na+/K+-ATPase subunits in Hep3B cells was studied and compared with those of
15
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
SK-HEP-1 cells, which had a high sensitivity to cardiac steroids. Since the expression
levels of the subunits of Na+/K+-ATPase in Hep3B cells were high, we deduced that
the low sensitivity of Hep3B cells was not related to the expression level of
Na+/K+-ATPase.
Previous studies discovered the existence of two pools of Na+/K+-ATPase
within the plasma membrane: the classical pool of enzymes acting as an energy
transducing ion pump, and the signal transducing pool of enzymes that was restricted
to the caveolae, which formed the “Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome” (26). By binding
to Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome, cardiac steroids could activate multiple downstream
signal transduction pathways (27). The identification of a mutant α1 subunit of
Na+/K+-ATPase which had normal pumping function but was defective in signal
transduction supported the existence of two pools of Na+/K+-ATPase (28). Since
depletion of caveolae increased the pumping function of Na+/K+-ATPase but
suppressed signal transduction induced by cardiac steroids, the function of caveolae
Na+/K+-ATPase in signal transduction was confirmed (29). In the present study, we
found that the expression level of caveolin-1 was low in Hep3B cells. More
importantly, co-localization of the Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit and caveolin-1 was
observed in SK-HEP-1 cells, but was barely observed in Hep3B cells. Therefore,
Hep3B cells may be deficient in the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome.
To further clarify factors involved in the regulation of the Na+/K+-ATPase
signalosome, the gene expression profile of Hep3B cells was determined using
RNA-Seq and compared to the SK-HEP-1 cells. Interestingly, the 36 genes that
16
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
differentially expressed between the two cell lines were mostly associated with
extracellular space, protein binding and extracellular region, which may be related to
the binding between cardiac steroids and the membrane Na+/K+-ATPase. APOE, one
of the 36 genes, was found to have critical position in the interaction network. APOE
protein is a 34-kDa glycoprotein that serves as a ligand for low density lipoprotein
receptors and also appears to have a wide variety of functions in addition to lipid
transport (30). Our results showed that the expression level of APOE was high in
Hep3B cells and that the knockdown of APOE by siRNA increased the sensitivity of
Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids. Previous studies suggested that APOE impacted
subcellular distribution/interaction of caveolin 1 (31, 32) and may be involved in the
formation of lipid rafts, which is a necessary condition for caveolae (33). Therefore,
APOE may affect the formation of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome by impacting the
subcellular distribution of caveolin-1. Results from studying the expression and
distribution of Na+/K+-ATPase subunits and caveolins showed that APOE
knockdown had no significant influence on their expression levels but induced clear
co-localization of caveolin-1 and the Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit at the plasma
membrane. APOE knockdown improved the formation of Na+/K+-ATPase
signalosome.
Though the components in the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome had not been fully
clarified, reported partners of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome included Src, PI3K
and EGFR (34-36). PI3K was a critical component of the signalosome and was bound
to a proline-rich region of the α-subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase (37). Binding between
17
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Na+/K+-ATPase and cardiac steroids triggered various downstream signaling
cascades which affect cell growth, apoptosis, adhesion and motility (38). Among these
signaling cascades, the PI3K-AKT pathway was one of the most important oncogenic
pathways in human cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (39). Further, the
PI3K/AKT pathway was found to be involved in the cytotoxicity of cardiac steroids
including BF (40, 41). Our study showed that the inhibition of BF on the
PI3K/AKT/GSK3β pathway and activation of the apoptosis cascades were stronger in
Hep3B cells with APOE knockdown compared with the negative control cells.
Therefore, function of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome was enhanced in cells with
APOE knockdown.
The level of the Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit was found to be significantly higher
in Hep3B cells. The Na+/K+-ATPase β subunits were not active subunits of
Na+/K+-ATPase, but they function to maintain membrane integrity and intercellular
interactions (21, 42, 43). To activate the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome, cardiac
steroids must bind to Na+/K+-ATPase on plasma membrane, a process that may be
influenced by intercellular interactions. Knockdown of the Na+/K+-ATPase β1
subunit induced disassembly of adherens junctions and increased sensitivity of Hep3B
cells, suggested the contribution of β1 subunit to regulating binding between BF and
the Na+/K+-ATPase. The functions of the Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit and
intercellular junctions in sensitivity of cells to cardiac steroids needs further study.
In summary, our study showed that deficiency in the Na+/K+-ATPase
signalosome was a factor in the low sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids.
18
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Currently, several clinical trials using digoxin (NCT02138292, NCT01887288
NCT02212639) in anti-cancer therapy are recruiting participants. Understanding the
mechanism of anti-cancer effects of cardiac steroids is necessary for the development
of cardiac steroids as new anti-cancer agents. Our results confirmed the important role
of the Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome in cytotoxicity of cardiac steroids, and found the
contribution of APOE protein in regulating the formation and function of the
Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome.
References
1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11-30. 2. Kew MC. Hepatocellular carcinoma: prevention by the first anti-cancer vaccine and other means. Adler Mus Bull. 2006;32:3-17. 3. Thomas MB, Zhu AX. Hepatocellular carcinoma: the need for progress. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2892-9. 4. Meng Z, Yang P, Shen Y, Bei W, Zhang Y, Ge Y, et al. Pilot study of huachansu in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, nonsmall-cell lung cancer, or pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:5309-18. 5. Chen Z, Chen HY, Lang QB, Li B, Zhai XF, Guo YY, et al. Preventive effects of jiedu granules combined with cinobufacini injection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in post-surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control trial. Chin J Integr Med. 2012;18:339-44. 6. Qi F, Li A, Inagaki Y, Kokudo N, Tamura S, Nakata M, et al. Antitumor activity of extracts and compounds from the skin of the toad Bufo bufo gargarizans Cantor. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:342-9. 7. Xin XL, Liu J, Ma XC, Wei Q, Lv L, Wang CY, et al. Preparative separation of four major bufadienolides from the Chinese traditional medicine, Chansu, using high-speed counter-current chromatography. Nat Prod Commun. 2010;5:1031-4. 8. Calderon-Montano JM, Burgos-Moron E, Orta ML, Maldonado-Navas D, Garcia-Dominguez I, Lopez-Lazaro M. Evaluating the cancer therapeutic potential of cardiac glycosides. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:794930. 9. Mijatovic T, Kiss R. Cardiotonic steroids-mediated Na+/K+-ATPase targeting could circumvent various chemoresistance pathways. Planta Med. 2013;79:189-98. 10. Slingerland M, Cerella C, Guchelaar HJ, Diederich M, Gelderblom H. Cardiac glycosides in cancer therapy: from preclinical investigations towards clinical trials. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31:1087-94. 11. Babula P, Masarik M, Adam V, Provaznik I, Kizek R. From Na+/K+-ATPase and cardiac glycosides to cytotoxicity and cancer treatment. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013;13:1069-87. 12. Cerella C, Dicato M, Diederich M. Assembling the puzzle of anti-cancer mechanisms triggered by
19
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
cardiac glycosides. Mitochondrion. 2013;13:225-34. 13. Ma B, Xiao ZY, Chen YJ, Lei M, Meng YH, Guo DA, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships study of cytotoxic bufalin 3-nitrogen-containing-ester derivatives. Steroids. 2013;78:508-12. 14. Lei M, Xiao Z, Ma B, Chen Y, Liu M, Liu J, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of bufalin-3-yl nitrogen-containing-carbamate derivatives as anticancer agents. Steroids. 2016;108:56-60. 15. Feng L, Zhang D, Fan C, Ma C, Yang W, Meng Y, et al. ER stress-mediated apoptosis induced by celastrol in cancer cells and important role of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in the signal network. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e715. 16. Antonov AV. BioProfiling.de: analytical web portal for high-throughput cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W323-7. 17. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D808-15. 18. Wang WB, Feng LX, Yue QX, Wu WY, Guan SH, Jiang BH, et al. Paraptosis accompanied by autophagy and apoptosis was induced by celastrol, a natural compound with influence on proteasome, ER stress and Hsp90. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:2196-206. 19. Wang H, Haas M, Liang M, Cai T, Tian J, Li S, et al. Ouabain assembles signaling cascades through the caveolar Na+/K+-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17250-9. 20. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511-5. 21. Tokhtaeva E, Sachs G, Sun H, Dada LA, Sznajder JI, Vagin O. Identification of the amino acid region involved in the intercellular interaction between the beta1 subunits of Na+/K+ -ATPase. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1605-16. 22. Oda H, Takeichi M. Evolution: structural and functional diversity of cadherin at the adherens junction. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:1137-46. 23. Xu ZW, Wang FM, Gao MJ, Chen XY, Hu WL, Xu RC. Targeting the Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase alpha1 subunit of hepatoma HepG2 cell line to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arresting. Biol Pharm Bull. 2010;33:743-51. 24. Qiu DZ, Zhang ZJ, Wu WZ, Yang YK. Bufalin, a component in Chansu, inhibits proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:185. 25. Tsai SC, Yang JS, Peng SF, Lu CC, Chiang JH, Chung JG, et al. Bufalin increases sensitivity to AKT/mTOR-induced autophagic cell death in SK-HEP-1 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:1431-42. 26. Xie Z, Askari A. Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase as a signal transducer. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:2434-9. 27. Prassas I, Diamandis EP. Novel therapeutic applications of cardiac glycosides. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:926-35. 28. Ye Q, Lai F, Banerjee M, Duan Q, Li Z, Si S, et al. Expression of mutant alpha1 Na/K-ATPase defective in conformational transition attenuates Src-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:5803-14. 29. Quintas LE, Pierre SV, Liu L, Bai Y, Liu X, Xie ZJ. Alterations of Na+/K+-ATPase function in caveolin-1 knockout cardiac fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49:525-31. 30. Swertfeger DK, Hui DY. Apolipoprotein E: a cholesterol transport protein with lipid
20
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
transport-independent cell signaling properties. Front Biosci. 2001;6:D526-35. 31. Ifere GO, Desmond R, Demark-Wahnefried W, Nagy TR. Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism influences aggressive behavior in prostate cancer cells by deregulating cholesterol homeostasis. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:1002-10. 32. Yue L, Bian JT, Grizelj I, Cavka A, Phillips SA, Makino A, et al. Apolipoprotein E enhances endothelial-NO production by modulating caveolin 1 interaction with endothelial NO synthase. Hypertension. 2012;60:1040-6. 33. Shvets E, Ludwig A, Nichols BJ. News from the caves: update on the structure and function of caveolae. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;29:99-106. 34. Reinhard L, Tidow H, Clausen MJ, Nissen P. Na(+),K (+)-ATPase as a docking station: protein-protein complexes of the Na(+),K (+)-ATPase. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:205-22. 35. Barwe SP, Anilkumar G, Moon SY, Zheng Y, Whitelegge JP, Rajasekaran SA, et al. Novel role for Na,K-ATPase in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and suppression of cell motility. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1082-94. 36. Kimura T, Han W, Pagel P, Nairn AC, Caplan MJ. Protein phosphatase 2A interacts with the Na,K-ATPase and modulates its trafficking by inhibition of its association with arrestin. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29269. 37. Yudowski GA, Efendiev R, Pedemonte CH, Katz AI, Berggren PO, Bertorello AM. Phosphoinositide-3 kinase binds to a proline-rich motif in the Na+, K+-ATPase alpha subunit and regulates its trafficking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6556-61. 38. Xie Z, Xie J. The Na/K-ATPase-mediated signal transduction as a target for new drug development. Front Biosci. 2005;10:3100-9. 39. Zhou Q, Lui VW, Yeo W. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2011;7:1149-67. 40. Zhu Z, Sun H, Ma G, Wang Z, Li E, Liu Y, et al. Bufalin induces lung cancer cell apoptosis via the inhibition of PI3K/Akt pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:2025-35. 41. Li D, Qu X, Hou K, Zhang Y, Dong Q, Teng Y, et al. PI3K/Akt is involved in bufalin-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:59-64. 42. Deb R, Sajjanar B, Singh U, Alex R, Raja TV, Alyethodi RR, et al. Understanding the mechanisms of ATPase beta family genes for cellular thermotolerance in crossbred bulls. Int J Biometeorol. 2015;59:1783-9. 43. Madan P, Rose K, Watson AJ. Na/K-ATPase beta1 subunit expression is required for blastocyst formation and normal assembly of trophectoderm tight junction-associated proteins. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:12127-34.
Figure Legends
Figure 1. A-B, Cell viability (MTT assay) of four types of hepatoma cells and one
type of embryo liver cells treated with various concentrations of BF or BF211 for 72 h.
Data presented was mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Significantly 21
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
different between Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). C, PCR
analysis of mRNA expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase subunits in the cell lines.
Data presented was mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Significantly
different vs Hep3B cells (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). D, Protein expression levels of
Na+/K+-ATPase α1 and Na+/K+-ATPase β1 in the cell lines.
Figure 2. Expression and localization of Na+/K+-ATPase and caveolins in Hep3B
and SK-HEP-1 cells. A, PCR analysis of mRNA expression levels of caveolin-1,
caveolin-2, caveolin-3 in Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 cells. Data presented was mean ±
SEM of three independent experiments. Significantly different vs Hep3B cells (*
p<0.05, **p<0.01). B, Immunocytostaining of Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit (red),
caveolin-1 (green) and nucleus (blue) in Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 cells. Representative
results of three independent experiments. Scale bar=20 µm.
Figure 3. Comparison of gene expression profiles of Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1
cells and bioinformatic analysis results of the differentially expressed genes. A,
Scatter plots figure of gene expression profiles of Hep3B cells and SK-HEP-1 cells.
Spots marking in red or green were genes with higher or lower levels in Hep3B cells
compared with SK-HEP-1 cells. B, GO enrichment analysis of the 36 differentially
expressed genes. Full report on enriched categories of degree 0. C, RT-PCR analysis
results of expression levels of APOE, APOC1, C3, FBLN1, PRNP, CTSB, COL18A1,
NID1 and BCAM.
22
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 4. A, Protein levels of APOE in wild type, negative control and APOE
knockdown Hep3B cells. B, Levels of Na+/K+-ATPase subunits and caveolins in
APOE knockdown and the negative control Hep3B cells. C-D, Cell viability (MTT
assay) of APOE knockdown cells and the negative control cells treated with various
concentrations of BF or BF211 for 72 h. E-F, Cell death (LDH release assay) of APOE
knockdown cells and the negative control cells treated with various concentrations of
BF or BF211 for 24 or 48 h. Data presented was mean ± SEM of three independent
experiments. Significantly different vs negative control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). G,
Immunocytochemical staining of Na+/K+-ATPase α1 subunit (red), caveolin-1 (green)
and nucleus (blue) in wild type, negative control and APOE knockdown cells.
Representative results of three independent experiments. Scale bar=20 µm.
Figure 5. A, Representative results of flow cytometry assay of apoptosis in negative
control and APOE knockdown Hep3B cells treated with various concentrations of BF
for 48 h. Representative results of three independent experiments. B, Quantification of
apoptotic cells as % over total number of cells in APOE knockdown cells and
negative cells treated with various concentrations of BF for 48 h. Data presented was
mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Significantly different vs negative
control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). C, Results of Western blotting assay of phosphorylation
of PI3K, AKT and GSK3β in negative control cells and APOE knockdown cells
treated with BF (50 nM) for 24 h. D, Results of Western blotting assay of PARP and
23
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
caspase-3 in wild type, negative control and APOE knockdown cells treated with BF
(50 nM) for 48 h. E, Results of flow cytometry analysis of the cell cycle phase
distribution of the negative control and APOE knockdown cells treated with various
concentrations of BF for 24 h. Data presented was mean ± SEM of three independent
experiments. Significantly different vs negative control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). F,
Results of Western blotting assay of cyclin D1, CDC25C and CDC2 in negative
control and APOE knockdown cells treated with various concentrations of BF for 24
h.
Figure 6. A, Protein expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase β1 subunit in wild type,
negative control and ATP1B1 knockdown cells. B-C, Cell viability of ATP1B1
knockdown cells and negative cells treated with various concentrations of BF or
BF211 for 72 h. D-E, Cell death (LDH release assay) of ATP1B1 knockdown cells
and negative cells treated with various concentrations of BF or BF211 for 24 or 28 h.
F, Quantification of apoptotic cells as % over total number of cells in ATP1B1
knockdown cells and negative cells treated with various concentrations of BF for 48 h.
Data presented was mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Significantly
different vs negative control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). G, Immunocytochemical staining
of E-cadherin (green) and nucleus (blue) in wild type, negative control and ATP1B1
knockdown cells. Representative results of three independent experiments. Scale
bar=20 µm.
24
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 9, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Knockdown of apolipoprotein E enhanced sensitivity of Hep3B cells to cardiac steroids via regulating Na+/K+-ATPase signalosome
Miao Liu, Li-Xing Feng, Peng Sun, et al.
Mol Cancer Ther Published OnlineFirst August 9, 2016.
Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961
Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/08/09/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961.DC1
Author Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been Manuscript edited.
E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.
Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].
Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/11/1535-7163.MCT-15-0961. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.